Articles (2020)

Indoor Girl Takes on a Yurt

Baby steps: out of love for her outdoorsy husband, Margie looks before she leaps and books a weekend in a Utah yurt, THEN learns the definition of “yurt.”

A few weeks ago, I was watching the E! channel and admiring the latest in celebrity fashion when my husband peered over his Wall Street Journal and mentioned that he would like to visit a yurt.

A what? Is that one of those exotic huts on the sandy beaches of Fiji?

Fingers crossed, I beat a trail to my computer. From Google, I learned that a yurt is not an exotic hut on a tropical island. Instead, it’s a circular tent-like structure with a lattice wood frame and canvas walls. Darn. Well, no matter. For once, my very outdoorsy husband actually asked for something, and I resolved to get it for him. Within minutes, I had reserved a yurt in the secluded mountainous region of Utah’s high Uintas.

When the reservations were made – and after I gave myself a well-deserved pat on the back for acquiring the perfect Christmas gift – I began preparing for a romantic wintry getaway. I imagined gentle snowflakes falling outside while my husband and I cuddled before a crackling fire inside. We’d eat delicious food, read good books, and maybe take a hike to the frozen river before returning to our yurt for an evening of solitude and relaxation. It was a picture-perfect plan – a trip my husband would never forget.

When I bragged to my girlfriends about my impending escape from civilization, I was surprised by their reactions. Every one of them found it necessary to wish me good luck. Did I need luck? Would my ready, fire, aim approach to the ideal Christmas gift backfire? True, I hadn’t done my homework. Recognizing this, I was faced with a couple of choices. I considered embracing the “ignorance is bliss” attitude. Instead, I decided on the “better late than never” approach and did some ex post facto research. For an indoor girl, the results of my research were a tad frightening.

I learned that some yurts are extravagant and offer all the luxuries of a five-star hotel, while others, such as the one I’d rented, are considerably less lavish. My yurt’s description included such amenities as a pit toilet (Google says that’s another word for “outhouse”), bunk beds, and a wood burning stove. The disclaimer (the one I signed without reading it), informed me that any of these items may be missing or broken, so come prepared.

Indoor Girl Takes On a Yurt - 1
Our yurt: not too shabby!

Reminding myself that I’d been camping a time or two and could surely survive a few days without the comforts of home, I decide to maximize my experience by packing extra supplies – an air mattress and maybe a few spare gallons of water to heat up for a sponge bath. The take-along-extra-supplies idea changed when I learned that we would be parking our car at the trailhead and skiing to the yurt while pulling our provisions on a sled. Fortunately, the disclaimer describes the trail as relatively easy. Whew! Wait, what do they mean by relatively? Time to downsize – replace the cast iron Dutch oven with an aluminum mess kit and leave the extra water at home. After all, if we need more water, we can always follow the advice in the aforementioned disclaimer – melt snow. Why didn’t I think of that?

As it turned out, pulling our supplies over the river and though the woods wasn’t all that difficult. At least that’s what my husband said. He didn’t even complain when I hitched a brief ride on the back of the sled he’d built especially for the occasion.

When we finally arrived at the sign directing us toward the yurt, my pulse quickened. I’d gone to a lot of effort to get this far and I was excited, at long last, to get a glimpse of my yurt. A short detour off the trail led us to our journey’s end. When I saw my yurt, blanketed in newly fallen snow and secluded amongst the aspens and evergreens, I forgot about the not-so-relatively-easy hike and hurried to get a closer look at my home away from home.

From our front porch, we were treated to stunning views of Mount Beulah and a snow covered meadow below Dead Man’s Pass – lovely in spite of its name. The yurt was surrounded by thousands of acres of unspoiled forest and offered incredible scenery as well as terrain perfect for skiing and snow shoeing.

No key was needed. The door wasn’t locked and it’s wasn’t necessary to check in. However, you do need a reservation and a trip permit. Inside the yurt we found cozy accommodations that were more than adequately stocked with everything a person could need. Way to under promise and over deliver! My husband built a crackling fire and, within minutes, the yurt was toasty warm and filled with the rustic comfort only a wood burning stove can provide. The fire also supplied the means to cook the tin foil dinners I’d learned to prepare prior to the trip. They were delicious – thanks to Youtube for the tutorial.

Indoor Girl Takes On a Yurt - 2
The yurt at dusk.

My first opportunity to make friends with the outhouse came late the evening of our first day. I took a flashlight along, but didn’t need it. Though the sky had grown dark, and the moon illuminated the landscape perfectly. Gazing at the black sky and the thousands of brilliantly shining stars, I relished the beauty that exists in my own backyard – well, two hours from my backyard, but you get the gist. It was an exquisite encounter with nature such as I have never had before. Although using a pit toilet is not enjoyable – and there is basically no way to improve the experience – the walk to and from the outhouse more than made up for any unpleasantness. Even in the frigid temperatures (a couple degrees below zero) I lingered outside for a time, enjoying the beauty of my pristine surroundings.

Indoor Girl Takes On a Yurt - 3
My and “my” yurt.

In the morning, my husband used the mess kit to prepare a delicious breakfast of omelets and bacon before he set out on a cross country ski trip. I stayed behind and enjoyed a glorious day relaxing while reading Sherlock Holmes, sipping hot cocoa, and thoroughly savoring the temporary interruption from my ordinarily busy life. Existing for 72 hours without my cell phone, laptop, and television altered my attitude toward living simply. I appreciated the opportunity to sit in silence in a beautiful setting where, for a brief time, life was uncomplicated. The necessity to downsize from a heavy cast iron dutch oven to a lightweight aluminum mess kit could be seen as symbolic of the perspective shift I experienced while on this trip. I’m hoping to incorporate this new approach into my daily life by lightening up, literally and figuratively.

My yurt adventure was a magnificent experience that pulled me way out of my comfort zone and gave me memories to last a lifetime. Unlike my husband, I would never want to live in a yurt; but I am excited for my next yurt adventure.

Winter’s Tone

The sights, sounds, and moods of the Ozark Trail.

Introduction

Plans for a winter backpacking trip began percolating in my brain, followed by the acquisition of supplies needed for said trip. Unfortunately, inventory shortages and holiday travel had me sweating the arrival of a couple of pieces of mission critical gear the week and day before my departure. I found myself fretting over plans B and C, as well as beating myself up over time not budgeted adequately. Truthfully, I had far too much to do in the time I had left. My lackadaisical demeanor was transitioning into panic at a rapid pace, and familial relations in my house were bearing the brunt of my madness. Thankfully, my gracious wife, whose patience with me never tires (a bit of an exaggeration) stepped in to fill sandwich baggies with rations of granola and chips. This was not my plan for the final moments of quality time we would have for the next ten days or so. For you gentlemen still developing your marital prowess: if your wife has permitted you to exercise your primal instincts in the backcountry, do not expect her to tolerate you seam-sealing your tarp after dinner the evening before your departure.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 1
Keep right.

With backpack stocked, the remaining logistical hurdle was a lengthy car ride to the trailhead to leave a car, followed by another lengthy ride to the opposite end of the trail. Our frenzied departure made the mood in the car about as warm as the snow-blanketed hillsides. A gray, overcast day didn’t help lift spirits either. The serpentine road and pickups loaded with firewood willed upon us a pace more apropos of the setting. As the miles and minutes ticked by, I was increasingly anxious of my departure. Small talk did little to ease the mood. Tackling this piece of the Ozark Trail had been on my list. I was excited to be executing my plan; unfortunately my gut was in knots. I scanned the trees for blazes or a sign indicating the trailhead. Finally, a double blue blaze appeared on a tree. I finished sealing my pack with hesitation. Once the lid was closed, our paths would part and disappointment would collide with excitement, as a new adventure began.

Day One

I could still hear the panicked barking of my dog as I wound through the trees and up the hill. Fighting back the tears, I refused to look back. As the barks and the car engine faded away, the tranquility of the snow-covered hills began erasing the emotional waterfall that had cascaded over me. I settled in to a steady pace and tried to put some trail behind me in the remaining daylight. The snow on the trail was undisturbed, with the exception of deer tracks. Some human footprints near the trailhead had stopped, and it looked like the deer and I were the sole occupants of the Ozark Trail today.

The Ozark Trail, often confused with the Ozark Highlands Trail (which I hiked and wrote about here, is across the state line in Missouri. There are plans of connecting the two trails someday, creating a 700-mile trans-Ozark Trail system. For now, the two trails remain separate, maintained by their own collectives. Looking for solitude and a chance to test my winter kit, I decided to scratch the backpacking itch in January, rather than wait for spring to pop. The Ozark Trail consists of more than a dozen named sections, most of which connect to make a 227-mile main spine. The remaining sections bring total trail mileage to over 300 miles. I chose to hike the main spine and save the spur trails for shorter trips. Humbled by my attempt to yo-yo the Highlands Trail, I built in a touch of slack to my itinerary. I packed food for 10 days, assuming a day or more could be wasted with bad (unsafe) weather conditions. If things really unraveled, there were several road crossings where a hitchhike to town could resolve the problem.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 2
Winter along the Eleven Point River.

The frenetic energy of getting my food packed and gear accounted for was beginning to subside with each plant of my trekking pole. Preparing for an extended outing is like the last steep miles of a long climb to a mountain meadow: anguish followed by blissful calm as the resistance eases. The sun was sinking lower and the cloudy day was bringing a close to hike-able daylight. So much energy expended for the day to hike for only an hour was bothersome to me. However, a few pinks and reds in the sky followed by coyote yips and the hoot of an owl reminded me why I had come outside.

Day Two

I awoke to find my pyramid shelter unstaked and laying on the foot of my sleeping bag. I was feeling a bit clumsy, but grateful the weather had cooperated with my haphazard set-up. Finding one’s trail legs takes a day or so. Once a routine is established, the engine fires rather mindlessly. A cloudy and gray day provided little motivation, but views from bluffs above the Eleven Point River made for nice pauses. Around mile fifteen, rain drops began to pepper me, eventually settling into a light rain that would follow me for the next eight miles. Satisfied with my efforts and needing a break, I sought refuge from the rain and fog under a cedar tree, that upon closer inspection made for an ideal place to bed down. With shelter up and a warm cup of tea in my belly, I mustered the energy to start a fire.

Attempts to contact my wife and assure her of my well-being were denied by the remote locale, even though I could see a tower on a hilltop miles away. So, I laid next to my campfire and reflected. The warmth enveloped me like a soft blanket. I had heard some hunting dogs running through the hills earlier and wondered if they had found their prey or shelter for the evening. It felt reassuring to hear those dogs in the woods. Drops of water falling in the leaves and my campfire’s occasional crackles were the lone sounds of a wet evening in the hills above the Eleven Point. Food, shelter, and fire: Maslow would have found little to be ungrateful for this evening.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 3
Fixer-upper Chevy.

Day Three

An early morning creek crossing dampens feet and spirits. Not to be deterred, I soldiered on and found the Hurricane Creek crossing not particularly daunting, despite forewarnings of flash flooding history. Water sources are marked on the National Geographic maps provided by the OTA (Ozark Trail Association). The Ozarks are chalk full of wet drainages. However, winter dries many of them out until the rains of spring replenish the hills. The OTA has done a nice job of listing water sources, but some were dry, and many unmentioned water sources were wet. I never went without water, but I carried water a lot of unnecessary miles as well.

Solo trekking without a communication source is a careless choice. However, once one tethers oneself to a communication device, a piece of isolation is compromised. I agree to notify my wife of my status and check hers as well. Unfortunately, miscommunication and my tunnel vision have created tensions I would rather not worry about on the trail – or at home, for that matter. One such misstep had marred the start to my hike and had me distracted.

The trail meandered through a maze of hollows and short ridge lines, impressing upon me the hard work of the OTA and their trail volunteers. Several birds, including woodpeckers and blue birds were spotted. The bird activity provided distraction from a gray day. By afternoon, clouds had cleared and a sunny day concluded with me on a hilltop hovering over another campfire. Chocolate in my tummy and my fire waning, I glanced over my shoulder and saw the sky had filled with stars that shined like diamonds. Life was good.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 14
Before the dark.

Day Four

Clear skies yielded to clouds once again as I made my way towards the Current River section. A biting wind fought me early and never really let up. Hopes of refilling my water bottle at a creek adjacent to an old mining operation were dashed by bone dry conditions. Should I have expected anything more from the Devil’s Run? Undeterred, my search for hydrological salvation continued. Curious horses, an abandoned 1950’s Chevy Coupe, and a blood-thirsty Weimaraner made for excellent diversions on a cold and cloudy day. The highway 60 crossing marked my beginning of the Current River section and also afforded a good enough signal for my first phone call to the woman upstairs (my wife). Invigorated by conversation and a fresh dose of calories, I forded Pike Creek sans footwear. The Current River section hosts a lovely palette of Ozark geology: rocky glades, igneous rock formations, scenic overlooks, wooded river bottoms, shut-ins, and sinkholes all pepper the landscape.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 7
Rocky Creek shut-ins.

I concluded my third full day of hiking at the Peck Ranch Conservation area. Peck Ranch is owned by the Missouri Department of Conservation. The agency benefits from an 1/8th cent sales tax levied on basically every purchase of outdoor, hunting, and fishing gear in the state. This tax has no sunset and inspires some vitriol in the state. However, the MDC does oversee an impressive number of public lands, as well as manage a robust fisheries and wildlife stock that many Missourians benefit from. Currently, MDC is restoring much of Peck Ranch’s short leaf pine trees. One could argue a number of ways that nature doesn’t really care, but diesel tractors and a pocket full of cash put up a helluva fight. The sunset was hinting at a few pinks and looked as though the clouds may part on my final push towards camp. A scattering of deer leaped ahead of me on the trail. A cup of tea and my campfire were beginning to feel like a routine. Stars began to appear and the cold drove me to bed. I had barely settled in when a pair of promiscuous wildcats let out a blood curdling scream. Bald eagles, robins, bluebirds, woodpeckers, deer, and wildcats were rolling out the welcome mat.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 18
Yucca and tombstone.

Day Five

Some days start off so nicely that no matter how one tries, it can’t get better. A brisk climb to the top of Stegall Mountain provided 100-mile views and warm sunshine. I descended into the National Park Service-owned Ozark National Scenic Riverways. Comprised of the Jack’s Fork and Current Rivers, the NPS property consists of the river corridor. The trail passes one of the park’s interpretive sites at Klepzig Mill, a grain mill built at the beginning of the 20th century and later converted to a power source for local residents. Struck by the “local” economy of sourcing one’s food and power, I looked out the door of the little shack perched on the side of the creek. Bottomlands rich with soil vastly better than the surrounding rocky hillsides certainly provided the impetus for development along this creek. The quiet valley was certainly a different place then. Gone was the self-sustaining pioneer spirit, replaced by a NPS history lesson. If memories are the only thing we preserve, are we any better off? The bark of dogs snapped my train of thought and sent me down trail.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 6
100-mile views from Stegall Mountain.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 8
Doorway into the past.

Views from the bluffs above the Current River crafted a lovely midday hike. Unfortunately, as the trail snaked back behind the bluff my spirits sagged and sore feet began to remind me of the 100 miles I had put behind me. A less than ideal spot below a county road offered me views of the nicest sunset yet. Puffs of smoke from my campfire hung in the air, as the setting sun took the horizon through a technicolor dreamland. Sagging spirits and sore feet were little competition for such a sublime setting. I fed my fire wood and my belly chocolate, refusing to take a second of this for granted.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 11
Spring house cloaked in fog and frost.

Day Six

Each day, one gets the chance for a fresh start to their journey. Perhaps daybreak is my favorite time of day for a reason. An early start by headlamp found me hiking under a crescent moon and stars. As the sun’s rays illuminated the Blair Creek valley, a silver coating of frost blanketed thickets and grass. Ruins of an old spring house emerged from a foggy pond, backlit by the sun’s glow. A piece of vertebrae in the trail prompted inspiration to have the backbone and fortitude to see my journey through. Sunshine and nice trail were moving this day along rather well.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 15
Solar and lunar.

Prior to this hike, many of my coworkers had asked me why I was going out on this journey alone. Obviously, those who backpack and trek don’t require validation of this question. However, the curious among us need satisfactory explanation as to why one would venture out in the middle of winter alone. The reasons are too nebulous to explain. In a nutshell, I don’t know why I’m going out. That’s ok. I’m completely satisfied with the journey, not the destination. I came down the hill and crossed a small creek. Something white caught my eye in the leaves by the creek. Upon closer inspection, I noticed a deer skull and antlers. Antler sheds are a precious find, but finding them attached to a skull is a goldmine for collectors. There was no way I could expect to haul my find out of the woods. I still had several days of hiking and would risk damaging the skull if I strapped it to my backpack. I snapped some photos and replaced the skull back by the creek. Walking away, I was somewhat disappointed by the thought that my find would never decorate a cabin, but I hoped too that another hiker would be fortunate enough to find it before hungry animals chewed up the antlers. Either way, someone or something would benefit from the treasure. On our journey, tangibles need not be collected as measure of success or happiness, simply seeing and remembering is often the best reward.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 13
Take only memories.

Unfortunately, all good days on the trail must come to an end. On a long hike, one resigns oneself to periods of transition. Unfortunately, these transitions seldom come into focus until the journey’s completion and subsequent reflection. In the moment however, it can seem as if the whole trip has taken a turn for the worse. The conclusion of my day was spent in a rather unsightly stretch of trail too close to roads and marred by motorized traffic. Political signs, beer cans and stop signs angled for real estate at road crossings. I pushed forward in search of greener pastures. The conclusion of hiking for the day took me through an extensive blow down of trees with lots of ATV traffic, as evidenced by the muddy trail. I sought refuge in the Grasshopper Hollow Fen complex for the night. I later learned that a trail crew was working feverishly to clean up the destruction a derecho (a rare low pressure system with hurricane force winds) had levied upon the area more than a year ago. The ATV traffic was actually their equipment that was being used to reestablish the trail, since hundreds of mature trees had been blown across the trail. I felt somewhat childish and ignorant after meeting a couple of the trail crew members a day later, especially since they were so apologetic about interrupting my hike with their ATV and chainsaw. I extended my thanks for their hard work and allowing me an open pathway.

Day Seven

Journeys are like eating. Fast food and fine dining both accomplish the same task, filling our bellies, and yet are totally different experiences. Walking a trail end to end is the same task for anyone. However, one person’s experience will obviously differ from another. One can slow the second and third course as much as they want, but the dessert signals the show is coming to an end. The next couple of days on my trek took me inside of 100 miles to go. Signs of measurable progress included my broken trekking pole, ripped tights, shredded socks, and a burn hole in my sleeping bag. Perhaps we stay away from the end as a means to pass the early days, but as the end approaches, we know it’s safe to start thinking about that final push to the finish. Sadly, as I was starting to think of the end of my hike, the weather was absolutely stunning. Crisp mornings with the moon and stars still hanging above me gave way to sunny afternoons in the 40s F. Trails followed the contours of Ozark ridge lines and made for swift passage. Sunsets cast an amber glow upon dried grasses. Each evening found me huddled around a small fire clutching a cup of tea and penning my thoughts for the day as the sun set and my dinner cooked. I found myself inside an emotional tug of war. I could spend a lifetime tending my fire, but the pull to be home with my family was a burden that even an idyllic moment in the woods couldn’t bear.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 16
On the trail of… something.

My short trek was like a campfire. Early on, during the wet lonely nights it seemed like the journey would fail. However, mile by mile I kindled and nursed it. Here I sat next to a warm blaze, confident the fire would last. There were coals and plenty of fuel, but sadly I would have to extinguish it and move along. Each day I would build another. Coyote howls were some of the first sounds each morning. One of my final mornings found me moving along a contour where I flushed out a flock of wild turkeys. Moments later I could hear hound dogs bellowing in the distance. A smile perched on my face as I couldn’t help but think of those dogs my first day on the trail. Here we were, still chasing prey. I pushed along a few more miles, catching a howl or two from my companions. They were getting closer. Moments later the crunch of leaves under foot behind me signaled a visitor and a white and tan dog with radio collar attached to her neck appeared. I could see the look of disappointment in her eye as she sniffed in circles behind me. Sure she had found her quarry, but knowing better she turned and retreated.

Day Eight

In the circle of fastpackers and trekkers, we treat our game like a buffet restaurant: quantity over quality. Knowing when to get up from the table is a fine art. For those of us raised to clean our plate, that means overstaying our welcome from time to time. Why hike the entire trail? Because it’s there. Why eat everything on our plate and be miserably full? Because it’s there. My second to last morning on the trail looked like the previous mornings, however, a low layer of clouds and fog slowly set in with a biting wind. I had been spoiled the previous day by temperatures well beyond seasonal norms. I had even wished at one point for a pair of shorts to replace my tights. Fighting some tightness in my Achilles tendon and the pervasive chill in the air, my mind was having a hard time engaging. Aside from an owl in the early morning, I saw very little wildlife moving. The sun finally broke through and granted some warmth to my chilled bones, but getting a message out to my wife proved futile. I wanted to finalize my arrival home, but the network would not allow me anything. Later in the afternoon, I approached a trailhead and encountered a hiker who informed me of a developing dangerous winter storm expected to bring extensive ice and snow to the area by the following evening.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 12
Ice flows punctuate the leaf litter on the hillside.

I had already moved into finish mode and now an impending winter storm exacerbated my rushed mood. I had planned for a final push of thirty miles on my last day with an empty pack and the car in sight, but quickly called an audible and extended my mileage goal for the day. The hiker had kindly offered me a ride to the trailhead, but I politely declined, knowing the finish was too close and there was food on the plate. Unfortunately, the Ozark Trail has been abused by illegal ATV traffic in some places. During my frenzy to log extra miles for the day, a motorcyclist approached me from behind on the trail. Not in any mood to deal with clowns today, I simply turned around and demonstrated no plan to yield my trail to them before they sped off into the woods. My unfortunate guess is that no effort has been made to end illegal trail abuse. There was a lot of ATV usage in the area. Between the county and U.S. Forest Service, I would guess a lack of resources to enforce and some general ambivalence towards the problem ultimately leads to the type of behavior I witnessed. Undeterred, I squeaked out an additional handful of miles and managed to have a nice sit by the fire, despite missing the final sunset of the trip.

The embers of my final campfire reflected back on my face and the last glow of dusk disappeared from the horizon. I had run down the battery on my phone attempting to get a message out. Instead, I replayed the past 48 hours in my head. Two days of warmer than average weather in January and obvious signs of little to no animal activity along with an apparent cell network overload seemed to spell out conditions the day hiker had mentioned. A storm of historic scale would overtake the area in the next 24 hours, I later learned. I had passed up a guaranteed ticket home in order to hike 25 more miles. The gravity of my choice was looping through my head. I knew I would make it back to my car. Unfortunately, I wasn’t sure driving home would be an option. Stuck at an interstate motel in a winter storm wasn’t high on my list of priorities at this time, but I was committed to see the trail through. I threw a few sticks on my fire, journaled some more, and finished my chocolate bars off.

Day Nine

My final morning out of camp was supposed to be a melancholy but celebratory experience. I had passed a small roadhouse in the country on my way to the trailhead. I was going to treat myself to a cold beer and a hot cheeseburger, watch some TV, and maybe answer a few questions about my mangy appearance and why on earth I would backpack in the winter. Now, I wasn’t sure if I would even make it all the way home, much less have time to stop for beer and food. I stepped out of camp well before sunrise. I could see drops of precipitation floating in front of my headlamp. My pace was hurried. My mood was too. The greatest threat to my safety was falling tree limbs in an ice storm and/or hypothermia. I managed to get a message to my wife and eventually spoke to her in person. The developing storm was expected to bring extensive rain, ice, and snow with it. Getting back to my car was going to be fine, but the four-plus-hour drive home was not a guarantee. Upon exchanging weather forecast information, my phone’s battery abruptly died. Not exactly the photo finish I’d recommend to others.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 19
Courtois crossing.

Rain showers dotted my hike back to the car. Temperatures in the upper thirties offered no respite. The final miles of the Courtois section of the Ozark Trail skirt the ridge above Courtois Creek and bluff top views give a bird’s eye look at the surrounding countryside. A lovely set of caves also grace the bluffs too. Unfortunately, they are closed due to the white nose fungus that is killing off native bat populations. One final creek crossing numbed any remaining feeling in my feet. Passing through the adjacent campground, I was greeted by a pair of unattended dogs. I prepared my trekking pole for combat and my canine foe barked louder. Upon exiting the campground, I chuckled to myself. Here both of us were with bigger barks than bites, neither of us sure what we were getting into.

The Ozark Trail: Winters Tone - 10
Bluff-top respite.

Plans do nothing but confine our goals to a limited boundary. Perhaps that’s why I like the Lennon lyric so much: “…life is what happens while you’re busy making other plans.” Getting outside of the plan is sometimes harder than no plan at all. Had I known what the weather conditions were going to be, I would have planned a much more aggressive finish to my hike. My wife later explained that she had held back on giving me the weather forecast, knowing that I would just worry about it and the possibility of it changing wasn’t worth the stress. I know for sure my hike would have materialized much differently in the final days had I been more aware of the weather. However, I’m glad to have someone keeping me slightly insulated from reality. Technology tethers us to our families, lives, etc. but kept on a leash, technology can allow us to push our boundaries, for better and worse.

The final miles of my hike peeled off in a mindless stupor. I was emotionally and physically drained. I was no longer in any state of mind to care whether my bed or a motel bed would be home for the evening. Some hot food and a shower would suffice. I could sleep in my car. Each time I return from a hike, I’m grateful for the solitude that it has afforded me. The noise and distractions of civilized life seem so loud after tuning out. Finishing these trips is so anticlimactic, but yet the tide of emotions that arrives in the following hours rivals the finish line celebration at a major marathon. To some, that would indicate it is about the destination. However, there is no destination without a journey. Why we journey is up to us. Get as much out of it as you can because there’s one destination that doesn’t give second chances.

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: 2012 State of the Market Report

Part 1: Why should you buy a WPB rain jacket? And why would you buy one that weighs more than 8 ounces (227 g)?

The Necessity of the Dubya-Pee-Bee

A rain jacket is, for most backcountry travelers, an inevitability. There are certainly areas of the world where precipitation is unlikely enough to render raingear useless weight, and places either warm or cold enough that precipitation is not a concern. In very warm climates, one can just get wet without suffering ill effects, and in very cold places the certainty of precipitation falling in the form of snow combines with the limits of current WPB (waterproof-breathable) technology to make other shells better choices. Most backcountry areas don’t fit into any of these categories, or only do so in certain seasons, and thus anyone hoping to experience the backcountry in safety and comfort ought to bring something to keep liquid precipitation off their backs and out of their ears. The reasons for this become a lifetime axiom for anyone caught out in a rainstorm without raingear. Water promotes heat loss with impressive efficiency, and renders almost all insulations drastically less effective. The necessity of raingear is a lesson best learned in theory first, rather than from the potentially hazardous school of hard knocks.

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: the 2012 State of the Market Report - Part 1: A historical definition of lightweight - 1
Better bring your raingear: the author testing the Haglofs Ozo in Alaska. Photo by Paige Brady.

That said, the reputation of WPB rain jackets is less than stellar. They’re reputed to keep precipitation out while not keeping sweat in, yet can fall short in one or both arenas. Breathability is typically the attribute which comes under fire, and in many cases, breathability can be so poor that some hikers have advocated abandoning WPB raingear altogether. Add the substantial expense of WPB jackets, and there appear to be compelling reasons to avoid these supposedly “essential” pieces of outdoor gear.

I examined the various alternatives to WPB jackets in my Lightweight Alternative Rainwear State of the Market Report, investigating the numerous solutions which might address the weight, limited use, and deficient functionality of WPB jackets. The details are discussed in greater depth in that series of articles, but in summary I found that while things like poncho-tarps and silnylon capes can indeed prove efficacious for many lightweight backcountry travelers, they have many limitations, which explain the ubiquity of WPB shells. Even the best poncho-tarps suffer in wind, while bushwhacking, and during any backcountry mode of travel other than walking. Capes are even worse. Modern day iterations of the cagoule, such as the Packa, are good in high winds and off trail, but are made of impermeable fabrics and even their best venting options still renders them less breathable than the worst WPB jacket. Perhaps the single greatest revelation I took out of testing alternative rainwear was an appreciation for just how good modern WPB jackets can be. The best such garments fit closely, yet don’t bind. They seal out even the worst weather, while still letting out a substantial amount of perspiration. They not only protect the hiker, climber, skier, boater, or cyclist from rain, snow, and the various combinations thereof, they also keep out spray from waves, wind, and the brutal soaking that can come from dripping wet brush and scrub. And, as I discovered in this report, the best do all of these things while weighing very little indeed.

The Perfect Rain Coat

The ideal WPB jacket would provide flawless and immutable waterproofing and weatherproofing, yet breathe as well as a single thin base layer. Neither of these is yet possible. WPB technologies still rely on a DWR (durable water repellant) treatment of the outer shell fabric to function, and even the best of these coatings need maintenance. These requirements are easy to fulfill in civilization, but expeditionary users may find doing so more problematic. More familiar to most will be the large extent to which current WPB technologies fall short of ideal breathability. Put a WPB shell on at the base of a steep climb to keep the cold rain off, and with warm humidity/a hard hike/a forceful perspirer/etc. the WPB membrane will soon be keeping water in as well as out. Too much perspiration accumulated and trapped will lead to the very thing the WPB jacket was put on to prevent: accelerated cooling via evaporation.

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: the 2012 State of the Market Report - Part 1: A historical definition of lightweight - 2
A tester’s burden: the author ponders his quiver.

Readers desiring a more indepth knowledge of why WPB technologies fall short of our breathability ideal, or merely a definitive understanding of exactly what various WPB technologies consist of should read Alan Dixon’s Waterproof Breathable Fabric Technologies: A Comprehensive Primer and State of the Market Technology Review. Dixon’s article was published eight years ago, but for better or worse the information contained therein in still highly relevant and largely up to date. The three WPB technologies found in the jackets tested here are Gore-Tex, eVent, and polyurethene, which are the three major technologies discussed by Dixon. In this respect, not much has changed in the world of lightweight WPB shells.

The operative word here is “lightweight” (to be defined shortly). As Will Rietveld discussed in his coverage of the 2011 Outdoor Retailer Winter Market, numerous new technologies and variations on old approaches are all attempting to maintain the weatherproofness of the existing WPB membranes, while improving breathability. The extent to which these new technologies achieve this aim is still being assessed. Alas, none of theses garments come especially close to being lightweight, and thus none are reviewed here. In the near future, this will hopefully change, though as discussed below there are historical reasons to be cautious when applying optimism to the evolution of the raingear market.

I’ve become accustomed to having only modest, practical expectations when it comes to the breathability of my WPB jackets, though, as mentioned above, wearing a truly non-breathable shell will put the supposedly lackluster performance of Gore-Tex and PU in good perspective. Over the years, I’ve learned to adapt my habits, both in terms of clothing selection and hiking pace, to suit the strengths and weaknesses of existing WPB jackets. Occasionally I find myself getting especially sweaty on an ascent, and then especially cold on a descent, but wearing minimal quick drying layers, strategic venting, and hiking a bit slower all conspire to avoid the worst of the WPB chill. The other virtue of all WPB shells (or at least all the ones tested here) is that they are windproof. If you’ve got to be a bit damp while out in the cold, there is a lot to be said for being able to slow the rate of drying (aka evaporative cooling) if you are so inclined. I’ve often found being damp and warm preferable to being dry and cold.

If I’m willing to compromise on less-than perfect breathability, I am not inclined to compromise on weatherproofing. Given the state of outdoor clothing design and technology in the last decade, there is no reason for a WPB shell to not do a really good job at keeping weather out when you want it to. (Note that waterproof is part of weatherproof, but far from the whole story.) I live in northwest Montana, and have both Glacier National Park and the Bob Marshall Wilderness complex in my backyard. Both receive lots of precipitation. Both have exposed alpine terrain and densely vegetated canyons in close proximity. Both receive snow in most months of the year. I tested the shells beginning in early spring and continuing through summer to autumn, almost exclusively in home terrain but also on trips further afield in Montana and one summer trip to Alaska. Packrafting is a major part of my wilderness travel, so every test shell saw use on the rivers and creeks on Glacier and the Bob. I also ski, mountain bike, and climb a few mountains, and the jackets came along for those, too.

My ideal shell fits closely enough to not flap in the wind or get in the way during climbing and paddling, but still has enough room for a mid-weight insulating layer (thick fleece or mid-weight synthetic jacket) and the dead air space between insulation and shell to maximize warmth. I don’t bring a down coat unless it’s cold enough that rain is not possible. I find hoods invaluable, and insist on a big one with a generous, structured brim to keep drips out. I want a hood to cinch equally well around a bare head or the hood of my insulating coat, and in either case to move with the head even if the shell is unzipped a fair bit. I favor anoraks over full zip coats, as they layer and wear more seamlessly without the bulk of the zipper, are simpler, and are a bit more durable insofar as the zipper is concerned. I’m 5’11”, hover around 160 pounds, have a 38” chest and 33” sleeves on my dress shirts. Pockets on rain shells don’t excite me too much, as I find pockets on inner garments to be a more reliable place to put things out of the weather. I do get excited about long sleeves, drop tails, and good detailing that doesn’t absorb water. I like to hike fast and all day, don’t cancel trips when the weather is less than desirable, and probably sweat more than average.

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: the 2012 State of the Market Report - Part 1: A historical definition of lightweight - 3
A good hood is a beautiful thing: the Haglofs Ozo.

All these preferences, prejudices, and idiosyncrasies should be taken into account when reading the individual jacket reviews, found in Part Two of this report. There is a lot of diversity in features and fit amongst our test shells, many of which I’m not especially convinced will suit other hikers perfectly. Keep your own body type, hiking style, preferences, and previous experience with other shells in mind, and take my conclusions with the consequent grains of salt.

The Vital Importance of DWR

A durable water-repellant treatment on shell fabric is vital to proper functioning of a WPB membrane. I’ll go out on a limb and assert that the overwhelming majority of “failures” experienced where a WPB membrane seems to leak is due to user error: improper maintenance of the DWR.

A DWR treatment on a shell allows the material to shed water and not become soaked. These treatments are all degraded and eventually worn off by dirt and abrasion on the surface of the shell fabric. Countering this is simple: wash your shell occasionally in non-detergent soap, rinse it thoroughly, and dry it briefly (~10 minutes) on medium heat. For the most part, modern DWR treatments are fairly effective, and this process will usually do the trick to revive the coating. If, after such a treatment, water splashed on your shell doesn’t immediately bead up, you’ll need to reapply the DWR using one of the various commercially available wash-in or spray-on products. Follow the directions and don’t skimp! Test your shell periodically, especially the week before a big trip in questionable weather.

Failure of the DWR does not lead to a failure of the membrane, which would allow water to leak in. The saturated shell fabric does render the process by which perspiration is passed through the membrane impossible, which means that, just as with a coated, non-breathable rain jacket, you will wet out from the inside. During very wet and cool conditions, evaporation from the sodden exterior fabric can even lower the dew point just inside the shell enough that condensation forms inside the jacket, just as it does on the inside wall of a tent during especially unsavory conditions. These are difficult conditions where synthetic insulation shines, and, even with its apparent weaknesses, WPB technology is much better than the alternatives.

Expedition usage, where proper care and reapplication of DWR is not possible, in another issue entirely and beyond the scope of this article.

Think of cleaning your shell and occasionally reapplying a DWR coating like changing the oil in your car: if you don’t do it, you might still do okay for a while, but that’s only because you got lucky.

Lightweight, Historically Defined

For the purposes of this report, lightweight rain jackets are only those whose manufacturer claimed weight was less than 8 ounces (227 g), made of WPB fabrics, and had a hood. Why this somewhat arbitrary weight benchmark? There are two reasons: pushing the state of the art and culling the herd.

There are a lot of WPB shells on the market. It seems that each major company makes at least half a dozen distinct models intended for various sorts of consumers. The very first BackpackingLight Raingear Roundup, a decade ago, had a cut off of sub-13 ounces (369 g). It included 17 garments, of which only five were made of WPB fabrics and had hoods. A similar weight limit today would include more garments than could be comprehensively reviewed in a relevant amount of time. Even going down from 9 ounces (255 g) to 8 (227 g) narrowed the field substantially. There is also much to be said for extolling the state of the art in outdoor gear. BackpackingLight has long been, in its best moments, a gadfly to an industry all too often driven by style and short term profit. Witness the early boosterism for eVent, Pertex, and Cuben Fiber, or Roger Caffin seemingly single-handedly being responsible for every MSR Reactor being sold with a big ugly sticker on the pot. Today I ask the question: why would a company make a WPB rain jacket that weighs more than 8 ounces (227 g)?

WPB hooded shells that weigh less than 8 ounces (227 g) have been on the market for a long time. The 2005 BackpackingLight Raingear Review listed half a dozen. One, the Marmot Essence, is still with us today (and reviewed for this report). The other five have either been reincarnated in substantially different models (OR Zealot versus today’s Helium II), or discontinued with no comparable replacement (Patagonia Specter). The Specter is a particularly interesting case; it was the lightest shell tested in 2005 and developed a cult following for its blend of light weight and excellent weatherproofing, yet was discontinued. Earlier this year Patagonia told me, in an exchange over Twitter, that they had durability problems with the Specter, and in 2009 I saw Kevin Sawchuk rip his (heavily used) Specter along the back neck seam while pulling it off after a long wet day. So then, can a sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) WPB shell cut it for serious, long-term use?

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: the 2012 State of the Market Report - Part 1: A historical definition of lightweight - 4
The shoulder area of a 15-month-old Marmot Mica. Raingear durability is a real concern, so long as that concern has realistic implications for field use and is not merely illusory reassurance.

There are three general ways to make a WPB shell light, and each comes with its own set of reasons why such a light shell would not be desirable. (I’m framing this with the perhaps not universal assumption that anyone would, if value, performance and durability were good enough, choose the lightest shell available.) A light outer fabric is a good way to make a shell light, as is a lighter WPB membrane/coating. Dispensing with features, like pockets, full zippers, and sophisticated hoods, is the third way. Durability is the chief objection to the first two, with climbers, bushwhackers, the indelicate, and the paranoid expressing concern that the fabric required to crack 8 ounces (227 g) will be too fragile for their needs. Coating durability is also a concern. Windshells used to use polyurethene coatings to enhance water and wind resistance, and the 4.4-ounce (125-g) first generation of the Sierra Designs Isotope (mentioned in the 2005 article) had so little PU inside that it wasn’t waterproof enough. One jacket tested for this report, the Montane Litespeed H2O, has a lighter PU coating that is advertised as very water resistant and as a result more breathable than fully waterproof PUs. It should be noted that the mature version of the Isotope weighed 5.4 oz, and was found by BPL testers to be fully waterproof. So then, why has there been so little progress in the lightening of WPB rain jackets?

Rain Jackets (WPB, less than 8 oz, Hooded)

Jacket MSRP WPB Membrane Claimed Weight oz / g Measured Weight oz / g
Montane Spektr 319 eVent 7.4 / 209.8 7.7 / 218.3
Montane Litespeed H20 150 PU 6.3 / 178.6 5.6 / 158.8
GoLite Malpais 250 PU 7.0 / 198.4 7.2 / 204.1
OR Helium 140 PU 6.9 / 195.6 6.4 / 181.4
Marmot Essence 175 PU 6.0 / 170.1 6.4 / 181.4
Haglofs Ozo 328 Gore-Tex Paclite 6.4 / 181.4 7.0 / 198.4
TNF Triumph Anorak 180 PU 5.8 / 164.4 5.5 / 155.9
MontBell Versalite 179 PU 7.4 / 209.8 7.0 / 198.4
Rab Pulse 175 PU 7.0 / 198.4 7.0 / 198.4*
OR Helium II 150 PU 6.4 / 181.4 6.8 / 192.8*
DriDucks Micropore 19 (w/ pants) Propore 6.0 / 170.1 not tested
RainShield 02 31 Propore 5.5 / 155.9 not tested
ZPacks WPB Cuben Rain Jacket 225 Cuben Laminate 4.5 / 127.6 not tested
* Unlike the rest of the test jackets, which were a men’s medium, the Pulse and Helium II were tested in men’s large.

The Failure of the Market

It’s easy to look at the 2005 report, then at the list of sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) WPB shells assembled for this test, and conclude that the industry has been, at best, marking time. Previous BPL testing, such as that cited above, and use in the field, like the use of the aforementioned Patagonia Specter by Roman Dial and Jason Geck during the Arctic 1000 Expedition, has demonstrated that sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) shells can be used in the most serious and committing conditions around. While the durability of the coatings in such light shells may not be universally laudable, history and the testing for this report seem to indicate, even given strenuous use, that it is not a design constraint. Lack of features may have been an objection previously, but is no longer. Shells in the current test group have multiple pockets and fully adjustable hoods as good as any on the market, and even pit zips. Coating/membrane durability and features cannot be considered valid reasons for rain shells weighing more than 8 ounces (227 g).

As mentioned above, durability of the shell fabric is probably the most substantive justification for heavy raincoats. I’m not at all sure I’d want to climb a wet, sharp granite off width in any of the test jackets. Then again, I didn’t actually try that (I don’t do such uncivilized things now that I’m old and wise), and I might be surprised. I certainly was surprised by some of the test jackets, the best of which shrugged off some nasty abuse with no concern whatsoever. I suspect the real reason most WPB shells remain so heavy has to do with consumer pressure. In the most recent BPL Raingear Review, in 2008, Will Rietveld inquired of an eVent representative why no lighter garments had yet been made with their technology. She replied that manufacturers had not yet demanded the light fabric that such a garment would require. Plainly, the market pressure, or perceived market pressure, for truly lightweight WPB garments has not increased substantially in the last half-decade. Companies are doubtlessly keen to avoid returns, but more than that I imagine, many folks see the semi-transparent PU coatings on the Marmot Essence, Triumph Anorak, or Rab Pulse and think that such a thing just cannot keep them dry. It may be a case where perception is reality.

Ultralight Waterproof-Breathable Jackets: the 2012 State of the Market Report - Part 1: A historical definition of lightweight - 5
Rain shells can be handy even on sunny days. Justin Baccary stays dry in a classic GoLite Virga on the Middle Fork of the Flathead, Montana.

This is a shame, as my testing revealed some of the sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) shells currently available are superbly functional and durable. While some users no doubt need a more durable shell fabric, and some might need features currently unavailable in a sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) shell, I assert that many folks choose a heavier shell in order to gain a sense of security, which is not reinforced by practical need. Aside from the careless and the especially brutal, a sub-8-ounce (sub-227-g) rain jacket will probably serve most users just fine.

Part 2 of this report will discuss individual shells in detail and help you find which shell best suits your needs.

Páramo Vista Rain Jacket Review

An incredibly breathable full-zip rain jacket that manages to fend off precipitation without using a membrane.

Overview

The Páramo Vista is a full-zip rain jacket that forsakes the traditional membrane for a Nikwax Analogy Pump Liner. The idea behind the liner is to mimic the fur of an animal and push water out. This is done to protect the user and the user’s insulation from the typical precipitation, condensation, and perspiration. The Pump Liner is then combined with a Directional microfiber outer fabric whose purpose is to deflect both wind and precipitation. While this sounds like a bunch of marketing lingo, my experience has been that the Vista lives up to the hype.

Páramo Vista SpotLite Review - 1
Wearing the Vista on a winter trip to Mt. Rogers in Virginia.

I have been wearing the Vista for a couple of months now and received it just prior to winter here in the southeastern U.S. For the most part, every time I’ve been out in any kind of precipitation, the Vista has been along for the ride. We’ve seen freezing rain, hail, sleet, snow, and high winds. I’ve been interested in the Páramo concept after hearing how well regarded it is in parts of Europe that share a similar climate. Unlike the western U.S, here in the southeast we’re more likely to experience freezing rain than snow, and if we do get snow, it’s a usually a sloppy wet mess.

Páramo Vista SpotLite Review - 2
Features clockwise from top left – two large front pockets, a single large mesh interior pocket, Velcro closed cuffs, and a double zipper.

Given its weight and combined use of both a liner and shell, the Vista is best used in winter. While not much heavier than some more traditional rain jackets, this is definitely no 6-ounce (170-g) pullover. What the Vista offers for that weight, though, is an incredibly breathable jacket, and the liner adds enough warmth for it to take the place of both a mid-layer and shell. The Vista also offers a large variety of features, including a reverse double zipper backed by snaps, two large and well placed hand-warmer pockets, adjustable Velcro cuffs, and a single-pull hem drawcord. The Vista also features a scooped tail, reflective piping, and a fully adjustable hood with a wired peak and rear retainer that allows it to be stowed away. While both the hand-warmer pockets and main zipper have redundant closures, which definitely adds weight, the design allows for increased ventilation while still offering some protection from the elements.

Páramo Vista SpotLite Review - 3
The Vista hood is fully adjustable, stows away with a rear retainer strap, and has a wired peak.

Based on my field use, the Vista lives up to the Páramo reputation. Even when the microfiber outer fabric completely wetted out while waiting on friends to pack up camp during a snow storm (I was very worried), I found it to be completely dry after a mile or two of time on the trail. I never found my base layer (usually a lightweight merino hoody) to be damp and usually felt just on the cool side of warm. On a few occasions when I did start to feel too warm, I found it very easy to adjust the zipper while leaving the snaps closed in order to gain a little extra ventilation. For what it’s worth, Páramo does offer a lighter jacket called the Quito, which also features pit zips. However, when speaking with Páramo they suggested the Vista was a better match for backpackers due to a reinforcement on the shoulders (to prevent water ingress under the load of pack straps). Páramo products can maintain water repellency throughout the life of the item, but this requires periodic use of Nikwax products for replenishment.

Specifications

Year/Model 2011 Páramo Vista
Style Full-zip hooded rain jacket
Fabrics Nikwax Analogy Light
Weight Manufacturer Specified: 19.82 oz (562 g) assumed size M
BPL Measured: 19.8 oz (561 g)
Features Two large chest pockets, one large mesh interior pocket, adjustable Velcro cuffs, stow-away fully adjustable hood with wired peak and retainer tab, two-way reversed zipper, scooped tail, single hem drawcord pull
MSRP US $332 (at time of writing)

Disclosure: The manufacturer provided this product to the author and/or Backpacking Light at no charge, and it is owned by the author/BPL. The author/Backpacking Light has no obligation to the manufacturer to review this product under the terms of this agreement.

How to Best Pack Your UL/Frameless Backpack with UL Gear

The advantages of having a lightweight, frameless backpack are huge – but without that heavy frame, the backpack has all the qualities of a large sack. For maximum comfort, you’ll need to pack carefully, in a way that gives your backpack form and balance.

The advantages of having a lightweight, frameless backpack are huge – but without that heavy frame, the backpack has all the qualities of a large sack. For maximum comfort, you’ll need to pack carefully, in a way that gives your backpack form and balance.

On a partial hike of the Appalachian Trail, I learned the importance of packing correctly using a GoLite Gust, a durable and capacious pack that weighs a little over a pound. My sleeping pad became a frame, and my tent poles gave the pack structure. It took me a while, but eventually I figured out a system that worked for the Gust. Depending on the materials available (i.e. your gear) and your type of pack, the exact formula will vary. However, you’ll need to consider form, balance, and functionality when packing your ultralight backpack, regardless of its type.

How to Best Pack Your UL/Frameless Backpack with UL Gear - 1
Ultralight packs come in a wide array of sizes and styles – if they don’t include a frame, you’ll need to build one using your gear.

WATERPROOFING

Before you do anything, make sure your pack is waterproof. Unless you want to carry a bulky raincover, drop a lawn-and-leaf or trash compactor bag into your pack. This provides a waterproof buffer between the elements and your belongings. Since the material of most ultralight bags is quite thin, your pack won’t retain much water. It’ll get wet, but it won’t get heavy, and that’s what matters. Spraying your pack with silicone waterproofing spray is another option, although the coating will wear off over time. Pack your gear into Ziploc bags for another layer of protection.

FORM

To build a frame into your pack using your gear, the two most important items are soft padding to go against your back and a stiff frame to give it form. Internal frame packs have these features built into them, but that becomes redundant once you realize that the items you commonly carry with you can be repurposed to create a frame.

If you’ve ever taken a pack apart, you may have noticed a thick foam pad that looks a lot like your sleeping pad. Why carry two near-identical objects on your back when one can serve the purpose of the other? It’s this that I love about the ultralight mentality – eliminating redundancy. By folding your sleeping pad in three, you can create padding for your back. With the GoLite Gust, curl the folded padding so that it fits more easily and stuff it into your pack so that it forms a nice solid foam back for your pack.

If you’re carrying tent poles, they’re great for giving form to your pack. Arrange them so that they run parallel to your spine when the pack is worn, and stuff your other belongings around them to keep them upright and the pack rigid.

How to Best Pack Your UL/Frameless Backpack with UL Gear - 2
Tent poles plus folded sleeping pad equals a makeshift frame for an ultralight pack.

BALANCE

Although weight distribution matters less for ultralight packs (there’s less weight to go around), it can still make a difference. For optimal comfort, keep your heavier items close to your back and near the middle or top of your pack, depending on what you find comfortable. First, drop your sleeping bag into your bag so that it ends up on the bottom of your pack. You don’t want too much weight in the very bottom of your pack; a lightweight sleeping bag is ideal.

If you’re like me, food is one of your heaviest items (I once ran into the “GoLite Guy,” Demetri Coupounas, hiking the Long Trail with a backpack full of kelp – yuck!). Split your food into two bags and sink one down each side of your pack to balance the load.

To distribute the weight of items like stove, fuel, and headlamp, wrap each item in a piece of clothing. This protects your gear and silences items that might otherwise bump together and clank as you walk down the trail. Be consistent so that you can find your gear when needed – for example, my headlamp always lives inside my woolen hat, near the middle of my pack.

FUNCTION

Retain a small bag filled with your food for the day and keep that near the top of your pack so that you don’t have to dig down into your pack until the end of the day when you make camp. Pack other items you might need during the day, such as your rain jacket, near the top of your gear. If it begins raining, you won’t have to risk getting all your other items wet while digging out your rain gear. Pack your rainfly or tarp above your sleeping bag. When setting up camp, if you can get the rainfly up first, you can set up your camp in style without getting any wetter.

Whether you’re bringing water bottles (I prefer Gatorade) or a hydration bladder, keep it accessible. Pack it near the top of your pack or in the front pouch.

TIPS

For the sake of consistency, once you’ve worked out a system that works for your pack, stick to it. This will make packing your bag a habit instead of a chore, and you’ll know where each object lives in case you need to get to it quickly.

Remember, don’t overload the pack, even if it’s as accommodating as the Gust. The thin shoulder straps of ultralight packs aren’t designed for heavy loads. To keep your pack comfortable, stick within the manufacturer’s weight recommendations. The Gust gets uncomfortable around 30 pounds, and does better with loads under 25 pounds or so.

Hiking part of the Appalachian Trail with my Gust pack – my first extended backpacking trip – I came across a fellow hiker with the same pack. He had socks stuffed underneath his shoulder pads and, loaded down as I was, I thought “Great idea!” Now I know better – lighten your load if your shoulders are getting sore. An ultralight pack works only if you pack it with ultralight gear!

2012 Photo Contest Winners!

The votes are counted, photos drooled over, and the top ten are in. Congrats to all who entered – the eye candy was gorgeous!

Thank you to all who contributed! We’re unable to publish all of the over fifty entries, but it was a tough race with many evocative and lush photographs. Though I wasn’t a judge, it was fun to collect the images and captions, learning a bit more about each of the photographers in the process. Here are the top ten entries, with the photographers’ captions and the judges’ commentary on each. Special thanks to our judges: Ryan Jordan, Chris Wallace, Damien and Renee Tougas, and Tony Wong.

Congratulations to the winners!

  • First Place (Hyperlite Mountain Gear Porter Pack): Heather Allen
  • Second Place (Ruta Locura Wasatch Bivy): Scott MacButch
  • Third Place (Mountain Laurel Designs eVent Mitts and Gaiters): Frédéric Maillard

First Place – Heather Allen

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 1
Sierra Sunrise: Mount Banner as viewed from Thousand Island Lake, Ansel Adams Wilderness, Sierra Nevada, California. Shot with a Canon G10.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: With reflections, I prefer a more symmetrical composition, and I miss just a tiny twinge of blue in the dark sky, but the alpenglow on this peak is unreal and I really, really, really want to camp here.

Chris Wallace: I love the alpenglow here, but I find it lacking an easily identifiable focal point (my eyes are not drawn anywhere in particular).

Damien Tougas: I love the way this photo makes me feel; when I look at it I feel both a chill of cool air and the warmth of the sun. Although the color of the sky seems a bit unnatural for my tastes, it does provide a nice contrast to the mountains.

Renee Tougas: The color on the mountain is fabulous. It would have been perfect if the water was still.

Tony Wong: I love the combination of overall sharpness of the image in the light and dark areas and how the photographer captured the early morning light on the mountains. The image would have been a little nicer if the shot composed a little "lower" so that tip of the mountain in the reflection on the water was not almost touching the bottom edge of the photo.

Second Place – Scott MacButch

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 2
Brooks Range, Arrigetch Peaks. We made a big circle, first floated a short distance down the Noatak River, hiking up Portage Pass to the Alatna, floated down the Alatna, then backpacked through the Arrigetch, and finally floated down the upper Noatak River to our starting place – 14 days.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: I yearn for this scene to appear during the magic hour of dawn or dusk, whatever gives me alpenglow on those peaks, and colors that are a little less harsh, but given the lighting limitations, the technical quality of this image is superb.

Chris Wallace: I find the colors washed out a bit, but the shelters provide a great sense of scale and make me want to camp here.

Damien Tougas: The scene is beautiful; I really want to camp here. While the colors feel a little washed out to me, I think the composition and location are great.

Renee Tougas: This photo makes you want to camp here and pack light to get there. The composition is great. The color seems a bit washed out, but I think that’s just a time of day lighting issue.

Tony Wong: This photo draws me in to explore all of it with my eyes. The shelters in the foreground makes the photo immediately personal, making me imagine that I could be there. They provide scale to the image and make the foreground more interesting. It would have been better if the shot had been composed a little higher so that the peaks on the upper right side included more of those white clouds and offered more room to "breathe" vs. being pinched by the top edge of the photo. The one missing element of this photo was if the sky had been much deeper, darker, and blue… overall, more contrast to bring out the details in the mountains in the background.

Third Place – Frédéric Maillard

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 3
Taken in Iceland, the first day of the Laugavegur hike. The incoming storm wasn’t yet reducing visibility; in the background you can see the rhyolite-coloured hills, typical of that area. The photo was taken with an Olympus E420 + kit lens.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: This image has everything – terrific composition and technical quality, beautiful color, and interesting lines that draw the viewer in. This would make a fantastic enlargement, when the viewer can identify the hikers. For web viewing, the people are too small. I want to know if they are in pain or smiling.

Chris Wallace: I love the the vivid color and expanse of the scene, but I’d prefer the hikers be more identifiable.

Damien Tougas: The crispness of the colors and lines in this photo really grab me, the scene is really nice too. There is so much going on here visually that it almost feels like too much to take in at once.

Renee Tougas: I love the soft mounds in this photo – it speaks peace to me. Whereas the sky has a sense of foreboding – such a striking contrast. I love the scale of the humans here – small.

Tony Wong: The wonderful contrast of textures and colors makes this photo a joy to look at. There are so many different elements that are well captured- rock, snow, dark, brooding clouds, and water off in the distance. Small details of the trail meandering along the crest of the ridges rewards closer inspection and shows people as the smallest thing to provide perspective and context of the landscape. Only thing that I could want is a little more detail of the people on the trail, if they were closer to the photographer when it was taken.

Honorable Mention – Steve Denny

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 4
Elly descending toward Taylor Lake near Durango, CO; finishing up a four-week thru-hike on the Colorado Trail with a hail storm hot on her heels. Camera: Canon G12, f/4 1/80 ISO100 Hiker: Elly Harder

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: A harshly lit sky detracts a little from this image, but composition is strong, color is natural, and her pack is sufficiently light!

Chris Wallace: All the greenery makes me feel a little at home, and I love having the female hiker showing how to get it done, but the sky could be a bit more colorful.

Damien Tougas: This photo makes me want to go backpacking right now. I love all of the varying shades of green, but the overexposure of the sky washes things out a bit towards the top of the photo.

Renee Tougas: The scene is wonderful, the foreground action against the backdrop – great composition. It would have been perfect if the foreground was more illuminated, seems a tad dark, but that’s simply a natural cloud and lighting issue.

Tony Wong: I really like this photo because of the woman on the trail in the foreground and the beautiful backdrop with the lush green surrounding the lake and trail covered mountains. The strong composition of this photo is that it’s completely familiar as one of those special moments on the trail that is just so recognizable. Unfortunately, what distracts on this photo is the softness and dull colors of the foreground. If the sky in the distance had more contrast, it would serve to make for a more complex and interesting skyline.

Honorable Mention – Danny Milks

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 5
Our Norwegian friend reaping the sweet reward of backcountry skiing in the mountains of Norway’s stunning west coast. Camera Data: Panasonic TS1 Focal Length: 29mm (in 35mm equivalent) Exposure time: 1/500 sec. F number: f/10.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: Placing trekkers who are far away in an image of such grandeur is difficult – this photo accomplishes this well with a simple, snow-dominated background and outstanding framing using cloud shadows, the horizon line, and rock. The position of the trekker in the frame is first rate – my eyes keep coming back to him/her.

Chris Wallace: It took me multiple viewings before I saw the trekker and their trail, but the colors are eye catching and I love the clouds.

Damien Tougas: I really like the composition of this photo, especially the way the sun, clouds and sky feel alive. The extreme contrast between the rock and the snow feels like too much, but was probably necessary to prevent overexposure of the snow.

Renee Tougas: A bit dark overall (polarizer?) but what a great scene.

Tony Wong: Shadow and light do well to light the singular and distant path cut into the snow by the lone adventurer. I love how the clouds catch the light and ride along the ridges of the snow covered peaks to softness what is a stark environment. The composition and shadows of the photo allows for complexity in enjoying the scenery in what could have easily been a washed out and featureless photo. The only complaint is the softness in foreground of the image at the lower bottom right.

Honorable Mention – Sieto van der Heide

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 6
The location is the high camp on Denali, Alaska, looking at Mount Foraker. Although a Denali trip is probably not backpacking ‘light,’ for me this is very much in the context of exploring beautiful places and challenging myself. The person in the photo is having a moment to herself and enjoying the surroundings. She’s stated, to her, “This is my most favorite place in the world.” This picture was shot with a Canon S95 and enhanced using Adobe Lightroom.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: Washed out colors that are slightly too warm for me to be natural don’t detract from the fact that I want to sit here, view this scene, and write in my journal.

Chris Wallace: I really love seeing the hiker sitting there on that ledge, but I’d like a little more vivid color.

Damien Tougas: The first word that comes to my mind when I look at this is "dreamy." I feel like the guy sitting on the rock dreaming of mountains beyond my reach. Exposure of this scene must have been difficult – the guy sitting on the rock feels dark, while the rest feels a bit light.

Renee Tougas: Impressive scene, doesn’t say much about lightweight backpacking per se. Doesn’t speak to me as much as the others.

Tony Wong: A dreamy landscape of clouds surrounding a snowing island in what seems the edge of space heights. The ledge of rock planking out for the lone and bundled figure makes this shot interesting because it allows the viewer to place themselves into the photo. If there were more contrast or color in the sky to bring out the blue, it would make for an even bolder image.

Honorable Mention – Ludovic Pradel

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 7
Taken in the Pyrenees Mountain (on the south of France) during a three-day hike in February last year. I’d opened my eyes at 3:30AM with a beautiful starry sky: I have to take a picture! I’ve made about 20 pictures with different time exposure until 5:30AM, just one picture was nice this one! Taken with my Nikon D90, 10 minutes exposure.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: In this image, I’m wanting more strength and color from the sunset, I want to be closer to the shelter (but with a wide view offered by a wider lens), but the star trails are mesmerizing. A great technical image of a lightweight shelter in a beautiful environment.

Chris Wallace: Absolutely love the star trails and lit shelter, but I wish the sunset were more colorful.

Damien Tougas: This photo is well done technically, and has a lot of really good ideas going on. I think that composure could be better, as everything feels a bit too far away.

Renee Tougas: This is my least favorite (totally subjective). I’d like more color in the tent (I’m a color girl).

Tony Wong: The bright light illuminating the shelter in the provides a warmth and makes the starkness of the environment seem more inviting. The blur of the stars above creates a sense of motion and action in what is a moment frozen in time. I have no idea of where that orange glow is coming from in the lower right, but its soft glow casts a light that allows for the details of the ridge in the background and the footprints in the snow to be seen. I am wondering if that orange light was gone, would the heavens be darker and the streaks of the stars more stunning?

Honorable Mention – Jack Kan

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 8
Usted Esta Aqui. Taken on the trail to Laguna de los Tres in Patagonia, Argentina. One hour 45 minutes from Laguna de los Tres. Two hours from El Chaltén. One of our favorite trails. There were two nice camps on the way, one for backpackers and one for climbers. Fitz Roy kept playing hide and seek behind the clouds. Details: Taken with Nikon D90. 16-85mm Nikkor lens. Hand-held. 1/320. f8. 16mm. ISO 200.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: Slightly blown highlights in the sky and just a smidge too much yellow don’t detract greatly from this image, and the tension between the sign that tells you how much time it will take to get to the lake, against the high peaks that say "don’t even try me, pal" is awesome.

Chris Wallace: The colors here are unreal and really make me want to be there in person, even though the sky is a bit bright.

Damien Tougas: The green evokes the smell of fresh mountain air and those jagged peaks look so inviting. The overexposure of the sky detracts from the grandeur of the scene and draws my eye to the sign, which I am sure wasn’t the intended focal point.

Renee Tougas: The sign dominates the scene a bit too much. The cloud looks over exposed but those mountain peaks, the composition draws you in.

Tony Wong: The "primitive" wooden trail sign makes this shoot something special. That it is not in English lets you know that you are somewhere "exotic" and invites you to explore the map to guess where you are in the world. The stunning background with its vibrant colors, green foliage, and snow draped stone spires only confirms that you are somewhere far from home (North America). The only flaw in this photo is that the image seems a little bit overexposed that loses contrast and details in the hills and mountains in the distance. The blue sky would have been nicer if it were not overexposed.

Honorable Mention – Emily Mathews

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 9
Sony Cybershot 25 mm wide-angle lens, 14.1 megapixels. Lovely visions looking east from the Apache Peak area of the San Jacintos in southern California. Morning rime ice covers the area. Caught a greet-the-day pose by my daughter as we hiked the PCT in May 2011.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: This image has it all, including the authentic expression of smugness that comes with carrying a very light pack.

Chris Wallace: I’m partial to more color, but I definitely feel the cold by looking at this and love the posing hiker.

Damien Tougas: The sky is beautiful, the composition is really good, and I just love the way everything feels so crispy cold. For me, it is missing a certain sharpness that I think would make this a truly amazing photo.

Renee Tougas: Love the playfulness in a natural place. Quite grey, I’d love a smidge of color.

Tony Wong: I love this photo because it simply captures the snowy beauty of the illuminated backdrop against the fun, whimsical joy of a young woman posing for the camera. Yes, the image of the woman’s face is a bit too soft, but with the soft haze of the white clouds lingering everywhere, it can be forgiven and seems to blend into the rest of the shot. The heavenly rays of the sun reaching down through the clouds to give light and warmth to this cold environment makes for an enjoyable photo. My only desire is to have more detail and clarity on this woman’s face to capture the emotion of the moment.

Honorable Mention – Mandy Redpath

2012 Photo Contest Winners - 10
Hiking up to the head of the Ashburton Glacier on the south island of New Zealand one bright morning. Camera: Fujifilm FinePix AX300.

Judges’ Comments

Ryan Jordan: Good technical quality, nice color, and solid composition make this scene a beautiful one. I wish the avalanches were more prominent as part of the image.

Chris Wallace: The trekkers making their way up reminds me of past trips, but I wish there was more to the sky.

Damien Tougas: The exposure, contrast, color, and scene all work really well. I think it would look better if the people were a little closer as I think it would add more life and color.

Renee Tougas: Sky in the top right corner too dark. Great composition and story – where are they going, where have they been?

Tony Wong: The intricate details in the snow with the adventurers in them is what makes this photo compelling. Fine details abound, from the footsteps in the foreground to the crumbling trails of snow that have slid off the step sides of the mountains on the right to give texture to what could easily be an overexposed and bland landscape of whiteness. I like that the adventurers are close enough that we can see the details of their packs and imagine the effort in their task to reach the top. The deep color of the sky helps, but I wish that it were a bit brighter and lighter in blue in the upper right corner contrasted with what is already a darkly contrasted image of the rock.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review

A very lightweight hoodless windshirt utilizing Pertex’s newest lightest fabric – Quantum GL. In addition to his thorough evaluation, Will includes a discussion of the versatility of a windshirt.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 1
The hoodless Montane Slipstream GL Jacket is made of the new Pertex Quantum GL fabric and weighs just 2.3 ounces (65 g) in size men’s Medium (photo by Glen Van Peski).

Introduction

Is an ultralight windshirt an essential piece of gear in an ultralight gear kit? There are good arguments pro and con, and during my testing of the new Montane Slipstream GL Windshirt, I kept that key question in mind.

Description

The Montane Slipstream is an ultralight no frills windshirt; its only real feature is a full-height #3 front zipper. It does have a tape stiffener behind the zipper that doubles as a storm flap, raglan sleeves, standup collar, dropped tail, and the cuffs and hem are elasticized. No hood, no pockets.

The fabric is Pertex Quantum GL (GL means “Good and Light”) which is 10 denier and weighs 0.8 oz/yd2 (25 g/m2), compared to 15-20 denier 0.9 oz/yd2 (27 g/m2) for standard Quantum. Actually, each one is a family of fabrics, but GL is finer and lighter. The shiny surface comes from calendaring to make the fabric stronger.

Specifications and Features

Manufacturer Montane
Year/Model 2011 Slipstream GL Jacket
Sizes Available Men’s XS to XXL (runs about a half size small)
Style Hoodless jacket with full-height front zipper
Fabrics Pertex Quantum GL 10 denier 0.8 oz/yd2 (25g/m2), 100% nylon ripstop, air permeability 1.0 cc max (JIS L 1096/ASTM D737), spray rating 80/20 (JIS L 1092), abrasion resistance 10,000+ at 12.5 kPA (BS EN ISO 12947-2), DWR finish
Features Full-height front YKK #3 zipper, stand up collar, raglan sleeves, articulated arms, elastic cuffs and hem, dropped tail, stuff sack included
Weight Size men’s Large tested.
Measured weight: 2.43 oz (69 g)
Manufacturer weight: 2.3 oz (65 g) size Medium
MSRP US$104

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 2
Front and rear views of the Montane Slipstream Jacket.

Performance

I took the Slipstream windshirt on seven backpacking trips and several day hikes during spring and summer 2011, where I encountered cold winds, chilly evenings and nights, rain showers, and snow showers.

The first thing you should know about the Slipstream is that it runs small. My sample is a size Large and it fits like a Medium, which I found to be okay for a windshirt since I frequently wore it over just a baselayer. I have fairly long arms and torso and found the sleeves and body to be long enough. The resulting fit is trim and has the advantage of less flapping in the wind.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 3
The Montane Slipstream Windshirt in size Large can be worn over a thin midlayer, such as the Patagonia Ultralight Down Sweater shown. If you want the windshirt to layer over more than that, you should size up.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 4
The Slipstream does its primary job well. I wore it over a baselayer while hiking several high altitude windy ridges and 13,000- to 14,000-foot (3963- to 4267-m) peaks, such as the ones shown, and it made the difference between chilly versus warm while hiking.

A dynamite combination for hiking in changeable weather is a thin windshirt over a baselayer. A windshirt provides an amazing amount of warmth and comfort for its miniscule weight. The main issue (for me) while summer hiking in such conditions is getting too warm, rather than cold, so I prefer a very thin windshirt. And the Slipstream, like other windshirts, is comfortable when it is cool, overcast, and breezy or windy. When the sun comes out, or the wind stops, the windshirt is too warm and has to come off.

I also found the Slipstream very useful when worn over a thin insulation layer in camp; it makes a significant difference by reducing convective heat loss and holding heat in. I even wore it in my sleeping bag on several nights for extra warmth, and didn’t have any problems with it feeling clammy.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 5
In the field, I found the Slipstream will shed brief rain quite well (left), but wets through fairly quickly. The lack of a hood is a disadvantage in rain. My indoor puddle test (right), where I put the backside of the jacket over a funnel and added a cup of water to create a puddle, was quite revealing. The photo was taken at the beginning of the test, but after an hour all but a few drops of the water had passed through the fabric. Conclusion: the jacket’s DWR treatment provides only limited water-repellency; the jacket is far from waterproof.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 6
Carrying a backpack over the windshirt did not abrade it at all.

Out of curiosity, I performed the same test on the MontBell Tachyon Anorak (discussed below), and found the same result. This reinforces the notion that a windshirt with DWR treatment can shed brief rain, but is not adequate rainwear for significant rains.

Comparisons

So how does the Slipstream compare with using a lightweight rain jacket for windwear, and how does it compare with other lightweight windshirts? For backpackers who insist on minimal pack weight, a windshirt can be left out in favor of using a lightweight rain jacket like The North Face Triumph Anorak (5.85 ounces/166 g for size men’s Large, which is the lightest woven fabric rain jacket currently available) for both windwear and rainwear. I have tested it, and find the Triumph plays the dual role very well.

The main difference is the Slipstream is thinner and lacks a WP/B polyurethane layer, so it has a wider comfort range, meaning it’s more breathable and remains comfortable to wear over a broader range of conditions. I can wear the Slipstream while hiking uphill carrying a backpack and stay comfortable much longer than I can with a lightweight polyurethane laminate rain jacket. The Slipstream blocks the wind and breathes well enough to stay comfortable, much of the time. However, when the breeze stops or the sun comes out, the windshirt gets too warm and I have to take it off.

But in a practical sense, if you don’t need windwear very often, a lightweight rain jacket will suffice. Perhaps the prudent thing to do is pack a windshirt when you expect to encounter conditions where it’s truly needed. And when you get into exactly those conditions, it’s gold.

In areas or seasons where rain is not a big issue, some hikers carry only a windshirt and use it for both wind and rain protection as needed. The Slipstream has a DWR treatment, so it sheds water well and will suffice in short duration showers, but its main disadvantage for such use is the lack of a hood.

How does the Montane Slipstream compare with the MontBell Tachyon Anorak, which received a Highly Recommended rating in a recent Backpacking Light review? The data in the following table tell a lot.

Manufacturer and Model Hood Zipper Length in (cm) Weight (oz/g) Size Men’s M MSRP (US$)
Montane Slipstream Jacket No Full-height 2.3 (65) 104
MontBell Tachyon Anorak Yes 7.5 (19) 2.3 (65) 89
The North Face Triumph Anorak Yes 12 (30) 5.6 (166) 179

Some highlights:

  • The Slipstream and Tachyon weigh the same; the difference is the Slipstream has a full-height zipper but no hood, and the Tachyon has a hood but only a short zipper.
  • The MontBell Tachyon is the least expensive.
  • The North Face Triumph weighs and costs twice as much as the MontBell Tachyon.

Assessment

A windshirt is a very versatile piece of gear, especially when you hike where the weather is highly variable (I suppose that applies most everywhere). The ideal conditions for a windshirt are some combination of cloudy, cool, and windy; and that occurs a lot where I hike.

The Montane Slipstream is equally as nice as the MontBell Tachyon, so the choice gets down to personal preferences and how you will use a windshirt:

  • If you will use the garment only as windwear, the hoodless Montane Slipstream is preferable. I prefer a separate windstopper-type cap, and the full-height front zipper works better for thermoregulation.
  • If you use the garment for both windwear and rainwear for brief showers, the MontBell Tachyon Anorak or TNF Triumph Anorak (or other ultralight jacket) is preferable because it has a hood.
  • If you want a garment that will suffice for windwear and provides reliable protection in significant rains, an ultralight rain jacket like TNF Triumph Anorak or Marmot Essence Jacket is preferable.

Overall, the Montane Slipstream performs well for its intended purpose. However Montane’s small sizing is an issue. It’s irritating to purchase a garment in your normal size, only to find out that it runs small, and have to exchange it for the next larger size. MontBell has overcome this issue for selling in the US, and it’s about time for Montane to do the same.

Montane Slipstream GL Jacket Review - 7
A windshirt is really handy to maintain comfort while hiking at high elevations where the weather can be highly variable.

Disclosure: The manufacturer provided this product to the author and/or Backpacking Light at no charge, and it is owned by the author/BPL. The author/Backpacking Light has no obligation to review this product to the manufacturer under the terms of this agreement.

Mountain Laurel Designs SuperMid Review

A large but still lightweight pyramid that can shelter three to four adults in all four seasons.

Overview

The Mountain Laurel Designs (MLD) SuperMid is a large floorless, single-pole, non-freestanding shelter. With enough coverage for up to four people, this lightweight silnylon shelter offers an excellent amount of space for its weight, as well as four-season weather protection. MLD also offers optional perimeter bug netting (sewn-in) as well as a bug tent insert which converts the SuperMid to a double-wall shelter (although you do lose a bit of floor space, and three occupants becomes more reasonable).

MLD SuperMid SpotLite Review - 1
The SuperMid pitched with joined trekking poles at a river-side camp.

Like MLD’s other pyramid shelters, the SuperMid allows for a very quick deployment, which is excellent for inclement weather: stake out the four corners in a reasonably square shape, unzip the door, insert and raise the pole, and tighten the corners. Done. I love shelters that are this simple and easy to pitch. MLD has designed the SuperMid so that it can be pitched using a single pole or supported by a limb above using an exterior loop sewn to the apex. The single support pole can be anything from a site sourced staff (limb), to joined trekking poles, to a packraft paddle.

MLD SuperMid SpotLite Review - 2
The SuperMid pitched using a site-sourced pole and rock at a higher-elevation camp near Mt. Rogers, Virginia. The next morning found several inches of snow accumulated on the ground and shelter.

I was able to use the SuperMid on several overnight trips, including a camp next to a river with temperatures in the low teens, and a camp just off Mt. Rogers in Virginia where we woke up to several inches of snowfall but with temperatures never dropping much below freezing. I tried using connected trekking poles as well as a site-sourced pole and rock for support, both of which sufficed. However, if you are expecting high wind or heavy snowfall, I would recommend a third-party carbon pole or a large stick for support. Wrenching the corners down with trekking poles for support seemed weak. I didn’t experience condensation on either occasion, even with accumulated snow blocking some of the lower ventilation.

MLD SuperMid SpotLite Review - 3
The SuperMid sealed up and using the side-panel tie outs to create a little more usable floor space.

The SuperMid provided plenty of weather-protected floor space for myself, my wife, Robin, and our border collie mix trekking companion, Max. I found myself positioning the base of the support pole closer to the door (as opposed to directly under the apex) and canting it inward to make sufficient space at the rear for Robin and me to sleep next to one another. The additional tie outs on the sides were welcome for both wind protection as well as the ability to claim a bit more usable floor space.

Specifications

Year/Model 2011 Mountain Laurel Designs SuperMid
Style 2-4 person pyramid shelter
Fabrics 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon
Weight Manufacturer Specified: 24 oz (680 g)
BPL Measured:
27.6 oz (782 g) with corner lines, liberally applied seam sealer, and stuff sack
Dimensions Manufacturer Specified: 8.9 ft (2.71 m) x 8.9 ft (2.71 m) x 5.75 ft (1.75 m)
BPL Measured:
8.83 ft (2.69 m) x 8.83 ft (2.69 m) x 5.75 ft (1.75 m)
Protected Area Manufacturer Specified: 70 sq ft (6.5 sq m)
BPL Measured: 68 sq ft (6.32 sq m)
Floor Area/ Weight Ratio 40.24 sq ft/lb (.008 sq m/g) based on 68 sq ft (6.32 sq m) floor area and weight of 1.69 lb (767 g)
Features Closable peak vent, Dyneema X reinforced apex with interior and exterior hang loops, both doors can be opened and tied back, mid-height door snaps allow for partial closure, eight ground level perimeter tie outs with LineLocs, center side-panel tie outs on all sides for reinforcement in high wind
MSRP US $295
Options 18-inch (46-cm) perimeter bug netting along bottom (adds US $75), InnerNet (adds US $195)

Disclosure: The manufacturer provided this product to the author and/or Backpacking Light at no charge, and it is owned by the author/BPL. The author/Backpacking Light has no obligation to the manufacturer to review this product under the terms of this agreement.

Andrew Skurka’s The Ultimate Hiker’s Gear Guide: Book Review

Are You an Ultimate Hiker? Andy Skurka’s approach to backpacking.

 

Buy Andrew Skurka's book: The Ultimate Hiker's Gear Guide now!

 

Andrew Skurkas The Ultimate Hikers Gear Guide – Book Review - 1

Introduction

Many of us have dreamed of being able to complete a thru-hike or to hike 30 miles a day or more.

In his book The Ultimate Hiker’s Gear Guide Andy Skurka offers tips to help people do just that. The book covers not just the gear but the techniques of becoming an “Ultimate Hiker.”

Part One: Are You an Ultimate Hiker?

Part One introduces Skurka’s approach to hiking, which he calls “Ultimate Hiking.” The Ultimate Hiker is someone whose objectives for a trip involve hiking long distances by perfecting their gear, hiking style, and knowledge of the conditions. An Ultimate Hiker is someone who wants to hike and explore, not make camp and laze around.

The “Ultimate Camper” is on the other end of the spectrum. The Ultimate Camper, on the other hand, is someone whose main focus is on activities such as bird watching, photography, hunting, fishing, hanging out with friends – in other words, anything other than hiking. Such campers have a different set of goals, where lightweight packing and advanced camping skills are less crucial to their success.

Skurka’s target audience is the hiker who would like to hike with lighter gear and more efficiency, like an Ultimate Hiker, but who does not have the knowledge to do so. Such hikers are called “Campers by Default” – they may want to hike farther into the wilderness or complete thru-hikes, but they are limited by improper gear and a lack of knowledge about backpacking.

Know Before You Go – Skurka’s Approach to Pre-trip Planning

Once an Ultimate Hiker has settled on an objective for a trip, the next step is learning what conditions will be like along the route of travel. Skurka discusses ways of finding relevant information for planning a trip and a gear list. He looks at weather information, likely vegetation density (for off trail travel), trail conditions (for shoe choices), likely snow conditions, remoteness of the route, water availability, and sun exposure among other things. All this information is used to pick the right gear for a given trip.

Part Two: Gear and Techniques

Part Two covers gear and techniques and takes up the majority of the book. Skurka put some thought into making the guide detailed enough to be useful, but not too “nerdy.” One way he does this is by breaking up the text frequently with charts, side bars, and special sections devoted to different topics. For example, he discusses different types of packs in the main text, then has a “Skurka’s Pick” sidebar listing his favorite packs for different conditions. The “Tried and True” pages focus more on techniques that go along with the gear being discussed. This approach makes the book more focused and readable.

Below is an overview of the different chapters with a few highlights.

Clothing Systems

Skurka actually goes into a lot of detail about what clothes to wear and bring along. He’s hiking in his clothes more than he is resting in his tent, so a good clothing system that helps to regulate his body temperature is worth thinking about.

I was hoping after all his trekking Skurka would have an answer to the search for better rain gear. Unfortunately, he does not. According to a “Skurka’s Picks” section, all rain gear fails given enough time. I agree with this, but shoes fail too, and Skurka discusses how to deal with that event. He doesn’t give any advice for how often a raincoat should be replaced or how it should be maintained to prolong its life.

On the other hand he has a couple tips for maximizing comfort in the rain. For example, he suggests fleece insulation in cold, wet weather. Assuming you’ll get somewhat soggy no matter what, he found fleece insulated better when wet than synthetic puffy insulation like Polar Guard.

Footwear

There’s a good discussion of shoes. Skurka explains why trail runners are appropriate for most wilderness treks (snow being the main exception) and how to choose a good pair. Although he likes trail runners, he doesn’t really address the issue of minimalist shoes, which are becoming more popular. He does say he feels the Five Finger-type shoes are too minimal for most hikers, but doesn’t say much more, which is unfortunate. The minimalist shoe debate is not just a question of how much protection your feet need, but of how you should be planting your feet and the importance of zero drop shoes as well.

Beyond the basic shoe choices there are also a number of tips for maintaining foot health on a long trip. Skurka suggests protecting your feet by washing socks daily to prevent blisters from grit. He also uses low gaiters so grit stays out his shoes and socks to begin with.

Will This Book Help if You are Already an Ultralight Backpacker?

A lot of BPL readers already know plenty about light hiking gear. If that’s you, the question you might ask is “Will this book help longtime BPL readers?” I think the answer is definitely “Yes.”

I tested this theory by comparing my experiences on a Colorado thru-hiking attempt (I had to bail out towards the end due to an injury). I hiked with a relatively good set of gear, but a number of small changes suggested in the book could have made my hike less painful, more efficient, and possibly gotten me all the way to Durango.

First, I had dirty socks, which led to blisters. This isn’t a problem on weekend hikes, but it is on longer hikes. Skurka suggests washing socks daily to prevent this and is a big fan of preventative first aid on any hot spots. If I’d washed my socks and watched my feet more carefully, I probably could have hiked a bit further. Also, if I’d been wearing gators, my socks would not have gotten so dirty to begin with.

I was chronically hungry, and I lost a noticeable amount of weight on the trip. If I’d considered how much more food Skurka uses on his long hikes and his recommendations for calories per day, I might have packed more food and been happier.

I hiked at night several times, but my light was too dim to work well; night hiking was slow and felt claustrophobic because I couldn’t see much. One night I had to stop early because I just couldn’t see well enough to be sure I wasn’t wandering onto a game trail instead of following the faint foot trail. Skurka’s solution for this is to wear one headlamp on the head and one on the waist for night hiking. The light on the head can be a focused spotlight for seeing landmarks at long distances while the waist light is a diffused floodlight close to the ground. This does a better job of lighting the path for his feet. This two-light strategy gives the advantages of both a floodlight and a spotlight without having to switch between lights. This trick would have made my evening hikes a lot more pleasant.

There were days I pushed myself really hard to make a mileage goal and ended up feeling beat up and sore in the evening. While working hard is part of long distance hiking, I was probably pushing myself too hard in a couple of cases. Whether this caused my injury or not, I’ll never know, but it certainly didn’t help. In a section entitled “How to Hike Fast,” Skurka recommends hiking longer rather than trying to hike faster and injuring yourself. I could have hiked longer if I’d taken his advice on lights (see above), so I could have ultimately hiked farther into the evening.

Sleep Systems

Skurka prefers quilts to mummy bags except for temperatures under 20F/-7C. Interestingly most hikers seem to pick quilts for the weight savings. Skurka mentions that, but focuses just as much on the flexibility of a quilt. Because of their variable girth, it is possible to layer more clothes under a quilt. He prefers down most of the time, but occasionally uses synthetic for prolonged bad weather. A “How 2” section covers how to deal with the drafts in a quilt. Sleeping pads are also discussed.

Shelters

Skurka prefers a tarp for many situations both for weight savings and simplicity. If the weather is quite poor, he uses a Mountain Laurel Designs “Mid” with a bug net as necessary. A “Tried & True” tells how to spot likely camping areas on a map and how to pick a specific spot once you find a good area.

Maps and Navigation

Skurka prefers maps to GPS. He emphasizes the importance of “staying found,” which basically means you should consult the map often enough to know where you are at all times. He suggests the best types of maps to use for navigating and lists a variety of resources for finding good maps of one’s route.

Trekking Poles

Skurka is a big fan of trekking poles and devotes an entire chapter to picking the right poles and using them properly.

Food

This chapter covers both food choices and the nutritional needs of long distance hikers. Skurka doesn’t eat significantly differently from other hikers, but he sometimes carries a lot more food as his trips get longer. A “How 2” gives a couple of his favorite recipes for meals. He also gives tips for choosing food, such as how to make sure food is edible in cold temperatures or won’t melt in warmer temperatures.

Cooking Systems

Although he prefers alcohol stoves, Skurka has used every type of backpacking stove available. This experience helps him summarize their advantages and disadvantages for travel in different seasons and situations. A “How 2” shows how to make a simple alcohol burning stove.

Water

This chapter explains the basics of hydration, finding and purifying water and ways of carrying it.

Small Essentials

This chapter covers all the little odds and ends a hiker carries, like pocket knives, blister care, sunscreen, bear spray, etc. One gem in this chapter was Skurka’s guide to LED headlamps (see sidebar).

Packing

Skurka saves packs for last because pack choice depends on the gear and food being carried. Assuming you have lightweight gear, he suggests frameless packs. His summer pack is a GoLite Jam; for winter he sizes up to the Pinnacle. He only uses a framed pack when he’s carrying more than 30-35 pounds. A “Tried & True” section describes how to pack gear properly. Skurka’s choice in packs is really the only area I’d argue with him. He says when he’s between torso sizes, he goes down rather than up. I prefer the opposite. My opinion is shared by Will Rietveld in his detailed study of frameless packs. Rietveld suggests erring on the side of longer torso length and folding the sleeping pad rather than rolling it as Skurka does. The method Will describes is considered the best way to keep most of the weight off the wearer’s shoulders. From the pictures in the book, it looks like Skurka’s pack is a size small, and like he’s carrying a lot of the pack weight on his shoulders.

Andrew Skurkas The Ultimate Hikers Gear Guide – Book Review - 2
When his pack is light and well balanced, Andrew barely notices that it’s on. (Photo courtesy Andrew Skurka.)

Part Three

Part Three is a series of sample gear lists for hiking in a variety of U.S. locations from the eastern forest to pack rafting in the desert southwest. A final page gives a few tips for finding gear more affordably.

Conclusion

This book was not written to please “Gear Geeks” or to answer every question about hiking gear. It was written for hikers who need advice on becoming Ultimate Hikers. Judged by that standard I think it does quite well.

On the one hand it provides new hikers with an easy to use guide to gear. If you have no idea what “internal frame packs,” or “shaped tarps” mean that’s fine. This book will explain all that and be readable enough you’ll actually read the whole thing. If you think you’d like to try some lighter weight gear or more ambitious backpacking but aren’t sure where to start, there’s plenty of solid advice.

If you already have a good gear kit and are familiar with ultralight backpacking this is a book that can help you learn techniques to take your hiking to the next level (see my Colorado Trail experience sidebar for an example of this).

What’s Good

  • Covers all the basics in a way that beginners can understand.
  • Includes good ideas for seasoned hikers.
  • Format encourages hikers to actually read it, rather than skim.
  • Lots of great photos.
  • Teaches ultralight techniques without sounding extreme.

What’s Not So Good

  • Pack fitting and packing methods are debatable.
  • Doesn’t address current issues relating to minimalist shoes.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • A few diagrams would be nice, especially in the sections dealing with techniques like pitching a tarp, or packing a backpack.
  • Answering the questions raised by the book, such as “If raincoats wear out, how often should we replace them?”

In spite of these gripes, it’s still a solid book. My hope is that Skurka will fix these on a future edition, but for now, I also hope he’ll get down to business writing a book about the Alaska Yukon Expedition.

What a Beginner Needs for Backpacking: Part 2

Clothing, Footwear, Group Gear (Water Treatment, Stoves and Fuel, Shelter). Basic training for the beginner and/or young backpacker, with a focus on Scouts.

Read Part 1: The Lightweight Lesson, Essentials, Backpack, Sleeping Bag and Pad, Personal Kit.

Introduction

These articles were written to follow my “Three Season Hiking Checklist” which as Scoutmaster I would give to the Scouts prior to each outing. The articles discuss each item on the list, in order, and are designed to help those new to backpacking make educated decisions about the gear they carry. Though I mention Scouts often, it is largely because I originally wrote this for them, but the information is valid for others as well!

Three-Season Hiking Checklist

Pack List for Overnight/Multi-day – Semi Lightweight  
Worn Clothing: What to Pack: Kitchen:
Pants (no cotton if possible) Sleeping bag (in plastic-lined stuff sack) Freezer bag cozie
Wool blend socks Sleeping pad – open or closed cell Cup and spoon (minimal)
Hiking/running shoes Ground sheet Biodegradable soap (small amount)
Long sleeve shirt Water bottle – full! (1 liter, max) see hydration  
    Misc. (Optional): Remember to keep weight down!!
Hiking Essentials, Packed as a Kit: Personal: Fishing rod and reel w/ lures
Navigation (map and compass) Toothbrush and paste (small) Hiking poles or staff
Sun protection (lip balm, sunscreen [small amount], sunglasses) Towel (very small) Baseball cap
Insulation poncho or rain suit (see Clothing Systems in Part II) Lightweight trowel (for catholes), or skip and use stick/tent stake Camera (lightweight and small)
Illumination (flashlight/headlamp) Medicines (Do not leave any prescriptions at home! This is not a time to try to go without!) Small Scriptures or copy of pages you are reading (very lightweight!)
First aid kit (5 oz max)   Gaiters
Fire (fire-starter and matches) Packed Clothing: Lightweight!  
Repair kit and tools (including small knife) Base Layer (lightweight) Food:
Nutrition (see extra food) Long underwear tops and bottoms in light or midweight. NO COTTON. Snack food – trail mix, candy (minimal if any, please!)
Hydration (extra water, 1 liter max) and purification tablets (lightweight) Wool or wool blend socks (only one extra pair) Breakfast – Patrol Assignment
Emergency shelter (troop tent?) Insulating Layer (lightweight) Lunch – Patrol Assignment
Whistle Extra shirt (no cotton) Dinner – Patrol Assignment
Toilet paper (very little) Fleece sweater or sweatshirt (no cotton)  
Garbage bag – large Wind shirt (6 oz +/-) Shared Troop Gear:
Duct tape (2 ft max) Protective Layer (lightweight) Water filter/purifier
  Shell jacket (rain) – important! Tent w/ground sheet
  Wool/fleece mittens/gloves Stove and fuel
  Fleece or wool hat  
  Bandana (yes, it has many uses)  

Part II covers the stuff that seems to take up a lot of room and weight in a backpack, as well as what to wear while hiking.

I was involved in Scouting as a boy. Looking back, my pack was heavier than the ones made today, because the pack frame was made of wood! My tent was a floorless “pup tent” made of heavy canvas. My mother made my sleeping bag out of an old, worn out sleeping bag (batting), oiled duck cloth (outer shell) and new flannel (inner shell). It was was a tough heavy bag, so tough I didn’t even need a ground cloth. With an extra pair of jeans, a collapsible Sterno stove (the thing never worked right), a flashlight that seemed to have a five-minute battery life, and some canned food, I had all ever needed. That was also all I carried. Most of my buddies carried similar stuff.

Boy, how things have changed! The gear options for backpacking today are enough to make your head spin, or at the very least burn a hole in your wallet. Do your homework before shopping to get the most bang for your buck.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 1
From school to trail. Thorp Lake, Washington

Clothing

How to dress your Scout for the outdoors? As Don Ladigan says in his book, Lighten Up! “Hikers expect a lot from their clothing. It has to insulate them from cold, ventilate in hot weather, and shield them from rain, snow, wind, and sun. A hiker’s clothing has to do all this whether the hiker is moving and generating heat or standing still and cooling off.”

We live in the Pacific Northwest, and dealing with moisture is a way of life, but there are also times when it’s warm and dry. This swing in weather conditions can happen on the same outing. What do you need to make sure your Scout is warm and dry, cool and comfortable? Things in the clothing industry have dramatically changed in the last decade or two, but one thing has stayed consistent: cotton is rotten.

If there is any possible way to avoid it, please do not send a Scout into the backcountry with any cotton clothing. This includes jeans or cotton T-shirts. Wearing cotton is a recipe for disaster. Cotton gets wet easily from either rain or sweat, and it takes forever to dry out, sucking the heat out of your body. It’s also heavy and uncomfortable to wear when wet.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 2
When his cotton jeans got wet, not even his belt could keep them up. Luckily, we found this bungee on the trail and put it to work. Please: no jeans.

Luckily there are much better options that are as cheap or cheaper to wear. The new “technical” fabrics that are out now wick moisture away from the skin, keeping you cooler in summer and warmer in winter.

To help accomplish the “warm and dry, cool and comfortable,” we use the basic layering system:

Base Layer

  1. Underwear– The Scout should already have a pair of underwear on when they come to an outing. Odds are, they are made of cotton. I don’t know how to avoid cotton underwear for Scout-age youth, but try and get as much poly or nylon blend as you can, for all the issues discussed above, in addition to preventing chafing. For those so inclined, you can get merino wool or Capilene (Patagonia brand) underwear. Both are fantastic, both are expensive. For most outings (overnights), there is no need to bring an extra pair of underwear. I know there are mothers out there crying “Heresy!” – but in thirty years, though I’ve tried to encourage them, I have yet to have a Scout change their underwear on a short outing. Why carry something that will not get used? The pair they are wearing is enough, and they will have a backup with the long underwear (discussed below) they are bringing anyway.
  2. Long underwear– NO COTTON! Get both a bottom and a long sleeve top. You can use these for Scout outings as well as all other cold weather activities (snow sports, tubing, soccer, football, etc), so get something that fits. Please read the label before you purchase them. Polypropylene is the most prevalent fabric for long underwear, made by many manufacturers. Long underwear also comes in merino wool (my preference), nylon, and polyester. In cooler weather long underwear can take the place of regular underwear, no need to bring an extra pair of both.
  3. Wool or wool blend socks– As Will Rietveld and Janet Reichl wrote, “Cotton is hydrophilic (water loving) and absorbs three times more moisture (from sweat) than most synthetic fibers, it doesn’t insulate when it’s wet, and it takes 14 times longer to dry compared to synthetic fibers. Water is a good heat conductor, so when your socks and feet get damp they will lose heat up to 25 times faster than when dry.” Cotton socks are a major source of blisters while hiking.

    Wool (merino wool), wool blend or CoolMax are far better fabric choices than cotton. They cost more, but they last longer. I don’t know too many Scouts who have wool socks at home, and purchasing specialty socks is not high on many parents’ priority list, but if you purchase a couple of pair, they will last most of your Scout’s hiking career. For short outings, they will only need the pair they are wearing and a pair for sleeping. Hiking for two days in the same pair of good quality socks is no big deal and just like underwear, they won’t put on the extra pair anyway. Wear clean socks for sleeping, as you’ll have warmer feet. We use one pair dedicated only for sleeping (I use thick wool or fleece socks). For an outing of four or more days, you can send an extra pair: three pairs total.

    Liner socks are a thin (non-cotton) sock wore inside the above discussed socks. With the newer socks out now, I find I don’t need the liner and haven’t used one for 10 years. Some might say, “Well, that won’t work for me.” Please give it a try – you might be pleasantly surprised. If you must use a liner, use only wool or synthetic. One pair is all that is needed, wash them out after hiking and they will be dry or dry enough in the morning.

  4.  

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 3
Making clothing adjustments for winter. Mount Rainier.

Insulating Layer

  1. Extra shirt– No cotton shirts! Besides the shirt they are wearing to hike in, this “extra” shirt can/should be the long sleeve underwear top from the base layer above. If wearing the long underwear top for hiking, use a poly blend short sleeve shirt in warm months or another long underwear shirt for cool months. A lightweight fleece (100 weight) shirt/pullover works well when a little more insulation is needed. Please do not have your Scout wear their Scout shirt uniform. Lord Baden-Powell stated in The Scouter (1913): “I don’t care a fig whether a Scout wears a uniform or not so long as his heart is in his work and he carries out the Scout Law.” To reiterate what I said in Part 1: A non-cotton troop or patrol t-shirt works well. Please do not wear the Scout uniform shirt; the patches, pockets, pins, emblems, and shoulder epaulets are not conducive to hiking with a backpack and thus should be avoided.
  2. Pants– Some Scouts hike in our area hike in long pants, others like to hike in gym shorts with or without long underwear underneath (see base layers above). Either way, do not wear cotton, especially jeans! If jeans are absolutely all you have (or all you showed up in), by all means, wear them. Better than the alternative. But remember: in wet weather, they are always a mess, and the Scouts wearing them are always cold. I suggest thin, quick drying hiking pants. I personally don’t like the “convertible” type (zip off legs) because they feel like I’m walking with two small Hula Hoops around my thighs. Lightweight synthetic pants are the best. You can purchase a used pair at Goodwill or a thrift store in great shape for less than $5 (that’s cheaper then jeans).
  3. Down, synthetic or fleece sweater or sweatshirt– Please NO cotton sweatshirts. A down sweater can very expensive, so I won’t discuss it here. A synthetic filled pullover or sweater is a good option for a Scout. They can handle wet weather a little better than down, they pack smaller than fleece and hold up fairly well, but they are also expensive. Fleece is a great material. It is relatively inexpensive and is good for insulation. Fleece has two drawbacks: it’s heavy and bulky, but I don’t know of any alternatives that will insulate and hold up to the wear and tear of Scouts. A good 200 or 300 weight fleece will work. They are hard to pack small, but a great value. You can find one of these for next to nothing at your local thrift store.
  4. Windshirt– A windshirt is a very lightweight thin nylon or nylon/polyester type jacket that weighs less than a shirt. They are not waterproof, making them highly breathable. They are designed to block the wind while hiking and in camp so you can stay warm when a heavier jacket isn’t necessary. They should weigh no more than 9 ounces, preferably less. They will keep you amazingly warm when warn over a long sleeve shirt or fleece jacket. They are an integral part of the layering system.

Protective Layer

  1. Shell jacket/poncho– Waterproof and breathable! News flash – it rains in the Northwest. Care is needed when looking for a rain shell. Do not purchase an expensive jacket for your Scout: the danger of something bad happening to it is too high. Look for a lightweight and inexpensive jacket, in that order. You will get wet from the rain outside or from sweat on the inside. Young Scouts don’t sweat much, so breathability isn’t as big an issue as it is with adults. Secondhand stores are a great place to find a hiking jacket. On the right day, you might even score an expensive WPB jacket for $15 or less! If you can find a poncho that will fit your Scout with his pack on and weighs less than 12 ounces, get it and have them use that for their protective layer.
  2. Wool/fleece mittens or gloves– Fleece or wool keeps your hands warm even in the rain. It can get cold enough even on a summer evening/morning to need a thin pair of gloves handy.
  3. Wool/fleece hat– A beanie, toque, or skull cap is one of the most important things to have in your pack. It’s a myth that we lose 75% of our body heat through our head, but you do lose heat from exposed skin. It is important to have something to help keep the heat in, and evenings in the mountain can get cold. I wear my hat almost every evening to bed, in my sleeping bag. The simpler the better – a snowboarding-style “Court Jester” hat is uncomfortable for sleeping and tempting for other Scouts to grab at: leave it at home.

Footwear

Shoes– Yes, shoes! Get a good-fitting sneaker-style shoe. It is best to have a shoe that is a half to a full size larger then what your Scout normally wears. Feet swell during a hike, and if there is no room for the now larger foot, problems arise. Please monitor your Scout’s shoe size. I have had too many Scouts complain that their feet hurt from too small shoes that they have out grown. There is no need to wear hiking boots, especially not leather ones! Boots are for those carrying over 50 pounds, ice climbers or glacier travel with crampons. Don’t use the excuse of weak ankles; boots don’t help protect your ankles. Studies have shown that they could be the cause of some ankle related problems. It wasn’t until I got out of boots and into very lightweight trail runners that my ankle problems went away.

Most Scouts can wear their everyday sneakers and do just fine. Don’t spend extra money on shoes, and especially not on hiking boots.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 4
Notice the shoes: joggers or trail runners. Mirror Lake (and more) Washington.

Gore-Tex or other waterproof/breathable (WPB) shoes should not be needed and are not worth the extra cost to purchase. We live in the Northwest, and wet weather is inevitable. A good wool sock and a light, breathable shoe, if wet, will keep your feet warm. This combination can also dry out in thirty minutes to an hour. WPB shoes will eventually get wet inside, and once wet, will take forever to dry out, because the water is trapped behind the WPB membrane. In hot weather, the same WPB shoes don’t breathe, so your feet get wet from sweat and again they stay wet, because they can’t dry out – not a good situation for your feet. Stay with trail runners or a regular jogger, and you will be the most comfortable.

Odds and Ends

Bandana– A bandana is a quintessential multi-use hiking item. It can be sun protection when worn around the neck or head, used to pre-filter dirty water before treating, used as a pot holder/first aid sling/triangle bandage/etc. They are inexpensive, so one should always be in your pack. This should also be the only cotton item in your pack, just wash before packing.

Miscellaneous and Optional (Remember to keep the weight down!)

  1. Hiking poles or staff– Hiking poles are not necessary for most Scout age youth; they seem to either get broken or lost. They can be a trip saver for adults, though. I loaned a pair to an adult who said his knees would have given out on the way down a mountain trail if he hadn’t had the hiking poles. They add stability, balance, and take some of the strain off your legs on the descents. I have a pair and use them on occasion, depending on the trail.

    Most important: keep them lightweight. Collapsible poles are convenient for pack stowage, and poles can be used when setting up a tarp.

  2. Baseball style hat or cap– In summer this becomes a necessity for sun protection. A nylon type is best and lightest. The cotton baseball cap is too heavy and hot. A hat is also a good way to hide a bad hair day on the second day of an outing and on the way home.
  3. Swimsuit– Lightweight nylon running shorts work great. Thick, long basketball shorts are far too heavy, don’t dry quickly, and are a tripping hazard. A regular swimsuit with a liner can also be worn as a pair of shorts (saving the need to bring an extra pair of underwear). The swimsuit needs to be very quick drying.
  4. Gaiters– Summer-weight gaiters keep dirt, sand, and small rocks out of your shoes and should be made of thin, lightweight, breathable material. Most Scouts don’t use them, but they are nice to have if you find that even the smallest pebble will cause you irritation. I recommend the Dirty Girl brand, despite the name. They are very lightweight and work great.
  5. Camera– With the advent of digital cameras, the old Scout staple “disposable” camera has gone by the wayside. Unless your Scout is a photo buff and can adequately care for a camera, I advise against sending them out with a camera of any value. Don’t let the “my phone has a camera” be an excuse to bring a phone – there is no use for Scouts with phones in the backcountry, and my troop didn’t allow any type of electronics on an outing.
  6. Fishing rod and reel w/lures– If your Scout is so inclined and wants to fish, get good quality, packable equipment. Your Scout will not have any fun if they have poor quality equipment. Packable is important so that the rod isn’t broken before it leaves the vehicle or while on the hike in. A short, two-piece rod can work if it is short enough.
  7. Small Scriptures or reading material– Purchase a small paperback edition, cut the binding off so the pages are separated, and your Scout can bring only the pages they are reading without having to carry the whole book.

Troop Gear

Our troop provides Water Filtration/Purification, Stoves, and Shelter (Tarps/Tents), which makes trips easier for the Scouts and parents.

Water Filtration/Purification

There are a number of water treatment systems on the market. Some work better than others and some are better for Scouts than others. For the most part, your system is needed for drinking water. For cooking, you normally boil the water, and by doing so fix any potential problems.

I will leave the debate over whether the fear of backcountry pathogens is excessively exaggerated or a real issue for a different time. Washing one’s hands, especially after relieving yourself, is the best prevention for backcountry illnesses. I will simply present the various options as how they apply to Scout outings.

No matter what system you use, you will need to have one for every three to four people, otherwise you will be waiting too long for “your” turn, making water stops last much longer than necessary. For large groups, weight and size multiplies by the number of “systems” needed to facilitate the group’s water needs.

  1. Chemicals
    • AquaMira– Aquamira Water Treatment treats drinking water using chlorine dioxide. It is probably the leader in this group. You can purchase either drops or tablets. I think the drops are better; there’s no taste and it takes less time to activate. I haven’t found a local source, though the company is located in Bellingham, but you can get it online. I recommend this brand.
  2. Tablets
    • MicroPur or AquaMira Tablets– Takes about 30 minutes to 4 hours to activate, works on anything in our area (Pacific Northwest). Some people notice a slight chlorine taste, but nothing strong like iodine tablets.
    • Iodine Tablets– These have been around forever. I remember the first time I tried them: as a twelve-year-old I swore I would rather have whatever was in the water than to drink that foul tasting stuff. I never used them again. Lucky for me I never had to find out what the alternative was. Iodine takes 30 minutes for efficacy, and the bottle is usually heavy.
  3. Ultraviolet At this time, there is only one major player in the UV backpacking water treatment market: SteriPen. These are almost foolproof and the Scouts like using them. Most outdoor stores have them and can hopefully help correctly educate you about the product. I highly recommend using this form of water treatment over any of the others, because of the ease of use, product size/weight, and effectiveness. They are battery operated, so care is needed, and I recommend having a backup (I use AquaMira as my backup). Follow the manufacturer’s specs on batteries – only use what they recommend, or you might/will have issues. With older SteriPens, take batteries out when not in use, because they could slowly discharge while hiking. With the newer “Opti” versions, they have less trickle drainage, so you can leave them in during an outing. Always store the units with the batteries removed.
  4. Pump Filters– These filter, but do not purify, water. With that said, they get rid of all the nasty stuff that can cause problems in the backcountry. They have been around for a long time and are effective, but they are heavy and more work than the other options now available. Weight and the amount of water that can be filtered in a given time frame should always be taken into account. Always follow the manufacturer’s specs on long-term storage. The First Need is the only true “purifier” pump on the market right now. It’s a great pump (I own one), but heaviest of all pumps and not necessary for backpacking in the Northwest.
  5. Gravity Filters– Gravity filters are like pump filters without the pump system. They are usually just the cartridge with a couple of hoses and a source water bag. These can be very lightweight and work well for base camping. Always follow the manufacturer’s specs on long-term storage. This would be my choice if the SteriPen wasn’t available.

Stoves & Fuel

Our troop provides the stoves for the Scouts to use, so they don’t need to purchase a stove. This information is for those in other troops or adults looking for a stove.

Care needs to be taken when operating any stove. BSA requires adult supervision over any stove use. If you plan on attending an outing, please know how to work the stoves that will be in use. I have had more trouble and dangerous issues with adults not knowing how to use the equipment than Scouts not knowing. Again, please learn how to properly use your and the troop’s equipment before the outing!

  1. Alcohol– BSA’s policy on alcohol stoves- “Prohibited Chemical-Fueled Equipment – Equipment that is handcrafted, homemade, modified, or installed beyond the manufacturer’s stated design limitations or use. Examples include alcohol-burning “can” stoves, smudge pots, improperly installed heaters, and propane burners with their regulators removed.” There is an ongoing debate on this issue about what is a “handcrafted” vs “manufactured” alcohol stove. There are a few alcohol stoves that are commercially manufactured and sold commercially, but it can also be said that they are handcrafted. I am not going to give an opinion either way, but I will say I have seen Scouts have far more dangerous issues with white gas stoves than with alcohol stoves. I think white gas stoves can be as dangerous, if not more so, than any homemade alcohol stove. To stay on the safe side of the liability issue, I make no recommendations for your Scout group. For short, personal outings, these are the lightest, best stoves – “and that’s all I have to say about that.” (Forrest Gump)
  2. Canister
    • Upright– This is probably the best stove to purchase for backpacking with Scouts. There are a number of manufacturers to purchase from, but the “gold standard” is the SnowPeak Gigapower (or SP 100). If you don’t have access to this stove, there are many others with good reviews.
    • Integrated canister– The older versions of the integrated canister were great in concept, but they had a few drawbacks that kept them on the fringe for lightweight backpackers. With new competition coming from MSR and Primus and modifications JetBoil has made, the newer versions of all brands are worth taking a look at.

      Please read Will Rietveld and Janet Reichl’s three articles on the subject Lightweight Integrated Canister Fuel Cooking Systems for more information.

      Though integrated canister stoves may be good for your own personal use, they may be too limited and expensive for troop use. Scouts should cook with the “Patrol Method,” and a stove’s flexibility in this case is important.

    • Remote canister– Remote canister stoves are basically an upright with a hose attached to the canister. They are heavier than their upright brothers, so for a new Scout/Scouter you should get the upright.
  3. Multi fuel/white gas– If you are buying your first stove or you can only afford one stove, this is not the type you should buy. There are a number of multi/white gas stoves on the market. They are heavy, bulky and more dangerous than the canister stoves. Their main advantage over canisters is in very cold (20°F and lower) temperatures. Some white gas stoves can be good for group outings where a cooking in a large pot is needed, but “large groups” doesn’t fit the BSA “Patrol Method” (small units), so you shouldn’t need this type of stove for that type of outing.
  4. Wood fire stoves– Wood fired stoves are beyond the discussion for new Scouts – there are a few cool products and DIY projects out there for more experienced Scouts.

With any stove and Scouts, this must be said: NEVER USE A STOVE IN YOUR TENT! (Cooking in a tent is beyond the scope of this article.)

Tent or Tarp?

A number of years ago, the parents in our troop got together to discuss the damage to their personal tents when used by the Scouts on outings. They decided to solve the problem and purchase the necessary number of tents for the whole troop. This solved the damage to their tents, and all in all the boys took pretty good care of the new ones. The big problem was that the new four-person tents weighed 10.5 pounds each!

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 5
You’d smile, too, if your dad carried this 10-pound four-person tent for you!

The thought was that when the tent, fly, and poles was divided up, the tent’s total weight wouldn’t be an issue. Well, it’s hard to divide a three-piece tent between four Scouts. We did it by having the fourth carry the canister stove and pot. Still, the tent body by itself was almost 5 pounds. It didn’t work well when all four Scouts sharing the tent weighed less than 100 pounds each, limiting the total weight they could carry (remember the 25% rule from Part 1).

We fixed the heavy tent problem by purchasing commercially-made three-boy (two-man) tarps that weighed 1 pound for the tarp and 1 pound for the heavy-duty, Scout-proof aluminum pole. The total weight for three boys was 2 pounds! When looking at shelter, think outside the box (tent). We saved over 8 pounds per shelter!

I do not expect (or advise) anyone to purchase a four-season, expedition grade tent for Scouting or regular backpacking outings, so I will not discuss them here.

In this section I also assume your Scout will use troop equipment, so the below information is for the adults who accompany the Scouts.

Three-Season Tents

Three-season tents come in all weights, shapes, and sizes. There are single-wall, double-wall and net tents. As Ray Estrella reported in his State of the Market Report on Two-Person Double-Wall Tents:

“A double-wall tent is preferred by the majority of backpackers because:

  • Condensation is not as large an issue, as the inner walls keep one from brushing against the wet outer walls. The inner tent will also keep condensation from falling onto you and your gear.
  • The double walls provide some insulating value, making the temperature slightly higher inside.
  • In bad conditions, a double-wall tent offers more protection with greater ventilation.
  • In nice weather, many double-wall tents allow the inner to be pitched alone, giving a view of the stars and the feel of “sleeping out” without the hassle of insects.
  • Once the weather has cooled enough to eliminate insect issues, many double-wall tents offer a Fast-Fly set-up, allowing the fly to be set up with just the poles and a footprint, eliminating the weight of the inner.

However, there are some disadvantages when compared to a single-wall tent:

  • Traditionally, a double-wall tent is going to be 25% to 50% heavier than a comparably sized single-wall tent.
  • A single-wall tent packs down much smaller than a double-wall, allowing a smaller volume backpack to be used.
  • A double-wall tent takes twice as much time to set up as a single-wall shelter, though there are some exceptions to this.
  • A single-wall has its interior protected while setting up in a downpour…”

Whether double- or single-wall, make sure it’s lightweight (less than 4 pounds for a double-wall, some single-wall two-person tents weigh as low as 2.5 pounds). Also keep an eye out for weather protection, ventilation, ease in setting up, rain fly coverage, and vestibule size (storage size). You won’t find many 2.5-pound tents at the big box stores, as they are made by cottage manufacturers, but they are out there and worth the time and effort to find them.

Tarps

When we talk about tarps, we are not talking about the blue ones sold at the hardware store (though they or even a simple plastic sheet work just fine). We are talking about a flat or shaped tarp made of very light waterproof fabric. Like tents, very lightweight high-quality tarps are usually made by cottage manufacturers, though larger companies like Sierra Designs and MSR have a few options worth looking at. Do some research on tarps before you purchase one; your time spent will be rewarded by a smarter purchase.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 6
Lightweight tarps work even in the rain. Sierra Designs Origami 3.

A tarp’s advantages are:

  • Lightweight: some weighing less than 7 ounces!
  • Ventilation: condensation is rarely, if ever, an issue for a tarp.
  • Stability: given their low profile, tarps can handle wind better than most tents.
  • Flexibility: there are a number of options in how you can pitch them.
  • Cost: generally cost less than a tent.

One of the best experiences when using a tarp is to wake up and watch the sunrise from the warmth of your sleeping bag without anything blocking your view.

Cookware

There are a lot of pots and pans and kits out there right now. Cost and what you can afford are the biggest deciding factors, but remember the lightweight rule. Titanium fits the weight bill best, but it is the most expensive. Stay away from stainless steel – too heavy. Aluminum/aluminum non-stick is probably the best for Scouting. It conducts heat well, is reasonably priced, and can take a beating.

Don’t get a pot bigger than you will need. If you purchase a kit, only take one pot and lid, sized for your needs on that trip. I take a 0.7-liter kettle when I am cooking for myself (which is most of the time) or a 1.3-liter pot when cooking for two. Make sure your pot fits your stove: some of the canister stoves have very small pot supports and will not safely support a larger pot.

Don’t get snookered into buying a kitchen kit with all the bells and whistles, you just won’t or shouldn’t use all that stuff. A pot, lid, and spoon are all you need. The rest is just extra weight and fluff.

Conclusion

Well, there you have it.

When I started this article I figured it would be a few pages long, just some quick notes about the items on the checklist. Ha! These are my “quick notes about the items on the checklist.” You could write a book about each topic covered, and many have. Most Scouters could also write a book about the mistakes they’ve seen regarding each topic covered. Still, these articles should give you a firm foundation of basic information to make informed and smart buying decisions. Please use this information to help make your Scouts time in the outdoors enjoyable.

To help make your new Scouts experience the best possible, get involved in their life. Basically that means “to be there,” not as a hovercraft, but as an observation balloon. I have never heard a retired parent say “I should have spent more time at the office.” Business can wait, kids don’t.

A little about me:

I have been involved in Scouting as an adult for almost 30 years, as a Scoutmaster, Assistant Scoutmaster, Varsity Coach, Venture Advisor, on a Troop Committee, etc. I have had all adult Scout training through Woodbadge, and all my certifications are still current. I give this information only to show that I have a thorough knowledge of how Scouting works and the concepts behind it. I also understand the real world. I try to work both of these worlds together for the benefit of my family, myself, and those I associate with.

I am the father of eight children, four boys and four girls, most of them grown and out on their own.

Through 30 years of backpacking solo, with family, and especially with the Scouts, I have learned a bit of what works and what doesn’t. Most important, I’ve learned how not to ruin a trip or your back with an overweight backpack. According to my family, I spend an inordinate amount of time researching and testing backpacking gear. My recommendations are based on my own experience, involvement as an equipment tester for a few undisclosed backpacking equipment manufacturers, thousands of hours on forums and discussions with industry experts, and years of trial and error (mostly error).

My old backpack weighed 7.5 pounds empty. I now hike with a base weight (everything, including my pack, except food and fuel) of around 7 to 10 pounds depending on the trip. My hiking situation is much better than it was when this whole thing started. I hike farther, faster, lighter, and now I really enjoy what I do!

What a Beginner Needs for Backpacking: Part 1

The Lightweight Lesson, Essentials, Backpack, Sleeping Bag and Pad, Personal Kit. Basic training for the beginner and/or young backpacker, with a focus on Scouts.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 1
There are lighter options that would make this hike a lot easier. Hyas Lake, Washington

Introduction

Most Scout leaders give the Scouts a pack list or checklist to be used for an outing. I had developed a checklist that I thought covered everything needed, but was stripped down enough that the boys were not carrying more that they should, given their own weight and build. I still use this checklist today. Well, checklists are only so good.

When I was a new Scoutmaster, we had planned a November overnight outing to a rustic cabin at Camp Parsons, a Boy Scout camp on Hood Canal in Washington State. It was to be a diversion from our customary backpacking outings. The group was small and the cabin was less than a quarter mile walk from the cars, so we didn’t worry about a pack check. This was the first outing for one of the boys, and while the three bags he pulled out of the vehicle when we arrived caught my attention, the other boys helped him carry them to the cabin, so I wasn’t too worried.

When it came time to unpack and lay out the sleeping bags, I found out what was in his three duffels. His dear mother had used “the checklist” to help him get ready, and though everyone had used the same list, he had far more than the others. His footwear alone included regular sneakers (on his feet), rubber boots (for the beach?), new hiking boots, and moon boots worthy of Napoleon Dynamite. When he pulled out a new cheap plastic tent for emergency shelter, despite the fact that we were staying in a cabin, it was hard not to laugh. A sitcom couldn’t have written a script any better than the entertainment this poor boy provided for us two adults that night. It was not his fault – his mother was just following the “checklist.”

The Lightweight Lesson

We didn’t want this scenario to happen on a backpacking trip; the experienced Scouts in the troop had already been well trained in lightweight backpacking, but we needed to educate all the new Scouts (and especially their parents) about each item on the checklist: why it was on the list and what was appropriate to bring for backpacking. I put together a program called What a Scout Needs. We scheduled a presentation and invited both existing and upcoming troop members and their parents. I put together four options a Scout could use and laid them out on the floor:

  1. A heavy (or average, for most Scouts/adults) option, 35+ pounds
  2. A mid-range option, around 25 pounds
  3. A lightweight option, around 16 pounds
  4. Ultra-lightweight option, around 8 pounds. This was for demonstration and would only work when a Scout acquired the necessary backpacking skills to allow for such light weights.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 2
All are wearing school clothes – they just changed their shirts. Tripod Flat, Washington.

I helped keep the Scouts and parents focused on the lightweight theme by taking a few minutes at each quarterly Court of Honor to present a lightweight topic, showing the normal option and the lightweight option. For repackaging, I showed a Costco-sized sunscreen bottle and the same product repackaged into a smaller container, for example. With this training, most Scouts attended outings with a full pack weight of around 16 pounds, including consumables and troop/patrol gear.

Though I’m no longer Scout Master, I still help with the troop. In March 2011, while teaching the Scouts how to build igloos on Mt. Rainier, I went to move a new Scout’s pack. It weighed a ton! I asked what he had in there?! His answer: “The stuff on the checklist.” They were still using my old checklist, but without the training, it wasn’t very helpful. A week later, a dad approached me say that his son was about to join the troop, and asked if I would provide some direction on what both of them needed. These and other events were the impetus for these articles (Part I and Part II) defining what an item “means” when it is on the checklist.

Every parent wants the right gear for their child. You may find great equipment for a good price, but all that effort could be wasted with a poor purchase.

Leather hiking boots, big backpacks, Scout mess kits, heavy sleeping bags, and heavy tents might seem like the ‘right’ gear, but can quickly become a discouraging liability for any Scout or Adult, but especially a new Scout. – Doug Prosser

The big question is, “What is the right equipment?” And just as important, “Can I trust the advice I get at the store?” These articles lay out what most Scouts really need, and how to provide such items in a lightweight style. The advice you are given in-store or by “old school”  adult Scouters often doesn’t take weight into account. Be informed about your choices so that you needn’t simply put all your trust in whomever is behind the counter at your local gear store. Adult Scouters often have a wealth of knowledge, but their gear advice may be stuck in the Scouting era they grew up in, and, consequently, can be heavy or over-built for you or your Scout.

Careful with Weight Limits

Another issue is that 11- and 12-year-old Scouts come in all sizes. At age 11, one of my sons was about 85 pounds and 5’3” while another was 140 pounds and 5’6” at the same age (with the same parents – don’t ask me how!). The clothing and pack sizes between the boys was different, but the weight they carried should be about the same. You couldn’t expect my larger son to carry 25% of his body weight (see 25% rule below): that would have him carrying 35 pounds and his brother carrying 21 pounds! Though he was bigger, he was no stronger than his 85-pound brother at that same age. Size doesn’t equal strength. The larger boys are usually simply small boys in a big body and have no more muscle than the smaller boys, though, of course this changes with age. Please be careful overloading the larger boys, even though they think they can do it. Carrying as little weight as possible works for every size body.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 3
Proud of their new “hood.” Igloo building, Mt. Rainier.

Please keep in mind as you assemble the gear for your Scout that their total pack weight should be no more than 25% of their body weight: this is the 25% rule. If they are 80 pounds, their fully loaded pack (including food, water, and troop gear) cannot be more than 20 pounds. We do not allow a Scout to carry more than 25%, and we actively encourage them to try for 20% or less. This weight limit should be part of every decision when purchasing a piece of equipment.

Lightweight backpacking is hiking and camping with everything needed to be safe, comfortable, and well fed while carrying a very small and lightweight backpack. – Don Ladigan, Lighten Up.

The Checklist

The information in these articles supplements the Three-Season Checklist I’ve already mentioned. This checklist is exactly what I hand out to Scouts and parents in preparation for a trip.

Pack List for Overnight/Multi-day – Semi Lightweight  
Worn Clothing: What to Pack: Kitchen:
Pants (no cotton if possible) Sleeping bag (in plastic-lined stuff sack) Freezer bag cozie
Wool blend socks Sleeping pad – open or closed cell Cup and spoon (minimal)
Hiking/running shoes Ground sheet Biodegradable soap (small amount)
Long sleeve shirt Water bottle – full! (1 liter, max) see hydration  
    Misc. (Optional): Remember to keep weight down!!
Hiking Essentials, Packed as a Kit: Personal: Fishing rod and reel w/ lures
Navigation (map and compass) Toothbrush and paste (small) Hiking poles or staff
Sun protection (lip balm, sunscreen [small amount], sunglasses) Towel (very small) Baseball cap
Insulation poncho or rain suit (see Clothing Systems in Part II) Lightweight trowel (for catholes), or skip and use stick/tent stake Camera (lightweight and small)
Illumination (flashlight/headlamp) Medicines (Do not leave any prescriptions at home! This is not a time to try to go without!) Small Scriptures or copy of pages you are reading (very lightweight!)
First aid kit (5 oz max)   Gaiters
Fire (fire-starter and matches) Packed Clothing: Lightweight!  
Repair kit and tools (including small knife) Base Layer (lightweight) Food:
Nutrition (see extra food) Long underwear tops and bottoms in light or midweight. NO COTTON. Snack food – trail mix, candy (minimal if any, please!)
Hydration (extra water, 1 liter max) and purification tablets (lightweight) Wool or wool blend socks (only one extra pair) Breakfast – Patrol Assignment
Emergency shelter (troop tent?) Insulating Layer (lightweight) Lunch – Patrol Assignment
Whistle Extra shirt (no cotton) Dinner – Patrol Assignment
Toilet paper (very little) Fleece sweater or sweatshirt (no cotton)  
Garbage bag – large Wind shirt (6 oz +/-) Shared Troop Gear:
Duct tape (2 ft max) Protective Layer (lightweight) Water filter/purifier
  Shell jacket (rain) – important! Tent w/ground sheet
  Wool/fleece mittens/gloves Stove and fuel
  Fleece or wool hat  
  Bandana (yes, it has many uses)  

Because gear and technology change so rapidly, I hesitate recommending anything specifically, except for those rare items that have stood the test of time and are likely to be readily available no matter when. I do not directly endorse any products, named or not, and I make no claims whatsoever – suggestions only. Though I’ve tried to keep this as general as possible for a wide readership, some suggestions are more specific to the types of trips MY Scout group takes – your needs may vary dependent upon the troop size, outing length, destination, etc.

Items to Show Up In

  • Pants – Hiking pants. No cotton jeans. See Pants in Part II, Clothing section.
  • Socks – No holes.
  • Shoes – Sneakers. Hiking boots are usually unnecessary. See Footwear in Part II for more information.
  • Shirt – A non-cotton troop or patrol t-shirt works well. Please do not wear the Scout uniform shirt; the patches, pockets, pins, emblems, and shoulder epaulets are not conducive to hiking with a backpack and thus should be avoided. See Base Layer and Insulating Layer in Part II for more information.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 4
Packing is easy when you don’t carry more than you need. Cowboy camping in the desert, Dusty Lake Washington.

Essential Hiking Gear

These essentials should be carried on every outing (list obtained from Seattle Mountaineers). All of the essentials (except for the garbage bag, water bottle, and extra clothing), should fit into a small ditty bag; mine is about the size of a grapefruit.

  1. Navigation:
    • Maps – if not provided by the troop, get either a Greentrails map or a USGS 1:24,000 scale of the area you are hiking
    • Compass with adjustable declination – Affordable suggestions: Suunto M-2D, Burton8010G, Suunto M-3D (I carry this one). Don’t be tempted to purchase a cheap one; a good compass will last a long time. Sighting mirrors are usually unnecessary, though clerks or Scouters often push them.
  2. Sun Protection:
    • Sunscreen – repackaged in a small dropper bottle (an eye dropper bottle or similar).
    • Sunglasses – absolutely necessary. Go light and cheap. Fashion is not an issue, there is no one out there to impress.
  3. Insulation: extra clothing. See Clothing Systems in Part II. The Scouts will not need more than what they are wearing and the warmer insulation layers that they will be carrying. For day hikes, adjust (that is, bring less) accordingly.
  4. Illumination: LED headlamp/flashlight. With headlamps/flashlights, the smaller and lighter, the better. I suggest an LED headlamp (hands-free and easy) that won’t turn on easily inside a pack. Do not pack extra batteries – LEDs last a long time and have long battery life. If the batteries are old or you are going on an extended outing, put fresh batteries in before a trip and skip carrying extras.
  5. First Aid Supplies: Everything together should weigh no more than 5 ounces, in one small Ziploc. The Scouts should be trained on how to use what they are carrying and what nature provides to augment their small kit. To plan for every possible emergency, one would need to bring an entire emergency room. Knowledge is the most important thing we carry.
    • A few Band-Aids in various sizes
    • 2 to 4 butterfly bandages or Steri-strips
    • 4-6 ibuprofen
    • 2-4 Immodium
    • 2 3×3 or 4×4 gauze pads
    • a small piece of moleskin and a small amount of medical tape, rolled on to a piece of plastic straw
    • Medications: An outing is not the time to “see how it goes” and stop taking necessary medications.
  6. Fire:
    • Matches – a small amount of regular matches in a Ziploc is enough to start a fire. About five REI Stormproof matches in a Ziploc are also handy in case of emergency.
    • Lighter – Mini Bic only.
    • Firestarter – a must, but the best are homemade.
      • Cotton balls coated in Vaseline, carried in an old film canister. Half of a cotton ball will burn for 3-5 minutes.
      • Dryer lint works great and is the cheapest, with an unlimited supply. Carry a few loads’ worth in a Ziploc.
      • The only commercial products I’ve found worth the money are Wetfire and Spark-Lite Tinderquick, but they are hard to find. NO: Magnesium firestarting tool. They burn at 5400F, but only for about two seconds, and they ruin knife blades.
    • Flint sticks – they come in all sizes and are great if you know how to use them, but they are not worth much if you don’t know how to work one. IF you purchase, buy the lightest available and practice at home before bringing it.
    • Waterproof container- All fire stuff should be put in a lightweight waterproof container, like a Ziploc bag. NO: The small orange container with the compass on top is worthless. They are heavy for what you get, the compass is inaccurate, and I dare you to try and light a match with the flint thing on the bottom – don’t get suckered into buying these kinds of useless items.
  7. Repair Kit and Tools:
    • Knife – with knives, like flashlights, smaller and lighter IS better. There is no need for a fixed blade (straight) knife that requires a sheath. I have only carried the Victorinox Swiss Army Knife “Classic” model (the little one) for the last five years, it weighs 0.7 ounce, and I only use it for the scissors. A single-blade pocket knife that weighs less then 2 ounces is more than adequate. NO: multi-bladed/multi-gadget knives or multi-tools (e.g., a Leatherman). Unnecessary for Scouts or adults and very heavy to boot.
    • Repair Kit –
      • 2 to 3 feet of duct tape, rolled on a shortened plastic straw.
      • Small sewing needle with an eye big enough to accept your dental floss. Stick it into/thru a cut down business card or a small piece of foam to protect the tip.
      • A couple of safety pins.
      • About 20 to 25 feet of string (not rope nor even parachute cord).
  8. Nutrition: extra food – one protein bar (or similar). You are rarely so far off the beaten trail to need more than this.
  9. Hydration:
    • Water bottle – The “standard” 1-liter Nalgene weighs 3.8 ounces, and a cleaned 1-liter water or pop bottle weighs 1.3 ounces. Skip the Naglene. I carry a wide mouth 1-quart Gatorade bottle. For most of your Scout’s hiking, he will not need to carry more than 1 liter of water at a time, but he may need containers that are large enough to hold 2 quarts of water or more for some outings. Choose a collapsible 2-liter bottle – they are very light and can be rolled up when not in use. NO: “Camelbak” style water systems. Too heavy, difficult to refill, subject to punctures, result in Scouts carrying too much water weight.
    • Water purification – AquaMira or similar drops/tabs, to avoid the taste of iodine. I also recommend and carry the SteriPen UV Water purifier, though this may be a bit pricey for most Scouts. NO: Pump systems. Too heavy. More information on Water Purification in Part II.
  10. Emergency Shelter: A large garbage bag, 33 gallon or bigger. These work for a number of things, including an emergency shelter or rain coat. Always have one in your pack.
  11. Whistle: Get a good plastic one. The whistles that come on a pack’s sternum strap aren’t worth much more than playing a one-note song; they are just not loud enough to be of any value. Get a “real” light plastic whistle, most outdoor or boating stores have them.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 5
November morning at Camp Parsons, Kitsap Peninsula, Washington.

Backpack

I have never had a Scout show up for an outing with everything except a backpack. Thus I do not list “backpack” on my packing checklist, though a backpack is one of the most important purchases you’ll make. It is best to purchase the backpack after you have acquired the other Big Four (backpack, sleeping bag, sleeping pad, and shelter) items, as well as the other equipment your Scout will be packing. When you have made these purchases, you will know the size of pack needed. Otherwise you may purchase a pack that is too large or too small in volume.

Picking a pack for an eleven-year-old is not easy, especially if they are on the shorter side of the growth chart. There aren’t many packs made for their size, and they might grow out of it quickly, so take growth into account when buying. There will be times that your Scout will be wearing their backpack for four to eight or more hours at a time; you will want it to fit correctly and be comfortable.

Backpacks typically come in the following weights: traditional weight (4 to 8+ pounds), lightweight (2 to 3.9 pounds), ultra-lightweight (1 to 2 pounds) and super-ultra-lightweight (under 1 pound). Scouts and their parents have no need or use for the traditional weight or size pack, so we will not discuss them . Please avoid them. If you know about super-ultra-lightweight packs and where to get one, you probably don’t need to read this article, so we will not discuss them either.

Three important things to consider when looking for a pack are:

  1. Size – Packs are sized to correspond to a person’s torso size, and vary from one manufacturer to another. Though there is no true standard in pack sizing, at least some effort is made to follow torso sizing, so having that accurately measured is important. You can go online for instructions; REI and Backpacking.com have good videos on how to measure for a pack. Pack sizes can range from XS to XL, depending on the manufacturer. If women’s or youth sizes are offered, those may be a better fit to a Scout’s body, and women’s packs often have more closely spaced shoulder straps (helpful for smaller Scouts). Just don’t tell the boy it’s a women’s pack, and he’ll never know. I have seen many a macho boy wear a women’s pack unknowingly, thinking they were the top stud.
  2. Weight – Pack weight makes up part of the “Big Four.” The weight of an empty pack is very important. You should not need nor purchase a pack weighing more than 3.5 pounds, for you or your Scout. Some of my Scouts carry excellent packs that weigh 1.8 pounds. You might not find them at the big box retailers; you might need to do some research, but they exist and are worth the effort to find.
  3. Volume – If you have pared down your equipment, you won’t need a large pack. A small volume pack will also encourage your Scout to bring less, saving weight. Optimum volume would be between 2400 cu in (39 liters) and 3600 cu in (59 liters). You should not look at anything larger than a 3500 to 3900 cu in (~65 liters). There is no need for anything larger, even in winter. Again, it is best to get most of your Scout’s other gear before you purchase a pack, because the volume needed will be dictated by the size of the gear to fit in the pack. Don’t purchase a pack with such a small volume that you must strap or dangle things from it. It seems like every troop has someone who does this, and it invariably brings to mind the classic idea of a hillbilly, bobbing down the trail, clanking. Everything should fit inside the pack with the exception of maybe a sleeping pad, rolled tightly under the pack lid.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 6
Top of the world – or at least Thorp Mountain. Mt. Rainier in the background. Notice the water bottles – lightweight and reuseable!

Backpacks come in three main types: frameless, internal frame, and external frame. Frameless packs require additional knowledge for weight and proper packing, and are probably outside the scope of most new Scouts. You are most likely to find internal frame packs to meet the above recommendations for size, weight, and volume.

Please do not be tempted to purchase a pack cover, also sold as a rain cover, opting instead for a pack liner. We use a trash compactor bag or a kitchen size garbage bag. These are inexpensive and work the best. You can also use a large 33-gallon garbage bag to cover the pack at night, the pack will fit completely inside.

Sleeping Bag

Sleeping bags can be a difficult purchase. Temperature ratings are usually set arbitrarily by the manufacturer, though Europe has a standard temperature rating process called “EN 13537,” which is reliably accurate. Unless you see the official EN 13537 rating, take temperature rating with a grain of salt. Low quality bags abound, but the manufacturers of these often overstate their temperature rating. High quality bags can be very expensive, but are usually more accurate with temperature ratings. Temperature rating is simply a starting point, and how it applies to your Scout depends on if they are a warm or cold sleeper and the circumstances they will most likely encounter on overnight trips.

The next issue with sleeping bags is whether the filling or insulation should be down or synthetic. Some people think that you shouldn’t use a down bag in wet weather; or that synthetic is warmer when wet. My take on this: I never want to sleep in any kind of wet bag. I work to keep my bag dry at all cost, and so should you, which largely eliminates moisture as a factor in this debate.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 7
Nice warm sleeping bags. Cowboy camping, Umtanum Canyon.

Now, cost and how rough a normal twelve-year-old is are factors – big factors! A good down bag costs a lot more than a synthetic bag, and while down is lighter, it is also more fragile. My boys all had synthetic bags until they were sixteen years old. Their first bags were purchased used, and I didn’t worry about how my boys treated them. Of course I knew how they’d be treated – I was a twelve-year-old Scout once. We try to teach the Scouts respect for their gear and attempt to curtail any blatant disregard, but we also understand that some of their brain function got turned off when they turned twelve. Now, if your son is like my nephew, you could give him a $300 down bag and it would still look new, fifteen years later. It’s your call (and money), and you know your Scout best.

Either way, down or synthetic, you should try to get a bag that weighs less than 3 pounds, and is preferably closer to 2 pounds. Just as a reference, some of the highest quality 20F bags weigh around 1 pound 13 ounces. When you get more comfortable with backpacking in general, you might want to look into backpacking quilts. They are even lighter than a sleeping bag and can be more comfortable, especially for hot sleepers.

Make sure that, whatever type of bag your Scout has, when in their pack it should be in a tight plastic bag (plastic trash compactor bags work best), for moisture protection. At the very least, stuff the sleeping bag in its own stuff sack that’s been lined with a plastic bag (plastic on the inside).

Sleeping Pads

There are three basic types of sleeping pads and each has their own merits (below). Pad lengths range from a short, torso size to a full length 6’8” size. Why, a parent may ask, would someone want only a torso sized pad? To save weight! You can put your empty pack under your legs for insulation. Why carry more than you need to? This works for both Scouts and adults, and they are totally comfortable while sleeping and on the trail (carrying less weight). A 5-foot Scout doesn’t need a 6.5-foot sleeping pad.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 8
Therm-a-Rest, ZRest (new- ZLite) CCF pad. Frenchman Coulee, Washington.

  1. Closed Cell Foam (CCF) – CCF is by far the lightest and cheapest way to go, and it is what most of the Scouts carry. CCF pads are not subject to punctures like the other pad options, making these a no-brainer to recommend. Most of our Scouts carry a ZRest or RidgeRest made by Therm-a-Rest, others carry the 3/8-inch blue firm foam pads. CCF is easy to trim to the size or shape of your Scout. Because sleeping pads often get strapped to the outside of the pack, a CCF pad can take a lot more abuse then those listed below without affecting its performance. This would be my first choice for a Scout, who usually isn’t heavy enough to warrant the thicker padding of the other options.
  2. Self Inflatable – Many manufacturers, colors, sizes, shapes, weights, etc. Try to stay under 1.5 pounds! If you are looking to go this direction, remember that thicker is heavier. Carrying a 4-pound pad is not worth it; there are other options for comfort. Keep reading.
  3. Inflatable / Air Mattress – Today there are a number of options in this area, but they mostly fall into two categories: Insulated and Non-Insulated.
    • Non-Insulated Inflatable Pads – Without insulation, these pads are vulnerable to convection and radiation heat loss. Take care if choosing them, because that heat loss can be a liability, even in summer. I do not recommend these for Scouts in our location (Pacific Northwest).
    • Insulated Inflatable Pads – Insulated air pads can be the most comfortable way to go. That comfort comes at a higher price, the need for TLC, and the need to actually blow them up. Insulated inflatable pads have down or synthetic fill or a “reflective barrier.” Given their cost and comparative fragility, I do not recommend purchasing an inflatable pad for a Scout.

Other Stuff

Ground Sheet – In our troop we try and sleep under the stars (cowboy camp) as much as possible, so having something to protect your sleeping bag from getting dirty is a good thing. A 7 x 3 foot piece of 3 to 4 mil plastic is all that is needed. You could also cut down the sides of a heavy duty, super large plastic garbage bag. A sheet of Tyvek works very well if you have access to that, though it will be noisy the first few times you use it. A ground sheet is also necessary for tarp camping.

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 9
Cowboy camping on 3 and 4 mil plastic ground cloths. Frenchman Coulee, Washington.

Kitchen

Utensils – At most, all your Scout needs is a cup (cheap plastic ones work great), a Lexan (unbreakable plastic) or titanium (pricier metal option) spoon, and maybe a bowl (a used margarine tub), but nix the bowl if they are freezer bag cooking. NO: Mess kits. A mass of wasted metal, they are not worth the weight.

Soap – People have far more digestive problems in the backcountry from lack of personal hygiene then any water borne illness. I recommend a natural, liquid soap like Dr. Bronner’s, repackaged into a small dropper bottle. A purse-sized hand sanitizer can be brought along as well, but soap is more effective.

Personal

Toothbrush – A small, light toothbrush, stored in a Ziploc sandwich bag.

Toothpaste – A travel size is more than a Scout will use in a year, but repackaging is not really an option. Tooth powder or baking soda in a tiny Ziploc is even lighter. Alternately, have your Scout make “toothpaste dots.”

Small trowel – For digging a cathole, though a stick or tent peg works just as well and is one fewer item to pack. If the trowel weighs more than 2.5 ounces, don’t bring it. Use a stick.

Toilet paper – Don’t send the whole roll! About 6 to 8 feet should be far more than needed for an overnighter. Fold it up and put it in a Ziploc.

When my third son turned eleven years old, for his first outing the troop planned a short 1.5-mile hike up to a beautiful small lake. I “allowed” him to pack his own pack, thinking “if he overpacks, he’ll learn for the next trip.” His pack weighed about 35 pounds! I should have stepped in to help him out, but at that time I was trying a different parenting style. Please don’t make the same mistake. Let your Scout pack their own pack after they have been trained on how and what to pack (remember the 25% rule).

In Part II of “What a Scout Needs for Backpacking,” we will complete our discussion with:

  • Clothing – underwear to outer shell
  • Footwear
  • Other optional items
  • Troop Gear
  • Water Filters/Purifiers
  • Stoves
  • Shelters – Tents and Tarps

What a Scout Needs for Backpacking - 10
Troop 697, still smiles after four miles. Manastash Lake, Washington.

CAMP Flash Anorak Review

An innovative design makes this wind shell easy to put on and take off.

Introduction

CAMP is an Italian company that specializes in ultralight gear for climbing and skiing. They have recently expanded into producing ultralight clothing. One of their first garments is the Flash Anorak, a 4-ounce (112-gram) pullover wind shell with a MSRP of $119.95. Randonee ski racing inspired the Anorak’s innovative design, though it also can be used for backpacking and cycling. The Flash Anorak aims to solve the all-to-common “on again, off again” problem faced by wind shell-loving outdoor enthusiasts.

Description

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 2
From the front, the Flash Anorak appears to be a normal lightweight wind shell (left). However, from behind, it is clear that this shell is different as it is worn over the shoulder straps and hipbelt, and lacks any fabric on the back (right).

The 2011 Flash Anorak is made of CAMP’s proprietary Araneum fabric, which is a 30 g/m² uncoated nylon. The fabric is claimed to be breathable, windproof, and water resistant. The shell’s hood is very basic – it is quite small, does not adjust, and has no brim. Additionally, the shell has an un-adjustable elastic waist, cuffs, and pinky (yes, pinky) loops.

The shell’s most unusual attribute is that there is no fabric on the back. This allows the user put on and take off the shell quickly without removing their backpack. While not being worn, the shell is stored in the attached front pocket which has a thin nylon belt that allows the user to wear it around their waist. The pullover style forgoes the full front zip of a “jacket” to minimize weight, bulk, and cost.

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 3
Worn like a fanny pack,the stretchy mesh and Araneum pocket, sewn into the inner stomach-area of the Anorak, stores the shell when not in use (left). The thin adjustable nylon strap and plastic buckle secures the pocket around your waist, ensuring that the shell is readily available (right).

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 4
A YKK#3 front zippers seals the shell from the sternum area to the Adam’s apple, but Velcro is used above that to seal the hood around the chin (left). The minimalist hood rolls away with a small Velcro tab on the back of the neck (right).

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 5
Another unique feature of the Flash Anorak is the thin elastic pinky loop (left), as opposed to a more traditional (though not ubiquitous) thumb loop. There are two advantages of the pinky loop: it doesn’t get in the way when gripping something, and it avoids potential overlap with baselayer thumb loops (center). Like a thumb loop, the pinky loop keeps the sleeve from sliding up the wrist when the arm is stretched out (right).

Performance

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 6
Without a visor or brim, the small hood hangs low on the forehead. Note that the pocket is sewn to the inside the shell, and weighs it down enough to create a bulge of fabric below my belly button (left). The back of the shell, as seen without a pack (right).

I tested the Flash Anorak for three months of backcountry ski tours in the Dolomites and hikes in the French Alps. I found that the shell was great for certain conditions in both sports and seasons, but it also had distinct limitations.

I am 6 feet (183 cm) tall and 170 pounds (77 kg) and normally wear a size medium, but had to move up to a size large for the Flash Anorak. The medium was too short in the sleeves and torso. The overall fit of the large was not great as the torso was too baggy and the hood was too small. To clarify, the hood was plenty big to fit around my large head (with a beanie), but would not fit over any type of helmet, despite CAMP’s claim the the hood is helmet compatible. The loose-fitting torso may be one disadvantage of the backless design. The large was big enough to wear a wool baselayer and MontBell Thermawrap Parka underneath, though I rarely did this in practice. The limited “unisex” sizing of small to extra large means that this shell will suit a limited range of males, and probably won’t fit most females very well.

The Araneum fabric is strong for its weight and windproof, but not very water resistant. CAMP’s website states that the shell offers “protection from wind and even from a light drizzle,” which is accurate, based on my experience. The fabric is untreated and does soak through under prolonged exposure to light rain or heavy snow. Water permeates the Flash Anorak faster than my GoLite Wisp or MontBell U.L. Wind Parka. I have not yet tested Pertex Quantum GL or MontBell’s 7d Ballistic Airlight, the lightest wind shell fabrics currently available, and therefore cannot make a comparison.

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 7
Putting on the jacket is easy, but does involve a few steps: pull the shell out of the pocket (top left); slide arms through the sleeves (top right); head through the unzippered front opening (bottom left); pull down on the torso (bottom right).

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 8
Now secure the back “tail”of the shell: take the two Velcro tabs by the hips and mate them in the middle, just below the backpack. This can be quite tricky while wearing gloves.

During backcountry ski trips, I found that the Flash Anorak works well in dry, windy weather. Skinning uphill, I would typically wear a very light baselayer. If the wind became too chilling for a certain section, as when crossing through a treeless area, I would only stop for a few seconds to put on the shell. The Anorak significantly cut down on wind chill without causing me to overheat. Also, I didn’t have to take off my pack, which can be a safety concern on steep/ exposed terrain. When the wind stopped, I could pack the shell away without breaking my stride.

I also liked having the Flash Anorak for warm-weather hiking trips. If the weather cooled at dusk or when going over a mountain pass, I could easily add the shell. Again, not having any back fabric allowed airflow to my back. I find it quite unpleasant wear any type of shell when my back is already sweaty! Compared to a traditional windshirt, the Flash Anorak allowed better air flow to my back, extending the comfort range by reducing the likelihood of overheating. The shell was also the perfect lunch-break layer on cool days. Instead of adding a long sleeve t-shirt for warmth, I wore the Anorak on top of a short sleeve t-shirt. This kept me warm enough while allowing the wet t-shirt back to dry.

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 9
The Flash Anorak covers pack straps and the hipbelt (left). Water hydration ports are in each shoulder (right).

While being worn, the Flash Anorak covered my backpack’s hipbelt pockets. However, I could still access them by reaching around the side of my torso. The shell also covered my shoulder straps, but that was not an issue. The Anorak has a port at each shoulder for a water bladder tube. I use water bottles and thus didn’t use these ports. It would take a bit of time and effort to reach under my shell to feed the tube through the port, making me think it isn’t very practical. When the Anorak is not being worn, and is therefore stuffed into its pocket, it does not hinder access to the pack nor does it require an extra step to remove the pack.

There is an obvious advantage of having this easy on, easy off shell while actively hiking, skiing or cycling. However, the advantage while moving is somewhat offset by the disadvantage when stopped, as there is one extra step to access the backpack. Because the shell covers the hipbelt and shoulder straps, I had to take off the shell first before I could take off the pack. In marginal conditions, like cold, windy mountain summits, this meant heat was lost before I could don an insulating layer. Moreover, heat loss through the back could be an issue if the shell was worn for a long time while inactive, like in the evening at camp.

The Flash Anorak works well without a pack. I’ve used this on numerous runs and a few bike rides. I appreciated the weather protection without overheating or sweating profusely. And in both sports, I was able to easily put on the shell for weather changes (sudden rain on a run, or a big descent on my bike) and take it off when those events had passed. The baggy shell torso is noticeable, however.

Comparison

At 4.0 ounces (112 grams) and $119.95, the Flash Anorak is both heavier and more expensive than many ultralight wind shells. It is not hard to find a sub-four ounce wind shell that costs less than $100.

The lightest hooded pullover is the MontBell Tachyon Anorak, which weighs 2.4 ounces (68 grams) and costs $89. MontBell uses their proprietary 7 denier fabric to achieve such a gossamer weight. The new Pertex Quantum GL is 10 denier and weighs 25 g/m2 (as opposed to 30 g/m2 for the Araneum). The lightest shell to use this fabric is Montane’s hoodless, full front-zip Slipstream GL, which weighs 2.3 ounces (65 grams).

However, the additional cost and weight of the Flash Anorak are fairly minor and come with increased utility. In terms of design, this CAMP shell is unlike any backpacking wind shirt currently on the market. That being said, the concept is not completely unique. Several cycling vests and shells have a weather-proof fabric on the front and shoulders, with a more breathable fabric on the back. The idea is the same – protect from the weather but allow the back to dump heat and breathe as much as possible.

The design works well in all but the coldest temperatures. At some point (generally well below freezing), some people advocate using a vest with a vapor barrier on the back and breathable fabric on the rest of the garment. This could cause the back of the user’s baselayer to get wet with perspiration, but keep insulation layers dry. Mark Twight writes about this in his book, Extreme Alpinism, and the company 40 Below makes a vest of this nature.

It is beyond the scope of this product review to go into further details on comparing the merits and techniques of such a variety of garments, ranging from CAMP’s fabric-less back to a normal wind shirt to a vapor barrier-backed winter vest.

Assessment

The advantage of the Flash Anorak’s quick use while moving is somewhat offset by the extra step (and exposure) of taking off the shell to access the backpack. The unimpeded breathability along the back is a huge improvement, but the design makes for a loose-fitting torso. The sub-par fit and lack of female sizing is disappointing. The Araneum fabric is quite light and emphasizes breathability over water resistance, which I prefer. DWR can always be added by the user. During several months of testing, I had no problems with the shell construction or fabric strength. Finally, the shell is heavier and more expensive than many traditionally-styled wind shells. A resourceful backpacker might buy a cheaper and lighter wind shell and then modify the back panel to resemble the Flash Anorak.

The Flash Anorak would be a good shell when speed is important, like for randonee ski races, orienteering competitions, and mountain marathons. Backpackers who sweat a lot might really appreciate the unimpeded breathability of the backless design. Outdoor enthusiasts who face itinerant weather will really like the convenience of the Anorak’s design. When the weather demands taking off one’s pack a lot to add/remove a wind shell, then this saves time and energy.

In the end, this is a shell that I will sometimes use for backcountry skiing, hiking, and cycling. Weighing the pros and cons, the Flash Anorak is not overwhelmingly better than my current wind shell. It is just different.

CAMP Flash Anorak Review - 1
Resting above Chamonix Valley and staying warm while my back dries off.

Specifications and Features

Manufacturer CAMP
Year / Model 2011 Flash Anorak
Style Hooded anorak wind shell
Sizes Available Unisex S, M, L, XL
Colors Available Orange with black highlights, Black with orange highlights
Fabrics Araneum – proprietary 30g/m2 uncoated nylon
Features Attached hood with Velcro tabs at chin area and zipper at neck area, elastic pinky loops,
elastic cuffs, elastic waist, holes for hydration bladder hose, no back fabric, attached
carrying pocket and waist belt
Weight (size Large tested)
Manufacturer Weight: 4.0 oz (112 g)
Measured Weight: 3.9 oz (111 g)
MSRP $119.95

Disclosure: The manufacturer provided this product to the author and/or Backpacking Light at no charge, and it is owned by the author/BPL. The author/Backpacking Light has no obligation to the manufacturer to review this product under the terms of this agreement.

Crazy for Quilts – How Quilts Became My Sleep System of Choice, PLUS A Review of My Favorite, the Stateless Society Custom Quilt

Take a walk through the backpacking addicted mind of Ray as he explains his journey to custom quilts, and read a review of his favorite model, a 14-ounce beauty made by fellow BPL-er Javan Dempsey.

You don’t have access to view this content.