Articles (2020)

Snags with Tags

Curious on whether or not tags add significant weight to your gear? Well they don’t! And there are far better ways to cut down on your gear weight!

Introduction

After a long arduous day on the trail, my partner Jon and I were in our tent contemplating ways to make our packs lighter. I joked to Jon that we should cut all the tags off our gear to save weight. Jon didn’t catch my sarcasm and approved the idea because he read about this technique from a couple of backpacking blogs. However, he never found an exact weight savings, but hypothesized he could shave an ounce off his pack weight. I bet $20 against him. Once back in town, since ski season was right around the corner we used Jon’s ski touring gear as the basis of the experiment.

 - 1
Jon hurriedly cutting off the tags from his ski touring gear.

The Test

Ski touring in the winter time means lots of layers and heavy packs. With each additional layer come more and more tags. We gathered Jon’s gear and started cutting off every flappy tag in sight, attempting not to accidentally cut or destroy any of the gear. Because of this, we decided not to cut all the tags that were sown flat onto the garments. After cutting the first tag, Jon hurried to weigh it, but was disheartened when the scale couldn’t make a reading because it was too light. Still determined to win the bet, he continued cutting tags for approximately ten minutes. When the scissors stopped clipping, he had collected 50 tags from 19 separate pieces of gear totaling 0.5 oz (14.1 g). For comparison a sandwich bag weighs 0.09 oz (2.4 g), a snack sized Snicker bar is 0.62 (17.5 g), and a single AA battery is 0.85 oz (24 g). By cutting 0.5 oz from the pack, a hiker that weighs 155 lb carrying a pack weighing 35 lb over a distance of 1,000 miles with no elevation gain/loss, will save approximately 367 kilocalories (Ze), or about four and a half snack sized Snickers.

Jon was disappointed he didn’t save an ounce like he had hoped, but he took comfort in having no more scratchy tags against his skin. He also didn’t have to worry about the large and obnoxious tag on his sleeping bag anymore. Jon’s joy was short-lived when he realized he didn’t know how to wash and care for his gear without the instructions provided on the tags. The disappointment continued when he was trying to dry out his gear after washing it, as he realized many of the tags doubled as hanging points. These were only minor setbacks compared to not being able to differentiate his gear because he labeled his initials and numbered different pairs of identical underwear on the tags.

 - 2
There are better ways to save half an ounce.

Summary

Given the minimal weight and caloric savings, we feel there are more effective ways to save half an ounce, unless you are attempting to go super ultra-light (less than a 5 lb pack weight). Jon admitted reluctantly, “I would rather have one less snack sized Snickers, than have trouble rotating my underwear in the field because I cut off my numbering system.” With that being said, Jon wishes he would have never cut off any tags. Since the tags are already gone, Jon can eat away his sorrows with one extra snack sized Snickers while I enjoy my new running gloves.

Works Cited

Ze [n.d.]. “Re: Calculate Calories Burned.” Hiking Science. Blogspot. 22 Mar. 2010. Web. 10 Nov. 2013.

Simplifying Expedition Food With Single Serving Sized Packages

Single serving packages can simplify shopping, packaging, and preparation of meals.

Introduction

This article will highlight, in part, how I simplify the shopping, packaging, and preparation of expedition foods by heavily relying upon single serving sized packages – especially for snacks that I eat throughout the day while on the trail (as opposed to in camp). Take note, however: I will not be discussing pre-packaged freeze dried meals. My preference is for foods that have a higher nutritional quality, a higher caloric density, and/or a lower cost than what is available in the food aisle at a local outfitter.

What I’m offering are my personal favorites in a few different categories. They are summarized in the following table.

 
Category Food Package Size Calories Caloric Density Fat Carb Protein
High Caloric Density Sahale Snacks Glazed Nuts 43 g 210 138 Cal/oz 14 g 18 g 6 g
Morale Annie’s Bunny Snacks 23 g 70 86 Cal/oz 0 g 18 g 0 g
High Protein SeaBear Wild Salmon 100 g 130 37 Cal/oz 2.5 g 0 g 26 g
High Caloric Density Walker’s Shortbread Fingers 32 g 159 141 Cal/oz 7.9 g 20.6 g 1.6 g
High Caloric Density Justin’s Almond Butter 32 g 200 177 Cal/oz 18 g 6 g 7 g
Fiber/Low-Sugar Carb Terra Sweet Potato Chips 34 g 170 142 Cal/oz 11 g 22 g 1.4 g
Morale Panda Black Licorice 32 g 100 89 Cal/oz 0 g 25 g 1 g

Perhaps some of these ingredients will find their way into your backcountry diet, or spark some interest in related foods.

#7. Sahale Snacks Glazed Nuts

I first discovered these at a Starbucks shop in Butte, Montana. I’m a fan of sweetened nuts and fruit/nut mixes more than just plain old nuts. Plain nuts (even salted and roasted) get old really fast on even short duration trips. I’ve probably returned from more trips with more weight of uneaten plain nuts than any other food.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 1
Sahale Snacks Glazed Nuts.

#6. Annie’s Bunny Snacks

The kids know what’s up with these. I like to trick myself into thinking they are healthy since they are organic, made with real fruit juice, etc. Some days, I may even believe that they’re fruit. I used to eat fruit snacks purchased in bulk from the likes of Costco (e.g., Kellogg’s), but I’ve been trying to avoid foods where the first ingredient is corn syrup.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 2
Annie’s Bunny Snacks

#5. SeaBear Wild Salmon

Single serving foil packets containing pre-cooked ground beef, chicken, tuna, and salmon are now common items found on the aisles of most grocery stores but many of them have strange additives and thus, taste a bit like, well, something else than what’s advertised. Such is the nature of most processed foods, I suppose. But the SeaBear Wild Salmon packets really are something special. I grew up in the Pacific Northwest, the son of a salmon fisherman, so I’m a little picky about my ocean fishes. SeaBear does not disappoint, and the only two ingredients are salmon and sea salt. I spread this on fried bagels for breakfasts, seed crackers for lunches, or fold it into noodle dishes or chowder for dinner.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 3
SeaBear Wild Salmon

#4. Walker’s Shortbread Fingers

I’ve been eating this glorious butter stick-disguised-as-a-cookie for as long as I can remember, and I’ve never grown tired of it. This is another really simple food – four ingredients: flour, butter, sugar, and salt. My favorite lunch snack includes two fingers slathered in almond butter – a 350+ Calorie snack that you can continue licking from your gums for miles!

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 4
Walker’s Shortbread Fingers

#3. Justin’s Almond Butter

Another tasty food, considering that it contains only two ingredients: almonds and palm oil. An outrageously high caloric density (177 Cal/oz) and convenient single-serving squeeze packet make this a food that I buy by the case – often.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 5
Justin’s Almond Butter

#2. Terra Sweet Potato Chips

I’ll admit it. I love chips. I used to pack snack bags of Fritos, Cheetos, and Doritos on most of my trips, crushing them into little bits so they wouldn’t take up space in my pack. Then, when it came time to eat them, I’d tear off a corner and pour them into my mouth. More recently, as I’ve tried to incorporate more nutritious options into my backcountry trips, I discovered other types of chips that have higher levels of fiber and non-sugar carbohydrates, with Terra Sweet Potato Chips being my favorite.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 6
Terra Sweet Potato Chips

#1. Panda Black Licorice

For a candy, this one is very simply made: it contains only molasses, flour, licorice, and aniseed oil. I consider myself somewhat of a licorice connoisseur, which means that if it isn’t fresh, heavily salted, and delightfully chewy, then it isn’t licorice. Panda Black comes close. It’s my favorite food for the three o’clock blues when I’m tired from a long day with several miles still to go. There’s something to be said for morale food.

expedition_food_single_serving_jordan - 7
Panda Black Licorice

Your Picks?

Help others by making the forum attached to this article a repository for packaged snack ideas. What are your favorites?

Backpacking Light 2013 Photo Contest – Part 1, Information for Entrants

Submit your best shots from 2013!

The Backpacking Light 2013 Photo Contest is now open!

It’s time to search your hard drive archives and find your best shots from your wilderness travel adventures! We’re looking for scenery (wild places), gear (creative imagery of lightweight gear in use), and people (lightweight hikers “doing their thing”!)

Winners will receive MLIFE vouchers and WTS scholarships, as well as the fame that goes with getting your photo published at backpackinglight.com and in our 2014 Calendar!

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 1
Heather Allen’s winning photo from 2012. Sierra Sunrise: Mount Banner as viewed from Thousand Island Lake, Ansel Adams Wilderness, Sierra Nevada, California. Shot with a Canon G10.

Please review the instructions below to enter.

Photo Format

  • File type: uncompressed JPG
  • Minimum size: 3200 x 2400
  • Color correction / manipulation allowed? yes
  • File name convention: “lastname-firstname-shortcaption.jpg”

How to Submit

  • Email to submissions@backpackinglight.com as an attachment
  • Email subject line: “BPL 2013 PHOTO CONTEST”
  • Email contents: include camera model and lens type; a descriptive caption or short essay (less than 100 words) describing the place and photo “story”; your full name and city / state / country of residence; a short bio (less than 100 words) about yourself.
  • ONE PHOTO PER EMAIL.
  • ONE PHOTO PER PERSON (so pick a good one!).

Deadline & Award Dates

  • Submission Deadline: November 30, 2013
  • Winners Announced: December 10, 2013
  • Photo Calendars Available: December 10, 2013

Scoring

  • RELEVANCE – How well does this photo reflect the activities of hiking, backpacking, and camping, especially as it related to Backpacking Light’s Mission (multi-day, backcountry, self-supported, and lightweight)?
  • ORIGINALITY – How well does this photograph reflect an original scene unlike anything else you’ve ever seen?
  • TECHNICAL – How well does the photographer employ the appropriate technical photography skills to capture the image (exposure, depth of field, shutter speed, focus)?
  • COLOR – How well does the photographer use color (or lack thereof) and natural lighting
  • AESTHETIC – How well does this photograph balance all of the above to elicit a “Wow!” factor when you look at the image?

Photos will be given 1 to 3 points in each category:

  • 1 point – The photograph does not meet expectations for minimum criteria in this category.
  • 2 points – The photograph meets expectations for minimum criteria in this category.
  • 3 points – The photograph exceeds expectations for minimum criteria in this category.

Prizes

  • 8-12 finalists will be selected for the 2014 BPL Calendar, available for purchase in mid-December 2013.
  • Of the finalists, the top 3 will be awarded $500, $250, and $100 scholarships applicable for any Backpacking Light Wilderness Trekking School program in 2014; if the winners don’t plan to use the scholarship, they may designate it to any person of their choosing.
  • All finalists will be upgraded to an MLIFE (Lifetime) subscription at BPL if they don’t already have one; if they have one, they may designate an MLIFE subscription to any person of their choosing.

Limitations / Exclusions

  • New photos only, please do not resubmit photos that were submitted to previous contests at BPL.
  • You must own full and complete copyright and license to your photo;
  • By submitting a photograph and other descriptive information to this contest, you automatically agree to grant BPL the nonexclusive right to publish your photo and information at the backpackinglight.com website, and as part of the 2014 BPL Calendar; no other rights will be granted to BPL without further written permission by the photographer. Compensation for this nonexclusive right shall be the “prizes” as outlined above.
  • This contest is open to BPL staff, but BPL staff do not qualify for prizes.
  • This contest is not open to jury participants. Jury or submit. Not both.

Jury Participation

Would you like to be a juror for this contest? If you have a few hours of time during the period of December 1-5, 2013, we’d love to have your help. Please submit your request, with a brief description of your photography experience and perhaps, a sample photo, to submissions@backpackinglight.com with the subject line of “2013 PHOTO JURY APPLICANT”.

Previous Winners

Lightweight Stove Systems for Group Cooking Part 1: Basic Framework for Selecting A Cooking Pot and Predicting Fuel Needs

A series of tests exploring the winter performance of inverted canister and integrated canister stove systems for large water volumes and snow melting.

You don’t have access to view this content.

Peak Design Capture Pro Camera clip

While the camera clip may be useful in some settings, it is not ideal for wilderness travel.

Introduction

The Peak Design Pro Camera clip is a device that allows you to support your camera by attaching the camera to your belt or pack strap. I was sent one of them to review for Backpacking Light. Although it is well designed and very reliable, it has a target market which may not be for all BPL members.

Description

 - 1
The Capture Pro (from vendor web site).

The photo here shows the main part of the unit. The ‘back two’ parts are a secure clip which can be attached to the shoulder strap on a pack or to a large belt. The red square bit at the front screws onto your camera using the standard 1/4 in Whitworth screw, and then slides forward to attach to the main clip.

The two big black round knobs are what holds the clip to the shoulder strap. They screw down and clamp. The square red knob is a quick release for the mounting plate giving quick access to the camera; push in on the knob and remove your camera from the clip. The small round knob is similar to the square red knob except that the round knob is a screw lock – so your camera cannot accidentally detach itself.

The Capture Pro is mostly solid aluminum and weighs about 5.3 oz (149 g). It costs around US $80.

 - 2
The Capture Pro in use (from vendor web site).

 - 3
These two (vendor) photos show the Capture Pro in use. It is easy to see that it has versatile applications.

Benefits

There is no doubt that this clip works just fine for large heavy DSLR cameras with big lenses, you can even detach the camera with one hand – just make sure you don’t drop it! The clip is very secure and there is little danger of the clip accidently releasing your camera.

The instructions suggest you clip it to your left shoulder strap so you can easily reach it with your right hand, or to your waist belt to take the weight off your shoulders. However, my experiences are detailed below and tell a slightly different tale.

Disadvantages (biased)

Sadly, I don’t think the designers of the Capture Pro are on the same wavelength as me. I carry a Canon G15 camera, and I found the Capture Pro just did not work for me and my camera.

The clip weighs approximately 5.3 oz (149 g). Currently, I use a MYOG X-Pac camera pouch weighing just 1.6 oz (45 g).

While traveling through the forest, the clip leaves the camera exposed to all the passing brushes and debris as well as the bad weather; my camera pouch protects the camera from both the elements and trail hazards.

The use of the clip makes my camera stick out oddly and wobble around while in movement. Conversely, a camera pouch keeps the camera much closer to me where it is stable.

Putting the clip on the left shoulder strap as recommended was seriously bad advice. When I swung my pack up onto my shoulders (hey, it’s UL, isn’t it?), the heavy lumpy camera and clip swung flying around banging onto nearby things and into me. In fact, I would say you should never mount anything heavy on your left shoulder strap. (Left handed people should reverse all my comments.)

Putting the clip on my pack waist band was … well, I didn’t do it because the way I see it, it’s a fine way to drop your camera into the dirt with your pack on top of it.

You could put the clip on a heavy belt, but I never wear one.

Summary

The Capture Pro may work very well for some people with a large DSLR with a big telephoto lens, travelling in open country, and it may well be one of the better ways of carting such a beast around, short of concealing it inside your pack. Even so, you often need to arrange for some weather protection.

An even more pressing issue is where do you attach the clip. Some options are to put it on a pack shoulder strap, but that requires that you put your pack on by sitting down in front of it. But for anyone else, especially UL walkers, the Capture Pro clip is probably just not the right idea. The Capture pro might work better in a more urban environment carried on a day pack. For lighter cameras, ranging from large P&S ones to pro-compacts with retracting lenses, an alternative to the Capture Pro Clip would be a be to use a camera pouch and place it on the right shoulder strap.

One of the best alternatives I can suggest is that I make my own waterproof light-weight pouches to fit my cameras. This is an option for you to consider. It works well; I can usually get my Canon G15 out with one hand fairly fast, so as to catch those transient happenings; someone falling in the river, that sudden magical view, whatever. Since they are waterproof, I can still use the pouch in bad weather – where the best photos sometimes happen.

MontBell Plasma 1000 Down Jacket Review

Although certainly a very dependable jacket, the Plasma seems to be more of a technology statement rather than a high-value jacket.

Overview

As the name suggests, the Plasma Jacket features 1000 fill-power down, which raises the bar for a premium down insulated jacket. But that’s not all; this Spartan jacket also features MontBell’s 7 denier (25 g/m2) shell fabric, for a garment weight of 4.8 oz (136 g). For comparison, a midweight wool baselayer weighs about 8 oz (227 g).

 - 1
Fill-power is the volume in cubic inches that one ounce of down will expand to fill (left image). Just a few years ago, 800 fill-power down was considered top shelf, now we are seeing more garments and sleeping bags insulated with 900 fill-power down, and the Plasma 1000 Jacket (right image) is the first garment to utilize 1000 fill-power down.

Furthermore, the Plasma 1000 a good value at US $269 compared to other ultralight high-end down sweaters. So, what’s not to like? It seems to tower above everything else. Well, it’s a bit of a conundrum, as explained below.

Description

 - 2
The MontBell Plasma 1000 Down Jacket, introduced in fall 2013, is insulated with 1000 fill-power down quilted in a 7-denier (25 g/m2) ripstop nylon shell. The only notable features are a full-height #3 zipper, standup collar, and simple elastic cuffs. It does not have any pockets or hem drawcord. MSRP is US $269.

 - 3
The Plasma 1000 has a unique sewn-through quilting pattern (left image) designed to promote down loft while keeping stitching to a minimum. Held up to a strong light (right image), the jacket’s uniform down distribution is apparent.

So far, MontBell has not adopted water-resistant down for their down garments and sleeping bags. Since they use premium down in most of their insulated products, they want to make sure the treatment does not impair down lofting or longevity. Also note that the Plasma is currently only available in unisex sizes, whereas the Ex Light is available in both men’s and women’s versions.

So, What’s the Conundrum?

The main competition to the Plasma 1000 is MontBell’s own Ex Light Down Jacket, and when you analyze the numbers, the Ex Light is actually a better value and arguably a warmer jacket.

 - 4
Montbell Plasma 100 Down Jacket (left image) and Ex Light Down Jacket (right image).

The following table compares the two jackets; data are from the MontBell website and my own measurements.

Montbell Plasma 1000 Montbell Ex Light
Shell 7-denier 7 denier
Down Fill-Power 1000 900
Fill Weight 1.6 oz (45 g) 1.8 oz(51 g)
Fill Weight x Fill-Power 1600 in2 (26.2 L) 1620 in2 (26.6 L)
Garment Weight (Mens M) 4.8 oz (136 g) 5.6 oz (159 g)
Measured Loft (double layer) 1.25 in (3.2 cm) 1.75 in (4.5 cm)
Center Back Length 28.4 in (72 cm) 26.6 in (68 cm)
MSRP US $269 US $199
  • A key comparison is Fill Weight x Fill-Power, which is the Total InsulationVolume (TIV) in the jacket. The Ex Light has a bit more.
  • Loft was measured in the chest area just below the arm pits. (The loft of the Montbell Ex Light Jacket is based on a 2008 model I own.)
  • The difference in TIV shows up in the loft measurements; the Ex Light has 28% more loft.
  • The difference in garment weight is only 0.8 oz (23 g).
  • Although MontBell specifies a shorter back length for the Ex Light, I found it to be identical to the Plasma 1000 (based on my 2008 jacket).
  • Note that these inferences are from a comparison of one jacket of each model.

In summary, the Ex Light weighs only 0.8 oz (23 g) more than the Plasma 1000, but it has significantly more loft and costs US $70 less. The Plasma 1000 is an excellent cutting edge jacket, but it appears to make more of a technology statement rather than a functional difference. Bottom line, it’s very similar to the Ex Light Jacket.

Another consideration is the amount of down in the jackets expressed as a percent of garment weight. Down in both jackets accounts for only 32% and 33% of jacket weight; the rest is fabrics and a zipper. Adding a bit more down to either jacket would substantially increase performance with minimal weight increase.

Performance

 - 5
I tested the Plasma 1000 Jacket on 8 multi-day trips totaling 26 days, plus numerous cool weather day hikes. Testing included an early spring Alaska trip and numerous summer backpacking trips with camps above 12,000 ft (3658 m).

Sizing is listed as “trim”. I’m 6 ft tall and 170 lbs (1.83 m and 77 kg) and normally wear a size Large; I found the Plasma to be true to size. It has enough girth to wear over a fleece midlayer.

For me, the Plasma 1000 provided sufficient warmth for summertime mountain backpacking trips, and is a great piece to provide warmth with minimal weight for any active pursuit. It’s my insulation layer of choice for my Mountain SuperUltraLight 6 lb (2.72 kg) base weight gear kit. It’s also the right amount of insulation to extend the warmth of a 30 F (-1 C) sleeping bag, which I usually recommend for mountain backpacking, or more accurately to attain the bag’s claimed temperature rating. In Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula I managed to stay warm (barely) on a 22 F (-5.6 C) night wearing the Plasma and a shell jacket inside a 30 F sleeping bag.

The Plasma 1000 is a bit of a “lightweight” for camp temperatures below freezing. A shell layer over it traps more heat and substantially extends its warmth. For active pursuits the Plasma is very comfortable in temperatures well below freezing.

 - 6
The Plasma 1000’s shell has a good DWR treatment that makes water droplets bead up (left image). However, in my puddle test (right image), where I place 1 fl oz (29.6 ml) of water on the jacket for 1 hour, most of the water soaked through the stitching and collected on a tray underneath. The Ex Light Jacket had similar results when I tested it several years ago.

Comparisons

Data in the following table are manufacturer specifications for men’s size Medium. There are many ultralight down jackets on the market, but these are the closest comparisons.

Jacket Fill-Power Garment Weight (oz) Cost (US$)
Montbell Plasma 1000 1000 4.8 (136 g) 269
Montbell Ex Light 900 5.6 (159 g) 199
Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer Down Jacket 850 7.0 (198 g) 300
Patagonia Down Shirt 800 5.9 (167 g) 249
Crux Pico Top 970 6.0 (170 g) 299
GoLite Selkirk Ultralite Jacket 800 6.0 (170 g) 140
  • The MontBell Plasma 1000 and Ex Light are the standouts for light weight.
  • The Mountain Hardwear Jacket and Patagonia Down shirt are overpriced.
  • The Crux Pico Top is seriously lightweight, but expensive.
  • The GoLite Selkirk has zippered hand pockets and a hem drawcord, so it’s hard to believe it weighs just 6 oz (170 g). If the weight is accurate, this one is a steal at $140. The Total Insulation Volume is 2000, which is higher than the Montbell jackets.

Conclusions and Recommendations

A truly ultralight down jacket is a very versatile piece year-around, for summer backpacking and cold weather active wear. Bottom line, the Montbell Plasma 1000 and Ex Light are the lightweight standouts in this seriously ultralight jacket category; both are exceptionally lightweight. However, the GoLite Selkirk is the wild card in the table above; if the weight is accurate, this jacket weighs only 1.2 oz (34 g) more than the Plasma and costs half as much. That’s hard to overlook.

My recommendation would be to double the amount of down in the Plasma Jacket, which would differentiate it from the Ex Light (and others) and substantially raise the warmth to weight ratio in a sub-7 oz (198 g) jacket.

Techniques for River Corridor Camping

Tarp camping is tricky enough. Couple that with unstable ground and strong winds and that perfect campsite can quickly become a nightmare. Learn all the tricks to stay dry and happy.

“Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world’s great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs. I am haunted by waters.” – Norman MacLean, A River Runs Through It

Introduction

At some point in your wilderness travel career, you’ll want to pitch your shelter on a river bar. Maybe you’ve arrived by packraft or foot, or have been allured by the promise of fat trout caught only steps from the porch of your tarp. For others, snoozing next to a thrashing river or bubbling current provides the audio elixir required to detox from a weekday world of honking, text message notifications, and complaining.

 - 1
Tarp camping in a dry side channel on the Gallatin River in Southwest Montana. The two rear corners are tied to tiny willow bushes, the two front corners are tied to buried deadmen, and the front ridgeline is secured by a stow sack containing 50 pounds of cobbles.

Some river bars provide dry ground year-round (or, at least, dry ground most years), while others are washed clean of debris every spring. River bars can exist as vegetated cottonwood cathedrals, sandy willow groves, large cobbles, or fine gravel. Often, river bar ground is rocky, sandy, or otherwise unconsolidated, and in general, rather awful places for titanium skewer tent stakes and the like. Other river bars littered with cobbles or gravel whisper their laughter when you fight them with any sort of tent stake!

Table 1. Tent Stake Holding Power

 
Forest Soil Wet River Sand 0.5” River Gravel
6 in x 1/8 in Titanium Skewer 22 4 4
MSR Groundhog 59 9 10
Sand Anchor [1] n/a 116 137
Cobblesack (50 lb) [2] n/a 62 71

Reference: Test method is outlined in Tent Stake Holding Power. Notes: [1] The sand anchor consisted of an REI Snow and Sand Anchor wrapped around a 6 in diameter stone and buried 8 in below the ground surface. [2] The cobblesack contained approximately 50 lbs of mixed sand, gravel, and stones with the latter two averaging 0.5 in to 3 in diameter. These are representative values and are not meant to reflect all types of stakes in all types of riverbed soil.

The purpose of this article is to provide you with some insight into riverbed camping challenges, and some techniques to overcome those challenges.

Weather Protection, Campsite Location, and Shelter Orientation

Suffering an exposed camp in a tarp on a river bar during a driving rainstorm is less than pleasant. Buffeting winds, sideways blowing rain, and even spray blown in from the river’s surface is not what I usually equate with “cozy” and “protected”.

So, the first consideration about river bar camping is determining where to locate your shelter in context with the prevailing weather pattern.

Orienting Your Shelter With Respect to Wind Direction

Will wind blow up, or down a river corridor?

This question is best answered by legends and gamblers, but there is a bit of rationale that might explain some trends.

First and foremost, prevailing weather patterns and river corridor topography probably have the most influence on which direction the wind blows.

Where I live in Montana, prevailing winds generally come from the southwest and blow towards the northeast. During a storm, this means I’d rather be paddling the west-to-east trending river corridor of the Yellowstone below Livingston than the east-to-west trending river corridor of the Clark Fork below Missoula.

Narrow river corridors, especially deep gorges, will act as wind funnels. Regardless of their orientation, wind entering the top (or bottom) of a gorge is more than happy to make its way around the twists and turns in the gorge with no care at all about the prevailing wind direction on the flatlands above.

In the absence of the prevailing winds that come with storms, river corridors commonly experience winds as a result of the heating and cooling of the earth’s surface – so called thermal winds. Thermal winds are most common in mountain environments where significant topographic relief amplifies the effects of temperature change.

A common morning (on very hot days) and afternoon wind blows up a river corridor. These are called anabatic (Gr. anabatos, the verb form of anabainein = “moving upward”) winds. In calm, sunny weather, a hill (or a mountain, for you east coasters), heats up in response to the sun’s radiative warming rays. This heats the air at the surface of the hill. This hot air rises and travels up mountain slopes, so this effect causes a pressure differential that draws air from high-pressure lower elevation spots (downstream) to the low-pressure higher elevation spots (upstream). Anabatic winds can last nearly all day and are generally the bane of summer paddlers who have to face them for hours at a time. It’s the primary motivation for hot-weather paddlers to get as many miles as possible completed early in the morning.

Conversely, a common late evening wind blows down a river corridor. These are called katabatic (Gr. katabatikos = “going downhill”) winds. In calm, sunny weather, a hill’s radiative heat layer cools dramatically (especially after sunset) and then starts spilling down into the adjacent river corridors, creating a downstream breeze. Unlike anabatic winds, katabatic winds are relatively short-lived (they often last less than an hour or two in the northern Rockies), and are not as powerful.

The third type of wind worth noting is the Foehn wind. I’m well acquainted with Foehn winds during fall and winter packrafting trips in mountainous regions – because they require a bit of high elevation snow for them to form. Foehn winds form when a warm, dry wind blows down the leeward side of a mountain range. As the wind reaches the snow at the range’s higher elevations, the winds cool and roar their way down alpine valleys. Foehn winds occur during periods of dramatic temperature changes (fall and late winter/early spring), and can be powerful, dramatic, and destructive. They typically blow downstream in valleys that are narrowly confined by two adjacent mountain ranges.

Then, there are days when a wind blows in a direction that is completely unpredictable or unexplainable. So be it, I suppose.

Regardless, winds blow more in river corridors than back in the adjacent forests where trees might provide a wind break, and there are some predictable trends that you might consider when pitching your shelter.

If you are expecting strong Foehn winds, you might think twice about camping on the river beach, or even camping with a tarp. I remember one warm spring day on the Yellowstone River where a Foehn wind kicked up a violent sandstorm that was rather unpleasant for us tarp campers on the beach. In other words, find trees, pitch your tarp in a storm pitch (see Tarp Camping Techniques for Inclement Conditions for instructions) with the foot end of the shelter facing upstream, and hold on.

Otherwise, consider that in the absence of foul weather, especially in the summer, you’ll have a bit of downstream breeze in the evening, little or no wind in the morning, and an upstream breeze in the afternoon. Pitch your tarp accordingly and be prepared for swirling, reversals, and unpredictability. Like I said earlier, predicting wind direction is best left to legends and gamblers, but it’s fun to try nonetheless, and the science is interesting.

Where to Pitch Your Shelter in the River Corridor

Other considerations worth noting include the amount and type of vegetation you have access to and the quality of your guyline anchors.

In tree bottoms (usually found on the floodplain a few feet above the normal high water mark of a freestone stream), tying your tarp to, and using trees as stakeout points and wind breaks probably give you the most security in a river bottom. In addition, since tree stands typically occur a few feet above normal river levels, they provide some protection against the coldest katabatic flows, some overhead protection from falling rain and snow, and insurance from rising waters in response to heavy rains.

 - 2
Camping on the floodplain in a lodgepole pine stand. Slough Creek, Montana.

As you travel from tree stands towards the river, you might encounter river brush. Where I live, that river brush is almost exclusively comprised of willows. Willows have strong root systems and can grow very dense. They provide good tie-down points, and big willow bushes can provide meaningful wind breaks. Willow stands often grow in consolidated soil with grass that provides reasonable ground stake holding power, but just as often can grow in sand or gravel where stakes won’t hold.

 - 3
Taking advantage of willows as windbreaks on the Slough Creek floodplain during a fall storm, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.

In wide, freestone rivers, willows usually give way to sand or gravel, and then cobbles. Special staking techniques are required for pitching in these areas (read further) and obviously, your opportunity for a wind break is gone as you approach the tempting “beach zone” of a beautiful river.

Staking a Tarp in a River Corridor

Once you’ve selected your campsite, and the direction that you want your shelter to face, it’s time to secure it. I’ve seen many novices pitch their freestanding popups in river corridors only to walk away for a doodie break to find their temporary home tumbling downstream towards the next set of rapids. The chase is on! Don’t do this with your pants down: cobbles are hard to stumble across when you’re doing the pants-around-the-ankle-shuffle.

In short, stake down your shelter very securely in a river corridor. It’s worth the time and effort, and provides an opportunity to engage your mind with a bit of problem solving! Also, you won’t lose your shelter, your shelter will handle wind loading better, and it will be quieter on a windy night.

Types of Stakes

Woe to the ultralighter who packs six inch titanium skewers for riverbed camping! Fine by me if you want to bring a few kiddie-stakes along for securing non-essential guylines if you’re camping in the forest near the riverbed, but don’t rely on them during a storm or are camping in the riverbed between its high water marks where holding power in unconsolidated terra-temporaria is suspect. Certainly an easily-offended ultralight guru will come forth and proclaim his success with skewers for riverbed camping and tell me that I’m cracked for pitching in gravel. To you I say: “Hyas klosh mamook mika!” The rest of you I refer to the valuable information found in Tent Stake Holding Power, as well as Table 1 presented in the beginning of this article.

The closer you get to the riverbed, the more creative you have to be with staking your guylines. Sand, gravel, and cobbles are the norm here, so conventional stakes are out. Long stakes are tempting (8 – 12 in) but can be heavy and difficult to insert into the cemented conglomerate that sometimes characterizes the beach of a freestone stream.

Thus, you should add a few options in your stakeout arsenal. I’d like to discuss three of them here: big rocks, deadmen and cobblesacks.

Big Rocks are big rocks to which you tie guylines (duh). Here, I define a Big Rock as a rock so big that it requires severe back strain to move it, and thus, it’s big enough to hold your shelter stake-out point immobile in a Real Storm (or if you’re a Scot, a “brisk breeze”). Big Rocks that anchor critical stake-out points, such as tarp ridgelines, are generally about the size of beer talus (see Techniques for Talus for a definition). Littler Rocks, which can be more easily picked up, or rolled around with one hand while the other snaps a selfie, don’t qualify. That some bit of pain is required to maneuver Big Rocks into position for shelter pitching should be obvious. The pain is magnified when you consider the number of guylines (which equals the number of Big Rocks required) on most tarps and tents pitched properly for windy environments. Therefore, I employ the use of Big Rocks as part of my arsenal, and seldom as the exclusive mechanism of staking out my shelter in a riverbed. Further, as the proud owner of an aging back, I no longer roll around Big Rocks, so I choose something slightly smaller and more manageable than a Big Rock, for staking out only those guylines that might not be subject to very high stresses during a wind.

Another riverbed staking tool, well known to the mountaineers and skiers who pitch their homes in snow, is the deadman anchor. A deadman is easily defined as “any convenient object to which a cord is tied, and then buried beneath the ground surface.” Living things don’t qualify. The idea behind the deadman is that relatively small (and light!) objects can be used, and one takes advantage of compacted soil between the shelter and the deadman to create the resistance required to keep the deadman in place when tension is applied to the guyline.

Virtually any available object can be used as a deadman anchor in river sand or cobble, but the most important part of seeing that it holds against a strong force is that it’s buried well beneath the surface of the bed. I’ve used tent stakes, sticks and small logs buried sideways, small stuff sacks filled with sand or a rock, and even Really Little Rocks (the size of a grapefuit) as deadmen for successful riverbed pitching.

 - 4
A variety of deadman anchors (top) useful for anchoring guylines in riverbed sand and gravel, including a snow/sand anchor (gray frabric with the orange cord), MSR Blizzard Snow Stake (large red stake), MSR Groundhog Stake (small red stake), an SMC Snow Picket (silver with yellow cord), a 1 in diameter stick, and a small stuff sack that can be filled with sand and gravel (green). Tying a guyline to a rock that will be buried as a deadman anchor (bottom left). Guyline leading to a buried deadman below the gravel surface (bottom right).

Snow and sand anchors are marketed various specialty outdoor accessory companies, and are easy and fun DYI projects on your mom’s sewing machine. They are comprised of a fabric patch about six inches square, with cords or thin straps of webbing attached at reinforced corners on the patch. Carabiners or rings then provide a transition point between the anchor’s cords/straps and the guyline. The fabric is wrapped around a cobble (or bundle of gravel or sand) and then buried beneath the ground surface.

 - 5
A fabric-and-cord style snow and sand anchor used as a deadman with cobbles (upper left), a single rock (upper right), a sand and gravel mixture (lower left). The deadman is buried at least six inches below the surface (lower right) with the opening of the anchor facing the guyline. The deeper the burial, the stronger the anchor. When buried at depths of six inches or more in loose river gravel, these types of anchors usually require more than 50 lbs of force along the guyline axis to fail.

I’ve made my own snow-and-sand anchors in the past from various lighter fabrics and materials, including Cuben Fiber and silnylon, and this can save a bit of weight if you are carrying several of them. However, be warned that light fabrics used on deadmen in this manner (being buried in rocks and sand) will suffer some abuse, and a little extra fabric weight can dramatically increase the durability of your anchor. I still use a set that I made in 2002 from 100% Spectra fabric, Samson 2.75 mm Dyneema line, and titanium rings, that are lighter than any commercially available sand/snow anchor I’ve used and far more durable. They are a core part of my stake kit for both wintertime and riverbed camping.

Deadmen anchors have the primary advantage of being able to provide a guyline attachment point very near (or even below) the ground surface, thus making them appropriate for ground-level stake-out points, such as those found attached to the floor of a tent. In addition, deadmen allow for the very low pitching of a floorless shelter, which reduces wind, spindrift, and sand entry into the shelter as sometimes happens in fiercer storms.

 - 6
I prefer small gravel, like this, for riverbed camping. It’s more comfortable to lay on than larger cobbles, easier to sculpt and dig anchor holes into, and cleaner than sand.

 - 7
A stout trowel is an invaluable tool for digging holes for deadmen on river bars. Heel boots and toy trowels, like the well-known orange or green plastic ones, won’t cut it. This one is marketed by a company that manufactures high quality composite garden trowels.

Cobblesacks (a.k.a. sandbags) are stow sacks that are large enough to hold several dozen pounds of rocky stuff. This generally equates to a stuff sack in the volume range of 800 to 1,500 cubic inches. Like Big Rocks, and unlike deadmen, cobblesacks are above-the-ground tent anchors. The concept is simple: fill a sack with sand, gravel, or cobbles; secure the drawstring; attach the drawstring to the end of the shelter guyline (via a knot, carabiner, or ring); tighten the guyline.

 - 8
The cobblesack in action. To use it properly, locate the “anchor position” first (you won’t want to try to move a delicate stow bag full of 50 lbs of rocks later!), then fill the sack with stones, gravel, or sand. Pull the drawstring and use the end of the drawstring loop as a guyline attachment point.

 - 9
I don’t usually pull the toggle and cinch the stow bag closure on a cobble sack – it places too much stress on the drawcord tunnel sewn into the sack fabric. Here, a small carabiner is affixed to the end of the drawcord, and the guyline tied to the carabiner with a tautline hitch, which provides the primary mechanism of guyline adjustment. I nearly always use a cobblesack over any other type of anchor for securing the ridge guylines of my tarp shelter, which require the highest tension forces (commonly, 20+ lbs) to ensure that the shelter is secure.

Cobblesacks have the distinct advantage over Big Rocks in that there is no heavy lifting involved, only the shuttling of small rocks or piles of sand between the riverbed and the sack. Cobblesacks have the additional advantage over both Big Rocks and deadmen in that larger volume cobblesacks can hold an enormous amount of weight (several hundred pounds!) and thus, can be used in the foulest weather conditions and/or for the largest shelters.

Other Attachment Points

Don’t neglect natural attachment points that are (supposedly!) immovable and thus, could provide secure anchors for guyline attachment points. The obvious example already discussed is that of the tree, which I’ve found to be readily available and completely reliable in the lowland river bottoms where I fish and packraft.

Nearer to the riverside, and a bit less robust, but even more ubiquitous than the cottonwood and pine trees in my local riverbeds, is the willow bush. Willows provide wind breaks, fish storage sticks, and skewers for bratwurst. As important, they are usually rooted strongly enough to serve as guyline anchors. Low-to-the-ground anchors can be wrapped at the base of the willow bush, with the guyline encircling several stalks to distribute stress. Higher elevation guylines, as those that might come out the middle of a tarp or tent panel and angle upward, can be wrapped around the more bendy upper willow branches, which serve as a bit of a shock absorber in high winds (perhaps at the expense of some shelter stability).

 - 10
Tying off a tarp corner around the base of a tiny willow bush. This single root bush had a root system less than 14 in deep and was able to withstand a static force along the guyline axis of 48 lbs before the roots pulled out of the gravel.

Driftwood is also common in the river corridors of freestone streams, and logs can be drug into place to provide useful guyline attachment points as well. Logs secured by a few Big Rocks between the log and the shelter provide a strong structure for securing one edge of a shelter.

 - 11
A piece of 10 in diameter by 8 ft long cottonwood does not provide enough anchor security on its own for anything but guylines subjected to very light tension forces. However, two Big Rocks placed on either side of the guyline attachment next to the wood (towards the tarp) can create an immovable structure suitable for any guyline.

Staking in a Wind Storm

One bitter and gusty January day many years ago, while trekking in Montana’s Bear Trap Wilderness in the Madison River corridor, I was preparing a pitch just off the riverbed in a stand of willows on a small, but landlocked island. I was a rookie back then, and I made a rookie mistake: I removed my tent from my pack, and knowing that it was light enough to blow all the way to Helena if I let go of it, I grabbed a single stout tent stake and secured one stake out loop into the ground firmly. Then, with the assurance that it was going nowhere, I let go of the flapping lot to retrieve gloves from my pack, and upon turning around, my tent, and the crossbow ammo that used to be my tent stake, was sailing down the river corridor.

The lesson I learned was twofold. First, that the force of wind on a large patch of fabric can be mighty (especially into the open door of a tent, which becomes something like a sail), and easily pull out even a few well-placed stakes. Second, and therefore, the first order of business when staking in a gale must be securing one of the shelter guylines to an immovable object (like your pack!) until several points are staked out and you are confident that the shelter is secure before untying it from your pack and continuing the pitch.

Other Considerations

In addition to the challenges of staking down a shelter on a river bar, you should also consider other aspects and challenges of river bar tarp camping, including sleeping comfort, conservation, river channel property ownership, and risks that must be considered so that you aren’t swept away by rising water in the middle of the night.

Sleeping Comfort

The ultralight ethic for creating a comfortable bed, at its minimalist core, depends on using a very thin and tiny patch of a closed cell foam pad in combination with a campsite located on fluffy forest duff or fresh cut pine boughs (leave no trace considerations aside). These types of pads are no longer used by me, but I know many young men with earth stains on their hearts that do.

The option of using such a spartan mattress does not really exist on river bars littered with gravel, sand, and cobbles. None of these surfaces approach anything remotely related to “soft” and although sand and gravel can be sculpted to provide little pockets for side-sleeper hips and such, sculpting the platform to a “just right” shape is sometimes an exercise in futility that begins with frustration at sunset and a backache by sunrise.

For river bar camping, I carry a Big Fat Pad – a 2.5 in inflatable air mat. This gives me the flexibility to sleep on gravel and small cobbles without actually having to worry about their presence enough to remove them, sculpt a bed, or drag a pack full of forest duff from the pines that grow beyond the cottonwoods. I find myself carrying this pad on nearly all of my trips now, just in case I see a gravel bar that I may want to camp on, think about camping on, dreaming about camping on, or simply camping near.

This doesn’t mean that I don’t prepare a bed, if camping on big cobbles. I do, and so should you! Other than (obviously) picking a reasonably level platform, cobbles can usually be removed in the bed area. On freestone streams, cobbles usually overlie a layer of sand, which tends to settle under the cobbles during springtime runoff. This process requires about ten minutes of effort if done intentionally, and is well worth the time investment.

On sand, a sleeping platform can be carved even from a slight incline, which gives you some flexibility in where you pitch your shelter. In addition, sand tends to accumulate small, poky sticks, so be wary of them before you set down your ultralight inflatable pad. Regardless, a ground cloth or bivy sack is useful for protecting inflatable pads from puncture, but are otherwise (usually) unnecessary for wet ground protection. River bars tend to drain very well and both closed cell and durable inflatable pads can be placed directly on the river bar without a ground cloth and provide plenty of protection from moisture. If using an inflatable pad, beware of camping on gravel in rivers that carve through limestone bedrock and other sharp rocks.

When river camping in a floorless shelter, I find bivy sacks to be particularly useful when the probability of Foehn winds is high. Being able to completely cocoon myself inside a bivy sack to protect my sanity during violent sandstorms is a tolerable reprieve.

Conservation Issues

There is controversy associated with river bar camping. Some leave no trace zealots believe that camping within ____ feet of any water body is irresponsible and shows a lack of respect for nature. They evidently believe that various forms of pollution emanate directly from the walls of a shelter, including litter, noise, visible humanity, urine, and poop.

 - 12
Gaining wind protection for the tarp by pitching it adjacent to a willow stand on the grassy-bottomed Slough Creek floodplain, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.

I’m not one of those zealots. I like to camp by water. But I like to camp by water responsibly, carefully, and respectfully, and I do find myself adopting an increasingly stringent leave no trace ethic as I grow older, and become more practiced at minimum impact techniques. Here’s what to consider when camping in a river corridor with respect to camping, fires, liquid waste, and solid waste:

The sand and gravel of riverbeds may be the ultimate durable surfaces for pitching a shelter outside of the slickrock of the desert and the granite slabs of alpine places. River channels between the high water marks are mostly devoid of vegetation, and in freestone streams, are rototilled and recycled with each minor flood that occurs once or more per annum.

Fires built below the high water mark leave scars and traces only during the time between floods. And at least once a year, all signs of fires between the high water marks are completely vaporized, never, ever to be noticed again. Contrast this to the fire scars and semi-permanent rings found in the forest, which can remain for decades. In canyons where camping is limited, on tailwater rivers that don’t receive regular flood surges, or in very high traffic areas, fire pans are a useful tool for minimizing your impact. My favorite fire pan is a simple turkey roasting pan, which is light, foldable, and has high sidewalls to contain the ashes. I fill the pan with a few inches of sand, then build the fire on top of that. Ashes can be packed out in zip baggies if your’re hardcore, or mixed into nearby soils in an inconspicuous location away from camp if you are an intentional ultralighter.

Liquid waste can be dispersed directly into the fast-moving and/or turbulent currents of high volume rivers. The river flow will dilute it quickly (“the solution to pollution is dilution”). In low-volume river corridors, liquid waste can be dispersed on the ground above the high water mark, in the hopes that rain will dilute its pollution potential. Some notable exceptions are worth mentioning. In desert areas with little rainfall or in grizzly bear country, liquid waste should generally be catholed in a “sump” far away from camp, or dispersed directly into a river regardless of its flow. Consult with the land management agency to see what their preferences are, and honor them.

Solid waste (poop and food) should always be catholed above the high water mark at least 200 feet from the river’s edge, except in areas where that practice is prohibited (especially high traffic and/or some desert river or canyon corridors). Many land management agencies will require some type of human waste disposal system, such as groovers or wag bags. For the DIY’er interested in a lightweight solution, you can poop on the ground, pick it up with an inside-out quart sized ziplock (use it like a glove, then turn it back inside-in), sprinkle some waste gelation “bio-gel” powder into the bag, seal it, and then store it in a second, more durable zip closure bag – some type of tough, odor-proof bag is ideal.

River Channel Property Ownership

Different areas have different laws regulating camping in river corridors bordered by privately owned lands.

In some jurisdictions, the entire river is owned by the property owner and one cannot even float through. In others, the riverbed is owned by the property owner, but the water remains a public right-of-way. Obviously, floating is allowed, but camping (or even getting out of your boat for a shoreline rest) would not be. Finally, some places allow public use of the water and the riverbed between the high water marks of any navigable stream. This is the fortunate case where I live, in the State of Montana, which means there are a plethora of opportunities for river camping here.

One caveat to my local stream access law, however, is where I can locate my river camps. Some islands remain privately owned, so I have to pay careful attention to land ownership. It can be confusing, since islands technically lie between the high water marks of the main channel. In addition, some islands are large enough to harbor permanent tree groves, so they are considered to have their own high water marks. As you might imagine, determining where to camp when river levels are low, some side channels go dry, and various types of islands become exposed, can be confusing. Consult your local river management agency to become educated about stream access in your state.

In addition, Montana has an interesting law that minimizes landowner-river user conflict by requiring river campers to camp at least 500 yards away from (or out of sight of, whichever is shorter) any occupied dwelling.

In short, if you are river camping in a river corridor that is not bound by public lands, be very careful about respecting private property ownership and understand both the laws that protect your rights as a citizen, and that protect the interests of landowners. In the most beautiful and pristine river corridors of Montana and Wyoming, for example, one may find themselves encroaching upon the viewscape of drunken movie stars with guns hanging out on the porch of their trophy home. These encounters are unpredictable. Movie star or not, however, landowner conflict is seldom a reasonable option that ends well, and should generally be avoided.

Rising Water

If you have a desire to camp in a riverbed that is prone to dramatic fluctuations in water levels resulting from dam releases or floods triggered by significant rainfall, consider bringing along a water leak alarm. They weigh a few ounces, are usually powered by a 9-volt battery, and emit an outrageously loud noise when triggered. I find them useful, if not a little bit unnerving when triggered, when camping in desert slot canyons, in river corridors below dams, and in rivers prone to rapid flow increases in response to nightly rainfall. I place them just a few feet from the waterline, between my shelter and the river, so that any overnight rise in water level is triggered well before it reaches my shelter. The only time I had one triggered was while camping on a gravel bar on the Hoh River in Olympic National Park during a spring deluge. The alarm sounded at about 2:00 am as the river started to rise, so I packed up my gear and moved my camp into the trees. During the course of the next four hours, the river’s edge had moved more than 40 ft inland across the gravel bar, swallowing my old camp.

Conclusion

My two favorite types of camps are on open tundra in high alpine areas, and in riverbeds. Neither is particularly comfortable when the weather turns bad, and both lack the coziness of a forest camp in windy or cold conditions.

However, camping in a riverbed is immensely rewarding. It connects you to the land via the motion and sound of the river in a way that cannot be experienced anywhere else.

Being able to enjoy river camping with lightweight gear and techniques that allow me to leave the conventional river camping shelter – the freestanding dome tent – at home, means that river camping doesn’t require me to add a dramatic amount of weight to my pack.

 - 13
Packrafter’s camp using guylines tied to willows for all tie-down points. Fish Creek, Montana.