The Nemo Switchback sleeping pad has a bright orange hue which is the first thing that catches your eye. The eye-popping color isn’t the real selling point in NEMO’s new foldable closed-cell sleeping pad, though; it’s the ratio between its thickness and packed size. Until now, Therm-a-Rest’s Z Lite Sol has been difficult to improve upon. With the Switchback, NEMO has created a pad that is measurably thicker than the Z Lite Sol while matching that pad’s folded dimensions and virtually matching its weight and cost.
Features (Size Regular)
- Hexagonal nesting pattern
- Dual-density Axiotomic™ foam
- Metalized thermal reflective film
- Folding panel design, rectangular shape
- MSRP: Regular: $49.95
- NEMO Lifetime Warranty
Specifications (Size Regular)
- Manufacturer provided weight: 14.5 oz (415 g)
- Measured weight: 15 oz (425 g)
- Manufacturer provided packed size: 20 x 5 x 5.5 in (51 x 13 x 14 cm)
- Measured packed size: 20.5 x 5 x 5.5 in (52.07 x 13 x 14 cm)
- Manufacturer provided unfolded dimensions: 72 in x 20 in x 0.9 in (183 cm x 51 cm x 2 cm)
- Measured unfolded dimensions: 72 x 20.5 x 0.9 in (183 x 52.07 x 2 cm)
- Temperature rating: 20F to 35F (-7C to 2C)
- It is 20% thicker than comparable pads at identical folding dimensions.
- The taller nodes theoretically allow for more trapped air for better insulation.
- It maintains the same utility and near-indestructibility of all closed-cell pads.
- Clever engineering measurably improves a stagnant product category.
- It is unproven if the added thickness improves comfort.
- The durability of the metalized thermal reflective film over the long term is unknown.
- The nodes begin to crush down after repeated use.
- Slightly more expensive than the competition.
Let’s compare the Switchback to the ubiquitous Therm-a-Rest Z Lite Sol. It seems a reasonable choice as both pads have identical packed dimensions and utilize the same folding structure.
|Product||NEMO Switchback||Therm-a-Rest Z Lite Sol|
|Weight (Regular)||14.5 oz (411 g)||14 oz (396.89 g)|
|Thickness||0.9 in (2.28 cm)||.75 in (1.90 cm)|
|Packed dimensions||20 x 5 x 5.5 in (51 x 13 x 14 cm)||20 x 5 x 5.5 in (51 x 13 x 14 cm)|
|Unfolded dimensions||72 x 20 x .9 in (183 x 51 x 2.28 cm)||72 x 20 x .75 in (183 x 51 x 1.9 cm)|
|R-Value||unavailable, NEMO provides a temperature rating of 20 F to 35 F||2.6|
|Sourcing||Imported||Made in the USA|
Glancing over the table, you can see that the two pads have identical length, width, and packed dimensions. The Switchback weighs a scant .5 oz more than the Z Lite Sol (My scale measured the Switchback at 15 oz as opposed to the 14.5 oz measurement provided by NEMO, but I’m willing to chalk that up to my consumer grade scale). The difference in node patterns is readily apparent, especially when viewed side by side (see above photo). The Switchback’s hexagonal pattern is what allows it to be nearly 20% thicker than the Z Lite Sol despite being the same size when folded.
The Z-Lite Sol is made in the USA, while the Switchback is imported. The price difference is negligible.
The NEMO Switchback is an example of a product that manages to reap measurable improvements from a stagnant category by utilizing elegant design. Who knows how much time and energy went into re-imagining the tried-and-true egg carton pattern? The result is a pad that is 20% thicker than the competition, with larger nodes that theoretically make for more comfortable nights.
The metallic heat-reflective film seems to perform at industry standards. That includes the film’s tendency to rub off. It’s a common problem — personally speaking, I’ve never used a pad where the reflective film didn’t rub away after repeated use. The nodes also seem to be crushing slightly. Again, not unusual, and if past experience is any indication, it would take hundreds of nights of compressing the foam to notice a practical difference.
Does the Switchback’s elegant design and execution translate into added comfort? Hard to say. Subjectively, I found the texture of the hexagonal pattern to be a little strange. I got used to it after a bit, but the initial impression after a lifetime of sleeping on egg-crate patterns was odd.
It was also hard to nail down just how much the Switchback’s added thickness improved upon the standard amount of comfort inherent to a foldable closed-cell pad. Some evenings I felt I could tell a difference, others, not so much. My takeaway is this: extra thickness at identical packed dimensions and at virtually the same cost and weight certainly can’t hurt. If you like your current closed-cell pad, I wouldn’t be rushing to your local gear shop to make a change, but if it’s time for an upgrade, it’s hard to go wrong with the Switchback.
Where to Buy
- Buy the NEMO Switchback at REI..
- Our forum members briefly discussed some recent closed-cell sleeping pad options.
- Are closed-cell foam pads not for you? Check out the UberLite.
- How we acquired these products: Product(s) discussed in this review were either acquired by the author from a retailer or otherwise provided by the manufacturer at a discount/donation with no obligation to provide media coverage or a product review to the manufacturer(s).
- We do not accept money or in-kind compensation for guaranteed media coverage: Backpacking Light does not accept compensation or donated product in exchange for guaranteed media placement or product review coverage.
- Affiliate links: Some (but not all) of the links in this review may be “affiliate” links, which means if you click on a link to one of our affiliate partners (usually a retailer site), and subsequently make a purchase with that retailer, we receive a small commission. This helps us fund our editorial projects, podcasts, instructional webinars, and more, and we appreciate it a lot! Thank you for supporting Backpacking Light!
Home › Forums › Nemo Switchback Sleeping Pad Review (First Looks)