You don’t have access to view this content.
SUL BikeRaftFishPacking (BFRP)
An SUL approach to multisport: bikepacking, packrafting, and tenkara fly fishing.
An SUL approach to multisport: bikepacking, packrafting, and tenkara fly fishing.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Adapting SUL for mountain conditions, where frequent weather extremes necessitate more capable gear.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Adapting SUL for mountain conditions, where frequent weather extremes necessitate more capable gear.
You don’t have access to view this content.
The SUL Mindset may be more than gear weights, and performance standards.
âSuperUltraLightâ (SUL) backpacking is an affectionate term that has become one descriptor for carrying a base weight of less than five pounds (other descriptors that Iâve heard include âarrogantâ, âpointlessâ, and âstupidâ). The purpose of this commentary is to expand the definition of SUL that considers a bit less rigidity, a bit more principle, and a bit more opportunity for the backpacker who chooses to study this subject intentionally.

That I can take a 1600 cubic inch volume pack into the mountain backcountry for an overnighter, without sacrificing comfort or safety, continues to make me smile and reflect in wonderment about this recreational niche we call lightweight backpacking.
When the concept of SUL was first introduced here in 2003 {http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/00138.html}, I mistakenly offered as its basis a metric (oneâs base weight) and a performance standard (a base weight of less than five pounds). This sparked (sometimes pharisaical) competitiveness in our community that led to new standards (e.g., âeXtreme UltraLight – XULâ) because too many people were adopting SUL style (and early converts were no longer uniquely identifiable by their five pound base weights). In our effort to meet these new standards, we discovered that pants with bellowed cargo pockets could hold a lot of gear that didnât count against our base weight.
In reviewing the progress of âSUL styleâ over the past 10 years, I had to ask myself what SUL has evolved into, and Iâve come to the conclusion that SUL hasnât really changed much.
I know, I know. This makes it tough to sell subscriptions. But itâs true! The gear really hasnât changed that much. Down sleeping quilts are still down sleeping quilts, and theyâre still light. Backpacks made with whisper thin fabrics that tear to shreds in brambles and canât hold sewn seams when theyâre loaded with food are still around. âSULâ tents still donât hold up to mountain storms very well. Thereâs been no drama in materials engineering for titanium, carbon fiber, or fabrics that weigh less than 0.5 oz per square yard.
I could end this article here and youâd know most of the story, probably.
Except that SUL has evolved into something much more than just the gear. In fact, where SUL in 2003 was all about the gear (and the weight of that gear), I think SUL today is independent of the gear. Itâs all about you, and your mindset.

Logical cases can be made that most backpackers hiking only a few miles on the weekends arenât going to enjoy the benefits of âSULâ style as much as, say, a thru-hiker. Nothing could be further from the truth. SUL enables and empowers casual recreational backpackers by motivating them to get out more often, going places they may not have had the confidence to go with a heavier pack, and giving them the confidence needed to engage more deeply with wild places.
If youâve been around this community for the past 10 years, and have tried and practiced SUL style, then youâve probably gone through some evolution in developing that style.
Hereâs a few highlights that Iâve learned along the way.
It no longer matters to me whether my base weight is six, four point five, or three pounds. Being entertained by carrying an SUL pack on a high mountain trail is entertainment enough without having to know the exact weight of every item to the nearest tenth of ounce. I rarely, if ever, weigh gear if Iâm practicing SUL, although I will weigh my pack, fully loaded, with food and water, before I hit the trail. That exercise still makes me smile.
Even in SUL gear, yes. I donât save weight on an SUL trip by selecting the absolute lightest item possible. I save weight by taking fewer items (see #3 below). The biggest change Iâve made over the years is in my selection of a pack. Having shredded my fair share of sub-half-pound packs through the years while bushwhacking or scrambling, Iâm over it. The monetary cost of a failed pack is always painful and I could never get over the feeling that backpacking gear shouldnât be disposable.

Even in a tiny pack and under the constraint of the arbitrary âfive pound base weight standardâ, I can pack a full set of raingear, a full set of down insulating clothes, and a full-perimeter tent, and be prepared – and comfortable – in the event of hostile weather.
This is the part about SUL I appreciate the most. Iâve learned to hike with fewer items through the years, and Iâve learned to care a lot about the items that I do carry. SUL takes âThe Essentialsâ to a much higher level and mandates that your skills be exceptionally high when practicing this style of backpacking in inclement conditions. I get far more personal satisfaction about practicing skills when faced with a challenge, than when relying on an advanced piece of gear to meet that challenge.
This is the part that confuses people. But if Iâm carrying an expedition pack capable of swallowing 70 liters and carrying 40 pounds, and 50 liters of the pack is occupied by 35 pounds of food, guess what? Yep, itâs SUL.
In closing, itâs very hard for me today to uphold some sort of performance metric that identifies SUL, or for that matter, UL (âUltralightâ) or LW (âLightweightâ) backpacking. I recognize the value in these metrics in terms of educating newcomers, but beyond that, I see little value in them.
The real value of the âSUL conceptâ is its ability to identify an extreme implementation of this incredibly interesting hobby (lightweight backpacking), and then to practice and execute it on a real trail in real wilderness where previously, you carried more.
In conclusion, I see SUL as a manifestation of something far more important than your ability to comparison shop for the lightest gear or to show the world how light your pack really is. That âsomethingâ may be different for you, than for me.
For me, SUL as a mindset has motivated me not only to be very intentional about what I take on the trail, but also to be very intentional about how I count the costs of all sacrifices that I make with time, finances, material possessions, and relationships. To that end, the practice of SUL has not just made backpacking more interesting and rewarding for me. As a life strategy, the practice of SUL has made every day of my existence more interesting and rewarding, whether on the trail or not.
If you’re a fan of fry-baked meals in the backcountry, and you are reading this article, it’s not likely you’re one who gets real excited about carrying the two-pound classic Banks’ Fry Bake. Here are some options for lighter gear and techniques for fry-baking as a solo traveler, or in smaller groups.
You don’t have access to view this content.
New and evolving technologies necessitate a reexamination of the conventional wisdom of down versus synthetic fill insulation.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Tunnel Tents Tutorial and State of the Market Report – Mini Reviews
You don’t have access to view this content.
A well-made quilt that offers high-quality materials, high fill-power down, and excellent loft for an incredible price.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Bored with water in the backcountry? Need to make hydration more appealing for your group? Add some flavor to your water, and vanquish any fear of dehydration or scurvy.
You don’t have access to view this content.
In Part 1, Fany and Nick embarked on a challenging journey with an unlikely companion: their 3 month old. Two years and another 750 km later, 30 month old Flora has completed the entire traverse. Thru-hiking with a toddler can be as rewarding as it is challenging.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Guidelines for evaluating watershed geography and streamflow to help ask the question: is this creek runnable in a packraft?
You don’t have access to view this content.
Do odor-proof bags work? How do supposedly “odor proof” plastic bags for backpacking hold up to the keen nose of a Police K9?
You don’t have access to view this content.
Part 3 in our series on satellite communications focuses on the currently available two-way texting devices suitable for lightweight backpacking.
You don’t have access to view this content.
These new trail shoes have gone the way of the Vibram sole. How does this development affect performance?
You don’t have access to view this content.
In the high country, runoff doesnât always coincide with what we all consider to be backpacking season, where trails are dry and the days are sunny. That being the case, here are some tips for trekking, packrafting, and camping in the spring snow and muck.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Part 2 in our 3 part series on satellite communications focuses on the currently available sat phones suitable for lightweight backpacking.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Packing to combine adventure travel and wilderness recreation.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Part 1 in our 3 part series on two-way satellite communications for lightweight backpacking.

Globalstar phone and Internet coverage map
After too much Type 2 and Type 3 fun, my wife wanted me to be able to call 911, and to stay in touch with her when in the backcountry. I had sent satellite phones with scientists to worldwide locations for more than 10 years, and new devices like the SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger had just reached the market. So I did some market research to fill my needs. At one point, my wife said something like âmaybe other people would want this information.â Little did I know how much work lay ahead.
This article is the first in a three part series on two-way satellite communications for lightweight backpacking. This Part 1 is an introduction; briefly describing alternatives, how satellite systems work, and each of the satellite systems you might consider. Part 2 covers satellite phones, and Part 3 covers satellite text-only devices. All the information in this series comes from vendor web sites and online reviews, except for the âPersonal experienceâ sections.
Why might you want two-way satellite communications while backpacking? Ignoring serious concerns about self-sufficiency and disconnecting from the grid, the most common reasons seem to be:
Two-way communications with first responders, family, or friends can mean the difference between life and death, between Type 2 fun and an unnecessary rescue, between saving your own life and unnecessarily risking the lives of rescuers.
The August 2011 Outside magazine article Panic Button describes the search and rescue problems with one-way devices like PLBs and SPOT.
Letâs briefly review other technologies you might use for wilderness communications.

Verizon USA coverage map
Many wilderness areas have little or no cell phone coverage, especially where you are furthest away from civilization. You might want to take a smart phone anyway, see Part 3.

Hughes 9202 BGAN satellite terminal
You may have seen TV journalists sending videos from war zones using portable Broadband Global Area Network (BGAN) satellite terminals. The lightest terminals weigh 1-2 kg and cost over $1,000 new, or you can rent one. You must add a phone to make phone calls, and a laptop, tablet, or smart phone for Internet access. Look into these if you really need medium speed Internet access from the backcountry – âup toâ 492 kbps – and you are willing to carry the extra weight.

Yaesu ham radio
Ham radios can be light and cheap, with no service charges, but you must pass an exam to get a special license to use one. The range of small, light ham radios can be very limited. You may not use ham radios for commercial purposes.

ACR ResQLink PLB
Personal Locator Beacons (PLBs) are good for one thing only: rescue in case of dire emergency. On the other hand, PLBs are relatively light, have no monthly cost, you canât call home or work, and they canât call you. Recent PLBs send an emergency signal with GPS coordinates through government-operated satellites, and a homing signal to guide rescuers locally. PLBs should be registered periodically with your contact information, to reduce false alarms. Registration is free in USA. Though sometimes used interchangeably, a PLB is different from an EPIRB, and backpackers should not use an EPIRB.

SPOT Satellite GPS Messenger
Several devices can be used to send one-way text messages, track your trip, and notify emergency services, including your GPS position. One-way devices are often lighter and cheaper than two-way devices.
Many one-way devices can send only three or four pre-defined messages – no good for âsend more Pop-Tartsâ unless you anticipated that message. And one-way devices cannot provide feedback, like âStay put, we canât rescue you until the storm clearsâ, or âAre you sure you want forty cases of Pop-Tarts delivered to Idyllwild?â
Generically, one-way and two-way satellite texting devices can be Satellite Emergency Notification Devices (SENDs), similar to PLBs. PLBs use government satellites, have no recurring fees in USA, and send emergency notices directly to rescue authorities, while SENDs use commercial satellites, with recurring fees, and send emergency notices through commercial monitoring services first.

Attaching a message to a Signal Corps carrier pigeon, circa 1917-18, from NARA via Wikimedia
Carrier pigeons can be used for communication up to 1,600 km. Pigeons weigh 300 g to 450 g, and need about 50 g per day of feed, plus a cage. You can use a pigeon just once per backpacking trip, making them impractical for lightweight backpacking. Some commercial photographers routinely send 256 GB SD cards with photos and videos by carrier pigeon. A carrier pigeon with a 4 GB memory stick was faster than DSL in a 2009 race in South Africa. For return messages, you must train another set of pigeons to fly to pre-arranged spots along your trip. You can access the Internet over carrier pigeons, using well-defined standards (see RFCs 1149, 2549, and 6214), but you will have problems with high latency, and high packet loss due to hawks and other raptors. I donât recommend Skyping over this connection.

Iridium phone, satellite, and ground station (not to scale)
Satellite signals must travel in a direct path between your device and a satellite, and between a satellite and a ground station, which is connected to the phone system and the Internet. Satellite signals are even weaker than cell phone signals, blocked by buildings, mountains, canyon walls, trees, and sometimes, heavy rain or snow.
Satellites are expensive: Globalstar, Iridium, and Orbcomm lost many satellites due to launch failures or other problems; the original Iridium system cost an estimated $6 billion; and Globalstar, Iridium, Orbcomm, and Terrestar have gone through bankruptcy. With cell phones covering over 90% of the worldâs population, the satellite system market is small. Satellite devices and plans are much more expensive than cell phones, and generally have far fewer features.
Two-way satellite systems have three basic designs:
A âbent pipeâ satellite immediately retransmits your phone call, text message, or Internet connection, back to a ground station within sight of the satellite. These satellites are relatively simple. Globalstar, Inmarsat, Terrestar, and Thuraya are âbent pipeâ systems.
A âspace networkâ system can relay your phone call, text message, and Internet connection between satellites until a ground station is in view. These satellites are much more complex than âbent pipeâ satellites, but require fewer ground stations for global coverage. Iridium is the only âspace networkâ system.
In a âstore and forwardâ system, the satellite receives and stores your text message until a ground station is in view, then forwards your message. Messages are delayed for 1 to 100 min each way. You cannot make phone calls or use the Internet over these systems. Orbcomm is a hybrid âbent pipeâ and âstore and forwardâ system.
The voice quality of most satellite systems is good to just acceptable. Some systems are consistently better than others, though all vary depending on many factors.
Have you ever used dial-up Internet access? That was blazing fast compared to satellite Internet access for lightweight backpackers. You should be rich, extremely patient, and use special setups designed for low speeds and interrupted sessions.
Commercial communication satellites are placed into two very different kinds of orbits around the Earth: Geostationary orbits (GEO), 35,786 km above the equator, and low earth orbits (LEO), at fixed heights from 772 km to 1,400 km high. If the Earth were the size of an NBA basketball, LEO satellites would be about 4-8 cm away, and GEO satellites would be about 2 m away.
A GEO satellite appears to hover at a fixed position over the equator, more-or-less in the southern sky as viewed from the northern hemisphere. Three GEO satellites can provide virtually worldwide coverage. Each satellite needs just one ground station to connect to the phone system and to the Internet. GEO satellites need large antennas, powerful transmitters, and large solar panels, and they are designed to operate for up to 20 yrs. Satellite TV (e.g. DirecTV, Dish Network), weather forecasting, and missile warning systems use GEO satellites.
What are some of the downsides of GEO satellites?
You need 44 to 66 LEO satellites, plus spares, to provide full-time coverage worldwide. LEO satellites are launched into many different orbits 772 km to 1,400 km high, crisscrossing the sky. Each satellite circles the Earth in about 100 min. Any satellite is visible 9 min at a time on average, even less with local obstructions, so longer connections require hand-offs from one satellite to another. âBent pipeâ systems using LEO satellites require dozens of ground stations to provide nearly worldwide coverage – your device must be within about 5,000 km of a ground station. âSpace networkâ and âstore and forwardâ systems can use just one ground station, but usually have several. LEO satellites have smaller antennas, lower power transmitters, and smaller solar panels than GEO satellites. LEO satellites donât last long due to atmospheric drag – sometimes less than 10 yrs. The International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope, and Google Earth photo satellites are in LEO orbits.
What are some of the downsides of LEO satellites?
Theoretically, each satellite system can cover the entire Earth, or a major portion of the Earth. In practice, satellite systems restrict coverage for technical, economic, or legal reasons. Most satellites use âspot beamsâ to focus power on limited areas, and they can determine your position close enough to allow or deny service as desired. Iridium and Globalstar do not work in several countries for legal reasons. Terrestar could cover most of North and South America, but limits coverage to most of the United States. Be sure to check the latest coverage maps and local laws before you choose a device, or take a device into a new area.
A weak satellite signal will degrade phone call voice quality, reduce data speeds, or stop connections entirely. Some of the factors that affect signal strength are:
You can avoid obstructions and orient your antenna correctly; all the other factors are determined by your device, satellite system, time, and location.
Satellite phones and text-only devices are locked to one satellite system by patents, technology, and physics. For example, you cannot switch an Iridium phone to call using Globalstar satellites. When you buy a device, you are locked into one system, with very limited choices on plans and prices. Choose wisely.
Globalstar

Globalstar covers most of the world with phone, text, and low-speed Internet services, using 48 âbent pipeâ satellites in LEO orbits 1,400 km high. Several phones use Globalstar, but Globalstar is better known for providing service to SPOT devices.
Some Globalstar satellites have problems affecting phone calls, two-way text, and Internet services, resulting in spotty coverage and dropped connections. Globalstar provides a web site that predicts coverage times for any location. You should prepare tables of locations and times just before heading into the backcountry; predictions go out only 3-4 days.
Predictions for my home town from calltimes.globalstar.com over a 3.75 day period in January 2013 showed 148 interruptions, 84% time coverage, 1 min to 107 min coverage windows, and 30 min average coverage window.
In February 2013, Globalstar launched the last six replacement satellites needed to fix these problems. Globalstar expects to put these satellites into service by summer of 2013. Check www.globalstar.com for the latest news.
One-way messages from SPOT devices are not affected by these problems.

Globalstar phone and Internet coverage map
â
Inmarsat

Inmarsat covers most of the world between latitudes 70 S and 70 N, with phone, text, and Internet services, using three âbent pipeâ satellites in GEO orbits. Inmarsat works with just one handheld satellite phone – the IsatPhone Pro. Inmarsat does not support any text-only devices. Inmarsat also supports BGAN terminals.

Inmarsat coverage map
â
Iridium

Iridium covers virtually the entire world, with phone, text, and Internet services, using 66 âspace networkâ satellites in LEO orbits 780 km high. Iridium works with several handheld satellite phones and text-only devices. The US Department of Defense is a major user of Iridium, owning and operating their own ground station in Hawaii. Iridium is prohibited by US laws from operating in Taliban controlled Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria and Sudan.

Iridium coverage map
Orbcomm

Orbcomm covers selected areas of the world for short message service only, primarily for tracking trucks, ships, and shipping containers. Orbcomm has 29 hybrid âbent pipeâ and âstore and forwardâ satellites in LEO orbits 774 km high; 29 satellites are not enough for full-time coverage. Recent Orbcomm devices switch between satellite service and cell phone service automatically. No currently manufactured Orbcomm devices are suitable for lightweight backpacking, though the Magellan GSC-100 was an interesting early device still available on the used market (see Part 3).

Orbcomm coverage map
Terrestar

Terrestar covers most of USA except parts of Alaska, with phone, text, and Internet services, using one âbent pipeâ satellite in GEO orbit. Terrestar works with just one satellite phone – the Terrestar Genus. Terrestar does not support any text-only devices. Terrestar service is supplied by a combination of DISH Network and AT&T, so you can switch a Terrestar Genus phone between satellite service and AT&T cell phone service.

TerreStar coverage map
Thuraya

Thuraya covers Europe, most of Asia, most of Africa, and Australia with phone, text, and Internet services, using two âbent pipeâ satellites in GEO orbits. Thuraya has a variety of small, light phones, and good airtime prices – useful if you are traveling in their coverage area. Thuraya also supports a BGAN-like satellite terminal.

Thuraya coverage map
| Â | Orbit | Type | Phone | Text | Internet speed | USA coverage |
| Globalstar | LEO | Bent Pipe | Yes | Yes (1) | 9.6 kbps | 48 states, most of Alaska |
| Inmarsat | GEO | Bent Pipe | Yes | Yes | 2.4 kbps | 49 states, southern Alaska |
| Iridium | LEO | Space Network | Yes | Yes | 2.4 kbps | 100% |
| Orbcomm | LEO | Hybrid (2) | No | Yes | None | Patchy |
| Terrestar | GEO | Bent Pipe | Yes | Yes | Unknown (3) | 49 states, most of Alaska |
| Thuraya | GEO | Bent pipe | Yes | Yes | 160 kbps down, 30 kbps up | None |
The performance of any satellite system is strongly dependent on the devices you use, how you use them, and where you use them. Reviews really compare devices and use cases, not systems. Still, we can compare satellite systems based on design, operations, and available devices.
So in my not-so-humble opinion âŚ
Best: Iridium
OK: Inmarsat, Terrestar
Marginal: Globalstar
Non-players: Orbcomm, Thuraya
OK: Terrestar
Marginal: Inmarsat, Iridium
Alternative: BGAN terminal with Wi-Fi Internet device
Not recommended: Globalstar
Non-players: Orbcomm, Thuraya
About the author
Rex Sanders has been backpacking off and on since the 1960s, and guiding whitewater rafts since 1987. In his day job, he supplied globetrotting scientists with Globalstar and Iridium phones from 2000-2011. But he never got to go on those adventures. He does not own any of these devices, and does not have any relationship with the companies mentioned here.
Ryan shares his ideal gear list for late-winter, early-spring trekking. By utilizing a snow shelter and making a few adjustments to your kit, you can push the limits of your conventional 3-season gear.
You don’t have access to view this content.
Recent developments in canister stoves have the potential to upset a lot of the industry, as the leadership seems to have passed out of the hands of Western brands and into Asia. Stoves that were trumpeted as the state of the art by well-known Western brands now look a little old, tired, heavy and, well, clunky. We look at a few of the leading edge stoves from 2012 to see where things are going.
You don’t have access to view this content.