You don’t have access to view this content.
Exploring Wyoming’s Medicine Bow Range
A quick, weekend trip into the Medicine Bow Range creates the background for this story of navigation technique and philosophy.
A quick, weekend trip into the Medicine Bow Range creates the background for this story of navigation technique and philosophy.
You don’t have access to view this content.
In this episode longtime BPL author Doug Johnson gives us a run-down of his favorite ultralight backcountry seating options reviewed in our new gear guide.

Tired of sacrificing comfort for a low base weight? So is Doug Johnson, a longtime BPL author on a multi-year quest to discover a luxurious-but-ultralight backcountry experience.  Doug has treated himself (and his family) to extensive cook systems, thick sleeping pads, and cozy hammocks – now he’s turned his expert eye to the world of ultralight backcountry seating.
It’s a fascinating gear category, and one with wildly different approaches to solving what appears to be a simple problem – how to sit comfortably at the end of a long day. Andrew and Doug get things started by setting some parameters – no sit pads allowed in this podcast (or stools, or hammocks,  or…well…just give it a listen, you’ll catch on).
Next, they jump into a few of the categories covered in Backpacking Chairs: A Comprehensive Guide to the Science of Seated Recovery, Ultralight Chair Design, and Market Landscape, including Inflatable Seat Kits, On-Ground Pole Supported Seats, Suspended Seats, and Frame Seats (among others).
Doug touches briefly on the design elements and performance considerations of each category, then elaborates on some of his favorites seats in each category. He finishes by choosing his two favorite seats before taking a brief sidetrack into the hammock world.
As they wrap up, Andrew challenges Doug to make a believer out of any die-hard gram counters that might be listening.
This Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction Backpack Review features a pack with a lightweight Dyneema Composite Fabrics body, Hardline woven fabric side and hip belt pockets for durability, and a mesh back pocket for storing wet gear.
The Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction backpack offers a similar physical configuration (one large rear pocket, two side pockets, two hip belt pockets, roll-top closure) as their Windrider, Southwest, and Northrim packs, but in a slightly different fabric configuration.
In short, the Junction offers a lightweight fabric main pack body, woven fabric side and hip belt pockets for durability, and a mesh back pocket for storing wet gear. A comparison of the material specs for all four packs can be found in the “Compared To…” section below.

The Junction is available in two sizes (2400Â and 3400Â cubic inch main pack bag volume). In this review, I’m using a Junction 3400 in size Large.
I believe that the Junction 3400 is the most versatile pack in HMG’s product line, and should be considered by anyone looking for a do-it-all pack that is highly water-resistant, durable, comfortable (with loads of less than 30 pounds), and has the perfect pocket configuration that can be adapted to most hiker’s trekking styles and preferences.
Watch my Video Review below (or via YouTube):

Materials:
See “Compared To…” section below for additional discussion and specifications about each of these materials and how they compare to the materials used in the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Windrider, Northrim, and Southwest backpacks.
Dimensions:
| Junction 2400 | Junction 3400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 30.1 oz (853 g) | 32.0 oz (907 g) |
| Load Capacity | 40 lb (18 kg) | 40 lb (18 kg) |
| Internal Volume | 2400 cu. in. (40 L) | 3400 cu. in. (55 L) |
| Center Pocket Volume | 300 cu. in. (4.9 L) | 300 cu. in. (4.9 L) |
| Side Pocket Volume | 2 x 150 cu. in. (4.9 L) | 2 x 150 cu. in. (4.9 L) |
| Hip Belt Pocket Volume | 2 x 55 cu. in. (0.9 L) | 2 x 55 cu. in. (0.9 L) |
| Total Pack Volume | 3110 cu. in. (51 L) | 4110 cu. in. (66 L) |
| Top Circumference | 37.5 in (95.3 cm) | 40.0 in (101.6 cm) |
| Bottom Circumference | 33.5 in (85.1 cm) | 33.5 in (85.1 cm) |
| Height (Fully Unrolled) | 30.0 in (72.6 cm) | 34.0 in (86.4 cm) |
| Back Width | 10.5 in (26.7 cm) | 10.5 in (26.7 cm) |
All specs above were provided by the manufacturer. Note that these dimensions are similar to the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Windrider 2400/3400, Southwest 2400/3400, and Northrim 3400.
Actual Measured Weight
The actual measured weight of our production model pack (3400, torso size L) is 32.8 oz (930 g).
I’ve been using (and abusing) Hyperlite Mountain Gear backpacks since the company launched in 2010. I’ve used HMG packs for alpine and ice climbing, backpacking, packrafting, backcountry skiing, and day-tripping. I’ve worn out HMG pack fabrics as a result of alpine scrambling, busted hip belt seams when I loaded them with up to obscene amounts of weight on long expeditions, and shredded mesh pockets while bushwhacking. This is the context for the commentary I present in this section.
The most unique feature of the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction backpack, when compared to the Windrider, Southwest, or Northrim, is the material configuration of the external pockets.
Hyperlite Mountain Gear uses three different materials in the external pockets of their various packs (refer to the table in the “Compared To…” section below for exact specs):
I find mesh pockets to be most useful for stowing wet gear (ground cloth, tarp or tent fly, raingear), and Hardline pockets most useful for stowing sharp items (tent poles, camera tripod) that have a history of poking holes in my mesh pockets.
My YouTube video review includes a bit about how I organize my gear in the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction backpack.
I prefer the DCHW (fully-woven Dyneema + DCF) pockets of the Northrim for rock scrambling (desert canyons, alpine climbing), but appreciate the Hardline+mesh pocket configuration on the Junction for backpacking and most off-trail trekking and bushwhacking.
Having shredded the side mesh pockets on a Hyperlite Mountain Gear Windrider while bushwhacking through slide alder, willow, birch, and burn areas, I’m not enthused about mesh side pockets. The Hardline side pockets on the Junction are a welcome addition.
Likewise, I also found the Southwest pack (which uses Hardline for all of its external pockets) to be lacking, because I wanted the ability to stow wet gear in a mesh pocket. That the mesh pocket is located on the rear of the Junction, protected from snagging while bushwhacking, is important to note.
Thus, I think the pocket configuration of the Junction (Hardline side pockets, rear mesh pocket) provides the best configuration that is versatile enough to meet the needs of most hikers.
The DCH50 and DCH150 fabrics used in the body of HMG’s packs, including the junction, are waterproof and absorb less water than virtually any other pack fabric I’ve used. Bonded seams and the roll-top design of HMG packs make them virtually waterproof. Even while packrafting, I seldom worry about the gear inside my pack, and simply stow it inside seam-taped stuff sacks (no dry bags).
The DCH50 used in the body of the junction, and the DCH150 used on the bottom of the Junction, are plenty durable for virtually any type of on-trail or light off-trail trekking.
My DCH50 backpacks have only suffered from durability issues when I take them on alpine scrambles around sharp limestone (e.g., the Bob Marshall Wilderness) or in sandstone slot canyons (e.g., the US Desert Southwest). In that environment, I’ve even blown holes in the DCH150 bottoms of my HMG packs. That’s an environment where I’d want a full-spectra bottom and external pockets, like what is available in the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Northrim pack.
All of Hyperlite Mountain Gear’s 2400-series and 3400-series packs have a manufacturer-claimed load carrying capacity of 40 pounds (the larger 4400-series and 5400-series packs offer load carrying capacities of up to 65 pounds). It’s important to note before we dive into this discussion any further that this is a recommended load limit and not a load that’s necessarily going to be comfortable.

I’ve used the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Porter 4400 and 5400 more than any other HMG pack – often with loads exceeding 50 pounds. This is the amount of weight I will typically carry on longer (10+ days) trips without resupply, and often with packrafting and/or alpine climbing gear.
However, I have seldom packed their smaller (2400, 3400) packs with more than the manufacturer-stated load carrying capacity of 40 pounds. And so, I was curious about how these smaller packs fared when pack weights went up. For example, with a 15-pound base weight (common for me during the summer when I’m carrying camera equipment), 10 days of food (16 pounds), and the 4L of water (8 lb) I usually carry when I’m dry-camping above the treeline – I’m pushing the 40-pound mark.
In order to study this, I performed suspension collapse tests based on a protocol I developed for analyzing suspension performance and determining the load-carrying capacity of a backpack. This protocol has been demonstrated on frameless packs, and I still use it regularly to measure the ability of a pack suspension to resist collapse under load.
For evaluating suspension performance at a specific load, my wife took two measurements: one from the ground surface to the midline of the hipbelt, and one from the ground surface to the top of the frame. The difference between these two measurements is the effective torso length of the pack under load. The effective torso length of a pack under load has a high degree of correlation with perceived comfort. Thus, using the quantitative analysis from the suspension performance protocol, a pack’s comfortable load-carrying capacity can be derived by determining the load at which the suspension performance factor (P) = 0.
The following chart illustrates the suspension performance of the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction 3400:

From this chart, a comfortable load-carrying capacity can be estimated at around 31 pounds. This is certainly in line with my experience with the Junction. At weights significantly greater than 30 pounds, the Junction’s minimalist frame starts to collapse significantly, becoming shorter than my body’s torso length. This prevents effective weight transfer between the shoulders and hips.
At 40 pounds, the shoulder straps start to pull downward and backward, straining shoulder muscles. By the time the pack is loaded with 50 pounds, be prepared for significant collapsing of the hip belt structure.
Given the Junction’s minimalist hip belt padding (1/8″ closed-cell rigid foam + 1/4 closed cell foam + spacer mesh) and shoulder strap padding (3/8″ + spacer mesh), once the frame of the pack starts to collapse at weights above 30 pounds, don’t expect it to maintain a high level of comfort.
If you have a shorter torso and expect to regularly carry weights greater than 30 pounds, consider sizing up one size. The longer frame length of a larger torso pack will then give you some wiggle room at heavy loads.
Here is Hyperlite Mountain Gear’s pack sizing guide:
Noting that your torso measurement is the vertical distance between your iliac crest and your 7th cervical (C7) vertebra.
When unweighted, our size Large Junction had a measured pack torso length (defined as the vertical distance between the crest of the shoulder straps and the midline of the hip belt) of 19 1/8 inches. My torso as measured from C7 to about one inch below the iliac crest (the point where I want the midline of my hip belt to ride) is about 17 3/4 inches. Thus, someone with a torso that measures in the “large” range as defined by Hyperlite Mountain Gear may find that their pack has a lower comfortable load-carrying capacity than identified in this review.


The table below compares all six of Hyperlite Mountain Gear’s fabric configurations (3400 cubic inch main body size was selected to compare weights consistently).
| Junction 3400 | Northrim 3400 | Windrider 3400 (White) | Windrider 3400 (Black) | Southwest 3400 (White) | Southwest 3400 (Black) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (oz) | 32 | 35.1 | 31.9 | 34.8 | 32.1 | 35 |
| Load Capacity (lb) | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Body Material | DCH50 | DCH150 | DCH50 | DCH150 | DCH50 | DCH150 |
| Bottom Material | DCH150 | DCHW | DCH150 | DCH150 | DCH150 | DCH150 |
| External Side Pocket Material | Hardline | DCHW | Mesh | Mesh | Hardline | Hardline |
| External Back Pocket Material | Mesh | DCHW | Mesh | Mesh | Hardline | Hardline |
| Hip Belt Pocket Material | Hardline | DCHW | Hardline | Hardline | Hardline | Hardline |
| MSRP | $345 | $410 | $345 | $365 | $345 | $365 |
Material Descriptions:
Based on the specs in the table above, here are the most obvious use-case scenarios for each pack:
The Hyperlite Mountain Gear Junction 3400Â is probably the most versatile backpack in HMG’s product line for most users.
If you only want to own one HMG pack, and you spend most of your time on trail or off-trail in open or bushy terrain, the Junction may be your best option.
If you need more durability for long expeditions in desert canyons or alpine limestone, check out the Northrim.
If you plan to regularly carry loads in excess of 30 pounds, consider sizing up one torso size. If you plan to regularly carry loads in excess of 40 pounds, consider a 4400-series pack.
I don’t recommend the Junction if your average pack weight (your pack weight at the mid-point of a trip) exceeds 35 pounds. This shouldn’t be much of a problem for trips up to a week in length if your base weight is less than 20 pounds and you’re not carrying more than a liter or two of water at a time.
Updated September 15, 2018
The RaidLight HyperLight MP+ Waterproof Jacket is one of the lightest no-frills rain jackets on the market.
The RaidLight HyperLight MP+ Waterproof Jacket is one of the lightest no-frills rain jackets on the market. Though designed for the storm-surprised trail runner, the soft finish quality and 3 oz (85 g) weight could be attractive to a minimalist-minded backpacker looking for an ultralight waterproof layer. In this review, we specifically examine the women’s version, but a men’s version is available as well.
**EDITOR’S NOTE** The Raidlight Hyperlight MP+ is a rain jacket from Raidlight, a brand specializing in trail-running gear.  It should not be confused with any products from Hyperlight Mountain Gear.
Photo: RaidLight

All manufacturer-reported specifications for the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+, including weight, are identical for the men’s and women’s version.

I spend close to 200 days a year in the backcountry as a professional educator and guide. I’m continually trying to improve my rain-jacket game. I consider it a mandatory piece of equipment because it can be the difference between comfort and discomfort. In very cold, wet, and windy conditions – it’s a safety item as well.
I’m always searching for a jacket that is lightweight and compact enough to “forget about” in my pack and yet gives me full protection during an all-day storm. I want a jacket that performs equally well during active pursuits like hiking and scrambling as well as passive activities like cooking and providing first aid.
I ask myself the following questions when choosing a rain jacket:
Â
For context, I tested the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+ alongside Patagonia’s Alpine Houdini, the Arc’Teryx Beta AR, and a convenience store plastic poncho.
I primarily tested the Raidlight Hyperlight MP+ on a 10-day backpacking trip in Big Sur, California. Luckily for this review, it has been a rainy spring in central California. We experienced 4 in (10 cm) of rain during our trip. When it wasn’t raining, we were “swimming” through Pacific coast fog. Temperatures ranged from the low 70s to the low 40s.
I also tested the Hyperlight MP+ while:

I evaluated the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+ by the following criteria:

Taped seams are a must for rain gear. The seams on the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+ are soundly taped, but I do wonder how well they will hold up to long-term use due to the light fabric.  The DWR treatment on the lightweight polyamide fabric was sufficient waterproofing (I did get wet, but it wasn’t from fabric soak-through – see the “Zipper” section below). The fabric itself is incredibly soft and quiet – when I pulled it out of the box my first thought was, “this fabric is supposed to keep me dry?”

The hood fits snugly with enough room to go over a baseball cap. As a weight saving measure, the elastic band is not adjustable.

The Hyperlight MP+’s zipper reaches to just under the chin. I found this design to be a little uncomfortable – I got some chafing with the zipper all the way up. This design had ramifications once it started to rain – see the zipper section below.

The elastic thumb-loops functioned as expected, keeping the sleeves in place during activity. My worry is one of durability: the seam connecting the fabric and loop doesn’t seem secure enough to hold up to long term use. I don’t see them lasting long, particularly not with the kind of use I’d be giving this jacket as an outdoor professional. On top of that, I found the loops to be somewhat uncomfortable on my thumbs – the thin elastic loop digs into the skin a little.
I have an athletic build and stand 5’5” and 130 pounds. I found the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+’s fit short in both the torso and arms and too tight for a layer beyond a thin fleece. I’d like to see this jacket cut slightly more roomy – even if it added a little weight. Of course, that’s a backpacker talking – most trail runners are going to layer this over a thin shirt.


The waterproof zipper is my main gripe with the RaidLight Hyperlight MP+. As seen in the photo above, I experienced significant moisture entry around the zipper during a four-hour rain and hail storm in the Big Sur. I believe this came from the design of the zipper rather than its waterproofing – because it chaffed my chin, I had to leave it unzipped slightly, allowing water to enter from the top.
The RaidLight Hyperlight MP+’s fabric is so soft that it almost feels like tissue paper. It breathes well – making it ideal for shielding you from light rain during heavy exertion. The downside is the fabric’s fragility –  this is not the rain jacket I would grab first for off-trail excursions or bushwhacking of any kind.


The MP+ is fairly compact for a rain jacket, compressing down to slightly larger than palm-sized. The built-in stuff pocket is located in the hood. The jacket fits into the pouch easily (no struggling to get it stowed) and continues to compress if necessary – meaning it’s easy to cram into whatever nook or cranny you have available in your packing system.

The RaidLight Hyperlight MP+ can have a seat at the ultra-light backpacker table. That table should have less than 20% chance of precipitation and temperatures above 50 F (10 C). The overlap between ultra-running gear and ultralight backpacking gear is growing but still imperfect – and that shows in this jacket.
The fabric feels great and has above average breathability for a waterproof layer – what you’d expect from a jacket designed for moving fast and working hard. As a runner, I can appreciate the minimalist lack of features and weight-saving (i.e., not very roomy) cut. But as a backpacker, I want to be able to move freely and access pockets without exposing my insulating layers to moisture. You just can’t do that in this jacket. However, the Hyperlight MP+ does function well as a wind shirt when paired with a light long-sleeved layer underneath, so it does get points in the “multi-use gear” department.

Some of the design features – like the elastic thumb loops and under-the-chin zipper, were uncomfortable. The clear watch panel is a cool and thoughtful touch.
Finally, as a professional in the outdoor industry and a woman in my thirties, I don’t want my only color option to be baby blue with hot pink.
Here is how the Raidlight Hyperlight MP+ compares to a couple of possible options for an ultra-light backpacking rain jacket in terms of price, performance, and features. The weights listed here reflect women’s sizes.
| Product | MSRP | Weight | Material | Ventilation | Hood | Pockets | Cut |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RaidLight Hyperlight MP+ Women's | $219.95 | 3 oz (85 g) | Membrane: 100% Polyurethane Outer Fabric: 100% Polyamide | none | Elastic, pre-tensioned | No | Slim |
| ZPacks Vertice Jacket | $259.00 | 4.9 oz (139 g) | 1.92 oz/sqyd Vertice Waterproof Breathable Fabric | Pit zips | Adjustable, helmet compatible | No | Long, slightly roomy |
| Arc’teryx Zetal FL | $325.00 | 6.9 oz (195.61 g) | 20-denier (N20p) nylonGORE-TEX Pro with 2-layer GORE-TEX PACLITE Plus | none | Adjustable | Two at hips | Roomy |
| Hyperlite Mountain Gear The Shell | $450.00 | 5.8 oz (164.42 g) | DCF-WPB | None | Adjustable, helmet compatible | One, at hip | Roomy |
| Outdoor Research Helium II Rain Jacket | $159.00 | 5.5 oz (155.92 oz) | Pertex Shield+ 2.5-layer waterproof breathable laminate on nylon | None | Adjustable | One, at chest | Roomy |
While the Raidlight Hyperlight MP+ is the lightest jacket in our table, it is also the most minimally featured and tightest fitting. This design demonstrates the Raidlight Hyperlight MP+’s origins as a jacket aimed at trail runners and highlights its limitations as a piece of ultralight backpacking gear.
I recommend this jacket to a trail runner who occasionally backpacks, or for absolute ounce shavers who can be confident they will only have to contend with light showers during a trip. The weight is hard to beat, and the fabric feels great, but the short, slim cut makes it vulnerable to competition from similarly priced jackets like the Outdoor Research Helium II Rain Jacket or ZPacks Vertice Jacket.
This episode of the Backpacking Light Podcast features highlights from our recent round of canister stove reviews.
This episode of the Backpacking Light Podcast features highlights from our recent round of canister stove reviews.
Canister stoves are notoriously difficult to compare accurately. Variations in testing conditions and methodology make any head-to-head comparisons suspect at best, especially when using manufacturer generated data. That’s why we developed StoveBench and spent hundreds of hours applying the methodology to virtually every sub-four ounce upright canister stove on the market.
The result is a 15,000 word gear guide chock full of graphs, charts, raw data, and our purchase recommendations for a variety of needs. In this podcast Ryan and Andrew use both StoveBench and the Upright Canister Stove Gear Guide as a springboard for their conversation.
Ryan and Andrew get things rolling by recommending that you listen to the StoveBench episode of the BPL Pod, read the StoveBench article on the website, or (preferably) both.
After that they spend some time laying the groundwork for stove comparisons: how they define the category, how they judge stove performance, and how they went about testing those performance considerations.
The last half of the pod is a convo covering a few of the stoves that stood out in the gear guide (good and bad!). As the episode unfolds, Ryan shares his thoughts on how design features affect performance, and Andrew gets into cost considerations. The guys wrap the episode with the champs: the two stoves that stood out in nearly every test. Spoiler alert: they aren’t the lightest.
We put the stoves through their paces. Not all of them survived unscathed.
All our stoves were special, but one one of them had to get the rose!
What stood out? We break it down for you (and discuss design considerations along the way). Â For an entirely comprehensive look at the upright canister stove market, check out the gear guide.
You can contact us at podcast@backpackinglight.com, or follow us on social media –
Unseasonably cold May temperatures and a winter storm warning were too much to pass up, so we set out for an overnighter in SE Wyoming.
This May, unseasonably cold temperatures and a winter storm warning were too much to pass up, so my son Chase and I set out for an overnighter in SE Wyoming.
We hiked about 16 miles, some on trail, but much of it off-trail through snow, swamp, tussocks, and bushwhacking through aspen, pine, and fir forests.
Here’s the trip video:

My starting skin out weight, including 3+ lb of camera equipment, food, and all worn/carried items was about 25 lb (not including water, of which I didn’t usually carry any (exception: I filled up 3L of water for a dry camp after we cooked dinner by the creek).
| Shelter | Tarptent Notch (weight includes stow bag, extra stakes and guylines, silnylon canopy, and partial mesh inner tent) | 33 oz |
| Sleeping Bag | Enlightened Equipment Enigma 10 deg F, 10d, 950 fill, pad straps | 20 oz |
| Sleeping Pad | Therm-a-Rest NeoAir Uberlite | 8 oz |
| Pad Inflation Bag | Exped Schnozzel | 2 oz |
| Pillow | Hyperlight Mountain Gear Stuff Sack Pillow (with some open cell foam pieces) | 4 oz |
| Sleep Gear Compression Sack | Osprey StraightJacket Compression Sack | 3 oz |
| Insulating Jacket | Enlightened Equipment Torrid Apex Jacket (Mens) | 8 oz |
| Rain Jacket | Arc’teryx Zeta FL Rain Jacket | 7 oz |
| Rain Pants | ZPacks Challenger (old model, now replaced by ZPacks Vertice Rain Pants which are even better!) | 4 oz |
| Base Layer Top | Smartwool PhD Light Hoodie | 7 oz |
| Base Layer Bottoms / Trekking Pants | REI Winter Running Tights (discontinued model) | 9 oz |
| Wind Shirt | Patagonia Houdini Air Windshirt (Men’s) | 4 oz |
| Active Insulation | Patagonia Nano-Air Light Hybrid Vest (Men’s) | 5 oz |
| Trekking Socks | Darn Tought HIker Boot Socks | 3 oz |
| Oversocks | Rocky Gore-Tex Oversocks | 2 oz |
| Shoes | La-Sportiva Akyra Trail-Running Shoes | 27 oz |
| Gaiters | Outdoor Research Rocky Mountain High Gaiters | 6 oz |
| Gloves | Black Diamond Lightweight Screentap Gloves | 2 oz |
| Mitten Shells | REI Minimalist Waterproof Mittens (Discontinued) | 2 oz |
| Hat | Smartwool NTS Merino 150 Beanie | 0.6 oz |
| Stove | MSR PocketRocket Deluxe | 3 oz |
| Pot | MSR Titan Kettle | 4 oz |
| Spoon | MSR Folding Spoon | 0.3 oz |
| Satellite Communicator | Garmin inReach Mini | 3.5 oz |
| Fitness / GPS Watch | Garmin Fenix 5X+ | 3 oz |
| Trekking Poles | Black Diamond Alpine Carbon Cork Trekking Poles | 17 oz |
| Camera Gear | GoPro HERO7 Black, mic adapter, external mic, tripod, extra batteries, lens pen, Lume Cube Air Lights (2), and some iPhone accessories (Moment tele lens / ND filter for B-roll shot between 32:43 and 34:17 in the video) | 48 oz |
| Weather Station | Two Kestrel Drop loggers (one for inside the tent, one for outside), Kestrel 5500 Weather Meter meter with Kestrel 5000-Series Elite Wind Vane, small tripod, some notetaking supplies, extra batteries | 10 oz |
| Phone / GPS / etc. | iPhone XS in a Moment Case, 10000 mAh battery bank. Apps I use in the backcountry: Gaia GPS App, Kindle, Filmic Pro, Notes | 16 oz |
| Sunglasses | Smith Challis Photochromic | 2 oz |
| Saw | Suluk46 Uki Saw | 4.5 oz |
| Water Treatment | Katadyn BeFree Collapsible 20oz Water Bottle | 3 oz |
| Extra Water Bottle | Hydrapack Seeker 3L Collapsible Water Container | 2.5 oz |
| Headlamp | Fenix HM50R Rechargable Headlamp | 2.2 oz |
| Dinner | Good-to-Go New England Corn Chowder (with Bonito!) | 7 oz |
| Breakfast | Good-to-Go Oatmeal | 4 oz |
| Favorite trail food | Patagonia Provisions Wild Smoked Salmon Filet | 7 oz |
Overall, in spite of gear glitches here and there, I had a really wonderful time on this trip.
We saw pushed hard enough, but not to the point of suffering.
The weather was chilly but I remained comfortable 95% of the time.
Sitting by the fire made me really, really happy. So did not running into any hormonally-charged moose.
The bird life we saw was remarkable – herons, ospreys, falcons, and a dozen different songbirds.
Nature is restorative and healing and I cannot imagine experiencing it like this on a regular basis.
Spending time with Chase out in the wilds is a rare treat that I’ll always cherish. We started Backpackinglight.com when Chase was two years old. He turns 21 at the end of this month. Every trip I take with him, I ask: is this the last one? Huge thanks to my wife, Stephanie, for encouraging us to go.
Updated September 15, 2018
The purpose of this article is to compare (review) the design and performance of the Helinox Chair Zero and the REI Flexlite Air Chair.
The purpose of this article is to review the Helinox Chair Zero to the REI Flexlite Air Chair and see if there are any meaningful differences.
The Helinox Chair Zero is probably the most beloved lightweight camping chair among hikers who pay attention to the weight of their kit.
The reason for this is that when it was introduced, it was the lightest “real” chair on the market. At just over a pound, it still offered all of the benefits and features of a comfortable chair, including an off-the-ground seat, a suspended seat that cradled your back and hips, a supportive backrest, and enough height so that your feet settled on the ground well below your hips.
Biomechanically, these are the key ingredients to relieving strain from the musculoskeletal system in a way that promotes, rather than hinders, restful recovery after hiking all day. (Chairs for backpacking should be designed with similar features as chairs for long-distance driving, with the goal of reducing biomechanical stress; unlike office chairs, where the goal is to foster a healthy posture with core activation).
While a backpacking chair isn’t commonly carried by thru-hikers or fastpackers who spend little time “camping” on their hikes, it’s becoming less and less of a luxury item now that chair weights are decreasing, and more options hit the market.
The REI Flexlite Air Chair is new for 2019. It’s made with lighter materials and is a slightly more compact design than the original REI Flexlite Chair. The latter chair weighs 12 oz more than the Flexlite Air, and is a little more stable under heavier loads.
The following video review presents a quick whiteboard class on chair design and compares the Helinox Chair Zero to the REI Flexlite Air Chair.

| Helinox Chair Zero | REI Flexlite Air Chair | |
| Weight (Claimed) | 1 lb | 1 lb |
| Weight (Measured)* | 17.7 oz | 15.8 oz |
| Pole / Hub Set Weight | 12.8 oz | 13.1 oz |
| Weight Capacity | 265 lb | 250 lb |
| Seat Weight | 4.9 oz | 2.7 oz |
| Seat Height | 11 in | 11 in |
| Leg Angle | 10 degrees | 20 degrees |
| Back Angle | 60 degrees | 60 degrees |
| Back Height | 24.5 in | 23.75 in |
| Folded Size (measured) | 13.5 in (L) x 4 in (dia) | 13.5 in (L) x 4.5 in (dia) |
| MSRP ($USD) | $119.95 | $99.95 |
* Measured weights do not include the included stow bags for each chair – only the pole/hub set, and fabric seat.
Weight Capacity:
Leg Angle:
Back Height:
Folded Size:
I recommend both of these chairs. They are well-constructed, durable, and the lightest of their kind on the market.
To save additional weight, you have to give up four-leg stability and/or ground clearance (e.g., the Alite Mayfly), use a chair without a supportive, cradling seat (e.g., the Trail Chair), use a chair without a supportive backrest (e.g., a bear canister or stool), or just sit on a little piece of foam (which really only serves to keep your butt dry and clean, offer no biomechanical advantages whatsoever).

 Doug is putting together a more comprehensive camp chair review that will be published in the coming months – stay tuned!
This type of design – four legs, off-the-ground seat, and a backrest – should be the gold standard for backpacking chair comfort. However, there is an opportunity for improvement, weight savings, and innovation. Expectedly, these advances would come from the cottage community rather than mass-market manufacturers such as REI or Helinox:
Updated September 15, 2018
In this episode, we talk about StoveBench: Backpacking Light’s new protocol for standardizing stove performance comparisons.
Today’s episode is a TECH SHORT. In this episode, we talk about StoveBench: Backpacking Light’s new protocol for standardizing stove performance comparisons.
We just published our huge Upright Canister Stove Gear Guide, in which we evaluated over thirty different backpacking stoves, eventually putting 17 through a variety of StoveBench tests. In light of that article we wanted to take a few minutes to more fully explain StoveBench.
In developing StoveBench, Ryan’s goal was to create a protocol capable of producing replicable results from home testing spaces all over the world.
Ryan begins the episode by explaining two important metrics: power and efficiency. Andrew gives a little backstory on why it was necessary to create StoveBench, and Ryan explains the protocol’s nuts and bolts.
After that the guys run through a few of the frequently asked questions surrounding StoveBench.
Ryan and Andrew introduce today’s topic: The StoveBench Protocol.
The StoveBench protocol is an effort to decrease variables and increase accurate testing results when measuring the performance of backpacking stoves.
Click here to read the StoveBench protocol for yourself. Make sure to read the forum as well! Also, make sure you are subscribed to the pod so you don’t miss our long Canister Stove episode, coming soon! Finally, be sure to check out our Canister Stove Gear Guide. It’s huge!
You can contact us at podcast@backpackinglight.com, or follow us on social media –
The Sawyer Micro Squeeze combines the flow-rate of the Sawyer Squeeze with the weight savings of the Sawyer MINI.

The Sawyer Micro Squeeze is the latest in Sawyer’s ongoing line of palm-sized hollow-fiber water filters. In theory, the Micro combines the flow-rate of the Sawyer Squeeze with the weight savings of the Sawyer MINI. Like its older brothers, the Micro is versatile and easily connected to any 28mm water bottles, including, of course, the beloved Smartwater Bottle. That being said, this review is not a head-to-head comparison of the three available Sawyer filters. It might be more useful to backpackers looking to cross over from chemical or ultra-violet treatment than it will be to users trying to decide if they should upgrade their current Sawyer filter.
Hollow-fiber filters utilize a bundle of miniscule tubes (think tiny, tiny straws) all bunched together into a matrix. The tube walls are pocked with microscopic pores: holes large enough for water to pass through, but not bacteria, cysts, or protozoa. Note that viruses are not included in this list: to take care of those, you want a purifier as opposed to a filter. In most filter systems the pore size is .1 or .2 microns.
Hollow-fiber filters offer a wonderful weight-to-performance ratio – at least at first. They are prone to clogging over the lifetime of the filter, and their performance can sometimes decrease precipitously from out-of-the-box peak flow rates, even after backflushing (methods of backflushing differ from product to product).
Lots of chemical treatment or ultraviolet uses have a story about choking down gritty, possibly tadpole-filled water. On the other hand, lots of filter users have stories about irreversibly clogged filters. In general, when using a hollow-fiber filter, it’s best to find the clearest, most sediment-free water possible.
One downside inherent in most hollow-fiber systems is this – you have to keep them above freezing. Some amount of water is more-or-less always trapped inside a hollow-fiber filter. When that water freezes, the resulting ice crystals can tear larger holes in the membrane. All sorts of things you definitely don’t want living in your lower intestines can then freely pass through these larger pores.
There’s a wide range of filters available on the market, from the 2 oz Sawyer MINI to the 16 oz, pump utilizing MSR MiniWorks Ex. We’ll consider the Sawyer Micro (and compare it to other filters) within the following framework: it belongs to a family of compact, sub-6 oz filters that utilizes .2 micron or less hollow fibers to filter a liter of water in three minutes or under using a squeezing method to force the water through the filter.


This section will be divided into multiple parts, with each part corresponding to a step in the process of filtering water with the Sawyer Micro Squeeze.

The Micro comes with a collapsable 32 oz squeeze bag which serves as the primary dirty water reservoir. Bags of this type are easily filled in flowing water but are troublesome in still water – particularly if the water is shallow. Luckily my water source for this test was a swiftly flowing creek. The water was lightly sedimented but mostly clear when held up to the light. My bag filled in a matter of seconds, and I was able to hold one corner in such a way as to prevent my hands from getting wet (the ambient temperature was 36 F).

After filling the bag, it is simple to attach the filter, flip the whole thing over, and begin squeezing into a clean water reservoir. I found attaching the filter to a Smartwater bottle to be only fractionally less easy than attaching to the squeeze bag.
Sawyer makes a point of telling you not to squeeze too hard – the warnings are all over the packaging and the website. I can see why. It’s very tempting to squeeze as hard as you can thinking that increased force will increase flow rate. Not so. After playing around with pressure I found a steady, even pressure to be the best option.
Squeezing the bag in this way was simple. As the amount of water in the bag decreases you have to adjust your hands and the bag in order to keep the pressure on. If the water is cold, your hands will be cold as well.
It takes a little practice to get the technique down, especially because you should not wring or twist the bag. Sawyer squeeze bags have a long history of failure, partly because of misuse and partly because it’s difficult to make a lightweight product that stands up to repeated, daily hydraulic pressure.
Sawyer re-designed the bags for the Micro – they are lighter and more flexible than the originals. However, it’s still possible to find examples of the new bags rupturing. Sawyer recommends careful attention to cleaning and maintenance of the filter to prevent undue pressure (see the Backflushing section, below).
In any case, the spotty nature of squeeze bag longevity is what leads many backpackers to use Smartwater bottles as a dirty water reservoir. While you can squeeze short bursts at a time into your mouth fairly easily (or use inline with a hydration bladder) using a Smartwater bottle as reservoir for filtering multiple liters of water is a little more difficult.

To see what I mean, let’s examine the data from my initial “First Looks” flow rate testing.
Here’s the chart from my initial round of testing, in which I used the included 32 oz squeeze bag to fill a 1L Smartwater bottle to just below cap level. My Micro was brand new and was used five times with tap water prior to this test (in the packaging material Sawyer says that the first few uses will be slower because of a dry filter).
SAWYER MICRO SQUEEZE TEST – WITH POUCH
| TEST # | Time to Filter 1L (M:SS) |
| 1 | 1:30 |
| 2 | 1:40 |
| 3 | 1:29 |
| 4 | 1:44 |
| 5 | 1:49 |
Here’s a similar test, using a 1L Smartwater bottle as the dirty water reservoir instead of the included pouch.
SAWYER MICRO SQUEEZE TEST – WITH BOTTLE
| TEST # | Time to Filter 1L (M:SS) |
| 1 | 2:51 |
| 2 | 2:24 |
| 3 | 2:44 |
| 4 | 3:12 |
| 5 | 3:00 |
And for comparison purposes, here’s data from an MSR TrailShot filter from the same water source on the same day. The TrailShot was lightly used and well-cleaned before this test.
MSR TRAILSHOT TEST
| TEST # | Time to Filter 1L (M:SS) |
| 1 | 2:47 |
| 2 | 2:45 |
| 3 | 2:50 |
| 4 | 2:44 |
| 5 | 2:55 |
 Before we go any further, some caveats.
In my tests, using the 32 oz squeeze bag was close to a minute faster per-liter than using a Smartwater bottle. The reason is this: After squeezing about a quarter of the water from the bottle, the bottle deforms and it becomes difficult to exert enough pressure to keep a steady flow going. The only solution is to flip the bottle over, unscrew the filter enough to allow air to flow into the bottle and restore pressure, re-screw the filter, flip back over, and continue filtering. Repeating this process two-to-three times per liter of water is what accounts for the increased time when filtering with a Smartwater bottle. In short – I’d opt for the squeeze bag over a bottle any day. But, if the squeeze bag breaks, you may not have a choice.
All filters clog. Backflushing is a necessary facet of successful filter use, and the ease with which the process happens in the field is a major performance consideration. The Sawyer Micro not only comes with a kind of plunger for high-pressure at-home backflushing but also an adaptor ring that allows you to backflush in the field using a water reservoir. This is handy, light, and easy – provided you don’t lose the ring.

I can say this: The Micro is light, the Micro is cheap, and the Micro seems to work well enough, at least for shorter trips and particularly when using the included squeeze bag. Watch out for cold hands, and be careful with the bag. Backflush regularly – maybe even once a day while in the field, more if your water sources are bad.
Anecdotal evidence from our forum seems to suggest that the classic Squeeze has a better flow rate than the Micro.
I’m worried that Micro’s filter isn’t replaceable. If it did happen to freeze or become irredeemably clogged, I’d rather just replace a filter than a whole piece of gear. That being said, a replacement filter for the TrailShot is more expensive than buying the Micro all over again.
I like Sawyer’s pressured backflushing system more than the “just shake it” system some other brands offer – but again I have no hard evidence that it is any better. It just seems like it would be.
Which brings me to my final point: writing this review made Ryan Jordan and I decide that BPL needs a FilterBench Protocol similar to our recent StoveBench Protocol. Only then can the performance metrics of the category (flow rate, resistance to clogging, resistance to failure when frozen, ability to clean when it is clogged) be fairly judged. At the very least a sort of FilterBench Lite test is in order, wherein brand new Squeeze, MINI, and Micro filters are pitted head-to-head under a variety of stressors.
Until then, it’s hard to definitively recommend the Sawyer Micro over any other available filters in this category (see Compared To… section below).
| PRODUCT | MSRP | Weight (oz) | Pressure type | 28mm compatibility | In-line gravity or hydration system compatibility | Filter pore size (microns) | Estimated lifespan (heavily dependent upon water quality and regular care; in L) | Replaceable filter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sawyer Micro Squeeze | $27.95 | 2 | Squeeze bag or bottle | yes | Yes | 0.1 | 378,541 | No |
| Sawyer MINI | $14.89 | 2 | Squeeze bag or bottle | yes | Yes | 0.1 | 378,541 | No |
| Sawyer Squeeze | $39.95 | 3 | Squeeze bag or bottle | Yes | Yes | 0.1 | unavailable | no |
| MSR TrailShot | $49.95 | 5 | Integrated squeeze bulb | No | No (but the MSR Trail Base system comes with an in-line filter that is essentially the Trail Shot) | 0.2 | 2,000 | yes |
| Katadyn BeFree | $44.95 | 2.3 | Squeeze bag | No (fits 43 mm) | No | 0.1 | 1,000 | yes |
The REI Quarter Dome SL 1Â is a single person, side entry, single side vestibule, double wall, mostly mesh inner, semi-freestanding tent.
The REI Quarter Dome SL 1Â is a single person, side entry, single side vestibule, double wall, mostly mesh inner, semi-freestanding tent. Its trail weight (fly, poles, inner) is only 32.3 oz (916 g) and it costs only $280, about $75 less than the category average.
The video review below provides detailed setup instructions for both inner-first and fly-first pitches. I also discuss how I camp and organize gear in a tent like this and performance in windy and humid conditions. Much of the information in the review is applicable to all tents in this category and not necessarily unique to the Quarter Dome SL 1, so users of similar tents from Big Agnes, MSR, or Nemo may find some value in it as well.

The video description at YouTube provides a timecode index.
This category of tents (single person, side-entry, single side vestibule, double wall, mostly mesh inner, semi-freestanding) has evolved significantly over the past five years.
The tents have become appreciably lighter and roomier, owed primarily to a hub-based pole set that creates a pseudo-geodesic panel framework. The primary US manufacturers include REI, Big Agnes, Nemo, and MSR.
We’ve included a comparison table below (see the Compared To… section) with ten models having a trail weight (fly, inner, and poles) of less than 3 lb. These tents have an average trail weight of 34 oz / 964 g (range is 23 oz / 652 g to 48 oz / 1361 g) and an average cost of $353 (range is $280 to $450).
The REI Quarter Dome SL 1 has a trail weight of 32.3 oz (916 g) and a cost of $280, which makes it the best value of the bunch.


After using this tent in rainy and humid conditions, I found condensation management to be excellent, attributable to an ideally-located and generously-sized roof vent and steep fly walls.
I also suspected that the fly fabric was made with a low emissivity material, at least when compared to the silnylon and polyurethane (PU) coated nylon fly fabric samples in my possession. Using standardized emissivity measurement methods that use an infrared temperature sensor and an adjustable-emissivity thermal imaging camera, I was able to confirm this suspicion. However, my methods are crude, so I don’t yet have enough confidence in my data to publish comparison numbers.

Wind-resistance is very good and the tent stays quiet and stable in winds up to about 30 mph (the maximum I experienced in this tent) – assuming it’s pitched properly and tightly with all of its stakes and guylines.
A vestibule that’s roomier than most single side entry tents, four interior mesh pockets, and six hang loops gives you plenty of options to stay organized.

In the following table, the REI Quarter Dome SL 1 is compared to other similarly-sized double-wall, mostly mesh inner, semi-freestanding (i.e., no trekking pole tents), side entry tents that have a maximum trail weight (fly, inner, poles) of 48 oz (122 g). This table features US tent manufacturers only.
* Note: the Tarptent Rainbow is a hybrid single/double wall tent, but has been included here because of its similarity to other 1-person, side-entry, single-vestibule tents.
| Model | weight (fly, inner, poles, oz) | MSRP (US$) | peak height (in) | floor area (sq. ft.) | type of entry | # vestibules | vestibule area (sq. ft.) | packed size (L x W, in) | pole material |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REI Quarter Dome | 32 | $280 | 38 | 18.9 | side | 1 | 9.6 | 6 x 19 | aluminum |
| REI Quarter Dome 1 | 39 | $300 | 42 | 18.9 | side | 1 | 9.8 | 6 x 18.5 | aluminum |
| MSR Freelite 1 | 32 | $390 | 36 | 18.0 | side | 1 | 9.0 | 6 x 18 | aluminum |
| MSR Carbon Reflex 1 | 23 | $450 | 34 | 17.0 | side | 1 | 7.0 | 5 x 17 | carbon |
| MSR Hubba NX 1 | 39 | $380 | 36 | 18.0 | side | 1 | 9.0 | 6 x 18 | aluminum |
| Big Agnes Copper Spur HV UL 1 | 34 | $380 | 38 | 20.2 | side | 1 | 9.0 | 4 x 16.5 | aluminum |
| Big Agnes Manzanares HV SL1 | 48 | $300 | 38 | 20.0 | side | 1 | 9.0 | 6 x 18 | aluminum |
| Nemo Hornet Elite 1 | 24 | $450 | 39 | 21.8 | side | 1 | 6.9 | 4 x 19 | aluminum |
| Nemo Dragonfly 1 | 32 | $350 | 39 | 20.3 | side | 1 | 10.0 | 4 x 19.5 | aluminum |
| Nemo Hornet 1 | 31 | $330 | 39 | 22.3 | side | 1 | 7.3 | 4.5 x 19 | aluminum |
| Tarptent Rainbow 1 | 37 | $269 | 43 | 23.9 | side | 1 | 8.2 | 4 x 18 | aluminum |
If price and weight are plotted against each other and a linear trendline is regressed to the data, we can get a feel for the value provided in this market category:

Points above the line represent a below average value while points below the line represent an above average value. The farther away a point is from the line, the worse (or better). This makes the Big Agnes Manzanares HV UL1 and the MSR Hubba NX 1 the lowest value tents and the REI Quarter Dome SL 1 the highest value tents.
This analysis comes with a few caveats:

The REI Quarter Dome SL 1Â earns a Recommended Rating for its wind stability, condensation resistance, livability, and value.
The only thing separating it from a Highly Recommended rating is that it’s still a half pound heavier than the two lightest tents on the market in this category – the Nemo Hornet Elite 1Â and the MSR Carbon Reflex 1. However, at $170 cheaper than either of those options, the REI Quarter Dome SL 1 offers a very compelling option when it comes to its price:weight ratio.


Updated September 15, 2018
This article features upright canister stove reviews that include extensive test data in inclement conditions and market analysis.
You don’t have access to view this content.
A detailed review of the Therm-a-Rest Vesper 20F Sleeping bag over 3 seasons of use including detail commentary.

The Therm-A-Rest Vesper 20F represents another step in a growing trend: mainstream gear companies increasingly catering to the ultra-light crowd (the REI Magma Trail Quilt 30, which we’ll compare to the Vesper to later in this article, is another example of this phenomenon). The Vesper is EN/ISO safety rated for a range around 20 F (-6.7 C) with a comfort rating of 32 F (0 C). Premium materials and a no-frills but elegant design combine to form a 19 oz (539 g) down quilt that packs down small, making the Vesper a powerful tool in an ultralight sleep system.
*More on this in the Temperature Rating and Warmth section

I’ve logged more than 2,000 trail miles and nearly 200 nights in quilts of various makes and models, so I know what I like in a quilt. To me, the ideal quilt should sit at the sweet spot of minimalist design and functionality. A quilt plagued by cold spots, drafts, or lack of coverage doesn’t do anyone any favors no matter how light it is. Similarly, a quilt that has too much material or too many extra features might as well be a mummy bag.
A good quilt needs to allow for more temperature control than a mummy bag while still remaining firmly affixed to a sleeping pad. It needs to shave ounces by utilizing the most minimal amount of fabric possible while still being wide and long enough to provide coverage for a side sleeper. A well-designed quilt should retain its loft over a long period of time, be as breathable as possible while still being water and moisture resistant, and be sewn and baffled in such a way as to minimize cold spots and down migration.
Some companies design quilts to be multi-functional; manufacturing quilts that can be opened completely like blankets – allowing for more flexible temperature regulation, decreased drying time when laid flat in the sun, or even worn around camp as a poncho. These are nice features but only one of them is extremely practical: having the capacity to lay a quilt out completely flat in a patch of sunlight is massively useful in the event of a catastrophic soak, or even a run of humid nights.
As for temperature control, I personally haven’t found blanket-style footboxes to be any more efficacious than simply adjusting my head insulation or rearranging the upper part of the quilt. I’ll discuss footbox styles (and why I believe Therm-A-Rest’s approach to the Vesper to be the best option) in greater detail later in this article.
I spent many of my outdoor nights sleeping in a quilt that was designed to be used as a poncho on chilly mornings (in fact that feature was one of the reasons I bought that quilt). I quickly learned that four inches of loft is a cumbersome thing to wrap around yourself while doing camp chores or, more terrifying, cooking over the unregulated flame of an alcohol stove. So I’m fine with quilt designs focusing on functionality rather than bells and whistles.
The Vesper was my companion on every extended and short-term trip I took between July 2018 and April 2019. I spent upwards of 30 nights in the Vesper across three alpine seasons, including while at altitude, in four different shelters, and with three different sleeping pads. In short: optimal conditions for quilt testing!
A summer trip to Wyoming’s Wind River Range provided ample opportunity to put the Vesper’s DWR treatment and hydrophobic down through their paces. I followed that up with a ten-day trek through the Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness in Montana – where nighttime winds were gusty and high-altitude early fall-temperatures dropped into the low thirties.
Finally, I took the Vesper out on several multi-day late fall / winter / early spring excursions in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Overnight temperatures on these occasions sometimes dropped into the teens, and were on average closer to the mid-twenties.
I paired the Vesper with a Therm-A-Rest NeoAir UberLite (see our review here) or a Nemo Equipment Switchback (see our review here), and in the winter I used both at the same time.
My base layers were mostly Brynje wool thermo mesh t-shirt, leggings, and beanie with thick Darn Tough wool socks. Occasionally I used an Icebreaker merino wool t-shirt and Smartwool leggings.
My performance assessment of the Therm-A-Rest Vesper 20F will consist of the following considerations:

At this point, it should come as no surprise that high-end quilt and bag manufacturers are using silky, lightweight fabrics for both shell and lining. The Vesper is no exception. Therma-A-Rest utilizes a featherweight 10D Nylon RipStop fabric on both the shell and lining of the Vesper, and the result is a quilt that is a tactile pleasure to sleep in. The fabric is quiet, soft, and so thin as to be translucent in direct sunlight. The upshot is you can easily find and mitigate clumps of down if necessary, although that isn’t much of a problem with the Vesper’s baffle design.
The shell is treated with DWR, and it easily shed the mist and splashes I encountered during several intense rainstorms in the Winds. Likewise, a quick shake in the morning flung away the cold-weather condensation that collected on the surface of the quilt in the eastern Sierra Nevada. I never felt clammy, stuffy, or drafty while sleeping in this quilt – so my judgment is that Therm-A-Rest managed to balance breathability and wind/water resistance in its choice of fabric. I certainly didn’t notice any rips, tears, or runs in the fabric after sustained use, so it seems to be sturdy enough. I’d be careful with it though.

If I had one fabric gripe, it would be this: I’m a fan of dark colored fabrics on the interior of my bags to aid drying on longer trips (full disclosure: I have no measurable evidence that a black or dark fabric dries faster than light fabrics in direct sunlight. Anecdotally though … yes). By contrast, the Vesper is a light grey. This color choice also tends to show stains and smudges.

Therm-A-Rest stuffs the Vesper with 12 oz (340 g) of 900-fill Nikwax Hydrophobic RDS certified goose down. This is premium stuff (most quilts come standard at 800 or 850 fill) and likely accounts for a good chunk of the Vesper’s $379.95 price tag. The payoff is a quilt that compresses extremely well but lofts up to a thickness of around 4.5 in (11.4 cm) and boasts an impressive warmth-to-weight ratio.
“Vertical or horizontal?” – this is the eternal question. In my experience, vertical baffles mitigate the down migration that can happen over a long period of sustained use. Vertical or hybrid (horizontal on the chest and vertical on the legs) baffles are now quite common in both quilts and sleeping bags. Therm-A-Rest goes old school with the Vesper and uses a horizontal baffle system – with a twist. The horizontal baffles extend about halfway down the sides of the bag. From there, a smaller series of perimeter side baffles takes over.

Horizontal baffles were my chief concern with the Vesper’s design: I have several quilts with horizontal baffles, and all suffer from cold spots in the baffles at the head end because of down migration into the sides of the baffles. So far, Therm-A-Rest’s use of perimeter baffles seems to be working: I haven’t experienced any noticeable down migration or cold spots using the Vesper, despite the side baffles seeming slightly under-filled. Holding the Vesper up to the light reveals areas in the side baffles that seem altogether lacking in insulation. Again, I haven’t noticed any side drafts in the Vesper, so this is likely an extremely precise weight and design consideration. However, if you are the kind of person for whom the phrase “twenty percent overstuffed” holds great importance, the low fill volume in the side baffles is likely to bother you.
The horizontal baffles are 5.5 in (13.9 cm) wide. All the baffles in the quilt are box-sewn, meaning there are thin layers of mesh between the seams to prevent down migration between the chambers. This contrasts to a sewn-through style, where the liner and shell are sewn together to create a barrier. Sewn-through can create cold spots but is lighter, where as box-sewn adds material (i.e. weight) but avoids creating points of zero insulation.
I’m happy that Therm-A-Rest went with a box baffle system in the Vesper. I wonder how many ounces they could have dropped with a sewn-through design, but they were already down to 19 oz (538.6 g) so they probably figured that they had some wiggle room. Ultimately I feel it’s the right choice. As I’ve already said, the Vesper is remarkably draft free and warm. Box baffles certainly play a part in that.
Cascade Designs (parent company of Therm-A-Rest) has a well-deserved reputation for tightly constructed products. The Vesper meets these standards … for the most part. I’d say that 99% of the seams and stitching are tight, even, and well-sewn. It’s perhaps unfortunate timing that after thirty nights of use I noticed the first loose threads (only two of them) while photographing the Vesper for this review.

The extremely thin 10D Nylon probably doesn’t help either – as the thin, light fabric may not hold stitching as well as heavier fabrics. I reached out to Therm-A-Rest about this issue and was told that my sample Vesper was produced on a different manufacturing line than the consumer products which were produced later. Small manufacturing flaws are not uncommon in such cases as, according to Therm-A-Rest, “sometimes we see slightly less quality control with the sample line.” Our experience here at Backpacking Light backs this up, so we are considering the loose threads on this sample Vesper to be a non-issue.
It will be interesting to see how the stitching holds up over even longer sustained use: I plan on using the Vesper on upcoming thru-hikes of the Tahoe Rim Trail and Arizona Trail at minimum.

Out of all the design elements found in quilts, perhaps nothing has as much variation as sleeping pad connection systems. Hooks, buckles, straps, cords: everybody seems to have a different approach. I’m a fan of Therm-A-Rest’s solution – a stretchy elastic cord with a plastic toggle on either end. Therm-A-Rest calls it a SynergyLink Connector. The toggle slips through a small loop on the sides of the Vesper and then the cord feeds underneath your pad to slip through a corresponding loop on the opposite side of the quilt. The resulting tension is just enough to keep the Vesper from being drafty while still allowing for freedom of movement.

The system is simple, elegant, and versatile: there are two loops on either side of the Vesper, one high up on quilt and one about two-thirds of the way down. You can choose which loop you’d like to use based on your sleeping style.
Of course, you can also always just leave the strap at home (but why would you at 0.1 oz / 2.8 g). Therm-A-Rest seems to know that ultralighters love hacking away at extraneous bits of fabric: why else would they make it removable in the first place? This is, in fact, my only problem with the system. The SynergyLink connector is so small and so light and so easy to attach and remove that it is easily misplaced (if you leave it hooked into the Vesper it sometimes comes loose and falls to the ground when you pull the quilt out of the compression sack).

After nearly losing it several times I took to storing the SynergyLink Connector in other places: a sundries bag, inside a sleep sock, in a zippered compartment of my pack. Basically anywhere but inside the compression sack with the Vesper. In the future I might experiment with ways of permanently or semi-permanently affixing the connector to one of the loops. A small rubber band might do the trick.
The Vesper 20F is comfort rated to 32 F (0 C) and limit rated to 20 F (-6 C). These numbers are worth digging in to, as they are one of the chief reasons to choose the Vesper over a competing quilt.
Much ink has been spilled over how temperature ratings in sleeping bags aren’t standardized in the same way that, for instance, R-Value in sleeping pads is. In fact, there is a standardized system, it’s just that not every gear manufacturer chooses to rate their bags according to it.
For instance, here’s a snapshot of the temperature specs for a competing quilt, taken from the product page of REI’s website.

Now here’s a snapshot of the temperature specs for the Vesper, also taken from the REI product page.

See the difference? Both products have a temperature rating, but only the Vesper has a tested lower limit and tested comfort temperature.
This is because Therm-A-Rest has on-site cold chambers and testing facilities that conform to the EN/ISO standards. Do other manufacturers have these facilities? Sometimes … but Therm-A-Rest seems to make it a point of pride to be accurate in their temperature numbers and they go out of their way to achieve EN/ISO certification on their quilts and bags.
Additionally, Therm-A-Rest has developed a handy visual graphic to help prospective buyers hone in temperature needs even more. Here’s the one for the Vesper.

Most companies are only going to give you one number, say, 20 F (-6 C). What does this number mean? Will you be comfortable at that temperature? Shivering? Bitterly cold but not dying? It’s different for every company, and they don’t always tell you which is the case.
This is why I so appreciate Therm-A-Rest’s attempts at transparency. I found their ranges to be right on: I was comfortable in a light beanie and base layer at 30 F (-1 C) and warmer. Any colder than that and I needed to start tossing on an extra layer or two (though not much). At 20 F (-6 C) I needed the Waterbear Hood and an insulating mid-layer like a fleece or long-sleeved shirt on top of my base layer. Temperatures in the teens required a down jacket or an additional quilt for maximum comfort.
Of course, this is all subjective. Experience and sleep temperatures vary wildly from person to person. But Therm-A-Rest is as precise and open about it as possible, and that is a great thing when making an expensive purchasing decision on a major piece of gear.
Broadly speaking, you could divide quilt footbox styles into two categories: fixed and unfixed. The footboxes on the unfixed models, like the Nemo Equipment Banshee or the Jacks R Better Sierra Sniveler, cinch closed because the quilts themselves are designed to be opened all the way (blanket style) if desired. This “lay-flat” design is ideal for claustrophobic sleepers, drying out wet quilts, or (in the case of the Sniveler) wearing the quilt as a serape.
Therm-A-Rest goes with a weight saving, simpler approach: a fixed footbox. The result is a quilt that doesn’t open all the way like a blanket but also avoids the cold spots that are all but inevitable with a cinch-close footbox.
The Vesper’s footbox has an ergonomic structure designed to accommodate a back sleepers upward pointed toes without undue loft compression. Some quilt foot boxes are designed to accommodate sleeping pads in addition to hiker feet (see the Nemo Equipment Siren, read our review here) but the Vesper’s footbox is a “feet only” space.
The Vesper’s footbox is sewn with a “differential cut”, meaning the inner shell is cut in such a way as to allow the insulation to stay lofted even when pressure (from toes or ankles, for instance) is applied from inside the bag. A differential cut is valuable in preventing cold spots (particularly with horizontal baffles), and I’m happy that Therm-A-Rest chose to utilize one in the footbox of this product.


The Vesper’s draft collar is one of its best features. This narrow horizontal baffle runs along the top of the Vesper and closes from behind with a simple snap button. A bright green drawstring (with an extra large loop to accommodate gloved fingers) cinches the collar to the desired circumference. Far from being constricting, the collar is wide enough to be comfortable but lofty enough to be warm and cozy. I was shocked at how quickly I came to appreciate it.

I found the Vesper’s 75 x 58 in (191 x 147 cm) dimensions to be plenty large enough to accommodate my relentless nocturnal rotations. That being said, at 5’6, 165 lbs, I’m not the world’s broadest-shouldered backpacker. Hefty backpackers might want to go with a size long, which runs 79 x 61 in (201 x 155 cm) at the cost of an additional 2 oz (28 g). That size difference represents the limit of the customizations available for the Vesper I’m afraid. Customization is one of the benefits of the cottage industry quilt market, and if you like your sleep system precisely dialed in you might not want to go the Vesper route.

You’d be hard pressed to find a quilt of comparable warmth and weight that compresses down to a smaller size than the Vesper. In my opinion, this is one of the Vesper’s strongest selling points. When paired with an ultralight sleeping pad (like, say, the UberLite) you have a supremely warm and comfortable (for its weight) three-season sleep system that takes up a relatively small amount of space in a minimalist pack.
Personally, I’m not a fan of the four-point strap and lid style compression sack that comes with the Vesper. The sack itself is fine: perfectly sized for the quilt, well-constructed, and functional. I just find all those straps to be a little unwieldy and, well, un-elegant.

I prefer a roll-top style compression sack. But it’s very likely you couldn’t get the Vesper compressed down to such a diminutive size in a roll-top style sack, so I can live with the one that comes with the Vesper. (For what it’s worth, I haven’t tried seeing how the Vesper compresses in other styles of compression sacks … I’d love to hear what other users have accomplished).
For this comparison table, I chose quilts that weigh from 17.5 oz (496 g) to 20 oz (567 g).
| PRODUCT | WEIGHT | TEMP RATING | FILL POWER | BAFFLE ORIENTATION | HYDROPHOBIC TREATMENT | FOOTBOX DESCRIPTION | LINER AND SHELL FABRIC | PAD ATTACHMENT | SPECIAL FEATURES (draft tubes, poncho style, etc) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therm-A-Rest Vesper | 19 oz | 20 F (-7 C) | 900 | horizontal, with small periminter side baffles | Nikwax | fixed | 10D ripstop nylon | elastic pad cords | snap neck closure |
| REI Magma Trail Quilt | 19 oz | 30 F (-1 C) | 850 | hybrid vertical/horizontal | water-resistant | fixed, trapezoidal | 15D ripstop nylon | cinching pad cords | adjustable insulated draft tube, button snap neck closure |
| Sea to Summit Ember | 19 oz | 25 F (-4 C) | 750 | hybrid vertical/horizontal | Ultradry | drawcord closure | 15D nylon | four adjustable straps | can be opened like a blanket on warm nights |
| Katabatic Palisade | 17.5 oz | 30 F (-1 C) | 900 | horizontal | Hyperdry | fixed, trapezoidal | shell: Pertex Quantum ripstop .85 oz/yd2; liner: Pertex Quantum taffeta 1.0 oz/yd2 | cord clip attachment system | down collar, cord clip system attaches to top of pad rather than underneath |
| Western Mountaineering AstraLite Baffled Top Quilt | 17.5 oz | 26 F (-3 C) | 850 | horizontal | none | fixed | shell: 7D nylon; liner: 10D nylon | two flat elastic loops | elastic-laced adjustable bottom closure |
| Enlightened Equipment Enigma | 17.94 oz | 30 F (-1 C) | 850 | U-shaped | Downtek | fixed, round | 10D nylon | elastic straps and clip | snap and drawstring neck closure |
| Kammok Bobcat Trail Quilt | 20 oz | 45 F ( 7 C) | 600 | diamond shaped | Downtek | snaps and drawcord closure | Atmos 20D ripstop nylon | straps | underquilt conversion, can lay flat like a blanket |
| ZPacks Solo Quilt | 19.5 oz | 20 F (-7 C) | 900 | hybrid vertical/horizontal | none | fixed | 7D Ventum ripstop nylon | flat clip and strap | 30% overstuffed, flat clip and elastic cord neck closure |
| Nunatak Arc UL | 19.4 oz | 20 F (-7 C) | 900 | hybrid vertical/horizontal | Hyperdry optional | fixed | 10D with customizable options | standard straps (running under pad) or shockcord (running under body) optional | optional edge tension control for high draft adjustability, drawcord neck closure standard |
I want to spend a few moments comparing the Vesper to another recent addition to the quilt market: The REI Magma Trail Quilt 30. This is a worthwhile comparison because both quilts are recent offerings from long-established gear manufacturers with track records for well-considered design and strong execution. Both quilts weigh 19 oz (538.6 g) and utilize some form of hydrophobic down. Both quilts have a fixed-footbox design, an adjustable collar with a button snap closure, and hybrid style baffles (the Vesper has horizontal baffles with perimeter side baffles, while the Magma has horizontal baffles across the torso and vertical baffles down the legs). Neither quilt can be customized beyond ordering different sizes (Regular and long for the Vesper, short, regular, and long for the Magma).
So, with similar features and similar weights, which bag is warmer? As we’ve examined, this question can be tricky. The Magma has a temperature rating of 30 F (-1 C). What does this mean, exactly? Hard to say. The best we can do is turn to REI customer support, which provides this feedback on a customer question.

So using this as a reference point, we can assume that both quilts will provide similar comfort at similar temperatures. But because the Magma isn’t ISO rated (as opposed to the Vesper, see the Temperature Rating and Warmth section of this review) we don’t know.
The Magma utilizes sewn-through baffles as opposed to the Vesper’s box-baffles, and I think that has to come into play warmth-wise in some way.
One thing that is measurable is this: the compressed size of both quilts relative to their width and length. The Magma packs down to 4.75 x 13 in (12 x 33 cm) while the Vesper compresses to 5.5 x 8 in (14 x 20 cm). That’s a significant difference inside a pack. Also, it’s quite an effort to get the Magma compressed down that small (this according to our forthcoming Magma review as well as anecdotal user comments on the REI website). On the other hand, it’s a cinch to get the Vesper into its sack and compressed.
The Vesper manages this win despite being two inches wider at the shoulders and having 1.5 oz (42.5 g) more fill weight than the Magma. Therm-A-Rest likely achieved this by using 10D fabric over the Magma’s 15D and 900 fill down over the Magma’s 850 fill.
These differences show up in the price tag, however. The Vesper retails for $379.95 while the Magma goes for $299.00. At those price points, you might just be getting more quilt for your buck with the Magma.
I was lucky to be able to test this quilt in such a variety of conditions and with so many different sleep system combinations. It performed well across the entire spectrum of my test: shaking off moisture and drafts, providing flexible temperature management, and keeping me warm at night while being virtually unnoticeable in my pack during the day.
This last point is the most salient to me, and the factor that places the Vesper on the “shelf of honor” in my gear closet. What is the ultralight ethos if not the utilization of well-designed gear that is as light as possible while still being extremely functional? That is the Vesper. It does its job with just enough frills (snap collar, pad connection system) to be effective but not enough to add unneeded ounces.
A focus on premium materials and intentional design choices means you end up with a quilt that provides ample coverage for all but the largest and most restless of sleepers. In addition, the Vesper compresses down to a size that is just a little ridiculous.
The Vesper 20F is a superior product: it excels in field performance, design, and material choice. Its warmth-to-weight and warmth-to-size ratio are top of class, and it handles inclement weather as well if not better than any other down quilt or bag I’ve come across. The design is precise and the manufacturing quality is as high as you would expect from Cascade Designs (which is to say, extremely high). The loose threads on my sample Vesper are not likely to be found on the consumer runs of the product.
My minor gripes like fabric color, stuff sack type, and an easily losable pad connector pale in comparison to the Vesper’s main strengths: just how warm of a quilt Therm-A-Rest manages to squeeze into such a small and light package. I consider the Vesper to be one of the top three quilts available at the moment, and as such I believe it deserves a Highly Recommended rating.
This Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt review covers a warm-weather backpacking quilt that packs a feature rich, ultralight punch.
The Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt is a warm-weather backpacking quilt that packs a feature rich, ultralight punch.
The Siren has a silky feel, comes with a well-designed stuff sack, and boasts a lifetime warranty from Nemo. I found the pad attachment system to be a little problematic, however.

My First Look at the Nemo Equipment Siren consisted of preliminary indoor testing with an eye towards build quality, fabric appeal, down loft and consistency, and design considerations.  My limiting factor on further testing was extreme cold conditions in the Canadian Rockies at the time of writing this article (this is, after all, a warm-weather quilt).
My future trips with the Siren include a two-week excursion to one of Canada’s most remote and northern National Parks.  As such, I intensely focused on accurately judging the potential performance of the Siren. I cannot afford a gear failure on this trip; my life could depend on it.

| Quilt | MSRP | Weight | Fabric | Fill | Length | Shoulder Width | Temperature | Customizable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt | $269.95 | 19 oz (538g) | DWR 10D Nylon Micro Ripstop | 850 FP down fill | 80 in (203 cm) | 53 in (135 cm) | 45F (7C) | No |
| Enlightened Equipment Revelation Quilt | $255.00 | 15.81 oz (448 g) | 10D Nylon | 850 FP down fill | 78 in (198 cm) | 54 in (137 cm) | 40F (5C) | Yes |
| Loco Libre Gear 40° Ghost Pepper Topquilt | $283.00 | 15.7 oz (445 g) | Argon 67 | 800 FP down fill | 80 in (203 cm) | 52 in (132 cm) | 40F (5C) | Yes |
The Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt is a one-size-fits-all, one temperature rating, non-customizable product. Such limited choice is in contrast to much of the quilt market where small and cottage manufacturers still dominate (though larger manufacturers are making in-roads). In this case, the Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt is suitable for users up to 6 ft (183 cm) and for temperatures of 45F (7C).
Let’s dig into this. For a similar price as the Siren, I could get a customized quilt rated for 40F (5C) weighing in at 14.71 oz (417g) in my beloved purple color from Enlightened Equipment.
I will stop here and say this: I have a quilt from Enlightened Equipment. Though I’m fond of my quilt, I find the Enlightened Equipment build quality is not as even and regular as Nemo Equipment. There are fabric differences as well.  Even in the yellow color (which acts as a magnet for aphids in the Canadian Rockies), I prefer the feel of the Nemo Equipment 10D Ripstop to the 10D nylon fabric of my Enlightened Equipment quilt. I will also say that I am not a fan of my Enlightened Equipment stuff sack and replaced it before I even tested the quilt. Not so with the Nemo Equipment compression sack. If I stuff the Siren, it will likely be in the provided stuff sack.
My first thought when unpacking the Nemo Equipment Siren was, “This is the most intuitive compression sack I’ve ever seen straight out of the box.”
This compression sack is a design masterpiece for two reasons:

My second thought after unpacking the Siren was, “How did such a lofty quilt fit into such a small bag?” The 850 down is of premium quality and is RDS certified. I searched for feather quills and escaping down and did not feel any as I squeezed and probed the quilt top to bottom.
The 10D ripstop Nemo uses on their bags and quilts is one of my favorite outdoor fabrics; it is soft, silky, and luxurious.
Nemo Equipment imparts high build quality into every quilt or bag I have ever seen of theirs. The Siren is no exception. I couldn’t find any loose stitches or stray strands anywhere on the quilt. The Siren also features two loops at the bottom for hanging to dry, a thoughtful touch.

The Siren’s toebox is massive: 12 in deep (30.5 cm) and17 in wide (43.18 cm). Nemo calls it a  “stretch footbox”. I didn’t notice much stretch in the fabric, though it’s not entirely without stretch either. Nemo Equipment’s idea here is to make the quilt draft-less by anchoring the quilt underneath sleeping mats of all sizes.
The Siren also features two snaps and a pair of elastic drawstrings at the mouth of the quilt for anchoring both ends down to prevent drafts. I like to thrash around a bit and will likely not want to anchor it this way often, but I will test it on my upcoming trips to see if I change my mind.

This brings me to the only feature I dislike on the Siren: the cord anchoring system. The design is minimalist, ultralight, and adaptable to almost any sleep mat size. However, I’m not a big fan. The cords are light, and they catch on everything. They are not cooperative when sliding a sleeping mat inside the quilt, especially when wearing gloves and bulky layers. I ended up with cords on the bottom of the mat and top of the mat. As I crawled in and out of the quilt, I snagged the cord on my neck.
The system is great in theory and will work for some people, but it is not ideal for me. It would not be a deal breaker for me either, especially considering that this quilt is intended for warm-weather and wearing gloves while using the cords will not always be a given.
Though I prefer Enlightened Equipment’s stretch straps and buckle anchoring system by far, I also recognize it is more bulky and heavy than Nemo Equipment’s cord system. There are some positives to Nemo’s approach: the cord is reflective and has free-flowing anchor eyelets, allowing the cords to tighten without a hitch once they are in the correct place.

One thing I have always appreciated about Nemo Equipment is their attention to small details. With the Siren that attention manifests itself in the superior fabric quality, excellent stuff sack design, and thoughtful drying loops. While I think the pad attachment system could use some work, overall, I am excited to use the Nemo Equipment Siren Quilt in the 2019 season.
The Hyperlite Mountain Gear Dirigo 2 is a two-person, hybrid single/double wall, two-vestibule Dyneema Composite Fabrics (DCF) tent that can be pitched with two trekking poles. This review assesses wind loading, snow loading, rain, condensation resistance, ease of setup, livability.
You don’t have access to view this content.
On the leading edge of the last bomb cyclone storm cycle that hit the Rockies and Midwest this spring (April 2019), I was hoping to get in a quick 24-hour trip up in the high country of Wyoming’s Snowy Range.
On the leading edge of the last bomb cyclone storm cycle that hit the Rockies and Midwest this spring (April 2019), I was hoping to get in a quick 24-hour trip up in the high country of Wyoming’s Snowy Range.

Apparently, the pressure bars compressed a little bit more than what was predicted, and I faced some breezy conditions that were a little more than what my ultralight shelter system could handle, so I retreated in the middle of the night.
Enjoy the video:

Route:
Weather:
Instrumentation:
Gear Notes:
Lessons Learned:


The Timmermade Waterbear Hood is a cottage-crafted down sleeping hood with a twist – a Climashield tunnel for warming the air around your face on extra-cold nights. I used the Waterbear Hood on a frigid eastern Sierra late-winter trip. It kept me cozy in my quilt while providing flexible options for warmth in variable shoulder-season conditions.
Let’s compare the Waterbear to two popular offerings on the market: ZPack’s Goose Hood and Katabatic’s Crestone Hood.
| Product | Timmermade Waterbear Hood | Zpacks Ultralight Goose Hood | Katabatic Gear Crestone Hood |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 3.1 oz (87.9 g) | 1.3 oz (37 g) | 2.2 oz (62.4 g) |
| Fill | 800 FP duck down | 850 FP goose down | 850 FP goose down |
| Material | 10D Argon 67 ripstop nylon (.67 oz/yd) | 7D Ventum ripstop nylon (.59 oz/yd) | Shell: Pertex Quantum ripstop nylon (.9oz/yd). Liner: Pertex Quantum taffeta (1.0oz/yd) |
| Unique Features | Adjustable Climashield tunnel | Shell is treated with C6 DWR | Removable underarm straps |
| Made in... | USA | USA (outsourced to GooseFeetGear) | USA |
| MSRP | $98.00 | $65.00 | $85.00 |
All three hoods utilize premium lightweight fabric shells, comparable downs, and similar styles (a crescent-shaped cut around the neck and drawstring feature around the face)

The Waterbear’s addition of the Climashield tunnel adds about a quarter of an ounce. The rest of the weight difference is due to the Waterbear’s box baffles and 2.5 in loft (other, less lofty Waterbear models might be a more accurate comparison, but this is the model I had to test). The tunnel is the feature that most separates the Waterbear from other down hoods, other than that it performs as you would expect any down hood to perform. The Waterbear is slightly more expensive than the Goose Hood and Crestone Hood. The cost is likely a reflection of the size of the Timmermade operation.

Dan Timmerman dreamed up the Waterbear because he hated breathing frigid air, even in moderately cold temperatures. By enclosing synthetic Climashield insulation in a fine mesh and attaching that insulation to the opening of a standard down hood design, Dan created an extremely versatile system that pairs the warmth and compressibility of down with the moisture resistance of synthetic. By drawing the Climashield tunnel partly or entirely closed, you can create a pocket of warmth around your face that prevents you from inhaling frosty air but still allows for air exchange. The Climashield handles the moisture from your breath exceptionally well, while the down around your head, neck, and ears is as toasty warm as expected.
I used the Waterbear on a three-night trip where overnight temperatures dropped into the teens (I paired the hood with a 20F down quilt, the Nemo Switchback, and the Therm-A-Rest UberLite). I slept in Brynje wool mesh base layers, wool socks, and a cheap off-brand synthetic-blend sweater.
I was skeptical at first: I’m sensitive to things around my face, particularly as I’m trying to sleep. Sometimes even a standard down hood is too much for me, and I tend to prefer a beanie/Buff combo for quilt sleeping. So I had some hesitation going into this test.
It turns out my fears were unfounded. By night two I was mostly used to the enclosure around my face. By night three I was relishing the warmth and flexibility the system provided. I generally started with the Climashield tunnel completely open and cinched it progressively tighter as temperatures dropped through the course of the evening. By early morning I was breathing warm air through a completely cinched tunnel of synthetic insulation and mesh (this has the unintended but welcome side-effect of blocking out a little bit of light, should you decide to sleep later than the sun). While I occasionally found the system to be a tad claustrophobic, the added warmth was worth it for the most part. Many ultralighters find down hoods to be too warm, even with quilts, and prefer some combo of hat/buff/balaclava/hooded insulation layer. If you are one of these people, you aren’t going to want or need the Waterbear.

As much as none of us would like to admit we degrade the loft of our down bags and quilts by pulling them over our heads and breathing into them, sometimes it happens. I know I’m occasionally guilty of it, especially on frigid mornings. The Waterbear hood eliminates the temptation. One thing to note: if you decide not to use the Climashield tunnel at all, remember to tuck it back into the hood; otherwise it will fall into your face when side-sleeping.
The system has all the versatility you’d expect from a down hood: you can wear it around camp or on breaks, and it’s excellent for restless sleepers. It compresses well (as you’d expect from a primarily down product) and fits easily into a quilt stuff sack or anywhere else you want to store it. Some users might find the nylon a little loud around the ears while tossing and turning, but anyone already accustomed to sleeping in a down hood won’t be bothered.
I’m bald, so I had a lot of skin-to-fabric contact while wearing the Waterbear. The premium materials used in the construction feel soft and silky against the skin. The stitches are even, tight, and rock solid. The internal seam running the length of the hood is unobtrusive: it never bothered me while trying to sleep.

The Waterbear Hood has all the hallmarks of an excellent cottage industry product: a smart and field tested design paired with loving execution, ultralight materials, and customizable options. Timmermade also sells a fully synthetic version that weighs in at 2.1 oz (28.3 g) that may be more interesting to warm sleepers.
It may be a few ounces heavier and a few dollars more expensive than traditional down hoods, but cold sleepers, some shoulder-season and winter quilt users, and down hood aficionados will appreciate the ingenuity, versatility, and comfort the Waterbear Hood brings to a cold-weather sleep system.
My intention was to link the most active volcanoes of the island. I would travel 410 miles on my fat bike, carrying all of my own food and gear, combining mountaineering and fat biking in the traverse.
This article provides accompanying information to my film volcanofatbike, which documents my attempt to cross Iceland by fatbike.

First of all, let me introduce myself a Little, I’m Gerard Anton (b. 1984) a dentist from Barcelona, I love mountains, outdoor sports, photography, travel, and adventure.
My backpacking background is:
I started participating in adventure races in 2002 and I’ve been competing in mountain sports since then as well. In 2014 it first time in Iceland. I hiked the Laugavegur trail and I fell in love with the country. I knew I had to come back to do something more than a hike, so I researched quicker, but still lightweight alternatives to backpacking and began purchasing gear for this next adventure.
I noticed my first fat bike in Spain in 2013. I had never tried one but thought that their ability to navigate in snow was an advantage for some expeditions, and in particular, I had Iceland in mind. Iceland has some of the biggest glaciers on the European continent, including the Vatnajökull (Europe’s second largest glacier, only behind the Svalbard Glacier). It is often crossed by 4×4 off-road vehicles and skiers with pulks training for polar expeditions. So why not follow their tracks via fatbike?
My intention was to link the most active volcanoes of the island. I would travel 410 miles on my fat bike, carrying all of my own food and gear, combining mountaineering and fat biking in the traverse. The first difficulty that I found was the lack of information on the glacier crossings and mountain weather in these regions. It seems that not many locals travel that deep into the mountains of the region.
I arrived in Reykjavik on July 15th. As I stepped into the airport I saw a television showing closed roads and blizzard conditions in the mountains. I asked some people in Reykjavik, and 2015 had been one of the coldest year of the last century. I started the route in a black sand beach near Skogafoss, on the southern side of the island. There is a crashed Super Douglas DC3 US army plane near that location. The crew all survived the impact, but the plane was abandoned rather than recovered, meaning the weather-beaten remains are still standing at the crash site.

The early miles of the trek are relatively easy until Skogafoss. From there I had to push my bike up a hill, gaining 3950 ft (1200 m). It took the whole day. The snow did not take long to appear as once I passed 2000 ft (600 m), I saw it for the first time of the expedition. It was wet and heavy snow, formed by a light mist and warm temperatures, that made pedaling nearly impossible. I spend the rest of the day pushing my fat bike up to the pass between the Eyafjallajökull and Katla Volcanoes.
My first goal is Eyafjallajökull (5465 ft; 1666m), the famous Icelandic volcano that last erupted in 2010 put European flights out of their regular flight patterns for 20 days. I camped in snow, but with good weather. Early in the morning, I took my mountaineering gear and began the trek to the summit. There was little visibility due to snow and wind, so I navigated with the GPS trying to avoid seracs and crevasses. Part way up, I realized that snow is covering my footsteps and that I will need to follow my GPS route to return back base camp. After two hours, I nearly reach the summit but was blocked by a large serac that surrounded the entire summit. Just 50m remaining until the summit but I had to go back. I’m not carrying ice climbing axes and crampons, and the serac provided too much of a hazard. As I was going alone, I had to know when to bow to the elements; it is important to know when to say no.

After that, I attempted to climb the Katla Volcano. This one is 11.8 mi (19 km) east of my camp. On my way to Katla’s summit approach, I found a hut with a ranger. Because of the large number of crevasses, he tells me that it is not possible to safely summit alone. Plus, the last two people to attempt Katla in 2012 had to be rescued by helicopter. I decided that it is wiser listen to the ranger and not to tempt fate, so I followed the route back to camp, this time going down to Thórsmörk, and then to Landmannalaugar. This part of the trail is supposed to be very difficult: there is a pass with fixed ropes and some cliffs. I had to be very careful in some sections. The people that I met here were completely shocked to see me with my fat bike in this terrain!

Once in I arrived in Thórsmörk, I spent the night there. The next day I reached Askja Lake, which was covered by wet, heavy snow which forced me to spend thrice the amount of time I expected on this portion of the expedition as I had to push my bike. At times the conditions forced me to take my gear off the bike, push the bike up, and return for the rest of my gear. These tough conditions, combined with two days of rain and snow, resulted in my gear getting wet and I had no opportunities arise to dry my gear nor to recharge the batteries for my Garmin inReach and my camera via a solar panel.
En route to Landmannalaugar, I fell off my bike and lost my sunglasses. Sunglasses are an important piece of gear in a snow landscape as snow blindness is a hazard. I was forced to improvise: I wore my tubular balaclava covering my eyes – as the fabric was thin, I was able to see through it.
Although I was moving slower than I would have liked, I reached the foot of the Katla Volcano. It is one of the most active volcanoes in Europe, erupting every seven to ten years, although since the last eruption was in 1999, it is due to erupt in the near future. The Katla Volcano (4960 ft / 1512 m) is not a technical climb and the primary concerns for those attempting it are those typical of any trek in high alpine terrain. It took me approximately two and a half hours to climb. Due to heavy cloud cover, it may not have been the best day to climb the peak, but I finally did reach the summit.
After two more days of travel, I arrived at the foot of the Vatnajökull Glacier. During peak season, the base camp at the glacier’s foot is usually full of activity, but the winter conditions have made it so it is empty. Also at the basecamp is an Iceland Safe Travel Agent, who, upon listening to my plan tells me that it isn’t possible to cross the glacier due to the high volume of snow and the heavy, wet quality of the snow. It would not be crossable until August. This seemed like the worst news I could hear at this point in the expedition. This was my goal, and I was being forced to rethink my plans.
What could I do now? I could go home, but I had been planning this trip for eight months and I did not want to go home without fulfilling my goal. I decided that to accomplish as much as possible, I should go to the southeast and attempt the highest mountain in Iceland, Oreafajökull (6923 ft / 2110 m). Beginning this leg of the journey was hard – not physically, but mentally. I could not complete my original goal, so the best I could do was to reach the last of the volcanoes I had originally planned to climb via a different route.

After two days of pedaling, I reached the foot of Oraefajökull. The weather was ugly and it was not the best day to attempt to reach the summit. I am on an adventure though, so I hid my bike and began climbing the 2100 meters to the summit. It was long and tough, lacking a path, and covered in snow. After four hours, and walking around two crevasses I had reached the summit.
I returned to my fat bike and cycled for two days in a headwind until I came to Reykjavik. Looking back at this journey after two years, I find that I have learned a lot about backpacking. Sometimes in your life, you win and sometimes in life you learn. In Iceland, I learned a lot. Vatnajökull lies there, calling me; perhaps I will try to cross it again (maybe in August).

The most important thing in making adventure backpacking successful is preparation. You must go light. But instead of throwing out gear and getting the lightest gear, it is best to jettison the gear that is inessential and not useful. The weather in Iceland is tough, windy, and rainy nearly every day, making durable and warm gear essential, even when trying to stay lightweight.
| Item | Description | Weight | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tent | Vaude Hogan UL Argon 1-2P | 3.28 lb (1.49 kg) | My lighter, Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo Tent is not tough enough for the Icelandic wind. This item represents a balance between being lightweight and tough. |
| Fat Bike | Surly Ice Cream Truck | 35.3 lb (16 kg) | A super heavy, iron bike, but it is nearly indestructible. Reliability of this equipment was for me, a higher premium than weight. |
| Backpack | Overboard Water Proof Pro Sports 20L | 1 lb 10 oz (760 g) | Waterproof. |
| 2 Orlieb Roller City Bikepacks | 3.35 lb (1.52 kg) | Waterproof. | |
| Vide Equipment | GoPro Hero 4, Nikon a7100, Tamron 18-50 f2.8 lense | 3.35 lb (1.52 kg) | |
| Cook Kit | Vargo 750 ti pot, Vargo Titanium Foldable Spork, China Titanium Stove | 6.7 oz (191 g) | I love this combination. |
| Jackets | Outdoor Research Gortex Jacket | 1 lb 7 oz (650 g) | |
| Salomon Bonatti Jacket | 4.6 oz (130 g) | ||
| Trangoworld TRX2 850 Down Jacket | 1 lb 5 oz (590 g) | ||
| Sunglasses | Adidas Evil Eye Sunglasses | 0.9 oz (26 g) | |
| Sleeping Bag | Mountain Hardware Phantom 32 | 1 lbs 6 oz (629 g) | I am considering lighter options, such as a quilt for future expeditions |
| Sleeping Pad | Camp Essential Light Mat | 11.1 oz (315 g) | I will be changing my pad in the future due to back problems. On more recent trips I have been using the Thermasrest NeoAir xLite. |
| Long Underwear | Merino Wool Long Underwear | 14.8 oz (420 g) | This is the best warmth to weight ration I have found for use during the night. |
| Phone | IPhone 4S | 3.9 oz (112 g) | |
| Shoes | Teva Sandals | 10.2 oz (290 g) | For river crossings. |
| Ice Axe | Petzel Snowwalker | 14.6 oz (415 g) | |
| Crampons | Salewa Alpinist Aluminum | 1 lb 8 oz (680 g) | |
| Mountain Boots | Millet Supertrident GTX | 1 lb 3 oz (550 g) | Work well with the crampons. |
| GPS | Suunto Ambit Peak 3 | 3 oz (86 g) | |
| Garmin Etrex 20 | 5 oz (141 g) | ||
| Solar Panel | Goal Zero Nomad 7 | 1 lb (460 g) | Used to charge GoPro and InReach systems. |
| Emergency Communications Device | Delorme InReach SE | 6.7 oz (189 g) | |
| Trekking Shirt | Helly Hansen | ||
| Bike Repair Kit | various tools and replacement items | 10.4 oz (295 g) | |
| First Aid Kit | Adventure Medical Kits .5 | 3.7 oz (105 g) | |
| Water Treatment | Saywer Squeeze | 3 oz (86 g) |
I have been to Iceland four additional times since this expedition and I would share the following tips to those who are planning a trip:
The Tarptent Aeon Li is one of the lightest solo (1-person) backpacking tents available. Made with Dyneema Composite Fabrics (DCF), the Aeon is a single-wall design featuring a zippered side-entry with a vestibule. The Aeon requires 4-7 stakes and is pitched with a single trekking pole.
The Tarptent Aeon Li is one of the lightest solo (1-person) ultralight backpacking tents available. Made with Dyneema Composite Fabrics (DCF), the Aeon is a single-wall design featuring a zippered side-entry with a vestibule. The Aeon requires 4-7 stakes and is pitched with a single trekking pole.

See my review of the Tarptent Notch Li, which discusses some of the features that the Notch Li has in common with the Tarptent Aeon Li, including PitchLoc corners, Dyneema Composite Fabrics, and magnetic door closure tabs.
The following video provides an in-depth analysis of the Tarptent Aeon Li:
(note: due to some wind noise, keep your finger on your volume control if needed so you can hear the narration during wind gusts):




What’s Unique about the Tarptent Aeon Li?
The market for lightweight solo tents weighing less than two pounds is quite crowded, comprised of dozens of both single- and double-wall designs from both cottage and larger manufacturers.
While it’s tempting to use the metric of weight for delineating product categories, it’s probably more appropriate to look at functional metrics when comparing products to each other.
In that context, these features characterize the Tarptent Aeon Li:
These features allow us to narrow the product category and  excludes shelters requiring shock-corded pole sets, 2+ person capacity shelters, and floorless shelters such as tarps and pyramids.
Other important criteria include:
That leaves a limited number of shelters meeting these functional criteria, with the most obvious competitor being the ZPacks Plexamid.
So what makes the Tarptent Aeon Li unique among this field of competitors?
1. Carbon fiber support struts.
The two back corners of the tent are each supported by two carbon fiber struts in an inverted-V configuration (Tarptent calls this a “PitchLoc” corner). A third (vertical) strut along the midpoint of the back wall, combined with the PitchLoc corners, help create a vertical wall along the back of the tent.

The presence of the struts creates the effect of a raised canopy, thus minimizing the chance that your sleeping bag will contact the lower edges of the sidewalls. A conventional pyramid design achieves the same effect without the struts – it just requires a larger canopy and larger pitched footprint. Thus, the geometric benefit of the struts is their ability to allow the tent to pitch with a smaller footprint (i.e., stakes closer to the tent).
The most impactive benefit of the strut system (and specifically, the PitchLoc corners), is that the PitchLocs create triangular structural elements that make the tent more wind resistant and more resistant to deformation as a result of snow loading. The difference in wind resistance and snow loading capability between a conventional pyramid shelter and the Tarptent Aeon is noticeable. It makes me wonder why manufacturers of conventional tarps and floorless pyramids aren’t incorporating structural elements into their designs. Maybe we will someday see tarps and pyramids incorporating the PitchLoc elements brought to market by Tarptent.
2. Carbon fiber peak strut
A carbon fiber strut situated horizontally at the peak of the tent, when combined with the vertical support pole (e.g., a trekking pole), creates a “T”-shaped structural element. When tension forces from the front and rear corner guylines are exerted on the T, the T provides resistance to torsional motion that allows the tent to be supported without the need for a front guyline. This type of structure is in contrast to typical pyramid designs, which require the front corners to be situated well in front of the top of the support pole. You can thus pitch the Aeon with a wide, nearly-vertical front opening (when both sides of the vestibule are rolled away) for expansive views and no guyline tripwires.

3. Precision design, cut, and sew (treat each of these individually)
The Tarptent Aeon Li is designed by a talented engineer (Henry Shires) who has an acute understanding of material properties (including DCF) and structural design. As such, the cut-and-sew (and bonding) processes have already taken into consideration a careful analysis of force distribution and aesthetic quality, resulting in a finished product that not only looks beautiful (when pitched properly), but also remains surprisingly stable in response to high wind and snow loads (considering that this is a one pound shelter).



Tarptent Aeon vs. Floorless Pyramid

Tarptent Aeon vs. Double-Wall Tent
For a double-wall tent that has a single side entrance, and single vestibule, check out the REI Quarter Dome SL 1, which I discuss in this video, or my review of the Tarptent Notch Li.
Tarptent Aeon vs. A Dual-Trekking Pole Supported Shelter
For a dual-trekking pole shelter, see my review of the Tarptent Notch Li.
Tarptent Aeon Li (DCF) vs. Shelters Made with Other Fabrics
Tarptent Aeon vs. ZPacks Plexamid
| Tarptent Aeon | ZPacks Plexamid | |
| Canopy material | 0.51 osy DCF | 0.51 osy DCF (customizable fabric options) |
| Floor material | 1.0 osy DCF | 1.0 osy DCF |
| Inner tent floor dimensions | 30 in (76 cm) x 88 in (224 cm) | 28-38 in (71-97 cm) x 90 in (230 cm) |
| Inside peak height | 47 in (119 cm) | 48 in (122 cm) |
| Vestibule area | ~ 8.6 sq. ft. | ~ 6.4 sq. ft. |
| Bathtub floor height | 4 in (10 cm) | 8 in (20 cm) |
| Downward sloping mesh perimeter screen for condensation management | yes | yes |
| Stakes required (recommended) | 4 (7) | 6 (10) |
| Guylines required to increase interior volume | no | yes |
| Vestibule door closure | Hook-and-loop, metal clip at bottom | Toggle, metal clip at bottom |
| Canopy overhangs bathtub floor inner screen door | yes | yes |
| Inner door zipper style | J, door ties away at side | Rainbow, door falls downward |
| Packed size | 4 in (10 cm) x 14 in (36 cm) | 6 in (15 cm) x 12 in (30 cm) |
| Weight (not including stakes) | 15.8 oz (448 g) | 14.8 oz (420 g) |
| Stakes included? | yes | no |
| MSRP | $535 | $549 |
Hikers who want the lightest possible shelter that also includes:
Hikers who:
Updated September 15, 2018
In this episode, we talk to Alaskan writer, biologist, and adventurer Caroline Van Hemert. Caroline is an ornithologist who, along with her husband Pat, undertook a 4,000-mile human-powered journey from Bellingham Washington to Kotzebue, a small town high above the arctic circle.

This podcast has been made by possible by the generous support of REI. Please consider supporting Backpacking Light and REI by using the affiliate link below to shop at REI. We receive a small commission if you end up placing an order if you use the link, at no additional cost to you. Thank you!
In this episode, we talk to Alaskan writer, biologist, and adventurer Caroline Van Hemert. Caroline is an ornithologist who, along with her husband Pat, undertook a 4,000-mile human-powered journey from Bellingham Washington to Kotzebue, a small town high above the arctic circle.
Caroline’s written a book about her journey, The Sun is a Compass. The book weaves together a lot of threads: the path Caroline’s life took to get to the start of her journey, her relationship with her husband, her life as a scientist, her feelings about motherhood: it’s a great read.
Our interview covers all that and more. So sit back, relax, and enjoy our conversation with Caroline Van Hemert.
Follow Caroline on Facebook and Instagram.  You can find her book wherever books are sold – learn more about The Sun is a Compass on Caroline’s website.
You can contact us at podcast@backpackinglight.com, or follow us on social media –
You don’t have access to view this content.