Articles (2020)

Speer Hammocks Frog Sac Sleeping Bag REVIEW

Warm weather, full-length center zip, PrimaLoft insulated sleeping bag.

Overview

Speer Hammocks Frog Sac Sleeping Bag REVIEW - 1
Speer Hammocks Frog Sac multi-use sleeping bag.

The Speer Hammocks Frog Sac is a well-constructed PrimaLoft insulated sleeping bag rated to 45 °F (7 °C). The most notable features of the Frog Sac are the full-length center zipper, foot opening, semi-rectangular outline, and locking toggles at the foot and neck openings. These all combine to allow the Frog Sac to be used in various ways. The bag can be fully or partially opened and used as a quilt. You can wear it as extra insulation in camp. While wearing it, you can open the bottom and unzip the zipper from the bottom to create as much room as you need to walk around or to get up from a sleeping pad or in/out of a hammock. For any camp chores you must unzip the front of the bag to free your arms and hands, letting in cold air. At the bag’s 45 °F (7 °C) rating, the Frog Sac is warm enough as a camp robe as it is designed, but arm openings would be a nice option and make it useful as in-camp insulation below the bag’s rating.

At 1 pound 11.5 ounces (780 g), the Frog Sac is not among the lightest summer weight synthetic insulation sleeping bags and quilts, but its versatility over a simple bag or quilt may make the extra ounces worth it for users interested in a bag they can also wear in camp for insulation.

In Brief

  • PrimaLoft insulated
  • Full-length center zipper
  • Drawcord foot box closure
  • Shaped shoulders
  • Minimal hood
  • Locking toggles at the foot and neck openings

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Speer Hammocks, Inc.

  Model

Frog Sac

  Type

Semi-rectangular, full front zip with drawstring foot and neck closures

  Sizes
Size medium tested

Medium, length 6’10” (208 cm) measured, 7′ (213 cm) claimed. Large, length 7’6″ (229 cm) claimed.

  Girth

Size Manufacturer Specification shoulder/hip/foot in (cm) Backpacking Light Measurement shoulder/hip/foot in (cm)
Medium 60.5/-/- (154/-/-) 60.5/60.5/40.0 (154/154/102)
Large 64.5/-/- (164/-/-)

  Weight

Backpacking Light measured 1 lb 11.5 oz (780 g), size Medium; Manufacturer claims 1 lb 10 oz (737 g) for size Medium, 1 lb 14 oz (850 g) for size Large. Stuff sack adds 0.8 oz (23 g).

  Fill Type

Synthetic, PrimaLoft

  Loft

Backpacking Light measured single layer loft 0.5″ (1.3 cm)

  Manufacturer’s Rating

45 °F (7 °C), 50 °F (10 °C) for a cold sleeper

  Outer and Liner Material

Outer is ripstop nylon with breathable DWR coating 1.1 oz/yd2 (37.7 g/m2); Liner is ripstop nylon 1.1 oz/yd2 (37.7 g/m2)

  Hood

Yes

  Zipper

Full-length front zipper with two sliders

  Features

Insulated zipper draft tube, tailored shoulders, contoured hood with drawstrings, bottom foot opening with drawstrings, locking barrel toggles on drawstrings

  Model Year

2004

  MSRP

$99 medium, $109 large

Features

The Frog Sac has PrimaLoft fill and 1.1 oz/yd2 (37.7 g/m2) ripstop nylon for the outer and inner shells. The outer shell has a DWR treatment. The top and bottom layers of the bag are each approximately 0.5 inches (1.3 cm) thick when fluffed up. The fabric is very comfortable against the skin, and the bag drapes closely on the body rather than having a stiff feel. The front and back sides have four horizontal sewn-through baffles spaced 17 inches (43 cm) apart. The corners of the squares on the back of the bag formed by the single vertical baffle and the horizontal baffles are not sewn through to reduce heat loss in those areas.

The Frog Sac is closely cut at the shoulders with a 60.5 inch (153.7 cm) girth. The girth of the bag remains the same until it begins to narrow just above the knees – still allowing plenty of room for your knees to maneuver in the bag. The shoulders of the Frog Sac are shaped rather than tapered as in a mummy bag. They are designed to help keep the bag on your shoulders while you are wearing it.

Speer Hammocks Frog Sac Sleeping Bag REVIEW - 2
The Frog Sac’s simple hood and locking toggles.

Wearing the hood holds the bag up when using the Frog Sac as a robe. The unshaped hood is formed by sewing the top and bottom layers of the bag together in an envelope style with the seam on the outside. It is very minimal, yet adequate for a summer weight bag. There are no extra pieces in the hood to form it into a “head” shape. When sitting or standing, the front edge of the hood rests uncomfortably a couple of inches forward of the crown, rather than on your forehead. The hood stays in place when wearing the bag as a robe or sleeping in it and turning side to side.

The Frog Sac has a full-length YKK #5 center zipper with two, two-way sliders. Anti-snag tape covers the insulated zipper baffle. Both the foot and neck openings have draw cords with toggles that can be snapped together. The locking barrel toggles can be used to secure the bag when wearing it as a robe. The top toggles allow you to fasten the bag on your shoulders so it doesn’t fall down when you are wearing it without the hood. The bottom of the bag can be flipped up (or under) and held in place at your waist with the bottom toggles so you can move about camp. The toggles and zippers are easily adjusted with gloves on.

The Frog Sac can be rolled and folded to fit into its stuff sack or simply stuffed. It is a close fit but it is not overly difficult to stuff the bag. The stuff sack has two draw cords 1.25 inches (3.2 cm) apart. The inner draw cord is intended to help stuff the bag into the stuff sack, but instead hinders stuffing by tangling with the outer draw cord.

The Frog Sac weighs 1 pound 11.5 ounces (780 g). There are several synthetic bags and quilts rated the same or colder that weigh less (e.g. Fanatic Fringe quilts, The North Face Propel bag). The Frog Sac is not the lightest synthetic summer weight sleeping option, but its suite of features are matched only by Integral Designs PrimaLoft Poncho Liner (Prima Blanket) which is of comparable weight.

Performance

Speer Hammocks Frog Sac Sleeping Bag REVIEW - 3
The Frog Sac and the 5’10” (178 cm) author – a couple of inches (5 cm) to spare once the bottom is cinched shut.

The Frog Sac was tested in a range of conditions in Arizona and Washington state: 75 °F (24 °C) to 38 °F (3 °C), high gusting winds and still air, dry air and humid air, on the ground and in a hammock.

The Frog Sac creates a cozy environment with its PrimaLoft insulation and lightweight ripstop nylon shell, along with the insulated zipper baffle that helps block wind and hold warmth in. The outer shell has a DWR treatment that keeps spray and surface condensation from soaking into the insulation.

The torso is cut wider than some ultralight mummy bags (60.5 in/154 cm girth) with enough room for a person of medium build to wear a lightweight insulating top inside the Frog Sac. The semi-rectangular cut leaves plenty of room for your knees, and your feet won’t get claustrophobic with the 40 inch (102 cm) foot girth and option to open the bottom of the bag. Speer Hammocks claims the bag is suitable for someone up to 6 feet (183 cm) tall and that is accurate. I’d recommend that if you are 6′ 1″ (185 cm) tall, you opt for the large model.

I had complaints about the hood when sitting, but it did its job while I was sleeping. It stayed on my head as I turned from side to side. I was able to fit a fleece hat on my medium to large head under the hood. Although the hood is minimal, it is adequate at the bag’s temperature rating. The whole bag was comfortable to toss and turn in; the hood stayed in place on my head, and the bag fit closely enough that the center zipper stayed in the center. The bag has the soft comfortable feel of an old blanket.

The full-length zipper is the right weight for the job. It operated smoothly for the most part (I had difficulty aligning the zippers to reconnect the two halves of the bag after having it laid out flat on two occasions). Anti-snag tape covers the insulated zipper baffle and with care, allows snag free zipping.

The Frog Sac can be turned into a roomy 5 foot (152 cm) by 6 feet 10 inch (208 cm) top blanket. A foot pocket can be formed by partially closing the full-length zipper if desired. The center zip puts the hood at your face when using the Frog Sac as a quilt, but the hood is small enough that it doesn’t get in the way. The shaped shoulders hook the blanket onto your shoulders when you are on your back so that the bag stays tucked under your chin.

The Frog Sac can be used as an insulation layer in camp, but you’ll have to unzip the bag nearly to your waist if you are using your hands. Cold air comes in, but near the rated temperatures, supplementing the Frog Sac with a light insulating top is enough to keep me warm. Wearing the hood keeps the Frog Sac from slipping down, or when not wearing the hood you can use the locking toggles to secure the bag around your neck. When wearing the hood, the shoulders of the Frog Sac rest about half a foot (15 cm) above your shoulders so your head supports a lot of the weight of the bag. Since the hood is an envelope shape rather than conforming to your head, the weight on your head is concentrated on the front seam of the hood, which can be uncomfortable.

Speer Hammocks Frog Sac Sleeping Bag REVIEW - 4
The Frog Sac as insulating camp wear you can move around in.

The Frog Sac’s bottom closes with draw cords and toggles. Sitting in camp, the zipper can be fully zipped with just the bottom open for your feet. It is surprisingly warm encased in this barely 0.5-inch (1.3 cm) single layer loft bag. To change to sitting cross-legged, or to make legroom for standing up and walking around camp, the bottom can be partially unzipped. The bottom edge of the Frog Sac can be turned up and secured around the waist with the locking toggles so that you can even set up or take down camp while keeping warm in the Frog Sac. The full-length zipper that opens from the bottom and locking toggles are the strength of the Frog Sac. These features allow you to easily go from standing to sitting, from laying on the ground, to up and walking around and it is a warm luxury to be able to get in and out of a hammock still carrying your built up warmth around you. Midnight calls of nature can be accomplished still partially encased in your warm bag although armholes in the bag would make this skill much easier to master.

Missing from this review (and for all sleeping bag reviews published here, for that matter) will be an assessment of whether or not the sleeping bag performs adequately at temperatures near its manufacturer-reported temperature rating. Click here for the complete Backpacking Light Position Statement on Sleeping Bag Temperature Ratings.

Durability

The Frog Sac is durable enough for normal use. Stitching is evenly spaced and straight; the seams are not likely to start opening. The outer shell fabric is prone to runs although this does not affect function. The zipper is the right size for the job. A smaller zipper would save weight but might not be up to the stress put on the zipper when wearing the bag around camp. I dragged the bottom of the Frog Sac around when walking and sitting on the ground in camp; it shows no signs of wear.

Value

The Frog Sac is a carefully built bag with appropriate materials and techniques used in construction. The size medium Frog Sac retails for $99. This price is comparable to other summer weight synthetic bags. The Frog Sac does its job as a sleeping bag, and offers many extra options for use with its full-length center zipper and bottom opening which add value.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • My number one recommended change is to add another section to the hood so it fits the head better and distributes the weight of the bag (when wearing it as a robe) over a larger percentage of the head for more comfort.
  • Armholes would make it much easier to wear the bag while using your hands such as when cooking or setting up camp.
  • Remove the second draw cord on the stuff sack, it just gets in the way and you’d save 0.1 ounces (3 g).

Six Moon Designs Comet Backpack REVIEW

Removable stays, an internal pad pocket, and adjustability over a wide torso length range make the Comet unique.

Introduction

The Six Moon Designs Comet backpack is a close cousin to the Six Moon Designs Starlite, which is one of our top rated backpacks. The Comet has optional aluminum stays like the Starlite, but in contrast, is a little smaller and the pad pocket is internal to the pack bag rather than external. We were amazed by the load carrying capacity of the Starlite when we tested it without stays. Does the Comet continue to amaze, or do the design changes let us down?

What’s Good

  • Pack volume is just right for lightweight backpacking
  • Removable stays allow a wide range of applications
  • Stays are easily contoured for a custom fit
  • Adjustable torso length
  • Adjustable/removable hipbelt
  • Large mesh outside pockets
  • Comfortably carries a heavy load

What’s Not So Good

  • Velcro dry bag closure is cumbersome and snags on clothing
  • Side mesh pockets are too tight, making it hard to reach items in the bottom
  • Sewing quality could be improved

Specifications

  Backpack

2005 Six Moon Designs Comet

  Style

Internal frame or frameless, top loading, dry bag closure with top strap

  Volume

One size 3700 ci (61 L): 2600 ci main compartment + 450 ci extension collar + 250 ci front pocket + 400 ci side pockets (43 L + 7 L + 4 L + 7 L)

  Weight

27.1 oz (768 g) measured weight with stays; manufacturer’s specification 27 oz (765 g); 22.3 oz (632 g) measured weight without stays, manufacturer’s specification 22 oz (624 g)

  Fabrics

Pack body is 70d silicone nylon, backpanel and bottom are 420d pack cloth, extension collar is 30d silicone nylon

  Features

Removable (optional) aluminum stays, internal sleeping pad pocket, internal security pocket, extension collar, 3 large outside mesh pockets, 4 compression straps, 2 hydration ports, dry bag top closure, adjustable torso length, removable hip belt, lumbar pad, load lifter straps, sternum strap, 2 ice axe loops

  Volume To Weight Ratio

137 ci/oz with stays (based on 3700 ci and a measured weight of 27.1 oz); 166 ci/oz without stays (based on 3700 ci and a measured weight of 22.3 oz

  Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity

35 lb (15.9 kg) estimated, with stays; 25 lb (11.34 kg) estimated, without stays

  Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio

21 with stays (based on 35 lb and a measured weight of 1.69 lb); 18 without stays (based on 25 lb and a measured weight of 1.39 lb)

  MSRP

$170, $180 with stays

Performance

The Six Moon Designs Comet backpack embodies several new design innovations and upgrades beyond the Starlite, which was top-rated by Backpacking Light in 2004 (Six Moon Designs Starlite Backpack Review). The main differences are: the volume is smaller (3700 cubic inches versus 4050), the sleeping pad pocket has been moved to the inside, center-mounted shoulder straps, adjustable shoulder strap and hipbelt positions, adjustable hipbelt angle, side compression straps, and larger outside mesh pockets.

Like the 2005 Starlite, the Comet is available with optional removable 0.5-inch x 24-inch 6061 aluminum stays ($10), allowing it to be used either as an internal frame or frameless pack. The stays easily slip into two webbing sleeves that run the full height of the pack, and anchor directly under the load lifter straps. With my wife’s help, we bent the stays on the edge of a counter to fit the contour of my back, which combined with the shoulder strap and hipbelt adjustments, allowed us to dial in a perfect fit. (Tip: when you insert the stays, be sure to slip the top of each stay into its hold-down pocket. The opening is at the edge of the Velcro on the lift tab.)

Six Moon Designs Comet Backpack REVIEW - 1
The Comet’s optional aluminum stays easily slide into pockets on the back of the pack (left). Be sure to slip the top of each stay into its hold-down pocket, otherwise it will slip out as shown (right).

The Comet’s sleeping pad pocket has been moved to the inside, which clears the backpanel to allow the incorporation of new innovations. The shoulder straps are center-mounted, which makes the pack easy to adjust for torso length. The vertical position of both the shoulder straps and hipbelt are adjustable, allowing one pack to adjust to torsos between 15 and 20 inches. The hipbelt design allows an angle adjustment, or complete removal. There is also a lumbar pad cushioned with 0.5-inch foam and covered with a slide-resistant fabric.

Six Moon Designs Comet Backpack REVIEW - 2
Bending the stays to the curvature of your back produces a custom fit (top, left). The Comet’s suspension system (top right) is full-featured and well padded. The shoulder straps are center-mounted (middle left) and have about 3 inches of vertical adjustment. The hipbelt (middle right) can be angled if desired; the lumbar pad is very comfortable and slide-resistant. Loosening the lumbar pad (bottom left) reveals the hipbelt attachment, which allows about 3.5 inches of vertical adjustment. Detail of hipbelt and shoulder strap attachments (bottom right).

The interior sleeping pad pocket looks like a hydration sleeve with a Velcro fastening tab. It is made of silnylon and accommodates most three-quarter length sleeping pads. Since the pack’s backpanel is not padded, it is best to insert a pad to cushion your back. When using the pack without stays, inserting a stiff closed cell foam pad in the pocket creates a “virtual frame” to transfer some weight to the hips. An 8-inch by 3-inch silnylon security pocket with a Velcro closure is also inside the packbag.

The Comet’s main compartment provides plenty of room for gear and food for a lightweight multi-day trip. An ultralight through-hiker can easily carry gear plus 10 days of food with this pack (with stays in). I had no trouble inserting a 9-inch x 10-inch bear canister. A 12-inch high extension collar provides the extra room that is often needed at the beginning of a trip.

Mesh pockets cover most of the outside of the pack. The two side pockets are 20 inches deep, nearly full height. The three outside pockets hold a tremendous amount of gear. One nitpick is that the pockets are not bellowed enough (especially the side pockets), so they are tight when the pack and pockets are filled with gear, making it hard to reach items in the bottom.

The Comet has a dry bag closure at the top, which consists of a full width Velcro strip that seals the main compartment plus a small side release buckle. There are two grosgrain loops to pull the Velcro apart. This arrangement helps make the Comet shower-proof (except the outside pockets), but the Velcro catches on clothing and the closure system is cumbersome. I would prefer a simple drawcord closure. A top compression strap works well to secure the rolled down top of the pack.

One complaint we had about the Starlite was the absence of compression straps to adjust for smaller loads. The Comet comes through with three compression straps on the front that effectively control volume and secure smaller loads. I easily collapsed the pack down to daypack size to carry clothing and food for a day hike from camp.

Six Moon Designs Comet Backpack REVIEW - 3
Mesh pockets cover the outside of the Comet (top left), providing plenty of convenient stowage. The extension collar (top right) has a Velcro dry bag closure. The rolled down extension collar is secured with a top compression strap (bottom left). Three compression straps on the front of the pack easily reduce the pack’s volume down to daypack size (bottom right).

To determine the Comet’s comfortable load-carrying capacity I assessed the pack’s structural load capacity and suspension comfort with and without the stays (see related article on Quantitative Analysis of Backpack Suspension Performance by Ryan Jordan). With the stays in, I tested the Comet with loads up to 50 pounds and found no pack torso collapse. That result was not unexpected since the shoulder straps and hipbelt are connected directly to the stays. I subjectively evaluated suspension comfort by carrying the Comet pack on five backpacking trips with loads ranging from 24 to 28 pounds. From my testing and field experience, I assessed the Comet’s comfortable load carrying capacity (with stays in) to be 35 pounds. For a stronger person, this pack may carry more, but I would be concerned about fabric ripping out.

Without the stays, I was able to load the Comet up to 25 pounds (with a stiff RidgeRest sleeping pad in the pad pocket) before pack torso collapse occurred. It also was quite comfortable to carry with that weight. My assessment of its comfortable load carrying capacity without stays is 25 pounds (20 pounds with an inflatable sleeping pad or thin foam pad).

The Comet’s comfortable load carrying capacity, with or without stays, is remarkable. With stays in, its carry load to pack weight ratio of 21 is one of the highest we have tested to date (the Gossamer Gear Mariposa is highest with a ratio of 28). The ratio for the frameless configuration (18) is also very good (the Six Moon Designs Starlite has a ratio of 22). If your pack weight is typically less than 20 pounds, and you rarely carry more than 25 pounds, consider getting the Comet without the optional stays. However, if you’re a lightweight backpacker, with loads typically 20-30 pounds, the stays make for a very comfortable carry and add only 4.8 ounces to the weight of the pack.

The Comet uses lightweight fabrics where possible and more durable fabrics in wear areas. I expect its durability with respect to fabric to be very good, but the quality of the sewing could be improved. I found several examples of inaccurate stitching and seams coming apart. On several occasions (including my load capacity tests) I heard threads pop, which gives me concern about the pack’s reinforcements.

Overall, the Comet backpack has a lot of features to like. It is right-sized for lightweight backpacking, or carrying many days of food on a through hike. I especially like the voluminous outside mesh pockets that allow you to keep many items handy. The (optional) aluminum stays really expand the pack’s versatility. It’s also a very good value at $170 without stays, $180 with stays.

What’s Unique

With its removable stays, the Comet is one pack that can meet most of your needs. It is one of the most versatile lightweight backpacks around, and will comfortably carry a sizeable load.

Recommendations for Improvement

For a new pack design, the Comet has very few bugs to work out. I suggest that the outside mesh pockets be bellowed more to make it easier to reach items in the bottom. Another recommendation is to increase the quality and strength of the stitching throughout the pack, and use more bar tack reinforcements in stress areas.

Speer Hammocks 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW

Simple, rugged, top entry hammock with large silnylon canopy.

Overview

Speer 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW - 1
Speer 8.0 A Hammock and rain canopy in the Kachina Peaks Wilderness Area of Arizona.

The Speer 8.0 A hammock (for people up to 6′ and 250 pounds) is a model of simplicity and smart design. There are no seams to wear out in the hammock body. The hanging straps are 11+ feet long, 1-inch wide polypropylene webbing, so separate tree hugger straps are not needed. The rain canopy (8′ by 10′ silnylon) provides plenty of insurance when you are expecting stormy conditions and can easily be replaced with something lighter when clear weather is predicted. The bug netting can be left at home to save a little weight (bug net and bug net support line weigh 3.9 oz) if it is not bug season. The complete package of hammock, rain canopy, and bug netting weighs 2 pounds 3.1 ounces (1.0 kg).

The hammock is quite wide at 4 feet 10 inches (147 cm). The hammock and hanging straps weigh 16.5 ounces (468 g). We’d like to see Speer offer a narrower, lighter weight hammock.

The Speer hammock should satisfy those who want plenty of rain protection (or want the option of replacing the Speer rain canopy with a lighter one of their own choosing), prefer a top entry hammock, and sometimes leave the bug netting at home.

Speer Hammocks has an extensive website with loads of tips for hammock campers including grids on what gear to add to stay warm. They also offer the hammock in sizes to accommodate larger and/or taller users, and even offer kits for people who want the satisfaction of building their own hammock.

Speer Hammocks makes the down filled PeaPod and Top Blanket to insulate their hammocks.

In Brief

  • Simple design with few wear points
  • Top entry
  • Bug netting can be left at home
  • Generous sized canopy
  • Canopy anchors to trees so doesn’t sag when the hammock is occupied
  • Light weight – complete 8.0 A hammock weighs 2 pounds 3.1 ounces
  • Excellent camp chair

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Speer Hammocks

  Model

Speer 8.0 A

  Type

Top entry with removable bug netting and separate rain canopy

  Sizes
8.0 A tested

Size/Model User Maximum Height User Maximum Weight Manufacturer claimed weight Backpacking Light measured weight
8.0 A 6 ft 0 in (183 cm) 250 lb (113 kg) 2 lb 0 oz (0.91 kg)* 2 lb 3.1 oz (1.00 kg)
8.0 C 6 ft 0 in (183 cm) 350 lb (159 kg) 2 lb 13 oz (1.27 kg)
8.5 A 6 ft 5 in (196 cm) 250 lb (113 kg) 2 lb 3 oz (1.00 kg)
8.5 C 6 ft 5 in (196 cm) 350 lb (159 kg) 2 lb 14 oz (1.32 kg)

  Weight
8.0 A

Full package as supplied
Hammock and hanging straps, bug net and bug net support line, rain canopy and guylines, carry sack
Manufacturer Minimum
Hammock and hanging straps, bug net and bug net support line, rain canopy and guylines, NO carry sack
4 stakes, 0.25 oz (7 g) titanium 60 ft (18.3 m) guyline
Backpacking Light Minimum
Same as Manufacturer Minimum but with 0.004 oz/ft (0.004 g/m) Aircore 1 Spectra guylines
4 stakes, 60 ft (18.3 m) guyline
Backpacking light Measured 2 lb 3.1 oz (1.0 kg) 2 lb 3.4 oz (1.09 kg) 2 lb 2.6 oz (0.98 kg)
Manufacturer claim 2 lb 0 oz (0.91 kg) — —

  Weight
Components 8.0 A

Component Backpacking Light Weight oz (g)
Speer 8.0 A hammock with hanging straps 16.5 (468)
Bug net 3.4 (96)
Bug net support line 0.5 (14)
Rain canopy with provided guylines 14.0 (397)
Carry sack 0.7 (20)
TOTAL 35.1 (995)

  Hammock Size

Inside length 8′ 2″ (249 cm), width 4′ 10″ (147 cm), manufacturer claims suitable for someone up to 6 ft (183 cm) tall, we concur

  Hammock Hanging Straps

11′ 4″ (345 cm) long, 1″ (2.5 cm) wide polypropylene low-memory stretch, 700 lb (318 kg) tensile strength – 24 ft weighs 5 oz (7.3 m weighs 142 g)

  Bug Netting

Rectangular black polyester no-see-um mesh, 22″ by 8′ 10″ (56 x 269 cm) with Velcro hook strip sewn around entire perimeter. Netting suspension: 1/16” (1.6 mm) Spectra core nylon sheathed ridge line with short section of shock cord with a plastic clip at one end of the line

  Rain Canopy Size

8′ 1″ x 10′ 1″ (2.46 x 3.07 m) measured, manufacturer claims 8′ x 10′ (2.44 x 3.05 m), 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) silynylon

  Rain Canopy Guylines

Six included, 9′ 7″ (2.92 m) long, 1/16” (1.6 mm) Spectra core with nylon sheath, 275 lb (125 kg) breaking strength – 100 ft weighs 1.8 oz (30.5 m weighs 51 g)

  Rain Canopy Tie Outs

Ten tie outs, reinforced with a second layer of silnylon fabric and extra stitching, two grommets at center of short ends of tarp, four grosgrain ribbon tie outs at four corners and four grosgrain ribbon tie outs 30″ (cm) inward of the corners along the long sides of the tarp

  Fabric Description

Speer 8.0 A hammock: 1.9 oz/yd2 (65 g/m2) ripstop nylon with DWR finish, rain canopy 1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) silicone coated ripstop nylon. Model C uses 3-4 oz/yd2 (102-136 g/m2) nylon fabric.

  Model Year

2004

  MSRP

Speer Hammock MSRP for assembled hammock MSRP for kit to construct your own MSRP for kit without canopy
8.0 A $199 $99 $64
8.0 C $249 $124 $89
8.5 A $224 $112 $77
8.5 C $274 $137 $102

Features

Ease of setup

The Speer Hammock is very simple to set up. Wrap a 1-inch (2.5 cm) wide webbing strap around one tree (and itself as described on the Speer website) and do the same with the strap at the other end of the hammock. The straps are attached to the hammock, so there’s no chance of misplacing them or need to carry separate “tree-hugger” straps. The straps are long at just over 11 feet (3.4 m), and strong enough that you only need to wrap them around a tree once, which gives more options in tree selection.

Pitching the 8 foot by 10 foot (2.4 x 3.1 m) tarp is straightforward. Tie the guylines from the center of the two short sides of the tarp to the same trees as the hammock has been tied to, then stake out the four guylines attached to the corners of the tarp. The guylines are 1/16” (1.6 mm) Spectra core, nylon sheathed cord that is easy to work with; it holds knots like the tautline hitch and is less likely to tangle than 100% Spectra cord that I’ve worked with. In foul weather, the tarp can be set up first to provide some shelter.

Usable Features

Speer 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW - 2
The Speer Hammock is simply and intelligently constructed. A rectangular piece of nylon fabric is knotted at each end so there are no seams to wear out. The 1-inch (2.5 cm) wide polypropylene webbing is sewn onto itself and held in place by the fabric knot.

The Speer Hammock is based on simplicity and has few parts. The hammock is a rectangle of fabric tied at the ends, each webbing hanging strap is sewn to itself in a loop and held in place by the fabric knot. The rain canopy is a silnylon rectangle, the bug netting is a rectangle of no-see-um netting with hook Velcro strips sewn to the edges, and a detachable ridgeline keeps the bug netting off your face. That’s it. The construction is also fairly simple which those who purchase a kit to make their own hammock set up will appreciate.

Although the design appears simple, it is well thought out. All the parts work well together, it’s easy to set up, and it’s easy to make weight saving choices like leaving the bug net at home or substituting a lighter tarp for a fair weather trip. Strips of Velcro (the loop side) for bug net attachment are sewn to both outside edges of the hammock so that you are less likely to get scratched entering and exiting the hammock. When using the bug netting, open the Velcro where needed to enter or exit the hammock.

Both hanging straps have D-rings to attach the bug net support cord to. The support cord is the same Spectra core material as the guylines with a length of thin shock cord and plastic clip tied to the end so that it is easy to attach and adjusts automatically to different hammock hangs.

The rain canopy has a center seam dividing the long sides in two which is factory coated to make it waterproof. Tie outs at each end of the rain canopy have grommets that can be used for hiking pole tips when pitching the hammock on the ground.

Speer provides an attractive blue silnlyon stuff sack with a light webbing handle along with the hammock. Everything (hammock, tarp, and bug netting) fits into it nicely.

Options

The Speer Hammock is available in sizes to fit people up to 6’5″ (2.35 m) tall and 350 pounds (159 kg). See the Specifications above for a detailed chart. Each of the four sizes is also available as a kit with all the materials (even the thread) provided for do-it-yourselfers.

Options available from Speer include various items to help you stay warm. Closed cell foam pads of different sizes and thicknesses are available as well as the down Pea Pod (completely encloses the hammock so loft is not reduced by body weight) and Top Blanket (which the hammocker can use on top as a quilt or inside the Pea Pod and under the hammock for bottom insulation).

Weight / Sizing

Speer 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW - 3
Speer designed their 8.0 A Hammock for someone under 6 feet (183 cm) tall and 250 pounds (113 kg). Here the 5’10” (178 cm), 160 pound (73 kg) author enjoys a siesta at the base of Spruce Mountain near Prescott, Arizona.

The Speer 8.0 A hammock weighs 16.5 ounces (468 g) as measured without the bug netting and tarp. It was comfortable for my 5 feet 10 inch (178 cm) frame and has a couple of inches to spare so that someone 6 feet (183 cm) tall will fit as Speer specifies. The sides of the hammock come up very high so there is no danger of rolling out. Some weight could be saved with a narrower cut and probably not impact hammock function to any great extent.

The tarp provided with the Speer Hammock is made of lightweight materials (1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) silynylon and 1/16” (1.6 mm) spectra core guylines) but is larger than most lightweight hammock canopies at 8′ by 10′ (2.4 x 3.1 m). The end user could substitute a tarp of lighter material, such as spinnaker fabric, or with smaller dimensions (at the expense of rain coverage) to save weight.

Flexibility of Pitching / Versatility

The flat 8 by 10 foot (2.4 x 3.1 m) rain canopy is easily pitched in various configurations. It can be pitched high enough to stand up beneath it, or with the sides nearly to the ground. The tarp has tie outs at the four corners, the centers of the short sides, and four tie outs 30 inches (76 cm) inward from the corners along the long sides. The tarp does not have tie outs in the center of the long sides.

The Speer Hammock and rain canopy can be pitched on the ground in the absence of tree cover. The hammock serves as a bivy to cover the sides and bottom of your sleeping bag and add a little warmth and wind protection. The rain canopy is pitched for overhead protection, normally “A” frame style, but the tarp tie outs accommodate other configurations. Tether the webbing tie outs to the end supports (most likely your trekking poles) to keep the “bivy” from wandering. One caveat, the nylon used in the bivy is coated with a DWR treatment but is not waterproof, so use your emergency space blanket under the hammock if the ground is wet or for added protection from stones.

The Speer Hammock makes a wonderful lounging chair. Just fold one side over against the other to create a comfortable seat. If the hammock is pitched low enough, you can cook seated in the hammock protected from rain by the overhead tarp.

Usable Space

There is enough length for a 6 feet (183 cm) tall person to sleep stretched out in the Speer 8.0 A hammock (tested). If you have strung the bug net ridgeline, you can hang small items from the ridgeline, or even tie a small stuff sack to it to store things overnight.

The large silnylon tarp provides plenty of room underneath to keep items such as your pack and shoes dry or to cook underneath it. When it is snugged in close in a storm pitch it would be a good idea to have your gear in your pack liner to protect them from spray. During rain the tarp can be strung overhead first to provide some protection from the rain while hanging the hammock although you won’t be completely protected when you secure the webbing around the support trees. When the tarp is pitched low, the hammock still needs to be hung high enough so that when you settle into it, it doesn’t sag to the ground.

Performance

The Speer 8.0 A hammock was tested in Washington state, the High Uinta Mountains of Utah, in desert monsoons, and at 10,000 feet (3,048 m) in Arizona in the San Francisco Peaks. It was tested in calm winds and gusts to 25 mph (40 kph), in temperatures from 85 to 20 °F (29 to -7 °C), and in dry weather and downpours.

Stability

The center of gravity of the Speer hammock with a person in it is well below the axis of the end straps if the hammock is hung slack as recommended. The hammock swings gently when you first get in to it since it does not have side ties outs to stabilize it. I normally reach out a hand to the ground to stop the swaying. Once in the hammock with the swaying halted it remains mostly still, although a quick turn over from one side to the other can cause it to sway again, but a hand to the ground easily stills this if the hammock is hung low enough.

Hanging the Speer hammock in high winds can be a challenge since it can catch wind like a parasail. Twisting the hammock around the axis of the hanging straps helps to reduce the hammock’s sail area and makes pitching it in the wind easier.

Pitching the rain canopy is similar to pitching any tarp except easier since you always have two fixed points to tether it to. The tarp pitches tautly in an open, calm weather pitch or in a steeper pitch for storms. Speer has attached two tie outs on each long side of the tarp 30 inches (76 cm) in from the corners. There are no tie outs in the centers of the long sides. The tarp can be pitched tautly using only the four corner tie outs or using all eight tie outs.

Speer 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW - 4
Here the bitter end of each manufacturer provided 9+ foot (292 cm) corner guyline is tied to the adjacent tie out to form a loop. The loops are easy to stake out, create more stability with two points of tension on the tarp, and are easy to shorten with an overhand knot when you need to “batten down the hatches.”

I found that tying the end of each corner guyline to the adjacent tie out along the long side of the tarp created a quick way to transition from calm weather rigging to storm rigging. A nice taut calm weather pitch is possible by staking out each of the loops formed this way. In storm conditions, an overhand knot tied with a quick release shortens the loop. The shorter loop can then be staked out pulling the tarp closer to the ground and providing more rain coverage for the hammock, but also steepening the sides of the tarp and providing a bigger cross sectional target to the wind. In the hammock in a desert monsoon with winds gusting to about 25 mph (40 kph), the tarp first deflected into the side of the hammock and then the two stakes on the windward side pulled out. Obviously tiny titanium stakes in the soft ground were not enough! I doubled the stakes in the two loops on that side before sitting out the rest of the storm without further incident.

Storm Protection

It is very relaxing to sit in the Speer hammock and watch the rain come down. The 8 foot by 10 foot (2.4 x 31 m) rain canopy provides lots of coverage, and there is room to cook dinner under it. Sideways blowing rain is a different experience. The hammock bottom and sides need to be kept from getting soaked. The tarp is pitched lower and closer to the top of the hammock and the sides are pitched closer to the ground (and closer to the sides of the hammock). There is less room for sitting in the hammock and cooking, but still plenty of room to lie in it.

Ventilation/Condensation Resistance

Lying in the hammock at 85 °F (29 °C) I felt a little clammy inside the high sides of the hammock, but even a slight breeze cooled me off. In general, the tarp/hammock setup provides lots of ventilation.

Insect Protection

Speer 8.0 A Hammock REVIEW - 5
Speer hammock with bug netting Velcro-ed to the hammock and supported by a ridgeline.

The 3.9 ounce (111 g) bug netting and support cord provide good coverage from bugs while in the hammock. It, of course, does not protect you outside the hammock. You’ll need some other type of bug protection while cooking. There is room inside the hammock with the bug netting supported by the ridgeline to read and lounge, but not to sit up. Depending on if and how the tarp is pitched, great views are possible. The hammock nylon allows some breeze through it for a cooling effect.

Durability

The Speer hammock is well made of appropriate materials for a lightweight yet sturdy trade off. The hammock has no seams (other than along the edges) to wear out. The hanging straps are sturdy and securely held in place by the hammock end knots. The tarp has grommets for the end tie outs, and all tie outs are reinforced with doubled silnylon fabric and extra stitching. I’ve seen no evidence of wear to date.

Value

The Speer 8.0 A Hammock is well made, sturdy, and versatile. However, at about 4 ounces (113 g) heavier and $29 more than the Hennessy Ultralite Backpacker A-Sym, it is priced a bit high. The extra cost may well be worth it though to a person who prefers to leave the bug netting at home (shaving off 3.9 oz) or who prefers a top entry hammock.

Tips and Tricks

  • Fold the mosquito netting in two along the long axis so the two hook strips of Velcro stick together to make stowing and retrieving the netting less scratchy.
  • Tie each corner guyline on the rain canopy to the tie out closest to it along the long hammock side. Staking out the loop created is easy and provides another point of tension on the hammock for more wind stability. Tie an overhand knot with a quick release in the loop to shorten it when you need to stake the tarp closer to the ground for storm protection.
  • If you are not expecting foul weather, or are an experienced backpacker looking to cut weight, take along a smaller, lighter tarp to replace the 14 ounce (397 g) Speer tarp. The Bozeman Mountain Works Stealth 1 (7 x 9 ft, 2.1 x 2.7 m) Catenary Ridgeline Ultralight Backpacking Tarp shows promise and weighs 7.5 ounces (213 g) for a complete hammock setup (without bug net) weighing 1.5 pounds (0.68 kg). Another weight saving option is to use a long poncho, such as the Sea to Summit Poncho/Tarp (9.8 oz plus guylines), to replace the hammock canopy as well as rain gear.
  • The Speer hammock makes an excellent lounge chair! Just fold one side over on the other. I thoroughly enjoyed watching a desert monsoon rainstorm while sitting in the Speer hammock nice and dry under the rain canopy.
  • It is easier to get in and out of the hammock when it is pitched low to the ground. I like it low enough so that I can cook while sitting in it and can reach the ground while lying in the hammock to grab my water bottle or steady the hammock from swaying.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • A narrower cut would reduce the weight of the hammock without affecting function.
  • Bug netting that is designed to keep out bugs without attaching to the hammock body would allow the removal of the Velcro strips on the hammock, further reducing hammock weight when the bug netting is left at home. One possibility worth exploring is netting with pockets for weights (stones) and Velcro at the ends that drapes over the netting support line.
  • A lighter weight rain canopy option would be nice for fair weather hammockers.

Black Diamond Zenix IQ LED Headlamp REVIEW

Combines 1-watt LED technical lighting prowess with more economical standard 5 millimeter LEDs for non-technical pursuits.

Introduction

Black Diamond Zenix IQ LED Headlamp - 1
Black Diamond Zenix IQ.

  • Do you need a high-performance headlamp that’s suitable for technically challenging nighttime activities?
  • Do you need a versatile light that supports in-camp chores and bedtime reading equally as well as it lights your nighttime cross-country adventures?
  • Do you prefer the simplicity of a single control switch?
  • Do you want a light that’s inexpensive to power and coaxes a lot of life from a single battery set?
  • Do you prefer the balance of a headlamp with a separate battery pack in back?

If so, take a look at the Black Diamond Zenix IQ. The Zenix IQ does its part in pushing the LED headlamp envelope further. It combines 1-watt LED technical lighting prowess with more economical standard 5 millimeter LEDs for non-technical pursuits in one lightweight and easy to use package. At less than 6 ounces with batteries, the Zenix IQ is a trim powerhouse.

Specifications

Headlamp Type

Separate lamphead and battery pack, cable-connected

Light Sources

Single 1-watt hyperbright LED with integral reflector plus two standard white LEDs, fixed beam angles

Test Run-Time Range

24 hours in two-LED, high mode; 2 hours of maximum output in 1-watt, high mode

Modes and Settings

Two operating modes with three brightness levels and one strobe setting (approximately 90/minute) each (total of eight modes)

Other Features

Adjustable lamphead angle, colored LED battery life indicator also acts as a flashing “find-me” marker light

Batteries

Two AA alkaline (provided), lithium or rechargeable cells optional

Weight

Backpacking Light measured: 5.7 oz (162 g) with alkaline cells, 4.0 oz (113 g) without batteries. Manufacturer: same.

Head Strap

Double strap bucket-style, adjustable-length elastic, fixed bands

Battery Access

Battery cover locks with thumbscrew

MSRP

$48

What’s Good

  • Bright, collimated 1-watt main LED
  • Frugal and effective two-5 millimeter LED floodlight
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Effective current management
  • Power indicator/”find-me” marker light
  • Inexpensive to power
  • Well balanced on the head

What’s Not So Good

  • Measured battery life is less than Black Diamond claims
  • Lamphead and battery box not gasketed against moisture and dust
  • Straps not completely removable

Summary

Black Diamond Zenix IQ LED Headlamp - 2

The Black Diamond Zenix IQ is the second-generation of this pioneering LED headlamp. The Zenix IQ’ bright output supports challenging technical nighttime activities. The new light is more than two-and-a-half times as bright as its predecessor – an astonishing increase – and added circuitry assures the low-output mode (using two 5 millimeter LEDs instead of the main 1-watt LED) significantly extends battery life (the original did not). The IQ model also adds three power levels per mode and a battery life indicator: a small LED on the side of the lamp module that changes color as the batteries wane. This LED doubles as a flashing marker light that makes it easy to find the Zenix IQ in the dark.

Details

The plastic-bodied Zenix IQ sports a single collimated “hyperbright” white LED (probably a 1-watt Luxeon), flanked by a pair of the familiar 5 millimeter white “superbright” LEDs. It operates in two modes: Mode 1 uses the main 1-watt LED and Mode 2 uses two auxiliary 5 millimeter LEDs (the three never operate together). Mode 1 provides a very bright pencil beam; Mode 2 provides a dimmer, more even and somewhat wider beam. Each mode has four settings: high, medium, low and strobe, giving eight total combinations. The strobe operates at the brightest output level in either mode. A single rubber-covered switch set beneath the lamphead controls all modes and settings. A full click turns the Zenix IQ on and off, switching between the two modes in turn (i.e., on Mode 1, off, on Mode 2, off…). With the light in the desired mode, clickless half presses roll through the four settings from high through strobe, then high… etc. When switched on, the IQ remembers the last mode used, but not the mode level.

When folded closed for storage, the mount plate protects the switch against accidental use. The switch can be operated wearing thin gloves and mittens, but mostly defied our attempts wearing thicker fare. The Zenix IQ’s 1-watt LED’s clear acrylic lens is slightly recessed in the housing to help protect it from scratching. The two 5mm LEDs are also recessed for protection; however, their wells also accumulate debris over time and require occasional cleaning. The battery monitor/ find-me light resides behind a tiny rectangular window on the lamphead’s left side.

Surprisingly useful, the battery minder/find-me light uses a tiny three-color LED – green, orange and red – behind the small window. Whenever the IQ is switched off, the light blinks about twenty times a minute, making it quite easy to locate it in the dark or buried inside a backpack. Worrywarts can take comfort in Black Diamond’s claim that the light will happily blink away for five years on a set of batteries.

In battery condition mode – whenever the light is switched on – the LED usually glows steadily. Green indicates the batteries are either new or relatively fresh. Per Black Diamond, at about 50% residual life the green switches to orange and the IQ’s main light blinks twice as an alert that this has occurred. Thereafter, the red LED is displayed. When fresh batteries are first inserted, the orange indicator blinks several times as the IQ self-calibrates, then the light switches to steady green. It will occasionally self-test when switched on even if the batteries haven’t been accessed. In our tests, we found this system rather helpful, although there’s obviously a large “gray”‘ area between new and 50% batteries, and likewise between 50% and downright dead. At its most basic, before leaving on a trip it’s easy to check whether to replace the batteries: green literally means, “go.” Fuel cartridges should be this communicative!

The Zenix IQ’s separate battery compartment is connected to the lamphead by a power cable routed around the headstrap’s right side. Moderate tugs on either end of our sample’s thickly insulated cable didn’t pull it from its moorings, but note that the cable isn’t provided with stress relief at the ends. The 3/4 inch-wide elastic head strap threads through a baseplate that’s connected with a hinge to the bottom of the lamphead, providing a vertical angle adjustment (limited in range to straight-ahead). The bolt-and-nut hinge can be tightened using a flat-blade screwdriver, if needed. In our test it held the lightweight lamphead’s angle throughout (trail runners take note). The adjustable-length head strap is long enough to fit over a helmet. The top or bucket strap cannot be removed without some seam-ripping, so its use isn’t optional as with some bucket-style headstraps.

The battery box resides at the back of the headstrap. The hard-plastic box is curved to follow the head’s contours and is padded by a couple of pieces of foam and the elastic headstrap. It’s comfortable and not particularly noticeable, other than reading while lying face up. An advantage to this arrangement is that batteries can be kept warm under a parka hood, extending their life in cold weather.

The battery compartment opens by unscrewing a slotted, knurled plastic and metal thumbscrew and swinging the cover open. The cover completely separates from the compartment and is held captive by the top strap. The thumbscrew slot allows use of a screwdriver, coin or other tool – a nice option for cold, wet hands – and the screw is captive to prevent its loss in the field. The battery compartment has a metal threaded insert to accept the thumbscrew, which should prevent damage from over-torquing the screw. We didn’t need to use a tool to open or close the compartment in our tests, and even heavily mittened hands could accomplish this feat – bravo! The battery box (and lamphead) is not sealed with a gasket or o-ring and will eventually take on water if immersed. This is not a light to use around saltwater. (Black Diamond’s IPX-4 waterproof rating claim is that the IQ will resist a water spray from any angle.) Batteries stay in place when the compartment is open and it’s easy to tell the correct alignment during replacement.

The Zenix IQ is current-regulated, which is perhaps its most important advancement over its immediate predecessor, the Zenix. The circuitry does a laudable job steadying light output except in Mode 1, high. It also noticeably steps the IQ down to the next lower level as battery wear progresses and, as promised, giving an advance blink to alert the user. This blink can frankly be a little startling if you’re not expecting it – fresh batteries before the nighttime high-wire act are strongly recommended. As with all LED lights, the Zenix IQ’s color temperature doesn’t change as output drops.

Tracking the Changes

The Zenix IQ is a follow-on model to the Zenix, which came out scarcely a year before. It has several differences and one major performance advance:

Differences Between Zenix IQ and Zenix Headlamps
Zenix IQ Zenix
Batteries Two AA Three AAA
Current regulation? Yes No
Battery meter/find-me blinker? Yes No
Weight with batteries 5.7 oz (162 g) 4.5 oz (128 g)
Battery life max/min strobe (manufacturer) 8-300 15-100
Center beam brightness (at 2 ft) 1150 lux 438 lux

That’s a lot of added value for a piddling extra three dollars.

Lab and Field Performance

We measured beam center and off-center performance for all modes and levels, using a light meter.

Zenix IQ Output in the Six Continuous Settings
Measured in Lux from 2 feet*, fresh Alkaline Batteries, Room Temperature (75 °F)
Setting Mode 1 (1-watt LED) Mode 2 (two, 5 mm 5 mm LEDs)
Beam center 1 ft off-center Beam center 1 ft off-center
High 1150 60 100 20
Medium 580 40 50 15
Low 280 20 30 10

Beam Configuration and Usefulness

The Zenix IQ beam has a bright yellowish center spot surrounded by a broader, dimmer blue-white halo. The beam pattern and color are quite different from our test Princeton Tec EOS; surprising, since they use very similar emitters. Both, however, seem equally useful in the field. The halo surrounding the center spot in the Zenix IQ beam is a somewhat irregular series of bands. As the test data show, it is effectively a pencil beam with a sharp cutoff, good for long beam throw and technical nighttime navigation, not so good for cooking and reading. For those more prosaic campsite activities, the IQ’s two 5 millimeter white LEDs provide quite adequate light without dazzling the eyes, and stretch the batteries at the same time. The 5 millimeter beam still isn’t particularly wide but the center and edges vary far less than the 1-watt beam, so the effect is one of a floodlight.

We didn’t generally require the Zenix IQ’s brightest setting (Mode 1, high) for more than a minute or two a night; we found that most technical activities (sketchy trails, basic cross-country) could be performed using medium. Camp chores and nighttime reading are fine using Mode 2, accessing the three levels as the requirement varied. Mode 2, low is adequate for reading and preserves night vision the best of the six options.

Runtime Tests

Black Diamond Zenix IQ LED Headlamp - 1
Black Diamond Zenix IQ Intensity vs. Time (Output) Graph.
Click this link to see a larger version of this graph.

We chose to test three of the IQ’s six continuous modes: Mode 1, high and medium and Mode 2, high. The graph shows that the current regulation holds the output steady, except for an initial drop in Mode 1, high. The Mode 1 graphs also demonstrate the stepping down that occurs as battery life drops. Mode 2, high output was rock steady for about a day, before winking off. All tests were with alkaline batteries at room temperature (75 °F).

We found run times to fall far short of Black Diamond’s estimates (see the following table). Since the Zenix IQ shuts completely off rather than lingering dimly for days as with some LED lights, we can’t know where the discrepancy comes from (sample variation?). We’re not disappointed at our test IQ’s performance, just puzzled at the great difference. What is gratifying is how effective the current regulation is in maintaining output.

Run Time, Specified and Measured
Mode 1 (1-watt main)
Manufacturer Specification
hours
Mode 1 (1-watt main) Backpacking Light Measured
hours
Mode 2 (two 5 mm auxiliary)
Manufacturer Specification
hours
Mode 2 (two 5 mm auxiliary)
Backpacking Light Measured
hours
High 8 4.5 60 23.5
Medium 19 5.5 120
Low 30 180
Strobe 50 300

Shortcomings and Suggestions

The Zenix IQ has few obvious faults, just strong competition, and Black Diamond deserves credit for following up the very good Zenix with the clearly superior Zenix IQ so quickly. Nevertheless, here are a few suggestions for improvement:

  • Make the top strap removable
  • Allow the lamphead to swing upward, past horizontal for overhead illumination
  • Add intensity memory to the mode memory
  • Gasket the lamphead and battery box and reinforce the cable entry points for true waterproofness
  • Enlarge the switch diameter to ease operation with mittened hands

Conclusion

Black Diamond Zenix IQ Headlamp - 3

The Black Diamond Zenix IQ is clearly a better headlamp than its predecessor, the Zenix. While it’s slightly heavier and operates a shorter time in high-high mode, it’s significantly brighter and offers more features. The addition of current regulation means the IQ can maintain steady light output longer as batteries wear and the switch to two AAs from three AAAs makes the light less expensive to power, with little weight penalty.

Comparing the main LED with the Princeton Tec EOS, our current favorite compact LED headlamp, the Zenix IQ is not quite as good a performer, either in the quality of the main beam or in battery life. It’s also not submersible like the EOS and doesn’t have a removable strap. However, the IQ offers a true floodlight/task light capability and the welcome battery meter/find-me light. For users who prefer a bucket-style strap and the superior balance and battery warming abilities of a separate battery pack, the Zenix IQ may get the nod.

Princeton Tec Corona LED Headlamp REVIEW

Eight-LED array powered by three AA batteries.

Introduction

Princeton Tec Corona LED Headlamp - 1
Princeton Tec Corona Headlamp.

Straight from the more-is-better school of headlamp design, the Princeton Tec Corona impresses with an eight-LED array powered by three AA batteries. The Corona is of primary interest to hikers and campers who want an efficient floodlight-style LED headlamp that also supports semi-technical nighttime navigation. There are lighter headlamps and there are brighter headlamps, but the Corona is versatile and easy-to-use. In an effort to please all users in all situations, the half-pound Corona offers myriad settings, twelve in all. If nothing else, this gives Corona owners ample opportunities for button pushing.

Specifications

Headlamp Type

Separate lamphead and battery pack, cable-connected

Light Sources

Eight 5 mm white LEDs arranged in three rows

Manufacturer’s Run Times

30 to 70 hours, highest and lowest continuous modes

Modes and Settings

Four operating modes, each with two brightness levels and one strobe setting (approx 100/min) for twelve total

Other Features

Lamphead fitted with aluminum heatsink

Batteries

Uses three AA alkaline (provided), lithium or rechargeable cells optional (the last at reduced output)

Weight

Backpacking Light measured: 7.9 oz (226 g) with alkaline cells, 5.3 oz (152 g) without batteries. Manufacturer: 8 oz (227 g) with alkaline batteries.

Head Strap

Double strap bucket-style, adjustable-length elastic, removable bands

Battery Access

Hinged, gasketed battery cover locks with flip latch

MSRP

$50

What’s Good

  • Twelve settings
  • Current regulation
  • Rear-mounted battery box for balance, keeping batteries warm under a hood
  • Waterproof

What’s Not So Good

  • Relatively heavy
  • Not as bright as the 1-watt competition
  • Current regulation only partially effective

Design

The Corona’s lamphead arranges eight 5 millimeter white LEDs in horizontal rows of three (top), four (center) and one (bottom). There are two switches: the larger main switch controls the LED array in a four-mode sequence and the smaller, nubbed switch rolls through three level settings within each mode. The switches are top-mounted on the lamphead, beside one another and sit in shallow recesses that help prevent accidental use.

The LEDs sit in a silvery reflective base protected by a clear convex plastic lens, itself protected by a surrounding bezel. The silver-painted LED base is contoured somewhat, probably to differentiate the LED groupings’ respective beam patterns. (Because the Corona’s LEDs aren’t a side-firing type, there’s not much stray light to be gathered and aimed by a reflector.) The rear of the hinged lamphead sports an aluminum heat sink set behind a plastic shield. The heat sink cools the electronics (LEDs emit heat and as I discovered, eight emit quite a bit). Three AA batteries reside in a gasket-sealed battery case that’s attached to the back of the head strap and connected to the lamphead with a power cable. A flip latch locks the hinged battery case closed. The adjustable-length bucket-style headstrap (a main strap and a top strap) are long enough to fit over a helmet.

Materials and Construction

Princeton Tec Corona LED Headlamp - 2

The Corona lamphead shell and battery box are made of hard, high-impact plastic. The curved battery box more or less fits the head’s contours, but there is no padding other than the headstrap itself. This is quite evident reading whilst lying on one’s back. The elastic headstraps are soft and comfortable, and offer a wide adjustment range. The 4 millimeter thick power cable has a substantial rubber jacket and is reinforced where it enters the battery box to prevent pulling out. Two quick-disconnect clips attach the cable to the headstrap on the right side.

Operation

The larger power/mode switch and smaller setting switch are easy to find and differentiate by touch. I can operate both switches while wearing thin gloves, even some mittens. Operation is as follows:

  • Main switch (large, smooth button on the right-hand side) – Mode 1 (eight LEDs), Mode 2 (five LEDs), Mode 3 (three LEDs), Mode 4 (one LED), off. A five-second pause in any mode keeps it in that mode, with the next button press switching the light off.
  • Level switch (smaller nubbed button on the left-hand side) – high, low, blink, repeat… The cycle repeats no matter how long the light has been switched on.
  • The Corona has no last-use memory and always switches on to Mode 1, high.

The lamphead can be tilted downward but not higher than straight ahead, somewhat of a limitation for overhead work (stringing a bear line, for example). The hinge can be tightened or loosened with a Phillips-head screwdriver. Adequately tightened, it holds its position during high-impact activities – inadvertent droop is not a problem.

The battery case latch is quite stiff and a challenge to open with cold hands or while wearing gloves, when I find it’s much easier to pry the latch open with a lever (e.g. spoon handle, screwdriver). Correct battery alignment is easy to make out even in poor light, and the batteries remain in place until pried out.

The slotted lamphead and battery case strap guides allow the straps to be completely removed or replaced in seconds. This enables use of the light either without the top strap or with no strap, and the straps can be washed or replaced.

Performance

Regardless of the mode or setting, the Corona’s beam always displays a bright center spot having a noticeable purple tint, and surrounded by a cold white halo. Switching among the four modes, the center spot and halo change in size and intensity but retain this basic configuration, which is very typical of flashlights using standard 5 millimeter white LEDs. Our light meter showed the beam intensity to be rather irregular and more varied than the eye can easily detect. All but the single-LED mode project a roughly oval beam, wider than it is high, with the three-LED mode perhaps the most pronounced.

Taken from the dimmest mode to the brightest: Mode 4, single-LED is an adequate camp and reading light, even on low. It, of course, has the narrowest beam angle and smallest center hot spot, so while it dazzles the eye the least, it also offers the narrowest floodlight. It’s possible to operate an entire evening in camp using Mode 4-low, provided there are no challenging chores like stringing a food bag line or pitching a tarp. The benefits of doing so are the greatest battery life and preserving night vision. Mode 3 (three LEDs) offers a significantly wider beam angle, easing performing chores and supporting walking on clear trails. Mode 3 has an ovoid center spot and floodlight halo, the result of the three LEDs being in a row and surrounded by their own mini-reflector.

Modes 2 and 1 (five and eight LEDs, respectively) are similar to one another in beam configuration, differing mainly in their intensity. Even in Mode 1 there is no sharp center spot such as with the 1-watt collimated LED used in the Princeton Tec EOS or Black Diamond Zenix series, but the surrounding floodlight is much broader and brighter than those headlamps. It’s still possible to perform fairly complex nighttime navigation with the Corona, so it might warrant consideration by climbers and cross-country buffs, but the 1-watt lamps throw an effective beam much farther and illuminate objects and the trail with far greater detail. The Corona’s heft makes it less than ideal as a running light but at least with a rear-mounted battery box, it is well balanced.

The strobe feature seems most useful for marking a position to which one wants to return, such as a sleeping site some distance from main camp. Aimed at a tent canopy or tarp, the flashing makes it easy to spot a shelter from a good distance while off stargazing or initiating the nitrogen cycle, and it’s likely the Corona’s most frugal setting. I don’t discount the potential for using the flash as an emergency signal should the need ever arise. Mode 1 maximizes the angle from which the light can be spotted from afar.

The Corona is at a minimum water-resistant and should shrug off rain with no problem. Our dunk test (brief immersion in water a few inches deep) showed a few droplets made it past the battery box gasket, notably at the point of small imperfections. The battery box can be rinsed out should it come in contact with saltwater or if batteries leak, but the lamphead resisted our attempts to open it up. This means that should moisture ever invade the lamphead, where all the electronics reside, it might not be possible to dry it out.

The test Corona is made of gray and chartreuse plastic and sports a gray and black elastic headband. The bright color is welcome for making the Corona easier to find in dim light or sitting on the ground in forest clutter. It’s all too easy to misplace a black, gray or silver flashlight and leave it behind when packing, but that doesn’t stop makers from frequently using those hard-to-see non-colors.

In the Lab

I measured the Corona’s beam intensity in the mode and level combinations, both in the beam center and 1 foot off-axis. The following table gives the results.

Corona Output in the Eight Continuous Settings
Measured in Lux from 2 feet*, fresh Alkaline Batteries,
Room Temperature (75 °F)
Mode 1 (eight LEDs) Mode 2 (five LEDs) Mode 3 (three LEDs) Mode 4 (one LED)
Setting Beam center 1 ft off-center Beam center 1 ft off-center Beam center 1 ft off-center Beam center 1 ft off-center
High 510 85 390 65 220 45 85 15
Low 275 55 180 30 105 25 45 10
*Highest continuous recordable readings

Much like a bicycle with thirty possible gearing combinations yields perhaps two-thirds as many on the road, not all of the Corona’s eight (twelve if you include flash) mode and level combinations are useful. That said, because the beam pattern changes with each of the four modes, no two appear exactly alike even if the measured intensity is similar; also as batteries wear, an unused mode and level can become “just right.” (Because we don’t have the complex instrumentation required to measure total light output we can’t say, for example, whether Mode 1 low might put out more total light than Mode 2 high, even though the latter is demonstrably brighter at the beam center.)

We chose two modes to test battery life: Mode 1-high and Mode 3-high (eight and three LEDs, respectively). The first is a measure of what the Corona will do “maxed-out,” the second a measure of what we felt to be the most reasonable setting for all-around general use – giving both adequate light with long battery life.

Princeton Tec Corona LED Headlamp - 3
Princeton Tec Corona Intensity vs. Time (Output) graph.
Click graph to see a larger version.

Interpreting the Results

Despite the Corona’s claimed current regulation, it exhibits time-output curves typical of lights without: there’s a nearly continuous drop in output over time. In our tests though, the Mode 3 (three LED) drop was much less precipitous than that of Mode 1 and in practice is not particularly noticeable for a good many hours. Mode 1 output plunged from the start and the dimming was noticeable. The Corona circuitry does seem effective at extending the “toe” of the output curve by coaxing the last bit of juice from the batteries, albeit at dim levels. We didn’t try to establish the runtimes to the last eventual wink-off. It will likely occur days past where our chart extends. At below 50-lux levels, light is sufficient for digging items out of backpacks, simple camp chores and clear trail-walking for those possessing owl-like night vision. Glacier travel, not advised.

In Use

Nighttime maneuvers are easily performed via the Corona, and camp chores are a snap because of the generous beam width. The amount of light it puts out is really quite impressive and the lower modes are adequate for everything short of tricky navigation and poor trails. Map reading and bedtime reading aren’t difficult, despite the somewhat distracting purplish beam-center blob. I found the multi-LED modes in low to be better than the single-LED mode for reading.

There are, however, tangible differences between multi-LED arrays such as the Corona’s and a collimated 1-watt LED that hydra-head designs can’t overcome when the going gets technical. Even with fresh batteries, maximum Corona output is roughly half as bright as Princeton Tec’s own EOS and its 1-watt Luxeon. Compared with the EOS, the Corona’s beam is more of a floodlight, covering considerably more area but not projecting as far. Details such as uneven surfaces aren’t as distinct and there’s more backscatter (glare) in rain and fog. Which type of light is better, depends both on conditions and your intended use.

Because the Corona always switches on to eight-high mode, users concerned with preserving their night vision should cover the lens until they progress to the desired lower level. For example, selecting Mode 4-low – the dimmest setting – takes a total of five button presses.

We also discovered we can remove the top strap and battery pack and still wear the lamphead using just the main strap. Although the short cable prevents placing the battery pack in a warm pocket, we can keep it warm under a turtleneck or even perched on a shoulder. Not an elegant or the most comfortable solution for keeping the batteries warm but effective, not to mention the lamp is noticeably lighter on the head and the strap can be worn looser. In more prosaic pursuits, with the battery pack detached the Corona is far more comfortable for reading in bed.

Recommendations

The Corona would be improved with more effective current management and a memory that retains the last setting used when it’s switched on. Substituting a red LED for part of the lamphead array would offer a night-vision preservation mode, a mode that would be best if it could be accessed directly from off, perhaps through a separate switch.

Conclusions

The Corona’s design concept has been trumped by newer 1-watt headlamps for non-technical use, especially those that either combine the main LED with one or more 5 millimeter LEDs or provide a flip-down diffuser lens-. As our tests demonstrate, even eight 5 millimeter LEDs can’t begin to match the output of a single 1-watt Luxeon. The Corona is both versatile and frugal, provided the many modes are used judiciously, and the light from its massively parallel LED array is good enough to support general backcountry activities and is especially nice for in-camp chores, where a flood-style beam is appreciated. But at eight ounces, the Corona is very heavy for a headlamp that doesn’t offer a long-throw pencil-style high beam suitable for technical nighttime activities, such as climbing and off-trail travel. For these pursuits there are better lights, including other offerings from Princeton Tec.

Tarptent Rainbow (Sneak Preview) SPOTLITE REVIEW

A free-standing Tarptent with side-entry, loads of headroom, and under two pounds!

Overview

Tarptents are a favorite with all types of lightweight and ultralight backpackers, as evidenced by the Tarptent Squall 2 receiving one of Backpacking Light’s 2005 Lightitude Awards. So a new Tarptent is big news.

I recently had the pleasure of thru-hiking a section of the Colorado Trail with Henry Shires, and had an opportunity to inspect Henry’s latest creation tentatively named the “Rainbow”. With Henry’s permission, we are releasing this preview of the new Tarptent Rainbow, which may be available as soon as December 2005.

The Rainbow is a distinct design departure from previous Tarptents. Instead of the traditional flowing catenary curves, and headroom-at-the-front design of the other Tarptents, the Rainbow is free-standing, has a single center ridge pole, side entry with vestibule, mesh entry wall with zippered door, a sewn-in silnylon floor, and loads of headroom.

The top has one 18-inch strut to widen the tent and support the vestibule on one side and a vent/window on the other. At the ends there is a provision to use hiking poles to extend and secure the sides.

The current prototype is a 1+ person size. It has a sewn-in floor, and mesh around the edges like other Tarptents. The floor size is 38 inches wide by 88 inches long, which comes to 23 square feet. Headroom is 44 inches. It weighs 32 ounces.

The initial model will be made of silnylon, and will likely be followed with a 2-person version, a model made of Epic fabric, and other options.

The new design innovations and options coming in the new Tarptent Rainbow are enough to make us lightweight gear fanatics lick our chops! We look forward to its arrival and the opportunity to do an in-depth review.

Photo: Through-hiker Henry Shires kneeling in his new Tarptent Rainbow.

Specifications and Features

  • Tent Type: Single-wall, free-standing, side entry with vestibule
  • Capacity: 1+
  • Fabrics: 1.3 oz/yd2 silnylon, no-see-um mesh
  • Dimensions: center height is 44 inches, outside is 46 inches wide by 100 inches long, the sewn-in floor is 38 inches wide by 88 inches long
  • Floor Area: 23 square feet; the sewn-in floor has 4-inch bathtub walls that lay flat to expand width and length by 8 inches in good weather
  • Included: silnylon tent, single aluminum ridge pole, aluminum strut, 6 titanium stakes, stake sack, tent sack
  • Weight: prototype is 32 ounces
  • Full height entry vestibule
  • Large zippered netting entry door
  • Sewn-in silnylon floor
  • Top vent/window
  • Optional use of hiking poles to secure the tent base
  • Reflective Spectra cord guylines
  • MSRP: $225 (tentative)
  • Contact: http://www.tarptent.com

Big Sky Products (SummitShelters) Revolution 2P UL Tent REVIEW

Light weight, single-wall Epic shell, two-person freestanding tent.

Editor’s Note: This review is based on an early prototype of the Revolution 2P UL tent. The production model incorporates the following changes: a 50% stronger Epic fabric which increases the tent weight 1 to 2 ounces; the shell has been tightened, and tensioners added to all four corners; the two top vents are replaced by one larger vent on the vestibule; and the seams around the window and bathtub floor are seam-sealed.

Overview

Big Sky Products (SummitShelters) Revolution 2P UL Tent REVIEW - 1
Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL with one side of the vestibule entry rolled up. The vertical mesh wall has a large zippered door for easy entry/exit. Guylines on the vestibule side (shown) are optional.

Weighing only 2 pounds 11 ounces (1.22 kg) for the complete package, the Big Sky Products SummitShelters series Revolution 2P UL may be the lightest two-person freestanding tent on the market. It is also a great value. It comes standard with an Epic shell, vestibule, silnylon floor, Fibraplex carbon fiber poles, and titanium stakes, and costs only $345. Its floor area/weight ratio of 0.66 ft2/oz sets a new standard for a two-person freestanding tent, and the weight includes a vestibule. The Black Diamond Firstlight tent similarly equipped with after market poles and stakes and optional vestibule weighs one pound more and costs $542.

In Brief

  • Single wall Epic freestanding tent with Fibraplex poles, silnylon floor, and vestibule
  • Highest area/weight ratio we know of for a two-person freestanding tent
  • Quick setup and easy to enter/exit
  • All space is usable due to steep sidewalls and near rectangular floor
  • Storm worthy, but water eventually wets through, increasing interior moisture
  • Some concerns about wind stability
  • Great value

Specifications

Tent Type

Two-person single wall freestanding tent with floor

  Fabric Description

Tent shell is grey Epic by Nextec, fabric weight is proprietary; tent floor is 30d 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon.

  Pole Material

Fibraplex carbon fiber, each pole 152 in (3.9 m) long, packed size 17 in x 1.5 in (43 x 4 cm), weight 8.1 oz (23 g). Easton aluminum poles (13.4 oz/380 g) are available as a less expensive option.

  Weight Full Package
Epic tent, 2 Fibraplex carbon fiber poles, 8 titanium stakes in silnylon sack, 2 guylines, silnylon compression stuff sack.

Backpacking Light scale Manufacturer claim
2 lb 11oz (1.22 kg) 2 lb 11oz (1.22 kg)

  Weight Minimum Package
Epic tent, 2 Fibraplex carbon fiber poles, 8 titanium stakes, 2 guylines, no stuff sacks.

Manufacturer supplied minimum Backpacking Light minimum
Tent body, 2 poles, 8 stakes, 12 ft (3.7 m) guyline Same as Manufacturer Minimum but with: 0.25 oz (7 g) titanium stakes
0.004 oz/ft (0.37 g/m) Aircore 1 Spectra guylines
2 lb 9.6 oz  (1.18kg) 2 lb 9.7 oz (1.18 kg)

  Floor/Vestibule Area

Floor area Vestibule area
27.7 ft2 (2.57m2) 9 ft2 (0.84m2)

  Floor Area/Backpacking Light Minimum Weight Ratio

0.66 ft2/oz (2.18 m2/kg)

  Dimensions

inches centimeters
Width 56 / 46 142 / 117
Length 84 213
Height 42 109

  Model Year

2005

  MSRP

$345 US with carbon fiber poles, $260 US with Easton aluminum poles

  Options
The Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution tent is available in three models.

Model Doors Vestibules Approximate Weight* oz (kg) MSRP*
1P 1 1 35 (0.99) $275
2P UL 1 1 43 (1.22) $345
2P 2 2 46 (1.30) $345
*Weights and costs are for tent with Fibraplex carbon fiber poles. Each model is available with stiffer Easton aluminum poles that weigh 5.3 ounces more and cost $85 less.

Usable Features/Ease of Use

Big Sky Products (SummitShelters) Revolution 2P UL Tent REVIEW - 2
The Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL uses exterior carbon fiber poles that slip into grommets at the corners. The tent clips onto the poles, making setup quick and easy. Our prototype test model shown here has a large ceiling vent on each end of the tent and a clear plastic window at the foot end. (The production model has one vent on the vestibule that vents the main tent through the mesh entry wall behind the vestibule – see the first photo for a view of the mesh wall.)

The Revolution’s shell is Epic fabric, which is breathable and functionally waterproof when stretched at a steep angle and not under pressure. The two-person Revolution 2P UL tested has a vestibule entry on one side and a solid wall on the other. Two external carbon fiber poles (or optional aluminum poles) in an “X” shape support the tent. Setup is very easy: lay the tent out; insert the pole ends into grommets at the corners; clip the tent to the poles; and stake out the corners, vestibule, and guylines. Eight stakes are needed for a secure pitch. Titanium stakes (6 inches/0.2 ounces each) come with this tent, so you don’t have to replace any inferior aluminum stakes.

Entry is from the side through a tall zippered vestibule and entry door. The large door (38 inches wide by 32 inches high) provides easy entry and easy access to gear stored in the vestibule. I was initially concerned about the functionality of the side entry (versus entering from one end), but the door, floor, and ceiling proportions are large enough to allow one person to maneuver around another occupant with minimal disturbance.

Inside the tent, the bathtub floor extends up the steep walls 8 inches, allowing sleepers to press against the sides without moisture transfer. There are two inside mesh storage pockets, one on the entry wall 20 inches wide by 6 inches deep, and a triangular “clothes hamper” 37 by 37 by 34 inches for storing clothes in the back corner. At the ceiling there are six loops for hanging a clothesline, gear loft, or a tent light. The foot end has a clear plastic lens-shaped window 25 inches wide by 6 inches high at the center.

The 9 square foot vestibule is large enough for two medium sized packs and boots, leaving room to enter/exit the tent, or gear plus a wet dog if you don’t mind him blocking the entry. During inclement weather, cooking can easily be done in the vestibule (using due caution), reaching through the tent’s large door.

Overall, I found the Revolution 2P UL to be the most user-friendly ultralight tent I have met so far. It is easy to setup, easy to enter, has the features I want, and provides good storage options.

Weight/Sizing

The Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL sets a new area/weight standard of 0.66 ft2/oz for a two-person freestanding tent, beating the Black Diamond Firstlight (0.63 ft2/oz in standard configuration). In his Black Diamond Firstlight Tent Review, Alan Dixon calculated a 0.72 ft2/oz area/weight ratio for the Firstlight using after market Fibraplex poles and titanium stakes substituted for the standard ones. However, at 0.66 ft2/oz the Revolution’s weight includes a 9 square foot vestibule, while a vestibule on the Firstlight is optional and adds 18.4 ounces.

The Revolution’s remarkable area/weight ratio is due to its standard Epic shell and silnylon floor, Fibraplex carbon fiber poles, titanium stakes, and silnylon stuff sacks. The comparative weight of tent components is summarized in the following table.

Weight Comparison – Standard Components
Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL Black Diamond Firstlight
Tent Component oz kg oz kg
Tent Body Epic shell, silnylon floor 31.5 0.89 Epic shell, silnylon floor 29.6 0.84
Poles Fibraplex carbon fiber 8.1 0.23 DAC FeatherLite aluminum 13.1 0.37
Stakes 8, titanium 1.7 0.05 6, aluminum 3.0 0.09
Guylines 2, nylon 0.3 0.01 4, 3 mm nylon 1.4 0.04
Stuff sack and stake bag Silnylon, compression 1.4 0.03 Silnylon 1.0 0.03
Total 43.0 1.22 48.1 1.36
Vestibule Included (9 ft2) Optional (13 ft2) 18.4 0.52
Grand Total 43.0 1.22 66.5 1.89

 

Weight and Cost Comparison – Minimum Weight Components
Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL ($345) Black Diamond Firstlight ($299)
Tent Component oz kg oz kg
Tent body: Epic shell, silnylon floor standard 31.5 0.89 standard 29.6 0.84
Poles: Fibraplex carbon fiber standard 8.1 0.23 after market ($102) 7.2 0.02
Stakes: titanium 8, standard 1.7 0.05 6, after market ($12) 1.4 0.04
Guylines 2, standard 0.3 0.01 4, standard 1.4 0.04
Minimum weight 41.6 1.18 39.6 1.12
Vestibule standard (9 ft2) optional (13 ft2, $129) 18.4 0.52
Total weight and cost $345 41.6 1.18 $542 58.0 1.64

Usable Space

Big Sky Products (SummitShelters) Revolution 2P UL Tent REVIEW - 3
I found the inside dimensions adequate for two people, and luxurious for one. With two sleeping pads side by side, there are 8 extra inches on each side. The length (84 inches) is sufficient for a 6-foot tall person, with 12 inches of room left for gear at the foot end. Taller people will really appreciate the 42 inches of headroom.

The space in the Revolution 2P UL is all usable, and seems larger than it really is because of the tent’s steep sidewalls and nearly rectangular floor. The bathtub floor extending 8 inches up the sides also increases usable space because one can press a sleeping bag or gear against the waterproof silnylon without any moisture transfer (the same is not true when pressing against the Epic fabric).

There are several options to stash clothing and gear: extra space at the foot end, hanging a clothesline or mesh gear loft (but headroom is compromised), a sizeable mesh pocket at the head end, a large mesh “clothes hamper” in the back corner, and the vestibule (a great place for packs and boots). The vestibule is easily accessed through the large entry door. For more convenience and storage, consider getting the Revolution 2P, which has a vestibule and entry on each side. It weighs approximately 8 ounces more than the 2P UL.

Wind Stability

The Revolution 2P UL with carbon fiber poles has limited wind stability. The clip attachment and limp shell (the single wall Epic shell “hangs” from the poles) make the windward side of the tent dish in and act like a sail. The flexible carbon fiber poles allow the tent to lean substantially in even a mild wind. (In contrast, the Black Diamond Firstlight uses internal poles to tightly stretch its single wall Epic shell, making it much more wind resistant.) Wind gusts of 15-20 mph at Death Valley California were enough to cause major concern. I also found that the tent flapped and contorted a lot and was quite noisy. For these reasons, it is very important to securely stake the tent with at least eight stakes. The staking pattern is 4 stakes at the corners, 2 on the vestibule, and 2 guylines on the opposite side. There are two more loops for guylines on the vestibule side, but the guylines and stakes are not provided. I strongly recommend four guylines. I would not recommend staking this tent with any less than eight stakes (10 is better), otherwise you might lose your investment! It helps to face the foot end of the tent into the wind.

The jury is still out on the wind stability of this tent, and user experience over the next year will reveal its limitations. Readers concerned about wind stability should get the 2P UL with the stiffer aluminum poles, or consider getting the Revolution 2P (46 ounces, $345) instead. The 2P has vestibules on both sides that stake to the ground, which stretches the shell more to give it better wind stability.

Storm Protection

Big Sky Products (SummitShelters) Revolution 2P UL Tent REVIEW - 4
The Revolution 2P UL required some slapping on the walls to make snow slide off. Snow accumulating on the top compressed the top vents. Snow sliding off the vestibule blocked ventilation from the bottom. The Revolution 2P UL is not a good choice for snow camping because of its limp shell.

Except for a March trip to Death Valley National Park, I could not find any dry conditions to test the Revolution. Most of my testing was during an unusually wet winter in Southwest Colorado and Southern Utah. It rained or snowed nearly every night I used it. I found the Revolution to be storm worthy, with no leaks. The manufacturer maintains that seam sealing is not necessary. I didn’t and did not notice any leakage through the seams.

I did find that the Epic fabric wets through after several hours of continuous rain or wet snow. The inside surface becomes damp, then wet, but does not drip because of the tent’s steep walls. However, the bleed-through increases the moisture inside the tent, which enhances condensation or frost on the inside walls by morning. When using the “clothes hamper” pocket during wet weather, beware of water bleeding through and wetting your clothes.

Ventilation/Condensation Resistance

With its solid mesh entry wall, two top vents, mesh ceiling panels under the vents, and breathable Epic fabric, the Revolution 2P UL has excellent ventilation and condensation resistance under normal conditions. In my wet/cool winter testing, I evaluated the Revolution under some worst case conditions for tent condensation. With maximum humidity, and nighttime temperatures ranging from 25 to 37 °F, I had either heavy frost or heavy condensation on the inner tent walls every night. Fortunately, with the steep sidewalls and high ceiling, I did not readily brush against the walls and transfer moisture. In spring-like conditions at Death Valley in March, I was finally able to test the tent in “normal” conditions, and found the tent’s ventilation system works just fine in dry/warm air. I would expect the Revolution 2P to have even better ventilation because of the second mesh entry wall and vestibule.

Single wall tents are especially inclined to have wet/cold weather condensation problems, because the single wall is a cold surface and water condenses (or freezes) on it, exactly like a dehumidifier works. Fortunately most of us encounter these conditions only a small percentage of the time we are out, so the lightweight benefits are worth it. A pack towel works great to wipe the inside walls when needed.

Insect Protection

The Revolution is completely sealed and provides full insect protection, along with good ventilation to keep the tent from warming up too much.

Durability

The SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL is sufficiently durable for three-season backpacking, but it’s not a bomb shelter. Because it is ultralight gear, it requires reasonable care. Its thin Epic fabric can be punctured or cut with a sharp object, and the carbon fiber poles can break if placed under excessive stress or stepped on. It’s important to make sure that the joints are fully mated before you flex the poles, otherwise they may break. The silnylon floor is only 30-denier, and can easily be punctured by sharp objects. Damage can be repaired, but it is important to understand the limitations at the outset, rather than be surprised later. That said, I had no damage or breakage problems during my testing period. In my opinion, this tent is sufficiently durable for general backpacking, assuming reasonable care.

Value

The Big Sky Products SummitShelters Revolution 2P UL provides a lot of features and space in a compact 2 pound 11 ounce package. It is nicely designed and well constructed. With an MSRP of $345, the Revolution is a bargain compared to a similarly equipped Black Diamond Firstlight tent, its closest competitor. The Firstlight with after market Fibraplex carbon fiber poles and titanium stakes, and optional vestibule costs $542 and weighs a pound more. The floor area of the two tents is nearly the same, but the Revolution 2P UL is 2 inches longer, and its weight includes a vestibule. The Revolution can be purchased with Easton Aluminum poles, which add 5.3 ounces but cost $85 less. My only reservation about this tent is its limp shell, which limits its stability in wind and wet snow.

In making a purchasing decision, readers should consider the Revolution 2P as well as the 2P UL, because it adds a second vestibule and door for about 8 ounces more weight. That’s a lot of extra utility for minimal extra weight and no extra cost.

Several Thousand Steps on the PCT

Lightweight gear and food, and lessons learned along two hundred miles of the PCT from B to C (Bend, Oregon to the Columbia River).

Introduction

B is Bend, Oregon, and C is the Columbia River, a couple of hundred miles roughly north along the Cascade Mountains. And I’d know exactly how many steps, if I hadn’t lost my pedometer the first day of the trip, which began at the Elk Lake trailhead on the Century Drive outside Bend. Since that loss was about the worst thing that happened, all in all I’d have to rate the experience a very good one.

The Start

Elk Lake lies on the eastern slopes of the Cascade Mountain chain, just south of the Three Sisters Mountains. Beginning from the Elk Lake trailhead, a trail leads 1.5 miles mostly west to connect to the Pacific Crest Trail. Although there is not much vertical change, the transition is pretty dramatic, from pine forest typical of the dry east side of the Cascades to fir forest typical of the wet west side.

The Pacific Crest Trail, in my experience, is generally a distinct foot highway, and so missing a dry junction in clear weather takes some doing. Not that I don’t have what it takes to miss a junction, but this time I managed to recognize the connection and turn north into the territory of wild animals – this despite warnings from a few bitten and bitter trail veterans who warned me as they passed. It was early July, and the mosquitoes were fierce, determined, and thirsty, and fresh blood was all they wanted – I would do for either an appetizer or the main course.

These warnings reinforced the ominous sense I had gained while reading the Pacific Crest Trail Guide, in which the area just to the south was described as one of the two buggiest on the entire trail. Consequently, I was armed with mosquito repellant, mosquito head net, and an extra piece of mosquito netting designed so that I could cower under it in the hammock or under the tarp I was carrying.

And so I turned north onto the PCT, and within a few miles I managed to knock the pedometer off, only realizing the loss when I was several more hard-won miles down the trail. OK, perhaps not so hard won, but still I decided not to turn around, retrace several miles without assurance of finding the darn thing, and then once more run the mosquito gauntlet, having made three trips for the progress of one. If anyone finds a silver pedometer with the annoying habit of vocalizing, for example, “All clear” in an irritating mechanical voice, then you may certainly keep it with my compliments.

The trail runs north past a collection of lakes and out onto the Wickiup Plain. I rather quickly observed that early July came with some snow left over from an average to good Oregon winter and covered the trail. Despite the opportunity, I managed not to get lost immediately and even found every now and then the trail running through bare spots.

Temporarily Misplaced

Or so I thought. It turns out that near Mesa Creek there is a junction between the Pacific Crest Trail and the Oregon Skyline Trail, which largely parallel one another. In many places the older Skyline Trail was incorporated into the PCT, but in others it remains separate. Inadvertently, I drifted onto the more westerly Skyline Trail, which had its very good points. One good point was, well, I was on it. Next, it was lower and therefore less snow-covered. However, not to be deterred I took a rather early opportunity to make my way back up east to the PCT, only to get really lost in the snow. As best I am able to reconstruct, I passed somewhere close to Obsidian Falls (or so I think, because I stumbled across some obsidian in quantity). If there were falls nearby, they were well shielded by snow. Then I zigzagged here and there, over hill and dale, up and down and all around, until by some miracle I hit the trail again.

Only it turned out not to be “the” trail, but by good fortune another one called Glacier Way that connected back into the PCT. Almost immediately following the junction, the PCT emerged north from the snow, up over lava rock, and out from under the North Sister. The Sisters, like the other big mountains in the Cascades, pile up the clouds and consequent snowfall on their west sides as storms move in carrying marine moisture from the Pacific.

While wandering around lost, I had worried that I might have to bail out of the trip, as much of it ran at the same 6,000 to 7,000 feet altitude at which I was snowbound. So I laid elaborate plans to grope my way north to the McKenzie Highway, hitchhike out, and hope to find public transportation, a mode apparently dying more quickly than foot travel. However, once clear of the influence of the taller mountains, the trail was open and easy to follow even at the higher elevations with only patches of snow here and there.

Bugs, Oh My!

So north I went with confidence, taking the scenic route where the Skyline Trail passed by North and South Matthieu Lakes, so that I could tell my friend Matthieu, into McKenzie Pass. Ah, but confidence on this adventure was not warranted, and not unpunished. The mosquitoes, which had been lurking at the lower altitudes all this time, swarmed in to greet me. They reminded me of the flying monkeys scene from The Wizard of Oz, except they were less benign.

I slapped legs, arms, face, and then did it again and again for practice. Then I stopped (a mistake nearly always) and slapped on DEET. The mosquitoes seemed to respond; they appeared to regard the stuff as cocktails to be lapped before setting in to the flesh beneath, and so redoubled their efforts. It was too hot to pull on long pants, but I didn’t want my legs to become two big consolidated welts, I also didn’t want to stop to figure it all out.

It was then that an idea germinated. I wriggled along wishing I had something lightweight, airy, and mosquito repellent. I thought of netting leggings, netting chaps (along the lines of rain chaps), and finally: the netting skirt. Unlike the leggings or chaps, I could actually make the netting skirt, using the piece of mosquito netting I had with me. A crude but workable wrap skirt could be made simply by covering the relevant portions and securing the result with a piece of string.

Of course, by the time I had worked all this out the worst of the mosquitoes had passed, and I was approaching a collection of humanity, or what passes for it along the PCT. Consequently, it was a couple of days later before I put the concept into practice. And while it’s true that rational folks would have thought better of it in the meantime, no such consideration nor reason intervened.

McKenzie Pass

At McKenzie Pass, I walked along the highway for a few steps to the Dee Wright Observatory. A very impressive lava flow spilled from the Yapoah Crater I had passed on the PCT a few miles back. Explanatory signs and trails through the lava give an impression of the workings of the inner earth when it becomes the outer earth.

From there the trail goes up through and down through lava rubble that came from Belknap and Little Belknap and then up on the slopes of Mt. Washington. All that piece of trail is dry as a bone. I wound up camping at the Washington Ponds, which the guidebook accurately described as hard to find. Fortunately, I found one pond while looking for the other.

North of Mt. Washington the PCT crosses the Santiam Highway, where a large fire devastated the forest through which the trail runs. For miles and miles and miles there is nothing left, except for here and there some green sprouts emerging from the charring and dust. The desolation makes one realize how rich a living forest is, with plants and flowers and berries and forest duff, shade and growing trees, and animal life among it all. In the burned area only a few pockets escaped the general conflagration.

In the area north of the highway, again the trail splits. I took the lower, and more watered, Skyline Trail rather than the upper PCT. I had already found that the fire and the loss of trees that resulted had dried up even the normally continuous streams.

The Netting Tutu Saves My Bacon

It was hot. For the first of two times I used the umbrella that I hauled along on the trip for shade. And then I decided to slip off trail into the inviting waters of Santiam Lake. It sounded from the guidebook and appeared to the eye, so cool, so refreshing, so alluring. In fact it was so warm, so bug-infested, but still, so much better than continuing to eat trail dust. The mosquitoes were so voracious that upon emerging from the lake I immediately applied DEET to everything that was or might ever be exposed.

I also left behind my bottle of DEET when I hastily packed up so as to get out of there with all deliberate speed. And, you may have guessed, several miles later I missed it, and didn’t go back.

Fortunately, I had used one technique that saved my bacon – and the other edible parts. I had treated those pieces of clothing that were thin enough, and exposed enough to potential mosquito attacks, with permethrin. That included head and face coverings, shirt, shorts, and the extra piece of mosquito netting. Permethrin is a chemical nerve agent for insects. I found that it absolutely protected every piece of clothing, and every bit of skin under it from the pests.

A Pacific Crest Trail Section Hike from B to C in Several Thousand Easy - and Other - Steps - 1
The author models his mosquito-netting tutu on a subsequent trip along the Oregon coast.

Out came the mosquito netting, the crude wrap, and, in the wilderness where no eye saw, the guy in the net skirt. I think it gave a somewhat debonair ballet effect to my walking. It also kept the bugs off. An occasional, bold mosquito would find her way underneath, only to search frantically for a way out again. No bites, no pain, big gain.

I moved on north, eventually rejoining the PCT just before Milk Creek. I had pushed to get to Milk Creek, having read in the guidebook that the glacier-fed streams became less manageable the later in the day one crossed. In fact, the guidebook had specified 11:00 a.m. as the latest crossing time, but I didn’t get there till noon. I reasoned that it wasn’t really sun noon, just that artificial daylight saving noon, and so crossing should still be OK. It was, and I rested on the opposite bank, taking a noontime R and R.

Unfortunately, it turned out that Milk Creek was not the creek the guidebook had warned about. Rather, the warning was for Russell Creek, another four and a half miles along the trail. I got there at a time, daylight saving or not, that no right-minded guidebook author would have recommended. But ignorance can be a good occasion for those guardian angels that protect children and fools to earn their wing struts. I crossed, and only later discovered my confusion of the two creeks. Moreover, Russell Creek didn’t seem very formidable. That guardian angel must have been on steroids.

Jefferson Park – A Highlight

From there the trail entered one of the highlights of the trip: Jefferson Park. It is truly lovely, and truly over-loved, no doubt. That early in the year there had been few visitors. There was a lot of snow around the trail so finding it was somewhat difficult. But of course, I was a veteran at getting lost, and so I did it with ease and good humor. The pass beyond Jefferson Park shared its stunning scenery. A sign in the pass notifying hikers that they were entering the Mount Hood National Forest disconcerted me: Mt. Jefferson loomed above, and Mt. Hood was nowhere to be seen, some 100 miles to the north.

To whoever put up the excellent cairns that guide hikers down from the pass north of Mt. Jefferson, eternal gratitude and applause! Out of the snow they stood, and very welcome sights they were. Even I could follow them, and was delighted to be able to do so.

The next portion of the trip passed uneventfully. There were plenty of water sources, few people, and healthy forests up to and around Ollallie Butte. However, not so many water sources occur north to placid Lemiti Creek, and from there to the Warm Springs River. In fact, water sources became determining factors for stops and stays until I reached Mt. Hood. The long north arm of Timothy Lake stretches out the trail along its shores. North of Timothy Lake, in the middle of what by all appearances was nowhere, I came across a nice gesture: by the side of the trail, someone had left several paperback books, which s/he had probably finished, as an impromptu exchange. One of them was an interesting little book highly recommended: Albert Schweitzer’s Out of My Life and Thought. According to the copyright, the tenth printing of my paperback was in February 1961. How’s that for the latest summer reading?

The trail crosses Highway 26 as it winds its way up from Madras, Oregon, and Highway 35 lay only a few miles farther. I took a little detour along the old PCT past Twin Lakes. I had grumped about what I thought was going to be a pull up onto Mt. Hood, but the trail was very well cut and pretty easy going – until I neared Timberline Lodge. There the trail comes out of the forest into the open, the sun was shining fiercely (it was noontime), the path was sandy and steep, and the portable shade of the umbrella was truly welcome. As was Timberline Lodge, where the air and water were pure, the bathroom dim and therefore apparently spotless.

I looked up a friend there and off-loaded a few extras that I hadn’t eaten, beaten, or thrown away, then with light heart and lightened pack, shaved and spit-bathed, and set off for the final leg. Mt. Hood’s Timberline Trail (which the PCT shares on Hood’s west side) has its ups and downs. One of the ups is Paradise Park, reached by a side trail, and aptly named and beautiful any time of year. The bear grass was prominent when I was there. One of the big downs leads to the Sandy River. There I cleverly decided to jump from a tall rock on one side to the opposite shore. I succeeded in the first part: that is, I jumped from the rock. I almost jumped to the opposite shore, too. Landing both a bit short and a bit awkwardly, I got wet feet and glacier grit in my shoes, and a small knee sprain for my judgment. My current resolve is not to jump from any height onto loose river rock. Maybe that’s why long-jump pits feature sand instead.

I took a scenic detour to Ramona Falls – well worth the trip – and then managed to cross Muddy Fork (properly named) in a peculiarly personal way. I got across the first arm easily – and into a thicket of willow. Hearing voices from hikers who had followed a more rational route, I was eventually able to bushwhack my way out, in order to cross the remaining two streams. Those crossings were uneventful, and from there the Timberline Trail led back to a junction with the PCT, which follows a much less scenic route farther down the Mountain.

The Finish

Off Mt. Hood to the north, the PCT makes its way across Lolo Pass, between Bull Run Lake and the lovely Lost Lake under Buck Peak, and then to Indian Mountain and Indian Springs (named by those who doubtless prided themselves on their originality, with whose descendents I apparently have fallen into entirely too much contact). I took a cut-off trail that leads to a trail joining Wahtum Lake (where the PCT goes) and Eagle Creek (where it no longer does), and turned toward the gorgeous and much photographed Eagle Creek. The Eagle Creek Trail is an ideal trail on which to end a hike, in my opinion, and since on this solo hike my opinion was the only one that counted, that is how the trek closed: down Eagle Creek to the Columbia, across to Cascade Locks, and back to as much civilization as the country currently offers.

Lessons Learned

  1. Tie the pedometer on.
  2. Carry back-up DEET.
  3. Read guidebooks carefully and try to understand them.
  4. Wear gauzy skirts only in carefully chosen society.
  5. Don’t jump from tall rocks.

Gear

Gear, not counting food or water, weighed about 16 pounds, of which I wore about four pounds and carried 12. I took (weights approximate):

  1. Pack, about 2,600 ci (43 liters), padded back and straps: 1.5 lb
  2. Homemade bivy sack modeled on Equinox, silnylon floor, ripstop top, and side zipper: 8 oz
  3. Synthetic quilt: 29 oz
  4. Therm-a-Rest 3/4: 20 oz
  5. Silnylon tarp, 65″ x 110″ and stakes: 12 oz
  6. Lightweight hammock (for lounging, not overnight): 15 oz
  7. Umbrella: 12 oz
  8. Walking/tarp pole (old cross country ski pole): 7 oz
  9. Clothing: shorts, nylon shirt, head cloth and visor, trail running shoes, low socks, homemade ripstop gaiters to keep out particles, fleece pullover, rain jacket/windbreaker, rain/windbreaker pants, fleece cap, fleece socks, head net: 5 lb
  10. Miscellaneous line, flashlight, knife, creams and lotions, watch, spoon, glasses and retainer and case, mosquito repellent, iodine for water treatment, pain medication and more pain medication just in case, soap, small wash cloths, toothbrush, nylon clips, and a plastic mirror: 29 oz
  11. A couple of paperback books: 10 oz
  12. Two 1 L soda bottles for water: 3 oz
  13. Extra piece of mosquito netting: 2 oz

Menu

I ate from a very limited menu, which results in a weight of a little over 1.5 pounds per day and yields about 3,800 calories per day, or about 5 calories per gram. I took:

  1. Peanut butter (6 calories per gram): about 9 ounces per day
  2. Nutella (5.5 calories per gram): about 4 ounces per day
  3. Olive oil (8 calories per gram): about 2 ounces per day
  4. Dried apricots (4 calories per gram): about 4 ounces per day
  5. Whole wheat flour tortillas (3.5 calories per gram): about 5 ounces per day
  6. Jerky (3 calories per gram): about 2 ounces per day

A Pacific Crest Trail Section Hike from B to C in Several Thousand Easy - and Other - Steps - 2

About the Author

Ken Maddox took a first extended backpacking trip a few decades ago that included two peak experiences: traversing the Tetons, and meeting his wife. Linda was backpacking, too, headed the opposite direction – a situation that has recurred on more than one occasion. Ken is hooked on lightweight backpacking and on doing so without spending a fortune, which the family finances would likely not support, and Linda certainly will not. Ken lives in Hood River, Oregon in the middle of the Cascade Mountains, about 60 miles east of Portland.

RailRiders Adventure Top SPOTLITE REVIEW

A well-vented top that excels in warm weather

Overview

The RailRiders Adventure Top shirt is designed to be a well-vented shirt that also provides good sun protection; and it does excel as a warm weather garment. The Adventure top is made with 2 ply 3 ounce supplex nylon and has a soft, very comfortable feel. It has a 3 button front closure that extends down from the neck for 6 inches, and button closure cuffs. The full side mesh panels and the vented Coolmax back mesh are the key features that make this shirt so comfortable in warm weather. There is a single chest pocket with a vertical velcro closure, and a vertical 7/8 inch collar for extra sun protection on your neck and that cool Nehru look.

I wore my Adventure top for several weeks of walking on the Pacific Crest Trail this spring, and it did excel in hot weather. The side panels are an absolute delight on hot days, keeping me noticeably cooler and dryer than other shirts I used. On my hottest day on the trail, I spent several hours navigating through sweltering Mission Creek canyon. Tired and dehydrated, I switched from another warm weather shirt to my Adventure top and was immediately more comfortable. The Adventure top, and its companion the Eco-Mesh shirt, are very popular with long distance hikers on the PCT, being light, comfortable and providing good protection from the relentless California sun. Another plus – after a few days in warm weather this shirt doesn’t stink nearly as bad as some other synthetic tops.

My only complaint with the Adventure top was the stitching. My shirt popped a few stitches from relatively minor stress while donning my pack. This happened at the seam between the side panel mesh and the supplex nylon. I beefed up the stitching by hand and never had another problem. The Adventure top also weighed in at almost 7 ounces, significantly more than the manufacturer’s spec of 5 ounces. We also found these shirts to run a little smaller than other shirts of the same size. Consider sizing up one size if you are in doubt about sizes. But overall, it has become a favorite and my top is still in great shape. It will see a lot more action in the warm southwest.

Features and Specifications

  • Weight: 6.9 oz as measured size L (195 g) Manufacturer’s spec 5 oz (141 g)
  • Full side mesh panels and Coolmax vented back panel
  • Comfortable, 3 ounce supplex nylon body
  • Button, 6 inch front closure and button cuffs
  • Vertical chest pocket with velcro closure
  • MSRP: $54
  • Contact: http://www.railriders.com

Backpacking Light Editor Receives National Award for Volunteer Efforts

Forest Service award recognizes Will Rietveld and spouse Janet Reichl for Leave No Trace education and research.

Backpacking Light Packing Systems Section Editor Will Rietveld and his wife Janet Reichl backpack nearly every week in the summertime. They combine testing gear for BPL with serving as volunteer Wilderness Information Specialists for the Forest Service.

Will and Janet were recently honored with a national award from the USDA Forest Service for “their exemplary service and efforts as Forest Service volunteers.” The award acknowledges the estimated 2000 hours they have put in on the trails, talking with wilderness users about Leave No Trace ethics, and the many special projects they have completed over the past seven years.

One project, funded by a research grant, was a research study to determine the effectiveness of Leave No Trace messages given to backpackers regarding proper disposal of human waste, and building campfires above timberline. The study found that backpackers as a group are very responsive to an appropriately delivered LNT message — compliance jumped from 21% to 70%!

In another project, Will and Janet developed a web-based “Chicago Basin Trip Planning Guide” to help visitors plan their trip and reduce their impact in a beautiful (but heavily used) area of the Weminuche Wilderness in Southern Colorado. Check it out at http://sjma.org/ (click on “Area Info”).

Will and Janet are passionate about educating inexperienced backpackers about Leave No Trace outdoor ethics. As volunteers, they talk with backpackers they meet on the trail, and Will has written several articles on the subject. An archive of Will’s articles can be found on their personal website called Southwest Ultralight Backpacking, click on “Backcountry Safety and Ethics”.

The staff at Backpacking Light would like to congratulate Will and Janet for all their efforts to help protect the wilderness areas we all love, and for all the good work they do for BPL. We can’t help but envy their choice of retirement lifestyle!

Marmot Essence Rainshell SPOTLITE REVIEW

Marmot’s Precip Plus 7 ounce rain jacket

Overview

Marmot has entered the fray of ultralight rainshells with the new Essence Jacket, which weighs in at near 7 ounces (7.4 ounces in size L as measured). The Essence is full-featured with a full zipper with storm flap, generous hood with stiffened brim and single adjustment, drawcord hem, single chest pocket, elastic cuffs and reflective tape. The jacket is cut for an athletic fit, reducing weight and excess bulk.

Marmot uses their proprietary PreCip Plus fabric in the Essence, which Marmot claims is more breathable and compressible than their other rainwear fabrics. Precip Plus uses a microporous polyurethane that is impregnated with silicon dioxide particles. Marmot claims these silicon dioxide particles create small, very consistent holes which allow water vapor to escape, but keep water droplets out. I have had limited use of the jacket so far, so can’t yet comment on its breathability performance.

My favorite feature on the Essence is the large, roomy hood. Some other ultralight rain jackets have sacrificed significant hood volume to keep down the total weight, but the Essence has a large roomy hood that covers my head well and has plenty of overhang on the brim. The generous hood will be much appreciated in long slow rains or windy squalls. The Essence is a significant entry in the ultralight rainshell group, competing directly with the leading jackets on features, weight, quality and price.

In 2006, Marmot will make available an anorak version of the Essence jacket. Marmot lists the anorak at 7 oz (199 g), but lists the jacket at 9 oz (256 g). Our size large Essence jacket is 7.4 oz, so it seems likely that the anorak will weigh in below 7 ounces. With the exception of the zipper, the features on the anorak are identical to the current jacket.

Features and Specifications

  • Weight: 7.4 ounces as measured size L (Manufacturer’s spec 9 ounces)
  • Fabric: Marmot Proprietary PreCip Plus
  • Features: Full zipper with storm flap, hood, single hood adjustment, single chest pocket, hem drawcord, elastic cuffs
  • MSRP: $160

Backpacking Food Taste Test: Entrées (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2005)

Backpacking Light staff tastes – and scores – several backpacking foods from AlpineAire, Backpacker’s Pantry, Cache Lakes, and Natural High.

Introduction

Backpacking Light staff are known to do almost anything to satisfy our subscribers’ thirst for knowledge aboutlightweight backcountry travel. We’ll freeze our tushes off in sleeping bags with optimistic temperature ratings, we’ll trek up mountains in a self-created sauna wearing a jacket that claims to be breathable, and – at Outdoor Retailer Markets – we’ll forgo sleep and bathroom breaks, suffer hand cramps from note taking and typing, and this year, even eat food we don’t like. All in the quest for real knowledge.

For the second Outdoor Retailer Market in a row, Backpacking Light staff (Mike, Ryan, Carol, Matt, Vic, Don, and Alan) offer their widely varying opinions on food. This show we tackled eight dried and freeze dried backpacking entrĂ©es from four companies. We added a new score to our “Would I take it backpacking” category – zero. Yes, some of our testers had vey strong opinions about certain offerings. (See the results of our Winter ’05 energy bar taste test here).

We limited ourselves to those meals that only needed boiling water. It was acceptable if a meal had an item that could be added later like Cache Lake’s Sweet Potato meals. But if a meal required more than one hydrating container we did not include it in our survey.

Our food critics looked at three categories when evaluating the meals: nutrition, taste, and the likelihood he or she would take the meal on a trip. Testers’ ideas of what constitutes “good nutrition” varied. One tester paid little attention to this category except as it pertained to caloric content. Another tester was particularly interested in sodium content. A third tester completely ignored the nutrition category and the rest took what many would consider a more “balanced” approach. Mike blazed a trail in our food testing annals by insisting we add “will not take” as a choice in the “Take It?” category. For him foods that were poor in nutrition and taste just were never going to make it into his pack. Matt agreed, and followed in Mike’s footsteps by giving some entrĂ©es a grade of zero in the Take It? category.

I crunched the numbers after everyone secretly recorded their ratings in the three categories. For each entrĂ©e, scores in each category were averaged for all testers, then the resultant three scores were added, with the third and most important category – will it make it into my pack – double weighted to arrive at the overall score for each meal. It is worth noting that not all our taste testers were able to sample all the meals.

Three entrées formed a cluster at the top of the overall scoring, with a significant separation from the remaining meals. Cache Lakes Sweet Potato With Pie Spice fared best, edging out Backpacker’s Pantry Sweet and Sour Chicken. Cache Lakes Sweet Potato with Cinnamon was third. The rest of the pack trailed noticeably behind with AlpineAire’s Pineapple Orange Chicken taking last place.

Table 1: Ratings Chart for Entrées
Ratings are from 1 – Worst, to 5 – Best
Scores in each category represent the average score from each tester. The Overall Rating is computed as the sum of scores from all categories, with a weighting factor of 2X for the Take It? score.
Brand / Food Overall Score Taste Nutrition* Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto1 10.3 3.1 2.6 2.3
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken1 9.1 2.5 3.0 1.8
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken1 10.3 2.5 3.2 2.3
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken1 14.4 6.0 3.2 2.6
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Pie Spice2 15.4 4.2 3.2 4.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon2 13.1 4.0 3.1 3.0
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp3 10.4 3.1 2.3 2.5
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada3 11.0 2.8 3.0 2.6
1Tested by six taste testers
2Tested by four taste testers
3Tested by three taste testers

*Don did not consider nutrition in his testing so, for purposes of computing scores, his Nutrition scores were assigned the median value of 2.5.

 
Table 2: Comments
Brand / Food Positive Comments Negative Comments
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto
  • Love cheese based food so this gets a big nod
  • Nice flavor
  • High content of sodium. Not tasty.
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken
  • None
  • Bland
  • Disappointing because I figured I would get more flavor out of it
  • Too flippin’ sweet – cloyingly sweet
  • Flavors did not compliment each other. It was sweet when it should not have been.
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken
  • A bit dry, but decent texture
  • Awesome saffron flavor
  • Great spices
  • Did not cook well, did not taste good, high sodium
  • Poor texture, not saucy enough and extra water would not help
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken
  • Tasted like real food, at least similar to it
  • Good
  • Nice for variety, nothing special
  • Good complex flavors
  • Too sweet
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Pie Spice
  • Very, very tasty
  • Sweet enough to be a dessert as well as a useful side dish
  • Awesome flavor and texture
  • Cache Lakes provided calorie content is per bag not per serving
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon
  • On a par with the Pie Spices dish
  • Good taste, stick to your ribs. Better as a dessert or snack.
  • Cache Lakes provided calorie content is per bag not per serving
  • Not as much flavor as Pie Spice
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp
  • Good texture, good flavors, needs some hot spice
  • Bland
  • Just hot, not full bodied with complex spicing
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada
  • None
  • None

Individual Tester Ratings Charts for Entrées

Interactive Table: Javascript-Enabled Browser Required
Ratings are from 0 – Worst, to 5 – Best
The Overall Rating is computed as the sum of the scores from all categories, with a weighting factor of 2X for the Take It? score.

To see the testers’ individual results, click: Mike, Ryan, Carol, Matt, Vic, Don, and Alan

Brand / Food Ryan’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 14.0 4.0 4.0 3.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 7.0 2.0 3.0 1.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 9.0 2.0 5.0 1.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 16.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato Pie Spice 20.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon 9.0 4.0 3.0 1.0
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp 13.5 3.5 3.0 3.5
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada 16.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Brand / Food Don’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition* Take it?
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato Pie Spice 17.5 5.0 n/a 5.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon 15.5 5.0 n/a 4.0
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp** Did Not Test Did Not Test Did Not Test Did Not Test
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada** Did Not Test Did Not Test Did Not Test Did Not Test
*For purposes of overall scoring I have given Don’s nutrition value a rating of 2.5 for items he tested.
**Don is a vegetarian and so did not test these items.
Brand / Food Carol’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 12.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 12.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 15.5 3.0 4.5 4.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 15.5 3.0 4.5 4.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato Pie Spice 10.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon 13.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp 9.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada 12.5 3.5 3.0 3.0
Brand / Food Mike’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 5.0 2.0 3.0 0.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 13.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato Pie Spice 15.0 4.0 3.0 4.0
Cache Lakes / Sweet Potato with Cinnamon 14.0 3.0 3.0 4.0
Natural High / Kung Pao Shrimp 9.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Natural High / Chicken Enchilada 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.0
Brand / Food Alan’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 15.0 4.0 3.0 4.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 8.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 19.0 5.0 4.0 5.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 10.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
Brand / Food Matt’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 13.0 3.0 4.0 3.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
Brand / Food Vic’s Overall Rating Taste Nutrition Take it?
AlpineAire / Garden Risotto 16.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
AlpineAire / Pineapple Orange Chicken 10.0 3.0 3.0 2.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Paella with Saffron and Chicken 11.0 3.0 4.0 2.0
Backpacker’s Pantry / Sweet and Sour Chicken 13.0 3.0 4.0 3.0

Ultralight Outfitters Ultralight Beercan Cook Pot and Stove SPOTLITE REVIEW

Nifty cooking system where the pot converts into a double walled mug.

Overview

The Ultralight Beercan Cook Pot and Stove is a nifty cooking system. As Will Rietveld writes about in Performance Comparison Testing of Alcohol Stoves, a cook kit needs to be optimized so all the components work together as a system. Ultralight Outfitters has already done the “test/tweak/repeat” for us with this cook system. The Ultralight Beercan Cook Pot and Stove is designed to burn solid fuel tablets, but for a few more tenths of an ounce you can supply your own alcohol burner to use with it.

What’s unique about this system is that the windscreen, pot support, and fuel tray can be used to convert the beer can cookpot into a double wall mug. Click here to view the Beercan stove in action (946 kb)
(note: Apple Quicktime is required to view this movie, to download please vist Apple).

Features and Specifications

  • Weight complete system (no pot lid): 3.8 oz (107 g)
  • Weight components (Note: grams listed are as weighed, not converted):
    • lip guard: 0.2 oz (7 g)
    • Foster’s 25.4 oz beer can with top removed: 0.8 oz (25 g)
    • pot stand: 0.5 oz (15 g)
    • fuel tray: 0.7 oz (22 g)
    • wind screen: 1.3 oz (38 g)
  • Material: stainless steel except for silicone rubber lip guard and aluminum beer can
  • Burns solid fuel tablets and alcohol (alcohol burner, i.e. soda can stove, not supplied))
  • MSRP: $14 (does not include beer can)

Gregory Spectrum Backpack REVIEW

An internal frame panel loading pack with a polished design, plenty of features, and rock solid performance. The Lexus of small volume panel loaders? Perhaps.

Introduction

The Gregory Spectrum is like a Lexus. It is well thought out, elegantly made, has most every feature you would want, and weighs less than 2.25 pounds. Surprise—it’s a panel loader, even though it’s literally covered with outside mesh pockets. The comfortable shoulder harness and articulated, padded plastic framesheet allow the Spectrum to carry as much gear as you can put into the pack. While the Spectrum is one of the most functional and versatile packs we have tested, it stops short of being a climbing or slot canyon pack. The abrasion would be too much for the thinner fabric and mesh pockets. Nevertheless, I bushwhacked the Spectrum through a lot of rough places and it stood up fine. It’s a fine multi-use smaller volume pack.

What’s Good

  • Panel loading
  • Five outside mesh pockets provide lots of convenient storage
  • Conforms closely to your body
  • Great suspension system

What’s Not So Good

  • Compression straps interfere with inserting water bottles into side pockets
  • Contents of mesh hipbelt pockets get wet when you set the pack down in the snow or hike in the rain

Specifications

Backpack 2005 Gregory Spectrum
Style Internal frame, panel loading
Volume 2100 ci (34 L) size L
Weight 2 lb 3.7 oz (1.01 kg) measured weight; manufacturer’s specification 2 lb 5 oz (1.10 kg)
Fabrics Main pack body is 70d silicone impregnated ripstop nylon; top pocket, bottom, and center of the backpanel are 210d polyurethane-coated ripstop nylon. Pockets are nylon mesh with an elastic binding.
Features Two mesh water bottle pockets, mesh front pocket, mesh hipbelt pockets, zippered top pocket, internal hydration sleeve and port, haul loop, side compression straps, load lifters, sternum strap, daisy chain, six D-rings for accessory straps.
Volume to Weight Ratio 58.8 ci/oz size L (based on 2100 ci and a measured weight of 35.7 oz)
Comfortable Load Carrying Capacity 20 lb (9.1 kg) BPL estimated
Carry Load to Pack Weight Ratio 9.1 (based on 20 lb and a measured weight of 2.2 lb)
MSRP $119

Performance

The Spectrum, at 2100 cubic inches (size L) is a superb multi-purpose pack. I used the Spectrum as a daypack on numerous snowshoeing trips, day hikes in the desert and mountains, and peak ascents. It could be used for an ultralight overnight trip (by attaching some gear to the front with an accessory strap), but there are other packs around that provide a better volume:weight ratio for that purpose.

The first thing you notice about the Spectrum is its quality construction and attention to detail. All seams have a nylon binding. All zippers (not the water-resistant type) have double sliders and convenient cord-plus-knob pull tabs. High quality and appropriate materials are used throughout the pack to make it both light and durable.

The second thing you notice is that the pack is full-featured. The top pocket is very convenient and big enough to hold lunch. There are a total of five roomy outside mesh pockets (one on the front, two on the sides, and two on the hipbelt), side compression straps, lots of attachment points, and a huge hydration sleeve. Four of the attachment points (D-rings on the front panel) can be used to attach snowshoes or a tall stuff sack full of extra gear. Accessory straps (not provided) are needed for these applications. One annoyance is the four D-rings on the front panel interfere with opening/closing the zipper (tip: hold the D-rings with one hand while zipping with the other).

Gregory claims that the Spectrum has two ice axe loops, but there are actually only two plastic D-rings on the bottom front to attach an ice axe using an accessory strap (not provided).

Although the manufacturer photos don’t readily show it, the Spectrum is a panel loader. The zippered panel (with double sliders) is about 17 inches tall and 9 inches wide, so it is very convenient to access the contents of the main compartment, including the hydration sleeve. Unlike some other panel-loading packs we have reviewed, the Spectrum does not have a tendency to auto-unload (meaning the panel zipper bursts open and the pack contents are dumped on the trail!). There is a side-release buckle at the top of the front panel to keep the panel closed and support the large front mesh pocket and anything attached to the front of the pack.



The Gregory Spectrum is a panel loader (top left), with a nearly full-height double slider zipper. A side-release buckle (top right) ensures that the panel will not auto-unload on the trail, and supports any gear attached to the front of the pack. A zippered top pocket (bottom left) is big enough for lunch and valuables, and has a key clip. The huge mesh hipbelt pockets (bottom right) will hold a lot of smaller items.

Hipbelt pockets are the rage nowadays, and the Spectrum does not disappoint. Would you believe full-length (11 inches long) bellowed mesh hipbelt pockets with full-length zippers? I found them big and stretchy enough to stuff in a bunch of smaller items – like glove liners, snacks, sunscreen, sweatband, GPS — you name it. The downside is when you take the pack off and set it on the ground, the hipbelt pockets sit right in the dirt (or snow) and the contents can easily get dirty or wet. For my digital camera, I preferred to attach a small camera case to the webbing end of the hipbelt, or enclose it in an Aloksak if I put the camera into a hipbelt pocket. The other obvious disadvantage of mesh hipbelt pockets is when it rains, the contents get wet.

I love the roomy mesh pockets on the outside o fthe Spectrum. The side mesh pockets are big enough to carry a 2-liter water bottle, or a 1-liter bottle with room left over. Unfortunately, water bottles in the side pockets are not reachable with the pack on. One annoyance: the side compression straps are inside the mesh pockets, and water bottles catch on the straps when you insert them into the pockets.

I also love the panel loading feature, which provided quick access to items in the bottom of the pack. The top pocket is also very useful, providing convenient access to frequently used items. It has a key clip inside, and an internal full-width zipper provides top access to the main compartment. The top access was handy to get to items in the top of the pack when I had gear attached to the front of the pack.

The next thing you notice about the Gregory Spectrum is its serious, full-featured suspension system. Technically, the Spectrum is an internal frame pack since it has a flexible plastic sheet in the backpanel. The backpanel is hinged at the lower back, so the bottom end of the pack (with the lumbar pad) contours to your hips. The pack incorporates Gregory’s Wraptor Stabilizer (a stiffened wing at the bottom of the shoulder straps), Sport Harness, and Gullwing waistbelt. These features, combined with a nicely padded hipbelt, shoulder straps, backpanel, and lumbar region provide the capability to comfortably carry some serious weight.



The Spectrum has a great shoulder harness and suspension system (top left). The backpanel articulates above the lumbar pad. The Wraptor Stabilizer (top right) is a stiffened wing and V-strap setup at the end of each shoulder strap. Attaching snowshoes (or other gear) to the front of the pack (bottom left) is easy using four D-ring attachments and an accessory strap. The top pocket contains a zippered opening (bottom right) that allows some access to the main compartment.

In my load-carrying tests, I found that the Spectrum (thanks to its capable suspension system) could comfortably carry as much as 25 pounds of concentrated weight (sand bags and bottles of water). The pack’s volume is the actual limitation, because it would be difficult to stuff 25 pounds of normal gear into the available space. Assuming normal outdoor gear, the pack’s weight carrying capacity maxes out around 20 pounds, and the suspension is fully capable of supporting it. In my field testing I used the Spectrum to carry loads in the 10-15 pound range. It had more than enough room to carry everything I needed for a day outing, even in cold weather.

There are two “V-pull compression straps” on the pack, one on the center of each side. To reduce pack volume for smaller loads, it works best to lay the pack on its back and push down on the front with one hand while tightening (pulling up) the compression straps with the other. The two compression straps adequately snug the pack contents to maintain stability. There is no compression strap on the bottom half of the pack, but it is not really needed for a pack this size.

I was a bit perplexed when I first tried to attach snowshoes to the Spectrum. They wouldn’t fit inside the main compartment or the front mesh pocket, and there were no accessory straps for attaching things. Then I noticed four ¾-inch plastic D-rings on the front panel and used two lightweight webbing straps threaded through the D-rings to attach the snowshoes. Because of the thinner fabrics used, the Spectrum is not up to carrying a lot of gear attached to the outside; a 4-pound pair of snowshoes is about the limit, and there is no provision for attaching skis. Crampons could be placed in a protective sack and strapped to the front of the pack.

The Spectrum’s hydration sleeve is huge, big enough to swallow a 3-liter hydration bladder. It’s easy to route the drinking tube to either side out of the top of the pack, and there are lots of attachments to clip the hose to on the shoulder straps. Since water bottles in the side mesh pockets were not reachable with the pack on, I found using a bladder the most convenient hydration option. The pack has plenty of volume for the bladder and gear, freeing up the side pockets for other things, like rainwear.

The Spectrum stops short of being a climbing pack. Its thinner fabrics and mesh pockets, although adequately durable for general use, are not up to scraping against granite or squeezing through tight slots. Also, it doesn’t have outside attachment points for carrying hardware, or attaching a lot of weight for that matter.

What’s Unique

The Spectrum gets it right. This pack provides all the room and utility I could want in a day pack for various types of outings, year-around. It’s very capable and comfortable, while holding pack weight down to a little over 2 pounds.

Recommendations for Improvement

The Spectrum is already well designed and assembled, but there is always room for a few nitpicks. One is to relocate or redesign the side compression straps so they do not interfere with inserting water bottles or gear into the side mesh pockets. Another upgrade would be to make one of the hipbelt pockets waterproof (e.g., made with the 70 denier silnylon fabric used else where in the pack and a water-resistant zipper). It would also be nice if accessory straps were provided for attaching gear to the front of the pack. Finally, if Gregory really wants to provide for everything, including a padded case on the shoulder harness for a digital camera or MP3 player would be nice.