Articles (2020)

MYOG Tunnel Tent (The Frankenstein Tent: Old Materials Come Alive Again)

An MYOG tunnel tent project using re-purposed fabrics from used gear.

Table of Contents

Introduction

In 1981, I bought an Early Winters Omnipotent SL. It took forever to get to sleep on my first night under its canopy, staring up, marveling at the taut architecture and complex construction. This three-pole tunnel tent, with its two Gore-Tex doors and integrated inner and outer, pitched in the blink of an eye, with just two anchors (e.g., stakes) for mild conditions.

Years later, I’d end up working as an outdoor clothing and equipment designer, conjuring up apparel, sleeping bags, packs, first aid kits, etc. But I never brought a tent to market.

Later rebuilding and/or renovating classic tents became a bit of a masochistic hobby, but I still hadn’t scratched that itch of creating one from the ground up.

Tunnel tent in snow
Four-pole MYOG Gore-Tex canopy tunnel tent created from materials salvaged from nine other shelters.

I moved on from designing commercial outdoor gear, because I didn’t think the world need any new stuff, and worked for decades in the environment and conservation sector.

Yet when friends or businesses were throwing away broken or unwanted tents and parts, I said, ā€œWait, I’ll take those.ā€ Thinking one day, I might get around to making a tent.

Finally, I bit the bullet. I have ā€˜Frankenstein’, a tent from the materials I’d accumulated. A new tent, yet one from old reused and repurposed fabric and components.

I couldn’t afford to make full prototypes; I only had barely enough of some materials to use them a single time. Once cut, there was no going back. I couldn’t order more.

tunnel tent in snow 2
Rear view of MYOG Gore-Tex tent. Rear and front tent poles are inserted from outside the tent. Centre pole can be positioned later on the inside of the canopy. Two pullout guylines (directly connected to the inner pole) self-adjust to a single anchor on each side.The centre pole is not required when wind or snow load is not anticipated. Photo Warren McLaren.

Features / Specifications

Features

This two-person shelter can quickly transition from a two-pole three-season bushwalking (backpacking) tent to a four-pole, fully vestibuled winter tent for backcountry ski trips.

The single-skin construction uses full Gore-Tex tent laminate for the canopy and ends. This three-layer cloth has a polyester Nexus inner lining which can hold excess condensation in its fluffy non-woven structure until the Gore-Tex membrane has the capacity to pass it through to the outside. (Even if the poles should collapse, the tent would effectively become a two-person Gore-Tex bivvy bag.) A rear tension cone of coated nylon protects the low vent, so cool dry air is drawn in, to then rise out the much higher front vent where it escapes pulling moisture-laden hot air with it. A simple guyline on this top vent keeps it upright in windy weather.

Only three anchors are required in most conditions – one for the rear tension cone and two for the front tension flap. If wind or snow load is expected, there are plenty of other guy lines and anchor points available.

The completely zip-detachable winter vestibule has arched pole support to cope with snow load. It easily accommodates two rucksacks and two pairs of ski boots with oodles of space for protected and ventilated cooking, with simple egress/access via left or right sides. It only requires one peg to pitch, includes a small floor in the front tension cone, and a high zip-adjustable, hooded vent.

A clip-on summer vestibule, weighing a quarter of the winter option, can alternatively be employed, providing shelter for a vented front door, a weather-protected cooking space, and somewhere outside the tent to store muddy, wet boots. It uses no additional pegs, simply slipping over the existing front tension flap anchors.

Vestibules can be left attached to the tent if required. The summer version rolls up into the front eave, out of the way, until needed. The winter vestibule can be completely unzipped from either side. Its sides can be zipped opened and clipped to the centre vent guyline, but then quickly sealed if weather threatens.

The tent can also be easily used without either vestibule. A toggle on the front Gore-Tex door allows for the top of it to be partially opened for ventilation in all but horizontal head-on rain.

tunnel tent in grass
Three modes of the Tunnel Tent MYOG. Top: Summer – Two poles with no vestibule (3 pegs). Middle: Three Season – Two poles with clip-on summer vestibule (3 pegs). Bottom: Winter – Four poles with alpine vestibule (4 pegs).

There are two internal mesh pockets for the storage of small items. Webbing loops are positioned to act as internal guylines if conditions warrant it. Metal zipper pulls have been replaced with reflective cord. Peg-out points are doubled loops of reflective cord so they accommodate either a ground peg or a ski as the anchor, without needing to add extra cord. The internal foot and head ends are both vertical, unlike other tunnel designs, specifically Scandinavian-inspired models, which often slope. This provides more livable space, and with both being Gore-Tex, there is less concern about the ends of one’s sleeping bag getting wet.

Although certainly not in the category of an ultralight shelter, the tent does offer huge versatility. It spans from a very spacious one-person, well-ventilated 3 season tent to a secure, windproof, and snow-stable Alpine haven for two people and all their gear.

And it does so in an environmentally responsible manner, with over 85% of the materials having been salvaged and reused from preloved tents and bivvies. Some of them are well over 35 years old. (Only the vestibules and front insect screen door employ virgin fabric.) The centre top ridge seam is the only seam I didn’t subject to my sewing machine.

The tent has been successfully field tested this year, although some refinements are under consideration.

Specifications

WeightsĀ (total tent weights do not include stuff sacks or tent pegs, but do include guy lines):

  • Main tent body – 1,668 g (58.8 ounces)
  • Front pole – 200 g (7 ounces)
  • Rear pole – 75 g (2.6 ounces)
  • Centre pole – 108 g (3.08 ounces)
  • Winter Vestibule – 357 g (12.6 ounces)
  • Winter Vestibule pole – 105 g (3.7 ounces)
  • Summer Vestibule – 108 g (3.8 ounces)
  • Summer tent, with two poles & no vestibule – ~1.9 kg (4.2 pounds)
  • Winter tent with four poles & hooped vestibule – ~2.5 kg (5.5 pounds)

PegsĀ (stakes):

  • Minimum pegs required (Summer) – 3
  • Minimum pegs required (Winter) – 4
  • Additional storm guylines – 4
  • Additional base peg points – 8
  • Maximum possible peg-out points – 16

Packed size:

  • Tent without poles, pegs, or vestibules – 7 litres (427 cubic inches) / 33 cm high x 16 cm diameter (13 inches x 6.3 inches)
tunnel tent in snow with dimensions
Dimensions of MYOG tent in winter alpine mode. Dashed lines indicating internal measurements. Photo: Warren McLaren

Dimensions:

  • Length – 208 cm (82 inches)
  • Front width – 140 cm (55 inches)
  • Rear width – 97 cm (38 inches)
  • Front height – 120 cm (47 inches)
  • Rear height – 48 cm (19 inches)
  • Winter vestibule length – 155 cm (61 inches)
  • Winter vestibule height at pole – 60 cm (24 inches)
  • Winter vestibule width at pole – 110 cm (43 inches)
  • Summer vestibule length – 120 cm (47 inches)
  • Tent body floor area – 2.46 sq. m. – (26.48 sq. ft.)
  • Winter vestibule floor area – 1.55 sq. m. (16.68 sq. ft.)
  • Summer vestibule floor area – 1.1 sq. m. (11.8 sq. ft.)
  • Length – rear peg to front winter peg – 465 cm (183 inches)
  • Collapsed pole folded length (longest) – 55 cm (22 inches)
  • Span between tent poles – 94 & 119cm (37 & 47 inches)

Materials

Fabrics:

  • Floor – Nylon Taffeta 160 x 90 TC 170 psi 7.5 lb warp x 7 lb weft (Chocolate Brown)
  • Rear cone – Nylon Taffeta 160 x 90 TC 170 psi 7.5 lb warp x 7 lb weft (Chocolate Brown)
  • Front tension panel – Nylon Taffeta 160 x 90 TC 170 psi 7.5l b warp x 7 lb weft (Chocolate Brown)
  • Canopy Ceiling – Polyester tent Gore-Tex (polyester Nexus inner) 91 x 96 TC 15,590 gms/m2/24hrs (Desert Tan)
  • Canopy Lower walls – Nylon tent Gore-Tex (polyester Nexus inner) 86 x 110 TC 3.2oz/sqyd (Yellow)
  • Front door – Nylon tent Gore-Tex (polyester Nexus inner) 86 x 110 TC 3.2oz/sqyd (Meadow Green)
  • Rear vent cover – Nylon tent Gore-Tex (polyester Nexus inner) 86 x 110 TC 3.2oz/sqyd (Yellow)
  • Front door mesh – No-see-um style Mosquito Net, Polyester, 45g/sqm, 155 meshes/cm2 (Black)
  • Rear vent mesh – Micro-knit netting (Lime Green)
  • Winter vestibule – Sil/Sil polyester 30d 45 g/sqm 2,000 mm, tear 5 kg/4 kg tensile 37.5 kg/35.5 kg (Sand)

Notions:

  • Front Gore-Tex door zipper – YKK No. 5 coil with double pull slider
  • Front mesh door zipper – YKK No. 3 coil with double pull slider
  • Rear vent cover (Gore-Tex) zipper – YKK No. 3 coil
  • Winter vestibule & tent joining zipper – YKK 5C zipper, coil, separating, two-way with double pull slider
  • Winter vestibule vent stiffener – 3 mm (0.12 Ā inches) Delrin rod
  • Winter vestibule vent zipper – YKK No.3 coil with double pull slider
  • Front Tension guyline rings – 15 mm (0.59 inches) stainless steel welded ring rated to 7 kN
  • Centre pole & summer vestibule clips – 12 mm (0.47 inches) nylon tent ring, & slotted nylon T-Bar (for 10mm [0.39 inches] webbing)
  • Winter vestibule pole sleeve – Taffeta 160 x 90 Thread count 170 psi 7.5 pound warp x 7 pound Ā weft plus 210d packcloth
  • Winter vestibule reinforcements – X-Pac Kevlar clear
  • Front tension panel guy adjusters – 15 mm (0.59 inches) Line Lock Lite & 15 mm (0.59 inches) Line Lock Lite side release buckle

Guylines:

  • Front guy lines – Lawson 2.3 mm (0.09 inches) Reflective Glowire, Orange
  • Side and rear guy lines – Lawson 2 mm (0.08 inches) Reflective Glowire, Gold
  • Rear shock-cord – 8 mm Ā (0.32 inches) marine-grade, multi-strand elastic core with polyester fine plait cover

Poles:

  • Rear and centre pole – 8.5 mm Ā (0.33 inches) Easton aluminium
  • Front pole – 9.6 mm (0.38 inches) Yunan aluminium, with floating connectors.
  • Winter vestibule pole – 8.88 mm (0.38 inches) Yunan aluminium, with floating connectors
tunnel tent interior
Interior view of MYOG tent. Left: Gore-Tex walls and door, also shows mesh pocket on side wall. Middle: close-up of Gore-Tex Nexus inner, overlocked stitching and centre pole ring & T-bar clasps. Right Top: Gore-Tex door partially opened for ventilation. Right Bottom: No-see-um insect screen door fully zip-closed.

The provenance of re-used materials

  1. Marmot TwilightĀ 2P bivvy tent – taffeta floor, tension flap & vestibule pole sleeve, canopy Gore-Tex, vent zips, & tension flap grosgrain
  2. Mountain Designs BurrowĀ bivvy tent – canopy side walls Gore-Tex
  3. Early Winters Sleep InnĀ bivvy bag – front door Gore-Tex
  4. Sierra Design Divine LightĀ bivvy tent – Front door zip facings (SD Hocus Pocus—a 2 layer waterproof breathable fabric)
  5. The North Face June BugĀ  – Easton poles (rear and centre pole)
  6. Wilderness Equipment Second ArrowĀ – main front Yunan pole and winter vestibule’s Yunan pole, and guy lines
  7. Wilderness EquipmentĀ i-ExploreĀ – winter vestibule grosgrain and t-bars (& prototyping fabric)
  8. Black Diamond Equipment MesaĀ – webbing, reflective pullouts, pole velcro, reflective cord
  9. One Planet WurleyĀ – delrin rod for winter vestibule vent

I also drew upon a personal collection of materials I’ve hoarded over many years: cords, webbing, fabric swatches, plastic hardware, and the like. The Lawson Glowire guyline cord was left over from previous tent renovations I’d undertaken. In a reuse shop, I found an Aldi inflatable, something or other, that had long lengths of seam-free polyester fabric. I used it to fashion a prototype winter vestibule instead of cutting up my Silpoly. The original Marmot Twilight bivy tent stuff sack I trimmed down to become the new pole bag.

New materials

The ripstop silicone polyester, no-see-um netting, two-way separating zip, nylon and steel rings, etc., were sourced from Extremtextil, out of Berlin, Germany. Other zips, mini line locs, etc., were found at Tier Gear from Tasmania, Australia. I was pleased with the service from both suppliers.

Techniques

Design

Not only was I cobbling together a collection of reused materials, but I would also do the same with the design. All design is iteration. It stands on the shoulders of what has gone before. I have personally owned 20 Ā tents that I can think of, including quite a few I have renovated or rebuilt.

In particular, I’ve always been entranced by my Early Winters Omnipotent. My three-pole Superlight (SL) version (serial number 286) has protected me through some wild storms the world over. I’ve also picked up an early version of the iconic four-pole Omnipotent from eBay (serial number 1151).

I later acquired a pre-loved Early Winters Light Dimension – the first outdoor product ever made from Gore-Tex, plus its big brother, the Winterlight. The problem with the latter two is although they have both easy access doors, neither has a vestibule to store wet and muddy gear nor to cook in when there’s rain or snow about.

Marmot Mountain Works (as they were originally known) decided to make what they considered a better mountaineering version of the Light Dimension. They dubbed it the Taku. Although only made for about five years – 1979 to 1984 – they’d forged an enduring reputation for being a lightweight yet tough, single-skin Gore-Tex alpine tent. (When Kelty set out to make an expedition tent (what became their Windfoil), they openly acknowledged that the Marmot Taku and the Early Winters Winterlight were their inspiration.)

Some years after Marmot stopped producing the Taku, Bibler introduced their version in Toddtex, which they dubbed the Phoenix. And later, Marmot themselves made the Taku rise from the ashes, though in their proprietary Membrain waterproof breathable (WPB) fabric. (Editor’s note: it has existed since under various model names. Consider today’s iteration, the Hammer.)

But for all its never-say-die qualities, the Taku didn’t have a vestibule either. But having picked up an original two-pole version (no. 322) with broken fibreglass/graphite poles, I renovated it and appreciated its ability to spill wind and cope with snow load.

It should be noted that the Stephenson Warmlite 2R was the original muse for the Light Dimension, whose success spawned so many imitations, single and double skin.

The Garuda Mountaineering Emeishan also intrigued me. Founder/designer Bryon Schutz described it as one of his favourite designs. It was basically a Taku with a large fixed front vestibule. But I’ve never seen one come up on eBay.

A discarded double-skin Sierra Designs Super Flash that I refurbished accompanied me to New Zealand and Patagonia, proving very sturdy in wind and snow, but requiring a design hack to make the tiny vestibule useful. For many years I used a Chouinard Comet. A single pole, single skin tent, coated with ā€˜Sealcoat’ Hypalon, which was considered so tough it was faced to the outside of the tent. It had excellent low-high ventilation. But again, no real vestibule.

Australian brand Wilderness Equipment has long made their First Arrow, and espoused its wind deflection and low-to-high ventilation. Years ago, I had an Ultimate Equipment Peapod II. It was poorly ventilated, but so very wind resistant that often I would be fast asleep as many of the tents around me had collapsed in wind storms.

The Sierra Designs Convert 2 is probably the nearest tent, currently for sale, that vaguely aligns with a (hybrid) tunnel that has a removal vestibule. The Exped Polaris is the only tunnel (also a hybrid) on the market with a 3-layer waterproof breathable ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene) single skin.

But, in short, I guess I was attempting a Taku/Winterlight/Emeishan, with an Omnipotent style zip-off vestibule.

tunnel tent - various images
Author’s experience with other tunnel tents. Top Left to Right: Early Winters Light Dimension and Winterlight (both Gore-Tex). Middle L-R: Early Winters Omnipotent and Omnipotent SL; Ultimate Equipment Peapod II (all double skin). Bottom L-R: Marmot Mountain Works Taku (Gore-Tex); Sierra Design Super Flash (double skin) and Chouinard Equipment Comet (single skin Sealcoat).

Poles

I prefer tunnels for their ease of pitch and ability to deal with high winds.

The finished tent looks simple enough, but belies the inordinate time that went into its design and construction.

A vast amount of hours, probably days, in fact, went into unpicking seams from old shelters so I could recover their fabric, webbing, cords, etc., from which to craft my tent.

I experimented with numerous tunnel pole designs by drilling holes in a length of wood, roughly the widest width of what my tent floor would be. Straight poles flexed into shape, pre-curved pole sections, gothic arch (one bend), flat top arch (two bends), and hybrid gothic arch (three bends), such as Roger Caffin uses for his tents. I played with a mix of old North Face poles that I believe were from their June Bug and Mayfly tunnels, various Sierra Design and Wilderness Equipment aluminium poles, Early Winters and Marmot fibreglass poles, and others of unknown parentage.

For the main front pole I settled on pre-curved poles by Yunan, with floating connectors (instead of fixed ferrules, the connector is an independent piece threaded between two sections of pole), and I swapped in more curved sections to replace some straight sections. I hack-sawed off the pole tips and filed smooth their ends.

Although all four poles were different, I labelled them with thin wraps of cloth tape in a numbered sequence from rear to front.

Each of the four poles fits the tent differently. The rear pole slips through a loop of reflective webbing at the inside top of the rear arch and sets in a webbing pocket in one corner. It is tensioned into place in the other corner, by my rendering of the LeverLock idea, which was developed by tent designer extraordinaire, Mike Scherer, for the Kelty Windfoil.

Similar story with the main front pole, except it first slips through a broad but short pole sleeve, only about 200mm (8 inches) long. It is then pulled over the pole and held in place, same as the rear pole, by the downward curve of the tension flap fabric. In windy weather, there are six velcro tabs that also wrap around the front pole. These align with the three upper guy lines on each side.

The middle pole, which is only required if snow loading or high winds are anticipated, can be easily fitted inside the tent after it is pitched. It seats into a webbing pocket on each side, that in turn, sits on top of an external pad of kevlar-reinforced Cordura-type material to protect the tent floor taffeta from abrasion at this pressure point. This middle pole is held firmly in place against the Gore-Tex canopy by one tab of Velcro, and four 12 mm (0.47 inches) nylon tent rings and T-bars. External guy lines are sewn directly through the webbing that’s holding these rings and bars, which in turn are on existing seams.

The winter vestibule pole is inserted into a pole sleeve, made from 70 denier nylon taffeta on one side and 210 denier packcloth on the other. A reflective tab indicates where to insert the pole, and it is pushed through to a sealed pocket (again reinforced with a Kevlar-infused fabric) on the far side. It too, was tensioned with a LeverLock-inspired strip of webbing.

tunnel tent seems
MYOG Tent details. Top Left to Right: X-Pac reinforcing, stainless ring for three front guylines, 40-year-old Gore-Tex tent fabric delaminating & rear peg-out shock cord. Bottom L-R: side pullout guylines (connected to inner pole); pole identification; front Gore-Tex door fabric joins & reused grosgrain webbing reinforcing vestibule ā€˜hem’ edges.

Construction

Once I was happy with the pole configuration, I needed to match possible tent heights and widths to the recovered materials I had available. I set up the poles on the backyard lawn, like a 3D wireframe tensioned out with cord. And took lots of measurements. Lots. I only had one shot at this. Gore-Tex tent Nexus fabric hadn’t been produced since the mid 1980s (if you exclude Bibler’s proprietary Toddtex.)

As it was, I had to join most of the reused fabrics together to give me the sizes I needed. Even after unpicking seams, I still only managed to scrap in with millimetres to spare, in some instances. On occasion, I had to reduce my seam allowance to get the fabric to fit the patterns.

The construction adage ā€œmeasure twice, cut onceā€ rang in my head constantly. I experimented with various catenary cuts for the different seams and assembled sections to test them out, unpicking them when the tension wasn’t taut, and re-measuring. But I was also very conscious of weakening my important structural seams by adding too many lines of needle holes. This is especially true when creating a single-skin tent, as there’s no redundancy, such as you get with a double skin tent.

notebook
Examples of measurements and production notes for MYOG tent development.

This uncertainty of the end result necessitated a slow, cautious approach. And oodles of double-checking of my measurements. I made copious notes and was luckily aided by having a roll of pattern-making card, onto which I could transpose my calculations, and go back to when I needed to correct something. It was all pencil and paper, no computer-aided design (CAD). But eventually, with some trepidation, I did commit to cutting the fabrics. And for the most part, I am happy with the outcome.

I found I needed to take pages and pages of pre-production notes, so I could get the correct construction sequence clear in my head. A couple of times, I swore loudly when I realised I’d have to unpick my work and start over again, because pieces had been assembled out of their required order. The front door, and winter vestibule pole sleeve assemblies were the most complicated to plan ahead. The winter vestibule alone has 33 individually cut pieces of fabric, which are combined with 41 individual components (zips, cords, webbing, buckles, etc.).

Sometimes having a break from the project helped me rest and clear my befuddled brain. If the lapse was too long, I’d forget crucial steps and end up reinventing the wheel all over again. The notes helped keep me on track and act as illuminating memory joggers.

tunnel tent various images 2
MYOG winter vestibule evolution. Clockwise from top left: Draping orange prototype fabric to get measurements; Ā tracing cardboard pattern shape onto prototype fabric weighted down by liquid-filled containers, finished vestibule unzipped one side for easy access, finished vestibule after snowy night (author has exited side closest camera and zipped vestibule closed again).

Once I had the main tent assembled, I commenced work on the vestibules, with the winter one first. I positioned rucksacks, boots, and stoves in front of the tent and draped cloth over the poles to ensure I had the sizing right. I wanted a roomy vestibule but not so large that it was too unsupported during a snowstorm. Again, copious measurements. Even so, I had to unpick my prototype vestibule several times as I experimented with patterns to give me the tautness I was seeking. I’d originally planned on adding guy-out points, but found that when these tensioned to the front peg-out point, they were as equally as good as if they were independently staked out. I redid the vent about three times, striving for a design that would offer maximum airflow but minimal egress of rain and snow during inclement weather.

The rear peg-out point borrows from a system Early Winters used very successfully to keep their tents taut. Thick shock cord in a double loop is joined with a fisherman’s knot. A non-stretchy cord guyline tugs this shock cord tight and keeps the tent under tension, and adds redundancy should the bungee cord ever fail, (I still have the original 40-year-old shock cord in my Omnipotent.) Where I don’t employ plastic guyline tensioners, I use my old standby of a taut-line hitch knot to get the same effect.

tunnel tent various images 3
MYOG tent winter vestibule. Left to right: Interior view showing pack, ski boots, bottles, and open high vent; front view showing streamlined vestibule profile, anchored with single snow stake & peg-out point showing reinforcing and two integrated guylines using the same anchor.

Seams

For many fabric seams I used a simple felled seam. I sewed the face fabrics together, serged them with a four-thread overlocker. Then pulled the seam firm and topstitched the assembled seam to sit flat. Where I could, I ā€˜shingled’ these seams so that moisture would easily run off them, rather like roof tiles or shingles. This is the same construction that was used by Early Winters and Marmot for their Gore-Tex tents. That the inner lining of Gore-Tex laminate is a non-woven polyester Nexus probably helps here, by adding a low stretch structural strength to the canopy seams. (Curiously back when Cannondale – yes, the bike company – made integral double-skin backpacking tents, they also espoused the virtues of overlocked seams).

I used the same seam construction for the Winter vestibule, with its 30 denier 45 g/sqm Silpoly and it has held up very well so far.

Corners on the Silpoly vestibules were reinforced with facings of Kevlar-threaded clear X-pac fabric, that I had serendipitously discovered in my collection of fabric remnants. Prior to discovering the small sheet of X-pac, I had reinforced the 70 denier taffeta with 210 denier packcloth remnants. I used variations of the Box X stitch to reinforce points of stress. I also reinforced the vestibules’ long outside edges with grosgrain, painstakingly unpicked and reused from other tents.

I chose a Gutermann polyester thread. Available in Australian sewing shops simply as ā€˜Extra Strong’ M 782. They recommend it as suitable for ā€œheavily stressed seamsā€ because it is ā€œparticularly robust and tear-resistant.ā€ It is very tough – I can’t break it with my hands. Polyester is less absorbent than nylon, whilst being more UV resistant. I used an NM 110 needle on my 37-year-old Pfaff 463 industrial sewing machine – and it was a refurbished unit when I bought it! (NM = “number metricā€ and 110 means 1.1 mm (0.039 inches) Ā thick.) I sewed everything with this thread and needle, from the gossamer Silpoly to multiple thick layers of webbing.

Where required I did use pins to secure assemblies of materials together. Given the long lengths and the curves involved, I tend to pin at a right angle to the seam allowance, as this enables me to sew gently over the pin without removing it. My seam allowance is 1 cm (0.39 inches).

Seams were externally sealed with Gear Aid Seam Grip WP. However, I sealed the tent in the middle of winter when daytime temps were less than 10 °C (50 °F), and some of the sealant went white, instead of remaining clear. Function appears unimpaired though.

The same cannot be said for the floor of the tent. It is a very robust 70 denier taffeta. I’m pretty sure I have now reproofed it three times with Gear Aid Seam Grip TF Tent Fabric Sealant (previously known simply as Tent Sure) polyurethane coating. Combined with the double-sealing of some seams, and looking at my early notes, I suspect all this sealing may have added roughly 200 g (7 ounces) to the overall tent weight. But alas, half of the floor still appears to be leaking. In the past, I’ve had very good results from Tent Sure. Maybe the initial application in cold weather is the problem. I’m not looking forward to the very considerable re-work involved in replacing the floor if I can’t resolve the issue. I’m in two minds about buying some brand new 40d TPU coated nylon (10,000 mm or 394 inches of hydrostatic head) or repurposing a floor from another tent.

tunnel tent various images 4
MYOG Tunnel Tent summer vestibule. NB: updated since photo, making it tension better at the top. Top Left to Right: Side view – vestibule uses same pegs as front guylines and middle guylines are on side release buckles so can be quickly detached for access/egress. Internal view showing protection for wet weather, cooking, and storage (top tension of the four rings and T-bars improved since photo). Bottom L-R: Front view showing coverage, vestibule rolled up and secured with cord toggle; front Gore-Tex door (green) with vestibule shown rolled up out of the way under top tension flap eaves.

Design Compromises

Design is often known as the ā€˜art of compromise’ – like trying to walk the trapeze between competing needs.

For example, I would’ve loved to have had a much deeper eave on the front tension flap. That would’ve allowed the front door to have been partially zipped up, increasing ventilation in foul weather without a protective vestibule. And a bigger eave would protect muddy boots left at the base of the door. But I needed the vent in the winter vestibule to be as close to the apex of the tent as possible to maximise the Venturi effect and more easily exhaust warm, moisture-laden air.

In a related vein, I initially designed the winter vestibule with a single centre-top seam, as this created a de facto ridgeline, better for snow and rain to roll off. But when I fully tensioned the whole vestibule out, I noticed the ridge seam pulled tight all the way into the vent, causing the base of it to dip down. I redid the patterns, so there were now two ridge seams that aligned with the seams of the top vent. The vent is tensioned better, but I’ve ended up with a small flattish section on the top of the vestibule. Again compromise, choosing the lesser of two evils.

I had considered opening the doors to the side, or the top, so they didn’t create a mound of fabric on the floor when unzipped. But in the end decided that maximum door size (better access and ventilation), symmetrical opening (same for both sleepers), and no bundled door stuffed into a pocket in the roof of the tent (which would’ve impeded the function of the high apex venting) were better choices. I developed a cord toggle system that could secure either the Gore-Tex or mesh door or both to keep them tidy.

If I’d settled for a fixed vestibule instead of a removable one, I could’ve eliminated the weight of the joining zipper, but given that it also doubles as the left and right access zipper for the vestibule, such weight savings probably wouldn’t have been that much.

I was also limited by the age of the reused materials I was deploying. They are not as light as the state-of-the-art fabrics available today. And my reused fabrics are bulkier too. Once I had the majority of the main tent crafted from reused materials, I did allow myself the luxury of using virgin fabric for the vestibules. (After I purchased that fabric, recycled Silpoly then came onto the market.)

And if not limited by the quantity of reused materials, I might’ve gone for a little more length and possibly even a bit of extra width. But there would’ve also been the added weight and packed bulk from that option.

The old Sierra Designs waterproof-breathable Hocus Pocus fabric was selected as the cover strip to protect the door zippers. Near the base of the door, the hemmed edge is prone to curling on itself and not retaining the preferred shape and size to weatherproof the zips fully. Maybe this has occurred because I probably didn’t have enough cloth to cut it all ā€˜on grain’, and there may be some bias stretching occurring, or it is just a trait of the fabric.

I would’ve preferred to have had the main front pole canted forward and be less vertical, but was limited by the length of Gore-Tex canopy fabric I had to work with, and also didn’t want to add any unnecessary seams that would increase weight and reduce structural integrity.

Opting for a single-skin Gore-Tex design gives me a very windproof shelter, but it means on cold, still nights, I have less warmth than offered by a double-skin tent, and possibly encounter a greater dew point/condensation issue as a result.

Field Performance Notes

Field Testing Conditions

This tent has thus far been exposed to:

  • 10 days backcountry skiing
  • 2 days bushwalking (backpacking)
  • 5 days canoe journey
  • And numerous backyard trials

The weather encountered during this field testing can be summarized as follows:

  • 420 ml (16.5 inches) of rain over four days
  • 70 kph (44 miles per hour) winds
  • 7 cm (2.75 inches) of fresh snow
  • -7 °C to 23 °C (19.4 °F to 73 °F) temperatures

Field Testing observations

Strengths

  • Plenty of room for sitting up, no bumping head or shoulders on ceiling/walls.
  • Winter vestibule has ample room for packs, boots, cooking and access.
  • In calm weather, winter vestibule can easily be zipped fully open to one side (either way), providing easy access.
  • Very easy entry without vestibules.
  • Seams holding up.
  • Venting works well with gentle breeze.
  • Very secure in wind, including from the side.
  • Silpoly vestibule copes well with snow and rain, they easily slide off.
  • All gold interior provides pleasant internal ambience for sitting out storms.
  • Big mesh front door provides venting and stargazing whilst keeping bugs out.

Limitations

  • Taffeta floor, although very robust, appears to be leaking.
  • Occasional tangling of front guy lines when unpacking.
  • Small side release buckles supporting winter vestibule zip to tent base are not strong enough.
  • Some odd beads of water on inner of Gore-Tex after prolonged heavy rain.
  • Old bivvy bag Gore-Tex fabric (used for side walls) is delaminating, but not showing signs of leaking.
  • Broke one side release mini Line Lock buckle, after it was not mated properly, and I tensioned it hard.
  • Using the spacious Winter vestibule requires a long snow platform to be tamped down.
  • Some condensation collects on middle interior pole (expected this).
tunnel tent various images 5
MYOG tent in use: Left: after overnight snow. Top middle: Two full length Cascade Designs Therm-a-Rest mattresses inside, Lower middle: packed size compared to 1 L (34 ounces) water bottle. Top right: reflective guylines at night, Middle right: shows the high vent in vestibule is adjacent to the apex or peak of the tent to aid in ventilation – dry air enters under the rear tension cone. Lower right: side view after snowfall.

Changes that I’d make if doing this again

Not much, really. The effort was a massive amount of time. But then again, The North Face Assault 2 in FUTURELIGHT waterproof breathable fabric retails in Australia for $1,700 AUD ($1,099 USD). The Exped Polaris in their VentAir waterproof breathable material is only available by special order and listed at $1,799.95 AUD ($1,164 USD). So I spent time, but certainly saved money.

I should’ve retested the water-tightness of the repurposed tent floor after reproofing it, before attaching the tent upper to it. Annoyed, I forgot to do that.

Maybe the ITW Nexus Lineloc 3 LL might’ve been a better choice for tensioning cords with gloves on than the mini Line Lock I used.

I made the zip strip (the strip of fabric that holds the tent-half of the winter vestibule zipper) from silpoly for lighter weight and compatible tension with the rest of the vestibule. However, it is tricky to seam seal the seam join between the silicone-coated fabric and the polyurethane-treated material. A non-siliconised fabric would’ve been a better choice.

I will replace the rear guyline’s plastic ring with the same metal ring used by the front guylines.

I hadn’t realised that liquid seam sealant applied to seams around reflective patches negates the reflectiveness underneath the sealant. I’d do wider patches next time to allow for this.

Initially, the plan for the pole sleeve of the winter vestibule was for it to be on the exterior. But as I assembled the sleeve, facing the PU side outwards so the pole would slide through more easily, I realised having this ā€˜stickier’ side out would attract snow and rain. So I had to invert the entire sleeve construction, to have the slippery silpoly uppermost for best snow shedding. Alas, this means the pole feeds in from the opposite side of the front and back poles.

In seeking to maximise the access and egress under the vestibules to the front door, I purposely reduced the amount of fabric on the lower end of the front tension flap. As a result, the flap doesn’t pull as tight over the pole at this point, and there is a small amount of slack in the Gore-Tex canopy here. Adding a partial pole sleeve or sewing my middle guyline pullout directly to the tension flap might improve tautness.

I may revisit how I have done the sidewall mesh pockets. They are reasonably roomy as they are, but small items can get a bit lost if too much is stored in the pockets. Will ponder improvements as I use the tent.

tunnel tent in snow again
Consett Stephen Pass, Main Range, Kosciuszko National Park, NSW, Australia.

Concluding commentary

I am in awe of those folk who boldly and enthusiastically take on MYOG projects without any prior sewing or design experience. I am so impressed with the amazing results they achieve using their humble kitchen table, garage, or living room floor as their cutting table. Incredible. They might just be the Alice Holubar, Mike Pfotenhauer, Daniel Shurman, or Bill Moss of the future.

My pathway into MYOG has been somewhat more of a chartered course. Under the tutelage of my dad, I learnt to sew on a Singer treadle human-powered machine as a teenager, making my own crude gear. Years on, seeking a break from my chosen profession of Outdoor Education, I went off and gained formal tertiary training in clothing design and production. I then worked in outdoor retail so as to understand the decision-making that buyers undertook when selecting their kit. I also completed a post-graduate University course in design, in general.

I was fortunate enough to spend about seven years as the in-house designer and product manager for Paddy Pallin, Australia’s oldest outdoor gear provider, back when they had their own on-shore factory. Later, as a freelance designer, I did a heap of work for Berghaus, the European brand, including a redesign of their premier Extrem mountaineering range.

During latter decades in the sustainability sector, I lectured in eco-design, worked on recycled textile projects, and also managed a community reuse centre. These days I’m back in outdoor education. In my limited spare time, I repair and renovate legacy outdoor gear. I also curate a kind of web museum showcasing heritage outdoor clothing and equipment atĀ Outdoorinov8.com.

I’ll use the tent for a bit before I make too many revisions. Apart from the leaking floor, all other aspects are so far performing well. I have plenty of other reuse projects awaiting in the wings. Among them, a three-layer Gore-Tex anorak, again made from salvaged materials and components; a Marmot Pocket Gopher down sleeping bag, circa 1983, of which I want to replace the ancient delaminating Gore-Tex outer with some new Pertex Endurance; an internal frame pack design, based off the circa 1981 The North Face Moraine, which weighed a mere 1.8 kg (3.96 pounds) for its 82 L (5,000 cubic inches) capacity. More ideas than I have time.

I’m pleased to see that many firms are using recycled materials in their products, as well as promoting repair, reuse, and longevity. If we wish to continue enjoying our magical natural world, we’ll need to do all that, and more.

Winter Hiking & Backpacking Gear – Part 1

Interested in winter hiking and backpacking? In this webinar, learn how to use your existing kit, plus a few extra strategic items, to be safe and comfortable in the winter. Part 1 of 2.

Interested in winter hiking and backpacking? In this webinar, learn how to use your existing kit, plus a few extra strategic items, to be safe and comfortable in the winter.

I’d really like to try winter hiking, but I don’t really want to purchase an entirely new kit of gear.

This is the number one barrier to hiking and backpacking in the winter. In this 2-part webinar series, we’ll explore each of the eight major gear systems and help you identify what gear you need, at the bare minimum, when combined with your existing kit, in order to be safe and comfortable in the winter.

Keynote: Gear for Winter Hiking & Backpacking (~45 minutes)

Part 1 (this webinar):

  • footwear and traction systems
  • shelter systems
  • sleep systems
  • clothing systems

Part 2 (the next webinar):

  • packing systems
  • cooking systems
  • hydration systems
  • navigation systems

Q&A (~ 30 minutes)

  • Day hiking vs. overnight backpacking during the winter?
  • Waterproof socks with trail running shoes?
  • Hacks to get myself out of my cozy quilt in the morning?
  • Strategies for doubling up sleeping pads using closed-cell foam pads and inflatable pads?
  • Where is a good place for winter backpacking for a seasoned backpacker who’s never gone in the winter?
  • How do you maximize FUN in the winter?
  • How to upgrade or extend a water-resistant bivy sack + full perimeter tarp combo for winter use?
  • How to manage condensation in a bivy sack during the winter?
  • How to deal with middle-of-the-night nature calls while sleeping in a bivy sack, especially if it’s raining or snowing?
  • Handwear systems to keep fingers warm, especially in camp – while maintaining dexterity without cold hands?
  • What about heated gloves, especially for photography?
  • Is there a way to move the dew point outside the sleeping bag if we only use one traditional winter sleeping bag?
  • How to use a portable battery pack to charge 7.4V batteries used in heated gloves?
  • How to fit Rocky Goretex socks properly?
  • How does ambient relative humidity influence condensation in winter vs. summer?
  • What type of shelter guylines for winter camping?
  • Comparison of fleece vs. high-loft insulation for winter backpacking?
  • How to stay comfortable in the high-humidity conditions of the US Northeast in winter conditions?
  • How to extend a 3-season inflatable pad to winter conditions?
  • Using Hydropel on feet during winter vs. summer?
  • Sleeping bag liners as part of winter sleep systems? Impact on dew point location?
  • Clothing systems for leg insulation while hiking and in camp? Role of long underwear (base layer), trekking pants, hardshell pants, and high-loft insulating pants?
  • Best guylines for deadman anchors? Polyester-sheath vs. Spectra/Dyneema?
  • Rectangular tarps vs. full-perimeter tarps for winter camping?
  • Base weight range for winter “lightweight” backpacking?
  • Vapor barrier clothes or bag liners for sleeping? Under what conditions?
  • Appropriateness of tarps for winter backpacking?
  • When do you recommend a Snowclaw shovel vs. a “proper” shovel for winter backpacking, camping, and avalanche rescue?
  • In a 2-layer sleep system, what about a down blanket used as an outer layer vs. a synthetic quilt?
  • Shelters and sleep systems for winter backpacking with a partner/as a couple?

About the Event & Access Info

  • Event Description: Winter Hiking & Backpacking Gear (Member Q&A)
  • Livestream Date and Time: Wednesday, November 30th, 2022, 7 PM US Mountain Time

Become a Member Today to Access the Live & Recorded Versions of this Event

Backpacking Light Member Q&A Sessions are Hour-Long Members-Only Live Events – they are recorded and the recorded session will be made available to all members for a limited time after the live event has ended (and for Unlimited Members forever).

To access the live or recorded (video) version of this event, a printable slide deck for note-taking, and the related resources/downloads, you must be logged in with an active Basic, Premium, or Unlimited Membership.

Members-Only: Watch the Recorded Video & Access Additional Resources

Additional Resources/Mentions

DISCLOSURE (Updated April 9, 2024)

  • Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage. Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be affiliate links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a commission on your entire order, which varies between 3% and 15% of the purchase price. Affiliate commissions represent less than 15% of Backpacking Light's gross revenue. More than 70% of our revenue comes from Membership Fees. So if you'd really like to support our work, don't buy gear you don't need - support our consumer advocacy work and become a Member instead. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Episode 72 | The Cottage Industry

In this episode we talk to Garage Grown Gear CEO and co-founder Lloyd Vogel where we’ll be diving into the outdoor gear cottage industry.

Listen

Summary

In this episode we talk to Garage Grown Gear CEO and co-founder Lloyd Vogel where we’ll be diving into the outdoor gear cottage industry.

Ep 72 splash screen

In this Episode:

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Staff Picks 2022

Updated: Click here for 2023 Staff Picks. Each year, our staff selects their favorite backcountry gear from the past year, and we look forward to you sharing yourĀ favorite gear of the year as well in the forum comments below!

Updated: Click here for 2023 Staff Picks

Introduction

Each year, our staff selects their favorite backcountry gear from the past year, and we look forward to you sharing yourĀ favorite gear of the year as well in the forum comments below!

Our Staff

This year’s Staff Picks contributors are:

collage of 12 people
Row 1 L to R: Ryan and Stephanie Jordan, Andrew Marshall, Mark Wetherington, Stephen Seeber; Row 2 L to R: Matthew King, Daniel Hu, Ben Kilbourne, Iago Vazquez; Row 3 L to R: Drew Smith, Roger Caffin, James Montavon, Anna Swarts.

Table of Contents

Shelters and Sleep Systems

Feathered Friends Flicker UL 20 Quilt Sleeping Bag

blue sleeping bag
Feathered Friends Flicker UL 20 Quilt. Photo: Feathered Friends.

After testing way too many sleeping bags, I decided that the Feathered Friends Flicker UL 20 Quilt Sleeping BagĀ is the most versatile and comfortable bag I’ve used in a long time. This bag is stuffed full of 14.7 oz of 950+ down and weighs a total of 25.2 oz in a size regular. I’ve never before used a sleeping bag that remains comfortable throughout such a huge range of temperatures. When zipped and cinched, this bag is cozy down to 15 degrees Fahrenheit on a warm pad. When opened into blanket mode, it’s comfortable up to about 60 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s a gigantic comfort range. Throughout most of that range – 30 to 50 degrees Fahrenheit – I use it like a quilt. The zipper remains underneath me, zipped up only to mid-thigh. I secure the snaps at the draft collar and then let the upper body area of the quilt sprawl. Then I sleep like a baby. – Ben Kilbourne

REI Magma 30 Trail Quilt

top view of a sleeping quilt
REI Magma 30 Trail Quilt. Photo: REI Co-op.

I finally switched to quilts this summer, and the REI Magma 30 Trail QuiltĀ hasn’t left much of anything to be desired for me! See our REI Magma Trail Quilt review. – Mark Wetherington

Sierra Designs Cloud 20

sleeping bag
Sierra Designs Cloud 20. Photo: Sierra Designs.

I really love the Sierra Designs Cloud 20Ā sleeping bag even though I’m saddened that some of the down has leaked out over the years. I love the zipperless design because it feels less constricting and more like a regular bed while still being plenty warm. – Anna Swarts

Packing Systems

Superior Wilderness Designs Movement 40L

hiker carrying a backpack in the forest
Using all three of my 2022 Staff Picks – SWD Movement 40L, Nite Ize Gear Ties, 6ā€ length, and Timmermade Alpha Direct 4004 Hoodie. Notice the red Nite Ize Gear Tie is being used to secure the bottom of the bleed kit on a webbing loop. Photo: Iago Vazquez.

I love the modularity of the SWD Movement Pack. I can go from frameless to framed at very competitive weights to the rest of the popular packs in the lightweight category. I can attach a myriad of things to it, from bear cans to snowshoes or skis – pretty much any gear one takes backpacking. The versatility of this pack is fantastic. And it’s a great company to deal with. – Iago Vazquez

Pa’lante V2 Backpack

white backpack
Pa’lante V2 Backpackpack. Photo: Pa’lante Packs.

The Pa’lante V2Ā is the perfect backpack for my summer trips up to four days (for me and my current kit). See our Pa’lante V2 Backpack review here.Ā – Mark Wetherington

Exped Splash 15 Pack

roll top day pack
Exped Splash 15. Photo: Exped.

The Exped Splash 15Ā is simple, it’s light, and it does two things well: keeps your stuff dry and serves as a daypack for side trips. Lashed to the bow of my packraft, it kept everything dry yet accessible on a 3-day trip down the Rio Chama. It was on deck and ready for canyon side trips. 15 L is plenty big enough to carry a rain jacket, water bottle, snacks and phone. On backpacking trips I’ve used it as a stuff bag for my quilt, and I could put a few more items in there if needed for river crossings. It’s small enough to stuff some clothes in and make a pillow. So far, the only drawback I’ve discovered is that I can’t really use it to carry my Tenkara rod on fishing side trips. – Drew Smith

ZPacks Arc Blast 55L Backpack

backpack lying on the ground near a sign that reads: "Elizabeth Pass, 8375 feet, Entering Sequoia National Park"
My ArcBlast at the high point of the Theodore Solomons trail. Photo: Drew Smith.

The ZPacks Arc BlastĀ pack has been around for a while, and I expect most BPL readers are aware of it. But there is a good reason for its longevity: it is a framed pack that weighs less than many frameless packs. Arcing the frame keeps the pack away from my back and allows air to circulate, a feature I prize on hikes through the desert and other hot places. Although the frame looks dainty, I have loaded the pack up with as much as 11 L of water. This is not a practice I recommend, but the pack survived, and so did I. The pack has also survived many miles of bushwhacking with only a few small tape patches to show for it. Perhaps more surprisingly, it has survived baggage handlers on a dozen or so flights. There are plenty of great new packs out there, but none have yet convinced me to move on from the Arc Blast. – Drew Smith

Atom Packs Atom+ EP40

stock photo of a backpack
Atom Packs Atom+ EP40. Photo: Atom Packs.

I carry a lightweight load on most trips. I’ve been using various frameless packs for the last several years, and I have learned that while I am very comfortable with a total pack weight of 16 pounds, I’m only acceptably comfortable at 18 pounds and thoroughly uncomfortable at 20 pounds or more. I decided to try a pack with a lightweight frame and have found the Atom Packs Atom+ to be a great solution. Mine is the 40-liter size, just slightly larger than a Gossamer Gear Kumo (my go-to frameless pack). The frame helps transfer weight nicely to the plush 3ā€ tall padded waistbelt, which I prefer over a more structured hipbelt like my kid’s ULA Ohm. The side pockets are very easy for me to reach. My pack is the standard production model (in blue/black/orange with shoulder pockets and a bottom pocket). I’d probably rather have a custom model in more understated colors, and I’d eliminate the shoulder and bottom pockets but this pack is working great for me. See our review of the Atom Packs Atom here.Ā – Matthew King

Clothing Systems

ExOfficio BugsAway Long-Sleeve Shirt

stock photo of a white collared long sleeve button down shirt
ExOfficio BugsAway Long-Sleeve Shirt. Photo: ExOfficio.

The ExOfficio BugsAway Long-Sleeve ShirtĀ has served me very well this year. It is amazing for hot weather hiking, keeping the sun off while venting as much as possible. It also came in clutch on early summer trips in the Rockies when the mosquitos were really swarming. I got mine used on the BPL Gear Swap, and it has been worth every penny. – James Montavon

Patagonia Quandary Pants

dark gray pants
Patagonia Quandary Pants. Photo: Patagonia.

After experimenting with a variety of other trekking pant brands the past few years, I returned to my favorites – the Patagonia Quandary Pants. The newer versions are lighter, have better four-way stretch, and are more comfortable to wear when wet (less binding). – Ryan Jordan

Base layer combo: Unisex Super Thermo T-Shirt Base Layer with InlayĀ and Finetrack ElementalĀ Layer

collage of a fishnet shirt and long sleeve base layer shirt
Unisex Super Thermo T-Shirt Base Layer with Inlay and Finetrack Elemental. Photos: Brynje and Finetrack

This Staff Pick is a base layer comboĀ – a Brynje polypro meshĀ (short sleeve for hot weather, long sleeve for everything else) plus a Finetrack Elemental LayerĀ (hydrophobic polyester with very high air permeability and very lightweight). The Finetrack Elemental Layer serves as a wind block and modesty cover for the Brynje mesh in both winter and summer. But it’s only available in black, which is unfortunate for summer use. See our review of Brynje mesh here. – Stephen Seeber

Patagonia Women’s Wind Shield Pants

black wind tights
Patagonia Women’s Wind Shield Pants. Photo: Patagonia.

These lightweight wind pants are incredibly comfortable for hiking in cooler temps. They cut the wind but are still breathable. The stretchy soft-shell fabric moves with you, and there is even room to wear Capilene base layer pants underneath for the winter season. I Love how light they are! (Around 244 grams). Zippered ankles are handy for changing out wet socks or layering over my Nordic boots. I Have been wearing a version of these pants mainly for snow activities since the early 2000s, and really love seeing how they’ve evolved in construction and that Patagonia has continued to make this a lighter, more comfortable fit. Friends who have visited and joined us for outdoor activities have been intrigued about my pants and usually ask to stop at our local outdoor store on the way to the airport so they can grab a pair to take home. I’m hoping my Santa brings me another pair, preferably blue, hint hint. – Stephanie Jordan

Appalachian Gear Company ALL-PACA Poncho

knitted poncho
Appalachian Gear Company ALL-PACA Poncho. Photo: Appalachian Gear Company.

Last year, I chose the Appalachian Gear Company (AGC) ALL-PACA crew sweater as one of my staff picks. The alpaca fiber AGC uses results in a garment that may be up to 2X warmer than a comparable merino wool garment. The ALL-PACA fabric’s relatively open weave traps a lot of heat for its weight. So when AGC announced the new ALL-PACA Poncho, I was intrigued by the thought of combining alpaca fiber with a multi-functional and traditional garment. I wasn’t disappointed. I swapped out my sweater for the poncho and found myself much more likely to hike in the cool mornings and evenings without having to stop and de-layer. The poncho also makes an ideal camp pillow or additional sleep-system layer at night. In cold, humid environments, I lay it on top of my quilt to migrate the dew point away from my down, and in the hot summer months, I use it as a minimalist blanket. – Andrew Marshall

Farpointe Alpha Duo or Single

fleece hoodie
Farpointe Alpha Duo. Photo: Farpointe.

Alpha Direct is my go-to mid-layer insulating fabric. My testing shows that two layers of 60 gsm Alpha Direct have the best warmth-to-weight ratio of any Alpha Direct fabric.Ā I asked Farpointe to make me one, and now the Farpointe Alpha DuoĀ is a standard product for them. I only wear it when temps are less than 15 °F. Otherwise, a singleĀ 60 gsm layer is sufficient. Their website shows it with a hood. Mine is hoodless. – Stephen Seeber

Timmermade Alpha Direct 4004 Hoodie

fleece hoodies, one orange, one white
Timmermade Alpha Direct 4004 Hoodie. Photo: Timmermade.

The Timmermade Alpha Direct 4004 HoodieĀ is a very light, packable, and versatile layer. Quality sewing. I really enjoyed working with Timmermade as well. – Iago Vazquez

Ben’s InvisiNet XTRA + Insect Shield

package with stuff sack reading: "Ben's Invisinet"
Ben’s InvisiNet XTRA + Insect Shield. Photo: Ben’s.

The Ben’s InvisiNet Head Net was a non-negotiable necessity on our late summer hikes this year. One minor note: it’s best used with a brimmed hat to keep the mesh away from your ears. I found that wearing the net over my bare head allowed the mesh to touch my ears, and while the mosquitoes weren’t able to fit their bodies through the net, they were able to bite my ears through the pores! This net weighs a mere 0.7 ounces and costs less than $15, so you get a lot of bang for your buck! – Daniel Hu

Saxx Kinetic Light-Compression Mesh Boxer Brief

men's underwear, boxer brief style
Saxx Kinetic Boxer Brief. Photo: Saxx.

The Saxx Kinetic Light-Compression Mesh Boxer BriefĀ is made for men who need the support of a brief as well as the chafing protection of a boxer brief. Basically, Saxx has built a ball hammock into a semi-compression, wicking, and 4-way stretch boxer brief. Breathable mesh panels hold your balls in place comfortably and also divide them from your legs, successfully preventing the dreaded sticking sensation. This underwear (and there’s zero hyperbole in this statement) has been life-changing for me. – Ben Kilbourne

Enlightened Equipment Torrid APEX Pullover

insulated pullover hooded jacket
Enlightened Equipment Torrid APEX Pullover. Photo: Enlightened Equipment.

I’m entering my third winter wearing the Englightened Equipment Torrid APEX Pullover. I take care of it (no aggressive stuffing or laundering), and continue to remain impressed by its ability to retain loft over the long term – it’s proven to be much more durable than I anticipated. At 8.5 oz, it’s light enough for summer backpacking but lofty enough as a day-use insulating layer for our Rocky Mountain winters. – Ryan Jordan

Cooking and Hydration

Bearvault BV500-Journey

Bear canister on ground with food in it.
Bearvault BC500-Journey. Photo: Daniel Hu.

The Bearvault BV500-JourneyĀ (see my review here) got a lot of use this year in the Washington Olympics. We took this bear canister for many miles through bear territory and even saw bears a mere quarter-mile from our campsite. While we fortunately didn’t have to deal with a bear intruding on our site and supplies, the canister gave us peace of mind and held up great through our adventures. On shorter trips, I’ve used the Bearvault BV450-JauntĀ with similar results. Bear canisters aren’t exactly light (the BV500-Journey is 2.5 lb), but they are necessary when traveling through bear country, and Bearvault’s products have been reliable and easy to use. – Daniel Hu

Heather’s Choice Packaroons

package reading: heather's choice blueberry almond packaroon - a coconut cookie for your backpack / made in alaska
Heather’s Choice Packaroons. Photo: Heather’s Choice.

I heard about Heather’s Choice PackaroonsĀ from Andrew’s Year of Lentils,Ā and they have been my favorite snack on almost every backpacking trip since. They are a little too good sometimes: my wife and I debate over who should get the last bite more often than not. They are calorie dense and easy to eat while walking. Vegan backpacking snacks can get boring with only so many combos of oats, peanut butter, and chocolate available, but packaroons get creative with flavors like orange vanilla and snickerdoodle. We got the Christmas flavors once they went on sale in January and are already looking forward to ordering the eggnog and peppermint packaroons again. – James Montavon

MSR Pocket Rocket 2 Mini Stove Kit

stove on a gas canister with a pot, pot holder, and cup
MSR Pocket Rocket 2 stove kit. Photo: MSR.

The MSR Pocket Rocket 2 Mini Stove KitĀ was a pandemic purchase but it brings me joy every time I use it. The MSR Pocket Rocket 2 is one of the most highly-rated stoves based on BPL’s StoveBench testing. The ease of use and how neatly it packs away make carrying it and cooking with it a dream! I’ve shown new backpackers this stove, and their feedback has generally been along the lines of: “I always thought stoves were complicated and intimidating, but now I think I could bring one and cook on my trip.” – Anna Swarts

Katadyn Steripen Ultra UV Water Purifier

uv light sterilizer pen
Katadyn Steripen Ultra UV Water Purifier. Photo: Katadyn.

I’ve owned the Steripen Ultra for nearly five years and have used it extensively. I’ve been impressed at how much water I can treat on a single battery. In addition to backcountry water treatment, it’s been great for traveling overseas when local urban water quality is dubious. – Anna Swarts

Food for the Sole Triple Peanut Slaw

packaged food reading: food for the sole / gluten-free, vegan / triple peanut slaw
Photo: Food for the Sole.

This Staff Pick is a little sad for me. I struggle with appetite issues while backpacking. I find cooking in the backcountry to be an unwelcome chore. I was excited when I read Andrew Marshall’s review of Food for the Sole Triple Peanut SlawĀ because it contains many of my favorite ingredients and it hydrates without heat. I was thrilled to find the dish just as tasty as Andrew described it. I was pleased with how little time it takes to rehydrate. This dish contains an impressive 178 calories per ounce! Sign me up! For me, it’s a perfect backpacking meal. The sad part is that Food for the Sole has closed its doors. I have one unopened bulk pack of Triple Peanut Slaw that I look forward to enjoying next summer in a beautiful location. – Matthew King

Footwear

Saucony Peregrine 12

trail running shoe
Saucony Peregrine 12. Photo: Saucony.

The Saucony Peregrine 12Ā is the first trail running shoe I’ve been truly excited about in a long time. What sets this trail running shoe apart from others I’ve been using is the foam. Saucony’s PWRRNĀ foam is fairly firm, so with every step I feel like the shoes are springing me forward. Shoes with softer foam, such as the Altra Lone Peak 6, for example, make me feel as if every step is draining my energy. This PWRRN foam also lasts a long time. I’ve put about 300 miles of running and backpacking on my first pair of Peregrine 12s, and they aren’t even remotely packed out yet. The 5 mm lugs are also still going strong, although the upper is now wearing a bit. This shoe has a rock plate, too, so precise foot placement isn’t always necessary. I find this feature to increase my comfort over a 25+ mile day because my feet aren’t getting beat up by rocks. With all these features I would expect this shoe to be heavier than it is, but it’s only 9.7oz in a men’s size 9. Additionally, this shoe fits securely without being constricting, so it’s amazing for scrambling, plodding, and running alike. Despite it having the classic pointy toe of most running shoes, it fits wide enough in the forefoot that my third and fourth toes never find the end. I can’t say the same for any Salomon or LaSportiva I’ve ever worn where my first toe is an inch from the end and my fourth toe is right up against the end. The low drop (4 mm) also probably contributes to this shoe’s scrambling ability – I’ve found shoes with a higher drop to feel tippy on off-camber terrain. I’ve used the Peregrine 12 for runs between trips as well as off and on-trail backpacking in the rocky and rugged Uintas, Wasatch, and Wind Rivers. I found them to be by far the best shoe I’ve ever used in any of these terrains that I’ve frequented over the years. – Ben Kilbourne

Bedrock Sandals Cairn Adventure Sandals

hiking sandals
Bedrock Sandals Cairn Adventure Sandals. Photo: Andrew Marshall.

I tested the Bedrock Sandals Cairn Adventure SandalsĀ all summer long in 2022 (see my review). If you hate hiking sandals, these aren’t going to change your mind. If you are on the fence, give them a try. The through-the-toes webbing design removes the pressure across the bones of the foot that you get in over-the-top sandal designs. The upshot? Fewer (read: none) repetitive use injuries of the kind I used to get while wearing Chacos. The minimalist midsole isn’t for everybody, but the outsole is Vibram and plenty aggressive for wet and dry on-trail conditions.

Many a fellow Bedrock user and I stopped to chat about them on the trail – and I can’t remember the last time I had a piece of gear that caused those kinds of mutually exciting conversations. Bonus points – I get compliments on them while wearing them to the grocery store or pretty much anywhere else in my small mountain town. – Andrew Marshall

HOKA Torrent 2 (Women’s)

trail running shoe
HOKA Torrent 2. Photo: Hoka.

The HOKA Torrent 2 Trail Running ShoesĀ are comfortable with a wide toe box. Ryan likes the Speedgoats, but their stack height is a little too high for me. I’ve proven them rugged – I’m on my second pair after several hundred miles while carrying a light pack. We hike varied terrain, and these have given me great traction on gravel, slick rock, mud, ice, and snow. Fits a pair of microspikes comfortably in winter. Just enough cushioning so I can avoid errant rocks but still feel what’s going on underfoot. My favorite hiking shoe for technical, rocky trails. – Stephanie Jordan

Navigation & Electronics

GoPro Hero 11 Black Camera

gopro action camera
GoPro Hero 11 Black Camera. Photo: GoPro.

With the addition of 4K at 120 fps slow-motion capability, the GoPro Hero 11 BlackĀ has finally evolved into the action camera I’ve been wanting for decades – but for a very specific purpose. I want to observe trout underwater in their native habitat. Previous versions of the GoPro haven’t provided the image quality or slow-motion capabilities that I’ve wanted. My simplest rig for underwater filming simply involves tying the camera to a large fishing swivel attached to a piece of Lawson GlowireĀ and tying the Glowire to the end of a trekking pole, which I use to control the location of the camera. I then allow the stream current to rotate the camera as needed. Not a very sophisticated rig, but I’m getting the footage I need to observe trout underwater. This has the potential to become a dangerously addictive hobby. In 2023, I’ll be exploring other types of housings, lens filters, and more to make the images prettier. But here’s a preview of a raw, out-of-camera clip I captured in the Rocky Mountain National Park backcountry in a stream full of brook trout. – Ryan Jordan

Black Diamond Astro 300-R Headlamp

blue headlamp
Black Diamond Astro 300-R Headlamp. Photo: Black Diamond.

The Black Diamond Astro 300-RĀ Headlamp is new for me in 2022, replacing my old first-generation Spot. I went with another Black Diamond because I loved my last one so much. This one is rechargeable – I wanted to give a nod to sustainability (in terms of fewer disposable batteries). It recharges via a micro-USB charge port and a single charge provides me with plenty of camp chore light for several days. It is bright enough for night walking and I love the dim light for reading in bed at camp or at home. I wear this lamp every day, not just for camping, so having a comfortable and easily-adjustable elastic headband is a plus! My favorite part is the Brightness Memory so I don’t have to fiddle with it every time I use it and the fact that there are three blue lights on the side that let you know when the battery is getting low. Those three blue lights also stay on for a few seconds after turning it off, which gives you a chance to tuck it away in your tent stow pocket. At 2.65 oz it’s certainly light enough to be the only headlamp I need for both frontcountry and backcountry use. – Stephanie Jordan

Garmin inReach Mini 2

garmin inreach mini satellite communicator
Garmin inReach Mini 2. Photo: Garmin.

The Garmin inReach Mini 2Ā has finally evolved into a highly capable satellite communicator. An improved device user interface, much better battery life, nicer screen, integration with Garmin Explore, and the ability to use it more effectively without a smartphoneĀ make it my favorite satellite communicator when weight and versatility are the top priority. Learn more and watch my interview with Garmin. I also added content to my How to Use the Garmin inReach MasterclassĀ this year with updates for Garmin inReach Mini 2 users.Ā – Ryan Jordan

Photocopier/Printer at the Local Public Library

lexmark printer
Photo: Lexmark.

Visit your library!Ā What a great tool for printing out paper maps and/or photocopying sections of maps before a trip. I always have a paper map as a back-up for digital navigation tools. It also serves double-duty as entertainment when in camp and I can fantasize about future trips where I’ll explore a far-flung basin, summit a remote highpoint, or finally get to an off-trail subalpine lake to fish. – Mark Wetherington

Accessories

Nite Ize Gear Ties

gear ties
Nite-Ize Gear Ties. Photo: Nite-Ize.

I use Nite Ize Gear TiesĀ to attach my trekking poles to my pack or to attach pockets and such to the outside of the pack. And unlike bungee and cord lock options, they don’t come undone.

Iago Vazquez

Black Diamond Distance Carbon Running Poles

trail running poles
Black Diamond Distance Carbon Running Poles. Photo: Black Diamond.

I fell in love with the Black Diamond Distance Carbon Running PolesĀ primarily for their small-diameter foam grip handles. The larger grips on my old trekking poles gave me severe hand cramps along with cold hands (because I had to grip them so tightly) and the Distance Carbon Running Poles alleviated the problem right away. They may be the lightest swing-weightĀ trekking poles on the market (89 grams per pole), which make it well worth giving up the collapsibility of my old trekking poles. – Stephanie Jordan

REI Flexlite Air Chair

folding chair
REI Flexlite Air Chair. Photo: REI Co-op.

Everyone’s got their luxury item (or two, or three) and one of ours is the REI Co-op Flexlite Air Chair, which adds an extra pound of weight to your pack but pays dividends in comfort when you reach your campsite. It’s comfortable and easy to set up, and we’ve been taking it on nearly every trip for several years. The metal poles are durable, as is the ripstop nylon seat. I suspect in the future, technology may give us a slightly lighter design, but until then, we’ll keep using these ones! See our comprehensive chair gear guideĀ and Ryan’s very detailed review video comparing the REI Flexlite to a Helinox Chair. – Daniel Hu

Kula Cloth Reusable Antimicrobial Pee Cloth

pee cloth
Kula Cloth Reusable Antimicrobial Pee Cloth. Photo: Kula.

I love my Kula Cloth! The amount of toilet paper I have found behind rocks and in the woods around my get-out-of-dodge wilderness area is unreal. So gross. We do need good hygiene while we are out there and this will help you accomplish just that after you tinkle and is a better option than shaking it off or using toilet paper. Use the non-irritating antimicrobial side to wipe and use the snap to hang from your backpack to dry. The sun also helps to sterilize any bacteria on the cloth. The smooth side is waterproof and comes in bright fun designs. Makes for a great holiday gift for all your hiking squatter friends! They will thank you for helping them pack in and out less toilet paper and practice better Leave No Trace. Not convinced? Watch the video hereĀ on how to use a pee rag. – Stephanie Jordan

Roadside Geology of Colorado by Felicie Williams and Halka Chronic

book "roadside geology of colorado"
Roadside Geology of Colorado. Photo: Mountain Press.

One of my favorite things about living in the mountain west is that the drive to the trailhead is amazing in itself. The book Roadside Geology of ColoradoĀ makes road trips around Colorado so much more fun and interesting. It also deepens my experience in the backcountry, far away from the features described in the book, because I can try to pattern what I’m seeing with what I’ve learned from this book, and then check my answers when I get home. It’s fun when I guess right and can know what happened millions of years ago just from looking at rocks, and when I’m wrong (often) I get to learn more and understand the challenging concepts of geology and geography deeper than before. – James Montavon

Kleenguard 30 Nemesis Polarized Safety Glasses

hiker wearing sunglasses with mountains in the background
The Nemesis at Glacier Point, the terminus of the Solomons Trail.

In every gear choice, a key factor is a balance between the gear taking care of you and you taking care of the gear. An item that performs somewhat better than the alternative but requires much more of an investment in time and attention is not necessarily a good choice. That’s how I feel about sunglasses. Ryan has made the case for backpacking in a top-notch pair of photochromic shades. I’ve gone that route, most recently when daughter #2 used her guide discount to get me a nice pair of Smith polarized photochromic shades. The view through them is great. But they get dirty easily, are hard to clean, are not very scratch-resistant, and the frame is wonky from me parking them on my hat. They work well, but only if I pay attention to them. I don’t want to pay attention to sunglasses.

The Kleenguard V30 Nemesis Polarized Safety glassesĀ have optics that are 90% as good for 10% of the price. I can buy a case of 12 for what the Smiths cost. When they get scratched, crushed or lost, I just grab a new pair from the box. I spend zero time and attention on them.

I still have the Smiths and use them for driving. And when I park at the trailhead, I leave the Smiths in the car and put on the Nemesis. – Drew Smith

OuterU faceGlove TS

nose covering on a mannequin head
OuterU faceGlove TS. Photo: OuterU.

The OuterU faceGlove TSĀ shields my nose from the cold for only 0.45 oz. My nose tends to head to frost nip or worse before the rest of my face. With this, I can avoid a full face covering and its attendant loss of unrestricted breathing. It’s always with me for winter hikes or skiing. – Stephen Seeber

Outside Inside Backpack Watercolor Kit

watercolor paints in case with brushes
Outside Inside Backpack Watercolor Kit. Photo: Outside Inside.

My wife bought me the Outside Inside Backpack Watercolor KitĀ on a whim while I was gearing up at REI for a thru-hike of the Wonderland Trail. As an illustrator, I have a cobbled-together travel watercolor kit, but there’s something to be said for a case, pad, paints, and brush all designed to work in conjunction with one another. The brush that comes with the kit is more than serviceable, and the paper is surprisingly good quality. The paints are middling, but it’s easy enough to pry out the cakes and replace them with your own if/as you grow more serious about painting. If you are seeking a more intimate way to connect with the sights you see while backpacking, this is a good way to do it. – Andrew Marshall

Share yourĀ favorite gear of 2022 with us!

What are your favorite pieces of outdoor gear from 2022?

Tell us what you loved and why in the forum comments below!

Related Content

DISCLOSURE (Updated April 9, 2024)

  • Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage. Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be affiliate links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a commission on your entire order, which varies between 3% and 15% of the purchase price. Affiliate commissions represent less than 15% of Backpacking Light's gross revenue. More than 70% of our revenue comes from Membership Fees. So if you'd really like to support our work, don't buy gear you don't need - support our consumer advocacy work and become a Member instead. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Episode 71 | Sleeping Bag Layering Systems

In today’s episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about how to use multi-layered sleep systems to stay warmer on multi-day trips in cold weather.

Listen

Summary

In today’s episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about how to use multi-layered sleep systems to stay warmer on multi-day trips in cold weather.

Podcast splash screen 71

</ br>

In this Episode:

  • Why should we layer two sleeping bags or quilts instead of just using one?
  • The benefits of using a hoodless down bag (inner layer) and an extra-wide synthetic quilt (outer layer).
  • What’s the main problem with using a down bag on multi-day trips in cold weather?
  • How to manipulate the dew point to keep our sleep system dryer!
  • Why a thin synthetic quilt is easier to dry than a thick down bag.
  • What clothing should I wear while using a 2-layer sleeping bag/quilt system?
  • Let’s own less gear, but make it work for us – how to backpack in all four seasons with only two sleeping bags/quilts!
  • How to layer for couples in a 2-person bag where each partner has wildly different temperature tolerances!
  • Why layering sleeping bags or quilts is more versatile and more comfortable than using a single-layer sleeping bag or quilt with all of your clothing layers.
  • The problem with sleeping with lots of clothing layers – circulation and comfort issues.
  • My favorite sleep clothing for cold weather backpacking.

Learn More

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

2022 Backpacking Light Members Choice Awards

First annual Members Choice Awards – what gear do our members use and love as we near the end of 2022?

Introduction

Marketers of gear brands loveĀ award badges because it helps them sell gear. Gear that comes with a Backpacker Editor’s ChoiceĀ or Outside Gear of the YearĀ stamp of approval is almost guaranteed to be a best-seller for the brand. Award badges appear on retailer’s online product listings, product hang tags, and placards adjacent to the product display on the sales floor of brick-and-mortar shops. Publishers of prominent titles like BackpackerĀ and OutsideĀ are thus able to exercise significant influence in the sales process.

As a publisher who has given out such awards and worked with gear brands to help them use the award badge to promote their product, I won’t be shy in admitting that there is benefit to the publisher as well. There is a direct relationship that few of us like to admit that the more favorable a gear brand is towards your publication, the more likely they will let you know about product launches, send you gear to review, or purchase advertising. Likewise, publishers who review gear critically sacrifice their ability to solicit advertising from those brands and promote those products to their readership in the hopes of earning affiliate commissions.

Traditional outdoor industry publishing business models, both print and online, rely on the relationship between gear brands paying the publisher for advertising or affiliate marketing. Outdoor recreation publishers that have built their business model on this foundation have thus evolved into de facto influencers for gear brands instead of providing independent journalism that helps consumers make wise choices about whether or not to buy a product.

Backpacking Light was founded on the idea that consumer advocacy would always be the cornerstone value that drove our business decisions. To that end, we knew that a business model where subscriber (member) support was our dominant revenue source (vs. advertising sales or affiliate commissions) was essential for us to remain independent from the influence of gear brands.

Members-choice-award-badgeThat’s why we are extremely proud to launch the Backpacking Light Members Choice Awards this year. Members Choice Awards represent the gear that Backpacking Light Members use and love. They represent products that are the collective favorites of hundreds to thousands of people submitting their picks in a democratic fashion, rather than the strategic decision made by a tiny group of editors, or worse, just me! –Ā Ryan Jordan, Publisher

Table of Contents

The Process

Nominations for 2022 Members Choice Awards were opened on September 14, and closed on October 31. Members were invited to nominate any product across a total of 45 different categories (for final tallying, some categories were consolidated). Each nomination was then tallied. The top product in each category, plus one or more honorable mentions, were selected based solely on the number of times those products were nominated. In most categories, the top products were nominated by 10% or more of Members who submitted nominations in that category.

The Members Choice Award badge is being awarded to the top products andĀ the honorable mentions in each category. For this inaugural award cycle, we make no distinction between the top products and the honorable mentions.

Finding Members Choice Award Winners in the Gear Shop

The Backpacking Light Gear Shop represents a curated collection of backpacking gear recommendations from our staff, contributors, product reviewers, and now, our members. Gear Shop products can be filtered by award type, and you can find all Members Choice Award winners by using that filter:

Gear-shop-members-choice-filter

Ā 

The Gear Shop is one of the most popular areas of our site, and our members use it primarily to conduct gear research in a particular category and discover new products. In addition, Gear Shop listings provide a gateway into finding used versions on the Gear Swap, related product reviews, and more.

2022 Members Choice Awards

Each product below is linked to the product listing in the Backpacking Light Gear Shop, where you can learn more about these products and content published by Backpacking Light related to them.

Backpacks

Members-choice-2022-backpacks

Packing Systems Accessories

2

Shelters

3

Bivy Sacks

4

Ground Cloths

5

Tent Stakes

6

Guylines

7

Sleeping Bags

8

Sleeping Quilts

9

Sleeping Pads

10

Stoves

11

Cookware

Water Treatment

13

Water Storage

14

Food Storage

Members-choice-backpacking-light-2022-

Packaged Backpacking Foods

16

Clothing: Base Layers

17

Clothing: Insulated

19

Clothing: Raingear

20

Clothing: Handwear

21

Clothing: Headwear

22

Footwear

23

Socks

24

Gaiters

25

Traction

26

Navigation & Electronics

27

Health, Safety, and Repair

28

Multi-Sport

multi-sport

Questions

  1. Do you use any of the gear mentioned above, and what has your experience been?
  2. What trends in this overall collection do you observe compared to the types of gear we may have used ten or twenty years ago?

Share your thoughts in the forum below!

BPL Live! Tour, News, and Q&A

Join us forĀ BPL Live! and take a tour of Backpacking Light, find out what’s new, and get answers to your questions about Backpacking Light, using the website, getting the most out of your membership, and more!

Join us forĀ BPL Live! and take a tour of Backpacking Light, find out what’s new, and get answers to your questions about Backpacking Light, using the website, getting the most out of your membership, and more!

Watch the Event:

 

Episode 70 | Fall Backpacking & Cold Feet

In this episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we talk about how to mitigate cold feet during fall-season backpacking conditions.

Listen

Summary

In today’s episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about how to mitigate cold feet during fall-season backpacking conditions.

Untitled

In this Episode:

  • How does backpacking change after the fall equinox?
  • What causes cold feet while hiking and backpacking?
  • Why is it so hard to keep your feet warm while backpacking in cold temperatures?
  • Physiology of foot warmth while hiking vs. in camp.
  • Challenges for backpackers with Raynaud’s Disease.
  • Strategies to mitigate cold feet – on the trail vs. in camp.
  • Stream crossings in the summer vs. fall.
  • How to mitigate cold feet with impermeable layers (“bread bags”).
  • Evaporative cooling and heat loss from the foot.
  • The role of waterproof-breathable shoes.
  • How to keep the blood warm in vessels through the ankle.
  • How to prevent socks from wicking cold moisture down into your shoe.

Learn More

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Hiking and Backpacking Injuries and Other Medical Issues Dominant inReach SOS Incidents

Data from 10,000 inReach SOS incidents show that hikers and backpackers needing emergency assistance for injuries and other medical issues is the predominant inReach use case.

This morning, Garmin announced the milestone of inReach having aided in 10,000 SOS incidents globally.

Data analysis is discussed in this blog post published by Garmin, and summarized in the following two charts:

what are people doing when they trigger an SOS?
Hiking and backpacking accounts for 39% of inReach-triggered SOS incidents. Source: Garmin.
why are people triggering an sos
Injuries and other medical issues (total 47%) make up the overwhelming majority of why people trigger an SOS with their inReach. Source: Garmin.

In our community, it’s probably not surprising that hikers and backpackers needing SOS assistance for injuries and medical issues are the dominant use-cases for inReach SOS triggers. It’s certainly the primary reason why I carry an inReach device – it adds that little bit of insurance for low-probability, high-consequence accidents.

Learn More

By The Numbers: What’s the Best Base Layer Fabric? Wool vs. Alpaca vs. Polyester

In this paper, I subject base layers in various weights made from merino, merino blends, and alpaca to the suite of tests I have developed to evaluate base layer performance. I then compare the performance of these base layers with those of the polyester base layers I have recently reviewed. We also see if my preconceived notions about merino hold water. Finally, we will see how to choose the fiber for our base layers.

You don’t have access to view this content.

Episode 69 | Ultralight Shelters in Inclement Weather

Episode 69 of the Backpacking Light Podcast dives into ultralight shelters and how their structures hold up during inclement weather.

Listen

Summary

In today’s episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about gear and skills for pitching ultralight shelters in inclement conditions – rain, snow, wind, and cold.

Podcast splash screen (3)

In this Episode:

  • What is Inclement Weather?
  • How the structure of a shelter affects its performance in inclement weather.
  • Choosing your campsite based on terrain and height above the ground.
  • Pitching a shelter for stability in inclement weather.
  • The downsides to shock cord for guyline tie-outs.
  • Comparing different shapes and materials for tent stakes.
  • Major issues regarding shelters when used in inclement weather.

Learn More

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Episode 68 | Unpacking the New Garmin inReach Messenger

In today’s gear short episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about the brand new Garmin inReach Messenger and how it fits into the broader market of satellite communications devices for backcountry users.

Listen

Summary

In today’s gear short episode of the Backpacking Light podcast, we’re going to talk about the brand new Garmin inReach Messenger and how it fits into the broader market of satellite communications devices for backcountry users.

Backpacking-light-podcast-garmin-inreach-messenger

In this Episode:

  • Introducing the Garmin inReach Messenger
  • What is a messenger?
  • Types of messengers
  • Features to consider when comparing messengers
  • Garmin inReach Messenger – unique features

Learn More

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Garmin inReach Messenger (Preview/Updated)

The Garmin inReach Messenger provides seamless messaging across cellular, WiFi, and satellite networks for only 4.0 ounces. It offers some compelling features over its closest competitor, the Zoleo Satellite Communicator, including an on-device display that makes it a viable standalone device when used without a smartphone.

Introduction: Garmin inReach Messenger vs. Zoleo Satellite Communicator

The Garmin inReach Messenger and Garmin inReach Messenger Plus are 2-way global satellite messengers that offers location sharing and SOS capabilities. The Garmin inReach Messenger Plus also provides photo and voice memo sharing capability. Either can be used as a standalone device or paired with your smartphone via the Garmin Messenger app. The inReach Messenger weighs 4.0 ounces and has an MSRP of $300, and the inReach Messenger Plus weighs 4.1 ounce and has an MSRP of $500. This article focuses on the Garmin inReach Messenger. For more information about the Garmin inReach Messenger Plus, see this article.

This article was originally published on September 27, 2022 and updated with new information on September 30, 2022 and September 18, 2024.

Table of Contents

Overview

Like the Zoleo Satellite Communicator and the Somewear Global Hotspot, the Garmin inReach Messenger offers seamless messaging across different types of networks (cellular/WiFi and satellite) and selects the most readily-available network without interrupting message conversations.

Unlike the Zoleo or Somewear products, however, the Garmin inReach Messenger offers the following unique features:

  • An on-device display allows the user to view incoming messages and send both preset and custom messages (via screen keyboard), along with other alerts and visual cues.
  • Group messaging conversations are maintained for all sent and received messages.
  • Weather forecasts can be requested and viewed without a paired smartphone.
  • TracBack (Garmin’s breadcrumb tracking program) is usable with or without a paired smartphone.
  • Reverse charging via USB-C to preserve the operation of a low-battery phone.

Garmin-inreach-messenger-vs-zoleo-satellite-communicator
The Garmin inReach Messenger comes with a price tag that’s $100 higher than its closest apparent competitor – the Zoleo Satellite Communicator. Is the inReach Messenger’s additional feature set worth it?

Learn More About Satellite Messaging Devices

See our updated Satellite Messenger Gear Guide to learn more about the Garmin inReach Messenger and its competitors.

Garmin inReach Messenger features

The unique features of the Garmin inReach Messenger include its on-device display, group messaging conversations, TracBack, and reverse charging.

On-device display

The Garmin inReach Messenger features a simple on-device display screen that offers notable feedback and functionality that can’t be accessed on the Zoleo Satellite Communicator or Somewear Global Hotspot without pairing them to a Smartphone:

  • reading incoming messages;
  • composing and reading outgoing messages (preset or custom) and monitoring their sending/sent status;
  • battery capacity remaining and reverse charging status;
  • time of day;
  • SOS status and incoming message monitoring;
  • the ability to select from and send from a variety of different (preset) Quick Text messages;
  • requesting and reviewing weather forecasts.

Garmin-inreach-messenger-1
Various device screens on the Garmin inReach Messenger show the types of information available when used as a standalone device. Source: Garmin.

Group messaging conversations

Most satellite messaging devices can send messages to groups (“broadcast” messaging), but when one group member replies, the reply is delivered only to the sender.

The Garmin inReach Messenger is the first satellite messaging device that can both send and receive messages among a group of people while maintaining the group during the entire conversation – similar to how group messaging works in most smartphone applications.

TracBack

TracBack is Garmin’s breadcrumb application. If you turn on TracBack on a TracBack-compatible inReach or GPS device, the unit tracks your route via waypoint breadcrumbs that it saves in its memory. Then, if you’d like to follow the exact route backward, you simply activate TracBack’s reversal, and the device will guide you back to your origination point following the same route.

TracBack can be a useful feature for not getting lost during nighttime bathroom forays into the dark woods, mushroom or berry or elk hunters following signs on the ground rather than paying attention to where they’re traveling, or negotiating through (and back) thick vegetation via game trails and brush-free corridors.

It’s not surprising that the Garmin inReach Messenger provides TracBack. That it allows it to be used without a paired smartphone is welcome.

Reverse charging

Even though the Garmin inReach Messenger is a capable device on its own when not paired to a smartphone, the smartphone is still required to access custom on-the-fly messaging. However, as many of us Garmin inReach Mini users will testify, the moment our smartphone dies is the moment that “typing” custom messages on the Mini becomes awkward enough to elicit enormous frustration. This is particularly problematic if you don’t have access to a portable battery charger, or in the case of an accident, your phone charger is inaccessible.

The Garmin inReach Messenger provides reverse-charging capability. That means if your phone dies or the battery is extremely low, you can use the Garmin inReach Messenger in reverse charging mode to keep your phone charged at a low level. This could be of great importance while communicating during an SOS event.

Garmin-messenger-companion-app-2
Screenshots from the Garmin Messenger companion app that is installed on a smartphone that is paired to the inReach Messenger. Source: Garmin.

FAQs (Updated 30.Sep.2022)

Does the Garmin inReach Messenger have a dedicated phone number?

A dedicated phone number on a satellite device makes it easier for anyone with a cell phone and SMS capability to send a text message to the device.

The Garmin inReach Messenger does not have a dedicated phone number. Here’s why (response from Garmin):

The inReach Messenger does not have a dedicated phone number. We have found significant challenges with SMS messaging, things like sending a message with a map link or delivering to a country with a restrictive cell carrier. We’ve found that many of our international customers are using internet driven apps like Whatsapp or Facebook Messenger instead of SMS anyway. We chose to focus our efforts on our Garmin Messenger app and delivering a rich messaging experience where participants can see things like delivery confirmation, read/unread state, and even if a friend or family member has joined the Messenger app community. This gives us the freedom to do things like send a message location or create a group message and know that we control the experience from within our own app.

Keep in mind that we do still support the other methods of communicating with someone who doesn’t want to install the Messenger app, you can send them a message using their SMS number or their email address. You can also send them your MapShare link which has the ability for a visitor to send a message to the inReach device owner. We feel that the Garmin Messenger app is a good solution for close friends and family who want the rich messaging experience and we feel that the original SMS/email/MapShare solution is a reasonable solution for those who don’t want the app.

How will the inReach Mini 2 integrate with the Garmin Messenger (when that support is released) and Garmin Explore apps?

Response from Garmin:

Please note that the inReach Mini 2 will be compatible with the Garmin Messenger app when we release our firmware update, however the first generation inReach Mini will not be compatible. The first generation Mini was launched in 2018 and has some hardware limitations that prevent us from bringing it forward to new apps like the Explore app and the Messenger app. The inReach Mini still works as designed with the Earthmate app for messaging, tracking, safety, planning and navigating, it’s just not able to take advantage of the internet messaging features found in the Garmin Messenger app.

As you’ve seen, the inReach Messenger device does not support any planning or navigation features and is not compatible with the Explore app. Our inReach devices like the inReach Mini 2 will use both apps for their different specialties – the Messenger app for messaging, tracking, and safety, the Explore app for planning, navigating, and reviewing activities. The two apps will be seamlessly linked so that the user doesn’t have to exit one app to go to the other, they will just choose the Messages tab in the Explore app to have the Garmin Messenger app open with the Messages tab displayed. The same thing will happen if someone using the Garmin Messenger app views details on a message and chooses to view the location on the map, the Explore app will open to show that detail.

How do people using the inReach Mini (or Mini 2) initiate contact with people using inReach Messengers in the backcountry? How about vice versa?

Response from Garmin:

inReach users will be able to message back and forth between all inReach devices, the same way they can now. Users with an inReach Messenger and Garmin Messenger app will be able to enter the inReach address for an older inReach device owner like an inReach Explorer+ and have it routed correctly. That same user can send their own inReach message to the inReach Messenger user and it will route to that owner’s Garmin Messenger app automatically. We are working very hard to support our new inReach Messenger and Garmin Messenger app users, as well as our existing users who might have older inReach devices. We want to make sure that everyone can communicate with each other and that we are continuing to advance the inReach ecosystem with exciting new features like internet messaging and group messaging.

Is the messenger app required for “friends and family” who don’t have an inReach or can they use their native phone texting app? Or does the messenger app provide added features/functions that one’s native SMS app won’t have?

Response from Garmin:

Messenger app is not required for ā€œfriends and familyā€ who don’t have an inReach. A benefit for non-inReach users to use the free Messenger app is participation in group messaging. If an individual (who isn’t using Messenger app) is put in a group chat by the inReach user in the Messenger app, they will only receive responses from the inReach user, not other participants of the group.

Final Comments

Until now, internet debaters have been drawn to the (mostly strawman) discussion of the Garmin inReach MiniĀ vs. the Zoleo Satellite Communicator. However, these two devices have notably different use cases and purposes. One (the Zoleo) is primarily a network-independent messaging device requiring a paired smartphone, and the other (the inReach Mini) is a satellite-only messaging, tracking, and navigation device that doesn’t require a paired smartphone to access its complete feature set.

The Garmin inReach Messenger, however, changes the decision calculus for hikers who are primarily interested in messaging features. With network-independent seamless messaging, the inReach Messenger is a direct answer to the Zoleo Satellite Communicator. With its on-device display, the ability to send custom messages, group messaging conversations, TracBack, reverse charging, and increased battery life, the Garmin inReach Messenger may now be the feature-defining product within the category of seamless satellite/cellular/WiFi messaging devices.

If you are interested in photo and voice memo sharing, see the Garmin inReach Messenger Plus.

Garmin inReach Messenger PLUS

The Garmin inReach Messenger Plus is currently the only satellite messaging device on the market that can transmit photos and audio messages (voice memos) via satellite.

WEIGHT: 4.1 ounces (116 g)
WHAT'S UNIQUE:
  • can transmit photos and voice memos
  • reverse-charging capability
  • integrates with both Garmin Messenger (messaging) and Garmin Explore (navigation) smartphone apps
See it at REI See it at Garage Grown Gear

Related

DISCLOSURE (Updated April 9, 2024)

  • Product mentions in this article are made by the author with no compensation in return. In addition, Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage.
  • Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be affiliate links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a commission on your entire order, which varies between 3% and 15% of the purchase price. Affiliate commissions represent less than 15% of Backpacking Light's gross revenue. More than 70% of our revenue comes from Membership Fees. So if you'd really like to support our work, don't buy gear you don't need - support our consumer advocacy work and become a Member instead.
  • Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Is Buying a Home Freeze-Dryer Worth the Money?

Home Freeze-dryers are handy but expensive. Are they worth the cost? We show you how to find out.

Introduction

In previous installments of this series, we’ve talked about the benefits of freeze-drying food for backpacking: flavor, nutrition, convenience, and shelf-life. But every benefit has a cost, and now it’s time to talk about that also.

In this article, I hope to give you the information needed to decide whether to get into home freeze-drying yourself. I’ll break the costs into three components: food, operations, and capital costs.

Every decision requires an alternative, and I will use the most straight-up, obvious one: buying pre-packaged freeze-dried meals. We are all familiar with Mountain House. It is the market leader and a fine product, but there are plenty of alternatives.

With a diversity of suppliers comes a diversity of package sizes and serving definitions, complicating our analysis. We need to straighten that situation out first.

In our Archives: Catch up on the rest of Drew’s freeze-drying articles here:

Food costs

Over the years, I’ve found that a Mountain House two-serving package is just about right for one dinner for one backpacker (me). They define a serving as 2 ounces (55 g).

I’ve also found that 3.5 to 4.2 ounces (100 to 120 g) of food that I’ve freeze-dried constitutes a good dinner. So that checks out. We’ll call 4 ounces (110 g) Ā a meal and use that as a base unit.

The exact number doesn’t matter so long as we are consistent.

The table below summarizes package sizes and costs from a variety of freeze-dried food suppliers, including a number of cottage outfits:

brandmealcost/packagegrams/packagecost/4 ounce meal
Mountain HouseClassic Beef Stroganoff$15165$10
Mountain HousePasta Primavera$9108$9.42
Backpacker's PanryPad Thai$10176$6.22
TrailtopiaPesto Chicken Pasta$11196$6.17
PinnacleSticky Teriyaki Chicken$16122$14.43
Good to GoMushroom Risotto$14180$8.71
Food for the SoleCoconut Rice and Beans$15146$11.26
Farm to SummitGarden Mac and Cheese$13170$8.73
PackitGourmetAustintacious Tortilla Soup$1399$14.44

Averaged together, costs look like this:

meal typeaverage amount of food per packageaverage cost per 4-ounce ( 110 g) meal
omnivore5.3 ounces (151 g)$9.93
vegetarian5.1 ounches (147 g)$9.80

I’ve broken out the average cost per meal for all meals listed (omnivore) and for just the vegetarian meals. The reason why will soon become apparent. The most surprising pattern in this table is that there is no pattern. The big dog Mountain House is not cheaper than the little guys, and vegetarian meals are not necessarily cheaper than meals containing chicken or beef.

We can also break costs out by calories rather than weight. The FDA recommends a daily intake of 2000-2400 calories/day for active women and 2600-3200 for active men (but see Backpacking Light’s How much food should I pack?Ā article). Let’s call 500 calories a meal, as most backpackers snack several times a day on high-calorie foods like nuts and chocolate, and energy bars. That calorie level gives us these results:

brandmealcost/packagecalories/packagecost/500 calorie meal
Mountain HouseClassic Beef Stroganoff$15750$10
Mountain HousePasta Primavera$9440$10.51
Backpacker's PanryPad Thai$10730$6.82
TrailtopiaPesto Chicken Pasta$11740$7.43
PinnacleSticky Teriyaki Chicken$16700$11.43
Good to GoMushroom Risotto$14820$6.89
Food for the SoleCoconut Rice and Beans$15670$11.16
Farm to SummitGarden Mac and Cheese$13850$7.94
PackitGourmetAustintacious Tortilla Soup$13370$17.57

Averaged together, costs look like this:

meal typeaverage calories per packageaverage cost per 500 calorie meal
omnivore674$10.17
vegetarian630$10.45

These tables set our baseline: it costs about $10 per meal for store-bought freeze-dried food, probably more like $11 if you account for taxes and shipping. But $10 is a nice round number, so we’ll go with that.

To estimate the food portion of the cost of making your own freeze-dried food, I looked up the prices of a number of staples at the local Whole Foods. This gives us an estimate that is at the high end:

foodcost/poundcost/110 g (dry)cost/110 g (wet)
beef - top sirlion$12$2.91$8.72
chicken breast$8$1.94$5.81
pasta$1.39$0.34
tomato$2.29$.0.55$2.22
beans$1$0.24
corn$1.50$0.36$1.45
rice$1.85$0.45
potato$1.19$0.29$1.15

Averaged together, costs for dry weight look like this:

meal typeaverage cost per 100 g of dry food
omnivore$2.55
vegetarian$0.98

Most foods lose about 3/4ths of their weight when freeze-dried, so to get the dry weight of the wet foods, I divided by four and converted pounds to grams.

Unlike prepared meals, adding meat incurs a substantial food cost. Because the cost of eating vegetarian is so much lower, I will track omnivore and vegetarian costs separately.

Of course, we don’t eat plain meat and vegetables. There are additional food costs for spices, herbs, sauces, etc. So let’s round up the food costs per meal to $3.00 for omnivores and $1.25 for vegetarians.

An additional conclusion from this analysis is that food costs are a minor component of prepared meal costs. I assume the commercial preparers buy in bulk at a discount, so their food costs will be even lower than what I presented above.

Operational costs

After nearly a year of freeze-drying, I have identified only two operational costs: electricity and pump oil. A quart of pump oil cost me $16 at the local hardware store. I’m still on the first quart as it can be filtered and reused. Its cost is a few pennies per meal at most and not worth including in our calculations.

The other operational cost is electricity. This cost is a good deal less than I expected. I used a Kill A Watt P3 meter to track electric power usage on several runs, summarized below.

Power consumption varies with ambient temperature and load size, but 20 kWh per run seems like a good estimate. The national average cost per kWhĀ is $0.104, giving us a cost of $2.03 per run for electricity.

The nominal max capacity of the HarvestRight Home Freeze-Dryer is 7 to 10 pounds (3.2 -to 4.5 kg). A typical run for me has been more like 6 to 7 lbs (3 kg). The yield of dried food from a 6-7 pound run is about 2 pounds (0.9 kg). At 4 ounces (110 g) per meal, that’s eight meals per run, using the same parameters as we used for packaged food. Electricity costs then work out to just about $0.25 per meal.

For omnivore meal costs, we are thus at $3.00 (food) + $0.25 (operations) = $3.25 per meal.

For vegetarians, it is $1.25 (food) + $0.25 (operations) = $1.50 per meal.

That’s a lot less than prepared meals, but we have not yet addressed the biggest and most problematic cost.

Capital costs

Food is cheap, electricity is cheap, but freeze-dryers are expensive. If they were not expensive, you probably already would have one.

The HarvestRight Home Freeze Dryer model I have been using (the medium one) currently listsĀ for $2900, up about $300 from a year ago. Trays, pump, and shipping are included in this price.

From above, the average cost for food and operation is $3.25 per meal for omnivores and $1.50 for vegetarians. At $10.00/meal to buy, this means the capital costs have to get below $6.75 or $8.50 per meal, respectively, before one starts to save money.

The math is simple then: $2900/$6.75 = 430 omnivore meals, or $2900/$8.75 = 330 vegetarian meals. At eight meals per run, that translates to 54 and 41 runs, respectively.

I don’t think that’s a problem from an equipment lifetime standpoint. I have done about 50 runs in the last year (I seem to have become very popular with my backpacking friends), and the HarvestRight shows no signs of wear or malfunction. I would be surprised if it didn’t last at least a hundred runs and could see its mean time-to-failure being several hundred or even a thousand. Good-quality vacuum pumps and compressors (the only moving parts) will last for over a decade of heavy use.

So the affordability question comes down to your consumption level and time horizon. If you think that you (and the new friends you will acquire) will eat more than 300-400 freeze-dried meals in the next decade or so, then buying your own freeze-dryer is a reasonable choice.

There are plenty of other factors and scenarios that affect the desirability of becoming a freeze-dryer owner. But I hope you find these cost calculations useful in making a decision.

Freeze-dried recipe: posole

Posole is a classic Mexican stew made with hominy in adobo sauce. It is a bit involved to make, but it scales easily, so you don’t have to make it often. It has become one of my trail favorites, especially in cold weather.

For a roughly 2-quart batch, you’ll need about 6 ounces (170 g) of dried peppers and 4 15 oz (425 g) cans of hominy. Both are available at your local carneceria. For peppers, I recommend guajillos and anchos. Throw in some chipotles (smoked anchos) if you want a smoky flavor.

Start by searing the peppers. Cover the bottom of a cast iron skillet with oil, and heat it medium-high until it just begins to smoke. While it’s heating, break or cut off the tops of the peppers, removing the stems and seeds.

a skillet full of searing peppers
These are a little blacker than optimal, resulting in a more bitter flavor.

Lay the peppers in the hot oil, searing them until they turn brown (and not too black), about 20 seconds per side. Put them in a mixing bowl of warm water, cover with a dish (to press them under the water), and let them soak for about 20 minutes.

a bowl full of peppers soaking
Soaking the peppers.

Pour the peppers and about half the water into a blender and whir it up very fine. Add more water if needed to get a good consistency. Rick Bayless (whose recipe I am adapting here) suggests straining through a cheesecloth, but I prefer a chunkier texture myself.

Cut up some white onion, drain the hominy, and add both ingredients to the adobo sauce. Sprinkle in some Mexican oregano to taste and simmer for a couple of hours.

Add pork or chicken if desired.

a bowl full of posole cooking
Posole simmering on the stove.

Radishes and cabbage are the traditional garnishes, but I usually top with dried flour tortillas strips and some cheese.

You can save some of the adobo sauce to dry separately. It makes an excellent sauce for other meals – adobo mac and cheese is a fantastic trail meal.

This recipe works for both freeze-drying and heat-assisted dehydration. The hominy doesn’t rehydrate as well if dehydrated and remains a bit chewy. It is still pretty darn good. Give posole a try if you are ready to move beyond burritos.

Learn More


Browse our curated recommendations in the Backpacking Light Gear Shop – a product research & discovery tool where you can find Member gear reviews, Gear Swap (used gear) listings, and more info about specific products recommended by our staff and members.

Gear Shop Ā» Food Preparation and Packaging

Related Content

DISCLOSURE (Updated April 9, 2024)

  • Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage. Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be affiliate links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a commission on your entire order, which varies between 3% and 15% of the purchase price. Affiliate commissions represent less than 15% of Backpacking Light's gross revenue. More than 70% of our revenue comes from Membership Fees. So if you'd really like to support our work, don't buy gear you don't need - support our consumer advocacy work and become a Member instead. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Can Apple’s New iPhone 14 Replace Your Garmin inReach?

Should/will the iPhone 14 replace my Garmin inReach (or similar satellite messaging devices)?

Introduction

When Apple announced the SOS/satellite messaging features of its new iPhone 14, three questions immediately bubbled to the surface of the outdoor community’s conversation Ā (see Backpacking Light’s forum thread introducing the satellite capabilities on the iPhone 14):

  1. Will SOS capabilities in the pocket of every hiker lead to more incidents of false alarms/low-danger rescues?
  2. Will the new technology encourage people to venture into areas they aren’t prepared to venture into, leading to an increase in real emergencies?
  3. Should/will the iPhone 14 replace my Garmin inReach (or similar satellite messaging devices)?

SOS feature on iPhone 14
With Apple’s iPhone 14, users outside of cell range will be able to utilize the Find My Phone feature to broadcast their location via satellite to friends and family. Photo: Apple

Will Apple’s new iPhone 14 lead to more work for search and rescue crews?

In Backpacking Light’s forums and elsewhere, I encountered concern over the potential abuse of the iPhone 14’s new SOS feature. The worry seemed centered around stories of hikers and backpackers using Garmin inReach devices to call for help when they could easily self-rescue instead.

One anecdote shared on our forum involved a young woman calling search and rescue (SAR) so she could order a pizza. People are concerned that SOS-enabled phones will magnify the number of unnecessaryĀ rescues and increase the overallĀ number of rescues.

These concerns got me wondering – what’s the percentage of satellite–messenger-initiated incidents involving unnecessary rescues vs. satellite-messenger-initiated incidents involving real danger where people cannot self-rescue? I reached out to some search and rescue groups around the heavily trafficked Rocky Mountain National Park and got an interesting answer – it’s hard to say.

ā€œI can tell you right now that data is a problem for us, and we won’t be able to give you much by way of stats. We’re working on funding for a statewide, consistent data collection system, but it has been an uphill battle,ā€ said Anna De Battiste, Public Information Officer (PIO) for the Colorado Search and Rescue Association.

When I asked Drew Hildner, PIO of the Rocky Mountain Rescue Group, the same question, he answered with a simple ā€œdon’t know.ā€ Ā What Hildner could tell me for sure was that the percentage of search and rescue actions initiated in the Rockies by satellite messenger devices is in the single digits.

Jay Christianson, PIO for the Colorado Search and Rescue Association, told me the same thing.

ā€œThe percentage of people that activate [the SOS features on satellite messengers] is quite low currently,ā€ he said. ā€œEven if the method of activation [shifts to satellite-enabled cell phones over dedicated satellite messengers], I really do not see a shift in the parties that will need rescuing. Realistically most parties that are considering search and rescue are in a position where self-rescue is impossible, be it physically or mentally, and from the SAR team position, early activation is beneficial so we can intervene before things get worse.ā€

Rocky Mountain National Park Ambulance
Search and rescue (SAR) operations at the Long’s Peak Trailhead, Rocky Mountain National Park on May 29, 2022. An avalanche on Mt. Meeker that morning caused one death and one serious injury. In addition to Rocky Mountain National Park’s Search and Rescue team, this operation included the Colorado Search and Rescue Association, Flight for Life, Rocky Mountain Rescue Group, Front Range Rescue Dogs, Colorado National Guard, and Med Evac. SAR Ops require significant resources. Will satellite SOS availability on everyday smartphones increase SAR Ops? Photo: Ryan Jordan.

Some takeaways here:

  1. The vast majority of search and rescue actions (at least in the Colorado Rockies) are not initiated by satellite messenger.
  2. Nobody is formally keeping track of what percentage of two-way-satellite-messenger-initiated actions are for people who could, in reality, self-rescue – but the SAR professionals I spoke to indicated it is not the majority of cases.
  3. That percentage is somewhat irrelevant from a rescuer’s point of view because while search and rescue teams certainly don’t want to be allocating resources towards pizza delivery or other unnecessary rescues, they absolutely do wantĀ to get to folks before bad situations turn into deadly situations.

This last takeaway is crucial. Every SAR professional I interviewed for this story took care to emphasize they’d rather people be safe than sorry. The vibe I’m getting is that the collective handwringing on behalf of the SAR community’s time and energy is a projection.

In fact, Jay Christianson sees the upcoming proliferation of SOS-enabled cell phones as a positive because it will allow SAR teams to intervene more quickly in a larger percentage of situations – saving both lives and resources.

ā€œHaving the ability to actively locate a subject in the field greatly reduces the full mission timeline. Many missions can have a multi-hour access time; if a team does not have a precise location, this can complicate access. This earlier arrival allows for early intervention with the subject to prevent potentially worse issues,ā€ he said.

Remember, most SAR actions are not initiated by satellite messengers, meaning most SAR teams work withoutĀ precise location data. So the upshot of satellite-messenger-enabled cell phones? More lost/injured hikers with precise data to give to SAR teams means quicker missions and less wasted money and human power, not more.

So what about the idea that Apple’s new SOS technology might encourage more folks to make stupid choices, leading to more SAR actions? None of the professionals I interviewed are worried about it. The logic seems to be that the type of person who’s going to set out for the summit of a 14er at three in the afternoon with half a bottle of water is already doing that. An SOS button in their pocket is not a deciding factor in that decision.

ā€œI do not imagine that this additive resource in cell technology will provide the tipping point for people to push their limits of accessibility and ability,ā€ said Jay Christianson.

Will the Apple iPhone 14 replace my Garmin inReach?

With the pearl-clutching around SAR-team time and energy out of the way, we are left with one question. Should the iPhone 14, with its satellite messaging and location broadcasting capabilities, replace your dedicated satellite messaging device? It’s a tempting proposition – who doesn’t love removing an item from their pack in favor of multi-use gear?

iPhone SOS feature screen
The Apple iPhone 14 will include a user interface that allows hikers to find the best line of sight for a Globalstar satellite.

But the consensus answer on our forum, which I agree with, is noĀ – for now. Most people believe that the iPhones 14’s SOS features are useful as a redundant safety system but not a full replacement for dedicated satellite messengers. Here are the three main reasons, as vocalized by Backpacking Light community members and supported by the search and rescue professionals I interviewed for this story:

  • Dedicated satellite messengers are more rugged and less easily damaged than cell phones.
  • Dedicated satellite messengers have longer battery life than cell phones, especially if hikers are using cell phones for navigation, photography/videography, note taking, and entertainment (they are).
  • Dedicated satellite messengers have two-way functionality, while the iPhone 14’s messaging functionality is limited to one-way communication (for now).

We must expect this last point to change, and soon. In August, T-Mobile announced a partnership with SpaceXĀ to make two-way messaging a reality, and we can assume other providers will attempt to provide the same functionality. Likewise, smartphones will continue to become more rugged and have longer battery life. It’s not outside the realm of possibility that Apple could release an iPhone dedicated to adventure athletes along the same lines as its recently unveiled Apple Watch Ultra.

Conclusion

In the near future, smartphone technology will continue to advance, and Silicon Valley will continue to tap into the outdoor market with new products. As this happens, we may begin to see some ultralight backpackers ditching dedicated satellite messengers completely in favor of smartphones, just as we now see some members of our community ditching dedicated cameras in the same fashion.

Peering further into the future, I can imagine once-silent mountain evenings now clotted with the noise pollution of a dozen hikers all voice chatting to friends and family back home – similar to the current scourge of Bluetooth speakers plaguing our public lands or the Bay Area business people having loud financial phone calls as they conduct ā€œwalking meetingsā€ along our local trails. Ā As always, it is not the technology that matters but how we choose to use it – or, to be more precise – how we choose not to.

Related content

DISCLOSURE (Updated April 9, 2024)

  • Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage. Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be affiliate links. If you click on one of these links and visit one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently place an order with that retailer, we receive a commission on your entire order, which varies between 3% and 15% of the purchase price. Affiliate commissions represent less than 15% of Backpacking Light's gross revenue. More than 70% of our revenue comes from Membership Fees. So if you'd really like to support our work, don't buy gear you don't need - support our consumer advocacy work and become a Member instead. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.

Episode 67 | How to Poop in the Woods (Skills and Tools for Backcountry Pooping)

Ryan and Andrew chat about new gear and techniques for the age-old question: how to poop in the woods (safely, cleanly, and responsibly).

Listen

Listen to the podcast on Itunes, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Summary

In this skills short episode of the Backpacking Light Podcast, Andrew and Ryan talk sh**, a.k.a, šŸ’©.

How to poop in the woods? It’s an age-old question, particularly as popular backcountry sites become more crowded.

This episode addresses the question of how long poop takes to decompose and suggests alternative LNT-approved methods (beyond catholes) for dealing with human waste.

a collection of tools for pooping in the woods. Text reads Backpacking Light podcast 67, How to Poop in the Woods

Outline

  • 0:00:00 – podcast introduction
  • 0:01:14 – the old ways of waste disposal in the backcountry and their issues (does poop decompose?)
  • 0:04:39 – why include a trowel in your kit
  • 0:06:01 – wag bags
  • 0:10:24 – hygiene in the backcountry
  • 0:13:58 – final thoughts: preventing GI distress through hygiene

Resources

  • šŸ’©.

How to Subscribe

Apple PodcastsĀ | Spotify | RSS

More Episodes

Backpacking Light Podcast Index

Credits

Executive Producer - Backpacking Light; Show Director and Host - Ryan Jordan; Producer - Chase Jordan; Theme music: Look for Me in the Mountains written by Chris CunninghamĀ and Ryan Jordan, performed by Chris Cunningham (acoustic guitar, lead and harmony vocals, harmonica), Chad LangfordĀ (upright bass), and Tom MurphyĀ (mandolin), produced by Basecamp StudiosĀ in Bozeman, Montana.

Feedback / Tips / Questions

podcast@backpackinglight.com

More Backpacking Light

Sign upĀ for the Newsletter. Become a Backpacking Light Member.

Disclosure

Sponsorship Policy: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated/discounted products in exchange for product mentions or placements in editorial coverage, including any podcast episode content not excplicitly identified as sponsored content. Some (but not all) of the links in these show notes may be affiliate links. Learn more about affiliate commissions, influencer marketing, and our consumer advocacy work by reading our article Stop wasting money on gear.