Articles (2020)

Hiking Lighter, Hiking Smarter

Experiences of a Montana news journalist taking the trail to backpacking enlightenment.

Lightweight guru Ryan Jordan
helps hiker lessen load

Story and photos
By Brett French
Gazette Outdoor Writer

I felt exposed. With my motley collection of backpacking gear laid out for criticism, I was sure Ryan Jordan would laugh out loud. After all, the founder of BackpackingLight.com is the guru of all things new and lightweight – a high-end gear aficionado.

But he took the discussion of my hand-me-down external frame pack and its jumbled contents very seriously. He carefully assessed the contents and pointed out how I could save weight and loaned me several items to test. The only time he showed emotion was when he came across my old blue Gerry down vest, circa 1973.

"That’s cool," he said. "That’s a relic. You could probably sell it for $200 on eBay."

Mentor needed

Conversion to a new belief system takes a mentor, someone who can point out the enlightenment in a new way of thinking. That’s how I ended up talking to Jordan. Hoping to trim the weight off my traditional backpacking gear, I appealed to him for a critique and a piece-by-piece examination of my gear.

Many backpackers are probably in the same boat, I reasoned, loaded down with old, heavy gear and unsure about the best places to make an investment to substantially lighten their load.

"Our mission is to educate people how to use a lightweight product safely and comfortably," Jordan said. "Our philosophy is you can carry lightweight gear and you don’t have to suffer."

He stressed, however, that "You can’t send a neophyte into the wilderness with a one-pound tarp. You can do this, but you need some skills."

Paring it down

Shaving weight off my oddball collection of gear was relatively easy. Without food or water, my basic kit weighed in at 31 pounds, 4 ounces. With some modifications from Jordan, I was able to get my entire pack weight, with food, down to 26 pounds.

The food alone for the three-day outing I planned weighed in at 7 pounds. And since I had plenty left over when I reached the trailhead, I probably could shave my food weight down to around 4 pounds. My goal on my next outing is to carry 20 pounds or less.

But what’s the best way to achieve such a weight loss? It’s a question as difficult as dieting.

"Take less stuff," Jordan said simply. "It doesn’t cost a dime."

My miscellaneous gear is a good case in point. It weighed in at 4 pounds, 12 ounces. Here’s some of what I had planned to take along: mosquito headnet, fuel bottle, binoculars, Leatherman multitool, lighter, matches, first-aid kit, pen and paper, patch kit for Therma Rest, sun and bug lotion, trowel, bullion cubes, toothbrush, toothpaste, bear spray, garbage sack, whistle, compass, firestarter, flashlight, extra batteries, clothespin, clothesline, ear plugs, aluminum foil and toilet paper.

"Unless I’m fishing, I don’t ever take a knife," Jordan said. Instead, he’ll take along a small pair of scissors to cut tape for patching up blisters.

So my large Leatherman multitool was overkill, he said. For those people who have to have a knife, Jordan recommended the smaller Leatherman Micra or Swiss Army Classic.

Hot plate lightweight

"The stove is probably one of the biggest areas where you can invest a little money and save a lot of weight," he said.

Jordan set me up with a Vargo Titanium Jet-Ti Stove (2.7 oz.-$65). The stove requires an isobutane canister ($7), one of which will last about four days depending on how much you use it. The Jet-Ti has an output of 9,000 BTUs an hour and quickly heated enough water for a dehydrated meal and drink. Also, it was nice to not have to mess around with filling a stove with fuel, pumping and fiddling to get the flame just right. Unfortunately, the canisters are not refillable.

By comparison, my old white gas Coleman Peak One stove weighed in at 2 pounds, 8 ounces, not counting the extra fuel that might be required.

The big 3

The backpack, tent and sleeping bag are the big three places to save weight, but they are also the most expensive, Jordan noted.

"The sleeping bag is probably the most expensive," Jordan said. "Most people carry a lot of weight because the bags are synthetic or durable."

Jordan let me borrow a Nunatak Arc Alpinist bag. With a detached down hood, it weighed in at 1 pound, 9 ounces compared to my old Goose Bay Down bag with fleece liner that weighed 4 pounds, 7 ounces.

The Arc Alpinist has 800 fill down, meaning there are 800 cubic inches of down per ounce of fill. Unique to this bag’s design is that it has no bottom. Instead, nylon webbing crosses from one side of the bag to the other. The idea is that when down is compressed, it loses its heating capability. So the down you’re sleeping on doesn’t do much good anyway, so why not remove it. The straps can be slid around your pad, which will provide insulation from the ground.

"I’ve taken it into the teens," Jordan said.

The bag was more than warm enough on cool summer nights. The stuff sack, made out of spinnaker sail material, weighed a half ounce. Stuffed, the bag measures about 7 by 11 inches.

"That’s down’s best quality, its ability to occupy small spaces," Jordan said.

Rated to 20 degrees, the Arc Alpinist’s medium bag (5 foot, 10 inches) costs $260.

For a pad, I left my 2-pound, 6-ounce Therm-A-Rest self-inflating mattress at home. This was a difficult choice. I love my pad, especially since I sleep on my side a lot and lesser pads leave my hips hurting.

But in the interest of experimenting, I opted instead for a closed cell foam pad ($14) that weighed in at about 14 ounces. (One good thing about foam pads is that there’s no risk of popping them.) It’s nowhere near as comfortable as my Therm-A-Rest, but for a couple of nights, it was no big deal. In the future, however, I might look to shave weight elsewhere just to take it along.

Home on the mountainside

"One of the biggest things people are paranoid about is that they invest a lot of money in a tent," Jordan said. And because it’s a big investment, they feel the need to take it along, even if the weather doesn’t merit such protection from the elements.

For my trip, I planned on taking my Crazy Creek Crib LEX that comes with a tarp. The neat thing about this 4-pound hammock is that it can also be used as a bivy sack when no trees are around. Aluminum poles prop the crib’s canopy up to avoid a claustrophobic feeling and it’s covered with mosquito netting. The tarp provides protection from rain.

With an Integral Designs Siltarp 3 ($135, 8 x 10 feet), some hiking poles, guy lines and tent stakes, Jordan was able to drop that weight to about 1 pound.

I’ve got to admit, setting up the tarp in the front yard to try alternate layouts is much different than erecting the same shelter in the middle of a rainstorm. I was a bit frustrated with my first design, trying to get enough headroom to feel comfortable without letting the rain in. And I was too chicken to try it in the traditional pup-tent style, with a pole at each end, for fear of the rain getting in. Instead, I set it up in a lean-to style to shed water and wind. I stayed dry and, on this trip, mosquitoes were no problem. I also had a huge window for viewing the stars at night.

I’ve tarp-camped before with mixed results. One night I spent worrying about my bag getting wet. Another time mosquitoes buzzing in my ear kept waking me up. So I would recommend a mosquito head net and ear plugs for tarp campers.

Lighter packs

For a backpack, I’ve got a hand-me-down Alaskan Frame Pack from Cabelas that weighs 6 pounds, 6 ounces. This is a beefy, external frame setup that has lots of pockets and strap loops.

Jordan could have been describing me when he said, "So many people when they started out bought heavy, durable gear."

But if most of your trips are in the summer, such heavyweight items aren’t necessary, Jordan said.

He recommended I keep my frame pack until I got my weight down. But I opted to shave 2 pounds by borrowing my son’s internal frame backpack. Its smaller size also meant I had to shave some gear to ensure it all fit.

Jordan took me by ProLite Gear’s shop in Bozeman to show me some of the lighter alternatives to my external frame pack. The Granite Gear Vapor Trail ($145) won Backpacker magazine’s Editor’s Choice award. It can carry 30 pounds and weighs just under 2 pounds.

GoLite’s Infinity pack ($200) was another Jordan choice. It’s a top seller, weighing 2 pounds, 7 ounces and accommodating 2550 cubic inches of gear. The Gregory Z ($180) was another recommendation. It weighs 3 pounds, and holds 3550 cubic inches of gear.

"What this really highlights is that there’s a huge range of stuff that you can get into at a wide range of costs," Jordan said.

He noted that for about $300 to $550, anyone could significantly shave weight off their basic backpacking kit.

Lightweight backpacking is here to stay, Jordan noted. All of the larger outdoor gear manufacturers have jumped on the bandwagon.

"We’re riding a wave," he said. "That’s something we’ve never seen before – the mass marketing of products directly at lightweight users."

Brett French can be reached at french@billingsgazette.com or at 657-1387.

Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises.

Source: http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2005/07/21/build/outdoors/30-hiking-lighter.inc

Top 10 Reasons to Carry a Spork

Results of a BackpackingLight.com reader contest, featuring the Top 10 Reasons to Carry a Spork List, and “Ode to a Spork” cowboy poetry by Paul Johnson.

What follows is the result of a reader contest held by BackpackingLight.com: what are the top 10 reasons to carry a spork while backpacking?

Top 10 Reasons to Carry a Spork

  1. Performs double duty as a camp trowel, backscratcher, tent stake, self defense weapon, signal or toilet mirror, bookmark, witchin’ stick, ice axe, piton, shoestring tightener, repair needle (requires hole in end), stealth camp wind chime, say “ahhh” stick, and peanut butter spreading jig.
  2. Sporks can be used in after dinner on-the-trail puppet shows for Trekkies: e.g., don’t you love the episode where Mr. Spork fights off the evil Ramenulons?
  3. You can play the Kevin Bacon Game with a Spork. Spork sounds like Mork. Mork was played by Robin Williams. Robin Williams is a fan of Lance Armstrong. Lance Armstrong has a resting heart rate of 34. Kevin Bacon has a resting heart rate of 134. You can TOTALLY see the spork-Kevin Bacon connection here.
  4. Hybrid styling reflects trends towards a unisex society.
  5. Doesn’t Ray use one?
  6. Useful for raking Zen patterns in sand while meditating.
  7. Trail crochet.
  8. “Spork” beats “Foon”.
  9. Sex appeal.
  10. Two words: “Got spork?”

Top 10 List Credits: Paul Johnson, Chad Lorenz, Casey Lindstrom, Catherine Moore, Gerry Olenick, Dave Plantenga, Alec Rieger, and Bob Spencer

Cowboy Spork Poetry

Submitted By Paul Johnson

Ode to a Spork

Alone on the trail, with m’trusty ole Spork.
It’s made’f pure Ti, ain’t no rusty fork.

It serves so many uses,
It’s utility never loses;
It’s my friend, it’s my mate, it’s my Spork!

At days end I bivy, and cook up my sup,
It’s all hot and steamin’, in my solo Ti cup.
Then into the cup, the Spork I do dip,
And lift up the Spork, straight on to my lip.

I taste all the goodness, the warmth, and the food.
My heart is so thankful; it no longer doth brood.
I lift up my eyes,
give thanks up above
for my friend, for my mate, for my Spork!

Then into my bag, beneath my taut tarp.
The sounds from my belly, like sounds from a harp.
This night I’ll sleep well
til morn’s light surely swells

Tis much thanks I owe
to my friend, to my mate, to my Spork.

Spork Bits

Little known trivia about the spork.

Did you know that the spork was actually the first utensil ever invented? Moses invented a three-tined spork to illustrate to the Israelites that each tine was symbolic to their right to God’s love, fruitful land, and a lightweight desert pack. Rumor has it that Moses parted the Red Sea, of course, with his staff, but what do you think was lashed on the upper end, reflecting the power of God off its shiny bowl back to Pharoah et al? You got it: a spork.

Ryan Jordan and Alan Dixon got caught with too-light packs and their pants down at 12k in a storm in the Tetons, with an all-night rappel ahead of them down an unknown mountain couloir. They had 14 rappels total and ran out of gear after 13. After fishing through their packs and searching for that last piece of protection (there wasn’t one), Ryan muttered with dismay, “Dang, I knew I shoulda brought a spork.”

You can flick mashed potatoes the farthest with a Vargo Ti Spork. The design works so well in terms of potato capacity and balance that you’d’a thought Brian Vargo designed the spork exactly for this purpose. Watch the backlash, though, and wear goggles: the deep tines of the Vargo Spork can whip spuds right back in your eye.

Need a Spork?

Try here: Sporkelicous

Jacks ‘R’ Better 8’x8′ Square SilNyl Tarp SPOTLITE REVIEW

First look at the Jacks ‘R’ Better 8’x8′ Square SilNyl Tarp.

Overview

Jacks ‘R’ Better is a small cottage company founded by… you guessed it, two guys named Jack. Their gear is aimed at hammock hangers, but some of it, the 8’x’8 Square SilNyl Tarp included, crosses over for tent/tarp camping use as well.

The Square SilNly tarp is designed to be strung above a hammock on the diagonal. Jacks ‘R’ Better says that it also works well in a flying diamond configuration, or in a standard ‘A’ frame pitch for ground sleepers.

Rumor has it that the Jacks are working on a modification so that the tarp can also serve as rain gear.

Features and Specifications

  • Fabric: Siliconized Cordura
  • 8’x8′ (2.4 m x 2.4 m) square
  • 10 tie outs, including center tie outs on both surfaces of the tarp
  • Ridgeline seam on the diagonal
  • Requires only two stakes if strung between trees
  • 9.4 oz (266 g)
  • MSRP $79.95

Jacks ‘R’ Better No Sniveller Universal Quilt SPOTLITE REVIEW

A first look at a lightweight down quilt for saving weight on your 3-season sleep system.

Overview

The Jacks ‘R’ Better No Sniveller Universal Quilt can be used as a top quilt with foot pocket in a hammock or for ground sleeping, as a flat quilt, and as a hammock under quilt with the included JRB Suspension System.

One thing that makes the No Sniveller Universal Quilt unique is the slit in the center of the quilt allowing it to be worn in camp as a poncho/serape for warmth. The slit is edged with omni-tape (both sides look like the loop side of Velcro) which is surprisingly comfortable against the skin when in use, and keeps the slit closed when it’s not needed.

The second thing that makes the No Sniveller unique, is that the actual loft is significantly higher than the advertised 1.5 inches. The average loft (centered between baffles) is between 2.25 and 2.5 inches for the two quilts we measured.

Features and Specifications

  • Shell fabric: 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) ripstop nylon with DWR
  • Down: 750 fp
  • Continuous baffles with no-see-um netting
  • Baffle height 1.5 in (3.8 cm)
  • 78 x 48 x 1.5* in (198 x 122 x 3.8 cm)
  • *Measured loft: 2.25 – 2.5 in (5.7 – 6.4 cm)
  • Both ends have drawcord and toggles
  • Foot box formed by omni-tape and drawcord closure
  • Included: JRB Suspension System (BPL measured weight 1.6 oz/45 g)
  • Included: Silnylon compression sack
  • BPL measured weight: 20.1 oz (570 g)
  • MSRP $219

Gossamer Gear Polycryo Ground Cloth SPOTLITE REVIEW

Ultralight and ultra-tough, a ground cloth for the masses with a weight that appeals to the fringe.

Overview

For you gram wienies – yes, you! – the Gossamer Gear Polycryo Ground Cloth is the lightest ground cloth that we know of (1.3 oz / 36 g) that is tough enough for multiple trips. Half a space blanket is lighter, but one puncture and they rip apart. I’ve had the same Gossamer Gear Polycryo Ground Cloth out in the desert for 7 nights and the dunes for 5 nights without any damage.

 

I used the Polycryo Ground Cloth with a sleeping bag and with a quilt, without a bivy. Both bag and quilt sometimes migrated off the Ground Cloth and into the dirt. I’d like to see the Gossamer Gear Ground Cloth offered in a slightly wider version. Gossamer Gear offers a 6′ x 8′ ground cloth but in a heavier material (apparently wider Polycryo sheets are hard to find).

Destruction testing further confirms that the Gossamer Gear Polycryo Ground Cloth is tough and puncture resistant as claimed. I cut a couple of pieces from my used Ground Cloth and destroyed them. I ground a piece under my foot on concrete a few times – no holes. When I next ground it on tiny gravel, I produced several holes. When I pulled the edges of the Polycryo square, it did not tear immediately (unlike a space blanket).

I poked a sharp stick into the second square of Polycryo until it pierced the material. It took a little, but impressive, bit of push to force the stick to puncture the Polycryo. I pulled on the edges of the square and, not weakened by the grinding on concrete test, it took some extra effort to stretch the hole until the Polycryo tore.

Features and Specifications

  • Tough and puncture resistant
  • Multilayer, cross-linked polyolefin film
  • Tensile strength of 15,400 p.s.i. per ASTM D-883
  • Water proof
  • 0.55 oz/yd2 (19 g/m2)
  • 32" x 96" (81 cm x 244 cm)
  • 1.3 oz (36 g)
  • MSRP $3.95 for two
  • Available in heavier material (0.9 oz/yd2 / 31 g/m2) in a larger size (6′ x 8′ / 1.8 m x 2.4 m)

Ion Alcohol Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

Fuel miser and a SYSTEM (burner + wind screen + pot support) weight of less than an ounce…take notice.

Overview

Super-ultralight backpackers and thru hikers take notice – the Ion Stove at 0.83 ounce (my measurement) is quite likely the lightest alcohol stove available for purchase. The kit includes the burner, pot stand, heat reflector, and windscreen. It is a complete cooking system (sans pot) at less than one ounce!

The Ion stove is strictly a solo stove intended for boiling water to make simple meals. So don’t expect it to cook for two people or prepare complex meals.

The Ion is a miser beyond its weight. To my knowledge, it is the most fuel efficient stove available. The Ion is claimed to boil a pint of water with as little as 0.3 to 0.4 ounce (10-12 ml) of alcohol, which I verified at 0.37 ounce (10.4 grams). At that rate a few ounces of alcohol will go a long way on a thru hike!

The downside of the Ion’s superb fuel efficiency is its extended boil time. Although the Ion has a claimed boil time under optimal conditions of 8:30 (minutes:seconds), my test time was 15:48. It should be emphasized that the Ion was designed to maximize fuel efficiency, and the longer boil time is the tradeoff for fuel savings. This factor should be taken into account when considering the Ion Stove. Personally, I light my alcohol stove, then go about camp chores until my water is boiling. So boil time does not matter that much to me.

Besides its low weight and high fuel efficiency, another notable feature of the Ion Stove is its “TiPod” pot stand. As the name implies, the 3-piece assembly is made of sheet titanium. That’s right, a titanium pot stand that is very strong and weighs only 0.2 ounce.

The 3 inch x 24 inch windscreen is made of thin aluminum, the type that is used for disposable roaster pans. It is a bit stiff, but durable. A nice feature of the windscreen is that it is adjustable for pot diameter, just open it to the desired diameter and secure it with a paper clip. The heat reflector is simple aluminum foil.

I field tested the Ion Stove on a 5-day backpacking trip in Northern Arizona with fellow BPL editors Jay Ham and Carol Crooker. We were impressed with the Ion’s miniscule size and weight, and the TiPod pot stand. However, we noted two issues with the Ion. The first is the extended boil time. The stove starts out slowly, then speeds up. In a strong breeze I recorded boil times in the 20 minute range. We all felt that the Ion is slower than we would like, especially in the morning when we are anxious to get on the trail.

Our second issue was the lack of support from the thin aluminum foil heat reflector on sandy soils. The weight of a filled cook pot punched the foil into the sand and created an unstable situation. I would prefer a heat reflector made of the same sheet aluminum as the windscreen.

My reasons for liking the Ion Stove are its extreme light weight, excellent fuel efficiency, and innovative titanium pot stand. The downside is its extended boil time. The latter is an issue for some people and moot for others. I understand the manufacturer is working on another version of the Ion that balances boil time and fuel efficiency.

Features and Specifications

  • Aluminum open flame Burner, 2 in (5 cm) diameter
  • Adjustable windscreen
  • 3-piece titanium pot stand
  • Measured weight 0.83 oz (24 g)
  • MSRP $20

Patagonia MicroPuff Vest SPOTLITE REVIEW

A worthy successor to the long-missed Puffball: less than seven ounces and packs to the size of a (insert cliche here: grapefruit! softball! water bottle!).

Overview

Patagonia has released a MicroPuff vest as an extension of their popular MicroPuff line of synthetic insulated garments. The MicroPuff vest is focused directly at maximum warmth per weight, with no external pockets, a snap, one third length placket and Polarguard Delta insulation. It has elasticized shoulder and waist openings and it stuffs into its own internal pocket.

The Patagonia MicroPuff pullover was one of our favorite synthetic garments of 2004. Will the loft of the vest measure up to the loft of the pullover? Will the limited features of the vest reduce its usability? Or will its warmth to weight ratio make it a good choice for synthetic insulation at an ultralight 6.5 ounces? Expect a full review later this year.

Features and Specifcations

  • 6.5 oz (184 g), Men’s L as measured
  • 2.6 oz Polarguard Delta insulation
  • Deluge DWR treated, 1 oz, 20 d mini ripstop shell
  • Stuffs into internal pocket
  • Snapped one third length placket
  • MSRP $89

Brunton Liberty Mantleless Canister Fuel Lantern SPOTLITE REVIEW

Hallelujah! No fragile mantles! Good fuel efficiency and bright output make this a tempting gadget for winter camping.

Overview

Got excess gas? I mean that box full of partial fuel canisters from your lightweight canister stove. This might be a way to finish them off on family camping trips. Brunton has introduced what they claim is the world’s first mantleless camping lantern. It features a platinum element and is claimed to be windproof and hassle free—no mantles or matches needed or glass globe to break. It comes with standard piezo ignition, so lighting is a push of a button. It has two reflectors to direct light to where you need it.

Although it is not light (8.3 ounces), we are interested in the Liberty because it is new technology. How bright, controllable, and fuel efficient is it compared to a conventional mantle-type canister lantern? In our upcoming review we will compare the Liberty to the Vaude Peak Illuminator and report on how it stacks up.

Features and Specifications

  • Platinum element instead of traditional mantles
  • Built-in reflectors to aim the light
  • No glass or plastic components
  • Piezo electric ignition
  • Approximately 80 watts/30 candlepower
  • Burn time up to 6 hours at high output from an 8 oz (227 g) canister
  • Size 4 x 2.5 x 1.3 in (10 x 6 x 3 cm)
  • Measured weight 8.3 oz (235 g), manufacturer’s specification 8.3 oz (235 g)
  • MSRP $115

Six Moon Designs Comet Pack SPOTLITE REVIEW

Internal frame option, narrow profile, and ease of use are the hallmarks of this lighweight backpack.

Overview

The new Six Moons Designs Comet Pack builds on the success of their current Starlite Pack, which our editor Jay Ham found to be “a standout with the highest comfortable load carrying capacity of any backpack tested by Backpacking Light”.

Like the Starlite, the Comet has optional aluminum stays available which allow it to be either a lightweight frameless pack or an internal frame pack.

In the Comet the sleeping pad pocket is moved to the inside of the pack, allowing the addition of center-mounted shoulder straps that adjust to fit torsos 15 to 20 inches. The Comet at 3700 cubic inches is also a little smaller pack than the Starlite at 4100 cubes. Outside mesh pockets have a little more capacity, and the pack is constructed of lighter weight fabrics like 70 denier silnylon.

Like the Starlite, the Comet looks impressive, and will likely land on our list of favorite packs. Look for a full review this summer.

Features and Specifications

  • Style: frameless or internal frame, top loading, dry bag top closure
  • Two removable aluminum stays
  • Three outside mesh pockets
  • Center-mounted shoulder straps adjustable for 15-20 in (38-51 cm) torsos
  • Removable padded hipbelt
  • Lumbar pad
  • Inside sleeping pad pocket
  • Inside security pocket
  • Fabrics: body 70d silicone nylon, high wear areas 420d pack cloth, extension collar 30d silicone nylon
  • One size, volume 3700 ci (59 L)
  • Measured weight without stays 22.3 oz (632 g), with stays 27.1 oz (768 g); manufacturer specification 22 oz (624 g) without stays, 27 oz (765 g) with stays
  • MSRP $170, stays $10

Mo-go-gear Go-torch Alcohol Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

A folding windscreen keeps this stove kit small but offers the power for boiling larger volumes of water.

Overview

The Go-torch by Mo-go-gear is a nicely designed open-jet alcohol stove that is well suited for group cooking. The 2.5-inch diameter burner has a 2-ounce capacity, it has a wide/sturdy pot stand, and comes with a windscreen (4 inches high x 24 inches long), heat reflector, and fuel measuring cup.

The Go-torch’s pot stand is very innovative and sturdy. It spreads out to about 4 inches in diameter, and folds flat for packing. The distance from the burner to pot bottom is 1.75 inches, which is higher than the traditional 1 inch. I queried the manufacturer on this and he replied that his tests showed that configuration worked best.

The windscreen and heat reflector (goes under the burner) are made of soft temper 36 gauge aluminum, which is very flexible and durable. It’s the same material the MSR windscreens are made of. Another nice feature is that the windscreen is adjustable for pot diameter, just set it to the desired diameter and secure it with a paper clip. For packing, the windscreen easily rolls up into a tight cylinder.

The total weight of the Go-torch is 2.4 ounces (my measurement). That is a little heavy by alcohol stove standards (you can find or make one that weighs 1 to 1.5 ounces), but remember that this stove can easily cook for two people or more. Much of the stove’s weight is in the pot stand and windscreen, which weigh 1.7 ounces together. However, these components are sturdy and will last a long time.

I tested the Go-torch both in the lab and field. My lab test results were as follows:

Test Condition Boil Time (minutes:seconds) Fuel Consumption (grams)
Optimal (70 °F air and water) 5:11 13.6
Cold (40 °F air and water) 8:18 15.9
Wind (70 °F air and water, plus 12 mph wind) 6:40 31.8

My tested optimal boil time is reasonably close to the manufacturer’s claimed boil time of 4:20. The discrepancy is easily accounted for by differences in elevation, fuel used, and water/air temperatures.

The Go-torch performed well in the field. It lit directly from a match in warm weather, but on a 35 °F morning I had to warm it with my hands to get it to light (which is normal). The Go-torch does not come with a simmer ring for flame control, so it is most suited for cooking quick meals by the boil and set method.

My reasons for liking the Go-torch are its suitability for group cooking, it’s a complete cooking system (sans pot), the windscreen is high quality and adjustable for pot diameter, its components are sturdily built, and it performs well. The consequence of its sturdiness is an extra ounce of weight.

Features and Specifications

  • Aluminum open jet burner, 2.5 in (6 cm) diameter
  • Adjustable windscreen
  • Sturdy 4 in (10 cm) diameter pot stand
  • Soft temper aluminum windscreen and heat reflector
  • Measured weight 2.43 oz (69 g)
  • MSRP $24

Notes from the Field: Arizona Canyoneering, SuperUltraLight Style

Field notes on perspectives from the field, with commentary on gear and technique in the canyons of the desert southwest.

SuperUltralight Canyoneering - 1
Lower section of West Clear Creek, Arizona.

I enjoyed my sub-5-pound base weight trip into Arizona’s West Clear Creek Canyon. Weather was as expected – lows of 60 °F and highs around 100 °F, no rain. The main thing I learned was that it’s really easy to go sub-5 in hot weather – no insanity required. I was able to skimp on weather protecting (cold and rain) gear, which left plenty of ounces to carry luxuries, like a TorsoLite, so I was super comfortable on the trail and in camp.

Gear – How’d it work?

The spreadsheet below has my final gear list. My base weight was 4.5 pounds. An unforeseen safety advantage was that total pack weight was light enough that I usually just kept my pack on when scouting routes, so I automatically had the 10 essentials with me.

Choosing gear for a backpacking trip always involves trade-offs between gear weight and usefulness. For example, on this trip I would have appreciated a hipbelt on the Gossamer Gear Uberlight pack about 10% of the time (when scrambling down a steep canyon or carrying extra water weight). But is it worth it to carry the extra 2 ounces a hipbelt would cost when it’s not needed 90% of the time?

Below I’ve listed selected gear and some of the factors I’ll take into account when I decide what gear to carry on my next SuperUltralight trip.

SuperUltralight Canyoneering - 2
The BMW TorsoLite pad easily floated a 12-pound pack and 1-pound trekking poles (not shown).

Gossamer Gear Uberlight Backpack. The small size made it easier to slip between rocks and horizontal, vertical, and slanted uprooted trees during a descent down a debris choked side canyon.

No hipbelt left my waist cooler and made slipping on the pack simple, but let the pack flop over my head when I bent double to scramble down rocks, leaving small items in the back pocket vulnerable to loss.

When I carried extra water for a dry camp above the canyon, the 18-pound pack felt really heavy on my shoulders. I hardly missed the hipbelt at 12 pounds (starting pack weight).

I was very conscious of how I placed the pack on the ground and tried to prevent it from snagging on trees and brush due to the 0.96 oz/yd2 spinnaker fabric. The pack did hang up a couple of times on tree branches but survived without any damage.

I missed a side water bottle pocket. I needed to take off the pack to get a drink of water.

My back was soaked with sweat from spinnaker fabric next to me instead of some absorbent – and heavier – material.

Bozeman Mountain Works TorsoLite. I really enjoyed the TorsoLite. I slept well at night on it, it easily floated my pack and hiking poles when I swam sections, and it even supported me when I floated down some swift water to cool off. It compressed small enough to fit in the outside pocket of the Uberlight.

Speer Hammocks Top Blanket. As Ed Speer advises, this is a narrow blanket (30″) made to be used with a hammock. However, it kept me warm to 60 °F on the ground. I did need to be conscious of tucking the edges beneath me each time I turned over – something I’m not used to doing in a sleeping bag – but doing so became habit by the end of the first night.

SuperUltralight Canyoneering - 3
SUL sleep setup: Gossamer Gear Polycro ground sheet, BMW TorsoLite pad, Speer Top Blanket, Dancing Light Gear Ultralight SleepNet, and grocery bag food sack (inside Adventure 16 mosquito head net) for a pillow.

Sea to Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sack. I used a 20-liter Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sack (1.8 oz) instead of a mylar turkey roasting bag (0.5 oz). The Dry Sacks are made of sil-Cordura with taped seams and a dry bag style roll top closure. The dry sack kept my bag and extra clothing dry (even when I “accidentally” dropped the full sack in the stream and left it for 20 minutes) and served as a back up emergency water carrier to my single Platypus bottle. The 20-liter size was a somewhat random choice based on what the Sea To Summit rep had available before the first major shipment arrived for the initial US release of the bags. It ended up being very handy. The sack diameter was the right size to nearly fill the bottom of the UberLight, yet left enough space so that I could easily extract the folded up TorsoLite from the pack and then slide it back in after I floated the pack through a swimming section. The Ultra-Sil Dry Sack also had enough volume that I could get all the pack contents into it at the end of the trip when my food volume was reduced.

Gossamer Gear Pack Liner. I used the Gossamer Gear Pack Liner inside the pack to provide double protection for the sleeping quilt and single containment of my food and sundries. It, along with the folded up TorsoLite, kept my pack floating when the pack “accidentally” fell in the water. The Gossamer Gear Pack Liner is proving to be quite tough; it survived this trip (and two previous short trips) with no holes.

Dancing Light Gear Ultralight SleepNet. This net (my size large weighs 2.7 oz) is a large rectangular sack that is intended to fit over your head and torso while in your sleeping bag. It definitely helped my sanity! I wore it over my legs while I ate to keep the pesky bugs from biting my exposed ankles. I used it over the bottom of my quilt and feet for a little extra warmth one night, and on another night over my head and torso while sleeping for the extra warmth. I used it as a head net by tucking the ends into my shirt.

Gardeneer Garden Pegs. These plastic pegs are very light (about 0.1 oz each), but didn’t make the grade. I broke two and bent one pounding six stakes in at a camp site above the stream on hard packed dirt.

Grocery bag food sack. The grocery bag food sack survived the trip and enabled me to use my food as a very adequate pillow, although I did question the wisdom of having food so close to my head when I heard some kind of wildcat screaming while I was trying to sleep on my last night in the canyon.

OraLabs Lip Sun Shield. I loved the tiny size and, despite applying it frequently, I used less than a quarter for a four-day trip. I like the taste and its smooth application too.

Behavior Modification

The bottom line is that I didn’t need to give up much with a sub-5-pound base weight in hot weather. The adjustments in behavior I made from an 8-pound base weight were minor since much of the weight loss was due to lighter weight gear, rather than less gear.

  • I found rocks or logs to lean or sit on rather than carrying a Therm-a-Rest chair kit.
  • I needed to get in the habit of tucking the blanket under me so I stayed warm at night.
  • I needed to be careful of where I put my pack and be conscious of my pack position when bushwhacking due to the lightweight fabric that was unprotected by mesh pockets.
  • I needed to take off my pack to hydrate.
  • I had to carry more weight on my shoulders and be careful of the pack tipping over my head while scrambling.

Sub-5-Pound Base Weight Canyoneering Gear List

Clothing Worn While Hiking WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
sun hat full brim Tilley LT5 3.3 94
hiking shirt long sleeved sun and brush protection Rail Riders Adventure shirt 6.1 173
sport top minimal, breathable Patagonia Mesh Sport Top 2.1 60
underwear synthetic briefs Moving Comfort Microbrief 1.3 37
pants hike/swim/bushwhack Columbia PFG zip off 10.3 292
hiking socks thin merino wool blend or synthetic SmartWool Ultra Light RBX socks 1.2 34
hiking shoes lightweight, dry fast Salomon Tech Amphibians 24.2 686
Other Items Worn or Carried WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
trekking poles collapsible so can be stowed Leki Lightwalk Hiking Staff 16.2 459
Other Clothing WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
bandana cool off, protect neck from sun bandana 0.8 23
pants dry, bug protection Solumbra Active Pants 6.3 179
long sleeved shirt dry GoLite C-thru Lite-weight 3.5 99
wind shirt extra evening warmth, bug protection Patagonia Dragonfly 3.2 91
Warm hat use with quilt at night Turtle Fur fleece beanie 1.3 37
extra socks thin merino wool blend SmartWool RBX Racer socks 1.3 37
Shelter and Sleep System WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
shelter poncho/tarp Bozeman Mountain Works SpinPoncho LITE prototype 5.9 167
tent stakes light weight, plastic Gardeneer Garden Pegs (6) 0.7 20
guylines 20′ of thin cord able to hold a tautline hitch 275 lb EZC spectra-core line 0.3 9
ground sheet fit under sleeping bag Gossamer Gear Polycro ground sheet 1.3 37
sleeping bag minimal for very warm weather Speer Hammocks Top Blanket 14.5 411
sleeping pad inflatable, used to float pack Bozeman Mountain Works TorsoLite 10.6 301
mosquito netting upper torso protection Dancing Light Gear Ultralight SleepNet 2.7 77
Packing WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
backpack small volume, frameless Gossamer Gear Whisper Uberlight with shoulder strap foam 3.9 111
waterproof pack liner keep pack contents dry while floating it Gossamer Gear Pack Liner (medium) 1.3 37
stuff sack water resistant for sleeping bag and extra clothing Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sack, 20 L 1.8 51
Cooking and Water WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
stove solid fuel, Esbit bottom quarter inch of V-8 juice can 0.1 3
fuel container Esbit packaging packaging for one Esbit tab weighs less than 1 gram and is included in fuel weight 0.0 0.0
cookpot titanium mug Snow Peak 600 2.8 79
cook pot lid aluminum foil cut to size, doubled 0.1 3
wind screen wind screen/pot support pot support/wind screen as designed by W. Kevin Smith, made of oven liner foil 0.3 9
bag for cookpot protect pack contents from Esbit residue on cookpot plastic grocery store veggie bag 0.1 3
utensil spoon GSI Lexan soup spoon 0.3 9
ignite Esbit lighter Scripto 0.6 17
water bottle 1 L 1 L Platypus with sport cap 0.9 26
emergency water carrier back up for Platypus Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sack (weight listed under Packing) 0.0 0
water treatment containers for Aqua Mira, measuring cap Bozeman Mountain Works 0.35-oz Capacity Dropper Bottles (2, carried in ditty bag) 0.4 11
food storage light weight plastic grocery bag 0.2 6
Other Essentials WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
maps trail map none needed, follow canyon 0.0 0
sunglasses clip on clip on sunglasses 0.2 6
mosquito head net bug protection Adventure 16 0.8 23
personal hygiene toilet kit toilet paper, alcohol hand gel, zip bag for used tp, antibiotic cream with pain relief in zip bag 1.1 31
personal hygiene teeth cleaning kit toothbrush, floss, baking soda (in tiny zip bag), mouth guard in zip bag in food bag 0.9 26
ditty bag miscellaneous paper cutter, headlamp, wound kit, firestarting kit, sunscreen, keychain compass, DEET in silnylon bag 3.9 111
light LED headlamp Photon II with mini alligator clip in ditty bag n/a
first aid minor wound care / meds ibuprofen, duct tape, butterfly bandages (2) in ditty bag n/a
firestarting emergency, firestarting storm matches (2), no-blow out birthday candles (2), whistle in ditty bag n/a
sunscreen SPF 30, sunscreen and lip balm Banana Boat Kids repackaged (1.6 oz), OraLabs Lip Sun Shield (0.2 oz) in ditty bag n/a
Consumables (4-Day Trip) WEIGHT
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
fuel Esbit 0.5 oz/ evening 1.5 43
food 3.5 days 24 oz / day 84.0 2381
water average carried 32 oz 32.0 907
water treatment Aqua Mira (excluding packaging) 0.6 oz/4 days 0.6 17
toilet paper soft but strong 1.2 oz/4 days 1.2 34
Weight Summary Pounds Kilograms
(1) Total Worn or Carried While Hiking 4.0 1.8
(2) Total Base Weight in Pack 4.5 2.0
(3) Total Weight of Consumables 7.5 3.4
(4) Full Skin-Out Base Weight (1) + (2) 8.6 3.9
(5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) 12.0 5.4
(6) Full Skin-Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) 16.0 7.3

Note: I did not include journalistic gear (camera, paper, and pen) in weight calculations.

Expected Conditions / Context for July Sub-5 Challenge Trips

Dry camping

What Dry camping, will need to carry 1 gallon of water
Where San Francisco Peaks, Arizona including Mt. Humphreys, the highest peak in Arizona
When July
Weather Air temperatures from 45-80 °F, wind, and possibly rain

Hammock camping

What Hammock camping
Where Mogollon Rim, Arizona
When July
Weather Air temperatures from 55-85 °F, possible rain

Look for the pre-trip gear list for both July trips here in the Backpacking Light Gear Lists Forum.

Mo-go-gear Fire-fly Alcohol Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

A tiny stove well suited for backpackers that view pint sized cooking mugs as group cooking devices.

Overview

Gossamer Gear never loses sight of light, and the new Fire-fly alcohol stove they commissioned from Mo-go-gear (at 1.56 ounces for the whole kit) is no exception. The cooking system includes the burner, pot stand, heat reflector, windscreen, and fuel measuring cup.

The Fire-fly uses a mini alcohol burner (2-inch diameter) with a capacity of 1.25 ounces. The heat reflector and 3-inch x 22-inch windscreen are made of soft temper 36 gauge aluminum, which is the same stuff that MSR uses for their windscreens. The pot stand is wide and sturdy.

I like the innovative pot stand (which folds flat), the high quality adjustable windscreen, and the fact the stove comes as a cooking system (sans pot). My guess is that it’s capable of cooking for two; we will find out. Our editors are testing the Fire-fly in different regions of the country, and we will publish a full review this summer.

Features and Specifications

  • Aluminum open jet burner, 2 in (5 cm) diameter
  • Adjustable windscreen
  • Sturdy 3 in (8 cm) diameter pot stand
  • Soft temper aluminum windscreen and heat reflector
  • Measured weight 1.56 oz (44 g)
  • MSRP $22.95

Montane 180 Waterproof/Breathable Shirt SPOTLITE REVIEW

Rain shirt? Jacket? Who cares: It’s 7 oz and has the ability to disappear in a corner of your pack.

Overview

Montane calls it “the world’s lightest weight fully waterproof and breathable outdoor shirt”. Is it really a shirt? At a claimed weight of just 6 ounces (size large), the Montane 180 is similar to the Patagonia Specter Pullover (at 6.5 ounces, size medium), and a close contender for the coveted title of lightest woven fabric hooded rain jacket. Both jackets use a polyurethane-only waterproof/breathable membrane, and have similar features.

In our upcoming review of the Montane 180 I will take a hard look at its features and performance compared to the Patagonia Specter Pullover that we recently reviewed. How do they compare for performance, weight, and value?

Features and Specifications

  • Water-resistant chest and pocket zips
  • Active cut with dropped tail
  • Roll-away adjustable hood with wired peak
  • Fleece lined collar
  • Zippered security pocket
  • 13.5 in (34 cm) zippered chest vent
  • Elastic drawcord hem, elastic cuffs
  • Shell Fabric: FREEFLOW® Lite, 1.7 oz/yd2 (57 g/m2), 20d x 20d ripstop nylon face fabric; Gelanots GX-PR waterproof/breathable coating on the inside, Teflon DWR finish on the outside
  • Measured weight 7.1 oz (201 g) size L; manufacturer’s specification 6 oz (180 g)
  • MSRP $166.50 US

GoLite Galaxy Internal Frame Backpack SPOTLITE REVIEW

Internal frame, enough volume for a long trek, and light weight = more appeal for traditional backpackers looking to “go light” without gettin’ freaky about it.

Overview

The Galaxy is the newest addition to GoLite’s Unlimited Series of packs created to provide a full-featured pack with maximum comfort and minimum weight. It incorporates the latest materials and technologies and is loaded with user friendly features. In size large, the total volume is 4600 cubic inches and weight is only 3 pounds 10.2 ounces (my measurement). That’s 79 cubic inches per ounce for a full-featured internal frame pack.

I loaded the Galaxy with 24 pounds of gear and took it out for a 30-mile two-day test run. I’m very impressed with this pack. It has plenty of options to organize gear, and carried the weight comfortably as promised. I like its anatomically shaped hard plastic framesheet that molded to my back and provided total weight transfer to my hips. I could even reach a water bottle from a side mesh pocket and put it back! The pack is not as squatty as the photo suggests.

Look for a full review of the Galaxy this summer on the Backpacking Light website.

Features and Specifications

  • Style: internal frame, top loading, drawstring closure, top pocket
  • Ergo-Flex suspension system
  • Two main vertical internal compartments
  • Two side mesh water bottle pockets with angled opening
  • 3-liter hydration sleeve
  • Floating top lid with pocket
  • Large outside pocket with water-resistant zipper
  • Main body is SilLite HG 40d polyester 3 oz/yd2 (102 g/m2), front pockets and bottom are 3-layer X-Pac fabric
  • Volume 4600 ci (75 L) size L
  • Weight 3 lb 10.2 oz (1.65 kg) size L; manufacturers specification 3 lb 11 oz (1.68 kg)
  • MSRP $250

Granite Gear Wisp Backpack REVIEW

Technical day pack that keeps loads close (SUL’ers take note: you might be able to eke an overnight out this one…).

Overview

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 1
The Wisp fully loaded (except the top pocket), with a fleece jacket stuffed in the “helmet flap.” It has five compression straps to adjust pack volume for different size loads.

The Granite Gear Wisp backpack is a lightweight, versatile technical day pack that is right-sized for many outdoor activities. It has a great shoulder harness and hipbelt with lots of adjustment and a good fit, as we would expect from Granite Gear. The pack fit snug to my body and carried all the gear I needed for day activities. A flap on the front of the pack is designed to carry a helmet, but can be used to carry a variety of other items, even snowshoes or crampons if the talons are padded. The Wisp has enough volume and carry capacity to use for ultralight backpacking. This pack relies on using a hydration system for water delivery – there are no outside mesh pockets to hold water bottles or assorted gear items. A top pocket over the drawstring closure and two hipbelt pockets provide some outside storage, but not enough. The hipbelt pockets are so tight that it is an effort to insert an energy bar, so some serious enlargement is needed. Overall, the Wisp is lightweight yet sturdy, and very versatile. With a few improvements to the outside pockets, it would be one of our favorites.

In Brief

  • Lightweight (1.5 pounds) 2,000 cubic inch technical day pack
  • Comfortable shoulder harness and hipbelt, with lots of adjustment
  • Very versatile and right-sized for numerous activities
  • Fits well and comfortably carries 20 pounds
  • Excellent load volume control
  • Hydration bladder only; no water bottle pockets
  • Hipbelt pockets need to be larger, and outside mesh pockets added

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Frameless, top loading technical day pack

• Fabric Description

Bottom, front, and reinforcements are high tenacity 210d Cordura, 6.4 oz/yd2 (216 g/m2); pack body is high tenacity 70d Cordura Hybrid Silnylon (it’s called “hybrid” because the fabric is both silicone impregnated and has a urethane coating), 2.4 oz/yd2 (81 g/m2)

• Sizes

One size fits torsos 18-22 in (46-56 cm)

• Volume

2000 ci (32.8 L)

• Weight

Bacpacking Light measured weight 1 lb 7.9 oz (0.68 kg); manufacturer specification 1 lb 8 oz (0.68 kg)

• Volume to Weight Ratio

83.7 ci/oz (based on 2000 ci for size regular, and Backpacking Light measured weight of 23.9 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

20 lb (9 kg) comfortable carrying capacity as determined by Backpacking Light; 25 lb (11 kg) comfortable carrying capacity claimed by manufacturer

• Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

13.4 (based on 20 lb load capacity and Backpacking Light measured weight of 23.9 oz)

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

$90 US

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 2
The Wisp adjusts to fit 18-22 inch torso lengths by positioning the hipbelt, then adjusting the shoulder strap length, sternum strap, and load adjustors to a comfortable fit. All straps are plenty long to adjust the pack to a wide range of body proportions. The camera case shown is not a part of the pack.

The Granite Gear Wisp is a frameless technical day pack. It achieves a “virtual frame” when the fully expanded pack is tightened with five compression straps (two connected to the top of the helmet sleeve, two on the lower pack body, and one over the top). A filled 2-liter water bladder in the vertical hydration sleeve also adds some rigidity. The suspension consists of padded shoulder straps with load adjustor straps, a sternum strap, and a padded hipbelt.

At first glance the Granite Gear Wisp seems small, but it has the capacity and adjustability to swallow a lot of gear. I tested the Wisp with carry loads up to 26 pounds, and determined its maximum comfortable carry load capacity (for me) is 20 pounds, which is lower than the manufacturer’s claimed load capacity of 25 pounds. Above about 20 pounds, the virtual frame collapsed and put too much weight on my shoulders. The loaded pack adjusted to fit snugly to my back, giving good stability and low center of gravity.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Granite Gear calls the flap on the front of the pack a “helmet carrying flap.” It is faced with a fine stretchy mesh and is open on the sides. It can just as easily be used to carry a shovel, snowshoes or crampons (with cleat protection), a jacket, or a stuff sack full of assorted gear. Compression straps at the top allow it to be tightly secured to the pack.

The Granite Gear Wisp internal zippered hydration sleeve is located vertically against the backpanel. The sleeve also contains a thin foam back pad. A 2-liter bladder fits in the sleeve, but it is cumbersome to insert without wadding the back pad. The back pad can easily be removed to eliminate this problem and save a little weight (0.9 ounce). A full water bladder makes the backpanel more rounded and extends the pack’s center of gravity away from the body. There are no water bottle pockets or holders on this pack, so a hydration bladder is the only choice other than a hipbelt-mounted bottle sleeve.

The main compartment has a 7.5-inch extension collar with a drawstring closure. It is covered with a flat top pocket connected by two side-release buckles. When completely full, the pack is about 23 inches high, 12 inches wide, and 9 inches thick. It easily compresses down to accommodate smaller volume loads.

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 3
Unfortunately, the hipbelt pockets are very shallow and tight, and will not accommodate more than an energy bar in each one. It would be wonderful if they were large enough to hold a digital camera and other assorted small items.

There are three outside pockets: a flat 10 inch by 10 inch top pocket, and two flat 6-inch hipbelt pockets. All have water-resistant zippers. There are two short daisy chains on the helmet sleeve and two webbing loops on the bottom corners.

I found the Wisp to be a very versatile pack and used it frequently for day hiking, trail running, snowshoeing, and backcountry skiing. It is right-sized to carry the needed gear for these activities, along with plenty of warm clothing. While trail running, the Wisp stuck to my body. The Wisp has enough weight and volume carrying capacity for an overnight or weekend trip using ultralight gear.

Durability

The Granite Gear Wisp is constructed of lightweight durable fabrics, with heavier fabrics in all wear areas. All of the webbing straps are 0.75-inch wide, and all stress points are reinforced with heavy bar tacking. Most seams are double stitched, with the raw edges covered with a seam binding. The Wisp is solidly constructed and built to last. It is durable enough for bushwhacking and scrambling, but don’t scrape it too hard against the granite!

Value

The Wisp is a solidly constructed versatile pack. If fits well and comfortably carries a decent load. With an MSRP of $90, the Wisp is fairly priced.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Add mesh water bottle pockets to the sides of the pack.
  • Enlarge the hipbelt pockets to make them more useful.
  • Add some depth to the top pocket to give it more capacity.

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack REVIEW

Small, dense, heavy loads carry well in this durable internal frame pack.

Introduction

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack - 1
Snowshoeing with the Mountainsmith Wraith in the Kachina Peaks Wilderness, Arizona.

Mountainsmith’s idea of a lightweight backpack is to reduce weight with lightweight materials without sacrificing features or carrying capacity. Their resulting Mountainlite line is known for high carrying capacities appropriate to their volumes, and features to suit discerning users. In this line, the 1600 cubic inch (26 L) Mountainsmith Wraith is sized right for lightweight day hikes or fast-packing trips. I tested the Wraith over four months of heavy use while hiking, fast-packing, skiing, mountain biking, trail running, snow shoeing, and as my daily commute bag.

What’s Good

  • Full featured harness and suspension offers exceptional fit and comfort
  • Delrin hoop frame is both supportive and flexible
  • Body hugging design perfect for fast packing pursuits
  • Six organizational pockets in addition to the main pack bag
  • Side panel compression straps do not interfere with side water bottle pockets
  • Frame does not interfere while wearing a cycling helmet

What’s Not So Good

  • Weight – the pockets and features, while functional, add unnecessary weight
  • Lacks necessary attachments to be a good snow sports pack
  • Water resistant zippers (YKK #8) are stiffer than most

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Internal frame, panel loading

• Fabric

Dimension Polyant VX-21 and high tenacity nylon

• Size

Fits 17 – 21 in (43 cm – 53 cm) torso lengths

• Volume

1600 ci (26 L)

• Weight

2 lbs 4.4 oz (1032 g) (Backpacking Light measured)

• Carrying Capacity

30 lbs (14 kg) or more as determined by Backpacking Light

• Volume To Weight Ratio

44 ci/oz

• MSRP

$130.00

Performance

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack - 2
Mountainsmith Wraith (manufacturer’s photo).

At only 1600 cubic inches, the Mountainsmith Wraith is more limited by size than carrying capacity. In an attempt to determine the upper limit of carrying capacity, I filled the Wraith full of water bottles and dense gear, and still did not exceed its comfortable carrying capacity at 30 pounds. The harness – shoulder and sternum straps, load lifters, and padded hip belt with stabilizers – fits my 19″ torso very well. The Delrin hoop frame adds just enough support to transfer weight to the hips without being too stiff and encumbering mobility. Backpanel padding makes limited contact with your back at the shoulder blades and lumbar providing much better air flow than a full-contact design. The Mountainsmith Wraith is a super performer for active pursuits (tested for trail running, mountain biking, skiing, snowshoeing, fast packing, and rushing through an airport), thanks to its body hugging design and compression system. It has four side panel compression straps plus a heavy gauge front-panel shock cord to compress the load close into your back.

There are four pockets accessible from outside the pack, an internal hydration sleeve, and a small, mesh change pocket in addition to the main pack bag. The outside pockets include two side panel water bottle pockets, easily reachable while wearing the pack, a front bellowed pocket, and padded camera pocket. The front bellowed pocket (vertical zipper) can swallow a lot of gear as the bellows nearly double its size. The top “camera” pocket can hold a point-and-shoot camera or other small electronics, and closes with a water resistant zipper; as does the main pack bag. Both of the water resistant zippers (YKK #8) are stiff and show little promise of loosening up after four months testing. Mountainsmith completes the package with a uniquely designed front panel shock cord, which can be detached at any point and reconfigured to hold odd shaped items.

Four months of heavy and frequent use had no effect on the Dimension VX-21 and high tenacity nylon fabrics. Some very slight fraying, or fuzziness, is evident on the zipper pulls and even less evident on the front shock cord. YKK zippers and heavy stitching should last the life of the pack.

What’s Unique

For those of us who prefer drinking from a water bottle, side panel water bottle pockets are the ticket. Few packs have accessible water bottle pockets and lower side panel compression straps that work effectively and concurrently. Mountainsmith nailed their design by running the compression straps partly behind the forward slanting side pockets, leaving the adjustable ladder locks exposed. The pockets are completely accessible while wearing the pack, even when the lower side panel compression straps are fully cinched. And these straps are placed low enough on the pack to do their job right.

Recommendations for Improvement

The Wraith falls short in its ability to carry winter gear. True, it does have a single ice axe loop and skis can be attached to the side panel compression straps, but it does not hold snowshoes and snowboards easily. If Mountainsmith added four D-rings on the front panel, to mirror the location of the side-panel compression straps, compression straps could be attached to secure larger items to the back panel.

The padding in the padded “camera” pocket could be made removable. There are times when it is not needed. Removing it when it’s not needed would save weight and add a little volume to that pocket.

Macpac 35 Amp Backpack REVIEW

Light materials with rugged durability, convenient gear access, and comfort for fastpacking.

Overview

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 1
Macpac 35 Amp.

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 2
Macpac 35 Amp in use.

The Macpac 35 Amp pack is aimed at adventure racers. It carries well and has lots of great features: two mesh water bottle pockets, mesh stuff-it pocket, top lid, and two very convenient ‘puku’ pouches in front. The removable hipbelt, frame, and puku pouches allow adventure racers and fast packers to adjust the Amp 35 to suit their needs. The rugged construction makes it great for rough treatment and off trail work but pushes it towards the heavier end of lightweight packs. As is typical with Macpac packs it is beautifully detailed and well thought out. The 35 Amp is a wonderfully versatile pack that carries loads up to 33 pounds (15 kg) really well.

In Brief

  • This pack has more innovative features than I have ever seen in a pack
  • Practical mesh ‘puku’ pouches mounted over the stomach on a bungee system provide quick access to trail essentials
  • Removable three-piece composite foam/PE frame sheet that can be used as a minimalist sleeping mat
  • Whistle built into the sternum strap clip
  • Nine pockets compliment the main pack bag to organize gear and make it quickly accessible
  • Drain holes in base and rear pockets
  • Harness and hipbelt provide adequate comfort for extending the carrying capacity beyond the frame’s ability
  • Water options include two side-panel, mesh water bottle pockets, hydration bladder pocket (inside), and four bungee drink bottle holders on the shoulder straps and front panel

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Removable framesheet, top loading with top pocket

• Fabric Description

Combination of 210d ripstop and 420d 6.6 fiber nylon. Waterproofed with a polyurethane coating. The heavier fabric is used on the high wear base, front, lid, and straps while the lighter ripstop is used on the sides. The pockets on the lid, sides, rear, and front are made of a tough nylon mesh. Comfortable open-weave, high-friction wicking material against the wearer’s back and on the straps.

• Sizes
two sizes, size 2 tested

Sizes Torso Length* (in) Torso Length (cm)
2 12-17 31-42
3 15-19 37-48
*Torso length is measured from the shoulder attachment points to the center of the hipbelt.

• Volume

nominally 2140 ci (35 L)

• Weight
size 2 tested

Size Backpacking Light measured oz (g) Manufacturer Specification oz (g)
2 43.7 (1240) 37 (1050)
3 37 (1050)

• Weight of Components
size 2 tested

Backpacking Light measured oz g
Main pack 31.1 882
Removable frame pad 4.9 140
Hip belt 5.4 152
Puku pouches 2.3 66
Total Weight 43.7 1240

• Volume To Weight Ratio

69 ci/oz size L (Based on 2140 ci, and Backpacking Light measured weight of 43.7 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

33 lb (15 kg) as determined by Backpacking Light although there is no sharp cut-off in comfort; none listed by manufacturer

• Carry Load To Pack Weight Performance Ratio

12 (Based on Backpacking Light measured carrying capacity of 33 lbs, and measured weight of 43.7 oz)

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

$203 USD , $299 NZD

• Manufacturer Contact Information

www.macpac.co.nz

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 3Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 4

Removable framesheet.

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 5
Macpac 35 Amp: three sections of framesheet and S-shaped shoulder straps.

The framesheet is an innovative three-panel design. There is a large central panel and two narrower side panels. The framesheets consist of 0.2-inch (5 mm) thick closed cell foam glued to a 0.04-inch (1 mm) thick sheet of stiff plastic. The three panels run the full length of the user’s back. These three pieces fit into tight vertical pockets to form a three-panel frame. When loaded with a small volume, the side panels hinge forward to form a box frame. When the pack is fully loaded, they flatten out to allow the pack to take more volume.

The framesheet provides very good protection against badly packed objects poking into your back. The large middle section of the frame can be removed to save weight. It also forms a useful minimalist sleeping pad; although at 21 inches (53 cm) long and 13 inches (33 cm) wide it is only for hard-core lightweight or emergency use. It does however make a practical foot pad for use with a short sleeping pad.

I took the pack for an eight-day lightweight trip without needing to strap anything but my crampons to the outside. I left the central framesheet at home to save weight because I felt the fully loaded pack would be stiff enough; I regretted that. Starting the trip with 33 pounds (15 kg), without the frame, I found the pack uncomfortable on my back. This appeared to be because the pack was pulling away from my back, especially with a full load and a tarp and crampons loaded well to the rear of the pack. Repacking on subsequent trips, and including the central framesheet, I found the pack could comfortably carry 33 pounds (15 kg), but not much beyond that. Frame collapse causes discomfort beyond 33 pounds, and while the harness remains comfortable upwards of 51 pounds, nearly all the weight is carried by the shoulders at this point. Those who don’t mind carrying weight on their shoulders will find they can extend the carrying capacity of this pack.

Like most Macpacs, the hipbelt pivots on a single point at the base of the back. This allows the hips to swing independently of the load and the back to stretch a little. The framesheet directs the load to this pivot point, which makes the pack comfortable with larger loads. With the framesheet removed, the hipbelt supports very little weight. Because of this, I found that if I remove the framesheet I should also remove the hipbelt and just use the simple webbing waist strap that is provided.

The pack can be compressed very nicely for small loads using the compression straps, three-piece frame, and shock cords on the side and back pockets. However, the small lid and short collars make it difficult to extend much beyond the nominal 35 liter (2140 ci) volume, although the large side and rear mesh pockets do allow for some extra gear to be strapped on the outside. It would be nice if the Macpac 35 Amp were a little taller and thinner for packing and carrying larger loads.

The Macpac 35 Amp has wide, comfortable S-shaped shoulder straps with a solid sternum strap.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 6
Mesh ‘puku’ pouches are great for easy access while on the move.

The pack has two great little ‘puku’ pouches that attach by bungees across the front. (Puku is the Maori word for belly.) They provide ideal access on-the-move to food, GPS, compass, knife, tape, and sunblock. They have a cool little central hook that joins the two bungees together. The pukus are at just the right height for easy access and unlike pouches hung from the hip belt, they don’t interfere with my thighs when stepping up. They are quick to unclip when taking the pack off but they are difficult to remove from the pack completely.

This pack has pockets everywhere – the main compartment, two lid mesh pockets, a zippered rear pocket, three mesh rear pockets, and a bladder pocket inside, in addition to the two puku pockets. This is wonderful for organizing gear and having a pocket for everything. The downside is that it adds considerably to the weight of the pack.

The pack has a rear pocket with a waterproof zipper. I have found this pocket wonderful for holding a wet or icy tarp or small tent. The tarp can be left as the last item to pack in the morning. Once inside the pocket the tarp is protected from damage. The pocket even has a drain hole in the base to let out water that accumulates.

There are bungee bottle holders mounted on each of the shoulder straps and on the rear of the pack.

The pack carries two ice axes nicely. Crampons can be strapped to the bungees on the outside, though there is not a high-wear crampon patch to protect pack fabric.

Durability

The pack uses an intelligent mix of 420 denier nylon on the exposed areas and 210 denier nylon elsewhere. While these materials push the weight of the 35 Amp up above that of earlier Macpac adventure racing packs, they have improved the durability significantly. Over nine months of hard use the only damage to the test pack is one small hole in the lighter weight material.

The mesh is surprisingly tough, and despite many hours pushing through rough scrub and carrying crampons on the bungees outside, no damage has occurred to the rear mesh pockets.

Overall, the 35 Amp is solidly built with great detailing to reduce wear and damage.

Value

With its myriad of features and practical design the Macpac 35 Amp is good value.

Recommendations for Improvement

While all the cool features of the 35 Amp make for a really fun pack, I would really like to see a stripped down version that is significantly lighter.

The puku pockets are extremely convenient to use, but they are very difficult to remove from the pack. Macpac should consider improving the attachment system for these pockets.

Almost to Katahdin: Appalachian Trail Section Hike to the Kennebec River

Section hiking progress towards the 2000 mile patch by Don “Photon” and Dave Johnston.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 1
Don (left) and Dave (right) Johnston at the trail head, summer 2004.

Maine! The final state in Don’s (Photon) 15-year quest to hike the Appalachian Trail (AT) one piece at a time. The New Hampshire-Maine state line is a touchstone for through-hikers and section-hikers alike, one that hints that this 2,174 mile quest might, in fact, have an end. Accompanied by my brother Dave, I not only crossed this line, but pushed another 130 miles into the heart of Maine, literally to within sight of the climax: Katahdin!

Over the past 15 years I have pushed slowly up the trail, using spring vacation until I was so far north that spring hadn’t actually arrived yet. Two years ago I switched to summer hikes and, accompanied by Dave, completed the section from the Long Trail in Vermont through the White Mountains to Gorham, New Hampshire. This year we continued the journey over the last of the Whites in the Mahoosuc Range, over Saddleback and the Bigelows, to the Kennebec River in central Maine.

The maps for this section show that the trail will retain the rugged character it assumed at Mt. Moosilauke at the south end of the White Mountains. However, in this section the tempo will be increased as the ups and downs are closer together. Due to shelter spacing, we were faced with a choice between short 8-hour days and long 14 or more hour days. We decided to do this 147-mile section in 12 short days with three resupplies to allow time for photography and to keep the pack weight down through this rugged section.

After driving about 800 miles, Dave and I arrived at the endpoint of our trip at the Kennebec River to drop off a car. River and Trails Northeast, which also provides the ferry service across the Kennebec, graciously provides private, monitored parking. While transferring my gear to Dave’s car, I discovered that I did not have the resupply package I intended to drop off on the way back down to Gorham. Fortunately, the Rivers and Trails store is well equipped for through-hiker style resupply and I cobbled together a 3-day supply of food with minimal compromise. We drove down to Gorham to spend a night at the well-known Hikers Paradise. The next day we were dropped off at the AT crossing of Route 2 in the valley between the Carter Range and the Mahoosucs where we had ended our section two years before. The hike was on.

Segment 1: Route 2 to Grafton Notch

We set out with 21-pound (Don) and 25-pound (Dave) packs, including food, water and fuel. My pack had more cottage industry gear and thus was the lighter of the two. Dave’s pack held better photo gear, including a full height tripod. For footwear, I was trying out Salomon Tech Amphibians, a mesh river shoe, while Dave used Lowa Renegade Gore-Tex lightweight boots. We both brought trekking poles capable of supporting our full weight to save our middle-aged knees on the expected steep ledgey descents.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 2
There were a lot of photogenic spots along the first portion of our trip. Here is a rare photo of Dave (the photography nut) at a rest stop on 3,565 foot Mt. Success.

Despite our late start on this 12-mile day, we did not hurry, pausing for photography including the obligatory tripod shot at the trailhead sign at the start of the climb. The weather had been wet in recent weeks, and there was a lot of water on the trail. This section is characterized by frequent wet areas traversed by bog bridges in varying stages of age and condition. As I walked over a floating bog bridge, it sunk below the surface and I had wet feet. Not unexpected and it felt nice and cool. The mesh river shoes do not retain water and my socks started drying after I emerged on the other side. I had with me Gore-Tex socks to put on in the event I needed to keep my feet warm in cold rain and wind but never needed them – this would turn out to be the wettest my feet got the entire hike.

We climbed steadily to Mt. Hayes and the first of many views. The weather was consistently warm (but not hot) and muggy, so the views were generally hazy and unremarkable. Still, there are few better rewards in hiking than summiting out above the forest, and we had a fair amount of that. After about eight miles, we reached Page Pond. The trail traverses the outlet over a 60-foot long beaver dam, just inches above water level, providing the unusual sensation of walking across the surface of the lake. We continued to climb progressively higher bumps, reaching the subalpine zone, then undulating between forest and subalpine scenery. We arrived at the shelter at Gentian Pond by 5:30 p.m. At dusk, we watched a moose cow feed in the pond as her two calves cavorted on the far shore. This was a fairly sedate day, although my notes say the trail was rugged. It turned out be just a warm-up for what was to come.

Our second day was sunny and warm. There were many short rugged ups and downs plus the high peaks of Mt. Success, Mt. Carlo, and the Goose Eye (West, East, and North) peaks. The peaks were clear like the balds down south. Although we hadn’t yet hit 4,000 feet, the peaks extend well into the krummholz zone and provide both subalpine scenery and decent views. The combination of the moist landscape and warm weather encouraged tiny flies, which loved to buzz in a small swarm near our sweaty faces. From the West peak of Goose Eye, we could see the route the trail would travel for miles ahead. We spotted Mahoosuc Notch, Mahoosuc Arm, Old Speck, Baldpate, and beyond – the next two days of the route. Along the way, we crossed the state line into Maine, a landmark noted by numerous northbounder’s notes in the log at the next shelter.

We arrived at Full Goose Shelter early and had time for reading, a nap, and battles with bold and greedy ground squirrels before dinner. This was only a 10-mile day, but it put us on the edge of the renowned Mahoosuc Notch for the next day. Several southbound hikers (self-proclaimed “slackers” hiking for the fun of it, of all things) arrived late in the day and we exchanged trail information. They said we would have fun going through the Notch.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 3
Don negotiating boulders in Mahoosuc Notch.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 4
Baldpate Lean-to.

Mahoosuc Notch. I have heard tales of it for many years. A 1,500-foot deep, narrow canyon with a bottom consisting of huge, angular boulders sloughed off the cliffs above. The trail travels about a mile through the notch, following a tiny watercourse that can occasionally be heard gurgling under the boulders. The air trapped in the notch is distinctly cool and even in August we saw several patches of ice in the deep crannies between boulders. The reported time to travel through it seems to range from one to three hours. I feared a tough time ahead, having gone through Devil’s Gulch on the Long Trail. However, I have found most of the famous sections on the AT are easier than expected. Since we were unsure of how long it would take us to traverse Mahoosuc Notch, we rose early to make sure we would meet the ride that we had arranged to meet us in Grafton Notch. We walked through a beautiful alpine meadow between the peaks of Fulling Mill Mountain before plunging into the west end of the notch. After collapsing and stowing our hiking poles in our packs we headed in. The joys of a light pack were evident. The notch required dynamic rock hopping, occasional hand-over-hand scrambling, confident footwork, and squeezes through crevices. While not able to bounce through as adroitly as we would have without a pack, it was clear that it would have been more difficult with larger, heavier packs. At every juncture there were multiple ways through and we found that choosing high routes was the easiest. We were through in an hour. As the southbounders had predicted, it was more fun than intimidating. The reputation of Mahoosuc Notch was probably earned among old-style backpackers with bulky 50-pound packs.

The climb up the other side to Mahoosuc Arm, on the other hand, lived up to its reputation as a long, steep climb with plenty of scrambling. This was a quintessential White Mountains trail: straight up the side of the mountain over uneven rocks, ledges and erosion-exposed roots, 1,250 feet in a mile. We rested at Speck Pond, pushed up Old Speck Mountain, finally reaching 4,000 feet. We were well ahead of schedule, and with only the descent to Grafton Notch left we had plenty of time to take the side trail to the lookout tower on top where we found great views of the back of the notch, the Goose Eye peaks, and ahead to Baldpate.

During the 2,500 foot descent, the overcast thickened and we got our first drops of rain. We descended to the road in Grafton Notch by 3:00 p.m. and had 3 hours before our scheduled pick up by Stony Brook Campground staff. The schedule called for us to stay at Stony Brook for the night, pick up our resupply, and go 16 miles to Hall Mountain Lean-to the next day. With the extra time in our schedule for the afternoon, we began to hatch another plan. If we could hitch a ride to Stony Brook and convince them to return us to Grafton Notch a day earlier than arranged, we could hike the 2.5 miles to Baldpate Lean-to instead of staying in the campground. This would make the next day’s mileage more reasonable. Almost immediately, a day hiker returned to the parking lot and offered us a ride. Once at the campground, we paid for our reserved night there, picked up the resupply, and the staff gave us a ride back to the trail at Grafton Notch. We arrived at Baldpate Lean-to before dark and before the rain got serious. It rained hard overnight but stopped by the morning. There were a number of people (including a Maine Appalachian Trail Club work crew finishing their tour and heading into town) at this shelter.

Segment 2: Grafton Notch to Route 4 (Rangeley)

I was beginning to really appreciate the advantages of my pack when staying in shelters. On this trip, I am using my Gearskin from Moonbow Gear. This pack unbuckles and opens up flat, forming my nearly-full-length bed for the night. Gearskins can be customized to your preferences at the time you order. Mine has been customized so it is essentially a pad sleeve with hip belt and shoulder straps attached. When lying down, the hip belt is located in the small of my back providing support right where it is needed and the shoulder straps are spread wide so they are to the sides. I sleep well on this and the support of the hip belt in the small of my back has prevented the back pain I used to get when sleeping on totally flat pads. My sleeping pad in the sleeve also serves as the pack frame when the Gearskin is folded and buckled into a pack form.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 5
Don on a ledge on Cascade Mountain with his Moonbow Gearskin pack. Mt. Washington and Mt. Madison in the background.

This has advantages in shelters because you do not need to find a place to hang your pack where it will be out of the way. With the pack opened up to form a bed my sleeping bag gets placed over it and all other gear forms a pillow. Inside the pack I had three sacks plus a tent. Food bag on the bottom, sleeping bag next, and everything else in a sack on the top followed by the lightweight tent. This is a very efficient system that saves time in packing up. Packing now consists of stuffing the sleeping bag in its sack, folding and buckling the pack, putting the food bag with fuel bottle and any extra water I am carrying in the bottom, sleeping bag sack next, then the top sack containing everything else, followed by the tent, and finally buckling the top shut. My pack-up time has dropped a full 30 minutes since I started using the Gearskin pack.

We climbed to Baldpate Mountain in shifting, cloudy remnants of last night’s storm. The West Peak was not treeless but we could see ahead to the well-named East Peak of Baldpate, a depilated dome that would be more at home in the Adirondacks than the Whites. Clouds blew and roiled in the col between the peaks and occasionally pushed up over the top like vaporous glaciers. The clouds came and went as we traversed the col and provided a variety of dramatic scenes. The final ascent over slabs was steep and wet enough that shoes tended to slip on the rock. When we got there the top was socked in, providing that sense of other-worldly isolation that in some ways is superior to unlimited views. Even so, the summit cleared before we left and revealed a sea of clouds punctuated by numerous ridges poking above the clouds. This scenic hat trick on Baldpate was one of the highlights of the trip.

The weather provided more scenic drama and made it an interesting morning as the clouds cleared. The terrain eased off for the rest of the day and we walked mostly in woods. Not long after Surplus Pond I heard some noise on the trail about 10 feet ahead that seemed odd, and thinking it was some animal I stopped to look more closely. The noise seemed to be near the base of a tree, and as I watched, the base of the tree splintered and the tree fell. This is the second time a tree has fallen near us on hikes.

At Hall Mountain Lean-to I took the side trail to the “Gun Sight” and could see the view across Sawyer Notch to Moody Mountain and Old Blue. Tomorrow looked like a more challenging day. For me the long climbs up Moody Mountain and Old Blue Mountain were as tough as anything we had seen so far. In one place, the route up was in the process of sliding down the mountain, adding a little more danger and challenge to the ascent. My left knee was beginning to bother me a little and looked a little swollen. We were mostly traveling through woods where trees blocked our views, even at the top of 3,600 foot Old Blue. The trail got more interesting in the second half of the day with a long section of bog walk and a stand of never-logged red spruce. The highest peak of Bemis Mountain was unspectacular, but its lower peaks (Third, Second, and First Peaks) were very scenic. Rock slabs and a variety of subalpine vegetation along the trail made interesting photographs. We stopped for the night at Bemis Mountain Lean-to.

The next morning we encountered some trail magic while crossing Route 17 where cans of Coke and Oreos in a cooler were provided to hikers. The rest of the day was a conspicuously low elevation jaunt past ponds and bogs. The largest of these, Long Pond, has numerous camps and cabins along one shore but is apparently only served by float plane, one of which we witnessed. The trail passes a great lunch spot with some tables on a sand beach at waterline facing out on the water. Later, we passed a classic north woods peat bog with pitcher plants. Although the day was by no means boring, we cruised the 17.7 miles to Route 4 easily. We caught a ride into Rangeley for our resupply and our night at Gull Pond Lodge. Proprietor Bob O’Brien’s converted house on the shore of Gull Pond is hiker-friendly to the extreme. Bob really takes care of hikers, providing transportation wherever and whenever it is needed and setting out a vast selection of breakfast foods in the morning. This is an almost-obligatory waypoint for through-hikers, with good reason.

Segment 3: Route 4 to Route 27 (Stratton)

In the morning, we began our climb of Saddleback Mountain under heavy overcast. We took a short side trip to Piazza Rock. This huge slab jutting out from the side of a ridge might indeed serve as a public square – if there were a town there, that is. From the wear at the edge on top many have stood on the brink and pondered the drop to the forest below.

From Piazza, the trail climbed steadily past scenic Ethel Pond and Eddy Pond, and then steepened for the 1,700 foot climb to the top of 4,120 foot Saddleback. Because of the threatening rain, Dave hiked without a shirt, drawing comments from day hikers. Even though it never rained this proved to be a good strategy, as the air was warm and muggy even above tree line. This being a Saturday there were many people on the mountain, some of whom were with a group getting oriented for a survey of alpine plants. They were accompanied by the MATC (Maine Appalachian Trail Club), steward for the section, who pointed out where the proposed wind farm would be located, towering 400 feet above the summits in the middle distance. He was unreserved in his condemnation of the project.

The summit of Saddleback is a true alpine climate. The rounded ridge top stays above tree line for more than a mile before dipping into a col and then rising again to The Horn. While we were on Saddleback the clouds rose and the wind began to pick up. We learned that a front was supposed to head in from the northwest, bringing thunderstorms and “damaging winds.” It was tempting to go slow and take in the view and alpine details, but we had two more treeless peaks to cover. We picked up the pace but by the time we reached The Horn the wind was blowing steadily at around 30 mph. It was still warm and there was no evidence of an organized storm so we took pictures and moved on toward Saddleback Junior. When we got above treeline on Junior, there was an obvious front moving toward us so we hustled off and down to Poplar Ridge Lean-to.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 6
Don on the summit of Saddleback Mountain wearing his infamous fishnet shirt.

The caretaker for this shelter has been maintaining it for something like 40 years and has placed there a number of laminated sheets detailing the history of the shelter and answers to questions hikers had written in the shelter log. The shelter floor is made from baseball bat-diameter saplings. Back when the shelter was built, the first hikers of the season would spread spruce boughs across it to make a comfortable sleeping surface. These days, hikers bring their own sleeping pads. There were a number of hikers here for the night and one pair was having trouble with the cleaning wire for their white gas stove which could not be reinserted. Many of us were familiar with the process but no one could get the wire back in so they used their fuel with another hiker’s stove.

The rain held off until most of us had eaten dinner then it came down in buckets and the winds howled. Even in this relatively sheltered location, some rain was blown into the shelter. It was windy and rainy all night.

The rain stopped about 6:00 a.m. and the sky soon cleared. We descended to Orbeton Stream at 1,500 feet and then immediately began climbing back above 3,000 feet. We passed several scenic mountain streams on the way up Lone Mountain on a nicely graded trail (for the northeast US that is.) We took a side trail 1.7 miles to 4,049-foot Mt. Abraham, a long, exposed ridge perpendicular to the main ridgeline. Mt. Abraham is essentially a pile of talus reminiscent of Mt. Washington and the Northern Presidentials. This was the only time on the trip where my mesh Salomon shoes were at a disadvantage over more thickly sided leather shoes. I had to be careful to keep from wedging the side of my foot between rocks. Mt. Abraham offered 360-degree views, including Sugarloaf ahead, and the Saddleback group behind us.

Our original plan was to stop at Spaulding Mountain Lean-to after just 11.4 miles, leaving 13.5 miles for the next day. However, the trail logs at the previous shelter reported that the Sugarloaf USA ski building on top of Sugarloaf (the second highest mountain in Maine) was open to hikers. This was about 3 miles past Spaulding Mountain Lean-to and would reduce our mileage to the road the next day. The only disadvantage reported was the lack of water on Sugarloaf. We stopped at Spaulding Mountain lean-to and loaded up on 2 liters of water each. The climb up 4,000-foot Spaulding Mountain with this extra weight was noticeably more difficult.

After climbing Spaulding Mountain, we reached the plaque commemorating the completion of the last segment of the AT by the CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps formed in 1933 by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to save the eroding forests and the urban unemployed) at this spot. My energy level was running flat. The rugged trail footing had taken its toll. I ate the last of my food for the day and drank my last water just prior to the climb up Sugarloaf. But the extra effort was worth it. This was a spectacular place. The building is a large, multi-level hexagonal chalet that was originally the terminus of the summit gondola. The gondola has been abandoned and the building is just used as a warming “hut” in the winter. The door was open, with just a sign asking hikers to keep the place clean. There was electricity and lights, and a toaster and microwave had been rigged. The floor-to-ceiling windows offered 270 degrees of view and several picnic tables offered a sleeping alternative to the oiled wood floors. As we watched the sun set over Crocker Mountain, we cooked dinner and relaxed.

Several of us decided to spend the night outside on the concrete porch. Not surprisingly on a 4,200-foot summit, it was quite windy and the wind didn’t die down in the evening; it got stronger overnight. The temperature was warm but the wind made exposed sleeping difficult. It was strong enough to blow light sleeping gear off the porch immediately if not anchored to something full time. The railing stopped Dave’s down bag from sailing off at one point. Three of us tried sleeping outside. One guy went in after a few hours because the wind was getting in his bag and was chilling him. Neither of us had that problem; in fact we were on the hot side. I had my 17-ounce Bozeman Mountain Works Arc-X quilt and Dave had his new 21-ounce Marmot Hydrogen bag, both with Pertex Quantum shells.

I wore Patagonia Capilene boxers, a Patagonia Dragonfly pullover, and a 1.7 ounce balaclava and Dave wore just a Dragonfly and shorts in his hooded bag. Despite the wind whipping my quilt around constantly, I slept very warm until dawn with the Dragonfly’s hood on my head. I sealed the quilt to my neck with the neck draw cord and had the quilt’s straps run under my sleeping pad fastening it down to keep out drafts and keep it from blowing away. I had a strap from my pack attached to a picnic table just in case the weight of all the gear in my pack pillow was not enough to keep everything in place when I got up during the night. I was impressed with the wind resistance of my quilt, I was not feeling any drafts. The Dragonfly hood was just what was needed to protect my head from the chilling wind. Despite the wind, we had heavy dew on the exterior of our bags, but it didn’t penetrate and evaporated shortly after we went back inside.

The next day we descended steeply to the Carrabassett River at 2,100 feet and then back up to 4,000 feet over the South and North Peaks of Crocker Mountain. The only notable scenery was off trail at a pond in Crocker Cirque. Reached from the Crocker Cirque Campsite side trail, the pond is surrounded on three sides by the steep ridges of Crocker Mountain. The weather was hot for the trip over the mountain and 2,600 feet back down to the road. We caught a ride to Stratton and had a pleasant stay at the White Wolf Inn, a regular small town motel that attracts hikers with special pricing. The White Wolf’s restaurant had uncommonly good and unusual food: we had breaded fiddlehead ferns, a main dish garnished with fresh local flowers, and rhubarb pie.

Segment 4: Route 27 to Kennebec River

It took a while to hitch a ride back to the trail in the morning, but it didn’t matter since we did not have a long day planned. We encountered a pair of day hikers at the crossing of a dirt road who asked to look at our map. As we resumed our hike, I leapt aside when I noticed a yellow jacket nest in the ground by spotting the guard bee on the ground near a hole. We managed to avoid getting stung at this one. At Horns Pond, we came upon a few hikers and the caretaker for the area. The conversation was about lightweight backpacking, and I was asked about my pack. I shared some information with the caretaker and eventually we moved on.

The Bigelow Range is justifiably well-known for its excellent alpine scenery and as the last high range before Katahdin. Horns Pond is a large, beautiful tarn at the base of The Horns (not to be confused with The Horn on Saddleback), a pair of peaks that were not named for their resemblance to musical instruments. Across a long col is 4,145-foot West Peak which is separated by a much narrower col from 4,088-foot Avery Peak. We planned to get to Avery Memorial campsite in the 3,800-foot col between the two high peaks at a minimum that day, but would continue to Safford Notch campsite if there was time.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 7
Don reviewing the day’s pictures at Avery Memorial Campsite. We set up the Nomad 2-4-2 to wait out a storm before climbing above timberline on Mt Avery.

As we climbed the South Horn, we began to hear thunder. On top we could see that a significant storm was passing through the valley just to the north. As we climbed West Peak, it looked like there was another storm headed right down our ridgeline. For safety we needed to be off the peaks. With the storm approaching, we descended to Avery Memorial campsite and set up our tent at 3:15 p.m. as the wind and rain began. The storm passed in about an hour, so we continued on and climbed Avery Peak. The storm had cleared the air and the view was about the clearest of the trip, with interesting remnants of storm clouds billowing all around. While not certain, we thought we could see Katahdin. We lingered on top, enjoying the changing view and taking pictures, until after 6:00 p.m.. We had only 2 miles and 1,500 feet to descend to Safford Notch, but this turned out to be the single most annoying section of the trip. The footing was awful and the trail poorly routed. We arrived at Safford Notch campsite at dusk – 1.5 hours for a downhill 2 miles.

There was a small Scout troop at the campsite and they assisted us in locating an available site. Later, one of the leaders came down to tell us to feel free to tell the Scouts in a nearby tent to quiet down if they bothered us. Somehow this turned into a conversation about lightweight backpacking, and I was asked to show some of our gear to the Scouts in the morning.

As it turned out my brother thought he had left his glasses up on the peak so he went back up and down the awful trail in the morning. (As it happens, the glasses were caught up in the Dragonfly in his pack all along, but this made for an invigorating early morning hike to the cloud-shrouded summit.) This gave me plenty of time to give an impromptu lightweight backpacking clinic to the Scouts. Most of our gear was of interest with many questions about our packs, Nomad 2-4-2 tent, Aqua Mira water treatment, first aid kit, emergency kit, flash lights, etc. Also covered was food and trail hygiene. Gear was passed around and they were impressed with the lightness of individual things like the Evernew pot with a pie plate foil lid and a bowl cover for storage instead of a stuff sack. They wanted in particular to see my alcohol stove in operation. There were many exclamations of awe as the water quickly boiled. With the water boiling, one of the hungry Scouts retrieved his oatmeal so the hot water would not go to waste. When Dave returned, the clinic ended and we packed up.

Little Bigelow Mountain only rises to 3,000 feet but has numerous views along its 1 1/2 mile ridgetop. As we descended, the trail turned into a perfectly groomed footpath and soon we were cruising for the first time. The next 7 miles to West Carry Pond Lean-to consisted of gentle rises over low mountains and skirting lakes. The crossing of Long Falls Dam Road marks the passing of 2,000 miles from Springer, and “2000 MI.” is painted in the center of the road – less than 200 miles to Katahdin. I am almost there.

We got to West Carry Pond Lean-to in the middle of the afternoon and watched the squirrels conduct their own pre-Olympics. At this pond cedar trees suddenly became ubiquitous at the shore and in wet areas. We hadn’t seen any cedar previously, but they were increasingly common as we continued north.

In the morning, we spent some time exploring Arnold Point, where Benedict Arnold and his army crossed the pond while on their way to invade Quebec during the Revolutionary War. This section of the AT follows part of the route of the “Arnold Trail” where Arnold’s army used East, Middle, and West Carry Ponds to portage between the Kennebec and Dead rivers. The portage was a disaster, with the men sinking in bogs up to their waists while carrying 400 pound green wood bateaux. Fortunately, the trail has been improved considerably since then.

The whole day was a cruise past several ponds and low elevation forest. In a wetland next to East Carry, we saw both pitcher plants and sundew. We photographed some of the waterfalls along Pierce Pond Stream as we descended to the Kennebec River. With only a few miles to go, we didn’t see the yellow jacket nest in the ground and the guard bee expressed his painful displeasure on Dave’s leg.

We arrived at the crossing point on the Kennebec a little after 2:30 p.m. The ferry service is free and exists because the Kennebec is not a free flowing river. It rises and falls quickly and unpredictably with the water releases from the power generating dams upstream. Hikers have died trying to ford this river here due to the rapid rise of the river and the powerful current that comes with that. The ferry is actually a canoe. After we signaled, the canoe came across and picked us up. When the canoe first landed, there were lots of exposed rocks on our side of the river. But as we put on PFDs and loaded the boat, the river rose. We got in as the rocks disappeared. As we crossed, the river continued to rise and when we hit the main current just past the middle of the river, we were soon pointed nearly straight upstream just barely making headway crossing the current. Even though the water is clear, the bottom of the river was not visible. I was glad we had not tried to float across on inflatable pool rings as we had heard someone had done recently (with two kids!). That misadventure caused quite a stir and scrambling of rescue personnel to be on hand just in case it didn’t work out.

With a short walk to the road, our trip was over. I have completed one more piece of the Appalachian Trail. Katahdin is now no longer just an abstraction at a little over 150 miles away. I wanted to call work and say I was not coming back… I am almost there.

Gear Lists

Don “Photon” Johnston’s Gear List
Clothing Worn While Hiking Ounces Grams
Mesh long sleeve shirt – REI Sonora t-shirt, no longer made 4.5 128
Patagonia Baggie Lights 3.9 111
SmartWool Light hikers 2.8 79
REI Spring Gaiters 2.1 60
Solomon Tech Amphibians 27 765
Watch Casio Alti-Thermo 1.8 51
Wallet Ziploc 1.3 37
Hat Patagonia – Vented Broadbill Hat 3.3 94
Hip pads 1.1 31
Other Items Worn or Carried Ounces Grams
Leki Poles -with Ultrapod attached 23.2 658
Other Clothing Ounces Grams
Western Mountaineering Flight Down Jacket (stored with sleeping bag) 10.9 309
Patagonia Dragonfly pullover windshirt 3.2 91
Nylon side zip pants 4.8 136
Silk weight boxers 2.8 79
Socks – Fox River VVS or SmartWool Light Hiking 2.8 79
Gortex socks for use with Salomon Tech Amphibians 3.5 99
Silnlyon chaps 2.6 74
Disposable shower cap 0.1 3
Disposable Poncho 2.0 57
Bozeman Mountain Works SpinPoncho LITE with added arms 8.4 238
Head net 0.8 23
Sunglasses – Sporteyz in Oakley cleaning case 0.6 17
Zephur jacket – Patagonia 2000 model 8.8 249
Capilene Balaclava – Patagonia for hiking in cold 1.7 48
Shelter and Sleep System Ounces Grams
Nomad 2-4-2 29.4 833
Mt Washington Pad (Red) 7.5 213
Mt Washington Pad (Red) 8.2 232
Bozeman Mountain Works Quantum Arc X quilt in Turkey bag 17.4 493
Packing Ounces Grams
MoonBow Gearskin 24.7 700
MoonBow Pack Cover 2.2 62
Cooking and Water Ounces Grams
High performance alcohol stove 2.3 65
Aluminum pie pan bottom 0.1 3
Alcohol fuel bottle 0.8 23
Evernew Titanium 0.9 liter pot with EZ foil lid 3.7 105
Drinking cup – plastic soup cup 0.8 23
Food stuff sack 1.4 40
Kitchen Bag: Lexan spoon, toothpaste, tooth brush, lighter, Ibuprofen, water bag cap with holes for washing up 6.0 170
Spectra 825 bear bag rope, 50 feet minimum 1.0 28
Water bottle 2.6 74
Platypus water carrier 2.9 82
Glad Stand and Zip bag – water scoop and wash bag 0.6 17
Aquamira – in painters mesh bag and Ziploc baggie 2.3 65
1 liter soda bottle – for carrying water with Gearskin pack 1.5 43
Other Essentials Ounces Grams
Camera Olympus Stylus 400 Digital with battery 7.0 198
Spare battery in plastic bag 1.3 37
Spare battery (third spare camera battery) 1.2 34
ARC AAA LED Flashlight (0.8 oz, adds to kitchen bag weight) 0 0
First Aid Kit: tweezers, wet proof tape, Pro tick remedy, Neosporin Antibiotic ointment, various band-aids and butterfly closures, prescription Cortisone cream, 0.5 oz alcohol, 4 Imodium, 4 Benehist, 4 Compeed, folding scissors (0.4 oz) 3.7 105
Repair/Emergency kit: water proof matches, nylon repair tape, needle and thread, whistle, platypus patches 1.6 45
Toilet trowel 0.7 20
Toilet paper – 1 oz per week 1.0 28
Hand sanitizer 0.9 26
Bag to contain trowel, paper, and sanitizer 0.2 6
Pack towel 0.5 14
Thermometer 0.8 23
Notepad – waterproof journal paper, 0.1 oz for 3 sheets 0.4 11
Pen 0.2 6
Maps 5.2 147
Insect repellent 1.5 43
Blistex or Banana Boat – Use as sunscreen for hands 0.4 11
Consumables (for 3-days between resupply) Ounces Grams
fuel (1 oz/day) 3.0 85
food (36 oz/day) 108.0 3062
water 32.0 907
Weight Summary Pounds Kilograms
(1) Total Worn or Carried While Hiking 3.0 1.4
(2) Total Base Weight in Pack 12.2 5.5
(3) Total Weight of Consumables 8.9 4.1
(4) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) 21.1 9.6
(5) Full Skin-Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) 24.1 11.0
Dave Johnston’s Gear List
Category Gear Item
Clothing Worn While Hiking
Nylon shorts
REI boxers
Button-front shirt with two pockets
Baseball cap
Synthetic socks
Lowa mid-height GTX boots
Other Items Worn or Carried
Komperdell hiking poles
Other Clothing
Frogg Toggs rain top
Patagonia Dragonfly
Cloudveil pants
Clothes bag (pillow)
Patagonia Capilene expedition-weight top and bottom (for cold nights that never happened)
REI mesh boxer underwear
Extra socks
Marmot lightweight fleece
Balaclava and Manzella glove liners
K-mart lightweight sandals
Shelter and Sleep System
Marmot Hydrogen 30° sleeping bag
Original Ridgerest full-length pad
Packing
Kelty Flight pack, frame sheet and stays, two side pockets, belt bag, water bottle holster, shoulder strap-mounted pouches for photo gear
Cooking and Water
Evernew 1 quart pot
Original Photon Stove
Fuel bottle
Measuring cup
Lexan spoon
12 oz storage tub (for oatmeal)
Glad 12 oz cup and cozy
Platypus 4-liter water bag
Aquamira, paint filter
Half-gallon milk jug w/ top cut off for dipping
Other Essentials
Princeton Tec Scout headlamp
O4 brand single LED as backup
Book
Maps, ID, credit cards, cash
Toothbrush/toothpaste
Medicine bag (usual stuff plus ibuprofen, powder, chafing ointment)
Toilet kit
Consumables
Food bag: about 2lbs/day for 3 days; bulk items (coffee, pills)
Photo
Sony DSC-S85 digital camera
Lens adapter
0.7x wide angle lens
2x telephoto lens
768k of Memory Sticks
Spirit level for panoramas
Extra battery
Alosak bags for camera and other gear (rain)
Slik lightweight tripod

About the Authors

Don Johnston has been an avid backpacker since 1988 preferring week long or longer hikes. In addition to his Appalachian Trail mileage, he has completed the John Muir Trail twice, the High Sierra Trail, the Tahoe Yosemite Trail, the Northville Placid Trail, and The Long Trail. Don is the inventor of the “Photon Stove™” alcohol stove. He designed and owns the original Arc Alpinist sleeping quilt. Working with Kurt Russell, he prompted the construction of and owns the first Nomad Lite-N-Airy tent. Don is a Network Administrator at a Montgomery County, Maryland High School. Don hopes to complete the final 150 miles of his AT quest in summer 2005.

Editor’s Note: Don sumitted Katahdin on August 19, 2005, completing his quest to section hike the Appalachian Trail.

Dave Johnston, with more limited vacation time, has backpacked with Don on many occasions and is an avid photo buff. He grabs time to hike when available in Virginia and West Virginia and has hiked in the Grand Canyon, Saguaro National Park, the Adirondacks, and part of the Florida Trail. Dave is a building codes and standards specialist and used his experience with the gas industry to provide valuable input during the development of the “Photon Stove™”. He currently is the Technical Director of the Vinyl Siding Institute.