Articles (2020)

Princeton Tec Apex Pro Headlamp (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Princeton Tec has reduced the weight of their 3-Watt LED Apex Pro by nearly 4 ounces.

The parade of the headlamps continues. Princeton Tec has taken their 3-Watt LED Apex and placed it on a diet. The Apex Pro weighs 106 grams (3.7 ounces) less than its AA powered cousin, the Apex. The weight reduction was achieved by changing the battery pack. The Apex Pro uses 2 CR123 Lithium batteries.

Princeton Tec Apex Pro Headlamp (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The Princeton Tec Apex Pro battery pack uses 2 CR123 Lithium batteries to power this new headlamp

.

The reduction in weight does come at the cost of a shorter overall burn time though the regulated burn time period is actually slightly longer in 3 Watt High mode.

Princeton Tec Apex Pro Headlamp (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
The Apex Pro is powered by 2 CR123 Lithium batteries. The lamp contains a single 3-Watt LED and 4 ultrabright 5mm LEDs and supports 2 modes in both Low and High operation. Overall burn time for the 3-Watt mode 36 hours; 48 hours in the 5mm LED mode. The lamp weighs 6.1 ounces with batteries.

Snowpeak Introduces Ultralight for the Masses (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

This Shelter’s Made for Dancing

Snowpeak Introduces Ultralight for the Masses (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
Got a group of 20 and need a shelter? No problem. It may not weigh under two pounds but Snowpeak has just the roof to cover you all. Boasting the highest area-to-weight ratio shelter for parties over 12, the Snowpeak Integrated Tent City has enough room to have square dancing on one side and a rave on the other with room left to barbeque under its spacious awning. BPL is considering ordering one for our winter staff retreat. We won’t tell you who square dances and who raves.

Smaller Lighter High-performance GPS Units (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Get Used to Smaller Lighter High-performance GPS units with limited navigation features

Get Used to Smaller Lighter High-performance GPS Units
but With Fewer Navigational Functions

Smaller Lighter High-performance GPS units - 1
The new generation of “performance measurement GPS” units have exceptional electronics and GPS performance. They are small, light and wearable but have minimal navigation functions. Left: the Garmin Edge 305, actually a bike unit but similar in weight and smaller than a Geko- it should work for a handheld backpacking GPS. Right: the wrist-wearable Garmin Forerunner 305. Both have barometric altimeters and heart rate monitors.

GPS manufacturers continue to focus their innovation and marketing in two areas,

1) Large-screened mapping units with full navigational functions [eg. the Garmin GPSMAP 60 and 76 series] around 8 oz, and

2) Small “performance measurement GPS”, usually wearable, but with small screens, no mapping capabilities and minimal navigational functions [Suunto X9i, Garmin Fore Runner 205 and 305; and Edge 205 and 305] around 3 oz

Why is this important to lightweight backpacking? Well, our core lightweight, navigationally focused units are languishing in the technological dust. The Geko 101 is discontinued and who knows how long until the Geko 201 and 301 fall into the tar pit of extinction? Neither the Geko or the eTrex units are slated to have the newest SiRF III GPS Engine. If you want to a good GPS fix in tree cover or in a tight canyon, you need SiRF III GPS or a similar digital GPS signal processor. [The new digital processing of the SiRF chipset has many thousands of times more signal processing power than traditional 12 channel analog GPS receivers. This means amazing performance like full time GPS tracking in a deep canyon of redwood trees.]

I’m deeply disappointed that improved mapping and GPS performance will not make it into the e-Trex and Geko series. Even just some better navigational features into the Forerunner or Edge series would be nice. Garmin are you listening?

While I laud the improvements to the larger mapping units (I use a Garmin 76CSx for my kayaking expeditions and love it to pieces), at almost 8 oz I wouldn’t consider them for a backpacking trip.

For the time being if I want the latest and greatest in lightweight GPS electronics for backpacking I need to make peace with the limited navigational features of the new small performance measurement GPS (SPM-GPS) like the Garmin Fore Runner 305.

Over the next few months I will be testing the applicability of small performance measurement GPS to lightweight backpacking. Hopefully we can come up with a How To/Tips and Tricks piece to use SPM-GPS for lightweight backpacking.

 - 2
New SPM-GPS units have tight integration with performance analysis software and electronic mapping like Google Earth. Example above is Garmin Training Center™ software. Below is the web-based application Motion Based™ that integrates with Edge and Forerunner data for performance tracking and mapping.

Advantages of small performance measurement GPS (SPM-GPS)

  • Sophisticated digital GPS circuitry captures weak signals in difficult reception areas like tree cover and narrow canyons or a combination of both!
  • Small wearable size (or in the case of the Garmin Edge small and mountable)
  • Potentially lighter weights (currently the same weight as the lightest units)
  • Tight integration with performance analysis software and with electronic mapping like Google Earth
  • Rechargeable batteries
  • Many monitor heart rate

Smaller Lighter High-performance GPS units - 3
Web-based application, Motion Based™, that integrates with Edge and Forerunner data for performance tracking and mapping.

Disadvantages of small performance measurement GPS (SPM-GPS)

  • Limited navigational functions (usually just 50-100 waypoints)
  • No mapping
  • Limited Battery life (non-field replaceable batteries = approx 10 hours) although there are ways to recharge these units in the field with user-hack battery packs attached to a micro-USB cable
  • Even smaller screens

How to deal with the limited navigation features SPM-GPS

  • Even though SPM-GPS data transfer definitions aren’t available in most mapping software like Nat Geo Topo! theoretically data transfer a should work by selecting a basic GPS unit like a Garmin 201 (National Geo Topo! already has a definition for the Suunto X9 units)
  • Also to transfer data you’ll need to load a USB/GPS driver
  • In lieu of on-screen GPS mapping, use custom printed maps with waypoint labels and download the waypoints to your SPM-GPS. For more info on this refer to Backpacking Light’s article Guide to Selecting and Using Ultralight GPS Systems http://www.backpackinglight.com/cgi-bin/backpackinglight/ultralight_gps_guide_04.html

Black Diamond Superlight Tents (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Black Diamond adds two new light weight, single-walled shelters to their Superlight line.

Overview

Black Diamond expands their Superlight series of single-walled shelters with the introduction of two new tents. The new HiLight is a smaller and lighter version of their acclaimed Lighthouse tent. The OneShot is a solo shelter that weighs less than some bivy sacks.

Black Diamond Superlight Tents (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The HiLight Tent.

Both shelters continue to feature the highly water resistant, but not completely waterproof EPIC by Nextec fabric. Well regarded in snow and heavy, but short duration rain, we’ve seen the fabric wet through under sustained rain pressure in Black Diamond’s older Superlight tents. I expect the fabric performance to be similar in both of these new shelters.

The HiLight has a feature set similar to the older Lighthouse tent, but its weight and footprint are similar to the smaller Firstlight. It retains the Lighthouse’s huge side-opening door and small awning supported by a third mini pole. Weight savings were achieved by using a smaller insect mesh panel on the door. The new panel still appears large enough to provide excellent ventilation. Judging from the published dimensions, it looks like it is likely too small for hikers over 6 feet tall. But, the tents were bolted to a display rack and I wasn’t able climb inside and confirm this.

Black Diamond Superlight Tents (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
The OneShot Tent.

The OneShot is the tent I’m most excited about for two reasons. First, it is a real freestanding shelter that’s large enough to sit up in, but its claimed weight of 2 lb 5 oz makes it lighter than some cramped bivy sacks. Second, it may prove, when I actually get to lie down in one, to be long enough for my 6 ft 2 in frame. I’ve used the supposedly two-person Firstlight shelter in the past, but I need to sleep diagonally to fit, and even then, take drastic measures to keep condensation off of my head and feet. The 85 inch length of the OneShot is potentially long enough to alleviate this. But, that determination will have to wait until I can actually test one – the relatively shallow pitch of the end walls may make that extra length only an illusion.

The OneShot features an even smaller version of the Lighthouse-style awning and third pole. The pole location is offset toward the foot end of the tent to create a sturdy looking triangulation of the three poles on the ceiling. The single door on the side is similar in design to the HiLight and Lighthouse. The OneShot achieves further weight savings with a trapezoidal shaped floor which reduces the amount of fabric needed at the foot end of the tent.

I plan to publish a full review of the OneShot in the future. The tent is expected to be available in January, 2007.

HiLight Specifications and Features

  • Claimed Weight Tent and Poles: 2 lb, 10 oz (1.18kg)
  • Claimed Weight Packaged: 3 lb, 2 oz (1.42kg)
  • Claimed Weight Vestibule: 1 lb (454g)
  • Claimed Weight Footprint: 10 oz (270g)
  • Dimensions: 81 in x 50 in x 40 in (206 cm x 127 cm x 102cm)

OneShot Specifications and Features

  • Claimed Weight Tent and Poles: 2 lb, 5 oz (1.04 kg)
  • Claimed Weight Packaged: 2 lb, 13 oz (1.28kg)
  • Claimed Weight Footprint: 7 oz (200g)
  • Vestibule: N/A
  • Dimensions: 85 in x 36 in x 36 in (216 cm x 91 cm x 91 cm)

Kestrel 4500 Pocket Weather Station (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

The Kestrel 4500 adds a digital compass to an already impressive portable weather meter

Over the past several years Kestrel has steadily expanded their line of pocket weather meters. With each new model they have added features. This fall they will release the Kestrel 4500 which expands on the very rich set of weather reporting and tracking functions of the 4000.

The key addition to the 4500 is the inclusion of a digital compass. While this compass will not truly replace a navigational compass owing to a relatively low accuracy of 5°, but that is more than sufficient for the weather-related functions the compass now permits. The 4500, like the 4000, has a 2000 data point memory. Data can be recorded instantly and at user specified intervals. Complete weather data is recorded including now wind direction, crosswind, tail wind, and naturally head wind information.

I was also able to view a prototype wind vane tripod mount. This mount will ensure the 4500 remains pointed into the wind and creates a fully functional and truly portable weather station. Though the final production model may be slightly different it is anticipated that the combined mount and 4500 will still weigh only 8 ounces.

Kestrel remains, in many people’s minds, the gold standard for small weather meters. With the 4500 they have created a truly portable weather station that should satisfy even the most ardent weather enthusiast. Is this something the typical ultralight backpacker’s needs to carry, perhaps not. But if you are interested in really analyzing your performance throughout a trip the way you probably analyze your gear’s performance starting with its weight then the Kestrel 4500 is a remarkable device worth looking at.

Features and Specifications

  • Current, Maximum and Average Wind Speeds
  • Air, Water & Snow Temperature
  • Wind Chill
  • Relative Humidity
  • Dew-point
  • Heat Stress Index
  • Barometric Pressure
  • Barometric Altitude
  • Density Altitude
  • Wet Bulb Temperature
  • Digital compass with 5° accuracy
  • 2000 data point memory records every measurement per data point. Data can be recorded instantly and in user-specified intervals.
  • Transfer data to a computer via USB
  • Weight: 3.8 ounces.

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Hyper-High Mtn (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Using aerogel technology from Aspen Aerogels, Pacific Outdoor Equipment launches what could be the warmest sleeping pad ever.

Overview

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Hyper-High Mtn (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The Pacific Outdoor Hyper-High Mountain Pad (atop a stack of less interesting yellow pads).

Are you a cold sleeper? Planning a winter mountaineering expedition? Used to doubling your pads up to stay warm on snow? Pacific Outdoor Equipment has changed the rules of the game. Using aerogel technology developed by Aspen Aerogels, they are beginning production of the warmest sleeping pad currently available to backpackers – probably even to car campers! All at an astonishingly low weight.

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Hyper-High Mtn (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
Torso area showing the hourglass shaped self-inflating region.

The Hyper-High Mountain Pad is a full-length hybrid pad consisting of a sandwich of a bottom layer of EVA foam throughout, an aerogel layer in the torso and foot regions, and a top layer of self-inflating foam in the torso area with polyethylene over the leg half and around the perimeter.

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Hyper-High Mtn (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 3
Foot area (ignore those yellow pads again).

It’s the aerogel layer that sets this pad apart from all others. Only 7mm thick, it imbues the pad with a claimed R-20 R-Value. That’s not a misprint: R-20! Aerogels are solid, silicon-based, open cell, nanoporous materials that have a very high proportion of free void volume, giving them extremely low densities and thermal conductivities. (Some aerogel materials are up to 1000 times less dense than glass, another silicon-based solid.) Aspen Aerogels has taken this NASA technology and developed a flexible insulating material that’s very light and very warm for its thickness. This product is the first application of this technology in a sleeping pad.

Pacific Outdoor Equipment Hyper-High Mtn (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 4
Side view showing the EVA (pink), PE (gray), and self-inflating (red) layers. (The aerogel layer is internal and not visible.)

For ultralight backpackers, the Hyper-High Mountain Pad could become “the” winter pad. But at 21.5oz, it’s overkill for most other uses. However, the technology is compelling – Pacific Outdoor Equipment will hopefully introduce an entire family of pads using it. For example, a torso-length, non-inflatable, R-5 pad might weigh as little as 4oz.

To put the claimed R-20 R-Value in perspective, excluding car-camping monsters, the thickest closed-cell foam and self-inflating mats are less than R-4, while 3.5 inch thick down-filled inflatables that weigh over 2 pounds are still less than R-9. An R-20 pad is a furnace for your backside! If testing confirms the claims, this pad could allow you to drop half a pound from your winter sleeping bag weight and still stay just as warm. We’ll let you know if the pad performs up to its claims in an upcoming review.

Specifications and Features

  • Dimensions: 20x72x1.5 in.
  • Polyethylene upper layer around perimeter and legs
  • 13mm thick EVA lower layer
  • 7mm Aerogel mid-layer in torso and foot areas
  • Claimed Weight: 21.5oz (609g)
  • Claimed R-Value: R-20
  • MSRP: $165

MSR Reactor Integrated Canister Stove (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

The integrated canister stove category just blew wide open with the imminent arrival of MSR’s new Reactor. It’s claimed to be the fastest-boiling, most fuel-efficient, windproof cooking system available. And there’s another integrated canister stove coming from a different stove maker. BPL will cover this tomorrow night. Move over Jetboil!

Overview

MSR Reactor Integrated Canister Stove  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The new MSR Reactor integrated cooking system has a unique radiant burner that combines with an enclosing heat exchanger to provide maximum efficiency and heat transfer to the cooking pot. The hard anodized aluminum pot is 1.7 liters, which makes it suitable for group cooking. Note the radiant glow of the burner head.

The new Reactor Stove is MSR’s answer to the Jetboil Group Cooking System. It was first announced at the Outdoor Retailer Summer 2004 trade show, and after several delays, it will finally arrive in an outdoor store near you in February 2007.

According to an MSR representative “It took longer because inventing ‘light plutonium’ was a bigger challenge than we expected. But we succeeded in finding a way to remove the deadly gamma rays, leaving only clean infra-red radiation to do the cooking. The Reactor will run for 24,000 years (one half-life) on a single gram of light plutonium 239, so you never need to worry about how much fuel to bring.”

Seriously, the Reactor runs on canister fuel. Its integrated cook pot is 1.7 liters and stove weight is 21 ounces, compared to 1.5 liters and 19 ounces for the Jetboil Group Cooking System. According to MSR claims, the Reactor will boil 1 liter of water in 3 minutes, will boil 2.8 liters from 1 ounce of fuel, and will boil 22 liters of water from a single 8 ounce canister of fuel. Jetboil claims a 4 minute boil time for the GCS (although in BPL testing it has slower boil times).

Our initial reaction is the stove should be the most sophisticated and efficient integrated canister stove to date, but it is also the heaviest integrated canister stove. Only time and testing will tell if its efficiency will justify the weight.

MSR Reactor Integrated Canister Stove  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
What is unique about the Reactor is its integrated heat exchanger that completely encloses a radiant burner, so it generates maximum heat output and transfers it by both convection and radiation to the cook pot. The burner is claimed to use 100% primary air entering through ports on the side, allowing it to be completely enclosed at the top and making it virtually impervious to wind. The pot lid is Lexan plastic.

Where does the efficiency comes from?

  • The burner head has a special metal foam that heats up and glows for radiant heat transfer (see lead picture). The bottom of the pot is dark to absorb the radiant energy.
  • The metal foam also slows convective air flow which increases convective heat transfer to the pot. Slow air flow allows more time for heat transfer.
  • Tight areas around the pots heat exchange fins create a pressure drop that fine tunes air flow (slower) for optimal heat transfer.
  • Because the pot and burner head are essentially a sealed air path (allowing no external air to enter except from the two mixer tube intakes), the stove’s efficiency is unimpaired by strong winds. Most canister stoves get about 40% of their air at the burner head and thus can’t have a sealed air system like the Reactor.
  • The pressure regulation in the burner head also maintains optimal burn rate and thus optimal efficiency over the life of the canister (no matter what the fill level).
  • All of the above means that the Reactor will have optimal efficiency over a broad range of flame settings, canister fill levels, temperatures, and wind. Most canister stoves will loose efficiency if any of these are suboptimal.

MSR Reactor Integrated Canister Stove  (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 3
Bottom side of the Reactor’s burner. It has an internal pressure regulator that maintains a constant 12.5 psi for consistent flame output for the life of the canister. Most canister stoves burn much faster on the initial few liters boiled and then heat slower and slower as canister pressure falls. These un-regulated stoves also boil much slower in cold weather when canister pressure also falls. In both cases the Reactor should have consistent boil times. MSR claims a boil time of 3 minutes for the first liter and 3.5 minutes for the last few liters or if the temperature drops below 35 degrees.

The Reactor Stove introduces some new technologies and raises the bar for integrated canister cooking systems. But it’s heavy at 21 ounces. Interestingly, the burner weights only 6 ounces, so the pot and heat exchanger assembly weigh a huge 15 ounces! The Reactor definitely needs some lightening up and the pot and heat exchanger (and Lexan lid) are the obvious choices. MSR plans to eventually produce a lighter version, as well as smaller and bigger capacity versions.

MSR claims the Reactor will be the fastest-boiling, most fuel-efficient windproof cooking system available. We just LOVE claims like that because it challenges us “gear technologists” a to check it out! Believe me, when our Cooking Systems Editor Dr. Roger Caffin gets his hands on the Reactor, he will have a LOT to say about it in his review.

As we mentioned earlier, another manufacturer is introducing an integrated stove; stay tuned for our report on another “hot” product that was quietly developing while our attention was focused on MSR.

Specifications and Features

  • Manufacturer: MSR (http://msrcorp.com/)
  • Product: Reactor Stove (available February 2007)
  • Type: Integrated cooking system
  • Fuel: Canister fuel only
  • What’s Included: Burner base, pot and lid, handle
  • Weight: 21 oz (595 g)
  • Features: Heat exchanger attached to bottom of cook pot completely encloses a radiant burner, internal regulator equalizes fuel pressure, piezo-electric ignition
  • MSRP: $150

Performance

  • Boil 1 liter of water in 3 minutes (full canister)
  • Boil 1 liter of water in 3.5 min (end of canister life)
  • Boil 2.8 liters from 1 ounce of fuel
  • Boil 22 liters of water from a single 8 ounce canister of fuel.

National Geographic Debuts “National Parks Explorer 3D” (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Update to CD-based Trails Illustrated national parks maps

National Geographic Debuts “National Parks Explorer 3D”
New Electronic Version of Trails Illustrated for National Parks

NatGeo National Parks - 1
National Geographic’s National Parks Explorer 3D is a long awaited update to their National Parks CD-based version of Trails Illustrated maps. The software is based on an easy to use version of the Topo! 4.0 engine. It’s a steal at $50 for 25 of the most popular national parks.

I still use my nearly 10 year old National Geographic 50 National Parks CD-based maps-as recently as last month for a Shenandoah National Park trip. It has accurate trails, usage regulations, park infrastructures and other essential information for trip planning that the 1:24,000 series USGS topographic maps do not. But the 50 National Parks CD maps and software are dated and their information is less accurate than it was 10 years ago. The support software to read and manipulates the maps is equally dated.

NatGeo National Parks - 2
For the best of all worlds use the National Parks Explorer 3D Trails Illustrated Maps for trails and park info in conjunction with the 1:2400 scale National Geographic Topo! State series maps for topographic detail.

Next month, National Geographic will publish “National Parks Explorer 3D,” an interactive, electronic version of their Trails Illustrated National Park Maps. It will contain a the newest and most-up-to-data Trails Illustrated maps for 25 of the most popular national parks and a wealth of additional travel and recreational information. The software is based on their new Topo! 4.0 engine. It has all the power of Topo! 4.0 but with much easier to use tools [we hope to see these in Topo! 4.1]. For instance the route tool automatically snaps to and precisely follows trails. Waypoints are automatically added as you draw routes. There is a new sophisticated print preview that makes printing custom maps about 10x easier than Topo! 4.0. There is an accompanying PDF file with the map legend, park regulations, contact number, and additional travel and recreational information for the area. While I think it is a bit gimmicky, it has a viewing tool that allows you to view your route in 3D as if you were flying over it in a helicopter. This helps you visualize just how steep that upcoming pass is.

Included Parks

  • Acadia, ME
  • Arches, UT
  • Big Bend, TX
  • Bryce Canyon, UT
  • Canyonlands, UT
  • Death Valley, CA
  • Glacier/Waterton, MT/Aberta
  • Grand Canyon, AZ
  • Grand Teton, WY
  • Great Smoky Mountains, TN/TC
  • Isle Royale, MI
  • Joshua Tree, CA
  • Kings Canyon, CA
  • Mt. Rainier, WA
  • North Cascades, WA
  • Olympic, WA
  • Redwood, WA
  • Rocky Mountain, CO
  • Sequoia, CA
  • Shenandoah, VA
  • Theodore Roosevelt, ND
  • Yellowstone, WY/MT
  • Yosemite, CA
  • Zion, UT

Komperdell Carbon Fiber Featherlite Fixed Length Trekking Poles (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

A 4.3 ounce trekking pole from Komperdell with straps and ultralite carbide Alpine tips for only $100

The Featherlite Carbon trekking poles are new from Komperdell and fall in their Alpine line of using the same grips found on their top-rated C3 Duolock adjustable poles. Add light and stiff carbon fixed-length shafts and ultralight Alpine press-fit tips and you’ve got a 4.3 ounce (bpl measured-120cm length) fixed length trekking pole.

These poles (due out in Winter, 2006) are not the lightest fixed-length carbon poles on the market; the Gossamer Gear Lightrek, and Titanium Goat poles, Bozeman Mountain Works STIX PRO, have them beat by over an ounce. However, they beat each pole in one way or another:

  • Much stiffer than the Gossamer Gear Lightrek poles and with straps
  • More finished than the Titanium Goat poles- contoured grips with straps and better tips
  • A full $180 cheaper than the STIX PRO poles

The Komperdell Featherlite Carbon poles are the first fixed-length carbon poles with contoured grips and straps that are in the same ballpark as the custom poles listed above- and at a great price. We can’t wait to get these out in the field!

Komperdell Carbon Fiber Fixed Length Trekking Poles (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The ultralight Alpine tips feature carbide tips, a locking mechanism for press-fit baskets, and little else.

Features and Specifications

  • Available Winter, 206
  • Comes in 110-135 cm lengths (in 5 cm increments)
  • 4.3 ounces per pole (120 cm length without baskets)
  • Carbide flextip
  • Technically an alpine ski pole but perfect for backpacking
  • Approximately $100

Komperdell Carbon Fiber Fixed Length Trekking Poles (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
Komperdell’s Clemens Kopal showing off the upcoming Komperdell Bamboo poles. While they have classic looks, they’re actually modern carbon fiber poles with a natural bamboo overlay, leather grips with EVA foam underneath, and fur-lines straps.

For those looking for the most distinguished poles around, check out the Komperdell Bamboo fixed-length poles. Starting with the carbon fiber shafts found on the Featherlite poles, they add a natural bamboo finish and a leather grip and strap. The result is a pole that is as stiff and vibration-damping as a modern carbon fiber pole but in a look that is distinctly classic.

Komperdell Carbon Fiber Fixed Length Trekking Poles (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 3
Bamboo models will include laquered bamboo finish with black leather grip and leather strap (left) and natural finish with brown leather grip and fur-lined strap (right).

Available in Winter 2007 (yes- over a year away), the Bamboo poles may be available in two finishes- one in a natural bamboo finish with a brown leather grip and a fur-lined strap, and the other in a lacquered bamboo finish with black leather grips and matching leather straps.

Komperdell Carbon Fiber Fixed Length Trekking Poles (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 4
The adjustable Bamboo pole will have a carbon/bamboo top section with lower sections from the top-rated Komperdell C3.

At 6.4 ounces for the 125 cm length and 6.5 ounces for the 135 cm length (bpl measured), these will not be the lightest poles around. However, they certainly have the most class and will have a reasonable price of approximately $110. They will be available in 110-135cm lengths.

An adjustable model is also in the works that uses the bamboo-coated carbon fiber for the upper section and standard C3 Duolock carbon sections for the lowers.

GoLite Ultra Series Backpacks (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

GoLite’s new backpack lineup for 2007 expands on the success of the Jam with new designs, colors, and smarter feature sets.

GoLite has re-designed their entire backpack line for 2007. Say bye-bye to the Infinity, Perspective, Speed, Race, Trek, Gust, and their brethren. Also going is GoLite’s SilLite fabric, which did not have enough abrasion resistance.

I would have to say that GoLite’s present pack line is a conglomeration of hits and misses. The Infinity and Jam were hits, but many of the others did not fare as well. GoLite’s goal with their new packs is to make them light AND durable, and to get the details right in terms of features and comfort. I am personally very impressed with the new packs; they incorporate a lot of nice improvements with little or no weight gain – exactly what I would like to see.

The new lineup will consist of nine packs in three groups. The Ultra group (presented here) is their very lightest packs; the Adrenaline group is adventure racing packs, and the Venture group is full-featured internal frame packs. All of their new packs are lighter than most of the competition, and all but one (the Ion) is available in both men’s and women’s specific versions.

GoLites New Backpack Lineup for 2007: Ultra Series (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The diminutive Ion at 9 ounces and 1,500 cubic inches can be used as a SuperUltraLight backpack. This minimalist pack has a water-resistant top zipper access, spacer mesh shoulder straps, sternum strap, and webbing hipstrap. There are no outside pockets, but it does have a hydration tube opening. MSRP will be $50.

GoLites New Backpack Lineup for 2007: Ultra Series (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 2
The most significant pack in the Ultra group is the Jam2, which as the name implies is a re-design of the Jam pack. The Jam has shrunk slightly from 3,200 to 3,000 cubic inches (size M) and has lost 2 ounces of weight (now 19 ounces). The shoulder straps are more comfortable spacer mesh and Brock foam, the side pockets are now angled for easier access and made of a stretch mesh, and the frontpanel access zipper is water-resistant. It has a drawcord and top strap closure system. Besides these bigger changes, many details of the Jam2 have been improved. MSRP is $100.

GoLites New Backpack Lineup for 2007: Ultra Series (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 3
The new Pinnacle pack at 4,000 cubic inches and 23 ounces is simply a larger version of the Jam2. MSRP is $130.

GoLites New Backpack Lineup for 2007: Ultra Series (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 4
A clever feature of the new Jam2 and Pinnacle packs is their ComPacktor system, which is a simple clip and loop on the bottom of the pack that works with the side compression straps to reduce pack volume as much as two-thirds.

Here is the upshot of the new GoLite Ultra packs, as I see it right now. The Ion is elegant in its simplicity, but lacks functionality compared to lighter SUL packs from Fanatic Fringe, Gossamer Gear, and Mountain Laurel Designs. It’s simple, durable, and probably comfortable, but the total lack of outside pockets really limits it. There’s not even a place to put a water bottle! The Jam2 is the standout. At 3,000 cubic inches, it hits a sweet spot for ultralight backpacking, and lots of improvements make a great pack even better. The Pinnacle is basically a better Gust. The volume and weight are similar to the old Gust, and the details from the Jam give it a nicer feature set.

Primus MicronStove Ti 2.5 (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Your old 3 ounce canister stove weighing you down? Talk to Primus.

Overview

Using lighter materials and stripping away unneeded features, Primus unveils a lighter version of their Micron stove that appears to be the lightest canister stove currently available.

The new MicronStove Ti 2.5 is constructed primarily of titanium and aluminum. The original 3.4oz Primus Micron stood out due to its compact folded size and unique lever-operated piezoelectric ignition. The MicronStove Ti 2.5 dispenses with the piezo igniter, and replaces heavier steel parts with re-designed components made from the lighter metals. For example, the older wire legs are now stamped titanium pieces with serrations on top to improve pot support.

Primus MicronStove Ti 2.5 (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The stove folded for storage. Without the igniter, it’s now more compact than ever.

I did not have an opportunity to fire up the prototype unit I saw at the show, but I was allowed to weigh it. In spite of the “2.5” in its name, and its brochure’s claimed 2.4oz weight, the prototype had an actual measured weight of 2.2oz. If production units can maintain this weight, this would make it the lightest commercially available canister stove, beating the 2.5oz Snow Peak GigaPower Titanium Manual, 2.7oz Coleman F1 Ultralight, and 2.7oz Vargo Jet-Ti Stove. Judging solely from its specifications, I expect performance to be comparable to the older model.

Specifications and Features

  • Dimensions in use: 3.5 in high x 5 in wide (9 x 13 cm)
  • Dimensions stored: 2.5 in high x 2.8 in wide x 2.3 in thick (6 x 7 x 6 cm)
  • Heat Output: 7500 BTU/hr (claimed)
  • Measured Weight: 2.2oz (62g) (prototype)
  • MSRP: $65

Universal Adapter Carport Power Charger (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

A portable 12-volt power pack to recharge your portable electronics.

Universal Adapter Carport Power Charger (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
The Universal Adapter Carport charger shown sealed and open but empty. This battery-pack is a portable 12-volt power source weighing about 10 ounces when loaded.

In an age where portable electronic devices are starting to play a more significant role in backcountry travel whether strictly for pleasure, aids to navigation, journaling, or communications they all have one serious drawback: they require power. More and more of these devices rely solely on proprietary rechargeable battery technology so you do not have the option of merely swapping batteries in and out. Therefore, having a reliable way to recharge your devices has become more important and it is likely that this ztrend will continue.

Their are two basic approaches to this issue: solar chargers and battery-pack chargers. Solar charger have the singular advantage of access to a nearly inexhaustible energy supply from the Sun. But that energy source is fickle and solar cells are notorious for only working in optimal or near optimal conditions. Battery-pack chargers provide a steady reliable source of power, but once the batteries in the pack are depleted you will not be able to recharge anything and you will be carrying useless dead weight. Which road you travel will be influenced by what you need to recharge and how often you expect to have to do it.

Universal Adapter is entering this market with a nifty battery-pack based charger. At first glance it seems like a rather hefty object to take along on a trip as it is designed to hold 8 AA size batteries. The pack becomes a 12 volt power supply from which you can plug a car charger to recharge your electronic gizmos. With the use of high capacity batteries, they recommend using 2300 milliamp hour or higher, the Carport charger can recharge most cell phones 3 to 5 times, PDAs and iPods 2 to 3 times, and perhaps most important to the backcountry travelers GPS units 2 to 3 times.

The unit is made of PC/ABS plastics and appears to be durable. It weighs 2.8 ounces without batteries. Batteries vary in weight with alkaline batteries weighing the most, followed by NiMH,, and lithium batteries being the lightest. A quick and dirty calculation suggest that the Carport charger would weigh approximately 9.4 ounces when filled with 8 NiMH batteries.

Is the Carport a viable alternative? For many trips it could well be. I have taken solar chargers on trips that while lighter also did not provide a reliable source of power to recharge the devices I had with me. Bringing extra batteries was not practical since even the after-market non-branded version would have cost in excess of $60. While I do not know if the Carport would have worked, none of us has had a chance to test one yet, if it does it would certainly have been worth it on medium length trip from 5 to 15 days in length.

Features and Specifications

  • A portable 12-volt power supply that can be used to recharge portable electronics such as iPods, GPS receivers, PDAs, and cell phones.
  • Weighs 2.8 ounces without batteries.
  • Uses 8 AA batteries.
  • Mates with a car charger to recharge your portable devices.
  • Can fully charge most cell phones 3 to 5 times; PDAs, iPods, and GPS receivers 2 to 3 times.
  • WOrks with non-rechargeable and rechargeable batteries; 2300 MAh capacity or high are recommended.

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW

This carbon fiber snow shovel is the lightest, most versatile, and most beautiful on the market… but also the most expensive.

Introduction

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 1

At just 16.4 ounces, the Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel is the lightest on the market. It is also highly versatile featuring a full-size blade, foam grip, an extendable shaft, left or right hand grip, and an innovative hoe position for scraping. In soft snow, it even passes as an ice axe in a pinch. At $159.95 it is also the most expensive shovel on the market. So, is it worth all that gold for this piece of carbon?

What’s Good

  • Full carbon fiber construction is light, stiff, and beautiful
  • Steel reinforcement protects the leading edge of the blade
  • Blade is strong enough for rain-soaked frozen Washington snow
  • Angled handle gives a more powerful position than standard flat handles and easily switches for left or right handed use
  • Hoe position is extremely useful for smoothing tent platforms or scraping out tight snow cave entrances
  • Padded grip is comfortable and non-slip
  • At just over 1 pound, it is the lightest extendable shovel on the market

What’s Not So Good

  • Steel reinforcement doesn’t protect the corners of the blade, leaving the carbon fiber susceptible to damage – especially from metal objects like snow stakes
  • Spring adjustment buttons sometimes stick (but are typically easy to repair)
  • Carbon fiber blade is strong but more prone to chipping than aluminum or Lexan
  • Narrower, curved blade is great for digging but not as good for cutting snow blocks as wider, flatter blades
  • Very expensive at $159.95

Specifications

  Year/Model

2006 Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel

  Materials

Carbon fiber blade with steel edge reinforcement, carbon fiber shaft with EVA foam grip and plastic handle junction

  Weight

16.4 oz (464 g) measured weight; 14.8 oz (419 g) manufacturer claimed weight

  Blade Dimensions

Width: 8.1 in (21 cm)
Length: 11.0 in (28 cm)

  Shovel Length

26.5 – 35.5 in (67 – 90 cm)

  MSRP

$159.95

Performance

The Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel features a beautiful carbon fiber blade with a steel-reinforced edge and molded ridges for strength and rigidity. The extendable shaft is also carbon fiber and locks with spring-loaded push buttons. When compact it locks into a right-handed angle but easily switches for left or right-handed use when extended.

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 2
The carbon blade is reinforced with a steel insert along its front edge and is strong enough to pound through Washington’s frozen rain-soaked snow.

The handle is also carbon fiber and attaches to the main shaft with a plastic elbow. It is angled about 30 degrees up for an ergonomic and powerful hand position. A long EVA foam grip on the main shaft is comfortable and anti-slip.

An innovative hoe function, which can be used for scraping, is achieved by removing the blade and fixing it to the hand grip.

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 3

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 4

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 5a

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 6

The Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel is very versatile, quickly adapting between compact (left top), extended hoe (top right), or extended left or right-handed grips (bottom left and right) Further, you can remove the blade for a passable soft-snow ice axe.

Despite its light weight, the carbon Komperdell shovel is very strong. I used it to dig snow caves, tent platforms, and avalanche pits with solid results. Even when hoisting extra-large blocks of rain-soaked snow or smashing into glacial ice, the Avalanche Carbon Shovel held up well and showed minimal deflection. In situations where I’ve bent aluminum shovels, this ultralight shovel had no problems.

While the blade is a good width for most applications, its bend, width, and ridges aren’t the best for carving large snow blocks for an igloo or building large kickers for snowboarding. As an all-around shovel for digging avalanche pits, building snow caves, or building tent platforms, the medium-sized blade is a good compromise.

The hoe function is innovative and useful. It only takes seconds to remove the blade and attach it to the handle to set up the hoe, which can be used for scraping or dragging snow. I found this very useful for smoothing tent platforms, moving large amounts of powder snow, or clearing tight snow cave entrances. I love the hoe set-up and use it almost as much as the shovel.

Komperdell claims that the Avalanche Carbon Shovel can be used as an ice axe when the blade is removed. I tested this in the field and found that it worked quite well in soft snow conditions. Because the “pick” is round and blunted, it is definitely not for icy conditions and isn’t an ice axe replacement. Still, it worked great for self arrest and glissading in winter or soft spring conditions.

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 7

Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel REVIEW - 8

The hoe function is excellent for moving powder snow or smoothing tent platforms while the shovel digs a quick snow cave or avalanche pit.

Despite being strong enough to handle heavy snow loads and chipping away at hard, crusty ice, the carbon blade is susceptible to sharp metal objects such as imbedded snow stakes. While the steel reinforced edge had no problem smashing into stakes while digging them out (except for some clear coat chips), the rounded edges of the carbon blade are not protected and chipped a bit. While this chipping has not affected the overall strength of the blade, extra care is needed when digging out frozen metal objects.

Assessment

At $159.95, the Komperdell Avalanche Carbon Shovel is the lightest, most versatile, and most beautiful shovel on the market, but also the most expensive. With most shovels coming in at less than $100, it’s hard to justify the extra expense of the Avalanche Carbon. For the price, though, it’s possible to drop five or more ounces of weight while adding a hoe and a passable ice axe.

What’s Unique

This is the lightest extendable shovel on the market. Further, its hoe position and passable in-a-pinch ice axe option make it the most versatile of shovels.

Recommendations for Improvement

This is a great shovel. I do offer the following recommendations for improvement:

  1. Wrap the steel reinforcement further along the edge of the shovel to provide more protection for the carbon fiber.
  2. Offer a less expensive aluminum version of the shovel for those that want the versatility but want to save some cash.

Before The Chaos: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006)

Before the chaos of the Outdoor Retailer Show we get ready with the Open Air Demo.

Before The Chaos: Open Air Demo (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006) - 1
Talking with the founder of Pakboats/Scansport. There are more inflatable and foldable canoes and kayaks here this year.

The Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2006 officially begins in a few short hours. With the start of ORSM’06 the real chaos of the event will commence. From that chaos will emerge a bevy of exciting products for the ultralight backcountry traveller as well as new insights into the direction our favorite industry is going. But before we spread out to track down these precious nuggets of information some of the Backpacking Light staff attending the show were able to explore the Open Air Demo first.

The Open Air Demo is held along the shore of Willard Bay several miles north of downtown Salt Lake City. Today the waters were calm and warm, and the skies clear, with a brilliant sun beaming down upon us. The atmosphere at this demo day was relaxed with several dozen vendors showing off their pride and joy: mainly, canoes and kayaks. We let ourselves become caught up in the excitement of testing boats from the kevlar canoes made by Bell to the intriguing pedal powered, recumbent bicycle style boats by Wave Walker (we all studiously avoided the H3 Hummer…).

This is a time to get into the swing of things and in some cases make new contacts or re-acquaint yourself with people you have met before. And with any luck perhaps come across a diamond in the rough that you would otherwise miss amongst the multitude of exhibitors at the Salt Palace.

This year a second day was added to the Open Air Demo and that has enhanced the camp-like feeling of this event. Vendors, retailers, and media are all fairly relaxed – the calm before the storm. While I personally did not find any diamonds here my belief that there will be products of interest to us all was confirmed. There is product buzz already about what’s to come tomorrow.

Trail Designs Vari-Vent Windshield Spotlight Review

A neat solution to windshields getting out of control.

Overview

As Will Rietveld shows in his two articles on windshields Part 1 and Part 2, running a stove without a windshield can be, at best, a good way of using a lot of fuel, and at worst a total exercise in frustration. But finding a suitable windshield for your stove can be difficult. Most commercial butane/propane and liquid fuel stoves do come with an aluminium foil windshield, but these ones are usually fairly heavy. For instance, a couple I have here are made with 0.23 mm (0.0092″) soft aluminium foil, and a 6″ high unit weighs 76 gram (2.68 ounce). They are just a strip of foil with a large roll-over at the edges (5 – 7 mm or about 1/4″) and a couple of corners cut off to let the fuel hose pass through. One could wish for something better and lighter.

An obvious alternative is to make your own windshield, but this is not so easy. Finding suitable aluminium foil at your local hardware store seems difficult or impossible: mostly the stuff they stock is far too heavy. The aluminium dampcourse I can buy in Australia is 0.27 mm (0.0106″) thick: even heavier. You can use foil from a disposable baking dish, but usually the dish is too short. You can use cooking foil, folded several times, but this is really only suitable for small windshields under about 3″ in height. Will has suggestions for other designs, but they may not be what you want either.

The Trail Designs windshields are made from aluminium foil only 0.14 mm (0.0055″) thick. They come in three nominal heights: 4″, 6″ and 8″, although actual heights are 112 mm (4.41″), 162 mm (6.38″) and 200 mm (7.87″). The length is about 710 mm (28″). This is enough to make a complete wrap-around windshield of just over about 210 mm (8.5″) diameter, which is distinctly larger than most 2-man cooking pots. For instance, the AntiGravityGear 2 quart pot is somewhat less than 150 mm (6″) diameter, while the 1 quart GSI Bugaboo pot [link to this] is right on 150 mm (6″) diameter. This means the Trail Designs windshield in complete wrap-around mode would have a gap between the Bugaboo pot and the windshield of about 30 mm (1.2″), which is probably slightly more than you need. Yes, the edges are rolled over for strength and safety, but only by about 1 – 2 mm (about 1/16″).

Even so, this is hardly something to get very excited about. It’s just a strip of aluminium foil, after all! But Trail Designs have a patent-pending feature which convinced me that the Vari-Vent units are a step forwards. Before I explain what this is, let’s look at what normally happens when you unroll your foil windshield and try to put it around your stove and pot. You get it just right, and sproing! It rolls up or springs away or generally misbehaves. This is bad enough, but if there is some wind around the behaviour of the very light bit of foil becomes even more unpredictable. This is a pain. Various solutions involving tent pegs have been promoted, but they don’t seem to have caught on, and are hard to use when your stove is on sheet rock anyhow. I have tried other light materials, but the corners kept getting in the flame and burning … and my wife complained about the smell. The problem seems to be that the ends of the windshield are free to go anywhere they want.

Trail Designs Vari-Vent Windshield SPOTLIGHT REVIEW - 1
The Trail Designs variable vent, opening outwards

There is a simple solution to this wayward behaviour which works anywhere, and weighs nothing: join the ends together firmly so the windshield sits in a stable solid ring. Anyone who has tried this will agree that it works, but with ordinary windshields it leaves the stove without an air inlet. This is not good, and can lead to poor performance and carbon monoxide production (I have been able to measure the latter). You can punch holes around the bottom edge of the windscreen (as found in some other commercial windshields), but different conditions seem to need different numbers of holes in different positions, which can be awkward in practice. You can raise the windshield up on a few stones, but this seems to be a bit unstable at times and very hard to adjust. We need a better way to control the air getting in which is stable and does not add weight.

Enter the Trail Designs solution. They have punched three-sided holes right around the bottom edge of their aluminium foil Vari-Vent windscreen. This is best explained by referring you to the picture to the left. The flap can be adjusted to do anything from completely closed to block off the wind to wide open to allow lots of air supply. This is terribly simple, and you can adjust this so easily in the field. You can close off the flaps on the windward side and leave open the ones elsewhere, and you can adjust the airflow as much as you wish. The instruction leaflet suggests you don’t do this while the stove is running, but it is easy enough if you are careful. Have the flaps poking outwards, and then a small stick can be used to adjust them. It’s best to hold the top of the windshield down while you do this, preferably with another stick as the air and the metal there may be a little hot! Just don’t get burnt. Now you have a completely adjustable but stable windshield.

Trail Designs Vari-Vent Windshield SPOTLIGHT REVIEW - 2
The folded join from above

How do you join the ends together to make this into a stable ring? You can use various sorts of paper clips of course, but these are never entirely satisfactory in my experience. I find that folding the two ends back by about 1/4″, one inwards and the other outwards, gives me a join which is really secure and quite simple to connect in the field. This is illustrated to the right. I hook them together and give them a bit of a squeeze. Note that I haven’t creased the fold down hard: you shouldn’t do this as you need to leave some room inside the fold for the other end to fit. On the other hand, you do need to crease it a little to stop it from falling apart when you shuffle the pot and the stove around in the field. Fortunately, the hook joint resists a lot of my clumsiness. (You can of course do this with other brands of windshields too.)

Which height do you need? Many alcohol stoves are only about 50 mm (2″) high with whatever pot stand they are using, so the 4″ windshield is be ideal for these. Granted, cooking foil is even lighter, but I have found that cooking foil disintegrates over time, and on a long trip this can be a pain. Equally, the extremely light and flimsy cooking foil windshields are much harder to control, while the complete circle of one of these is far more stable.

The 6″ units may be useful with some remote tank liquid fuel stoves, especially the ones 4 inches high or more. The 6″ windshield should give a couple of inches cover over the side of the pot. You need to make some arrangement to pass the fuel line through the ring – it is often easy enough to to use one of the existing vent holes for this. This will depend a bit on the stove and a ‘comfortable’ height for the fuel line. In the picture below the red arrow shows the fuel line going through one of the vents. You could also use an 8″ unit with such a stove if you expect to have to handle really high winds, but I doubt this would be really needed. Since liquid fuel stoves usually have the control valve on the fuel tank, which is outside the windscreen, adjustment is easy.

I have found the 8″ unit really convenient with an upright canister stove. The pot rests on such a stove are usually about 150 mm (6 in) above the ground, so once again the windshield will cover a couple of inches of the side of the pot. A higher windshield might protect the pot even more from cooling winds, but it would weigh more and I don’t think it is necessary.

Trail Designs Vari-Vent Windshield SPOTLIGHT REVIEW - 3
Field use of an 8″ Vari-Vent windscreen with a Coleman Ti Fyrestorm stove – the windscreen is higher than needed.

What length do you need? Well, Trail Designs supply the Vari-Vent windshield in a single fairly long length of 28 inches, but a couple of inches at each end is clear of holes. You can chop short bits off each end and still have room for the hook joint, to make it have exactly the clearance you want on your favorite cooking pot. If you are using a smaller one-man cooking pot you may want to chop off a bit more than the little bit at the ends. In this case you can chop a longer length off one end by including a hole (or two). Just rememebr to leave about 1/2 inch for the hook joint.

Of course, once you wrap one of these windshields right around an upright gas stove you can’t access the control handle. This also applies to the new Coleman Fyrestorm Ti remote-canister stove, where the control valve is at the stove. I solved this problem very easily by cutting a neat small hole in the windshield just where the control handle on my upright stove would be. The picture here shows this hole with a blue arrow. This was still a little awkward with my SnowPeak GST-100 stove as the handle was quite short, so I made a slightly longer handle with some Ti wire from the Backpacking Light store. Since the original handle was steel, the new and longer handle was actually lighter. The hole I made is rather small: it might be better to make a slightly larger hole to access the control – the stove will need air after all.

The windshield in this picture is actually much higher than I needed. I was using it because I was also testing out the new Coleman Fyrestorm Ti stove at the time. The control handle for it has fitted through one of the vent holes, marked by the green arrow. Of course, one or two extra small hole hardly makes any difference.

Can an ultra-lightweight walker justify carrying such a windshield? If what you have is a very small low alcohol stove, maybe not. In that case some cooking foil, renewed every few trips, may be enough. But if the stove you are using is slightly higher the cooking foil idea doesn’t work that well, and the weight of one of these windshields can be justified. How so? Well, look again at some of the results from Will’s research. When a stove has to struggle in a wind to bring water to the boil, it uses more fuel – in some cases lots more fuel. Will writes “In my alcohol stove tests, I found a 38-320 percent increase in fuel consumption to boil one pint of water in a 12 mph wind, and that was WITH a windscreen.” That fuel has weight. My own experiments over the years suggested that I had halved the weight of fuel carried by using a windshield and a lid. Over just a few days the extra fuel required to run a bare stove in the wind can easily be more than the weight of one of these windshields. A smart walker carries and uses a windshield – with any stove.

What is the best way of packing one of these away? Commercial units (Trail Designs and others) seem to come folded up, but repeated folding will damage the foil, sooner or later. I prefer to smooth the foil out carefully as soon as I get it, and then to roll it around one of my water bottles and secure it there with a rubber band. If I lose the rubber band, it doesn’t matter.

Could the windshield be improved? Of course it could: it could be made out of even thinner (lighter) aluminium foil – but then it would have to be a harder alloy and we come back to the problems of availability. Or maybe it could be made from a different metal: hard stainless steel shim, or even titanium foil. However, you can be sure that these more exotic metals would make the windshields far more expensive!

Is the windshield perfect? Nothing ever is. The one problem I haven’t solved really well so far is how to light my stove inside such a circular windshield. When the windshield only covers three sides out of four I can come in on the fourth side with my butane lighter. But when the windshield covers a full circle I have to come in from above – and that risks scorching the hairs on the back of my hand. I have found two solutions for this so far. The first involves lifting the windshield up and out of the way while I light the stove. Fine, except in serious winds. The other is to erect the windshield as a 3/4 circle, light it, then join the ends up. This latter is more fiddly, and I have to watch out for the flames while making the join, but it does work reliably.

Trail Designs display these windshields on their web site www.traildesigns.com, but marketing is currently done through the Anti Gravity Gear web site www.antigravitygear.com, where they are listed under Stoves.

Features and Specifications

Unit Height Weight MSRP
4″ 112 mm (4.41″) 32 g (1.13 oz) US$7.95
6″ 162 mm (6.38″) 44 g (1.55 oz) US$9.95
8″ 200 mm (7.87″) 54 g (1.90 oz) US$11.95

 

  • Typical length: 28″, enough for a diameter of 8.5″
  • Foil thickness: 0.14 mm (0.0055″)
  • Can be trimmed to length required
  • Can be joined into secure circles
  • Edges are rolled for strength and to avoid cuts
  • Easy to cut out holes for fuel lines and control handles
  • Can be folded up for packing, but best rolled around a smooth bottle

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW

Does the perfect frameless backpack exist? The Mountain Laurel Designs Prophet comes pretty darn close.

Introduction

The Mountain Laurel Designs SuperUltraLight Prophet packs have been revamped for 2006. The Prophet 20, Prophet 30, and Prophet 40 are replaced with the Prophet Pack, which now comes in sizes Small, Medium, and Large. That’s where the simplification ends, because each of the new packs has different specifications. With MLD packs, the size refers to the bag size, not the pack torso length. The torso length is custom with each order. I can unequivocally say that the Prophet is now my favorite frameless backpack, and in this review I explain why.

What’s Good

  • Right-sized for UltraLight and SuperUltraLight backpacking
  • Very well designed and constructed
  • Removable included accessories
  • Large capacity front mesh pocket
  • Very useful optional sternum pocket
  • Very comfortable to carry with up to 20 pound loads

What’s Not So Good

  • Front mesh pocket could be taller
  • Top Y-strap easily gets twists in it

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Mountain Laurel Designs (www.mountainlaureldesigns.com)

  Year/Model

2006 Prophet, size Large

  Style

Frameless, top loading, drawcord closure with top strap

  Sizes

Three bag sizes available, torso length is custom to order

  Volume

Small 1,800 ci (29.5 L), Medium 2,100 ci (34.4 L), Large (2,600 ci (42.6 L)

  Weight

Size Large tested, 6.1 oz (173 g) measured weight without accessories, manufacturer’s specification 6 oz (170 g). Mfr. Specification for size Small is 5 oz (142 g), and for size Medium is 4 oz (113 g)

  Fabrics

Sizes Small and Large are 1.35 oz/yd2 silnylon, size Medium is 0.97 oz/yd2 Spinntex (spinnaker cloth); backpanel is 1.9 oz/yd2 coated ripstop nylon

  Features

Detachable waist strap with whistle, detachable sternum strap, detachable bungee system, detachable water bottle holders, wrap-around front mesh pocket with elastic binding, 2.5 inch ( cm) wide padded shoulder straps, one ice axe loop, drawcord top closure with Y-top strap

  Included Accessories

Waist strap (1 oz), sternum strap (0.75 oz), bungee system (1 oz) , 2 elastic water bottle holders (0.5 oz)

  Options

Sternum pocket with water-resistant zipper (0.5 oz/$20)

  Volume To Weight Ratio

426.2 ci/oz size (based on 2,600 ci and a measured weight of 6.1 oz)

  Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity

20 lb (9.07 kg) estimated maximum comfortable load an average person can carry all day in this pack

  Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio

52.6 (based on a 20 lb load and measured weight of 0.38 lb)

  MSRP

Small is $100, Medium is $110, Large is $125

Performance

Before I launch into its features and usability, I want to clarify the differences between the different sizes available. The current size Medium is the old Prophet 30. It is made of spinnaker fabric and comes with a full set of detachable accessories. Sizes Small and Large are made of more durable silnylon and have beefier hardware. Size Small is actually a kid’s pack, and has two torso adjustment bungees attached to the shoulder straps that provide for 2 to 3 inches of torso growth.

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW - 1
Views of the new MLD Prophet pack in size Large. The front (top left) has a large wrap-around mesh pocket with an elastic binding that attaches to the top Y-strap. The backpanel view (top right) shows its wide padded shoulder straps and attachments for water bottles. MLD’s “Prophet Pocket” is a silnylon sternum pouch that attaches to the sternum strap. The side view (bottom, left) shows the bungee compression that is included with the pack. The top view (bottom right) shows the drawcord closure and Y-strap.

Although this review is focused on the Prophet as a SuperUltraLight backpack, the application depends on the pack size chosen. Size Small at 1,800 cubic inches is the same size as MLD’s Revelation pack, and could be just the right size for a sub-4 pound base weight fastpacking trip. In size Medium (2,100 cubic inches) the Prophet is clearly targeted at SUL backpacking. However, in size Large (2,600 cubic inches), the Prophet is small and light enough to use for SUL trips but has enough volume to easily handle multi-day ultralight backpacking trips with a 5-8 pound base weight.

It’s also important to note that the MLD pack sizes refer to the volume of the bag, not the torso fit range. The pack torso is made to order. So, when you purchase a MLD pack you are essentially getting a custom pack. To illustrate the point, the size Large I tested was supposed to be constructed of silnylon, but it came in .97 Spinntex (spinnaker cloth). Bottom line, Ron Bell at MLD likes to deviate from the specifications, and will readily sew a pack to fit your preferences.

With SUL backpacks, the contest is to get it as light as possible, and MLD is on the cutting edge of lightness. One way to make the base pack as light as possible is to make several components detachable, so they can be excluded from the pack weight. MLD craftily did that with the Prophet, designing the waist strap, sternum strap, bottle holders, and bungee attachment system as detachable components. MLD also claimed that the drawcord closure is “detachable” (but I didn’t buy into that; it’s included in my measured pack weight). The advantage of this approach is the user can configure the pack exactly the way he or she wants it. My measured weight of all the accessories (including the optional sternum pocket) is 3.2 ounces, so the pack in size Large with all accessories and options adds up to 9.3 ounces (or 6.0 ounces when stripped of all accessories).

My preference was to use the Prophet fully accessorized. The additional components added very little weight (3.2 ounces) and added a lot of utility in terms of stability, comfort, and ease of use. I used one bottle bungee on the left shoulder strap, and found it extremely convenient to keep a 20-ounce bottle of water handy to grab without taking the pack off. I also loved the optional 8-inch x 8-inch silnylon sternum pouch which attaches to the sternum strap. It has a water-resistant zipper and kept a bunch of essentials (notebook and pencil, map, snacks, water treatment, etc.) handy, again without having to take the pack off.

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW - 2
Although you can strip the Prophet down to 6 ounces, I really liked the accessories included with the pack, namely the sternum and waist straps, bottle bungees on the shoulder straps, and the optional “Prophet Pocket”. The pack weight with these accessories is 8.3 ounces, 9.3 ounces if you add the bungee attachment system to the front of the pack.

I tested the Prophet on four multi-day backpacks with total pack weight ranging from 14.5 to 19.8 pounds. I found that the sternum and waist straps definitely improved the pack’s stability on off-trail explorations where I didn’t want the pack to shift when I was working my way down ledges or crossing sliderock fields. The Prophet was surprisingly comfortable to carry, in spite of the fact its torso length of 18 inches was a little short for me (see top photo, unfortunately I didn’t get to specify the torso length I wanted). Its weight carrying capacity was helped by its 2.5 inch wide padded shoulder straps. With the pack body tightly packed, I found that I could shift approximately half of the weight to my hips via the pack’s “virtual frame”.

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW - 3
The Prophet’s shoulder straps (left) are 2.5 inches wide and adequately padded with 0.4 inch thick foam and spacer mesh. The right photo shows details of the bottom shoulder strap attachment and detachable waist strap.

I’m a big fan of outside mesh pockets on a frameless pack, and I especially liked the wrap-around front mesh pocket on the Prophet. It holds a lot of stuff and keeps it secure with a strong elastic drawcord and cordlock at the top. My preference would be for a taller front mesh pocket so it would hold more yet.

The bungee attachment system provided with the Prophet can be attached to either the upper or lower front of the pack. I didn’t use it, but it provides some additional attachment capability for a wet tent or poncho, or carrying a sleeping pad or clothing on the outside of the pack. The top Y-strap snaps into a buckle at the top center of the mesh pocket to provide some top compression and help hold gear under the bungee system. The bungee attachment system also provides moderately effective volume compression for this smaller pack.

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW - 4
Included with the Prophet is a front bungee attachment system (1 ounce) that can be attached to the upper part of the pack (left) or over the front pocket (right). The upper attachment has more utility for attaching items to the outside of the pack and providing some volume compression.

I found the Prophet to be quite durable (with reasonable care) for a SUL pack. The spinnaker fabric used by MLD is very high quality and holds up well (Note: the specification for the size Large pack is silnylon, unless requested otherwise.) Also, the mesh used for the front mesh pocket is surprisingly durable for its light weight.

Mountain Laurel Designs 2006 Prophet Backpack REVIEW - 5
The mesh used for the front pocket is remarkably durable for its weight, but its not invincible.

Assessment

The MLD Prophet pack is very well designed and constructed. It’s just the right size for SUL mountain travel. The user can customize it to a large extent by ordering the pack with specific materials and sizing (fabric, pack torso length) and configuring it for each trip with detachable accessories (sternum strap, waist strap, bottle bungies, bungee attachment system). MLD’s “Prophet Pocket” (a sternum pocket) is extremely handy, and I strongly recommend getting it.

Although this review is focused on using the Prophet as a SUL backpack, in size Large it has plenty of room to serve as a multi-day ultralight backpack. The standard silnylon pack body is more durable and waterproof than spinnaker cloth (reviewed here), and weighs only 0.25 ounce more.

On the trail, the Prophet was a SUL star. It carried loads up to 20 pounds very comfortably and stably. Because of its versatility, comfort, and user-friendliness the Prophet has become my frameless pack of choice for backpacking with a base pack weight of 5-8 pounds. At $125 for size Large, it’s a good value considering the fact you’re getting a custom pack. The Prophet was also a standout in our SuperUltraLight Backpacks Review Summary.

What’s Unique

The Prophet pack comes with included detachable accessories so the user can configure the pack for each trip, or remove them to save weight.

Recommendations for Improvement

MLD has a winner with the Prophet pack. The only suggestion I have is to make the front mesh pocket a little taller.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW

Built for the gear-obsessed SUL crowd, the 3.2 ounce Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation pack is the lightest pack on the market while still offering a usable set of features. Further, it is the first commercially-available pack to be constructed of high-tech Cuben Fiber fabric. Impressive – yes, but how does it stand up to the rigors of off-trail hiking?

Introduction

The Revelation is an all-new SuperUltraLight (SUL) pack from Mountain Laurel Designs, a company known for pushing the limits of ultralight backpacking. Designed for only the most trim and focused kits, this 1,850 cubic inch (30.3 L) pack is simplistic but functional and weighs a scant 3.2 ounces. Further, it is the first pack available that is constructed of Cuben Fiber, a Spectra fiber and Mylar film laminate fabric that is used primarily for high-end sailboat sails.

What’s Good

  • The lightest 1,850 cubic inch pack on the market – only 3.2 ounces!
  • Perfectly sized for low volume sub-5 pound SUL loads
  • Functional outside front pocket and bungee system
  • Strong, waterproof, and wicked cool Cuben Fiber main bag
  • Beautiful craftsmanship and good reinforcements at critical areas
  • Optional removable accessories

What’s Not So Good

  • Quick release buckles are easily broken if cinched too hard (will be replaced with a stronger 5/8-inch buckle in production models)
  • Sewn on sternum strap is too short and too low
  • Cuben Fiber fabric, while strong, is not very puncture resistant (although according to MLD it’s more puncture resistant than normal spinnaker cloth)
  • Ice axe loop is too long
  • Ultralight materials need to be treated gently

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Mountain Laurel Designs (www.mountainlaureldesigns.com)

  Year/Model

2006 Revelation

  Style

Frameless, top loading, drawcord closure with top strap

  Sizes

One size, custom torso length

  Volume

1,850 ci (30.3 L) including outside pocket, 1,500 (24.6 L) main bag only

  Weight

3.2 oz (91 g) measured weight as tested without bungee system; manufacturer’s specification 2.8 oz (78 g) stripped

  Fabrics

Main pack body is Cuben Fiber (MLD calls it Spectralite .60), which is a spectra fiber and Mylar film laminate 0.60 oz/ yd2 (22 g/m2) custom made for Mountain Laurel Designs; pocket and drawstring trim are PU coated spinnaker cloth 0.85 oz/yd2 (33 g/m2), shoulder straps are PU coated spinnaker 0.85 oz/yd2 (33 g/m2) with 3D Mesh backed 3/8 in foam padding

  Features

Top-loading main pack bag with spectra drawstring top (removable), shoulder straps padded in shoulder area only, sternum strap (can be cut off), single outside pocket, single ice axe loop, single top compression strap

  Options

Included accessories are: bungee system [0.3 oz (8 g)], shoulder strap bungee set for water bottles [0.4 oz (11 g)]; a sternum pouch is available [0.7 oz (20 g), $15]; custom configurations also available such as extra shoulder padding, taller extension skirt, waist belt, etc.

  Volume To Weight Ratio

578.1 ci/oz size M/L (based on 1,850 ci and a measured weight of 3.2 oz, without options)

  Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity

12 lb (5.4 kg) estimated maximum comfortable load an average person can carry all day in this pack; manufacturer claim is 15 pounds (6.8 kg)

  Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio

60.0 (based on a 12 lb load and measured weight of 0.2 lb)

  MSRP

$95

Performance

Mountain Laurel Designs is a small company that has developed a reputation of pushing the limits of ultralight backpacking with its cutting edge designs. The all-new Revelation pack is proof of that claim. It’s the first pack constructed primarily of Cuben Fiber, a polyester film laminate sail material, which is sure to draw the attention of the most gear-obsessed ultralighter.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 1
The Revelation is a perfect size for SUL trips, such as this fastpack into Washington’s Alpine Lakes high country.

At just 1,850 cubic inches (30.3 liters), the Revelation is specifically focused on SUL trips where less volume is needed. Being experienced and obsessed with SUL backpacking, I found the volume to be more than adequate for my sub-5 pound loads. With my down quilt, spinnaker tarp and bivy, small stove, synthetic pullover, and minimal extra clothes and gear, I found the pack to have enough extra room inside for several day’s worth of food. The outside pocket snugly accommodates two 1 liter Platypus bottles as well as a map and small camera while the front bungee system will hold a torso pad, a rain jacket, and other items. An ice axe loop adds functionality for early season trips or off-trail adventures.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 2
The PU-coated spinnaker cloth outer pocket (left) is more abrasion resistant than the Cuben Fiber main pack and will hold up to two 1 liter Platypus bottles. The shoulder straps (right) are faced with the same spinnaker cloth. The backpanel is waterproof Cuben Fiber fabric, and kept my gear totally dry during sweaty summer hiking. The shoulder straps have attachment points for the optional sternum pouch.

At only 3.2 ounces the Mountain Laurel Designs pack is the lightest backpack on the market. And that is for a pack that includes an outside pocket, well-thought out reinforcements, a sternum strap, and padded shoulder straps. The included bungee system adds just 0.3 ounce to the pack’s weight and boosts carrying options.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 3
The two-inch wide padded shoulder straps (left) are comfortable for up to 12 pound loads. The shoulder strap adjusters (right) are quite strong and durable and are double looped so they can be tied to a fixed length in the field should buckle breakage occur.

The two-inch wide shoulder straps are comfortable when carrying loads up to 12 pounds but the lack of a waist belt makes loads beyond that range uncomfortable. The sternum strap should help with heavier loads but like the Mountain Laurel Designs Prophet 25 I reviewed last year; it is too low and too short to be usable for my tall, medium build frame. It is also non-adjustable. While I didn’t use the sternum strap, I also didn’t miss it; the shoulder straps fit quite comfortably. When stuffed, the main pack bag forms a round cylinder but it’s easily contoured using the “punching technique”. Simply fill the pack with soft items against your back, punch the back panel into a more flat shape, and you’re good to go.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 4
The sternum strap (left) is too low to be comfortable and too short to be very functional for my medium build. With a pair of scissors the sternum strap was easily removed, saving 0.2 ounce. The Revelation comes with removable shoulder strap bungees for attaching water bottles adventure racer style.

Cuben Fiber (which is a film, not a fabric) is very different from the silnylon and spinnaker cloth used in other SUL packs. According to Brian Hancock on www.SailNet.com: “Cuben Fiber is a much more complex means of creating fabric. For a start, it is made of many layers of untwisted filaments laid in a multitude of directions. Once the fabric has been engineered, it is loaded into an autoclave and baked under high heat and pressure until the individual filaments and film become one, making it extremely strong and stretch resistant for its weight….The process of making the ‘fabric’ is very labor intensive and therefore the cost of the raw fabric is expensive.”

Despite having a plastic shopping bag/waxed paper feel, the fabric is extremely strong and lightweight and has been used in sailboat racing since debuting (and winning) in the America’s Cup Race by America3 in 1993. While its tear resistance is many times higher than similar weight nylons, the downside to Cuben Fiber is its low abrasion resistance, making it a poor choice for ground cloths and bushwhacking packs. The material is typically bonded together with adhesive, resulting in a seam that is much stronger than sewn seams. A nice bonus with Cuben Fiber fabric is that it is much quieter and less “crinkly” than the spinnaker cloth used in other SUL packs.

The pack body of the Revelation pack is bonded in its main seam. At all locations where sewing is necessary, such as the outside pocket, it is both bonded and sewn. Special tape (technically Mylar backed tape with a PU adhesive and a polyester reinforcement grid) and backing material (heavy weave Kevlar with an adhesive) is used on both the inside and outside of the pack bag and sewn through at all stress points such as shoulder strap attachments, outside pocket corners and the bottom seam. These points are obviously bomber and proved to be robust enough to carry weights far beyond those recommended for the pack.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 5
The shoulder strap attachment is reinforced with a polyester grid Mylar tape and heavy weave Kevlar fabric. The photos show the attachment on the inside (left) and outside (middle) of the pack. Construction details (right) such as a blue PU-coated spinnaker drawcord sleeve, a micro cordlock, Spectra drawcord , and a perfect seam in the top closure highlight the quality construction of Mountain Laurel Design products.

PU-coated spinnaker cloth was used in areas more prone to abrasion such as the top drawstring, shoulder straps, and outside pocket. Details such as a micro cordlock and spectra cord used in the top closure, perfectly sewn seams, and doubled ½-inch webbing used on the shoulder strap cinches show thoughtfulness and care in the construction of the pack.

Despite the high level of quality construction, it is important to remember that the Revelation pack is a specialized piece of equipment and needs to be handled with care. That said, I definitely pushed the limits of the pack, hauling it above the tree line in Washington’s Alpine Lakes Wilderness. My multi-day route involved hauling an ice axe, seated glissades on rough snow, repeated slides along rough talus boulders, and even some bushwhacking. Despite the rough treatment, the Revelation showed little wear. The damage consisted of one small puncture in the Cuben Fiber fabric (easily fixed with a small piece of duct tape) and a broken buckle.

Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation Backpack REVIEW - 6
Despite some rough bushwhacking in sub-alpine forest, the Cuben Fiber pack body (left) suffered only this small puncture and was easily fixed with a small piece of duct tape. The lightweight buckles (right) used for the top and sternum straps were easily broken when cinched with moderate pressure. Fortunately, the top buckle will be replaced with a stronger 5/8-inch model in production packs.

While the fabric damage was less than expected, the top strap buckle broke very easily when cinching it down to hold my ice axe in place. With the stock buckles, extra care needs to be shown when cinching. However, I think a stouter buckle should be used, especially in the main cinch point. The adjusters used at the more critical shoulder strap adjustments were much more durable and I had no problems with them during field testing.

Even with the use of expensive Cuben Fiber fabric, extensive attention to detail, and custom sizing, the Revelation is a great value at $95. If you are pushing the limits of SUL backpacking, it is the lightest, best sized, and coolest pack in existence and if treated with care, will have the durability to last for many adventures.

What’s Unique

The use of Cuben Fiber fabric sets the Mountain Laurel Designs Revelation apart from all other packs in its class. It is sized perfectly for compact SUL loads and has the minimum feature set to make it truly usable. To some it looks like a garbage bag with straps but to those in the know, it is the most high tech and specialized pack in existence.

Recommendations for Improvement

Despite being a beautifully constructed and well though-out design, I do have a few suggestions for improving the Revelation pack:

  • The sternum strap is problematic, being both too low and too short. A removable sternum strap would be better. However, I don’t think it’s necessary at all. By cutting it off, I got my Revelation down to an even 3 ounces (or 3.3 ounces with the bungee system).
  • The top compression strap buckle is not strong enough and broke way too easily. (It will be replaced with a stronger 5/8-inch buckle in production models).
  • The ice axe attachment (aka Multi-Gear Loop) is a little long and made it difficult to keep the axe from moving (even with extra twists). While I’d like it to be smaller, it is well sized for a pair of trekking poles and should probably remain the current size for versatility.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW

Looking for a weekend frameless pack that is both lightweight and durable? Check out the new ULA Conduit.

Introduction

In ULA’s new 2006 line of backpacks, the Conduit is a frameless top-loading pack with a volume of 3,200 cubic inches and weight of just 22 ounces, just right for a weekend ultralight or lightweight backpacking trip or a day hike carrying bulky gear. It’s made of Dyneema Gridstop fabric which is both lightweight and bomber. In this review I evaluate the many features and attributes of the Conduit, and discuss its sizing and fit.

What’s Good

  • Lightweight AND durable
  • Ample volume for a weekend trip
  • Good volume adjustment
  • Lots of outside storage
  • Wide, well-padded shoulder straps spread weight
  • Optional removable accessories
  • Excellent construction

What’s Not So Good

  • Pack torso length is shorter than specified
  • Shallow, tight side pockets

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA, http://www.ula-equipment.com/)

  Year/Model

2006 Conduit

  Style

Frameless, top loading, rolltop closure

  Sizes

S/M fits 17-19 in (43-48 cm) torsos, M/L fits 20-22 in (51-56 cm) torsos

  Volume

3,200 ci (50 L)

  Weight

1 lb 6.2 oz (629 g) measured weight (size M/L); manufacturer’s specification 1 lb 4 oz (567 g)

  Fabrics

Main pack body is 210d Dyneema Gridstop polyurethane-coated nylon, pockets are durable polyester mesh with an elastic binding, frontpanel is 1.9 oz/yd2 urethane-coated ripstop nylon

  Features

Angled mesh side pockets with elastic binding, large bellowed front mesh pocket with elastic binding, two zippered hipbelt pockets, two equipment loops, two ice axe loops, two side and one top compression straps, two hydration tube ports, padded wings plus 1.5 inch webbing hipbelt, interior sleeping pad sleeve, sternum strap, haul loop, attachment loops for optional accessories

  Options

Zippered internal stash pocket [1.1 oz (31 g), $5], hydration sleeve [1.4 oz (40 g), $5], water bottle holsters [0.4 oz (11 g), $2 each], handloops [0.8 oz (23 g), $2 each]

  Volume To Weight Ratio

144.1 ci/oz size M/L (based on 3,200 ci and a measured weight of 22.2 oz, without options)

  Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity

20 lb (6.8 kg) estimated maximum comfortable load an average person can carry all day in this pack

  Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio

14.4 (based on a 20 lb load and measured weight of 1.39 lb)

  MSRP

$125

Performance

The new Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit at 3,200 cubic inches and 22.2 ounces (measured weight) is a versatile frameless pack that can be used for weekend ultralight backpacking trips or a larger volume day pack. It’s made mostly of Dyneema Gridstop, which is a superb fabric that provides both durability and light weight. The fabric contains polyethylene fibers that are claimed to be ten times stronger than steel and two times stronger than Kevlar. The mesh used in the Conduit is also very durable.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW - 1
Views of the ULA Conduit backpack. The front (top left) has a huge mesh pocket that holds a lot of gear; there are two Velcro accessory loops at the top. The backpanel view (top right) shows its wide shoulder straps and padded hipbelt with large zippered pockets. Each side (bottom left) has a half-height angled pocket and a hydration tube port. The top has a roll down closure with a tightening strap on each side, plus a top compression strap.

The Conduit is feature rich, with all the convenience features most backpackers want. The front of the pack has a huge bellowed mesh pocket that will hold a ton of gear. The side half-height mesh pockets are angled so you can easily reach a water bottle. And the hipbelt pockets are some of the nicest around – they have gusseted sides and plenty of room for a camera and more. They are mounted on padded hipbelt wings that locate the pockets at your side.

Inside, the Conduit has a half-height sleeping pad sleeve that positions and holds your folded sleeping pad against your back to create a padded backpanel. There are attachments for ULA’s optional hydration sleeve and zippered stash pocket (see specification table), that can be transferred to other ULA packs. Two hose ports are provided for the internal hydration sleeve.

In use, I loved the huge mesh front pocket for keeping on-the-trail gear handy. The large hipbelt pockets were perfect to hold my digital camera, snacks, and numerous other smaller items. I had mixed feelings about the angled side pockets. When I used water bottles, the pockets were handy for reaching them without taking the pack off. However, when I packed them with gear, they had limited capacity and were a bit tight. The optional accessories that I found most useful were the internal stash pocket and the water bottle holders that attach to the shoulder straps.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW - 2
ULA’s optional accessories easily attach to the Conduit, or any other ULA pack. They include an internal stash pocket (top left), a hydration sleeve (top right), water bottle holders (bottom left), and handloops (bottom right). See specifications table for weight and cost information.

The optional internal hydration sleeve was a bit cumbersome to use with this pack (or any pack with an internal hydration sleeve) because of the difficulty to refill it when the pack was stuffed full. My personal preference was to put a Platypus hydration system in one of the side pockets, which was much more convenient. A full height side pocket on one side would be better for that purpose.

The Conduit’s suspension system consists of 3-inch padded shoulder straps (that distribute weight well), a sternum strap, and 8.5 inch padded hipbelt wings that connect via a 1.5 inch webbing belt and buckle.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW - 3
The shoulder straps on the Conduit (left) are 3 inches wide and well padded, good for distributing weight. The bottom of each shoulder strap attaches to a small delta wing on the bottom of the pack (right). The hipbelt has two padded 8.5 inch wings, each with a large zippered pocket. The side pockets are half height with a fabric bottom.

For fit, the Conduit comes in two sizes: S/M fits 17-19 inch torsos, and M/L fits 20-22 inch torsos. I measured the pack torso length (bottom of shoulder straps to middle of hipbelt) of the size M/L pack I tested, and found it to be only 18 inches. This means that the M/L Conduit will best fit a person with a medium-sized torso (17-19 inches). A long-torsoed person can either tighten the shoulder straps and carry most of the load on his shoulders, with the hipbelt acting as a stabilizer, or allow the shoulder straps to wrap around the shoulders and down the back to place more weight on the hips.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW - 4
In size M/L, the Conduit was a perfect fit on our 16-year old niece (left), but it fit low on me (right).

Why not make the pack torso longer? One limiting factor, as ULA explains, is that most sleeping pads are 20 inches wide, and the folded pad needs to fit vertically inside the pack from the bottom of the pack to the top of the shoulder straps, without inching up. That gives about an 18-inch pack torso length when measured to the middle of the hipbelt. The solution I found to make the Conduit fit more comfortably was to put a “hinge” in it. I folded my TorsoLite inflatable sleeping pad into a square and put it in the bottom of the pack, along with my sleeping bag. I then put my food bag above that against the backpanel, and packed the rest of the pack normally. This put a distinct bend in the backpanel, as shown in the photos, which made it conform much better to my back.

Ultralight Adventure Equipment (ULA) Conduit Backpack REVIEW - 5
Packing the Conduit to put a hinge in it (left) improved the fit of the Conduit against my back (right), but I would prefer a taller pack that matches my torso length.

That said, my personal preference is for a pack with a torso length that more closely matches my body torso length. For example, the Gossamer Gear Mariposa pack in size medium has a measured pack torso length of 21 inches, and the G5 Hyperlight in size medium measures 24 inches. Obviously Gossamer Gear doesn’t let the 20-inch width of a sleeping pad limit the torso length of their packs. So, the bottom line, for me, is I like most everything about the Conduit except its short torso. I would really like to see the Conduit (and other ULA packs) available in an extra large size, with a pack torso length of around 21 inches.

Assessment

The Conduit is just the right size for an ultralight weekend trip or day trip carrying bulky gear. This pack is both lightweight and durable, so you don’t have to baby it like many frameless backpacks made of thin fabrics. The construction is excellent, using very high quality materials and adequate reinforcements; even the internal seams are all bound. Its feature set is superb.

For weight carrying, the Conduit has wide padded shoulder straps to distribute weight and its padded hipbelt wings cushion the hips. The Conduit in size M/L best fits a person with a 17 to 19 inch torso, but can be adapted to a taller person by packing it to create a hinge. Depending on the fit and your shoulder strength, the Conduit can comfortably carry 20 to 25 pounds all day.

What’s Unique

The use of Dyneema Gridstop fabric for most of the pack makes it both lightweight AND durable. ULA’s optional accessories are removable and can be interchanged in other ULA packs.

Recommendations for Improvement

The ULA Relay is really a fine lightweight pack that incorporates a lot of refinements from previous ULA packs. However, I do have a few suggestions for improvements that are worth considering:

  • Replace the angled side pockets with full height pockets, possibly with an angled entry near the bottom to allow inserting a water bottle without taking the pack off
  • Reverse the top compression strap so the strap hangs on the front side of the pack
  • Offer the Conduit in an extra large size with a pack torso length of about 21 inches