Articles (2020)

Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitt Review

At one ounce per pair, these waterproof/breathable rain mitts are designed for ultralight backpacking, but should they be worn over a jacket sleeve or under it?

Description

It took me nearly a year to use the Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitts enough to give them a thorough testing. In the western United States, rain mitts spend more time in my pack than on my hands, but when I need them, I really need them. In other regions of the country, rainwear gets a more frequent and thorough workout, so performance is very important. The MLD eVENT Rain Mitt is a good choice in either situation. At only 1.1 ounces per pair (measured weight, size Large), they are wicked light, and a no-brainer to carry them in your pack as standard equipment.

Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitt Review - 1
The Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitts I tested are constructed of Gore-Tex XCR in the palm and inside of the thumb (blue), and two-layer eVENT (black) for the remainder. The latest (2009) version uses three-layer eVENT in the palm area. As can be seen in the photo, the mitts have a curved shape to reduce seam stress while holding trekking poles.

Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitt Review - 2
The MLD Rain Mitts have a long gauntlet with an anchored cordlock/bungee cord closure that is easy to operate with mitts on.

Performance

My usual glove size is an XL, so I opted for the eVENT Rain Mitt in size Large (it’s available in Medium and Large). The size Large provides plenty of extra room to wear gloves inside them, even heavy ones. Although the volume of the mitts is more than ample, I still needed the size Large for their length in the hand and gauntlet areas.

The mitts come with a small tube of McNett Seam Grip for seam sealing, and MLD recommends stuffing the gloves with paper to expand them to facilitate a neat job of seam sealing. That’s easier said than done; I find it difficult to do a neat job of sealing anything with Seam Grip! The result is sealed seams, but it’s not pretty.

I tested the MLD eVENT Rain Mitts while backpacking or day hiking in rain and wet snow on numerous occasions, with and without trekking poles. In warmer weather I wore thin liner gloves inside them, and in colder weather I went to thicker fleece gloves inside. I also gave them a try for backcountry skiing.

I found the MLD Rain Mitts to be a real hand saver when I needed them. While hiking in really wet conditions, it’s hard to keep my hands dry and warm, and with glove liners inside they kept my hands dry all day. They also breathed well, and I did not have any problems with moisture buildup (from sweat) in my glove liners while hiking uphill in warmer temperatures. They are waterproof as expected; I did not have any occasions where water penetrated the fabric or seams. However, how I wore the Rain Mitts did make a difference. With the gauntlet worn over the sleeves of my rain jacket, I found that water (under gravity) has a tendency to run into the mitts, but the mitts worn under the sleeve of my jacket shed water very well. If the mitts are worn with the gauntlets under jacket sleeves, it is helpful to place a rubber band around the wrist area to hold the sleeves in place.

Mountain Laurel Designs eVENT Rain Mitt Review - 3
MLD Rain Mitts worn with the gauntlet on the outside (left) and inside (right). Water ran into the mitts with the gauntlet on the outside of my sleeve. The right photo shows my preferred method of wearing the mitts under my sleeve.

The Rain Mitts performed well with trekking poles and did not leak, even with some pumping action from holding the poles. After a year of intermittent use, my test mitts did not show any serious signs of wear from trekking poles, but it stands to reason that fabric abrasion from constant use with trekking poles will probably wear them out faster.

Ron Bell at Mountain Laurel Designs does not recommend using the Rain Mitts for snow sports, and I agree. I used them once while backcountry skiing and realized that they are simply too fragile for that type of use. I much prefer the Outdoor Research Endeavor Mitt for snow sports; they are still light at 3.9 ounces/pair, adequately durable, and waterproof.

Overall, the MLD eVENT Rain Mitt is hard to beat for three-season backpacking. They add very little weight to your pack, and, combined with lightweight liner gloves, make a very effective and versatile handwear system for ultralight backpacking.

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Mountain Laurel Designs (http://mountainlaureldesigns.com/)

  Year/Model

2008 eVENT Rain Mitt

  Materials

Current (2009) version has three-layer eVENT in the palm area and inside of the thumb, two-layer eVENT for the remainder

  Sizes

Medium, Large

  Features

Ergonomic curved shape to reduce seam stress while holding trekking poles, long gauntlet with anchored cordlock/bungee cord closure

  Weight

Measured weight, size Large: 1.1 oz/pair (31 g)
Manufacturer specification: 0.95 oz/pair (27 g)

  MSRP

US$45

Video: Packraft Wet Reentry

Wet reentry is one of the most common rescues you’ll perform while packrafting. Be sure to work the kinks out of your technique ahead of time so this self-rescue tool will be honed when you need it.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Pertex has an enviable reputation for developing and creating some of the most innovative technically advanced fabrics for the outdoor sports market. Our position of being close to the outdoors means that we know exactly what you need – after all, we’re gear users ourselves. Pertex apparel provides the perfect balance of wind protection, breathability and water repellency with ultra-light weight and stowability. Discover Pertex today.

Video: Packraft Wet Reentry - 1
Practicing wet reentry: a Whitewater Rescue Technician student places his paddle across the packraft tubes before boosting himself back into his boat.

To learn more about packrafting at Backpacking Light, visit backpackinglight.com/packrafting, or take a wilderness course in packrafting at backpackinglight.com/school.

Overview

Packraft whitewater enough, and you will eventually find yourself taking an unplanned swim. When that happens, the best option is often to quickly climb back into the boat while still floating down the river. You’ll have better maneuverability to avoid upcoming drops or strainers and better protection from rocks if you are back in your boat and paddling than if you are swimming. Practicing getting back into your boat – wet reentry – under controlled conditions will help the process go more quickly when you need to do it for real.

Practice in a safe place with the boat rigged for a trip and wearing all your gear. You are likely to discover adjustments you need to make in your gear and technique. As Derek Collins notes, “A really heavy pack [loaded on the front of the packraft] will definitely change the way a boat handles in the water.” Practicing in a pool, I found it difficult to pull myself up onto the raft tubes wearing a PFD (Kokatat Orbit Tour) with the floatation thickly concentrated in the abdominal area. As a result, I don’t wear that PFD in anything above Class II.

Forrest McCarthy emphasizes the importance of holding onto your paddle. He says, “If you are going to lose one thing, hold onto your paddle. Boats are easier to find than paddles.” As you perform wet reentries, you’ll figure out the best way to keep track of your paddle while you right your boat. You’ll also need to practice not letting go of the paddle when you initially flip and come up for air. I found myself using both hands to open the spray deck and surface after a flip on the Gates of Lodore section of the Green River. My paddle was lost and never recovered, but luckily my group had a spare. Forrest also gained some wisdom the hard way when he lost his paddle during a long swim on the Yellowstone River (as Tom Turiano relates in the podcast, Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts) and had to paddle the rest of the way with some wood scraps he nailed and tied together.

In this video, Forrest McCarthy and Derek Collins demonstrate and talk through the steps involved in a successful wet reentry. Wet reentry is one of the most common rescues you’ll perform while packrafting. Be sure to work the kinks out of your technique ahead of time so this self-rescue tool will be honed when you need it.

 

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. Video demonstration of wet reentry on a packraft.

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo

Foot entrapment among submerged rocks is the leading killer of whitewater boaters. Think about it: the most common way to die while boating is by doing something OUTSIDE your boat!

Packraft Wet Reentry

Foot entrapment among submerged rocks is the leading killer of whitewater boaters.  Think about it:  the most common way to die while boating is by doing something OUTSIDE your boat!  DO NOT stand up in rocky bottom waters until your own bottom is hitting rocks near the shore’s edge.  This is one of many topics best covered in a whitewater rescue course.  Take one!

Most often, when you fall out of a packraft, you fall backwards, or back and to the side, having been bander-snatched.  Hopefully, a helmet will be on your head when this happens.

If you flip with a spray deck/skirt and cannot, like most of us, roll your packraft, disconnect the deck/skirt’s Velcro from around your waist and push yourself out.  If possible, right the boat and jump back in, placing your paddle across both tubes to keep it from flipping as you flop in.

To right an upside down and loaded boat in the current, get upstream of the boat, turn it sideways, then reach over and grab the downstream tube, pulling backwards and out of the water toward you.  This forces the upstream tube down and into the current, where the force of the water helps right the boat.  It works like a charm.  Once righted, reach across with your paddle to hold the boat and launch in belly first, rolling your butt onto the seat.

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo - 1
Anchorage Packrafting Safety Class:
(back row, left to right) Roman Dial, Dorte Krough, Jeff Conaway, Joe Stock, Dano Michaud, John Evingson, Brad Meiklejohn, Scott Solle, Ian Lleshi
(front row, left to right) Barkley Broeder, Peggy Dial, Doug Jewell, Agnes Stowe

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo - 2
Turn the boat sideways, reach over, grab the upstream tube, and pull it backwards and out of the water toward you (as Roman is doing with his paddle). This forces the upstream tube down and into the current, where the force of the water helps to right the boat.

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo - 3
Hold your paddle across the tubes to stabilize the boat as you begin to kick your torso into it.

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo - 4
Continue to kick and porpoise into the boat, rotating onto your butt when you’re far enough in/on the craft.

Packraft Wet Reentry Photo Demo - 5
Hold your paddle out of the way and swing your feet over the edge. If you’ve done this reentry correctly, your feet will not have touched the bottom at any time.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: BACKPACKING LIGHT SEEKS PARTNERSHIP WITH OHV/ORV COMMUNITY TO PROMOTE MULTI-USE HARMONY IN AMERICAN WILDERNESS

Backpacking Light (www.backpackinglight.com), an internet-based community of hikers known for their pro-wilderness values, is forging partnerships with organizations such as the pro-trails Blue Ribbon Coalition (www.sharetrails.org) to join forces in the fight for American Wilderness preservation.

Bozeman, Montana (April 1, 2009)

Ryan Jordan, Backpacking Light’s founder and publisher, was surfing the Internet one day when he came across ShareTrails.org. “When I read the opening statement on the home page, ‘The BlueRibbon Coalition is a national non-profit organization dedicated to preserving responsible recreational access to public lands and waters,’ I was bursting with excitement, because that’s our mission too!”

Jordan immediately recognized a number of parallels between Backpacking Light and the BRC:

  • Both organizations participate in the process of evaluating public land management agency travel plans;
  • Both organizations love trails;
  • Both organizations believe that America’s wild land gems should remain accessible to all humans;

“But the real harmonic potential transcends all that,” Jordan said, “and we have some pretty powerful ideas for getting hikers and ORVers to use public lands in harmony.”

Backpacking Light’s proposals, currently being investigated in a lengthy feasibility study, include:

  • The development of completely noiseless ORVs with zero emissions of any type, zero sound of any type, and zero fuel consumption. Jordan notes that Wikipedia provides great latitude in its definition of a vehicle, which opens up a number of possibilities for creating the alternative ORV of the future. He notes that some of the outdoor industry’s most innovative companies are developing alternative ORVs that meet Jordan’s criteria, including Inov-8, Alpacka, and Wenonah, to name a few.
  • Creation of the new niche industry of “hiker-taxiing,” by which ORV owners receive money from hikers for taking them on rapid tours of their favorite trails. The benefits to this program would include fewer blisters, faster reconnaissance, having to invest less time into personal fitness, and the opportunity to “hug” an ORVer by riding on the back of his (or her) motorbike. “There are serious risks of increasing conflict with this program, but the rewards of intimacy could lead to long-lasting partnerships. Opposites attract, and we can’t fight that,” says Jordan.
  • Being mentored by the BRC in a new partnership with EA Sports to develop a series of video games to promote hiking. “ORVers have forged incredibly successful relationships with video gaming companies, and we want a piece of that action too,” says Jordan, who won the 1982 Donkey Kong tournament at the El Dorado Casino Hotel in Reno, Nevada, and hikes a lot too. “It’s time that the hiking community is recognized for their intensity and excitement among our screen-addicted youth, but we can’t do it without those who’ve paved that road ahead of us.” Jordan will model the new game series after PlayStation’s MX World Tour, but focus less on riding motorcycles and more on doing things motorcycle people could never do, like hike through a forest of blowdowns or haul all your stuff out to an island camp at the middle of an alpine lake using just a Therm-a-Rest and some duct tape. “Hey, we have a lot to offer too. Just give us a chance to rock your XBox, OK?”

Because these are long term projects that provide significant logistical, philosophical, and political challenges, Jordan is eager to promote harmony out of the gate with more realistic short-term endeavors. For example, Jordan advocates distributing earplugs at multi-use trailheads from minimum-impact dispensing machines disguised as permit kiosks. He hopes this project will lead to a complete virtual-reality sensory equipment package that will deaden all senses to surrounding ORV activity, including vision, hearing, smell, and the general awareness of the surrounding environment. Jordan noted that some pretty sophisticated devices are already on the market, with manufacturer Bell and others leading innovation in this area. The goal here is less about creating harmony and more about eliminating the awareness of each other. Jordan says that this may be a “unique first step to a long term solution because right now, we’re pretty much total aliens to each other. We don’t even drink the same brands of beer.”

Jordan hopes that a BPL-BRC partnership is forged on the horizon soon. “The opportunity to maximize the enjoyment of wild lands for all is too good to pass up and now is the time to make it happen.”

The tides of change may indeed be rising. A few weeks ago, as snow began to melt from Montana’s trails, Jordan encountered an ORVer and BRC member – walking – back to his car on a muddy trail. “What happened, are you OK?” Jordan asked.

“Yeah,” the teenage biker said, “my bike broke down a few miles back, and I got a raging blister from walking in these stupid boots.” As Jordan and the young man departed, Jordan’s guilt overwhelmed him. He turned, and said, “Hey kid.” When the biker turned around, Jordan tossed him his New Balance 802’s and a Lara Bar. The biker choked back a tear and muttered a simple “Thanks.”

The Blue Ribbon Coalition is a non-profit ORV advocacy group that supports the establishment of Congressionally designated backcountry where motorized use can co-exist with … other recreational uses as well as other management activities while still preserving the backcountry character of the landscape.

Backpacking Light is a media company that publishes a weekly online magazine about lightweight hiking, backpacking, and other human powered sports. Backpacking Light recognizes that the intention of the Wilderness Act of 1964 was to preserve existing and identify continuing opportunities for wilderness land protection in the United States, and that environmentally sensitive backcountry areas should be closed to motorized use. In addition, Backpacking Light recognizes that the preservation of the “backcountry character of the landscape” is difficult in the absence of agreement on the definition of “backcountry character.”

Uncovering the Truth: Underground Doping in the Long Distance Hiking Community

When Jason Goldman* (not his real name) completed a thru-hike of the Pacific Crest Trail in less than 100 days, not too many people paid attention: it had been hiked faster by others. But this was Jason’s third thru-hike of the PCT. His previous two were completed in 183 and 174 days, respectively…

*All names and trail names have been modified to protect the identity of those involved.

When Jason Goldman* completed a thru-hike of the Pacific Crest Trail in less than 100 days, not too many people paid attention: it had been hiked faster by others. But this was Jason’s third thru-hike of the PCT. His previous two were completed in 183 and 174 days, respectively. So when he published his report of a three-month thru-hike, we sent Jason congratulations on a job well done. We simply assumed that he’d lightened his gear, refined his technique, and improved his fitness. And then we forgot about it.

Until three years later, when we received an email from a thru-hiker who goes by "Walker-G,"*

"There are a few things that I have to get off my conscience. I’m a long distance hiker who puts in 30- to 50-mile trail days regularly, even with a 30- or 40-pound pack. But I’m to the point that I’m struggling with my authenticity and this really hit home on my last hike, which combined the Trans-Canada rail route with the C2C across the U.S. I reached the Great Lakes and quit, because I become ill from the side effects of taking performance supplements."

By now, my mouth was agape, and while I’d suspected that a few hikers I’d met along the AT and PCT were experimenting with supplements, I never thought their use would have trickled up into the long distance hiking elite.

Walker-G continues:

"I know it isn’t illegal for hikers to do this, but the guilt I feel is real. I’ve been active in the long distance community for years, and sadly, I’m seeing the use of performance supplements spreading. I was a witness to Jason Goldman’s use of them on the PCT in 2006, and we talked about it a lot. Jason introduced me to the mix of supplements he was using, which included a number of herbal supplements, creatine, and an injectable anabolic steroid. I started using all three in 2007 and within four months of regular use, I was able to hike 40-mile days back to back to back, over long periods of time. Previously, I was pretty taxed by 20-mile days. I was in awe of how my performance had changed on the trail and had grand illusions of media success and the opportunities that could be afforded to me if I became a professional hiker – juiced up of course. So, my 2008 Canada-U.S. transects would be my proving ground, and 2009 would be my coming out year, with my attempt at a 17,000 mile transect of Europe, Siberia, Mongolia, China, and the Himalaya."

Attached to the email was a PDF document listing the names of eighteen well-known long distance hikers that Walker-G knew to have experimented with performance supplements of some type, including the names of two media-hungry thru-hikers with record-breaking accomplishments who personally told Walker-G they were using illegally-obtained anabolic steroids to fuel their endurance and strength to seemingly inhuman levels.

We are investigating Walker-G’s allegations of the two hikers using illegal steroids and have contacted both individuals. One declined to comment, saying that this was none of our business. The other is currently on a long distance hike and could not be reached. We are confident their sides of the story will be told before we will be put in a position to release their names.

Questions for Discussion:

1. Should legal, non-prescription performance supplements be explored to boost long distance hiking performance?

2. Should the decidedly anarchist community of long distance hiking be immune from the prying eyes of the media?

3. Should asterisks be noted next to the records of hikers who have been known to use performance supplements, especially steroids?

Sound off in the forums below.

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts Part 3

Seven packrafters with a total of over thirty-five years of experience under their bums share the safety gear they won’t be without, skills that have kept them coming back for more, common – and dangerous – mistakes, and real life rescue stories.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Pertex has an enviable reputation for developing and creating some of the most innovative technically advanced fabrics for the outdoor sports market. Our position of being close to the outdoors means that we know exactly what you need – after all, we’re gear users ourselves. Pertex apparel provides the perfect balance of wind protection, breathability and water repellency with ultra-light weight and stowability. Discover Pertex today.

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts - 1
Andrew Mattox on the Snake River. As packrafters run whitewater more routinely, safety gear and techniques are ever more important.

To learn more about packrafting at Backpacking Light, visit backpackinglight.com/packrafting, or take a wilderness course in packrafting at backpackinglight.com/school.

Introduction

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety: Common and dangerous mistakes.

A packraft is an inflatable raft that is light and small enough to carry in a backpack. It is most often used by backpackers as a tool to help them cross terrain that includes rivers. The two types of lightweight packrafts available today are the Sevylor Trail Boat and the Alpacka packraft. The Trail Boat is lighter and much cheaper than Alpacka packrafts, but also significantly less sturdy.

Packrafting in some form or another has been around for decades, with backpackers using rafts to cross and float less technical (usually class II and below) rivers to complete loops and traverses. As the sport has grown, backpackers have set their sights on routes that include more whitewater. In some cases river running is as much or more the focus of the trip as backpacking. Sheri Tingey, Alpacka designer, has responded to the sports’ direction by refining boat design over the past seven years so that Alpacka rafts are now capable whitewater craft.

Packrafters usually have a background in backpacking or climbing, with little river running experience and often without a true understanding of the power of moving water. In the past, they have rarely carried safety gear and lacked river rescue skills. That needs to change both for the survival of packrafters and the emergence of the sport as a respected option in the boating community. The necessity of carrying safety gear and having the skills to go along is now coming sharply into focus. In 2007, veteran packrafter Roman Dial worked with Rescue 3 International instructor, Scott Solle to bring an internationally recognized course in whitewater safety to packrafters in Alaska. Another expert packrafter, Forrest McCarthy, brought Scott to Jackson, Wyoming to teach the first packraft safety course in the lower forty-eight.

A dozen packrafters gathered in Jackson Hole, Wyoming in April 2008 for a Whitewater Rescue Technician class. They came from Alaska, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Washington, Colorado and Idaho. Seven were experts with over five years of packrafting under their belts while the remaining five were relative newcomers, with two of these never having packrafted at all.

I attended the course and took advantage of the packrafting experience represented there to compile tips on safety, gear, rescue stories, and a list of the most common mistakes.

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety:

  1. Exercise good judgment
  2. Know your group
  3. Know the river
  4. Carry the proper equipment.

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety: Have mad skills.

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety: Common and dangerous mistakes.

Metamorphosis #4: Monocle

It is amazing how removing so much from one’s hands puts so much at one’s fingertips.

Editor’s Note: Metamorphosis #1 and #2 were first published in the BackpackingLight Print Magazine, Issues 7 and 9, respectively. All four installments are now also available online.


Introduction

Who says that monocles are unsexy and out of style? Strip back the chain, the metal rod, your dignity, and any wire framing, and your antique monocle (or even your old pair of glasses) becomes an ultra-cool, super-efficient, lightweight backpacker’s vision tool. At least, that’s how it happened for me.

Before I chronicle the birth of the monocle, let me recap the metamorphosis that has taken place:

Fall of 2006, frustrated with the expense of typical backpacking gear, I set out to find a new, more efficient way of engaging in my favorite pastime. Inadvertently, I stumbled across Backpacking Light and was immediately drawn toward the ‘light.’

Spring and summer of 2007, I dropped from a total backpack weight exceeding sixty pounds to a respectable base weight of nineteen. Respectable, that is, until you consider that my goal had been to achieve ‘ultralight’ status, which meant a sub-ten-pound base weight. As 2008 unfolded, I knew I’d have to drop those last nine pounds, and that they could be the hardest. To meet that end, I made a few critical purchases:

  • For its utilitarian nature, I chose the GoLite Shangri-La 3, a shelter which provides several configurations ranging from single wall floorless shelter to bombproof tent. In its lightest configuration (sans floor and using trekking poles instead of the ones provided), the Shangri-La 3 is barely over two pounds. Still a lot of weight, but large enough for three people.
  • For those solo excursions, I purchased an 8-ounce Spinntex tarp for combination with my Bozeman Mountain Works VAPR bivy sack (6 ounces) for a shelter setup that is under one pound. (Note that dry nights could be dealt with by use of the bivy alone!)
  • To supplement my sleeping equipment, I purchased the Big Agnes Horse Thief, a 1 pound, 11 ounce top bag which is, I confidently submit, the most comfortable sleeping bag I’ve ever been in. The way I see it, everything from warm weather down to the freezing point will mean the Bozeman Mountain Works Pro 90 Quilt. Freezing and down to single digits will find me in the Big Agnes Horse Thief. Sub-zero weather (and limited mileage) will have me zipped up in my 6 pound, 8 ounce Nebo sleeping bag. Hey, I’m all about lightweight, but I’ve gotten very used to having fingers and toes!
  • For cooking, I chose the Tri-Ti Caldera Cone constructed specifically for my BPL Titanium 550 pot. My scale shows the whole mess (complete with a plastic Clamato bottle as a carrier) at under 5 ounces. Now there’s a beautiful thing to see…

Armed with these new toys and an urgency to break the ten pound barrier, I took the last three steps toward ultralight.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 1
The author checks the map on the Lake Plateau.

Step One – The Lake Plateau of the Absarokee Beartooth Wilderness

The Lake Plateau trip had been in our sights since 2004, when an initial attempt had gone awry. After a nine-mile ascent to Columbine Lake at the southern edge of our intended loop, pouring rain turned to copious amounts of snow, causing us to rethink the wisdom of heading still higher over unknown passes.

On the morning of day two, we decided to stand fast and watch the skies for signs of an opening. On that cold September day, Gibbs and I gave life to the new Olympic sport of ‘Fire Standing’ as we watched the swirling grey sky. Hour after hour and log after log, we stood in wait. In a true Olympic test of endurance, we shifted weight, turned in continual rotation to evenly warm our trunks, and made brief forays for dry fuel. Being a dedicated athlete, I tried in vain to dry my socks on a branch near the heatless blaze, only to see them smolder. We stomped our feet and slapped our hands, deeply breathing the intoxicating aroma of wood smoke. We peered in anticipation toward the new winter sky, but the day passed slowly and with no resolution. By the close of the third day, Gibbs and I sat shivering in a booth at MacKenzie River Pizza Company in Bozeman, defeated and disgusted. We’d been thoroughly skunked.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 2
Near Lake Columbine – A great place for Fire Standing.

We vowed to redress the defeat, and the bottle of Black Velvet that Gibbs had stashed in a nearby cairn was declaration enough that we’d be back. So, in the first week of September 2008, my buddy and I again rendezvoused in the Boulder Creek drainage south of Big Timber, Montana. This time it was our intention to complete the loop from north to south, reaching Columbine Lake at the end of our trip, rather than at the beginning.

Since the Anaconda Pintler Transect the year before, my base weight had changed little. I’d trimmed some fat to be sure, but the addition of the Shangri-La 3 was my burden alone. However, I can take some credit for Gibbs’ base weight dropping by fifteen pounds or more since I carried water purification tablets, the Shangri-La shelter, and the Tri-ti stove. Left behind was his Sierra Designs tent, his Pur water purifier, and his MSR stove and gas canisters.

With a twenty-pound base weight and a total weight of less than thirty, I anticipated no problem ascending the 1,500 feet from the trailhead of Upside Down Creek to the rim of the plateau. As we made our final preparations in the rain on the morning of our outset, both harboring white visions of our 2004 trip, a Forest Service truck rolled alongside my car.

“You guys fishing?” He barely cracked the window of his truck to inquire.

“Backpacking.” We both responded in concert, wondering why our attire did not make this fact obvious. The ranger suspiciously eyed us for a moment or two.

“Sure doesn’t look like you’re prepared for backpackin’.” He chortled while nodding toward my pack. “It’s gonna be cold.”

I couldn’t think of anything smart to say, and probably would have thought the better of it anyway. No sense in seeding animosity when this same guy could be coordinating removal of our corpses from the high country in only a matter of days.

“I’m counting on it,” I replied.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 3
Waiting for more precip on Columbine Pass.

The ranger was right, but only up to a point. Our first day’s hike began in the rain, but gave way to slowly falling flakes once we’d gained some elevation. Sometime during the night, the front had passed and left a black, open sky into which every bit of warmth seemed to lift from the earth. The next morning dawned solid and frosted, but with the promise of blue sky from one horizon to the other. At a slow meander, Gibbs and I set out across the Plateau. The relative lack of burden on both our shoulders allowed us to easily clear eleven miles, a daily tally we’d not achieved since 1998.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 4
Frosty morning on the Lake Plateau.

Three days and twenty calm miles later, Gibbs and I approached Columbine Lake from the high country that had so eluded us four years earlier. As we descended into the familiar surroundings, the sky was again swallowed by clouds. Soon the entire cirque donned the appearance that it had had four years before.

With cold and anxious hands, Gibbs removed several keystone rocks from the cairn that he’d chosen in 2004. To the sounds of laughter and shouting, a pale and unappealing bottle of Black Velvet was paraded in victory for nearly half an hour before the snow began to fall. I broke no weight threshold, but four years to the month, at the exact location of our skunking, Gibbs and I again spent the afternoon ‘Fire Standing’ – but this time, like champions.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 5
The author and Gibbs are reunited with four-year-old Black Velvet.

Step Two: Utah Canyonlands with Dr. H

By mid-October, I’d still not reached my goal. With the desert washes in full autumn color and a weekend to spare, my friend Dr. H. and I tossed a few random items in the back of my truck and rolled out of Grand Junction and toward canyon country. Dr. H., a native of Vermont and being largely obsessed with the climbing of rock faces, hadn’t experienced much in the way of backpacking. I assured him that backpacking was a likewise enjoyable way to spend time out doors, even if the probability of meeting healthy ‘hippy chicks’ who live in VW busses was somewhat lower.

“Yeah, man, that’ll be cool.” He agreed to give it a shot. “I think I might even like backpacking if it’s done ultralight like you’re talking about.” Here’s a guy that’ll jump straight to the last page.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 6
Dr. H surveys the desert near Canyonlands National Park.

Dr. H. and I made a few calculation errors. First, we departed the Grand Junction area far too late in the morning to make it to our destination. Second, we had unwittingly chosen the Needles area, not knowing that this is, in fact, part of the Canyonlands National Park. Lastly, (and this was my error), I hadn’t made the concerted effort at changing anything from my previous trip. I trimmed the number of Esbit tables that I carried and seriously cut back on clothing. In the end, I couldn’t decide if the purpose of the trip was to see the Needles area, to expose Dr. H. to backpacking, or to cross some weight threshold that Ryan Jordan would be proud of! The sad result is that all counts seemed to fail.

I learned that the Needles IS a part of Canyonlands National Park and DOES require a backcountry permit for entrance. I learned that there is a perpetual and total ban on fire in backcountry areas, and that a visitor may only camp in approved locations. Most importantly, I learned that on that day, no locations were available.

Four or five miles down a red dirt road into BLM land, Dr. H and I pulled off into the sagebrush and parked the truck. We had no map, the beer was getting warm, and the sun was within two hours of setting behind the elusive Needles area far to our west. My pack was the same miserable twenty pounds that it had been during a bonafide packing trip only a month before, but this was to be just an overnighter!

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 7
Fall colors near Indian Creek, Utah.

In the end, it didn’t matter. Twenty minutes into our hike, Dr. H. finished the beer he’d been drinking, crushed the can, and asked if he could stash it in the outside mesh pocket of my pack. All illusions of ultralight were already long gone, so I shook off the excess moisture and did the unthinkable: I added an empty can of Pabst Blue Ribbon to my base weight.

Several desert washes from where we’d parked the truck, Dr. H. and I made camp. Just to complete the bumbling and inefficiencies, we risked catastrophe and camped on the sandy bottom of a desert wash. To be completely honest, it was the best outdoor sleep I’d had in years. The next morning we scouted our way down the wash and picked a random route back to the truck, making a full circle. Once again, I’d broken no weight threshold, but the company was great, the pinyon campfire unparalleled, and the desert scenery spectacular. To make it ultralight, however, I realized I’d have to go it alone.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 8
The Shangri-La 3 in a desert wash. Dr. H still asleep.

Step Three: Birth of the Monocle

I don’t want to become an intolerable snob, but I have to toot my own horn just a bit here – I made it.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 9
The Spinntex tarp on the Grand Mesa.

In early November, two weeks after the first snows had kissed the 10,000-foot crown of Colorado’s Grand Mesa, I set out on my own to break the ten-pound barrier. I knew the trip would be just one night, so I confidently gathered only what I thought might be necessary.

My food on this outing consisted of one freeze dried meal, five granola bars, two packages of oatmeal, two pouches of instant coffee, and a small bag of nuts. I carried with me two full liters of water, the Tri-Ti cooking system and related titanium mug, and a cheap plastic spoon.

My clothing consisted of shoes, pants, shirt, socks, skivvies, a baseball cap, a long sleeve wool shirt, one handkerchief, and an LED light on a lanyard, all of which I wore from the outset, since it was quite cool at 10,000 feet, and I knew my route would not be vigorous. I also brought and used at night: a balaclava, wool gloves, and thermal underwear.

My sleeping arrangement consisted of the Spinntex tarp, the Bozeman Mountain Works VAPR bivy and Pro 90 quilt, and a Therm-a-Rest. I carried two REI trekking poles and one Nikon digital camera. And, OK, I’ll admit that the weight of the camera is NOT worked into the equation, but I only brought the thing to prove that I’ve done it. Cut me some slack here!

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 10
The new system of overnight necessities.

My random items included four Esbit tablets, a small pocket knife, a small strip of water purification tablets, a short length of rope, a small bundle of toilet paper, one box of matches, a tube of lip balm, one USGS topo map, and my first aid kit, which contained some aspirin, antibacterial cream, a few bandages, the head of a toothbrush and an eye dropper each of saline solution and Dr. Bronner’s soap. (Yes, I’ve gotten over the humiliation of brushing my teeth with Dr. B’s.) Also in my bag of tricks was one meerschaum pipe and perhaps four bowls’ worth of tobacco. If I can’t pretend to be Bilbo Baggins, really, what use is an adventure?

In a frenzy of weight slashing before departing my parked truck, I wrapped a leaf of paper around a pencil rather than burden myself with the entire notepad. I then turned to my assembled pile. My gaze fell upon those glasses… those old, nearly worthless glasses. How could I suffer with their bulk and weight only to use them in that short transition period between contact removal and ultimate sleep? Was it really that necessary to have glasses to peer through when inspecting something that goes bump in the night?

In only a moment my pocketknife was employed to loosen the screws on that old pair of glasses, and in less than a minute, they had been transformed to a single convex lens. The monocle was born.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 11
The monocle at sunrise.

The quest I took that November day followed no path. Instead, I charted my own route across the Grand Mesa until I had reached the southern rim, where I positioned my tarp so to give myself a view across the North Fork Valley. I watched the sun set pink upon the West Elk mountains to the southeast and the San Juan’s far on the horizon. I watched the towns of Delta and Hotchkiss begin to glow as night swept over them. After dinner and a long warm fire, I stole away to my tarp and fell asleep listening to the wind take flight from the Mesa top.

An hour before sunrise, the navy blue sky gave way to promise of sunrise beyond the crisp outline of the Rocky Mountains. The first rays of sunlight found me reclining calmly in my shelter with a hot cup of coffee. I suppose that I tasted a certain measure of melancholy with my coffee, realizing that there was no one to share such a beautiful morning with. In fact, I realize that I’d delayed breaking the ten-pound barrier because something so much more important had always been at hand: friendship and the sharing of events rather than rigid goals.

Nonetheless, I had met my goal, and the morning was mine to celebrate. As I packed my things that morning, I marveled at how simple breaking the ten-pound barrier really had been.

I’d hiked mile after mile with no fixed destination.

I’d satisfied my hunger with simple sustenance.

I’d slept calmly with almost nothing to shelter me.

I’d rejoiced in a beautiful morning for no other reason than to see it.

It is amazing how removing so much from one’s hands puts so much at one’s fingertips.

Metamorphosis 4: Monocle - 12
Ten-pound barrier, broken!

Category Item Brand Worn Packed
FOOTWEAR Socks REI 2.3  
  Shoes Vasque Gore-Tex 39.4  
HIKING CLOTHES Cotton T-Shirt Generic 7.0  
  Leather Belt N/A 4.3  
  Pants Carhartts 13.4  
  Underwear Generic 2.7  
  Wool Gloves REI 0.7  
  Bandanna Generic 0.9  
  Baseball Cap Generic 4.9  
  Long-Sleeve Shirt Generic 17.0  
HIKING GEAR Trekking Poles REI   26.0
  LED Photon   0.3
  Water Bottles (x2) 1L Platypus   1.8
  U.S. Forest Service Map Grand Mesa USGS   1.8
PACKING GEAR Backpack (no stiffener or lid) GoLite Infinity Pinnacle   29.0
CAMPING GEAR Insulating Pants Generic Thermal   5.5
  Balaclava Generic   1.9
  Spinntex Tarp Custom, bought on BPL forums   8.0
  Tent Poles/Stakes Titanium   1.3
  Sleeping Pad Therm-A-Rest   33.3
  Sleep Quilt BMW Pro 90 Quilt   16.0
  Bivy Sack BMW Vapr Bivy   6.0
  Solid Fuel Esbit   2.0
  Mess Kit Trail Designs Tri-Ti Caldera Cone, BPL Firelite   5.0
  Plastic Utensils Generic   0.3
  Water Purification Blister Tabs   0.1
MISCELLANEOUS GEAR Pocket Knife Generic   2.1
  Fire/Entertainment Matches/Lighter/Pipe/Tobacco   4.3
  Monocle Homemade!   0.6
  Note-taking Pencil, Leaf of Paper   0.6
  First Aid Kit Ibuprofen, Bandages, Antibiotic Cream,Toothbrush, Dr. Bronner’s, Saline, Contact Case   2.6
  Toilet Paper     1.1
CONSUMABLES Food 1.25 lbs/day of Freeze Dried Meals, Nuts, Granola Bars   32.0
  Water 2 Liters   64.0
      oz lbs
TOTAL WEIGHT – FSO     338.2 21.1
TOTAL BASE WEIGHT     149.6 9.4
TOTAL WEIGHT – CONSUMABLES     96.0 6.0


Read More of Nathan’s Transformation

Metamorphosis #3: Walking the Edge

At the onset of my affiliation with Backpacking Light, my base weight stood at a whopping sixty pounds. After several months worth of hand-wringing and basic re-education in the art of backpacking, I’d dropped my base weight to nineteen pounds.

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 1
Climbing toward the Continental Divide on day one, with less weight than ever before.

Editor’s Note: Metamorphosis #1 and #2 were first published in the BackpackingLight Print Magazine, Issues 7 and 9, respectively. All four installments are now also available online.


Montana Highway 1, just west of the town of Anaconda, maintains an excruciatingly slow speed limit. For nearly ten miles, as it creeps toward the Georgetown reservoir and the shoulder of the Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, the highway is posted, on average, twenty-five miles per hour lower than most drivers would consider fair. Making this snail-like progress even more aggravating is the close proximity of so much good stuff: high mountain lakes, thickly forested canyons, and wind-blown ridgelines… if you could just get there already!

That was essentially my state of mind last September as I ascended the last twenty-mile stretch to meet my buddy Ryan Gibbs by the shores of Storm Lake. I drove eleven and half hours from western Colorado, and the prospect of being freed from the vehicle, feeling the chill of alpine air, and toasting our upcoming trek held considerably more allure than keeping my speed below forty miles per hour.

Gibbs and I have been regular visitors to the Storm Lake area during the last decade or so. At the eastern edge of the Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness, it’s a bit far from the area where we did most our backpacking as boys, but provides quick access to the most dramatic portion of that mountain range. It’s also within a few miles of where Gibbs took a severe fall in 1995, resulting in compound fractures to both his tibia and fibula. He narrowly escaped with his life.

Thanks to the Deer Lodge County Search and Rescue, a military chopper from Malmstrom Air Force Base, and a good dose of grit on his part, he still owns a left leg. That leg carries an impressive mark from that day, but I suppose the incident really marked us both. Storm Lake will always represent a time and place where two reckless young guys discovered their mortality and thereby became young men. We raise our drinks in tribute to it pretty regularly, whether or not we’re anywhere near the Pintlers.

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 2
The view across the Queener Basin.

This year, our annual packing trip was in the Pintlers, and this familiar place was about to serve as a testing ground for my fledgling new lightweight system. Two years ago, Gibbs and I decided that September of 2007 would be the year we’d complete a transect of the Anaconda-Pintler (AP) Wilderness along the Continental Divide Trail from west to east. We’d be walking the edge, so to speak. It was only one year before, however, that I’d heard of Backpacking Light for the first time.

As I navigated the last jumbled potholes and drove into view of the lake, I saw Gibbs seated casually, legs hanging from the passenger side of a dusty Subaru. His head turned slowly to witness my arrival, eyes shielded by sunglasses, cheek clearly full of sunflower seeds. Expressionless, he hoisted a can a beer as if to say, “Nice you could make it.”

The fact is, I wouldn’t miss it, especially this year. At the onset of my affiliation with Backpacking Light, my base weight stood at a whopping sixty pounds. After several months worth of hand-wringing and basic re-education in the art of backpacking, I’d dropped my base weight to nineteen pounds. On the day I rolled up to Storm Lake, my pack sat on the seat next to me, looking trim and sporting a base weight of seventeen and a half pounds.

Should I have dropped more? Oh yeah. Do I feel guilty? Well, old habits die hard. The AP transect had grown to mythic proportions in my mind over the last two years, and I really didn’t want to find myself twenty-five miles back, wet, freezing, and hungry. So, seventeen and a half pounds seemed reasonable for a week-long trip.

To that base weight, I added:

  • 7 lbs, 6 oz of food
  • 2 lbs or so of water (fluctuating daily…)
  • 2 lbs or so of rum (decreasing daily…)

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 3
Gibbs climbs toward Goat Flats with his traditionally sized pack on the last day. Fifty-seven miles must have been a grind!

 

I felt as though my pack was still pretty streamlined at a total weight of twenty-nine pounds, give or take. I’d foregone the weighing of the clothes I intended to wear while hiking and the trekking poles that I planned to carry. After all, my total weight, food and drink included, was down to less than half of my previous base weight. I was feeling pretty smug until Gibbs caught sight of my pack and put a match to all the insecurities I’d kindled about penetrating the wild with so little.

“Hey! You got a new pack!” He flung open the passenger side door and lifted my GoLite into the cool evening air. His eyes widened. “No WAAAAAY.” He tested its weight with one arm.

“Yup.” I replied, waiting for the deluge.

“No waaaay, dude.”

“Yep, things have changed.”

“No way. You’re gonna die.”

Gibbs proceeded to quiz me on the functionality of my new gear. When I proudly displayed my Bozeman Mountain Works Pro 90 Quilt, he hung upon it a term which would endure throughout the transect: Kleenex, as in, “Sleep good in your Kleenex, man.”

When I displayed my Esbit wing stove, his comments amounted to “I’m bringing my MSR anyway.”

When I proudly held my bottle of Klearwater between my forefinger and thumb, his comments were slightly more encouraging: “Good.” He tossed his water pump back into the trunk of his Subaru. “I’m leaving this behind.”

His reticence was not without impact, however. His words, combined with his more studied knowledge of the immediate forecast, caused me at least a moderation of panic. In a last stab at prudence, I shoved a tattered, hooded jacket into the lid pocket of my pack. This, along with the my portion of the communal goods – ground cloth and poles for the tent, two small canisters of gas (for the stove he refused to abandon), and fishing gear over which I hemmed and hawed – spiked my total weight to around thirty-five pounds.

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 4
The author at Storm Lake Pass, ready to make the final descent toward a waiting cooler of steaks and beer.

I know you guys aren’t impressed. However, thirty-five-ish pounds as a total weight was about to make a universe of difference.

After a short morning drive to the western edge of the wilderness near Sula, Montana, we set off toward Surprise Lake, nestled beneath the Continental Divide ridge. Only minutes into our ascent, it became clear that my low-weight advantage would change the outlook for our trip. I maintained my breath while both hiking and chattering on about this and that. The tingling sensation of heat and sweat were conspicuously absent. Instead, my body warmed to a comfortable level, and I walked as if taking a purposeful stroll down a country road. As I pulled further and further ahead of my packing partner, the difference between lightweight and the status quo began to shine. I could go anywhere. My enthusiasm grew proportionally with each new vista.

We reached our goal on the first day, but arrived far later than anticipated. Maps unfurled on the soft alpine ground near the shores of the lake, we began taking calculated measurements and setting benchmark goals for subsequent days. It became evident that Gibbs and I had somewhat misjudged the time required to hike from one end of the wilderness to the other.

We’d estimated that five nights and six days of hiking would allow us ample time for lounging, fishing, and exploration. It may have, had we both been carrying thity-five-pound packs. His, however, was still closer to the sixty-pound end of the spectrum, and making his progress all the slower was the unfortunate configuration of the bones in his legs ever since his fall.

Limited range of movement in his left foot and a set of knee-caps that don’t line up leave Gibbs in considerable discomfort after only five or six miles. His pain worsens while going downhill, a prime reason he was the first to adopt the use of trekking poles a few years back. This year; however, Gibbs must have been distracted by the birth of his third son. In short, he wasn’t paying attention to his packing before departure and forgot his trekking poles. It wasn’t long before I hung a name on him that stuck: Limp.

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 5
A comparative look at old and new packing methods. Gibbs’s pack (left) is the size that my pack used to be. The trekking poles are mine, but a day or two into the journey I loaned them to Gibbs, who had forgotten his own. My lightweight pack allowed me to get by with a found walking stick!

When we arrived at Surprise Lake that first night on the trail, we did so under ominous tendrils of yellow smoke that curled upward from the Rat Creek Fire only a dozen miles to our southwest. We nervously debated the prudence of making camp within range of a wildfire, but agreed to trust a press release that indicated the fire to be more or less under control. Ultimately, it was of little concern, and the smoke didn’t last. By dawn of the second day, western Montana experienced its “fire-season ending event.” Turning northeastward, Gibbs and I struck off along the Continental Divide Trail under a veil of icy rain and low-slung clouds.

Icy rain and low-slung clouds pretty much sums up the scenery we enjoyed for the next five days. It was occasionally punctuated by slow falling flakes, which kept me looking toward the sky for any clue as to just how severe it could get. By day three, Gibbs and I were far enough into the wilderness to make any change of direction a wash: twenty-five miles from either of the vehicles, one to the northeast, the other southwest. Twenty miles, at least, to any paved road large enough to hope for a ride. Essentially, retreat or abandonment was never really an option. Instead, we crossed our fingers and kept our eyes to the sky.

Our primary concerns were the passes. The CDT only really follows the physical Divide in the southwestern region of the wilderness. To the northeast, the physical Divide becomes a razor’s edge, tracing the rim of one alpine cirque after another. In this half, the trail drops and rises in and out of each cirque, essentially hop-scotching from one ocean drainage to another. The passes, steep and exposed, can be unsettling with even a brisk wind. Any heavy snowfall above 7,000 feet would have made attempting them unwise, at the very least.

The weather tested my lightweight gear, though. Each night, I pulled a face mask over my head, tucked my thermals into my socks and gloves, slipped a silk liner into my Pro 90 Quilt and bedded down in less than one pound, two ounces of sleeping gear. Each morning, my soft sided water bottle was slushy with ice, but I was well-rested and warm.

Gibbs’s take on my sleep set-up was, as expected, somewhat harsh. In bedding down on our second night when the temperature first dropped below freezing, he set off on his usual tangent about my “Kleenex.”

“Listen,” I protested, “all a guy needs is to supplement with this!” I extracted my face mask and proudly pulled it into position. “This thing is great,” I explained, “I think I might even start using it at home. Limits noise, keeps you warm, cradles your entire head…”

“Makes you look like the Gimp from Pulp Fiction,” he finished my sentence. “I’m scared to be in here with you, dude. Next time you’ll be bringing a little red ball.”

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 6
The tent, nicely insulated with snow at the foot of Pintler Pass.

His tone softened over the next four days. On the third day, I donated my trekking poles rather than watch him do even more damage to his bum leg. On the fourth day, I heard Gibbs begin to mutter about the weight of various items within his pack. “Shouldn’t have brought that… this thing weighs a ton… if I were carrying a Kleenex…what does Backpacking Light say about…?” The writing was on the wall. By the time Gibbs and I were preparing our fifth meal, we’d brainstormed the development of whole new lightweight cooking system that we figured would do for two packers: The F.I.D.D.C.E.S. (pronounced “fid-cuss”) would integrate a windscreen, two cups, one lid, and a apparatus large enough to heat four cups of water. What else could it be called other than the Fully Integrated Dual Dude Cooking and Eating System?

Before the trip was through, I heard Gibbs say that, indeed, he needed to go light. The evidence was, quite literally, painfully clear. It was better to be Gimp than Limp.

The trip ended up being much more of a forced march than we’d expected. It took Gibbs and I the full six days of hiking to clear the fifty-five or so miles from the western to the eastern edge of the wilderness. Three of our nights were in the snow, and two were in the rain. The passes were fine, visibility and footing adequate in most cases. On our last day, of course, the storm blew out, and we were graced with brilliant sunshine and blue skies as we crossed Goat Flats and began our drop toward Storm Lake, where a cooler of beer and elk steaks waited.. In hindsight, there were plenty of items I could have excluded from my pack. With the transect now behind me, I imagine my potential miles per day without the following:

  • One volume of Edward Abbey’s short stories: approximately one pound. I never even cracked it open.
  • One Crazy Creek camp chair: one pound, six ounces. It snowed and rained on four of the five evenings we spent in the backcountry. Lounging around the fire was done on foot, thereby facilitating the rotation of the body to evenly warm all sides… The chair served as an additional layer beneath my sleeping pad at night, but would have been better left at home.

Metamorphosis 3: Walking the Edge - 7
Stunning tamaracks, Warren Peak, and a lightweight pack.

  • One Princeton headlamp: three ounces. It got so soaked on the third night that, to this date, it hasn’t functioned correctly. Besides, I had my LED light, which weighed a matter of grams. Granted, it wasn’t easy holding the LED between my teeth while trying to aim the light by pursing my lips. I managed to drool on the little unit a fair amount, but with its lanyard I was able to wear it around my neck while I slept, keeping it handy.
  • That very same fishing pole/reel/tackle that I’d debated so much at the trailhead: two pounds, six ounces. It never touched the water.

In the same vein, I discovered that some of my lightweight backpacking alterations were so helpful that I plan to adhere to them religiously:

  • I really enjoyed the face mask, despite being slandered for using it. I’ve already replaced it with a more appropriate balaclava that should serve the same purpose and not startle my tent mate.
  • Zip-off pants/shorts are the way to go. This item provides beautiful double duty use. During a long uphill grind in the snow when getting too warm, just unzip and tuck the legs down beneath your gaiters.
  • Gaiters: I’ll never go packing in the shoulder seasons without them. Having them prevented me from needing any rain pants, and they kept my shoes dry when slogging through six inches of wet snow.
  • Klearwater or similar substitute. I’ll never pump water again…

Lastly, there was one thing that I’ll avoid like the plague: I’ll never again use Dr. Bronner’s instead of toothpaste. Each night, as I wrapped myself up in my facemask and quilt, I suffered the humiliation of having just washed my own mouth out with soap.

Gibbs and I have already discussed the changes that we’ll incorporate into next year’s trip. We plan to split the sleeping arrangement, not because he is intimidated by my face mask, but rather, because he’s intending on moving on to a lightweight, single-person tent, while I’m more inclined to experiment with a bivy and tarp. In either case, we’re both looking forward to more, or rather, less.

My own intentions are keep the weight going down. Since moving back to the Rocky Mountains last May, I’ve managed to sleep outdoors at least once every month. Here in western Colorado, I’ve got high mountains and deserts to play with. Metaphorically, though, I think I’m ready to stop walking the edge, and ready to drop down into some single digit base weights.

I bet the desert around Moab is beautiful in the winter, especially when carrying an ultralight pack…

Nathan’s Somewhat Lightweight Gear List
CATEGORY ITEM BRAND/MODEL WORN PACKED
FOOTWEAR Socks (2 pair) REI 2.3 2.3
  LW Hiking Boots Vasque Gore Tex 39.4  
  Gaiters Generic   7.9
  Camp Shoes Crocs   12.0
HIKING CLOTHES Cotton T-Shirts (x3) Generic 7.0 14.0
  Convertible Pants REI Long Convertibles 13.4  
  Cotton Underwear (x3) Generic 2.7 5.4
  Gloves Generic 0.7  
  Hiking Hat Columbia 2.9  
  Insulating Top Generic Thermal   6.5
  Insulating Bottom General Thermal   5.5
  Rain Jacket Stearns   18.5
  Balaclava Generic Synthetic   1.9
  Bandana N/A 0.9  
  Hooded Jacket Generic   35.1
  Leather Belt N/A   3.4
HIKING GEAR Headlamp Black Diamond   2.9
  Trekking Poles eBay Special   25.4
  Sunglasses Peppers   0.7
  Water Bottle (x2) 1L Platypus   1.8
  Map USFS – Anaconda Pintler 3.0  
PACKING GEAR Clothing Stuff Sack Kelty   5.3
  Waterproof Pack Cover Too Old to Remember   5.8
  Food Storage Waterproof Bag for Hanging   1.7
  Libation Storage 1L Platypus   0.9
CAMPING GEAR Shelter Sierra Designs   8.0
  Tent Poles/Stakes Sierra Designs   32.0
  Sleeping Pad Thermarest   33.3
  Sleep Quilt Bozeman Mountain Works Pro 90 Quilt   16.0
  Sleeping Bag Liner Sea to Summit   5.5
  Camp Chair Crazy Creek   23.1
  Backpack GoLite   32.0
  Fuel Bottle (x2) Generic   16.0
  Stove MSR   9.0
  Windscreen Tin Foil   0.9
  SUL Stove and Fuel Vargo Stove, Esbit Tabs   8.5
  Firestarter Waterproof Matches   0.3
  Cook Pot Titanium Mug With Lid   3.1
  Utensil Lexan Spoon   0.4
  Water Purification Klearwater   1.1
  Water Bucket (2 gallon) Sea to Summit   2.6
  LED Light Photon   0.3
MISC GEAR Fishing Rod, Reel, and Tackle Generic   19.4
  Notebook/Pencil Moleskin   5.0
  Pocket Knife in Small Carrier N/A   3.7
  Glasses Old, Broken Pair 3.0  
  First Aid Kit Ibuprophen, Band Aids, Antibiotic Cream, Toothbrush, Baggy 2.4  
  Soap/Toothpaste Dr. Bronner’s 1.2  
  Toilet Paper Charmin 1.1  
  Contact Case and Saline Solution N/A 1.8  
CONSUMABLES Food (Freeze Dried Meals, Clif Bars, Jerky) 1.25 lbs/day 60.0  
  Water 2 L 64.0  
Total Weight     oz lbs
Total Base Weight     377.2 23.6
Total Weight – Consumables     124.0 7.8
Total Weight – FSO     583.0 36.4


Read More of Nathan’s Transformation

Metamorphosis #2: A Change in Attitude

Compared to the expertise written into surrounding pages, a nineteen-pound base weight must look like an embarrassingly tight pair of pants. With another ten pounds in food and water, my thirty-pound pack still needs heavy trimming.

Metamorphosis #2: A Change in Attitude - 1
Nathan Boddy.

Editor’s Note: Metamorphosis #1 and #2 were first published in the BackpackingLight Print Magazine, Issues 7 and 9, respectively. All four installments are now also available online.


I feel like a wobbly-kneed fawn. I’ve got all the confidence of a gawky tourist, clutching at his phrasebook in a foreign country. I’m like a pimple-faced teenager at a school dance, craning in anxiety at the ladies across the room…

But, my base weight has dropped to nineteen pounds.

Compared to the expertise written into surrounding pages, a nineteen-pound base weight must look like an embarrassingly tight pair of pants. With another ten pounds in food and water, my thirty-pound pack still needs heavy trimming. With this base weight, however, I have just barely squeezed into the unremarkable “light” category. Unremarkable, that is, until you consider the base weight I’ve dropped from: sixty pounds.

Following my confessions in Issue 7 of Backpacking Light Magazine, I dedicated myself to the goal of becoming a super-ultralight (SUL) backpacker. The first step of weighing my existing gear revealed a startling excess of booty: extra batteries, large bottle of sunscreen, rubber poncho, homemade PVC fishing rod carrier… the list was substantial. As I sat in my kitchen scribbling down weights, I realized that no one item could easily be removed to reduce my base weight. Granted, my 6.5-pound Nebo sleeping bag was topping the list, but my backpack wasn’t far behind at 5.2 pounds! I had a flashlight that weighed one pound and a “light” jacket that weighed two! All in all, the mountain of goods that I spread out on my kitchen table set a shockingly high benchmark.

Will it Hurt?

My first step away from that benchmark was to order a handful of items from BPL: a bottle of KlearWater water purifier, a titanium Esbit wing stove, and some fuel tablets. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t shocked when the tiny box arrived several days later. My first thought before tearing it open was, “They must not have sent the whole order.” I was wrong. They had sent the whole order, and there was room in the box to spare. As I held my new Esbit wing stove between thumb and index finger, one thought kept rattling through my head: “I’m going to starve.”

My vigor for the implementation of new backpacking methods seemed to be tested at every juncture. Not only was I alarmed that the Esbit stove was the size of a paper clip, but several very important camping traditions seemed to be under attack. “Feet Relief,” (the name my backpacking partner Gibbs and I have given to our camp sandals), appear contradictory to the lightweight ethos. A Crazy Creek chair has held my exhausted frame after many a long day in the alpine, but again, does not seem to compliment ultra austerity. My adoption of trekking poles has been somewhat more acceptable, but is an act for which I must swallow my pride. When Gibbs first started using them a year or two ago, I chided him for his dependence on “Pixie Stix.” When shopping for the right pair, I shook my head in disbelief that Leki poles come equipped with walking instructions.

Separating me from my old pack has been another difficult passage. I suspect it will while away its last years doing odd chores, like it did recently, swallowing all my clothes in a hurried move across the country and belching them forth again in my new home, but it will not likely see the high country again. It has been replaced by a used GoLite Infinity internal frame pack, whose weight can be coaxed below the two-pound barrier when stripped of its frame stiffener and pocket lid. As excited as I am about the GoLite, I feel like I’m dating again after a long marriage. On our first several dates, the GoLite and I giggled nervously, trying to get used to one another. I stammered and tried not to look like a fool.

Are We Having Fun Yet?

As winter melted into spring, I assigned myself a few dry runs to get used to the new methods and mindsets. During a visit to southern Arizona, I climbed into the Santa Rita Mountains, where my inability to block the wind from my Esbit stove forced me to consume some rather crunchy chili beef with mac. My grumbling intestines reminded me to buy a foil windscreen before serious trips. In mid-May, I tried my hand at pitching my old tent fly, sans poles, sans tent. I was hoping that it would serve in place of an expensive tarp. In a small, tick-infested swath of public land in southern Minnesota, I grumbled discontentedly as it sagged toward my perspiration streaked face. After thirty minutes of slapping at mosquitoes, I abandoned the effort. I still hadn’t been able to replace my sleeping bag, which would not have physically fit into my new GoLite anyway, and my efforts to fashion a shelter from existing items had failed miserably. It began to seem as though all my best intentions were doomed.

However, not everything was a disaster: on an afternoon hike just outside of Rochester, Minnesota, I took my chances at purifying my drinking water with a few drops of the KlearWater solution. I can say with conviction that it worked. Had it been anything less than effective, the agricultural slurry I pulled out of Silver Creek that day may very well have killed me. Lastly, I replaced my flashlight with an LED light the size of quarter, jettisoned my hard-sided Nalgene bottles for collapsible, and dedicated myself to the hunt for a new shelter and sleep system.

Concerning sleep systems, let me be clear: if my legs do not maintain their distance from one another during slumber, I will sweat to death. I am a warm and claustrophobic sleeper, so tapered mummy bags are out. That being said, I had determined that a top-bag system would be ideal. That decision led me to Big Agnes. In the interest of total disclosure, I have to admit that many of the sleep systems I’d seen on BPL made me wonder if you people weren’t completely out of your minds. A sleep quilt? Really? I sleep warm, yes, but isn’t it desirable to wake up in a bag? At any rate, the Big Agnes bags seemed to combine a fairly roomy design with a decent weight. After hours of comparisons, reading reviews and analyzing my pocketbook, I had it narrowed down to two: the Horse Thief or the Nugget. Maybe the Yampa… jeesh, don’t get me started. Does it indicate a problem that I spent more time weighing the merits of sleeping bags than I did on the purchase of my first home? Nevertheless, my first action represented what is always the safest decision: I purchased a Big Agnes Roxy Ann for my wife and continued dithering about my own bag.

Joining the Nutters

As the summer began, I had essentially made no gains since spring. I was confused, disheveled, and clutching at a mismatch of ultra-light and ultra-heavy backpacking gear. I was too reluctant and broke to make a firm decision regarding my next step, but my intrigue with lightweight precluded me from continuing on with the old gear. It wasn’t until a car camping trip at 10,000 feet in Colorado that I awoke with an epiphany: I was under my sleeping bag. I had shimmied completely out of the bag, undoing the zipper along the way, and was sleeping soundly directly underneath it. The shock was not waking up in that position-it happens nearly every time. No, the shock was in the realization that I had inadvertently been turning my sleeping bag into a quilt, laying directly upon my pad, and had been doing it for years! I’ve said it myself: “if my legs do not maintain their distance from one another during slumber, I will sweat to death. I am a warm and claustrophobic sleeper.” Problem solved.

In a matter of days, I was enduring some gentle derision myself as I proclaimed proudly that I had purchased a fourteen-ounce Bozeman Mountain Works Pro 90 Quilt. “A quilt?” My wife’s words came as more of a mockery than a question, “Doesn’t sound very comfortable to me.”

With several minor failures behind me, I determined to throw myself into the roiling sea and either sink or swim. Striking out across Colorado’s Grand Mesa, I tried to mentally prepare myself for a miserable night. It was to be the maiden voyage of my quilt, and to be tried out live without a safety net. I had brought minimal food, my new selection of lightweight gear, and a blue tarp for cover. That’s right: the old fiber-reinforced blue tarp, fresh from Ace Hardware (also seen protecting roofs in the Gulf Coast). It was a considerable weight savings over my old tent and represented a definite departure from the old way. No more tip-toeing around-I was jumping in with both feet. Speaking of feet, I took a radical departure from my traditional steel-toed boots and donned a pair of ultra-light Crocs. I figured my Pixie Stix could make up for any lost stability.

I won’t pretend it was the best night’s sleep I’ve had in the high country. Considering the hurried configuration of my blue tarp into a triangular tunnel to serve both as tarp and ground cloth, I think I slept quite well. In fact, being my first night under a bona fide quilt and struggling to keep my body’s warmth from escaping at each roll, I’d say it was a fine rest. My feet protruded a bit from the bottom end of my haphazard tarp arrangement, and my head lay mostly exposed to the night air, but this allowed me a dazzling view of a meteor shower dancing behind the silhouetted spruce trees. The temperature dropped into the mid-forties, but once I was able to locate my stocking cap, my body’s engine kept me at a comfortable idle. I was, in fact, surprised to see daylight paint the eastern sky so soon.

Wait, That’s It?

When I finally tossed the quilt aside and pulled myself out of my blue refuge, my first thought was, “Ok, I’ve done it.” I knew I’d be in a hurry to make a prior arrangement in town, so I began to gather my things, which was precisely when the full allure of lightweight backpacking hit home with a fury: I was packed in under five minutes. I slung my pack over my shoulder easily, without the furious grunting and heaving to which I had so long been accustomed. With my pack as light as it was, I happily avoided the trail and began to pick my way across the Mesa, slowly, deliberately, enjoying every step. I stopped at regular intervals, absent of the concern that getting going again might be an effort. I stooped to pick up interesting rocks, snap pictures, and ponder the topography. I was reluctant to turn back toward home.

As I mentioned at the beginning, I’ve still got a long way to go. I’m not sure how to reconcile the apparent needs I have- Crazy Creek, Leatherman tool, pack cover, extra clothing, tripod for the camera, rain pants – with ultralight alternatives. Old habits die hard. However, I was so jazzed up after my successful trip that I found myself at work the following Monday, scribbling lists of the changes I’d make to my next jaunt. Unfortunately, too many of the items were things I felt I needed to add to my pack, rather than remove. Still, there are obvious ways to improve as well. I’m more than willing to leave behind a whole array of items that I once thought indispensable: stove, water pump, sunscreen, glasses case. There are also a few items I simply failed to minimize fully last time: car keys, wallet, toothbrush handle… but will these changes be effective when put to a more challenging test? Will my base weight continue to drop? Considering how much I cut for the last test, is it even possible to get into the ultralight category?

I’ve got some very critical pounds between here and there, but I am not afraid.


Read More of Nathan’s Transformation

Metamorphosis #1: Confessions of a Heavyweight Backpacker

At the trailhead, I saddle up: I don’t carry my pack. It rides me. My steel-toed boots thunder along the trail, resonating tremors deep into the ground of high country tundra. My shirt clings heavily with perspiration, the soles of my feet cry out for air, and my shoulders ache for reprieve. My name is Nathan Boddy, and I have a backpacking problem.

Metamorphosis #1: Confessions of a Heavyweight Backpacker - 1
Nathan’s heavyweight pack.

Editor’s Note: Metamorphosis #1 and #2 were first published in the BackpackingLight Print Magazine, Issues 7 and 9, respectively. All four installments are now also available online.


Just days ago, I was poised to drop a few hundred dollars on eBay. I needed only to submit my bid and beam it up to the cyber auction. The Kelty Typhoon II tent (10 lb, 11 oz) promised to be all of the “bombproof” four-season shelter that reviewers across the ‘net claimed it would be. The behemoth was outfitted with two massive vestibules, two doors, multiple gear stashes – and a matching footprint! It was reported to be capable of withstanding more than twenty inches of snow and driving winds. A slumbering camper might even get a bit too toasty inside the Typhoon II.

Wouldn’t the backcountry be marvelous?!

But I paused too long.

Minutes passed, and the auction ended. Like many times before, I was left wondering why I cannot commit to the purchase of new gear.

Confession

Year after year, I fail to acquire the backcountry equipment that whispers sweet promises of improved performance. I continue to crawl into the alpine with an eleven-year-old backpack that pinches and slumps. I still use a six-(plus)-pound sleeping bag that has the packed dimensions of a mid-sized foot stool. I have carried the same old water purifier for hundreds of bone-jarring miles, despite its ability to produce repulsive water from its iodine-stained machinery and jaundiced tubing. I supplement my near-worthless headlamp with a full sized, double D battery flashlight… which I seldom use. I drag a two-pound tarp, a collapsible camp chair, Army surplus rain pants, an oversized rain parka, and an unusual assortment of emergency accoutrement.

Ahh, my pack and I. We weigh a ton, so to speak.

At the trailhead, I saddle up: I don’t carry my pack. It rides me.

My steel-toed boots thunder along the trail, resonating tremors deep into the ground of high country tundra. My shirt clings heavily with perspiration, the soles of my feet cry out for air, and my shoulders ache for reprieve.

My name is Nathan Boddy, and I have a backpacking problem.

I Don’t Age: I Mature

In a frantic last minute reshuffling of gear at a trailhead in the Beartooth Mountains last fall, I cringed while shoving my tripod and fishing gear back into the trunk of the car. There wasn’t an inch to spare – either inside or outside of my pack – to accommodate these luxuries. Despite these unfortunate sacrifices, my pack pounded down upon me like a slow jackhammer as I staggered off toward the trail. By mid-afternoon, my longtime backpacking partner Ryan Gibbs and I were eight miles up, beaten and weary.

Grumbling, we agreed on a campsite that only five years ago we would have eschewed for its proximity to the trailhead. Granted, it was only the first day on the trail, and we were just warming up, right? After all, we had sapped ourselves of needed energy with a short scramble up a talus slope earlier in the day. In spite of vain attempts at justifying our near-the-car campsite, we had to face reality: Ryan and I aren’t twenty-year-olds anymore.

The siren song of age was singing taps. It’s a song we’d heard about, but not actually heard – until now.

After September’s trip, I determined with finality that I will commit to incorporating a lightweight ethos into my hiking style.

2007 will not find me with the same awkward gear. My days in the high country are too precious to encumber my own performance. With this in mind, I find myself jumping enthusiastically into the research and planning required to replace key components of my gear: backpack, sleeping bag, tent, purifier, stove!

Now What?

Following my nearly fatal purchase of the Typhoon II, however, I followed a breadcrumbed path of articles and reviews that led me into a bright new world that I had never known existed. This new world has challenged my long held notions about backpacking and – like many of you – has literally kept me awake at night! Could it be possible that my hesitation to purchase the mammoth Kelty shelter was simply an instinctual response for self-preservation? Could it be that toeing the line with equipment upgrades is not the only option?

Could it be that I could go… light?

I’ve seen the handwriting on the wall for some time.

I have, in fact, left items behind to reduce bulk and weight, but the fun stuff has always been getting axed first. When my thirteen-year-old gas stove finally met its demise in 2005, I began to use a old blackened tin pot to boil creek water on our campfire, rather than purchase another cooker. But I won’t tell you what the pot weighs.

I’ve wasted hours grappling with my sleeping bag in order to extract it from my pack in a Cesarean-like maneuver that leaves even onlookers exhausted. While I’m sure an upgrade in equipment may help in some of these matters, I fear that toting my heavy pack for many more years may only put me on the one-way path of a trail barge to nowhere, skidding to a stop on a muddy beach with a broken rudder.

Now I see this bright new world of lightweight backpacking.

With this discovery, my suppressed urge for simplicity has been acknowledged! The tight seal of reliance on outdoor equipment and “commercialized backpacking” has been broken, and I am now peeling back the facade to see what lies underneath. With my inclination for minimalism, how can I possibly continue my current trajectory, while knowing that some people are walking tall and strong into the wilderness with packs loaded with gear that weigh less than my pack – empty!? How can I continue to call myself an “avid” backpacker while others are exploring the alpine with loads weighing less than ten pounds?

How can I not begin to obsess over these questions?

This will take time. I have only just begun to see into your world – but I can see far enough to crave more. While my instinct nudges me toward simplicity, my training screams frantic warnings. Can I trust a tarp in place of a tent? Is it really possible to use solid fuel tablets in place of a tank of white gas? Can I really survive with a stove that weighs thirteen grams? Bivy sacks and titanium spoons… is this not complete lunacy?

After all, I have two decades of backpacking a la humpback behind me and reconditioning this ethos will not be easy.

Conclusion

So, give me one year.

With loyalty to experimentation and adventure, one year should be sufficient to give lightweight backpacking a thorough trial. More than just a trial, however: I’ll put it and myself, to the test. In September of 2007, Gibbs and I will attempt a transect of the Anaconda-Pintler Wilderness along the Continental Divide. It’s easy to speculate that, with our bodies aging, time being increasingly hard to come by, and our historical attachment to heavy gear, that this may not only be one of the longer, but also one of the last long hikes we undertake.

However, with lightweight gear and the discipline to use it comfortably, I may see the Pintler transect evolve into an entirely different creature: the beginning of a whole new way to enjoy the backcountry. Alternatively, I suppose it could mean day after day of derision and scorn as Gibbs lambastes me for being an ill-prepared idiot above the treeline.

I have one year to lay the groundwork. One year to undergo the metamorphosis from heavy to light. One year to drop my base weight to… twenty… fifteen… ten pounds?


Read More of Nathan’s Transformation

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts Part 2

Seven packrafters with a total of over thirty-five years of experience under their bums share the safety gear they won’t be without, skills that have kept them coming back for more, common – and dangerous – mistakes, and real life rescue stories.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Pertex has an enviable reputation for developing and creating some of the most innovative technically advanced fabrics for the outdoor sports market. Our position of being close to the outdoors means that we know exactly what you need – after all, we’re gear users ourselves. Pertex apparel provides the perfect balance of wind protection, breathability and water repellency with ultra-light weight and stowability. Discover Pertex today.

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts - 1
Andrew Mattox on the Snake River. As packrafters run whitewater more routinely, safety gear and techniques are ever more important.

To learn more about packrafting at Backpacking Light, visit backpackinglight.com/packrafting, or take a wilderness course in packrafting at backpackinglight.com/school.

Introduction

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety: Have mad skills.

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety

A packraft is an inflatable raft that is light and small enough to carry in a backpack. It is most often used by backpackers as a tool to help them cross terrain that includes rivers. The two types of lightweight packrafts available today are the Sevylor Trail Boat and the Alpacka packraft. The Trail Boat is lighter and much cheaper than Alpacka packrafts, but also significantly less sturdy.

Packrafting in some form or another has been around for decades, with backpackers using rafts to cross and float less technical (usually class II and below) rivers to complete loops and traverses. As the sport has grown, backpackers have set their sights on routes that include more whitewater. In some cases river running is as much or more the focus of the trip as backpacking. Sheri Tingey, Alpacka designer, has responded to the sports’ direction by refining boat design over the past seven years so that Alpacka rafts are now capable whitewater craft.

Packrafters usually have a background in backpacking or climbing, with little river running experience and often without a true understanding of the power of moving water. In the past, they have rarely carried safety gear and lacked river rescue skills. That needs to change both for the survival of packrafters and the emergence of the sport as a respected option in the boating community. The necessity of carrying safety gear and having the skills to go along is now coming sharply into focus. In 2007, veteran packrafter Roman Dial worked with Rescue 3 International instructor, Scott Solle to bring an internationally recognized course in whitewater safety to packrafters in Alaska. Another expert packrafter, Forrest McCarthy, brought Scott to Jackson, Wyoming to teach the first packraft safety course in the lower forty-eight.

A dozen packrafters gathered in Jackson Hole, Wyoming in April 2008 for a Whitewater Rescue Technician class. They came from Alaska, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Washington, Colorado and Idaho. Seven were experts with over five years of packrafting under their belts while the remaining five were relative newcomers, with two of these never having packrafted at all.

I attended the course and took advantage of the packrafting experience represented there to compile tips on safety, gear, rescue stories, and a list of the most common mistakes.

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety:

  1. Exercise good judgment
  2. Know your group
  3. Know the river
  4. Carry the proper equipment.

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety: Have mad skills.

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety: Common and dangerous mistakes.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay

Loch Lomond and the Trossachs, situated in the southwestern Highlands, is Scotland’s first national park, encompassing a beautiful area of mountains, forests, rivers, and lochs surrounding Loch Lomond itself, the largest lake in Britain.

Loch Lomond and the Trossachs, situated in the southwestern Highlands, is Scotland’s first national park, encompassing a beautiful area of mountains, forests, rivers, and lochs surrounding Loch Lomond itself, the largest lake in Britain. The West Highland Way long distance trail runs through the park below Ben Lomond, the southernmost Munro (3,000 foot peak).

Last autumn I made a short two-night trip along the West Highland Way and over Ben Lomond in stormy weather. The autumn colors were splendid and the rushing clouds dramatic but the hiking was difficult in places, with winds gusting to 60 mph and thick mist on the summits. Photography was challenging too, as holding the camera steady in the strong gusty wind was impossible, so lying down or wedging myself against rocks was necessary, while heavy rain and wet mist meant there were long periods when the camera was kept in its protective bag.

Click a thumbnail to view the image gallery.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 1
In the little village of Drymen, which lies on the West Highland Way, is the sixteenth-century hostelry called the Clachan. This was a welcome stop as I drove up the long winding road on the east side of Loch Lomond in pouring rain, though I was more interested in hot warming soup than wines or spirits. I was also aware that I was putting off starting my hike in the hope the weather might improve.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 2
National Park sign at Balmaha, a tiny village beside Loch Lomond where there is a useful and interesting Visitor Centre. From Balmaha you can take a ferry trip across Loch Lomond to the big wooded island of Inchcailloch. I was just passing through and stopped only for a look round the Visitor Centre.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 3
My hike started at Rowardennan, which lies at the end of the public road along the east side of Loch Lomond. The rain had ceased temporarily, and there were touches of color as the late afternoon sun pierced the clouds. Loch Lomond stretched out to the north between cloud-capped hills. My route would lie through the woods on the shore for many miles.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 4
Walking in the dusk was beautiful and calming after a day spent driving in stormy weather. The wind dropped, and the waters of the loch rippled gently reflecting the drifting clouds in ever-changing patterns. Slowly the distant hills faded into darkness, and the forest became shadowed and mysterious.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 5
I pitched camp in the dark deep in the trees. Sometime during the night I woke as the wind strengthened and started to roar in the tree tops, bringing down a gentle patter of leaves on the tent, soon followed by staccato bursts of rain. I woke to dampness and trickles of drizzle. The forest was silent now, soothing and relaxing, and I watched the trees for a while before packing up and hiking on.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 6
The damp forest floor was rich and bright with plant life – mosses, grasses, and clover – and decorated with a scattering of autumn leaves, brown and gold. Hiking through this natural colorful mosaic as gentle rain drifted down through the tree canopy was pleasant and easy, a quiet preparation for the excitement to come.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 7
A mile or so from camp I started to climb away from the loch and out of the trees. The clouds were thickening again now and the rain showers heavier and longer. Across the grey waters of Loch Lomond, the rugged peaks of the Arrochar Alps thrust up into the clouds. But for the deep golds and browns of the birch trees glowing in the pale light, the scene would have been almost monochrome. The autumn colors gave a richness and depth to the scene that had me pausing to look and take photographs despite the rain.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 8
Soon I was leaving the trees for rain-sodden moorland, a morass of deep water-filled holes and thick tussocks of bouncy grass making for difficult walking. The rain was harder now, the clouds lower, and the waters of the loch starting to surge in rolling waves. As I looked across the loch, the distant hills vanished into the wind-driven clouds.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 9
Turning towards Ben Lomond, I hiked through the wet moorland, my feet now soaked, towards my ascent route along the Ptarmigan Ridge, seen here to the right of the summit. Before I reached the ridge, the mountain disappeared in a swirl of cloud, and my final climb to the summit was over wet, slippery rocks in a gusting wind that stopped me moving at times, leaving me leaning over on my trekking poles glad to have kept my feet.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 10
On the summit, I crouched behind a rock out of the wind for a snack and in the hope that the weather might break. The wind was ferocious, but it did tear the clouds apart, giving brief glimpses of Loch Lomond and the surrounding hills. Roaming the summit area in the storm was exhilarating. At one moment thick clouds reduced visibility to a few feet, the next moment they split open and suddenly Loch Lomond with its islands could be seen over 3,000 feet below.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 11
As the clouds rose and fell and parted and reformed in the wind, they revealed the Arrochar Alps rising across Loch Lomond, hazy in the wet, misty air, but with their summits uncovered for brief moments. On the lochside, the tiny white dots of buildings showed where people would be inside, warm and dry, probably glad to be out of the rain and wind. I didn’t envy them. I was reveling in the excitement and glory of the wildness of the storm and the land.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 12
I had intended to camp high, but I was halfway down the mountain before I felt the wind had abated enough for a reasonably comfortable camp. It was raining and dull when I pitched the tent, and I was soon inside with no intention of emerging until the night was gone. I was delighted to wake to a pink dawn with Loch Lomond shining in the distance and big patches of blue sky.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 13
The previous evening I’d cooked inside the tent, something I prefer not to do, but with no vestibule and a storm raging, there was little choice. The dry morning meant I could prepare breakfast just outside the tent door with a view up the slopes of Ben Lomond, which was much more relaxing.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 14
The squalls of rain were not over though, and I had a couple of drenchings as I descended steep slopes back to Loch Lomond. The newly risen sun was shining too however, resulting in some splendid rainbows curving over the loch.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 15
Whilst the rain and clouds had blown away, the wind was still strong and waves were driving along the loch as I walked back to Rowardennan. The sunshine changed the feel of the landscape though. The bright blue sky, sparkling blue waters and brilliant autumn colors gave an air of friendliness and comfort to a landscape that had mostly been threatening and somber. Compare this image with Picture 4, taken from a similar spot two days earlier.

Backpacking in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Photo Essay - 16
As the last clouds faded away into the blueness, the hills and woods across the loch stood out sharp and clear for the first time. Looking at the colors and sunshine, it was already hard to remember the cold driving rain and dense mists. This mixture of calm and storm, rain and sun, color and dullness, vast vistas and a few yards inside a cloud are all part of the experience of backpacking in the Highlands, which is always interesting, always unpredictable.

Grand Canyon Rim-2-Rim-2-Rim

While perhaps a touch extreme, running Rim-to-Rim-to-Rim (RRR) is not uncommon within trail running circles. But within hiking circles, this trek does not seem to garner much attention, when there are few trips, mile-for-mile, hour-for-hour, that compare. In one day, you pass through 1.6 billion years of geology (four times) and span the grandest Big Ditch in the world (twice).

You don’t have access to view this content.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review

Prior to the Terra Nova Laser Photon Elite, the Laser Competition was listed by Guinness World Records as “the lightest two-skin (double-wall) tent.” While no longer the record-holder, at just over 2 pounds, the Laser Competition is still among the lightest double-wall tents on the market.

Introduction

The Terra Nova Laser Competition is a tent that a year ago held the Guinness World Record for “World’s Lightest (double-wall) Tent”. Although this title is now held by the nearly-identical Terra Nova Laser Photon Elite (2008), the Laser Competition, with its tougher fabrics, is still among the lightest solo double-wall tents on the market.

Weighing in at just over 2 pounds, the Laser Competition is more than just a lightweight experiment, however. It is a fully functional and eminently usable solo tent. It has a spacious interior due to its single-hoop tunnel design and dual carbon struts that maximize space at the ends. The inner and outer tents pitch at the same time, making set-up quick and easy. A taut pitch is also easy to achieve. By using the included pole hood and guy lines, it can also cross to alpine or winter environments and has solid wind stability in moderate winds.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 1
The Terra Nova Laser Competition easily achieves a very taut pitch.

What’s Good

  • Very lightweight for a solo double-wall tent – just 2 pounds, 2 ounces
  • Fly and tent body pitch as one with only one pole – very quick and easy
  • Inner tent is easily detached for a lightweight fly-only pitch
  • Carbon fiber struts maximize space at ends of the tent
  • Tunnel design creates usable interior space
  • Sheds wind, rain, and moderate snow with ease
  • 2.7-ounce pole sleeve hood provides rain protection for the zipper and side guy outs for alpine and winter usage
  • Vestibule is well sized for a solo hiker

What’s Not So Good

  • Small door entrance
  • Requires ten stakes at a minimum (sixteen to use all stake and guy out points)
  • No high vent limits ventilation and leads to condensation
  • Ventilation options are difficult to manage from inside the tent
  • Included carbon fiber stakes break easily (current year model comes with titanium stakes instead)
  • No interior storage pockets

Specifications

Specifications

  Year/Manufacturer/Model

2007 Terra Nova Laser Competition

  Style

Three-season, double-wall, floored tent

  Fabrics

Fly: Watershed SL silicone coated nylon, minimum Hydrostatic Head 4000mm
Inner tent: 6.6 nylon
Floor: Watershed silicone coated nylon, minimum Hydrostatic Head 7000mm

  Poles

DAC Featherlite 7001 aluminum alloy: 5.0 oz (142 g)

  Stakes

Terra Nova carbon fiber stakes (now comes with 2 g titanium skewers)

  Dimensions

Floor area: length 86.5 in (220 cm), width 24.5 / 36.5 in (62 / 93 cm), peak height 37.5 in (95 cm)

  Packed Size

19 x 6 in (48 x 15 cm)

  Total Weight
(includes tent, included stuff sack, twelve stakes, stake bag, pole sleeve hood and guy lines)

BPL Tested Weight: 2 lb, 5.1 oz (1.05 kg)
Manufacturer Specification: 2 lb, 1.8 oz (0.96 kg)

  Trail Weight
(includes tent, twelve stakes, excludes stuff sacks , guy lines, and pole sleeve hood)

BPL Tested Weight: 2 lb, 2.0 oz (0.96 kg)
Manufacturer Specification: 1 lb, 14.3 oz (0.86 kg)

  Fly-only Pitch Weight
(includes fly, pole, and six stakes only)

1 lb, 3.6 oz (0.56 kg)

  Protected Area

Floor area: 17.4 ft2 (1.62 m2)
Vestibule area: 8.4 ft2 (0.78 m2)
Total area: 25.8 ft2 (2.40 m2)

  Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio

12.1 ft2/lb

  MSRP

$370.00 US

  Options
(not tested)

Emergency repair kit: $26.00 US)
Groundsheet: $6.00 US

  Aftermarket Modifications (tested) – Fibraplex Carbon fiber pole set: $44.75, 3.0 oz
(85 g)

saves 2.0 oz (57 g) over stock pole;

  Backpacking Light AirCore NANO Dyneema Guy Line Cord Kit: $15.99

saves 0.7 oz (20 g) over stock guy lines

Performance

The Terra Nova Laser Competition is a double-wall solo tent that is similar in many ways to the Hilleberg Akto. It is a hoop design with a single aluminum pole at the center. To increase usable space, the Laser Competition uses a carbon fiber strut at each end for additional support while the Akto uses dual fiberglass rods at each end for a similar purpose. Both tents have inner tents that attach to the rain fly and pitch fly-first, meaning that the inner tent is protected when pitching the tent.

The Terra Nova and Hilleberg tents are also similar in dimensions (see image below). However, one big difference between the two tents is the weight; while the Hilleberg weighs 3 pounds, 2.4 ounces, the Terra Nova weighs a full pound less, at 2 pounds, 2.0 ounces (Backpacking Light measured trail weights). It is this trimmed-down weight that made the Laser Competition the former Guinness World Record holder as “the lightest two-skin (double-wall) tent,” a title which is now held by the Terra Nova Laser Photon Elite (which is approximately 4.2 ounces lighter).

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 2
The Terra Nova Laser Competition (left) is similar in dimensions and design to the Hilleberg Akto (right).

The Terra Nova tent uses a silnylon rain fly and floor with a tent body that is made of nylon with no-see-um mesh panels for ventilation. The tent is not free standing, requiring a minimum of ten stakes, and sixteen stakes are needed to use all available guy outs.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 3
The Laser Competition has a ground level pitch, which protects the inner tent and vestibule from rain splash. The vestibule (right) is well sized for a solo hiker.

One advantage of hoop tents is that you get excellent usable space for the weight because of the steep side walls. The Laser Competition is no exception; the inner tent follows the steep arch of the hooped pole on one side and is nearly vertical on the other, making it very spacious for the footprint.

The vestibule is generously sized for a solo tent. The 8.4 square feet are large enough for a pack, shoes, a stove, and other gear.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 4
The Laser Competition is sized generously for a solo hiker.

Inside the Laser Competition, there is enough space for a hiker over six feet to stretch out without touching the ends. This makes it easy to stay in the tent for extended periods without feeling cramped. I also found it easy to sit up, though only in the tall center area.

The interior width of the tent is wide enough for a hiker and a medium pack or a dog inside the tent. While it is cramped for two adults, it is wide enough for my toddler-age son and I to sleep next to each other (it’s our favorite father-son tent).

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 5
The tent is wide enough for an adult and a child, but too small for two adults.

The single carbon fiber strut on each end gives a 16-inch tall flat area on the ends of the tent. This creates additional usable space, as well as providing airflow between the tent body and the fly or additional storage space.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 6
The carbon fiber struts create short vertical walls at the ends, which add to head and foot room (and makes a good spot for my two-year-old son Henry to sit).

To pitch the Laser Competition, you simply stake out one end, install the center pole, stake the other end, and insert additional stakes. The inner tent pitches with the fly, making set-up a breeze; I was able to pitch the tent in less than five minutes with minimal effort.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 7
Carbon fiber support struts (left) add height to the head and foot ends of the tent. The inner tent attaches to the fly with toggles (right) and is easily removed.

The inner tent attaches to the fly with seven toggle clips and two quick-release snaps on the ends. Removing the inner tent is a two-minute job and gives extra inside space for cooking, preparing climbing gear, or other tasks. It is also possible to leave the inner tent at home, creating a spacious fly-only shelter that weighs just 1 pound, 3.6 ounces.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 8
The inner tent is easily removed to create a spacious 19.3-ounce floorless shelter.

A drawback of the Terra Nova design is that the fly cannot be removed for an inner-tent only pitch. This limits options during warm or humid conditions. The fly also restricts views from inside the tent, and while the small door opening protects the inner tent during pouring rain, it is a bit of a cramped entry.

To enlarge the entry, the door pulls back with a toggle and a small piece of Velcro to maximize the opening. It is also possible to remove a stake and pull the doorway and fly back to further increase the opening, although I never tried this in the field.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 9
The door pulls back with a toggle for decent views.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 10
At the base of the door, an aluminum clip takes tension off of the zipper for easy closure- a very good idea!

Ventilation on the Laser Competition is a mixed bag. The inner tent has large triangular mesh vents on either end, and the door is half mesh, creating excellent airflow in the inner tent. The outer tent has limited ventilation options. Lower vents are created on the ends by releasing a stake and rolling up the fly below the carbon strut. However, you have to be outside the tent to open the ends, and it takes some practice to get it right without affecting fly tension. The biggest problem with ventilation, however, is the lack of a high vent on the fly. This severely limits airflow through the tent and leads to condensation problems.

During very humid conditions, such as snow camping, excessive condensation sometimes dripped on the inner tent and on one multi-day winter trip, I was forced to pack the inner tent separately because the fly was so wet. A covered high vent, such as that on the Hilleberg Akto, would make a huge difference in ventilation and condensation resistance.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 11
The inner tent has mesh panels on the door and the ends for extra ventilation.

A unique feature of the Laser Competition is its removable pole hood. The hood is a length of waterproof nylon that attaches with lines to the pole ends and ties to the top of the fly in two locations with short cords. It adds 2.7 ounces to the tent, protects the non-waterproof rain fly zipper, and adds two side guy lines.

While a permanent zipper flap and guy lines would surely be lighter overall, the removable pole hood worked well and gives the option of saving a few ounces when conditions are milder and you plan to camp below the tree line. In windy or winter conditions, however, the extra guy lines need to be used, as they are essential for wind stability.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 12
The removable pole sleeve hood protects the seam and zipper from rain and provides two side guy lines.

In the field, the Laser Competition had solid wind stability in moderate to high gusts due to its low height and tapered, aerodynamic shape. The pole hood and optional side guy lines are essential in these conditions. The ground level fly kept the inner tent dry in heavy downpours, even with the zipper open. When the tent was used without the pole hood, the non-waterproof zipper did let in the occasional drip, but it wasn’t a big deal – I just had to remember to keep items in the vestibule away from this area during heavy rain.

Snow loading on single pole hoop shelters, such as the Laser Competition and Hilleberg Akto, is a drawback of the design. Heavy snows can pile up on the fly and lead to tent collapse. While the pointed ends of the Terra Nova tent minimized this concern, it is important to periodically clear the fly during heavy snow accumulations.

While the Terra Nova Laser Competition is an extremely lightweight tent, it is built with materials that stood up well to extended use in a variety of conditions. It is far more than an experiment to build the lightest tent – this is a fully functional and well built shelter. However, don’t expect to find interior pockets, as those were sacrificed at this weight.

The included carbon fiber stakes are lightweight, but very fragile; I broke three on my first weekend using the tent and quickly traded for stronger ones. Apparently, Terra Nova had a similar experience with these stakes, because titanium stakes are now included with the tent.

Terra Nova Laser Competition Review - 13
The Laser Competition came with carbon fiber stakes which easily broke.

At $370.00 US, the Terra Nova Laser Competition is a functional and lightweight double wall solo tent. It is pretty expensive, but you get quite a worthy shelter for your money. For comparison, the $385 US Hilleberg Akto is similar in size, one pound heavier, but has an integrated pole hood, extra guy lines, and increased ventilation. Both tents have their strengths, but if weight is your primary concern, the Terra Nova is your best option.

During testing, I did a couple of upgrades to further decrease tent weight. First, I traded the stock aluminum pole for a Fibraplex Carbon fiber pole set ($44.75, 3.0 oz) which was durable and saved 2.0 oz (57 g) over the stock pole. Next, I swapped the stock guy lines for a Backpacking Light AirCore NANO Dyneema Guy Line Cord Kit ($15.99), which saved 0.7 oz (20 g) over the stock guy lines. After these two upgrades, the Laser Competition trail weight was just 1 pound, 15.3 ounces – extremely lightweight for a double-wall solo tent with this level of durability and usable space.

What’s Unique

The Terra Nova Laser Competition is extremely lightweight for a fully functional double-wall solo tent. I also found it to be highly versatile, using it for high alpine climbs, winter snow camping, and summer backpacking with my son. While you may have to go with the Laser Photon Elite to get the illustrious Guinness World Record, the Laser Competition makes up for the added weight with more durable materials.

Recommendations for Improvement

While the Terra Nova Laser Competition is a very lightweight tent that didn’t really cut corners to cut weight, the absence of a high vent is a serious drawback in ventilation and condensation resistance. I recommend that Terra Nova add a high vent to increase airflow and improve condensation resistance.

My other recommendation would be to replace the carbon fiber stakes that came with the tent with more durable ones. Happily, this has already been addressed by Terra Nova with their latest model.

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts Part 1

Seven packrafters with a total of over thirty-five years of experience under their bums share the safety gear they won’t be without, skills that have kept them coming back for more, common – and dangerous – mistakes, and real life rescue stories.

PODCAST SPONSOR

Pertex has an enviable reputation for developing and creating some of the most innovative technically advanced fabrics for the outdoor sports market. Our position of being close to the outdoors means that we know exactly what you need – after all, we’re gear users ourselves. Pertex apparel provides the perfect balance of wind protection, breathability and water repellency with ultra-light weight and stowability. Discover Pertex today.

Podcast: Packrafting Safety Tips from the Experts - 1
Andrew Mattox on the Snake River. As packrafters run whitewater more routinely, safety gear and techniques are ever more important.

To learn more about packrafting at Backpacking Light, visit backpackinglight.com/packrafting, or take a wilderness course in packrafting at backpackinglight.com/school.

Introduction

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety:

  1. Exercise good judgment
  2. Know your group
  3. Know the river
  4. Carry the proper equipment.

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety

A packraft is an inflatable raft that is light and small enough to carry in a backpack. It is most often used by backpackers as a tool to help them cross terrain that includes rivers. The two types of lightweight packrafts available today are the Sevylor Trail Boat and the Alpacka packraft. The Trail Boat is lighter and much cheaper than Alpacka packrafts, but also significantly less sturdy.

Packrafting in some form or another has been around for decades, with backpackers using rafts to cross and float less technical (usually class II and below) rivers to complete loops and traverses. As the sport has grown, backpackers have set their sights on routes that include more whitewater. In some cases river running is as much or more the focus of the trip as backpacking. Sheri Tingey, Alpacka designer, has responded to the sports’ direction by refining boat design over the past seven years so that Alpacka rafts are now capable whitewater craft.

Packrafters usually have a background in backpacking or climbing, with little river running experience and often without a true understanding of the power of moving water. In the past, they have rarely carried safety gear and lacked river rescue skills. That needs to change both for the survival of packrafters and the emergence of the sport as a respected option in the boating community. The necessity of carrying safety gear and having the skills to go along is now coming sharply into focus. In 2007, veteran packrafter Roman Dial worked with Rescue 3 International instructor, Scott Solle to bring an internationally recognized course in whitewater safety to packrafters in Alaska. Another expert packrafter, Forrest McCarthy, brought Scott to Jackson, Wyoming to teach the first packraft safety course in the lower forty-eight.

A dozen packrafters gathered in Jackson Hole, Wyoming in April 2008 for a Whitewater Rescue Technician class. They came from Alaska, New Mexico, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Washington, Colorado and Idaho. Seven were experts with over five years of packrafting under their belts while the remaining five were relative newcomers, with two of these never having packrafted at all.

I attended the course and took advantage of the packrafting experience represented there to compile tips on safety, gear, rescue stories, and a list of the most common mistakes.

Part 1 – Packrafting Safety:

  1. Exercise good judgment
  2. Know your group
  3. Know the river
  4. Carry the proper equipment.

Part 2 – Packrafting Safety: Have mad skills.

Part 3 – Packrafting Safety: Common and dangerous mistakes.

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review

Great value on a super-warm, lightweight, 800 fill down parka.

Description

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review - 1
The GoLite Inferno Down Parka is insulated with 800 fill power down and weighs 24.6 ounces (size Large).

GoLite calls it a hooded down jacket, but it’s a down parka by my definition – it has an attached insulated hood, and the body is long enough to cover the bum. A jacket normally comes to the waist. Semantics aside, the Inferno is an ultra-warm down parka, intended for serious winter cold. It’s the right class of warmth for those of us who love to get out in winter cold, and even (gasp!) snow camp in mid-winter, but it’s simply too heavy and too warm for three-season backpacking.

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review - 2
The backside (left) of the GoLite Inferno Down Parka, showing its insulated hood and puffy down chambers. The hood (right) has a drawcord around the brim and three adjustors (1 rear, 2 front) to provide good face protection.

The Inferno is insulated with 800 fill down with sewn-through construction in a horizontal six-inch quilted pattern to hold the down in place. I measured its double layer loft at four inches across the body and sleeves.

It has a relaxed fit, with enough room inside to wear it over a heavy base layer and lightweight insulated jacket to provide even more warmth. The hood is roomy enough to wear over a climbing helmet and has three adjustors to close it in around the face. Sleeves are extra long and have Velcro adjustors on the cuffs.

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review - 3
The inside (left) has one mesh drop pocket and one zippered security pocket. The outside (right) has two zippered fleece-lined handwarmer pockets.

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review - 4
Sleeves on the Inferno are plenty long to overlap the hands, and the Velcro adjustor on the cuffs is easy to grasp with gloves on.

Performance

I wore the Inferno parka while igloo camping in February, tent camping on consolidated snow in March and April, and finished my testing while backcountry skiing in November.

GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket Review - 5
Just for fun, I slept in the GoLite Inferno inside a 25 F sleeping bag and a bivy under the stars at 11,600 feet in April. I also wore down pants and down booties. I stayed toasty warm on a 15 F night.

For snow camping, I prefer a down parka that has a lot of water resistance so I can wear it when it’s snowing lightly and not get wet. Of course I want it to be lightweight, but not so fragile that I have to constantly protect it from being snagged or punctured. Finally, I want lots of pockets so I can stash anything I want to keep warm and handy.

The Inferno’s two outside zippered fleece-lined pockets are definitely useful for warming hands and holding snacks, but they are barely large enough to hold winter gloves or a hat. That’s not necessarily bad, because I prefer to stash those items inside the jacket in drop pockets. Unfortunately, the Inferno has only one medium-sized drop pocket. I wish it had two big ones; they add very little weight to the garment and are extremely useful for stashing and drying gloves and socks, keeping a water flask from freezing, or warming a fuel canister. The inside security pocket is a good place to store valuables, sunglasses, etc.

For pure warmth, I found the Inferno to be sufficient for my winter camping needs. The combination of 800 fill down and sewn-through construction provides a good balance of warmth and value. The 800 fill down provides plenty of loft and warmth for its weight, much more than the 650 fill down in many jackets, but doesn’t run up the cost like premium 850+ fill power down and baffled construction. In really cold temperatures, it’s easy to don a lightweight insulated jacket under the Inferno for extra warmth and to eliminate cold spots.

Note that the Inferno’s shell and lining is 22 x 30 denier recycled polyester. It’s nice that it’s recycled, but what about durability? Nylon is considered to be stronger and more abrasion resistant than a polyester fabric of equal weight. According to GoLite, the polyester fabric used in the Inferno weighs about 10-15% more than a 15 denier nylon and is equal in durability. That said, the Inferno needs to be treated the same as any other low denier fabric. Polyester is also more hydrophobic than nylon, so it is less likely to absorb water and more likely to retain its breathability. I liked the Inferno’s polyester shell; it has a very soft hand, feels warm to the touch (nylon feels cold), and is adequately durable with reasonable care. It did not snag easily like other lightweight shell fabrics I have tested. The Velcro cuffs on the sleeves do not damage the shell fabric, which is another problem I have encountered on other jackets.

When wearing the Inferno during a light or heavy snowfall in cold weather, the snow slides off without wetting the jacket. Wet snow sticks more and wets through at the seams, but the Inferno is too warm a jacket to wear at those temperatures (around freezing) anyway. In those conditions it’s better to wear a waterproof-breathable shell jacket over a thin insulating jacket.

Assessment

Overall, I am very pleased with the materials, design, and performance of the GoLite Hooded Inferno Jacket. It’s an excellent balance of light weight, warmth, wind/water resistance, durability, and value. Its attached hood and longer body and sleeve lengths allow a clothing system capable of providing lots of warmth in serious winter cold. The Inferno is a great choice for winter snow camping or any activity in really cold temperatures.

I looked for comparable products, and found that the Inferno seems to occupy a class of its own. Many similar jackets, for example the Outdoor Research Megaplume Down Jacket (33 ounces, US$325), have 650 fill power down compared to the GoLite Inferno’s 800 fill. High-end down parkas like the Nunatak Torre Parka (28 ounces, US$619) have 850+ down fill and baffled construction, but they have a big price tag too. Overall, the Hooded Inferno Jacket from GoLite meets the needs of the serious winter adventurer who wants lightweight performance gear without breaking the bank.

Specifications

  Manufacturer

GoLite (http://www.golite.com/)

  Year/Model

2008 Hooded Inferno Jacket

  Insulation

800 fill power down

  Materials:

Outer shell is a 100% recycled combination of 22d base yarns and 30d ripstop polyester yarns with DWR, lining is the same fabric without DWR

  Features

Attached insulated hood with three adjustors, fleece chin-guard, full front zipper, insulated draft collar behind the zipper, two outside zippered fleece-lined hand pockets, one inside mesh drop pocket, inside zippered security pocket, hem drawcord with two adjustors

  Weight

measured weight men’s L 24.6 oz (697 g), manufacturer specification 25 oz (709 g)

  MSRP

US$275

Pitching a Tent in the Snow

Want to try tenting in the snow, but haven’t done it before and not sure how? Haven’t time in the evening to build a snow cave or an igloo just for one night? We walk you through the basics of what gear you need, how to choose a good site, how to create a platform, and how to pitch your tent (or a tarptent if you are brave).

You don’t have access to view this content.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review

At 2 pounds, 10 ounces, the Montana is the lightest two-person double-wall tent available, but extreme lightness comes with a few tradeoffs.

Introduction

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 1
Four-season version of the Big Sky International Montana 2P after a snowy, windy night at 11,600 feet.

At 2 pounds, 10 ounces trail weight for the three-season version, the Big Sky International Montana 2P can claim the title of world’s lightest two-person double-wall tent. If you’re willing to fork out an additional $260 for a spinnaker fly and carbon fiber poles, you can reduce the trail weight down to an incredible 2 pounds, 4 ounces. Likewise, at 3 pounds, 15 ounces for the four-season version, it’s also the lightest two-person double-wall four-season tent to be found anywhere. To minimize weight, the Montana is a completely different design from other Big Sky tents; it has an end entry and vestibule on the front and a less usable vestibule on the rear. Extreme lightweight is very nice, but how user-friendly is Big Sky’s newest tent design, and how well does it perform? And how does it compare with other lightweight double-wall tents from Big Sky and Terra Nova?

Specifications

  Year/Manufacturer/Model

2008 Big Sky International Montana 2P (Note: review and specifications are based on Rev. A of the Montana 2P; the current model is Rev. C)

  Style

Three- or four-season, two-person, double-wall tent with floor

  Fabrics

Standard fly and floor are 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon; summer interior is no-see-um mesh; winter interior is 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) uncoated ripstop nylon; very light fly is 0.9 oz/yd2 (30 g/m2) spinnaker fabric

  Poles and Stakes

Summer version uses two lightweight carbon fiber or aluminum poles; winter version uses three heavy duty carbon fiber or aluminum poles; a minimum of six stakes are needed for a secure pitch

  Floor Dimensions

Length: 84 in (213 cm)
Width at head end: 56 in (142 cm)
Width at foot end: 46 in (117 cm)
Front height: 45 in (114 cm)
Rear height: 24 in (61 cm)

  Packed Size

19 x 5 in (48 x 13 cm)

  Total Weight

Tent is purchased a la carte, with numerous options to choose from. Example summer configuration is 2 pounds, 12 oz (1.25 kg), winter configuration is 4 pounds, 1 oz (1.84 kg) (includes fly, tent body, aluminum poles, compression stuff sack, six stakes, stake sack)

  Trail Weight

With aluminum poles, summer configuration is 2 pounds, 10 oz (1.19 kg), winter configuration is 3 pounds, 15 oz (1.79 kg) (excludes compression stuff sack and stake sack)

  Protected Area

Floor area: 32.7 ft2 (3.04 m2)
Vestibule area: 13.2 ft2 (1.23 m2)
Total area: 45.9 ft2 (4.64 m2)

  Protected Area/Trail Weight Ratio

17.5 ft2/lb for summer configuration; 11.7 ft2/lb for winter configuration

  MSRP

Varies with options selected; US$348.75 for the summer version with lightweight aluminum poles; US$496.90 for the winter version with heavy duty aluminum poles and SnoAnchor stakes

  Options

Summer or winter fly, summer or winter body, lightweight or heavy duty aluminum or carbon fiber poles, several stake choices, guylines, storage bag, X-cord, footprint

Design and Features

The design of the Montana 2P departs from other Big Sky double-wall tents, as it has one end entry with a vestibule on each end, as opposed to two side entries with vestibules on their popular Evolution 2P and Convertible 2P tents.

The distinctive design elements that set the Montana 2P apart from the Evolution 2P are as follows:

  • The inner tent is attached to the fly with mini quick-release fasteners.
  • Two lateral poles are used at the front and rear (the four-season version has a third pole in the center), so the Montana is basically an A-frame tent design.
  • The poles are inserted into sleeves on the fly, rather than sleeves on the inner tent, and the body + fly are set up as a unit.
  • High vents at the front and rear provide flow-through ventilation.
  • Snow flaps around the perimeter of the winter fly help secure the tent in a snowstorm and minimize spindrift.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 2
The Big Sky Montana 2P is available in four-season and three-season versions. Using Big Sky’s a la carte approach, buyers can configure the tent any way they want. A typical four-season version (left) has an uncoated nylon interior, snow flaps on the fly, and three heavy duty lateral poles for support. A typical three-season configuration (right) has a mesh interior and two poles.

Purchasing a Big Sky tent is like ordering a la carte in a restaurant – it allows you to get exactly what you want, but you need to make a decision on each component rather than order a pre-selected package. You have your choice of flies, interiors, poles, stakes, and accessories. For example, many hikers prefer a nylon interior instead of a mesh interior in a three-season tent; with Big Sky’s a la carte system, that’s no problem. I recommend getting Big Sky’s “Y-Not” stakes; they weigh only 0.5 ounce more than a set of titanium shepherd hook stakes and hold a lot better.

By choosing the appropriate components, the Montana 2P can be configured as a lightweight three-season tent or a sturdier lightweight four-season tent. Big Sky qualifies the latter as “WinterLite,” meaning it’s “Suitable for camping in snow and cold weather and capable of withstanding moderate wind and snow loads. Please note that this shelter is not ‘Mountain,’ ‘Alpine,’ or ‘Expedition’ rated and is NOT intended for use in extreme weather conditions.” With their WinterLite rating, Big Sky has basically created a new tent category (as defined above) for hikers who want to do an occasional short duration winter camping trip under better weather conditions.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 3
Views of the Montana 2P, winter version. The front end of the tent (top left) has a large entry vestibule and large zippered entry door. There is a large high vent at the top of the vestibule. The rear end of the tent (top right) also has a large high vent. The side view (bottom left) shows the Montana 2P’s length (13 feet). The top view (bottom right) shows the tent’s proportions.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 4
My testing for this review was based on Revision A of the Montana 2P (left photo, foreground tent), which has a pointed front vestibule and smaller pole sleeves. The tent has evolved to the current Revision C (left photo, background tent), which has a trapezoidal front vestibule, a window, and larger pole sleeves. The right photo provides a closer view of the front of the current tent (Revision C).

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 5
Inside features. The tent’s body is attached to the fly with clips at the front and rear (top left), but there are no attachment clips in the tent’s mid-section, so the interior drapes inward. The floor shape and dimensions (top right) are identical to other Big Sky two-person tents. There is no access to the rear vestibule from inside the tent (bottom left). The Montana has two smaller mesh storage pockets at the front end (bottom right), which are minimal compared to the four large pockets at the front and rear of the Evolution 2P and Convertible 2P.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 6
Outside features. The Montana 2P has large, closable top vents at the front (left photo) and rear of the tent (right photo). The smaller rear vestibule does not have any access other than lifting up the rear of the tent.

The Montana also has a fly-only option, consisting of the tent fly, poles, X-cord, and footprint (if desired). The X-cord connects the four corners of the tent to keep them from spreading. In both summer and winter versions, the Montana’s fly-only option will create a really light and roomy single-wall tent.

Performance

The Montana’s “fly first” design (tent body attached to the fly with clips, so it sets up as a single unit) allows the tent to be set up very quickly and also allows it to be set up in the rain without getting the interior wet. Setup is simple: lay out the tent, insert poles into sleeves on the fly, and stake it out. Six stakes (four at the corners and two on the ends) are required for a secure pitch. I recommend adding a set of four guylines and stakes for use in windy conditions.

The front (entry end) of the tent has a larger, taller vestibule and large zippered door which permit easy entry for both occupants. However, only half of the space is usable for storage because room is needed for entry/exit. Inside height is 45 inches at the front and 24 inches at the rear, so headroom for sitting up is adequate only at the front of the tent.

As mentioned, there is no access to the smaller rear vestibule from inside the tent. That is actually a moot issue because of the limited headroom at the rear of the tent. It’s easier to access the rear vestibule from outside the tent, but there is no access other than pulling the rear stake and lifting the tent. Smaller items can be inserted under the bottom edge of the fly. To be fair, Big Sky only claims one+ vestibule for the Montana; the pointed rear vestibule is mainly there to stake out the rear and deflect wind.

Although the floor dimensions and area of the Montana 2P are exactly the same as the Evolution 2P and Convertible 2P, interior space is much less usable because of limited headroom and draping sidewalls of the inner tent body (see photos in previous section). Since the Montana is a double-wall tent, there is little problem with occupants or gear getting wet from brushing against the interior tent walls. The headroom situation inside the Montana 2P is a little better than a traditional Tarptent, with adequate headroom for sitting up and dressing only at the front of the tent. You must duck low to reach anything stored in the rear of the tent.

 

For a better viewing experience, please download the Flash Player. Video tour of the Big Sky International Montana 2P tent.

I found the Montana’s design to be very wind stable, especially if the rear of the tent can be pointed into the wind. On a windy day, I tried pitching the Montana with only two long stakes (Easton 9-inch tubular) at the ends, and it easily withstood a 20 mile per hour wind (measured). However, I don’t recommend that as standard practice; it’s better to completely stake out the tent and use guylines as well, to protect your investment.

While silnylon tents from most manufacturers require seam sealing by the customer, Big Sky tents do not; they come seam sealed from the factory. Big Sky would not reveal their process, but I can verify that the Montana 2P is waterproof. I sprayed the seams using a garden hose with 30 pounds of pressure and found no leakage.

The Montana 2P performed admirably in rain and snow. The tent is A-frame shaped in cross-section, so it sheds snow well. Snow flaps on the four-season fly are very functional to help anchor the tent down and eliminate spindrift in wind-driven snow. The front and rear vents are also closable to further minimize spindrift.

The tent’s fly reaches nearly to the ground on the long sides of the tent and is raised more on the vestibules. Ventilation is adequate when there is at least a light breeze and/or the entry door is left open at night, and even better if the front vestibule is left open as well. I experienced little or no condensation most of the time. However, it is subject to heavy condensation or frost on the inside of the fly on a calm/cool/damp night or rainy conditions – condensation is very hard to avoid under such conditions. The difference with a double wall tent is the condensation is on the inside of the fly, and the tent body (nylon or mesh) minimizes contact with the moisture.

Big Sky International Montana 2P Tent Review - 7
Heavy condensation on the inside of the tent’s fly on a calm/cool/damp night.

Assessment

Although the Montana 2P (three-season version) is about 13 ounces lighter than the Convertible 2P and about 11 ounces lighter than the Evolution 2P, it is clearly not as user-friendly. Both the Convertible and Evolution are side entry, with two doors and two vestibules, while the Montana 2P has only one entry and one+ vestibule. Although the floor dimensions and area are the same for all three tents, the Convertible and Evolution are remarkably roomier inside, with abundant headroom. Each has four large storage pockets, compared to the Montana’s two small ones. With the entry doors open, occupants can easily reach items stored in the side vestibules, so the vestibules are incorporated into the tent’s usable space. Thus, compared to other Big Sky tents, headroom and usable space are a definite tradeoff for the weight reduction in the Montana 2P. Still, it is not hard to accept the Montana 2P on its own terms and savor its lightness. To illustrate, the two person Montana 2P is 11 ounces lighter than the popular one person Big Agnes Seedhouse SL1 and has a heckuva lot more room. Bottom-line, the Montana 2P will probably appeal more to hikers who value light weight more than convenience and usable space.

The four-season version of the Montana 2P is equally remarkable in its lightness – a four-season two-person double-wall tent that weighs 4 pounds. The Montana’s design is fairly typical for a four-season tent, a tried and true A-frame shape that sheds wind and snow well, especially with the foot of the tent facing the wind. The small vestibule at the foot end cuts the wind and provides some gear storage to keep it from getting lost in the snow. My biggest wish for the four-season version is to add clips between the tent body and fly at the center of the tent to pull it out more and keep it taut. The four-season version has a pole sleeve at the center, so the clips can easily be sewn in.

Weight-wise, the closest competitors to the Big Sky Montana 2P are the Terra Nova Laser and Argon 900. The Montana 2P beats the Laser by half a pound and the Argon 900 by a couple of ounces. Both Terra Nova tents are side entry with one door and vestibule.

Although I present typical summer and winter configurations in the above photos, the beauty of the Big Sky a la carte system is that users can select the components that best meet their needs, budget, and conditions. The flip side of having more choices is more complexity, and Big Sky’s website does little to simplify the tent configuration process.

What’s Good

  • Lightest two-person double-wall tent available
  • Pole sleeves on the fly create a tighter, more stable tent
  • Interchangeable summer and winter interior configurations
  • Lightweight or heavy-duty aluminum or carbon fiber poles available
  • Easy setup as a single unit
  • Single unit setup keeps the interior dry in the rain
  • Several stake options
  • Snow flaps seal perimeter in a snowstorm
  • Adequate space for two people plus gear
  • More wind stable than the Evolution 2P

What’s Not So Good

  • Adequate headroom only at the front
  • Tent body drapes inward, further reducing interior space
  • Rear vestibule has no access from inside the tent and only limited outside access

What’s Unique

The Montana 2P is the lightest two-person double-wall tent available. It’s also the most customizable double-wall tent available (along with the Convertible), with multiple fly, body, pole, and stake options available to create an array of three- or four-season configurations. The entire tent can be quickly set up as a single unit.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Add attachment clips to the center of the tent body to pull it outward and make it more taut
  • Create access to the rear vestibule from inside the tent