Articles (2020)

CamelBak All Clear Microbiological UV Water Purifier (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

CamelBak introduces a complete and easy to use UV water purification system, marking the adoption of this proven technology by a big company.

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

CamelBak, the hydration folks, break into the water treatment business with the All Clear Ultraviolet water purifier. The All Clear design (9.2 oz/$99) combines a UV-C discharge lamp into a screw-thread bottle cap that contains the electronics and batteries. The cap is threaded for the familiar 63 mm wide-mouth bottles and water containers known to backpackers everywhere. Powered by two CR123 cells, the All Clear has an 80-second cycle time for 0.9 liters of water. An LCD display communicates treatment time, battery health, etc. The All Clear is due in stores in October 2009.

CamelBak All Clear Microbiological UV Water Purifier (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
The basic CamelBak All Clear UV Water Purification system (right) uses two CR123 batteries; the deluxe system (left) uses a rechargeable battery pack and comes with a USB cable.

Operation is simple: Fill a 1L or .750L bottle, screw in the purifier, press and hold the start button, and wait for the timer to count down while agitating the bottle. Batteries are accessed via the top-mounted battery compartment.

CamelBak claims a set of CR123s will treat 70 to 90 liters and the optional rechargeable Li-Ion battery pack can treat 32 to 36 liters between charges. No mention is made of cold water’s effect on battery life (a common portable UV purifier hurdle). Lamp life is claimed to be 8,000 or more cycles.

The All Clear will be offered in two versions: standard ($99 for CR123 battery operation) and deluxe ($129 for rechargeable Li-ion battery operation). Both include a bottle imprinted with instructions, and the Li-ion battery pack can be purchased separately for $30.

Ultraviolet light inactivates viruses, bacteria, and cysts, qualifying the All Clear as a purifier under the EPA’s definition, as compared to most filters and chemical treatments, which are less effective against viruses and cysts, respectively. UV has no effect on water’s taste and does not treat chemical contamination. Besides cold water, UV’s other Achilles heel is turbid water. The CamelBak All Clear literature does not address it; presumably, filtering or settling will be required for cloudy source water. There’s no mention whether CamelBak supplies a prefilter for straining debris out of the source water.

Beyond some cosmetic differences and the LED display, the All Clear looks remarkably similar to the Meridian Design UV Aquastar, a proven design I’ve been using with success for several years (success is defined as me not getting sick). If they are indeed similar, the All Clear will offer hikers a simple, relatively quick way to treat water, both in camp and on the go. UV’s ability to scoop, treat, and drink quickly and easily while on the go is matched only by filter bottles, and filter bottles don’t lend themselves as well to treating large volumes in camp.

UV is still a niche outdoor product, and it’s gratifying to see a company Camelbak’s size jump in. If their design has improved cold water performance of UV units, and if they can really wring out 80 or 90 liters from a single battery set, they’ll provide a welcome option for hikers.

Generation Two: SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

New lighter and smaller SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Generation Two: SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger(TM) (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
At 3:30 PM MST, June 21 2009, SPOT announced the next generation of hardware for their SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger. The product name stays the same, “New SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger.” For clarity, I will refer to the new model as SPOT Gen 2, or simply Gen 2.

Generation Two: SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger(TM) (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2
The product was introduced by Astronaut Scott Parazynski, who took a Gen 1 SPOT to the summit of Everest in May 2009.

When we reviewed Gen 1 SPOT Satellite Personal Tracker, we thought its concept so innovative that it could possibly transform backcountry safety. But after testing it over a number of months we concluded that “…in field conditions we believe likely to be encountered backpacking and hiking, the SPOT unit did not ‘deliver virtually every message,’ as the SPOT unit’s literature claims. As such, we see the SPOT unit as an innovative system with a lot of promise, but with some glitches and room for improvement.” It seems that SPOT Gen 2 has addressed many of Gen 1’s shortcomings and may come closer to SPOT’s innovative potential.

Of all Gen 2’s improvements listed below, the GPS chipset and improved antenna/transmission matter the most. Only these have the potential to improve the reliability of SPOT’s message delivery, especially in areas with tree cover or in deep canyons. Of the two, it is probably the message transmission improvements that will make the most difference. It will take some time and field-testing to determine if Gen 2 has significantly improved message delivery reliability over Gen 1. We certainly hope so. I, for one, would like to carry an improved SPOT Gen 2 on many of my trips.

Generation Two: SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger(TM) (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
The new 5.2 oz SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger

Generation Two: SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger(TM) (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
Also in attendance at the SPOT Gen 2 rollout was Les Stroud. Les and Scott share a few quips before the beginning of the press announcement.

SPOT Gen 2 Improvements Summary

  • 30% lighter (5.2 oz)
  • 30% smaller (3.7 x 2.6 x 1.0 inches)
  • 3 AAA batteries decrease size & weight. Operating time is slightly less. Standby (On) 110 days, Tracking 6 days, SOS or Help 4 days.
  • Improved GPS performance.
  • GPS upgrade to uBlox AMY-5M chipset. Similar to SiRF and other high performance GPS chips.
  • Advanced GPS capabilities – Time-to-First-Fix (TTFF) usually seconds instead of minutes.
  • New antenna improves performance in foliage and canopied environments.
  • New Rogers material antenna (Gen 1 was ceramic material).
  • Gen 2 increases performance at the horizon. Power same as Gen 1 (.16 Watt) using a proprietary Global Star tuning pattern and spread spectrum.
  • Improved user interface.
  • Message-sending LED notifications.
  • GPS acquisition light.
  • New separate Tracking button.
  • New extra “Custom Message” button that works the same as OK but with different message content.
  • Also has separate email notification list.
  • New backlight message function buttons blink when the specific function is engaged.
  • Safety covers over the SOS and Help buttons.
  • Universal communications symbols on buttons.
  • Available in two colors: orange and silver.

Availabilty: Fall 2009

MSRP: $170

Gen 1 vs. Gen 2

Gen 1: No verification that a message was successfully delivered.
Gen 2: The new dedicated Message Sent light helps considerably. Now it is easy to tell if the SPOT attempted to send/transmit messages (even if you don’t know if the satellite received them). The message light blinks green when the unit is transmitting a message. True message delivery confirmation is still not available, since SPOT is only a one-way communication device.

Gen 1: Confusing user interface
Gen 2: SPOT has made considerable improvements. Backlight function buttons that blink when the function is activated (also makes night use a lot easier). Dedicated GPS fix and Message Sent status LEDs. Safety covers over the HELP and SOS buttons. Message LED blinks green when sending messages and blinks red when in Tracking mode. GPS LED blinks red when it does not have a fix and blinks green when it does.

Gen 1: Activating Tracking mode confusing – one long press of the OK button did not give a good indication if you were, in fact, in Tracking mode.
Gen 2: A dedicated Tracking function button is both easy to use and know when you’ve activated it.

Gen 1: Limited message length and limited number of message recipients on the SPOT website.
Gen 2: New Custom Message button: This expands your ability to communicate by sending a message besides I’m OK or I need help. (We know of users that would send three OK messages in sequence to indicate a new message status for their trip.) The Custom Message operates in the same way as the OK message function, but has a different message content and a separately maintained email notification list.

Gen 1: GPS receiver performance is not as good as the best handheld GPS units.
Gen 2: A new high performance GPS chipset should help a lot. That being said, the Gen 2 single antenna is still optimized for message transmission to communications satellites (a different frequency than receiving GPS signals) so GPS performance will not be as good as “straight” GPS units with an antenna optimized for GPS reception.

Gen 1: Tracking mode may have significant message gaps while hiking and backpacking.
Gen 2: New GPS chip and improved antenna should help here. Also Gen 2 queues the previous two tracking waypoints. If message transmission fails a couple of times, but the GPS is working, the waypoints will not be lost. The queued waypoints will be conveyed on the next successful message transmission. This will make your track log plots a lot prettier.

Gen 1: Long wait time to transmit OK messages. One of the Gen 1 slowdowns was for a first fix due to slow GPS chipset. Gen 1 could take as long as five minutes to get first fix.
Gen 2: SPOT claims that Gen 2 should normally acquire a first fix in less than a minute (the best dedicated GPS units are in the range of 20-40 sec for a first fix), but this is still a complicated issue. SPOT makes three attempts to transmit an OK message in the twenty minutes after you press the OK button. Getting a fast GPS fix should speed OK message transmission considerably in areas with a clear sky view and good satellite coverage, but the real challenge for SPOT is message transmission. So for maximum reliability, especially in areas without a clear sky view (and possibly poor satellite configuration), one should still wait the full twenty minutes so the SPOT will make all three attempts to send an OK message.

Gen 1: At 7.3 ounces (208 g) with batteries, the SPOT could be lighter.
Gen 2: A 30% reduction in size and weight is quite welcome. A slightly less ruggedized (it’s could be a word!) unit could weigh even less.

What is Still Not Addressed

No text display (probably due to operational problems of LCD displays in extremely cold environments). For those of us not at the top of Everest or in Antarctica, it would be nice to get a SPOT with a small LCD display.

  • An LCD display would allow the SPOT to display GPS coordinates. As such, it could do double duty as your GPS unit, saving weight and the amount of gear you carry.
  • An LCD display would convey the unit’s operational status in a way that a few LED’s can’t come close to matching.

No message delivery confirmation.

  • This will not happen until Globalstar gets new satellites in the sky. The current ones have failing amplifiers that complicate two-way communication. SPOT was in part developed to make use of the working channels on satellites that were no longer useful for sat phone communication. A SPOT with two-way communication/message delivery confirmation would probably be larger, heavier, and more expensive. The service plan would likely be more expensive as well.

New Personal Locator Devices at ORSM 2009 (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

Personal locator devices (PLDs) are a hot, rapidly evolving area for the outdoor market. An overview of where we think it’s headed (and why).

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Marketing Reassurance for the Masses

Andrew Skurka’s mother would rather he have a SPOT Personal Tracker than a sleeping bag when on one of his epic treks. This dumbfounded him, but knowing he’s OK when out of communication on the trail makes his mother feel much better than knowing he’s warm at night. My father feels the same way. He starts niggling me a week or two before a big trip, asking me if I am going to carry the SPOT this time. I think this mirrors the sentiments of many close to outdoor enthusiasts who push the edge (or even those who don’t push it). Our close ones start worrying about the time we put our first foot on the trail. It’s a huge relief to them to get that OK message once a day.

It’s no wonder that personal locator devices (PLDs), SPOT Tracker, PLBs, etc. are a hot and rapidly evolving area for the outdoor market. My guess is that use of PLDs will explode in the next five years, especially as they get smaller, more sophisticated, easier to use, less expensive, and more reliable. At some point this technology will mature and offer dependable, affordable, off-grid communications and emergency notification/SOS signals. In the meantime, there are some excellent concepts that could do a bit better at in-field execution but will only improve over time.

PLBs seem the most robust for emergency notification, since they have a locating beacon that airplanes and SAR personnel can home in on. They have dual antennas, one optimized for GPS reception and one optimized for distress signal transmission, and they transmit at much higher power. But PLBs do not provide non-emergency communications. A daily OK and last point known message not only reassures loved ones, it also provides critical backcountry rescue info “date/time and of last known location” if a distress signal cannot be sent. It wasn’t until I went on my first search and rescue (SAR) for a missing hiker that I understood just how important this date/time of last known location information is. It can limit a search area to a few square miles versus a 300-mile radius. That can make the difference between being found in hours or days. Checking in once a day is definitely a safety measure, not just a reassurance to loved ones.

Six of One, Half-Dozen of the Other

The SPOT Personal Tracker concept does a great job of tracking and checking-in to notify loved ones you are OK. For emergency notification, it does not provide a locating beacon and may be more challenged than a PLB to successfully transmit a distress notification in difficult areas like heavy tree cover or deep canyons.

My guess is that PLBs will soon add messaging functions and that the SPOT type messaging units will improve their distress signal transmission capabilities. In time, the distinction between the two approaches will blur.

PLD Individual Write-ups from ORSM 2009

Original SPOT Gen 1 Review

Energizer Micro Headlamp is Powered by a Single AA Cell (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

A bright and lightweight LED headlamp from battery giant Energizer that offers several attractive features at $30 and 3.1 oz with a lithium battery (as weighed by BPL).

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Energizer Micro Headlamp is Powered by a Single AA Cell (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
The new for spring 2010 Energizer Micro Headlamp weighs just 3.1 ounces and puts out 60 lumens of light.

Key features: Single, white, variable intensity LED claimed to emit a maximum of 60 lumens; separate red LED mode; two pushbutton switches that control the white and red functions independently; pivoting lamphead; waterproof.

The Micro is a relatively simple single-strap headlamp design, complicated somewhat by a remote rear-mounted battery pack that connects to the lamphead via two cables. The main white LED is centrally mounted and collimated to focus the beam. There’s no diffuser option. The white LED is flanked by two small red LEDs. Energizer tells us main LED output is adjustable but does not note the number of steps or whether the light defaults to high between uses. We presume there’s just one red output level. That they’re individually operated via separate, top-mounted buttons is good news to folks concerned with preserving night vision. The buttons look large enough to operate wearing gloves. Strap circumference is adjusted with Velcro, not slide buckles.

Based on the scant data available, we can presume the Micro steps up the AA battery’s voltage to operate the light, a strategy that keeps weight and bulk low while allowing users the most affordable battery option extant. The circuitry may also regulate output. The separate battery compartment and wiring make the light a little heavier and more complex than an integrated design, and similar battery cables sometimes get snagged in branches, but a 3.1 oz weight with battery still puts the Micro in league with the lightest 3xAAA lights (a design we wish headlamp makers would abandon for simpler and more frugal options like this). A lithium cell would cut the Micro’s weight slightly and provide maximum performance.

Energizer provides no battery life data, and we can’t comment on beam pattern and the light’s color temperature, but there’s a good deal of promise in this new offering. Most truly miniature headlamps rely on short-lived button cells or expensive CR123 cells, so the Micro warrants further investigation as an alternative.

A Potpourri of Eye Candy: Day 1 (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

A grueling first day at summer 2009 OR rewarded us with loads of lightweight goodies; here’s a first installment, with more to come.

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Tuesday July 21, 2009
Day one was very productive for finding gear of interest to lightweight and ultralight backpackers. In no particular order, the following photo-rich dispatch will provide you with information and insights into what we found. All items will be available spring 2010 unless stated otherwise.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
At Outdoor Research we found the new DryComp Ridge Sack (34 L, 16.4 oz, $119), which is basically a waterproof pack with a dry bag closure. It’s constructed of 70d nylon fabric with RF welded seams and has a basic feature set: dry bag closure, large front mesh pocket, two compression straps, front bungie cord system for attaching loose items, spacer mesh shoulder straps, and ice axe loops. This pack is appealing because of its versatility – use it as a waterproof backpack, wet weather or winter day pack, dry bag for winter camping or boating, or a pillow.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2
A visit to the Montbell booth nearly always produces some new goodies, and they did not disappoint. Alan Dixon models the new Montbell Teahyon Anorak (left), which weighs only 2.3 ounces and has a hood. It’s made of 7 denier Ballistic Airlight with a Polkatex DWR finish (the same fabric used in the Ex Light Down Jacket). The initial product will be unisex; MSRP is $89. The Montbell UL Wind Jacket (right, 3.6 oz, $74) will be available in men’s and women’s versions. It’s made of a more durable 12 denier Ballistic Airlight with Polkatex finish and has a full front zip, but no hood. These are really sweet wind shirts; Montbell’s Ballistic Airlight fabric is very durable, and their Polkatex DWR finish is excellent. However, the calendered Ballistic Airlight fabric does trade off some breathability for extra strength.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
Another notable item at Montbell is that they are extending their Spiral construction technology (introduced in the Spiral Down Hugger) across their entire sleeping bag line. The spiral construction adds plenty of expansion capability while holding the bag close to the sleeper for better thermal efficiency, and it cuts bag weight by about 3 ounces.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
In my article Lightweight Rainwear 2009, the Marmot Mica jacket (women’s Crystalline, left) was one of the standouts at just 6.5 ounces. For spring 2010 the Mica will gain pit vents and better hood adjustors, with a corresponding gain of 0.5 ounce, bringing the weight up to 7 ounces, which is probably well worth it. The MSRP will remain at $130. The Marmot Super Mica jacket (right, 9 oz, $200) will be an enhanced version adding a wire brim, more hood adjustment, pit zips, and core vents in the side pockets. Both jackets are based on Marmot’s Membrain Strata waterproof-breathable fabric, which is a really thin face fabric laminated to a polyurethane membrane and a sprayed on 0.5 layer for protection. For a really lightweight, full-featured rain jacket, these are hard to beat.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 5
The Mountain Hardware Skyledge 2.1 ($350) is a new tent with an old name. This updated two-person double-wall tent now has a trail weight of 3 pounds 7 ounces, and it has two doors and two vestibules. Its fly is 20 denier with a polyether coating, and the floor is a durable 70 denier. It uses two X-poles plus a cross pole to extend the vestibules. Interior room is adequate at 28 square feet with good usable space, and interior height is 39 inches. The pitch light weight (fly, poles, footprint) is 2 pounds 11 ounces.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 6
The increasing number of really light mid-height hiking boots is attracting our interest. The newest ones are the Montrail Jawbone boot (left, 15 oz/boot, $125) and the Montrail Sabino Trail Mid GTX (right, 15.6 oz/boot, $140). More supportive mid-height boots like these are preferred by lightweight backpackers and adventurous types who do more off-trail bushwhacking.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 7
Terra Nova is a British company known for their lightweight double wall tents. Their latest creation is the Terra Nova Solar Elite solo tent ($370), weighing just 1 pound 13 ounces. It has a side entry with vestibule and is supported by a single ridge pole and connected wishbone at the head end. Fabrics are the same as the Laser Photon. It requires nine stakes to fully stake it out, and the stakes are their infamous 1-gram titanium toothpicks. The Solar Elite’s fly extends to about 3 inches above the ground, allowing some ventilation when the door is closed, but it lacks a high vent, so it appears that ventilation will be minimal and condensation common like the Laser Competition and Laser Photon we previously reviewed.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 8
Rab, another British company, will be introducing their lightest eVENT jackets ever. The Rab Demand Pull-on (left photo, red model, 10 oz, $250) is a half zip, and the Rab Demand Full-on (left photo, blue model, 11 oz, $275) has a full front zipper. Both have a hood, one napoleon pocket, and the longest dropped tail we have ever seen (which is good for bending over). Both jackets have a unique external single drawcord adjustment on the hood (right photo) which saves some weight. The Pull-on doesn’t beat the Integral Designs eVENT Rain Jacket (8.9 ounces) in weight, but the ID jacket has a short body. The ID Thru Hiker Jacket has a full length body and weighs 11.9 ounces, so the Rab jackets are lighter when body length is taken into account. We’re still hopeful for the 7-8 ounce eVENT jacket – one of these days.

Day 1 at Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 9
Equinox has a new ultralight day pack called the Parula (1050 cubic inches, 6.1 oz, $48) made of silnylon. It’s top loading with two mesh side pockets, a daisy chain on the front, a zippered top pocket, mesh backpanel, and padded shoulder straps. A pack this light can be used as both a stuff sack and a pack for day hikes from a base camp.

ORSM09: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

Open Air Demo consists of booths and boats – and there is always something new, something interesting, and something unique.

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Monday July 20, 2009
Summer Outdoor Retailer starts with Open Air Demo, a day at Pineview Reservoir near Snowbasin to check out what’s new at manufacturer booths and to spend some time trying out boats on the water. It was a hot day, so the water really felt good.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 1
Open Air Demo consists of lots of booths and boats – and there is always something new, something interesting. We had great fun looking for lightweight gear, and it didn’t take long to find our usual quota of fresh, intriguing products.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 2
I guess it’s obvious from this photo that Coleman has a new line of insect repellents coming out. Sunscreens too, though they didn’t have a poor person cooking in a costume for that product.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 3
Available now from Grand Trunk is a new 6.7 ounce hammock called the Nano-7, claimed to be the lightest hammock on the market. That weight includes the carabiners at the ends but not the Tree Sling attachment cords. It’s constructed of 1.27 ounce ripstop nylon, measures 9 feet x 4 feet, and costs $70.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 4
Also from Grand Trunk is their new Tent Shoes (1.5 oz/pair, $15), which are PU-coated overboots that slip over hiking boots. More comfortable yet, they can be worn over bare feet or dry socks when you get to camp. It sure feels good to get wet/dirty shoes and socks off and something more pleasant on your feet.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 5
At the Sun Dry booth we found the new Sport Hat (2.2 ounces, $34), modeled by Janet Reichl. This hat really seems to get the proportions right – it has a 3.5-inch brim and 5-inch back veil – just enough. Other sun hats seem to overdo one or the other measure and look a bit dorky as a result. Janet liked the Sport Hat so well she bought one. A similar hat called the Offshore Water Hat (2.8 oz/$34) has a neoprene chin strap with buckle and sweat band to provide extra wind stability.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 6
At Birkenstock Footwear we found some really light flip-flops called the Wikiki (3.7 oz/pair women’s 6, $30). They are made of blown EVA, similar to Crocs, a much lighter alternative to carrying a pair of heavy sandals for camp shoes.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 7
For geocaching enthusiasts, here’s the gadget for you! The geomate.jr (3.2 oz/$70) is a GPS device that comes pre-loaded with the locations of 250,000 geocaches in all fifty states. It incorporates a high sensitivity SiRFstarIII receiver, and runs on two AAA batteries. When you turn it on, it gives you the direction and distance to the nearest geocache. The device also displays your present lat-long location, compass direction, and elevation, so it could be used as a locator device in conjunction with a cell or sat phone in case of an emergency. If you successfully find all 250,000 geocaches, you can find another hobby or purchase the Update Kit ($25), which consists of a cable to download new locations from a website.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 8
The Columbia Mobex Pack (28 oz/$100) is a new adventure racing/trail running/lightweight day hiking pack that incorporates loads of cool features: clamshell fast entry (just rip it open), five external pockets, three internal pockets, trekking pole attachments, HDPE framesheet, and Exo-Flex nylon frame that extends the main compartment. It’s constructed of 20d triple ripstop nylon and has a capacity of 1452 cubic inches.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 9
Paddle boards were the darling of the Open Air Demo. It seemed just about everyone at the show tried one out, and they outnumbered kayaks in the paddling demo area. Alan Dixon is on an 18-foot 6-inch Catalina Unlimited Model by Joe Bark Paddle Boards, designed for racing on big water, like the California Channel to the Catalina Islands or the Molokai Channel in Hawaii. A basic board for flat water is about 12 feet long, 30 inches wide, weighs about 30-35 pounds, and costs about $1350. Why get one? Well, they’re unique, they’re great for an upper body workout, and you can even fly fish from one or take your kid or dog for a ride!

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 10
Alison Simon demonstrates a wider and more stable sport paddle board.

ORSM09 Day One: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2008) - 11
Coleman is a diversified company that makes just about everything for camping, and their products are generally well designed and well thought out. Well, it had to happen – Coleman is introducing their 2009 Evolution series of Cobalt camping trailers. Yes, it’s a pop-up trailer, but these look much better suited for access via backcountry roads: they have extra clearance, traction tires, an awning, a large storage rack on the tongue, rugged components and reinforcements, and everything you need inside. You might say it’s a “senior’s backpack.” I (Will) have always said that when I get old and crippled, I’m getting one of these, so we put our name on one. Alan Dixon left, and Will Rietveld right.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

Henry Shires performs his magic once again – the new Tarptent Moment has one hoop pole, two stakes, sets up in less than a minute, and has loads of room for one person.

Editor’s Note: This article was opened to the public on July 22, 2010. To subscribe and see Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2010 articles as they are published, click here.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
The Tarptent Moment is a single-wall solo tent with vestibule that weighs just 28.5 ounces. It sets up in less than a minute using two stakes.

Editor’s Note: Backpacking Light is including new products from small online businesses in our Outdoor Retailer coverage. Most can’t afford a booth at OR, but their new products are just as important to our readers as those from the big companies.

Overview

Henry Shires at Tarptent has really been cranking out a lot of new tents lately. Within the last eight months, he has introduced the Scarp 1, Scarp 2, and Hogback, all double-wall and all really good designs. In August 2009 he will be introducing the Moment, a single-wall solo tent with a side entry vestibule that sets up in less than a minute with two stakes and weighs just 28.5 ounces!

The Moment uses one lateral center pole, similar to the other new Tarptents. Each end has a PitchLok strut consisting of two carbon fiber struts in sleeves that create a triangle. Set-up is a three-step process – slide the pole into its sleeve and connect to grommets at the ends, stake one end of the tent, and stake the other end. Simple and fast.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2

Side view. The zippered entry is on the right side of the center pole. There are two top vents, which is a real plus.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
End view. The Moment is diamond-shaped and has a vestibule on the entry.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
Looking inside. There is plenty of room for one person plus gear, plus a dog. Dimensions are 84 inches long, 40 inches wide at center, 20 inches wide at ends, and 40 inches high at center.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 5
Inside, looking toward the foot of the tent. The floor has 5-inch bathtub walls, and there is a mesh panel at the end for ventilation.

Tarptent Moment (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 6
The sides of the tent are raised above the ground for ventilation (left), and can be raised even higher (right) for extra ventilation when it’s needed.

The new Tarptent Moment resembles to the Terra Nova Laser Competition and Photon, but it’s single-wall, while the Competition and Photon are double-wall. The major differences are in the details: the Moment has an L-shaped zippered mesh entry wall, uses two stakes rather than twelve, and is much better ventilated.

Admittedly, I get excited about every new lightweight tent that comes out, but I am really excited about the new Tarptent Moment; this one appears to be a winner.

Specifications and Features

Product Tarptent Moment
Style One-person single-wall tent with floor, side entry with vestibule
Poles and stakes One center lateral aluminum pole, PitchLok end struts, two Easton tubular stakes (included)
Fabric Silnylon 1.3 oz/yd2 canopy and floor, mesh entry wall and perimeter
Area Floor 18 ft2, vestibule 6.6 ft2
Dimensions Length 84 in, center width 40 in, end width 20 in, height 40 in
Weight 28.5 oz 
MSRP US$215 (tentative)

Coming Soon – Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009)

What can you expect from our coverage of the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market next week?

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 1
Open Air Demo has a lot of small booths to attract our attention to new innovations, but the main focus is watercraft (above), and lots of them.

The Outdoor Retailer Show is a twice-yearly convention focused on the outdoor store near you – your local outdoor retailer. It’s a huge gathering where gear manufacturers pay big bucks to showcase their latest and greatest gear (in this case for spring 2010) to outdoor retailers and hopefully rake in lots of orders. It’s also a great opportunity for the media (like yours truly) to prowl around and find out what’s in the pipeline.

Outdoor Retailer comes a little earlier starting this summer – July 20-24 to be exact – and Backpacking Light will be there to report on gear of interest to lightweight backpackers. Our coverage will start with Open Air Demo on Monday, July 20, at Pineview Reservoir near Snowbasin. There will be lots of small booths there, where manufacturers will hawk their newest innovations, in hopes of luring us to their big booths at the main Show. But the biggest draw of Open Air Demo is the opportunity to actually try out new gear. It’s mainly about watercraft, and lots of them… which is why it’s located on a reservoir! We get to demo lots of different boats and decide (for example) which Kevlar canoe we like best. Tough job!

The main event runs for four days (July 21-24) at Salt Lake City’s Salt Palace Convention Center. To give you an idea of the scale of the Outdoor Retailer Show, here are a few statistics:

  • The Salt Palace has 515,000 square feet and the OR Show uses all of it and then some. In recent years, the OR Show has spilled over into the nearby Energy Solutions Arena, which is also huge.
  • 21,000 attendees.
  • Over 1000 exhibitors representing 1500 brands.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 2
The Outdoor Retailer Show occupies the entire 515,000 square feet of Salt Lake City’s Salt Palace Convention Center (left), and spills over into the nearby Energy Solutions Arena (right).

With so many exhibitors, there’s no way we can cover all of them, nor do we want to. Our challenge is to find the proverbial needle in a haystack – new lightweight gear that will interest our readers. We narrow our focus by visiting manufacturers that will most likely have gear of interest – GoLite, Montbell, Evernew, Terra Nova, Cascade Designs, Innov-8, etc. We also reach out (by email) to small manufacturers (like Gossamer Gear, Tarptent, Six Moon Designs, AntiGravityGear, etc.) who can’t afford a booth at OR and offer to cover new gear they will be announcing between now and spring 2010.

Covering OR means long days for your dedicated reporters. Each day we run through a succession of half-hour appointments with selected manufacturers (which we schedule in advance). When we have a few minutes between appointments, we roam the aisles looking for something new and exciting. By the end of the day, we’re on overload. Dinner provides a short respite, then we head to our hotel room to write articles ’til midnight or later. From Salt Lake City, we email our articles to our off-site team consisting of Mike Martin, Ryan Jordan, Rick Dreher, Ray Estrella, Addie Bedford, and Cat Jasins who help write, edit, and publish the articles in the magazine the next day. Lather, rinse, (sleep?), and repeat…

Despite the sleep deprivation, we love covering OR because it concentrates everything in one place: we find lots of new gear and technologies to report on, we get to visit with our friends in the industry, and we enjoy the enthusiasm and camaraderie.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 3
Many exhibitors’ booths at OR are very elaborate, requiring major shipping to get things there, plus staff to explain the products.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 4
Exhibitors use every attention-getting tactic you can think of to attract people to their booth, like this Swiss horn. Many exhibitors use big/tall signs or place their name anywhere it will be seen, including restrooms and floors. Of course, all of that costs money.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 5
Huge piles of shipping crates sit behind the Salt Palace, all labeled by vendor.

Coming Soon - Backpacking Light Coverage of the Summer 2009 Outdoor Retailer Show (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2009) - 6
As you likely know from magazine ads, the outdoor industry is growing in greener directions, and the Outdoor Retailer Show is no exception.

Up in Smoke: Backcountry Fire Building Videocast

Building a fire is nothing short of an art form, and no one can teach you everything you’d need to know to perfect it in a ten-minute video. Instead of attempting to do this (perfecting your form), we’ve simply highlighted some of the gear and techniques used to start a fire.

Fire building videos on the Internet are a dime a dozen, but each and every one of them can teach you a thing or two. However, building a fire is nothing short of an art form, so no one can teach you everything you’d need to know to perfect it in a ten-minute video.

Instead of attempting to do this (perfect your form) you’ll find that we’ve simply highlighted some of the gear and techniques used to start a fire. A short description of the fire triangle, finding fuel, and other quick tips are included as well.

Watch for a quick intro to these techniques and discuss some of your own on the Backpacking Light forum at the bottom. If we get enough reader suggestions, perhaps we’ll release Up in Smoke II – More Fire Building with Sam H.

 

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player.

Backcountry fire building tips, techniques, and tools with Sam H.

Stoves, Tents and Carbon Monoxide – Deadly or not?
Supplement 5: Snow Peak GST-120 Lite Max

The Snow Peak GST-100 GigaPower stove is widely regarded as the ‘Gold Standard’ for upright canister stoves. It weighs about 74 grams. Snow Peak has released a new stove in this series: the GST-120, or Lite Max, weighing only 56 grams, reviewed here. Does the Lite Max live up to the reputation of its precursor, the GST-100 (which is still available)?

You don’t have access to view this content.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review

The Nemo Nano Elite is marketed by the manufacturer as a lightweight, fast set-up tent aimed at adventure racers and the fast-and-light crowd. Since I can’t run with the former, I try to hang with the latter.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 1
The Nano Elite is a 3.2 pound two-person single-wall three-season tent.

Introduction

The Nemo Nano Elite is marketed by the manufacturer as a lightweight, fast set-up tent aimed at adventure racers and the fast-and-light crowd. Since I can’t run with the former, I try to hang with the latter…

The 3.2 pound (1.46 kilogram) Elite’s interior two-pole set-up and side entry is reminiscent of the Bibler Ahwahnee and Black Diamond Lighthouse tents, but at a much lighter weight, achieved by using non-breathable 20 denier nylon for the body. The Elite is the lightest weight-to-floor-area shelter Nemo makes, even including bivies. And, if the tent can in fact be used by four people, the shelter clocks in at 13 ounces per person.

I did not put the four-person claim to the test, but I did put the Elite through its paces.

Year/Manufacturer/Model 2009 Nemo Nano Elite 2- to 4-Person Tent
Style Three-season, two- to four-person, single-wall tent with floor.
Fabrics Body: 20 denier silicone and PU coated nylon ripstop (1 flavor each side)
Floor: 30 denier PU coated (5000 mm) nylon ripstop
Poles and Stakes Poles: DAC 9/9.6 mm Featherlite poles, total weight 13.1 oz (371 g)
Stakes: 5x  6.4 in (16.3 cm) aluminum X stakes, total weight 2.2 oz (62 g)
Dimensions Length Listed: 82 in (208 cm)
BPL Measured Length: 82 in (208 cm)
Width Listed: 56 in (142 cm)
BPL Measured Width: 53 in (134.6 cm)
Inside Height Listed: 40 in (102 cm)
BPL Measured Height: 39.5 in (100 cm)
(Note: set-up can make these numbers fluctuate.)
Packed Size 8 x 7 in (20 x 18 cm)
Total Weight Listed Weight: 3 lb 1.6 oz (1.43 kg)
BPL Measured Weight: 3 lb 3.6 oz (1.46 kg)
Trail Weight 2.8 lb (1.27 kg)
Protected Area Floor Area Listed: 32 ft2 (2.97 m2)
Actual Area as Set Up: 30.2 ft2 (4.64 m2)
Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 10.8 ft2/lb
MSRP US $389.00
Options Footprint ($39.00, 7 oz/198 g)
Website http://www.nemoequipment.com/

The Product

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 2
Parts of the Nano Elite.

The Nano Elite comes packed in two sacks. The two nine-section, shock-corded poles are in their own 0.8-ounce (23-gram) storage sack that ended up as a 17-inch (43.2-centimeter) long package that is 2 inches (5 centimeters) in diameter. The three sections that make up the middle of each pole are 0.6 mm thicker than the sections at either end to provide more strength at the top of the arch formed by the bent poles.

A 2.7-ounce (77-gram) dry-bag style stuff sack holds the tent body, along with the stake bag. Looking inside the 0.5-ounce (14-gram) stake bag, we find the five aluminum stakes, two guylines, two nylon repair patches and a tent-pole repair sleeve. The guylines, nylon patches, and repair sleeve weigh in at 1 ounce (29 grams).

As Nemo makes the claim that the Nano Elite packs down to the size of a climbing helmet, I thought it appropriate to get a photo of it next to one. When compressed aggressively, the tent body just about gets as small as my Black Diamond helmet. The poles will not fit inside the dry-bag, but the two storage sacks may be attached to one another by running the strap of the dry-bag through a wide loop in the middle of the pole sack. I did not do this, as I pack my poles separately.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 3
As small as a climbing helmet? The Nano Elite stuffed.

The set-up is pretty straightforward and was no mystery to me, as I own a Bibler tent and have used other interior-pole tents in the past. Nemo has thoughtfully printed the set-up instructions on a piece of Tyvek-type material, which is affixed to the open end of the dry-bag.

The ends of the poles sit in a concave metal button at each corner of the tent. Once put in position, the poles stay in place by means of Velcro anchor wraps. A nice touch is the ability to attach them from either side of the tabs, making set-up a little faster.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 4
The poles sit in a metal button in each corner, and are secured with wrap-around Velcro tabs. Two mesh gear pockets sit against the back wall.

At either end of the back wall can be found a triangular mesh gear pocket that measures 11 inches (28 centimeters) at the bottom with an opening of 5.5 inches (14 centimeters). As the pockets are only attached to the tent at the corners, other larger or bulky gear may be stuffed behind the pocket, keeping it close at hand.

The large single door opens by way of an arched double-slider zipper. The zipper is protected by a 1.5-inch (3.8-centimeter) storm flap. As the zipper runs in an upward curve from one side to the other, it means that the open door must lay on the floor of the tent or the ground outside when fully opened. There is a single door keeper in the center of the opening that allows the loose door to be gathered and kept in place somewhat.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 5
Views of the Nano Elite. Top left picture shows the door closed. Top right shows the door open with mesh insert closed. Bottom left shows the side profile. Note the angle of door. When open, rain can fall into the tent and onto the occupant closest to the door. The bottom right picture shows two standard size sleeping pads in place.

The door has a removable mesh insert that can be used to ventilate the tent in bug laden areas. It goes over the door on the outside, allowing the door to be adjusted from inside the tent. One thing I found aggravating is the fact that the mesh insert has a zipper pull on the outside only. I must catch the zipper with a fingernail to drag it around the track to open while inside the tent. Grrrrr.

The Nano Elite has a 36-inch (91-centimeter) long vent near the top of the back wall. A 5-inch (12.7-centimeter) long strut pushes the vent open. The strut, which is attached to the outer edge of the vent, has a section of Velcro to keep it in place. When fully extended, the opening provides approximently 90 square inches of mesh-protected ventilation.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 9
Views of the vent from inside the tent (left), and outside the tent (right).

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 10
The 36-inch long opening provides up to 90 square inches of mesh-protected ventilation.

Field Testing

I used the Nano Elite a total of seven nights, three in Minnesota, three in our local California mountains, and one in Yosemite National Park.

In Minnesota, there were heavy winds coming at 38 miles per hour (61 kilometers per hour) when I pitched the Nano Elite. Setting it up in the high wind was a bit of a chore. I staked one corner to keep it from blowing away and crawled in to set up the poles. The wind was whipping the tent about so much that it was quite difficult to get the pole ends into the metal buttons. Once I had the poles in place, I had to quickly shut the door so as not to become a giant kite. After securing the poles with the Velcro tabs, I went back out to stake it down. I added the two pieces of nylon cord supplied to the guy-outs on the windward side and realized that the tent came with only five stakes. I used a screwdriver as a stake to hold one of the guy-lines. I later put one of my own Ti stakes in with the Nemo stakes in order to be able to fully stake the tent.

Nemo employs catenary curves at the base of the tent to cut out wasted fabric and increase tension in the tent walls, which helps with wind resistance. The tent handled the wind okay, but since the floor can only be staked down at the four corners, I found that the wind came under the floor of the tent at the catenary curves. Though I pulled the corners as tightly as I could, the wind still threw my bag and sleeping pad around when I wasn’t actually on top of or inside them.

This windiness also occurred in California. I was measuring the winds at 12 miles per hour with gusts to 20 miles per hour (19 and 32 kilometers per hour). Again, while I was not in the tent, the wind went under the floor, tossing everything around inside.

While the wind helped keep condensation at bay, as I was able to adjust the door opening to ventilate the tent, it also kept waking me up, as the side of the tent would smack me in the head during gusts. Perhaps this would be less of a problem for users under 6 feet tall (I am 6 feet, 3 inches). As such, I used the Elite as a solo shelter, placing my sleeping bag and pad at an angle to get as much length as possible. Even laying at an angle kitty-corner, my bag still hit both sidewalls.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 11
I found the Nano Elite to be too short for me to keep from hitting the sidewalls, even when placing my sleeping bag at an angle.

As long as there was a little bit of air movement, the Nano Elite did a decent job of keeping condensation under control. But in calm conditions, condensation started building up immediately. On trips during which the bugs were not out yet, I could remove the mesh insert to allow the most ventilation possible and noticed that it did help reduce condensation somewhat, though this wouldn’t be a good solution in buggy conditions.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 12
Waiting for snow at Saxton Camp.

The night in Yosemite saw clear skies and not a breath of wind. The mosquitoes forced me to keep the mesh insert in place. The temperature got down to 38 F (3 C), and I woke to copious condensation. Water was dripping from the poles onto my bag. I used my Packtowl washcloth to wipe the inside walls off before packing up and had to wring it out a couple times in the process.

Observations

As I am 6 feet, 3 inches (191 centimeters) tall, I would have enjoyed the Nano Elite more had it been about 8 inches (20 centimeter) longer. While it is wide enough for two people (should they be shorter than I), there is not room for much else in the way of gear storage inside. The door placement on the side means that the person in the back must climb over the front person to enter or exit the tent. Should that be acceptable, the Nano Elite gives two people a quick pitching tent at about a pound and a half each.

It should be noted that the lack of a vestibule means that, for two people, their packs and possibly footwear would have to stay outside, where they will be exposed to the weather. The lack of vestibule also means that the door can’t be opened to ventilate the tent when it is raining, as water will fall straight into the tent. The person in the front gets crawled over and rained on each time their partner needs out. ("What, you have to go again? Hold it!"). These limitations would probably rule out using the Elite in a place like the Pacific Northwest. Plus, as I ran into condensation problems with the door open, I shudder to think what it would have been like with it closed.

I chose to use the Elite as a solo tent, bringing my gear inside with me. Even solo, the Nano Elite’s weight comes in at the low end of most free-standing two-person tents. Indeed, the tent I use most often, a Big Agnes Seedhouse SL2 with carbon fiber poles and Ti stakes, comes in at only a few ounces less than the Nano Elite.

It should be noted that Nemo does make a standard Nano that is longer and wider, with a vestibule to protect the door. These changes (shorter length and width, no vestibule) were made to the Elite simply as a way to cut weight.

There is plenty of head room, even when I was sitting on my Neo Air pad. The steep side-walls give the tent a lot of room to move around in. Two people can sit and play cards in it with no problem. Four people may even be able to sit inside to wait out a rain shower, but I do not think that four hikers could use it to sleep in. I did not try this, as I don’t know three other people that will hike with me, and the Swedish Bikini Team was not available.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 13
The Elite’s height and steep walls make for plenty of room and head clearance.

The tent performs well in high wind, though any tent with a rectangular base and only two cross poles is going to present a flat face that can catch wind. I tried to always set it up with a back corner into the (anticipated) breeze, and while the sidewallss did bow in during big gusts, the tent did not flap, nor was it noisy. I was pleasantly surprised that it handled the windy night in Minnesota without a single stake being pulled loose.

In non-inclement weather, I found that the Elite has fair ventilation. As long as there is some air movement, condensation was really not a problem. In as little as 4-mile-per-hour (6 kilometer-per-hour) winds, the tent would have enough air movement to keep it fairly dry. The condensation problems occur when it is calm or inclement, though, from my experience, that is true of any non-breathable single-wall tent. The addition of a low shingled vent at one or both ends of the tent would help ventilation, especially when the door may not be used for this purpose due to weather.

One thing that Nemo may want to look at is the placement of the metal buttons in the corners that the poles go into. It is pretty important that the poles, which have a sharp edge, go into the buttons and not the fabric of the tent. I found that the buttons are slightly to the inside of the corner, which made it difficult to insert the pole, especially if the wind was blowing. Each time I set it up, I would wonder if that was the case with any of my other similar tents. Finally, I dug out my Bibler Fitzroy to see if had the same problem, and found that its metal button was dead centered in the corner. I can slide its poles in and hit the button each time, no guessing or fiddling.

Nemo Nano Elite Tent Review - 14
While the catenary curves at the base are supposed to help with wind resistance, I found that strong winds would blow under the tent at these points.

What’s Good

  • Light weight for a freestanding tent
  • Fast set-up
  • Good stability in high winds
  • Lots of headroom
  • What’s Not So Good

  • Heavy condensation in inclement weather when venting options are limited
  • Pole-in-button placement difficult in windy conditions
  • Not long enough for taller users
  • Mesh lacking inside zipper pull
  • Comparisons

    As far as comparison tents, the Nano Elite’s closest competitor is probably the Mandatory Gear Puppy Pile Too. This single-wall, external-pole tent uses carbon fiber poles, silnylon, and a lower height to achieve a weight of only 1 pound 14.1 ounces (0.85 kilogram), over a pound less than the Nano Elite.

    Closer in form and function is the Black Diamond Lighthouse. While weighing 12.5 ounces (354 grams) more than the Nano Elite, it boasts more headroom, breathable Epic fabric, and a third short pole at the top that allows limited protection from rain for the door and back window/vent.

    Tent Floor Area (ft2) Peak Height Ventilation Trail Weight (lb) Cost
    Nemo Nano Elite 32 40” Back vent 2.8 $389.00
    MG Puppy Pile Too 36.7 33” Roof-top vent 1.88 $549.00
    BD Lighthouse 33.1 45” Back window, Epic fabric 3.0 $429.95

    Recommendations For Improvement

    • Add an inside pull for the mesh door zipper
    • Re-position the metal buttons for pole ends
    • Add a low vent on the sides for ventilation during rain or snow
    • Include a sixth stake for full guyline use

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation

    The summer of 2008 got Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School off to a great start. We ran three trips in three wildly different locations: Northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and Desert Southwest. Each allowed for a unique experience and permitted us to focus on the core curriculum of the Wilderness Trekking format.

    Lightweight Education

    The summer of 2008 got Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School off to a great start. We ran three trips in three wildly different locations: Northern Rockies, Pacific Northwest, and Desert Southwest. Each allowed for a unique experience and permitted us to focus on the core curriculum of the Wilderness Trekking format.

    All three of our courses began with a full day in a classroom as a foundation for the backcountry time. This was an opportunity for in-depth presentations and group discussions, as well as hands-on time with the gear, all building to the moment we left the indoor classroom for the outdoor one.

    The Gear and How to Choose It

    There is no denying that a major component of lightweight camping is an emphasis on gear and its weight. One of the amazing benefits that Backpacking Light can offer is an arsenal of extremely specialized equipment. There was an excellent assortment of cutting-edge stoves, shelters, bear bag hanging tools, bivy sacks, tent stakes, water treatments, and backpacks. Getting to handle and use these items was a high point for most of the students – they were like kids in a candy store, with a comfy pack instead of a sugar coma as the consequence of indulging in the array.

    The team was encouraged to use (well, play with, actually) a wide variety of gear. Folks cooked their meals on a rotation of stove systems, and each night we slept under different tarps. The result was some real-deal insight into what worked best for each person and their individual needs. Student feedback indicated that experience actually using the gear was invaluable in shaping their decisions for their own gear closets.

    The instructors formalized the process of how students chose gear, factoring in multi-use items, durability, potential weather, our route and our goals for the trip. If a piece of gear was superfluous, we made a mindful decision about not taking it, creating a lot of discussion around the perception of “need.” The phrase “But I always take this,” should set alarm bells ringing; you need to consciously ask yourself “Why do I always take this?” If you can’t answer that, the item doesn’t go in the pack.

    Weighing Every Little Thing – No Sneaking!

    The preparations for a lightweight backpacking trip require definitive data, and the only way you can get the relevant info is to put each individual item on a scale and write down its weight on a data sheet. This exercise is an essential part of the experience. The process goes pretty quickly as we minimize the actual number of potential items by separating our wants from our needs, all before the scales even come out. We have a data sheet for each team member, pencils, calculators, and bunch of digital scales (digital is more precise, and we’re all about precision). The students immediately jump into the process, and the business of dramatic subtraction begins. 

    We urged folks to be bold and to use their course to really try something new. Students discovered that it’s a liberating experience to leave things behind. We encouraged a lot of sharing, so while we had up to ten students on some trips, we never had ten tubes of toothpaste. Something as simple as sharing little things also added to the community experience of our little team.

    The moment of truth: one at a time, we put the packs on the scale. There was a heightened sense of camaraderie as each teammate announced their total pack weight, and that total was written on a large display data sheet. What surprised and fascinated everyone, including the instructors, were how low the initial numbers were. It was impressive, and it consistently lead to a last minute flurry of even more subtraction, with a friendly competition to get those numbers just a little bit lower.

    We were meticulous about the weight of all the gear, including the weight of the food, which was a real eye-opener for some of the students. Like we had every other item, we made decisions based on efficiency, experience, and safety. Some folks were a little worried that we might not be taking enough and that they would end up being hungry. We reassured them, then trimmed their food weight anyway. At the end of the trip, we verified our food calculations and their accuracy. After a six-day, five-night trek, we weighed the leftovers that we walked out with, and they came in at well under one pound. Many students had never considered food weight, simply considering quantity for each meal. Reducing excess food weight was one more area of knowledge and resulting freedom when backpacking – and the good news is that no one felt as though they had been deprived during the trip. Everyone ate their fill.

    We also weighed the stove fuel going in and at the end of the trek so that we could get a true number about the quantity we used. Our trash was an issue too, and before going in, we were thorough about minimizing any excessive packaging. As a final measure, we weighed all the trash when we came out. These numbers were impressively low without us taking any extraordinary measures beyond simply being mindful of what we were carrying in.

    A New Way of Thinking

    During our time in the backcountry, we collectively settled into a pleasant day-to-day rhythm. Some classes were in a big formal circle, but most were done on the trail as brief info-bursts, which makes sense. There aren’t many grand concepts involved with lightweight backpacking and camping, but there are a million little tricks. As an example, I was with a small crew on a steep set of switchbacks, and I demonstrated to the students how to take off and pack their windshirt while continuing walking… never stopping. We had some fun with this simple trick, racing each other as we pulled off layers and crammed them into the pack and put ’em back on – all while hiking.

    We also focused on hydration methods and carrying. The traditional backpacker loads up their pack with lots of water, which is a very conservative approach (hiking with the belief that no water will be available to you on the trail), and it adds a lot of weight to their packs, backs, and hips. We carefully reviewed the maps for water sources along our route, and combined the maps with the instructors’ knowledge about the area of travel. The Gallatin Ridge in Montana in late summer is intimidating and dry, yet we managed to fill our bottles from some tiny springs along the way. Instructor Ryan Connelly would pow-wow with a group of students and point at zone over a mile away, off on the horizon. A little stripe of bright green grass among the yellowed foliage of late summer was a dead giveaway for a water source.

    “See that green? That means there we should find some water there.” He then led by example, drinking his water bottle dry and hiking with an empty vessel. There was no need to encourage anyone to do the same; it was understood. A half-hour later, when we arrived at the lush pocket of green grass, we found the little trickle seeping out over the rocks and filled up.

    Tarp camping was a newfound joy for a lot of the students, who were accustomed to the perceived security of their tents. Sleeping with a sewn-in floor and sidewalls seems impermeable to bugs, and students were surprised at how comfortable and non-chewed up they stayed with a simple ground cloth and tarp. Now, I’ve got a lot of experience setting up a tidy tarp, but watching Andrew Skurka teach tarp-craft was genuinely impressive. I was in the presence of true mastery: taut pitches, secure guylines, and stable poles attested to his skill.

    While critics of lightweight backpacking focus on what they believe is being neglected or left behind, those who want to pursue it as a means of getting to the wilderness more often and more comfortably must first look headlong at their packing choices. Learning some lightweight tricks is key, but learning how to pack light and still lack for nothing takes time and a dedication to trial and error. Those who enroll in courses like this are motivated and bold, taking more vigorous steps to reducing packweight and seeing what else opens up as a result. It was a delight to spend time on the trail in conversation, since no one was too winded to chat, and the fact that the packs were light and the shoes were comfortable made trail-time even more pleasant.

    Teaching on the Fly

    The class was good for the instructors, too. When we turned a corner in the high country and got a big expansive view of our route from the previous day, it was easy to do an impromptu map class. We could match big features on the map to visual points off in the distance, features we had climbed over yesterday. We got a fix on our position on the map and could extrapolate what to expect for the rest of the day. With traditional backpacks, we would have needed to take ‘em off in order to focus and relax into the lesson. Not so with our team: we did all our map work and navigation with the lightweight packs on, without any burden. This simple exercise (not shedding one’s pack at each and every opportunity) was a highlight of the trip for some of the students. The lightweight pack heightens your ability to look around and make decisions with a new-found efficiency, and leaving heavy items behind translates to more, not less, freedom on the trail.

    In 2008, our WT1 course format was very different than it is in 2009. In 2008, students were treated to a two-day intensive classroom training session. They then embarked on an optional community trek to test their new skills together. The students chose treks that were in the range of four to five days, just enough time to become immersed in an authentic lightweight backcountry experience. At the end, they were getting into the rhythm of a well oiled machine, but all the students collectively recommended that we make the WT1 field component of the course mandatory, and just a little bit longer. They felt like the last day came too soon, that they were all finally achieving a heightened level of efficiency, and they wanted to USE those newfound skills a bit longer. In response and recognition of this desire to use new skills for as long as possible, we’ve extended our WT1 courses in 2009 to a full seven days, with six days and five nights in the field.

    In 2008, we had multiple locations throughout the west for the WT1 courses, and while this gave us diversity of field of study, we’ve decided to keep future courses in our own backyard of the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. The wilderness areas around Bozeman are just TOO perfect! Plus, it’s our own playgound, so we have more to offer as far as natural history lessons and our own intimate knowledge of the terrain.

    Traveling Off the Trail

    There is something liberating about hiking on a path in the mountains, but there is a heightened feeling of freedom when you leave that path. We made an effort to do some ambitious off-trail hiking on all of the courses, modeling efficiency in path finding and route selection. Our reward was to move through some astoundingly pristine places. There is an emotional fulfillment in being in the wilderness, and feeling competent in your route finding away from the trail heightens that feeling. Trails are all very well and good, but they simply move you from point A to point B. Choosing your own way, one not traveled by most others in a place, is satisfying in all the deep and meaningful ways that make us feel empowered and independent.

    Once we mastered cooking on the trail and water source location, we were liberated from the traditional campsite location requirement of a stream or river or creek nearby. And when we realized that we could walk away from the trail, we were capable of making low impact stealth camps with small overall footprints. As the team began to master these basic lightweight skills, it was as though we were watching little puzzle pieces snap into place in the students’ minds, making them capable of doing something truly new and revolutionary in their outdoor pursuits.

    We were camping in a new way, and the rewards were enormous.

    Want More?

    To further explore what the BPL Wilderness Trekking School has to offer, click on the SCHOOL link. We wanna help lighten your load! If you have any questions email us.

    Further Reading:

    Bill Stadwiser’s Not a Day on Any Calendar
    Don Wilson’s Desert Southwest Trip Report

    Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 1
    Each class begins with a detailed measuring and weighing of each and every item in a student’s pack.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 2
    Group weigh-in and chart, which often inspires a flurry of further gram-trimming and friendly competition among students.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 3
    Ridgeline travel in the Pacific Northwest (PNW). In 2008, the Backpacking Light Wilderness Trekking School taught courses in the PNW, the desert southwest (DSW), and the northern Rockies (NR).

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 4
    Lush trail in the PNW. Trekking poles provide balance and stability; even with a lightweight pack, they help you move through difficult terrain more quickly and with greater control.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 5
    Students are taught fire building techniques for both safety and cooking purposes. Also, it’s a magnetic source of entertainment and warmth, no matter the locale.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 6
    Route-finding is more fun in a beautiful setting – and with friends. Learning how to read topo maps and use compasses effectively can be as useful in the backcountry as learning how to establish relationships is in the front country.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 7
    PNW students enjoyed the benefits of trail-side blueberries (picked with lightweight backpacks still on!) while on their hike.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 8
    WTS Instructor Mike Clelland! demonstrates one lightweight way to keep your head and ears warm while in the PNW. Also, he’ll be starring in Baywatch: Tacoma sometime soon.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 9
    PNW students enjoy preparing and eating breakfast near water, nice and warm on a chilly morning after already hiking two miles.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 10
    Lightweight packs enable hikers to access heights and depths quickly and nimbly. With the world (or at least more of the complete region) at your fingertips, what will YOU do with a lighter pack?

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 11
    Enjoying the sun on the lighter side of life.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 12
    Students often learn the Clelland way of settling disputes: Ninja-Cowboy-Bear. Unlike Rock-Paper-Scissors, the game is best played with the whole body, not mere hands.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 13
    A taut pitch is essential for successful (non-noisy) tarp camping. Test it the same way you might test your abs: quarter bouncing.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 14
    So THAT’S how Adventure Magazine’s 2007 Adventurer of the Year wakes up! With Andrew Skurka as an instructor, what will YOU learn from him?

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 15
    “I swear,” says Don Wilson, “their packs were THIS BIG. Also, I am an excellent fisherman.”

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 16
    Muffins on trail? You bet! Steam cooking tasty brekky muffins is one of many skills you’ll walk away with… and you’ll be FULL.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 17
    Andrew Skurka breaks down student shoe choices for weight, support, materials, longevity, and possibly stench-factor.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 18
    DSW student works on her technique for lighting up a BushBuddy stove. WTS students shared a variety of shelters, bivy sacks, and cook kits, gaining critical hands-on experience to learn which best suited their needs.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 19
    Dwarfed by the surroundings, NR students navigate a small patch of snow, still holding on in the high elevations of the Rocky Mountains.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 20
    Above the treeline, the views and vistas are incredible, reaching far into adjoining ranges to give students a deep sense of the remote, the removed.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 21
    Tasty – dipping water from an alpine lake refreshes the senses.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 22
    Pensive reflection in the Rockies. When not struggling with a weighty pack, weightier issues can be processed (or set aside) in some of the most engagingly beautiful environs available.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 23
    Another method of water retrieval: spring-fed sources require waiting your turn to replenish your (recently) emptied water bottle.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 24
    Instructor Ryan Connelly explains geographic features of the Gallatin Range. Classrooms have nothing on this kind of visual aid.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 25
    Further up and further in – there’s always more to see in Big Sky Country.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 27
    Hiking isn’t always above the treeline. Students enjoy the fragrance and needled ground of high alpine pine trails.

    Wilderness Trekking School Summer Initiation - 26
    Pauses aren’t taken for catching breath or resting, but for catching the lovely view and enjoying your fellow classmates.

    Shangri-Lite at 62 – Haute Route at 20 Pounds or Less

    On the Haute Route, a 21-pound pack is over-inflated. At sixty-two well-used years, I submitted myself to random weight checks to remain sub-twenty pounds and passed most of them. Making the formula feasible are the huts and hotels which always appear just when you’ve had enough.

    You don’t have access to view this content.

    Philmont Scout Ranch: How Light Can You Go?

    After taking a Wilderness Trekking course from Andrew Skurka and Don Wilson, I wanted to try the Philmont Scout Ranch in a UL style. By stepping out of my existing comfort zone, I discovered a whole new one.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 1
    Doug Prosser weighing his pack prior to leaving basecamp. Weight was less than 15 pounds!!

    Introduction

    Have you ever been challenged, pushed a bit out of your comfort zone? Where the mind and body both start feeling a bit uncomfortable; where fear starts to raise its ugly head? Lightweight backpacking is all about dealing with your fears and pushing yourself out of your comfort zones, both mentally and physically, only to make you more comfortable in the long run!

    Freedom. You are ready and willing to try anything to push yourself even further than you thought possible. You are having a blast, because fear is the furthest thing from your mind. You are stretching yourself well beyond what you thought possible just a few short months ago (from your nice couch).

    I saw some of these changes within myself in 2008 while planning another Philmont Scout Ranch trek for that August. I’ve gone a number of times and am very familiar with what to expect there and figured this would be much the same. However, in late spring, Backpacking Light announced a new series of Wilderness Trekking School courses. I signed up for the Wilderness Trekking I (WTS-I) in the desert southwest during October. I was interested in learning new skills, since I had never hiked with other lightweight backpackers, and I wanted to see how Don Wilson and Andrew Skurka taught the course.

    Don Wilson was our primary instructor for the pre-hike planning via email, during which time I was also planning my Philmont gear list. Through a series of emails, I accepted a challenge from Don to go as light as I could at Philmont, which required me to scrap everything I was planning and to look again at every single gear choice. I got out my scale and weighed each piece of gear I was even remotely thinking of taking, then put all the weights into a spreadsheet. I then began comparing that spreadsheet to the gear lists of others, such as our other WTS-I instructor, Andrew Skurka and ones posted on BackpackingLight.com.

    I started looking at areas where others were much lighter than I, such as sleep systems, tents, rain gear, clothing, and what I call ‘doodads’ – those miscellaneous items that are really cool, but not quite necessary, that somehow find their way into a lot of packs. In short, almost everything! I was forced to change my thought processes and to face a number of my fears. Would I have enough food and water? Would I get wet? Be warm enough? Be too hot hiking? Be comfortable enough to sleep at night? With Don’s help, I pushed myself out of my comfort zone of known gear items to make some big changes in my gear and clothing.

    When we came off trail, our crew went directly to the Philmont scale to weigh our packs. There was a gal in front of us weighing her pack prior to going out. It was 55 pounds. She was dumbfounded by my cheering crew when my pack weighed in at 8.5 pounds. Yes, that is correct: 8.5 pounds! Only three of our ten crew members had pack weights over 20 pounds (21, 25, and 30 pounds).

    Thanks to the people that shared their ideas about Philmont gear choices and my WTS-I instructors and classmastes for their help in forming and executing the ideas shared here.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 2
    Various Black Diamond, Sierra Designs, and Mountain Laurel Designs tents for our crew. The biggest and lightest one in the back is the MLD.

    A Classic, Revisited

    On both my trips to Philmont Scout Ranch in 2007 and 2008, I came across a number of people who had read my original Philmont article (Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer) and lightened their packs. Unfortunately, I also came across a number of people who were having physical problems, and a few that were being shipped back to basecamp because they could not continue due to injuries. Prior to going out on the trail, our crew watched Scouts weighing their packs prior to boarding their bus to the trailhead. The heaviest pack we saw was 77 pounds! Wish I could have seen THAT gear list.

    The gear on the list below was selected specifically to meet the requirements of Philmont Scout Ranch while being as light as possible. Although the list was compiled for Boy Scouts and Scout Leaders attending Philmont, it will work equally well for others interested in a lighter pack.

    Seasons: Summer – temps range from mid-30s to 90s F, short afternoon showers common, but every now and then it dumps for a lot longer
    Length: Ten days of hiking with two to five days between resupply
    Where: Philmont Scout Ranch, Sangre de Christo mountains, New Mexico

    One of the easiest ways to get a lighter pack is to buy a digital scale and weigh all of your gear, then put the weights into a spreadsheet. You will be amazed at the differences in weights between similar items. Your choices become really easy and, before you know it, you’ll be saving pounds. There are even premade gear spreadsheets at BackpackingLight (search “spreadsheet”).

    Rationale for Selected Gear

    At Philmont, the gear you carry is broken into five sections: Personal Equipment: Clothing, Personal Equipment: Gear, Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems, Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont, and Crew Equipment Provided by Your Crew.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 3
    The Pilot to Bombardier outhouse: Two seats back-to-back with some of the best views anywhere, though conversation is usually minimal.

    Personal Equipment: Clothing

    Philmont sets some standards that influence your clothing choices, requiring completely separate sleep clothing, full rain suits (no ponchos), and long pants for various activities. Even within these parameters, one can still go fairly lightweight while remembering the following: NO COTTON and WEIGH EVERYTHING.  There can be a wide range of weights between manufacturers of the same item.

    Long pants are required for spar pole climbing, horseback riding, and conservation projects. These activities could possibly be done in your rain pants, which I tried during my 2002 trek, but then my rain pants required numerous pieces of duct tape to cover the holes. For those who prefer to hike in shorts, a better solution would be pants with zip-off legs. My long-term (has served well for several years now) personal choice is the Ex-Officio Amphi Convertible Pant. In addition to zip-off legs, it has a built-in brief, so you don’t need to bring underwear, which saves even more weight. There are a number of manufacturers of zip-off or long hiking pants and hiking underwear, such as REI, EMS, Mountain Hardwear, Ex-Officio, Golite, The North Face, or Patagonia. If you prefer undies, you will only need one pair for the whole hike.

    For a shirt, I recommend one with an SPF-15+ rating. Since our troop prefers to make silk-screened troop shirts for Philmont, we have purchased hiking shirts for the last few treks, either short or long sleeve, depending on individual preference, from REI when we could find them on sale for less than $20 each. There are a number of other manufacturers that could also be used. Some weigh more than others, so pay attention.

    Insects have been so rare at Philmont that I bring no DEET, but I always bring my headnet. To prevent any bug/tick problems, I treat my hiking, sleep clothing, and headnet with Permethrin.

    All you need is the one pair of pants and one hiking shirt for the whole trek. Yes, just one of each – not five or even ten of each, as I have seen some people do. Maybe that’s how you get a 77-pound pack… When you get a chance to shower at one of the staff camps, wash your shirt, pants, and socks; put them back on and they should dry in less than an hour. I take two pairs of socks, one to wear hiking and the other pair for sleeping. I rotate them throughout the hike.

    Boots are not necessary, since almost all hiking is done on well-worn trails, and your pack weight should be below 25 pounds. Running shoes with good tread will do fine, especially if they are trail runners. Make sure they are broken in a bit before going. Most running shoes may only have a useful life of around 500 miles, so replace old shoes prior to Philmont even if they still look good. I learned the advantages of gaiters from Andrew Skurka, and I am looking forward to trying a simBLISSity LevaGaiter.

    Hats generate a lot of different preferences: wide brim, waterproof, baseball cap, etc. In 2008, I used a waterproof Mountain Hardwear Stimulus hat, since I was bringing a rain jacket that did not have a hood.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 4
    Part of the crew cooking and waiting out a drizzle under the dining fly. Note the Dri-Ducks and Frogg Toggs rainwear.

    I’m pleased to announce that over the past two years I have seen many Frogg Togg rain suits at Philmont. The people I’ve talked to really like them. With Don Wilson’s challenge in mind, I wanted to find something even lighter than the 16-ounce Frogg Toggs, and what I settled on was a Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Jacket (no hood) at 6.9 ounces, the ULA Rain Wrap (rain skirt) at 3.1 ounces, and the Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Rain Hat at 2.5 ounces, for a total of 12.5 ounces. I had some doubts (fears) about this set-up.

    First, could a jacket this light and thin keep me dry? Second, would a rain skirt work adequately or did I really need rain pants? Third, would a waterproof hat breathe well enough during regular hiking? My doubts and fears were disproved in both hard rain and in some rather warm conditions. The jacket and hat breathed so well that I wore the jacket a number of times as a wind jacket while hiking, and I did not wet out from the inside. I still think my regular hiking hat, the Tilly Airflow, breathes a bit better than the Stimulus hat, but I really did not have an issue with the difference (plus the Stimulus was an ounce lighter). The Rain Wrap kept my rear and legs dry and cool when hiking. Two things to note: you can prevent rain from running off your jacket and down your backside by pulling the elastic waist of the wrap higher (rain on the backside is a particularly unpleasant feeling), and you can look as though you are wearing a kilt when using the wrap with short.  One boy wondered aloud if I were wearing anything underneath.

    You also need to bring a warm insulation layer. Since I’m from southern California, anything below 75F is chilly, and I run cold anyway.  You may not need as much insulation as do. I use the Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pullover, size large (9.3 ounces, discontinued) and the Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pants (7.8 ounces). In addition to these two Cocoon items, I used a Patagonia R1 Hoody pullover shirt (13.5 ounces). The Backpacking Light Cocoon jacket and pants worked really well, but the addition of the Patagonia R1 Hoody dramatically improved the warmth of my insulation. The Hoody has a couple of features that I love, which allow you to leave some other items at home.

    The first feature is a hood that zippers up high over your mouth, thus allowing you to leave home your beanie hat or balaclava. The zipper is designed such that it actually zips up over your cheek, so that it does not bother your mouth or nose. The second feature are thumb loops that allow the fleece to cover a good portion of your hand, thus allowing you to leave your gloves at home.   Backpacking Light has now produced their own hoody, very similar to the Patagonia version, but made from merino wool. The Backpacking Light version is a bit lighter (8 ounces) so it will be what I take in 2010 when I make my next Philmont trek.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 5
    The crew on top of Mount Baldy, 12,415 feet.

    In past years, I’ve used a Marmot DriClime Jacket or PossumDown sweater with a Patagonia Micro Puff vest, and folks are welcome to use fleece, synthetic, wool or down vests and/or jackets. Two things to keep in mind when thinking about your insulation layers: one, if you are using a down sleeping bag, consider using either fleece or synthetic insulated jackets/vest in case everything gets wet. Two, weigh all your options, because you may be very surprised by how much some of these things weigh.

    Personal Equipment: Gear

    In 2008, I used the same Gossamer Gear G5 pack (2,800 ci body, 3,800 ci maximum, silnylon version) that I used in 2005. It is really hard to argue with a pack that weighs less than 8 ounces. In 2008, the three people that had packs weighing over 20 pounds were either carrying a GoLite Gust (4,500+ cubic inches) or large Osprey packs (4,000+ cubic inches). I believe their increased weight was related to one very important point: they had increased volume in their packs, which allowed them to add a number of items, like a Tom Clancy novel and a chair to sit on while reading, as well as extra clothing. An important lesson is that you should not bring a larger pack than is necessary. People have taken one look at my G5 and decided “No way am I going to take that ‘sack’ – there is no way it will hold up,” though my G5 has been to Philmont twice, and on many hikes over the last four years, including the WTS-I course. Plus, it was pretty fun to blow my Philmont crew away the first night: we have to put our packs under the dining fly at night. I put mine out stuffed in a one-gallon Zip-loc bag to keep it dry and mud-free.

    Some more ‘mainstream’ examples of packs that could work well for Philmont: GoLite Jam2 (six out of twelve people on the WTS-I course carried this), Quest, Pinnacle (maybe a little large for Philmont), Granite Gear Virga, Vapor Trail, Meridian Vapor, Latitude Vapor, Nimbus Ozone; Gregory Z 55; Gossamer Gear G5, Mariposa, Mariposa Plus; Osprey Atmos 50, REI UL Cruise 60, Quick UL 45… lots to choose from. Remember to make sure that each ounce or pound of pack weight really makes a profound difference for you. My original pack was a Dana Design Terraplane that weighed close to 9 pounds empty, which is more than my pack, clothing, and gear now weigh all together.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 6
    The author (right) and patrol leader waiting for dinner. The author is wearing a Patagonia R1 Hoody under Backpacking Light Cocoon UL 60 Pants and Jacket.

    Water: How much to take and how to carry it. This is one of the areas I have tried to work on the last few years, and Philmont is a perfect proving ground. In the past, I carried a 100-ounce Camelback hydration system. I made sure it was filled before I left camp each morning. That is nearly seven pounds of water and container, so I have been working on managing the amount of water I carry. For most of my last Philmont trek, I drank approximately two liters of water in the morning before leaving camp, then carried only a 500 ml bottle after leaving camp in the morning. Granted, I had to stop a number of times to relieve myself of the two liters during the hike, but I was only carrying one pound of water for the day. I carried water containers to hold 5.5 liters of water to fill on the approach to dry camps. Water is plentiful around Philmont and carrying a small amount is easy and saves a lot of pack weight. One other suggestion when going into a dry camp: eat your dinner for lunch near a water source, since dinners require water, whereas lunches and breakfasts are usually dry.

    I have modified some of the following items based on the WTS-I course. Be careful with these items, because a lot of weight can suddenly show up with these “doodads.”

    * Derma-Safe Folding Utility Knife instead of my pocket knife.

    * ACR Emergency whistle.

    * Two Photon lights (one white and one red) on a reflective Kelty Triptease lanyard so I know where everything is when I need it.

    * I did not carry much in the way of a first aid kit, except a small roll of duct tape, Tincture of Benzoin ampules, and a small role of Leukotape P sports tape, since I seldom blister, and we had a group first aid kit. The tincture of benzoin allows tape to stick better to the skin. The Leukotape P sticks better to the skin than duct tape. If I were hiking somewhere other than Philmont, I would bring additional items.

    * Fischer space pen and Rite-In-The-Rain All weather Mini notebook for journaling.

    * Hydropel Sports Ointment to prevent blisters if hiking in wet weather or with wet feet. Hydropel will even help the person that sweats a lot on their feet and gets blisters as a result. Apply in the night to bottoms of dry feet. Start applying a couple days prior to your hiking or anticipated wetness. Do not carry the whole tube, but put enough in a small container to last the trek.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 7
    Typical trail sunset – though you never do get used to them.

    Some other items are personal medicines, sunglasses, and a “stash” of coffee, if you are a big coffee drinker. If you really need your caffeine, Trader Joe’s chocolate-coated espresso beans (150 calories/ounce) were really popular on our treks. Remember to bring a cotton bandana for cooking and personal needs.

    Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems

    Philmont requires separate sleeping clothes from what you wear during the day, because your hiking clothes could become contaminated with spilled food, thus leaving odors on your clothing that bears might be attracted to while you sleep. Philmont is very serious about bear avoidance. They spend a lot of time teaching crews the “Philmont” way to prevent bear attraction. Please do not challenge them on these issues, just go with the flow. They have been very successful in preventing most bear attacks with thousands of Scouts going through the Ranch, always camping in the same fixed locations.

    Your sleep clothing choices depend on a) whether you sleep warm or cold, and b) the rest of your sleep system. Night temperatures are rarely colder than the mid-30s. I sleep cold and wore the insulation layers mentioned above, as well as my Mountain Hardwear Stimulus jacket over top. If it was warm, I did not wear the Cocoon Pullover; if it was in the low 40s or 30s, I wore everything. I was very cozy, much warmer than previous Philmont treks. I attribute this to the R1 Hoody and wearing the rain jacket – two changes for 2008 that kept me toasty me during the cold nights.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 8
    Crew awaiting dinner. Please hurry!

    Philmont requires a tent; no tarps or bivies are allowed. They do not require that a tent have an integrated floor, so many lightweight options are available. The Scouts in 2002 and 2005 used the Mountain Hardwear Kiva, which holds up to four Scouts. In recent years, we have left the Kiva at home and used Black Diamond tents. I have used the Black Diamond Betamid, Beta Light, and Mega Light over the last number of years. These tents work great and are reasonably priced. Some people use the Black Diamond bathtub-type floors that are designed for their respective tents, though these are very heavy. A flat ground sheet will work fine, if you pay attention to keep from setting up in areas where water pools. Since I was under Don Wilson’s challenge to go as light as possible, I picked up a tent from Mountain Laurel Designs (MLD) Spinntex MID for 2008. This is a slightly larger version of the Black Diamond Mega Light with more tie-outs and a lighter fabric; our Scoutmaster loves having lots of space in his tent, and with just the two of us it was a palace. The MLD Spinntex MID weighed just less than 24 ounces with stakes, guylines, seam sealing, and stuff sack. We always use our trekking poles instead of carrying a separate tent pole.

    Again, with Don’s challenge ringing in my ears, I made the hardest change in my gear. I left my Big Agnes pad at home and used a Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4 length closed cell pad, cut down to fit in my G5. Now, I have to say, it was much better than I originally thought or remembered. Initially, I did wake up more often, but after a few of nights, I slept really well. I certainly didn’t miss inflating and deflating the Big Agnes, nor did I mind the lack of padding beneath my lower legs.

    In a tent, a 30- to 40-degree bag will work well when combined with some of your insulation layers. I have used a (sadly discontinued) Bozeman Mountain Works Pertex Quantum Arc X down bag the last couple of years. I highly recommend down bags for Philmont because they are light and compact into a small space. Fear of wet down can be alleviated by lining my pack with a pack liner, into which I stuff my sleeping bag and extra clothes. I have never had a problem with wet clothes in fifteen-plus years of backpacking.

    There are lots of manufacturers of bags under 2.5 pounds, such as REI, EMS, Campmor, Montbell, Western Mountaineering, GoLite, Nunatak, Big Agnes, Jacks ‘R’ Better, Marmot, Gossamer Gear, Backpacking Light, Feathered Friends, Mountain Hardwear, The North Face, Lafuma, Sierra Designs, and Kelty. One of the cheapest and lightest options for scouts would be the Campmor brand bags, such as the Goose Down 20 Degree Mummy regular sleeping bag (2 pounds 4 ounces) for $119.99. You may be able to find some of the manufacturer’s sleeping bags on sale somewhere on the web.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 9
    Author on the trail with his Gossamer Gear G5 silnylon backpack and Backpacking Light STIX carbon fiber trekking poles.

    One other topic that concerns people at night is bugs. We really never had problems with bugs. Very rarely have I needed my headnet, though I did use it in 2008 when I inhaled one too many black flies one day.

    Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont

    Philmont will issue gear to your crew if you do not bring your own. The Philmont gear is heavy and designed to take the constant abuse that Scouts can deliver. If you plan well, you will not have to take much or any of Philmont’s heavy gear. Below is a discussion of the gear listed in “Philmont 2008 Guidebook to Adventure.”

    The first item is a nylon dining fly (12 x 12 feet) weighing about 4 pounds. Its two collapsible poles weigh about 1 pound. Instead, have your crew take a silnylon tarp that’s at least 8 x 10 feet, along with extra titanium stakes and lightweight line. In place of the dining fly poles, our crew used two hiking poles tied together to give them added height, just single poles if we wanted to keep the tarp low.

    Do not use the Philmont tents, since they weigh about 5.5 pounds for two people. There are many current lightweight options under 2 pounds per Scout, like the Black Diamond Beta Light, Mega Light as well as the GoLite Shangri-La 2 or 3 Tarp/Shelter. Others are Sierra Designs Origami 2 Ultralight 2-person, Gossamer Gear Squall Classic tent, and the Tarptent Rainshadow 2.

    The cook kits Philmont provides range in weight from 4 to 6 pounds per cook group, and cutlery kits weigh 0.5 pound. Our crew cooks as one group, and we use a 6-liter pot (4 liters is a bit small), and a 2-liter pot for some desserts. Another option for desserts is to mix them in plastic bags. Replace the pot lids with heavy duty tin foil lids, which will be lighter, and tape off the sides of the pots and spray the bottoms with black high temp stove paint. The black-bottomed pots will boil water much faster, conserving fuel and speeding up the food prep process. Also, all stoves should be used with some sort of foil wind screen, even if it is not windy. Leave the frying pan at home. The only cutlery item you need is a large spoon and a serving cup with a handle. Leave the spatula at home. A large number of crews have used the turkey bag cooking method while at Philmont because cleanup is a snap.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 10
    Sunset from Mount Philips, 11,711 feet.

    We have always taken two stoves when, in theory, we could get by with only one. The option I am thinking about for my next trek is to take a MSR Simmerlite stove and one 22-ounce fuel bottle with pump, and, as a backup, take a Bushbuddy stove. I’ll only use this option if we are allowed to have fires. In 2008, Philmont started to carry a number of butane/propane canisters at the trading posts/commissaries. I received a number of comments recommending the MSR WindPro canister stove. The reports I have from crews at Philmont in 2008 was that the MSR WindPro worked much better than the white gas stoves. The canister usage for the whole trek was reported to be approximately three 8-ounce canisters per stove when using two stoves per crew. With all these great reports on the canister stoves, it sounds as though they represent a more ideal solution than the white gas stoves we have used in the past – especially with the ability to purchase canisters at the backcountry commissaries and with the staffed camps willing to take the empty canisters as trash.

    The next item from the Philmont cook kit is hot-pot tongs (two pairs), weighing about 0.5 pound. I never saw a use for these, since we bring a cooking bandana (our only cotton item) that works well for grabbing hot items.

    The camp shovel, weighing about 1 pound, is a relic of early days when latrines were dug at each camp (as I did during my 1970 trek). Today, every campsite has an outhouse, so we leave this behind.

    Also provided are plastic trash bags, salt, and pepper. The plastic packets in which you carry your food provide sufficient space to stuff your trash, but trash bags may come in handy as emergency rain wear, if a Scout’s rain gear gets lost. Salt and pepper in individual little packets generate a lot of small pieces of trash. A better option is to bring a small container of each, along with some additional spices for your trail meals.

    Philmont provides scrub pads, toilet paper, and small containers of both dish soap and hand sanitizer that we take. We also bring an additional hand sanitizer bottle with us so that we have them readily available when cooking, eating, or returning from the outhouse. We think this is one of the most important aspects of avoiding sickness on the trail.

    Philmont also provides Katadyn Micropur water purification tablets and we make sure everyone is carrying at least one strip of ten tablets.

    The Ranch uses a plastic strainer to filter food particles out of wash water and drain it into an underground sump. A spatula is used to scoop the larger food particles from the strainer to be thrown in your trash. We have not taken either strainer or spatula the last two years. Instead, we purchase two 1-gallon paint strainer bags (for spray painting) from Home Depot. Use one bag for five days, trash it, then use the other for the remaining days. It worked great and is very light.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 11
    Crew heading down the trail. Some folks apparently enjoy being pack-mules.

    Philmont provides bear bags and bear ropes. We have always taken their bear bags and ropes, but after our 2007 trek, I received information on a new alternative for the bear ropes. I met Paul Mergens on my 2007 trek. He recognized me from my article and shared what he is doing and had confirmed by Doug Palmer, the Head Philmont Ranger. He used ropes similar to the AirCore Pro URSA Dyneema Bear Bag Hanging Ropes. He ordered Amsteel Blue Ropes 2.5 millimeter (7/64 inch) with a tensile strength of 1400 pounds and weighing less than 0.5 pounds/150 feet. He stated costs were approximatley 14 cents/foot, and that the ropes performed well with no wear. Because of the small diameter, the Scouts needed to use a small stick with the rope wrapped around to haul the heavy bear bags up. Different lengths have been recommended, but I would do the main rope at 150 feet and “oops” rope at 100 feet. A number of crews, including ours, used these ropes in 2008 with great success.

    Equipment Provided by Your Crew

    This section addresses those miscellaneous gear items that your crew may bring with them that will not be supplied by Philmont.

    Philmont recommends a sewing kit with heavy thread and needle. During our past treks, we brought a “hotel” sewing kit, but we never used it for anything other than draining blisters.

    Bring enough tent stakes to put up all your tents, plus the dining fly (in windy conditions) instead of the recommended ten per person.

    Two to three collapsible water containers, 2.5 gallons each, are recommended so that when you go to dry camps, your crew can bring extra water. In 2002, a number of us brought extra Platypus 2.5-liter containers and in 2005, a few of the crew brought 2.5-gallon containers that they could inflate and use as pillows at night. Either way works, but it is convenient having some larger containers. In 2008, I brought two 1.5-liter and one 2-liter containers, beside the 500-ml one in my pocket, for a total of 5.5 liters carrying capacity. I also recommend that you have the crew fill all their water containers and purify them prior to going to bed so you can hit the trail immediately in the morning. You usually need to remind the Scouts to make sure this happens.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 12
    Author in his rain gear, Mountain Hardwear Stimulus hat and jacket, along with the ULA rain wrap. The stuff in the G5 pack is protected by a plastic pack liner inside.

    Two or three backpacking stoves are recommended. We brought two MSR Simmerlight stoves. Since we had two stoves, we did not bring a stove repair kit, but we did bring two 33-ounce and one 12-ounce fuel containers. We ended up with way too much fuel. I think that a 33-ounce fuel container per stove will provide adequate fuel in between food/fuel pick-ups. Next Philmont trip, I will most likely bring an MSR WindPro canister stove with a Bushbuddy stove as back-up.

    One crew first aid kit is required, but the list of items in the kit Philmont suggests is a bit much. Our first aid kit was not any different than we take on a weekend trek. Every Ranger-staffed camp has extensive first aid supplies, trained first-aid providers, and the ability to transport people out of the backcountry, so you will not need to provide care for multiple days.

    A number of our crew brought along duct tape wrapped around each of our hiking poles. I also had Leukotape P on my hiking sticks. The duct tape was used for a number of things during the trek, but the most important was to patch holes and tears in rain suits. The Leukotape P sticks better on skin, so that is used for blisters and first aid. During my WTS-I course, Andrew Skurka pointed out that the extra weight of the tape on my poles creates a bit more work for me as the poles swing back and forth. His solution is to pack small rolls in his pack.

    One waterproof ground cloth (5.5 x 7.5 feet) per tent is recommended, but we only brought a thin Polycryo ground cloth for myself, and my tent mate used an Adventure Medical Kit Heatsheet Blanket. Both of these ground sheets worked well, and for those that think these ground cloths do not last, this was the second Philmont trip for mine.

    Three 50-foot lengths of 1/8 inch nylon cord are recommended, but we only brought one 50-foot length of AirCore Plus Spectra Rope. All tents and dining flies were pre-strung with AirCore Pro Dyneema Guyline Cord Kits.

    Philmont: How Light Can You Go? - 13
    Our crew finishing our trek at basecamp.

    Conclusion

    The original question was: How light can you really go?

    Well, my pack was 8.5 pounds when I came off the trail. I had acquired a few extra items along the trail that I was carrying for the group. When I was doing my planning, I was aiming at a 6-pound pack with just my stuff or a 7.5-pound pack with tent and stakes (see gear list below). I think the pack weight could even be reduced by another pound to 1.5 pounds. Savings of 4.5 ounces (23.9 to 19.4) on a smaller tent (MLB Superfly Spinntex), 3.3 ounces (7.7 to 4.4) using a G6 instead of G5 pack, 9.6 ounces (22.8 to 13.2) switching from the Patagonia R1 hoody and Backpacking Light Cocoon 60 UL Pullover to the Backpacking Light Cocoon 60 Pro Parka, all which saves over 17 ounces. If we really needed to save a bit more, get a sleeping bag less than 16 ounces, lighter eating bowl, forget the eye glass cleaner and the personal toilet paper, and use rocks and logs for some tent tie outs and leave some stakes at home… You see where it becomes an obsession!

    Drum roll please: you can have a 5-pound base weight at Philmont, without any shared gear.

    Really, can the guy with the 77-pound pack please stand up and show us how on earth you got all that in there?  Unless you broke your ankles, in which case we will leave you alone.

    Links:

    About the Author

    Doug Prosser is an Assistant Scoutmaster for Troop 257 in the Ventura County Council, California, with 14 years experience. He lives in Camarillo, which is located on the coast in southern California, and has participated in numerous hikes in the local mountains, planning many treks into the High Sierra for his Troop. He attended Philmont Scout Ranch as a Scout and as a leader, most recently in 2007 and 2008. He started out with a 50-pound-plus pack and continues to lighten his load, always looking for a better way of backpacking. His friends have dubbed his garage “Doug’s Camping World.” Doug has a strong interest in teaching both kids and adults how to enjoy backpacking. He continues to train and gear up for a John Muir Trail hike in August 2009, with three other graduates of the Backpacking Light Wilderness Trekking School Desert Southwest Course of 2008. Doug is looking forward to his 2010 Philmont trek, which will be the fortieth anniversary of his 1970 trek to Philmont as a scout.

    2008         2005       Weight Change
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND oz Comments CATEGORY ITEM BRAND oz oz
    HIKING CLOTHES Rain Hat Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Rain Hat 2.5 Breathed well, blocked rain. HIKING CLOTHES Rain Hat Dorfman Pacific 4.3 -1.8
      Short Sleeve Shirt Troop REI shirt 7.3 Dark blue was hot, shirt was pretty heavy.   Short Sleeve Shirt Troop Cool-max Shirt 5 2.3
      Zip-Off Pants with Built In Briefs Ex Offficio Amphi Convertible 12.8 Third trip to Philmont, still working well.   Zip-Off Pants with Built In Briefs Ex Offficio Amphi Convertible 12.8 0
      Merino Socks DeFeet WoolEator XL 1.9 Really love these socks, thanks Andrew Skurka!   Hiking Socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-Crew Socks 2.9 -1
      Trail Shoes Solomon XA Pro 3D Ultra size 13 + custom orthotics 39.4 No problems, no blisters.   Trail Shoes Lowa Vento II, Size 13 46.4 -7
    OTHER ITEMS WORN/CARRIED Cotton Bandana Survival Bandana 1.5   OTHER ITEMS WORN/CARRIED Cotton Bandana Survival Bandana x 2 (one for cooking; one for everything else) 3.2 -1.7
      Lanyard Kelty TripTease with ACR Whistle, Spyderco Knife, PrincetonTec White Light, Photon Red Light. 1.5 New batteries, plenty of light.   Lanyard Kelty Triptease with Light, Whistle, Knife, Can Opener 2.5 -1
      Lighter Cheap, Butane, No Child Locks 0.5     Lighter Cheap, Butane, No Child Locks 0.5 0
      Trekking Poles Backpacking Light STIX Carbon Fiber Trekking Poles 9.5 Really liked these new poles, so much lighter.   Trekking Poles Komperdell Pro Series AS 21.2 -11.7
      Eye Glasses Prescription 0.7 Too cheap to get the surgery.   Eye Glasses Prescription 0.7 0
      Sunglasses Clip-ons + Case 1.4 A must.   Sunglasses Clip-ons + Case 1.4 0
                Eye Glasses Case Backpacking Light Hides TechnoSkin Sunglass Case/Retainers 0.6 -0.6
                Watch/Compass/Altimeter Suunto Vector 1.9 -1.9
    OTHER CLOTHING Insulation Layer BPL Cocoon UL 60 Pullover – Large 9.3 Toasty! OTHER CLOTHING Insulation Layer PossumDown Sweater, XL 10.3 -1
      Extra Hiking Sock/Sleep Sock DeFeet WoolEator XL 1.9     Sleep Sock Warm generic socks, also used as pads on pack’s shoulder straps. 3.7 -1.8
      Rain/Wind Suit Mountain Hardwear Stimulus Jacket (No Hood) 6.9 Night layering kept me almost too warm some nights.   Rain/Wind Jacket Gossamer Gear Micropore Rainsuit Jacket XL 5.5 1.4
      Rain Kilt ULA Rain Wrap 3.1     Rain Pants Gossamer Gear Micropore Rainsuit Pants XL 4.2 -1.1
      Sleep Pants BPL Cocoon UL 60 pants 7.8 The Cocoon wear generated a few funny comments, but I was really warm.   Sleep Pants REI Polartec 100 Teton Pants, Large 10.3 -2.5
      Sleep Shirt Patagonia R1 Hoody Pullover Shirt 13.5 Great find. It has hood, thumb loops tp keep hands warm, very long to keep my rear warm. For 2010, I plan to use a BPL Merino Wool Hoody(Large, 8 oz).   Sleep Shirt LL Bean Synthetic Shirt 8 5.5
                Insulation Vest Patagonia Micro Puff 6 -6
                Hat Generic Beanie 1.2 -1.2
                Extra Hiking Socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-crew Socks 2.9 -2.9
    SLEEP SYSTEM Ground Cloth Plastic Sheeting, 1-2 mil 1.7 Worked fine even in the downpours. SLEEP SYSTEM Ground Cloth Black Diamond Betamid Floor, 20 oz, partner carried 0 1.7
      Sleeping Bag Pertex Quantum Arc X Variable Girth Down Sleeping Bag + Extra Down 18.7 Kept me warm for the last three trips to Philmont when combined w/ insulation layers. Nighttime temps only got in the 40s.   Sleeping Bag Pertex Quantum Arc X Variable Girth Down Sleeping Bag 16.4 2.3
      Shelter MLD Spinntex MID, Seam Sealed, Guylines 20.6 A palace with tons of room, very light. Partner did not carry any shelter.   Shelter Black Diamond Beta Light 22 -1.4
      Tent Stakes 11x Titanium Stakes 3.3 Partner did not carry.   Tent Stakes 6x Titanium Stakes, 2 oz, partner carried 0 3.3
    PACKING Backpack Gossamer Gear G5 Ultralight Backpack, silnylon version, size small 7.7 Second trip to Philmont for this pack, and it’s still my favorite light pack. There’s actually too much space in it for my gear and food. I could have taken a G6 (Whisper Uberlight) and saved a bit more weight, since I cut out so much volume. PACKING Backpack Gossamer Gear G5 Ultralight Backpack, silnylon version, size small 7.7 0
      Waterproof Pack Liner BPL Pack Liner 1.2 Worked great. Everything was dry every time.   Waterproof Pack Liner 3x Trash Compactor Bags (1 for us, 2 extras) 6.9 -5.7
      Sleeping Pad/Pack Frame Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4-Length Closed Cell Pad (Cut Down) 6.6 I’m a side sleeper, but was learning to use more belly and back sleeping by the time I came off trail. A Big Agnes clear pad would be really nice, but I was trying to go as light as possible. I can do without the Big Agnes but I really like sleeping on Agnes!   Sleeping Pad/Pack Frame Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4-Length Closed Cell Pad (Cut Down) 7 -0.4
                Sleeping Pad Big Agnes Insulated Air Core Pad Mummy, Extra-Long 25 -25
    COOKING AND WATER Spoon, Dish Lexan Spoon (Handle Shortened), Plastic Dish 2.1 Dish could have been lighter… COOKING AND WATER Spoon, Dish Lexan Spoon (Handle Shortened), Plastic Dish 2.1 0
      Water Bottle 500ml Dasani Water Bottle 1.2 One lesson: Carry very little water. Drink ~2 liters in camp, pee a lot on the trail, carry 500ml water.   Water Bottle CamelBak Insulated 100 oz Unbottle with Tube 9.5 -8.3
      Extra Water Bottles Evernew 1.5L (2x) and 2L (1x) 4.1 Plenty of water for dry camps.   Extra Water Bottle Platypus 3L (Only Filled for Dry Camps) 1 3.1
                Spice Kit Hot Pepper 0.9 -0.9
                Cup Plastic, for Used as Ladle for Hot Water 0.8 -0.8
    OTHER ESSENTIALS Medications Loperamide, Ibuprofen, Personal Meds 2.8 Never needed loperamide, nor ibuprofen. Brought second set of personal meds just in case. OTHER ESSENTIALS First Aid/Medications Wound, blister care, asst. medications 2 0.8
      Waterproof Notebook Rite-in-the-Rain All Weather Mini-Notebook 0.7           0.7
      Toilet Paper Quartered Shop Towels + Prep H Portable Wipes in Plastic Bags 3.5     Toilet Paper Small Amount in Zip-loc Bag 6 -2.5
      Personal Hygiene Small Toothbrush, Dental Floss 1     Personal Hygiene Toothbrush, Toothpaste, Soap in Zip-loc Bags 2 -1
      Head Net BPL Bug Net 0.4 First time I used it in three Philmont treks.   Head Net Campmor Backpacker No-See-Um Head Net 0.8 -0.4
      Cash   0.1     Cash   0.1 0
      Pen BPL Fischer Stowaway Pen 0.1 Worked well, very small.         0.1
      Eye Glass Cleaner and Wipe Generic 1.9 Hate dirty glasses, but looking for a UL alternative. Suggestions?         1.9
                Hand Sanitizer 2 oz bottle for pre-cooking/eating and post-bathroom 3 -3
                Lip Balm SPF 15+ 0.3 -0.3
                Umbrella Montbell Umbrella 5.7 -5.7
    CONSUMABLES Food 2 days’ worth 96 Average amount carried, Philmont provided. CONSUMABLES Food 2 days’ worth 96 0
      Water 0.5L 16 Average amount carried.   Water 2L 64 -48
      Water Treatment Katadyn Micropur Purification tablets 0.3     Water Treatment Katadyn Micropur Purification tablets 0.3 0
    TREK SHARED GEAR (split between 10 Scouts-adults carried none-decision of Scouts) Stove, Windscreen MSR SimmerLite Stove and Windscreen x2 (13.8 oz each) 27.6 2010 will use MSR Windpro w/ 8 oz Canisters TREK SHARED GEAR (split between 10 people on trek) “Stove, Windscreen” MSR SimmerLite Stove and Windscreen x2 (13.8 oz each) 27.6 0
      Fuel MSR 22 oz Bottles x2 (1.8 lbs each) 58 2010 will use 8 oz Canisters   Fuel MSR 33 oz bottle x2 (2 lbs each) 64 -6
      Cookpot 6L Aluminum, 2L Titanium Pots 32     Cookpot 4L Aluminum Pot x3 (10.8 oz each) 32.4 -0.4
                Guylines REI Braided Nylon Cord, 1/8 inch, 100 ft 5.6 -5.6
      Dining Fly Silnylon 10 x 8 ft Tarp, 4x Titanium Stakes 16     Dining Fly Silnylon 10 x 8 ft Tarp, 4x Titanium Stakes 16 0
      First Aid Kit AMK Weekender With Some Additions 23     First Aid Kit AMK Weekender With Some Additions 23 0
      Spice Kit salt and pepper 4     Spice Kit Salt, Pepper 4 0
      Cooking Utensils MSR Folding Large Spoons x2 and Spatula 2.7     Cooking Utensils MSR Folding Large Spoons x2 and Spatula 2.7 0
      Bear Hanging Bags x3 (8 oz each), Amsteel Blue Ropes 2.5mm 150 ft (8 oz) and 100 ft (5 oz) 37     Bear Hanging Bags x3 (8 oz each), Philmont-provided rope, 150 ft (2.5 lbs) 64 -27
      Sunscreen 4 oz Bottle 5.4     Sunscreen 4 oz Bottle 5.4 0
                Bug Juice 3M UltraThon Repellent 2.5 -2.5
      Sewing Kit Hotel Kit 0.1     Sewing Kit Hotel Kit 0.1 0
                Repair Kit Nylon Ties, Pins, Clevis Pins, Stick of Hot Glue 2 -2
      Strainer Paint Strainer Bags x2 0.4     Strainer Provided by Philmont 8 -7.6
      Dish Soap 3 oz Camp Suds 3.4     Dish Soap 3 oz Camp Suds 3.4 0
      Scrub Pads 2x Cut Down Scrub Pads 0.6     Scrub Pads 2x Cut Down Scrub Pads 0.6 0
      Hand Sanitizer 4 oz Purell x2 10     Hand Sanitizer 4 oz Purell x2 10 0
      Digital Camera Pentax Optio S 50 9     Digital Camera Pentax Optio S 50 9 0
      Maps Philmont Official WP Map and Holder 5.3     Maps Philmont Official WP Map and Holder 5.3 0
                       
                       
    WEIGHT SUMMARY  2008       WEIGHT SUMMARY  2005      
    Weight Saved (oz)   oz lbs kg   oz lbs kg  
    -24.4 (1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 79.0 4.9 2.2 (1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 103.4 6.5 3.0  
    -51.1 (2) Total Base Weight in Pack 120.2 7.5 3.5 (2) Total Base Weight in Pack 171.3 10.7 4.9  
    -48 (3) Total Weight of Consumables 112.3 7.0 3.2 (3) Total Weight of Consumables 160.3 10.0 4.5  
    -5.1 (4) Total weight of Trek Shared Gear 23.5 1.5 3.2 (4) Total weight of Trek Shared Gear 28.6 1.8 0.8  
    -104.2 (5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) + (4) 256.0 16.0 7.3 (5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) + (4) 360.2 22.5 10.2  
    -128.6 (6) From Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) 335.0 20.9 9.5 (6) From Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) 463.6 29.0 13.2  

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review

    Totally synthetic, good soles, and a XCR membrane for wet weather use, plus a range of width fittings including really wide. Very good under some winter conditions, but with a curious defect which limits their use.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 1
    Courtesy New Balance.

    Overview

    These were covered briefly in a Spotlite Review, and a promise was made to provide a full review after they had been well exercised. I will assume you have just read the Spotlite and not go over the stuff mentioned there.

    Field Testing – Locations

    They have been tested under a rather wide range of conditions: everything from extreme winter snow conditions through mild three-season conditions in harsh rocky country to lazy river walking. In general they have been very good, with one exception.

    Snow Use

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 2
    Day two of the winter trip.

    These shoes were worn by both the author and his wife in a winter snowshoe trip which went ‘slightly off-course’. You can read all about the trip at When Things Go Wrong.

    While things did go rather wrong over all, the shoes did not. Both my wife and I had got them half a size too big – partly by accident, but this allowed us to wear two pairs of thick wool socks inside the shoes. That extra padding, plus the Gore-Tex lining and the Gore-Tex gaiters, meant we had nice warm feet every day of the trip.

    My wife did try wearing just one pair of socks inside the shoes, but found that the reduced padding allowed the straps of her snowshoes to be felt by the top of her arches. The tongue of the shoes is not all that padded.

    Some people worry that joggers are only good for wearing with light packs. This is a silly argument, as the difference in total weight on your feet between a pack of 10 kg and a pack of 20 kg is really only the difference between, say 80 kg and 90 kg on your feet. You have to include the weight of your body.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 3
    Portering in to a remote ski base camp.

    Anyhow, on a subsequent skiing trip we used the joggers for the walk in to a hut with rather heavy loads. The creeks were all flooded, and we could not safely drive in. When you are carrying full winter gear, plus skis, plus base-camp food, your pack does get heavy. The joggers coped just fine.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 4
    Portering back out of the remote ski base camp, with rubbish.

    Coming back out we weren’t carrying as much food (of course), but I was carrying a large load of rubbish. We had spent some time cleaning up the area. The New Balance MT1110GT joggers went just fine on my Yowie snowshoes. Very little wear was visible on the shoes at this stage.

    Three-Season Use

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 5
    Low down in the rainforest at Barrington Tops.

    My wife wore her New Balance MT1110GT joggers on a multi-night trip around the Barrington Tops in mid-summer. This is an isolated plateau region based partly on volcanic basalt. The vegetation ranges from dense rainforest, as shown above, to near-alpine conditions.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 6
    Bad weather on top of Barrington Tops.

    Unfortunately some of the weather up top was a shade damp, but my wife’s shoes functioned very nicely despite that. Yes, her socks did eventually get wet, but we are fairly sure that the water got in by wicking down her trousers, not through any leak in the Gore-Tex liner. Well, if there was a leak, it wasn’t noticed. The soles gripped nicely in both the mud at the bottom and the wet alpine conditions up top.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 7
    Rough country in the Kanangra-Boyd Wilderness area.

    Another trip we used the New Balance MT1110GT joggers on was a traverse of five peaks in the Kanangra-Boyd Wilderness area. It was an extension of a classic ‘Three Peaks’ trip. This is harsh rough rocky country with no tracks. The joggers had to cope not only with the rock underfoot, but with the scrub brushing against the mesh top layer.

    The soles gripped well and showed little wear. The uppers also showed little wear. That ‘cosmetic mesh’ on top is not fragile! In fact, after being worn on many rough walks, the joggers continued to function very well and to show little wear.

    River Walking

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 8
    The gentle Coxs River valley.

    However, the life of one of the pairs of shoes came to an abrupt end in a most unexpected manner, while we were on a gentle walk down the Coxs River. Well you might ask, how this could be? The problem is that walking parts of the Coxs River means you have to cross it many times as one side, then the other, becomes impassable. We have been up and down this river many times and are used to doing this: we just walk across the shallow water without worrying about it. ‘Cross early and cross often’ seems to be the message.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 9
    Gaps in the sewing.

    But we had not allowed for what can only be described as a bungle at the factory in China. The shoes are well made, and the Gore-Tex liners are well done. But around the base of the tongue on each shoe there were gaps in the sewing. You can see the gaps in the photo here: they are where the screwdrivers disappear inside the shoes. The tips of the screwdrivers are in between the Gore-Tex liner and the outer structural parts of the shoe. The thin blue lines show where the sewing is missing on each side of the tongue.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 10
    Walking across the Coxs River.

    We waded across the river many times, kicking up the sand at the bottom and flexing the shoes. As we did this, the sand was able to creep through these gaps and inside the shoe, in between the GoreTex liner and the body. It settled down at the edges of the inner sole, mixed with the glue which bonds the inner sole to the foam sole, and formed hard lumps along the edges. They appeared especially around the ball of the foot where it flexes. They were extremely uncomfortable and made the shoes unwearable – like having small stones in your shoes.

    New Balance MT1110GT Joggers Review - 11
    Opening the shoes up for cleaning.

    On the Coxs river trip, I was wearing my favourite summer joggers, Dunlop KT26s, and had no trouble. My wife was wearing her MT1110GT joggers, and it was those which filled up with sand. When we got home I pulled her shoes apart to see what was going on, and saw enough to verify the claims made above. There were little lumps of sand scattered all along both sides where the purple lines are. I tried to remove all the sand, but I found that unless I really ‘deconstructed’ the shoes I was just not going to succeed. The sand was too stuck in place. I gave up, as I was not sure I could reconstruct the shoes afterwards.

    Summary

    The New Balance MT1110GT shoes are very nice, hard-wearing but fairly light joggers with a good Gore-Tex membrane. Being available in half sizes and a 4E width fitting (as well as narrower versions), they should fit most walkers. Bought a half-size too large to allow for extra socks, they make excellent winter walking and snowshoeing shoes.

    They also make excellent walking shoes for harsh rocky country. Both the soles and the uppers seem to be able to take harsh treatment. The Gore-Tex membrane seems to handle early morning dew very well.

    But unless you modify the shoes by hand-sewing across the blue lines in the photo above, you should not take these shoes into the water or even into very sandy places. If you do sew them up they should be OK – I think. I have sewn my pair up and they continue to provide excellent service.

    Specifications

      Manufacturer:

    New Balance

      Year/Model:

    2008

      Manufacture:

    China

      Materials:

    synthetic fabrics and rubbers, no leather, plus XCR membrane

      Last:

    SL-1 (see New Balance’s site for their definition)

      Size: – 6

    13, 14, 15 in D, EE and EEEE fittings

      Weight:

    Quoted 385 g (13.5 oz) each, measured 406 g (14.3 oz) for US size 11 EEEE (BPL measurement)

      Colour:

    what you see is what you get

      MSRP:

    not quoted

    What’s Good

    • A fairly low weight
    • A wide range of width fittings
    • A flat inner sole and footbed
    • Very good friction on the sole
    • No leather or suede anywhere

    What’s Not So Good

    • Sand can get inside the body through gaps in the stitching

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review

    Although the Scarp 2 incorporates several weight-saving and space-making design elements to create a friendly, roomy, well ventilated, and stable tent for two campers, these benefits do not come without compromise.

    Introduction

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 1
    The Tarptent Scarp 2 on a late winter visit to the alpine tundra in southern Colorado. The Scarp 2 is a two-person double-wall three-season tent weighing 3.25 pounds, or a winter-light four-season tent weighing 4.5 pounds, and it has two doors and two vestibules and loads of interior room.

    Until recently, hikers looking for a really lightweight (around 3 pounds) two-person double-wall tent had to choose from a short list, namely the Big Sky International tents (Evolution, Convertible, Montana, and Revolution), Terra Nova Laser, and MSR Carbon Reflex 2. Selecting an ultralight double-wall tent can be frustrating, because in order to cut weight, some manufacturers have made compromises in tent size, fabrics, features, and durability. The addition of the new (May 2009) Tarptent Scarp 2 may make the selection a little easier because it has two doors with vestibules, loads of interior room, good ventilation, value pricing, and it weighs just 3.25 pounds. Is the Scarp 2 the new standout in this category, or does it have some limitations of its own?

    Specifications

      Year/Manufacturer/Model 2009 Tarptent Scarp 2
      Style Three- or four-season, two-person, double-wall tent with floor and two side entry doors with vestibules; freestanding in four-season configuration
      Included Tent body, fly, one aluminum hoop pole, six aluminum stakes, stake sack, tent stuff sack
      Fabrics Fly and floor are 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon; mesh interior is 0.7 oz/yd2 (23.7 g/m2) ; nylon interior is 1.1 oz/yd2 (37.3 g/m2), uncoated but calendared for water resistance
      Poles and Stakes One Easton 0.340 in (8.6 mm) 7075-T9 aluminum center hoop pole, PitchLok corners and center supports contain a total of ten 18-inch (46-cm) carbon fiber struts in webbing sleeves, six Easton aluminum tubular 8-inch (20-cm) stakes
      Floor Dimensions Manufacturer Specifications:
    Length: 86 in (218 cm)
    Width: 52 in (132 cm)
    Height: 45 in (114 cm)
    BPL Measured:
    Length: 86 in (218 cm)
    Width: 50-52 in (127-132 cm)
    Center Height: 45 in (114 cm)
    End Height: 24 in (61 cm) at sleeper’s head
      Features Single lateral hoop pole, fly and interior pitch as one unit, two side entry doors with vestibules, two top vents, truncated ends with PitchLok corners, two mesh storage pockets, three- and four-season configurations
      Packed Size 20 x 5 in (51 x 13 cm)
      Total Weight BPL Measured Weight Three-Season Version: 3 lb 4.9 oz (1.49 kg)
    Manufacturer Specification: 3 lb 6 oz (1.53 kg);
    BPL Measured Weight Four-Season Version: 4 lb, 8.1 oz (2.04 kg)
    Manufacturer Specification: 4 lb 9.5 oz (2.08 kg)
      Trail Weight Measured Weight Three-Season Version: 3 lb 4.1 oz (1.48 kg)
    Measured Weight Four-Season Version: 4 lb, 0.1 oz (1.85 kg) (excludes stuff sack and stake sack)
      Protected Area Floor Area: 31 ft2 (2.99 m2)
    Vestibule Area: 12 ft2 (1.11 m2)
    Total Protected Area: 43 ft2 (3.99 m2)
      Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio 13.2 ft2/lb for three-season version, 10.7 ft2/lb for four-season version
      MSRP US$325
      Options Opting for the nylon interior adds US$20 (adds 2.5 oz/71 g), US$135 if purchased separately; two exterior Easton 0.340 aluminum cross poles US$30 (17 oz/482 g)

    Design and Features

    The Tarptent Scarp 2 incorporates some unique design characteristics to increase interior space and minimize weight. The tent is supported by one lateral hoop pole in the center that spans the living space plus two vestibules, and the ends of the tent are truncated by means of Tarptent’s patent-pending PitchLoc corners and struts. These design elements are not totally new – Terra Nova, Exped, and Hilleberg use a single hoop pole in certain models – but the implementation is typical Tarptent ingenuity.

    Another unique feature (for the US) is the Scarp double-wall tents pitch as one unit (interior plus fly), so setup is faster and dryer than the typical two-step setup of attaching poles to the inner tent then laying the fly over it. Further, the Scarp 2 is available with either an all mesh or a solid nylon interior, and exterior cross-poles are available to make the tent more wind stable and storm worthy for four-season use. Although none of these elements are new (except the PitchLoc corners), what is new is combining these space-making and weight-saving elements into one tent.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 2
    The Scarp 2 is available in three-season (top left and right) and four-season (bottom left and right) versions. The three-season version has a mesh interior and single hoop pole. The four-season version has a solid nylon interior and adds two exterior cross poles to tension the fly.

    Some hikers prefer a solid nylon interior in a three-season tent, rather than a mesh interior (many Europeans do). There are several advantages: there’s more privacy, it’s warmer, and it sheds any condensation dripping from the fly. Opting for the solid nylon interior adds 2.5 ounces to the weight and US$20 to the cost.

    Like the Big Sky International Convertible and Montana, the four-season version of the Tarptent Scarp 2 is rated for light-duty winter use, meaning it will withstand moderate winds and snow loads. It is not a bomber/alpine/expedition tent capable of withstanding extreme conditions. The advantage is light weight (4.5 pounds) and versatility. Many hikers want to go on an occasional winter camping trip in better weather to backcountry ski and experience the winter splendor, and a winter-light tent is a good choice for that situation.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 3
    Views of the Tarptent Scarp 2. The side view (top left) shows the single lateral ridge pole (in yellow sleeve) used in the three-season version. The end view (top right) shows the tent’s PitchLok triangular corners and straps on the fly used to attach exterior cross poles for four-season use. The top view (bottom left) shows how effectively the exterior cross poles extend and tension the fly, and also shows the tent’s dual top vents. A downward view (bottom left) shows the tent with the vestibules open.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 4
    Outside features. The ends of the tent are truncated (left) resulting in more usable inside space. Tarptent’s new PitchLok corners (center) enable the truncated ends and add stability. They consist of carbon fiber struts inside a webbing sleeve and fold together for packing. The tent’s two top vents (right) face opposite directions, and partially close with a clip and loop.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 5
    Inside features. Each vestibule (left) has 6 square feet of storage area, enough for a large pack, boots, and more. There are two small mesh pockets (center) at the head end that lie on the floor. Each vestibule door has a side-release buckle at the bottom (right) to relieve tension on the zipper.

     

     

    For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. Video tour of the Tarptent Scarp 2 in both three- and four-season configurations.

    Editor’s Note: we are having technical difficulties getting our Flash player to work.  To watch the video tour, please click the down arrow and watch in the new page, then go back in your browser to return to the article.  We are working on this bug and hope to get it resolved soon.  Thank you for your patience!

    Performance

    Setup is similar to the Tarptent Rainbow tents, except the hoop pole is lateral rather than longitudinal. Insert the pole into its sleeve and attach the ends to grommets, stake one end of the tent, stake the other end, then adjust stakes and tension. The center hoop pole extends and tensions the vestibules. I found the Scarp 2 a little fussier to adjust compared to other tents, but it has a total of ten Line-Lok tensioners to keep the tent taut.

    The ergonomics and usable space of the Scarp 2 are excellent. The dual side entries make it very convenient for two people to inhabit the tent, and each person has his/her own vestibule for storage. When the vestibule doors are closed, the entry doors in the inner tent can be left open to incorporate the vestibules into the tent’s usable space. And the Scarp has loads of usable space for two people: the floor is an honest 50 inches wide, the inside length is 86 inches, minimum height at the ends is 18 inches, and maximum height in the center is 45 inches. The Scarp is an excellent tent for tall hikers. My only complaint is the tent’s design does not allow for large and convenient storage pockets; the Scarp 2 has only two small mesh pockets at the head end, and they are just big enough for a pair of glasses.

    Late winter and spring is a good time for testing tents, because of the frequency of snow and wind storms. I tested the Scarp 2 in numerous storms, and found:

    • Without the exterior cross poles, the canopy compresses a lot with a coating of wet snow or a strong wind. It also flaps a lot in the wind.
    • With the exterior cross poles installed, the tent deflects snow and wind well.
    • The supplied Easton 8-inch tubular stakes hold well in soil, but they do not hold well in snow or sand. Specialized snow stakes are necessary for snow camping.
    • The PitchLok corners and cross poles have a tendency to pull the stakes out of the ground, especially in snow and sand, unless they are inserted at a 45 degree angle.
    • Wind-driven snow and rain can enter the tent through the top vents. There is no way to close them completely or adjust them from inside the tent.
    • The bottom of the fly is 6-8 inches above the ground. Sand and dust blow in during a desert windstorm, and spindrift comes in during a windy snowstorm. A fly with snow flaps is not available for winter camping, but it helps to pile snow around the perimeter of the tent to reduce spindrift.
    • The nylon interior is essential for snow camping. It prevents spindrift from entering the interior living space, and retains heat. I measured a 15 F inside/outside temperature difference one cold morning.
    • When not in use, the straps on the fly used to connect the cross poles blow around in the wind and abrade the silnylon fly. I recommend removing them to save 0.5 ounce and eliminate their flapping around.
    • The inner tent is not tensioned very much because it basically hangs from the fly. This creates a lot of space between the inner tent and fly (6-10 inches) for good ventilation.
    • The Scarp is well ventilated due to its raised fly, abundant air space between the inner tent and fly, and two top vents. On a windy night, a breeze circulates through the tent, but the mesh interior does a good job of minimizing it, and the nylon interior provides even more protection.
    • Because of the Scarp’s corner and end struts (total of 10) the tent can’t be stuffed, rather its best to gather the struts at each end, fold the tent body to their length (18 inches), roll it up, and insert it into the stuff sack.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 7
    Without the exterior cross poles, a small amount of wet snow really compresses the tent’s canopy (left). With the cross poles installed, dry snow readily slides off (center). The vestibules are raised 7.5 inches off the ground, so snow comes in at the bottom (right).

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 8
    the PitchLok corners and exterior cross poles have a tendency to pull stakes out of snow and sand (left), so it’s important to use long stakes and drive them in at a 45 degree angle. The Scarp has a 6-10 inch air space between the inner tent and fly (center), which helps ventilation. Dust and pollen stick to the silnylon fly (right), which is true for any silnylon tent.

    Tarptent Scarp 2 Tent Review - 9
    The Scarp 2 can be pitched with the fly and poles only to create a very roomy single wall floorless tent weighing 2 pounds 6.6 ounces. I tested the fly-only configuration on one trip, by myself, and found it big enough to sleep three people! The raised sidewalls allow breezes (and bugs) to pass through the tent.

    The Scarp 2 has excellent ventilation, consisting of raised sidewalls, a large space between the inner tent and fly, and two top vents. I experienced little or no condensation in the Scarp 2 when there was some air movement. However, I still had heavy condensation on the inside of the fly on several occasions (a calm, still night with a large temperature drop), which is normal. Many people prefer a double-wall tent because it “eliminates the condensation problem”. That’s a myth. A double-wall tent’s insulating air space avoids the formation of condensation to some extent, but there are still many occasions when condensation forms on the inside of the fly. The inner tent provides a buffer from direct contact with the condensation (which is nice), but you still pack up a wet tent in the morning.

    Assessment

    How does the new Scarp 2 compare with the competition? I assembled the following table to provide some comparative specifications. For a fair comparison, all of the tents listed are three-season, two-person, double-wall, with aluminum poles (except the MSR Carbon Reflex 2, which does not have an aluminum pole option), and weigh less than 3.5 pounds.

     
    Tent Mfr. Total Weight Floor Area (ft2) Number of Doors Number of Vestibules Vestibule Area (ft2) Floor Dimensions and Height (WxLxH) MSRP (US$)
    Terra Nova Laser 2 lb 12 oz 20.7 1 1 8 35x88x37 420
    MSR Carbon Reflex 2 3 lb 4 oz 23.3 1 2 14 40x84x40 500
    Big Sky International Evolution 2P 3 lb 0.1 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 372
    Big Sky International Convertible 2P 3 lb 4.4 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 390
    Big Sky International Montana 2P 2 lb 10.1 oz 32.7 1 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 350
    Big Sky International Revolution 2P 3 lb 0.9 oz 32.7 2 2 16.8 56/46x84x42 372
    Tarptent Scarp 2 3 lb 6 oz 31 2 2 12 50x86x45 325

    Some highlights from the information in the table:

    • The floor area of the Terra Nova and MSR tents is small and the cost is high.
    • The Terra Nova Laser is definitely the lightest, but the interior is rather cramped and it has only one vestibule.
    • The Big Sky International tents are a bit lighter than the Tarptent Scarp 2, and have a little more floor area and much more vestibule area.
    • The Tarptent Scarp 2 holds its own compared to the competition. It costs a little less, but it’s also a bit smaller than the Big Sky tents and weighs a little more.

    The closest comparison is between the Tarptent Scarp 2 and the Big Sky International Convertible 2P, because both tents set up as one unit and have three-season and four-season versions. The differences are in the details. The Convertible has four large mesh storage pockets, uses two poles in an X-pattern, has larger vestibules, and costs $45 more, but it’s available with only one fly with snow flaps. The Scarp 2 has two small pockets, uses one lateral hoop pole plus ten struts, has smaller vestibules, costs less, and also is available with only one fly that has attachments for external cross poles. Both tents have two top vents. The Scarp 2’s longer length and truncated ends give lots of interior headroom, but the Convertible has steep endwalls and also has good headroom. There is no clear standout in this comparison, and the final choice depends on user preferences.

    In my opinion, the Scarp 2 is an excellent choice for a three-season tent, but I have a few reservations about it in four-season mode. The attachment of the exterior cross-poles is a bit funky and time consuming (but they work well). I asked Henry Shires at Tarptent about the possibility of using clips instead of the tie-down straps, and he explained that he tried hard to develop a clip attachment (which would be faster), but it simply didn’t work out. Another issue is the large gap under the fly, which is an asset for three-season use, but allows snow to come into the vestibules when snow camping. The only solution I can suggest is to pile snow around the perimeter of the tent, as needed, to keep wind-driven snow out of the vestibules. Finally, there’s little that can be done to prevent wind-driven snow from entering the tent through the top vents (except for stuffing something into the vent to seal it, or orienting the tent sideways into the wind, which is not recommended).

    I personally like the Scarp 2 with the nylon interior. It weighs 2.5 ounces more, but it retains heat when cold weather camping, and it sheds condensation and spindrift. Another advantage of choosing the nylon interior for three-season use is that it only requires the addition of the exterior cross-poles (US$30) to have the versatility of a three-season or four-season tent.

    What’s Good

    • Roomy two-person double-wall tent weighing 3.25 pounds
    • Utilizes a one pole hoop design and truncated ends to minimize weight while maximizing interior usable space
    • Inner tent and fly pitch together as a unit
    • Mesh and solid nylon interiors available
    • Three- and four-season versions available
    • Four-season version is very wind stable and storm worthy
    • Large air space between the inner tent and fly
    • Two doors and two vestibules
    • Plenty of space for two hikers plus gear
    • Good tent for tall hikers
    • Excellent ventilation
    • Stakes are included with the tent

    What’s Not So Good

    • Storage pockets are very small and lay on the floor
    • Three-season version flaps in the wind
    • Dust and pollen stick to the silnylon fly
    • Exterior cross poles are time-consuming to attach
    • Four-season version allows wind-driven snow to enter

    Recommendations for Improvement

    • Larger storage pockets
    • Offer a separate fly for the four-season version that has snow flaps on the bottom and closable vents on the top. This would allow the removal of the pole attachments on the summer fly.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca

    With dozens of peaks above 6,000 meters (nearly 20,000 feet), Peru’s Cordillera Blanca range is one of the highest, most rugged sections of the Andes, and the most heavily glaciated of any mountains in the planet’s equatorial zone. It is a well-known mountain climbing destination, and hundreds of kilometers of hikeable trails have made the range increasingly popular among trekkers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 1
    The Cordillera Blanca: high peaks, massive glaciers, and deep valleys with mountain pastures.

    Just an eight-hour bus ride from Lima, the Cordillera Blanca is among the most accessible high mountain ranges in the world. Not only is transportation to and from the range straightforward and convenient, but bureaucratic procedures are almost nonexistent. Independent travelers from just about any country can fly into Lima’s busy international airport and be in the mountains preparing for their multi-day hiking trip the following day with relatively little pre-trip planning. A month-long sojourn in the mountains can cost as little as $1000 USD, including airfare from the United States.

    Flying There

    If bought in advance with some flexibility of dates, plane tickets to Lima from U.S. airports can be relatively inexpensive. For instance, I was able to buy round-trip tickets from Detroit to Lima for December 2008 for $650 through travelocity.com.

    At their airport of departure, backpackers will need to check baggage containing trekking poles, gas stoves, knives, and other potentially hazardous items. I personally transport my trekking poles in a telescoping plastic poster tube, which has enough space in it for an assortment of other small items as well. If you spend a night before and after your trek in a backpacker-friendly hostel or hotel next to the Cordillera Blanca, you can usually arrange to store your protective container there for the duration of your hike.

    Visas are not required to enter Peru for tourist trips of up to ninety days. Upon leaving the country, however, you will pay a $30 departure tax directly at your airline’s check-in desk (in dollars or Nuevo Sol). Aside from a simple immigration form, no paperwork is required for entry or exit.

    Lima

    At the Lima airport, foreign currency can be exchanged for Peru’s Nuevo Sol at zero commission. Commission is charged when exchanging money back into dollars, Euros, and other currency.

    Taxis can be obtained on the spot at the airport, typically for the equivalent of $10-20 for a ride into Lima, which is a sprawling city with many neighborhoods. It is safest, however, to arrange a ride in advance through a reputable taxi service. No public transportation exists to carry travelers from the airport to Lima.

    Lima has plenty of inexpensive hostels, as well as the usual selection of high-end hotels. Depending on when your flight comes in, you may want to spend the night in Lima, or you could depart immediately for the mountains. Lima has some sights, but is not a prime tourist destination in and of itself.

    Getting to the Cordillera Blanca

    The easiest way to reach the Cordillera Blanca from Lima is to ride there with any number of bus companies. The transportation and tourist hub of the range is the town of Huaraz, a seven- to ten-hour ride from Lima, depending on the time of day and the number and duration of stops. A few of the bus companies offering service to Huaraz are Movil Tours, Cruz del Sur, and Expreso Ancash. Buses are large, modern touring buses with comfortable reclining seats. Tickets range in price from roughly $10 to $50 one way, depending on the departure time and type of seat (e.g. partially or fully reclining, or bed).

    I tried to reserve bus tickets over the phone, but was told this was impossible. So we showed up at the company’s bus terminal the next morning an hour before departure and bought tickets on the spot. We were told that seats typically fill up half an hour or so before departure. A wise move would be to have the addresses of several bus companies on you and travel from terminal to terminal around downtown Lima if tickets are unavailable. Taxis around Lima cost just a few dollars, even including the somewhat higher prices that foreigners are typically charged. You will need to settle on a price beforehand, since there are no meters.

    Huaraz

    Almost every visitor to the Cordillera Blanca passes through Huaraz, the largest town in the region with approximately 100,000 residents. Here you will have the greatest assortment of food products to choose from, as well as fuel, maps, and plenty of backpackers from around the world. Although smaller towns in the area may be closer to your chosen trailhead, Huaraz has much more information and infrastructure and is at a better altitude for acclimatizing (3,000 meters, or 10,000 feet). There are a wide variety of accommodations available, but trekkers will generally find it more useful to stay at a backpacker-oriented hostel, which offer beds as cheap as $4 a night. At the hostel we stayed at – Jo’s Place, highly recommended – we were able to find an old backpacker’s guidebook, a detailed topographic map of the mountains hanging on the wall, and partially used gas canisters left by other backpackers. Furthermore, even though it was the middle of the low season, we met several other foreigners who were setting off on backpacking trips like us. There is an abundance of mountain guides in Huaraz, but experienced and travel-savvy backpackers should have little problem organizing and carrying out their trips on their own.

    When to Go

    Guidebooks and tourism-oriented websites basically assume that backpackers will hike in the Cordillera Blanca and nearby Cordillera Huayhuash during the dry season – May to October, which corresponds to winter in the southern hemisphere. Information about hiking during the rest of the year is difficult to find. We arrived just before the New Year, which corresponds to the beginning of the rainiest period, which peaks in February. Initially apprehensive about weather conditions in this high and distant land, we found the weather to be easily manageable with wise gear choices. During the dry season, one will find far more hikers on trails, which are basically deserted during the rest of the year. Essentially, one can hike in the Cordillera Blanca at any time of year with relatively minor gear adjustments. There is no such thing as a traditional “winter” where the snowline drops dramatically and the higher areas become impassable.

    Weather Considerations

    Being so close to the equator, seasonal temperature fluctuations in the Cordillera Blanca are relatively minor. As a result, there appear to be no deciduous plants, and the transition from frost-free zone to permanent snow and ice occurs within a span of just 2,000 vertical meters. During the dry season, backpackers typically wake up to below freezing temperatures (-5 to -10 C is common) above 3,500 meters, but the unobstructed sun quickly warms the air, and one can often hike in shorts. During the wet season, nighttime temperatures are warmer (generally 4 to 8 C in the 3,500-4,500 meter range), rain is frequent but not nonstop, and skies are often overcast, obscuring the dramatic mountain views. Rain, snow, hail, and lightning are possible any time of year, especially around the high passes. Once, we had to descend from a 4,830 meter pass through a thin layer of wet snow. We did not feel that special equipment would be necessary for hiking any of the trails.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 2
    Coming down this steep trail from the pass required carefully placed side steps and a trekking pole and umbrella as stabilization.

    During the wet season, one may expect at least several hours of rain nearly every day, as well as wet trails. The rocky ground and minimal vegetation generate quite little mud. Total annual precipitation in most of the Central Andes is fairly low, and the rain we encountered was rarely heavy. We usually had several hours without rain in the morning and at least a couple of rainless hours later in the day. We feel our choice of raingear was ideal: GoLite Chrome Dome umbrellas and homemade silnylon rain skirts. This combination allowed us to hike in the rain with no loss of comfort, though getting our trail runners to dry out was occasionally a challenge. Even on the rainiest of days, however, we would still have at least a couple of hours of almost-sunshine where we could hang our socks on our packs to dry.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 3
    Negotiating a water-covered trail.

    The sun is a force to be reckoned with. A half hour of exposure at 4,000 meters or higher can leave a fair-skinned person roasted. We honestly don’t know how we would have gotten by without our reflective GoLite umbrellas, even with just a few hours of sunshine a day.

    One may encounter biting flies in the mountain valleys, but these were not a major nuisance, even during the rainy season. We had a net tent to go under our tarp, but found the bugs went away at night anyway and eventually stopped using it.

    Acclimatization

    Any multi-day hike in the Cordillera Blanca will take you to well over 4,000 meters (roughly 13,000 feet) within a day or two of starting. Most backpackers choose to acclimatize in Huaraz, at 3,000 meters above sea level. From Huaraz, one can take a number of one-day excursions around the area to aid in acclimatization. A short walk around the center of Huaraz will quickly familiarize one with the available tour options, which cost around $10.

    Food

    Huaraz has a large selection of groceries that can be used for backpacking. Smaller towns and villages in the region have a much smaller assortment. Huaraz has at least one smallish supermarket and a large market. We were able to find things like a Ramen noodle equivalent, packaged cheese, peanut butter, Oreos, banana chips, powdered milk, cream of wheat, granola, a small selection of chocolate (Peruvians don’t have the same sweet tooth Americans do), and resealable bags. Huaraz is well-stocked for backpackers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 4
    Ten days of no-cook or quick-cooking food for two people, totalling 50,000 calories. We repackaged everything in Ziploc bags for convenience.]

    Groceries may be nonexistent in mountain villages, so don’t count on being able to restock. There was just one very small store in Pishgopampa, halfway into our route, where we were able to get things like apples, cookies, matches, and toilet paper. We would have been fine without this resupply, but decided to buy a few things just in case.

    Fuel

    Gas canisters with 230 and 500 grams of gas are available around Huaraz in many travel agencies and mini gear shops, which are concentrated in the central part of town. We saw two different mixtures of propane and butane, one of which is preferable for very cold temperatures. In addition, backpacker-oriented hostels may have stores of partially used canisters left by past hikers and climbers. We picked up a couple of these for free and returned them – somewhat more used – ten days later. Pure alcohol is readily available in pharmacies, and other sources say that blue-colored alcohol de quemar can also be found. The mountains have little wood, and campfires are prohibited, so a BushBuddy is out of the question.

    Regulations

    Most of the Cordillera Blanca is located within the Huascarán National Park. A one-day pass costs under $2 per person (payable in Peruvian currency), and a one-month pass (required for any overnight stays) costs $20 per person. The fee is payable upon entering the park, but sometimes there is no one to collect it in the off-season. Camping is allowed anywhere, and human waste does not have to be packed out of the park. However, no fires are allowed. No additional permits are required to hike or climb any of the peaks – even Peru’s highest, Huascarán (6,768 meters, or over 22,000 feet).

    Crime

    While some other mountain areas of Peru, such as the nearby Cordillera Huayhuash, were the site of robberies and even murder during the years of The Shining Path, the Cordillera Blanca have never had such problems. In recent years, all mountain areas in the region are considered safe, but guidebooks still recommend hiring a guide for hiking in the Huayhuash, and local “guards” will ask for money to watch over your camps at night. In the Cordillera Blanca, none of this is necessary, but still take care to avoid attracting undue attention in inhabited areas.

    Maps and Information

    For 20 Soles ($6.50), a very basic, non-topographic map of the Cordillera Blanca can be obtained at some travel agencies in Huaraz. Unless you are walking along the most popular and well-marked path, the Santa Cruz trek, this map will probably not be sufficient for orienteering. However, the other map for sale – a detailed topographic map of the Cordillera Blanca and nearby Cordillera Huayhuash – costs 80 Soles ($25 USD). Finding this a high price to pay for our slim budget, we opted to take a photo of the map on the wall of our hostel, and this, along with the basic tourist map and practical orienteering skills, kept us on the trail we needed to go. In ambiguous spots, a careful comparison of the tourist map and the topographic map photo was enough to send us up the right valley or mountainside.

    Also very useful is a free “Map Guide” for Huaraz that has most of the information that a traveler would need – what to do in and around Huaraz and the surrounding mountains, how to get around, etc.

    Trails, Terrain, and Orienteering

    The Cordillera Blanca are high, glaciated mountains, with deep valleys that take on a pronounced U-shaped starting at approximately 3,700 meters. Few, if any, trails in the Cordillera Blanca are dedicated hiking trails. Mostly, they are used by locals – some for hundreds of years. Trails link settlements and lead to important grazing areas. Hence, they either follow valley bottoms or lead up over passes into the next deep valley. Sometimes trails cross streams, which usually have primitive bridges over them. Trails are well-worn and generally easy to follow. The less popular the route, however, the fewer signs there are, and the easier it is to lose the trail, which may at times be hard to distinguish from livestock paths.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 5
    A high mountain settlement.

    Luckily, the dramatic topography makes map reading a cinch, and the largely unobstructed landscape allows for easy cross-country travel should you stray off the trail. If you are still unsure of the route, locals will know which path to take, if any happen to be around. Even though not everyone in the mountains speaks Spanish (Quechua is the default language), saying a name place with a questioning intonation and pointing will probably be enough to make yourself understood and get an answer.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 6
    Orienteering is not a problem in open terrain such as this.

    Selecting a Route

    The most popular and well-marked trekking route is the Santa Cruz Trek (50 km), followed by the Alpamayo Trek (90 km) and a number of other less known circuits. The readily available free tourist guidebook in Huaraz has a simple map with all the trails on it, and these trails can be stitched together to make a route of anywhere from 30 to 200 or more kilometers. Based on our time schedule (ten days), we created a loop combining most of the Santa Cruz Trek and the Alpamayo Trek. We settled on this route the day before we began our hike. We chose to go in a counter-clockwise direction in order to begin with a gradual elevation rise and finish with a long descent. This helped with acclimatization, but we still experienced some headaches the first couple days.

    As you can see from the elevation profile below – which shows only the high and low points – our route took us over eight passes in nine days. Walking up and down steep passes over 4,500 meters proved to strenuous, but overall our pace and schedule were quite unhurried.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 7
    The route we chose was the following: Cashapampa village – Quebrada Santa Cruz valley – Punta Unión pass – Tuctu village – Alto de Pucaraju pass – Quisuar village – Tupatupa pass – Pishgopampa village – Laguna Sactaycocha lake – Huillca village – Quebrada Alpamayo valley – Laguna Cullicocha lake – Hualcallan village.

    Getting To and From the Trailhead

    Getting to your trailhead from Huaraz could prove challenging without some knowledge of Spanish. This is one more reason to choose a backpacker-oriented hostel for your first couple nights in Huaraz, because you’ll be able to meet other backpackers and share important information. In our case, we took a local minibus to the town of Caraz, where we were immediately approached by a mototaxi driver who had guessed our itinerary and took us to the location in town where cars filled up to take people up the mountain to Cashapampa, where our trailhead was. On the way back, we were approached by a taxi driver in Hualcallan and taken to Caraz, where we took the same kind of minivan bus back to Huaraz. As a general rule, one can figure out transportation on the go and count on the locals having long ago figured out where backpackers need to go and how to take them there.

    Water

    Water is always nearby in the mountains even in the dry season, since trails generally follow deep gullies with glacier-fed streams. However, much of the mountains are grazed by cattle, sheep, horses, donkeys, and pigs as high as 4,500 meters or more. Nearly ubiquitous cow patties led us to treat 100% of our water with AquaMira. Even where there seemed to be no cattle, donkeys on the trail would leave patties of their own, and we were never completely sure that the water we were getting was untainted. We did not notice any filters for sale in Huaraz, but it is highly likely that iodine drops could be obtained in mini gear shops or pharmacies.

    Locals

    In general, Andean mountain dwellers appear cheerful and friendly towards strangers. If you speak Spanish (or better, Quechua), it will be easy to talk to people and find about their life. Their Spanish is often easier to understand than that of Peruvians who grew up speaking it at home and have a much larger vocabulary.

    However, you will probably encounter people – especially children – who ask you for candy or other things. We actually had a grown man run a quarter mile down a slope just to tell us, “Dame un caramelo” (give me a piece of candy). To be honest, we felt put off by people who would bluntly ask us for candy without having even talked to us. Once, we were feeling ungenerous and refused some children candy, and they only left us alone after we had turned them down multiple times for chocolate and money as well. Generally, it is wise to carry along a bag of lemon candy or similar treats to give to locals whom you feel inclined to treat. Unfortunately, most of them will just toss the plastic wrappers on the ground, since they’re apparently not yet aware of the difference between biodegradable and non-biodegradable trash. In fact, we are sure that most of the trash left on trails is from local residents and guides, not foreign backpackers.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 8
    We met these friendly, colorfully dressed children, aged seven to twelve, walking up to a 4,500 meter pass without their parents, who were celebrating the New Year far below.

    Livestock

    The only negative aspect of our backpacking trip was encounters with cows, who at times viewed us as intruders. On some steep slopes cows may be reluctant to get off the trail, forcing you to somehow go around them or scare them off. One must be attentive to the cows’ mood and movements to judge whether they are indifferent, on guard, or aggressive. An indifferent cow looks at you curiously and continues to chew its cud. A cow on guard stares at you and stops chewing its cud. An aggressive cow moves towards you while staring at you without chewing. Aggressive behavior is usually the result of having calves around. The smaller the calf, the more protective the cows will be.

    Cows with calves are best avoided at a safe distance of a hundred yards or more. If you notice they have started to advance towards you, calmly walk away from them and pick up a few rocks, just in case. Once, a group of cows came running down a hill and moved towards our campsite, which was at the bottom of a large meadow in the valley. We tried to hastily break camp, but the cows got to us before we had finished. They seemed curious about us and wanted to check out our campsite, but we knew that if we abandoned our things, they would trample everything and slobber all over our food. Once the cows were about thirty meters away, I began blowing my emergency whistle as we continued to pack up. The cows didn’t know what it meant and continued moving towards us, albeit more slowly and unsurely. Finally we had moved everything to the nearby collapsing stone outhouse, and from there began tossing pebbles at them. Meanwhile, some other hikers had responded to our whistle and stood a kilometer away on a ridge to see what was up. After five minutes or so of pebble throwing, we were able to get the herd to stop trying to move closer to us, and by advancing towards them, we finally got them to start moving away from us in another direction. Cow herds are very inert indeed.

    Do not underestimate cows. Even though guidebooks and websites on the Cordillera Blanca make virtually no mention of them, we told locals about our scary encounter with the cows, and they cautioned us to be careful and told us about a herder who had been gored by a bull. Presumably, cattle are less of an issue during the dry season, when there are far more hikers on the trail, the cows may move elsewhere to graze, or the calves may have grown up.

    Shelter Choice and Site Selection

    We chose to use a generous 10 x 10 foot silnylon tarp to provide more coverage during the Andean rainy season and believe this was a good choice. We were not at all cramped and could comfortably cook under the tarp during the rain. Surprisingly, we encountered almost no nighttime wind. Site selection is limited due to the dramatic topography and tufty Andean grass, and almost all our campsites ended up being in pastures at the bottom of deep valleys. After our encounter with cows, we searched for spots out of sight of any grazing cattle. Finding a dung-free patch was sometimes a challenge.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 9
    Tarp camping at 4,650 meters above sea level.

    Conclusion

    Our hiking adventure in the Cordillera Blanca allowed us to see and experience magnificent mountains larger than anything we had ever seen before. We faced consistently wetter conditions than we had hiked in before, and were pleased to find that our rain gear, quick drying clothes, and generous tarp allowed us to avoid any discomfort or loss of hiking time due to rain. Finally, through our many conversations with local mountain dwellers, we came away with an awareness of how people live in the Andes – how they have changed the mountains, how the mountains have shaped their civilization, and how their lifestyle is changing in the modern era.

    As we read about other mountainous regions of the Central Andes, it appears that the logistics are much the same everywhere. Inexpensive local buses and taxis take backpackers to all the popular hiking destinations, and services have cropped up to provide them with the supplies they need. Based on our experience in the Cordillera Blanca, we would feel confident making visits to mountain ranges in southern Peru, Bolivia, and much of Chile and Argentina with very little advance planning except for gathering some phone numbers and addresses of bus companies or hostels in important locations. These mountains are magnificent, accessible, enjoy fair weather, and are perfectly suited for lightweight backpacking.

    Ultralight Backpacking in Peru’s Cordillera Blanca - 10
    At the end of the trail.

    Rick          
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND MODEL WORN PACK
    FOOTWEAR Trail Runners Inov-8 320 776.0  
      Socks SmartWool N/A 39.0  
      Gore-Tex Socks Rocky N/A   75.0
      Thongs Teva N/A   201.0
      Socks SmartWool N/A   70.0
    TREKKING CLOTHES Bottom Base Layer Icebreaker 150 Leggings   155.0
      Bottom Shell Layer Homemade Momentum Wind Pants 74.0  
      Top Base Layer Icebreaker Mondo Zip 200 249.0  
      Shirt GoLite Drimove T-shirt 103.0  
      Top Shell Layer CAMP Magic Jacket   128.0
      Top Insulating Layer Montbell UL Down Inner Vest 174.0  
      Underwear ExOfficio Polyester Sports Briefs 63.0  
      Shorts Generic Polyester Running Shorts   117.0
      Eye Protection Polaroid Sports Sunglasses 21.0  
      Shell Gloves Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitts   34.0
      Top Insulating Layer BackpackingLight Cocoon PRO60 Parka   350.0
      Insulated Pants MontBell UL Down Inner Pants   208.0
      Weatherproof Coat Montane Quickfire   324.0
      Sun Protection GoLite Visor 30.0  
      Headgear Generic Fleece Headband   20.0
      Mosquito Headnet Simblissity UL Mosquito Headnet   10.0
      Insulating Gloves PossumDown Gloves   41.0
    TREKKING GEAR Trekking Poles Titanium Goat AGP Poles 202.0  
      Umbrella GoLite Chrome Dome 222.0  
      Altimeter/Compass/Watch High Gear Summit 63.0  
    PACKING GEAR Backpack Zpacks Blast 32   217.0
    CAMPING GEAR Tarp Generic 10 x 10 Silnylon Tarp   530.0
      Ground Sheet Adventure Medical Kits 2-Person Emergency Blanket   85.0
      Bug Net Homemade Hanging Bug Shelter for Two   210.0
      Stakes Generic Cheap Plastic Stakes   140.0
      Tarp Guyline AirCore Pro URSA Dyneema Rope 50′ plus Carabiners   75.0
      Quilt BackpackingLight PRO60 Quilt   330.0
      Bivy Titanium Goat Ptarmigan   190.0
      Sleeping Pad Gossamer Gear 104 x 150” Hammock Pad   250.0
      Emergency Bivy Adventure Medical Kits Emergency Bivy   93.0
      Sleeping Bag Liner Jag Bags Silk   149.0
      Stove MSR Pocket Rocket   111.0
      Pot MSR Titan   130.0
      Spoon BackpackingLight Long-Handled Spoon   9.0
    MISC GEAR Personal Hygiene       150.0
      First Aid Kit Homemade     150.0
      Maps       100.0
      Water Container Platypus 2.5 Liter Reservoir   36.0
      Odds & Ends   Repair Kit, Flashlight, Batteries, Matches, MP3 Player   200.0
      Water Treatment AquaMira Drops   80.0
      Camera Canon G7 w/ Extra Battery, Charger, Memory Cards   500.0
    CONSUMABLES Food   10 Days   7500.0
      Fuel   2 Small Fuel Canisters   400.0
      Water   1 Liter   1000.0
    Total Weight     lbs g kg
    Total Weight Worn/Carried     4.4 2016.0 2.0
    Total Pack Weight     12.0 5468.0 5.5
    Total Consumables Weight     19.6 8900.0 8.9
    Total Initial Weight (Pack + Consumables)     31.6 14368.0 14.4
    Full Skin Out Weight     36.0 16384.0 16.4

    Kim          
    CATEGORY ITEM BRAND MODEL WORN PACK
    FOOTWEAR Trail Runners Salomon XA Comp 650.0  
      Socks SmartWool N/A 40.0  
      Socks Keds N/A   48.0
      Thongs Generic N/A   180.0
    TREKKING CLOTHES Bottom Base Layer BackpackingLight UL Merino Wool Leggings   103.0
      Bottom Shell Layer GoLite Women’s Wind Pant 94.0  
      Shorts Adidas Running Shorts   89.0
      Top Base Layer REI All Weather Polyester Zip Pullover 186.0  
      Shirt Nike Fit Dry Ultrawicking Top 156.0  
      Underwear Victoria’s Secret Micromesh Panty 13.0 13.0
      Top Shell Layer Marmot Windshirt w/ Hood   133.0
      Headgear Generic Fleece Headband   20.0
      Top Insulating Layer Western Mountaineering Flight Jacket   349.0
      Eye Protection Generic Sunglasses   24.0
      Mitts REI N/A   60.0
      Shell Gloves Homemade Silnylon Rain and VB Mitts   15.0
      Mosquito Headnet Coghlan’s Headnet   30.0
    TREKKING GEAR Umbrella GoLite Chrome Dome 222.0  
    PACKING GEAR Backpack Zpacks Blast 18   120.0
    CAMPING GEAR Quilt Jacks ‘R Better Rocky Mountain No Sniveller, w/ Hood and Stuff Sack   900.0
      Spoon REI Lexan Spoon   12.0
    MISC GEAR Personal Hygiene       180.0
      Water Container Platypus 2.5 Liter Reservoir   36.0
      Odds & Ends   Flashlight, Batteries, MP3 Player   160.0
    CONSUMABLES Food   10 Days   5000.0
      Water   1 Liter   1000.0
    Total Weight     lbs g kg
    Total Weight Worn/Carried     3.0 1361.0 1.4
    Total Pack Weight     5.4 2472.0 2.5
    Total Consumables Weight     13.2 6000.0 6.0
    Total Initial Weight (Pack + Consumables)     18.6 8472.0 8.5
    Full Skin Out Weight     21.6 9833.0 9.8

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River

    Stretches of the Madison River can be described as a “booze cruise,” where innertube flotillas of relaxing college students and drift boats of fly-fishers fill the river. The Bear Trap canyon isn’t one of those stretches, especially during spring snowmelt.

    Introduction

    Finding pals who both own a packraft and know how to packraft is not easy business. Finding instructors who know how to teach packrafting to others is even harder. When I received RSVPs from seven outdoor educators (including a handful of accomplished packrafters) to join me on a packrafting trip down the Madison River so we could all learn to packraft from each other, I knew I was onto something pretty special. The deal was simple: there were no costs, no fees, and no pay; we’d teach each other, we’d probably swim, and we’d have a heckuva good time.

    So when we all convened at Ennis Lake on the morning of May 28, the least I could do was make everyone pancakes and bacon on a decidedly heavy Camp Chef. Our goal was simple: paddle our way to Three Forks, Montana, forty-five miles downriver. We’d start with a few hours of practice at Ennis Lake, then some river skills practice in the whitewater below Ennis Dam, and finally, a run down the Madison River starting with some of the most hallowed wilderness whitewater in the state of Montana: Bear Trap Canyon. We figured perhaps we’d end at the famous location along the trail of Lewis and Clark: the headwaters of the Missouri River.

    4,000 cfs Baby!

    The Madison River was running full tilt in response to a heavy snowpack and warm temperatures: nearly 4,000 cfs (base flows average 1,200 cfs). These are flows that elevate the normally Class III canyon into a Class IV-V froth of deadly rapids: Whitehorse, the Kitchen Sink, and the Green Wave, while turning normally tame Class IIs into solid IIIs. We knew we wouldn’t be able to float the big rapids, but we were surprised at the difficulty involved in negotiating the rest of the upper canyon. Fast, technical whitewater with serious consequences: big holes, unending hydraulics, and lots, and lots, and lots of massive rocks. So, we spent most of the evening on the first day negotiating Class II-III whitewater in the upper canyon cautiously and carefully. Three of us took swims in strong eddy lines and rock holes, getting ‘bandersnatched’ (sucked backwards) into the hydraulics. As the light faded and reading the complex current became more difficult, we called it an evening, bushwhacked up the canyon wall to a trail, and found a four-star campsite on a grassy beach. We went to bed tired, but rewarded.

    Not Stupid OR Suicidal

    The next day, we walked three and a half miles of trail to bypass massive rapids, including a twelve-foot reverse curling roller at Whitehorse, the bus-sized recirculating hole of the Kitchen Sink, and massive complexity at the Green Wave. There had been no registered attempts, commercial, or private, to float the river since May 12, when the river started to rise. We later learned from hardcore kayakers that running the Bear Trap this time of year should be considered something between stupid and suicidal.

    So, at 11:00 a.m. on May 29, we finally dropped in at Bear Trap Creek for a continuous run to Three Forks. We’d float a mile of technical Class II that allowed us to practice our pirouettes and snicker-snacks through a series of rock gardens, followed by miles and miles of more tame Class I-II water that included strong eddies and big wave trains to provide plenty of interesting boating. By the end of the day, we had covered thirty miles, finding a remote island camp after exploring a side channel barely wider than our little boats. As our campfire faded into the darkness of the evening, those of us remaining awake witnessed a treasured and rare event: Montana fireflies. We spotted four of them, blinking intermittently across the stream, twenty feet from our fire. The Montana firefly is an elusive and extraordinarily rare creature, having only been witnessed by select few.

    Nothing Like Having Your Blood Drawn

    The warm feeling of sharing our camp with fireflies faded soon as we went to bed and removed several less elusive creatures (ticks) from our clothing and skin, along with anything resembling a tick with paranoiac fury – burrs, pine needles, extra clumps of hair, moles, etc.

    On May 30, we continued our voyage to Three Forks, exploring tiny, meandering side channels probably unknown to other boaters, napping lazily when the river flow slowed to a crawl, and sharing a tin of smoked oysters towards the end of the trip. Upon our arrival at the confluence of the Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers, shortly after we entered the headwaters of the mighty Missouri, a Gallatin County Search and Rescue boat captain (on a training exercise) shouted enthusiastically, “Look at those! Alpackas! They only weigh four pounds and can run whitewater!”

    What It’s All About

    We beached our boats with renewed confidence, discussed the design and execution of Backpacking Light’s new Introduction to Packrafting course and a newfound enthusiasm to teach others about safely planning and executing their own packrafting expeditions.

    That evening, surrounding a table at Bozeman’s MacKenzie River Pizza Company, we talked about our varying states of job security, homelessness, investments, parenting, marriage, and religion. It was clear that our eclectic little group was about as diverse as a Brooklyn Book Club, but our common thread was strong, and we cemented our commitments to each other through an ultralight ethic, a big and wondrous river, and a new mode of travel that left us feeling more than just a little bit giddy.

    Participants: Darin Banner, Scott Christy, Carol Crooker, Brett French, Sam Haraldson, Ryan Jordan, Mike Martin, and Andrew Skurka.

    Photos: Ryan Jordan, Olympus 790SW

    More:

    Learn to Packraft with Backpacking Light’s Wilderness Trekking School

    Read about packrafting in the book Packrafting! by Roman Dial

    Watch a video about a packrafting trek through Beartrap Canyon by Ryan Jordan and Bill Stadwiser

    Read an article in the Bozeman Daily Chronicle, by Amanda Ricker

    Read an article in the Billings Gazette, by Brett French

    More articles about packrafting at Backpacking Light

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 1
    We spent the morning of our first day getting used to packrafts at Ennis Lake. Sam Haraldson paddles calm waters while the Tobacco Root Mountains set the scene.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 2
    We spent a lot of time flipping and getting back into boats. Mike Martin braces with his paddle, reaches across, and hurls himself back in – a valuable skill that might become necessary as we attempted Bear Trap Canyon.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 3
    Mike Martin watches sunrise on the canyon cliffs with the river far below.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 4
    Sam Haraldson meanders through brush high on the canyon walls towards the Bear Trap Creek put-in.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 5
    Mike Martin paddles below a massive rockslide, caused by an earthquake in the 1990s, that trapped many campers in Bear Trap Canyon by obliterating the road.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 6
    The Madison River is home to roosting pelicans in the spring. During the peak season of April and May, one can drift quietly beside flotillas numbering into the hundreds.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 7
    We experimented with many types of pack lashing systems, including this one utilizing Nite-Ize Figure 9 fasteners and nylon accessory cord.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 8
    Sam Haraldson floats by a packraft-eater.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 9
    Sam Haraldson explores the Madison Cliffs, home to riverside micro-ecosystems rich in plant and animal life, including swallows and rattlesnakes.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 10
    Scott Christy follows the gang along the Madison Cliffs.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 11
    Carol Crooker has second thoughts about not bringing a shelter, with hostility building in the background. When it’s 80 degrees and sunny at the put-in, you tend to make these kinds of decisions.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 12
    A bald eagle wonders if Darin Banner is vulnerable in the little Alpacka below.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 13
    Darin Banner enjoys a quiet moment in an eddy at sunset as we evaluate our camping opportunities.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 14
    It’s getting late, and Carol’s hungry. An expedition packrafter learns to do everything while in the boat, including eat, drink, treat water, brew coffee, brush teeth, and even pee.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 15
    Finally, we found a side channel that led to an island camp with cottonwoods and evergreens that would provide us wood for fire and cooking, plus shelter from the storm.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 16
    We all left shelters back at the car, so we had to be creative about storm protection. Carol propped her boat in the branches of a tree and slept under it…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 17
    …as did Sam…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 18
    …while Ryan tied his between two trees, hammock-style…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 19
    …Andy went for an engineered, freestanding-structure…

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 20
    : …while Scott borrowed poor Darin’s boat for a two-raft lean-to.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 21
    A small fire warmed our hearts, boiled water for our meals, and always seems to be a welcome addition for any river trip.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 22
    Andy Skurka distributes boiled water rations for meals and hot drinks in the evening.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 23
    Alpenglow on the cottonwoods.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 24
    Sunset on the hidden side channel leading into and out of our island campsite.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 25
    Andy Skurka gets ready to start our last day of paddling.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 26
    A lazy flotilla of packrafters approaching Three Forks, Montana (L to R): Scott Christy, Brett French, Darin Banner, Andrew Skurka, Mike Martin, Carol Crooker, and Sam Haraldson.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 27
    Scott Christy negotiating wood in a side channel connecting the Madison and Jefferson Rivers.

    Photo Essay: Packrafting the Madison River - 28
    Final strokes: Scott paddles past the final eddy to our takeout on the Missouri River near Trident, Montana.