Articles (2020)

MacPac Epic 150 SF Sleeping Bag (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

19 ounce water-proof 750 fill down sleeping bag.

Overview

MacPac’s Epic 150 SF sleeping bag makes an excellent addition to an adventure racer’s or ultra-lighter’s gear quiver. It allows the use of a very small tarp, or perhaps no tarp at all, without the need for a bivy. MacPac uses stitch-free welded seam construction to create the baffles and seal in the 750 FP European Goose down. This also creates a totally waterproof bag using Reflex LoftPro waterproof-breathable fabric. Reflex LoftPro is a PU coated 2-layer fabric with a claimed breathability better than PacLite.

Features are fairly sparse; and we like that. MacPac omitted a zipper and made the fit trim, so it might be a challenge to shimmy into it. The stuff sack is oddly sewn into an inside seam, but could be easily removed with scissors. There is no need for a draft tube and the collar has been omitted.

At 19 ounces and a claimed temperature rating of 35 F, the Epic 150 can easily beat the combined weight of a similarly rated down bag and lightweight bivy. Loft will likely diminish as moisture condenses on the inside of the PU coating, making this bag more suited to shorter trips and/or drier climes. We hope to receive a review sample after the show for a thorough review.

Features and Specifications

  • Fabric: Reflex LoftPro outer with 30d VapourLite inner.
  • Weight: 19 oz
  • Fill Weight: 5 oz
  • Claimed Temperature Rating: 35 F, 2 C
  • MSRP: $280

APA Enterprises Sun UV Monitoring Wristwach (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

Monitor the UV Index and predict when you need extra protection

As technology changes, making things smaller and cheaper, new market niches open. One such niche can be found in environmental monitoring technology that lets people track the ultraviolet (UV) index on a moment-by-moment basis. APA Enterprises is one company that is filling this niche with products that go beyond simple UV monitors. Their products, of which the wristwatch shown here is one in the Sport Series, not only monitor UV radiation but are meant to help you determine when your skin needs more complete protection.

The wristwatch weighs 1.3 ounces (37 grams). The watch provides basic time-keeping functions. Its main purpose though is to monitor UV radiation and help you determine when you need to add protection (this means adding clothing that blocks UV radiation). The watch, and the other products APA sells, achieves this by analyzing data you provide about your skin and the amount of sun protection you are currently using with the readings it takes of current, and past UV output over time.

While there is no doubt that skin cancer is a serious concern and that backpackers, such as ourselves, spend a great deal in the sun it is hard to say whether this product, or others like it, will help reduce those concerns. Perhaps the most important feature of the APA Enterprises products is their stand-out ability to help remind us to get out of the sun when the need arises. Through that gentle reminder perhaps the wearer can change his or her behavior to further reduce the odds of seriouasly damaging their largest organ.

Features and Specifications

  • The wristwatch is the lightest in the Sport series line weighing 1.3 ounces (37 g).
  • APA sells several other monitors in various styles not only meant for individual use, but for families as well.

Inov-8 Mudroc 280 Trail Running Shoes (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

A Sub-10 Ounce Trail Running and Hiking Shoe

Inov-8 Mudroc 280 Fell Running Shoes: Weight 280 g (9.9 oz)

Remember when the controversial topic was switching from leather hiking boots to trail runners? Now there is a trend to go even lighter. This time from “heavier” padded trail runners to lighter and more flexible shoes – some weighing as little as 9.5 oz (270 g). The claim is that the lighter and more flexible shoe is less fatiguing by allowing the foot’s normal biomechanical action. These shoes are the logical progression from a trend to go to lighter packs, faster hiking speeds and longer distances. Going under ten pounds for a base pack weight used to be a big deal. Now, a number of people are using sub-5 pound packs for cold trips on challenging terrain.

This August, Andrew “Trail Dog” Thompson broke the speed record on the 2,174 mile Appalachian Trail. He shaved almost a day off the old record by completing the AT in 48 days 10 hours 11 minutes. He did it using Inov-8 Flyroc 310 and Terroc 330 shoes weighing 10.9 oz and 11.6 oz respectively.

Inov-8, founded in 2003, is a British manufacturer of extremely light trail running (fell running in the UK) shoes. They’ve taken competitive trail running, ultra-running, adventure racing, and orienteering by storm. They have a number of prestigious race wins.

The Mudroc 280 was the 2004 Fell Race British & English Championship winning shoe. This shoe is stripped down to its essential elements. Inov-8 calls it a “Lightweight Mountain/Fell racing [shoe] with a minimal upper construction, precise fit, and more sensitive underfoot. The 280 has a new softer sticky sole compound exclusively developed by the Inov-8 team using climbing rubber technology.”

“Minimal upper construction… more sensitive underfoot” are the key phrases here. When you put on a pair of Inov-8 shoes you notice an immediate difference. They are lighter and significantly more flexible than even light conventional trail runners. They feel more like slippers than shoes. The soles are so flexible you feel ground imperfections under your feet.

One would think that shoes like this would lead to foot soreness but they don’t (as long as you give your body time to adapt). The shoes work for ultra-runners and Trail Dog who subject their feet to more punishment than you and I ever will. Maybe it works for an average hiker. The basic premise of these shoes, according to Inov-8 founder Wayne Edy, is to allow the foot and ankle their natural biomechanical motion without interference from the shoe – “The foot controls the shoe. The shoe does not control the foot.” Inov-8 shoes provide some protection and a sole for traction but do not interfere with the foot’s natural motion. That is, the closer you get to running barefoot the better your efficiency and stability, and the less your risk of injury.

Using a shoe like this does take some time to adapt. It’s critical that you take the time to incrementally condition and strengthen your body to running or hiking in the new shoes. Sore calves are a common symptom of adapting to more flexible shoes. Strange but true.

I started off running around 3 to 4 miles in my Inov-8 (less than my usual mileage) and slowly worked up to 12 to 14 mile hilly trail runs over a few months. Initially a number of muscles in my calves, ankles and feet were sore. This was my body adapting to my normal stride and strengthening muscles. Three months later I am running farther and with less fatigue than with the old padded and controlling trail shoes I thought necessary for shock absorption and foot protection – even on rocky trails. My eyes and feet are better coordinated, another skill needed to step in the right places and miss the wrong places on the trail.

Readers, I am not a gifted runner. I’m by far a light runner. But I don’t think I’m going back to my old shoes anytime soon. In fact, I’m graduating myself from 310 gram Flyrocs to lighter 280 gram Mudrocs. I haven’t enjoyed trail running this much in years!

Inov-8 Flyroc 310 shoes: Trail Dog used them on the AT and I first adapted to lighter shoes with the Flyroc 310s. I used them for 14 mile trail runs and long training hikes for the last three months. I’m graduating myself to the lighter Mudroc 280s in preparation for some very long distance hiking this Fall.

AquaStar Plus Ultraviolet Water Treatment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

Water purification through ultraviolet irradiation – a new approach to cleaning our water

Introduction

Backcountry travellers have always had to take special care of their water. In the past we had three ways to make our water safe: filter it, treat the water with chemicals, or boil the water. Recently, a fourth method for removing harmful organisms – bombard the water with ultraviolet radiation. The unit weighs 3.7 ounces (104 grams) and consists of the UV-C light emitting bulb and a screw-on plastic cap that contains the circuitry and two lithuim CR123 batteries.

The AquaStar is designed to work best with 1-quart Nalgene Lexan bottles. While it can mate to other widemouth Nalgene bottles, care needs to be taken to ensure the seal is strong and it may be necessary to agitate the water some to ensure complete exposure. AquaStar claims it only takes about 80 seconds to effectively treat a Nalgene bottle’s worth of water.

The Aquastar Plus is their latest entry into this market and it appears to be well built and as sturdy as any product in this particular class can be. Time will tell if this type of water treatment technology is really a viable option for the ultralight backpacker.

Features and Specifications

  • The AquaStar Plus weighs 3.7 ounces (104 g) excluding the provided 1-quart Lexan bottle, but includes batteries.
  • Fits neatly into a 1-quart Lexan Nalgene bottle
  • Kills bacteria and viruses in about 80 seconds using ultraviolet light
  • Two CR123 lithium batteries power the unit and will treat 50 to 70 liters of water.

Acumen Hydra-Alert Sports Watch with Fluid Check (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

A watch that reminds you when and how much to drink

Note: while this article discusses water loss calculations, Hydra-Alert is considering adding calorie loss calculations to the watch in the future. More about this possible feature at the very end of this article.

The Hydra-Alert™ (HA) is a sport watch that adds a new feature to training aids, it estimates your fluid loss and tells you when and how much to drink. The Hydra-Alert™ sports watch monitors air temperature, ambient humidity, and your heart rate to estimate fluid loss during physical activity. No, it doesn’t directly monitor water loss, it estimates it. The HA does this by plugging monitored values (air temp and humidity) and exertion level (heart rate vs. resting heart rate) into internal formulas for fluid loss. There is a one-time programming of the unit for the user’s weight, sex, age, resting heart rate and maximum MET (VO2 MAX) The unit will run a simple self administered test to calculate resting heart rate and maximum MET if you don’t know them.

The HA has been in development with the Military to keep soldiers hydrated in difficult environmental conditions, like the Iraq war. For instance it helps soldiers on guard duty (they wear hydration bladders) to hydrate at proper levels.

One big advantage I can see to the HA is to conserve water. With an accurate estimation of you water loss, you drink only what you need. This allows you to carry only the water you need and minimizes drinking stops to those that are needed. No more conservatively guessing at water you need, carrying and drinking large amounts, and peeing it out in short order. I can also see applications for the HA in ultra-endeavors. I wished I had the HA for long hot dry days canyoneering in Southern Utah.

The Hydra-Alert™ can tell you, at user determined intervals, how much water you need to drink (fluid lost during the interval). For example, you could set the unit to beep every 20 minutes with the amount of water you need to drink. If you can’t drink then (like you’re in the middle of a climbing pitch) the unit will keep track of you water loss and give you an updated amount 20 minutes later that includes the water you didn’t drink. The HA keeps track of the total amount of water lost during the entire exercise period. This is very useful information for predicting water consumption for future trips or training sessions.

Obviously the HA designers had the medial risks from dehydration in mind, not conserving water! Maintaining proper hydration is essential for healthy cardiovascular and metabolic function. Possible consequences from dehydration include:

  • Reduced endurance
  • Diminished physical performance
  • Diminished cardiac output
  • Increased body temperature
  • Elevated heart rate
  • Inaccurate perceived exertion
  • Loss of muscle strength
  • Inefficient oxygen consumption
  • Eventual Heatstroke and Heat Exhaustion

The Hydra-Alert™ also calculates a four zone Heat Index based on temperature and humidity: Caution, Extreme Caution, Danger, and Extreme Danger. These give the user an indication of risk of dehydration before they start to exercise. Oh, and the Hydra-Alert is accurate even when you’re not exercising.

Features Included in Hydra-Alert watches:

  • Fluid Check™ for Safeguarding Against Dehydration.
  • Build-in sensor for detecting Temperature and Humidity
  • Display Heat Index
  • MAX MET (VO2 MAX) Calibration
  • Fitness Index
  • Heart Rate Monitoring
  • Three separate EZ-Set Target Zone with Visual and Audible alarms
  • Records and Displays Time Below/Above/Within TZ
  • In-Zone-Goal Count Down Timer (0-60 min)
  • Heart Rate Sampling: 5, 15, 30, 60 sec or 5 min
  • 50 Lap Memory over 1 Exercise Session
  • Interval Timer
  • Easy to Read Stopwatch
  • Dual Display for Analog and Digital Time
  • Weekly and Annual Event Reminder
  • Date and Day Display
  • Daily Alarm
  • Nite Lite with Smart Lite Function
  • Scratch Resistant Crystal Lens
  • Water Resistant to 30 Meters
  • Rechargeable Battery
  • MSRP: $150 to $350 depending features (four models)
  • Weight unavailable

Now about calorie loss: How cool would it be if you not only knew water loss but also how many calories you were burning? Using the same information of monitored heart rate the HA could (in a future version) figure out how many calories you burn. So at the reminder intervals it would not only tell you how much water to drink but also how many calories to eat. Not only that, the unit, knowing your exertion level, would figure out the amount of fat and carbohydrate your body burns. It could even tell you when you start to enter critical glycogen depletion and start metabolizing body muscle into energy (not good).

If you took some good training hikes with the HA monitoring calorie consumption you’d get a good idea of how much energy you expend hiking or running. With this information you could better calculate the food you need on a trip – that is, you could figure out the minimum amount of food for a trip saving a lot of weight. Also, with the HA you could hike in your most efficient “fat burning” zone.

Again, I stress that the calorie monitoring function is not in any current Hydra-Alert units and not even announced for future units. It is simply based on discussions with HA’s physiologist about possible future enhancements using their technology.

Black Diamond Skylight Tent (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

A three-person single-wall tent in the Superlight tent family (Firstlight and Lighthouse).

The new Black Diamond Skylight is a three-person single-wall tent in the Superlight tent family (Firstlight and Lighthouse). The Skylight has a hybrid single/double walled construction. The rear two-thirds of the tent uses a single wall of Epic fabric for good breathability and high water-resistance (see our review of the Firstlight). The front of the tent is a mesh inner wall and an Epic outer canopy/fly and can be rolled-up in nice weather or rolled down in inclement conditions for protection and a spacious vestibule.

Weights: Package: 4.97 Lbs Tent: 2.84 Lbs Poles: 1.26 Lbs

Area: 36.667 sq feet

Dimensions: 88″ (length) x 69″ (shoulder width) x 42″ (center height)

Packed Size: 7″ x 12″



The front of the tent is a mesh inner wall and an Epic outer canopy/fly and can be rolled-up in nice weather or rolled down in inclement conditions for protection and a spacious vestibule.

Osprey Aether 60 Backpack (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

Redesigned Aether 60 with an innovative heat moldable harness.

Overview

Osprey’s Aether 60 has long been regarded as a standard in lightweight pack lines. In our tests of previous versions, we found the hip belt limits the upper carrying capacity of this pack. Osprey announced some significant improvements to the Aether series at this Outdoor Retailer; most notably an innovative redesign of their hip belt and suspension.

Heat moldable foam in not new to the outdoor industry. It’s best use has been where a perfect fit improves performance, such as in ski and telemark boots. Osprey has pioneered heat moldable harnesses in their backpacks, and the Osprey Aether series uses a lighter version of their BioForm CM foam used in their heavier packs over the past year. Dealers who carry the Osprey line will be equipped with a specially designed oven to heat the belt for approximately 10 minutes. The hiker wears the hip belt while it’s warm, and the belt conforms perfectly to the wearer’s shape.

The backpanel has also been improved with better ventilation. Osprey uses a nubbed foam covered in mesh to improve air flow across the entire back.

The cost of this innovation is increased weight. The new Aether 60 adds an additional 6.4 ounces over their previous version. The fit seemed improved over older versions, even without heat molding the hip belt, which may compensate for the increased weight.

The other features the Aether 60 is known for remain the same or similiar. It will still carry ice axes, snow shoes, snowboards, skis, and accept their line of accessory pockets.

Features and Specifications

  • Fabric: The main fabrics are 210d double ripstop, 210 oxford, and 420d oxford in higher wear areas. 2-way stretch nylon and Lycra are used for the side and front pockets. Heat moldable Isoform CM material is used in the hipbelt.
  • Weight: 3 lb 15 oz (size M); 4 lbs 2 oz (size L)
  • Volume: 3700 ci (size M); 3800 ci (size L)
  • MSRP: $199

MontBell Self Inflating Pads (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

Among the lightest for their size.

While getting briefed on the latest and greatest products from MontBell, we noticed a stack of unnamed self inflating pads semi-hidden under a rack of clothing. Curious, we asked for details. The pads are 20 inches wide and come in various lengths. The 3 and 4 feet pads weigh 9.9 and 12.7 ounces respectively. That really got our attention, along with the fact that these are not thin pads, but are a full inch thick. MontBell told us the pads are available in Japan but they haven’t decided whether to bring the pads to the US market. All three BPL staffers present “highly” encouraged MontBell to do the right thing and bring them over.

Features

  • There is a single seam in the center of the pad to reduce flashing weight at the edges
  • The valve is lighter than standard
  • All four corners have toggles so pads can be linked together
  • The foam is not die-cut and is claimed to be warmer than standard lightweight self-inflating pads
  • Webbing and buckle system secure the provided stuff sack at the head of the pad for a pillow
  • 40d fabric cover

Jacks ‘R’ Better Summer Universal Blanket SPOTLITE REVIEW

A sub-1-pound summer weight quilt that can be used as a top blanket or hammock under quilt.

Editor’s Note: The Jacks ‘R’ Better Summer Universal Blanket is now known as the Shenandoah Summer Quilt.

Overview

The Jacks ‘R’ Better Summer Universal Blanket is a simple, sewn through down blanket with features designed to make it multi-use. Both ends have drawcord/toggles and sewn in grosgrain loops at the corners so the Summer Universal Blanket can be used as a hammock under quilt (with the provided Suspension System). For top quilt use, either in a hammock or on the ground, one end can be closed with the drawcord/toggles and omni-tape (non-scratchy Velcro-type tape) to form a foot box.

As we’ve seen with other Jacks ‘R’ Better products, the advertised weight and dimensions are right on (the Jacks are both engineers and it shows), and the measured loft is higher than claimed. The average measured loft of our test sample is 1.8 inches (manufacturer claims 1.2 inches).

Features and Specifications

  • Shell fabric: 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) ripstop nylon with DWR
  • Down: 800 fp
  • Continuous, sewn through baffles
  • Baffle spacing: 7.5 in (19 cm)
  • 78 x 48 x 1.2* in (198 x 122 x 3.0 cm)
  • *BPL measured loft: 1.8 in ( 4.6 cm)
  • Manufacturer temperature rating: 45 – 50 &degF (7 – 10 &degC)
  • Included: JRB Suspension System and silnylon compression sack (BPL measured weights – 1.6 oz/45 g and 1.2 oz/34 g)
  • BPL measured weight: 14.4 oz (408 g)
  • MSRP $169

Integral Designs Silcoat Backpack SPOTLITE REVIEW

Simple, lightweight, and versatile.

Overview

The Integral Designs Silcoat Backpack, as the name implies, is made of silnylon. The backpanel is 200d polyurethane-coated nylon packcloth, and the shoulder straps and waistbelt are polyester webbing. It has a volume of 1526 cubic inches (25 L) and weighs 4.6 ounces (my measurement). The Silcoat Backpack has a very simple design and can serve as a lightweight pack for dayhikes from camp, bear hang, pillow, stuff sack, and dry bag.

All of the webbing straps are much heavier than they need to be. I removed the webbing waistbelt and the attached stuff sack, which reduced the weight to 3.5 ounces. The weight could be reduced more if lighter webbing (or other material) were used for the shoulder straps.

I carried the Silcoat Backpack on four backpacking trips in the southern Rockies, and tested it as a daypack, stuff sack, dry bag, bear hang, and pillow.

It works great as an ultralight pack for dayhikes or forays from camp. I initially used the pack with its waistbelt, but the pack rode too low on my back (photo) in order to get the waistbelt down near my waist. After I removed the waistbelt I found the fit much more to my liking, with the pack riding higher on my back. Simply adjust the shoulder strap length to find the “sweet spot” where the pack feels comfortable but does not slide off your shoulders.

The pack has enough volume to carry dayhike essentials for two people under summertime conditions, and will carry about 10 pounds with no discomfort. Since there was no padded backpanel to keep hard objects from poking me in the back, I had to create my own with a sleeping pad or clothing. I typically packed clothing against my back, water bottles on the bottom, and lunch food on top.

For use as a stuff sack/dry bag, the Silcoat Backpack should be seam sealed using Silicone II or Silnet diluted with mineral spirits. It’s not a true dry bag because it has a flap and drawcord rather than a rolltop closure. The pack had plenty of room for both my lightweight sleeping bag and insulated jacket, and could have taken other clothing too, but I didn’t want to overstuff. Placed in the bottom of my pack, it was good insurance to keep my insulation dry.

Using the Silcoat Backpack as a bear hang or a pillow is an either/or situation when food is hung overnight, but it can be used for day-hanging food and as a pillow overnight. As a bear hang, it worked great, with good outside attachment points to tie a cord to. I always sealed food in another plastic bag inside the pack, to reduce smells and make sure it stayed dry.

Used as a pillow with clothing stuffed inside, the Silcoat Backpack was a luxury!

At this point many of our readers of the ultralight persuasion are probably thinking “hey, this is something I can live without”! But gear like this has its place. It fits in well with a lightweight backpacker’s gear list. And even us ultralight fanatics will find it very useful on family outings.

Specifications and Features

  • Fabrics: body is grey silnylon, backpanel is 200d PU-coated nylon packcloth, shoulder straps are 2-inch (5 cm) wide polyester webbing, waiststrap is 1-inch (2.5 cm) wide polyester webbing with a side-release buckle
  • Volume: 1526 cubic inches (25 L)
  • Weight: manufacturer claimed weight is 4.5 oz (128 g); BPL measured weight is 4.6 ounces (130 g)
  • Dimensions: 10 in (25 cm) diameter x 18 in (46 cm) high
  • Features: reinforced backpanel, waist strap, attached silnylon stuff sack, drawcord closure
  • MSRP: $50

Sedona Trading Company Trail Gourmet Seasonings SPOTLITE REVIEW

Spices for those of us who want no fuss, no muss, and little weight

Backpacking food, both commercially available and home made, sometimes suffers from being bland. While we can certainly carry a spice kit, that is for many Ultralight backpackers (to say nothing of the super Ultralight crowd) an often cumbersome thing to do. Worse, when you want dinner after a long day you probably are not too inclined to fiddle about much with individual, small, spice containers. Sedona Trading Company has come up with an innovative solution to this problem: small gelatin capsules that contain multiple spices to form a tasty mix. Their Trail Gourmet Seasoning capsules come in a variety of flavors and Sedona Trading Company has been expanding their menu. We were able to try the Sedona Mild and Medium flavors. These are chili-based seasonsings that remind one of the Southwest. I tried mine with pasta dishes and bean stews. While I preferred the Medium version that owes more to my tastes in spices and shouldn’t be considered a slight against the Mild flavor. Both were good and I have no doubts I’ll enjoy other flavors when I try them.

The capsules look like large pills that you would swallow. Since they’re made of gelatin they dissolve in water. The hotter the water the quicker the capsule will dissolve, but even in cool water you can dissolve a capsule in just a few minutes. If the idea of dissolving the capsule makes you queasy or you want to create a dry rub say for a fish fry simply break the capsule open and sprinkle the spices into your food that way. Of course, then you will have to carry the capsule out with you as part of your trash.

Determining how many capsules to use per meal is, of course, a trial and error business. I found that sometimes I could get away with fewer capsules if I sprinkled their contents on an already re-hydrated and cooked meal. However, when doing things this way you do tend to create flavor bombs. Often times I found 4 of the Sedona Medium capsules was a good starting point for meals. I simply dropped the capsules into my heating water and then continued to cook as normal.

Features and Specifications

  • Pre-packaged spice capsules. No muss; no fuss.
  • Capsules are the size of a large pill
  • Capsules weigh slightly less than 1 gram each
  • Capsules are approximately 1/2 inch long by 3/16 inch wide (20 mm by 4 mm)
  • Package size: 3″ x 5″ or 4″ by 6″ (8 cm by 13 cm or 10 cm by 15 cm) and comes with about 60 capsules
  • Currently availale flavors: Asain, Cabo, Great Lakes, HabaJala, Hatteras, Italian, Sedona, Southwest
  • MSRP: Prices range from $2.69 to $2.99 for the various flavors in packages of 20 capsules; $4.79 to $4.99 for packages with 60 capsules.

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Tent REVIEW

Single wall, low-profile, and built for altitude: the Summit Extreme belongs on a high mountain ridge.

Overview

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 1
The Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is built with a single focus – to climb to the world’s toughest summits.

The Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is a tent that was created for a singular purpose – to climb serious mountains quickly with the lightest weight and greatest level of security possible. It weighs in at just about 3.25 pounds, making it among the lightest two-person bomber mountaineering tents on the market. The Summit Extreme is constructed of Exchange Lite Gore-Tex, which is highly breathable and gas permeable, and has a large rear vent; both factors greatly minimize condensation. (Exchange Lite Gore-Tex is not available in tents sold in the U.S.; Outdoor Designs is manufactured in the U.K.) It uses Easton 340 Carbon FX poles which are 35% lighter but 208% stronger than similar aluminum models. The Summit Extreme has an extremely low profile at 28 inches, 13 stake out points, and can handle the strongest of winds. It has a small footprint and can be pitched in very small spots (even most double porta-ledges). A unique feature is the dual sealed tie out points, allowing two climbers to be directly anchored to the mountain without having to open the tent to pass a rope or slings.

However, in its singular focus, the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme has some serious downsides. The 28-inch roof is very short, making sitting up impossible. This low height also creates low angled walls which, while adding to its wind stability, greatly minimize usable space. This tent is very cramped for two people. It also has no vestibule, making this a better solo tent unless you have a very focused pair of climbers who are willing to accept the cramped quarters. There is a mosquito mesh door on the front but this is not a tent you’d want to spend a lot of time in while waiting out the bugs in lowland areas. At $660 USD, the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is also a very expensive tent. That said, the price is right, and the design is right, if you need a tent that offers an unparalleled mix of light weight, high security, breathability, and wind stability. It begs to be taken up the most serious mountains in the world.

In Brief

  • Ultralight mountaineering tent at just 3.25 pounds minimum package
  • Easton Carbon fiber poles are 35% lighter and 208% stronger than aluminum models
  • Exchange Lite Gore-Tex is highly breathable and virtually eliminates condensation
  • Dual sealed tie out points to anchor climbers directly to the mountain
  • Very cramped quarters and a very low ceiling make this a better solo tent and passable for a pair of climbers only for the most focused summit attempts
  • Low ceiling, stiff poles, and 13 guy out points create exceptionally high wind stability
  • Very tough and durable
  • Made in the U.K. – Gore-Tex tents not available in the U.S.
  • Not cheap at $660 but a good value for climbers that need its features
  • The Summit Extreme has no equal in its niche – light weight, secure, breathable, and stable

Specifications

• Tent Type

Single wall with floor, mountaineering tent

• Fabric Description

Tent body: Exchange Lite Gore-Tex – 15,000 mm Hydrostatic Head, O2 and CO2 gas permeable; Tent floor: coated nylon – 10,000 mm Hydrostatic Head

• Pole Material

Carbon fiber, Easton 340 Carbon FX (ultimate tensile strength poles – 200,000 psi, inserts – 96,000 psi)

• Weight Full Package
As supplied with stuff sacks, stakes, guylines, etc.

Backpacking Light scale Manufacturer claim
4 lb 8.2 oz (2.05 kg) 3 lb 4.8 oz (1.50 kg)

• Weight Minimum Package
Tent body and fly, minimum necessary stakes and guylines, no stuff sacks or extra hardware

Backpacking Light minimum Manufacturer supplied minimum
Same as Manufacturer Minimum but with: 0.25 oz (7 g) titanium stakes, 0.004 oz/ft (0.37 g/m) Aircore pro Dyneema guylines
6 stakes, 12 ft (3.7 m) guyline
6 stakes, 12 ft (3.7 m) guyline
3 lb 3.8 oz (1.47 kg) 3 lb 5.4 oz (1.51 kg)

• Floor/ Vestibule Area

Floor area Vestibule area
27.1 ft2 (2.52 m2) none

• Floor Area/Backpacking Light Minimum Weight Ratio

0.52 ft2/oz

• Dimensions

inches centimeters
Width 47 120
Length 83 210
Height 28 70

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

$660 (£350)

Usable Features / Ease of Use

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 2
The rear vent can be held open by attaching it to the guyline and is fully adjustable from within the tent. Note the elastic section of the guyline for flex during high winds.

Setting up the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is very easy. Like other single wall wedge designs, the poles are set up outside the tent, slipped inside, and flexed into their corner spots. Pole tips are placed into the corner grommets (two are provided for tensioning options or for running a double pole set for extra strength). The 10 Velcro tabs are then attached. A minimum of six stakes are recommended to achieve the maximum stability and floor space (one at each corner and two for the side guy outs). In really nasty conditions, I was even able to set the tent up from inside, although it’s usually easier from the outside because of the small interior space.

The poles are Easton 340 Carbon FX models which are 35% lighter than similar gauge aluminum poles but 208% stronger. In fact, these poles are twice as strong as ANY OTHER POLE EASTON MAKES. Their weakness is in their standard Easton aluminum inserts, which are half the strength of the pole material (see Durability below).

The tent material is Gore-Tex Exchange Lite, a waterproof/breathable fabric that is also oxygen and carbon dioxide permeable, allowing for totally sealed usage for extended periods. All seams are seam taped and the corners have deep, reinforced pole pockets.

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 3 Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 4
The dual tie in loops are found on the top and side of the tent.

There is one door that has an inner mosquito/spindrift netting door. Door seams are covered by two overlapping 3.5 inch wide flaps that are Velcro closed. A rear vent is placed low in the tent for high/low air flow with the front door. This vent can be sealed closed by a cordlock, but is not backed with mesh. The vent is easily adjusted from inside and attaches to the rear guyline for maximum ventilation.

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 5
The author hanging out with the top tie in use. I am directly tied off with zero load on the tent and no opening in the top. Another loop on the side gives another secure tie-off.

A unique feature of the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is the dual sealed tie points. These points are created by fabric hoops that are sewn to the tent walls, creating sealed elbow macaroni-shaped hoops. One hoop is located on top of the tent (hoop outside the tent) and the other is at the base of the tent side (hoop inside the tent). These two fabric tubes allow the climber(s) to tie into the tube with a runner and then to tie into an anchor on the outside of the tent. This system effectively removes the tent from the system WITHOUT having to pass a rope or runner through an opening in the tent. This means that you can pitch the tent on a highly exposed ridge, on a big wall porta-ledge (it fits most double porta-ledges), or in an area of extreme wind and secure yourself directly to the mountain, increasing security in extreme conditions dramatically.

The Summit Extreme comes with standard v-stakes and a set of guylines. Also included are guylines with thick elastic hoops at one end which allow the tent to give a bit during high winds. These elastic guylines were a blessing during one 60+ mph night, allowing the fully guyed-out tent to give during gusts, helping maintain solid anchor placements. Three reasonably lightweight and durable stuff sacks are also included, although the pole sack is too short for the carbon poles.

Weight / Sizing / Usable Space

At around 3 pounds 4 ounces for the complete tent, this is one of the lightest tents that can truly be considered “bomber.” The floor space is also reasonable, measuring 1 inch wider and 1 inch longer than a comparable Integral Designs MK1 Lite. However, because of the very short 28 inch roof (compared to 42 inches on the MK1 Lite), the walls are at a low angle. This cuts way down on usable space, making this tent very small for two people. As a solo tent, usable space in the Summit Extreme was better, but at 6’2″ tall, I slept at an angle to be most comfortable. I could not fully sit up in the tent, and with a partner it was necessary to take turns getting ready or organizing gear.

There is no vestibule and precious little space for gear inside. If there are two of you, compromises will be a necessity.

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 6 Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 7
The Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is a tiny tent – very low to the ground and very cramped for two hikers. My wife and I survived in the tent during condensation testing on the Olympic Coast – cramped but with extremely minimal condensation despite completely sealing the tent in constant rains.

Wind stability

Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme Mountaineering Tent - 6
The Summit Extreme has low angled walls, stiff Easton carbon fiber poles, and 13 guy outs, creating exceptional wind stability.

Although the low height and low angle walls cut down on usable space, they absolutely shine when the wind picks up. Despite the fact that two-pole designs tend to not be the best when winds pick up because of side deflection, the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme does very well with high winds, due to its sloped walls that easily spill wind. With 50-60 mph gusts on a mountain ridge in the Cascades, the tent barely moved. The side guy outs added to the stability of the tent. In fact, much higher winds would be needed to fully test the upper limits of wind stability with the Summit Extreme. This is the first tent I’ve used that I would take for an overnight in a storm on the summit of Rainier or a high camp in the Himalaya.

Storm Protection

The Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme sheds snow easily. However, the low roof creates a tiny flat spot on the top of the tent. During snow storms, I had to occasionally knock snow off the roof. Nothing abnormal resulted from these light snow loads and the tent could handle far greater snow loads with ease.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance

The Gore-Tex Exchange Lite fabric is second in breathability only to eVENT in waterproof/breathable tent fabrics. However, the only full eVENT tent currently available is the Nemo Tenshi and only for a limited time. Further, because of fire codes, Gore-Tex tents are not available from North American companies. To find Gore-Tex tents you have to look at brands outside of North America such as Outdoor Designs (U.K.), Terra Nova (U.K.), MacPac (Australia), or Montbell-Japan. But when it comes to breathability and condensation resistance, it is well worth it to track down a Gore-Tex tent.

Little more than minor condensation along the poles was ever achieved during field usage of the Summit Extreme. This includes a very wet trip in the Olympic National Park; despite constant drizzle, still air, two people in the tent, and keeping it completely sealed, very little condensing occurred in the tent and not enough to run down the sides (a huge difference from the condensation found on the large volume silnylon tent pitched next to us). Even during condensation testing in my backyard when I boiled water in the tent for 15 minutes (not recommended), the condensation was remarkably low and dried within 20 minutes after shutting off the stove.

By opening the rear vent and cracking the door, cross ventilation was sufficient for airing out the tent if one is forced to cook inside the tent (once again, not recommended). However, finding space for cooking is a different matter.

Insect Protection

The Summit Extreme tent is designed to survive bug season but not to be comfortable in it. The door has bug netting and the fabric is breathable. However, the tiny tent is just a step ahead of a bivy for comfort when being swarmed. The rear vent without netting makes it impossible to achieve cross-venting at these times. However, adding netting to this vent would make it impossible to adjust the vent from inside the tent, a compromise not acceptable with the focus of the Summit Extreme.

Durability

While on a climbing trip, I fell hard on the tent while walking on ice in my boot liners, breaking a pole insert (which are half the strength of the carbon poles). I ended the trip fine and Easton had a new section to me in just three days, no questions asked. Believe me – this was not the fault of the pole. It is interesting to note that it was not the carbon pole that snapped but the aluminum insert, proving the strength of the carbon shafts.

The Gore-Tex fabric is very tough, both inside and out, and showed zero wear after several months of field testing. Even when a sharp piece of aluminum shoved into the tent fabric from the broken pole, I was amazed that no damaged occurred. Same goes with the floor which shows no wear despite being pitched directly on ice and rock on many occasions. This tent will last through many tough summit bids.

Value

At $660, the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme is an expensive and specifically-focused tent and is $100-$200 more expensive than its nearest competitors from Integral Designs and Bibler. That said, there really is no competitor for the Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme. It can go with you on the most challenging alpine routes and keep you alive with its wind stability, moisture-passing walls, durability, and dual tie out loops. For climbers that put themselves on the toughest routes, this tent is an excellent value. If you are a casual mountaineer, however, your money will be better spent on a more comfortable, less expensive, and less narrowly-focused tent.

Recommendations for Improvement

The inside pockets need more reinforcement on the corners so they don’t pull away from the inside of the tent (a minor issue). Other than that, there is no need for additional improvements. Sure, it would be nice to have more headroom or more usable space but that would miss the point of the Summit Extreme.

If you’re looking for a more well-rounded tent, the Summit Raider is also available from Outdoor Designs. It features aluminum poles, a more comfortable 41 inch ceiling, the same Gore-Tex walls, and at a weight penalty of less than 1 pound.

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Tent REVIEW

Roomy two-person mountaineering tent with fire retardant waterproof/breathable canopy fabric of pre-stretched polyester.

Overview

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 1
The Mountain Hardwear EV2 is loaded with high tech materials and design: strong Atlas Scandium SL pole set with new floating connectors, low-stretch VX-O2 panels follow pole lines and reinforce side panel tie outs. The idea is that together they create a strong truss-like system to support the tent in high winds and heavy snow loads. The main canopy is a waterproof/breathable, fire-retardant (nice!), pre-stretched polyester.

The EV2 may be the lightest two-person, three-pole mountaineering/expedition tent on the market. Many new high tech (and expensive) materials contribute to weight savings. The EV2, even with its few flaws, is our first choice for a fast and light ascent tent. The Atlas Scandium SL poles and low-stretch reinforcing panels on the canopy create a surprisingly solid structure for the weight. Five vents and the waterproof/breathable, fire retardant canopy fabric do a credible job of managing condensation. The EV2 is one of the easiest tents we’ve pitched, mountain or otherwise. With the built-in vestibule, we found the tent had more than enough room for us and our gear to comfortably wait out a day long Patagonian storm of high winds with horizontal rain, sleet, and snow.

In Brief

  • Just over 5 lbs with vestibule – possibly the lightest tent in its class
  • Roomy for a two-person mountaineering tent with good area to weight ratio
  • Easy and extremely fast to pitch with exoskeleton poles and clip attachments
  • Strong, light Atlas Scandium SL poles with field serviceable floating connectors
  • High tech fabric/design: low stretch structural panels follow pole/stress lines. Fire retardant waterproof/breathable canopy fabric of pre-stretched polyester (meets fire resistant code for tents!)
  • Five vents and waterproof/breathable canopy fabric provide good condensation resistance for a single walled tent
  • We were unable to get a completely taut canopy pitch
  • Less resistant to heavy snow loads than heavier four-pole mountaineering tents (especially true with the older Easton pole set)

Specifications

• Tent Type

Single wall, three-pole, mountaineering/expedition tent with built-in vestibule

• Fabric Description

Canopy Conduit FR 2.9 oz/yd2 (98 g/m2) high tenacity pre-stretched polyester (the fire retardant FR fabric it less breathable than standard Conduit but meets code for fire retardance for dwellings so the tent can be sold in the states). This is a very expensive fabric!
Structure stabilizing panels Dimension Polyant VX-02. The 1.6 oz/yd2 (54 g/m2) VX-02 is a low stretch laminated fabric with reinforcing fibers. It has a coating for UV resistance.
Floor Superlite 2000, a 70d nylon taffeta (more durable than ripstop and pitches better). The polyether urethane coating in the floor is hydrophobic and more durable than the hydrophilic urethane coating used on most tent floors.

• Weight Full Package
As supplied by manufacturer with stuff sacks, stakes, guylines, etc.

Component Weight
Body 3 lb 13.6 oz (1.75 kg)
Easton poles 1 lb 3.3 oz (0.55 kg)
[Atlas poles] [1 lb 5.6 oz (0.61 kg)]
10 stakes, 3 stuff sacks, guylines, 10 cord locks 11.0 oz (0.31 kg)
Total weight 5 lb 11.9 oz (2.61 kg)
Backpacking Light scale (poles & body) Manufacturer claim (poles & body)
5 lb 0.9 oz (2.30 kg) Easton poles 4 lb 14 oz (2.21 kg)
5 lb 3.2 oz (2.36 kg) Atlas poles 4 lb 14 oz (2.21 kg)

• Weight Minimum Package
Includes tent body and fly, minimum necessary stakes and guylines, no stuff sacks or extra hardware

Backpacking Light minimum Manufacturer supplied minimum
Tent body, fly, poles, 12 titanium stakes: eight 0.25 oz (7 g) stakes and four 0.4 oz (11 g) stakes; and 16 ft (4.8 m) Triptease cord with 2 cordlocks.
Stakes and guyline = 4.2 oz (120 g)
Tent body, fly, poles, 10 Y stakes, 16 ft (4.8 m) guyline with 2 cordlocks.
Stakes and guyline = 6.2 oz (177 g)
Note: manufacturer supply is 2 stakes short of requirement for a good pitch
5 lb 7.4 oz (2.49 kg) Atlas poles 5 lb 9.4 oz (2.55 kg) Atlas poles

• Floor/ Vestibule Area

Floor area Vestibule area
31 ft2 (2.88 m2) Built-in (included in floor area)

• Floor Area/Backpacking Light Minimum Weight ratio (including internal vestibule)

0.36 ft2/oz (1.2 m2/kg)

• Dimensions

inches centimeters
Width 48 122
Length 108 274
Height 41 104

• Model Year

2004 body tested with 2004 Easton and a stronger 2005 Atlas pole set

• MSRP

$625.00 USD

Usable Features / Ease of Use

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 2
Pitched in the Patagonian Andes. The Mountain Hardwear EV2 was strong enough to withstand the legendary Patagonian winds. It was 3 or more pounds lighter than most tents venturing out in the area, and the envy of other parties.

With external poles and clips, and no fly, the Mountain Hardwear EV2 is easier and faster to pitch than most mountaineering tents, including those that use internal poles attached with Velcro straps. The EV2 vestibule goes up easily – a welcome change from some tents where attaching an external vestibule takes more time than pitching the tent body itself. While it is easy to pitch, getting a taut canopy on the EV2 is difficult. I will discuss this further later in the review.

The EV2 has:

  • Five vents with mosquito netting, storm flaps, and built in struts to prop them open. The vents zipper completely closed to keep wind-blown precipitation out, or open to reduce condensation
  • New, and strong, Atlas pole set with floating connectors
  • Special clips at pole intersections are supposed to increase strength
  • External poles that generate no condensation on the inside of the tent
  • Two small, non-yellowing, non-clouding, clear UVX film side windows
  • Large stake out loops that accept both skis and snow pickets
  • Four mesh storage pockets for things like cameras, headlamps, glasses, etc.
  • Eight, buckle adjustable webbing tie outs for the floor and vestibule.
  • A narrow (but longish) floor design accommodates pitching on narrow ledges and snow platforms commonly encountered in climbing
  • The usual stuff sacks, Y stakes, manual (not very useful), and seam sealer, etc.

Weight / Sizing

The EV2 may be the lightest tent in its class. Although it has a slightly lower total area to weight ratio than the Crux X2, it is important to remember that the vestibule of the EV2 is completely enclosed and floored. No other two-person, three-or-more pole mountaineering tents can claim the floored area to weight ratio of the Mountain Hardware EV2.

Usable Space

For a five-pound, three-pole mountaineering tent the EV2 has a lot of room. The built in vestibule contributes to this. My wife and I slept in the rear of the tent and found enough room in the vestibule for all our gear. We easily weathered a day of high winds, rain, sleet, and snow in the EV2 without going crazy. The tent seems much larger than other tents in the 31 to 33 square foot size range. The roof line is almost horizontal front to back making it easy for two to sit-up and face each other. For a mountaineering tent it is fairly bright and cheery. The VX-02 panel reinforcements are semi-clear and let light in. There are two small side UVX film windows and the orange waterproof/breathable canopy fabric lets pleasantly colored light in as well. Even the vents let light in. The pseudo-bathtub floor, which has edges raised 3 inches above the ground, reduces the level floor area a bit. It took a little getting used to, but we did not find this a significant problem for usable area or gear storage.

Wind Stability

I found the Mountain Hardwear EV2 plenty stable in the winds in Patagonia which is, without question, the windiest place I’ve ever been. It seems like the closer you get to the crest of the Patagonian Andes and the huge southern ice field, Hielo Sur, the stronger the winds blow. The most severe test for the EV2 was a campsite below Paso Viento. Viento means wind in Spanish and if they have to mention wind in Patagonia… The wind was so strong that my wife and I were unable to walk or stand up. We retreated to a semi-sheltered site and pitched the EV2 to wait out the wind. The EV2 was stable with little deflection even during the hardest gusts that day and night. Our only gripe was the noise from flapping panels on the not completely taut tent canopy. Good side tie outs were essential to reduce the panel flapping and stabilize the large and otherwise unsupported side panels of the tent. The raised edges of the tent floor occasionally allowed some wind underneath the tent – a strange experience. The 41 inch peak height, while tall enough for both of us to sit up, was low enough to reasonably shed wind.

Contributing to the strength of the tent is the new Atlas Scandium SL pole set. This pole replaces the standard Easton 7172 poles on previous EV2’s and adds a few ounces to the total weight. Much of this weight increase comes from a stronger and larger diameter vestibule pole. Atlas Scandium SL poles use floating connectors which they claim make the poles stronger, lighter, and more durable than standard fixed connector inserts or swaged end poles. The floating connectors allow more even pole flex, are 13% stronger than traditional fixed insert poles like the Easton 7172, and are 30% stronger than swaged end poles like the DAC FeatherLite. The floating connectors also make the poles more easily field repairable.

The EV2 has panels of low-stretch VX-02 fabric panels in high stress areas – under the tent poles and crossing the side panels of the tent where the side tie outs attach. The theory is that these panels form a strong, non-stretching network that interlocks with the poles for a super stable pitch structure between the tent canopy and poles. We found this only partially successful.

Storm Protection (Wind and Rain)

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 3 The built-in vestibule offers seamless protection. No extra weight and nothing extra to pitch. The downside is that the vestibule is not protected from the rain when entering and exiting the tent (move fast), nor can you cook inside the tent with the vestibule partially open. The side and ceiling vents work OK when cooking in the tent but not as well as a partially opened, side entry vestibule as used on many mountain tents. When tent-bound in a severe storm, there is a zippered hole in the vestibule floor to get snow in and dirt and other stuff out (like emptying your pee bottle) without having to open the tent door. Make sure you don’t mix clean snow with the stuff you put out!

The Mountain Hardwear EV2 does quite well with wind, rain, and moderate snow. The front door and all five vents zipper shut to keep wind and precipitation out. The built-in vestibule works to store all your gear away from precipitation and keeps it readily available as you wait out a storm. You can seal down the EV2, even more than a double walled shelter, which usually has a gap between the floor and the fly. I found this a blessing at the end of a day of windy hiking and bad weather in Patagonia. There was nothing more I wanted than to crawl into a place where there wasn’t wind, dust, and grit swirling around, or horizontal rain, sleet, and snow, and where the whooshing and howling quieted down. The EV2 is easy and fast to pitch, so I was under shelter sooner than with most other shelters I’ve used. The five vents worked well to let in fresh air, hold down condensation, and keep precipitation out. The side windows and vents were also nice to peek out and see what the weather was doing.

Storm Protection (Heavy Snow Loads)

Note: The following discussion involves testing done prior to receiving the newer and stronger Atlas pole set. The EV2 that deflected under snow loading used the older and more flexible Easton poles. We believe that the stronger Atlas pole set should reduce the EV2’s deflection under snow loads. In particular, the vestibule pole is much stiffer, with an increased pole diameter from 0.350 to 0.390 inch.

Our major gripe with the EV2 is deflection with heavy snow loading. One of our testers used the EV2 (older Easton poles) on a winter ski trip. During a night with around 16 inches of snow, the ceiling of the EV2 deflected 6 to 8 inches and the walls closed in by a foot or more. After a day of skiing and more heavy snow, the EV2 had deflected to a height of around 24 inches or almost half of its original 41 inch peak height. The tent did spring back undamaged after shoveling out. A Mountain Hardwear Trango 2 tent pitched in the same campsite did not significantly deflect under the same snow load. On the other hand, the Trango 2 is a four pole, double-walled tent, that weighs nearly twice the weight of the EV2.

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 4 I found the Mountain Hardwear EV2 plenty stable in the wind but a bit noisy due to some of the canopy panels flapping. This is about as taut a pitch as I could achieve in the field. Notice that some of the canopy panels are under-tensioned and wrinkled. A good side tie out anchored into the crossing VX-02 structure stabilizing seam strips helps but does not completely solve the problem. The less-than-taut canopy may well contribute to tent deflection under heavy snow loads. Not visible in the picture is the super taut tent floor.

A few of our staff engineers (also the testers) discussed the snow load deflection. Here’s our best guess at possible factors contributing to this and some possible solutions (in addition to the stronger Atlas pole set already mentioned above):

1. While the exoskeleton and clip pole attachment is a breeze to pitch, it may not lock the poles solidly in relation to each other or connect them solidly to the VX-02 reinforcement panels on the tent canopy. Thus, under heavy loads the poles have the freedom to shift from a strong structural configuration to a weaker one (i.e. they get crooked and start to flatten out) allowing significant deflection of the tent body. Also, and possibly more important, the three-pole design leaves a large and relatively unsupported rear panel on the tent as well as lacks the structure and rigidity of a four-pole tent.

Solution?: An interlocked four-pole structure may do much better as evidenced by the performance of the Trango 2. There may be something special about the rigidity and structural integrity of four pole design. As such, taking a pole out of a four-pole tent may not be the best approach to saving weight. A better approach might be sticking with four-pole design and looking for weight savings elsewhere. We’d guess that a fourth pole on the EV2 would add about 5 to 8 ounces. Even with the additional weight, the EV2 would still be the lightest tent in its class. (It may not be a coincidence that a new Mountain Hardwear tent, the ‘EV3,’ uses a four-pole design. This upcoming tent is featured at the end of this review; we can’t wait to get our hands on one.) Other possibilities include better stabilizing the poles to each other and/or the canopy so they can’t shift as much under load. In this way they may better utilize the structure and support of the VX-02 reinforcement panels on the tent canopy, the original design goal of the tent. Our tent was showing some wear at the pole junctions after substantial Patagonian winds, indicating that they were shifting under load.

2. The lack of tension in the canopy of the EV2 may also contribute to snow load deflections as well as allowing tent panels to flap in the wind. The floor of the EV2 is under much greater tension than the tent canopy. When we first pitched the tent, the floor was so tight and the canopy still not taut, that we were sure that we had done something wrong. But all testers found the floor very tight and could not get a taut-canopy pitch on the EV2.

Solution?: The EV2 is a complex structure and we can suggest no immediate solution other than that Mountain Hardwear needs to find a way to better distribute the tension in the tent. More tension should go to the canopy and less to the floor. Again a four-pole design may help with this.

It is important to note that our reviewers did not use an optional ‘internal guy’ system described in the EV2 User Manual. This system, while taking extra time and effort to set up, may have improved the EV2’s snow loading performance. The Trango 2 also did not use the internal guy system and did well with snow load.

Ventilation / Condensation resistance

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 5 This is a pitch done in a hurry. No apologies. It was windy and sleeting when we pitched the tent and we wanted to get under shelter ASAP! Rocky ground also prevented perfect stake placement. With some fiddling this pitch could be improved. Note also the raised edges of the pseudo-bathtub floor. It takes a bit of getting used to, but it is normal for the floor edges to pitch 2 to 3 inches above the ground. Mountain Hardwear claims that this is much stronger than a true bathtub floor.

The critical factor for managing condensation in the Mountain Hardwear EV2 is wind. With wind the EV2 is almost condensation free due to its five vents with struts to prop them open. Without wind, the EV2 with its waterproof breathable fabric, does better than non-breathable single walled tents but still condenses at moderate levels*. In calm conditions the vents are not large enough to make convective (chimney) ventilation work. To be fair, vents large enough for this are inappropriate on a mountaineering shelter. In calm, bug free conditions, the vents can be completely opened without mosquito netting for improved air movement.

Patagonia has an excessive amount of damp and foul weather that can make the best single wall tent look pretty bad. One of the techies at Mountain Hardwear was a bit skeptical of how the EV2 would do with condensation there. He shouldn’t have been. Even waiting out a very cold day of constant rain we had no problems with condensation in the tent. What contributed most to this were the vents and that there was wind. With the vents open, the wind created enough air exchange to keep condensation at bay. The vents are thankfully located in areas of the tent that keep drafts away from the occupants. The waterproof/breathable shell fabric helped as well with condensation. In addition, having the poles outside the tent keeps them from condensing and dripping on you, which can be a problem in tents with internal pole attachments as found on many mountaineering tents. On another night without rain, we slept with the front door open. The vestibule was deep enough and protective enough that sleeping in the rear of the tent we were protected from the wind. Without rain and bugs this is a very pleasant way to sleep and an excellent way to keep condensation down.

Our other tester used the tent on an overnight backcountry ski trip. With two people damp from skiing, no wind, and temperatures just below freezing, the tent had moderate condensation. In his opinion the tent did significantly better than non-breathable single walled tents but not as well as some of the eVENT single walled tents he has used under similar conditions. The eVENT tents do not use fire retardant fabric, while the EV2 does.

* Note: All tents/shelters will condense given the right conditions – even uncoated nylon with no fly over it. I’ve had condensation inside a large nylon tent with a substantial mosquito netting roof vent, no fly, and the tent was even protected by a large roof. If it’s humid enough with little air movement, anything will condense.

Insect Protection

The EV2 provides complete insect protection. There are five vents on the tent with mosquito netting and no other way for bugs to get in. That being said, this is a mountaineering tent and not a camping tent. If you want a tent with bug protection and a nice view buy a Coleman. The EV2 front door does not have a mosquito netting backing and there are no large panels of mosquito netting anywhere else on the tent. Under heavy bug pressure, your ventilation, and more importantly, viewing options are limited. Although the tent is fairly bright and cheery inside, it may not be the happiest place to wait out a swarm of mosquitoes.

Durability

The strong and field serviceable Atlas Scandium SL pole set, strong UV resistant VX-O2 panel reinforcements, and the pre-stretched polyester canopy fabric (polyester is also UV resistant) should go a long way to making the EV2 a durable tent. The durable taffeta polyether coated tent floor should be durable enough on most ground that you can skip the footprint and save yourself some weight.

Value

The Mountain Hardwear EV2 is arguably the lightest and most innovative tent in its class. For $625 you get a lot of high tech design and materials. The EV2 is a great tent. Even with its design blemishes, it would be our testers’ first choice for a two-person fast and light ascent. With a few structural improvements EV2 could be an exceptional tent and an excellent value. But the current design falls a bit short of its goal due to the snow load deflection and not-so-taut canopy. The EV2 is a good if not stellar value. We eagerly await the next generation EV2.

Recommendations for Improvement

See possible structural improvements discussed in the “Heavy Snow Loads” section above. A side entry option on the vestibule would be a nice addition.

Tips

The raised floor edges are supposed to be that way! Remember to follow the pitching instructions and leave the tie out webbing at an initial 3-inch length. Don’t cinch the straps more to make the canopy tighter. You’ll only increase floor tension without improving the canopy tension. Make solid side tie outs to stabilize the sided panels and you should obtain a reasonably taut pitch. It takes a bit of practice to get things just so and achieve the best pitch possible (which will likely include a few less than taut tent panels).

Special feature: sneak peak at the upcoming Mountain Hardware EV3

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 6
Mountain Hardwear EV3: If you look closely you can see that it has a four pole design. It also has a side entry vestibule (not shown). This tent was built for Ed Viesturs. He will use the EV3 in his attempt to climb Annapurna, the final peak in his bid to be the first American to climb all fourteen 8,000 meter peaks without supplemental oxygen. Note: EV in the tent name stands for Ed’s initials. He tested the EV2 before introduction of the tent. Photo courtesy of Mountain Hardware<

Mountain Hardwear EV2 Single Wall Mountaineering Tent - 7
Mountain Hardwear EV3: It’s a little blurry, but this front view shows the improved vestibule. It has a side entry, which protects the vestibule from precipitation while entering and exiting the tent and gives more options for ventilation, especially when cooking in the vestibule. You can just make out the four pole design if you stare hard. Photo courtesy of Mountain Hardware<

 

Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks SPOTLITE REVIEW

Lightest woven fabric dry sacks on the market today.

Overview

The Sea To Summit Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks are the lightest woven fabric dry sacks on the market, significantly lighter (by several ounces) than the Granite Gear Dry Sacks, and just lighter (by less than an ounce) than comparably sized Outdoor Research HydroLite Dry Sacks. Plastic sacks such as a mylar turkey roasting bag (0.5 oz) and the Gossamer Gear Pack Liner bags (2 mil polyethylene film, 1.3 oz for medium, 12″ x 8″ x 32″) are lighter, but the Sea To Summit Dry Sacks still merit a look by ultralighters.

The Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks are waterproof when used as designed, according to the US marketing rep, Shelley Dunbar. She adds, “If you are going to be getting really wet, as in floating them in a river, we also recommend another layer of protection for expensive items such as cameras or GPS. They are not recommended for prolonged submersion.”

I used a 20 liter Sea To Summit Dry Sack on a recent SuperUltralight canyoneering trip to protect my sleeping quilt and spare clothing in sections where I needed to swim and float the pack. I double protected my soft goods by also using a Gossamer Gear Pack Liner. Everything stayed dry.

For testing purposes, I threw the stuffed Ultra-Sil Dry Sack into a slow section of the creek towards the end of my trip. I left it floating high in the water for 20 minutes. When I removed my quilt and clothing, they were bone dry. I repeated this test with a 4-liter sack in my sink at home with the same results. In both cases, the Dry Sacks floated with the bottom seam out of the water.

The Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks are not recommended for prolonged submersion, but there are occasions when that might occur inside a pack. For example, Backpacking Light Product Review Director, Alan Dixon, recently returned from Patagonia with tales of unpacking his pack at the end of a day of wild weather to find the bottom of the pack filled with water. A dry sack in the bottom of the pack could have been partially submerged underwater for quite some time in a case like that. The Sea to Summit rep assures me that their Dry Sacks will not leak in that situation. I’m awaiting production samples to test their claim.

Sea To Summit is an Australian company making their Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks available in the US this summer. They will soon be introducing Ultra-Sil pack liners and a compression dry sack where air is released through the eVENT bottom rather than through a valve.

Notes:
Use the listed volume of the Ultra-Sil Dry Sacks, rather than the listed dimensions to determine what size sack you need. According to the Shelley Dunbar, “The rule of thumb for making the dry sacks as water tight as possible is three folds, minimum.” Three folds subtracts about 4 inches from the listed length of the Dry Sack, and the smaller sacks (1,2, and 4 L) are flat, rather than cylindrical, changing the volume calculation. The 4-liter size is just big enough for a lightweight synthetic insulated top, e.g. Patagonia Puffball, men’s medium.

The 20-liter Dry Sack fits inside a Gossamer Gear Uberlight pack with enough room so that a folded Bozeman Mountain Works TorsoLite pad (serving as back padding), can easily be removed and replaced, such as when using the pad to float the pack through a narrow canyon section. The 20-liter Sack is over twice the volume that is needed to hold a sleeping quilt and extra hot weather clothing – big enough to hold all the contents of a sub-5-pound base weight pack for an overnight trip. Sea To Summit will soon have three oval shaped pack liners (50, 70, and 90 L)available (2.6, 3.4, and 4.4 oz respectively). The 50 liter Dry Sack should be about right for a 3000 cubic inch volume pack. Sea to Summit said there is the possibility of an extra small pack liner which would suit ultralight packs.

It is important to roll the Ultra-Sil Dry Sack top down far enough so that the pressure from the Sack contents keeps the folds in the closure tightly closed and water out.

Features and Specifications

  • Ultra-Sil nylon, a polyurethane coated Siliconized Cordura
  • Fabric is polyurethane coated with a proprietary technique to ensure the seam tape adheres and is waterproof
  • Fabric is specified to be waterproof to a hydrostatic head of 2000 mm, including the taped seams
  • Watertight, non-wicking Hypalon roll top closure with stiffener at the top for a better seal
  • The roll top closure is simple to use and neat
  • Soft and flexible with a slippery finish for easy packing
  • Nearly transparent allowing good visibility of the contents
  • All seams are double stitched and tape sealed
  • The 4 and 20-liter samples I obtained weighed exactly as advertised
Volume* Size (in x in) Weight oz (g) MSRP $
1 L 6 x 9 0.7 (20) 8.95
2 L 8 x 12 0.8 (23) 10.95
4 L 9 x 15 0.9 (26) 11.95
8 L 6.5 x 18 1.1 (30) 15.95
13 L 8.5 x 21 1.4 (40) 18.95
20 L 10 x 24 1.8 (50) 22.95
35 L 12 x 27 2.3 (65) 29.95
*Note: 50, 70, and 90 L oval shaped Ultra-Sil pack liners will be available soon.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW

Two-person bomber tent constructed of eVENT – waterproof, very breathable, and now rarely available in tents.

Overview

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 1
The Nemo Tenshi is a super-breathable and well ventilated bomber tent.

The Nemo Tenshi tent does the best job of avoiding condensation of any tent I’ve used. With waterproof and highly breathable eVENT fabric (much more breathable than Gore-Tex or other laminate fabrics), three vents, and a rear window with bug screen, I experienced extremely minimal, to no, condensation in winter conditions. A removable “condensation curtain” helps further by limiting all condensation to a small area and directing it to a vent. A retractable awning also allows you to leave the door partially unzipped for extra ventilation and effectively protects your gear when entering the tent. At 45 inches tall (114 cm), the Tenshi allows for significant airflow and usable living space.

All of these extras come at the price of weight. Although the Nemo Tenshi tent is only 1 inch wider and 4 inches longer than the discontinued Integral Designs eVENT MK1Lite, it weighs over 2 pounds more. Further, it is taller than several comparable tents, making its side walls steeper and more susceptible to deflection during high winds. That said, the Nemo Tenshi survived being pitched on a ridge top with wind gusts over 70 mph – where I was unable to walk without being blown over – with only minimal damage. Pressure vents in the awning allowed it to remain open all night without damage, proving that it’s tough enough for a mountaineering tent. This is a versatile tent that can take serious weather.

Note: General Electric purchased eVENT and now restricts its use in tents due to flammability considerations. Integral Designs and other manufacturers no longer use eVENT in their tents. The Nemo Equipment Tenshi tent is among a rare few tents that are still constructed of eVENT.

In Brief

  • Waterproof and highly breathable eVENT fabric
  • Three vents, a rear window, and a door with retractable awning allow excellent ventilation
  • Innovative “condensation curtain” focuses condensation in a small area and directs it toward the front vent, and is removable
  • The retractable awning can be easily stowed and pressure vents release air gusts
  • At around 5.5 pounds, the Tenshi isn’t the lightest single wall tent, but extra features add to its versatility
  • Usable space is improved by extra height (3 to 6 inches taller than some comparable tents) and steep side walls, at the cost of increased side deflection in high winds
  • Optional insulated floor is bulky and heavy (2 lb 13.9 oz), but may be useful to some

Specifications

• Tent Type

Single wall with floor

• Fabric Description

Shell: eVENT fabric; vents and awning: Dimension-Polyant VX02; floor: PU coated 70D Nylon

• Pole Material

DAC Featherlite Aluminum poles (tent was tested with a heavier pre-production pole set)

• Weight Full Package
As supplied with stuff sacks, stakes, guylines, etc.

Backpacking Light scale Manufacturer claim
5 lb 15.5 oz (2.71 kg)* 4 lb 14.4 oz (2.22 kg)

• Weight Minimum Package
Includes tent body and fly, minimum necessary stakes and guylines, no stuff sacks or extra hardware

Backpacking Light minimum Manufacturer supplied minimum
Same as Manufacturer Minimum but with:
0.25 oz (7 g) titanium stakes, 0.004 oz/ft (0.37 g/m) Aircore Pro Dyneema guylines

5 stakes, 12 ft (3.7 m) guyline

5 stakes, 12 ft (3.7 m) guyline
5 lb 6.4 oz (2.45 kg)* 5 lb 8.5 oz (2.51 kg)*
*Note: tent was tested with a heavier pre-production pole set

• Weight of Accessories

Condensation curtain (included) Insulated floor (optional)
3.9 oz (0.11 kg) 2 lb 13.9 oz (1.30 kg)

• Floor/ Vestibule Area

Floor area Vestibule area
28 ft2 (2.6 m2) n/a

• Floor Area/Backpacking Light Minimum Weight Ratio

0.35 ft2/oz

• Dimensions

inches centimeters
Width 47 119
Length 86 218.5
Height 45 114

• Model Year

2005

• MSRP

$675.00 USD, (optional insulated floor $89 USD)

Usable Features / Ease of Use

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 2
The retractable awning uses one pole and is easily stowed.

Setting up the Tenshi is very easy. Like other single wall wedge designs, the poles are set up outside the tent, slipped inside, and flexed into their corner spots. Pole tips are placed into the corner grommets. Velcro tabs are then attached to fix the poles in place. A minimum of five stakes is recommended to achieve the maximum stability and floor space (one at each corner and two for the side guy outs). When conditions were very windy, I was able to set up the tent from inside. However, the Velcro tabs are rather narrow, making them more difficult to attach than on similar tents.

The tent material is eVENT, a fully waterproof material that is far more breathable than comparable Gore-Tex or other laminate fabrics. The Nemo Tenshi is among a rare few tents that are still constructed of eVENT. Dimension-Polyant VX02 fabric is used for increased strength in the canopy and external vent flaps; I have seen this fabric used in several products through the years and it has worked very well.

A unique feature of the Tenshi is the retractable awning. My test sample awning sets up with one pole that is a very tight fit and takes a great deal of shoving to slide into the Velcro attachment. I’ve been assured that this difficulty has been addressed in the production models. The awning features pressure vents that are designed to release pressure during high winds. I found these vents to be extremely effective during a night of high winds when I had the awning deployed. Further, the guy out on the end of the awning added additional stability at the front of the tent.

A rear window is lined with bug mesh and provides cross ventilation and an extra look at the surroundings. This can also be used as a second door in an emergency but isn’t designed to be used regularly. I found it be unneeded in most situations but in warm weather, the cross ventilation was a nice change from most bomber tents, which tend to be pretty stuffy in these conditions.

An optional closed-cell EVA foam floor mates with the Tenshi floor, creating a fully insulated base. The floor weighs 2 pounds 13.9 ounces and costs an additional $89. It is extremely bulky and I never used it in the field, although it may be a useful option for some people.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 3
A rear window with bug netting provides cross ventilation and additional views.

Weight / Sizing

All of the extra features of the Nemo Tenshi are nice but they come at the price of additional weight. These extras, such as the rear window, three top vents, awning, additional height, and condensation curtain (3.9 oz extra), contribute quite a bit of the 5.5 pound weight of the Tenshi. I would like to see a pared-down version of the tent available.

Compared to the other bomber tents in our review suite, the Nemo Tenshi floor area to weight ratio of 0.35 ft2/oz is close to the Mountain Hardware EV2 (0.36), and lower than the Crux X2 Storm (0.44) but these other tents are much more stable three and four pole designs. The Outdoor Designs Summit Extreme, with an area to weight ratio of 0.52 ft2/oz, has nearly one and a half times the area per ounce, but sacrifices living space. Still, the Tenshi could easily lose weight and retain its size.

Usable Space

When compared to similar tents, the Nemo Tenshi has a taller ceiling height:

  • 45 inches: Nemo Tenshi
  • 42 inches: Bibler I Tent
  • 41 inches: Outdoor Designs Summit Raider
  • 39 inches: Integral Designs MK1 XL

This extra height increases the steepness of the walls and the usable space of the tent. This Nemo Tenshi is comfortable for two people to sleep or sit up in, although there isn’t much room left over for gear.

Unlike the Bibler I Tent or Integral Designs MK1 XL, there is no optional full vestibule for the Nemo Tenshi.

Wind Stability

Camped on a ridge in the North Cascades last winter, I had this tent in the most serious winds I’ve ever experienced. Wind gusts that were approximately 70 mph made it impossible to move around camp without crawling. I used all seven of the Tenshi guylines and laid in the darkness, hoping that the tent wouldn’t blow off the mountain or disintegrate. It didn’t, and I was happy to wake up in safety. The Nemo Tenshi can survive serious winds and proved that it is a true bomber tent.

However, these high winds also revealed some problems in the design. While the steep sidewalls increased usable space, they also increased side deflection. Although the side guy outs did a good job of counteracting this, they tensioned the upper portion of the wall much more than the lower section, causing the lower sidewalls to flap in even moderate gusts. Further, having the upper portion of the tent more rigid made the tent unable to “spill” side gusts like some other two-pole tents that lean over slightly to release pressure. The consequence was extra stress on the seams, resulting in several internal Velcro pole attachments coming loose through the night and one ripping free of the tent wall (see Durability below).

Storm Protection

The steep sidewalls helped the Nemo Tenshi to effectively shed snow and rain. During heavy snowfall, keeping the upper vents closed was important because they acted to flatten the roof and cause snow to pile up.

In heavy Washington rains, the Tenshi shed water easily and the eVENT fabric proved to be completely waterproof. When sitting out bad weather, the sufficient usable space and yellow walls made things a bit more comfortable and cheery. We often had to drag our gear inside the tent – a vestibule would be a really nice option to keep wet gear outside the living area.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 4
Three large vents include support rods, Velcro closures, and can be opened and closed from inside the tent through zippered access slots.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 5
The condensation curtain keeps any condensation in a small area, directing it to a front vent. The curtain drapes loosely across the body and is easily removable with Velcro attachments.

There is no such thing as a 100% condensation-free fabric. Given subzero conditions, sealed vents, and high levels of humidity and warmth inside a tent, condensation can occur with any fabric. The beauty of eVENT, though, is that the range of conditions in which condensation will not occur (or will be minimal) is much broader than Tegral-Tex (Integral Designs), Todd-Tex (Bibler), Epic (Black Diamond), and even Gore-Tex (Outdoor Designs). With all the vents sealed in conditions well below freezing, the condensation I experienced was extremely minimal. With the three vents open or the door or rear window cracked, I never experienced any condensation at all. I was stunned by the performance of the eVENT fabric.

The Tenshi has three vents that close with Velcro and prop open with small support rods. The side vents have small internal zippers that allow you to reach outside to adjust the vents without leaving the tent. With a bit of a stretch, I could also reach the front vent. This feature was very useful during storm conditions, especially because the awning prevented reaching out the door.

If that wasn’t enough, the Nemo Tenshi also includes a removable “condensation curtain.” This curtain attaches to the sidewalls with Velcro strips and drapes across the chests of the sleepers, trapping moisture in a small portion of the tent and directing it toward an upper vent. When used with the door cracked under the protective awning, specific high/low venting can be achieved. This is a brilliant design that would be well worth the extra 3.9 ounces in subzero conditions. This is a well thought-out innovation that would be especially effective in tents made of less breathable fabrics. However, with the excellent breathability and ventilation of the Tenshi, I found it to be overkill in most situations.

Insect Protection

It’s rare that a mountaineering tent would be found in bug-infested areas below the treeline. However, living with the Tenshi in these situations would be quite comfortable. It has a large door, rear window, and three vents that are all backed with mosquito netting. As temperatures rise, the eVENT fabric would also help to keep things comfortable. This is a very versatile bomber tent.

Durability

(Before commenting on durability, it is important to note that the tent tested was a pre-production model and came with a detailed outline of problems already addressed before the first production run. Flaws found that were addressed in this outline have been indicated.)

During the night of high winds described in the Wind Stability section, the poles were stressed out of the internal Velcro attachments on several occasions. During one of these events, the attachment partially tore from the inner tent wall. Improvements in internal welding are intended to address this problem in production runs.

Another potential durability issue was corner pockets that came loose from the sidewalls. With the resulting gaps, a pole could easily slide behind the pocket and come against the weaker eVENT fabric. Nemo is sewing these corners in production runs to address this possibility.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 6
Problems with internal welding have been addressed in production runs.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 7
Corner pockets will be sewn in production runs.

Nemo Tenshi Tent REVIEW - 8
Using shorter, or elastic, cord would be more secure for roll-up doors.

The only other flaw I found in the tent was door tie-up cords that were too long. Shorter cords or those made of elastic would keep rolled doors and windows closed more securely.

Value

At $675, the Nemo Tenshi is in the upper end of high-end bomber tents but is also made of more expensive (and rare for tents) eVENT fabric. (In fact, the only other eVENT tent that is currently on the market is the Exped Polaris, which retails for $619.) Considering the versatility and amazing condensation-resistance of the Tenshi, the price is reasonable.

However, when you consider that for less money you can pick up a Bibler I Tent or an Integral Designs MK1 XL with the optional vestibule, the decision becomes less obvious. If you’re looking for the ultimate in fabrics, though, you’ll be hard pressed to beat eVENT, and in today’s market, that leaves few options. With the Nemo Tenshi, you’ll have a versatile design that you’ll enjoy for years to come.

Recommendations for Improvement

The Nemo Tenshi is a well thought-out design with many innovative features. It is well-built and will last many seasons of winter and mountaineering use. However, there are some changes that could improve this design:

  • I’d like to see a pared-down version without the rear window, canopy, condensation curtain, vent zippers, and front vent. This would not only cut weight, but costs as well, and most of the time I wouldn’t miss the extras.
  • An optional vestibule would increase overall usable space by providing a place to put gear and to cook. This would improve the tent’s usability in the winter.
  • The cords for door closures need to be shorter or made of different materials.
  • Lowering the ceiling height a few inches would improve wind stability with a minimal loss of usable space.
  • Lower the side guy outs a few inches. This would put more even tension on the sides of the tent and would reduce flapping and stress.
  • Increase the length of the internal Velcro pole attachments so they would take more force to come loose during high winds.

Mini Bull Design Elite Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

Mini alcohol stove that doesn’t require a pot stand or priming.

Overview

I came across the Mini Bull Design Elite alcohol stove when I conducted a search for the “perfect” SuperUltraLight alcohol stove. I wanted a stove that was simple and very light.
My criteria:

  • weight under 0.3 ounces
  • no pot stand required
  • no priming required
  • works with a narrow pot such as beer can pots or a ti cup

The Elite meets all four requirements. It produces nice hot, blue flames. Determining how efficient it is with a narrow beer can pot will require further testing.

Features and Specifications

  • constructed from one energy drink can
  • jetted to burn denatured alcohol at a rate of 1 oz (30 ml) in 10 minutes
  • jets are on the side – wait for them to ignite before placing the pot on top
  • constructed using a press fit with a hot roll crimp at the base to lock the two halves together
  • no tape or glue used in the construction
  • small pots recommended
  • manufacturer claims it will preheat and blossom in about 15 seconds
  • inner and outer walls are very close together
  • does not require a pot stand or priming
  • BPL measured weight: 0.2 oz (7 g)
  • MSRP $5

Big Sky Products (Summit Shelters) Evolution 2P Tent SPOTLITE REVIEW

Double wall two-person tent with two doors, two vestibules, easy setup, and interior pockets for organizing gear: all for just a shade over three pounds.

Overview

Double wall tents are not high on our list of things to love about ultralight backpacking. We get more enthused about single wall tents, tarp tents, and tarps, and Ryan gets downright ecstatic when the conversation turns to poncho tarps and bivy sacks. So when we were faced with the prospect of having to review some double wall tents for BackpackingLight.com, we really had to suck it up and bury some serious biases and learn – again – to appreciate their benefits. Double wall tents still offer significant advantages over lighter shelters. A double wall tent is generally stronger and more wind resistant than a similarly designed single wall counterpart, and, with a few minor exceptions, condensation is still easier to manage in a double wall tent due to the breathable inner tent that remains mostly dry. But, double wall tents are more complex to set up, they have low weight:space ratios, and they are heavy.

Those preconceptions and biases against double wall tents made us appreciate the Summit Shelters Evolution 2P Tent all the more.

The Evolution 2P is a fairly traditional looking double wall tent – it is built for two with all the amenities of a three-season backpacking tent: dual side doors, dual side vestibules, plenty of interior pockets to aid organization, and a mesh inner tent for maximum airflow. On paper, when you review these features, you immediately notice the comparison to tents like the MSR Hubba Hubba, Sierra Designs Hyperlight AST 2, REI Quarter Dome UL, and The North Face Vector 22. However… there’s one very notable difference: the Evolution 2P is a pound – or more – lighter than these tents.

With a silnylon fly and floor and carbon fiber poles (you can also cash down with a slightly heavier aluminum option), the Evolution 2P tips the scales at just over three pounds. That’s a remarkably low weight for two people to share on a backpacking trek, considering the nature of the tent, and it’s plenty light to be seriously considered as a roomy solo tent. The Evolution 2P is only a fraction of a pound heavier – and far roomier – than most of the lightest double wall solo tents on the market.

So does the weight savings come at a price? To the mass market that has been drilled (brainwashed?) with ”durability fear”, certainly – the carbon fiber poles require more care in handling and setup than aluminum poles, and provide a somewhat less stable structure in severely windy weather (however, in this double wall design, I would have no reservations in using the tent in virtually any three-season condition one might find in the US). In addition, the silnylon floor is lighter and less waterproof than conventional (heavier) tent floors, but again, silnylon fabrics have been put through the wringer enough by the ultralight community to have gained wide acceptance.

The real beauty of the tent is its ease of setup. External poles with clips make the free standing inner setup a cinch (new models come with single continuous pole sleeves, which may even be easier), and the fly goes on quickly. Vestibules are secured with two stakes each, and for best storm resistance and ventilation, the tent can be staked at its corners – we recommend carrying 8 stakes (lightweight titanium, of course!). Optionally, in severe weather, you can add up to four guylines to tie outs along the pole structure, which helps stability significantly in high winds.

For two people, ease of use is hard to beat with the Evolution 2P. Each occupant has plenty of interior pocket storage for organization, and dual vestibules and doors go a long way towards keeping close tentmates close friends. Vestibules are large enough for boots, a mid-sized backpack, and plenty of other gear. The fly is adjustable in several different positions on each vestibule side, allowing you to fine tune ventilation and views ranging from entirely open sides to fully sealed. Peak vents in the top of the fly vent moisture, and a clear vinyl window brings morning light into the shelter.

Pros: Lightest double wall, two-door, dual-vestibule tent on the market; easy setup; plenty of pockets for interior storage and organization; multiple vestibule configurations

Cons: Full mesh inner tent allowed condensation to “rain in” from the inside of outer fly in high morning winds following a cold, still night; carbon fiber poles not stiff enough for serious snow loading.

Ideal Application: 3-season camping with a child or spouse, or solo hiking for folks that like the comfort, security, wind resistance, bug protection, and privacy of a double wall tent.

Features and Specifications

  • Fly fabric: silnylon with clear vinyl window
  • Inner tent fabric: full no-see-um mesh walls and roof, silnylon bathtub floor
  • Doors: 2, with double pull zippers
  • Poles: carbon fiber or 7000-series aluminum; two criss-crossing poles to create a freestanding wedge configuration
  • Stakes and Guylines: 4 stakes required to stake out vestibules, 8 recommended to maximize floor space and tautness of pitch, up to 12 stakes and 4 guylines can be used for maximum stability in high winds
  • Floor Area: tent 36.4 sq ft; vestibule 18 sq ft
  • Weight: 3 lb 1 oz (carbon fiber poles), 3 lb 6 oz (aluminum poles)
  • MSRP: $345 with carbon poles, $260 with aluminum poles