Articles (2020)

Mo-go-gear Fire-fly Alcohol Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

A tiny stove well suited for backpackers that view pint sized cooking mugs as group cooking devices.

Overview

Gossamer Gear never loses sight of light, and the new Fire-fly alcohol stove they commissioned from Mo-go-gear (at 1.56 ounces for the whole kit) is no exception. The cooking system includes the burner, pot stand, heat reflector, windscreen, and fuel measuring cup.

The Fire-fly uses a mini alcohol burner (2-inch diameter) with a capacity of 1.25 ounces. The heat reflector and 3-inch x 22-inch windscreen are made of soft temper 36 gauge aluminum, which is the same stuff that MSR uses for their windscreens. The pot stand is wide and sturdy.

I like the innovative pot stand (which folds flat), the high quality adjustable windscreen, and the fact the stove comes as a cooking system (sans pot). My guess is that itโ€™s capable of cooking for two; we will find out. Our editors are testing the Fire-fly in different regions of the country, and we will publish a full review this summer.

Features and Specifications

  • Aluminum open jet burner, 2 in (5 cm) diameter
  • Adjustable windscreen
  • Sturdy 3 in (8 cm) diameter pot stand
  • Soft temper aluminum windscreen and heat reflector
  • Measured weight 1.56 oz (44 g)
  • MSRP $22.95

Montane 180 Waterproof/Breathable Shirt SPOTLITE REVIEW

Rain shirt? Jacket? Who cares: It’s 7 oz and has the ability to disappear in a corner of your pack.

Overview

Montane calls it “the world’s lightest weight fully waterproof and breathable outdoor shirt”. Is it really a shirt? At a claimed weight of just 6 ounces (size large), the Montane 180 is similar to the Patagonia Specter Pullover (at 6.5 ounces, size medium), and a close contender for the coveted title of lightest woven fabric hooded rain jacket. Both jackets use a polyurethane-only waterproof/breathable membrane, and have similar features.

In our upcoming review of the Montane 180 I will take a hard look at its features and performance compared to the Patagonia Specter Pullover that we recently reviewed. How do they compare for performance, weight, and value?

Features and Specifications

  • Water-resistant chest and pocket zips
  • Active cut with dropped tail
  • Roll-away adjustable hood with wired peak
  • Fleece lined collar
  • Zippered security pocket
  • 13.5 in (34 cm) zippered chest vent
  • Elastic drawcord hem, elastic cuffs
  • Shell Fabric: FREEFLOW® Lite, 1.7 oz/yd2 (57 g/m2), 20d x 20d ripstop nylon face fabric; Gelanots GX-PR waterproof/breathable coating on the inside, Teflon DWR finish on the outside
  • Measured weight 7.1 oz (201 g) size L; manufacturer’s specification 6 oz (180 g)
  • MSRP $166.50 US

GoLite Galaxy Internal Frame Backpack SPOTLITE REVIEW

Internal frame, enough volume for a long trek, and light weight = more appeal for traditional backpackers looking to “go light” without gettin’ freaky about it.

Overview

The Galaxy is the newest addition to GoLite’s Unlimited Series of packs created to provide a full-featured pack with maximum comfort and minimum weight. It incorporates the latest materials and technologies and is loaded with user friendly features. In size large, the total volume is 4600 cubic inches and weight is only 3 pounds 10.2 ounces (my measurement). That’s 79 cubic inches per ounce for a full-featured internal frame pack.

I loaded the Galaxy with 24 pounds of gear and took it out for a 30-mile two-day test run. I’m very impressed with this pack. It has plenty of options to organize gear, and carried the weight comfortably as promised. I like its anatomically shaped hard plastic framesheet that molded to my back and provided total weight transfer to my hips. I could even reach a water bottle from a side mesh pocket and put it back! The pack is not as squatty as the photo suggests.

Look for a full review of the Galaxy this summer on the Backpacking Light website.

Features and Specifications

  • Style: internal frame, top loading, drawstring closure, top pocket
  • Ergo-Flex suspension system
  • Two main vertical internal compartments
  • Two side mesh water bottle pockets with angled opening
  • 3-liter hydration sleeve
  • Floating top lid with pocket
  • Large outside pocket with water-resistant zipper
  • Main body is SilLite HG 40d polyester 3 oz/yd2 (102 g/m2), front pockets and bottom are 3-layer X-Pac fabric
  • Volume 4600 ci (75 L) size L
  • Weight 3 lb 10.2 oz (1.65 kg) size L; manufacturers specification 3 lb 11 oz (1.68 kg)
  • MSRP $250

Granite Gear Wisp Backpack REVIEW

Technical day pack that keeps loads close (SUL’ers take note: you might be able to eke an overnight out this one…).

Overview

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 1
The Wisp fully loaded (except the top pocket), with a fleece jacket stuffed in the “helmet flap.” It has five compression straps to adjust pack volume for different size loads.

The Granite Gear Wisp backpack is a lightweight, versatile technical day pack that is right-sized for many outdoor activities. It has a great shoulder harness and hipbelt with lots of adjustment and a good fit, as we would expect from Granite Gear. The pack fit snug to my body and carried all the gear I needed for day activities. A flap on the front of the pack is designed to carry a helmet, but can be used to carry a variety of other items, even snowshoes or crampons if the talons are padded. The Wisp has enough volume and carry capacity to use for ultralight backpacking. This pack relies on using a hydration system for water delivery – there are no outside mesh pockets to hold water bottles or assorted gear items. A top pocket over the drawstring closure and two hipbelt pockets provide some outside storage, but not enough. The hipbelt pockets are so tight that it is an effort to insert an energy bar, so some serious enlargement is needed. Overall, the Wisp is lightweight yet sturdy, and very versatile. With a few improvements to the outside pockets, it would be one of our favorites.

In Brief

  • Lightweight (1.5 pounds) 2,000 cubic inch technical day pack
  • Comfortable shoulder harness and hipbelt, with lots of adjustment
  • Very versatile and right-sized for numerous activities
  • Fits well and comfortably carries 20 pounds
  • Excellent load volume control
  • Hydration bladder only; no water bottle pockets
  • Hipbelt pockets need to be larger, and outside mesh pockets added

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Frameless, top loading technical day pack

• Fabric Description

Bottom, front, and reinforcements are high tenacity 210d Cordura, 6.4 oz/yd2 (216 g/m2); pack body is high tenacity 70d Cordura Hybrid Silnylon (it’s called “hybrid” because the fabric is both silicone impregnated and has a urethane coating), 2.4 oz/yd2 (81 g/m2)

• Sizes

One size fits torsos 18-22 in (46-56 cm)

• Volume

2000 ci (32.8 L)

• Weight

Bacpacking Light measured weight 1 lb 7.9 oz (0.68 kg); manufacturer specification 1 lb 8 oz (0.68 kg)

• Volume to Weight Ratio

83.7 ci/oz (based on 2000 ci for size regular, and Backpacking Light measured weight of 23.9 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

20 lb (9 kg) comfortable carrying capacity as determined by Backpacking Light; 25 lb (11 kg) comfortable carrying capacity claimed by manufacturer

• Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

13.4 (based on 20 lb load capacity and Backpacking Light measured weight of 23.9 oz)

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

$90 US

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 2
The Wisp adjusts to fit 18-22 inch torso lengths by positioning the hipbelt, then adjusting the shoulder strap length, sternum strap, and load adjustors to a comfortable fit. All straps are plenty long to adjust the pack to a wide range of body proportions. The camera case shown is not a part of the pack.

The Granite Gear Wisp is a frameless technical day pack. It achieves a “virtual frame” when the fully expanded pack is tightened with five compression straps (two connected to the top of the helmet sleeve, two on the lower pack body, and one over the top). A filled 2-liter water bladder in the vertical hydration sleeve also adds some rigidity. The suspension consists of padded shoulder straps with load adjustor straps, a sternum strap, and a padded hipbelt.

At first glance the Granite Gear Wisp seems small, but it has the capacity and adjustability to swallow a lot of gear. I tested the Wisp with carry loads up to 26 pounds, and determined its maximum comfortable carry load capacity (for me) is 20 pounds, which is lower than the manufacturer’s claimed load capacity of 25 pounds. Above about 20 pounds, the virtual frame collapsed and put too much weight on my shoulders. The loaded pack adjusted to fit snugly to my back, giving good stability and low center of gravity.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Granite Gear calls the flap on the front of the pack a “helmet carrying flap.” It is faced with a fine stretchy mesh and is open on the sides. It can just as easily be used to carry a shovel, snowshoes or crampons (with cleat protection), a jacket, or a stuff sack full of assorted gear. Compression straps at the top allow it to be tightly secured to the pack.

The Granite Gear Wisp internal zippered hydration sleeve is located vertically against the backpanel. The sleeve also contains a thin foam back pad. A 2-liter bladder fits in the sleeve, but it is cumbersome to insert without wadding the back pad. The back pad can easily be removed to eliminate this problem and save a little weight (0.9 ounce). A full water bladder makes the backpanel more rounded and extends the pack’s center of gravity away from the body. There are no water bottle pockets or holders on this pack, so a hydration bladder is the only choice other than a hipbelt-mounted bottle sleeve.

The main compartment has a 7.5-inch extension collar with a drawstring closure. It is covered with a flat top pocket connected by two side-release buckles. When completely full, the pack is about 23 inches high, 12 inches wide, and 9 inches thick. It easily compresses down to accommodate smaller volume loads.

Granite Gear Wisp Pack - 3
Unfortunately, the hipbelt pockets are very shallow and tight, and will not accommodate more than an energy bar in each one. It would be wonderful if they were large enough to hold a digital camera and other assorted small items.

There are three outside pockets: a flat 10 inch by 10 inch top pocket, and two flat 6-inch hipbelt pockets. All have water-resistant zippers. There are two short daisy chains on the helmet sleeve and two webbing loops on the bottom corners.

I found the Wisp to be a very versatile pack and used it frequently for day hiking, trail running, snowshoeing, and backcountry skiing. It is right-sized to carry the needed gear for these activities, along with plenty of warm clothing. While trail running, the Wisp stuck to my body. The Wisp has enough weight and volume carrying capacity for an overnight or weekend trip using ultralight gear.

Durability

The Granite Gear Wisp is constructed of lightweight durable fabrics, with heavier fabrics in all wear areas. All of the webbing straps are 0.75-inch wide, and all stress points are reinforced with heavy bar tacking. Most seams are double stitched, with the raw edges covered with a seam binding. The Wisp is solidly constructed and built to last. It is durable enough for bushwhacking and scrambling, but don’t scrape it too hard against the granite!

Value

The Wisp is a solidly constructed versatile pack. If fits well and comfortably carries a decent load. With an MSRP of $90, the Wisp is fairly priced.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Add mesh water bottle pockets to the sides of the pack.
  • Enlarge the hipbelt pockets to make them more useful.
  • Add some depth to the top pocket to give it more capacity.

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack REVIEW

Small, dense, heavy loads carry well in this durable internal frame pack.

Introduction

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack - 1
Snowshoeing with the Mountainsmith Wraith in the Kachina Peaks Wilderness, Arizona.

Mountainsmith’s idea of a lightweight backpack is to reduce weight with lightweight materials without sacrificing features or carrying capacity. Their resulting Mountainlite line is known for high carrying capacities appropriate to their volumes, and features to suit discerning users. In this line, the 1600 cubic inch (26 L) Mountainsmith Wraith is sized right for lightweight day hikes or fast-packing trips. I tested the Wraith over four months of heavy use while hiking, fast-packing, skiing, mountain biking, trail running, snow shoeing, and as my daily commute bag.

What’s Good

  • Full featured harness and suspension offers exceptional fit and comfort
  • Delrin hoop frame is both supportive and flexible
  • Body hugging design perfect for fast packing pursuits
  • Six organizational pockets in addition to the main pack bag
  • Side panel compression straps do not interfere with side water bottle pockets
  • Frame does not interfere while wearing a cycling helmet

What’s Not So Good

  • Weight – the pockets and features, while functional, add unnecessary weight
  • Lacks necessary attachments to be a good snow sports pack
  • Water resistant zippers (YKK #8) are stiffer than most

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Internal frame, panel loading

• Fabric

Dimension Polyant VX-21 and high tenacity nylon

• Size

Fits 17 – 21 in (43 cm – 53 cm) torso lengths

• Volume

1600 ci (26 L)

• Weight

2 lbs 4.4 oz (1032 g) (Backpacking Light measured)

• Carrying Capacity

30 lbs (14 kg) or more as determined by Backpacking Light

• Volume To Weight Ratio

44 ci/oz

• MSRP

$130.00

Performance

Mountainsmith Wraith Backpack - 2
Mountainsmith Wraith (manufacturer’s photo).

At only 1600 cubic inches, the Mountainsmith Wraith is more limited by size than carrying capacity. In an attempt to determine the upper limit of carrying capacity, I filled the Wraith full of water bottles and dense gear, and still did not exceed its comfortable carrying capacity at 30 pounds. The harness – shoulder and sternum straps, load lifters, and padded hip belt with stabilizers – fits my 19″ torso very well. The Delrin hoop frame adds just enough support to transfer weight to the hips without being too stiff and encumbering mobility. Backpanel padding makes limited contact with your back at the shoulder blades and lumbar providing much better air flow than a full-contact design. The Mountainsmith Wraith is a super performer for active pursuits (tested for trail running, mountain biking, skiing, snowshoeing, fast packing, and rushing through an airport), thanks to its body hugging design and compression system. It has four side panel compression straps plus a heavy gauge front-panel shock cord to compress the load close into your back.

There are four pockets accessible from outside the pack, an internal hydration sleeve, and a small, mesh change pocket in addition to the main pack bag. The outside pockets include two side panel water bottle pockets, easily reachable while wearing the pack, a front bellowed pocket, and padded camera pocket. The front bellowed pocket (vertical zipper) can swallow a lot of gear as the bellows nearly double its size. The top “camera” pocket can hold a point-and-shoot camera or other small electronics, and closes with a water resistant zipper; as does the main pack bag. Both of the water resistant zippers (YKK #8) are stiff and show little promise of loosening up after four months testing. Mountainsmith completes the package with a uniquely designed front panel shock cord, which can be detached at any point and reconfigured to hold odd shaped items.

Four months of heavy and frequent use had no effect on the Dimension VX-21 and high tenacity nylon fabrics. Some very slight fraying, or fuzziness, is evident on the zipper pulls and even less evident on the front shock cord. YKK zippers and heavy stitching should last the life of the pack.

What’s Unique

For those of us who prefer drinking from a water bottle, side panel water bottle pockets are the ticket. Few packs have accessible water bottle pockets and lower side panel compression straps that work effectively and concurrently. Mountainsmith nailed their design by running the compression straps partly behind the forward slanting side pockets, leaving the adjustable ladder locks exposed. The pockets are completely accessible while wearing the pack, even when the lower side panel compression straps are fully cinched. And these straps are placed low enough on the pack to do their job right.

Recommendations for Improvement

The Wraith falls short in its ability to carry winter gear. True, it does have a single ice axe loop and skis can be attached to the side panel compression straps, but it does not hold snowshoes and snowboards easily. If Mountainsmith added four D-rings on the front panel, to mirror the location of the side-panel compression straps, compression straps could be attached to secure larger items to the back panel.

The padding in the padded “camera” pocket could be made removable. There are times when it is not needed. Removing it when it’s not needed would save weight and add a little volume to that pocket.

Macpac 35 Amp Backpack REVIEW

Light materials with rugged durability, convenient gear access, and comfort for fastpacking.

Overview

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 1
Macpac 35 Amp.

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 2
Macpac 35 Amp in use.

The Macpac 35 Amp pack is aimed at adventure racers. It carries well and has lots of great features: two mesh water bottle pockets, mesh stuff-it pocket, top lid, and two very convenient ‘puku’ pouches in front. The removable hipbelt, frame, and puku pouches allow adventure racers and fast packers to adjust the Amp 35 to suit their needs. The rugged construction makes it great for rough treatment and off trail work but pushes it towards the heavier end of lightweight packs. As is typical with Macpac packs it is beautifully detailed and well thought out. The 35 Amp is a wonderfully versatile pack that carries loads up to 33 pounds (15 kg) really well.

In Brief

  • This pack has more innovative features than I have ever seen in a pack
  • Practical mesh ‘puku’ pouches mounted over the stomach on a bungee system provide quick access to trail essentials
  • Removable three-piece composite foam/PE frame sheet that can be used as a minimalist sleeping mat
  • Whistle built into the sternum strap clip
  • Nine pockets compliment the main pack bag to organize gear and make it quickly accessible
  • Drain holes in base and rear pockets
  • Harness and hipbelt provide adequate comfort for extending the carrying capacity beyond the frame’s ability
  • Water options include two side-panel, mesh water bottle pockets, hydration bladder pocket (inside), and four bungee drink bottle holders on the shoulder straps and front panel

Specifications

โ€ข Backpack Style

Removable framesheet, top loading with top pocket

โ€ข Fabric Description

Combination of 210d ripstop and 420d 6.6 fiber nylon. Waterproofed with a polyurethane coating. The heavier fabric is used on the high wear base, front, lid, and straps while the lighter ripstop is used on the sides. The pockets on the lid, sides, rear, and front are made of a tough nylon mesh. Comfortable open-weave, high-friction wicking material against the wearer’s back and on the straps.

โ€ข Sizes
two sizes, size 2 tested

Sizes Torso Length* (in) Torso Length (cm)
2 12-17 31-42
3 15-19 37-48
*Torso length is measured from the shoulder attachment points to the center of the hipbelt.

โ€ข Volume

nominally 2140 ci (35 L)

โ€ข Weight
size 2 tested

Size Backpacking Light measuredย ozย (g) Manufacturer Specificationย ozย (g)
2 43.7 (1240) 37 (1050)
3 37 (1050)

โ€ข Weight of Components
size 2 tested

Backpacking Light measured oz g
Main pack 31.1 882
Removable frame pad 4.9 140
Hip belt 5.4 152
Puku pouches 2.3 66
Total Weight 43.7 1240

โ€ข Volume To Weight Ratio

69 ci/oz size L (Based on 2140 ci, and Backpacking Light measured weight of 43.7 oz)

โ€ข Load Carrying Capacity

33 lb (15 kg) as determined by Backpacking Light although there is no sharp cut-off in comfort; none listed by manufacturer

โ€ข Carry Load To Pack Weight Performance Ratio

12 (Based on Backpacking Light measured carrying capacity of 33 lbs, and measured weight of 43.7 oz)

โ€ข Model Year

2004

โ€ข MSRP

$203 USD , $299 NZD

โ€ข Manufacturer Contact Information

www.macpac.co.nz

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 3Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 4

Removable framesheet.

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 5
Macpac 35 Amp: three sections of framesheet and S-shaped shoulder straps.

The framesheet is an innovative three-panel design. There is a large central panel and two narrower side panels. The framesheets consist of 0.2-inch (5 mm) thick closed cell foam glued to a 0.04-inch (1 mm) thick sheet of stiff plastic. The three panels run the full length of the user’s back. These three pieces fit into tight vertical pockets to form a three-panel frame. When loaded with a small volume, the side panels hinge forward to form a box frame. When the pack is fully loaded, they flatten out to allow the pack to take more volume.

The framesheet provides very good protection against badly packed objects poking into your back. The large middle section of the frame can be removed to save weight. It also forms a useful minimalist sleeping pad; although at 21 inches (53 cm) long and 13 inches (33 cm) wide it is only for hard-core lightweight or emergency use. It does however make a practical foot pad for use with a short sleeping pad.

I took the pack for an eight-day lightweight trip without needing to strap anything but my crampons to the outside. I left the central framesheet at home to save weight because I felt the fully loaded pack would be stiff enough; I regretted that. Starting the trip with 33 pounds (15 kg), without the frame, I found the pack uncomfortable on my back. This appeared to be because the pack was pulling away from my back, especially with a full load and a tarp and crampons loaded well to the rear of the pack. Repacking on subsequent trips, and including the central framesheet, I found the pack could comfortably carry 33 pounds (15 kg), but not much beyond that. Frame collapse causes discomfort beyond 33 pounds, and while the harness remains comfortable upwards of 51 pounds, nearly all the weight is carried by the shoulders at this point. Those who don’t mind carrying weight on their shoulders will find they can extend the carrying capacity of this pack.

Like most Macpacs, the hipbelt pivots on a single point at the base of the back. This allows the hips to swing independently of the load and the back to stretch a little. The framesheet directs the load to this pivot point, which makes the pack comfortable with larger loads. With the framesheet removed, the hipbelt supports very little weight. Because of this, I found that if I remove the framesheet I should also remove the hipbelt and just use the simple webbing waist strap that is provided.

The pack can be compressed very nicely for small loads using the compression straps, three-piece frame, and shock cords on the side and back pockets. However, the small lid and short collars make it difficult to extend much beyond the nominal 35 liter (2140 ci) volume, although the large side and rear mesh pockets do allow for some extra gear to be strapped on the outside. It would be nice if the Macpac 35 Amp were a little taller and thinner for packing and carrying larger loads.

The Macpac 35 Amp has wide, comfortable S-shaped shoulder straps with a solid sternum strap.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Macpac 35Amp Internal Frame Backpack - 6
Mesh ‘puku’ pouches are great for easy access while on the move.

The pack has two great little ‘puku’ pouches that attach by bungees across the front. (Puku is the Maori word for belly.) They provide ideal access on-the-move to food, GPS, compass, knife, tape, and sunblock. They have a cool little central hook that joins the two bungees together. The pukus are at just the right height for easy access and unlike pouches hung from the hip belt, they don’t interfere with my thighs when stepping up. They are quick to unclip when taking the pack off but they are difficult to remove from the pack completely.

This pack has pockets everywhere – the main compartment, two lid mesh pockets, a zippered rear pocket, three mesh rear pockets, and a bladder pocket inside, in addition to the two puku pockets. This is wonderful for organizing gear and having a pocket for everything. The downside is that it adds considerably to the weight of the pack.

The pack has a rear pocket with a waterproof zipper. I have found this pocket wonderful for holding a wet or icy tarp or small tent. The tarp can be left as the last item to pack in the morning. Once inside the pocket the tarp is protected from damage. The pocket even has a drain hole in the base to let out water that accumulates.

There are bungee bottle holders mounted on each of the shoulder straps and on the rear of the pack.

The pack carries two ice axes nicely. Crampons can be strapped to the bungees on the outside, though there is not a high-wear crampon patch to protect pack fabric.

Durability

The pack uses an intelligent mix of 420 denier nylon on the exposed areas and 210 denier nylon elsewhere. While these materials push the weight of the 35 Amp up above that of earlier Macpac adventure racing packs, they have improved the durability significantly. Over nine months of hard use the only damage to the test pack is one small hole in the lighter weight material.

The mesh is surprisingly tough, and despite many hours pushing through rough scrub and carrying crampons on the bungees outside, no damage has occurred to the rear mesh pockets.

Overall, the 35 Amp is solidly built with great detailing to reduce wear and damage.

Value

With its myriad of features and practical design the Macpac 35 Amp is good value.

Recommendations for Improvement

While all the cool features of the 35 Amp make for a really fun pack, I would really like to see a stripped down version that is significantly lighter.

The puku pockets are extremely convenient to use, but they are very difficult to remove from the pack. Macpac should consider improving the attachment system for these pockets.

Almost to Katahdin: Appalachian Trail Section Hike to the Kennebec River

Section hiking progress towards the 2000 mile patch by Don “Photon” and Dave Johnston.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 1
Don (left) and Dave (right) Johnston at the trail head, summer 2004.

Maine! The final state in Don’s (Photon) 15-year quest to hike the Appalachian Trail (AT) one piece at a time. The New Hampshire-Maine state line is a touchstone for through-hikers and section-hikers alike, one that hints that this 2,174 mile quest might, in fact, have an end. Accompanied by my brother Dave, I not only crossed this line, but pushed another 130 miles into the heart of Maine, literally to within sight of the climax: Katahdin!

Over the past 15 years I have pushed slowly up the trail, using spring vacation until I was so far north that spring hadn’t actually arrived yet. Two years ago I switched to summer hikes and, accompanied by Dave, completed the section from the Long Trail in Vermont through the White Mountains to Gorham, New Hampshire. This year we continued the journey over the last of the Whites in the Mahoosuc Range, over Saddleback and the Bigelows, to the Kennebec River in central Maine.

The maps for this section show that the trail will retain the rugged character it assumed at Mt. Moosilauke at the south end of the White Mountains. However, in this section the tempo will be increased as the ups and downs are closer together. Due to shelter spacing, we were faced with a choice between short 8-hour days and long 14 or more hour days. We decided to do this 147-mile section in 12 short days with three resupplies to allow time for photography and to keep the pack weight down through this rugged section.

After driving about 800 miles, Dave and I arrived at the endpoint of our trip at the Kennebec River to drop off a car. River and Trails Northeast, which also provides the ferry service across the Kennebec, graciously provides private, monitored parking. While transferring my gear to Dave’s car, I discovered that I did not have the resupply package I intended to drop off on the way back down to Gorham. Fortunately, the Rivers and Trails store is well equipped for through-hiker style resupply and I cobbled together a 3-day supply of food with minimal compromise. We drove down to Gorham to spend a night at the well-known Hikers Paradise. The next day we were dropped off at the AT crossing of Route 2 in the valley between the Carter Range and the Mahoosucs where we had ended our section two years before. The hike was on.

Segment 1: Route 2 to Grafton Notch

We set out with 21-pound (Don) and 25-pound (Dave) packs, including food, water and fuel. My pack had more cottage industry gear and thus was the lighter of the two. Dave’s pack held better photo gear, including a full height tripod. For footwear, I was trying out Salomon Tech Amphibians, a mesh river shoe, while Dave used Lowa Renegade Gore-Tex lightweight boots. We both brought trekking poles capable of supporting our full weight to save our middle-aged knees on the expected steep ledgey descents.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 2
There were a lot of photogenic spots along the first portion of our trip. Here is a rare photo of Dave (the photography nut) at a rest stop on 3,565 foot Mt. Success.

Despite our late start on this 12-mile day, we did not hurry, pausing for photography including the obligatory tripod shot at the trailhead sign at the start of the climb. The weather had been wet in recent weeks, and there was a lot of water on the trail. This section is characterized by frequent wet areas traversed by bog bridges in varying stages of age and condition. As I walked over a floating bog bridge, it sunk below the surface and I had wet feet. Not unexpected and it felt nice and cool. The mesh river shoes do not retain water and my socks started drying after I emerged on the other side. I had with me Gore-Tex socks to put on in the event I needed to keep my feet warm in cold rain and wind but never needed them – this would turn out to be the wettest my feet got the entire hike.

We climbed steadily to Mt. Hayes and the first of many views. The weather was consistently warm (but not hot) and muggy, so the views were generally hazy and unremarkable. Still, there are few better rewards in hiking than summiting out above the forest, and we had a fair amount of that. After about eight miles, we reached Page Pond. The trail traverses the outlet over a 60-foot long beaver dam, just inches above water level, providing the unusual sensation of walking across the surface of the lake. We continued to climb progressively higher bumps, reaching the subalpine zone, then undulating between forest and subalpine scenery. We arrived at the shelter at Gentian Pond by 5:30 p.m. At dusk, we watched a moose cow feed in the pond as her two calves cavorted on the far shore. This was a fairly sedate day, although my notes say the trail was rugged. It turned out be just a warm-up for what was to come.

Our second day was sunny and warm. There were many short rugged ups and downs plus the high peaks of Mt. Success, Mt. Carlo, and the Goose Eye (West, East, and North) peaks. The peaks were clear like the balds down south. Although we hadn’t yet hit 4,000 feet, the peaks extend well into the krummholz zone and provide both subalpine scenery and decent views. The combination of the moist landscape and warm weather encouraged tiny flies, which loved to buzz in a small swarm near our sweaty faces. From the West peak of Goose Eye, we could see the route the trail would travel for miles ahead. We spotted Mahoosuc Notch, Mahoosuc Arm, Old Speck, Baldpate, and beyond – the next two days of the route. Along the way, we crossed the state line into Maine, a landmark noted by numerous northbounder’s notes in the log at the next shelter.

We arrived at Full Goose Shelter early and had time for reading, a nap, and battles with bold and greedy ground squirrels before dinner. This was only a 10-mile day, but it put us on the edge of the renowned Mahoosuc Notch for the next day. Several southbound hikers (self-proclaimed “slackers” hiking for the fun of it, of all things) arrived late in the day and we exchanged trail information. They said we would have fun going through the Notch.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 3
Don negotiating boulders in Mahoosuc Notch.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 4
Baldpate Lean-to.

Mahoosuc Notch. I have heard tales of it for many years. A 1,500-foot deep, narrow canyon with a bottom consisting of huge, angular boulders sloughed off the cliffs above. The trail travels about a mile through the notch, following a tiny watercourse that can occasionally be heard gurgling under the boulders. The air trapped in the notch is distinctly cool and even in August we saw several patches of ice in the deep crannies between boulders. The reported time to travel through it seems to range from one to three hours. I feared a tough time ahead, having gone through Devil’s Gulch on the Long Trail. However, I have found most of the famous sections on the AT are easier than expected. Since we were unsure of how long it would take us to traverse Mahoosuc Notch, we rose early to make sure we would meet the ride that we had arranged to meet us in Grafton Notch. We walked through a beautiful alpine meadow between the peaks of Fulling Mill Mountain before plunging into the west end of the notch. After collapsing and stowing our hiking poles in our packs we headed in. The joys of a light pack were evident. The notch required dynamic rock hopping, occasional hand-over-hand scrambling, confident footwork, and squeezes through crevices. While not able to bounce through as adroitly as we would have without a pack, it was clear that it would have been more difficult with larger, heavier packs. At every juncture there were multiple ways through and we found that choosing high routes was the easiest. We were through in an hour. As the southbounders had predicted, it was more fun than intimidating. The reputation of Mahoosuc Notch was probably earned among old-style backpackers with bulky 50-pound packs.

The climb up the other side to Mahoosuc Arm, on the other hand, lived up to its reputation as a long, steep climb with plenty of scrambling. This was a quintessential White Mountains trail: straight up the side of the mountain over uneven rocks, ledges and erosion-exposed roots, 1,250 feet in a mile. We rested at Speck Pond, pushed up Old Speck Mountain, finally reaching 4,000 feet. We were well ahead of schedule, and with only the descent to Grafton Notch left we had plenty of time to take the side trail to the lookout tower on top where we found great views of the back of the notch, the Goose Eye peaks, and ahead to Baldpate.

During the 2,500 foot descent, the overcast thickened and we got our first drops of rain. We descended to the road in Grafton Notch by 3:00 p.m. and had 3 hours before our scheduled pick up by Stony Brook Campground staff. The schedule called for us to stay at Stony Brook for the night, pick up our resupply, and go 16 miles to Hall Mountain Lean-to the next day. With the extra time in our schedule for the afternoon, we began to hatch another plan. If we could hitch a ride to Stony Brook and convince them to return us to Grafton Notch a day earlier than arranged, we could hike the 2.5 miles to Baldpate Lean-to instead of staying in the campground. This would make the next day’s mileage more reasonable. Almost immediately, a day hiker returned to the parking lot and offered us a ride. Once at the campground, we paid for our reserved night there, picked up the resupply, and the staff gave us a ride back to the trail at Grafton Notch. We arrived at Baldpate Lean-to before dark and before the rain got serious. It rained hard overnight but stopped by the morning. There were a number of people (including a Maine Appalachian Trail Club work crew finishing their tour and heading into town) at this shelter.

Segment 2: Grafton Notch to Route 4 (Rangeley)

I was beginning to really appreciate the advantages of my pack when staying in shelters. On this trip, I am using my Gearskin from Moonbow Gear. This pack unbuckles and opens up flat, forming my nearly-full-length bed for the night. Gearskins can be customized to your preferences at the time you order. Mine has been customized so it is essentially a pad sleeve with hip belt and shoulder straps attached. When lying down, the hip belt is located in the small of my back providing support right where it is needed and the shoulder straps are spread wide so they are to the sides. I sleep well on this and the support of the hip belt in the small of my back has prevented the back pain I used to get when sleeping on totally flat pads. My sleeping pad in the sleeve also serves as the pack frame when the Gearskin is folded and buckled into a pack form.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 5
Don on a ledge on Cascade Mountain with his Moonbow Gearskin pack. Mt. Washington and Mt. Madison in the background.

This has advantages in shelters because you do not need to find a place to hang your pack where it will be out of the way. With the pack opened up to form a bed my sleeping bag gets placed over it and all other gear forms a pillow. Inside the pack I had three sacks plus a tent. Food bag on the bottom, sleeping bag next, and everything else in a sack on the top followed by the lightweight tent. This is a very efficient system that saves time in packing up. Packing now consists of stuffing the sleeping bag in its sack, folding and buckling the pack, putting the food bag with fuel bottle and any extra water I am carrying in the bottom, sleeping bag sack next, then the top sack containing everything else, followed by the tent, and finally buckling the top shut. My pack-up time has dropped a full 30 minutes since I started using the Gearskin pack.

We climbed to Baldpate Mountain in shifting, cloudy remnants of last night’s storm. The West Peak was not treeless but we could see ahead to the well-named East Peak of Baldpate, a depilated dome that would be more at home in the Adirondacks than the Whites. Clouds blew and roiled in the col between the peaks and occasionally pushed up over the top like vaporous glaciers. The clouds came and went as we traversed the col and provided a variety of dramatic scenes. The final ascent over slabs was steep and wet enough that shoes tended to slip on the rock. When we got there the top was socked in, providing that sense of other-worldly isolation that in some ways is superior to unlimited views. Even so, the summit cleared before we left and revealed a sea of clouds punctuated by numerous ridges poking above the clouds. This scenic hat trick on Baldpate was one of the highlights of the trip.

The weather provided more scenic drama and made it an interesting morning as the clouds cleared. The terrain eased off for the rest of the day and we walked mostly in woods. Not long after Surplus Pond I heard some noise on the trail about 10 feet ahead that seemed odd, and thinking it was some animal I stopped to look more closely. The noise seemed to be near the base of a tree, and as I watched, the base of the tree splintered and the tree fell. This is the second time a tree has fallen near us on hikes.

At Hall Mountain Lean-to I took the side trail to the “Gun Sight” and could see the view across Sawyer Notch to Moody Mountain and Old Blue. Tomorrow looked like a more challenging day. For me the long climbs up Moody Mountain and Old Blue Mountain were as tough as anything we had seen so far. In one place, the route up was in the process of sliding down the mountain, adding a little more danger and challenge to the ascent. My left knee was beginning to bother me a little and looked a little swollen. We were mostly traveling through woods where trees blocked our views, even at the top of 3,600 foot Old Blue. The trail got more interesting in the second half of the day with a long section of bog walk and a stand of never-logged red spruce. The highest peak of Bemis Mountain was unspectacular, but its lower peaks (Third, Second, and First Peaks) were very scenic. Rock slabs and a variety of subalpine vegetation along the trail made interesting photographs. We stopped for the night at Bemis Mountain Lean-to.

The next morning we encountered some trail magic while crossing Route 17 where cans of Coke and Oreos in a cooler were provided to hikers. The rest of the day was a conspicuously low elevation jaunt past ponds and bogs. The largest of these, Long Pond, has numerous camps and cabins along one shore but is apparently only served by float plane, one of which we witnessed. The trail passes a great lunch spot with some tables on a sand beach at waterline facing out on the water. Later, we passed a classic north woods peat bog with pitcher plants. Although the day was by no means boring, we cruised the 17.7 miles to Route 4 easily. We caught a ride into Rangeley for our resupply and our night at Gull Pond Lodge. Proprietor Bob O’Brien’s converted house on the shore of Gull Pond is hiker-friendly to the extreme. Bob really takes care of hikers, providing transportation wherever and whenever it is needed and setting out a vast selection of breakfast foods in the morning. This is an almost-obligatory waypoint for through-hikers, with good reason.

Segment 3: Route 4 to Route 27 (Stratton)

In the morning, we began our climb of Saddleback Mountain under heavy overcast. We took a short side trip to Piazza Rock. This huge slab jutting out from the side of a ridge might indeed serve as a public square – if there were a town there, that is. From the wear at the edge on top many have stood on the brink and pondered the drop to the forest below.

From Piazza, the trail climbed steadily past scenic Ethel Pond and Eddy Pond, and then steepened for the 1,700 foot climb to the top of 4,120 foot Saddleback. Because of the threatening rain, Dave hiked without a shirt, drawing comments from day hikers. Even though it never rained this proved to be a good strategy, as the air was warm and muggy even above tree line. This being a Saturday there were many people on the mountain, some of whom were with a group getting oriented for a survey of alpine plants. They were accompanied by the MATC (Maine Appalachian Trail Club), steward for the section, who pointed out where the proposed wind farm would be located, towering 400 feet above the summits in the middle distance. He was unreserved in his condemnation of the project.

The summit of Saddleback is a true alpine climate. The rounded ridge top stays above tree line for more than a mile before dipping into a col and then rising again to The Horn. While we were on Saddleback the clouds rose and the wind began to pick up. We learned that a front was supposed to head in from the northwest, bringing thunderstorms and “damaging winds.” It was tempting to go slow and take in the view and alpine details, but we had two more treeless peaks to cover. We picked up the pace but by the time we reached The Horn the wind was blowing steadily at around 30 mph. It was still warm and there was no evidence of an organized storm so we took pictures and moved on toward Saddleback Junior. When we got above treeline on Junior, there was an obvious front moving toward us so we hustled off and down to Poplar Ridge Lean-to.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 6
Don on the summit of Saddleback Mountain wearing his infamous fishnet shirt.

The caretaker for this shelter has been maintaining it for something like 40 years and has placed there a number of laminated sheets detailing the history of the shelter and answers to questions hikers had written in the shelter log. The shelter floor is made from baseball bat-diameter saplings. Back when the shelter was built, the first hikers of the season would spread spruce boughs across it to make a comfortable sleeping surface. These days, hikers bring their own sleeping pads. There were a number of hikers here for the night and one pair was having trouble with the cleaning wire for their white gas stove which could not be reinserted. Many of us were familiar with the process but no one could get the wire back in so they used their fuel with another hiker’s stove.

The rain held off until most of us had eaten dinner then it came down in buckets and the winds howled. Even in this relatively sheltered location, some rain was blown into the shelter. It was windy and rainy all night.

The rain stopped about 6:00 a.m. and the sky soon cleared. We descended to Orbeton Stream at 1,500 feet and then immediately began climbing back above 3,000 feet. We passed several scenic mountain streams on the way up Lone Mountain on a nicely graded trail (for the northeast US that is.) We took a side trail 1.7 miles to 4,049-foot Mt. Abraham, a long, exposed ridge perpendicular to the main ridgeline. Mt. Abraham is essentially a pile of talus reminiscent of Mt. Washington and the Northern Presidentials. This was the only time on the trip where my mesh Salomon shoes were at a disadvantage over more thickly sided leather shoes. I had to be careful to keep from wedging the side of my foot between rocks. Mt. Abraham offered 360-degree views, including Sugarloaf ahead, and the Saddleback group behind us.

Our original plan was to stop at Spaulding Mountain Lean-to after just 11.4 miles, leaving 13.5 miles for the next day. However, the trail logs at the previous shelter reported that the Sugarloaf USA ski building on top of Sugarloaf (the second highest mountain in Maine) was open to hikers. This was about 3 miles past Spaulding Mountain Lean-to and would reduce our mileage to the road the next day. The only disadvantage reported was the lack of water on Sugarloaf. We stopped at Spaulding Mountain lean-to and loaded up on 2 liters of water each. The climb up 4,000-foot Spaulding Mountain with this extra weight was noticeably more difficult.

After climbing Spaulding Mountain, we reached the plaque commemorating the completion of the last segment of the AT by the CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps formed in 1933 by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to save the eroding forests and the urban unemployed) at this spot. My energy level was running flat. The rugged trail footing had taken its toll. I ate the last of my food for the day and drank my last water just prior to the climb up Sugarloaf. But the extra effort was worth it. This was a spectacular place. The building is a large, multi-level hexagonal chalet that was originally the terminus of the summit gondola. The gondola has been abandoned and the building is just used as a warming “hut” in the winter. The door was open, with just a sign asking hikers to keep the place clean. There was electricity and lights, and a toaster and microwave had been rigged. The floor-to-ceiling windows offered 270 degrees of view and several picnic tables offered a sleeping alternative to the oiled wood floors. As we watched the sun set over Crocker Mountain, we cooked dinner and relaxed.

Several of us decided to spend the night outside on the concrete porch. Not surprisingly on a 4,200-foot summit, it was quite windy and the wind didn’t die down in the evening; it got stronger overnight. The temperature was warm but the wind made exposed sleeping difficult. It was strong enough to blow light sleeping gear off the porch immediately if not anchored to something full time. The railing stopped Dave’s down bag from sailing off at one point. Three of us tried sleeping outside. One guy went in after a few hours because the wind was getting in his bag and was chilling him. Neither of us had that problem; in fact we were on the hot side. I had my 17-ounce Bozeman Mountain Works Arc-X quilt and Dave had his new 21-ounce Marmot Hydrogen bag, both with Pertex Quantum shells.

I wore Patagonia Capilene boxers, a Patagonia Dragonfly pullover, and a 1.7 ounce balaclava and Dave wore just a Dragonfly and shorts in his hooded bag. Despite the wind whipping my quilt around constantly, I slept very warm until dawn with the Dragonfly’s hood on my head. I sealed the quilt to my neck with the neck draw cord and had the quilt’s straps run under my sleeping pad fastening it down to keep out drafts and keep it from blowing away. I had a strap from my pack attached to a picnic table just in case the weight of all the gear in my pack pillow was not enough to keep everything in place when I got up during the night. I was impressed with the wind resistance of my quilt, I was not feeling any drafts. The Dragonfly hood was just what was needed to protect my head from the chilling wind. Despite the wind, we had heavy dew on the exterior of our bags, but it didn’t penetrate and evaporated shortly after we went back inside.

The next day we descended steeply to the Carrabassett River at 2,100 feet and then back up to 4,000 feet over the South and North Peaks of Crocker Mountain. The only notable scenery was off trail at a pond in Crocker Cirque. Reached from the Crocker Cirque Campsite side trail, the pond is surrounded on three sides by the steep ridges of Crocker Mountain. The weather was hot for the trip over the mountain and 2,600 feet back down to the road. We caught a ride to Stratton and had a pleasant stay at the White Wolf Inn, a regular small town motel that attracts hikers with special pricing. The White Wolf’s restaurant had uncommonly good and unusual food: we had breaded fiddlehead ferns, a main dish garnished with fresh local flowers, and rhubarb pie.

Segment 4: Route 27 to Kennebec River

It took a while to hitch a ride back to the trail in the morning, but it didn’t matter since we did not have a long day planned. We encountered a pair of day hikers at the crossing of a dirt road who asked to look at our map. As we resumed our hike, I leapt aside when I noticed a yellow jacket nest in the ground by spotting the guard bee on the ground near a hole. We managed to avoid getting stung at this one. At Horns Pond, we came upon a few hikers and the caretaker for the area. The conversation was about lightweight backpacking, and I was asked about my pack. I shared some information with the caretaker and eventually we moved on.

The Bigelow Range is justifiably well-known for its excellent alpine scenery and as the last high range before Katahdin. Horns Pond is a large, beautiful tarn at the base of The Horns (not to be confused with The Horn on Saddleback), a pair of peaks that were not named for their resemblance to musical instruments. Across a long col is 4,145-foot West Peak which is separated by a much narrower col from 4,088-foot Avery Peak. We planned to get to Avery Memorial campsite in the 3,800-foot col between the two high peaks at a minimum that day, but would continue to Safford Notch campsite if there was time.

Almost There: Appalachian Trail Section Hike Trip Report - 7
Don reviewing the day’s pictures at Avery Memorial Campsite. We set up the Nomad 2-4-2 to wait out a storm before climbing above timberline on Mt Avery.

As we climbed the South Horn, we began to hear thunder. On top we could see that a significant storm was passing through the valley just to the north. As we climbed West Peak, it looked like there was another storm headed right down our ridgeline. For safety we needed to be off the peaks. With the storm approaching, we descended to Avery Memorial campsite and set up our tent at 3:15 p.m. as the wind and rain began. The storm passed in about an hour, so we continued on and climbed Avery Peak. The storm had cleared the air and the view was about the clearest of the trip, with interesting remnants of storm clouds billowing all around. While not certain, we thought we could see Katahdin. We lingered on top, enjoying the changing view and taking pictures, until after 6:00 p.m.. We had only 2 miles and 1,500 feet to descend to Safford Notch, but this turned out to be the single most annoying section of the trip. The footing was awful and the trail poorly routed. We arrived at Safford Notch campsite at dusk – 1.5 hours for a downhill 2 miles.

There was a small Scout troop at the campsite and they assisted us in locating an available site. Later, one of the leaders came down to tell us to feel free to tell the Scouts in a nearby tent to quiet down if they bothered us. Somehow this turned into a conversation about lightweight backpacking, and I was asked to show some of our gear to the Scouts in the morning.

As it turned out my brother thought he had left his glasses up on the peak so he went back up and down the awful trail in the morning. (As it happens, the glasses were caught up in the Dragonfly in his pack all along, but this made for an invigorating early morning hike to the cloud-shrouded summit.) This gave me plenty of time to give an impromptu lightweight backpacking clinic to the Scouts. Most of our gear was of interest with many questions about our packs, Nomad 2-4-2 tent, Aqua Mira water treatment, first aid kit, emergency kit, flash lights, etc. Also covered was food and trail hygiene. Gear was passed around and they were impressed with the lightness of individual things like the Evernew pot with a pie plate foil lid and a bowl cover for storage instead of a stuff sack. They wanted in particular to see my alcohol stove in operation. There were many exclamations of awe as the water quickly boiled. With the water boiling, one of the hungry Scouts retrieved his oatmeal so the hot water would not go to waste. When Dave returned, the clinic ended and we packed up.

Little Bigelow Mountain only rises to 3,000 feet but has numerous views along its 1 1/2 mile ridgetop. As we descended, the trail turned into a perfectly groomed footpath and soon we were cruising for the first time. The next 7 miles to West Carry Pond Lean-to consisted of gentle rises over low mountains and skirting lakes. The crossing of Long Falls Dam Road marks the passing of 2,000 miles from Springer, and “2000 MI.” is painted in the center of the road – less than 200 miles to Katahdin. I am almost there.

We got to West Carry Pond Lean-to in the middle of the afternoon and watched the squirrels conduct their own pre-Olympics. At this pond cedar trees suddenly became ubiquitous at the shore and in wet areas. We hadn’t seen any cedar previously, but they were increasingly common as we continued north.

In the morning, we spent some time exploring Arnold Point, where Benedict Arnold and his army crossed the pond while on their way to invade Quebec during the Revolutionary War. This section of the AT follows part of the route of the “Arnold Trail” where Arnold’s army used East, Middle, and West Carry Ponds to portage between the Kennebec and Dead rivers. The portage was a disaster, with the men sinking in bogs up to their waists while carrying 400 pound green wood bateaux. Fortunately, the trail has been improved considerably since then.

The whole day was a cruise past several ponds and low elevation forest. In a wetland next to East Carry, we saw both pitcher plants and sundew. We photographed some of the waterfalls along Pierce Pond Stream as we descended to the Kennebec River. With only a few miles to go, we didn’t see the yellow jacket nest in the ground and the guard bee expressed his painful displeasure on Dave’s leg.

We arrived at the crossing point on the Kennebec a little after 2:30 p.m. The ferry service is free and exists because the Kennebec is not a free flowing river. It rises and falls quickly and unpredictably with the water releases from the power generating dams upstream. Hikers have died trying to ford this river here due to the rapid rise of the river and the powerful current that comes with that. The ferry is actually a canoe. After we signaled, the canoe came across and picked us up. When the canoe first landed, there were lots of exposed rocks on our side of the river. But as we put on PFDs and loaded the boat, the river rose. We got in as the rocks disappeared. As we crossed, the river continued to rise and when we hit the main current just past the middle of the river, we were soon pointed nearly straight upstream just barely making headway crossing the current. Even though the water is clear, the bottom of the river was not visible. I was glad we had not tried to float across on inflatable pool rings as we had heard someone had done recently (with two kids!). That misadventure caused quite a stir and scrambling of rescue personnel to be on hand just in case it didn’t work out.

With a short walk to the road, our trip was over. I have completed one more piece of the Appalachian Trail. Katahdin is now no longer just an abstraction at a little over 150 miles away. I wanted to call work and say I was not coming back… I am almost there.

Gear Lists

Don โ€œPhotonโ€ Johnstonโ€™s Gear List
Clothing Worn While Hiking Ounces Grams
Mesh long sleeve shirt – REI Sonora t-shirt, no longer made 4.5 128
Patagonia Baggie Lights 3.9 111
SmartWool Light hikers 2.8 79
REI Spring Gaiters 2.1 60
Solomon Tech Amphibians 27 765
Watch Casio Alti-Thermo 1.8 51
Wallet Ziploc 1.3 37
Hat Patagonia – Vented Broadbill Hat 3.3 94
Hip pads 1.1 31
Other Items Worn or Carried Ounces Grams
Leki Poles -with Ultrapod attached 23.2 658
Other Clothing Ounces Grams
Western Mountaineering Flight Down Jacket (stored with sleeping bag) 10.9 309
Patagonia Dragonfly pullover windshirt 3.2 91
Nylon side zip pants 4.8 136
Silk weight boxers 2.8 79
Socks – Fox River VVS or SmartWool Light Hiking 2.8 79
Gortex socks for use with Salomon Tech Amphibians 3.5 99
Silnlyon chaps 2.6 74
Disposable shower cap 0.1 3
Disposable Poncho 2.0 57
Bozeman Mountain Works SpinPoncho LITE with added arms 8.4 238
Head net 0.8 23
Sunglasses – Sporteyz in Oakley cleaning case 0.6 17
Zephur jacket – Patagonia 2000 model 8.8 249
Capilene Balaclava – Patagonia for hiking in cold 1.7 48
Shelter and Sleep System Ounces Grams
Nomad 2-4-2 29.4 833
Mt Washington Pad (Red) 7.5 213
Mt Washington Pad (Red) 8.2 232
Bozeman Mountain Works Quantum Arc X quilt in Turkey bag 17.4 493
Packing Ounces Grams
MoonBow Gearskin 24.7 700
MoonBow Pack Cover 2.2 62
Cooking and Water Ounces Grams
High performance alcohol stove 2.3 65
Aluminum pie pan bottom 0.1 3
Alcohol fuel bottle 0.8 23
Evernew Titanium 0.9 liter pot with EZ foil lid 3.7 105
Drinking cup – plastic soup cup 0.8 23
Food stuff sack 1.4 40
Kitchen Bag: Lexan spoon, toothpaste, tooth brush, lighter, Ibuprofen, water bag cap with holes for washing up 6.0 170
Spectra 825 bear bag rope, 50 feet minimum 1.0 28
Water bottle 2.6 74
Platypus water carrier 2.9 82
Glad Stand and Zip bag – water scoop and wash bag 0.6 17
Aquamira – in painters mesh bag and Ziploc baggie 2.3 65
1 liter soda bottle – for carrying water with Gearskin pack 1.5 43
Other Essentials Ounces Grams
Camera Olympus Stylus 400 Digital with battery 7.0 198
Spare battery in plastic bag 1.3 37
Spare battery (third spare camera battery) 1.2 34
ARC AAA LED Flashlight (0.8 oz, adds to kitchen bag weight) 0 0
First Aid Kit: tweezers, wet proof tape, Pro tick remedy, Neosporin Antibiotic ointment, various band-aids and butterfly closures, prescription Cortisone cream, 0.5ย ozย alcohol, 4 Imodium, 4 Benehist, 4 Compeed, folding scissors (0.4 oz) 3.7 105
Repair/Emergency kit: water proof matches, nylon repair tape, needle and thread, whistle, platypus patches 1.6 45
Toilet trowel 0.7 20
Toilet paper – 1ย ozย per week 1.0 28
Hand sanitizer 0.9 26
Bag to contain trowel, paper, and sanitizer 0.2 6
Pack towel 0.5 14
Thermometer 0.8 23
Notepad – waterproof journal paper, 0.1ย ozย for 3 sheets 0.4 11
Pen 0.2 6
Maps 5.2 147
Insect repellent 1.5 43
Blistex or Banana Boat – Use as sunscreen for hands 0.4 11
Consumables (for 3-days between resupply) Ounces Grams
fuel (1 oz/day) 3.0 85
food (36 oz/day) 108.0 3062
water 32.0 907
Weight Summary Pounds Kilograms
(1) Total Worn or Carried While Hiking 3.0 1.4
(2) Total Base Weight in Pack 12.2 5.5
(3) Total Weight of Consumables 8.9 4.1
(4) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) 21.1 9.6
(5) Full Skin-Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) 24.1 11.0
Dave Johnstonโ€™s Gear List
Category Gear Item
Clothing Worn While Hiking
Nylon shorts
REI boxers
Button-front shirt with two pockets
Baseball cap
Synthetic socks
Lowa mid-height GTX boots
Other Items Worn or Carried
Komperdell hiking poles
Other Clothing
Frogg Toggs rain top
Patagonia Dragonfly
Cloudveil pants
Clothes bag (pillow)
Patagonia Capilene expedition-weight top and bottom (for cold nights that never happened)
REI mesh boxer underwear
Extra socks
Marmot lightweight fleece
Balaclava and Manzella glove liners
K-mart lightweight sandals
Shelter and Sleep System
Marmot Hydrogen 30ยฐ sleeping bag
Original Ridgerest full-length pad
Packing
Kelty Flight pack, frame sheet and stays, two side pockets, belt bag, water bottle holster, shoulder strap-mounted pouches for photo gear
Cooking and Water
Evernew 1 quart pot
Original Photon Stove
Fuel bottle
Measuring cup
Lexan spoon
12ย ozย storage tub (for oatmeal)
Glad 12ย ozย cup and cozy
Platypus 4-liter water bag
Aquamira, paint filter
Half-gallon milk jug w/ top cut off for dipping
Other Essentials
Princeton Tec Scout headlamp
O4 brand single LED as backup
Book
Maps, ID, credit cards, cash
Toothbrush/toothpaste
Medicine bag (usual stuff plus ibuprofen, powder, chafing ointment)
Toilet kit
Consumables
Food bag: about 2lbs/day for 3 days; bulk items (coffee, pills)
Photo
Sony DSC-S85 digital camera
Lens adapter
0.7x wide angle lens
2x telephoto lens
768k of Memory Sticks
Spirit level for panoramas
Extra battery
Alosak bags for camera and other gear (rain)
Slik lightweight tripod

About the Authors

Don Johnston has been an avid backpacker since 1988 preferring week long or longer hikes. In addition to his Appalachian Trail mileage, he has completed the John Muir Trail twice, the High Sierra Trail, the Tahoe Yosemite Trail, the Northville Placid Trail, and The Long Trail. Don is the inventor of the “Photon Stoveโ„ข” alcohol stove. He designed and owns the original Arc Alpinist sleeping quilt. Working with Kurt Russell, he prompted the construction of and owns the first Nomad Lite-N-Airy tent. Don is a Network Administrator at a Montgomery County, Maryland High School. Don hopes to complete the final 150 miles of his AT quest in summer 2005.

Editorโ€™s Note: Don sumitted Katahdin on August 19, 2005, completing his quest to section hike the Appalachian Trail.

Dave Johnston, with more limited vacation time, has backpacked with Don on many occasions and is an avid photo buff. He grabs time to hike when available in Virginia and West Virginia and has hiked in the Grand Canyon, Saguaro National Park, the Adirondacks, and part of the Florida Trail. Dave is a building codes and standards specialist and used his experience with the gas industry to provide valuable input during the development of the “Photon Stoveโ„ข”. He currently is the Technical Director of the Vinyl Siding Institute.

PHOTO ESSAY: Navajo Canyon, Arizona

BPL Staffers enjoy a rare opportunity to explore Arizona’s Navajo Canyon.

This page is 2000KB in size due to high resolution photographs, and may load slowly depending on the speed of your internet connection.

Navajo Canyon Trip Report - 18
Lightweight newbie, Andrew, along with Backpacking Light staffers Jay, and Will, in Navajo Canyon, Arizona.

Ahh, spring backpacking in beautiful, southwest canyon country, what could be better? Taking the trip with a bunch of fellow gear freaks and BPL staffers, thatโ€™s what! Add to that a newbie lightweight backpacker to regal with tales of underweight packs and words of ultralight wisdom โ€“ pure bliss!

Backpacking Light’s Pack Editor, Will Rietveld, Make Your Own Gear Editor, Jay Ham, Jay’s co-worker, Andrew, the aforementioned newbie, and I, spent five days in April hiking in and near Navajo Canyon, a drainage southeast of Lake Powell. The official purpose of the trip was to collect soil samples as part of Jay (and Andrew’s) work as soil scientists. Jay manages a 2.5 million acre soil survey project for the Natural Resources Conservation Service. Will and I were along as official volunteers. Jay had special permission to enter the area, which is on Navajo land, for his project. Navajo Canyon is a special place as non-English speaking Navajo still live there, and ancient and modern Native American ruins and artifacts sprinkle the canyons.

The trip got off to a great start. I drove a couple of hours to Flagstaff, Arizona from my home in Phoenix to arrive in time to share a home cooked meal with Jay, his wife, two daughters, and Andrew. Backpacking Light staffers are located around the United States and in New Zealand, and we haven’t all met each other in person. This trip into Navajo Canyon was a great opportunity for me to really get to know Jay and Will better.

Andrew is an experienced backpacker and Jay had been advising him on becoming a lightweight backpacker. Early on as we talked gear over dinner, it became clear that Andrew would be the perfect foil for comic relief throughout the trip. This was to be Andrew’s first lightweight trip and he was obsessing over each item, and making last minute decisions on what, and what not to, bring. After some detailed and long-winded discussion throughout dinner, the show-and-tell began. (Luckily Joy and the girls are experienced backpackers and didn’t get too bored by all the gear talk.) Andrew showed us huge rolls of plastic drop cloths he had just purchased. One was 2 mil, the other was 4 mil. Jay and I were unanimous – both were too heavy. Andrew decided to bring the 2 mil.

The discussion then turned to sleeping pads. Andrew insisted he needed a good night’s sleep and had decided on a heavy-by-lightweight-standards, Exped Airmat air mattress. When Joy, who also prizes a good night’s sleep, brought out her synthetic fill Big Agnes Insulated Air Core, Andrew began to over-analyze his mattress choice – a not uncommon state for Andrew as I was to discover over the course of the week. At one point Andrew offered to buy Joy’s mattress on the spot, but later changed his mind. Watching Andrew hold a lengthy back-and-forth discussion on mattress merits, mostly with himself, was amusing – because I’ve been there! The evening discussions continued with topics ranging from which tent stakes to use to underarm odor.

We finally sent Andrew home so we could all get some sleep.

The next morning, we met at Jay and Andrew’s office, picked up a company vehicle and driver, and began the three-hour drive north to Page, Arizona where we’d rendezvous with Will who was driving from Durango, Colorado. Three more hours of near continuous gear talk ensued, with a short break for soil scientist talk amongst Jay, Andrew, and our driver, Carl, and a long break to talk more about underarm odor.

Over dinner the previous night, Andrew, out of concern for us, insisted that he needed to use deodorant on the trip. Jay and I mentioned that we don’t take deodorant on backpacking trips (turns out Will doesn’t either – we’re dedicated ultralighters). Andrew was not deterred, he continued to debate whether he should pack along a very small container of stick deodorant, or maybe one of those crystal mineral salt balls. He also wondered about the issue of underarm hair and how much that interferes with a deodorant’s effectiveness. We found out on the drive to Page that Andrew decided to bring a fragment of a crystal deodorant ball and that he had shaved all the hair from his left armpit. He said he started to shave his right armpit, but about three-quarters of the way into the job, he decided that being hairless might cause him to chaff, and stopped. So, he’d decided to run an experiment to see which pit smelled better after a few days of hiking in warm weather. We volunteered Carl to be the judge when he picked us up at the end of the week. For some reason, Carl didn’t want this honor. I started to see that although Andrew was still holding on to some heavy weight thinking, he definitely had the potential to be a fanatical, uh I mean dedicated, ultralightweight backpacker.

We hooked up with Will in Page, made a quick stop at a Subway for lunch – and dinner for some of us – and then hit the dirt roads to our drop off spot. After an hour of driving, we spend a half hour at the local Navajo Chapter house where we picked up an introductory letter we could present in case we ran into any Navajos in the canyons. After more driving we drove past a newly constructed five-sided Hogan (traditional Navajo dwelling) on a narrow, sandy road. No one was in sight so we drove on and turned down an even narrower path. After another half an hour of four-wheeling, we arrived at the drop off spot.

Carl had some soil work to do nearer to Page so he drove off with instructions (and a GPS waypoint) to pick us up at the exit point down canyon on Friday.

We greeted Carl at the pick up point just as a Navajo couple drove by in a battered pickup. Andrew asked Carl to do a pit-sniffing test, but Carl declined. Andrew did a self-test and concluded that shaving improved his post-trip smell. Then we drove off to return to our normal lives…but not before we got in a couple more hours of talk about lightweight gear and techniques.

The Benefits of Going Light

Commentary on the multiple benefits of lightweight backpacking.

Some hikers, upon converting to the ultralight style of backpacking, become rabid proselytizers for the cause, convinced that everyone needs to get their base pack weight below 10 pounds to avoid the eternal damnation of 65-pound packs. Though it may border on blasphemyโ€”since a good chunk of my recent life has been devoted to creating ultralight gear and getting it into the hands of like-minded enthusiastsโ€”Iโ€™m not convinced that everyone needs a small base pack weight. If you are young, in great physical shape, your trips consist entirely of relatively short distances into the backcountry to establish base camps for day trips, and you already own a bunch of traditional backpacking gear, you can probably save yourself the trouble of reading this website.

Good for the Body

For the rest of you, there are many benefits to going light. The most obvious is perhaps the physical benefit. For anyone who is older than 25 (or younger than 16!), whose career and rest of life doesnโ€™t leave as much time as they would like to work out, who has an old sports/war injury, who has some kind of disability (any part of the body that doesnโ€™t work as well as the norm), who has limited vacation time in which to recreate, lightening your pack weight will be a blessing. Your body will thank you for carrying a lighter pack. A lighter pack will

  • Be easier on your joints and muscles
  • Help prevent aggravating old injuries
  • Allow you to maintain your outdoor activities to a ripe old age

I have received many excited letters from graying outdoor enthusiasts who had resigned themselves to giving up backpacking for good, only to find out that with ultralight gear and techniques they were once again able to spend time in the backcountry that they loved.

A lighter pack allows longer daily travel distances, putting more of the backcountry within reach. Now with a three-day weekend you can see countryside that would have required a week off of work using traditional backpacking techniques. As you get further into the backcountry, you get to enjoy less crowded trails and more solitude. The ability to travel further can extend your backpacking into the shoulder seasons of early spring and late fall, where previously the shorter days were an impediment to any serious trip.

Good for the Environment

Besides having less impact on your limbs and ligaments, a lighter load can result in a reduced impact on the backcountry. Many ultralighters, freed from the slavish adherence to short grinds between established campsites, use their ability for enhanced distances and greater flexibility to practice stealth camping. Adopting proper โ€œLeave No Traceโ€ ethics, the ultralighter can reduce their impact on the backcountry. They donโ€™t need to camp near water like everyone else. Their lighter loads allow them to enjoy dinner near the water and hike on a few miles, avoiding overuse of the waterside sites and opening up some new pristine vistas from their stealth site. To the extent that ultralight techniques allow more people to enjoy the backcountry, this can foster a greater base of ownership and involvement in preserving that backcountry, donating time and resources to protect it.

Good for the Mind

Besides keeping your body active later in life, going light helps keep your mind active and healthy. Techniques and knowledge are a big part of lightening your pack weight. Often you rely on your experience to reduce the amount of gear you carry. Some ultralight gear requires a little more thought to use than the standard issue stuff.

For instance, a nice 4-pound tent is fairly easy to set up just about anywhere. But if you are carrying an 8-ounce tarp, you will need to be more clever about where you camp and you will need to know some techniques to fashion the tarp into a worthy shelter. Lightening your load engages your mind in your backcountry adventure. This engagement starts before the trip, as you gather information, analyze options, and refine gear lists. As you educate yourself online and through books, you help to keep the brain cells active. Studies have shown that is integral to a long and healthy life.

READ MORE IN:
LIGHTWEIGHT BACKPACKING AND CAMPING
This article is reprinted from the PREFACE of LIGHTWEIGHT BACKPACKING AND CAMPING: A Field Guide to Wilderness Hiking Equipment, Technique, and Style, to be introduced at BackpackingLight.com on August 7, 2005. Click here for more info…

Good for Simplicity

Going light helps to simplify your life. Through the tenets of multiple-use items and taking less gear, the number of items in your pack drops with the overall weight. Less gear to pack means itโ€™s easier to get out. In this day and age of busy careers, multiple kid activities, and overlapping commitments, having a simple kit may make the difference of you getting out on a trip or not. Even if you havenโ€™t planned anything, when youโ€™re prepared and flexible there will be times you can jump into a trip when an original participant cancels at the last minute.

Besides the obvious benefit of less weight, having less gear is a freeing experience in that you have less stuff to keep track of on the trail. (On the flip side, with your gear honed down to a minimum, if you lose something, it was probably something that you really needed.)

Good for Relationships

One of the more esoteric benefits of going light is the ability to build relationships with the people who design and make your gear. It is unlikely that the average hiker will be able to pick up the phone and easily get hold of a major manufacturer’s equipment designer for a gear discussion. But since much of the cutting-edge ultralight gear being produced is coming out of cottage manufacturers, you get the opportunity to ask detailed questions of the people making the equipment. In many cases, you have real input into the design of the next generation of ultralight backpacking gear. Many ultralight products on the market today bear the mark of individual enthusiasts who asked for tweaks to suit their own needs. If you value the diversity of small business, going lighter provides you ample opportunity to support smaller shops.

Good for More

Sometimes the benefits of going light arenโ€™t so much that you get that light, but that you make room for your passion. I have photographer friends that will leave home a stove and subsist on cold mashed potatoes so that they can make room for 10 pounds of camera gear. Similarly, climbers who carry ample racks of hardware to ply their craft benefit from going light on everything else.

Since the journey to lightness is largely a cerebral one, where does one start? Self-education is critical to avoid getting in a situation where you didnโ€™t bring enough gear to be safe for your experience level. Your journey should be one of baby steps, learning and trying a couple of new things on each trip, finding what works for you and what doesnโ€™t. There are many online email lists that are a great resource. Basically, any list having to do with long hikesโ€”such as the Pacific Crest Trail, Continental Divide Trail, or Appalachian Trailโ€”will have a following of experienced ultralighters. There are beginning to be significant books with the latest information on ultralight backpacking, like the book for which this Preface was written, LIGHTWEIGHT BACKPACKING AND CAMPING: A Field Guide to Wilderness Hiking Gear, Techniques, and Style. If you have not already read it, I also highly recommend the book Lightweight Backpacking 101, also published by Beartooth Mountain Press. So dive in and start your own journey to lightness!

Glen Van Peski is the founder of Gossamer Gear, serves on the Board of Directors of the Pacific Crest Trail Association, lives in Carlsbad, California, and for a really tall guy, has a really light pack (with a base weight that is normally less than six pounds).

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW

Single wall? Double wall? With eVENT and silnylon, the Sarvis may offer the best of both.

Overview

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW - 1
The Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight eVENT tent is a three plus-season tent perfect for a spring ski trip. Similar to the Big Agnes Seedhouse series but larger, and with an additional crossover center pole, the Sarvis is exceptionally stable and storm worthy for a 4 pound free standing tent.

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW - 2
Stable. The Big Agnes Sarvis pitched and battened down on some ultra-comfortable duff in a stand of pines near the AT, Blue Ridge Mountains, Virginia. About an hour after this photo was taken the Sarvis weathered violent thunderstorms and powerful wind gusts without the slightest difficulty. The center crossover pole and strategic side tie-outs on the front and middle poles and fly edges all contribute to a strong and stable pitch.

Big Agnes sees their new Sarvis series as a slightly larger version of their popular Seedhouse series of tents. Where the Seedhouse SL2 can be a bit cramped, the Sarvis SL2+ has room for two campers and all their gear. The Sarvis SL2+ has 4.5 square feet more floor area and 8 inches more peak height. In addition Sarvis tents have “a unique hybrid construction, combining the weight savings of single wall with the flexibility and ventilation of double wall.” The single walled eVENT rear panels and front double walled portion of the tent along with three strategic vents do a good job of minimizing condensation. One of the joys of the Big Agnes Sarvis is its roll back fly, which affords excellent views and fresh air even with threatening weather.

I see the Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT as more than a larger Seedhouse. Not only is it a hybrid between single and double walled tents, it is also a hybrid between three and four season tents. It is exceptionally stable and storm worthy for a 4-pound shelter. Perfect applications for the Sarvis SL2+ would be a spring ski trip, an early or late season winter trip in windy and iffy weather, or even light mountaineering (not necessarily the recommendation of Big Agnes). The Sarvis uses the same DAC FeatherLite Hub and pole design as the lighter Seedhouse series, but has an additional crossover center pole for stability. As such, the Sarvis is more suitable for harsher environments (especially high winds) than the Seedhouse and other light and ultralight tents. The Big Agnes Sarvis tent is lighter and has less condensation issues than most double walled tents traditionally used for these trips. Compared to heavier, true four-season mountaineering tents (which admittedly Big Agnes never intended the Sarvis to be used for), the Sarvis is probably not up to the rigors of exposed high altitude mountaineering. The Sarvis is heavier than some two plus and three season ultralight and light tents and takes more time to pitch, but these tents are nowhere near as stable as the Sarvis. The Sarvis is about as easy to pitch as a double walled tent with fly, but not as easy to pitch as something like the ultralight Tarptents or Six Moon Designs tents.

In Brief

  • Good condensation management – innovative hybrid single-double wall design with extremely breathable eVENT rear panels and three vents
  • Close to four-season stability and storm resistance
  • Sophisticated DAC pole and hub system with an additional stabilizing center crossover pole
  • Roll back fly allows you to sleep under the stars even with iffy precipitation
  • Roomy with 46 inches of head height – included vestibule adds 6 square feet of storage
  • Complex pitch – it has a number of poles (some with sleeves) and 13 stakeout points
  • Heavier than two plus or three-season floored shelters like Tarptents, Six Moon Designs Europa, or even the Big Agnes Seedhouse 2

Specifications

• Tent Type

Hybrid single/double wall, free-standing tent with floor and built-in vestibule

• Fabric Description

Fly, tent floor, vents and reinforcements: 30d silicone treated outer surface and PU coated inner suface1.94 oz/yd2 (66 g/m2) high-tenacity ripstop nylon, 246 thread count. Rear tent panels: three layer eVENT with a tricot inner surface eV104-3L30d high tenacity, nylon 6.6, triple-grid rip stop, 3 oz/yd2 (102 g/m2). Mesh panels: 20d no-see-um netting.

• Pole Material

0.350 in (8.8 mm) DAC FeatherLite with FeatherLite hub system

• Weight Full Package

As supplied, with stuff sacks, stakes, guylines, etc.

Backpacking Light scale Manufacturer claim
4 lb 7.0 oz (2.01 kg)* 4 lb 9 oz (2.06 kg)
*Note: 3 lb 15.7 oz (1.81 kg) body, poles, and attached guylines and cord locks

• Weight Minimum Package

Tent body and fly, minimum necessary stakes and guylines, no stuff sacks or extra hardware

Backpacking Light minimum Manufacturer supplied minimum
Same as Manufacturer Minimum but with: 0.25 oz (7 g) titanium stakes, manufacturer supplied guylines and cord locks 13 stakes, 7 manufacturer supplied guylines and cord locks
4 lb 3.0 oz (1.90 kg) 4 lb 5.3 oz (1.96 kg)

• Floor/ Vestibule Area

Floor area Vestibule area
32.5 ft2 (3.02 m2) 6 ft2 (0.56 m2)

• Floor Area/Backpacking Light Minimum Weight Ratio

0.49 ft2/oz (1.59 m2/kg)
(0.56 ft2/oz (1.88 m2/kg) including vestibule area)

• Dimensions

Inches Centimeters
Width 73 (max) 185 (max)
Length 82 208
Height 46 117

• Model Year

2005

• MSRP

$399.00 USD eVENT

• Options

Sarvis SL 2+ footprint, 8 oz (227 g), $50.00 (not reviewed)

Usable Features / Ease of Use

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW - 3
Details on the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ eVENT, clockwise from top left: a) roof vent showing strut to keep it open and Velcro closure; b) front vestibule zippered door with storm flap and double tie-backs, zippered mesh font door with tie-backs and inside of tent showing the rear vent; c) toggles that tie back the rain fly to the center crossover pole; d) DAC FeatherLite Hub System and pole clip attachments at rear of the tent.

I like the additional center pole and the multiple stakeouts on the Sarvis. The poles and stakeouts are all in the right places! With the 13 stakeouts arranged just so, I can get a strong and stable pitch on the Sarvis – good enough for light mountaineering. The tradeoff is that the Sarvis takes more time to pitch than lighter shelters that require fewer stakeouts and poles. This is extra time well spent in my opinion. The bent center crossover pole and its sleeve attachment adds a great amount of strength to the tent but takes longer to insert and remove than the more in vogue clip pole attachments. The ridge pole also fits in a sleeve but the front and rear arches attach with the faster pole clips.

One nicety – the rain fly/vestibule is already attached to the center arch of the tent and is a breeze to deploy or roll back – much easier than the full fly on most double walled shelters. The fly includes the vestibule, which makes the tent’s weight more attractive. Since pitching the fly is part of pitching the tent, it probably takes no longer pitch the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent than a traditional two-pole double walled tent with its rain fly.

The Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent comes with all necessary tie outs and cord locks already attached to the body. A very nice touch! The provided stakes are V-section aluminum and are not my favorites. There is a stuff sack for the poles, one for the stakes, and a large one to hold the body and all parts. There is an optional footprint to protect the 30-denier floor on rough ground, and it may be a good idea to purchase one or make your own out of Tyvek or similar materials.

Weight / Sizing

The Big Agnes Sarvis is a bit roomier than many two-person tents capable of three plus season use. If you add in the 6 additional square feet of storage for the included vestibule, the Sarvis has a good size to weight ratio for a tent capable of backcountry ski trips or light mountaineering. The Sarvis has about 2 to 4 more square feet than many two-person tents. Its 46-inch peak height is exceptionally generous. The Sarvis has a lower area to weight ratio than the very lightest two plus or three season shelters like a floored Tarptent Squall, Six Moon Designs Europa, or even the Black Diamond FirstLight. But these shelters are not as wind or snow resistant as the Sarvis.

Usable Space

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW - 4
Good views and fresh air with weather protection moments away. With conventional rain fly tents I’m drenched by the time I get the fly setup, so I usually opt for sleeping under the fly in questionable weather which means condensation, no fresh air, no views, no stars! Not so with the Sarvis. Even in iffy weather, I can sleep out under the stars and have fresh air with little fear of getting soaked by a sudden storm. If a storm does come I can unroll and stake down the fly in a mater of seconds.

The Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent, with its included vestibule, has room for two people and all their gear. As noted earlier it has an exceptionally high peak height. This is in the center of the tent and even a very tall person can sit up inside. Because it is localized, it does not work quite as well for two people to sit up and face each other. Two people can sleep side by side in the Sarvis with room in the side corners of the hexagon to put a fair amount of gear. There are three pockets in the mesh panel at the front of the tent to stow small gear like sunglasses and headlamps. The rear of the tent is fairly narrow and with two occupants it takes some effort to keep the foot of your sleeping bag from brushing against the walls. The vestibule area is large enough for two medium sized packs, semi-empty and stacked on top of each other, and two pairs of running shoes, but not much more. The front opening vestibule limits sheltered cooking options.

Wind Stability

The Big Agnes Sarvis is one of the most wind-stable tents I’ve used. The four arch structure (three crosswise arches and one ridgeline arch) is stiff. The center crossover pole reinforces the middle of the sidewalls of the tent, an area usually unsupported except for four pole mountaineering tents. When you add 13 stakeouts at all the right points you’ve got a structure that can handle constant 40 mph winds with higher gusts with surprisingly little deflection. The unsupported front vestibule does flap in the wind unless you get an ultra-tight tension on the front stakes. The high peak is good for room and comfort – not so great for optimal wind shedding, although the Sarvis structure seems to handle the extra height.

Storm Protection

Storm protection from three-season rain, sleet, and hail is excellent with good ventilation coming from the rear vent and under the fly. Views are limited to small peeks from the two upper vents. In very strong winds, some cold air, fine grit/sand, or spindrift (winter use) can get in under the front fly and the rear vent and come through the no-see-um netting. This can be mitigated in snow camping by building a snow wall around the front vestibule – a fairly common practice. Nonetheless, a full nylon inner tent is warmer and provides better protection but is also more condensation prone and heavier than the mesh on the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent. The rear vent on the Big Agnes Sarvis cannot be closed and the tie out for the rear vent cover also acts as a stabilizer for the rear panel of the tent. Both the top vents can be Velcroed shut.

The vestibule could use a side entry. The vestibule is not protected from the rain when entering and exiting the tent so you have to move fast to keep the vestibule area dry. With the front opening you can’t leave the vestibule partially open for views and ventilation, nor can you cook under shelter with the vestibule partially open (not a manufacturer recommended activity in any case).

Big Agnes does not bill the Sarvis SL2+ tent as a winter camping tent but it is capable of winter camping and even some light mountaineering. The front mesh is a bit drafty for this type of use but it is certainly not a showstopper. The Big Agnes Sarvis tent did as well or better with snow loading than many heavier two-pole single walled three-season tents I’ve used. The steep walls and slippery silnylon shed snow well. The crossover center pole is the key to snow load performance and adds a lot of resistance to both roof deflection and sidewall deflection. The front of the vestibule, which is unsupported by poles, is its weak point and deflected considerably along its front edge. The rear eVENT panels moved inward under snow load to make the already narrow rear of the tent even narrower. Even so, the tent did a creditable job and, with a bit of smarts from the user, it is suitable for a spring ski trip. It will be lighter and condense less than most tents used for backcountry skiing.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance

Big Agnes Sarvis Superlight SL2+ eVENT Tent REVIEW - 5
Convective ventilation. The rear vent draws cool, less humid air in as warmer humid air rises and exits from the top vents (upper right on photo). A wind blowing in the rear of the tent aids this process. Cool air also enters from under the front and sides of the rain fly.

Condensation resistance is excellent if there is wind, especially from the rear of the tent. In cool, damp weather with little wind I did have condensation. The condensation was most problematic along the silnylon panel forming the roofline of the tent and on the rain fly, especially above my head. Nonetheless, the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent condensed less than most double walled tents I’ve used. Keeping a gap under the front rain fly helps keep condensation down by allowing convective (chimney) ventilation from under the fly and through the rear vent to exit out the top vents. This is most important with little or no wind. A side entry vestibule would aid with ventilation in rainy and windless conditions.

Insect Protection

Insect protection is great. With no rain the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent has excellent views and is one of the most pleasant and least claustrophobic tents to wait out a cloud of mosquitoes. Just roll back the fly and attach it with the tie back toggles to the center crossover pole. The tent’s roominess is also an asset when serving a bug enforced tent prison sentence. With bugs and precipitation the roominess is still an asset but you lose most of your view. Again a side entry vestibule would be a help for ventilation and views.

Durability

The 1.9 oz/yd2 silnylon used on the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent is stronger and more durable than the 1.3 oz/yd2 silnylon used on many ultralight tents. The 20-denier mosquito netting on the Sarvis is very light and prone to pickup a few “blemishes” with use. Big Agnes says this is normal and there is no reason for concern. It is more of an aesthetic issue as the mesh is fairly strong. They have yet to have a tent returned because of a large tear in the netting. The 30-denier floor is lighter but less durable than the 70 denier floors used on many heavier tents. You will likely need to use a footprint or protective ground cloth under it when pitching the tent on sharp and abrasive surfaces. This is not all bad. It gives you the option of leaving the footprint or protective ground cloth at home and having a lighter floored tent when camping on soft surfaces like grass, pine duff, and snow. The swaged ends of the DAC FeatherLite pole set require care to make sure they are fully mated before flexing them. When not fully engaged, the swaged ends can split if you apply pressure. Finally, if you intend to take the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ tent for long periods of time at altitude, be aware that the outer shell of the Sarvis is nylon, which is less UV resistant than polyester fabrics now in use in many tents. Prolonged exposure to UV may weaken the fabric on the Big Agnes Sarvis tent. It’s probably better to put the tent up later in the day and take it down in the morning if you intend to spend a while at altitude. Many other ultralight tents which commonly use silnylon and light nylon fabrics, like Tarptents and the Six Moon Designs Europa, will do no better with UV resistance.

Value

If you need a strong and light tent suitable for spring skiing trips or sketchy weather in exposed places, the Big Agnes Sarvis SL2+ eVENT tent is a reasonable value. For $400 you get a very stable tent with lots of room and features. For less severe conditions, you can get a lighter tent and/or less stable tent for less money. Don’t expect it to weather the high winds and snow the Sarvis can though.

Recommendations for Improvement

A side entry on the vestibule would make it a lot more useful, adding ventilation and views during precipitation and protecting the area when exiting and entering the tent. For those willing to cook in a vestibule it would give a sheltered area to operate a stove. Breaking the center crossover pole into two pieces would make it easier to insert and remove from its pole sleeve. Even though I never had a problem with the tent in violent thunderstorm gusts, I would prefer a slightly lower peak height just to add a margin of stability to the tent. Finally a minor gripe: It would be great if the Big Agnes Sarvis tent came with titanium skewer stakes. I didn’t like the supplied “superlight,” V-peg aluminum stakes. They are heavier than titanium stakes, have poor penetration, and require a fair amount of force to place in all but the softest soils. Because they are wider than skewer stakes they do not steer well around rocks. The ends of the V-peg aluminum stakes are small, sharp, and uncomfortable to ‘palm.’ They are difficult to push in by hand and require that you bash them in using a rock or other heavy object. In comparison, a 0.25 ounce, 7 gram titanium wire skewer is about half the weight, requires less force to penetrate soil, and steers around rocks. The hooked end is comfortable in your palm while you push it in.

Boy Scout Gear List: New Scouts, Three-Season

New Boy Scouts (and your parents!), take note: going light will leave your patrol leaders in the dust and there will be money left over from your paper route.

New Boy Scouts Gear List for Three-Season Mild Conditions - 1
Forester Pass as seen from the south: the highest point on the Pacific Crest Trail in Sequoia National Park.
Photo credit: Doug Prosser

Introduction

When a boy first joins the Boy Scouts, one of the first questions that comes up for his parents is what backpacking gear to outfit their son with. Naturally, the parents really want to get their kid the “right” gear. But there are differing opinions on what it right. The new Scouts in the troop that I am Assistant Scoutmaster of range in age from 11 to 13 years, in height from 4’0″ to 5’10” and in weight from 65 to 180 pounds. These new Scouts all want to be recognized as being able to hike and carry their share of the gear. They can easily lose their self-esteem if they are given a huge, heavy pack to carry and then they can’t make it up the first hill they encounter. From my observations, what the boys can carry changes once they have seen a few years of testosterone and perhaps played sports; then it doesn’t seem to matter how much weight is in their packs and they usually leave the adults behind on the trail. But when they first become Scouts, it’s a different matter. Leather hiking boots, big backpacks, Scout mess kits, heavy sleeping bags, and heavy tents might seem like the “right” gear, but can quickly become a discouraging liability for the new Scout. What I will show you in this article are inexpensive, lightweight options for new additions to the Troop.

Before I go into the gear in detail, I’d like to give you some suggestions of places to look for inexpensive clothing and gear. For clothing, try your town’s thrift stores first, then department stores, then sports or outdoor stores. To find discount gear and clothing online, look at campmor.com, sierratradingpost.com, rei-outlet.com, rei.com, northernmountain.com, and backcountrygear.com, especially at their sale/clearance items.

Context

New Boy Scouts Gear List for Three-Season Mild Conditions - 2
The author and son, Mike, on top of Forester Pass, August 2001. Doug, Mike, and Troop 257 were on their way from Onion Valley south on the PCT, then out over Mt. Whitney. Mike was 14 years old, a Scout, and on his fourth Sierra hike. He went on to earn his Eagle Scout rank in 2003; he starts at the US Coast Guard Academy in June 2005. They grow up fast!

The gear on the list below was selected with careful attention paid to low weight and low cost as much as possible. The list was compiled for new Boy Scouts (although it will work equally well for anyone who wants to lighten their load but not their wallet) backpacking in three-season, mild conditions.

This topic may be the easiest for me to write about since I have gone from a 9 pound, $400 backpack to a 15 ounce, $75 sack with shoulder and waist straps. Please pay attention to what the backpack weighs empty – weigh it in the store. I can get all the gear mentioned above for our sleep system into my 15 ounce pack and when packed, it will weigh less than my old 9 pound pack empty. The pack is an item that you may have to replace as your Scout grows. For young, small Scouts a youth sized backpack makes the most sense. (Example: Kelty Long Trail Junior, torso length 12-17 inches, 3 pounds, 7 ounces at $50.) It will be small enough for their body frame size and it can’t be loaded too full as to be heavier than they can carry. Once they hit their growth spurt, a full sized backpack will be needed. There are multiple backpacks that can be adjusted over a growth range once they are out of the youth sized packs. There are some packs that come in small, medium, and large sizes. The size you choose depends on their torso length.

There are two main types of backpacks, external fame and internal frame. For Scouts, it does not matter which one is used. What I would suggest is borrowing or renting different types of backpacks to see which your Scout prefers. Many troops have multiple packs available for use or you can see your local outdoor store to see if they rent gear. Keep in mind when shopping that most Scouts will want the type of pack that everyone else in the troop is using. The size of the internal frame packs should be no more than 4,000 to 5,000 cubic inches for the type of trips most Scouts go on. Try to keep the weight below 4 to 5 pounds. The costs can range greatly from $50 to multiple hundred of dollars. I would not spend over $200, but you should be able to spend under $150 and get an excellent pack.

Buying the right backpack requires a store that has a good selection and knowledgeable sales people to fit them. When in the store, load the backpack with 20-40 pounds of weight and have your Scout wear it in the store to see how it feels on his body. If you already have purchased other gear, take it in a box to the store and pack the backpack with the gear and have your son try it on. Remember, he will be wearing that pack and gear for up to 6-8 hours some days so make 100 percent sure it is comfortable. Also, check out the discount web sites such as campmor.com because you can find some tremendous savings on packs, especially last year’s models.

EXAMPLE PACKS Size (torso length, in) Volume (ci) Price Weight
Granite Gear Virga Ultralight backpack 14-18 3,200 $100 1ย lbย 5 oz
Kelty Yukon 3500 external frame backpack 15-21 3,500 $65 4ย lbย 12 oz
Kelty 4500 Coyote internal frame backpack 13-19 4,500 $90 4ย lbย 3 oz
Kelty Long Trail Junior backpack 12-17 2,300 $50 3ย lbย 7 oz
Gossamer Gear G4 backpack 20-24 4,600 $85 16 oz
ULA P-1 backpack S: 15-17 in, M: 18-20 in, L: 21-23 in, XL: 23+ in 4,250 $125 24 oz

Cooking and Water Systems

COOKWARE:

This is one area that you should make as simple as possible. The Scout needs one pot to cook in. This pot should be lightweight and hold at least 1 quart/liter. Aluminum foil can be used as a lid if the pot does not have one. The Scout then needs something to eat and drink out of. A plastic margarine container works really well as a dish and an 8-12 fluid ounce plastic cup will hold cold as well as hot liquids. You have these items around the house. A single Lexan spoon will be the only utensil he needs to eat with, keep the fork and knife at home. If he needs a knife, use a pocketknife. One other item we routinely use while cooking is a bandana. This works really well grabbing hot pots or wiping off our hands.

BACKPACKING STOVES:

Do not bother to buy any backpacking stoves because the troop probably has multiple stoves for the to boys use. Please see the quartermaster to check them out. If you have to get a stove for young Scouts, stay away from white gas and alcohol stoves and instead look at Esbit solid fuel tabs or butane/propane fuel canister stoves.

WATER PURIFICATION:

Philmont Scout Ranch traditionally uses the Polar Pure Iodine Crystal Kit, $10, for water purification. One bottle of this should last your Scout the entire time he is in Scouting. Polar Pure has one really big advantage with new Scouts in that you can tell if it was added to the water (iodine color), as opposed to clear Aqua Mira. So often they can’t remember if they treated the water or not and the color of the water is the surest clue. The Troop will teach him how to use this as well as other methods of water purification. Polar Pure can be found at most backpacking stores or at your local Scout store. This can be a multi-use item in that the iodine will sterilize cuts and scrapes if you need an antimicrobial solution.

WATER BOTTLES:

This is an item that you may have around the house. A wide mouth 1-quart Gatorade bottle or a 2-liter soda bottle will work well. Just clean them out well before and after each hike, or just get new ones after each hike. There are many different types of backpacking water bottles you can purchase, but the recycled bottles work well and cost nothing. For most of your Scout’s hiking, he will not need to carry more than 2-3 quarts of water at a time, but he will need containers that are large enough to hold 3 quarts of water or more for the hot summers. As the boys become more experienced, they may start wanting hydration systems like a Camelbak. These systems cost much more than empty recyclable bottles but will give the Scout easier access to water encouraging him to drink more often. These systems do not need to be purchased for new Scouts, but can be purchased for experienced Scouts. These hydration systems tend to get holes in them when in the hands of careless boys, so wait till they are a bit older and more responsible to buy them for your Scout.

Miscellaneous

FLASHLIGHT:

With flashlights, the smaller and lighter, the better. Initially, use something you have around the house. Later on, your son will want to check out items like headlamps or Photon lights. The new technology uses LED lights, which allows the bulbs and batteries to last an extremely long time, so when looking for new flashlights look first at those with LED lights. A good way to carry their LED light and knife is on a lanyard around the Scout’s neck. This will not prevent the lights from being lost, but it does help.

KNIFE:

For knives, like flashlights, smaller and lighter is better. The only types of knives my Troop allows are folding and/or multi-tool knifes. We do not allow straight knives that require sheaths. About the only time the boys use a knife is for cutting rope or when cooking. The Wenger Esquire Swiss Knife is a 1-2 ounce knife that meets these requirements.

COMPASS:

Everyone should be carrying a compass; it is one of the 10 essentials. A beginner’s compass costing $10 to $15 is adequate to start with. If the boys get very advanced, they will tell you what they need. The compasses last nearly forever, I still have my beginners compass from the 1960’s and my boys used it too. These can be found at all backpacking stores or at your Scout store.

TOILETRIES AND MISCELLANEOUS:

The common items – not listed in order of importance – are tooth paste and tooth brush, dental floss, small soap and bandana to dry off with, toilet paper in waterproof zip-lock bag, hand sanitizer, sunscreen, mosquito head net, very basic first aid kit (Band-Aids, Neosporin ointment in a small tube, moleskin), a very basic repair kit (duct tape – 2 feet rolled around something – and a sewing kit from a hotel), extra batteries for flashlight, a lighter and/or waterproof matches.

Conclusion

Technology has come a long way in providing today’s Scouts with many lightweight options for gear and clothing. The information above and the gear checklist that follows will help the Boy Scout that is new to the Troop (and his parents) select gear that will keep him safe and comfortable and that he will be capable of carrying without wearing out.

Some examples of brands and models/styles are listed below for reference only. They neither represent an endorsement of that particular product nor a suggestion that the product listed is the best choice in the context of any particular situation.

CLOTHING WORN WHILE HIKING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
hat with brim wide-brimmed hat least expensive one you can find $8 4.0 113
hiking shirt lightweight nylon short or long sleeved SPF 30+ if possible least expensive one you can find $18 8.0 227
underwear none or synthetic briefs least expensive one you can find n/a n/a n/a
hiking shorts nylon, quick drying, built-in briefs thrift store/department store $4 9.0 255
hiking socks lightweight merino wool or Coolmax trail running socks Thorlo Lite Running Mini-crew Socks $10 2.0 57
hiking shoes breathable, lightweight trail running shoes whatever is on sale and fits $50 32.0 907
OTHER ITEMS WORN OR CARRIED
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
bandana cotton Survival Bandana $4 0.8 23
light micro light (LED) Princeton Tec Eclipse LED Clip Light $10 1.0 28
whistle pealess whistle ACR Emergency Whistle $3 0.2 6
knife lightweight small blade knife Wenger Esquire Swiss knife $8 1.0 28
compass simple, inexpensive Silva Polaris Type 7 Compass $10 1.0 28
watch simple, waterproof is nice feature use what scout has $0 1.0 28
neck cord nylon line – holds light, whistle, knife, compass Kelty Triptease line reflects light at night, easier to find $0 0.0 0
lighter small propane lighter, without child locks cheapest on the market $1 0.5 14
OTHER CLOTHING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
wind shirt thin, nylon, lightly insulated windbreaker thrift store/department store $3 10.0 284
wind pants thin, nylon, lightly insulated wind pants thrift store/department store $3 10.0 284
rain poncho waterproof, covers backpack, doubles as ground cloth Campmor extra large vinyl poncho $5 14.0 397
insulation layer down/fleece vest or jacket thrift store/department store $10 16.0 454
warm hat wool or fleece beanie/watch cap Campmor Wigwam Thermostat Cap $9 2.5 71
sleep shirt nylon short or long sleeve t-shirt Campmor Duofold High Performance Series Long Sleeve shirt $8 7.0 199
extra hiking socks lightweight merino wool or Coolmax trail running socks Thorlo Lite Running Mini-crew Socks $10 2.0 57
SLEEP SYSTEMS
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
overhead shelter silnylon tarp, two boy tarp (split between two boys) Campmor 8′ x 10′ Ultralight Backpacking Tarp (13oz/2) $65 6.5 184
tent stakes aluminum (split between two boys) Campmor The North Face 7 inch V-Stake – 10 Pack (6oz/2) $8 3.0 85
guylines 50 feet nylon rope, 1/8 inch (split between two boys) Nylon Backpacker Rope 1/8 inch, 50 ft (4oz/2) $4 2.0 57
sleeping bag least expensive down bag 20-40 degree rated Campmor Goose down 20 degree Mummy sleeping bag regular $110 36.0 1021
sleeping pad closed cell foam cut down to size of scout Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4 length closed cell pad cut down $16 9.0 255
PACKING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
backpack torso length 12-15 inches for small young scouts Kelty Long Trail Junior Pack, torso length 12-17, 2300 ci $50 55.0 1559
waterproof liner trash bag to protect clothing from water, and emergency use trash compactor bag plus two extra trash bags $1 1.0 28
COOKING AND WATER
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
stove+windscreen young scouts do not carry to keep weight low n/a n/a n/a
cookpot young scouts do not carry to keep weight low n/a n/a n/a
water treatment young scouts do not carry to keep weight low once young Scouts are trained, they carry their own bottle of Polar Pure n/a n/a n/a
utensil spoon Lexan soup spoon $1 0.3 9
dish plastic margarine container, small find in house n/a 0.3 9
cup plastic 8-12ย ozย cup able to take boiling water find in house n/a 0.3 9
water bottles 3-4L 1 L easily accessible 1 L Aqua Fina water bottle with Gatorade sport cap n/a 1.7 48
two, 1.5 L hard sided two, 1.5 L Aqua Fina water bottles n/a 4.2 119
OTHER ESSENTIALS
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
maps printed from computer TOPO Program troop has or troop map collection n/a 1.0 28
first aid minor wound care assorted wound and blister care items, antimicrobial ointment $5 2.0 57
hand sanitizer 2oz bottle: pre-cooking/eating & post-bathroom least expensive available $1 3.0 85
toilet paper non-scented toilet paper small amount in plastic zip-lock bag n/a 2.0 57
personal hygiene teeth and body cleaning kit small toothbrush, small toothpaste, small soap in zipper lock bags n/a 2.0 57
sunscreen SPF 30 or higher small tube or stick $5 1.0 28
bug barrier head net Campmor Backpacker no-see-um Head net $5 0.5 14
CONSUMABLES
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Price Ounces Grams
fuel young scouts do not carry to keep pack weight down n/a n/a n/a
food lunch Saturday and Sunday, young scouts only carry their own lunch tuna fish and crackers, dried fruit, cookies $5 16.0 454
water average carried – 1.5 liters 1 L full + 1.5 L bottle partially full; 1.5 L bottle empty n/a 50.0 1418
WEIGHT SUMMARY lbs kg
(1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 3.8 1.7
(2) Total Base Weight in Pack 12.0 5.5
(3) Total Weight of Consumables 4.1 1.9
(4) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) 16.1 7.3
(5) Full Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) 19.9 9.0
COST SUMMARY
(1) Total Cost of Gear $307
(2) Total Cost of Clothing $138
(3) Total Cost (1)+(2) $443

New Boy Scouts Gear List for Three-Season Mild Conditions - 3

Doug Prosser is an Assistant Scoutmaster for Troop 257 in the Ventura County Council, California with 10 years experience. He lives in Camarillo, which is located on the coast in southern California between Santa Barbara and Los Angeles. He has participated in numerous hikes in the local mountains and has planned many treks into the High Sierras for his Troop. He attended Philmont Scout Ranch as a scout and as a leader. He started out with 50+ pound packs and continues to lighten his load, always looking for a better way of backpacking. His friends have dubbed his garage “Doug’s Camping World.” Doug has a strong interest in teaching both kids and adults how to enjoy backpacking. He continues to train and gear up for an extended trek on the Pacific Crest Trail within the next few years. Doug can be contacted at DougProsser@verizon.net

Backpacking Light Magazine Seeks Nominations for Outdoor Industryโ€™s Most Stringent Product Award Program

Introducing the Lightitude Award for the Best Gear of 2005

Bozeman, Mont. โ€“ June 1, 2005 โ€“ Backpacking Light Magazine (www.BackpackingLight.com) announces the debut of a new product performance recognition program for the outdoor industryโ€™s best gear. Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005 will mark the industry premiere of the โ€œLightitude Awardโ€ to honor product integrity and performance in lightweight gear and apparel.

Backpacking Light Magazine is now accepting nominations for the annual Lightitude Awards. The deadline is July 1, 2005. Nomination forms are available online at www.BackpackingLight.com by clicking โ€œLightitude.โ€

Lightitude Awards honor backcountry gear, apparel, footwear and accessories demonstrating exceptional field performance. Unlike most other magazine product performance award programs, unreleased or โ€œnewโ€ products that have neither been field tested by the public nor subjected to the court of public opinion do not qualify for a Lightitude Award nomination.

Backpacking Light Magazine will accept nominations from qualified outdoor industry professionals and backcountry core users only. The selection committee consists of Backpacking Light Magazineโ€™s staff (renowned for their rigorous standards for product performance), selected industry design professionals, and highly experienced backcountry enthusiasts, with input solicited from the public.

โ€œThree barriers must be overcome for a product to receive a Lightitude Award,โ€ says Backpacking Lightโ€™s publisher, Ryan Jordan. โ€œNominations must first come from qualified individuals and are then subject to the court of public opinion. Finally, they are screened by a review committee who has put the product through the wringer in both lab and field settings.โ€

The purpose of the process is to make sure that Lightitude Awards are given to well-deserved recipients, and not just handed out to companies coming out with โ€œcool new gearโ€ with little market longevity or testing. Nominations, public comment and award committee reviews will be made publicly available at www.BackpackingLight.com for all Lightitude Award recipients to further validate the integrity of the award. Jordan is confident that โ€œthe Lightitude Award will set a new industry standard for meaningful recognition of product design, performance and integrityโ€ that consumers can trust.

Award recipients will receive complimentary tabletop plaques for display at their booth and an award logo digital media kit. Award recipients also receive a license to use authentic Lightitude Award trade show, point of sale, and point of purchase materials, including banners, hang tags, packaging stickers and more.

Information for the Press

Awards Ceremony: The first-annual Lightitude Awards will be presented at the 2005 Outdoor Retailer Summer Market in Salt Lake City, Utah on Friday, August 12 from 7:30โ€“9 a.m. at the Backpacking Light Retailer Seminar in the Salt Lake City Downtown Marriott. Outdoor gear manufacturers, media professionals and retailers are encouraged to attend. More information is available at the BackpackingLight.com booth (Booth #7614 in the Pavilion) at Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005.

Award Information: Information about Lightitude Award winners will be available in electronic format after the awards ceremony. To request high-resolution photos and stock copy about the award-winning products, please send an email to publisher@backpackinglight.com.

About Backpacking Light
Backpacking Light Magazine (www.BackpackingLight.com) is the outdoor industryโ€™s most recognized and authoritative voice for wilderness travel philosophy, techniques and gear. Catering primarily to prosumer and industry professional audiences, Backpacking Light technical articles and product reviews are based on accurate and trustworthy investigative research. In addition, Backpacking Light publishes content for beginning and novice wilderness travelers to help them go light while staying safe and comfortable in the backcountry. Backpacking Light offers two primary subscription-based products, including a print magazine of exceptional shelf quality (Backpacking Light, ISSN 1550-4417) and a comprehensive online magazine (BackpackingLight.com, ISSN 1537-0364) that features articles, reviews, gear guides, reader forums, and a membersโ€™ co-op-style gear shop that features some of the quirkiest and coolest ultralight gear on the planet.

Media Contact
Bridget Cavanaugh
Oโ€™Berry Cavanaugh
Phone: 406-522-8075
Email: bmc@oberrycavanaugh.com

Aarn Bodypacks Featherlite Freedom Internal Frame Backpack REVIEW

Big loads carry well and redefine what it means to control your center of gravity.

Overview

Aarn Bodypacks Featherlite Freedom Internal Frame Backpack - 1
The Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom has two front balance pockets to transfer some pack weight to the front of the hipbelt, providing better load distribution. Aarn recommends packing heavier items in the front pockets and lighter items in the main pack.

The Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom created by Aarn Designs in New Zealand gets an “A” for innovation. The bodypack concept is deployed through a combination of innovative design features. At 50 liters, the Featherlite Freedom is a medium sized pack suitable for a lightweight weekend trip or an extended trip using ultralight gear and food. I achieved a superb fit with this pack and comfortably carried 30-pound loads over a variety of terrains. The front pockets required some getting used to. They do not restrict arm movement for using ski or trekking poles, but they do restrict vision to the feet somewhat. This was less important on trails, but was a hindrance for off-trail hiking when descending ledges or down-climbing. The front pockets also make the pack more cumbersome to put on/take off, especially when wearing gloves and a jacket. Some refinements I would like to see include adding more organizational features to the front pockets while reducing their weight, and adding outside mesh pockets to the main pack to make it more versatile and usable when the front pockets are removed.

In Brief

  • Front balance pockets provide even loading onto the hipbelt
  • Exceptional fit and adjustability
  • Form-fitting and adjustable hipbelt
  • Excellent freedom of movement
  • Requires more effort to put on/take off
  • Front pockets need more organizational features
  • Lacks outside pockets when front pockets are not used

Specifications

โ€ข Backpack Style

Internal frame, top loading, roll top

โ€ข Fabric Description

The front of the pack tested is Kolon ripstop fabric (a polyester with nylon ripstop reinforcing and polyurethane coating on two sides); weight is 6 oz/yd2 (205 g/m2). It will be upgraded in spring 2005 to more durable Kolon 210d small diamond ripstop with silicone coating on one side and polyurethane on the other; weight is 4.3 oz/yd2 (147gm/m2). The pack sides are 330d DuPont Cordura, and the pack bottom is 500d Cordura. The shoulder straps and back panel are “Mรผller 3mesh”, which is a springy three-dimensional fabric that provides lightweight, shock absorbing, highly air permeable padding.

โ€ข Sizes Size L tested

Size Torso Length (in) Torso Length (cm)
S <16 <40
L >16 >40

โ€ข Volume Size L tested

Size Volume (ci) Volume (L)
S 2,746 45
L 3,051 50

โ€ข Weight Size L tested

Size Backpacking Light measuredย ozย (kg) Manufacturer Specificationย ozย (kg)
S Not measured 54 (1.6)
L 61.5 (1.74) 60 (1.7)

โ€ข Volume to Weight Ratio

49.6 cu in/oz (size Large, includes dry liner)

โ€ข Load Carrying Capacity

Backpacking Light estimate is 30-35 lb (14-16 kg); Manufacturer’s stated capacity is 44 lb (20 kg)

โ€ข Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

9.1 based on an estimated load carrying capacity of 35 lb (15.9 kg). Pack weight includes the front pockets and dry liner.

โ€ข MSRP

$329.95 NZ (approximately $230 USD)

โ€ข Manufacturer Contact Information

www.aarnpacks.com

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Aarn Bodypacks Featherlite Freedom Internal Frame Backpack - 2 The Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom’s hipbelt hinges at the seam and clasps the hips. A hipbelt stabilizer/compression strap attaches to a delta wing in the center. Note that the strap overlaps a small mesh pocket on the side of the pack, making it useless except for holding trekking poles or a fishing rod. The purple strap joins the shoulder straps via a slider through a sleeve in the bottom of the pack. The purple/black strap is the “X-Chest” attachment to the hipbelt. The red webbing loop is the attachment for one of the front pockets. Aarn uses V-shaped webs to connect the center buckle, and a pulley-like system for tightening.

The Aarn Featherlite Freedom frame consists of a looped acetyl rod and center aluminum stay. The back panel is Mรผller 3mesh spacer fabric, which is a cushiony three-dimensional mesh that provides superb ventilation. The back panel is concave to bring the load closer to your back.

The suspension system consists of numerous components and technologies. The 3-inch wide shoulder straps are a thinner version of the spacer mesh sandwiched between layers of a stretchy fabric, which allows them to easily conform to the shoulders. The bottom of the shoulder straps are connected to a plastic band that slides through a sleeve in the bottom of the pack. The hipbelt has a hinge in it to conform to the pelvis. Each side of the hipbelt has a hook and loop attachment at the back so both the length and angle can be adjusted. The hipbelt and shoulder straps have stabilizer straps, and there is also a sternum strap.

Since the suspension is somewhat complex, it requires a careful read of the instructions to master the pack adjustments. The process is: 1) adjust the hipbelt to its proper position, 2) adjust shoulder strap length and position, 3) have someone remove and bend the center stay to conform to your back, and 4) adjust hipbelt length and angle.

Aarn Bodypacks Featherlite Freedom Internal Frame Backpack - 3 The Aarn Featherlite Freedom Bodypack’s unique “Front Balance Pockets” are actually part of the suspension system. They attach to the shoulder straps and hipbelt, and each has an arched aluminum stay to transfer weight to the front of the hipbelt, which balances weight transferred to the back of the hipbelt by the main pack. Pack instructions recommend packing high-density items in the front pockets and medium/low density gear in the main packbag to achieve even loading on the hips. With the pockets removed (right), the pack uses “X-Chest straps” in concert with “Flow Motion” shoulder straps to provide excellent freedom of movement.

I carried the Aarn Featherlite Freedom on six trips that included dayhiking on and off-trail, snowshoeing, backpacking, and hut to hut ski touring. The pack’s suspension system made it easy for me (6 feet, 170 pounds) to comfortably carry 25-30 pounds without feeling any localized discomfort. Pack weight was evenly and effectively transferred to my hips. The front balance pockets worked effectively to offset the weight on my back.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Aarn Bodypacks Featherlite Freedom Internal Frame Backpack - 4
The Featherlite is about 24 inches high when filled to capacity (left). On a 5-day cold weather trip, I was unable to fit all of my gear into the pack and resorted to lashing my tent and sleeping pad on the front of the pack (center). On a day hike from camp in cold weather, the Featherlite worked great with a partial load (right). The pack’s roll top and internal divider adequately controlled pack volume, and compression straps are not really needed.

The Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom has one of the most sophisticated and adjustable suspension systems to be found anywhere, and I had no trouble dialing in a perfect fit. The pack’s articulated hipbelt and sliding shoulder straps allowed excellent freedom of movement while the pack “stuck” to my back.

The main compartment has a zippered center divider designed for load stabilization and to hold the load closer to the body. A waterproof liner (3.6 ounces), that comes with the pack, has a tunnel in the center to accommodate the divider. I had no trouble packing around the center divider. There is a hydration pocket for a 2-liter bladder inside with a tubing exit. The top closure rolls down like a dry bag and is secured with three side release buckles. The front of the pack has a drawcord and two ice axe loops for outside attachment. There is a shallow mesh pocket on each side of the pack that would be useful for securing trekking poles or a fishing rod.

The unique front balance pockets make the Featherlite Freedom an excellent trail pack. They are big enough (10 liters total) to carry everything a person might need on the trial. However, organization is another matter, I found myself continually digging for items I needed. I would really like to see more compartments, slips, and pockets in and on them to provide convenient access to water bottles, snacks, maps, digital camera, gloves, and an assortment of smaller items. That said, it would also be desirable to reduce the weight of the front pockets from their present 14 ounces.

Although the front pockets are very functional and convenient, they also take some getting used to. I received a lot of wise cracks about my “boobs,” and had a lot of fun shaking my front pockets in response! There is enough space between my body and the pockets to pass my arm through, so there is plenty of ventilation and free space for women to carry this pack as well as men. The front pockets do not restrict arm movement for using ski or trekking poles, but they do restrict vision to the feet somewhat. This was less important on trails, but was a hindrance for off-trail hiking where I was descending ledges or down-climbing.

Tip: The Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom has extremely limited outside storage options when the pack is used without the front pockets. A way to add convenient storage for gear you’ll need access to while on the trail, is to pack gear in a tall stuff sack and secure the stuff sack under the drawcord on the front of the pack.

With the front pockets in place, I found it cumbersome to connect the hipbelt buckle. The pockets blocked my view and reach, and the small 1-inch buckle was difficult to connect with gloves and a jacket on. There are a total of four buckles to secure the pack to your body: one on the hipbelt, two to connect the front pockets to each other, and the sternum strap – so donning and doffing the pack is a bit of a process. The front pockets are easily removed and converted to a daypack or two fanny packs for day hikes from camp.

With the front pockets removed, the Aarn Freedom Featherlite is a very comfortable 2 pound 15.5 ounce, 40-liter capacity conventional backpack for lightweight summer trips. In dry weather, pack weight can be further reduced by removing the 3.6-ounce dry liner.

Without the front pockets, the pack’s “X-Chest Straps” are used. They extend from the hipbelt to a buckle on the opposite shoulder strap, creating an X-configuration across your front. This pack configuration provides excellent freedom of movement, but has one major problem – no outside pockets! The versatility of this pack would be greatly increased by adding lightweight mesh pockets to the sides and front. I personally like lots of outside pockets to provide convenient access to frequently used items, and to have a place to stash a wet tent fly or rainwear.

Durability

The pack is constructed of durable materials, with heavier fabric in high abrasion areas and heavy bar-tacking or reinforcement in stress areas. Fabrics are state of the art for durability and long-term performance.

Value

At approximately $230 USD (depending on the exchange rate), the Aarn Bodypack Featherlite Freedom is a very good value, considering its innovative design, superb fit, comfort, freedom of movement, quality construction, and durability.

Recommendations for Improvement

While the Featherlite Freedom gets an “A” for innovation, fit, and comfort, I would like to recommend a few refinements to make it a little lighter, more convenient to use, and more versatile.

  • Use a lighter weight fabric for the front pockets, where less durability is needed, and add lots of organizational features. The weight of the pockets could be further reduced by using pre-bent carbon stays.
  • Use a lighter weight fabric for the pack liner, such as coated spinnaker cloth.
  • Use a larger buckle (or other arrangement) on the hipbelt to make it easier to attach.
  • Add deep mesh pockets to the sides and front to provide extra volume and make it more usable and versatile when the front pockets are not used.
  • Consider offering an ultralight version of this pack that utilizes state of the art lightweight/durable materials, and lots of convenient storage pockets.

Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 Backpack REVIEW

A product performance review of the Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 internal frame pack.

Overview

Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 Pack - 1
The Mont-Bell Alpine 60, at 3 pounds 11.6 ounces, handles 40 pounds of gear very well and is adequately equipped to attach a multitude of alpine gear – two ice axes, crampons, and climbing rope among them.

The Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 pack has a comfortable frame and an all around durable design. At 3 pounds 11.6 ounces (1.69 kg) and 3,660 cubic inches (60 liters), this pack will most likely be too heavy and large for the ultra-light crowd; however, those who rank themselves as a lightweight backpacker or alpinist may find this pack a great buy. The Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 pack can comfortably handle loads up to 40 pounds. It has attachment options for a variety of tools used by alpine adventurers – crampons, rope, and two ice axes. The pack expands for larger volume loads nicely, but performs poorly when carrying smaller, dense loads due to insufficient compression straps along its lower flank. Hydration compatibility is a nice-to-have option that is missing from the Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 pack.

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Internal frame, top loading, top lid with dual buckle closure supported by a removable lightweight aluminum T-stay (two piece) and 8 mm urethane back/bivy pad.

• Fabric Description

Pack body: Dyneema rip-stop nylon. Bottom/Top Lid: Cordura.

• Sizes

One size adjustable to fit torsos from 17 to 22 inches (43 to 56 cm)

• Volume

3,660 ci (60 L)

• Weight

3 lb 11.6 oz (1.69 kg) as measured with stays (manufacturer claims the same)

• Volume to Weight Ratio

51 ci/oz with stays (based on 3,660 ci and 59.6 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

40 lbs (18 kg) as claimed by Mont-Bell and confirmed by Backpacking Light

• Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

11 (based on 40 lbs and Backpacking Light measured weight of 3 lb 11.6 oz)

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

$179.00

Frame and Suspension

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack incorporates a removable spine-length aluminum stay coupled with a fixed aluminum horizontal T-stay at the pack’s top. Removing the main stay is performed by undoing a Velcro strap and pulling the stay out of its slot. A 0.3 inch thick removable urethane pad measuring 9 inches by 42 inches (0.6 inches thick when folded in the pack) is contained in a separate pocket, which doubles as an emergency bivy pad. Other suspension features include dual density foam shoulder straps, an adjustable sternum strap, padded/stabilized hipbelt, and load lifters. The shoulder straps are sewn in a fixed location on the backpanel. Similar to the shoulder straps, the hipbelt uses dual-density foam and has a secure and low-bulk fit. Adjustment for torso size is performed by sliding the Velcro attached hipbelt up or down. The Velcro attachment of the hipbelt also allows it to be removed entirely; a nice feature for climbers whose harness may otherwise get in the way.

Mont-Bell Lightweight Alpine 60 Pack - 2

Usable Features and Ease of Use

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack consists of a large main pack bag along with a floating/detachable three-pocket top lid. The main sack closes with two main cinches providing a fairly storm-proof enclosure. A compression strap sewn at the sack’s top provides a means to stabilize the main sack as well as to affix a climbing rope. Gear inside the main sack tends to get lost in the cavernous enclosure. Having additional stuff sacks definitely improves usability.

The top lid pocket is attached with three adjustable side release buckles, allowing easy access to the main bag and the ability to adjust the lid to accommodate varying pack volumes. With a fully loaded pack, the lid fits nicely with its elasticized sides. The lid has one large pocket, a smaller pocket suitable for maps, and a handy, accessible valuables pocket.

There are no side-panel water bottle pockets. The Alpine 60 is not hydration ready either; however, it is possible to slide a bladder in the pad pocket (with the vertical stay removed) or leave the bladder loose among one’s other gear. The hydration hose routes easily enough through the main bag opening or through a user-created hole near one of the shoulder straps.

For extended rest stops, one must debate whether the effort to remove the bivy pad is worth the comfort. The vertical aluminum stay must first be taken out of the pack before removing the pad; a task that is difficult when the pack is fully loaded. The pad must then be wrestled out of the pack. However, the greater challenge may be putting the pad back in the full pack. When empty, removal of the bivy pad becomes an easier task, though not as convenient as unlashing one’s sleeping pad from exterior straps.

With dual ice axe loops, a rope attachment strap, a narrow profile, and crampon attachment capability, the Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack is a natural choice for alpine situations. The crampon attachments, made with two buckles sewn on a durable Cordura patch, are located on the top of the lid in a top-heavy and unstable placement. The ice axe loops are located at the bottom of the pack’s daisy chains with axe handles secured with buckles that require threading, a drawback for quick and easy tool removal. Side release buckles would have been a better choice here.

Load Volume Flexibility

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack has a limited ability to adjust to smaller pack volumes. While the two compression straps perform great where they are located, the absence of compression straps lower on the pack causes the pack to bulge out in this location. The pack does much better adjusting to larger volumes. The main packbag has an extension collar that can serve to heighten the pack and allow for greater volumes. The extension collar is big enough and convenient for storing a climbing helmet.

Pack Load Carrying

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack carries 40 pounds well with little load carrying performance loss. The aluminum stays transfer loads to the hipbelt efficiently and effectively. The hipbelt stabilizer straps securely cinch the pack into the lower torso and prevent the pack from swaying. The load stabilizer straps near the shoulders are also effective in ensuring load transfer to the hipbelt. Although the hipbelt is thin and not heavily padded, it is comfortable while carrying the maximum load recommended (40 pounds). The thick, dual density shoulder straps also increase carrying comfort.

When packing the Alpine pack, it is important to prevent heavier items from shifting to the pack’s bottom where there are no compression straps to control the load. With a smaller pack volume but weight still in the 30 pound range, it is difficult to maintain a neatly packed bag. Heavier items shift to the uncompressed lower section of the packbag making it bottom heavy. For the alpine user, this scenario may play out when leaving behind gear for the day and making a fast and light summit push. In this situation, the Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack does not carry loads effectively.

Durability

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack is made with lightweight alpinism in mind. Durable Dyneema flanks the majority of the pack with tough Cordura patches on high use areas. This pack will stand up reasonably well to slides and scrapes on rocky scrambles as well as ascents up chimneys. Large fasteners are used throughout the pack which exude toughness. We are continually impressed with the quality of workmanship seen in Mont-Bell gear. The Mont-Bell Alpine is no exception, with double stitched high stress areas and clean finished seams.

Value

The Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack is a good value in a lightweight, alpine worthy pack when compared to other packs in the same category, which are generally $20 to $40 more expensive. This pack is relatively lightweight and extremely durable; it will no doubt last through years of abuse.

Recommendations for Improvement

Areas for improvement with the Mont-Bell Alpine 60 pack might include adding another well placed compression strap near the pack bottom. This would allow for carrying heavy, lower volume loads with greater load control. Threading buckles to attach ice axes made removing tools difficult at best, especially while wearing gloves. Side release buckles would be an improvement. Finally, integrating a hydration ready design would greatly improve this packs usability, since it lacks water bottle pockets.

Osprey Atmos 50 Backpack REVIEW

A durable and effective load carrier with an innovative back panel that keeps your back cool.

Overview

Osprey Atmos 50 Backpack - 1
The Osprey Atmos 50 worn by the author. Because so much of this pack’s volume is divided among the various pockets, bulky items, like your tent and sleeping pad, can be difficult to fit inside the backpack.

The Osprey Atmos 50 is the largest backpack in the Atmos series with a volume of 3,050 cubic inches (50 liters). Its solid construction, 11 compartments, innovative Airspeed suspension, and two hydration ports are all packaged in a 2 pound 13 ounce (1.28 kg) production backpack. While the Atmos 50 is hardly the lightest backpack in its size class, you will be hard pressed to find a comparable backpack, with similar features, weighing less. The Airspeed suspension sets this backpack apart from the rest with its trampoline-like mesh back panel that is given tension by a flexible hourglass frame. The frame is stiff enough along the vertical axis to support the pack load and flexible enough to easily twist with your hips and torso as you move. The tubular and rod aluminum, spring-loaded frame suspends the main backpack compartment 1.5 to 3 inches from your back. This creates an open, zipper accessible, space that is not only an excellent place to store a water bladder, but makes the Atmos 50 exceptionally breathable.

Our pre-production sample had a comfortable carrying capacity of 25 pounds. As the load was increased, the lower edge of the hipbelt started to dig into our hips. The Atmos 50 can definitely handle loads heavier than 25 pounds (one reviewer started a desert backpacking trip with 42 pounds), but when loads exceed 30 pounds we all felt discomfort from the hipbelt.

In Brief

  • Bombproof by lightweight backpack standards.
  • The Airspeed suspension creates a superbly breathable and comfortable backpack with a frame that is stiff enough to support even large loads, but flexible enough to easily conform to the user’s movements.
  • Eight external pockets, two hydration pockets, and the main packbag make compartment style packing a breeze.
  • The back panel hydration pocket is easily accessible and does not use precious space in the main packbag.
  • The two hipbelt pockets are great for storing small “essentials” and reduce the need to take the pack off to retrieve such items while on the trail.
  • The hipbelt angle limits the carrying capacity, conservatively, to 25 pounds – far less than the carrying capacity of the Airspeed frame.
  • Heavier than many internal frame backpacks of similar volume.

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Internal frame, panel loading

• Fabric Description

Our pre-production review samples were constructed of 410d broken twill weave nylon (red) and 210d double ripstop nylon (gray). In production packs, Osprey has replaced the 410d nylon with a lighter 210d broken twill. A durable stretch material (also gray), similar to but lighter than Spandura, is used for the pockets.

• Sizes Size M tested

Size Torso Length (in) Torso Length (cm)
S <18.5 <47
M 18-21 46-53
L >20 >51

• Weight

3 lbs 1.1 oz (1.39 kg) as measured, size medium. Our pre-production samples were constructed with heavier fabrics than intended for final production packs. According to Osprey, the production Atmos 50 packs weigh 2 lbs 13 oz (1.28 kg).

• Volume to Weight Ratio

67 ci/oz size M (Based on 3,050 ci and Osprey provided weight of 2 lbs 13 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

25 lbs, determined by Backpacking Light. Manufacturer’s rating not provided.

• Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

9 (based on 25 lbs and Osprey provided weight of 2 lbs 13 oz)

• Model Year

2005

• MSRP

$199

Frame, Suspension, and Pack Load Carrying Performance

Osprey Atmos 50 Backpack - 2
The Airspeed suspension used by the Atmos series packs combines a mesh trampoline-like back panel with an aluminum hourglass shaped frame to suspend the main packbag away from your back.

The Osprey Atmos series backpacks are set apart by their lightweight Airspeed suspension. Built of tubular and rod aluminum, the Airspeed frame turns the mesh back panel into a stiff, trampoline-like, surface and suspends the backpack several inches away from the wearer’s back. This keeps your back extremely cool and comfortable. A centrally located pivot allows the upper and lower portions to twist independently. This, combined with the flexibility of the mesh back panel, allows the backpack to conform and move with the individual’s body shape quite effectively while still providing enough rigidity to carry heavy loads.

I used the Atmos 50 on backpacking trips along the notoriously hilly northern Virginia section of the Appalachian Trail called the Roller Coaster, as well as several hikes in Michigan. The backpack was also tested on a desert hike where carrying large amounts of water was essential. We found that the hipbelt was the primary limiting feature to carrying heavier loads. As loads increased past 25 pounds, the lower edge of the hipbelt would begin to cut into our hips. The hipbelt does a poor job of spreading the weight evenly. The frame is certainly capable of carrying loads far heavier than 25 pounds, but we found that carrying large loads for extended periods of time was quite uncomfortable. The shoulder strap padding is light and thin, and while the straps conform to most body types, one reviewer experienced discomfort just below and to the inside of the armpit.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Osprey Atmos 50 Backpack - 3
The space created by the Airspeed suspension and back panel is ideal for storing water bladders (two 1-liter Nalgene flexible canteens and a 2-liter Platypus bladder) without sacrificing precious main compartment volume.

If you prefer to separate gear into many pockets, instead of in one great maw, the Atmos 50 probably has a pocket to suit your needs. There are a total of 11 compartments in this backpack: eight exterior pockets, the back panel hydration pocket, the internal hydration pocket, and the main packbag.

The back panel pocket provides an easy way to carry hydration bladders. This pocket is accessed through an inside zipper at the top of the main packbag and is large enough to easily hold 4 liters of water. This is the best place to store water: you do not sacrifice precious space in the other pockets nor have to unpack the backpack to access the water bladders. Some reviewers noticed the slight bulk and water temperature of bladders stowed here, but were not irritated by either. If water temperature is a concern, a user could simply wrap the water bladder in thin foam or bubble wrap to insulate it.

There are three other pockets that can carry water. The two side panel pockets are capacious enough to comfortably hold 1-liter bottles. These pockets are not accessible while wearing the backpack, and the compression straps cover them making it hard to remove or insert items without loosening the straps. There is a classic internal hydration bladder pocket built into the main packbag but accessing the bladder in this pocket usually requires unloading the pack and any volume taken up by the bladder reduces internal pack volume accordingly.

The two zippered, mesh pockets on either side of the hipbelt are a clear design winner. You can easily put a small digital camera and notebook in one pocket and use the other pocket to store trail snacks and a pocket-size GPS.

The front, elastic “shove-it” pocket can easily hold a poncho and softshell jacket. While it would be nice if the pocket were a bit larger, it is hardly a major drawback. We found the release buckle to that pocket difficult to actuate, particularly when the pack was full. The female end, which is firmly attached flat against the pack fabric, is the culprit.

Behind the shove-it pocket are two vertical pockets accessed through water-resistant zippers and backed by urethane-coated fabric. Since these share pack volume with the main packbag, filling the main compartment with gear reduces what these pockets can hold and limits their usefulness.

The top lid pocket is spacious. I found I could generally reach up to open and close the pocket to retrieve strategically placed items without removing the pack. The floating design also allowed stowage of a rain jacket or similarly sized item under the hood.

The Osprey Atmos 50 has four compression straps: two on each side panel. These were effective at compressing and controlling the load. The lower two unfortunately cover the two vertical side pockets making these difficult to access while wearing the pack.

There are two ice axe loops at the bottom of the pack with corresponding loops on the upper sides to attach long pieces of gear such as tent or trekking poles. On the bottom, front panel of the Osprey Atmos 50 are two webbing strap loops, adjustable with small side release buckles, that are sized right for a small four-season tent in its stuff sack or a foam sleeping pad.

Durability

As mentioned previously, our review sample was a pre-production prototype. There will be changes in the production model, notably a switch to lighter fabrics. During my tests of the backpack I saw no signs of unexpected wear. The fabrics in the pre-production model were virtually bombproof by lightweight backpack standards. Osprey’s decision to lighten the fabrics is appropriate.

Value

The Osprey Atmos 50 a good value. It’s replete with features, has a design that provides superior ventilation, and a frame that readily conforms to your body, and it’s well built. For those who prefer simplicity, the myriad of features may act more as a hindrance to packing, and although this pack is a good value for the features, it may not be the best choice for ultralight backpacking.

Recommendations for Improvement

While the Osprey Atmos 50 is a very fine pack there are some things that could be done to make it even better.

The internal hydration pocket is a tight fit for a full bladder. More than once I inadvertently squeezed water out of my bladder while installing it into this pocket. In addition, using this pocket reduces the internal volume of the main compartment considerably. Given the very useful space between the mesh back panel and the main packbag for storing multiple bladders, we would recommend removing the unnecessary internal bladder pocket to reduce weight.

The main limitation to carrying weight in the Osprey Atmos 50 was not the suspension or even the pack’s capacity, but the hipbelt. When loads exceeded 25 pounds, our reviewers started to notice the hipbelt digging in. The hipbelt concentrates weight to the lower edge of the belt and results in increasing discomfort with increasing weight carried. Altering the hipbelt angle where it attaches to the back panel, to reduce the pressure on the lower edge, would greatly extend the pack’s carrying capacity. With loads greater than about 30 pounds, wearers also started to feel discomfort in the shoulder straps. The shoulder straps hit a bit too wide on the shoulders, rather than draping over the collarbone.

Wild Things AT Backpack REVIEW

A lightweight classic for many years: does it still have what it takes to compete with the new breed of frameless packs on the market?

Overview

Wild Things AT Pack - 1
Author Will Rietveld with the Wild Things AT pack in the San Juan Mountains of southwest Colorado.

The Wild Things AT pack is a large capacity multi-purpose pack that could be used as a lightweight approach pack or (as the name implies) a long-trail pack. The pack has a thick, stiff backpad and solidly connected hipbelt, which give it remarkable load carrying capacity for a frameless backpack. We dragged this pack over ledges and bushwhacked with it nearly without a scratch, thanks to its Dimension Polyant X-PAC fabric and reliable construction. However, the Wild Things AT pack lacks some hiker-friendly features. Exterior storage space is limited and water bottle pockets are not accessible with the pack on. We would appreciate a large mesh pocket on the back of the pack for drying wet gear. The Wild Things AT pack has limited compressibility; only one of the horizontal compression straps is effective in adjusting pack volume for different load sizes. Overall, the Wild Things AT pack rocks for carrying high volume/weight loads through rough country, but it needs more convenience features to satisfy the typical lightweight backpacker.

Specifications

โ€ข Backpack Style

Frameless, top loading with a top lid pocket

โ€ข Fabric Description

Pack body, side pockets, and top cap: Dimension Polyant X-PAC fabric, 5.5 oz/yd2 (186 g/m2) three-layer polyester TX, 150d with a tear strength of 25 lb and a waterproofness specification of 100 psi. Extension collar: 1.9 oz/yd2 (64 g/m2) PU coated ripstop nylon.

โ€ข Sizes Size L tested

Sizes Torso Length (in) Torso Length (cm)
S 17-19 43-48
M 18.5-20.5 47-52
L 20-22 51-56

โ€ข Volume

5,000 ci (82 L) total, 4,200 ci (69 L) in the main body and 800 ci (13 L) in the extension collar. Pack volume is the same for all sizes.

โ€ข Weight

Backpacking Light measured (men’s L) 2 lb 9.2 oz (1.17 kg); manufacturer specification 2 lb 8 oz (1.13 kg)

โ€ข Volume to Weight Ratio

102 ci/oz unextended, 121 ci/oz extended (based on Backpacking Light measured pack weight of 2 lb 9.2 oz).

โ€ข Load Carrying Capacity

Backpacking Light estimated comfortable capacity 25-30 lb (11.3-13.6 kg), manufacturer estimated comfortable load carrying capacity 40 lb (18.1 kg)

โ€ข Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

11.7 (based on 30 lb and Backpacking Light measured weight of 2 lb 9.2 oz)

โ€ข Model Year

2004

โ€ข MSRP

$230 Manufacturer suggested retail price

Frame and Suspension

Wild Things AT Pack - 2

The Wild Things AT pack utilizes a full-length 0.75-inch thick closed cell foam backpad in combination with two horizontal and two vertical compression straps to create a virtual frame for weight transfer to the hips. The pack’s suspension consists of contoured shoulder pads, load lifter straps, sternum strap, and a removable padded hipbelt with side stabilizer straps.

The foam backpad can be removed from its zippered compartment and replaced with a sleeping pad. The Wild Things AT pack weighs 2 pounds 5.2 ounces without the foam backpad. We tried an inflatable sleeping pad (Therm-a-Rest ProLite 3 Short) and a closed-cell foam sleeping pad (Ridge Rest 3/4) in the compartment. While both fit fine, they are about 4 inches shorter than the original pad and reduce the effective pack torso length by the same amount.

The shoulder strap load lifters are long enough to reach with the pack on. The sternum strap has limited adjustability, and needs longer webbing and possibly ladder-lock buckles on both ends to make it more easily adjustable. Neither the shoulder straps nor the 4-inch wide hipbelt is adjustable for torso length. The best way to fit this pack is to loosen all of the straps, put the pack on, snug the hipbelt at the proper location, and then systematically adjust the shoulder straps, load lifters, and hipbelt stabilizer straps. All of these straps on the Wild Things AT Pack are sufficiently long, and can be trimmed to reduce weight by an additional 2-3 ounces, should one desire.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Although the Wild Things AT pack is a minimalist pack, it does have several essential features: two side pockets that are large enough to hold 2-liter bottles, a fitted lid with two pockets, two gear loops on the hipbelt, a double drawcord extension collar, a sturdy haul loop, and a whistle incorporated into the sternum strap side release buckle.

Wild Things AT Pack - 3
The Wild Things AT Pack has an enormous volume capacity for a frameless pack (5,000 cubic inches), but has limited compression to control smaller volume loads.

The pack body is huge and swallows an enormous volume of gear. The manufacturer claims that the pack can be used as a partial bivy to cover up to 36 inches of the lower body. Loading it with lightweight gear, we were unable to exceed the main packbag volume and never needed the extension collar

The sides of the top lid use elastic to provide a snug fit. The top is easily removed and can be used as a daypack by connecting the fasteners on each side and slipping your arms through the holes. The lid has a medium-sized pocket on the topside, with a water-repellent zipper, and a smaller zippered compartment on the underside. Outside storage on the Wild Things AT pack is limited to the lid topside pocket, which is too small to hold a rain jacket, and the two side pockets.

The Wild Things AT pack has to come off for the wearer to take a drink since it is not hydration compatible and water bottles cannot be accessed while wearing the pack. With no outside mesh pockets, the only option for drying wet gear is to tuck it under the compression straps.

The Wild Things AT Pack can be used for light climbing, but it is not equipped for serious climbing. It has gear loops on the hipbelt and a sturdy daisy chain on the shoulder pads for holding and accessing hardware, but no haul loop, ice axe loop, or outside attachment point for carrying a climbing rope, and the side water bottle pockets make the pack a bit too wide for slipping through narrow places.

Load Volume Flexibility (Compression)

The Wild Things AT Pack has a limited ability to control small volume loads. Only the lower horizontal compression strap does any real compressing. Unless the pack and extension collar are loaded to capacity (a rare occurrence for the lightweight backpacker) the upper horizontal compression strap is too high to compress anything. The two vertical “compression straps” merely serve to secure the top cap; offering little compression to the main packbag. It would help to have a third horizontal compression strap just above the water bottle pockets.

Pack Load Carrying

I carried the Wild Things AT pack on five backpacking trips in the Colorado Rockies. Initial pack weights ranged from 27 to 38 pounds. I carried several 2-liter bottles of water to raise pack weight, emptying one after each 1,000 feet of elevation gain, testing the pack with loads down to 20 pounds. The pack endured mountain winds, snow showers, rain showers, some scrambling where the pack had to be raised and lowered over ledges, and bushwhacking through heavy brush.

Using the method detailed in Quantitative Analysis of Backpack Suspension Performance we found significant pack torso collapse with loads above 30 pounds. After carrying the Wild Things AT pack a total of about 65 miles and gaining 13,500 feet of elevation, I found the maximum comfortable load carrying capacity for the Wild Things AT pack to be 25 to 30 pounds. With a 30-pound load, approximately 80 percent of the weight could be transferred to the hips, and the comfort level was quite good. It may be possible for some people to comfortably carry properly packed loads approaching 35 to 40 pounds.

The Wild Thing AT pack’s thick, stiff backpad tightly fitted into a zippered pocket, combined with a solidly attached hipbelt account for the pack’s remarkable weight carrying capacity. As with most frameless packs, the more the pack is expanded the better it carries. We substituted a three-quarter length Ridge Rest pad (folded to five layers) in place of the AT pack’s backpad, and it worked equally well supporting loads although it shortened the pack’s torso length to a size medium. Conversely, a self-inflating Therm-a-Rest sleeping pad provided little weight transfer; pack carrying comfort was reduced to 20 pounds.

The Wild Things AT pack is tall with a center of gravity close to the user’s body. It works well to load heavier items against the backpad in the upper center of the pack to optimize the center of gravity.

Durability Field Observations

The Wild Things AT pack will hold up to a lot of use. The lack of fragile mesh pockets and the pack’s Dimension Polyant X-PAC fabric make it very durable for bushwhacking or mountaineering. The bottom of the pack is a double layer of Dimension Polyant. Seams on the top cap are single stitched. Critical seams on the pack body are triple stitched (outer row stitched twice, inner – less stressed row – stitched once). Webbing, heavily bar tacked, is used to reinforce load bearing attachment points.

Value

Strong points for the Wild Things AT pack are its high durability and volume/weight carrying capacity. It has good padding on the shoulder straps and hipbelt and plenty of adjustments for a good fit. However, at $230 it is on the expensive side and we therefore rate it as an average value.

Recommendations for Improvement

We suggest Wild Things add a third compression strap to the backpanel, and lower the top side panel straps, so pack volume can be more effectively adjusted and the virtual frame more easily maintained with mid to small volume loads. Use ladder-lock buckles on both ends of the sternum strap along with longer webbing to make it more easily adjustable. The lack of exterior pockets requires frequent entry into the pack bag. We love convenient outside storage pockets and recommend that the top cap pocket be enlarged so it will hold more. Also, adding a large mesh pocket to the back of the pack would facilitate drying gear.

Book Review: Fixing Your Feet

“Flyin'” Brian Robinson reviews the seminal work about foot care for hikers, backpackers, adventure racers, and other outdoor athletes.

Fixing Your Feet: Prevention and Treatments for Athletes, by John Vonhof. Wilderness Press (third edition, 2004), 341 pages (softbound, illustrated), $17.95. ISBN 0-89997-354-X.

Fixing Your Feet is the definitive guide to foot care for hikers, runners and walkers. Its author, John Vonhof, has extensive first-hand experience fixing foot problems at trail runs and adventure races around the world. He has added the collective wisdom of dozens of outdoor athletes who tell us what works for them. The book is well organized and full of great information. The personal anecdotes of athletes, many of whom I know either personally or by reputation, greatly enhance the readability of this reference book. The result is a smorgasbord of ideas and instructions for preventing and fixing any foot problem.

I read the first edition of this book while preparing for my 7,400-mile Calendar Triple Crown hike in 2001. Solo for much of the 300 days, I needed to be my own foot-care expert and this book taught me what I needed to know. I completed that hike with very few blisters or other foot problems. Then in 2003, I ran the 220-mile John Muir Trail in four days. I blistered horribly and lost several toenails, so back to the book I went. This time I read the 2nd edition. Shoe and sock technology, taping technique, foot-care products and websites had changed a lot in that time. More changes have come along since, resulting in the completely revised 3rd edition which documents state of the art foot-care today.

The key to this book’s effectiveness is its practical advice. Starting with what hurts, the author guides us in discovering what’s wrong with our feet and what we can do about it. For example, the book lists 159 ways to prevent blisters! Multiple solutions are provided for each problem because what works for one person’s feet doesn’t work for everyone, and as I learned on the John Muir Trail, what works today may not work tomorrow.

In 341 pages, the book covers all aspects of foot care and treatment. There are so many avenues to explore that I’m still trying out some of the suggestions on my longest runs and hikes. I refer to this book constantly and I believe it deserves a place on the reference shelf of every serious outdoor athlete.

Purchase Fixing Your Feet now at BackpackingLight.com.

Book Review  Fixing Your Feet Prevention and Treatments for Athletes - 2

“Flyin’ Brian” Robinson is the only person who has ever completed the Calendar Triple Crown, a 7,400-mile, triple through-hike of the Appalachian, Pacific Crest and Continental Divide Trails, all in the same year. His 10-month odyssey through 22 states traversed the entire length of the three major U.S. mountain divides in 2001.

Disclosure: Brian Robinson receives no proceeds from the sale of this book and is not affiliated with BackpackingLight.com except as a guest author.

Moonbow Gearskin Backpack REVIEW

Product performance review of the Moonbow Gearskin frameless pack – a unique harness/compression system that acts like a pack.

Overview

Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 1

The Moonbow Gearskin is a truly unique pack. More accurately, it is a “harness/compression system that acts like a pack.” Instead of using a large sack that is filled from the top or sides, the Gearskin folds around your shelter, sleeping bag, and other items and compresses them into a pack-like load.

The Gearskin system has some strong advantages. It is the fastest packing system I have used. All you have to do is open the pack, lay down your pad, roll up your shelter with sleeping bag and other items inside, attach and tighten the compression straps, and go! Using this system, we were able to break down camp and be on the trail in record time. Further, the Gearskin system can expand to handle very large loads – up to 6,500 cubic inches! This is a custom product and built with very high standards of quality. It is also very lightweight at 1 pound 9.8 ounces (0.73 kg).

However, this system also has its disadvantages. Because the Moonbow Gearskin pack has no side or top protection, your gear is at risk when hiking through underbrush or scrambling. With your sleeping bag rolled up inside the shelter, any leftover condensation on the shelter comes into direct contact with the bag’s insulation, possibly decreasing its loft. Although the Gearskin can handle very large loads, it handles small loads poorly, allowing gear to shift and smaller items to fall out between compression straps. Of these concerns, the first two can be easily addressed by using a pack liner and waterproof sleeping bag stuff sack, although they add to the Gearskin’s weight and eliminate some of its simplicity.

The Moonbow Gearskin is a pack that does some things extremely well and delivers a unique range of options. For a backpacker who wants to maximize trail time, hikes in drier climates, sticks to trails, and wants a pack to handle a wide range of load volumes, the Moonbow Gearskin pack is a quality item that does the job differently than any other.

Specifications

• Backpack Style

Frameless, unique harness/compression system

• Fabric Description

200d, 4 oz/yd2 (136 g/m2) Oxford used on main pack body, heavy mesh used on optional outside pocket. Also available in 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) silnylon, 1.9 oz/yd2 (64 g/m2) coated ripstop, and 400d, 8 oz/yd2 (271 g/m2) pack cloth.

• Sizes

Custom sizing. To order one, you send a torso outline and body measurements and Moonbow makes the pack to your specifications. Size reviewed was for a 19.5 in (50 cm) torso.

• Volume

Variable from 2,500 – 6,500 ci (41 L – 106 L). Extra back pocket adds approximately 700 ci (11 L) and hip pocket adds approximately 35 ci (0.6 L)

• Weight

1 lb 9.8 oz (0.73 kg) as measured, 19.5″ torso; manufacturer’s specification “around 1 pound” (0.45 kg), however, this is widely variable based on fabric selection and options.

• Volume to Weight Ratio

Variable from 97 to 252 ci/oz due to expandable volume (based on 2,500 – 6,500 ci volume and Backpacking Light measured weight of 1 lb 9.8 oz)

• Load Carrying Capacity

Backpacking Light maximum carrying capacity: 30 lb (13.6 kg). Backpacking Light comfortable carrying capacity: 20 – 25 lb (9.1-11.3 kg). No carrying capacity given by Moonbow.

• Carry Load to Pack Weight Performance Ratio

18.6 (based on Backpacking Light maximum carrying capacity of 30 lb and Backpacking Light measured weight of 1 lb 9.8 oz)

• Model Year

2004

• MSRP

Manufacturer’s suggested retail prices start at $180. Cost as tested (with removable hip pocket and large mesh back pocket): $213

Frame and Suspension

According to Moonbow, “A Gearskin is a harness/compression system that acts like a pack.” This is entirely accurate; the pack is essentially a compression “burrito” with shoulder straps, a waist belt, a sternum strap, and load lifters, all custom-sized for your back. I found the padded shoulder straps comfortable, as was the 4.5-inch wide, padded hipbelt, which transferred heavier loads onto the hips. The load lifters require a very full pack before they become effective, as the gear is needed to form the virtual frame in the upper portion. The virtual frame is created by way of an extensive compression system, consisting of ten quick-release adjustable straps (four on each side and two on top). While the compression system can accommodate a very large load, undersized loads may shift inside the tightened straps.

Usable Features and Ease of Use

Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 2 Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 2

Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 2 Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 2 Moonbow Gearskin Pack REVIEW - 2

Packing the Moonbow Gearskin pack, left to right from the top.

The Moonbow Gearskin pack utilizes a unique system to load gear. Instead of having an enclosed sack into which you put your gear via a top entry or side zipper, the Gearskin wraps around your rolled-up load and compresses it into a large fold, simplifying the process of packing up. We used the following steps when packing up the Gearskin:

  1. Lay out the Moonbow Gearskin pack by releasing the side-release buckles on the compression straps.
  2. Set your folded sleeping pad against the back panel of the pack.
  3. Collapse and roll or fold-up your shelter with the sleeping bag still inside and lay it on the pack.
  4. Insert other items into the fold of the shelter including poles, stove kit, and clothing.
  5. Buckle the compression straps. Add any other items you need on the trail such as a clothing stuff sack or water bottle. Tighten the straps, and you’re ready to go.

Packing up camp with the Moonbow Gearskin pack was very quick and easy with one roll and no stuff sacks needed. It was one of the fastest packing systems we’ve seen. Many variations on the packing system are possible including using stuff sacks or a large packliner (see Options below). It is also possible to leave the pad inside the shelter but we found our described method easiest.

While the Gearskin system is very quick to pack, there are some caveats. First, it leaves your shelter exposed and unprotected – a real problem when hiking off-trail or canyoneering. Further, because the sleeping bag is left inside the tent, any leftover condensation comes into direct contact with the sleeping bag’s insulation. Because of this, we recommend using a large waterproof sleeping bag stuff sack.

Because of its open design, it is simple to slide a hydration bladder into the Moonbow Gearskin pack, but with no side pockets, water bottles and small bladders must be cinched down in the compression system, making it impossible to access them on the go. Long items like tent poles can slide out of the side compression straps but are quite secure in the center of the pack, compressed within the Gearskin.

As tested, our Moonbow pack came with the large back mesh pocket and a single, removable hip pouch. Because the Moonbow Gearskin envelops most of your gear in the folded shelter/bag/pad roll, these outer pouches made it much easier to access daily items such as camera, rain gear, and lunch on the trail. You need to unclip and unroll the whole load to access large items while on the trail.

Load Volume Flexibility (Compression)

The Moonbow Gearskin pack does an excellent job of handling large loads. Even with a HUGE amount of gear (up to 6,500 cubic inches), the compression system expands to accommodate and compress the load. This pack can easily carry a winter load when extra insulation would have most ultralight packs bursting at the seams. However, the Gearskin does poorly with small, dense loads. When we tried to use the Moonbow pack with our normal stuff sacks or as a daypack, items shifted and even fell out between the compression straps. It is important to use the Gearskin as directed with a shelter and sleeping bag enclosing the load (or with larger stuff sacks that don’t compress gear in order to fill the pack’s minimum load volume). By switching to this style of packing, and not mistaking the Gearskin as a summit or daypack, it was able to carry minimal loads in comfort.

Options

Because it is custom built for you, the Moonbow Gearskin pack is available with many different options. In addition to different fabrics, you may also select a large back mesh pocket, single or dual back fabric pockets, ice axe loops, hip pouches, a mesh pocket against your back for a towel, or a packliner to keep your load fully enclosed. Further, to fully incorporate the pack into a Powerpac system, you can have the Gearskin permanently or semi-permanently (with Velcro) attached to a shelter to become an integral part of a shelter or bivy system. Beyond that, design changes are up to you and Moonbow is known for their custom work.

Pack Load Carrying

Properly loaded with sufficient volume, the Moonbow Gearskin pack comfortably carries 20 to 25 pounds when using a closed cell foam sleeping pad to create a “virtual frame.” Loads up to 30 pounds are bearable for short durations. The Gearskin design results in the load center of gravity being comfortably close to your back. Unlike some other ultralight frameless packs that create a tubular shape when overloaded, the Moonbow Gearskin is able to maintain a rectangular shape (bird’s eye view), keeping the load close. That said, this large contact area doesn’t allow for breathability and after a long day of hiking, the back of the pack can be soaked.

It is critical that you fill the Moonbow Gearskin pack at least to the minimum capacity. With loads less than 2,500 cubic inches, it is impossible to properly compress the pack, severely compromising the virtual frame. Although the Gearskin has an excellent hip belt and shoulder straps, it is critical to maintain this minimum volume to create a firm enough virtual frame to handle the weight. If the minimum volume is not met, the frame can collapse, exerting excessive torque on the shoulders. For comparison, packs that have pad pockets like the Six Moon Designs Starlite and Gossamer Gear Mariposa (with pads in the pockets and optional stays removed for a fair comparison) do not compress smaller loads well either, but because the pad pocket locks the pad to the harness, the virtual frame is maintained.

As load volumes increase, the Gearskin’s compression system becomes a real asset. During one testing session, we loaded the pack with bulky winter clothing, a -10 °F sleeping bag, a winter tent, and all other necessary winter gear. The compression system easily accommodated this large load (approximately 5,000 cubic inches) and it carried very comfortably. While the compression system can handle these bulky loads, keep in mind that they have to remain relatively light to remain at or below the comfortable carry capacity.

Durability

Each Moonbow Gearskin pack, hand-sewn by Rhia at Moonbow, is a beautifully constructed piece of equipment. The stitching on the pack is top-notch with double bar tacking at every compression strap and haul loop contact, felled seams to prevent fraying, and extra reinforcing at shoulder strap attachments. There are quality YKK zippers on the zippered hip pockets and ITM Nexus buckles throughout. Our Gearskin came in 200 denier Oxford cloth which, although heavier than other ultralight options, showed no signs of wear after scrapes against brush and granite cliff faces during a scramble in the Cascades. The mesh used in the optional large exterior pocket is also extremely tough and resisted wear from tent poles, stakes, and sharp rock samples.

Although the Moonbow Gearskin is very durable, it does not fully enclose your gear in its tough fabrics. Using the suggested packing system, your shelter is fully exposed along the sides and top when on the trail. While the pack remained unscathed throughout our testing, my exposed tent rainfly became heavily abraded during some off trail jaunts. It is highly recommended that durable stuff sacks or a pack cover/liner be used with the Gearskin during conditions such as these.

Value

At $213, as tested, the Moonbow Gearskin pack is one of the more expensive frameless packs. However, it is a specialty pack that is of the highest quality and comes to you EXACTLY as you want it. This is a high-quality piece of equipment that is durable enough to last many seasons. If a faster packing system and the ability to carry an extremely wide range of pack volumes is what you’re looking for, the Moonbow Gearskin may be the year-round pack that will best accommodate your needs.

Recommendations for Improvement

This is a unique design that has its own advantages and disadvantages. It packs very quickly and can handle an extremely wide range of larger volumes. However, it lacks the ability to handle smaller volumes, has no side or top gear protection, and the problem of tent condensation coming in contact with sleeping bags. These concerns are simply the tradeoffs of the system. Using a packliner and stuff sacks can solve the concerns of gear and sleeping bag protection, but this reduces the packing-up-speed and simplicity of the pack. Wrapping items more securely into the tent can eliminate the problem of small items falling out between the side straps; however, this further limits accessibility. It is possible that by adding overlapping fabric flaps on the side of the Moonbow Gearskin pack, the problems of gear protection and smaller items falling out could be minimized.