Articles (2020)

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

Henry Shires performs his magic once again – the new Tarptent Moment has one hoop pole, two stakes, sets up in less than a minute, and has loads of room for one person.

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
The Tarptent Moment is a single-wall solo tent with vestibule that weighs just 28.5 ounces. It sets up in less than a minute using two stakes.

Editor’s Note: Backpacking Light is including new products from small online businesses in our Outdoor Retailer coverage. Most can’t afford a booth at OR, but their new products are just as important to our readers as those from the big companies.

Overview

Henry Shires at Tarptent has really been cranking out a lot of new tents lately. Within the last eight months, he has introduced the Scarp 1, Scarp 2, and Hogback, all double-wall and all really good designs. In August 2009 he will be introducing the Moment, a single-wall solo tent with a side entry vestibule that sets up in less than a minute with two stakes and weighs just 28.5 ounces!

The Moment uses one lateral center pole, similar to the other new Tarptents. Each end has a PitchLok strut consisting of two carbon fiber struts in sleeves that create a triangle. Set-up is a three-step process – slide the pole into its sleeve and connect to grommets at the ends, stake one end of the tent, and stake the other end. Simple and fast.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2

Side view. The zippered entry is on the right side of the center pole. There are two top vents, which is a real plus.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
End view. The Moment is diamond-shaped and has a vestibule on the entry.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
Looking inside. There is plenty of room for one person plus gear, plus a dog. Dimensions are 84 inches long, 40 inches wide at center, 20 inches wide at ends, and 40 inches high at center.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 5
Inside, looking toward the foot of the tent. The floor has 5-inch bathtub walls, and there is a mesh panel at the end for ventilation.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 6
The sides of the tent are raised above the ground for ventilation (left), and can be raised even higher (right) for extra ventilation when it’s needed.

The new Tarptent Moment resembles to the Terra Nova Laser Competition and Photon, but it’s single-wall, while the Competition and Photon are double-wall. The major differences are in the details: the Moment has an L-shaped zippered mesh entry wall, uses two stakes rather than twelve, and is much better ventilated.

Admittedly, I get excited about every new lightweight tent that comes out, but I am really excited about the new Tarptent Moment; this one appears to be a winner.

Specifications and Features

Product Tarptent Moment
Style One-person single-wall tent with floor, side entry with vestibule
Poles and stakes One center lateral aluminum pole, PitchLok end struts, two Easton tubular stakes (included)
Fabric Silnylon 1.3 oz/yd2 canopy and floor, mesh entry wall and perimeter
Area Floor 18 ft2, vestibule 6.6 ft2
Dimensions Length 84 in, center width 40 in, end width 20 in, height 40 in
Weight 28.5 oz 
MSRP US$215 (tentative)

Coming Soon – Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

What can you expect from our coverage of the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market next week?

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
Open Air Demo has a lot of small booths to attract our attention to new innovations, but the main focus is watercraft (above), and lots of them.

The Outdoor Retailer Show is a twice-yearly convention focused on the outdoor store near you – your local outdoor retailer. It’s a huge gathering where gear manufacturers pay big bucks to showcase their latest and greatest gear (in this case for spring 2010) to outdoor retailers and hopefully rake in lots of orders. It’s also a great opportunity for the media (like yours truly) to prowl around and find out what’s in the pipeline.

Outdoor Retailer comes a little earlier starting this summer – July 20-24 to be exact – and Backpacking Light will be there to report on gear of interest to lightweight backpackers. Our coverage will start with Open Air Demo on Monday, July 20, at Pineview Reservoir near Snowbasin. There will be lots of small booths there, where manufacturers will hawk their newest innovations, in hopes of luring us to their big booths at the main Show. But the biggest draw of Open Air Demo is the opportunity to actually try out new gear. It’s mainly about watercraft, and lots of them… which is why it’s located on a reservoir! We get to demo lots of different boats and decide (for example) which Kevlar canoe we like best. Tough job!

The main event runs for four days (July 21-24) at Salt Lake City’s Salt Palace Convention Center. To give you an idea of the scale of the Outdoor Retailer Show, here are a few statistics:

  • The Salt Palace has 515,000 square feet and the OR Show uses all of it and then some. In recent years, the OR Show has spilled over into the nearby Energy Solutions Arena, which is also huge.
  • 21,000 attendees.
  • Over 1000 exhibitors representing 1500 brands.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2
The Outdoor Retailer Show occupies the entire 515,000 square feet of Salt Lake City’s Salt Palace Convention Center (left), and spills over into the nearby Energy Solutions Arena (right).

With so many exhibitors, there’s no way we can cover all of them, nor do we want to. Our challenge is to find the proverbial needle in a haystack – new lightweight gear that will interest our readers. We narrow our focus by visiting manufacturers that will most likely have gear of interest – GoLite, Montbell, Evernew, Terra Nova, Cascade Designs, Innov-8, etc. We also reach out (by email) to small manufacturers (like Gossamer Gear, Tarptent, Six Moon Designs, AntiGravityGear, etc.) who can’t afford a booth at OR and offer to cover new gear they will be announcing between now and spring 2010.

Covering OR means long days for your dedicated reporters. Each day we run through a succession of half-hour appointments with selected manufacturers (which we schedule in advance). When we have a few minutes between appointments, we roam the aisles looking for something new and exciting. By the end of the day, we’re on overload. Dinner provides a short respite, then we head to our hotel room to write articles ’til midnight or later. From Salt Lake City, we email our articles to our off-site team consisting of Mike Martin, Ryan Jordan, Rick Dreher, Ray Estrella, Addie Bedford, and Cat Jasins who help write, edit, and publish the articles in the magazine the next day. Lather, rinse, (sleep?), and repeat…

Despite the sleep deprivation, we love covering OR because it concentrates everything in one place: we find lots of new gear and technologies to report on, we get to visit with our friends in the industry, and we enjoy the enthusiasm and camaraderie.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
Many exhibitors’ booths at OR are very elaborate, requiring major shipping to get things there, plus staff to explain the products.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
Exhibitors use every attention-getting tactic you can think of to attract people to their booth, like this Swiss horn. Many exhibitors use big/tall signs or place their name anywhere it will be seen, including restrooms and floors. Of course, all of that costs money.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 5
Huge piles of shipping crates sit behind the Salt Palace, all labeled by vendor.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 6
As you likely know from magazine ads, the outdoor industry is growing in greener directions, and the Outdoor Retailer Show is no exception.

Up in Smoke: Backcountry Fire Building Videocast

Building a fire is nothing short of an art form, and no one can teach you everything you’d need to know to perfect it in a ten-minute video. Instead of attempting to do this (perfecting your form), we’ve simply highlighted some of the gear and techniques used to start a fire.

Fire building videos on the Internet are a dime a dozen, but each and every one of them can teach you a thing or two. However, building a fire is nothing short of an art form, so no one can teach you everything you’d need to know to perfect it in a ten-minute video.

Instead of attempting to do this (perfect your form) you’ll find that we’ve simply highlighted some of the gear and techniques used to start a fire. A short description of the fire triangle, finding fuel, and other quick tips are included as well.

Watch for a quick intro to these techniques and discuss some of your own on the Backpacking Light forum at the bottom. If we get enough reader suggestions, perhaps we’ll release Up in Smoke II – More Fire Building with Sam H.

 

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player.

Backcountry fire building tips, techniques, and tools with Sam H.

Stoves, Tents and Carbon Monoxide – Deadly or not?
Supplement 5: Snow Peak GST-120 Lite Max

The Snow Peak GST-100 GigaPower stove is widely regarded as the ‘Gold Standard’ for upright canister stoves. It weighs about 74 grams. Snow Peak has released a new stove in this series: the GST-120, or Lite Max, weighing only 56 grams, reviewed here. Does the Lite Max live up to the reputation of its precursor, the GST-100 (which is still available)?

You don’t have access to view this content.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review

The Nemo Nano Elite is marketed by the manufacturer as a lightweight, fast set-up tent aimed at adventure racers and the fast-and-light crowd. Since I can’t run with the former, I try to hang with the latter.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 1
The Nano Elite is a 3.2 pound two-person single-wall three-season tent.

Introduction

The Nemo Nano Elite is marketed by the manufacturer as a lightweight, fast set-up tent aimed at adventure racers and the fast-and-light crowd. Since I can’t run with the former, I try to hang with the latter…

The 3.2 pound (1.46 kilogram) Elite’s interior two-pole set-up and side entry is reminiscent of the Bibler Ahwahnee and Black Diamond Lighthouse tents, but at a much lighter weight, achieved by using non-breathable 20 denier nylon for the body. The Elite is the lightest weight-to-floor-area shelter Nemo makes, even including bivies. And, if the tent can in fact be used by four people, the shelter clocks in at 13 ounces per person.

I did not put the four-person claim to the test, but I did put the Elite through its paces.

Year/Manufacturer/Model 2009 Nemo Nano Elite 2- to 4-Person Tent
Style Three-season, two- to four-person, single-wall tent with floor.
Fabrics Body: 20 denier silicone and PU coated nylon ripstop (1 flavor each side)
Floor: 30 denier PU coated (5000 mm) nylon ripstop
Poles and Stakes Poles: DAC 9/9.6 mm Featherlite poles, total weight 13.1 oz (371 g)
Stakes: 5x  6.4 in (16.3 cm) aluminum X stakes, total weight 2.2 oz (62 g)
Dimensions Length Listed: 82 in (208 cm)
BPL Measured Length: 82 in (208 cm)
Width Listed: 56 in (142 cm)
BPL Measured Width: 53 in (134.6 cm)
Inside Height Listed: 40 in (102 cm)
BPL Measured Height: 39.5 in (100 cm)
(Note: set-up can make these numbers fluctuate.)
Packed Size 8 x 7 in (20 x 18 cm)
Total Weight Listed Weight: 3 lb 1.6 oz (1.43 kg)
BPL Measured Weight: 3 lb 3.6 oz (1.46 kg)
Trail Weight 2.8 lb (1.27 kg)
Protected Area Floor Area Listed: 32 ft2 (2.97 m2)
Actual Area as Set Up: 30.2 ft2 (4.64 m2)
Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 10.8 ft2/lb
MSRP US $389.00
Options Footprint ($39.00, 7 oz/198 g)
Website http://www.nemoequipment.com/

The Product

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 2
Parts of the Nano Elite.

The Nano Elite comes packed in two sacks. The two nine-section, shock-corded poles are in their own 0.8-ounce (23-gram) storage sack that ended up as a 17-inch (43.2-centimeter) long package that is 2 inches (5 centimeters) in diameter. The three sections that make up the middle of each pole are 0.6 mm thicker than the sections at either end to provide more strength at the top of the arch formed by the bent poles.

A 2.7-ounce (77-gram) dry-bag style stuff sack holds the tent body, along with the stake bag. Looking inside the 0.5-ounce (14-gram) stake bag, we find the five aluminum stakes, two guylines, two nylon repair patches and a tent-pole repair sleeve. The guylines, nylon patches, and repair sleeve weigh in at 1 ounce (29 grams).

As Nemo makes the claim that the Nano Elite packs down to the size of a climbing helmet, I thought it appropriate to get a photo of it next to one. When compressed aggressively, the tent body just about gets as small as my Black Diamond helmet. The poles will not fit inside the dry-bag, but the two storage sacks may be attached to one another by running the strap of the dry-bag through a wide loop in the middle of the pole sack. I did not do this, as I pack my poles separately.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 3
As small as a climbing helmet? The Nano Elite stuffed.

The set-up is pretty straightforward and was no mystery to me, as I own a Bibler tent and have used other interior-pole tents in the past. Nemo has thoughtfully printed the set-up instructions on a piece of Tyvek-type material, which is affixed to the open end of the dry-bag.

The ends of the poles sit in a concave metal button at each corner of the tent. Once put in position, the poles stay in place by means of Velcro anchor wraps. A nice touch is the ability to attach them from either side of the tabs, making set-up a little faster.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 4
The poles sit in a metal button in each corner, and are secured with wrap-around Velcro tabs. Two mesh gear pockets sit against the back wall.

At either end of the back wall can be found a triangular mesh gear pocket that measures 11 inches (28 centimeters) at the bottom with an opening of 5.5 inches (14 centimeters). As the pockets are only attached to the tent at the corners, other larger or bulky gear may be stuffed behind the pocket, keeping it close at hand.

The large single door opens by way of an arched double-slider zipper. The zipper is protected by a 1.5-inch (3.8-centimeter) storm flap. As the zipper runs in an upward curve from one side to the other, it means that the open door must lay on the floor of the tent or the ground outside when fully opened. There is a single door keeper in the center of the opening that allows the loose door to be gathered and kept in place somewhat.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 5
Views of the Nano Elite. Top left picture shows the door closed. Top right shows the door open with mesh insert closed. Bottom left shows the side profile. Note the angle of door. When open, rain can fall into the tent and onto the occupant closest to the door. The bottom right picture shows two standard size sleeping pads in place.

The door has a removable mesh insert that can be used to ventilate the tent in bug laden areas. It goes over the door on the outside, allowing the door to be adjusted from inside the tent. One thing I found aggravating is the fact that the mesh insert has a zipper pull on the outside only. I must catch the zipper with a fingernail to drag it around the track to open while inside the tent. Grrrrr.

The Nano Elite has a 36-inch (91-centimeter) long vent near the top of the back wall. A 5-inch (12.7-centimeter) long strut pushes the vent open. The strut, which is attached to the outer edge of the vent, has a section of Velcro to keep it in place. When fully extended, the opening provides approximently 90 square inches of mesh-protected ventilation.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 9
Views of the vent from inside the tent (left), and outside the tent (right).

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 10
The 36-inch long opening provides up to 90 square inches of mesh-protected ventilation.

Field Testing

I used the Nano Elite a total of seven nights, three in Minnesota, three in our local California mountains, and one in Yosemite National Park.

In Minnesota, there were heavy winds coming at 38 miles per hour (61 kilometers per hour) when I pitched the Nano Elite. Setting it up in the high wind was a bit of a chore. I staked one corner to keep it from blowing away and crawled in to set up the poles. The wind was whipping the tent about so much that it was quite difficult to get the pole ends into the metal buttons. Once I had the poles in place, I had to quickly shut the door so as not to become a giant kite. After securing the poles with the Velcro tabs, I went back out to stake it down. I added the two pieces of nylon cord supplied to the guy-outs on the windward side and realized that the tent came with only five stakes. I used a screwdriver as a stake to hold one of the guy-lines. I later put one of my own Ti stakes in with the Nemo stakes in order to be able to fully stake the tent.

Nemo employs catenary curves at the base of the tent to cut out wasted fabric and increase tension in the tent walls, which helps with wind resistance. The tent handled the wind okay, but since the floor can only be staked down at the four corners, I found that the wind came under the floor of the tent at the catenary curves. Though I pulled the corners as tightly as I could, the wind still threw my bag and sleeping pad around when I wasn’t actually on top of or inside them.

This windiness also occurred in California. I was measuring the winds at 12 miles per hour with gusts to 20 miles per hour (19 and 32 kilometers per hour). Again, while I was not in the tent, the wind went under the floor, tossing everything around inside.

While the wind helped keep condensation at bay, as I was able to adjust the door opening to ventilate the tent, it also kept waking me up, as the side of the tent would smack me in the head during gusts. Perhaps this would be less of a problem for users under 6 feet tall (I am 6 feet, 3 inches). As such, I used the Elite as a solo shelter, placing my sleeping bag and pad at an angle to get as much length as possible. Even laying at an angle kitty-corner, my bag still hit both sidewalls.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 11
I found the Nano Elite to be too short for me to keep from hitting the sidewalls, even when placing my sleeping bag at an angle.

As long as there was a little bit of air movement, the Nano Elite did a decent job of keeping condensation under control. But in calm conditions, condensation started building up immediately. On trips during which the bugs were not out yet, I could remove the mesh insert to allow the most ventilation possible and noticed that it did help reduce condensation somewhat, though this wouldn’t be a good solution in buggy conditions.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 12
Waiting for snow at Saxton Camp.

The night in Yosemite saw clear skies and not a breath of wind. The mosquitoes forced me to keep the mesh insert in place. The temperature got down to 38 F (3 C), and I woke to copious condensation. Water was dripping from the poles onto my bag. I used my Packtowl washcloth to wipe the inside walls off before packing up and had to wring it out a couple times in the process.

Observations

As I am 6 feet, 3 inches (191 centimeters) tall, I would have enjoyed the Nano Elite more had it been about 8 inches (20 centimeter) longer. While it is wide enough for two people (should they be shorter than I), there is not room for much else in the way of gear storage inside. The door placement on the side means that the person in the back must climb over the front person to enter or exit the tent. Should that be acceptable, the Nano Elite gives two people a quick pitching tent at about a pound and a half each.

It should be noted that the lack of a vestibule means that, for two people, their packs and possibly footwear would have to stay outside, where they will be exposed to the weather. The lack of vestibule also means that the door can’t be opened to ventilate the tent when it is raining, as water will fall straight into the tent. The person in the front gets crawled over and rained on each time their partner needs out. ("What, you have to go again? Hold it!"). These limitations would probably rule out using the Elite in a place like the Pacific Northwest. Plus, as I ran into condensation problems with the door open, I shudder to think what it would have been like with it closed.

I chose to use the Elite as a solo tent, bringing my gear inside with me. Even solo, the Nano Elite’s weight comes in at the low end of most free-standing two-person tents. Indeed, the tent I use most often, a Big Agnes Seedhouse SL2 with carbon fiber poles and Ti stakes, comes in at only a few ounces less than the Nano Elite.

It should be noted that Nemo does make a standard Nano that is longer and wider, with a vestibule to protect the door. These changes (shorter length and width, no vestibule) were made to the Elite simply as a way to cut weight.

There is plenty of head room, even when I was sitting on my Neo Air pad. The steep side-walls give the tent a lot of room to move around in. Two people can sit and play cards in it with no problem. Four people may even be able to sit inside to wait out a rain shower, but I do not think that four hikers could use it to sleep in. I did not try this, as I don’t know three other people that will hike with me, and the Swedish Bikini Team was not available.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 13
The Elite’s height and steep walls make for plenty of room and head clearance.

The tent performs well in high wind, though any tent with a rectangular base and only two cross poles is going to present a flat face that can catch wind. I tried to always set it up with a back corner into the (anticipated) breeze, and while the sidewallss did bow in during big gusts, the tent did not flap, nor was it noisy. I was pleasantly surprised that it handled the windy night in Minnesota without a single stake being pulled loose.

In non-inclement weather, I found that the Elite has fair ventilation. As long as there is some air movement, condensation was really not a problem. In as little as 4-mile-per-hour (6 kilometer-per-hour) winds, the tent would have enough air movement to keep it fairly dry. The condensation problems occur when it is calm or inclement, though, from my experience, that is true of any non-breathable single-wall tent. The addition of a low shingled vent at one or both ends of the tent would help ventilation, especially when the door may not be used for this purpose due to weather.

One thing that Nemo may want to look at is the placement of the metal buttons in the corners that the poles go into. It is pretty important that the poles, which have a sharp edge, go into the buttons and not the fabric of the tent. I found that the buttons are slightly to the inside of the corner, which made it difficult to insert the pole, especially if the wind was blowing. Each time I set it up, I would wonder if that was the case with any of my other similar tents. Finally, I dug out my Bibler Fitzroy to see if had the same problem, and found that its metal button was dead centered in the corner. I can slide its poles in and hit the button each time, no guessing or fiddling.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 14
While the catenary curves at the base are supposed to help with wind resistance, I found that strong winds would blow under the tent at these points.

What’s Good

  • Light weight for a freestanding tent
  • Fast set-up
  • Good stability in high winds
  • Lots of headroom
  • What’s Not So Good

  • Heavy condensation in inclement weather when venting options are limited
  • Pole-in-button placement difficult in windy conditions
  • Not long enough for taller users
  • Mesh lacking inside zipper pull
  • Comparisons

    As far as comparison tents, the Nano Elite’s closest competitor is probably the Mandatory Gear Puppy Pile Too. This single-wall, external-pole tent uses carbon fiber poles, silnylon, and a lower height to achieve a weight of only 1 pound 14.1 ounces (0.85 kilogram), over a pound less than the Nano Elite.

    Closer in form and function is the Black Diamond Lighthouse. While weighing 12.5 ounces (354 grams) more than the Nano Elite, it boasts more headroom, breathable Epic fabric, and a third short pole at the top that allows limited protection from rain for the door and back window/vent.

    Tent Floor Area (ft2) Peak Height Ventilation Trail Weight (lb) Cost
    Nemo Nano Elite 32 40” Back vent 2.8 $389.00
    MG Puppy Pile Too 36.7 33” Roof-top vent 1.88 $549.00
    BD Lighthouse 33.1 45” Back window, Epic fabric 3.0 $429.95

    Recommendations For Improvement

    • Add an inside pull for the mesh door zipper
    • Re-position the metal buttons for pole ends
    • Add a low vent on the sides for ventilation during rain or snow
    • Include a sixth stake for full guyline use

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation

    The summer of 2008 got Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School off to a great start. We ran three trips in three wildly different locations: Northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and Desert Southwest. Each allowed for a unique experience and permitted us to focus on the core curriculum of the Wilderness Trekking format.

    Lightweight Education

    The summer of 2008 got Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School off to a great start. We ran three trips in three wildly different locations: Northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and Desert Southwest. Each allowed for a unique experience and permitted us to focus on the core curriculum of the Wilderness Trekking format.

    All three of our courses began with a full day in a classroom as a foundation for the backcountry time. This was an opportunity for in-depth presentations and group discussions, as well as hands-on time with the gear, all building to the moment we left the indoor classroom for the outdoor one.

    The Gear and How to Choose It

    There is no denying that a major component of lightweight camping is an emphasis on gear and its weight. One of the amazing benefits that Backpacking Light can offer is an arsenal of extremely specialized equipment. There was an excellent assortment of cutting-edge stoves, shelters, bear bag hanging tools, bivy sacks, tent stakes, water treatments, and backpacks. Getting to handle and use these items was a high point for most of the students – they were like kids in a candy store, with a comfy pack instead of a sugar coma as the consequence of indulging in the array.

    The team was encouraged to use (well, play with, actually) a wide variety of gear. Folks cooked their meals on a rotation of stove systems, and each night we slept under different tarps. The result was some real-deal insight into what worked best for each person and their individual needs. Student feedback indicated that experience actually using the gear was invaluable in shaping their decisions for their own gear closets.

    The instructors formalized the process of how students chose gear, factoring in multi-use items, durability, potential weather, our route and our goals for the trip. If a piece of gear was superfluous, we made a mindful decision about not taking it, creating a lot of discussion around the perception of “need.” The phrase “But I always take this,” should set alarm bells ringing; you need to consciously ask yourself “Why do I always take this?” If you can’t answer that, the item doesn’t go in the pack.

    Weighing Every Little Thing – No Sneaking!

    The preparations for a lightweight backpacking trip require definitive data, and the only way you can get the relevant info is to put each individual item on a scale and write down its weight on a data sheet. This exercise is an essential part of the experience. The process goes pretty quickly as we minimize the actual number of potential items by separating our wants from our needs, all before the scales even come out. We have a data sheet for each team member, pencils, calculators, and bunch of digital scales (digital is more precise, and we’re all about precision). The students immediately jump into the process, and the business of dramatic subtraction begins. 

    We urged folks to be bold and to use their course to really try something new. Students discovered that it’s a liberating experience to leave things behind. We encouraged a lot of sharing, so while we had up to ten students on some trips, we never had ten tubes of toothpaste. Something as simple as sharing little things also added to the community experience of our little team.

    The moment of truth: one at a time, we put the packs on the scale. There was a heightened sense of camaraderie as each teammate announced their total pack weight, and that total was written on a large display data sheet. What surprised and fascinated everyone, including the instructors, were how low the initial numbers were. It was impressive, and it consistently lead to a last minute flurry of even more subtraction, with a friendly competition to get those numbers just a little bit lower.

    We were meticulous about the weight of all the gear, including the weight of the food, which was a real eye-opener for some of the students. Like we had every other item, we made decisions based on efficiency, experience, and safety. Some folks were a little worried that we might not be taking enough and that they would end up being hungry. We reassured them, then trimmed their food weight anyway. At the end of the trip, we verified our food calculations and their accuracy. After a six-day, five-night trek, we weighed the leftovers that we walked out with, and they came in at well under one pound. Many students had never considered food weight, simply considering quantity for each meal. Reducing excess food weight was one more area of knowledge and resulting freedom when backpacking – and the good news is that no one felt as though they had been deprived during the trip. Everyone ate their fill.

    We also weighed the stove fuel going in and at the end of the trek so that we could get a true number about the quantity we used. Our trash was an issue too, and before going in, we were thorough about minimizing any excessive packaging. As a final measure, we weighed all the trash when we came out. These numbers were impressively low without us taking any extraordinary measures beyond simply being mindful of what we were carrying in.

    A New Way of Thinking

    During our time in the backcountry, we collectively settled into a pleasant day-to-day rhythm. Some classes were in a big formal circle, but most were done on the trail as brief info-bursts, which makes sense. There aren’t many grand concepts involved with lightweight backpacking and camping, but there are a million little tricks. As an example, I was with a small crew on a steep set of switchbacks, and I demonstrated to the students how to take off and pack their windshirt while continuing walking… never stopping. We had some fun with this simple trick, racing each other as we pulled off layers and crammed them into the pack and put ’em back on – all while hiking.

    We also focused on hydration methods and carrying. The traditional backpacker loads up their pack with lots of water, which is a very conservative approach (hiking with the belief that no water will be available to you on the trail), and it adds a lot of weight to their packs, backs, and hips. We carefully reviewed the maps for water sources along our route, and combined the maps with the instructors’ knowledge about the area of travel. The Gallatin Ridge in Montana in late summer is intimidating and dry, yet we managed to fill our bottles from some tiny springs along the way. Instructor Ryan Connelly would pow-wow with a group of students and point at zone over a mile away, off on the horizon. A little stripe of bright green grass among the yellowed foliage of late summer was a dead giveaway for a water source.

    “See that green? That means there we should find some water there.” He then led by example, drinking his water bottle dry and hiking with an empty vessel. There was no need to encourage anyone to do the same; it was understood. A half-hour later, when we arrived at the lush pocket of green grass, we found the little trickle seeping out over the rocks and filled up.

    Tarp camping was a newfound joy for a lot of the students, who were accustomed to the perceived security of their tents. Sleeping with a sewn-in floor and sidewalls seems impermeable to bugs, and students were surprised at how comfortable and non-chewed up they stayed with a simple ground cloth and tarp. Now, I’ve got a lot of experience setting up a tidy tarp, but watching Andrew Skurka teach tarp-craft was genuinely impressive. I was in the presence of true mastery: taut pitches, secure guylines, and stable poles attested to his skill.

    While critics of lightweight backpacking focus on what they believe is being neglected or left behind, those who want to pursue it as a means of getting to the wilderness more often and more comfortably must first look headlong at their packing choices. Learning some lightweight tricks is key, but learning how to pack light and still lack for nothing takes time and a dedication to trial and error. Those who enroll in courses like this are motivated and bold, taking more vigorous steps to reducing packweight and seeing what else opens up as a result. It was a delight to spend time on the trail in conversation, since no one was too winded to chat, and the fact that the packs were light and the shoes were comfortable made trail-time even more pleasant.

    Teaching on the Fly

    The class was good for the instructors, too. When we turned a corner in the high country and got a big expansive view of our route from the previous day, it was easy to do an impromptu map class. We could match big features on the map to visual points off in the distance, features we had climbed over yesterday. We got a fix on our position on the map and could extrapolate what to expect for the rest of the day. With traditional backpacks, we would have needed to take ‘em off in order to focus and relax into the lesson. Not so with our team: we did all our map work and navigation with the lightweight packs on, without any burden. This simple exercise (not shedding one’s pack at each and every opportunity) was a highlight of the trip for some of the students. The lightweight pack heightens your ability to look around and make decisions with a new-found efficiency, and leaving heavy items behind translates to more, not less, freedom on the trail.

    In 2008, our WT1 course format was very different than it is in 2009. In 2008, students were treated to a two-day intensive classroom training session. They then embarked on an optional community trek to test their new skills together. The students chose treks that were in the range of four to five days, just enough time to become immersed in an authentic lightweight backcountry experience. At the end, they were getting into the rhythm of a well oiled machine, but all the students collectively recommended that we make the WT1 field component of the course mandatory, and just a little bit longer. They felt like the last day came too soon, that they were all finally achieving a heightened level of efficiency, and they wanted to USE those newfound skills a bit longer. In response and recognition of this desire to use new skills for as long as possible, we’ve extended our WT1 courses in 2009 to a full seven days, with six days and five nights in the field.

    In 2008, we had multiple locations throughout the west for the WT1 courses, and while this gave us diversity of field of study, we’ve decided to keep future courses in our own backyard of the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. The wilderness areas around Bozeman are just TOO perfect! Plus, it’s our own playgound, so we have more to offer as far as natural history lessons and our own intimate knowledge of the terrain.

    Traveling Off the Trail

    There is something liberating about hiking on a path in the mountains, but there is a heightened feeling of freedom when you leave that path. We made an effort to do some ambitious off-trail hiking on all of the courses, modeling efficiency in path finding and route selection. Our reward was to move through some astoundingly pristine places. There is an emotional fulfillment in being in the wilderness, and feeling competent in your route finding away from the trail heightens that feeling. Trails are all very well and good, but they simply move you from point A to point B. Choosing your own way, one not traveled by most others in a place, is satisfying in all the deep and meaningful ways that make us feel empowered and independent.

    Once we mastered cooking on the trail and water source location, we were liberated from the traditional campsite location requirement of a stream or river or creek nearby. And when we realized that we could walk away from the trail, we were capable of making low impact stealth camps with small overall footprints. As the team began to master these basic lightweight skills, it was as though we were watching little puzzle pieces snap into place in the students’ minds, making them capable of doing something truly new and revolutionary in their outdoor pursuits.

    We were camping in a new way, and the rewards were enormous.

    Want More?

    To further explore what the BPL Wilderness Trekking School has to offer, click on the SCHOOL link. We wanna help lighten your load! If you have any questions email us.

    Further Reading:

    Bill Stadwiser’s Not a Day on Any Calendar
    Don Wilson’s Desert Southwest Trip Report

    Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 1
    Each class begins with a detailed measuring and weighing of each and every item in a student’s pack.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 2
    Group weigh-in and chart, which often inspires a flurry of further gram-trimming and friendly competition among students.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 3
    Ridgeline travel in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). In 2008, the Backpacking Light Wilderness Trekking School taught courses in the PNW, the desert southwest (DSW), and the northern Rockies (NR).

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 4
    Lush trail in the PNW. Trekking poles provide balance and stability; even with a lightweight pack, they help you move through difficult terrain more quickly and with greater control.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 5
    Students are taught fire building techniques for both safety and cooking purposes. Also, it’s a magnetic source of entertainment and warmth, no matter the locale.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 6
    Route-finding is more fun in a beautiful setting – and with friends. Learning how to read topo maps and use compasses effectively can be as useful in the backcountry as learning how to establish relationships is in the front country.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 7
    PNW students enjoyed the benefits of trail-side blueberries (picked with lightweight backpacks still on!) while on their hike.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 8
    WTS Instructor Mike Clelland! demonstrates one lightweight way to keep your head and ears warm while in the PNW. Also, he’ll be starring in Baywatch: Tacoma sometime soon.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 9
    PNW students enjoy preparing and eating breakfast near water, nice and warm on a chilly morning after already hiking two miles.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 10
    Lightweight packs enable hikers to access heights and depths quickly and nimbly. With the world (or at least more of the complete region) at your fingertips, what will YOU do with a lighter pack?

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 11
    Enjoying the sun on the lighter side of life.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 12
    Students often learn the Clelland way of settling disputes: Ninja-Cowboy-Bear. Unlike Rock-Paper-Scissors, the game is best played with the whole body, not mere hands.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 13
    A taut pitch is essential for successful (non-noisy) tarp camping. Test it the same way you might test your abs: quarter bouncing.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 14
    So THAT’S how Adventure Magazine’s 2007 Adventurer of the Year wakes up! With Andrew Skurka as an instructor, what will YOU learn from him?

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 15
    “I swear,” says Don Wilson, “their packs were THIS BIG. Also, I am an excellent fisherman.”

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 16
    Muffins on trail? You bet! Steam cooking tasty brekky muffins is one of many skills you’ll walk away with… and you’ll be FULL.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 17
    Andrew Skurka breaks down student shoe choices for weight, support, materials, longevity, and possibly stench-factor.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 18
    DSW student works on her technique for lighting up a BushBuddy stove. WTS students shared a variety of shelters, bivy sacks, and cook kits, gaining critical hands-on experience to learn which best suited their needs.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 19
    Dwarfed by the surroundings, NR students navigate a small patch of snow, still holding on in the high elevations of the Rocky Mountains.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 20
    Above the treeline, the views and vistas are incredible, reaching far into adjoining ranges to give students a deep sense of the remote, the removed.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 21
    Tasty – dipping water from an alpine lake refreshes the senses.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 22
    Pensive reflection in the Rockies. When not struggling with a weighty pack, weightier issues can be processed (or set aside) in some of the most engagingly beautiful environs available.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 23
    Another method of water retrieval: spring-fed sources require waiting your turn to replenish your (recently) emptied water bottle.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 24
    Instructor Ryan Connelly explains geographic features of the Gallatin Range. Classrooms have nothing on this kind of visual aid.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 25
    Further up and further in – there’s always more to see in Big Sky Country.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 27
    Hiking isn’t always above the treeline. Students enjoy the fragrance and needled ground of high alpine pine trails.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 26
    Pauses aren’t taken for catching breath or resting, but for catching the lovely view and enjoying your fellow classmates.

    Shangri-Lite at 62 – Haute Route at 20 Pounds or Less

    On the Haute Route, a 21-pound pack is over-inflated. At sixty-two well-used years, I submitted myself to random weight checks to remain sub-twenty pounds and passed most of them. Making the formula feasible are the huts and hotels which always appear just when you’ve had enough.

    You don’t have access to view this content.

    Philmont Scout Ranch: How Light Can You Go?

    After taking a Wilderness Trekking course from Andrew Skurka and Don Wilson, I wanted to try the Philmont Scout Ranch in a UL style. By stepping out of my existing comfort zone, I discovered a whole new one.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 1
    Doug Prosser weighing his pack prior to leaving basecamp. Weight was less than 15 pounds!!

    Introduction

    Have you ever been challenged, pushed a bit out of your comfort zone? Where the mind and body both start feeling a bit uncomfortable; where fear starts to raise its ugly head? Lightweight backpacking is all about dealing with your fears and pushing yourself out of your comfort zones, both mentally and physically, only to make you more comfortable in the long run!

    Freedom. You are ready and willing to try anything to push yourself even further than you thought possible. You are having a blast, because fear is the furthest thing from your mind. You are stretching yourself well beyond what you thought possible just a few short months ago (from your nice couch).

    I saw some of these changes within myself in 2008 while planning another Philmont Scout Ranch trek for that August. I’ve gone a number of times and am very familiar with what to expect there and figured this would be much the same. However, in late spring, Backpacking Light announced a new series of Wilderness Trekking School courses. I signed up for the Wilderness Trekking I (WTS-I) in the desert southwest during October. I was interested in learning new skills, since I had never hiked with other lightweight backpackers, and I wanted to see how Don Wilson and Andrew Skurka taught the course.

    Don Wilson was our primary instructor for the pre-hike planning via email, during which time I was also planning my Philmont gear list. Through a series of emails, I accepted a challenge from Don to go as light as I could at Philmont, which required me to scrap everything I was planning and to look again at every single gear choice. I got out my scale and weighed each piece of gear I was even remotely thinking of taking, then put all the weights into a spreadsheet. I then began comparing that spreadsheet to the gear lists of others, such as our other WTS-I instructor, Andrew Skurka and ones posted on BackpackingLight.com.

    I started looking at areas where others were much lighter than I, such as sleep systems, tents, rain gear, clothing, and what I call ‘doodads’ – those miscellaneous items that are really cool, but not quite necessary, that somehow find their way into a lot of packs. In short, almost everything! I was forced to change my thought processes and to face a number of my fears. Would I have enough food and water? Would I get wet? Be warm enough? Be too hot hiking? Be comfortable enough to sleep at night? With Don’s help, I pushed myself out of my comfort zone of known gear items to make some big changes in my gear and clothing.

    When we came off trail, our crew went directly to the Philmont scale to weigh our packs. There was a gal in front of us weighing her pack prior to going out. It was 55 pounds. She was dumbfounded by my cheering crew when my pack weighed in at 8.5 pounds. Yes, that is correct: 8.5 pounds! Only three of our ten crew members had pack weights over 20 pounds (21, 25, and 30 pounds).

    Thanks to the people that shared their ideas about Philmont gear choices and my WTS-I instructors and classmastes for their help in forming and executing the ideas shared here.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 2
    Various Black Diamond, Sierra Designs, and Mountain Laurel Designs tents for our crew. The biggest and lightest one in the back is the MLD.

    A Classic, Revisited

    On both my trips to Philmont Scout Ranch in 2007 and 2008, I came across a number of people who had read my original Philmont article (Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer) and lightened their packs. Unfortunately, I also came across a number of people who were having physical problems, and a few that were being shipped back to basecamp because they could not continue due to injuries. Prior to going out on the trail, our crew watched Scouts weighing their packs prior to boarding their bus to the trailhead. The heaviest pack we saw was 77 pounds! Wish I could have seen THAT gear list.

    The gear on the list below was selected specifically to meet the requirements of Philmont Scout Ranch while being as light as possible. Although the list was compiled for Boy Scouts and Scout Leaders attending Philmont, it will work equally well for others interested in a lighter pack.

    Seasons: Summer – temps range from mid-30s to 90s F, short afternoon showers common, but every now and then it dumps for a lot longer
    Length: Ten days of hiking with two to five days between resupply
    Where: Philmont Scout Ranch, Sangre de Christo mountains, New Mexico

    One of the easiest ways to get a lighter pack is to buy a digital scale and weigh all of your gear, then put the weights into a spreadsheet. You will be amazed at the differences in weights between similar items. Your choices become really easy and, before you know it, you’ll be saving pounds. There are even premade gear spreadsheets at BackpackingLight (search “spreadsheet”).

    Rationale for Selected Gear

    At Philmont, the gear you carry is broken into five sections: Personal Equipment: Clothing, Personal Equipment: Gear, Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems, Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont, and Crew Equipment Provided by Your Crew.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 3
    The Pilot to Bombardier outhouse: Two seats back-to-back with some of the best views anywhere, though conversation is usually minimal.

    Personal Equipment: Clothing

    Philmont sets some standards that influence your clothing choices, requiring completely separate sleep clothing, full rain suits (no ponchos), and long pants for various activities. Even within these parameters, one can still go fairly lightweight while remembering the following: NO COTTON and WEIGH EVERYTHING.  There can be a wide range of weights between manufacturers of the same item.

    Long pants are required for spar pole climbing, horseback riding, and conservation projects. These activities could possibly be done in your rain pants, which I tried during my 2002 trek, but then my rain pants required numerous pieces of duct tape to cover the holes. For those who prefer to hike in shorts, a better solution would be pants with zip-off legs. My long-term (has served well for several years now) personal choice is the Ex-Officio Amphi Convertible Pant. In addition to zip-off legs, it has a built-in brief, so you don’t need to bring underwear, which saves even more weight. There are a number of manufacturers of zip-off or long hiking pants and hiking underwear, such as REI, EMS, Mountain Hardwear, Ex-Officio, Golite, The North Face, or Patagonia. If you prefer undies, you will only need one pair for the whole hike.

    For a shirt, I recommend one with an SPF-15+ rating. Since our troop prefers to make silk-screened troop shirts for Philmont, we have purchased hiking shirts for the last few treks, either short or long sleeve, depending on individual preference, from REI when we could find them on sale for less than $20 each. There are a number of other manufacturers that could also be used. Some weigh more than others, so pay attention.

    Insects have been so rare at Philmont that I bring no DEET, but I always bring my headnet. To prevent any bug/tick problems, I treat my hiking, sleep clothing, and headnet with Permethrin.

    All you need is the one pair of pants and one hiking shirt for the whole trek. Yes, just one of each – not five or even ten of each, as I have seen some people do. Maybe that’s how you get a 77-pound pack… When you get a chance to shower at one of the staff camps, wash your shirt, pants, and socks; put them back on and they should dry in less than an hour. I take two pairs of socks, one to wear hiking and the other pair for sleeping. I rotate them throughout the hike.

    Boots are not necessary, since almost all hiking is done on well-worn trails, and your pack weight should be below 25 pounds. Running shoes with good tread will do fine, especially if they are trail runners. Make sure they are broken in a bit before going. Most running shoes may only have a useful life of around 500 miles, so replace old shoes prior to Philmont even if they still look good. I learned the advantages of gaiters from Andrew Skurka, and I am looking forward to trying a simBLISSity LevaGaiter.

    Hats generate a lot of different preferences: wide brim, waterproof, baseball cap, etc. In 2008, I used a waterproof Mountain Hardwear Stimulus hat, since I was bringing a rain jacket that did not have a hood.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 4
    Part of the crew cooking and waiting out a drizzle under the dining fly. Note the Dri-Ducks and Frogg Toggs rainwear.

    I’m pleased to announce that over the past two years I have seen many Frogg Togg rain suits at Philmont. The people I’ve talked to really like them. With Don Wilson’s challenge in mind, I wanted to find something even lighter than the 16-ounce Frogg Toggs, and what I settled on was a Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Jacket (no hood) at 6.9 ounces, the ULA Rain Wrap (rain skirt) at 3.1 ounces, and the Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Rain Hat at 2.5 ounces, for a total of 12.5 ounces. I had some doubts (fears) about this set-up.

    First, could a jacket this light and thin keep me dry? Second, would a rain skirt work adequately or did I really need rain pants? Third, would a waterproof hat breathe well enough during regular hiking? My doubts and fears were disproved in both hard rain and in some rather warm conditions. The jacket and hat breathed so well that I wore the jacket a number of times as a wind jacket while hiking, and I did not wet out from the inside. I still think my regular hiking hat, the Tilly Airflow, breathes a bit better than the Stimulus hat, but I really did not have an issue with the difference (plus the Stimulus was an ounce lighter). The Rain Wrap kept my rear and legs dry and cool when hiking. Two things to note: you can prevent rain from running off your jacket and down your backside by pulling the elastic waist of the wrap higher (rain on the backside is a particularly unpleasant feeling), and you can look as though you are wearing a kilt when using the wrap with short.  One boy wondered aloud if I were wearing anything underneath.

    You also need to bring a warm insulation layer. Since I’m from southern California, anything below 75F is chilly, and I run cold anyway.  You may not need as much insulation as do. I use the Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pullover, size large (9.3 ounces, discontinued) and the Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pants (7.8 ounces). In addition to these two Cocoon items, I used a Patagonia R1 Hoody pullover shirt (13.5 ounces). The Backpacking Light Cocoon jacket and pants worked really well, but the addition of the Patagonia R1 Hoody dramatically improved the warmth of my insulation. The Hoody has a couple of features that I love, which allow you to leave some other items at home.

    The first feature is a hood that zippers up high over your mouth, thus allowing you to leave home your beanie hat or balaclava. The zipper is designed such that it actually zips up over your cheek, so that it does not bother your mouth or nose. The second feature are thumb loops that allow the fleece to cover a good portion of your hand, thus allowing you to leave your gloves at home.   Backpacking Light has now produced their own hoody, very similar to the Patagonia version, but made from merino wool. The Backpacking Light version is a bit lighter (8 ounces) so it will be what I take in 2010 when I make my next Philmont trek.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 5
    The crew on top of Mount Baldy, 12,415 feet.

    In past years, I’ve used a Marmot DriClime Jacket or PossumDown sweater with a Patagonia Micro Puff vest, and folks are welcome to use fleece, synthetic, wool or down vests and/or jackets. Two things to keep in mind when thinking about your insulation layers: one, if you are using a down sleeping bag, consider using either fleece or synthetic insulated jackets/vest in case everything gets wet. Two, weigh all your options, because you may be very surprised by how much some of these things weigh.

    Personal Equipment: Gear

    In 2008, I used the same Gossamer Gear G5 pack (2,800 ci body, 3,800 ci maximum, silnylon version) that I used in 2005. It is really hard to argue with a pack that weighs less than 8 ounces. In 2008, the three people that had packs weighing over 20 pounds were either carrying a GoLite Gust (4,500+ cubic inches) or large Osprey packs (4,000+ cubic inches). I believe their increased weight was related to one very important point: they had increased volume in their packs, which allowed them to add a number of items, like a Tom Clancy novel and a chair to sit on while reading, as well as extra clothing. An important lesson is that you should not bring a larger pack than is necessary. People have taken one look at my G5 and decided “No way am I going to take that ‘sack’ – there is no way it will hold up,” though my G5 has been to Philmont twice, and on many hikes over the last four years, including the WTS-I course. Plus, it was pretty fun to blow my Philmont crew away the first night: we have to put our packs under the dining fly at night. I put mine out stuffed in a one-gallon Zip-loc bag to keep it dry and mud-free.

    Some more ‘mainstream’ examples of packs that could work well for Philmont: GoLite Jam2 (six out of twelve people on the WTS-I course carried this), Quest, Pinnacle (maybe a little large for Philmont), Granite Gear Virga, Vapor Trail, Meridian Vapor, Latitude Vapor, Nimbus Ozone; Gregory Z 55; Gossamer Gear G5, Mariposa, Mariposa Plus; Osprey Atmos 50, REI UL Cruise 60, Quick UL 45… lots to choose from. Remember to make sure that each ounce or pound of pack weight really makes a profound difference for you. My original pack was a Dana Design Terraplane that weighed close to 9 pounds empty, which is more than my pack, clothing, and gear now weigh all together.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 6
    The author (right) and patrol leader waiting for dinner. The author is wearing a Patagonia R1 Hoody under Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pants and Jacket.

    Water: How much to take and how to carry it. This is one of the areas I have tried to work on the last few years, and Philmont is a perfect proving ground. In the past, I carried a 100-ounce Camelback hydration system. I made sure it was filled before I left camp each morning. That is nearly seven pounds of water and container, so I have been working on managing the amount of water I carry. For most of my last Philmont trek, I drank approximately two liters of water in the morning before leaving camp, then carried only a 500 ml bottle after leaving camp in the morning. Granted, I had to stop a number of times to relieve myself of the two liters during the hike, but I was only carrying one pound of water for the day. I carried water containers to hold 5.5 liters of water to fill on the approach to dry camps. Water is plentiful around Philmont and carrying a small amount is easy and saves a lot of pack weight. One other suggestion when going into a dry camp: eat your dinner for lunch near a water source, since dinners require water, whereas lunches and breakfasts are usually dry.

    I have modified some of the following items based on the WTS-I course. Be careful with these items, because a lot of weight can suddenly show up with these “doodads.”

    * Derma-Safe Folding Utility Knife instead of my pocket knife.

    * ACR Emergency whistle.

    * Two Photon lights (one white and one red) on a reflective Kelty Triptease lanyard so I know where everything is when I need it.

    * I did not carry much in the way of a first aid kit, except a small roll of duct tape, Tincture of Benzoin ampules, and a small role of Leukotape P sports tape, since I seldom blister, and we had a group first aid kit. The tincture of benzoin allows tape to stick better to the skin. The Leukotape P sticks better to the skin than duct tape. If I were hiking somewhere other than Philmont, I would bring additional items.

    * Fischer space pen and Rite-In-The-Rain All weather Mini notebook for journaling.

    * Hydropel Sports Ointment to prevent blisters if hiking in wet weather or with wet feet. Hydropel will even help the person that sweats a lot on their feet and gets blisters as a result. Apply in the night to bottoms of dry feet. Start applying a couple days prior to your hiking or anticipated wetness. Do not carry the whole tube, but put enough in a small container to last the trek.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 7
    Typical trail sunset – though you never do get used to them.

    Some other items are personal medicines, sunglasses, and a “stash” of coffee, if you are a big coffee drinker. If you really need your caffeine, Trader Joe’s chocolate-coated espresso beans (150 calories/ounce) were really popular on our treks. Remember to bring a cotton bandana for cooking and personal needs.

    Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems

    Philmont requires separate sleeping clothes from what you wear during the day, because your hiking clothes could become contaminated with spilled food, thus leaving odors on your clothing that bears might be attracted to while you sleep. Philmont is very serious about bear avoidance. They spend a lot of time teaching crews the “Philmont” way to prevent bear attraction. Please do not challenge them on these issues, just go with the flow. They have been very successful in preventing most bear attacks with thousands of Scouts going through the Ranch, always camping in the same fixed locations.

    Your sleep clothing choices depend on a) whether you sleep warm or cold, and b) the rest of your sleep system. Night temperatures are rarely colder than the mid-30s. I sleep cold and wore the insulation layers mentioned above, as well as my Mountain Hardwear Stimulus jacket over top. If it was warm, I did not wear the Cocoon Pullover; if it was in the low 40s or 30s, I wore everything. I was very cozy, much warmer than previous Philmont treks. I attribute this to the R1 Hoody and wearing the rain jacket – two changes for 2008 that kept me toasty me during the cold nights.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 8
    Crew awaiting dinner. Please hurry!

    Philmont requires a tent; no tarps or bivies are allowed. They do not require that a tent have an integrated floor, so many lightweight options are available. The Scouts in 2002 and 2005 used the Mountain Hardwear Kiva, which holds up to four Scouts. In recent years, we have left the Kiva at home and used Black Diamond tents. I have used the Black Diamond Betamid, Beta Light, and Mega Light over the last number of years. These tents work great and are reasonably priced. Some people use the Black Diamond bathtub-type floors that are designed for their respective tents, though these are very heavy. A flat ground sheet will work fine, if you pay attention to keep from setting up in areas where water pools. Since I was under Don Wilson’s challenge to go as light as possible, I picked up a tent from Mountain Laurel Designs (MLD) Spinntex MID for 2008. This is a slightly larger version of the Black Diamond Mega Light with more tie-outs and a lighter fabric; our Scoutmaster loves having lots of space in his tent, and with just the two of us it was a palace. The MLD Spinntex MID weighed just less than 24 ounces with stakes, guylines, seam sealing, and stuff sack. We always use our trekking poles instead of carrying a separate tent pole.

    Again, with Don’s challenge ringing in my ears, I made the hardest change in my gear. I left my Big Agnes pad at home and used a Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4 length closed cell pad, cut down to fit in my G5. Now, I have to say, it was much better than I originally thought or remembered. Initially, I did wake up more often, but after a few of nights, I slept really well. I certainly didn’t miss inflating and deflating the Big Agnes, nor did I mind the lack of padding beneath my lower legs.

    In a tent, a 30- to 40-degree bag will work well when combined with some of your insulation layers. I have used a (sadly discontinued) Bozeman Mountain Works Pertex Quantum Arc X down bag the last couple of years. I highly recommend down bags for Philmont because they are light and compact into a small space. Fear of wet down can be alleviated by lining my pack with a pack liner, into which I stuff my sleeping bag and extra clothes. I have never had a problem with wet clothes in fifteen-plus years of backpacking.

    There are lots of manufacturers of bags under 2.5 pounds, such as REI, EMS, Campmor, Montbell, Western Mountaineering, GoLite, Nunatak, Big Agnes, Jacks ‘R’ Better, Marmot, Gossamer Gear, Backpacking Light, Feathered Friends, Mountain Hardwear, The North Face, Lafuma, Sierra Designs, and Kelty. One of the cheapest and lightest options for scouts would be the Campmor brand bags, such as the Goose Down 20 Degree Mummy regular sleeping bag (2 pounds 4 ounces) for $119.99. You may be able to find some of the manufacturer’s sleeping bags on sale somewhere on the web.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 9
    Author on the trail with his Gossamer Gear G5 silnylon backpack and Backpacking Light STIX carbon fiber trekking poles.

    One other topic that concerns people at night is bugs. We really never had problems with bugs. Very rarely have I needed my headnet, though I did use it in 2008 when I inhaled one too many black flies one day.

    Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont

    Philmont will issue gear to your crew if you do not bring your own. The Philmont gear is heavy and designed to take the constant abuse that Scouts can deliver. If you plan well, you will not have to take much or any of Philmont’s heavy gear. Below is a discussion of the gear listed in “Philmont 2008 Guidebook to Adventure.”

    The first item is a nylon dining fly (12 x 12 feet) weighing about 4 pounds. Its two collapsible poles weigh about 1 pound. Instead, have your crew take a silnylon tarp that’s at least 8 x 10 feet, along with extra titanium stakes and lightweight line. In place of the dining fly poles, our crew used two hiking poles tied together to give them added height, just single poles if we wanted to keep the tarp low.

    Do not use the Philmont tents, since they weigh about 5.5 pounds for two people. There are many current lightweight options under 2 pounds per Scout, like the Black Diamond Beta Light, Mega Light as well as the GoLite Shangri-La 2 or 3 Tarp/Shelter. Others are Sierra Designs Origami 2 Ultralight 2-person, Gossamer Gear Squall Classic tent, and the Tarptent Rainshadow 2.

    The cook kits Philmont provides range in weight from 4 to 6 pounds per cook group, and cutlery kits weigh 0.5 pound. Our crew cooks as one group, and we use a 6-liter pot (4 liters is a bit small), and a 2-liter pot for some desserts. Another option for desserts is to mix them in plastic bags. Replace the pot lids with heavy duty tin foil lids, which will be lighter, and tape off the sides of the pots and spray the bottoms with black high temp stove paint. The black-bottomed pots will boil water much faster, conserving fuel and speeding up the food prep process. Also, all stoves should be used with some sort of foil wind screen, even if it is not windy. Leave the frying pan at home. The only cutlery item you need is a large spoon and a serving cup with a handle. Leave the spatula at home. A large number of crews have used the turkey bag cooking method while at Philmont because cleanup is a snap.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 10
    Sunset from Mount Philips, 11,711 feet.

    We have always taken two stoves when, in theory, we could get by with only one. The option I am thinking about for my next trek is to take a MSR Simmerlite stove and one 22-ounce fuel bottle with pump, and, as a backup, take a Bushbuddy stove. I’ll only use this option if we are allowed to have fires. In 2008, Philmont started to carry a number of butane/propane canisters at the trading posts/commissaries. I received a number of comments recommending the MSR WindPro canister stove. The reports I have from crews at Philmont in 2008 was that the MSR WindPro worked much better than the white gas stoves. The canister usage for the whole trek was reported to be approximately three 8-ounce canisters per stove when using two stoves per crew. With all these great reports on the canister stoves, it sounds as though they represent a more ideal solution than the white gas stoves we have used in the past – especially with the ability to purchase canisters at the backcountry commissaries and with the staffed camps willing to take the empty canisters as trash.

    The next item from the Philmont cook kit is hot-pot tongs (two pairs), weighing about 0.5 pound. I never saw a use for these, since we bring a cooking bandana (our only cotton item) that works well for grabbing hot items.

    The camp shovel, weighing about 1 pound, is a relic of early days when latrines were dug at each camp (as I did during my 1970 trek). Today, every campsite has an outhouse, so we leave this behind.

    Also provided are plastic trash bags, salt, and pepper. The plastic packets in which you carry your food provide sufficient space to stuff your trash, but trash bags may come in handy as emergency rain wear, if a Scout’s rain gear gets lost. Salt and pepper in individual little packets generate a lot of small pieces of trash. A better option is to bring a small container of each, along with some additional spices for your trail meals.

    Philmont provides scrub pads, toilet paper, and small containers of both dish soap and hand sanitizer that we take. We also bring an additional hand sanitizer bottle with us so that we have them readily available when cooking, eating, or returning from the outhouse. We think this is one of the most important aspects of avoiding sickness on the trail.

    Philmont also provides Katadyn Micropur water purification tablets and we make sure everyone is carrying at least one strip of ten tablets.

    The Ranch uses a plastic strainer to filter food particles out of wash water and drain it into an underground sump. A spatula is used to scoop the larger food particles from the strainer to be thrown in your trash. We have not taken either strainer or spatula the last two years. Instead, we purchase two 1-gallon paint strainer bags (for spray painting) from Home Depot. Use one bag for five days, trash it, then use the other for the remaining days. It worked great and is very light.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 11
    Crew heading down the trail. Some folks apparently enjoy being pack-mules.

    Philmont provides bear bags and bear ropes. We have always taken their bear bags and ropes, but after our 2007 trek, I received information on a new alternative for the bear ropes. I met Paul Mergens on my 2007 trek. He recognized me from my article and shared what he is doing and had confirmed by Doug Palmer, the Head Philmont Ranger. He used ropes similar to the AirCore Pro URSA Dyneema Bear Bag Hanging Ropes. He ordered Amsteel Blue Ropes 2.5 millimeter (7/64 inch) with a tensile strength of 1400 pounds and weighing less than 0.5 pounds/150 feet. He stated costs were approximatley 14 cents/foot, and that the ropes performed well with no wear. Because of the small diameter, the Scouts needed to use a small stick with the rope wrapped around to haul the heavy bear bags up. Different lengths have been recommended, but I would do the main rope at 150 feet and “oops” rope at 100 feet. A number of crews, including ours, used these ropes in 2008 with great success.

    Equipment Provided by Your Crew

    This section addresses those miscellaneous gear items that your crew may bring with them that will not be supplied by Philmont.

    Philmont recommends a sewing kit with heavy thread and needle. During our past treks, we brought a “hotel” sewing kit, but we never used it for anything other than draining blisters.

    Bring enough tent stakes to put up all your tents, plus the dining fly (in windy conditions) instead of the recommended ten per person.

    Two to three collapsible water containers, 2.5 gallons each, are recommended so that when you go to dry camps, your crew can bring extra water. In 2002, a number of us brought extra Platypus 2.5-liter containers and in 2005, a few of the crew brought 2.5-gallon containers that they could inflate and use as pillows at night. Either way works, but it is convenient having some larger containers. In 2008, I brought two 1.5-liter and one 2-liter containers, beside the 500-ml one in my pocket, for a total of 5.5 liters carrying capacity. I also recommend that you have the crew fill all their water containers and purify them prior to going to bed so you can hit the trail immediately in the morning. You usually need to remind the Scouts to make sure this happens.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 12
    Author in his rain gear, Mountain Hardwear Stimulus hat and jacket, along with the ULA rain wrap. The stuff in the G5 pack is protected by a plastic pack liner inside.

    Two or three backpacking stoves are recommended. We brought two MSR Simmerlight stoves. Since we had two stoves, we did not bring a stove repair kit, but we did bring two 33-ounce and one 12-ounce fuel containers. We ended up with way too much fuel. I think that a 33-ounce fuel container per stove will provide adequate fuel in between food/fuel pick-ups. Next Philmont trip, I will most likely bring an MSR WindPro canister stove with a Bushbuddy stove as back-up.

    One crew first aid kit is required, but the list of items in the kit Philmont suggests is a bit much. Our first aid kit was not any different than we take on a weekend trek. Every Ranger-staffed camp has extensive first aid supplies, trained first-aid providers, and the ability to transport people out of the backcountry, so you will not need to provide care for multiple days.

    A number of our crew brought along duct tape wrapped around each of our hiking poles. I also had Leukotape P on my hiking sticks. The duct tape was used for a number of things during the trek, but the most important was to patch holes and tears in rain suits. The Leukotape P sticks better on skin, so that is used for blisters and first aid. During my WTS-I course, Andrew Skurka pointed out that the extra weight of the tape on my poles creates a bit more work for me as the poles swing back and forth. His solution is to pack small rolls in his pack.

    One waterproof ground cloth (5.5 x 7.5 feet) per tent is recommended, but we only brought a thin Polycryo ground cloth for myself, and my tent mate used an Adventure Medical Kit Heatsheet Blanket. Both of these ground sheets worked well, and for those that think these ground cloths do not last, this was the second Philmont trip for mine.

    Three 50-foot lengths of 1/8 inch nylon cord are recommended, but we only brought one 50-foot length of AirCore Plus Spectra Rope. All tents and dining flies were pre-strung with AirCore Pro Dyneema Guyline Cord Kits.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 13
    Our crew finishing our trek at basecamp.

    Conclusion

    The original question was: How light can you really go?

    Well, my pack was 8.5 pounds when I came off the trail. I had acquired a few extra items along the trail that I was carrying for the group. When I was doing my planning, I was aiming at a 6-pound pack with just my stuff or a 7.5-pound pack with tent and stakes (see gear list below). I think the pack weight could even be reduced by another pound to 1.5 pounds. Savings of 4.5 ounces (23.9 to 19.4) on a smaller tent (MLB Superfly Spinntex), 3.3 ounces (7.7 to 4.4) using a G6 instead of G5 pack, 9.6 ounces (22.8 to 13.2) switching from the Patagonia R1 hoody and Backpacking Light Cocoon 60 UL Pullover to the Backpacking Light Cocoon 60 Pro Parka, all which saves over 17 ounces. If we really needed to save a bit more, get a sleeping bag less than 16 ounces, lighter eating bowl, forget the eye glass cleaner and the personal toilet paper, and use rocks and logs for some tent tie outs and leave some stakes at home… You see where it becomes an obsession!

    Drum roll please: you can have a 5-pound base weight at Philmont, without any shared gear.

    Really, can the guy with the 77-pound pack please stand up and show us how on earth you got all that in there?  Unless you broke your ankles, in which case we will leave you alone.

    Links:

    About the Author

    Doug Prosser is an Assistant Scoutmaster for Troop 257 in the Ventura County Council, California, with 14 years experience. He lives in Camarillo, which is located on the coast in southern California, and has participated in numerous hikes in the local mountains, planning many treks into the High Sierra for his Troop. He attended Philmont Scout Ranch as a Scout and as a leader, most recently in 2007 and 2008. He started out with a 50-pound-plus pack and continues to lighten his load, always looking for a better way of backpacking. His friends have dubbed his garage “Doug’s Camping World.” Doug has a strong interest in teaching both kids and adults how to enjoy backpacking. He continues to train and gear up for a John Muir Trail hike in August 2009, with three other graduates of the Backpacking Light Wilderness Trekking School Desert Southwest Course of 2008. Doug is looking forward to his 2010 Philmont trek, which will be the fortieth anniversary of his 1970 trek to Philmont as a scout.

    2008         2005       Weight Change
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND oz Comments CATEGORY ITEM BRAND oz oz
    HIKING CLOTHES Rain Hat Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Rain Hat 2.5 Breathed well, blocked rain. HIKING CLOTHES Rain Hat Dorfman Pacific 4.3 -1.8
      Short Sleeve Shirt Troop REI shirt 7.3 Dark blue was hot, shirt was pretty heavy.   Short Sleeve Shirt Troop Cool-max Shirt 5 2.3
      Zip-Off Pants with Built In Briefs Ex Offficio Amphi Convertible 12.8 Third trip to Philmont, still working well.   Zip-Off Pants with Built In Briefs Ex Offficio Amphi Convertible 12.8 0
      Merino Socks DeFeet WoolEator XL 1.9 Really love these socks, thanks Andrew Skurka!   Hiking Socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-Crew Socks 2.9 -1
      Trail Shoes Solomon XA Pro 3D Ultra size 13 + custom orthotics 39.4 No problems, no blisters.   Trail Shoes Lowa Vento II, Size 13 46.4 -7
    OTHER ITEMS WORN/CARRIED Cotton Bandana Survival Bandana 1.5   OTHER ITEMS WORN/CARRIED Cotton Bandana Survival Bandana x 2 (one for cooking; one for everything else) 3.2 -1.7
      Lanyard Kelty TripTease with ACR Whistle, Spyderco Knife, PrincetonTec White Light, Photon Red Light. 1.5 New batteries, plenty of light.   Lanyard Kelty Triptease with Light, Whistle, Knife, Can Opener 2.5 -1
      Lighter Cheap, Butane, No Child Locks 0.5     Lighter Cheap, Butane, No Child Locks 0.5 0
      Trekking Poles Backpacking Light STIX Carbon Fiber Trekking Poles 9.5 Really liked these new poles, so much lighter.   Trekking Poles Komperdell Pro Series AS 21.2 -11.7
      Eye Glasses Prescription 0.7 Too cheap to get the surgery.   Eye Glasses Prescription 0.7 0
      Sunglasses Clip-ons + Case 1.4 A must.   Sunglasses Clip-ons + Case 1.4 0
                Eye Glasses Case Backpacking Light Hides TechnoSkin Sunglass Case/Retainers 0.6 -0.6
                Watch/Compass/Altimeter Suunto Vector 1.9 -1.9
    OTHER CLOTHING Insulation Layer BPL Cocoon UL 60 Pullover – Large 9.3 Toasty! OTHER CLOTHING Insulation Layer PossumDown Sweater, XL 10.3 -1
      Extra Hiking Sock/Sleep Sock DeFeet WoolEator XL 1.9     Sleep Sock Warm generic socks, also used as pads on pack’s shoulder straps. 3.7 -1.8
      Rain/Wind Suit Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Jacket (No Hood) 6.9 Night layering kept me almost too warm some nights.   Rain/Wind Jacket Gossamer Gear Micropore Rainsuit Jacket XL 5.5 1.4
      Rain Kilt ULA Rain Wrap 3.1     Rain Pants Gossamer Gear Micropore Rainsuit Pants XL 4.2 -1.1
      Sleep Pants BPL Cocoon UL 60 pants 7.8 The Cocoon wear generated a few funny comments, but I was really warm.   Sleep Pants REI Polartec 100 Teton Pants, Large 10.3 -2.5
      Sleep Shirt Patagonia R1 Hoody Pullover Shirt 13.5 Great find. It has hood, thumb loops tp keep hands warm, very long to keep my rear warm. For 2010, I plan to use a BPL Merino Wool Hoody(Large, 8 oz).   Sleep Shirt LL Bean Synthetic Shirt 8 5.5
                Insulation Vest Patagonia Micro Puff 6 -6
                Hat Generic Beanie 1.2 -1.2
                Extra Hiking Socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-crew Socks 2.9 -2.9
    SLEEP SYSTEM Ground Cloth Plastic Sheeting, 1-2 mil 1.7 Worked fine even in the downpours. SLEEP SYSTEM Ground Cloth Black Diamond Betamid Floor, 20 oz, partner carried 0 1.7
      Sleeping Bag Pertex Quantum Arc X Variable Girth Down Sleeping Bag + Extra Down 18.7 Kept me warm for the last three trips to Philmont when combined w/ insulation layers. Nighttime temps only got in the 40s.   Sleeping Bag Pertex Quantum Arc X Variable Girth Down Sleeping Bag 16.4 2.3
      Shelter MLD Spinntex MID, Seam Sealed, Guylines 20.6 A palace with tons of room, very light. Partner did not carry any shelter.   Shelter Black Diamond Beta Light 22 -1.4
      Tent Stakes 11x Titanium Stakes 3.3 Partner did not carry.   Tent Stakes 6x Titanium Stakes, 2 oz, partner carried 0 3.3
    PACKING Backpack Gossamer Gear G5 Ultralight Backpack, silnylon version, size small 7.7 Second trip to Philmont for this pack, and it’s still my favorite light pack. There’s actually too much space in it for my gear and food. I could have taken a G6 (Whisper Uberlight) and saved a bit more weight, since I cut out so much volume. PACKING Backpack Gossamer Gear G5 Ultralight Backpack, silnylon version, size small 7.7 0
      Waterproof Pack Liner BPL Pack Liner 1.2 Worked great. Everything was dry every time.   Waterproof Pack Liner 3x Trash Compactor Bags (1 for us, 2 extras) 6.9 -5.7
      Sleeping Pad/Pack Frame Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4-Length Closed Cell Pad (Cut Down) 6.6 I’m a side sleeper, but was learning to use more belly and back sleeping by the time I came off trail. A Big Agnes clear pad would be really nice, but I was trying to go as light as possible. I can do without the Big Agnes but I really like sleeping on Agnes!   Sleeping Pad/Pack Frame Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4-Length Closed Cell Pad (Cut Down) 7 -0.4
                Sleeping Pad Big Agnes Insulated Air Core Pad Mummy, Extra-Long 25 -25
    COOKING AND WATER Spoon, Dish Lexan Spoon (Handle Shortened), Plastic Dish 2.1 Dish could have been lighter… COOKING AND WATER Spoon, Dish Lexan Spoon (Handle Shortened), Plastic Dish 2.1 0
      Water Bottle 500ml Dasani Water Bottle 1.2 One lesson: Carry very little water. Drink ~2 liters in camp, pee a lot on the trail, carry 500ml water.   Water Bottle CamelBak Insulated 100 oz Unbottle with Tube 9.5 -8.3
      Extra Water Bottles Evernew 1.5L (2x) and 2L (1x) 4.1 Plenty of water for dry camps.   Extra Water Bottle Platypus 3L (Only Filled for Dry Camps) 1 3.1
                Spice Kit Hot Pepper 0.9 -0.9
                Cup Plastic, for Used as Ladle for Hot Water 0.8 -0.8
    OTHER ESSENTIALS Medications Loperamide, Ibuprofen, Personal Meds 2.8 Never needed loperamide, nor ibuprofen. Brought second set of personal meds just in case. OTHER ESSENTIALS First Aid/Medications Wound, blister care, asst. medications 2 0.8
      Waterproof Notebook Rite-in-the-Rain All Weather Mini-Notebook 0.7           0.7
      Toilet Paper Quartered Shop Towels + Prep H Portable Wipes in Plastic Bags 3.5     Toilet Paper Small Amount in Zip-loc Bag 6 -2.5
      Personal Hygiene Small Toothbrush, Dental Floss 1     Personal Hygiene Toothbrush, Toothpaste, Soap in Zip-loc Bags 2 -1
      Head Net BPL Bug Net 0.4 First time I used it in three Philmont treks.   Head Net Campmor Backpacker No-See-Um Head Net 0.8 -0.4
      Cash   0.1     Cash   0.1 0
      Pen BPL Fischer Stowaway Pen 0.1 Worked well, very small.         0.1
      Eye Glass Cleaner and Wipe Generic 1.9 Hate dirty glasses, but looking for a UL alternative. Suggestions?         1.9
                Hand Sanitizer 2 oz bottle for pre-cooking/eating and post-bathroom 3 -3
                Lip Balm SPF 15+ 0.3 -0.3
                Umbrella Montbell Umbrella 5.7 -5.7
    CONSUMABLES Food 2 days’ worth 96 Average amount carried, Philmont provided. CONSUMABLES Food 2 days’ worth 96 0
      Water 0.5L 16 Average amount carried.   Water 2L 64 -48
      Water Treatment Katadyn Micropur Purification tablets 0.3     Water Treatment Katadyn Micropur Purification tablets 0.3 0
    TREK SHARED GEAR (split between 10 Scouts-adults carried none-decision of Scouts) Stove, Windscreen MSR SimmerLite Stove and Windscreen x2 (13.8 oz each) 27.6 2010 will use MSR Windpro w/ 8 oz Canisters TREK SHARED GEAR (split between 10 people on trek) “Stove, Windscreen” MSR SimmerLite Stove and Windscreen x2 (13.8 oz each) 27.6 0
      Fuel MSR 22 oz Bottles x2 (1.8 lbs each) 58 2010 will use 8 oz Canisters   Fuel MSR 33 oz bottle x2 (2 lbs each) 64 -6
      Cookpot 6L Aluminum, 2L Titanium Pots 32     Cookpot 4L Aluminum Pot x3 (10.8 oz each) 32.4 -0.4
                Guylines REI Braided Nylon Cord, 1/8 inch, 100 ft 5.6 -5.6
      Dining Fly Silnylon 10 x 8 ft Tarp, 4x Titanium Stakes 16     Dining Fly Silnylon 10 x 8 ft Tarp, 4x Titanium Stakes 16 0
      First Aid Kit AMK Weekender With Some Additions 23     First Aid Kit AMK Weekender With Some Additions 23 0
      Spice Kit salt and pepper 4     Spice Kit Salt, Pepper 4 0
      Cooking Utensils MSR Folding Large Spoons x2 and Spatula 2.7     Cooking Utensils MSR Folding Large Spoons x2 and Spatula 2.7 0
      Bear Hanging Bags x3 (8 oz each), Amsteel Blue Ropes 2.5mm 150 ft (8 oz) and 100 ft (5 oz) 37     Bear Hanging Bags x3 (8 oz each), Philmont-provided rope, 150 ft (2.5 lbs) 64 -27
      Sunscreen 4 oz Bottle 5.4     Sunscreen 4 oz Bottle 5.4 0
                Bug Juice 3M UltraThon Repellent 2.5 -2.5
      Sewing Kit Hotel Kit 0.1     Sewing Kit Hotel Kit 0.1 0
                Repair Kit Nylon Ties, Pins, Clevis Pins, Stick of Hot Glue 2 -2
      Strainer Paint Strainer Bags x2 0.4     Strainer Provided by Philmont 8 -7.6
      Dish Soap 3 oz Camp Suds 3.4     Dish Soap 3 oz Camp Suds 3.4 0
      Scrub Pads 2x Cut Down Scrub Pads 0.6     Scrub Pads 2x Cut Down Scrub Pads 0.6 0
      Hand Sanitizer 4 oz Purell x2 10     Hand Sanitizer 4 oz Purell x2 10 0
      Digital Camera Pentax Optio S 50 9     Digital Camera Pentax Optio S 50 9 0
      Maps Philmont Official WP Map and Holder 5.3     Maps Philmont Official WP Map and Holder 5.3 0
                       
                       
    WEIGHT SUMMARY  2008       WEIGHT SUMMARY  2005      
    Weight Saved (oz)   oz lbs kg   oz lbs kg  
    -24.4 (1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 79.0 4.9 2.2 (1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 103.4 6.5 3.0  
    -51.1 (2) Total Base Weight in Pack 120.2 7.5 3.5 (2) Total Base Weight in Pack 171.3 10.7 4.9  
    -48 (3) Total Weight of Consumables 112.3 7.0 3.2 (3) Total Weight of Consumables 160.3 10.0 4.5  
    -5.1 (4) Total weight of Trek Shared Gear 23.5 1.5 3.2 (4) Total weight of Trek Shared Gear 28.6 1.8 0.8  
    -104.2 (5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) + (4) 256.0 16.0 7.3 (5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) + (4) 360.2 22.5 10.2  
    -128.6 (6) From Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) 335.0 20.9 9.5 (6) From Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) 463.6 29.0 13.2  

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review

    Totally synthetic, good soles, and a XCR membrane for wet weather use, plus a range of width fittings including really wide. Very good under some winter conditions, but with a curious defect which limits their use.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 1
    Courtesy New Balance.

    Overview

    These were covered briefly in a Spotlite Review, and a promise was made to provide a full review after they had been well exercised. I will assume you have just read the Spotlite and not go over the stuff mentioned there.

    Field Testing – Locations

    They have been tested under a rather wide range of conditions: everything from extreme winter snow conditions through mild three-season conditions in harsh rocky country to lazy river walking. In general they have been very good, with one exception.

    Snow Use

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 2
    Day two of the winter trip.

    These shoes were worn by both the author and his wife in a winter snowshoe trip which went ‘slightly off-course’. You can read all about the trip at When Things Go Wrong.

    While things did go rather wrong over all, the shoes did not. Both my wife and I had got them half a size too big – partly by accident, but this allowed us to wear two pairs of thick wool socks inside the shoes. That extra padding, plus the Gore-Tex lining and the Gore-Tex gaiters, meant we had nice warm feet every day of the trip.

    My wife did try wearing just one pair of socks inside the shoes, but found that the reduced padding allowed the straps of her snowshoes to be felt by the top of her arches. The tongue of the shoes is not all that padded.

    Some people worry that joggers are only good for wearing with light packs. This is a silly argument, as the difference in total weight on your feet between a pack of 10 kg and a pack of 20 kg is really only the difference between, say 80 kg and 90 kg on your feet. You have to include the weight of your body.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 3
    Portering in to a remote ski base camp.

    Anyhow, on a subsequent skiing trip we used the joggers for the walk in to a hut with rather heavy loads. The creeks were all flooded, and we could not safely drive in. When you are carrying full winter gear, plus skis, plus base-camp food, your pack does get heavy. The joggers coped just fine.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 4
    Portering back out of the remote ski base camp, with rubbish.

    Coming back out we weren’t carrying as much food (of course), but I was carrying a large load of rubbish. We had spent some time cleaning up the area. The New Balance MT1110GT joggers went just fine on my Yowie snowshoes. Very little wear was visible on the shoes at this stage.

    Three-Season Use

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 5
    Low down in the rainforest at Barrington Tops.

    My wife wore her New Balance MT1110GT joggers on a multi-night trip around the Barrington Tops in mid-summer. This is an isolated plateau region based partly on volcanic basalt. The vegetation ranges from dense rainforest, as shown above, to near-alpine conditions.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 6
    Bad weather on top of Barrington Tops.

    Unfortunately some of the weather up top was a shade damp, but my wife’s shoes functioned very nicely despite that. Yes, her socks did eventually get wet, but we are fairly sure that the water got in by wicking down her trousers, not through any leak in the Gore-Tex liner. Well, if there was a leak, it wasn’t noticed. The soles gripped nicely in both the mud at the bottom and the wet alpine conditions up top.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 7
    Rough country in the Kanangra-Boyd Wilderness area.

    Another trip we used the New Balance MT1110GT joggers on was a traverse of five peaks in the Kanangra-Boyd Wilderness area. It was an extension of a classic ‘Three Peaks’ trip. This is harsh rough rocky country with no tracks. The joggers had to cope not only with the rock underfoot, but with the scrub brushing against the mesh top layer.

    The soles gripped well and showed little wear. The uppers also showed little wear. That ‘cosmetic mesh’ on top is not fragile! In fact, after being worn on many rough walks, the joggers continued to function very well and to show little wear.

    River Walking

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 8
    The gentle Coxs River valley.

    However, the life of one of the pairs of shoes came to an abrupt end in a most unexpected manner, while we were on a gentle walk down the Coxs River. Well you might ask, how this could be? The problem is that walking parts of the Coxs River means you have to cross it many times as one side, then the other, becomes impassable. We have been up and down this river many times and are used to doing this: we just walk across the shallow water without worrying about it. ‘Cross early and cross often’ seems to be the message.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 9
    Gaps in the sewing.

    But we had not allowed for what can only be described as a bungle at the factory in China. The shoes are well made, and the Gore-Tex liners are well done. But around the base of the tongue on each shoe there were gaps in the sewing. You can see the gaps in the photo here: they are where the screwdrivers disappear inside the shoes. The tips of the screwdrivers are in between the Gore-Tex liner and the outer structural parts of the shoe. The thin blue lines show where the sewing is missing on each side of the tongue.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 10
    Walking across the Coxs River.

    We waded across the river many times, kicking up the sand at the bottom and flexing the shoes. As we did this, the sand was able to creep through these gaps and inside the shoe, in between the GoreTex liner and the body. It settled down at the edges of the inner sole, mixed with the glue which bonds the inner sole to the foam sole, and formed hard lumps along the edges. They appeared especially around the ball of the foot where it flexes. They were extremely uncomfortable and made the shoes unwearable – like having small stones in your shoes.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 11
    Opening the shoes up for cleaning.

    On the Coxs river trip, I was wearing my favourite summer joggers, Dunlop KT26s, and had no trouble. My wife was wearing her MT1110GT joggers, and it was those which filled up with sand. When we got home I pulled her shoes apart to see what was going on, and saw enough to verify the claims made above. There were little lumps of sand scattered all along both sides where the purple lines are. I tried to remove all the sand, but I found that unless I really ‘deconstructed’ the shoes I was just not going to succeed. The sand was too stuck in place. I gave up, as I was not sure I could reconstruct the shoes afterwards.

    Summary

    The New Balance MT1110GT shoes are very nice, hard-wearing but fairly light joggers with a good Gore-Tex membrane. Being available in half sizes and a 4E width fitting (as well as narrower versions), they should fit most walkers. Bought a half-size too large to allow for extra socks, they make excellent winter walking and snowshoeing shoes.

    They also make excellent walking shoes for harsh rocky country. Both the soles and the uppers seem to be able to take harsh treatment. The Gore-Tex membrane seems to handle early morning dew very well.

    But unless you modify the shoes by hand-sewing across the blue lines in the photo above, you should not take these shoes into the water or even into very sandy places. If you do sew them up they should be OK – I think. I have sewn my pair up and they continue to provide excellent service.

    Specifications

      Manufacturer:

    New Balance

      Year/Model:

    2008

      Manufacture:

    China

      Materials:

    synthetic fabrics and rubbers, no leather, plus XCR membrane

      Last:

    SL-1 (see New Balance’s site for their definition)

      Size: – 6

    13, 14, 15 in D, EE and EEEE fittings

      Weight:

    Quoted 385 g (13.5 oz) each, measured 406 g (14.3 oz) for US size 11 EEEE (BPL measurement)

      Colour:

    what you see is what you get

      MSRP:

    not quoted

    What’s Good

    • A fairly low weight
    • A wide range of width fittings
    • A flat inner sole and footbed
    • Very good friction on the sole
    • No leather or suede anywhere

    What’s Not So Good

    • Sand can get inside the body through gaps in the stitching

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review

    Although the Scarp 2 incorporates several weight-saving and space-making design elements to create a friendly, roomy, well ventilated, and stable tent for two campers, these benefits do not come without compromise.

    Introduction

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 1
    The Tarptent Scarp 2 on a late winter visit to the alpine tundra in southern Colorado. The Scarp 2 is a two-person double-wall three-season tent weighing 3.25 pounds, or a winter-light four-season tent weighing 4.5 pounds, and it has two doors and two vestibules and loads of interior room.

    Until recently, hikers looking for a really lightweight (around 3 pounds) two-person double-wall tent had to choose from a short list, namely the Big Sky International tents (Evolution, Convertible, Montana, and Revolution), Terra Nova Laser, and MSR Carbon Reflex 2. Selecting an ultralight double-wall tent can be frustrating, because in order to cut weight, some manufacturers have made compromises in tent size, fabrics, features, and durability. The addition of the new (May 2009) Tarptent Scarp 2 may make the selection a little easier because it has two doors with vestibules, loads of interior room, good ventilation, value pricing, and it weighs just 3.25 pounds. Is the Scarp 2 the new standout in this category, or does it have some limitations of its own?

    Specifications

      Year/Manufacturer/Model 2009 Tarptent Scarp 2
      Style Three- or four-season, two-person, double-wall tent with floor and two side entry doors with vestibules; freestanding in four-season configuration
      Included Tent body, fly, one aluminum hoop pole, six aluminum stakes, stake sack, tent stuff sack
      Fabrics Fly and floor are 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon; mesh interior is 0.7 oz/yd2 (23.7 g/m2) ; nylon interior is 1.1 oz/yd2 (37.3 g/m2), uncoated but calendared for water resistance
      Poles and Stakes One Easton 0.340 in (8.6 mm) 7075-T9 aluminum center hoop pole, PitchLok corners and center supports contain a total of ten 18-inch (46-cm) carbon fiber struts in webbing sleeves, six Easton aluminum tubular 8-inch (20-cm) stakes
      Floor Dimensions Manufacturer Specifications:
    Length: 86 in (218 cm)
    Width: 52 in (132 cm)
    Height: 45 in (114 cm)
    BPL Measured:
    Length: 86 in (218 cm)
    Width: 50-52 in (127-132 cm)
    Center Height: 45 in (114 cm)
    End Height: 24 in (61 cm) at sleeper’s head
      Features Single lateral hoop pole, fly and interior pitch as one unit, two side entry doors with vestibules, two top vents, truncated ends with PitchLok corners, two mesh storage pockets, three- and four-season configurations
      Packed Size 20 x 5 in (51 x 13 cm)
      Total Weight BPL Measured Weight Three-Season Version: 3 lb 4.9 oz (1.49 kg)
    Manufacturer Specification: 3 lb 6 oz (1.53 kg);
    BPL Measured Weight Four-Season Version: 4 lb, 8.1 oz (2.04 kg)
    Manufacturer Specification: 4 lb 9.5 oz (2.08 kg)
      Trail Weight Measured Weight Three-Season Version: 3 lb 4.1 oz (1.48 kg)
    Measured Weight Four-Season Version: 4 lb, 0.1 oz (1.85 kg) (excludes stuff sack and stake sack)
      Protected Area Floor Area: 31 ft2 (2.99 m2)
    Vestibule Area: 12 ft2 (1.11 m2)
    Total Protected Area: 43 ft2 (3.99 m2)
      Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 13.2 ft2/lb for three-season version, 10.7 ft2/lb for four-season version
      MSRP US$325
      Options Opting for the nylon interior adds US$20 (adds 2.5 oz/71 g), US$135 if purchased separately; two exterior Easton 0.340 aluminum cross poles US$30 (17 oz/482 g)

    Design and Features

    The Tarptent Scarp 2 incorporates some unique design characteristics to increase interior space and minimize weight. The tent is supported by one lateral hoop pole in the center that spans the living space plus two vestibules, and the ends of the tent are truncated by means of Tarptent’s patent-pending PitchLoc corners and struts. These design elements are not totally new – Terra Nova, Exped, and Hilleberg use a single hoop pole in certain models – but the implementation is typical Tarptent ingenuity.

    Another unique feature (for the US) is the Scarp double-wall tents pitch as one unit (interior plus fly), so setup is faster and dryer than the typical two-step setup of attaching poles to the inner tent then laying the fly over it. Further, the Scarp 2 is available with either an all mesh or a solid nylon interior, and exterior cross-poles are available to make the tent more wind stable and storm worthy for four-season use. Although none of these elements are new (except the PitchLoc corners), what is new is combining these space-making and weight-saving elements into one tent.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 2
    The Scarp 2 is available in three-season (top left and right) and four-season (bottom left and right) versions. The three-season version has a mesh interior and single hoop pole. The four-season version has a solid nylon interior and adds two exterior cross poles to tension the fly.

    Some hikers prefer a solid nylon interior in a three-season tent, rather than a mesh interior (many Europeans do). There are several advantages: there’s more privacy, it’s warmer, and it sheds any condensation dripping from the fly. Opting for the solid nylon interior adds 2.5 ounces to the weight and US$20 to the cost.

    Like the Big Sky International Convertible and Montana, the four-season version of the Tarptent Scarp 2 is rated for light-duty winter use, meaning it will withstand moderate winds and snow loads. It is not a bomber/alpine/expedition tent capable of withstanding extreme conditions. The advantage is light weight (4.5 pounds) and versatility. Many hikers want to go on an occasional winter camping trip in better weather to backcountry ski and experience the winter splendor, and a winter-light tent is a good choice for that situation.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 3
    Views of the Tarptent Scarp 2. The side view (top left) shows the single lateral ridge pole (in yellow sleeve) used in the three-season version. The end view (top right) shows the tent’s PitchLok triangular corners and straps on the fly used to attach exterior cross poles for four-season use. The top view (bottom left) shows how effectively the exterior cross poles extend and tension the fly, and also shows the tent’s dual top vents. A downward view (bottom left) shows the tent with the vestibules open.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 4
    Outside features. The ends of the tent are truncated (left) resulting in more usable inside space. Tarptent’s new PitchLok corners (center) enable the truncated ends and add stability. They consist of carbon fiber struts inside a webbing sleeve and fold together for packing. The tent’s two top vents (right) face opposite directions, and partially close with a clip and loop.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 5
    Inside features. Each vestibule (left) has 6 square feet of storage area, enough for a large pack, boots, and more. There are two small mesh pockets (center) at the head end that lie on the floor. Each vestibule door has a side-release buckle at the bottom (right) to relieve tension on the zipper.

     

     

    For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. Video tour of the Tarptent Scarp 2 in both three- and four-season configurations.

    Editor’s Note: we are having technical difficulties getting our Flash player to work.  To watch the video tour, please click the down arrow and watch in the new page, then go back in your browser to return to the article.  We are working on this bug and hope to get it resolved soon.  Thank you for your patience!

    Performance

    Setup is similar to the Tarptent Rainbow tents, except the hoop pole is lateral rather than longitudinal. Insert the pole into its sleeve and attach the ends to grommets, stake one end of the tent, stake the other end, then adjust stakes and tension. The center hoop pole extends and tensions the vestibules. I found the Scarp 2 a little fussier to adjust compared to other tents, but it has a total of ten Line-Lok tensioners to keep the tent taut.

    The ergonomics and usable space of the Scarp 2 are excellent. The dual side entries make it very convenient for two people to inhabit the tent, and each person has his/her own vestibule for storage. When the vestibule doors are closed, the entry doors in the inner tent can be left open to incorporate the vestibules into the tent’s usable space. And the Scarp has loads of usable space for two people: the floor is an honest 50 inches wide, the inside length is 86 inches, minimum height at the ends is 18 inches, and maximum height in the center is 45 inches. The Scarp is an excellent tent for tall hikers. My only complaint is the tent’s design does not allow for large and convenient storage pockets; the Scarp 2 has only two small mesh pockets at the head end, and they are just big enough for a pair of glasses.

    Late winter and spring is a good time for testing tents, because of the frequency of snow and wind storms. I tested the Scarp 2 in numerous storms, and found:

    • Without the exterior cross poles, the canopy compresses a lot with a coating of wet snow or a strong wind. It also flaps a lot in the wind.
    • With the exterior cross poles installed, the tent deflects snow and wind well.
    • The supplied Easton 8-inch tubular stakes hold well in soil, but they do not hold well in snow or sand. Specialized snow stakes are necessary for snow camping.
    • The PitchLok corners and cross poles have a tendency to pull the stakes out of the ground, especially in snow and sand, unless they are inserted at a 45 degree angle.
    • Wind-driven snow and rain can enter the tent through the top vents. There is no way to close them completely or adjust them from inside the tent.
    • The bottom of the fly is 6-8 inches above the ground. Sand and dust blow in during a desert windstorm, and spindrift comes in during a windy snowstorm. A fly with snow flaps is not available for winter camping, but it helps to pile snow around the perimeter of the tent to reduce spindrift.
    • The nylon interior is essential for snow camping. It prevents spindrift from entering the interior living space, and retains heat. I measured a 15 F inside/outside temperature difference one cold morning.
    • When not in use, the straps on the fly used to connect the cross poles blow around in the wind and abrade the silnylon fly. I recommend removing them to save 0.5 ounce and eliminate their flapping around.
    • The inner tent is not tensioned very much because it basically hangs from the fly. This creates a lot of space between the inner tent and fly (6-10 inches) for good ventilation.
    • The Scarp is well ventilated due to its raised fly, abundant air space between the inner tent and fly, and two top vents. On a windy night, a breeze circulates through the tent, but the mesh interior does a good job of minimizing it, and the nylon interior provides even more protection.
    • Because of the Scarp’s corner and end struts (total of 10) the tent can’t be stuffed, rather its best to gather the struts at each end, fold the tent body to their length (18 inches), roll it up, and insert it into the stuff sack.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 7
    Without the exterior cross poles, a small amount of wet snow really compresses the tent’s canopy (left). With the cross poles installed, dry snow readily slides off (center). The vestibules are raised 7.5 inches off the ground, so snow comes in at the bottom (right).

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 8
    the PitchLok corners and exterior cross poles have a tendency to pull stakes out of snow and sand (left), so it’s important to use long stakes and drive them in at a 45 degree angle. The Scarp has a 6-10 inch air space between the inner tent and fly (center), which helps ventilation. Dust and pollen stick to the silnylon fly (right), which is true for any silnylon tent.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 9
    The Scarp 2 can be pitched with the fly and poles only to create a very roomy single wall floorless tent weighing 2 pounds 6.6 ounces. I tested the fly-only configuration on one trip, by myself, and found it big enough to sleep three people! The raised sidewalls allow breezes (and bugs) to pass through the tent.

    The Scarp 2 has excellent ventilation, consisting of raised sidewalls, a large space between the inner tent and fly, and two top vents. I experienced little or no condensation in the Scarp 2 when there was some air movement. However, I still had heavy condensation on the inside of the fly on several occasions (a calm, still night with a large temperature drop), which is normal. Many people prefer a double-wall tent because it “eliminates the condensation problem”. That’s a myth. A double-wall tent’s insulating air space avoids the formation of condensation to some extent, but there are still many occasions when condensation forms on the inside of the fly. The inner tent provides a buffer from direct contact with the condensation (which is nice), but you still pack up a wet tent in the morning.

    Assessment

    How does the new Scarp 2 compare with the competition? I assembled the following table to provide some comparative specifications. For a fair comparison, all of the tents listed are three-season, two-person, double-wall, with aluminum poles (except the MSR Carbon Reflex 2, which does not have an aluminum pole option), and weigh less than 3.5 pounds.

     
    Tent Mfr. Total Weight Floor Area (ft2) Number of Doors Number of Vestibules Vestibule Area (ft2) Floor Dimensions and Height (WxLxH) MSRP (US$)
    Terra Nova Laser 2 lb 12 oz 20.7 1 1 8 35x88x37 420
    MSR Carbon Reflex 2 3 lb 4 oz 23.3 1 2 14 40x84x40 500
    Big Sky International Evolution 2P 3 lb 0.1 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 372
    Big Sky International Convertible 2P 3 lb 4.4 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 390
    Big Sky International Montana 2P 2 lb 10.1 oz 32.7 1 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 350
    Big Sky International Revolution 2P 3 lb 0.9 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 372
    Tarptent Scarp 2 3 lb 6 oz 31 2 2 12 50x86x45 325

    Some highlights from the information in the table:

    • The floor area of the Terra Nova and MSR tents is small and the cost is high.
    • The Terra Nova Laser is definitely the lightest, but the interior is rather cramped and it has only one vestibule.
    • The Big Sky International tents are a bit lighter than the Tarptent Scarp 2, and have a little more floor area and much more vestibule area.
    • The Tarptent Scarp 2 holds its own compared to the competition. It costs a little less, but it’s also a bit smaller than the Big Sky tents and weighs a little more.

    The closest comparison is between the Tarptent Scarp 2 and the Big Sky International Convertible 2P, because both tents set up as one unit and have three-season and four-season versions. The differences are in the details. The Convertible has four large mesh storage pockets, uses two poles in an X-pattern, has larger vestibules, and costs $45 more, but it’s available with only one fly with snow flaps. The Scarp 2 has two small pockets, uses one lateral hoop pole plus ten struts, has smaller vestibules, costs less, and also is available with only one fly that has attachments for external cross poles. Both tents have two top vents. The Scarp 2’s longer length and truncated ends give lots of interior headroom, but the Convertible has steep endwalls and also has good headroom. There is no clear standout in this comparison, and the final choice depends on user preferences.

    In my opinion, the Scarp 2 is an excellent choice for a three-season tent, but I have a few reservations about it in four-season mode. The attachment of the exterior cross-poles is a bit funky and time consuming (but they work well). I asked Henry Shires at Tarptent about the possibility of using clips instead of the tie-down straps, and he explained that he tried hard to develop a clip attachment (which would be faster), but it simply didn’t work out. Another issue is the large gap under the fly, which is an asset for three-season use, but allows snow to come into the vestibules when snow camping. The only solution I can suggest is to pile snow around the perimeter of the tent, as needed, to keep wind-driven snow out of the vestibules. Finally, there’s little that can be done to prevent wind-driven snow from entering the tent through the top vents (except for stuffing something into the vent to seal it, or orienting the tent sideways into the wind, which is not recommended).

    I personally like the Scarp 2 with the nylon interior. It weighs 2.5 ounces more, but it retains heat when cold weather camping, and it sheds condensation and spindrift. Another advantage of choosing the nylon interior for three-season use is that it only requires the addition of the exterior cross-poles (US$30) to have the versatility of a three-season or four-season tent.

    What’s Good

    • Roomy two-person double-wall tent weighing 3.25 pounds
    • Utilizes a one pole hoop design and truncated ends to minimize weight while maximizing interior usable space
    • Inner tent and fly pitch together as a unit
    • Mesh and solid nylon interiors available
    • Three- and four-season versions available
    • Four-season version is very wind stable and storm worthy
    • Large air space between the inner tent and fly
    • Two doors and two vestibules
    • Plenty of space for two hikers plus gear
    • Good tent for tall hikers
    • Excellent ventilation
    • Stakes are included with the tent

    What’s Not So Good

    • Storage pockets are very small and lay on the floor
    • Three-season version flaps in the wind
    • Dust and pollen stick to the silnylon fly
    • Exterior cross poles are time-consuming to attach
    • Four-season version allows wind-driven snow to enter

    Recommendations for Improvement

    • Larger storage pockets
    • Offer a separate fly for the four-season version that has snow flaps on the bottom and closable vents on the top. This would allow the removal of the pole attachments on the summer fly.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca

    With dozens of peaks above 6,000 meters (nearly 20,000 feet), Peru’s Cordillera Blanca range is one of the highest, most rugged sections of the Andes, and the most heavily glaciated of any mountains in the planet’s equatorial zone. It is a well-known mountain climbing destination, and hundreds of kilometers of hikeable trails have made the range increasingly popular among trekkers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 1
    The Cordillera Blanca: high peaks, massive glaciers, and deep valleys with mountain pastures.

    Just an eight-hour bus ride from Lima, the Cordillera Blanca is among the most accessible high mountain ranges in the world. Not only is transportation to and from the range straightforward and convenient, but bureaucratic procedures are almost nonexistent. Independent travelers from just about any country can fly into Lima’s busy international airport and be in the mountains preparing for their multi-day hiking trip the following day with relatively little pre-trip planning. A month-long sojourn in the mountains can cost as little as $1000 USD, including airfare from the United States.

    Flying There

    If bought in advance with some flexibility of dates, plane tickets to Lima from U.S. airports can be relatively inexpensive. For instance, I was able to buy round-trip tickets from Detroit to Lima for December 2008 for $650 through travelocity.com.

    At their airport of departure, backpackers will need to check baggage containing trekking poles, gas stoves, knives, and other potentially hazardous items. I personally transport my trekking poles in a telescoping plastic poster tube, which has enough space in it for an assortment of other small items as well. If you spend a night before and after your trek in a backpacker-friendly hostel or hotel next to the Cordillera Blanca, you can usually arrange to store your protective container there for the duration of your hike.

    Visas are not required to enter Peru for tourist trips of up to ninety days. Upon leaving the country, however, you will pay a $30 departure tax directly at your airline’s check-in desk (in dollars or Nuevo Sol). Aside from a simple immigration form, no paperwork is required for entry or exit.

    Lima

    At the Lima airport, foreign currency can be exchanged for Peru’s Nuevo Sol at zero commission. Commission is charged when exchanging money back into dollars, Euros, and other currency.

    Taxis can be obtained on the spot at the airport, typically for the equivalent of $10-20 for a ride into Lima, which is a sprawling city with many neighborhoods. It is safest, however, to arrange a ride in advance through a reputable taxi service. No public transportation exists to carry travelers from the airport to Lima.

    Lima has plenty of inexpensive hostels, as well as the usual selection of high-end hotels. Depending on when your flight comes in, you may want to spend the night in Lima, or you could depart immediately for the mountains. Lima has some sights, but is not a prime tourist destination in and of itself.

    Getting to the Cordillera Blanca

    The easiest way to reach the Cordillera Blanca from Lima is to ride there with any number of bus companies. The transportation and tourist hub of the range is the town of Huaraz, a seven- to ten-hour ride from Lima, depending on the time of day and the number and duration of stops. A few of the bus companies offering service to Huaraz are Movil Tours, Cruz del Sur, and Expreso Ancash. Buses are large, modern touring buses with comfortable reclining seats. Tickets range in price from roughly $10 to $50 one way, depending on the departure time and type of seat (e.g. partially or fully reclining, or bed).

    I tried to reserve bus tickets over the phone, but was told this was impossible. So we showed up at the company’s bus terminal the next morning an hour before departure and bought tickets on the spot. We were told that seats typically fill up half an hour or so before departure. A wise move would be to have the addresses of several bus companies on you and travel from terminal to terminal around downtown Lima if tickets are unavailable. Taxis around Lima cost just a few dollars, even including the somewhat higher prices that foreigners are typically charged. You will need to settle on a price beforehand, since there are no meters.

    Huaraz

    Almost every visitor to the Cordillera Blanca passes through Huaraz, the largest town in the region with approximately 100,000 residents. Here you will have the greatest assortment of food products to choose from, as well as fuel, maps, and plenty of backpackers from around the world. Although smaller towns in the area may be closer to your chosen trailhead, Huaraz has much more information and infrastructure and is at a better altitude for acclimatizing (3,000 meters, or 10,000 feet). There are a wide variety of accommodations available, but trekkers will generally find it more useful to stay at a backpacker-oriented hostel, which offer beds as cheap as $4 a night. At the hostel we stayed at – Jo’s Place, highly recommended – we were able to find an old backpacker’s guidebook, a detailed topographic map of the mountains hanging on the wall, and partially used gas canisters left by other backpackers. Furthermore, even though it was the middle of the low season, we met several other foreigners who were setting off on backpacking trips like us. There is an abundance of mountain guides in Huaraz, but experienced and travel-savvy backpackers should have little problem organizing and carrying out their trips on their own.

    When to Go

    Guidebooks and tourism-oriented websites basically assume that backpackers will hike in the Cordillera Blanca and nearby Cordillera Huayhuash during the dry season – May to October, which corresponds to winter in the southern hemisphere. Information about hiking during the rest of the year is difficult to find. We arrived just before the New Year, which corresponds to the beginning of the rainiest period, which peaks in February. Initially apprehensive about weather conditions in this high and distant land, we found the weather to be easily manageable with wise gear choices. During the dry season, one will find far more hikers on trails, which are basically deserted during the rest of the year. Essentially, one can hike in the Cordillera Blanca at any time of year with relatively minor gear adjustments. There is no such thing as a traditional “winter” where the snowline drops dramatically and the higher areas become impassable.

    Weather Considerations

    Being so close to the equator, seasonal temperature fluctuations in the Cordillera Blanca are relatively minor. As a result, there appear to be no deciduous plants, and the transition from frost-free zone to permanent snow and ice occurs within a span of just 2,000 vertical meters. During the dry season, backpackers typically wake up to below freezing temperatures (-5 to -10 C is common) above 3,500 meters, but the unobstructed sun quickly warms the air, and one can often hike in shorts. During the wet season, nighttime temperatures are warmer (generally 4 to 8 C in the 3,500-4,500 meter range), rain is frequent but not nonstop, and skies are often overcast, obscuring the dramatic mountain views. Rain, snow, hail, and lightning are possible any time of year, especially around the high passes. Once, we had to descend from a 4,830 meter pass through a thin layer of wet snow. We did not feel that special equipment would be necessary for hiking any of the trails.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 2
    Coming down this steep trail from the pass required carefully placed side steps and a trekking pole and umbrella as stabilization.

    During the wet season, one may expect at least several hours of rain nearly every day, as well as wet trails. The rocky ground and minimal vegetation generate quite little mud. Total annual precipitation in most of the Central Andes is fairly low, and the rain we encountered was rarely heavy. We usually had several hours without rain in the morning and at least a couple of rainless hours later in the day. We feel our choice of raingear was ideal: GoLite Chrome Dome umbrellas and homemade silnylon rain skirts. This combination allowed us to hike in the rain with no loss of comfort, though getting our trail runners to dry out was occasionally a challenge. Even on the rainiest of days, however, we would still have at least a couple of hours of almost-sunshine where we could hang our socks on our packs to dry.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 3
    Negotiating a water-covered trail.

    The sun is a force to be reckoned with. A half hour of exposure at 4,000 meters or higher can leave a fair-skinned person roasted. We honestly don’t know how we would have gotten by without our reflective GoLite umbrellas, even with just a few hours of sunshine a day.

    One may encounter biting flies in the mountain valleys, but these were not a major nuisance, even during the rainy season. We had a net tent to go under our tarp, but found the bugs went away at night anyway and eventually stopped using it.

    Acclimatization

    Any multi-day hike in the Cordillera Blanca will take you to well over 4,000 meters (roughly 13,000 feet) within a day or two of starting. Most backpackers choose to acclimatize in Huaraz, at 3,000 meters above sea level. From Huaraz, one can take a number of one-day excursions around the area to aid in acclimatization. A short walk around the center of Huaraz will quickly familiarize one with the available tour options, which cost around $10.

    Food

    Huaraz has a large selection of groceries that can be used for backpacking. Smaller towns and villages in the region have a much smaller assortment. Huaraz has at least one smallish supermarket and a large market. We were able to find things like a Ramen noodle equivalent, packaged cheese, peanut butter, Oreos, banana chips, powdered milk, cream of wheat, granola, a small selection of chocolate (Peruvians don’t have the same sweet tooth Americans do), and resealable bags. Huaraz is well-stocked for backpackers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 4
    Ten days of no-cook or quick-cooking food for two people, totalling 50,000 calories. We repackaged everything in Ziploc bags for convenience.]

    Groceries may be nonexistent in mountain villages, so don’t count on being able to restock. There was just one very small store in Pishgopampa, halfway into our route, where we were able to get things like apples, cookies, matches, and toilet paper. We would have been fine without this resupply, but decided to buy a few things just in case.

    Fuel

    Gas canisters with 230 and 500 grams of gas are available around Huaraz in many travel agencies and mini gear shops, which are concentrated in the central part of town. We saw two different mixtures of propane and butane, one of which is preferable for very cold temperatures. In addition, backpacker-oriented hostels may have stores of partially used canisters left by past hikers and climbers. We picked up a couple of these for free and returned them – somewhat more used – ten days later. Pure alcohol is readily available in pharmacies, and other sources say that blue-colored alcohol de quemar can also be found. The mountains have little wood, and campfires are prohibited, so a BushBuddy is out of the question.

    Regulations

    Most of the Cordillera Blanca is located within the Huascarán National Park. A one-day pass costs under $2 per person (payable in Peruvian currency), and a one-month pass (required for any overnight stays) costs $20 per person. The fee is payable upon entering the park, but sometimes there is no one to collect it in the off-season. Camping is allowed anywhere, and human waste does not have to be packed out of the park. However, no fires are allowed. No additional permits are required to hike or climb any of the peaks – even Peru’s highest, Huascarán (6,768 meters, or over 22,000 feet).

    Crime

    While some other mountain areas of Peru, such as the nearby Cordillera Huayhuash, were the site of robberies and even murder during the years of The Shining Path, the Cordillera Blanca have never had such problems. In recent years, all mountain areas in the region are considered safe, but guidebooks still recommend hiring a guide for hiking in the Huayhuash, and local “guards” will ask for money to watch over your camps at night. In the Cordillera Blanca, none of this is necessary, but still take care to avoid attracting undue attention in inhabited areas.

    Maps and Information

    For 20 Soles ($6.50), a very basic, non-topographic map of the Cordillera Blanca can be obtained at some travel agencies in Huaraz. Unless you are walking along the most popular and well-marked path, the Santa Cruz trek, this map will probably not be sufficient for orienteering. However, the other map for sale – a detailed topographic map of the Cordillera Blanca and nearby Cordillera Huayhuash – costs 80 Soles ($25 USD). Finding this a high price to pay for our slim budget, we opted to take a photo of the map on the wall of our hostel, and this, along with the basic tourist map and practical orienteering skills, kept us on the trail we needed to go. In ambiguous spots, a careful comparison of the tourist map and the topographic map photo was enough to send us up the right valley or mountainside.

    Also very useful is a free “Map Guide” for Huaraz that has most of the information that a traveler would need – what to do in and around Huaraz and the surrounding mountains, how to get around, etc.

    Trails, Terrain, and Orienteering

    The Cordillera Blanca are high, glaciated mountains, with deep valleys that take on a pronounced U-shaped starting at approximately 3,700 meters. Few, if any, trails in the Cordillera Blanca are dedicated hiking trails. Mostly, they are used by locals – some for hundreds of years. Trails link settlements and lead to important grazing areas. Hence, they either follow valley bottoms or lead up over passes into the next deep valley. Sometimes trails cross streams, which usually have primitive bridges over them. Trails are well-worn and generally easy to follow. The less popular the route, however, the fewer signs there are, and the easier it is to lose the trail, which may at times be hard to distinguish from livestock paths.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 5
    A high mountain settlement.

    Luckily, the dramatic topography makes map reading a cinch, and the largely unobstructed landscape allows for easy cross-country travel should you stray off the trail. If you are still unsure of the route, locals will know which path to take, if any happen to be around. Even though not everyone in the mountains speaks Spanish (Quechua is the default language), saying a name place with a questioning intonation and pointing will probably be enough to make yourself understood and get an answer.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 6
    Orienteering is not a problem in open terrain such as this.

    Selecting a Route

    The most popular and well-marked trekking route is the Santa Cruz Trek (50 km), followed by the Alpamayo Trek (90 km) and a number of other less known circuits. The readily available free tourist guidebook in Huaraz has a simple map with all the trails on it, and these trails can be stitched together to make a route of anywhere from 30 to 200 or more kilometers. Based on our time schedule (ten days), we created a loop combining most of the Santa Cruz Trek and the Alpamayo Trek. We settled on this route the day before we began our hike. We chose to go in a counter-clockwise direction in order to begin with a gradual elevation rise and finish with a long descent. This helped with acclimatization, but we still experienced some headaches the first couple days.

    As you can see from the elevation profile below – which shows only the high and low points – our route took us over eight passes in nine days. Walking up and down steep passes over 4,500 meters proved to strenuous, but overall our pace and schedule were quite unhurried.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 7
    The route we chose was the following: Cashapampa village – Quebrada Santa Cruz valley – Punta Unión pass – Tuctu village – Alto de Pucaraju pass – Quisuar village – Tupatupa pass – Pishgopampa village – Laguna Sactaycocha lake – Huillca village – Quebrada Alpamayo valley – Laguna Cullicocha lake – Hualcallan village.

    Getting To and From the Trailhead

    Getting to your trailhead from Huaraz could prove challenging without some knowledge of Spanish. This is one more reason to choose a backpacker-oriented hostel for your first couple nights in Huaraz, because you’ll be able to meet other backpackers and share important information. In our case, we took a local minibus to the town of Caraz, where we were immediately approached by a mototaxi driver who had guessed our itinerary and took us to the location in town where cars filled up to take people up the mountain to Cashapampa, where our trailhead was. On the way back, we were approached by a taxi driver in Hualcallan and taken to Caraz, where we took the same kind of minivan bus back to Huaraz. As a general rule, one can figure out transportation on the go and count on the locals having long ago figured out where backpackers need to go and how to take them there.

    Water

    Water is always nearby in the mountains even in the dry season, since trails generally follow deep gullies with glacier-fed streams. However, much of the mountains are grazed by cattle, sheep, horses, donkeys, and pigs as high as 4,500 meters or more. Nearly ubiquitous cow patties led us to treat 100% of our water with AquaMira. Even where there seemed to be no cattle, donkeys on the trail would leave patties of their own, and we were never completely sure that the water we were getting was untainted. We did not notice any filters for sale in Huaraz, but it is highly likely that iodine drops could be obtained in mini gear shops or pharmacies.

    Locals

    In general, Andean mountain dwellers appear cheerful and friendly towards strangers. If you speak Spanish (or better, Quechua), it will be easy to talk to people and find about their life. Their Spanish is often easier to understand than that of Peruvians who grew up speaking it at home and have a much larger vocabulary.

    However, you will probably encounter people – especially children – who ask you for candy or other things. We actually had a grown man run a quarter mile down a slope just to tell us, “Dame un caramelo” (give me a piece of candy). To be honest, we felt put off by people who would bluntly ask us for candy without having even talked to us. Once, we were feeling ungenerous and refused some children candy, and they only left us alone after we had turned them down multiple times for chocolate and money as well. Generally, it is wise to carry along a bag of lemon candy or similar treats to give to locals whom you feel inclined to treat. Unfortunately, most of them will just toss the plastic wrappers on the ground, since they’re apparently not yet aware of the difference between biodegradable and non-biodegradable trash. In fact, we are sure that most of the trash left on trails is from local residents and guides, not foreign backpackers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 8
    We met these friendly, colorfully dressed children, aged seven to twelve, walking up to a 4,500 meter pass without their parents, who were celebrating the New Year far below.

    Livestock

    The only negative aspect of our backpacking trip was encounters with cows, who at times viewed us as intruders. On some steep slopes cows may be reluctant to get off the trail, forcing you to somehow go around them or scare them off. One must be attentive to the cows’ mood and movements to judge whether they are indifferent, on guard, or aggressive. An indifferent cow looks at you curiously and continues to chew its cud. A cow on guard stares at you and stops chewing its cud. An aggressive cow moves towards you while staring at you without chewing. Aggressive behavior is usually the result of having calves around. The smaller the calf, the more protective the cows will be.

    Cows with calves are best avoided at a safe distance of a hundred yards or more. If you notice they have started to advance towards you, calmly walk away from them and pick up a few rocks, just in case. Once, a group of cows came running down a hill and moved towards our campsite, which was at the bottom of a large meadow in the valley. We tried to hastily break camp, but the cows got to us before we had finished. They seemed curious about us and wanted to check out our campsite, but we knew that if we abandoned our things, they would trample everything and slobber all over our food. Once the cows were about thirty meters away, I began blowing my emergency whistle as we continued to pack up. The cows didn’t know what it meant and continued moving towards us, albeit more slowly and unsurely. Finally we had moved everything to the nearby collapsing stone outhouse, and from there began tossing pebbles at them. Meanwhile, some other hikers had responded to our whistle and stood a kilometer away on a ridge to see what was up. After five minutes or so of pebble throwing, we were able to get the herd to stop trying to move closer to us, and by advancing towards them, we finally got them to start moving away from us in another direction. Cow herds are very inert indeed.

    Do not underestimate cows. Even though guidebooks and websites on the Cordillera Blanca make virtually no mention of them, we told locals about our scary encounter with the cows, and they cautioned us to be careful and told us about a herder who had been gored by a bull. Presumably, cattle are less of an issue during the dry season, when there are far more hikers on the trail, the cows may move elsewhere to graze, or the calves may have grown up.

    Shelter Choice and Site Selection

    We chose to use a generous 10 x 10 foot silnylon tarp to provide more coverage during the Andean rainy season and believe this was a good choice. We were not at all cramped and could comfortably cook under the tarp during the rain. Surprisingly, we encountered almost no nighttime wind. Site selection is limited due to the dramatic topography and tufty Andean grass, and almost all our campsites ended up being in pastures at the bottom of deep valleys. After our encounter with cows, we searched for spots out of sight of any grazing cattle. Finding a dung-free patch was sometimes a challenge.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 9
    Tarp camping at 4,650 meters above sea level.

    Conclusion

    Our hiking adventure in the Cordillera Blanca allowed us to see and experience magnificent mountains larger than anything we had ever seen before. We faced consistently wetter conditions than we had hiked in before, and were pleased to find that our rain gear, quick drying clothes, and generous tarp allowed us to avoid any discomfort or loss of hiking time due to rain. Finally, through our many conversations with local mountain dwellers, we came away with an awareness of how people live in the Andes – how they have changed the mountains, how the mountains have shaped their civilization, and how their lifestyle is changing in the modern era.

    As we read about other mountainous regions of the Central Andes, it appears that the logistics are much the same everywhere. Inexpensive local buses and taxis take backpackers to all the popular hiking destinations, and services have cropped up to provide them with the supplies they need. Based on our experience in the Cordillera Blanca, we would feel confident making visits to mountain ranges in southern Peru, Bolivia, and much of Chile and Argentina with very little advance planning except for gathering some phone numbers and addresses of bus companies or hostels in important locations. These mountains are magnificent, accessible, enjoy fair weather, and are perfectly suited for lightweight backpacking.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 10
    At the end of the trail.

    Rick          
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND MODEL WORN PACK
    FOOTWEAR Trail Runners Inov-8 320 776.0  
      Socks SmartWool N/A 39.0  
      Gore-Tex Socks Rocky N/A   75.0
      Thongs Teva N/A   201.0
      Socks SmartWool N/A   70.0
    TREKKING CLOTHES Bottom Base Layer Icebreaker 150 Leggings   155.0
      Bottom Shell Layer Homemade Momentum Wind Pants 74.0  
      Top Base Layer Icebreaker Mondo Zip 200 249.0  
      Shirt GoLite Drimove T-shirt 103.0  
      Top Shell Layer CAMP Magic Jacket   128.0
      Top Insulating Layer Montbell UL Down Inner Vest 174.0  
      Underwear ExOfficio Polyester Sports Briefs 63.0  
      Shorts Generic Polyester Running Shorts   117.0
      Eye Protection Polaroid Sports Sunglasses 21.0  
      Shell Gloves Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitts   34.0
      Top Insulating Layer BackpackingLight Cocoon PRO60 Parka   350.0
      Insulated Pants MontBell UL Down Inner Pants   208.0
      Weatherproof Coat Montane Quickfire   324.0
      Sun Protection GoLite Visor 30.0  
      Headgear Generic Fleece Headband   20.0
      Mosquito Headnet Simblissity UL Mosquito Headnet   10.0
      Insulating Gloves PossumDown Gloves   41.0
    TREKKING GEAR Trekking Poles Titanium Goat AGP Poles 202.0  
      Umbrella GoLite Chrome Dome 222.0  
      Altimeter/Compass/Watch High Gear Summit 63.0  
    PACKING GEAR Backpack Zpacks Blast 32   217.0
    CAMPING GEAR Tarp Generic 10 x 10 Silnylon Tarp   530.0
      Ground Sheet Adventure Medical Kits 2-Person Emergency Blanket   85.0
      Bug Net Homemade Hanging Bug Shelter for Two   210.0
      Stakes Generic Cheap Plastic Stakes   140.0
      Tarp Guyline AirCore Pro URSA Dyneema Rope 50′ plus Carabiners   75.0
      Quilt BackpackingLight PRO60 Quilt   330.0
      Bivy Titanium Goat Ptarmigan   190.0
      Sleeping Pad Gossamer Gear 104 x 150” Hammock Pad   250.0
      Emergency Bivy Adventure Medical Kits Emergency Bivy   93.0
      Sleeping Bag Liner Jag Bags Silk   149.0
      Stove MSR Pocket Rocket   111.0
      Pot MSR Titan   130.0
      Spoon BackpackingLight Long-Handled Spoon   9.0
    MISC GEAR Personal Hygiene       150.0
      First Aid Kit Homemade     150.0
      Maps       100.0
      Water Container Platypus 2.5 Liter Reservoir   36.0
      Odds & Ends   Repair Kit, Flashlight, Batteries, Matches, MP3 Player   200.0
      Water Treatment AquaMira Drops   80.0
      Camera Canon G7 w/ Extra Battery, Charger, Memory Cards   500.0
    CONSUMABLES Food   10 Days   7500.0
      Fuel   2 Small Fuel Canisters   400.0
      Water   1 Liter   1000.0
    Total Weight     lbs g kg
    Total Weight Worn/Carried     4.4 2016.0 2.0
    Total Pack Weight     12.0 5468.0 5.5
    Total Consumables Weight     19.6 8900.0 8.9
    Total Initial Weight (Pack + Consumables)     31.6 14368.0 14.4
    Full Skin Out Weight     36.0 16384.0 16.4

    Kim          
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND MODEL WORN PACK
    FOOTWEAR Trail Runners Salomon XA Comp 650.0  
      Socks SmartWool N/A 40.0  
      Socks Keds N/A   48.0
      Thongs Generic N/A   180.0
    TREKKING CLOTHES Bottom Base Layer BackpackingLight UL Merino Wool Leggings   103.0
      Bottom Shell Layer GoLite Women’s Wind Pant 94.0  
      Shorts Adidas Running Shorts   89.0
      Top Base Layer REI All Weather Polyester Zip Pullover 186.0  
      Shirt Nike Fit Dry Ultrawicking Top 156.0  
      Underwear Victoria’s Secret Micromesh Panty 13.0 13.0
      Top Shell Layer Marmot Windshirt w/ Hood   133.0
      Headgear Generic Fleece Headband   20.0
      Top Insulating Layer Western Mountaineering Flight Jacket   349.0
      Eye Protection Generic Sunglasses   24.0
      Mitts REI N/A   60.0
      Shell Gloves Homemade Silnylon Rain and VB Mitts   15.0
      Mosquito Headnet Coghlan’s Headnet   30.0
    TREKKING GEAR Umbrella GoLite Chrome Dome 222.0  
    PACKING GEAR Backpack Zpacks Blast 18   120.0
    CAMPING GEAR Quilt Jacks ‘R Better Rocky Mountain No Sniveller, w/ Hood and Stuff Sack   900.0
      Spoon REI Lexan Spoon   12.0
    MISC GEAR Personal Hygiene       180.0
      Water Container Platypus 2.5 Liter Reservoir   36.0
      Odds & Ends   Flashlight, Batteries, MP3 Player   160.0
    CONSUMABLES Food   10 Days   5000.0
      Water   1 Liter   1000.0
    Total Weight     lbs g kg
    Total Weight Worn/Carried     3.0 1361.0 1.4
    Total Pack Weight     5.4 2472.0 2.5
    Total Consumables Weight     13.2 6000.0 6.0
    Total Initial Weight (Pack + Consumables)     18.6 8472.0 8.5
    Full Skin Out Weight     21.6 9833.0 9.8

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River

    Stretches of the Madison River can be described as a “booze cruise,” where innertube flotillas of relaxing college students and drift boats of fly-fishers fill the river. The Bear Trap canyon isn’t one of those stretches, especially during spring snowmelt.

    Introduction

    Finding pals who both own a packraft and know how to packraft is not easy business. Finding instructors who know how to teach packrafting to others is even harder. When I received RSVPs from seven outdoor educators (including a handful of accomplished packrafters) to join me on a packrafting trip down the Madison River so we could all learn to packraft from each other, I knew I was onto something pretty special. The deal was simple: there were no costs, no fees, and no pay; we’d teach each other, we’d probably swim, and we’d have a heckuva good time.

    So when we all convened at Ennis Lake on the morning of May 28, the least I could do was make everyone pancakes and bacon on a decidedly heavy Camp Chef. Our goal was simple: paddle our way to Three Forks, Montana, forty-five miles downriver. We’d start with a few hours of practice at Ennis Lake, then some river skills practice in the whitewater below Ennis Dam, and finally, a run down the Madison River starting with some of the most hallowed wilderness whitewater in the state of Montana: Bear Trap Canyon. We figured perhaps we’d end at the famous location along the trail of Lewis and Clark: the headwaters of the Missouri River.

    4,000 cfs Baby!

    The Madison River was running full tilt in response to a heavy snowpack and warm temperatures: nearly 4,000 cfs (base flows average 1,200 cfs). These are flows that elevate the normally Class III canyon into a Class IV-V froth of deadly rapids: Whitehorse, the Kitchen Sink, and the Green Wave, while turning normally tame Class IIs into solid IIIs. We knew we wouldn’t be able to float the big rapids, but we were surprised at the difficulty involved in negotiating the rest of the upper canyon. Fast, technical whitewater with serious consequences: big holes, unending hydraulics, and lots, and lots, and lots of massive rocks. So, we spent most of the evening on the first day negotiating Class II-III whitewater in the upper canyon cautiously and carefully. Three of us took swims in strong eddy lines and rock holes, getting ‘bandersnatched’ (sucked backwards) into the hydraulics. As the light faded and reading the complex current became more difficult, we called it an evening, bushwhacked up the canyon wall to a trail, and found a four-star campsite on a grassy beach. We went to bed tired, but rewarded.

    Not Stupid OR Suicidal

    The next day, we walked three and a half miles of trail to bypass massive rapids, including a twelve-foot reverse curling roller at Whitehorse, the bus-sized recirculating hole of the Kitchen Sink, and massive complexity at the Green Wave. There had been no registered attempts, commercial, or private, to float the river since May 12, when the river started to rise. We later learned from hardcore kayakers that running the Bear Trap this time of year should be considered something between stupid and suicidal.

    So, at 11:00 a.m. on May 29, we finally dropped in at Bear Trap Creek for a continuous run to Three Forks. We’d float a mile of technical Class II that allowed us to practice our pirouettes and snicker-snacks through a series of rock gardens, followed by miles and miles of more tame Class I-II water that included strong eddies and big wave trains to provide plenty of interesting boating. By the end of the day, we had covered thirty miles, finding a remote island camp after exploring a side channel barely wider than our little boats. As our campfire faded into the darkness of the evening, those of us remaining awake witnessed a treasured and rare event: Montana fireflies. We spotted four of them, blinking intermittently across the stream, twenty feet from our fire. The Montana firefly is an elusive and extraordinarily rare creature, having only been witnessed by select few.

    Nothing Like Having Your Blood Drawn

    The warm feeling of sharing our camp with fireflies faded soon as we went to bed and removed several less elusive creatures (ticks) from our clothing and skin, along with anything resembling a tick with paranoiac fury – burrs, pine needles, extra clumps of hair, moles, etc.

    On May 30, we continued our voyage to Three Forks, exploring tiny, meandering side channels probably unknown to other boaters, napping lazily when the river flow slowed to a crawl, and sharing a tin of smoked oysters towards the end of the trip. Upon our arrival at the confluence of the Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers, shortly after we entered the headwaters of the mighty Missouri, a Gallatin County Search and Rescue boat captain (on a training exercise) shouted enthusiastically, “Look at those! Alpackas! They only weigh four pounds and can run whitewater!”

    What It’s All About

    We beached our boats with renewed confidence, discussed the design and execution of Backpacking Light’s new Introduction to Packrafting course and a newfound enthusiasm to teach others about safely planning and executing their own packrafting expeditions.

    That evening, surrounding a table at Bozeman’s MacKenzie River Pizza Company, we talked about our varying states of job security, homelessness, investments, parenting, marriage, and religion. It was clear that our eclectic little group was about as diverse as a Brooklyn Book Club, but our common thread was strong, and we cemented our commitments to each other through an ultralight ethic, a big and wondrous river, and a new mode of travel that left us feeling more than just a little bit giddy.

    Participants: Darin Banner, Scott Christy, Carol Crooker, Brett French, Sam Haraldson, Ryan Jordan, Mike Martin, and Andrew Skurka.

    Photos: Ryan Jordan, Olympus 790SW

    More:

    Learn to Packraft with Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School

    Read about packrafting in the book Packrafting! by Roman Dial

    Watch a video about a packrafting trek through Beartrap Canyon by Ryan Jordan and Bill Stadwiser

    Read an article in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, by Amanda Ricker

    Read an article in the Billings Gazette, by Brett French

    More articles about packrafting at Backpacking Light

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 1
    We spent the morning of our first day getting used to packrafts at Ennis Lake. Sam Haraldson paddles calm waters while the Tobacco Root Mountains set the scene.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 2
    We spent a lot of time flipping and getting back into boats. Mike Martin braces with his paddle, reaches across, and hurls himself back in – a valuable skill that might become necessary as we attempted Bear Trap Canyon.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 3
    Mike Martin watches sunrise on the canyon cliffs with the river far below.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 4
    Sam Haraldson meanders through brush high on the canyon walls towards the Bear Trap Creek put-in.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 5
    Mike Martin paddles below a massive rockslide, caused by an earthquake in the 1990s, that trapped many campers in Bear Trap Canyon by obliterating the road.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 6
    The Madison River is home to roosting pelicans in the spring. During the peak season of April and May, one can drift quietly beside flotillas numbering into the hundreds.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 7
    We experimented with many types of pack lashing systems, including this one utilizing Nite-Ize Figure 9 fasteners and nylon accessory cord.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 8
    Sam Haraldson floats by a packraft-eater.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 9
    Sam Haraldson explores the Madison Cliffs, home to riverside micro-ecosystems rich in plant and animal life, including swallows and rattlesnakes.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 10
    Scott Christy follows the gang along the Madison Cliffs.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 11
    Carol Crooker has second thoughts about not bringing a shelter, with hostility building in the background. When it’s 80 degrees and sunny at the put-in, you tend to make these kinds of decisions.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 12
    A bald eagle wonders if Darin Banner is vulnerable in the little Alpacka below.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 13
    Darin Banner enjoys a quiet moment in an eddy at sunset as we evaluate our camping opportunities.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 14
    It’s getting late, and Carol’s hungry. An expedition packrafter learns to do everything while in the boat, including eat, drink, treat water, brew coffee, brush teeth, and even pee.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 15
    Finally, we found a side channel that led to an island camp with cottonwoods and evergreens that would provide us wood for fire and cooking, plus shelter from the storm.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 16
    We all left shelters back at the car, so we had to be creative about storm protection. Carol propped her boat in the branches of a tree and slept under it…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 17
    …as did Sam…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 18
    …while Ryan tied his between two trees, hammock-style…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 19
    …Andy went for an engineered, freestanding-structure…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 20
    : …while Scott borrowed poor Darin’s boat for a two-raft lean-to.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 21
    A small fire warmed our hearts, boiled water for our meals, and always seems to be a welcome addition for any river trip.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 22
    Andy Skurka distributes boiled water rations for meals and hot drinks in the evening.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 23
    Alpenglow on the cottonwoods.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 24
    Sunset on the hidden side channel leading into and out of our island campsite.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 25
    Andy Skurka gets ready to start our last day of paddling.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 26
    A lazy flotilla of packrafters approaching Three Forks, Montana (L to R): Scott Christy, Brett French, Darin Banner, Andrew Skurka, Mike Martin, Carol Crooker, and Sam Haraldson.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 27
    Scott Christy negotiating wood in a side channel connecting the Madison and Jefferson Rivers.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 28
    Final strokes: Scott paddles past the final eddy to our takeout on the Missouri River near Trident, Montana.

    Selling Lightweight: How Retailers Can Help Your Pack Weight

    The interactions between retailer and consumer can have a dramatic influence on the gear carried and experience had by a consumer. We examine the tools both retailers and consumers can use in evaluating gear and determining the best lightweight options for individuals.

    Introduction

    At some point, when people decide they’d like to give backpacking a try, they generally head to their local shop to get outfitted. Because specialty outdoor retailers are the front line in consumer education, it makes sense that retailers first need to fully understand ultralight philosophies themselves for the greater public to develop an ultralight consciousness.

    Regular visitors to Backpacking Light know precisely the type of gear and base pack weights that tend to come out of outfitting sessions at most retailers: heavy! Start out with seven-pound tents and six-pound packs… the rest of the gear adds up quickly, and don’t forget all those quick-dry, wicking, multiple layering pieces! To some degree, this is a function of what manufacturers are making available. At the same time, product offerings are influenced by end-user purchases and sales figures – if "Tent X" sells a lot of units, then the likelihood is that you’ll be seeing more like "X" in the future. I think that products ultimately sell based on what the sales staff likes – or what they find easy to sell. So it becomes vitally important for retail staff to understand how and why virtually everyone can benefit from some aspect of an ultralight philosophy.

    Sales are based in no small part on familiarity. If we assume that a novice backpacker has a passing familiarity with traditional backpacking, then we know what kind of expectations they have when they go looking for gear. And frankly, most of them expect to be pack mules! I think it is important for retailers (and their consumers) to realize just how much impact a retailer can have on a person’s limited vacation time. Proper guidance in gear selection can really help make or break someone’s trip.

    Selling Lightweight: How Retailers Can Help Your Pack Weight - 1

    The UL Soft Sell

    That’s why I’ve found – and find with increasing frequency – the vital importance of retailers educating themselves to the point of truly understanding ultralight backpacking, along with more traditional approaches. With that understanding, they can apply ultralight philosophies to backpackers at any interest, age, or intensity level. It is important for retailers too (or especially) to understand that UL isn’t about sawing toothbrushes in half. Toothbrush handles are pretty insignificant. Ultralight is about taking less gear and making significant weight changes in the gear you do select. Understanding UL can be a powerful tool for the business of specialty outdoor shops, sure. But it’s also an important tool and educational component for each consumer who walks through the doors of an (ahem) enlightened shop.

    There is no one who wouldn’t benefit from carrying a (relatively) light pack, but many people dismiss UL altogether! Youngsters scoff and say they don’t mind the extra pounds. Other people smile and say they think it’s a bit ridiculous to cut the handle off toothbrushes (they may have a point). Still others say health problems prevent them from doing any backpacking. A packfitter might just accept these comments and sell them heavier gear or let people walk away. However, I think it’s necessary for packfitters to call people’s bluff, to show them in a respectful way how easy it is to lighten a pack, and to show them why and how it can benefit anyone.

    People are a bit incredulous when I tell them it’s a simple matter to have a base weight in the fifteen-pound range – and I point out that many book bags on campus weigh more than that. So I developed a straight-forward display that I use as a launching point for many of my outfitting interactions. Part of this is enthusiasm on my part that I hope translates to excitement on the part of my customers. Part of it, frankly, is the pleasure of seeing the proverbial lightbulb click on when people realize ultralight really is possible, easy, realistic – and simple to do comfortably without sacrificing safety.

    Selling Lightweight: How Retailers Can Help Your Pack Weight - 2

    For the Visual Learners

    What I did in my shop was arrange a display on and alongside a shelving system. The shelves are floating and located under a window in hopes of accentuating the airiness of the system. I developed a basic three-season gear list suitable for cold and wet Michigan weather, then went through the shop and grabbed some of my lightest examples of each. I didn’t always grab the lightest, though! I wanted a gear list that would not leave someone feeling as though they were compromising anything. I’ve found that the biggest source of resistance to UL is a perceived need for sacrifice, so I made it a point to grab a full length 1.5-inch thick self-inflating pad, a double-wall free-standing tent, an insulated mug, and other such "luxuries." All told, I still ended up with a base weight of only 13.16 pounds.

    I hung the sleeping bag and pack next to the shelves, then displayed the entirety of the gear list on the shelves. I made up a large print sign highlighting the complete pack weight, then printed off several smaller signs itemizing everything with corresponding weights. Cook gear, for example, is all displayed together on the shelf and has a sign over it with a description of each item, brand and model, and the weight. Okay, I admit, it looks a little train-wreckish, but people regularly stop and peruse the display. This area of the store is an important launching point for discussions about outfitting needs.

    My favorite people to encounter are those who see backpacking as something they’ll never be able to do again. They have back or knee problems, or they’re too out of shape to carry a fifty-pound pack. When I tell them they can get everything they need for a solo trip – even a plush two-inch pad and a camp chair – for about fifteen pounds, they really perk up. The display allows me to show them exactly how it’s done. It also seems to help people process the low pack weight as a tangible reality.

    Comfort, Safety, and Cost

    The thing is, you don’t need to carry more to be more comfortable, and this is the point many folks miss. There’s really not much you could add to my list to improve comfort. There’s also no dangerous lack of safety margins. These points seem to escape a lot of people when you talk about lightweight backpacking in general; they assume you’re doing without and bordering on dangerous. I try to reinforce the comfort and safety possible – and expected – within the framework of lightweight backpacking throughout my discussions with people.

    It is important to meet individual needs, not to outfit people based solely upon your personal philosophies. In other words, someone might be doing longer trips with infrequent or non-existent resupplies, in which case a heavier framed pack might be their best option. Just because that person’s using a heavier pack, though, doesn’t mean all of their equipment could or should be heavier. On the contrary, it calls for more emphasis on cutting weight of the other items in their pack. As we discuss gear options, I make it a point to talk about the importance of cutting weight when adding weight in other areas, and the fact that adding a couple pounds here and there suddenly adds up to ten pounds.

    It’s also important to work within the real-world constraints of budget, desire, comfort, and priority. If someone already has a heavy pack but no tent, then the outfitter’s priority needs to be finding a lightweight tent that fits the person’s needs. A conscientious approach in doing so will help form consumer habits and experiences when it comes to their next gear list or upgrade.

    Think of Ounces in Terms of Pounds

    I take pains to reinforce the importance of ounces – save three ounces here, two ounces there, and you’ve saved yourself half a pound. Save only two ounces each on eight items in your pack, and you’ve saved a full pound. The stuff adds up quickly. Heavy hiking socks weigh nearly a quarter-pound. Within this framework, I address pack volume as a place to save ounces. This can be tricky footwork for both consumer and retailer. I explain that the same pack model in a smaller volume can save, say, a pound. However, if their gear doesn’t all fit in the pack it won’t carry as well (with gear strapped outside) and the weight benefits are lost. I then show people some demo stuff sacks displayed fully filled out so they can see exactly how much space difference there is between two models – for example, when referencing the difference between a 60- and 70-liter pack, I show them a roughly 10 liter stuff sack. I then explain that the 10-liter sack could easily represent the difference between a synthetic and down bag – reinforcing (a) the potential necessity for them to have a larger pack or (b) the potential importance and interconnectedness of choosing smaller and lighter gear in as many purchases as possible.

    60 and 70 liter?! Yep. The reality is that people tend to start out with at least some kind of equipment, it’s usually not the smallest or lightest, and it usually takes them a while to whittle down their kit. There’s also the matter that many people might take trips with no resupply, unlike typical ultralight thru-hikers, and might need some more volume for chow. I still recommend 80- to 90-liter packs for some people who’ll be doing longer trips and winter trips – you have to keep an open mind and fulfill a person’s needs, not your biased interpretation of their needs. Back to those stuff sacks, I also show people how much difference in food volume there can be. For one week, I consume 10 to 15 liters of food. For about two weeks without resupply, I consume about 30 liters of (repackaged) food. Since many sleeping bags take up 15 liters in themselves (and let’s face it, some bulkier synthetics push 30 liters), if you add two weeks of food with an average bag you’ve got 45 liters of pack volume between two key factors. You’ve still got to add shelter, clothes, cook gear, and more. This is why I say to base your recommendations on ultralight philosophy, but to not restrict yourself solely to that philosophy. Help a consumer make a reasonable transition to UL!

    One Piece at a Time

    Cookware and kitchen stuff can be a great place to examine the balance between UL and more traditional gear. One of the techniques I use with customers is a sort of ratio, typically between price:weight savings. In other words, if a difference of $40 can save you a pound in a cookset, but that same $40 saves you eight ounces in a sleeping pad, get the cookset. (Incidentally, when I want to emphasize the importance of ounces, I speak in terms of pounds. Instead of two ounces, for example, I might phrase it "an eighth of a pound.") I rarely sell anything other than titanium cookware. I suspect that’s unusual for most retailers; I believe that many people simply sell less expensive product because (a) it’s easier to sell and (b) that’s all they think the consumer wants. Spending just a little time and effort to explain the benefits of Ti cookware usually helps people see why it’s a better choice, resulting in a happier customer and shopowner.

    Selling Lightweight: How Retailers Can Help Your Pack Weight - 3

    On the other hand, alcohol stoves aren’t for everybody, nor are canister stoves. The reality is that liquid fuel stoves are simply more versatile, functional options at times, despite their greater weight. If I have someone who wants to split their time between winter and three-season weather, I’ll probably sell them a broad-bottomed Ti pot and a white gas stove, while explaining why I made those recommendations. I also then suggest considering an upright canister stove for lightweight summer use.

    I steer clear of single-wall tents or tarps as primary shelter considerations. The vast majority of complaints I hear from people about any camping experience is that their tent leaked or they otherwise got soaked while in their tent. In fact, it’s not uncommon for bad experiences in a tent to be a major reason people dislike traveling the backcountry. Many of these negative experiences are the result of condensation problems in single-wall tents… so I never sell them. Frankly, this is an area of major sacrifice for many folks that sometimes wouldn’t make sense for them anyway. Not everyone wants to push the edge. Some people like being warm, dry, and comfortable without having to futz or fiddle. And in my area, with plenty of sustained storms and steroidal mosquitos, double-wall tents can significantly help maintain and retain one’s sanity. We have far too much humidity here, too much weather and cold and bugs. In my neck of the woods, finding someone a lightweight double-wall tent is the name of the game.

    No One is Always Right

    We could talk about how retailers can best serve consumers all day long (which we might well do in the forums), but the last major point I’d like to make is price point. Some ultralight stuff is cheap, some quite expensive. Many retailers shy away from the more expensive products, perhaps afraid of being some sort of predatory horrible sales guy. Maybe they assume that people won’t want to spend the extra money for a superior quality or lighter weight product. Let me just say that I’ve sold $400 sleeping bags to people who were trying to get by with $50 ones, and they were happy to be leaving with the much more expensive bag. Those same people regularly come in to thank me and tell me how much they’ve enjoyed the things I’ve sold them, or how happy they are they spent the extra money.

    Selling Lightweight: How Retailers Can Help Your Pack Weight - 4

    People are never disappointed to find out that they own a quality piece of gear that works as advertised. They’ll invariably take a great deal of pleasure and pride in that piece of equipment. A truly warm, 20 F down sleeping bag that weighs about a pound and a half? And will last twenty years or more? Awesome! Price is often secondary. So: Sellers, buyers, don’t back away from the bigger-ticket options. They can prove to be money well spent.

    It is important to be upfront with customers about your opinions, beliefs, and approaches to equipment, and to realize that those are your opinions, not the one truth for all backpackers. Openly stating your biases as you work with someone is important both for their benefit and to remind you of the lens with which you view the backpacking world. I relate personal experiences. Let’s be real. I didn’t start out with a ten- to fifteen-pound base weight. No one really does. I started with well over a fifty-pound base weight, but I’ve learned. So I take people through pertinent parts of the journey. Your way won’t work for everybody, but by lightening their pack, your ultralight knowledge can help people of all backgrounds and interests by making their time outside more enjoyable.

    Walking on Fire: A Light-Hiker’s Guide to Wildfire Awareness, Survival, and Evasion (Part 3 of 3)

    We’ve covered several skills of assessing and avoiding fire. Whether passing through, sheltering in, or simply going near a fire area, there are particular hazards beyond immolation to be aware of.

    You don’t have access to view this content.

    Packrafting Utah’s Escalante River in Late March

    At 1.6 cfs in the Escalante, would there be more packrafting or raft-packing for our intrepid explorers?

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 1
    Huge sandstone walls along the river are tall enough to fill just about any camera lens. Bill Stadwiser admires nature’s architecture from the vantage point of an Alpacka.

     

    Introduction

    I am embarrassed to admit that, after several years of living in Utah, dozens of weeks spent in the western desert, and many nights dreaming away under a shelter slung between two juniper trees, I somehow managed to avoid reading Edward Abbey’s classic work, Desert Solitaire. That is, until a few weeks ago when, upon learning this fact, a friend demanded that I correct this travesty and made sure a copy found its way into my hands. As I lay in bed one February night in Montana, I began to read:

    Off in the east an isolated storm is boiling over the desert, a mass of lavender clouds bombarding the earth with lightning and trailing curtains of rain. The distance is so great that I cannot hear the thunder. Between here and there and me and the mountains it’s the canyon wilderness, the hoodoo land of spire and pillar and pinnacle where no man lives, and where the river flows, unseen, through the blue-black trenches in the rock.

    Reading our buddy Ed’s words stirred up thoughts of the desert that had been lying dormant ever since I left Utah four years ago. Like Goldie Wilson, the young busboy in Back to the Future who suddenly realizes that someday he is going to become mayor of Hill Valley, a smile came to my face as I said to myself, “River trip in a desert canyon. I like the sound of that.”

    Raft-packing?

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 2
    Stunning panoramic views greet travelers along the Escalante River. Notice the reflection of canyon features on Bill’s glasses.

    For years I’ve heard stories about the eighty-mile stretch of the Escalante River above Lake Powell. Friends of mine who have spent their entire lives in Utah have remarked that of all the spectacular backcountry Utah has to offer (and there is plenty) this length of the Escalante ranks among the most enticing.

    Andy Heath, a close friend and packraft owner, agreed that Escalante was an alluring destination. We immediately began poring over maps at the library in Bozeman and formulating an itinerary. Andy and I could only find a brief window this spring when our schedules would coincide. Late March was it, and we were confident that we could cover the roughly forty river miles between Fence Canyon and Coyote Gulch in four days.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 3
    Desert life flourishes along the river. Is Andy is chasing a photo opportunity or an afternoon snack? A grin like that could suggest either.

    Despite our optimism, there was one glaring problem with our plan – low water. As a matter of fact, when preparing for the trip, many of the people with whom we spoke cautioned us that what were planning could not be done. For starters, spring runoff would not be for another couple of weeks, if at all due to the disappointing winter snow pack. We were warned that to run it in March would mean having to walk (aka ‘raft-pack’) much of the canyon. Also, those not familiar with the Alpacka’s tough-as-nails reputation were skeptical as to whether our inflatable boats could survive the maze of sharp stones and thorny Russian olive thickets that higher water levels would normally cover. Upon requesting permits, the rangers looked at us with a certain degree of paternal concern, then explained that the river was only running at 1.6 cfs (no, 1.6 is not a typo). To their knowledge, no one had successfully run the river at that level.

    At this point, the only information we had that contradicted the negative feedback we were receiving was a forum posting written by Sheri Tingey, inventor of the Alpacka raft. She claimed that contrary to conventional wisdom, 2 cfs was not only enough water to packraft the Escalante, it was actually ideal. Putting our faith and trust in Sheri’s experience above all else and hoping for a bit of rain, Andy and I thanked the rangers for their advice and asked for permits anyway. After showing us our three bailout options above Coyote Gulch, a semi-sarcastic “Have a nice walk,” was the last thing we heard before heading out the door.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 4
    Over time, flowing water does remarkable things to sandstone. This honeycomb pattern found about 100 feet above the river’s current level was just one among the many of the interesting features we encountered. To give a sense of scale, most holes seen here are no larger than an average coin.

    Philosophic Thoughts

    I find desert travel particularly conducive to generate rolling, rambling, and what some might even call philosophic thoughts, amateur though they may be. Like a flux capacitor surging at 1.21 gigawatts, I noticed the desert transporting my brain to the place where time moves at geological pace, thus altering (and lessening) my brain’s insistence on its own significance and notions of permanence. Reading Desert Solitaire, it is obvious that our buddy Ed had similar thoughts,

    Alone in the silence, I understand for a moment the dread which many feel in the presence of primeval desert, the unconscious fear which compels them to tame, alter, or destroy what they cannot understand, to reduce the wild and prehuman to human dimensions. Anything rather than confront directly the antehuman, that other world which frightens not through danger or hostility but in something far worse – its implacable indifference.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 5
    Taking breaks from the river to enjoy the scenery and snack is all part of the packrafting experience. Andy secures his boat before enjoying a much deserved midday rest.

    Upon entering the canyon and seeing the first series of bends unfold before me, the thought came to my mind that our contemporary attitude towards wilderness conservation and preservation are narrow at best when applied to a land that is so jagged and unfinished. Encountering a place such as the Escalante River – a landscape constantly creating, destroying and re-creating itself – I realized how futile efforts would be to preserve it as it is at this moment in time. Rather, what is worth preserving are the natural, unimpeded processes by which the earth shapes itself free of unnecessary human intervention. Or, to put it into terms Back to the Future aficionados will understand, it is not the Hill Valley clock tower that is worth saving, as the crazy lady would have us believe, but rather the chance for lightning to strike it.

    As we made the transition from foot to packraft, the thoughts continued, although subtler and more serene as the energy of the river began to move our bodies and gear. Floating next to the towering walls and meandering twists, this canyon and my packraft collaborated to remind me that change is necessary, inevitable, and utterly fascinating when I sit back and watch it do its thing.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 6
    Though water levels were very low (1.6 cfs), Andy and I only encountered a few areas where it was absolutely necessary to portage around obstacles. Here, Andy prepares to put in just below a series of unnavigable boulders.

    Desert Quicksand

    Those who have explored this area before warned Andy and I to watch out for quicksand. Our buddy Ed is among those offering cautionary advice:

    Ordinarily it is possible for a man to walk across quicksand, if he keeps moving. But if he stops, funny things begin to happen. The surface of the quicksand, which may look as firm as the wet sand on an ocean beach, begins to liquefy beneath his feet. He finds himself sinking slowly into a jelly-like substance, soft and quivering, which clasps itself around his ankles with the suction power of any viscous fluid. Pulling out one foot, the other foot necessarily goes down deeper, and if a man waits too long, or cannot reach something solid beyond the quicksand, he may soon find himself trapped.

    Andy and I discovered within a few hours of putting in our boats that quicksand is indeed a sporadic reality in the canyon. Upon exiting the boats, our first steps on shore were often tentative ones, never fully sure if the ground would give way under our feet. On one occasion, Andy found his right leg buried up to his knee in goopy sand, with the left precariously balanced on his still-unanchored boat. Fortunately, an inflated packraft is excellent device to facilitate self rescue from quicksand (reason #19 why an Alpacka raft is way cooler than a Delorean), and we were soon laughing about the event.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 7
    Navigating through shallow water, gravel bars, and large boulder fields meant for a pretty technical packraft. Here, Andy looks for a passable way through the maze.

    Despite all the advanced warnings regarding getting stuck, the one warning we did not receive was to watch out for a different type of quicksand – the metaphorical kind that grabs your brain makes you not want to leave a place. During our float, Andy and I were so thoroughly captivated that we often talked about returning in a year or two to raft the entire eighty-mile stretch between the town of Escalante and Coyote Gulch. During that trip, we mused, we would take our time and explore as many side canyons and gulches along the way as we desired. Though exhilarating, the need to make good time in the shallow water prevented us from exploring beyond the main channel. As a result, the vast majority of the canyon’s secrets still remain a mystery to us, concealed behind the twisting labyrinth of walls, cracks, and bends… awaiting our inevitable return.

    Hail to All Good Samaritans in Faded Silver Nissans

    Its worth noting that there are definite advantages to reconfirming one’s shuttle plans when preparing for a rafting trip – especially in the desert. At the top of the list of advantages are avoiding the scenario whereupon one arrives at the end of the trail, out of food and short on water to find an empty parking lot. I can say for certain that there is a very distinct sinking feeling that takes place in the stomach upon arriving at said location and receiving a voicemail from your shuttler confirming your suspicions that he or she is indeed not coming to your rescue and that they are “sorry.” Denial, anger, bargaining, and acceptance follow thereafter in short order.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 8
    The closer one gets to Coyote Gulch, the more dramatic the canyon becomes. Views like this occur much more frequently as the canyon carves its way deeper and deeper into the rock.

    I easily could explore the ways in which our predicament was like Marty McFly finding himself unexpectedly stuck in 1955 (November 5, to be exact) without a fully-operational time machine, but I can recognize a dead horse when I see one, so we’ll just move on. What I will say is that Andy and I found ourselves in the midst of quite the dilemma: stay put for who knows how long and hope someone offers us a ride back to our car or begin the long walk along a seldom-used desert road with unknown/doubtful access to drinking water.

    While weighing the pros and cons of each decision, we were delighted to see an old, faded, silver Nissan truck approaching on the sandy road to the west. Tempering our excitement, we gingerly walked up to the man who exited, said hello, and asked him the predictable series of questions people in our situation would ask. As it turned out, the man was a former park ranger and understood our situation all too well. Not only did he offer us a ride back to our car, he actually handed us his keys and told us to drop it off when we were done retrieving our vehicle. I don’t recall his name, and I doubt he remembers ours, but two things are utterly clear to me after the event. Wow, were we incredibly lucky, and man, do I love Utah.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 9
    Stephen’s Arch is the grand finale of our trip, providing one final magnificent view of the Escalante before exiting at Coyote Gulch. Here, the water slows through a wide open bend in the river, allowing Andy a luxurious amount of time to take it all in.

    Final Thoughts

    While Andy and I are proud to say that we successfully floated the river at 1.6 cfs with relatively few portages (two or three per day on average, of which a grand total of three were mandatory/unavoidable), Andy and I definitely found ourselves wishing for more water on multiple occasions. I will suggest that 1.6 cfs is the absolute bare minimum needed to navigate this river by packraft. Both a light load and a well-tempered boat are also essential under these conditions to maximize buoyancy. Our biggest obstacles faced while rafting were the barely submerged boulders and gravel bars. Each proved hard to spot and could halt progress entirely when encountered unexpectedly. We found that constant attention to river features and the picking of proper water channels were imperative to maintaining steady progress. In short, 1.6 cfs was barely do-able, 2.0 would have been nice, and above 2.5 luxurious.

    As far as weather is concerned, March is definitely a shoulder season in southern Utah. As such, we encountered everything from snow to blazing sun. For those wishing to do a similar trip, this obviously means taking the necessary precautions and planning accordingly when preparing a gear list. Fires are both forbidden in and ill-suited for the Escalante River canyon due to the fragile ecosystem, so it is wise to consider a little extra insulation for night, especially if you are a cold sleeper. Fortunately, many items in a typical packrafting kit have multiple uses and can help lighten the load and offset the additional weight of the packraft itself. Some typical examples are as follows: First, an upside-down packraft makes for a luxurious sleeping pad for those of us six feet and under. As a result, a sleeping pad is unnecessary for many packrafting trips. Similarly, raft paddles break down easily and provide solid support for a tarp shelter. Andy and I brought a two person mid and supported it in this way. Finally, a quality dry top (an essential piece of gear at this time of year) negates the need for additional rain gear, so long as you don’t mind your legs being wet during the day.

    Finally, though we are all conscious of the amount of weight we pack on our trips, I would encourage folks to consider bringing along some excerpts from Desert Solitaire to most any float in southern Utah. A pared-down paperback copy weighs only a couple of ounces, and there is something wonderful to be gained from hearing Abbey’s words read aloud at night, echoing off the same stone that inspired him to write.

    Packrafting Utahs Escalante River in Late March - 10
    After arriving at the trailhead and finding our shuttle curiously absent, Andy and Bill had to improvise and make friends with strangers. In the background is our Good Samaritan’s Nissan, which he generously let us use without a second thought. Thank you, thank you, thank you, good sir, wherever you are.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to Help Troubled Boys

    Getting emotionally disturbed boys working together to take a backpacking trip is a big job… with many setbacks, limited gear, and almost no budget.

    Introduction

    My journey into ultralight backpacking was an interesting experience. I took one of my first ultralight trips with a group of emotionally disturbed young boys. I was in North Carolina working with Cameron Boy’s Camp, a therapeutic wilderness camp/school for troubled boys.

    These boys come to camp from very difficult family situations and, as a result, they are often unable to function in normal society. The camp groups them by age, and they live in primitive campsites of wood-framed tents they build and maintain themselves. Each group – six to ten boys and their three Counselor/Teachers or ‘Chiefs’ – is responsible to plan their own program together, based on the needs and desires of the group.

    As the boys build trusting relationships with their Chiefs and each other, they learn to clearly express their frustrations, rather than acting them out. When they do act up, natural consequences (like being late for meals) are a powerful learning experience. As boys learn to work together to build a tent, chop wood, or pack a canoe, they learn social skills they can use back home with their families.

    Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 1
    Pre-Lightweight Backpacking & Camping days: Jerry and my brother, Daniel, in Alaska.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 2
    Hiking across a pass in Alaska.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 3
    The author, in Alaska, in his traditional heavy gear. My, how far he’s come.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 4
    In preparation for a backpacking trip, we took the boys canoeing and camping on North Carolina’s Great Pee Dee and Lumber Rivers. Notice how the paddles and gear are organized in a neat row. This trip was a huge factor in preparing our group for a good backpacking trip.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 5
    Dragging a canoe around a log jam on the Lumber River. We insisted we were building character, but the boys weren’t convinced it wasn’t just work.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 6
    Without lightweight gear, nor the time or budget to go shopping, we relied on technique and smart packing to limit the weight. The only packs that fit our little guys were these old external frame packs.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 7
    Ready to go, with the author (far left) and Chief Sue (the only woman!).

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 8
    The ‘h’ tree. A popular camp landmark, boys used to climb it when it was smaller. Some of them probably still manage to shimmy up when Chiefs aren’t looking.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 9
    Hiking – proud to have accomplished something big, the boys were lighthearted on the trail.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 10
    We broke up hiking with fun activities like playing at the pond and on the rope swing. An excuse for the younger ones to rest without feeling like a hindrance as well as nipping some building tension, everyone loved the rope swing.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 11
    Looking for our first campsite. The winter sleeping bags (all we had) weighed nearly five pounds each, requiring us to really buckle down on other things without skimping beyond safety for the boys, who were our number one concern.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 12
    Our first campsite, ready with tarp. Everyone else slept under this while I gave my new Equinox poncho tarp a go.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 13
    Chow time and happy campers. Happy, squirrelly campers.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 14
    Hiking past Big Sam’s Lake. Austin, at the back, carried our tarp, which is why his pack is so bulky.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 15
    Exploring a tree, another break we took to keep the trip fun. The boys are trying to see how long they can balance on the trunk.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 16
    Chief Sue helps the boys set up camp. They did a great job of helping and figuring things out, knowing that we didn’t have all the answers, they saw themselves as part of the solution.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 17
    Our last campsite. Notice how the backpacks are laid out along a log to keep things organized, which was tremendously helpful when it came to knowing where everyone’s gear was, getting settled at night, and packed up in the morning.

    Therapeutic Ultralight: Using Lightweight Backpacking to help Troubled Boys - 18
    Six to eight miles with the Frontiersmen. I’ve done longer, I’ve done lighter, but I doubt any of my other trips have had the lasting significance of this one.

    Year One with the Frontiersmen

    I had an interest in taking my group, the Frontiersmen, backpacking from the very beginning. In fact, a short backpacking trip was planned when I joined the group. The idea was to go on canoeing trips over the summer, then try to catch the fall colors for our backpacking trip.

    Unfortunately, the group was in no shape for a wilderness excursion. Things were plenty wild enough around camp.  In my first week, we found ourselves holding down three boys that wanted to fight, while they and the rest of the group were screaming obscenities at each other for two hours straight. Every group goes through periodic ‘Cain-raising’ phases, as new boys test the system. Eventually, natural consequences kick in, and the boys decide it’s not worth it. In the meantime, however, things were just too chaotic to go off in the backcountry.

    I escaped the craziness for a while on a vacation with my brother, Daniel, and friend, Jerry, to Alaska. We planned a two-night backpacking trip, carrying traditional gear. The trip was fun, but on the second day I reinjured a knee I’d hurt while playing with the boys. We bailed on the trip and spent the rest of the time doing shorter day hikes. I didn’t know much about ultralight backpacking, but I made up my mind that I’d lighten my pack next time.

    Year Two with the Frontiersmen

    Going into my second spring at camp, things had stabilized a lot, as most of our group were the same boys from the year before. We got the guys camping on an island in the middle of a lake. With the group coming together a bit more, we canoed down the Lumber River for about five days. The trip was a huge success. Logjams and low water forced the guys to work together more.

    Next, we did a three-week canoeing trip on the Pee Dee River, which was also a big success.

    Meanwhile, I had discovered Lightweight Backpacking and Camping by Ryan Jordan and was diligently trimming my pack weight. Sue, my new co-Chief, gave me a homemade tarp tent; I replaced my old Therm-a-Rest and eliminated extra stuff I didn’t really need. I also bought a new Gregory Z-55 pack to replace my twenty-year-old Gregory pack that weighed around seven pounds.

    After the Pee Dee trip, we counselors felt we could handle backpacking. The guys were functioning very well together and some were on their way home. The problem was it was now fall, and with Thanksgiving, Christmas, and various camp activities, we wouldn’t be free to take a trip until January. It was then or never, because I was leaving at the end of the month. Obviously backpacking in cold weather had its challenges, but I thought if we used the lightweight principals I was learning, it might be possible.

    Planning the Trip

    I also felt that another trip would help the group maintain cohesion. Two of our older boys had left as well as two counselors. Austin and Alex were eleven years old and were both doing pretty well at camp. The other four, Daniel, Howie, Nic, and Hunter, were all nine years old and were fairly new to camp. The newer boys hadn’t really bought into the idea that camp was part of the solution to their problems. I was often the only one holding the group together, and I wanted them to come together as a team before I left.

    I spoke to Chief Tim, our Assistant Director, to see if we could plan a quick backpacking trip. There wasn’t really time to plan a major trip to the mountains, and it would have been too cold to be practical anyway. Tim suggested we do a two-day trip around the huge chunk of backwoods that the camp owned.

    The guys were excited about the idea of backpacking. This motivated them to put more effort into keeping the group functioning well. If a boy was getting out of line, another would say, “We can’t act like this if we want to go backpacking.”

    The camp didn’t have any truly lightweight gear, and we didn’t have the time or budget to go shopping. I was mostly relying on technique and smart packing to keep weight down. This was where Lightweight Backpacking and Camping came in handy.

    Another group had already claimed the newer backpacks for a trip on the Florida Trail, so the only packs that would fit most of our little guys were old, external frame packs. They actually worked out pretty well, as they were fairly light and simple for our boys to pack.

    I nearly choked when I saw the winter sleeping bags. With the bags weighing close to five pounds, I realized we would have to skimp any way we could. However, we couldn’t go too light. A cardinal rule of being a good Chief is to always look out for the needs of your group. If you’re not taking good care of them, you’re destroying the trust you’ve worked so hard to earn.

    I used the ‘Super Ultralight’ chapter of Lightweight Backpacking and Camping to give me ideas. Eventually, we came up with the following list for each boy to carry:

    • One extra hoody (one was worn)
    • One Red Ledge waterproof/breathable raincoat (more as a windbreaker)
    • Extra socks
    • Two water bottles
    • Foam pad
    • Sleeping bag (-10 government surplus)
    • Plate and spoon
    • Poncho

    We had Austin and Alex, our two oldest boys, carry a tarp and large pot. Chief Sue and I would carry all the other gear, a few extra clothes for emergencies, and the food.

    Learn by Doing

    It was very much a ‘learn as you go’ trip. My friend and previous co-Chief was gone, so I had to run the group and train Chief Sue, who was new. Neither of us had taken a group backpacking at camp. Besides that, none of the camp’s previous groups had gone this light before, and we were figuring it out as we went. This was where support from the boys was huge. Our boys were smart, and they knew we didn’t have all the answers. Instead of getting nervous about this (which often happens with such kids), the boys jumped in, and we figured things out together.

    We got some awesome help from Chief Tim and Brian, our supervisor, in packing up, but mostly it was the boys’ project. I made it clear: if they wanted to go, they had better pull their weight. The boys helped plan the meals and pack them in bags. They helped find gear in the warehouse and got it organized. With a list, they then pulled together their personal items and packed them. In spite of the constraints we had to work with, the heaviest pack for an older boy was around seventeen pounds (including water), with the younger boys carrying about twelve pounds. The boys had some trouble adjusting their packs’ fit, but no complaints about weight. Unfortunately, I didn’t get to try out my new Gregory pack. I just had too much group gear to haul. I did go extremely light on personal gear, though. Sue and I each had our packs maxed out carrying all the stuff the boys couldn’t. There was no way we could have done this trip with traditional backpacking gear.

    On the Trail

    On the first day, we hit the trail in high spirits. The boys were proud to be backpacking. The attitude of accomplishing something big gave them an extra motivation they often lacked. I had pitched this trip idea to them as the coolest, most challenging trip a group could take. We hiked slowly, stopping to find walking sticks and explore. For a while we alternated between yelling encouragements and jokes up and down the line with singing crazy camp songs.

    The only real glitch of the trip was more an accident than bad behavior. One boy flicked mud into Alex’s face with his walking stick. It was a LOT of mud. I could see it in his eye as he tried to blink it out, so I got out an unused water bottle and had Alex lie down, irrigating his eye using most of the 34-oz bottle until it was clear. Alex handled it well and said he was good to go. The eye wasn’t red or anything, so I guessed there was no need for a doctor.

    The rest of the group was somewhat annoyed, however. They were all concerned about Alex and felt that the boy with the stick was unkind in not showing more concern for someone he’d just hurt. I suggested he apologize and maybe ditch the stick, since his flinging it around was a safety hazard. Needing to move on from this, I got the group hiking quickly, coming upon a rope swing nearby. This proved just what we needed to help everyone relax.

    By late afternoon, the smaller boys were tired. They didn’t complain, but they let me know they wanted to rest soon. When I told them the campsite was near, they plowed on. I was proud of their attitude. One reason we had to reach this specific campsite was that we’d cached water there, as water in the creeks was considered unsafe.

    At Camp

    Our campsite was located near Big Sam’s Lake, a popular spot for the groups to go fishing. We split into two teams at the campsite, and Sue took some of the guys to dig a latrine and rig up a bear bag. A couple of other boys helped me set up the tarp. I realized we’d forgotten stakes, so I had two of the boys to sharpen sticks instead.

    I had brought my new Equinox poncho tarp to try out, but I could easily imagine it getting ruined by careless boys. I told the guys to watch out for it, and almost took it down, but when Chief Sue and her crew came back, the guys with me spread the word to watch out for Chief’s new toy. “Be careful of Chief Luke’s tarp – it’s delicate, and he really likes it.” This personal concern was appreciated, and it was better than they’d treated tents in the past.

    Cooking was a bit of a challenge, because we’d left the grill we used on canoeing trips. We could have propped the pot on rocks, but there were none, so we improvised. We made tripods out of walking sticks and belts to hold up a crosspiece for a pot to hang from.

    Before bed at camp, groups always have a ‘pow-wow,’ or an evaluation of what they learned and accomplished for the day. That night, the boys were clearly feeling good about themselves, and we encouraged them to keep it up and make it the best trip ever.

    Good People Make for Good Stories

    We had a funny incident when we started hiking the next morning. One of the boys, who shall remain anonymous, had a pair of jeans that were quite a bit too big. “Chief” he called back, “my pants are falling down.” “Don’t worry,” I said “your hip belt should hold them up.” He disappeared around a corner, then I heard a panicked “CHIEF!” I got around the corner, and there he was with his pants around his ankles. The other guys tried not to embarrass him as he got himself put back together. I helped him adjust his hip belt so it didn’t push his pants down anymore, and we had a good laugh together.

    We hiked through a creek bottom most of the morning. I showed the group how to purify water with iodine tablets or a filter. I also tried out a rope swing over the creek and got my feet wet. “Chief, you got a problem with water,” Austin teased, “you dumped your canoe on the Pee Dee and now you get your feet wet!” He was referring to the fact that I’d been the only one to tip a canoe on our trips so far. That accident was particularly memorable because the sleeping bags were all in my canoe.

    We were making great time, so we took it easy. We spent a lot of the afternoon exploring around a pond. The guys had fun balancing on a fallen tree and playing around the water.

    When I called a halt we gathered up in a circle, like we always did when it was time to make a plan of action. To keep things organized, I laid out the campsite plan for the group. I pointed out the fireplace and the two trees we’d rig the tarp off. I then instructed the boys to lay their packs along a log in a neat row.

    The boys now had a routine for a backpacking camp and moved more quickly and with less required instruction than the previous day. We made bear bagging a group activity; everyone had a few tries at throwing the rope over the branch about twenty feet up. Of course most of the boys couldn’t throw that high, and if they could, they got the rope tangled up. It made for a pretty entertaining show.

    Our campsite was looking good when my old co-Chief Aaron (who’d become a supervisor) came by to check on us. He’d put a lot into the group, and it was fun for him to be part of our success. He gave me a package of cookies for the guys as a sort of celebration. We certainly celebrated. There were more cookies than we really needed, and we let the boys splurge a bit.

    That night around the pow-wow fire, we asked the boys what they thought of our trip. They all expressed a real feeling of accomplishment. They’d all felt like the little runts of camp when the older boys pulled off adventures and we hadn’t. The boys also pointed out that we’d done this trip without any big problems. I agreed it was an awesome trip and bragged on the boys because I was truly thrilled with them. They’d helped us Chiefs plan and pack for a trip none of us had done, they’d trusted us while we figured things out on the fly, they’d encouraged one another when they got tired, and they’d shown initiative in helping meet the needs of the group. I could not have asked for more out of them.

    Conclusion

    The trip had been exactly what I’d wanted. It had challenged the guys to put more effort into helping each other than they otherwise would have done. As a result, the guys realized what they could accomplish by working together, and they would hopefully feel more confident in seeking help at the camp.

    Aaron and Brian had both put a lot of hard work into helping get the Frontiersmen off the ground, and they were happy to see us backpacking. After two years of hard work, it was a fantastic way to end up. I told one of my friends, “We went backpacking; I can die in peace and go to Frontiersmen Heaven.”

    About a week later it was all over, I said my good-byes and moved on to a job in Colorado. Over the last few months, the boys and I had become very close and leaving was hard. We’d come a long way together: campers that used to treat me like dirt were bawling that I was leaving.

    I’m grateful to Aaron, Sue, Brian, Tim and all the other awesome staff at camp for all the work they did to make the trip possible and to make Frontiersmen a good group. I’m also glad I had Ryan Jordan’s book to make our trip a logistical possibility.

    I’ve lost track of most of those boys, though I know two have since graduated from camp and seem to be doing very well at home. Another was pulled out a bit prematurely, but his mom also reports good progress. Since then, I’ve done plenty of longer, lighter, and more scenic trips. But the one I’ll always consider my most significant was the six to eight miles I covered with the Frontiersmen.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Elite Tent (2008 Model) Review

    With a trail weight of just 1 pound 11 ounces, it’s the Guinness World Record holder for the lightest double-wall tent commercially available, but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect.

    Introduction

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 1
    Alpine camping in the Terra Nova Laser Photon, a one-person double wall tent with a trail weight of just 1 pound 11 ounces.

    Weighing just 1.7 pounds (trail weight), the Terra Nova Laser Photon now holds the Guinness World Record for the lightest tent, specifically “the lightest two-skin tent commercially available”. It’s targeted for mountain marathons and adventure racers, but it’s actually very suited for ultralight backpacking. My review evaluates the efficacy of the Laser Photon in relation to the previously reviewed Terra Nova Laser Competition and Hilleberg Akto and the new Terra Nova Laser Elite and Tarptent Scarp 1+. How do these ultralight double wall solo tents compare in terms of livability, weight, and value?

    Specifications

      Year/Manufacturer/Model

    2008 Terra Nova Laser Photon

      Style

    Three-season, one-person, double-wall, non-freestanding tent with floor, one vestibule, and one side entry door

      Included

    Tent body, fly, one aluminum hoop pole, twelve titanium stakes, pole hood, pole sack, stake sack, tent stuff sack

      Fabrics

    Proprietary. Inner tent is high thread count ripstop nylon, about 1 oz/yd2; fly is Watershed SL2 2000mm; floor is Waterbloc SL 4000 mm

      Poles and Stakes

    One DAC Featherlite 7001 aluminum center hoop pole, two 17.25 in (44 g) carbon fiber end struts, twelve titanium 1-gram stakes 5.25 in (13 cm) long

      Floor Dimensions

    Manufacturer specifications:
    Length: 87 in (220 cm)
    Width at center: 36.6 in (93 cm)
    Width at ends: 24.4 in (62 cm)
    Height: 37.4 in (95 cm)
    Measured specifications:
    Length: 86.5 in (220 cm)
    Width at center: 37 in (94 cm)
    Width at ends: 26 in (66 cm)
    Height: 35 in (89 cm)

      Features

    Very lightweight fabrics, carbon fiber end struts, strong aluminum hoop pole, one-gram titanium stakes, large vestibule, large side entry door

      Packed Size

    18 x 5 in (46 x 12 cm)

      Total Weight

    Measured weight: 1 lb 12.1 oz (0.8 kg)
    Manufacturer specification: 1 lb 11.8 oz (0.79 kg)

      Trail Weight

    Measured weight: 1 lb 11.2 oz (0.77 kg)
    Manufacturer specification: 1 lb 10.1 oz (0.74 kg) (excludes stuff sacks)

      Protected Area

    Floor area: 17.4 ft2 (1.62 m2)
    Vestibule area: 8.4 ft2 (0.78 m2)
    Total protected area: 25.8 ft2 (2.4 m2)

      Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio

    12.1 ft2/lb

      MSRP

    £330 (about US$435)

      Options

    Footprint (8.3 oz/235 g/£40, about US$53)

    Design and Features

    The Terra Nova Laser Photon is a lighter version of the Laser Competition. The design and dimensions of the Competition and Photon are exactly the same. Both are a tunnel design, with a center hoop pole and end struts for support, and a large vestibule protecting the entry. The inner tent and fly are attached and pitch as a unit. The design is very similar to the Hilleberg Akto and Tarptent Scarp 1+, which will be compared with the Terra Nova tents in the Assessment section at the end of this review.

    Based on measured trail weights, the Laser Photon is 6.8 ounces lighter than the Laser Competition, which previously held the Guinness World Record for lightest double-wall tent. The weight savings is achieved through the use of lighter fabrics and one-gram titanium stakes. The lightweight fabrics used in the Photon are impressive. The inner tent is a high thread count nylon, and the fly is a lighter version of silnylon; both appear to weigh about 1 ounce per square yard. Although the emphasis in the Photon is light weight, it’s interesting to note that the main hoop pole is aluminum rather than carbon fiber. The cost for the weight savings is £50 (about US$70).

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 2
    Views of the Terra Nova Laser Photon. Entry is from the side (top left) via a zippered door to the left of the center pole. The ends (top right) are raised by a carbon fiber strut attached to the inner tent. The rear view (bottom left) shows the tent’s ground level fly, which protects the inner tent from splash back. In the top view (bottom right), the entry is at the top of the photo.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 3
    The complete tent stuffs into a small but ample lightweight stuff sack (left). The tent is “secured” with twelve of Terra Nova’s new 1- gram titanium stakes (right). The stakes are 5.25 inches long and weigh 1.28 grams each.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 4
    Inside features. The entry door in the fly (top left) ties to the side; a large vestibule prevents rain from directly entering the inner tent. The five-foot wide zippered entry into the inner tent (top left and right) is huge; when unzipped, the door lays on the tent floor. Note the rear strut and large air space between the inner tent and fly, as well as the large vestibule space. The floor (bottom left) is 87 inches long and 37 inches wide at the center, which is ample for a taller person plus some gear. Each end of the tent has a mesh vent (bottom right), plus a large mesh panel at the top of the entry door.

    Performance

    Setup is easy and fast: stake out one end, insert the center pole, stake out the other end, and complete staking. That’s the good news; those one-gram stakes are another matter. The carbon fiber stakes supplied with the Laser Competition broke easily, so Terra Nova came up with one-gram titanium stakes to replace them. Let me be the first to say that they don’t work either. The first time I set up the tent I had a lot of problems with the stakes turning and releasing the guylines, then vanishing in the vegetation. I spent a lot of time on my knees finding the stakes. In my opinion, the one-gram stakes do not have enough holding power and are easily lost, so they are entirely inadequate. I replaced them with six-inch titanium shepherd hook stakes (0.22 oz/6 g each), which did a fine job of securing the tent. The tent has a total of ten attachment loops at the base of the inner tent and fly, plus four guylines (two on the center hoop plus two on the ends). This sounds complex, but four pairs of loops can be attached to single stakes, bringing the number of stakes for a secure pitch down to ten. The net weight gain from using the heavier stakes is 1.56 ounces.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 5
    Terra Nova provides twelve one-gram stakes (center) with the Laser Photon tent, which are little more than a toothpick (bottom). I replaced them with some “real” six-inch titanium stakes (top), which are still very light and provide a secure pitch. Alternatively, you can purchase the tent with Terra Nova’s two-gram stakes, which are 4.75 inches long.

    The interior of the Laser Photon is quite roomy for a one-person tent. Its 87-inch floor is long enough for a taller person, but headroom is limited (measured at 35 inches at the center and 15 inches at the ends). I’m six feet tall and found the tent’s height acceptable both while lying down and sitting up. The floor’s 37-inch width at the center provides some extra room for gear. Contributing most to the tent’s roominess is its large vestibule (20 inches wide at the center) and 60-inch wide zippered door which combines the vestibule into the tent’s usable space.

    During my summer, fall, and winter testing I was able to use the Laser Photon under a range of conditions. The tent’s tunnel shape, ten stakes (my modification, which includes four guylines), and fly to the ground design makes it extremely wind stable. It easily withstood 45 mph gusts with only minor deflection. When I endured a spring duststorm in southern Utah, I discovered a shortcoming to the version of silnylon that Terra Nova uses for the fly – dust really sticks to it, bad! Silnylon (silicone impregnated ripstop nylon) is available in different formulations, usually different ratios of silicone and polyurethane, and this one appears to be mostly silicone. Dust sticks to it like a magnet. Fortunately, the dust washes off with clear water.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 6
    Dust really sticks to the silnylon used for the Photon’s fly (left); a Utah duststorm turned the fly from green to brown! I found the Photon to be very wind stable and strong enough to withstand light snow (right).

    The Photon is sturdy enough to withstand a light to moderate snow -if you slap the walls of the tent frequently – but it’s obviously not designed or built to support a heavy snow load. Dry snow readily slides off, but wet snow sticks to the tent (as shown), causing significant deflection. The ground level fly does a good job of keeping wind and wind-driven snow out of the tent, as well as shielding the inner tent from splash-back from heavy rain. Also, the ground level fly in combination with the nylon inner tent are very effective in retaining heat – on a cold March morning I measured the outside temperature at 33 F and the inside temperature at 50 F, a seventeen-degree difference.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 7
    The zipper on the Photon’s fly (left) is not waterproof and does not have a storm flap, so water will seep through. I found the dripping inside to be minor, and it falls in the vestibule, not the inner tent. Terra Nova includes a pole hood (right) made of polyurethane coated nylon that ties on over the ridge pole, and incorporates two guylines. It weighs 3.1 ounces in its stuff sack, and is not included in the tent’s weight. It’s most useful for windy/rainy conditions where extra support and protection are needed. I found that sealing the seams with diluted silicone is sufficient to prevent leakage (except the zipper) for normal three-season backpacking.

    While the Photon’s ground level fly keeps wind and snow out, it also keeps moisture in. Translation: the tent is not very well ventilated to the outside, so condensation is a significant problem. There is a large air space between the inner tent and the fly, and good ventilation between the inner tent and fly via mesh vents at both ends and in the door, plus the door can be opened partially or entirely. Moisture readily passes out of the inner tent, but there are no vents in the fly to exhaust moisture out of the tent. Unlike the Hilleberg Akto, for example, which has a high vent on the vestibule and two end vents on the fly, the Photon does not have any vents at all on the fly, and the fly extends down to the ground. Condensation is minimal in breezy or windy conditions – in fact the ground level fly is an asset when it’s windy – but on a clear, cool, calm night it’s a recipe for condensation. Under such conditions I found light to moderate condensation or frost on the inside of the fly, and in rainy conditions I found heavy condensation on the inside of the fly. Fortunately, the inner tent and fly can be easily separated so the wet fly can be packed separately.

    Terra Nova Laser Photon Tent Review - 8
    The Laser Photon can be pitched using only the fly, poles, and stakes to create a two-person floorless single wall tent weighing 20 ounces (with ten titanium shepherd hook stakes). The inside dimensions in this configuration are 102 inches long x 63.5 inches wide x 37 inches high.

    Assessment

    Its one thing to pare out weight to achieve a world record for the lightest two-skin tent commercially available, but it can potentially conflict with functionality. The one-gram stakes created for the Photon are a good example; they are more of a novelty than something truly functional. Under tension, they easily turn and release a guyline attached to them, and their small heads disappear in the vegetation. I personally would not entrust a high end tent costing £330 (about US$435) to those toothpicks! Rather, I would opt for more secure stakes (adding 1.6 ounces, as described above), and save some weight somewhere else. The same philosophy applies to the lack of even a minimal mesh storage pocket inside and a storm flap over the zipper, which would add another ounce. And while we’re at it, how about adding a high vent or two to lessen the condensation problem?

    To offset the weight added from my refinements, I suggest switching to a carbon fiber hoop pole (a two-ounce savings), a C-shaped entry door into the inner tent (a one-ounce savings, and the door would tie off to the side rather than lay on the floor), and using thinner elastic and Spectra cords on the guylines (a one-ounce savings). Such refinements would make the Photon more user-friendly for ultralight backpackers.

    As mentioned earlier, the Laser Photon is similar in design to several other tents. The following table provides details for comparing the tents.

    Tent Floor Area (ft2) Vestibule Area (ft2) Ventilation Trail Weight (lb) Cost (April 2009) **
    TN Laser Photon 17.4 8.4 None 1-11.2 £330 (approx US$435)
    TN Laser Elite 17.4 3.0 None 1.7 £387 (US$500)
    TN Laser Competition 17.4 8.4 None 2.1 £280 (approx. US$365
    Hilleberg Akto 18.3 8.6 1 top vent, 2 end vents 3.1 US$420
    Tarptent Scarp 1+ * 19.0 12.5 2 top vents, raised sidewalls 2.8 US$295
    *The TT Scarp 1+ has two doors and two vestibules
    **Terra Nova and Hilleberg tents are available from US dealers; cost varies

    Some highlights and observations from the comparison table are as follows:

    • The Laser Elite is Terra Nova’s latest model. It’s the lightest tent here, but its 23-inch interior height limits its appeal mostly to adventure racers
    • The Laser Competition weighs 6.8 ounces more than the Photon and costs about US$70 more
    • Although it has a good reputation, the Hilleberg Akto is a bit heavy and pricey
    • The Laser Photon would be a good value if it included a carbon fiber hoop pole, plus other refinements described above
    • The Tarptent Scarp 1+ weighs a bit more than the Laser tents, but it has more floor space, two doors and two vestibules, more headroom, better ventilation, and costs a lot less

    Overall, the Terra Nova Laser Photon tent is a mixed bag – it utilizes a very stable and roomy design, and its ultralight, but it needs several refinements to make it more user-friendly and functional for ultralight backpacking.

    What’s Good

    • Sub two-pound one-person double-wall tent
    • Utilizes a tunnel design to minimize weight, and maximize interior usable space
    • Inner tent and fly pitch together as a unit
    • Very wind stable and storm worthy
    • Very taut and has a large air space between the inner tent and fly
    • Huge vestibule
    • Plenty of space for one person plus gear, or one hiker plus a dog

    What’s Not So Good

    • No high vent or end vents on the fly to exhaust moisture, so condensation is an issue
    • One-gram stakes are not adequate to secure the tent
    • Hoop pole is aluminum instead of carbon fiber
    • No storage pocket
    • No storm flap on the zipper
    • Dust sticks badly to the silicone nylon fly
    • Toggle and loop tieout for the vestibule door are difficult to reach

    Recommendations for Improvement

    • Add high vents
    • Add a mesh storage pocket
    • Switch to an C-shaped zipper on the entry door to save a little weight and allow the door to be tied off to the side
    • Add a storm flap to protect the zipper on the fly
    • Replace the one-gram stakes with more substantial and functional stakes
    • Replace the aluminum hoop pole with a carbon fiber pole, or offer it as an option