Articles (2020)

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review

Tarptent’s newest, lightest solo tent is innovative and available in breathable Tyvek and traditional silnylon versions. At 18.5 ounces, the Tyvek Sublite is the lightest breathable fabric tent available.

Description

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 1
The Tarptent Sublite one-person single wall tent is available in Tyvek (shown) and silnylon.

The Tarptent Sublite is a one person single wall tent that comes in two versions: Tyvek and silnylon. The design is basically the same, but the two tents differ in details and performance. The Sublite is the first use of Tyvek in a tent, which is a breathable nonwoven fabric. Technically, this is the world’s lightest breathable fabric tent.

The Tyvek used in the Sublite is type 1443R “soft structure” Tyvek, which is soft, lightweight, highly water-resistant, very durable, breathable, and inexpensive. It is NOT the house-wrap type of Tyvek, rather it is the lighter, softer type used in Tyvek protective clothing. Tyvek is a “spunbonded olefin” and is not a true woven fabric. Fabric weight is 1.25 oz/yd2, which is about the same as silnylon at 1.3 oz/yd2.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 2
Views of the Tyvek Sublite. The tent is supported by trekking poles (or optional sectional aluminum poles) in an A-frame configuration near the front of the tent, plus two sewn-in vertical carbon fiber struts at the rear. A zippered entry is located to the right of the trekking pole (top left). The end view (top right) shows its boxed foot end without any vent. The top view (bottom left) shows its proportions. And the head end (bottom right) has a closable vent at the bottom and high vent at the top.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 3
Entry into the Tyvek Sublite is from the side; there is no mesh inner door or rain flap to keep rain from falling into the tent.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 4
The Tyvek Sublite has a floating silnylon bathtub floor with a mesh panel on both sides for extra ventilation. There is a closable vent at the head end (left), but none at the rear end (right). The tent has plenty of room inside for one person plus gear.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 5
The Sublite has a high vent at the head end to enhance ventilation. The photos show the vent on the outside (left) and inside (right). A panel of mesh on the inside excludes bugs.

The silnylon version of the Sublite is the same design and dimensions as the Tyvek version. However, since silnylon is not breathable, the silnylon version has a few extra features to enhance ventilation: a closable foot vent, a larger vent at the front, a zippered mesh door, and an extendable rain flap so the entry can be left open for better ventilation in rainy weather.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 6
The Silnylon Sublite is the same tent design and dimensions as the Tyvek version, only it’s made of silnylon and weighs 3 ounces more. The photo shows the tent set up with Tarptent’s optional sectional aluminum poles. A zippered mesh door hangs partially open. It also has an extra guyline at the front.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 7
Because silnylon is not breathable at all, the silnylon version has a few extra design elements to enhance ventilation. These are the addition of a mesh door (left, rolled up in the photo), and a large closable foot vent (right) which is not present on the Tyvek version.

Performance

The Sublite is quick and easy to set up, and requires two 53-inch (135 cm) trekking poles (or optional aluminum poles) to create its A-frame support and a taut pitch. Most hikers don’t use 135 cm fixed length poles, so adjustable trekking poles are necessary for the Sublite. The trekking poles in the top photos are 51 inches, my longest fixed length poles, and they are not quite long enough, so I resorted to elevating them with rocks get the needed length. In doing so, I had to futz with the tent to get a decent pitch and it is not as taut as it should be. Setting up the Sublite with adjustable length trekking poles also requires a fair amount of fiddling to attach them. The fastest, easiest and best support system for the Sublite is Tarptent’s optional aluminum poles (4.75 ounces, US$10). They attach quickly and provide a taut pitch with no fiddling with Velcro attachments.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 8
The Sublite requires adjustable trekking poles or optional aluminum poles for support. The tips are inserted in a sleeve at the top (left) and the handles in a pocket at the bottom (right). There are two Velcro loops on each side to secure them to the tent body.

For a solo shelter, the Sublite is very hospitable. The A-frame peak of the tent provides lots of headroom right where I need it when I sit up. There is plenty of room inside the tent for one person plus gear. Although there is no storage pocket inside, the mesh sides above the bathtub floor provide a handy ledge for stashing small items.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 9
The lack of an entry vestibule means that wet gear (or a wet dog) would have to stay outside or stashed at the foot of the tent. The Silnylon Sublite (but not the Tyvek Sublite) has a partial solution in the form of a rain flap (left) that can be extended to cover the entry. For some reason, the vertical part of the rain flap is sewn to the inside of the tent, so the mesh door cannot be fully zipped when the rain flap is extended (right), leaving a 3-inch gap for bugs to enter.

An unexpected benefit of the Tyvek Sublite is its white color reflects heat and its breathable fabric allows more air exchange, so the tent is significantly cooler in hot weather compared to its silnylon equivalent.

The only porosity test data I could find on type 1443R Tyvek is a Gurley Hill Porosity rating of 69 seconds/100 cc. This is the time required for 100 cubic centimeters of air to pass through one square inch of material under a pressure of approximately 4.9 inches of water (Test Method: TAPPI T460/ASTM D726). DuPont claims that this Tyvek is vapor permeable and six times more breathable than microporous film membranes (monolithic polyurethane).

In use, the Tyvek Sublite does seem to breathe quite will. On warmer nights (above about 50 F) with the door zipped closed to exclude bugs I did not have any condensation at all. On several clear/calm/cool nights I did not have any film condensation on the inside walls, which is typical for silnylon tents, but the inside walls were damp to the touch. The dampness did not wet my clothing when I brushed against it. On two occasions following calm/clearing nights after an afternoon rain, the inside tent walls were covered with small water droplets which dripped to the floor, but it was a minor issue.

Tyvek is rated as “highly water-resistant” but is not claimed to be waterproof. I have personally used this type of Tyvek as a groundsheet for several years and have had no problems with water passing through it. During a high intensity thunderstorm, I saw water droplets forming on the inside walls of the canopy that dripped onto me and my gear. The problem was accentuated by “condensation splatter” caused by hail impacting the outside of the tent. Tarptent’s statement that the Tyvek Sublite is “fine for all night moderate rains but not recommended for long-duration intense rainstorms” is accurate. Bottom line, the Tyvek Sublite performs very well in non-rainy weather, short duration showers, and gentle rains, but it is not the best place to be during a prolonged intense thunderstorm.

 

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. Video tour of the Tarptent Sublite Silnylon Tent. NOTE: The audio portion where Will states that the tent held up just fine is in error. The tent actually leaked quite a bit.

Because silnylon is non-breathable, the silnylon version of the Sublite has extra ventilation features, adding up to mesh vents on all four sides, a mesh door, and a high vent. I found the Silnylon Sublite to be very condensation resistant most of the time, especially when there was at least a light breeze. However, like most single wall tents, it will develop condensation on the inside walls on a clear/cool/calm night with a large temperature drop, and during an extended rainstorm.

Tarptent Sublite Tent Review - 10
Condensation on inside walls of the Silnylon Sublite after a rainy night.

Assessment

I tested both versions of the Sublite in an assortment of summer backpacking conditions and found it to be an excellent ultralight solo tent. At just over a pound including stakes, I definitely can’t complain about the weight! However, I have two issues with the Sublite; the first is the height of its A-frame is too tall for most fixed length trekking poles. It requires 53-inch poles, and that means heavier adjustable length poles for most people. The tent pitches faster and better with Tarptent’s optional aluminum poles. My second issue is the Tyvek Sublite has no vestibule over the entry, so rain will fall directly into the tent. The silnylon version has an extendable rain flap, but it makes entry/exit more cumbersome, and the mesh door does not zip up on one side so bugs can enter.

Overall, the things I really like about the Sublite’s design are its light weight, easy setup, side entry, ample headroom where you need it, ample floor space, and good ventilation.

The Tyvek version is definitely unique. It breathes as well as any Epic fabric tent I have tested, and the weight and cost are a lot less. Tyvek is very strong, so I don’t have any concerns about it not holding up over time. The shortcomings of the Tyvek version are 1) the entry does not have an inner mesh door (only one Tyvek door) so there are minimal views from the tent, and 2) intense rainfall will force water through the Tyvek. Thus, the Tyvek version is best suited for climates where prolonged intense rainfall is uncommon.

In its size and weight class, the closest comparison to the Sublite is the Gossamer Gear One. The One is made of spinnaker fabric, which is lighter, noisier, and more delicate. Both tents have a side entry, but the One has a large vestibule over the entry, which is a real plus, and still weighs an ounce less than the Tyvek Sublite. However, the One costs $100 more.

Specifications

  Manufacturer/ Year/ Model Tarptent 2008 Tyvek Sublite and 2008 Silnylon Sublite (http://www.tarptent.com/)
  Style One person single wall tent with floor and side entry. The Tyvek version is breathable fabric
  Fabrics Tyvek version is type 1443R Tyvek (1.25 oz/yd2/ 42.4 g/m2) with a silnylon floor; silnylon version is 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon canopy and floor
  Poles and Stakes Two carbon fiber rear struts (sewn-in) plus two 53 in (135 cm) trekking poles or optional Easton aluminum poles, four 6 in (15 cm) Easton tubular stakes
  Floor Dimensions 86 in long x 26/42/24 in wide x 42 in high (218 x 66/107/61 x 107 cm)
  Packed Size 14 in x 4 in (36 x 10 cm)
  Total Weight Tyvek Sublite 1 lb 3.4 oz (550 g); manufacturer specification 1 lb 2.5 oz (524 g); Silnylon Sublite 1 lb 6 oz (624 g), manufacturer specification 1 lb 5.5 oz (610 g) (includes tent, 4 stakes, 2 stuff sacks)
  Trail Weight Tyvek Sublite 1 lb 2.9 oz (536 g), Silnylon Sublite 1 lb 5.5 oz (610 g) (includes tent and four stakes)
  Protected Area Floor 20 ft2 (1.86 m2), no vestibule
  Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 17 ft2/lb for Tyvek Sublite; 14.9 ft2/lb for Silnylon Sublite
   MSRP Tyvek version US$179, silnylon version US$199
  Options Footprint US$35, 10.3 oz (292 g) with stuff sack; aluminum poles US$10 , 4.75 oz (135 g)

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered

Lightweight Testimony: Tony Wong Finds, Loses, and Rediscovers a Lightweight Passion.

I took my first backpacking trip right after I graduated from college. I was living in a student co-op in Berkeley, and a bunch of us decided to celebrate the end of the year by going up to Half Dome in Yosemite. Having never backpacked before, I borrowed whatever gear I could from friends and scrounged an assortment of food from the co-op.

At the trailhead to Vernal Falls, I carried a Coleman external frame pack, a white gas two-burner car camping stove, a gallon of fuel, a four-person tent, a gallon jug of water, some extra clothing, and a five-pound jar of peanut butter.

I was twenty-three years old, young, fit, and I was in pain.

The pack I wore was two sizes too large for me. As a result, the hipbelt did not fit, and the entire weight of the pack tugged down on my shoulders. Just walking to the trailhead was difficult under this tremendous load, and I struggled to catch my breath.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 1
Yosemite Half Dome, Nevada and Vernal Falls from the Panoramic Trail south of Glacier Point.

I know we hiked up Vernal and Nevada falls, but I am not certain I ever saw them. Most of my memory from that part of the trip was of the mist from the water fall cooling my aching, sweat-drenched body as I stared at the endless number of granite steps I had yet to climb. In an attempt to shift the weight off my shoulders, I was bending so far forward that all I could see was ground. Any attempt to look up was rewarded with my head hitting the massive jar of peanut butter strapped on the top of my pack.

Mercifully, we made it to Little Yosemite Valley to set up our base camp and climbed Half Dome the next day with just daypacks.

The views atop Half Dome were breathtaking, with the tree-dotted expanses of granite everywhere I looked and the valley floor far below me. I was on top of the world, and I wanted more of it.

Educating a Mule

I bought my first book on backpacking, Karen Berger’s Trailside Guide: Hiking and Backpacking. It became my backpacking Bible, educating me on the myriad of choices I had to confront when buying gear. It also gave me insight into the skills I would need to learn and challenges I would face in the wild.

More books would follow, including Backpacker magazine’s Everyday Wisdom: 1001 Expert Tips for Hikers and More Everyday Wisdom: Trail-Tested Advice from the Experts.

I was determined to learn how to select gear wisely and remedy the mistakes from my first backpacking experience. Yet somehow years went by without my taking another backpacking trip. I found my career, got married, bought a house, got a dog, and then started a family. It was not until my daughter turned two-and-a-half that I began to reflect on my unfulfilled desire to go backpacking. While I wanted my daughter, Mei-Ling, to be comfortable in the outdoors, in truth, I wasn’t comfortable myself.

So, I dusted off my old books, re-familiarized myself with the essentials of backpacking gear and strode confidently into REI. It was July – the height of the camping season – and the ideal time to pay full price for all my backpacking needs.

After dropping a few thousand dollars, I walked out of REI with everything a family of three would need to take on the world and survive. The trunk of my car was crammed with an exhaustive array of outdoor preparedness apparatus, including repair kits for my stove and water filter and any other gear that could possibly succumb to disaster. I’d even found a portable nebulizer for my asthmatic daughter.

Being the Family Sherpa

For our first family backpacking trip, I decided to return to Yosemite and go to Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. As I carefully loaded our backpacks, I took pride in knowing each item had been carefully considered and recommended by expert backpackers based on years of hard-earned trail experience. What I had not prepared for was carrying all of the gear for a family of three.

I was thirty-six years old, mature, relatively fit, had the best and lightest gear that money could buy, and I was in pain.

I weighed 135 pounds and, according to my backpacking book, I should have been carrying no more than a third of my body weight. Apparently, the 80 pounds I was hauling was closer to 59 percent of my body weight.

My wife had it even worse, struggling seven long miles with Mei-Ling on her back in an ill-fitting child carrier.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 2
“Backpacking is easy, Mommy!” Mei is riding in style in an early model Deuter Kangakid, which lacked any lumbar support padding. Notice the plastic bag full of used diapers.

Once we arrived at our campsite, the trip became quite enjoyable. With my aching, sweat-drenched body freed of the pack, I was able to appreciate the beauty of the park. Gazing out over the ridges of granite, hearing wind whistling through the pine trees and white water crashing down the river, I was reminded of the reasons I had wanted to do this again.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 3
Yosemite’s Hetch Hetchy Reservoir is visited by less than 1% of park visitors, providing a unique opportunity to enjoy the beauty of the park without the crowds. Photo taken one mile northeast of Rancheria Falls campsite with Hetch Hetchy Reservior in the distance, which is the water source for San Francisco. Rancheria Falls campsite is about seven miles from the O’Shaughnessy Dam trailhead and is an easy trek with little elevation change.

But my aching feet and the crushing pain in my back on the trail told me I was still doing something wrong. What had I missed in all my books? They told me how much weight I should be carrying, but not how to lighten my pack. I realized I would have to experiment on my own.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 4
Yosemite Tenaya Creek is southeast of Tuolumne Meadows, off of Highway 120/Old Tioga Road near Olmsted Point, and flows from Tenaya Lake.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 5
My wife Pat and four-year-old daughter Mei-Ling, smiling before the mosquitoes ate us alive in Yosemite’s Tenaya Creek during the month of June.

On other family trips to places like Tenaya Creek in Yosemite, I made progress on getting lighter.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 6
Down to “just” fifty-five pounds to Lake Vernon!

For a four-day trip to Lake Vernon, I pared my pack down to fifty-five pounds.

Finding a New Book

In October of 2006, my friend Bill and I decided to hike the Ohlone Trail – a twenty-mile overnighter in the San Francisco Bay Area. Bill’s friend, Jeremy, joined us. I carried only thirty-five pounds on this trip, my lightest yet. My 5300-cubic-inch Gregory Palisade pack alone accounted for seven of those pounds.

As the day progressed, Bill and I plodded along the trail and did our best to keep up with Jeremy. At the top of the steep hills, he patiently waited for us to catch up. Winded from our climb, we took time to catch our breath, while Jeremy cheerfully marched on ahead of us.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 7
Jeremy’s Granite Gear Vapor Trail, taunting me while showing me the errors of my heavyweight ways.

To my shock and disbelief, Jeremy was only carrying a nineteen-pound pack! When we made camp that night, I was dumbfounded. Jeremy had a freestanding tent. He ate hot food and slept warm and comfortably that night. No suffering, no deprivation, no holes drilled into his spoon. How had he done this?

Days after the trip, I struggled to figure out how Jeremy had managed to carry a pack half the weight of mine without sacrificing on comfort in camp. I bombarded him with emails, grilling him about the gear he carried. Eventually Jeremy told me about the book Lightweight Backpacking & Camping. Then he remarked, “Now you know everything that I do.”

I read this book over and over to glean its secrets. Thus began my maddening quest to further reduce the weight of my backpack.

Obsessing Over Gear

I downloaded a gear calculator program and weighed all of my clothing and gear on a postal scale down to the ounce.

I soon realized how changes in my gear choices could make pounds of difference. Switching from a white gas stove to a canister stove shaved off a pound. Exchanging my synthetic sleeping bag for a down one saved me a pound and a half. Trading my seven-pound, three-person tent for a tarptent saved me five-and-a-half pounds.

I embarked on hours of research, posted questions on the Backpacking Light forums, and experimented endlessly with an assortment of gear. I was in pursuit of the perfect kit. There were many trials and a number of errors along the way.

On a trip to Santa Cruz Mountains, I pitched my tarptent on top of an exposed ridge while a rain storm rolled in. As I huddled inside the shelter, howling winds ripped a stake out of the soggy ground. The tarptent collapsed on me, and more than an inch of muddy water rushed inside. Unable to get out of the tent for fear that the wind would blow it away, I cinched the top of my sleeping bag and curled up on my side, hoping for the best. I awoke the next morning looking like Han Solo encased in carbonite beneath the drenched collapsed tent. The exterior of my sleeping bag and sleeping pad were completely soaked. Thankfully, in my seam-sealed Marmot Helium EQ bag, I had somehow remained completely warm and dry through the night.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 8
Learning by screwing up. The consequences of failing to practice properly pitching my tarptent and poor site selection resulted in sleeping in a mud puddle under a collapsed tent.

Fortunately, there were more successes than errors.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 9
Below Yosemite’s Red Peak Pass (11,075 feet) descending to Triple Peak Fork.

Jeremy and I took a number of trips together, each one giving us confidence to push harder, travel longer distances – and to go lighter and lighter. Our first major trip together was a fifty-mile, four-day loop in Yosemite from Glacier Point to Red Peak Pass. Though we traveled quickly and light, we suffered huge blisters on our heels and learned the importance of foot care and wearing the right shoes and socks.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 10
Starting out on the High Sierra Trail from Sequoia National Park from Crescent Meadow with Castle Rocks in the background sporting a Gregory Z55 pack, amazingly comfortable at 3 lbs, 3 oz.

Two months later, we set out to conquer the seventy-mile High Sierra Trail from Sequoia National Park to the top of Mt. Whitney. I carried thirty-six pounds. The trip we had planned to complete in seven days took only four days. We were thrilled with the knowledge we could comfortably do fifteen miles per day, which hinted at the possibility of even longer trips.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 11
A slice of Heaven with the perfect swimming hole. Fraser Lakes, 9201 feet above Emigrant Lake in the Stanislaus National Forest, which lies on northern border of Yosemite.

This year Jeremy and I made the leap of faith into the world of poncho tarps, bivy bags, and frameless packs. I carried twenty-six pounds into the Emigrant Wilderness on a four-day, forty-mile trip. We experienced the full range of Mother Nature’s moods, including hail and rain. There were injuries, pain, and perseverance. There were places of beauty that took my breath away and put a silly grin of pure happiness upon my face.

I recently took my first solo backpacking trip at Big Basin in the California Redwoods State Park. The trip put all the things I had read and learned into a test of endurance. For two days and one night, I carried seventeen pounds and travelled fifty-nine miles.

Explaining My Sickness

On a snow-camping trip with the Sierra Club this past February in Yosemite, other hikers struggled under the weight of fifty-pound packs. I carried thirty-six pounds and remained comfortable and warm. During the trip, a puzzled instructor asked why in the world would I want to hike fifteen to twenty miles in a day? In essence, why go light?

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 12
Yosemite’s Dewy Point (7385 feet) provides a stunning view that overlooks Yosemite Valley and is located about four miles north of Badger Pass Ski area. Taken during the Sierra Club’s snow camping class. There is something wrong when you are marched in the middle of nowhere, are made to dig your own grave in the snow, toss a tarp over the top of it, and then are told to sleep in it for two nights.

I explained to the instructor that going light has not been about deprivation and suffering. Going light has enabled me to be more engaged in my outdoor pursuits. It has demanded the best of me physically and has challenged me to thoughtfully consider what I need to carry, where I will go – and how to get there safely.

It is not about the number of miles I travel. It is about the spectacular things I witness in nature, sights that humble me with their raw power and beauty. It’s about time on the trail with friends and family, learning about each other and ourselves – and sharing experiences that inspire new journeys to be taken in the future.

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 13
Sharing the adventure: Jeremy & Tony at Deer Lake in the Emigrant Wilderness

A Passion Found, Lost, and Rediscovered - 14
Tony, Pat, and five-year-old Mei-Ling backpacking together at Point Reyes, California. North of San Francisco. Despite going light, see how nothing changes: Mei is still bumming a free ride.

I no longer view mysterious, distant places as only within the reach of a few extreme adventurers I read about in magazines, but as something that we can all aspire to reach. I am thirty-nine years old, wiser, still fit, and no longer in pain.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland

Reminisce about the warm colors of the fall with Chris Townsend’s evocative photography.

Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 1
Looking south over Strathspey to distant cloud-shrouded hills. In the foreground rough moorland grasses are turning yellow and brown. Beyond them birches shine gold in the sunlight.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 2
Downy and silver birches (Betula pubescens and Betula pendula) are the most common native trees in Scotland. The great swathes of yellow and gold seen throughout the Highlands in autumn are birches. These trees don’t all change color at the same time, which extends the season of autumn glory. Here some downy birches are already golden, whilst others are still mostly green.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 3
The native woodland of the Cairngorms is a mix of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and birch, the remains of the Caledonian Forest that was once much more extensive. Scots pine retains its dark green needles year round, but the reddish bark glows in sunlight.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 4
Strathspey is a glaciated landscape. Here, Scots pines cloak a knoll of hard ice-resistant rock above a flat marshy area dotted with birches. Crossing this innocuous looking terrain requires waterproof footwear and careful route finding to keep your feet dry. Soft ground, tiny pools, and little streams are everywhere.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 5
Birches are quite short-lived for trees, most only living 60 to 90 years, though some reach 150. They are pioneer species, rapidly colonizing open ground. Here a fallen dead birch lies on open grassland before scattered downy birch and, on the left, aspen (Populus tremula), a native tree whose leaves turn bright yellow in autumn. Aspen are found throughout the Highlands, but are far less common than birch.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 6
Rowan (Sorbus aucuparia) is a small native tree found all over the Highlands, sometimes as high as 3,000 feet, far above other trees. In autumn the leaves turn red, but are often quickly stripped off by frost and wind. The brilliant red berries (rowan is in the rose family) last longer, until eaten by birds. I found this solitary leafless rowan on a rise amongst bracken (Pteridium aquilinum), a fern that turns a rusty orange in autumn, in front of a birch wood.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 7
View over Strathspey to the Cromdale Hills with bracken and rough pasture in the foreground, birch woodland in the middle ground and cultivated fields (used for growing hay for winter feed for livestock) and conifer plantations in the background. The golden trees in the conifer forest are mostly larch.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 8
Rain clouds sweep over the Strathspey woods. This hike took place in fast changing weather with bursts of sunshine and heavy showers.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 9
Gnarled old Scots pine frame a view over the fields and woods of Strathspey to the Cromdale Hills, painted with the first snows of winter. The line of trees in the centre of the picture below the hills is a strip of European larch (Larix decidua) and beech (Fagus sylvatica), neither native to the Highlands but both beautiful in autumn.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 10
Wisps of windblown cloud streak the sky above the snow-covered Cromdale Hills. In the foreground, faded yellow grasses stretch out to birches, still holding onto some leaves despite the cold and windy weather, and to dark Scots pines.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 11
Larches are always colorful in autumn, but in 2008 the colors were exceptionally intense and vivid, glowing gold and orange. This is an old larch wood planted on the crest of a gentle hill and only some twenty feet wide, though several hundred yards long. It lies in the former grounds of Castle Grant, a Victorian mansion, and was probably planted to break the skyline view as part of the landscaping of the estate.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 12
The larches rise some 100+ feet above a tangle of boulders and fallen branches. European larch is native to the mountains of central Europe and was introduced into Scotland in the 1600s. Larch has been extensively planted since and has also self-seeded in some areas.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 13
The low afternoon sun lights up the line of larches (sunset is not long after 4:00 p.m. at this time of year). The long shadows are from the raised strips of stubble in front of them, this being the edge of a field used for growing hay, which was harvested many weeks earlier when the larches were still green.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 14
In a narrow cold marshy ravine that sees little sun, outside of summer, patches of the first winter snowfall linger amongst the reeds. Most of the trees have lost their leaves, but one birch still shines gold. In the distance the purple sheen is from the reddish bark of the twigs and the last summer’s new growth on the birches.

Autumn in Cairngorms National Park, Scotland - 15
An autumn sunset in Strathspey, looking over the darkening woods and fields to the snow-capped Cairngorm mountains, where winter has already taken hold.

Strathspey is a wide valley (which is what strath means) lying in the north of the Cairngorms National Park in the Scottish Highlands. The strath is a mixture of conifer plantations, remnants of natural woodland, marsh, low moorland, rough pasture, and farmed fields, through which the river Spey winds its way and above which rise the high Cairngorms. In autumn the woods of Strathspey are spectacular as the birches, aspens, larches, and rowans turn gold and red. In 2008 the colors were even more impressive than usual, the trees glowing with light and brightness. On several day hikes near my home in the strath, I took these photos of that wonderful autumn.

Dana Parnello on Controlled Product Testing at REI

Dana shares his thoughts on lightweight trends, gear testing, breakthrough products and assorted other topics.

Backpacking Light is kicking off a new series of profiles with outdoor industry professionals, long distance hikers, adventure trekkers, land managers, conservationists, and others who will be of interest to lightweight backpackers. We’ll talk with them about their vocations, their passions, and their outlook on topics of interest to the lightweight backpacking community. In this installment, we talk with Dana Parnello, Manager of Product Research and Testing at REI. Dana shares his thoughts on lightweight trends, gear testing, breakthrough products and assorted other topics.

BPL Profile: Dana Parnello, Manager of Product Research and Testing at REI - 1
Dana Parnello on a backpacking trip near Redfish Lake, Idaho.

BPL: Tell us about your role at REI.

Dana: That’s a big and broad opening question. Really, I wear (at least) two hats; one for the REI the Co-op, and another for REI Gear & Apparel and Novara branded products. My team includes Testing (Lab and Field) and Engineering. While we focus a lot of our energy on our REI Gear & Apparel and Novara brands, we also conduct testing for our buyers, marketing, product information and product compliance groups’ use. Also, we spend quite a lot of time working industry standards groups like the ASTM, AATCC, and UIAA.

BPL: What are the goals of the testing lab or the principles behind your testing?

Dana: I am fond of saying that the Magnusson* Laboratory helps Co-op members/customers make informed decisions. This is done in partnership with our vendors and suppliers and typically helps us all learn how to better serve our members/customers.

As BPL is well aware, many products (e.g., stoves and lights, which we always test in-house) are tested using a manufacturer’s in-house methods. These are all generally sound methods. Of course, since they don’t measure things the same way, the results can’t really be compared to each other. So, we attempt to minimize variables where possible and provide meaningful comparisons. For example, our stove test station always starts with water at the same temperature, maintains constant fuel pressure, always uses the same pot (yes, stove/pot systems are starting to complicate that aspect) and uses the same surface (to minimize variability in convection) for every test. We also use proprietary methods for stove and pot stability ratings.

We do similar testing on a wide variety of products you can find at REI. This information is used by our buyers and by our product information teams to populate of lot of the fields you’ll find in our Product Information Guides (PIGs) and at www.rei.com.

For REI Gear & Apparel and Novara, the Magnusson Lab is used in a variety of capacities, and is a strong ally with our Design and Engineering and Development teams. We conduct development testing on everything from textiles and sleeping bag temp ratings to trekking pole three-point bend, twist-testing (torque), and metal hardness. This testing is done on individual materials, sub-assemblies, and/or whole products, depending upon what we want to learn.

BPL Profile: Dana Parnello, Manager of Product Research and Testing at REI - 2
Dana in full traditional mountaineering garb at the German Alpine Club, Munich Germany.

BPL: Doing controlled testing of outdoor gear is a challenge. Does the lab use both standardized and proprietary tests?

Dana: When we are confident that standardized tests produce accurate and comparable results, we will authorize third party labs to test on our behalf. We have developed really helpful relationships with test facilities in Europe, Asia and the U.S. Also, as we develop proprietary test methods, we have been known to train third party labs, or our suppliers, to do this testing further upstream in the development cycle.

For instance, I recently returned from a trip where I set up two mills in Japan to conduct our proprietary textile breathability method and spent time in China with a supplier and third party test lab conducting testing on a new line of camp furniture that is hitting our stores now.

That said, some test equipment is just too costly to bring in-house. For example, we have tested our tents in a number of different wind tunnels. With respect to in-house testing, the Magnusson Lab* has a climate controlled room and quite a variety of test equipment (tensile tester, hardness, button impact, tear strength, crocking, pilling, burst, multiple freezers, light testing stations, etc). More importantly, in the absence of standardized methods, our lab and engineering staff develop test methods that help us learn what we need.

Also noteworthy, with all the testing our lab conducts, we have a healthy data set from which to develop product standards. Where we feel we have something worth sharing, we feel a responsibility to participate in standards development. Steve Nagode (REI R&D Engineer) was the ASTM F08 Camping Soft goods (packs, bags, etc) sub-committee chair for several years. He and I have been actively participating in the UIAA Climbing and Mountaineering standards meetings and we are active corporate members of the AATCC. None of these roles could be filled without the great work our lab has done over many years.

BPL: How about field testing? That’s a focus at BPL; do you do a lot of field testing?

Dana: Perhaps the most important thing our lab does is qualify products for field testing. Nothing, absolutely nothing, will ensure product performance and end-user satisfaction like getting the product in the intended use by a group of folks who closely approximate the intended end-user; be they experts or novices.

To that end, our lab staff is complimented by equally talented field test analysts. They are tasked with the development of test plans, recruitment of testers, distribution of samples, collection and analysis of formal tester reports and, of course, the publication of the information.

BPL: Can you tell us about any recent tests of lightweight gear that our readers might enjoy?

Dana: Sure. I’ll have to be a little cryptic though; some of these items are still in development.

We had some interesting field tester comments on a proposed ultralight (UL) pack. Testers indicated the frame design could use some tweaking. I can’t share the specifics, but I will tell you that our designer has come up with some really creative alterations in stay placement and panel cut out patterns. Stay tuned…

For another (admittedly vague) example, our lab helped us measure the strength of some proposed UL gear manufacturing techniques. Our designer is incorporating what he learned in testing to evolve the design to take advantage of the new techniques, while maintaining overall performance and durability.

Finally, field testing recently validated some upcoming sleeping pad design modifications. Lighter and thinner is great. The challenge is to achieve this while maintaining the cushion and insulation expected; and those are tough things to lab test.

BPL: Hmm, mysterious. So, can you tell us if these new pads will be both lighter and thinner?

Dana: Yes (insert grin here).

BPL: What new products or materials do you see breaking new ground in lightweight gear?

Dana: The most amazing and rapid evolution I have seen in many years has to be what is happening in the lighting arena. Lights (largely driven by LED technology and battery improvements) are getting smaller, more durable (impact resistant), and showing extraordinary run-time and brightness gains.

BPL Profile: Dana Parnello, Manager of Product Research and Testing at REI - 3
Some of the testing team from REI’s Magnusson Laboratory. Left to right: Scott Smith, Tifani Andre, Dana Parnello, Adam Hockey, Steve Nagode, and Jim Hollenbeck.

BPL: REI seems to have an increased focus on producing lightweight products. Does REI see the market for lightweight products growing?

Dana: My personal opinion is that lightweight doesn’t just satisfy the niche market of "light and fast." I like lighter gear, as it enables my wife and I to take my seven- and ten-year-old daughters further into the backcountry. In that regard, I hope it grows. The challenge is to do so without making things that are disposable.

BPL: Yes, lighter gear has opened up new possibilities for many people, kids and otherwise. REI is a large retailer with many customers who might not be used to treating lightweight gear very carefully. How do you strike a balance between durability and light weight?

Dana: In addition to valuing other performance aspects, REI’s customers expect durability. The reality is, we offer a lifetime satisfaction guarantee. When we fear that durability will not meet their expectations, then we make changes (to materials or design, etc.) to ensure we can keep them happy in the outdoor playground as long as they want.

BPL: Another notable trend in the industry is an increased focus on "green" products. Is REI taking steps to produce products that have reduced environmental impact?

(Here, Kevin Myette joined the conversation; Kevin is the Director of Product Integrity at REI.)

Kevin: Truthfully, we don’t exactly call them "green," but we understand your meaning. We address product stewardship on many fronts-from environmental to social. From an environmental perspective, we continue to work to reduce the impact of our products. We realize one of the most significant ways we can do this is to choose better materials-rapidly renewable, recycled, and/or grown with organic farming processes.

Truth is, however, since performance remains high on our list of considerations, the material choice is often dictated by the activity. So-choosing wisely from appropriate materials keeps our Materials R&D team very busy. We also have a restricted substance list and process to ensure that chemicals which we’d rather not see are kept out of our products.

This is what we do for our own brands (REI and Novara), but since the bulk of what we sell is not our own brand, that is where we realize our best tactic is to engage the rest of the industry in developing common criteria for measuring, reporting and improving the environmental footprint of products. It is our belief that with common methods the whole industry will benefit. To this end we have been instrumental in the establishment and promotion of the growing effort (forty brands or so currently involved). We have been a leader in working with the rest of the industry in a collaborative effort known as the OIA-Eco Working Group.

BPL: Dana, what type of trips/outdoor sports do you personally enjoy?

Dana: My wife, two young daughters, and I enjoy backpacking, XC skiing (classic and skate), cycling, running, swimming (yes, even tri’s) some summer canoeing, playing with the dog and anything that happens on an island or beach. Personally, I am a rabid cyclist; enjoying road, mountain, ‘cross, night-riding, touring. Turn me loose with my family and/or friends with loaded bikes on an island tour, and I am in my happy place. I’ve done a little climbing, but really only enough to appreciate the importance of sound testing and standards.

BPL: Thanks Dana, it’s been a pleasure.

*The REI Magnusson Laboratory is named after Cal Magnusson. Cal, a former Boeing SST project engineer, is fondly remembered as the founding father of formalized Product Testing at REI.

Reflection on the Wild Coast: A Photo Essay

Adventurers Erin McKittrick and Bretwood Higman summarize their 4000-mile trek in photos and prose.

Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 1
Tolt Reservoir Trail
June 11, 2007. Hig walked the Tolt River trail on our third day out of Seattle. After a year of planning and months of frantic preparation, we had finally begun. With out-of-shape bodies and brand new gear, we turned east towards the mountains, leaving Seattle’s urban corridor behind.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 2
Stump on a Stump
July 18, 2007. Erin posed next to a giant old red cedar stump, which sported a recently-cut hemlock stump on its crown. We had been eagerly looking forward to the British Columbia coast. The map showed us promising curves of green islands, winding blue channels, and craggy white peaks. Somehow, the twisting lines of logging roads were missing from the maps. While southern B.C. was scenic from the waters frequented by yachting tourists, on land we found nothing but ridgelines too steep to walk, bordering valleys razed and re-razed by the loggers.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 3
Princess Royal Island
August 13, 2007. The summer’s glorious sun and its less glorious swarm of insects brought us to the paradise of Princess Royal Island in northern coastal B.C. The island’s rare pure white black bears remained stubbornly hidden while we explored the thick rainforests and steep granite slopes. Carved into smooth granite, the alpine lakes held the clearest water I’ve ever seen. Waterfalls cascaded down a stepped slope of cliffs and flats. Weaving our way along long terraces, searching for a way down between the cliffs, five downhill miles made a full day’s travel.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 4
Misty River in the Misty Fjords
September 11, 2007. Mist hung over the Chickamin River in southeast Alaska’s Misty Fjords. The dramatic ocean fjords are well-explored by tour boats and kayakers, but few people beyond the Fish and Game salmon counters venture inland. But the steep terrain and lush undergrowth of the temperate rainforest made boat travel by far the most practical way. At this point in the trip, we’d done over half of our distance by packraft in ocean, lakes, and rivers.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 5
Rainbow Season
October 1, 2007. Fall in southeast Alaska’s rainforest is rainbow season. Between bouts of drizzle and relentlessly grey skies, the sun would appear, hanging low in the autumn sky, glinting gold on the mossy trees, and creating sparkling rainbows in the perpetually moist air.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 6
Start of the Storms
October 5, 2007. We had been waiting for a storm. Wind rushed up Seymour Canal on southeast Alaska’s Admiralty Island, doubling over the bushes and whipping the water into a frenzy of whitecaps. As packrafters, we were happy to thumb our noses at it, appreciating the storm from the sheltered paths of bear trails while fishing boats sloshed and swayed in the waves.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 7
Crashing Surf
November 14, 2007. Hig’s tiny form gave a sense of scale to the giant waves crashing on the Gulf of Alaska coast. Driven by the most recent storm, the ocean swells crashed huge and white on the bouldered coast.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 8
Icy Bay
November 19, 2007. Hig stared out across the jagged white expanse of icebergs at the head of Icy Bay. The previous evening’s crossing attempt had landed us up against a wall of grinding and shifting bergs, and it had taken us three hours of hard paddling in the dark, wind, and rain to return to the east side of the bay. Between the frequent storms and copious ice, it seemed unlikely that we would ever get across.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 9
Extra Insulation
December 5, 2007. Low tide left icebergs scattered on the shallow mud flats at Controller Bay. The obstacles of the Lost Coast had pushed our schedule weeks behind our plan. Winter arrived before we were ready for it. With warm clothes winging their way through the postal system two towns ahead of us, Hig stuffed his backpack with grass for a bit of extra insulation in the packraft, in our mittens, and around our bed.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 10
Black Spruce Snow Shwack
January 11, 2008. In the darkest days of January, in the shadow of a mountain range where the sun rarely peeked, winter proved itself slow. In the imaginations of inexperienced winter travelers, snow would allow us to fly across the landscape, everything transformed into a smooth white sheet for our convenience. As we pushed our feet through a six-inch base of fluffy powder in a thick forest of black spruce, we started to realize that the journey wasn’t going to take nine months after all. This would be a year-long expedition.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 11
Spotlight on Moose Ridge
February 26, 2008. A low hanging sun behind a haze of clouds spotlights Hig on a snowy ridge. Winter was finally starting to turn around for us. As we left the peopled surroundings of Anchorage behind, we started to hit the first good snow and open skiing terrain we’d seen all winter. River otter belly tracks crisscrossed the hills – our fellows in enjoying the snow.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 12
Pizza from the Sky
February 29, 2008. Rarely visited on foot, Lake Clark Pass is a corridor for the small airplanes that connect the small villages of Lake Clark and Lake Iliamna to the rest of the world. The small beige plane wiggled its wings at us – swooping down and waving with each twice daily pass overhead. One morning, we looked up to find a yellow-streamered blessing from the sky. The pilot had dropped us a pizza from the Moose’s Tooth restaurant in Anchorage. It might have frozen in the ten degree weather, so we devoured it immediately.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 13
Over a Windy Pass
March 23, 2008. Following a possible road route from the proposed Pebble Mine, we crossed a steep pass between Lake Iliamna and the ocean. Wind funneled through the narrow notch in the mountains between the Bering Sea and Pacific Ocean weather zones, grabbing at the skis strapped to our packs and sending rivers of snow swirling in the air.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 14
Buried by Snow
April 5, 2008. This is not what our pyramid shelter is supposed to look like. Come nighttime, a sudden wind left us in a high snowbound pass with only a few scattered boulders to hide behind. We spent an hour carefully building a six-foot-high wall of snowblocks, cut with our paddles. Then we spent a night being buried in the drift behind the wall, squeezing into a smaller and smaller space as the shelter threatened to collapse over our faces with the weight of the snow.

Journey on the Wild Coast - 15
Encounters with Bears
May 5, 2008. Our first spring grizzly bear left a platter-sized track on the early May snow. According to the bear hunters’ calculations, he might have stood eleven and a half feet standing on his hind legs. According to our observations, he was a skinny and hungry eleven and a half feet, even more put out by the late cold spring than we were. Hig videoed the bear’s circling investigation while I stood by with the pepper spray ready. We were happy not to end up as lunch in one of the tensest bear encounters we’ve ever had (out of hundreds).

Journey on the Wild Coast - 16
Packraft along Unimak Cliffs
June 17, 2008. We paddled around the fog-shrouded cliffs of Unimak Island, watching bears napping on ledges, making slow progress through a landscape with far too many things to photograph. I fixed my eyes on land to keep from becoming seasick in the small swells.

“So, how was your trip?”

“Awesome!” I reply unrevealingly. Or, “It was everything.” Or, “It was a year…,” my voice trailing off in the hopelessness of answering.

We get this question from everyone. As if we could sum up a year-long expedition in the same few words one might use to describe a week on a Caribbean cruise.

Images pop into my head. Swatting a seemingly infinite stream of mosquitoes beneath a baking July sun while climbing through a steep forest of yellow cedar… Nudging our packrafts through a maze of shifting ice floes while trying to find a way across the nearly-solid Knik Arm… Hunkering down in a thicket of alders which were shaking and roaring in a late May snowstorm…

Tracing the line of the journey back, I can picture each of the events that came between, connecting these disparate images. But I have a hard time believing that they were part of the same trip.

We journeyed from the middle of Seattle to the first Aleutian Island. We traveled 4,000 miles – about 1,000 by packraft, 1,000 by skis, and the remaining 2,000 on foot. We finished on day 385 – a year and two weeks from the journey’s beginning. In over a year, we didn’t step into a car, skiff, airplane, or any other form of motorized transport. Temperatures ranged from 90F to -30F. I can’t even guess at the speed of the wind or the number of storms.

“The weather was awesome.”

Soon after we returned, we gave an interview to an NPR’s Weekend America. “I asked you about what you learned, and you keep telling me about the weather!” the host exclaimed.

When we attempt to add flesh to the skeleton description of our journey, we find our words inevitably circling in the pattern of seasons and storms. Long before we decided on this particular trip, I was enchanted by the idea of an expedition that spanned the seasons. Summer would be warm. Winter would be cold. We would need to change our gear and mode of transport with the seasons. We would see everything.

Only the last of those expectations began to approach the true experience of a year spent entirely outdoors. Snow melted, bugs came out, berries ripened, day breezes broke the uncomfortable heat, we wore shorts and silly sun hats, leaves turned yellow and brown, mushrooms popped up, leaves blew off the bushes, we wore fleece most of the time, we were moistened by a seemingly endless gray drizzle, mushrooms froze, the days grew darker, waves whipped the ocean’s surface, storms howled along the coast, bears denned up, snow flew, thin ice crept across the water, we stuffed grass in our too-thin mittens, snow piled on our coats and packrafts, we added a down quilt to our gear, we stepped into skis, zero degree weather started feeling warm, we skied firmly-frozen rivers and lakes, the sun returned, wind blew, snow fell, we left forests behind, blowing rain ended the cold snaps, the sun rose high and blazing, thundering booms went off beneath the slowly-thawing lake ice, snow melted, wind blew, skis were abandoned, sea ice cracked up, snow fell, lakes began to thaw, wind howled, snow fell, bears woke up, wind screamed, the first green sprouts poked above the red-brown tundra, snow fell, wind roared, we floated full spring rivers, wild greens graced all our meals, rain blew sideways, flowers bloomed, and the wind shook the earth.

Our moods were shackled to the weather. The first storms were an exhilarating rush of wind. Later gales left us feeling weary and battered. Even now in a calmer world, a strong gust of wind subconsciously triggers excitement and apprehension – for a gale that never comes. The persistent drizzles of fall soaked into our psyches, and it sometimes felt as if my brain itself would dissolve. The call of a new bird returning north could turn any day wondrous. Flashes of sun made us ecstatic. Waiting for spring was a months-long state of being that penetrated every corner of our minds. With only a few sheets of lightweight fabric between us and the outside world, through regions with some of the most extreme weather in the world, our moods followed the swirls of the air.

“The terrain was amazing.”

“I’ve flown over all that country,” the pilot said, shaking his head in incredulity. “And I can’t even begin to imagine how you would do it!”

There’s a reason that when people set out to walk around the world, they go nowhere near this coast, preferring to pass through Alaska in the more open, less-rugged arctic. The arc of the north Pacific is a line that seems simple only when viewed from a long way up in space.

We fought our way through thickets of logging slash, salal, devils’ club, willow, and blueberry. We struggled over steep bouldery scrambles and treacherous snow slopes. We walked the open expanses of gravel roads, sandy beaches, granite ridgetops, mossy meadows, crumbling blufftops, frozen lakes, windblown tundra, wind-packed snow, and fields of lava. We paddled bouldery creeks, giant rivers, calm inlets, swirling tidal rapids, crystal clear lakes, white-capping channels, and iceberg-choked bays. We skied on rutted snowmachine trails, through fluffy snow on frozen creeks and in thick black spruce forest, across frozen estuaries, on glare ice in six inches of water, over the wind-packed snow on lakes, valleys, and ridges, and on the half exposed cranberry plants where there was hardly any snow left at all.

It was a purposeful inconsistency. We’ve never been attracted to polar expeditions, long desert crossings, or journeys across the ocean. We’re impatient. Both Hig and I have a mindset perfect for a packrafter – someone who’s not content to travel in the same way or through the same sort terrain for any appreciable chunk of time.

You might think that after seeing so much wild terrain, one would become jaded – that each piece of new country would be a little less interesting than the last. But even at the end of the journey, battered by blowing rain, out of food, and with nearly every piece of our gear rent by bushes, stones, and one particularly unwelcoming bear, we never stopped planning for future expeditions.

“Nothing will ever be the same.”

It’s a tired cliché that a long journey will change your life. Even for two experienced people who thought we’d gone through all the metamorphosis the wilderness had to offer long ago. Even for people who weren’t looking for change. There’s something inexplicably powerful about stepping out beyond the realm of anything you’ve ever done before.

Maybe we’ll even do the same trip again, in another 25 years or so to see how the world has changed. But next time, we’ll pick a warmer year.

The Journey’s End: Summarizing 4000 Miles Along the Wild Coast (Podcast)

A few weeks after completing their 4000-mile journey by foot, ski and packraft from Seattle to the Aleutian Islands, Erin and Hig share a tale of a destructive bear encounter, their favorite gear, future plans, and why being good at transitions was a vital ingredient to the trip’s success.

Journey on the Wild Coast - Journeys End - 1
Snapshot of a marathon sewing session to repair 24 inches of bear-slashed gashes in the shelter.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Kahtoola, based in Flagstaff, Arizona, has a passion for innovation and quality outdoor gear. Their flexible KTS crampons, Step-in Snowshoe options and MICROspikes stretch-on traction products are trend setting designs that outperform other products in their category and are all backed by Kahtoola’s Satisfaction Guarantee. See them at www.kahtoola.com or call 866 330 8030.

Overview

Hig Higman and Erin McKittrick left their apartment in Seattle, Washington on June 9, 2007. They completed their journey on Unimak Island on June 27, 2008. Two days later they were aboard their first motorized transport in over a year – the ferry to Seldovia, Alaska. At the time of this interview, they have spent the last few weeks in Seldovia visiting family and friends. I called them at Hig’s mother’s home so they could share some final thoughts on their epic journey.

Erin and Hig begin by recounting their only destructive bear encounter, which ironically happened on the very final leg of their long journey. A brown bear on Unimak Island found their Therm-a-Rests, tent, and packraft tasty – without paying much attention to their food. Hig gives a detailed account of repairing the two-foot bear tear in his packraft. His method is different than depicted in the famous Sheri Tingey video (where she simulates a field repair on a bear shredded packraft). Hig uses only dental floss and Aqua Seal and is proud to say his repair holds air the first time (which he tests with his tongue) and is trustworthy enough for a few miles of ocean paddling.

Hig and Erin go on to list their favorite gear and talk about the top option for their next big adventure. They hope to “follow the coal” by visiting the northwest Arctic – site of huge coal deposits – then visiting coal-fired power plants in China (likely the biggest customer for Arctic coal), and following the plants’ carbon dioxide emissions to the Gulf of Alaska where they will closely examine any existing evidence of climate change.

Finally, they talk about what it is like to be back in semi-civilization in Seldovia after a year-long trek. Surprisingly, they have made the transition with ease. They are full of plans for future joint adventures, and Erin is eagerly beginning a book about their Wild Coast journey. Both realize that they have a gift for transitioning, having done it repeatedly on the Wild Coast – they estimate they stayed with thirty families on their journey. They laughingly describe the advantages of their next home. They plan to erect a yurt or maybe a ten-foot-square garbage shed on Hig’s Mom’s property in Seldovia. They muse that it’ll be roomier than their pyramid tarp, since the sides are vertical, and they are happy they won’t have to set it up over and over again night after night.

The sense of humor that seems to have helped them withstand months of physical and mental challenges with relative ease is still obviously intact. Their sense of adventure is undaunted. There is no doubt they will be off on another adventure soon enough.

2008 Backpacking Light Staff Picks

Backpacking Light staff pick their favorite gear of 2008.

Another year has gone by and it is time once again for the BackpackingLight staff to come up with their lists of favorite pieces of gear. Some have commented that it is getting noticeably tougher to come up with three pieces of gear that have become most favored and most depended upon over the past year. But in due time the staff came up with their lists and this is the result.

This isn’t an “Editor’s Choice” or formal endorsement, just a list of gear we like.

Enjoy – and don’t forget to add your own 2008 favorites in the forum below.Your BPL Eds

2008 Staff Picks of Favorite Gear
Backpacking Light Staff Member Favorite Pieces of Gear
Ryan Jordan Alpacka Packraft Titanium Goat Vertex 8+ and Titanium Stove Beartooth Merino Hoody
Chris Townsend Inov-8 Terroc shoes Caldera Ti-Tri Jack Wolfskin Gecko
Roger Caffin Silnylon & Carbon Fibre Two-Man Double-Skin Winter Tent Coleman Xtreme Canon A95
Mike Martin Nunatak Skaha Plus Down Sweater, Front Pocket Version SMC Snow Saw Arcteryx Alpha SL Pants
Will Rietveld Trail Designs/AntiGravityGear Caldera Keg Keen Ridgeline Trail Running Shoe Sea To Summit Mullet Cap
Mike Clelland! The FireLite SUL Short Handled Titanium Spoon Hefty Trash Compactor Bags FlexAir Dual Compartment Ultralight Pillow
Carol Crooker GoLite Footwear Sun Dragon Shoes Big Agnes Clearview Air Pad Big Agnes Cyclone SL Chair Kit
Kevin Sawchuk ULA Conduit Bushbuddy Custom Nunatak Arc Specialist (w/ 2oz overfill/custom sizing)
Sam Haraldson Google Earth and gpsvisualizer.com Software Packages FireLite Mini Firestarting Kits Ultralight Adventure Equipment Amp Backpack
Don Wilson Arc’Teryx Squamish Windshell Canon 40D Camera Letters to a Young Poet, by Rainer Maria Rilke
Alan Dixon Olympus E-520 Digital SLR Camera with Zuiko 12-60 mm Lens Anti Gravity Gear Caldera Kitchen (for AGG 3-cup Pot) Bozeman Mountain Works Stealth 1 Nano Tarp
Doug Johnson Trail Designs Caldera Keg Six Moon Designs Refuge X Hilleberg Kaitum 2
Rick Dreher Hennessy Hammock Hyperlite Asymmetrical BPL FireLite Ti Trappers Mug Pacific Outdoor Equipment Insulated Airmat (Thermo 6)
Ben Klocek Golite Jam2 Canon PowerShot SD630 Camera Patagonia Wool 2
Janet Reichl Teva Aniso eVENT Shoe Petzl E+Lite Headlamp Granite Gear Air Space Bag
Alison Simon REI Sahara Convertible Pants REI Stoke 19 Day Pack (DIAD pack) Pro Bars (new Savory flavors)

Ryan Jordan, Publisher and Editorial Director – Bozeman, Montana

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 1

Alpacka Packraft
www.alpackaraft.com
It’s taken me four years to put the packraft on my picks list, but now I’m ready. The deal was sealed this year as I shared my other boats on some great trips with friends and family. It’s one thing enjoying a ride in a packraft, it’s quite another watching somebody else do the same. My model of choice: the little Alpacka, with a spray deck (90 oz in blue) and Sawyer Packraft Paddle (28 oz). Photo: Pacific Creek, Teton Wilderness, July 2008.

Weight: 118 oz in specified setup
MSRP: $1100

2008 Staff Favorites - 2

Titanium Goat Vertex 8+ and Titanium Stove
www.titaniumgoat.com
OK, so it’s not my first choice for long distance hiking or SUL. But there is something to be said about the benefits (social, practical, and emotional) of having fire crackling in a wood stove inside your tent. Who said car camping and backcountry base camping can’t also enjoy ultralight style? The tent with a carbon pole weighs about 5.5 lbs, and the small titanium box stove will only set you back 2.5 lbs. Add 10 lbs of gear and 10 lbs of food, and you’re still tipping the scales sub-30 lbs with potential for extreme comfort and high class wilderness living.

Weight: 8 lbs for both
MSRP: $1300

2008 Staff Favorites - 3

Beartooth Merino Hoody
www.backpackinglight.com
While you’ve been waiting for this product to come to market, I’ve had the privilege of wearing it all year. This is my absolute favorite piece of clothing, period, if there is any possibility of temperatures less than 50 degrees.

Weight: 8 oz (size medium)
MSRP: $110

Chris Townsend, Senior Gear Editor – Grantown-on-Spey, Scotland

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 4

Inov-8 Terroc shoes
www.inov-8.com
When I first changed from boots to shoes many years ago, I couldn’t imagine hiking footwear as light as Inov-8s. I’ve tried several of the range, and the Terrocs are the ones that fit my wide feet best. After several years of wearing Terrocs on every type of terrain, they have become firm favorites. I find them supportive and stable on rough terrain, and the grip is excellent. They’re surprisingly durable for such ultralight shoes too. I’ve worn them on two twelve-day high level crossings of the Scottish Highlands on the TGO Challenge, and they’re still in good condition, with just a dab of superglue needed on a couple of seams.

Weight: 330 g (11.6 oz)
MSRP: $85

2008 Staff Favorites - 5

Caldera Ti-Tri
www.titaniumgoat.com
www.traildesigns.com
When the Caldera Cone appeared, I was excited and impressed. An ultralight alcohol stove system with the same protection as the full weight Trangia was a wonderful breakthrough in design. It was the first ultralight alcohol stove I used regularly. The Ti-Tri system is even better as it can be used as a wood burner with alcohol as a back-up on trips where wood won’t be available all the time, or for stormy weather where I want to cook under cover. The latest version of the Ti-Tri even has a lightweight grate that fits inside the cone. The Ti-Tri is the result of collaboration between two innovative ultralight gear companies, Titanium Goat and Trail Designs. It’s great to see such companies working together to produce such an excellent product.

Weight: 7 oz for 550 ml size
MSRP: $110

2008 Staff Favorites - 6

Jack Wolfskin Gecko
www.jack-wolfskin.com
Simple lightweight fleece tops are often overlooked in favor of more hi-tech softshell and synthetic insulated garments. However, when I look at the warm top I use more than any other, the one that finds its way into my pack year round, it turns out it’s the Gecko, a fleece sweater with no features other than a short neck zip and a stand-up collar. In summer this is often the only warm top I carry. In winter I may wear it all day as a mid layer. Durability is excellent – my Gecko is in good condition despite being used hundreds of times during the last eight years. And at a weight of just 8 oz, it’s the lightest fleece sweater I know.

Weight: 8 oz
MSRP: $68

Roger Caffin, Senior Editor – Berrilee, NSW, Australia

A bit of a mix this year – one MYOG tent, one faithful canister stove and a faithful camera.

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 7

Silnylon & Carbon Fibre Two-Man Double-Skin Winter Tent This is the tent my wife and I had in our epic trip featured in When Things Go Wrong. Despite being pitched on a saddle right in the path of an extreme storm (a very silly place, really), it and we survived the night in relative comfort. It just goes to show what an MYOG project can produce. This tent has generous space for my wife and me, with a groundsheet space of 2.2 x 1.2 m (7.2 x 3.9 ft) and an internal height of a bit under 1.0 m (39 in). The bathtub groundsheet and the inner tent kept the spindrift out all night – and would keep insects out too. It has good ventilation when we need it, with roof-height vents at both ends, as well as optional ground-level clearance all around if the sod cloths are raised. There is a large vestibule at the front end, big enough for disrobing, storing our packs, and cooking dinner.

Weight: 1.77 kg (62 oz)
MSRP: Make it yourself!

2008 Staff Favorites - 8

Coleman Xtreme
www.coleman.com
This is the gold standard for winter stoves. The weight quoted includes a full 300 g fuel canister. Some liquid fuel stoves weigh this much with an empty fuel canister! I have used this stove for many years, and it has been wonderfully reliable. I know that when I fire it up, we are going to have a hot dinner in short order. It does not flare up even when starting (unlike many liquid fuel stoves!) and can be operated quite safely inside my tent while the storm rages outside. It can simmer gently or melt snow.

Weight: 726 g (25.6 oz)
MSRP: About $65, if you can find one

2008 Staff Favorites - 9

Canon A95
www.usa.canon.com
It may be getting old these days, and it may be only five megapixels and lack image stabilisation, but this camera has served me for many years now with great faithfulness. I trust and rely on it. I can use it freehand, on a tripod, or hooked up to my computer. How did I get this photo of it? I used a mirror!

Weight: 303 g (10.7 oz) – including 4 AA lithium batteries
MSRP: discontinued model

Mike Martin, Senior Techniques Editor – Coeur d’Alene, Idaho

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 10

Nunatak Skaha Plus Down Sweater, Front Pocket Version
www.nunatakusa.com
This jacket is unbelievably warm for its weight. The 800+ fill-power down, Pertex Quantum shell fabric, and half-zip cut weight, while the hood, handwarmer pocket, and fully-baffled construction add warmth. This is my “go to” parka for temperatures ranging from 0F to 45F. I use it in my daypack for backcountry skiing and as part of my sleep system with a quilt. The Skaha Plus has no unnecessary features that add bulk or weight, while the pass-thru pocket is almost worth the 13.7-ounce weight alone as a handwarmer for my chronically cold fingers. Nunatak is a semi-custom shop, so I ordered my jacket with overfill to further improve its warmth per weight ratio and allow me to take it into colder conditions. If I could change one thing, it would be to use a slightly heavier, but sturdier and less snag-prone zipper.

Weight: 13.7 oz (size large with 1.5 oz overfill)
MSRP: $390

2008 Staff Favorites - 11

SMC Snow Saw
www.smc-gear.com
Are you looking for the lightest possible winter shelter? Bring a tool instead of a tent and build your own! The SMC Snow saw is one of the lightest commercially available snow saws at 3.4 ounces. It is beautifully made from a single piece of anodized aluminum. And, it cuts through snow like butter. Adding a snow saw to your winter kit allows you to make much more precise shapes out of snow than a you could with a shovel alone. Let your inner snow sculptor free and build lavish kitchens, snow walls, doghouses, or even an igloo. Ever play with Lego blocks as a kid? A saw gives you ability to make life-size blocks. All you need is the right snow, enough time, and your imagination. The only modification I’ve made to mine after a year of use is to wrap the grip in bicycle handlebar tape to make it warmer and more comfortable to hold.

Weight: 3.4 oz
MSRP: $34

2008 Staff Favorites - 12

Arcteryx Alpha SL Pants
www.arcteryx.com
After slogging through wet snow for four days at 9,000 feet elevation on Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking Course III in the Fall of 2007 wearing lycra tights and a pair of non-waterproof wind pants, I began a search for a better leg layering system for cold, wet, snowy conditions. I wanted a waterproof/breathable shell to protect against possible rain that I could put on easily while wearing snowshoes, or alternatively, a shell that was breathable and well-ventilated enough that I could leave it on continuously over a wide range of conditions. The Arcteryx Alpha SL pants fit the latter criteria perfectly. The 2-layer Goretx Paclite pants have “hip zips” that run from the cuffs to the hipbone area. This obviously doesn’t allow fully separating the zippers to put the pants on over boots or snowshoes, but by stopping the zip below the waist, the design minimizes bulk under a pack’s waistbelt, and relieves stress on the top of the zipper. The zips are still long enough to provide amazing ventilation – so much so that I’ve found the pants can simply be left on constantly, eliminating layering changes. For the past year, my snowshoeing leg layer system has consisted of the SL Pants, long johns of appropriate thickness for the expected temperature range, and shortie gaiters. I’ve found the combination to be extremely dry and comfortable over a wide range of temperatures, precipitation types, and wind conditions.

Weight: 9.3 oz (size medium-tall)
MSRP: $199 (estimated)

Will Rietveld, Associate Editor – Durango, Colorado

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 13

Trail Designs/AntiGravityGear Caldera Keg
www.traildesigns.com
www.antigravitygear.com
I can’t imagine a lighter complete cooking system than this. The minimal essentials consisting of a pot and lid, Caldera cone, and alcohol stove weigh just 2.7 ounces, and the complete kit with lip guard, insulator sleeve, fuel bottle, measuring cup, and carrying tube (which doubles as a bowl and cup) adds another 3.6 ounces. An expanded kit called the Caldera Caddy Sack (US$15) from AntiGravityGear adds a pot cozy and stuff sack. The pot in this system is a recycled Heineken 25.4 ounce beer can, which is easily damaged. But the beauty of the complete kit is that everything fits inside a thin plastic tube with a screw cap, which protects the contents and makes the system very compact for packing. In use, I preferred to use the beer can pot for just boiling water, and the plastic bowl, cup, and cozy for hydrating food and eating/drinking. The latter are easier to eat out of and clean.

Weight: 6.3 oz
MSRP: $60

2008 Staff Favorites - 14

Keen Ridgeline Trail Running Shoe
www.keenfootwear.com
I have wide feet, so it’s hard to find lightweight footwear that fits me well. I found the Keen Ridgeline to be comfortable right out of the box, and it continues to be comfortable after many miles of on- and off-trail hiking. They are quite light, but still provide plenty of cushioning and support. I like a low cut trail runner that has a good midsole TPU plate for rock protection and support, plus a grippy outsole, and a breathable mesh upper that doesn’t let a lot of dust and sand to come through. And (for me) the toebox needs to be really wide. Fit and comfort are probably the most important attributes when choosing a trail shoe, and the Keen Ridgeline is one that really comes through for me.

Weight: 13.4 oz/shoe (men’s 9)
MSRP: $90

2008 Staff Favorites - 15

Sea To Summit Mullet Cap
www.seatosummit.com
I personally prefer a hiking cap with a removable skirt that can be easily added when it’s needed for sun and wind protection. The Sea to Summit Mullet Cap is the best I have found. The cap is constructed of seven pieces, so it really fits well, and its H2Off fabric is very durable as well as UV and water resistant. The skirt attaches to four Velcro patches on the cap, so it’s very easy to add or remove. To hold it in place in the wind the cap has an elastic cord and cordlock in back and a snap on the skirt under the chin. I have been wearing the Mullet Cap year-around on numerous trips for three years now and it just keeps going and going. When it gets dirty, it cleans up well in the wash machine, and there are very few signs of wear. I like to wear a billed cap like the Mullet when wearing a hooded jacket, to keep the hood from blocking my vision and to keep my eyeglasses dry in the rain. This type of cap is also called a Havelock, named after an English general (Major General Sir Henry Havelock) who popularized it during campaigns in India in the mid 1800s.

Weight: 2.7 oz
MSRP: $30

Mike Clelland!, Contributor – Driggs Idaho

These are tight times. There is a collective belt tightening going on all around us, and I worry people equate lightweight camping with spending big bucks. Not true. These Spartan picks reflect my Scottish heritage. Each item is under $10.

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 16

The FireLite SUL Short Handled Titanium Spoon
www.backpackinglight.com
Spoons have been around for a long time, right? Way back – when one of our creative ancestors might have carved the very first spoon out of a mastodon bone. In the intervening years, you think we would have perfected it. Well, it happened – finally! The FireLite SUL Short Handled Titanium Spoon is a monument of simplicity and functionality. There is a subtle little flat area right along the tip, and that simple detail makes it delightfully easy to clean out the inside of a mug or the cook pot. It doesn’t stop there: the handle on the spoon is stiff and straight, the perfect tool to clean the inside of a smooth walled pot. Gloppy caked on crud is effortlessly shaved off with this fine spoon. Plus, you can even eat dinner with it!

This little spoon is flawless.

Weight: 0.25 oz
MSRP: $7

2008 Staff Favorites - 17

Hefty Trash Compactor Bags I do NOT use a pack cover. I line my backpack with ONE plastic bag. I have no redundancy. These bags are plenty big to line my lightweight backpack with enough extra to wrap over at the top for absolute waterproofing. These are highly specialized, heavy gage (2.5 mil) white plastic, designed for those electric kitchen trash compactors, and easily found in the grocery store. I have yet to find anything better or lighter. These are sturdy enough to last for multiple trips; I used one for all of last summer, and I plan on getting another year out of it. Plus, they’re white, so it’s easy to find stuff in the bag. If the tarp is wet in the morning, I stuff it in the bottom of my backpack first, then put the compactor bag on top. Everything inside the compactor bag stays dry. I put my rain gear on top, outside the bag, because if it rains, I’ll end up wearing it. Simple!

Weight: 2.2 oz
MSRP: $6 for 5

2008 Staff Favorites - 18

FlexAir Dual Compartment Ultralight Pillow
www.backpackinglight.com
I need a BIG pillow when I sleep. A traditional camper will simply roll up his pile jacket and extra down vest, jam it in a stuff sack, and get a wonderful support for his noggin. Not so for the UL camper. When I go into the mountains, I plan on sleeping in all my clothes, leaving nothing for my head. Now, I’ve tried the other FlexAir pillows, and the slightly heavier Dual Compartment version is the only choice for true head cradling. Just don’t blow it up too much, or it feels like you are trying to balance your skull on a beach ball. Also, the straw is a wonderful addition to you arsenal of tools. I used my humble straw to fill a water bottle in the high country of the Gallatin Range in August. We could hear water trickling inside some rocks, but there was no way to get at it. My team mates were dejected, but I whipped out my little pillow straw and eased it into a crack, concocting a nice little faucet. My pillow system saved us!

Weight: 0.98 oz
MSRP: $9 for 3

Carol Crooker, Associate Editor – Mesa, Arizona

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 19

GoLite Footwear Sun Dragon Shoes
www.golite-footwear.com
The Sun Dragons are kind to my feet. Their “Soft Against the Ground” technology keeps my feet fresher during long days of hiking on rocky trails than any other shoes I’ve worn. The wide toe box is another boon. I don’t need to go up half a size – and risk tripping over the excess – to get toe space. I’ve been wearing the 2007 models of these shoes. They wear out quickly, but the 2008 versions are reported to be more durable (both the 2007 and 2008 models are available from online retailers). Although branded by GoLite, the shoes were developed by the Timberland Invention Factory. Doug Clark, formerly of the Invention Factory, bought the shoe design and started a new company to continue manufacturing this line of GoLite shoes. The new line will be delivered to retailers by mid-February but the Sun Dragon is not being carried forward. The new Force model has the same outsole but is heavier (14-15 oz, MSRP $110). The Fire and the Comp are the remaining 2009 trail runner models. Both are lighter weight race shoes with a new lower profile outsole.

Weight: 11.8 oz (335 g) 2007 model
MSRP: available at steep discounts online

2008 Staff Favorites - 20

Big Agnes Clearview Air Pad
www.bigagnes.com
I’ve been getting my best nights of sleep ever in the backcountry on the Clearview pad, a simple air mattress. The secret is the soft polyurethane shell that has more give than the tougher (and heavier) shells of the Big Agnes Air Core and Pacific Outdoor Equipment Ether Thermo pads. The Clearview has no insulation, but I’ve found it just as comfortable with a thin closed cell foam pad on top for warmth. I like to add a 1/16-inch foam pad when it’s 35 F to 45 F, and I’ve slept comfortably with a 3/8-inch pad down to low 20s F.

Weight: 11 oz (312 g) for 20 x 60 x 2.5 inch mummy
MSRP: $35

2008 Staff Favorites - 21

Big Agnes Cyclone SL Chair Kit
www.bigagnes.com
A chair kit is my backpacking luxury item. I find it very relaxing to lounge back in a chair when I’m cooking meals. There is something about being able to tilt back slightly that puts my back at ease better than any rock or tree I’ve leaned against. The Cyclone is the lightest chair kit out there, and carrying an extra 6 oz for the added comfort is definitely worth it for me!

Weight: 6 oz (170 g)
MSRP: $40

Kevin Sawchuk, Ultralight Ambassador – Alamo, California

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 22

ULA Conduit
www.ula-equipment.com
The ULA Conduit is my favorite pack. Its light weight, simple design, and durable materials set it apart from most other packs of its size. Add generous waistbelt pockets, several usable water carrying options, and a large mesh outer pocket, and there’s no other pack with such practical features. Its smaller and bigger brothers are my other favorites when less or more capacity is needed.

Weight: 20 oz
MSRP: $125

2008 Staff Favorites - 23

Bushbuddy Custom
www.bushbuddy.ca/
There’s currently only one of these in existence but it takes the Bushbuddy concept and makes it applicable to larger groups and winter travel. Its larger size makes it about three times easier to use than the regular Bushbuddy, so melting snow and cooking for three to four people is feasible. Keep talking to Fritz, and he may make this commercial. Shown with a one-gallon pot.

Weight: 10.5 oz
MSRP: A confession might result in divorce, but it cost more per oz than the standard Bushbuddy… a lot more.

2008 Staff Favorites - 24

Nunatak Arc Specialist (w/ 2oz overfill/custom sizing)
www.nunatakusa.com/
Tom Halpin makes a mean sleeping bag. I’ve had several of his bags over the years, from a thirteen-ounce super fast-packing lightweight to a twenty-four-ounce version that kept me warm at 5 F without insulated clothing. Tom’s top notch service, workmanship, material choices, and bag options make these my favorite bags.

Weight: 18 oz
MSRP: $400

Sam Haraldson, Marketing Director – Bozeman, Montana

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 25

Google Earth and gpsvisualizer.com Software Packages
www.earth.google.com/
www.gpsvisualizer.com
For those looking into free digital solutions to research, plan, and map routes for their upcoming excursions, a collection of online applications are available to do this easily. First, using the Google Earth software, draw a path that coincides with the route you are planning. There are layers available for the Google Earth application that allow you to view USGS topographic maps overlaid on the surface of the earth, which make finding your route easier if you plan to walk trails. Once you’ve dialed in your path, export the file and visit gpsvisualizer.com. You can upload the exported file and use the various sections of the website to create elevation and distance profiles, convert your data into various formats, print maps, and more. We can talk about gear in online forums until our keyboarding fingers bleed, but it’s not worth anything unless you plan some quality trips to take it on. The Google Earth and GPS Visualizer software broadens your ability to visualize a trip beforehand, helps you to remember it after, and does a fine job of it.

Weight: 0.0 oz
MSRP: Donation requested

2008 Staff Favorites - 26

FireLite Mini Firestarting Kits
www.backpackinglight.com
There is a feeling of self-sufficiency I get from starting a fire in my camp stove using the FireLite Mini Firestarting Kit. Although I still carry a lighter and some waterproof matches in a watertight emergency backup kit, I enjoy a small wood fire for a number of reasons. Being able to leave the chemical fuels at home and burn a fuel sustainable to the environment I’m in, as well as not having to plan a fuel resupply strategy nor carry its weight on my back are all great reasons to pack this product.

Weight: 0.81 oz. (23 g)
MSRP: $12

2008 Staff Favorites - 27

Ultralight Adventure Equipment Amp Backpack
www.ula-equipment.com
Bridging the gap between super-ultralight and super-durable, the Amp is the perfect pack for weekend-plus backpacking trips. With an ideal volume for gear and consumables needed for a weekend or more, and the carrying comfort to match, the ULA Amp went with me on all of my short backpacking excursions in 2008. In the dead of summer, its volume was just right for a couple of liters of water, my tarp, UL 60 Quilt, and a Caldera Cone cook kit. The Amp’s design is such that it stays below your neck and between your shoulders. This, paired with its durable construction, make it excellent for off-trail pursuits, and I carried it on numerous summit bids this year. The ULA Amp hits home for its size, durability, and perfection in filling a niche.

Weight: 10.6 oz. (300 g)
MSRP: $89

Don Wilson, Editorial Correspondent – Tucson, Arizona

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 28

Arc’Teryx Squamish Windshell
www.arcteryx.com/
This windshell has become my shell of choice over the past year. At about 5 ounces, it is not the lightest shell out there, but it has a very good feature set, very high quality production, and the nicest windshell fabric I’ve used. For my use, which includes some climbing, the fabric is a very good balance of comfort, breathability and durability which I have not found equaled in other windshells. I’ve taken it on many trips this year, from warm desert hikes to cold, high altitude climbs, and it has remained a favorite for the full breadth of my hikes. It also looks great. Everyone who sees it asks me about it. It will be with me for some time to come. Its biggest drawback is the price – MSRP is $139.

Weight: 5 oz
MSRP: $139

2008 Staff Favorites - 29

Canon 40D Camera
www.usa.canon.com
OK, this baby is HEAVY. It is a full DSLR weighing in at 2 or 3 pounds, depending on what lenses and other gear I carry. It has refreshed my interest in photography, dramatically improved my images, and generally added enjoyment to my trips, both during and after each hike. If that banishes me from the lightweight brotherhood, so be it. I rationalize it by convincing myself that if my other gear is light, I can carry this beauty. Best of all, there have been innumerable new opportunities to look with new eyes upon trees, and leaves, and snow, and flowing water. My hiking companions may get annoyed at times, but when we can all share a sunset in order to take a few pics, then it is all worthwhile. While I enjoy this specific camera, it is really the process of photography and awareness that has been the payoff. Street price about $800.

Weight: 2 to 3 lbs
MSRP: $800

2008 Staff Favorites - 30

Letters to a Young Poet, by Rainer Maria Rilke This is another unconventional gear choice, but that’s my mission. I carried this slim volume when I hiked the John Muir Trail with my wife a few years back. We read to each other at night, and discussed our reading while we hiked. This fine series of letters discusses the challenges of following your passion, and struggling to find your way through life. The enjoyment and memories of our ten day hike were perhaps more impacted by this small volume than any other gear choice we made. Hiking with your best friend, through beautiful and difficult terrain, all the while sparked by great conversation – that’s about as good as it gets. MSRP $9, weight about 2 ounces.

Weight: 2 oz
MSRP: $9

Alan Dixon, Editorial Correspondent – Washington, D.C.

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 31

Olympus E-520 Digital SLR Camera with Zuiko 12-60 mm Lens
www.olympusamerica.com
A six-ounce point and shoot camera won’t do if I want sharp 16×20 inch or larger prints with rich, accurate color (or even smaller sizes, for that matter). So in the last few years, I have been taking a light digital SLR on more and more backpacking trips. I find that the Olympus E-520 hits the sweet spot of performance to weight for a backpacking camera. While I love the outstanding photographic results from cameras like the Nikon D300 with a 18-200 mm VR lens, or the Canon 5D Mk II with a 24-105 mm IS lens, they weigh around 3.5 pounds! True, the E-520’s smaller 4/3 sensor gives up a bit in dynamic range, resolution, and ISO performance to the larger and much more expensive D300 or 5D. But the smaller and lighter E-520 performs admirably in most lighting situations (and with a bit of skill, in many difficult lighting situations as well). I prefer the E-520 over the slightly lighter E-420, for its built-in image stabilization and greater dynamic range. The Zuiko 12-60 mm (24-120 mm, 35 equiv) is a superb lens – one of the very best digital zooms on the market. Best of all, I get beautiful photographs from the E-520 and 12-60 lens combo.

Note: This may all change if Olympus’ entry into the new Micro 4/3 Format camera comes in around 10 oz for the body. If so, with a fixed normal lens, one might get DSLR results from a 13-14 oz camera and lens combo. I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

Olympus E-520 SLR Digital Camera (body only)
Weight: 19 oz (with battery)
MSRP: $649
Olympus 12-60mm f/2.8-4 ED SWD Zuiko Zoom Lens
Weight: 18 oz
MSRP: $749

2008 Staff Favorites - 32

Anti Gravity Gear Caldera Kitchen (for AGG 3-cup Pot)
www.antigravitygear.com
The AGG Caldera Kitchen is the ideal couple’s ultralight cooking system, and my wife and I take it on every trip. The original Trail Designs Caldera made it on my list two years ago. In 2007, packaging genius George “Tin Man” Andrews introduced the AGG Caldera Kitchen. It added so many refinements in functionality and creature comforts to the Caldera system that I am including it again. The AGG 3-cup pot is consistently the most fuel-efficient pot for the TD Caldera system. This adds up to a lot fuel savings on long trips with two people. The 3-cup pot and cozy are a boon in sub-freezing weather. The stove works flawlessly in the 20’s F. Our tea brews properly and stays hot. Our meals actually hydrate and are warm when we eat them. I like a small pack, and the AGG Caldera Kitchen is one of the most compact and abuse resistant two-person alcohol cook sets I’ve used. (When I solo I take a 2.5 oz Trail Designs Caldera Keg.)

The AGG Caldera Kitchen is an ultralight bargain. It includes a full mess kit for two, measuring cup, stove, windscreen, pot cozies, potholder, and stuff sack. A titanium pot alone can approach the cost of the full Caldera Kitchen. The Caldera Kitchen is quite green by backpacking standards, using only small amounts of natural alcohol fuel (vs. open fires, canister stoves etc.) Just say, “I will not use a canister stove again!”

Weight: 11 oz for full kit – (7 to 9 oz in our usual configurations)
MSRP: $80

2008 Staff Favorites - 33

Bozeman Mountain Works Stealth 1 Nano Tarp
www.bozemanmountainworks.com
I like the simplicity and ease of pitching a tarp. At less than 4 oz for a full-coverage tarp, the Cuben fiber Nano is my favorite solo shelter. The Stealth 1 Nano is big enough for two people in a pinch, and my wife and I have used it that way! (Oware calls the same size a 1.5-person tarp.) The large coverage has another weight savings. When I solo, it allows me to use a down bag without a bivy to protect it from rain that might blow under a smaller tarp. In most inclement weather, the Nano keeps me dry with room to store gear and cook. And as always, it provides views and ventilation that a tent simply can’t match. The Nano, while expensive for a tarp, is still inexpensive compared to most UL tents, and you get what you pay for. A tarp or shelter with the same coverage in Spinnaker fabric is almost double the weight.

Weight: 3.9 oz
MSRP: $189, if you can find one

Doug Johnson, Associate Editor – Redmond, Washington

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 34

Trail Designs Caldera Keg
www.traildesigns.com
This is one incredible system. For $60, you get a 6.3 oz system that includes a custom Heineken pot with lid, stove with priming lip, Caldera Cone, a protective caddy that works as a mug or a bowl, insulation cozies for the pot, mug, and bowl, a measuring cup, a fuel bottle, and a silnylon storage bag. It boils water quickly, even in a breeze, and is extremely simple to use. It packs into a small package that protects all of the items. It may not be the lightest option but it’s close, and it’s become my go-to stove for most trips. The Caldera Keg is simply genius.

Weight: 6.3 oz
MSRP: $60

2008 Staff Favorites - 35

Six Moon Designs Refuge X
www.sixmoondesigns.com
At just 16 oz, this is the lightest two-person floored tent in existence. Sure, it doesn’t have a bathtub floor, and it’s not the best shelter in high winds, and it’s expensive… but it’s big enough for two to sit up, has great ventilation, does well in hard rains or moderate winds, and weighs only one pound! This is truly a breakthrough shelter.

Weight: 16 oz
MSRP: $400

2008 Staff Favorites - 36

Hilleberg Kaitum 2
www.hilleberg.com
At under 6 lbs, the Hilleberg Kaitum is not an ultralight summer tent. However, the harder I push this shelter in winter and mountaineering settings, the more I love it. It is spacious for two with easily usable space and dual vestibules that give plenty of room for storage, cooking, and two climbers gearing up in the morning. Best of all, it’s totally bomber; I’ve had this tent in treacherous conditions and laid in my bag smiling while the tent gets absolutely pounded. There are few tents that can claim this combination of usable space, moderate weight, and stormworthiness. The Kaitum is a winner in my book and will be with me on many more adventures.

Weight: 5 lbs, 8 oz
MSRP: $675

Rick Dreher, Photo Editor – Sacramento, California

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 37

Hennessy Hammock Hyperlite Asymmetrical
www.hennessyhammock.com
The Hyperlite is the latest iteration of Hennessy’s lightweight hammock series. Thin, light fabrics and miniscule lines have reduced weight to 26 ounces while retaining the utility of heavier models. NOTHING is more comfortable to sleep in than a correctly set up hammock and the Hyperlite delivered throughout last season. The often overlooked advantage to hammocking is it opens up campsites where ground-dwellers need not apply, especially valued in popular areas on busy weekends, where a hammock provides solitude otherwise unavailable. The only thing they went too far with was the Tree Hugger straps, which are far too short in this model.

Now will somebody please develop under-insulation that’s compact, affordable and easy to use?

Weight: 26 oz
MSRP: $230

2008 Staff Favorites - 38

BPL FireLite Ti Trappers Mug
www.backpackinglight.com
Holding a pint at a scant 37 grams, the Trappers Mug is an impressive achievement. The incredibly thin material, strengthened by the rolled lip, is strong enough for the task and titanium’s low heat transfer rate helps prevent scorched lips. The cup will deform in the pack if not stowed carefully, but can be bent back into shape easily.

I used my own hard-earned shekels on the Trappers Mug so this isn’t a paid endorsement. (I will happily accept honoraria ex post facto.) You want titanium cookware because it is light, strong, doesn’t absorb taste or odors and is practically indestructible, and the FireLite series has pared the weight down to the minimum conceivable using this material. Watch this space for the beryllium series.

Weight: 1.3 oz (37 g)
MSRP: $30

2008 Staff Favorites - 39

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Insulated Airmat (Thermo 6)
www.pacoutdoor.com
When sleeping ground-bound, the POE insulated air mattress (16.6 ounces) is the most comfortable option I’ve found. Unfolding from its submarine sandwich-sized sack, my three-quarter length mattress is my favorite three-season pad option. It’s more comfortable than self-inflators, infinitely more comfortable than a closed-cell foam pad, packs smaller than either and is clearly warmer than a plain air mattress. The main trick is finding the correct inflation (sufficient give without touching the ground).

It’s slipperier than most pads when on silnylon tent floors and not as warm as thicker self-inflators, but in balance it’s the best three-season pad I’ve used. I can imagine only a down-filled mattress as being a step up from this for overall comfort. Little wonder MSR is entering the fray next year.

Weight: 16.6 oz
MSRP: $65

Ben Klocek, Production Editor – Sebastopol, California

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 40

Golite Jam2
www.golite.com
I love this simple pack that expands and contracts to fit my gear. With a little tightening of the compression straps, I don’t even need to “MYOG” support using my sleeping pad. The roomy front pocket keeps all my essentials handy, and while the shoulder straps are a little on the wimpy side, this encourages me to keep my load light. I usually don’t use the waist strap, as I love the freedom and the feel of the wind blowing up my shirt without it, but buckle that baby up and the load capacity increases by 10 lbs. My base weight hovers around 8.5 lbs, and with a weekender trailhead weight of 15 lbs, this pack is golden.

Weight: 1 lb, 5 oz
MSRP: $75

2008 Staff Favorites - 41

Canon PowerShot SD630 Camera
www.usa.canon.com
This is a simple, fast, high quality camera with a great macro and plenty of advanced options that can take a beating. When this camera finally died, I replaced it with another just like it. I carry it in my pocket on all trips and hardly notice it’s there until I need it. Then, with a few button presses, I’ve got the right settings for the shot and – click – a perfect shot every time. The huge view finder is great, and I don’t ever miss the “hold-it-to-your-eye” view finder that other cameras have. I love being able to hold it over my head or down near the ground without needing to get there myself and still getting great photos.

Weight: 5 oz
MSRP: $600

2008 Staff Favorites - 42

Patagonia Wool 2
www.patagonia.com
Can you say soft? This shirt is like snuggling with my honey! I’d wear it all the time if I could afford more of them. The only downside is the price, so if you can find one on sale, get it. For a simple base layer that wicks away the sweat, stays smelling rosy fresh, and feels great on your skin, the Wool 2 is perfect. It’s a lightweight fabric, so it can’t take much abuse, but I use it as a base layer that is not subjected to much bushwhacking and rock. It’s got a great slim cut, which looks great for town when worn over a t-shirt.

Weight: 5.9 oz
MSRP: $70

Janet Reichl, Editorial Correspondent – Durango, Colorado

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 43

Teva Aniso eVENT Shoe
www.teva.com
The Teva Aniso has a softshell outer fabric and an eVENT waterproof-breathable lining. It fits well, breathes well, is quite light weight, and very supportive. I started out wearing them only when I was expecting some wet conditions, but since they breathe so well I now also wear them in dry conditions. I find them comfortable for desert hiking in cooler weather, and in particular I like that the softshell fabric doesn’t allow sand to pass through like mesh uppers do. These shoes have a wider toebox, and though my feet are not necessarily wide, I find them very comfortable both on and off-trail. The OrthoLite midsole provides good cushioning and the aggressive outsole provides very good traction. The uppers have TPU reinforcements bonded to the softshell fabric for protection and extra support. The Aniso has held up well to off-trail hiking.

Weight: 11 oz/shoe (women’s 7)
MSRP: $100

2008 Staff Favorites - 44

Petzl E+Lite Headlamp
www.petzl.com
On backpacking trips when I plan to do some reading or crossword puzzles in the evenings, I like to take the Petzl E+Lite instead of a pinch light. It’s one of the lightest headlamps around, and frees my hands to do other things. It uses two CR2032 Lithium batteries, which are the flat ones that are commonly used in sport watches. The batteries are inexpensive and last a surprisingly long time. The light has low and high settings, plus a flash, is easy to turn on and off with light gloves and its ball joint pivot makes it easy to point to the desired angle.

Weight: 0.95 oz
MSRP: $30

2008 Staff Favorites - 45

Granite Gear Air Space Bag
www.granitegear.com
The Granite Gear Air Space zippered stuff sack is a wonderful multipurpose item. The size small that I use is perfect to stuff my sleeping bag or insulated clothing. When in camp, it becomes a place to contain smaller items. At night I put any extra clothing in it and use it as a pillow. Its rectangular shape makes it easier to pack in a backpack and for it to stay in place when used as a pillow. The large opening provided by the long, waterproof zipper makes it easy to find things inside. On each end there is a grosgrain handle that provides counter force for zipping or to help pull the sack out of my pack. Made of silnylon, the sack slides easily out of a pack and is especially handy for wet weather or winter camping, when I can lay it down on the wet ground or snow and the things inside do not get wet.

Weight: 1.5 oz (size S)
MSRP: $18

Alison Simon, Editorial Correspondent – Washington, D.C.

Selections focused on economical purchase.

 

2008 Staff Favorites - 46

REI Sahara Convertible Pants
www.rei.com
When I first started backpacking, I wore a set of convertible nylon trail pants. I can’t remember who made them or what they weighed. All I knew was that they were the perfect set of trail pants. Five years ago, when I started lightweight backpacking, I “upgraded” to a pair of softshell pants with an inner nap that provided more warmth. Two years ago, I saw those convertible pants on the trail again and felt a longing to get them back on. Today, they are the only pants I wear, and I have not looked back. The reality is that I don’t need that much warmth on my legs, and the softshell pants were slow to dry. The Sahara pants have a light, durable, and quick drying fabric (I’m big on washing clothes on the trail – everything I wear has to dry quickly, preferably during my washing up at the mid-day lunch break). The pockets on the Saharas (up to eight, depending on the pair) are great for storing the little stuff I use all day long (lip balm, sunscreen, mints, camera, dried fruit, etc.). The Saharas have a relaxed fit that is comfortably snug around my waist, yet has plenty of fabric at the knees and crotch to allow for full movement, including climbing. The twelve-inch zippered cuffs slide easily over my shoes, and the Velcro closures fit the cuffs perfectly around my ankle. In the two years that I have worn these pants, I have only taken off the pant legs once. But the ability to do so continues to send me back to these pants over a pair that doesn’t have the versatility, for “just in case.”

Weight: 12 oz
MSRP: $55 (although they go on sale for as little as $20)

2008 Staff Favorites - 47

REI Stoke 19 Day Pack (DIAD pack)
www.rei.com
Although it looks like I am getting a kickback from REI, it just happens that they have my favorite and most economical products this year. I discovered this gem of a technical, done-in-a-day (DIAD) pack this summer while looking for something to bring on a hill walking trip to Scotland. I needed a durable pack that I could climb in and that could withstand wind, rain, sleet, and whatever else Scotland wanted to throw in my direction. At 20 oz, the Stoke is about half the weight of similar hydration packs from well known hydration pack manufacturers. It holds just over 1100 cubic inches, which is enough for all my warm weather clothes, rain gear, lunch, and everything I needed for the day of hiking and climbing in the cold and wet weather of the Northwestern Scottish Highlands. Two compartments allow me to separate food from clothing, and the two mesh side pockets are available for smaller items. The Stoke withstood climbing abuse and the Scotland elements well (although I added a silnylon liner sack to keep clothing from getting wet on a very rainy day atop a Cullin). There is a small compression system atop the pack and a hand carry strap at the top. My favorite parts are the padded hip belt (with pockets) and padded shoulder straps, and, of course, the righteous orange color.

Weight: 20 oz
MSRP: $60

2008 Staff Favorites - 48

Pro Bars (new Savory flavors)
www.theprobar.com
The original flavor Pro Bars have been around since the 1990s. In 2004 I stopped eating them because I need variety in my diet. There is only so much of one thing I can eat. In 2006, the company expanded their offering of bars to include four new flavors, Nutty Banana Boom, Apple Cinnamon Crunch, Cran-Lemon Twister, and Koka Moka. It was an improvement, but the new bars seemed to be based on the original Pro Bar formula, and therefore had a telltale taste similarity. Then came the magical year of 2008. Enter savory Pro Bars — Kettle Corn, Maple Pecan, Cocoa Pistachio, Cherry Pretzel, Sesame Goji (and of course, Superfood Slam, not a savory flavor, but still outstanding). Now there is a line-up of Pro Bars worthy of the major leagues for gourmet trail snacks. They taste great, and I love that there is a large variety to choose from. This summer I took some women out on a backpacking trip (their first ever) and by unanimous opinion the variety of pro bars were the favorite food item (the girls particularly loved Superfood Slam, while my personal favorite is Cherry Pretzel). I love that they average about 120 calories per ounce and have great organic, unprocessed nutrition. We now buy them in bulk, and I keep a stock on hand at all times. All I’ve got to say is “keep those flavors coming!”

Weight: 3 oz per bar
MSRP: $3.29 per bar or $35.00 per dozen

Exposure Lights – Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review

The Exposure Lights Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx are rechargeable lights with excellent versatility for multi-sport pursuits. They can go from the bicycle to the backpack very easily, offering exceptional brightness, light weight, and a weatherproof design.

Overview

The Exposure Lights Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx are rechargeable lights with excellent versatility for multi-sport pursuits. Used when cycling, the combination is bright enough for high speed technical mountain bike night riding, matching the output of many bicycle HID light systems.

On its own, the Joystick MaXx is a very powerful flashlight for backpacking or mountaineering trips up to a week. In addition, it is a versatile light that performs equally well for bike commuting or when used as a helmet light for multi-light night mountain biking.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 1
The Exposure Lights Joystick MaXx securely snaps into a helmet mount that screws into a helmet vent and is easily removable for non-cycling needs.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 2
The Exposure Lights Joystick MaXx weighs only 2.8 ounces, is water-resistant, and very durable.

Typically when backpacking, I’ve only considered flashlights that use replaceable batteries, but the Exposure Joystick MaXx has changed my mind about rechargeable lights in the backcountry. When compared to my favorite bright headlamp, the Princeton Tec Eos, the Exposure light weighs less, has a longer lasting battery, is rechargeable, and is insanely brighter; for comparison, the stock Princeton Tec EOS is 25 lumens on high while the Joystick MaXx has a whopping 240 lumens on the MaXx setting – that’s nearly ten times brighter!

In the field, I typically used the Joystick MaXx on the lowest setting most of the time, giving me about 25 hours of consistent light. This is plenty for week-long trips and when used sparingly would last for an even longer trip. When some extra power is needed, the 240 lumens is extremely bright and helped several times when night hiking. A downside, however, is that there isn’t a brightness low enough for low-light tasks, such as reading – I recommend carrying a smaller LED light for tasks such as this. The brightness of the Joystick MaXx is best when used for navigation or hiking at night.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 3
The one-ounce headstrap makes the Joystick MaXx a functional headlamp and is adjustable with Velcro.

A one-ounce headstrap turns the Joystick MaXx into a functional headlamp. It is a two-inch wide stretchy band with Velcro adjustability, and it holds the light securely at a usable angle. The angle is easily adjustable by repositioning the headstrap on your head. It also has a reflective rear logo for extra safety when walking or running near cars. While the headstrap adds a great deal of versatility to the light, it is overbuilt compared to other headlamp straps; I think it’s easily possible to lighten up this piece.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 4
Comparison: a modified Princeton Tec Eos (left- using a much brighter than stock Seoul LED) casts a very weak beam when compared to the Joystick MaXx (right).

For bicycle use, Joystick MaXx comes with mounts for both the handlebars and the helmet. Both attach very easily and the tiny light clips in securely. Even when taking hard crashes, the Joystick never came out of the helmet mount. For those that enjoy both cycling and backpacking, the Joystick MaXx can easily cross between both worlds – especially useful when bicycle touring or adventure racing.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 5
Both Exposure Lights have three output settings – MaXx (left), Ride (middle), and Low (right) in addition to a flashing setting.

Both Exposure Lights have three output settings as well as a flashing setting. I found the manufacturer claim of three hours (MaXx setting), ten hours (Ride setting), and twenty-four hours (Low setting) to be a bit conservative; I managed to get between thirty and sixty minutes more in the MaXx setting and one to two hours more in the Low setting. Both lights are regulated and have a "reserve fuel tank" feature that automatically turns the lights to Low when the battery has only 5% remaining. At this point the light will dim gradually over a three-hour period, giving you an extra chance to get home or set up camp. I found it comforting to know that if I pushed the light too far, that there was always a bit extra to get me to camp or the car.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 6
The Enduro MaXx has exactly three times the brightness of the Joystick MaXx but almost identical battery life, making the two an excellent pair for cycling.

While not my first choice for backpacking, the Enduro MaXx is a fantastic partner to the Joystick MaXx for technical night mountain biking. With the Joystick MaXx on the helmet and the Enduro MaXx on the handlebars, you have a veritable flood of light from the bar and additional lighting that goes wherever your eyes go. The combination is incredible when riding through dense woods, enabling speeds that nearly reach a daytime pace. The Enduro MaXx attaches to the bike handlebar with a quick release that is quite secure, but allows the light to be removed with a quick pull of the red release knob.

Exposure Lights - Joystick MaXx and Enduro MaXx Review - 7
Combined, the Exposure MaXx and Joystick MaXx make create a lightweight, no-cable system that is excellent for night cycling.

While most lights with similar brightness require cables that connect to batteries attached elsewhere on the bike, all Exposure Lights have the batteries fully contained in the light. The result is not only simple, but extremely lightweight – 11.2 ounces for the whole package.

Specifications

Year/Model 2008 Exposure Lights Joystick MaXx
Features CNC machined alloy weatherproof case, cable-free design, single Seoul LED emitter with collimated lens, "Dual Beam Optics" combination flood/spot pattern, light level indicator, "fuel gauge" battery life indicator, "reserve fuel tank"
Included Light with integrated Lithium Ion battery, smart charger, helmet mount
Modes Three brightness levels, one flash mode
Run Time 3.5 to 25 hrs measured (3 to 24 hrs claimed)
Output 240 lumens on highest MaXx setting
Dimensions Cylinder is 1. in (25mm) wide, 4.1 in (104mm) long
Weight 2.8 oz (78 g), headstrap 1.0 oz (27 g), handlebar mount: 0.2 oz (7 g), helmet mount: 0.7 oz (21 g)
MSRP $249.99
Options – Headstrap $25 ($20 when purchased with a light), Piggyback batteries available- 1 cell: $69.99, 3 cell: $139.99
MaXx car charger: $34.99
Year/Model 2008 Exposure Lights Enduro MaXx
Features CNC machined alloy weatherproof case, cable free design, three Seoul LED emitters with collimated lenses, "Dual Beam Optics" combination flood/spot pattern, light level indicator, "fuel gauge" battery life indicator, "reserve fuel tank"
Modes Three brightness levels, one flash mode
Run Time 4 to 27 hrs measured (3 to 24 hrs claimed)
Included Light with integrated Lithium Ion battery, smart charger, Exposure universal handlebar quick release bracket
Output 720 lumens on highest MaXx setting
Dimensions Cylinder is 1.8 in (46mm) wide, 4.2 in (106mm) long
Weight-light 8.4 oz (237 g), quick release handlebar mount: 0.8 oz (23 g)
MSRP $449.99
Options Piggyback batteries available, 1 cell: $69.99, 3 cell: $139.99
MaXx car charger: $34.99

Podcast: Carol Crooker Puts Waterproof Footwear to the Allegheny Test

Four footwear systems in as many days: Carol does her best to get cold feet.

Podcast: Report from a Snow Covered Trail - Field Test Results of Low Gore-Tex Shoes, Wool Socks and Gore-Tex Socks in Near Freezing Conditions  - 1

PODCAST SPONSOR

Kahtoola, based in Flagstaff, Arizona, has a passion for innovation and quality outdoor gear. Their flexible KTS crampons, Step-in Snowshoe options and MICROspikes stretch-on traction products are trend setting designs that outperform other products in their category and are all backed by Kahtoola’s Satisfaction Guarantee. See them at www.kahtoola.com or call 866 330 8030.

Overview

During the fringes of winter when temperatures hover around freezing and snow on the trail sometimes turns into cold water, it can be hard for a lightweight backpacker to keep her feet warm. Many swear by lightweight Gore-Tex shoes with wool socks for such conditions (see Will Rietveld’s series on Lightweight Footwear Systems for Snow Travel ). On a recent four-day trek in the Allegheny National Forest in Pennsylvania, I wore low top Gore-Tex XCR shoes with thin wool socks through shallow snow, mud and water to test if my feet, which get cold easily, would stay warm with this simple, light system. I also tested Gore-Tex socks – which I’d had great luck with inside mesh shoes – to see if the socks benefited a system based on waterproof/breathable shoes. I wore a different system on each foot every day and recorded my observations during the trip.

Paramo Waterproof Directional Clothing

Waterproof clothing without coatings or membranes: how they do it and how it works.

Introduction & History

Paramo Directional Clothing - 1
Hiking in Paramo Pajaro jacket and Cascada trousers on a cold windy day.

Paramo (http://www.paramo.co.uk) is a UK clothing company that makes a unique form of waterproof clothing without coatings or membranes. Paramo also makes base layers, mid layers and windproof garments, but it is the waterproof clothing that I am interested with here and that lies at the heart of the range.

Paramo was created by Nick Brown, the chemist behind the Nikwax range of proofing and cleaning products. Back in the 1980s Nick had the idea for a new type of waterproof clothing using water repellency and wicking to keep the wearer dry rather than barrier technology. He thought this system should be far more breathable, comfortable, and versatile than conventional rain wear. His prototypes worked as expected, but no outdoor clothing companies were interested in taking up the idea, so in the early 1990s Nick started Paramo Directional Clothing Systems to make and market the garments.

Paramo is the name of a cold, wet area in the Andes, lying above the timberline and below the snowline where Nick Brown first tested prototype Paramo garments.

The Theory of Directional Waterproof Clothing

Paramo Directional Clothing - 2
Wearing Aspira Smock and Alta trousers on a bitterly cold snowy day in Yellowstone.

Paramo waterproof garments consist of two layers of material: a windproof water repellent polyester microfiber outer and a very thin polyester fleece lining, known as the Nikwax Analogy Pump Liner. The inside of the pump liner, facing the body, is smooth; the outside, facing away from the body, has fine V-shaped ribbing, with the open end of the Vs away from the body. This liner is designed to mimic animal fur and push water away from the body, hence the name directional. It works because water molecules form spheres. As there isn’t enough space to do this at the base of the V ribbing, water moves outwards to where the diameter of the space between the ribs is large enough.

The pump liner on its own isn’t windproof, and water can easily be forced through it by pressure, so an outer layer is needed to deflect wind and break the force of rain. Even so, the two layers combined don’t meet hydrostatic head tests, as there is no solid barrier to the pressure of a column of water. However, garments have been tested on a dummy in the rain room at the Leeds University Textile Department in the UK, where they withstood the equivalent of hours of heavy rain.

To work, both layers need to be non-absorbent, so they are treated with Nikwax water repellency. In fact, the whole of a garment is treated like this, including zippers. This water repellency can be restored when necessary, making the garments very long-lived.

The lack of a coating or membrane means that Paramo garments are quite breathable, far more so than any other rain wear, and can transmit liquid water as well as moisture vapor, so sweat will pass through. Seams don’t need to be taped or sealed, and punctures or tears are not a problem, as there’s no barrier to damage.

Paramo in Use

Paramo Directional Clothing - 3
Alta/Aspira trousers provided good protection for my legs whilst igloo building.

The theory sounds great, but the key question is how well garments work in practice: while carrying a pack in the wilds. When I first heard the idea, I was skeptical, unable to see how a garment without a waterproof barrier could keep me dry. Then Nick Brown sent a set of very basic prototype garments – a zip-fronted hooded jacket and pull-on trousers – and asked me to try them. I took them up into the Cairngorm mountains in typical Scottish cold rainy weather, and was somewhat surprised and very pleased to find the garments kept me dry and were free from condensation. Since then, I have used Paramo garments frequently in cold and wet weather, finding them far superior to anything else, whether hard shell or soft shell. The breathability and comfort is the same as that of soft shells without membranes. Wearing Paramo, I don’t feel like I’m wearing rain wear. Indeed, I have worn Paramo trousers all day, every day for three week long trips, only removing them for sleeping (and I’d sleep in them if I was cold).

Occasionally, I have gotten damp in Paramo garments. They certainly aren’t perfect; just the best answer yet to staying comfortable in cold wet conditions. Once the water repellency starts to fail, the garments start to absorb moisture and can get damp inside. Keeping garments clean and renewing the water repellency whenever it shows signs of fading is necessary, but of course you can’t do this while out on the trail. However, even when wet, I’ve found Paramo garments comfortable. On one long day of skiing in heavy rain (it happens!) in some early Paramo trousers without shaped knees, the fabric stretched tight over my knees with every stride, and I felt cold wet rain against my skin. As soon as the tension was released, I felt dry again, and at no time did the wetness spread or my legs feel generally cold.

If soaked, Paramo dries fast, too. On another ski tour, I forded a river in temperatures of -4 F/-20 C (the river was open because it was fed by thermal springs), and discovered too late that the water was much deeper than I’d thought. I’d unzipped my Paramo trousers and rolled them up to my thighs, but the water washed over them and they were soaked when I climbed out on the far bank. My bare, wet legs felt painfully cold in the freezing air, but once I’d rolled down the trousers and started skiing again, they quickly warmed up, and within half an hour the trousers were dry.

Paramo garments cope with a wide range of conditions. I’ve found them comfortable in dry cold at -31 F/-35 C and in very high humidity at +35 F/1.6 C. However the garments are quite warm due to the two layers, especially the inner one, and the air trapped between them. I find the warmth equivalent to a medium weight base layer and full weight rain wear. As I run hot and like to hike quite fast for fairly long periods at a time, I find the garments too warm in temperatures above 40 F/5 C, unless it’s very wet and windy. I know other hikers who find Paramo comfortable year round.

Because Paramo garments are quite heavy and bulky (the lightest jacket weighs an average of 25 ounces/720 grams, though new lighter ones will appear in 2009 – see Garments below), I don’t use them unless I will wear them virtually all the time. I don’t want them in my pack. This means I only wear Paramo garments in conditions where the temperatures are unlikely to rise above 40 F, which means late October to early May in my home country of the Scottish Highlands. Of course, temperatures can be higher than this even in winter when the sun shines. Then, I unzip all the vents and sometimes wear the jacket next to the skin.

Paramo Directional Clothing - 4
Wearing the Aspira Smock on a cold, snowy day in Yellowstone.

Paramo garments are neither hard shell or soft shell but combine the best properties of both, being waterproof, windproof, highly breathable, and comfortable. I just wish I could wear them in warmer weather. Despite the heavy weight, Paramo waterproof garments can fit into a lightweight system if worn all the time. On trips where I wear the trousers, the only legwear I carry is long underwear, as there is no need for rain or wind pants. With jackets, I leave one warm layer behind due to the extra warmth and don’t pack a windproof top, which I do when using a conventional rain jacket.

Care

Paramo garments don’t need special care on the trail. In fact, they need less care than conventional rain wear, as there’s no need to worry about getting holes in them. Small punctures don’t affect the rain resistance, and can be ignored. To show this, Paramo sent me a jacket that had been damaged in manufacture and had a mass of tiny needle holes in one shoulder. I soon discovered that these holes made no difference to the performance. Larger tears need repairing of course, but this can be done by sewing the edges together or else stitching a patch on. I have damaged garments during trips – the most serious when I brushed against a hot stove in a hut and melted part of the outer pair of trousers, and when a fall while skiing ripped a jacket arm on some jagged ice – and each time a crude makeshift repair (sewing is not my strong point) was adequate until I was home and able to send the garment to Paramo for a proper repair.

Paramo garments should be kept clean if they are to work properly. Dirt impedes breathability and can reduce water repellency. Because detergents can damage the water repellency, garments should be washed in pure soap products. Paramo, unsurprisingly, recommends Nikwax Tech Wash, a liquid biodegradable soap, and this does work well. I have used alternatives successfully, however. Paramo suggests washing garments after every four to eight weeks of regular wear. I wash them when visibly dirty, or if the outer wets out quickly. If garments are really filthy or badly stained, they can be washed in detergent, which is a more effective cleaner than soap, but must then be washed in soap to remove detergent residues and reproofed with Wash-In TX.Direct.

Paramo says garments should be reproofed with Wash-In TX.Direct every six to twelve months, depending on amount of wear or when the garments wet out even after washing. My garments are reproofed annually, which has proven adequate.

Paramo Ethical Manufacturing

Since 1992, Paramo waterproof clothing has been made in Bogota, Colombia, continuing Nick Brown’s association with South America. This overseas manufacturing is not done to reduce costs, but to provide work and training for “at risk” women as part of the Miquelina Foundation social program, now a charity. Miquelina has since gone from relying on donations to making profits that are reinvested in equipment and training and used for other projects, such as a housing cooperative.

Garments

Paramo Directional Clothing - 5
The first of Paramo’s new lightweight waterproof clothing – the Velez Adventure Light Smock.

Paramo makes nine different waterproof jackets and three different pairs of waterproof trousers in men’s and women’s sizes. In men’s medium size, weights range from 25 ounces/720 grams (Velez Adventure Smock) to 35 ounces/985 grams (Alta Jacket) in jackets and 20 ounces/572 grams (Cascada Trousers) to 32 ounces/904 grams (Aspira Salopettes) in trousers. Even given the two-layer construction and the warmth, these weights are quite high. In autumn 2008 Paramo launched the Velez Adventure Light Smock, with a lighter weight outer shell. Weighing 21 ounces/591 grams, this saves a little weight. I’ve been testing this garment and can find no diminution of the performance. Initially, only a small number of the Velez Adventure Light Smocks have been made, and they are only available from one store in London, England. However, Paramo says that more lightweight garments will be launched in the spring of 2009, and these will be more widely available.

Paramo garments generally have good ventilation options and protective features. Jackets have big adjustable hoods with wired brims that will fit easily over helmets (or cover your face!). Most jackets also have plenty of pockets, including ones accessible when wearing a pack hipbelt. Rather than underarm zippers, some jackets have upper arm vents, which are easier to use, while smocks also have twin two-way front zippers that can be used as vents. Trousers have full or three-quarter length two-way side zippers. On many garments, there is a popper fastened storm flap inside the zipper. Except in storms, the zipper can be left open and just the poppers used to fasten the garment, which allows for good ventilation while still providing protection.

Jacket cuffs are usually wide so that sleeves can be rolled up in warmer weather and airflow in the sleeves is excellent. Removable foam strips are found in the backs of some jackets. These are said to be for comfort when wearing a pack and for “better removal of perspiration.” I’ve never found any advantages to these, and they feel uncomfortable, so I always remove them. Some trousers have foam pads in the knees and seat that I also don’t like and remove, though I can see that if you’re likely to be kneeling or sitting in snow or on wet ground, then they could be useful.

The Paramo garments I have used most are the Aspira Smock (30.6 ounces/868 grams), Alta II Jacket (30 ounces/839 grams), Pajaro Jacket (31.2 ounces/885 grams), Alta Trousers (now replaced by the similar Aspira Trousers – 30.5 ounces/864 grams) and Cascada Trousers. For ski touring, snow hiking and camping, my favorites are the Aspira Smock and Trousers.

The Smock has an excellent protective hood, arm vents, twin front zips, a huge kangaroo pocket into which I stuff hats, gloves, maps, ski wax, and more, and two internal pockets useful for items that need keeping dry or for drying and warming cold and damp gloves. The Smock is quite short, which isn’t a problem as I always wear it with the trousers, which I like when skiing, as it isn’t restrictive. The trousers have built-in elastic braces (suspenders) that cleverly only fasten to the front so the seat can be lowered by unzipping the sides without unfastening them. Having struggled uncomfortably in storms in the past with braces that needed to be undone before trousers could be lowered, I really appreciate this design. I like braces, as they keep the trousers up without need of a belt and help prevent any gaps appearing at the waist.

The trousers also have chunky reversed side zippers, reinforced thigh linings for increased water shedding (helping avoid the problems with an earlier design I described above), tough abrasion resistant fabric on the seat, knees and ankles for greater durability, wide adjustable hems to fit over plastic boots and internal snow cuffs that mean gaiters aren’t needed. The ankle reinforcements are particularly welcome, as they protect against cuts from crampons and ski edges.

Paramo Directional Clothing - 6
Paramo hoods are large enough to fit over helmets – and for providing maximum protection!

When there isn’t deep snow and I’m not using skis or crampons, I prefer the lighter weight Cascada Trousers, which have three-quarter length side zips, a double seat and shaped knees. For hiking, these are comfortable and easily vented. With the Cascadas, I wear either the Alta II or Pajaro jacket. The Alta II has arm vents, an internal poppered storm flap, lower handwarmer pockets and chest pockets. The Pajaro is designed as a general “country lifestyle” jacket and has arm vents, internal poppered storm flap, huge chest pockets and two large bellows pockets above the hem.

It’s the pockets that make the Pajaro attractive – I can carry hat, gloves, map, compass, compact camera, mini binoculars, DSLR camera lenses, and more in them. However the advent of the much lighter Velez Adventure Light Smock – basically a less specified version of the Aspira Smock with twin front zips and big kangaroo pocket – means that the Pajaro and Alta II jackets will now be used only for day hikes and overnight trips. For longer trips, I’ll save weight by taking the Adventure Light.

There is one curious and interesting Paramo top that I haven’t tried, the 3rd Element (27 ounces/765 grams). This can be split into vest and arms/hood, allowing for excellent ventilation and the option of just wearing the vest when it’s not too stormy or in camp. The 3rd Element was used successfully on the 2008 Challenge crossing of the Scottish Highlands by ultralight hiker Colin Ibbotson, who found the ventilation meant he could wear the jacket virtually all the time. A lighter weight version of the 3rd Element could be the Paramo jacket for year round lightweight backpacking.

Conclusion

Paramo waterproof clothing is the most breathable and comfortable rain wear by far. In wet, cold conditions it performs superbly. Garments are designed to be worn all the time rather than carried in the pack and are warm enough to replace two or even three layers, which somewhat mitigates the high weight and packed bulk.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review

Osprey’s new Exos 46 and Exos 58 backpacks are designed specifically for lightweight backpacking, and, at just over 2 pounds, set a new weight standard for an internal frame backpack with a built-in frame. Plus, they’re durable and full-featured.

Introduction

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 1
Before the storm. The new for spring 2009 Osprey Exos 46 (shown) and 58 packs will weigh just over 2 pounds and are full-featured.

We have previously reviewed the Osprey Aether and Atmos backpacks and found their feature set much to our liking, but their weights pushed our upper limits, and we could barely call them "lightweight." Osprey is solidly re-entering the lightweight backpack competition with its new Exos pack, which is a brand new pack series specifically designed to be lightweight. The Exos packs will be available in spring 2009 in 34, 46, and 58 liter volumes.

Specifications

  Year/Model

2009 Osprey Exos 46 and Exos 58

  Style

Built in internal frame, top loading with floating top pocket

  Volume

Exos 46 is 2800 cu in (46 L)
Exos 58 is 3500 cu in (58 L)

  Weight

Size M tested. Measured weight: Exos 46 2 lb, 3.3 oz (1 kg), Exos 58 2 lb, 6.5 oz (1.1 kg)
Manufacturer specification: Exos 46 1 lb, 14 oz (845g), Exos 58 2 lb, 3 oz (997g)

  Sizes Available

Unisex S, M, L

  Torso Fit Range

Small fits torso less than 18.5 in (47 cm), hip less than 31 in (79 cm)
Medium fits torso between 18.5 – 20.5 in (47-52 cm), hip between 30 – 34 in (76-86 cm)
Large fits torso longer than 20 in (51 cm), hip larger than 33 in (84 cm)

  Fabrics

70d x 100d shadow-check and 160d x 210d window rip-stop

  Frame Material

6061-T6 aluminum, polycarbonate cross piece

  Features

Floating top pocket with zippered access and zippered mesh map pocket on the underside, stretch pocket for MP3 player or small GPS on shoulder strap, two mesh side pockets with top and side access, large front stretch-woven kango pocket, two mesh hipbelt pockets, full width front compartment under kango pocket with zippered access on both sides (one side on the Exos 46), two front tool holders (one on the Exos 46), four side compression straps, one top compression strap, two ice axe loops, two sleeping pad loops, Stow-on-the-Go trekking pole attachment, AirSpeed mesh backpanel, load lifters, adjustable sternum strap with whistle, ErgoPull hipbelt, 3L internal hydration sleeve with two hose ports

  Volume To Weight Ratio

79.3 ci/oz for the Exos 46, 90.9 ci/oz for the Exos 58 (based on 2800 and 3500 ci, respectively, and measured weights of 35.3 and 38.5 oz, respectively)

  Maximum Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity

30 lb estimated comfortable load for an average person carrying the pack all day

  Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio

13.6 for the Exos 46 and 12.5 for the Exos 58 (based on 30 lb and a measured weight of 2.21 and 2.41 lb, respectively)

  MSRP

Exos 46 US$179
Exos 58 US$219

Suspension System and Features

Although the Exos was designed to be lightweight, it borrows a lot of design elements from Osprey’s current Talon and Atmos backpack lines. Every component was optimized for light weight and functionality. It’s rather amazing that a backpack with a built-in frame can be so light and at the same time have so many features (see the list in the Specifications section).

This review covers both the Exos 46 and Exos 58 backpacks, which differ mainly in volume. The feature set is nearly identical on the two packs, with only a few small differences.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 2
Views of the Osprey Exos 58 (and 46). The frontpanel view (top left) shows the pack’s large front stretch-woven kango pocket and dual tool loops. The pack’s AirSpeed backpanel (top right) is a trampoline type for increased ventilation. There is even a small pocket on one shoulder strap for an MP3 player. A side view (bottom left) shows the pack’s large mesh pockets with top and side entry and narrow compression straps that will also attach items to the side of the pack. The top view (bottom right) reveals a zippered mesh map pocket under the top cap, top compression strap (orange), and drawcord closure.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 3
The new AirSpeed mesh backpanel on the Exos packs is not as deep as previous versions. The gap is about 1 inch, enough to provide good ventilation without interfering with pack volume or the pack’s center of gravity. The peripheral contoured tubular frame is 6061-T6 aluminum.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 4
At first look, Osprey’s BioStretch (mesh covered slotted foam) shoulder harness (left) and hipbelt wings (right) seem thin and inadequate, but the suspension system performed well with moderate loads (see my field testing section below).

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 5
The peripheral tubular aluminum frame of the Exos is curved to wrap around the hips. Hipbelt wings and shoulder harness (see photo in previous panel) are attached to the backpanel mesh rather than the frame. This is not a design intended to carry heavy loads.

The Exos packs do NOT have an adjustable torso length like many larger Osprey packs. Rather, the shoulder straps and hipbelt wings are sewn to the backpanel and the only adjustment available is to lengthen or shorten shoulder straps and load lifters. Getting a proper fit is a matter of choosing the proper pack size. The Exos will be available in unisex sizes small, medium, and large (torso fit ranges are listed in the Specifications section).

Field Testing

During summer 2008, I tested both the Exos 46 and 58 on numerous backpacking trips carrying a wide range of loads. I tested the Exos 58 (58 liters) first, assuming it would be the optimum size for lightweight backpacking. However, using typical lightweight backpacking gear and loads in the 25- to 30-pound range, I was never able to completely fill it up. The Exos 58 has a lot of room! It has eight separate pockets, so a large portion of my gear fit in the pockets alone.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 6
The side mesh pockets on the Exos (left) have a side entry that enables a hiker to reach and replace a water bottle without taking the pack off. My favorite feature on the Exos pack is the large zippered compartment under the kango pocket on the frontpanel (right). The Exos 58 has zippered access on both sides, while the Exos has access on only one side. The pocket will hold numerous frequently needed items and make them easily accessible on the trail.

On one occasion, while volunteering for the Hardrock 100 Endurance Race, I used the Exos 58 to carry in 40-pound loads of supplies and food to a remote aid station, climbing 1000 feet over a three mile distance. The pack carried the weight just fine without popping a seam and transferred the majority of the weight to my hips, but I had to tighten the hipbelt really tight to keep it from slipping off my hips.

Although the Exos 58 carried moderate (25 to 30 pounds) loads comfortably, the heavier loads described above are beyond its comfort range, except for hikers with strong shoulders. Thus, for summer backpacking, the Exos 58 seems to have too much volume for its weight carrying capacity. On the other hand, the Exos 58 would be an excellent choice for winter backpacking, where more volume is needed for bulkier insulated clothing and gear.

Realizing that the Exos 58 was a bit too roomy for me, I tested the Exos 46 during the second half of the summer. Although 46 liters seems small, I found the volume to be closer to my needs for summer backpacking. On a six-day, 100-mile backpacking trip on the Continental Divide Trail, I was able to get all of my gear and eight days of food (31 pounds initial weight) into the Exos 46. It carried the weight comfortably enough, but I was happier when pack weight dropped under 25 pounds. It would help if the shoulder straps were a little wider to distribute the weight more.

My carry load tests closely agree with Osprey’s recommended maximum carry weights of 20 to 30 pounds for both the Exos 46 and 58. Bottom line, the Exos backpacks are not designed or intended to carry heavy loads. My field testing confirmed that.

Osprey Exos Backpack Review - 7
Exos 46 on the Continental Divide Trail in Colorado. Because of its numerous pockets, the pack has more room than its 46-liter size would indicate. The Exos also carried well on day-length trips from a base camp (right).

Assessment

The Exos is a brand new pack model, and it’s remarkable that Osprey got most of the details right on the first try. In spite of its light weight, the Exos is loaded with features. I found it rather amazing that an internal frame backpack weighing slightly over 2 pounds can have so many features (including eight pockets!) and durable fabrics.

Osprey states "The Exos Series was designed with the knowledge that, in the long run, going light with a pack that has no suspension burns more energy than is gained by ounces saved." If they are referring to a frameless backpack, I personally would never carry 20- to 30-pound loads in a frameless pack. Granted, some frameless packs, like the GoLite Pinnacle and Jam2 are capable of carrying heavier loads more comfortably, but the updated Pinnacle and Jam2 for spring 2009 will weigh 2 pounds and 1 pound, 10 ounces, respectively – nearly as much as the Exos. My current pack of choice to carry 20 to 30 pounds is the Six Moon Designs Comet (27 ounces, $170 with stays) that has removable stays, but again the Comet weighs nearly as much as the Exos and does not have the feature set of the Exos. Needless to say, the Exos is now my pack of choice for carrying 20- to 30-pound loads.

However, the Exos is not quite perfect, and I have a few small issues to mention here, which hopefully will be addressed in the production pack.

  • The side mesh pockets are way too tight (see photo above), so they will not hold much when the main compartment is fully expanded
  • The sternum strap is adjustable, but I found its lowest setting to still be too high
  • The load lifter straps slip some; I needed to tighten them about twice a day
  • I didn’t have much use for the sleeping pad straps on the bottom of the pack, and they catch on branches while bushwhacking (Osprey says they can easily be cut off.).

Overall, I’m very impressed with the new Osprey Exos backpacks. This is a pack designed from the ground up for lightweight backpacking, assuming you want a pack that has room for everything and plenty of organizing and convenience features. The Exos will carry a 20- to 30-pound load with comfort and is capable of carrying up to 35 pounds when necessary. Both packs have more room than their size (46 or 58 liters) would indicate, so be sure to take that into account when choosing which one to get.

What’s Good

  • Sets a new weight standard for a built-in internal frame backpack.
  • Mesh backpanel provides ventilation and does not interfere with pack volume or center of gravity.
  • Lightweight, durable fabrics and frame material.
  • Large stretch kango front pocket is very handy for carrying a wet shelter or stuffing a jacket.
  • Contoured tubular frame is very lightweight, yet is capable of complete weight transfer to the hips.
  • Numerous pockets for organizing and convenient access.
  • Fits well (if you choose the correct size).
  • Comfortably carries moderate loads.

What’s Not So Good

  • Torso length is not adjustable.
  • Side mesh pockets are tight when pack is full.
  • Load lifters slip and require retightening.
  • Sternum strap is too high.

Recommendations For Improvement

  • Lower the sternum strap.
  • Bellow the side mesh pockets and increase the size of the top opening.
  • Revise the load lifters so they don’t slip.
  • Widen the shoulder straps to distribute weight.

Podcast: Journey on the Wild Coast – Raising an Adventurer

Erin and Hig’s mothers weigh in with childhood anecdotes that give us a glimpse of young explorers in the making.

 - 1
Erin McKittrick at around eleven, with little brother Scott and dog Jessie.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Ibex Performs
Ibex is crafted with the finest quality wool, allowing it to adapt to every condition. Stay cool when it’s warm, stay warm when it’s cool. You’re always comfortable, whether you’re hiking the trail or settling in for a night under the stars.

Overview

 - 2
Twelve-year-old Bretwood Higman and dog Shiggy.

Hig and Erin form a dynamic hiking duo that is somewhat incomprehensible to mere mortals. How do they withstand the dangers and stresses of wilderness hiking month after month? And, most astoundingly, how does this married couple manage to get along while doing it?

Denita (Dede) Higman reveals that Hig was adventuresome from kindergarten.

Nicole (Niki) Hoagland, Erin’s mom, says Erin has always been very “determined.” The moms weren’t able to completely explain why Hig and Erin are capable of hiking 4000 miles through trail-less wilderness, or how they have developed into such a harmonious hiking team, but it’s obvious some of the couple’s adventurous spirit is genetic.

Oh, and a hint from Niki – don’t ask Hig how he got so lucky as to find a woman who would accompany him on his journeys. Who says the journeys are all Hig’s idea?

Wanderlust: Backcountry Meandering with My Family in the Wallowa Mountains

Join Regina WB for her annual family trek to Blue Lake in the Eagle Cap Wilderness, Wallowa Mountains.

 - 1
We pass Minam on the way up to Blue Lake. Many hikers choose to stay here at Minam, as it has quite a few established camps around it.

When glaciers moved through Oregon’s Eagle Cap Wilderness, they ripped apart the earth, leaving dramatic granite faces streaked and exposed, creating what is now the Wallowa Mountains, the state’s premier backpacking location. As my father likes to say, "This is God’s country," and I’ll hand it to him that the Wallowas do provoke a sense of awe and perhaps even a spiritual feeling within me. Maybe it’s the solitude or the openness of the landscape. Maybe it’s the people I meet when I am on the trail, cowboys mostly, who shuffle by on horses and remind me that there is a simpler life happening not too far from where I stand, on the sloping ranches and golden farms of La Grande and Lostine.

My family is from Portland, Oregon, and the Wallowa Mountains are our tradition. From the time my three brothers and I could strap on a backpack, our father loaded us in the car for a six-hour drive east, followed by a two-day hike into the heart of the Eagle Cap Wilderness, where we’d explore for a week or so. Though our family is spread out now, we make an effort each year to come home and hike into those familiar alpine meadows. We do it for us, but we also do it for dad, as nothing makes him happier than seeing his children suffering under the weight of a pack or tenderly applying moleskin to enlarged blisters on our heels and toes. By the end of our trips to the Wallowas, we are sunburnt, mosquito-bitten, blister-covered, and physically exhausted. We are also happy. Some families have picnic reunions or vacations to Cancun; ours goes backpacking.

This summer, we came back together after a lapse of a couple of years. We loaded up the car with packs, sleeping bags, oatmeal, and a beat up map that no one ever looks at because there’s no need. We know to take Highway 84 east from Portland through the windy Columbia River Gorge and then out onto the plains of the state’s cattle country, eventually turning off in La Grande. We then head through Wallowa and Lostine, small farming and timber towns. Past Lostine, at the end of a forty-minute drive down a rocky road that can pop the toughest tire, we park at Two Pan trailhead and unload.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 2
On the road up to Two Pan trailhead, there are a few leftovers from the years before the zone was deemed a National Wilderness area, such as this original log cabin.

This year, as usual, we’ve taken our time getting to Two Pan, and the sun is starting to go down. No matter. We take off down the trail with our headlamps handy for when darkness hits. My brother Jason is quickly ahead of us, disappearing up the path. We call him "the antelope" because of his long stride, which has had us eating his dust since he was fifteen years old. Each one of us has a different way of approaching the hike up. My father keeps a steady, sturdy pace far ahead of me, but way behind Jason. Greg, my "little" brother, is 6’5" and hikes like a pack mule. He can carry more weight than any of us, but is slower because of it. He also never complains. Chad is light and quick and keeps the mood upbeat. I am the slowest, the turtle to Jason’s hare. I stop a lot to take photos and search the landscape for white mountain goats in rocky knolls and slide areas. We’ve seen goats a few times up here, bounding like ballerinas from boulder to boulder, sometimes with kids.

An hour and a half into the hike, and it’s dark. We’ve turned on our headlamps, but only use them to watch for roots and complicated rocks on the trail, as the moon is just about full, lighting up the night forest around us in a magical blue shadow. The trail out of Two Pan up to Blue Lake, our destination, is the West Fork trail, which follows the Lostine River most of the way. There are fifty-two named alpine lakes in the Wallowas, and some are more secluded than others. Falcon Guide author on the Wallowas, Fred Barstad, rates the climb from Two Pan to Blue Lake as "moderately difficult" with an elevation gain of over 2,000 feet. Tonight, we won’t make it to Blue Lake, and instead decide to make camp near a trail split in a meadow. It’s a good stopping spot because of the soft grass and fresh water nearby. The rest of us set up our tents, but Jason decides to sleep under the stars, which are thick and ablaze in the August sky, tainted only slightly by the light pollution coming from the white moon. At night he’ll hear white-tailed deer nosing around the meadow, and in the morning he’ll wake with dew on his face.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 3
The trails in the Wallowas are rocky dirt paths with great views.

On day two, we take the hike more seriously. It’s up, then up some more, which is how I love to hike first thing in the morning. This series of switchbacks makes for a dramatic climb in elevation on a slim, rocky, dirt path. Because it’s Wednesday, we don’t see many hikers. After a couple hours, a group of cowboys with saddle stock pass us. We stand off the path and let them go by, saying our "howdies" and smiling, but my father and brothers consider all these "horse people" to be traitors to the Wallowas. Unless you’re wearing a pack, you’re lazy in my father’s eyes.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 4
Dad comes down a typical Wallowa trail though a sunny clearing.

He also hates the way the horses tear up the stream banks and muddy the trails. I have often dreamed of having an alpaca or mule carry my pack come late in the afternoon on day two of the hike and so can’t share my father’s distaste for the horses. Plus, for the most part, the cowboys are laid back local guys who know and love the Wallowas. A couple years ago, on the hike out from Mirror Lake, one brother and I were stopped by a group of them riding enormous horses and trailing loaded up mules behind them. After some small talk they offered us a drink.

"A drink?" we asked.

"Yeah, how ’bout a Bud?" one of them said and opened up a large sack attached to a hazel-color mule. Inside was not only a case of beer, but ice. They gave us each a Budweiser, which is not my favorite beer, but was probably the best one I have ever had after spending six days in the wilderness. We emptied our cans, and they headed up the trail, while we carefully headed down. Since then, the "horse people" have made my good list.

This hot Wednesday, no one offers us drinks as they pass us by, leaving a dusty trail to tackle. As we continue, I stop and look west at 9,000-foot Elkhorn Peak in the distance. In the scree fields, there are pika chirping and bobbing in and out, doing whatever it is they do. The Wallowas are rich in flora and fauna, but they have a very short summertime growing period from June to September. As a result, in August everything is in full swing. Come earlier or later, and you’ll be up against cold, difficult river crossings, rain, hail, and even possibly snow. Because of the harsh climate, the Ponderosa and lodgepole pines are sparse, and people are advised to protect the native plants, which do their best to reproduce in the summer. Wildfires are also a big concern, so campfires are limited in most places and required to be made 200 feet or more away from alpine lakes.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 5
The terrain around the alpine lakes is mostly soft grassy meadows, full of wildflowers and green onions.

According to ranger Sweyn Wall, the alpine lakes are the most fragile ecosystems in the Eagle Cap Wilderness. With about 30,000 to 40,000 hikers and horses coming through the Wallowas each year, human impact is a significant issue. "Other areas of concern include invasive plants in the lower elevations, and the removal of natural fire from the ecosystem. We do actively inventory and manage invasive plants, but it is often difficult to locate populations when they are at a stage that is easily manageable," says Wall.

Working our way up the trail, we reach a meadow and stop for lunch along the Lostine River. By this time, we have crossed the river twice, using river rocks as makeshift bridges. Some years we’ve had to take off our boots and wade across, but this time the river is low enough to keep our shoes on. When the Lostine River is not criss-crossing the West Fork trail, it’s meandering through meadows scattered with Indian paintbrush, yarrow flowers, and wild onion. These picture-perfect settings beg us to sit down and take a load off… so we do, using a fallen tree as a bench and keeping our eyes open for golden eagles and red digger squirrels.

We eat our cheese and salami lunch in almost total silence. It’s not that we’ve got nothing to say, it’s that the kind of peace these mountains evoke should not be disturbed. The other part is that one of my dad’s Wallowas rules is "no useless chattering." Over the years, Dad has compiled an unofficial list of rules that his children know and abide by. A sampling:

  1. No electronics (leave iPods, phones, and GPS at home).
  2. No time (don’t ask how long the hike will take or what time it is, because it doesn’t matter anyway).
  3. Self sufficiency (you pack your own food, and you pump your own water).
  4. No whiners (unless you have a cougar attached to your leg, he doesn’t want to hear about it).
  5. No mothers (um, let me explain).

That last rule may put some people off, but it is actually Dad’s Rule Number One. When he first started coming up to the Eagle Cap Wilderness, he came with his buddies, who were all married with young children. They came up as a group of men probably trying to escape their families for a week. When their kids got older, they started bringing us along, but held fast to the idea that their wives couldn’t come up. The Wallowas was always a trip for guys and eventually became a trip for dads and kids. The fathers feared that with wives in tow, their kids would be pampered (see #4 above), and that the ruggedness of the experience would be altered. Wives and mothers might want certain comforts that the fathers didn’t care to bother with, and so moms were banned from the trip. Sexist? Perhaps. But it’s been like this for twenty years, and only time will tell if grandchildren or other circumstances might eventually change Dad’s mind. I doubt it.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 6
Views from Blue: from Blue Lake, the views extend down glacier carved valleys.

Back on the trail, we cross more lush meadow and reach Minam Lake, circling around it. Many hikers stay at Minam, as it’s a crystal-clear beauty with plenty of swimming, trout fishing, and a handful of established campsites along the perimeter. For us, the Wallowas is all about solitude, and we want to camp alone, so we keep going another 300 feet up to Blue Lake. Camp is in a boulder-clad clearing surrounded by shady lodgepole pine and fir trees, plus a mountainside backdrop which alternates between granite rock slides and patches of snowfields, leftovers from those glacial days.

Wallowa Mountains Blue Lake Hike - 7
We spend a few hours every day at the flat piece of granite we call Swim Rock, or just Swim for short. Here, there’s a diving spot and plenty of room to dry off in the sun.

The next day, Jason and a friend climb up to the snow fields, scrambling and hopping over boulders. With them they’ve brought a poncho and a pot. I am laid out on Swim Rock, reading a David Sedaris book when I hear, "Whoop!! Ahhh! Hoo, hoo, hoo," coming from the snowfields. With the binoculars, I watch them zip down the snowfield using a rubber poncho as a sled. Later, they return with Jell-O, which they premixed and cooled in a titanium pot in the snow while sledding.

Around the campfire, there is talk of climbing Eagle Cap the next day, a strenuous hike from Minam Lake with an elevation gain of 1,972 feet. This is the central point of the Wallowa Wilderness, with unobstructed views reaching Idaho on a clear day, plus views of most of the Eagle Cap Wilderness and the Imnaha River headwaters. Another day hike option out of Blue Lake is the loop trail to Mirror Lake. From Blue Lake, the trail heads down to Minam, then crosses an 8,500-foot pass after a series of switchbacks, eventually dropping onto Mirror Lake. If a hiker didn’t want to take the same West Fork trail back to Two Pan, he could hike over to Mirror Lake, then hike out on the East Fork trail.

There are many day hikes, many trails to traverse, and plenty of ridges to explore in the Wallowas. Jason and his friends will head out and try new trails, plus re-visit some old ones. Greg will fish for trout and cook them up late in the afternoon. Dad will hike too, fish a bit, and sit on boulders in the sun. Packing up and leaving Blue Lake at the end of the week is always hard. We drag our feet and take our time heading out on the trail. Leaving is difficult because the Wallowas are so perfect, but also because it means we’re all going to go our separate ways. Not to worry, we’ll get together next year at the same time and same place, on the edge of a different alpine lake with new campfire stories to tell under a starry sky that thankfully never changes.

State of the Market Report: Single Wall Tents (2008)

Veteran gear editors Chris Townsend and Will Rietveld unlock the mystique of the single wall tent – identifying their advantages and disadvantages, evaluating designs and technologies, listing specifications on the lightest ones available, picking their favorites for a range of applications, and speculating on future trends.

You don’t have access to view this content.

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review

This new single wall tent provides convenience and ventilation, plus loads of room for one person and gear and can accommodate two people when needed.

Overview

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review - 1
The AntiGravityGear O2 is a roomy one- or two-person single wall silnylon tent with side entry and trekking pole support.

The new AntiGravityGear (AGG) O2 tent evolved from the AGG Tarptent. The footprint and canopy are basically the same, but the front entry and back of the tent have been substantially revised. While the AGG Tarptent (which is still available), at 23 ounces, is a lightweight and roomy shelter for one person and plenty big for two, its major shortcoming is excessive interior condensation due to inadequate ventilation. The O2 is designed to overcome that problem and add some convenience features; how well does it succeed?

As mentioned, the footprint and canopy of the AGG Tarptent and O2 are virtually identical. The canopy is one piece of fabric, so there is no ridge seam to seam seal (or leak). However, the lack of canopy seams creates a tent with a lot of loose fabric that needs to be pulled outward with back and side pullouts in order to maximize interior volume.

The design changes in the O2 are at the front and rear. The front has a large zippered vestibule and a mesh entry wall with large zippered entry door. The rear has a large mesh panel for extra ventilation, with a zippered closure on the inside and large overhang on the outside.

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review - 2
Views of the AntiGravityGear O2 tent. The front of the tent (top left) has a large zippered vestibule that extends almost to the ground. The rear (top right) is extended by a tieout cord attached to a trekking pole and then to the ground. A side view (bottom left) shows one side of the vestibule open and tied back. Each side has a tieout cord that can either be staked directly to the ground (shown) or extended to a branch found onsite and then staked to the ground. The top view (bottom right) shows the tent’s shape; the front of the tent is at the bottom of the photo.

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review - 3
Inside the AGG O2. Note that the front of the tent is supported by a trekking pole angled to the side. Entry is through a large zippered mesh door. The rear of the tent has a large mesh panel to provide flow-through ventilation.

The front of the tent has a PVC plastic cap that a trekking pole tip inserts into, which is safer protecting against slippage compared to a grommet, especially with worn tips. There are four front vestibule positions: it can be fully open (first photo), it can be completely closed (second photo, top left), one side can be tied back (second photo, bottom left), or half of each side can be tied up (below) for more ventilation.

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review - 4
The O2’s front vestibule can be set at half height position for extra ventilation.

I tested the AGG O2 tent on a number of summer trips in mountain and desert country. As a solo tent, the O2 is luxurious, with loads of room in both the tent and vestibule. Because of the side entry and lower headroom in the back, the O2 requires some logistical plannng for two sleepers. It works best if the person sleeping in the back of the tent gets settled in before the second person enters. For midnight relief, the person in the rear has to climb over the person in the front to exit the tent. Also, headroom is more limited in the rear of the tent, so it is more cumbersome to enter and exit a sleeping bag, especially if the tent walls are wet. Keeping the back and side pullouts taut is vital to maximize the volume inside the tent.

While two people can adjust to sharing the O2 tent, a side entry tent is simply more convenient if it has two doors and two vestibules. Alternatively, a couple can choose a tent with an entry at one end. In either case, one person can exit the tent without disturbing the other. Considering this, the best use for the AGG O2 is as a one-plus-person tent, providing plenty of room for one person plus gear, and only used occasionally two people.

In rainy weather or buggy conditions, the AGG O2 provides a lot of security for minimal weight. The tent completely seals up to exclude bugs. The vestibule on the front and the rear overhang provide plenty of protection so the tent can be ventilated to the max during a rainstorm. If wind and bugs permit, opening the front mesh door really helps to increase ventilation and minimize condensation.

AntiGravityGear O2 Tent Review - 5
In spite of its better ventilation, the AGG O2 tent is not exempt from condensation on the inside walls on a clear/cool/calm night. This photo was taken on a 32 F morning while camped at 12,200 feet in the southern Colorado Rockies.

In windy conditions, it helps a lot to orient the back of the O2 tent into the wind. The back vent has a zippered closure, so the amount of breeze passing through the tent can be regulated. However, the O2 is not particularly wind stable. Because of its loose canopy, secured by three pullouts, the tent flaps a lot in the wind and even buzzes during stronger gusts. The front vestibule helps to deflect wind from the front, and fully zipping the mesh entry door and back vent closure helps to reduce the amount of air flowing through the tent.

For comparison, the AGG O2 is similar to the Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo (25.4 ounces trail weight, US$235). It has an extra 10 square feet of floor space and weighs about 2.6 ounces more. However, (in my opinion) the Lunar Solo is better ventilated, more wind stable, in addition to having a floating bathtub floor.

Overall, the AGG O2 provides a lot more room for its weight than most other single wall tents, and is reliable shelter from storms and bugs. Its condensation resistance is average for a single wall tent, but it is not particularly wind stable.

Specifications

  Manufacturer:

AntiGravityGear (http://www.antigravitygear.com/)

  Year/Model:

2008 O2

  Shelter Type:

One or two-person single wall tent with side entry

  Poles:

Requires trekking poles

  Stakes:

Eight 6-inch titanium shepherd hook stakes (not included)

  Fabrics:

Canopy and floor are 1.3 oz/yd2 silnylon, entry wall and rear vent are mesh

  Dimensions:

Trapezoidal, floor is 9 feet in back tapering to 7 feet in front, 55 inches deep, front height is 43 inches, rear height is 24 inches

  Protected Area:

Floor 36 ft2, vestibule 10 ft2

  Features:

Large zippered front vestibule, mesh entry wall with large zippered door, back mesh ventilation panel with zippered closure, one piece canopy (no top seam), trekking pole support

  Weight:

Total weight 1 lb, 12.6 oz (includes seam sealed tent, eight titanium stakes, tent stuff sack, stake sack); trail weight (includes tent, stakes) 1 lb, 12 oz; manufacturer specification 1 lb, 12 oz total weight

  MSRP:

US$279

  Options:

Seam sealing US$30

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review

Two-person single wall tent with a twist: one side is double wall, so the fly can be rolled up in good weather for extra views and ventilation.

Overview

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review - 1
The two-person MontBell Crescent 2 is a “hybrid tent” – one side is double wall and the other side is single wall. It’s supported by a single longitudinal pole.

Montbell’s new hybrid Crescent 2 tent is supported by a single length-wise pole similar to their now discontinued Hexagon two-person double wall tent. However, the Crescent 2 is a single wall tent, with a twist: one side of the tent is double wall (with a mesh body and a waterproof fly on that side) and the other side is single wall. Technically, it’s a hybrid tent, since part of it is double wall.

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review - 2
Views of the Montbell Crescent 2. In the head end view (top left), the right side of the tent is double wall. The entry is through a zippered opening in the fly on the right side of the pole. The foot end of the tent (top right) has a high vent. A side view of the single wall side of the tent (bottom left) shows how the canopy extends the drip line out away from the tent. The top view (bottom right) puts all this into perspective; the top of the photo is the double wall side of the tent.

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review - 3
The unique feature of the MontBell Crescent 2 (besides its monopole design) is that the fly on one side of the tent can be rolled up in good weather to provide abundant ventilation and views. The left photo shows the tent with the fly staked out, and the right photo shows the fly rolled up.

By the numbers, the Crescent 2 is a roomy tent. The floor is 96 inches long and 59 inches wide, and headroom is 43 inches at the center. Area is 34 square feet. However, usable space is another matter. Since the tent hangs from a single length-wise pole, the side walls drape inward substantially, greatly reducing inside volume. With two people inside the tent, the occupants are constantly brushing against the tent walls with their heads and shoulders. The limited elbow room is not a real problem in good weather, but is not pleasant in rainy weather when the inside tent walls are wet with condensation.

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review - 4
Entry is through a small zippered mesh door on one end of the tent (left). The door is barely shoulder width and is accessed through a zippered opening in the tent’s fly on the right side. Seen from the inside (right), the door has a wrap-around zipper so it can be completely opened and pushed to the side out of the way.

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. You may also download the MontBell Crescent Moon 2 Tent

Video: A tour of the inside of the Montbell Crescent 2 during a rainstorm.

During southern Colorado’s summer monsoon season, I had the opportunity to test the Crescent 2 in both wind and rain. In 20 + mph winds accompanying a thunderstorm, I found the tent to be quite stable, especially with either end of the tent facing the wind. The Crescent 2 comes with nine 7-inch long Y-stakes which secure the tent very well.

MontBell Crescent 2 Tent Review - 5
I found the Crescent 2 to be an effective sanctuary in mountain showers and an overnight rain (left), but it is not exempt from condensation on the inside walls (right).

When condensation forms on the inside walls, we found it prudent to sleep in the center of the tent or toward the mesh wall to avoid contacting the wet walls with our sleeping bags. However, while dressing in the morning, it was nearly impossible to avoid brushing against the wet interior walls.

Some further comments on the Crescent 2, both pro and con:

  • The tent sets up very quickly
  • The footprint available for the Crescent 2 is heavy: 10.2 ounces with stuff sack.
  • The tent’s canopy extends the drip line well away from the tent
  • Rain falls directly into the tent when the door is open.
  • There is only one inside storage pocket, in the rear of the tent.
  • The tent is a stealth green color, which matches the forest color very well.
  • The tent has a very small entry “vestibule” but there is some storage space under the double wall side of the tent.

Overall during the test period we found that the Montbell Crescent 2 tent grew on us somewhat. Set-up is very simple and fast. It endures wind and storms well. In good weather, rolling up one side gives excellent ventilation and views. However, its limited headroom is inconvenient, and the tent’s trail weight is slightly under 3 pounds, which is heavy compared to the competition. In comparison, the Tarptent Double Rainbow weighs 2 pounds, 7.7 ounces and has two doors and two vestibules, as well as more elbow room inside.

Specifications

  Manufacturer:

MontBell (http://www.montbell.com/)

  Year/Model:

2008 Crescent 2

  Shelter Type:

Hybrid two-person single wall tent (one side is double wall)

  Poles:

8.8 mm DAC Featherlight NSL

  Stakes:

Nine 7-inch aluminum alloy Y-stakes

  Fabrics:

Canopy is 30d polyurethane coated nylon rip-stop, 1500 mm; floor is 40d PU coated nylon rip-stop, 2000 mm; 20d nylon mesh

  Dimensions
(length x width x height):

96 x 59 x 45 in (inside headroom is 43 in)

  Protected Area:

Floor 33.9 ft2, vestibule 2.2 ft2

  Features:

Single longitudinal pole, tent clips to pole, wrap-around zipper on entry door, one side of tent has a mesh wall and separate fly that rolls up, small mesh storage pocket in rear, bathtub floor

  Weight:

Total weight 3 lb, 1.4 oz (includes tent, pole, nine stakes, two guylines, repair sleeve, three stuff sacks); trail weight (includes tent, pole, stakes) 2 lb, 15.3 oz; manufacturer specification 3 lb total weight

  MSRP:

US$279

  Options:

Footprint US$35, 10.3 oz with stuff sack