Articles (2020)

Patagonia Micropuff Vest REVIEW

Simple, lofty and light – to be replaced fall ’06 with a heavier version – too bad.

Introduction

The Patagonia Micropuff vest is the sister garment to the Micropuff pullover, which was the top performer in our lightweight synthetic vests Review Summary in late 2004. With the same 2.7 oz/yd2 Polarguard Delta insulation, but simpler construction, the Micropuff vest has a specified weight of only 6 ounces.

What’s Good

  • Excellent loft to weight ratio for a synthetic garment
  • Warm, 3 inch high collar
  • Stuffs nicely into internal pocket
  • Roomy enough for a light layer underneath

What’s Not So Good

  • Elastic hem can ride up on your waist

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Patagonia

  Year/Model

Spring 2006 Micropuff Vest

  Style

Pullover vest

  Weight

6.6 oz (187 g) measured weight size L; manufacturer’s specification 6 oz (170 g)

  Loft

1.3 in (3.3 cm) double layer as measured

  Loft to Weight Ratio

0.20 in/oz

  Shell Fabric

1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2), 20d ripstop polyester with Deluge DWR finish; Lining is 20x20d mini-ripstop nylon with Deluge DWR finish

   Insulation

2.7 oz/yd2 (92 g/m2) Polarguard Delta

  Features

Snapped placket, inside pocket can be used as stuff sack, elastic hem and arm holes

  MSRP

$89

Performance

The Patagonia Micropuff vest is a light, packable, warm and versatile layer. One has been my constant companion on trips for most of the past year. I’ve had it with me on cold desert nights on the PCT, summit days in the Peruvian Andes, damp forest camps in the Amazon Basin, and winter hikes throughout the desert southwest. The Micropuff vest will keep you warm in wet weather and is a great choice to supplement other layers and add warmth to a clothing and sleeping system.

The measured loft of the Micropuff vest is 1.3 inches (double layer) giving it an impressive loft to weight ratio for a synthetic garment – 0.20 inches per ounce. This loft to weight ratio is more than double the ratio of the leading vest from our 2004 lightweight synthetic garment review summary. A key to the light weight of this vest is the lack of a zipper and the simple snap system on the 8 inch chest placket. The snap closures also help improve compressibility over a zipper.

What makes the Micropuff vest a good performer? Two things – simple design and good insulation. There are few garments on the market with as simple and light a design as this vest. No pockets, no zipper, simple elastic closures on the hem and armholes, a light snap system on the placket, and a warm collar to keep your neck toasty.

Patagonia has also hit the mark with their choice of Polarguard Delta insulation. All Polarguard insulations are continuous filament insulations, which, according to the manufacturer, make them more durable and strong and less likely to form clumps or mattes than cut staple insulation such as Primaloft. Continuous filaments also help to maintain insulation when wet. On the other hand, Polarguard will absorb more water than Primaloft insulation of the same weight. In Backpacking Light tests, Polarguard 3D absorbed more water than Primaloft One fill of the same weight, but the Polarguard 3D had superior performance in maintaining insulation when wet. Polarguard Delta, as used in the Patagonia Micro Puff Pullover, is the latest and most efficient insulation offered by Polarguard. See our companion article on down versus synthetic clothing for additional test results and comparisons of down and synthetic insulation performance when wet.

I had the Micropuff vest with me in Peru this summer, where conditions ranged from surprisingly cool, moist forests in the Amazon basin, to cold, nasty days in the Andes. I found the vest to be a versatile layering component, and wore it every day. On a cold hiking day at high altitude, it is the perfect layer to wear under a wind shirt or waterproof/breathable rainwear. Without a zipper, and with the small placket, the vest offers few options to cool off when you get warm – taking it off is the only reasonable option. I also found it to be a good combination with a down jacket while around camp or in a sleeping system. Combined with a light jacket such as the Western Mountaineering Flight Jacket or the GoLite Cumulus, you get a heck of a lot of warmth for less than 20 total ounces.

The cut of the Micropuff vest is loose enough to wear a light layer underneath, but not too baggy. The shoulders are cut widely, easily covering my shoulders. Torso length is moderate, with a slight drop tail. Both the arm holes and waist hem are lined with elastic. One thing about the vest I did not like was the tendency of the elastic hem to ride up on my waist during activity. The was mostly an issue when not wearing a pack; the vest would ratchet up my waist during hiking or walking, and need to be pulled down frequently. The 3-inch collar is a nice touch when the weather is cold or windy. The collar and placket have a series of plastic snap closures which do a pretty good job of sealing off the elements, but not as good as a zipper and storm flap. There is an inside chest pocket with Velcro closure which doubles as a stuff sack. The vest stuffs easily into the pocket and can be sealed with the same Velcro closure. My vest is in great shape after several washings and at least 75 days of outdoor use this year.

Patagonia Micropuff Vest REVIEW
The Patagonia Micropuff vest stuffs easily into the internal chest pocket.

NOTE: Patagonia will discontinue the Micropuff vest in its current form with the release of their Fall 2006 line. It will be replaced by a full zipper vest, which also has a zippered pocket. Other features will be largely the same as the current vest, including the Polarguard Delta insulation. The manufacturer’s specified weight for the new vest is 9 ounces, a full 50 percent increase in specified weight over the current Micropuff vest.

Patagonia Micropuff Vest REVIEW
The Micropuff vest excels as a layering garment. Here the author (left) has a Micropuff vest layered beneath a waterproof/breathable layer before the onset of bad weather in Peru’s Vilconata range.

What’s Unique

Patagonia has done a great job of maximizing performance per weight with the Micropuff vest by minimizing features and choosing high quality materials. Combined with the attractive $89 price, this makes the Micropuff a great value.

Recommendations for Improvement

I’d rather see Patagonia keep the current version of the vest than the updated, heavier version they will release in Fall 2006. In the current version, I would prefer a lightweight drawcord to the current elastic hem so that it could be adjusted to keep the vest from riding up.

Western Mountaineering Flash Vest REVIEW

The lightest down vest on the market, with a full zip but no neck coverage.

Introduction

I’ve been itching to get my hands on a Western Mountaineering Flash vest ever since Western Mountaineering announced the product last year. The Flash aims to set a new standard in lightweight insulation with a specified weight of only 3.5 ounces (100 grams). With every feature aimed at shaving a few grams, the Flash vest gives up some comfort. But does it matter when you get a down vest at this weight?

What’s Good

  • The lightest down garment on the market
  • Superb loft to weight ratio (0.45 inches/ounce)
  • Full zipper
  • Stuffs down to the size of a baseball
  • Good torso and shoulder coverage

What’s Not So Good

  • No collar
  • Elastic hem rides up on your waist
  • Heavier than the specified weight

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Western Mountaineering

  Year/Model

2006 Flash Vest

  Style

Full zipper vest

  Weight

4.4 oz (125 g) measured weight size L; manufacturer’s specification 3.5 oz (99 g)

  Loft

2.0 in (5.1 cm) double layer loft, as measured

  Loft to Weight Ratio

0.45 in/oz

  Shell Fabric

0.9 oz/yd2 (31 g/m2) nylon taffeta

   Insulation

850 fill power goose down, sewn through construction

  Features

Full zipper, reflective trim

  MSRP

$125

Performance

The Flash vest is lighter than many windshirts; Western Mountaineering specifies the average weight of the Flash vest as 3.5 ounces. Our sample is a size large and weighs a bit more, at 4.4 ounces, but this is still an impressive amount of warmth in a small package. The Flash uses sewn through construction and a limited feature set to provide a fantastic loft to weight ratio. The Flash has a full zipper, no collar, a fairly large v-neck opening, no pockets and simple elastic for the hem and armholes.

The Flash vest packs its insulation into a square grid of sewn through down compartments, with each compartment about 3 inches per side. With 850 fill power down, the Flash lofts up to 2 inches of double layer loft. The loft to weight ratio of the Flash is 0.45 inches per ounce – the second highest loft to weight ratio of any garment tested by Backpacking Light. Only the Western Mountaineering Flight vest has been measured by Backpacking Light at a higher loft to weight ratio. I found the loft very even across the whole vest, with no obvious low points and continuous loft in each down compartment to within 3/8 of an inch from the edge of each compartment. The shell is a 20 denier, 380 thread count, 0.9 oz/yd2 nylon taffeta. The shell is also DWR treated. The full zipper is easy to use and is not backed by a storm flap. The finish fabric on the elastic hem and armholes is reflective for a bit of night safety.

The light weight and core warmth provided by the Flash make it a good option for layering and in a sleep system. The same is true for most vests, but does the warmth of the Flash live up to its impressive loft to weight ratio? I took the Flash vest out on a winter hike in Arizona’s Aravaipa canyon recently, with low temperatures right at freezing. I was toasty all night in my unzipped bag with the Flash, and I am usually a cold sleeper. I did miss a collar though, and felt noticeably more cool air along my neck and upper chest than I would have with better coverage. The vest would certainly be warmer with a collar, or a higher cut in the neck, but of course there is a weight trade-off. According to Gary Petersen, production manager for Western Mountaineering, the Flash vest has been designed without a collar and with a lower cut zipper to make it easier to layer over the Flash and to reduce clothing and zipper clutter around your neck and upper chest. I did not note any cold spots due to the grid pattern of the down compartments. With a vest this light, I expected that torso coverage might be lacking, but I was pleased with the overall torso coverage. I had plenty of coverage on my long torso and over my shoulders. The cut is plenty roomy enough to allow some layering under the vest. There is no drop tail.

Western Mountaineering Flash Vest REVIEW
The Flash vest provides good coverage for such a light vest – with more than adequate shoulder and torso coverage (left). The reflective tape in the finish is a nice touch as seen in this flash photo (right).

It’s obvious that the Flash should be able to pack down to a small size, but I decided to see for myself. The Flash vest does not come with a stuff sack, but I easily stuffed my vest into a stuff sack normally used for a wind shirt. It fit into this sack with plenty of room to spare, and with a little tighter squeeze, it would pack down even smaller. Just like a wind shirt, the small size and light weight eliminate reasons not to carry it. It is a good choice for emergency insulation in case of unexpected cold on short trips. Heck, take a couple of them.

Western Mountaineering Flash Vest REVIEW
Two inches of loft packed into a windshirt stuff. Now that’s compact! (Stuff sack not included.)

For the past year, I’ve been using synthetic vests whenever I carried a vest. How well would the Flash vest hold up if it got really soaked? To find out, I dunked and soaked the Flash vest and am pleased with its ability to recover rapidly from a complete soaking. See the accompanying article on down versus synthetic vests for the complete test results. In light rain the shell fabric has easily repelled water and kept the down dry – but my field testing in this regard has been hampered by a record drought this winter in Arizona. The performance of the shell fabric repelling water is still largely untested. I don’t care much for elastic hems – especially if they close up tightly on my hips or waist. The elastic hem on the Flash cinches securely around my torso and has a tendency to ride up on my waist as I move around.

What’s Unique

The lightest down vest on the market. Core warmth with 2 inches of double layer loft, and only 4.4 ounces for a size large…and that includes a full zipper. At $125, it’s a lot of warmth for your dollar.

Recommendations for Improvement

My only recommendation would be the addition of a light drawcord at the waist, or a looser elastic hem. Either of these changes would make the Flash more comfortable.

The Flash excels just as it was designed – as a layer under other garments. Any additions such as adding a collar or closing up the neck opening might increase the versatility of the Flash, but would add weight. After a winter of use I’m glad to have such a light, warm layer and have come to prefer the cut just as it is.

Six Moon Designs Gatewood Cape SPOTLITE REVIEW

Compared to a poncho/tarp, is it possibly a better poncho AND a better shelter?

Introduction

Is the Gatewood Cape better than a poncho/tarp? The introduction of the Six Moon Designs’ Gatewood Cape in Spring 2006 has generated a lot of interest – especially from those of us who have weathered wind-driven rain (or sand) under a skimpy poncho/tarp. But what exactly is the Gatewood Cape, and how is it different from a poncho/tarp?

In poncho, err cape, mode, the Gatewood Cape is very similar to a poncho/tarp, except it has arm slits in the sides and a full zipper in the front for extra ventilation.

In shelter mode, it creates a real shelter rather than a glorified umbrella. The sheltered area measures 105 inches long by 66 inches wide, providing a floorless area of 35 square feet. That’s more space than many two-person tents! However, the walls are fairly flat, so much of the space is only usable for gear storage. In case you’re wondering, the shelter is long enough for a taller person. The height is only 36 inches in the center when the sides are staked nearly to the ground, but more headroom can be gained by raising the sides. Overall, it’s a roomy one-person shelter.

Six Moon Designs Gatewood Cape SPOTLITE REVIEW - 1
A birds-eye view of the Gatewood Cape set up as a shelter. It is supported by one trekking pole that connects to a clip-in harness under the hood. The small rectangles on either side of the hood are arm slits for use as rainwear. The zippered entry in front of the hood also serves to provide ventilation when the cape is worn. The cape packs into the pocket at the left front, which also serves as an inside pocket in shelter mode and a chest pocket in rainwear mode.

The shelter is supported by a single trekking pole at the front center, under the hood. Entry is from the side via a zippered door and vestibule. Six stakes (not included) are required around the perimeter, and the sides can be staked to the ground to provide better wind or bug protection.

At 11.65 ounces with the pole harness and extender loops on the tieouts (our measurement), the Gatewood Cape is 2-3 ounces heavier than a silnylon poncho/tarp and about 5 ounces heavier than a spinnaker poncho/tarp. However, with the Gatewood, you don’t need to also carry a lightweight bivy or bag cover weighing 5 to 7 ounces.

We’re really excited about the possibilities for the Gatewood, and are eager to get out and test it. It most likely will work in a SuperUltralight backpacking system, allowing us to stay under 5 pounds base weight, while gaining in rain protection and shelter. Look for our full review this summer.

Specifications and Features

  • Manufacturer: Six Moon Designs (http://www.sixmoondesigns.com)
  • Fabric: 30d (1.3 oz/yd2) silnylon
  • Rainwear Features: attached hood with front drawcord, arm slits, integrated stuff sack that doubles as a chest pocket, full-zip front opening for ventilation
  • Shelter Features: sets up quickly with one adjustable trekking pole and six stakes, integrated stuff sack doubles as an interior pocket, zippered entry door on front vestibule
  • Included: Cape, integrated stuff sack, pole harness, lightweight cord to make tieout extender loops
  • Measurements: 105 in (267 cm) long, 66 in (168 cm) wide in center, 36 in (91 cm) high in center
  • Weight: Measured weight 11.65 oz (330 g) with tieout extender cords and pole harness, manufacturer specification 11 oz (312 g)
  • Floor Area: 35 ft2 (3.25 m2) canopy coverage
  • MSRP: $110

Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Hood REVIEW

Seals perfectly with the head opening in the JRB poncho quilts and has lots of puff for the weight, but the non-adjustable neck opening can let in drafts when it is used for sleeping.

Jacks R Better Down Hood REVIEW - 1

Introduction

The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Hood is a super-light (2.3 oz, 66 g measured) complement to the wonderful No Sniveller quilt. Omni-Tape (like non-scratchy Velcro) around the bottom edge seals it perfectly to the head opening in the quilt. Is it functional enough to be attractive to non-Jacks ‘R’ Better quilt users?

What’s Good

  • High warmth to weight ratio
  • Practical
  • Supplements a quilt or hoodless sleeping bag

What’s Not So Good

  • It makes you look like a Teletubby
  • The down fill requires protection from moisture
  • Single drawstring means that only a circular face hole is possible
  • Neck opening is not adjustable

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Jacks ‘R’ Better

  Year/Model

2006 JRB Down Hood

  Weight

2.3 oz (66 g) measured weight; manufacturer specifies 2.0 oz (57 g)

  Fabric

1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) ripstop nylon with DWR

  Insulation

0.85 oz (24 g) of 800+ fill power down, 1.5 in (3.8 cm) baffles

  Loft

1.7 inches (4.4 cm) single layer

  Size

One size only

  Features

Omni-Tape to connect to Jacks ‘R’ Better quilts at the neck opening

  MSRP

$59.95

Performance

In cool conditions, it’s important to guard against heat loss from your head. A down and ultralight fabric down hood is a very lightweight way to do that. At only 2.3 ounces the Jacks ‘R’ Better hood is the lightest down hood that we are aware of. It is half the weight of the Nunatak down hood and a third of the weight of the Finbar Hood.

Jacks R Better Down Hood REVIEW - 2
The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Hood with the No Sniveller quilt/poncho and Down Sleeves form a very warm garment.

With 1.7 inches of single layer loft, the JRB Down Hood works as a standalone hood to boost the rating of a hoodless sleeping bag or quilt. It doesn’t cover all of the neck, but this is not an issue when using it with the No Sniveller Quilt worn as a poncho. The hood seals the gap at the neck of the No Sniveller. It only comes in green, with a black liner, and wearing it with the No Sniveller around camp, I got a hard time from the older women who accused me of looking like a Teletubby – but it’s hard to care when you’re warm and happy.

Jacks R Better Down Hood REVIEW - 3

Jacks R Better Down Hood REVIEW - 4

The JRB Down Hood can be cinched up to leave only the mouth exposed.

The hood has a simple drawstring face closure. On a cold night it can be pulled closed to just leave a gap for the mouth, however it is difficult to pull it tight without covering your eyes.

The hood is a pleasure to wear around camp. The shape works well; the design is nice and simple, and the warmth for weight makes it a must-take for most trips.

What’s Unique?

The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Hood is the lightest down hood we know of, and it is reasonably priced. For dual uses, hook the tape to itself, pull the drawcord and use it at a stuff sack or a foot warmer.

Recommendations for Improvement

The JRB Down Hood is simple and very light. Most “improvements” I can think of would only add weight, except one: make it available in colors other than green.

Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood REVIEW

A big (almost 7-ounce), synthetic hood for cold weather.

Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood REVIEW - 1
Tukuche, Dhaulagiri and a Finbar hood. Nepal.

Introduction

Sure they mocked my fashion sense at low altitude but once we got up in the snow and bitter cold the envy started. The question turned to “Is it warm in there?”

The Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood is a big, insulated synthetic hood. Does it have a place in a lightweight pack?

What’s Good

  • Warm, so warm
  • Great companion for a quilt or hoodless sleeping bag
  • Maintains-loft-when-wet synthetic insulation
  • Rolls with you at night
  • Adjustable insulation thickness

What’s Not So Good

  • Heavier than necessary
  • Toggle digs into head when reading in bed

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Innovations by Fin

  Year/Model

2005 Finbar Hood Hunter/Walker model

  Weight

6.8 oz (192 g) measured weight (includes 0.9 oz, 26 g removable insulation)

  Fabric

Supplex nylon

  Insulation

Two layers of 3M Lite-Loft insulation plus a removable layer of polyester fiberfill

  Loft

1.3 inches (3.4 cm) single layer with removable insulation included

  Size

One size only

  Features

Shoulder straps, dual drawcords, uninsulated shoulder shield

  MSRP

$45

Performance

The Innovations by Fin Finbar hood is an innovative, well thought-out hood. I took it on numerous winter trips in New Zealand and on a two-month trip across western Nepal. Despite its nearly 7-ounce weight, it became a firm favorite.

Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood REVIEW - 2
2005 Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood.

On a cold night putting the Finbar hood on is like moving into another world, noise is muffled and I soon become warm and cozy. The great value of the Finbar hood compared to a sleeping bag hood is that you can wear it as you move around. It becomes a dual use item: a boost to your sleeping bag at night as well as great for wearing on cold mornings and at lunch stops in the snow. It sure dampens the shock of transition from sleeping bag to outside world to be able to keep the warm hood on while eating breakfast and packing.

The Finbar Hood has a generous uninsulated shoulder shield that helps seal the hood into a sleeping bag to prevent drafts. The hood also has straps under the armpits that prevent it rotating in the night so that you wake to find your eyes blindfolded and the fabric covered in drool.

I found the Finbar hood wonderful for use with a hoodless sleeping bag or quilt. It is valuable when worn in a hooded bag as well to help boost the rating in marginal conditions.

The Hunter/Walker model tested has two drawcords: one to pull the hood into a small circular breathing hole in front of the mouth and a second drawcord which, when the hood is cinched up, pulls the standard circular opening into a horizontal slit that keeps the eyes clear and allows some peripheral vision. This is much more practical for walking around while leaving a minimum of face exposed. The horizontal toggle tended to dig into my head when lying down. I plan to replace it with a smaller toggle.

With a single walled tent I often have condensation or ice accumulate on the inside walls overnight, and accidentally rubbing it off with my hat or hood is common. Because of this the Finbar hood got quite wet on occasions but the Lite-Loft synthetic insulation meant that the hood maintained loft and stayed warm. A down hood would be lighter (e.g. the Nunatak Down Balaclava at 4 oz, 113 g or the Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Hood 2.3 oz, 66 g) but the down is much more susceptible to loft loss from moisture. Still, it would be nice to have a more water resistant outer fabric on the Finbar hood, especially on the top where it is most susceptible to getting wet. The comparable down hoods as well as being more expensive, also lack the adjustable face hole, the shoulder shield and shoulder straps, and the ability to vary the insulation thickness.

Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood REVIEW - 3
The Finbar Hood can be cinched up to just leave the mouth exposed or adjusted to a horizontal slot to keep the eyes clear.

The Finbar hood is quite bulky but instantly justifies its place in my pack when it saves carrying a warmer sleeping bag or extra insulating jacket just for camp. It allows me to use a hoodless bag or quilt to below freezing and greatly extends the conditions I can enjoy being out of my sleeping bag at a cold campsite. I also found it good insurance when using a down sleeping bag in conditions where I was worried the down could get soaked. Whether stopped for lunch in a Himalayan snowstorm or watching stars on a frosty night the Finbar hood is a pleasure to wear.

What’s Unique?

The Innovations by Fin Finbar Hood is unique as a synthetic insulated hood that seals to your upper body rather than simply being a hat. An uninsulated shoulder shield seals it into a sleeping bag and under armpit straps keep the hood in place when rolling in your sleeping bag at night. It also has dual drawcords to adjust the shape of the face hole and a removable layer of insulation to adjust for warmer weather.

Recommendations for Improvement

The Finbar Hood has a well thought-out and executed design. Some further refinements I would recommend are:

  • Lighter weight fabrics
  • Smaller shoulder shield to save weight
  • Primaloft or PolarGuard insulation for slightly improved performance
  • More water resistant fabric, especially for the top panel. I would love to see a Pertex Quantum version of this hood.

Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Sleeves REVIEW

Lightweight, stand-alone down sleeves to pair with a vest or wearable poncho quilt.

Introduction

The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Sleeves are designed to be worn under the Jacks ‘R’ Better wearable, poncho-style quilts to add extra arm insulation. The sleeves can also be worn with a standard vest. The concept is simply executed in a pair of 5-ounce sleeves. Does this novel concept have a place in a lightweight backpacker’s pack?

What’s Good

  • Well made of quality materials
  • Lofty
  • Shell fabric is downproof and water resistant
  • Simple to attach
  • Dual use as foot warmers

What’s Not So Good

  • Attachment system accounts for nearly a third of the total sleeve weight
  • Kelly green color

Specifications

  Manufacturer

Jacks ‘R’ Better

  Year/Model

2006 JRB Down Sleeves

  Weight

Measured weight size Regular, 4.9 oz (139 g); manufacturer’s specification 5 oz (142 g)

  Fabric

1.1 oz/yd2 (37 g/m2) ripstop nylon with DWR

  Insulation

0.85 oz (24 g) of 800+ fill power goose down for each sleeve; sewn through at bottom and top longitudinal seams and at two horizontal seams creating six down compartments in each sleeve

  Loft

Measured loft 2.9 in (7.4 cm) double layer loft measured at the center of each of the down compartments and averaged, then averaged for both sleeves

  Sizes

Short, sleeve length 30-31 in (76-79 cm); Regular, 32-33 in (81-84 cm); Long, 34-35 in (86-89 cm)

  Features

Elastic wrist band, shoulder opening has two elastic tethers with non-scratchy Omni-Tape tabs sewn to the ends to secure sleeves

  MSRP

$79.95

Jacks 'R' Better JRB Down Sleeves REVIEW - 3
The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Sleeves with the No Sniveller Quilt and JRB Hood on a hammock camping trip.

Performance

I tested the JRB Down Sleeves with the Jacks ‘R’ Better No Sniveller wearable quilt, and with two vests (GoLite Core and a prototype Mountain Laurel Designs hooded down vest). Test locations were in Arizona in Saguaro National Park and in the Flagstaff peaks.

The sleeves look like a standard set of parka sleeves without the parka. They are simply designed: sewn-through construction, elastic cuffs, and two tethers on each sleeve to hold the sleeves in place. The JRB Down Sleeves will fit over a base layer and possibly over a mid-layer for those with less bulky arms. The six down chambers on each sleeve are nice and puffy, with the cuff end compartments the loftiest – presumably since the upper arms will be covered when the sleeves are worn with a quilt. I haven’t observed any down leakage through the 1.1 oz/yd2 ripstop shell fabric. All-in-all a nice concept that is well executed.

The JRB sleeves are sewn through with an average double layer loft of 2.9 inches. For comparison purposes, the sleeves on the Western Mountaineering Flight jacket are also sewn through (with ten down compartments per sleeve rather than six) and have an average double layer loft of 3.6 inches (the loftiest sections are those closest to the shoulder). Jacks ‘R’ Better keeps the sleeve attachment system simple and relatively light, but the 1.6 ounces (44 g) of added “software” still accounts for nearly a third of the total sleeve weight and the lower loft of the JRB sleeves compared to the similar weight Flight sleeves (the Flight Vest weighs 5 ounces less than the Flight Jacket). Still, the loft:weight ratio of the JRB Sleeves is good – 0.59 inch/ounce compared to a very respectable 0.32 inch/ounce for the Flight jacket and an estimated 0.72 inch/ounce for the Flight sleeves alone.

Jacks 'R' Better JRB Down Sleeves REVIEW - 4a

Jacks 'R' Better JRB Down Sleeves REVIEW - 4b

Simple yet functional attachment system on the JRB Sleeves. The squares on the ends of the elastic tethers are Omni-Tape (non-scratchy hook and loop).

The Regular length sleeves are a good fit for my 32-inch arms. The sleeves are easy to put on and take off. The shoulder seam tethers either connect to the Omni-Tape lining the head opening in a Jacks ‘R’ Better quilt, or the two Omni-Tape squares on the end of each tether attach to each other. When using the sleeves with a vest, the second set of tethers connect to each other across the chest like a sternum strap. The sleeves are surprisingly secure with this system. They did not slip even when I waved my arms around like a lunatic in camp or when I wore them overnight inside a close fitting sleeping bag.

It’s clear that the sleeves make a good companion to the Jacks ‘R’ Better wearable quilts. The No Sniveller quilt adds an amazing amount of comfort in a cold camp and the 5-ounce sleeves extend that comfort. Bonus dual uses for sleeping: use one sleeve as a foot cozy for both feet; wear the sleeves like leg warmers under a quilt. But what if you don’t use a quilt – are the sleeves still useful?

The sleeves allow another level of temperature regulation when used with a vest compared to an insulated jacket. They also allow the mixing of down and synthetics. In cold, wet conditions, a synthetic vest can be worn under a rain jacket or poncho and the down sleeves added for warmth in camp. So yes, the sleeves do have a place in a lightweight pack, although I’d like to see a lighter attachment system. I should add that the current attachment system is elegantly simple, functional and light – but lighter would be even better.

Jacks 'R' Better JRB Down Sleeves REVIEW - 2
The Jacks ‘R’ Better JRB Down Sleeves with the GoLite Core vest. An attractive option with stand-alone down sleeves is to pair them with a synthetic vest – wear the synthetic vest under a poncho in cold, rainy weather and add the down sleeves in camp.

What’s Unique

The Jacks ‘R’ Better Down Sleeves are the only lightweight, stand-alone down sleeves commercially available.

Recommendations for Improvement

Jacks ‘R’ Better once again uses their favorite kelly green fabric in the JRB Down Sleeves. The two Jacks are ex-Army, which may explain the green fixation – but it’s so 80’s. How about basic black? My other request is for a lighter attachment system.

Fanatic Fringe PG Delta 30 Quilt SPOTLITE REVIEW

Looking for an ultralight quilt, but don’t trust down insulation? With a few compromises, this may be your solution.

Overview

When the package from Fanatic Fringe arrived and I opened the box revealing their PG Delta 30 Quilt, the thought that immediately struck me was, "This thing is going to be really drafty." My next thought was, "Wow, this is really light for a synthetic bag." Those two initial observations pretty well define the product. Fanatic Fringe has distilled the sleeping quilt down to its essence, stripping away all zippers, straps, buckles, and drawcords, leaving only an enclosed footbox as its sole luxury feature. This lack of extraneous hardware may be aesthetically appealing to the same type of ultralight backpacker who doesn’t bring along gloves because he could always use his spare pair of dirty socks in a pinch. It also contributes to a loft:weight ratio superior to some feature-rich down bags.

However, the lack of any means to secure the quilt around the sleeper’s neck, shoulders, or even sides can lead to a drafty and chilly night when used alone under a tarp. Plus, the Polarguard Delta insulation doesn’t drape around you and conform to your shape to form a draft seal as well as down does. Fortunately, the situation changes when the quilt is combined with a tent or highly-breathable bivy sack to stop drafts. A bivy sack, in particular, complements the quilt well both by stopping drafts and by restraining the sides of the quilt to mold better to the sleeper’s shape. The quilt still is prone to drafts around the neck area, but this can be reduced by using some insulated clothing to form a gasket around the neck and shoulders.

Fanatic Fringe PG Delta 30 Quilt SPOTLITE REVIEW - 1
Underside of the quilt. Note the enclosed footbox.

The 48 inch girth at the shoulders is wide enough to cover most hikers. And, like all quilts, insulated clothing can be worn underneath without compressing any of the insulation. However, the formed footbox is narrow. It is roomy enough for an average hiker lying on his back. But, if you have extra-large feet, plan to wear booties, or sleep on your side, the footbox is too confining.

As its name suggests, the PG Delta 30 Quilt is made with Polarguard Delta insulation. This offers a significant advantage over down insulation due to its resistance to moisture-induced loft degradation. For wet-climate use, or for long trips where accumulated moisture from perspiration might reduce a down bag to a sack of wet oatmeal, synthetic insulations can be well worth their increased weight and diminished compressibility with respect to down. Plus, with its simple construction and lack of heavy and non-compressible accessories, this synthetic quilt has a higher loft:weight ratio and compresses smaller than some overbuilt down bags. The quilt is constructed by stitching the insulation to the shell fabric around its perimeter, without any any internal stitching, baffling, quilting or scrim to stabilize the insulation. The result is remarkably light weight. But, as the insulation is only secured at its edges, care must be used when handling the bag, particularly during stuffing and unstuffing, to prevent  damaging the insulation. The long-term durability of this construction remains to be seen.

Fanatic Fringe PG Delta 30 Quilt SPOTLITE REVIEW - 2
Combined with a breathable bivy sack and tarp, the PG Delta 30 Quilt is well protected against drafts and moisture.

What’s Good

  • Simple design devoid of extra hardware.
  • Moisture-resistant synthetic insulation.
  • Loft:Weight ratio comparable to some down bags.
  • Well suited for use with a breathable bivy sack.

What’s Not So Good

  • Limited draft control provisions.
  • Narrow footbox.
  • Construction offers little protection to the insulation, requiring careful handling.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Improve the size and shape of the footbox.
  • Offer a version with a neck drawcord and side straps for draft control.
  • As the quilt already requires careful handling to protect the insulation, overall weight could be further reduced by using a lighter shell material.

Features and Specifications

  • Manufacturer’s Claimed Weight: 22.5 oz
  • BPL Measured Weight: 22.0 oz
  • BPL Measured Loft: 2.2 inches
  • Loft to Weight Ratio: 9.0 cm/kg
  • Dimensions: 48 inch girth at shoulders x 72 inch length
  • Insulation: Polarguard Delta
  • Fabric: 1.1 oz nylon ripstop with a urethane DWR finish
  • Manufacturer’s Temperature Rating: 30 °F
  • MSRP: $189

GoLite Hut 1 SPOTLITE REVIEW

Roomy, bombproof floorless shelter for one.

Overview

The Golite Hut 1 is a one-person, fully-enclosable, floorless shelter with a number of unique features. Rather than the typical guyline cords seen from other manufacturers, it uses the easily adjustable tieout strap system borrowed from its older and  larger cousin, the Golite Hex. This allows re-tensioning the tieouts from inside the shelter, and the reflective straps are easily spotted with a flashlight at night. The front and rear ridgeline guyouts are more conventional, but they do employ guyline tensioners to minimize fumbling with knots. The Hut 1 can even be pitched over an adjustable trekking pole at its apex without any external guyline in front – the vestibule tieouts can support the front of the shelter in this configuration alone. Plus, when set up this way, only six stakes are needed for a fair-weather pitch. The large vestibule has a sturdy zipper closure, complete with a reinforced snap at the bottom to reduce stress on the zipper. Finally, the 1.76 oz/yd2 silnylon used is sturdier than the lighter silnylons and silicone-impregnated polyesters used by Golite’s competitors.

All these robust features come at a price, however. Competing shelters made from lighter materials are available with weights under 10 ounces, while the Hut 1 weighs in on the BPL scales at 17.4 ounces (not including stakes and stuff sack). Also, it’s fortunate the tie-out straps are easily adjustable, as the fabric stretches noticeably when wet, causing the Hut 1 to sag from rain or condensation. Those same straps are also too short to pitch the shelter more than a couple inches off the ground for ventilation. Finally, while the zippered entrance is convenient, opening and closing the zipper alters the tension on the fabric panels, causing minor pulling and sagging that requires more fiddling with the tieout straps to correct.

What’s Good

  • Bombproof – potentially a winter shelter for experienced ultralight backpackers!
  • Fully enclosable – rain, spray, and spindrift proof.
  • Convenient zippered vestibule.
  • Easily adjustable reflective tie-outs.
  • Very roomy for one person.
  • Requires only six stakes for a minimum pitch; up to ten for a storm pitch.
  • Catenary Ridgeline – easy to achieve a taut pitch.

What’s Not So Good

  • Requires collapsible trekking pole or nearby trees to erect. (Poles which cannot be shortened to less than 40 inches are not usable without modifying the shelter.)
  • Heavier than competing products; heavier than advertised.
  • Strap tieouts are not long enough to allow an elevated pitch for ventilation.
  • Fabric sags when wet, requiring re-tensioning guylines.
  • Fabric tension changes with zipper open and closed, making it hard to achieve a taut pitch without adjustment.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Lengthen strap tieouts to allow an elevated pitch. (I ended up replacing the straps with longer lengths of cord, as shown in the photo above.)
  • Include a hole with a weather flap near the apex to allow using a longer, protruding pole.  (I ended up making this modification myself.)
  • Use a more stretch-resistant fabric.

Features and Specifications

  • Manufacturer’s Claimed Weight: 15 oz
  • BPL Measured Weight: 17.4 oz
  • Manufacturer’s Claimed Floor Area: 39 ft2
  • Body Material: SilLite™ (1.76 oz/yd2 silnylon)
  • MSRP: $130

The North Face DIAD Jacket SPOTLITE REVIEW

Well under 9 ounces, including pit zips – but those pit zips are pretty small

Overview

The North Face DIAD Jacket is a lightweight waterproof-breathable jacket weighing only 8.6 ounces in men’s size extra large with quite a few features for a jacket in the 8 ounce range. DIAD is an acronym for Done in a Day – a common climbing phrase referring to long, one day, fast and light ascents. The DIAD is perhaps the most feature laden rain jacket on the market that weighs in below 9 ounces. And in a size medium it will be closer to 7 ounces.

Performance and Features

The DIAD is targeted at lightweight climbs and other fast moving outdoor activities. It has intrigued me since I first read its specs – 7.0 ounces, mini-pit zips, chest pocket and fully adjustable hood. That is an impressive list for a 7.0 ounce jacket. The test jacket we have weighs 8.6 ounces and is a men’s extra large large; a men’s size medium may weigh close to the specified 7.0 ounces. The DIAD is also available in women’s sizes.

The DIAD has 2.5 layer HyVent DT fabric. HyVent DT is a lighter version of the original HyVent feabric from The North Face. It reduces the 3rd layer to a microgrid half layer to eliminate some weight. This grid still separates the microporous elements from the skin and allows some air flow between the skin and the microporous layers. I have found the fabric very packable and light. I can pack the DIAD into a softball sized stuff sack. I have had it out in only one storm – pictured at right in Jacks Canyon, AZ just prior to the storm.

Another bulk reducing feature is the welded seams of the DIAD. The seams are built using The North Face’s Magic Seam contruction. This technique eliminates sewn seams and is advertised to improve waterproofness. The jacket has a roomy chest pocket and two small pit zips that are situated under the upper arm. The North Face refers to these an mini pit-vents, and they are indeed fairly small at 8 inches each. They will certainly help to move some moisture out in the right conditions – but the impact may be limited by the size of the opening. I’ll report on their performance in a full review later this year.

The cuff closures on the DIAD are a simple lightweight velcro, but have less bulk and weight than other velcro closures I’ve seen; a very nice feature. The hem has an elasticized drawcord with pull closures on both sides. The hood is roomy and will work with a low volume climbing helmet. The hood has an elastic drawcord with pull closures on both sides. The hood cinches down very nicely; significantly better than other rainwear with a similar weight. The sleeves are quite long and will easily slide down over your wrists or gloves. The torso coverage is not as generous – acceptable, but not enough keep your hips dry.

I’m looking forward to getting the DIAD into the field this summer. Especially to give the mini-pit zips a full trial. At first glance the DIAD looks to be an impressive competitor in the limited field of 7 to 8 ounce rainwear.



Left image: The 8 inch mini pit-vents are placed under the upper arm. Right image: The velcro cuff closures are simple, light, low-bulk and secure.

Features and Specifications

  • Weight – 8.6 ounces, men’s size extra large – manufacturer’s specification 7.0 ounces
  • Shell Fabric – 15 denier, 2.1 oz/yd2,100% Nylon ripstop
  • Waterproof/Breathable Technology – HyVent DT 2.5 layer
  • Features – Hem drawcord, hood drawcord, velcro cuff closures, chest pocket, reflective logos, 8 inch mini pit-vents
  • MSRP $199

Backpacking Light Print vs. Online Magazines: Vision for 2006 and Beyond

A letter to the readers of Backpacking Light Magazine.

 

Illustration by Mike Clelland

Dear BackpackingLight.com Reader,

Over the course of the past several weeks, BPL Premium Members have expressed some confusion and concern about the role of the online vs. print format of Backpacking Light. The confusion is completely warranted. There exists no other publication in any industry that we know of, that follows this publication model, so we certainly don’t expect everyone to completely understand the rationale behind something that seems to fly into the face of conventional expectations.

Thus, the purpose of this letter is to clarify some of these issues, and provide a response to some excellent feedback from our subscribers.

First, some definitions. Generally, BackpackingLight.com and more specifically, the BackpackingLight.com Premium Membership, are referred to herein as the “online magazine”, while Backpacking Light Magazine (the print quarterly) is referred to as the print magazine. When the term “Backpacking Light” or “BPL” is used, we are generally referring to the publishing company as a whole.

About the Online Magazine Subscription

In 2001, BPL launched the website BackpackingLight.com, and in 2003, it became a subscription-based online magazine (“Premium Membership”). The core value of the online subscription is tied to the following primary benefits for Premium Members:

  • Access to all article content at BackpackingLight.com
  • Discounts on gear sold in the BackpackingLight.com gear shop

Visitors to the site who are not subscribers to the online magazine still retain access to free content, which includes Gear Guides, Forums, Reader Reviews, public (unrestricted) article content, and gear shop purchasing at MSRP.

About the Print Magazine Subscription

In 2004, in response to a growing number of reader requests for a print magazine, we launched a pilot issue of Backpacking Light Magazine. After much deliberation about content, we made the decision that if we were going to launch a print magazine, it would have its own unique identity and thus, its own unique content, separate from that of the online magazine.

The quantity of magazines that are thrown away each year, or otherwise filled with “junk” content and irrelevant advertising, is incredible, and we want to minimize our contribution to that pile. Therefore, one of the most important features that we want to maintain with the print magazine is that it be an archival quality, journal-like mini-book that will occupy space on a bookshelf in a home library. The downside to this is the higher cost involved in producing that type of quality.

Because of the high cost of producing an archival-quality print magazine, financial sustainability is achieved primarily through economies of scale. This doesn’t mean we intend to turn the magazine into a typical letter-format rag one might find in a supermarket, but it does mean that we need to scale its distribution in a meaningful way. In short, we’d like to see the magazine on the shelves of fine bookstores and outdoor specialty retailers nationwide so that (1) sufficient economies of scale can be achieved to ensure long-term sustainability and (2) the message of lightweight backpacking is delivered to others not reached through the BackpackingLight.com channel.

In 2005, Backpacking Light Magazine (print) became available as a subscription based magazine. Issue 4 just went to press, Matt Colon has been appointed as the Editor-in-Chief for Issue 5 and beyond, and we are beginning to understand, as a staff, the very real need to communicate to you about how the individual identities of online and print are going to be maintained, and perhaps more importantly, the rationale behind it all.

The need to maintain different editorial directions for BPL’s print and online magazines is better understood in light of a review of existing print magazine models in the outdoor industry.

Magazine Publishing Model #1: A Superficial (Free) Web Presence and a Subscription-Based Print Magazine

The typical scenario is this. A publisher will produce a high quality print magazine that realizes revenue through subscriptions, single copy newsstand sales, and advertising. The breakdown between the three revenue streams is different for every magazine, but the objective of all mass-market print magazines is to increase revenue primarily through advertising. As such, the focus of the publisher’s marketing strategy is necessarily placed on growing the subscriber base and otherwise increasing magazine distribution. That’s where their website comes in. Their websites serve to promote the print magazine and drive Website visitors to subscribe to the print magazine. The end result is more print magazine subscribers, which leads to a higher distribution, which commands higher advertising rates, which leads to more revenue.

We have made it very clear since day one that we desire to produce an excellent product first, with increased distribution driven by demand for that product. Advertising is not a significant revenue stream for us. We are striving for long-term financial health and sustainability through subscription revenue, not advertising revenue. It gives us more editorial flexibility, more editorial freedom, and keeps us accountable to our subscribers for developing a fine product, and not to our advertisers for superficially growing a distribution base.

Magazine Publishing Model #2: One Content Set, Two Modes of Distribution: Subscription-Based Electronic and Print Versions

Some magazines maintain equivalent content sets but deliver them in two mediums. The typical revenue model for this is based on either (1) the option to subscribe to one or the other, or (2) the option to subscribe to both at a discounted rate, so that you have a choice of medium. This is the model most commonly used by major premium newspapers to provide article access via the Web, and by magazine publishers that publish their print magazines in PDF format for online distribution.

BPL’s model closely, but not exactly, resembles this model. While we offer two medium types (print and online), they are not replicates of each other and thus two distinct products. However, both products are available as a combined option at a discount (i.e., online subscribers can purchase a discounted print subscription).

The BPL Publishing Model

And so, BPL has taken a slightly different road, in part out of necessity of growing a company organically, and in part out of a desire to focus on product (content) quality first, instead of maximizing distribution of a mediocre product.

Consequently, our model consists of the online membership being our core product. We feel, and have had reader feedback confirming this, that online membership has been and will continue to be our core product with the most value to the most serious practitioners of ultralight backpacking.

Obviously, we want to improve the product quality of our online magazine. Reader feedback on our forums in recent weeks indicates a sense of reader stress about the quality of the online magazine going down. We’ve been listening, and we respond with a new editorial calendar for the online magazine that incorporates your suggestions. View it here:

Because the online magazine contains such a wide variety of content types (articles, gear guides, forums, reader reviews, gear review summaries, etc.), and because the online magazine contains such a prodigious quantity of content, there are financial limitations to (1) preparing that content for print publication, and (2) printing that content.

1We do recognize that our article publication breakdown indicates a review-heavy editorial calendar over the last 12 months. Much of this was due to the backlog of product reviews that our Section Editors were mandated to complete as part of their training and commitments made to manufacturers, both of which result as the outfall of growing pains of our organization. Now, with a full corps of experienced and talented Section Editors, and a gear review selection policy that is more disciplined and restrictive (so we can focus on reviewing gear that has the highest amount of interest to our readership), we are able to unleash our staff to do what they do best, in addition to writing reviews: comprehensive review summaries, technique articles, and lightweight backpacking features. See the Editorial Calendar (link above) to see what’s in store for the rest of 2006 and beyond!

In the 12-month period ending April 17, 2006, more than 330,000 words of content in 221 articles1 were released at BackpackingLight.com (333,562 to be exact). The content can be broken down as follows:

  • 9 Editorials
  • 21 Features
  • 10 Techniques
  • 122 Reviews
  • 54 SpotLites
  • 5 Review Summaries

It is worth noting that this content does not include the dozens of articles and several thousand more words of content released as dispatches from the Outdoor Retailer Summer and Winter Markets, nor does it include any of the print magazine features published in Issues 2-4 of 2005-2006.

Thus, in our current print size format, we would have to publish 14 issues of the print magazine per year, just to deliver this content in both online and print formats. And this does not consider the new content that we published in the print magazine last year.

Then the question arises: “Why not just take the ‘best stuff’ from the online magazine and publish it as a print magazine; that way, online subscribers get it all, and print subscribers get the best stuff”. Because the ‘best stuff’ from the online magazine is more technical in nature and focused on more time-sensitive content such as gear reviews, a quarterly print publication intended for archival and reference purposes is a poor medium for publishing this type of content. The result would be a dilution in the quality of the print magazine and its inability to serve its primary target markets, which include, but are not necessarily limited to, retailers, bookstores, and subscribers seeking a more literary tactile experience than what is available on the Internet. Ultimately, distribution of the magazine would be limited by scope and cannibalization of print subscribers by an online version, and long-term sustainability of the print magazine would be at risk.

The next question then, is: “OK, so you have two distinct magazines: one online, one print. Why not just give online subscribers full access to digitized articles that appear in the print magazine?” The answer to this question is more complicated.

First, retailers of the magazine have expressed concerns about stocking a print magazine that makes its content available in other channels.

The rationale for this concern is that once a print magazine reader finds out they can acquire the content online or through another otherwise competitive channel, the retailer will lose revenue. We have no desire to cannibalize revenue from the retailers that stock the print magazine. Thus, we intend to support their sales efforts with content that is exclusive to print magazine readers.

Second, the print magazine is largely staffed and financially supported by separate means than the online magazine (due to personal investments made by selected members of the staff to launch the print magazine).

The online editorial staff and budget is not sufficient in and of itself to provide the editorial and financial support to launch a print magazine. Thus, to make the print magazine successful, a new staff with a new budget supported by investment capital was required. Because of this separation between the print and online magazines (a necessary objective consistent with our own internal goals of growing BPL organically without debt to insure maximum long term health and sustainability), it’s not possible – at this early phase of print magazine “start-up” – to leverage the efforts and financial risks of the print magazine staff and investors to add value to the online magazine.

Third, in spite of all this, we really do have a desire to give our core customers (online premium members) lower barriers in accessing print magazine content.

Because print magazine content is produced above and beyond online content (with different staff, different budgets, and different financial models), those barriers cannot be zero or financial sustainability of both online and print subscriptions would be at risk. Currently, benefits to online subscribers come as discounted PDF reprints of articles published in the print magazine, and as discounted subscriptions for premium members. Currently, premium members can purchase print subscriptions at our cost of producing the print magazine. Ideally, we expect to lower these barriers of entry to access print content by online subscribers by reducing the costs of PDF reprints and print subscriptions to online subscribers. In fact, we’ve already done that, in the short time that the print subscription has been available. Initially, print subscriptions were available to online subscribers for $19.99 (print subscription list price to the general public is $24.99). Now, they are available to online subscribers for $14.99. Likewise, PDF reprints (MSRP $4.99) have reduced in price for online subscribers from $3.99 to $2.99 to $1.99 (current) in the past several months.

There are undoubtedly online subscribers who would like to read the print magazine content, but who do not want it in a print format. Currently, PDF reprints are the only mechanism of delivering that content to online subscribers or other online-only readers. We are evaluating options for delivering a print magazine subscription online, and will probably provide that access to print subscribers, so that the print subscription fee buys access to both print and electronic versions of the print magazine.

We are continuing to brainstorm ideas about ways to integrate the print experience to online readers in a more meaningful way, so please stay tuned and look for more progress on this topic.

Content and Structure: Online vs. Print

The final, and perhaps the most important question, is: “What are the real differences between the online and print magazines, and how will these differences affect me as a lightweight backpacking enthusiast?”

Overview of the Online Magazine

The online magazine BackpackingLight.com was founded on the premise that consumers could become highly educated with technical information that would allow them to (1) make better gear buying decisions, and (2) be safe and comfortable with ultralight backpacking techniques. We intend to continue those online roots and make education the driver behind its editorial strategy.

And so, the first objective of the online magazine is an ambitious one: to provide meaningful education for its subscribers about gear and technique.

The second objective exists to take advantage of the online medium. Unlike print, online publications can be multi-media, interactive, more timely, and without space limitations. Consequently, audio and video content, interactive features, news reporting, time-sensitive content that changes frequently, and data-intensive content will be delivered through the online subscription channel.

Summary of Content in the Online Magazine*

The online magazine focuses on providing education and information about lightweight backpacking techniques and gear.

  • Research & Testing
  • Comprehensive Product Reviews
  • In-Depth Techniques
  • Review Summaries
  • Field Notes
  • Outdoor Retailer News
  • Community Forums
  • Reader Reviews
  • Interactive Gear Guides

* This is not a comprehensive list, but rather, the characteristic types of content that are “generally” found in the online magazine and not “generally” found in the print magazine.

In addition, there will be the case from time to time where submissions for the print magazine are of exceptional quality but there is no page space in the print magazine to publish them in a timely manner. In this situation, there may be articles that fit better into the print format (see below), but will be published online in lieu of not publishing them at all.

Overview of the Print Magazine

The print magazine Backpacking Light Magazine was founded on the premise that readers wanted a more readable, less technical, and more tactile experience that invoked the more emotive responses available in a hard copy format (color photographs, well-written stories and prose) than in an online format. In addition, because the potential distribution of information through a print magazine channel can reach a much wider audience of beginning and intermediate hikers than an online channel (due primarily to newsstand, bookstore, and specialty retailer distribution), the print magazine is well-suited for publishing information about the style, philosophy, and general techniques of ultralight backpacking. Finally, because the print magazine is designed to be an archival quality publication, its content will be comprised primarily of features that are less time sensitive (such as news and reviews).

Summary of Content in the Print Magazine*

The print magazine focuses on providing a more tactile and emotive experience about lightweight backpacking style, philosophy, and applications.

  • Commentary (Land Stewardship, Environmental Policy, and Humor)
  • Destination Features
  • Applications of Lightweight Backcountry Travel
  • Lightweight Philosophy
  • Travel Narratives
  • Photo Essays
  • Technical Abstracts of Comprehensive Online Features
  • Lightweight Backpacking Technique (Shorts & Tips)
  • Review Summaries: Annotated
  • Gear Guides: Annotated
  • Market Relevant & Cottage Industry Advertising

* This is not a comprehensive list, but rather, the characteristic types of content that are “generally” found in the print magazine and not “generally” found in the online magazine.

Common Content in Print and Online Magazines

Although individual gear reviews will generally be published only online, selected (e.g., four per year, or one per print issue) review summaries (in-depth performance comparisons of related gear) and gear guides (in-depth statistical comparisons of related gear) will be available in both online (full review summary) and print (annotated review summary) formats.

The advantage of a print version is off-line portability, better at-a-glance visual presentation, and consolidation of the salient features of the review category for those that do not subscribe to the online magazine. The advantage of the online version is more in-depth gear guides with interactive features for product comparison and selection, the availability of detailed individual product reviews, and the full text of the review summary.

So, while some content will be reproduced in both print and online formats, that amount is small, strategically selected and edited to optimize the strengths of both mediums for those that subscribe to both online and print magazines, and valuable enough as standalone products for subscribers to only one or the other.

Summary

We certainly don’t claim to do everything the “right” way, whatever that means – let’s explain what we mean by this. Throughout this process, we’ve realized that “right” for somebody is “wrong” for others. A more appropriate disclaimer would be this one: “We certainly don’t claim to be able to please all of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, or even some of the people all of the time. We just want to make sure that we are preserving for and enhancing your passion for the outdoors in general, and lightweight backpacking in particular.”

But we do know some things to be right for everyone all of the time. In this regard, what we do strive for is (1) involvement of our subscriber base in developing and executing our vision, (2) creating and maintaining publication products with outstanding quality, and (3) upholding the highest ethical standards of communications, customer service, and public relations in the industry.

To that end, the print vs. online strategy outlined in this letter has been motivated more by direct feedback from our most vocal and loyal subscribers than by any other singular factor. And for that, we offer you the utmost thanks.

We sincerely hope this letter clarifies some of the issues that have been brought up in recent months. More important, we hope that it gives you a vision for the future of where BPL is going as we continue to strive to provide quality publications for the lightweight backpacking community.

And whether you decide to subscribe to the print magazine, the online magazine, or both, we’ll do our very best to make sure your reader experience is a good one that is worth the subscription fee.

Best Regards,
The BPL Editorial Board

  • Ryan Jordan, Publisher
  • Carol Crooker, Online Editor-in-Chief
  • Matt Colon, Print Editor-in-Chief
  • Vic Lipsey, Director of Marketing
  • Alan Dixon, Senior Technical Editor

Make Your Own Gear: The Micro Z-Stand Pot Support

Using Backpacking Light Titanium Alloy UltraRods to build a sturdy, and now heat resistant, sub-0.20 oz (5.7 g) Z-Stand pot support for alcohol and solid fuel stoves.

Backpacking Light Titanium Alloy UltraRods are certainly thin – and light.

We’ve received a number of comments from those that have purchased the UltraRods that they won’t support a heavy pot of water when used in some designs for wire-type pot supports, including the Z-Stand Pot Stand Design published here earlier. We offered a redesign of the standard Z-Stand to work with the UltraRods; and while this has worked fine for many, the direct flame from some side-ported stoves overheats the titanium, causing it to soften and bend under the weight of a cook pot.

Here, we offer a Z-Stand redesign that supports a heavy pot of water and withstands the heat from side-ported alcohol stoves. The trick is to relocate the diagonals on the Z-Stand to a lower position along the verticals by spiraling them down the verticals. Ron Liljedahl, a Backpacking Light subscriber, loaned us his stove setup, which had previously “melted” three UltraRod Z-Stands, to allow us to test the new design. Thanks again Ron!

To make your own, use the same technique as the original Z-stand design. Start with a vertical going up, and make the bend and spiral at the top using needle nose pliers. Caution! You must make gentle curves and bend the material slowly to prevent it from snapping (yes, I believe we’ve met the threshold of what this material can do). Finish it off with a third diagonal that spirals up the first vertical, as we did with the modified Z-Stand. The final weight for the stand pictured above is under 0.2 ounces.

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW

A warm weather, wide coverage, rain hat from the makers of the classic Seattle Sombrero.

Introduction

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW - 1

The Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero is a rain hat that provides full coverage against the elements. Its proprietary Ventia shell is waterproof and breathable and it has a foam-stiffened brim with plastic edging. Its mesh lining with a Coolmax headband keeps you cool during warmer downpours. The Nimbus is wider than the popular Seattle Sombrero. How does the Nimbus Sombrero stand up to pouring rain and slush?

What’s Good

  • Wide brim provides full coverage from rain and snow
  • Waterproof and breathable
  • Easily adjustable with one hand
  • Secure in windy conditions, even with the chin cord removed
  • Very durable, keeps its shape after being stuffed many times
  • Mesh liner and lack of insulation keep things cool in moderate temps.

What’s Not So Good

  • Ventia fabric is not as breathable as Gore-Tex or eVENT
  • Wide curving brim restricts vision somewhat

Specifications

  Year/Model

2005 Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero rain hat

  Weight

3.3 oz (92 g) as measured (size L); manufacturer’s specification 3.4 oz (95 g) size L

  Fabrics

Proprietary Ventia waterproof/breathable – seam taped, mesh-lined crown, Coolmax mesh headband

  Features

Foam-stiffened brim, flexible plastic piping, external one-handed drawcord adjustment, side snaps, removable chin cord, floats

  MSRP

$35

Performance

During my review, I focused on how the Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero compares to the classic Seattle Sombrero (a popular rain hat that I’ve used for years) and what advantages it offers, if any. In short, the Nimbus Sombrero has a stiffer brim, broader rain coverage, and less insulation that makes it more comfortable in warm weather. I was able to wear the Nimbus Sombrero in heavy summer rains without overheating, under wider coverage than the Seattle Sombrero offers.

The Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero is a well-designed rain hat. The outer shell is made of Ventia, a proprietary fabric from Outdoor Research that is waterproof/breathable, although less breathable than Gore-Tex or eVENT. It is fully seam taped and never leaked during field testing. It has a mesh lining and a Coolmax mesh headband.

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW - 2

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW - 3

The Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero offers broad rain coverage and a one-handed adjustable elastic cord headband that is very secure.

The Nimbus Sombrero includes a removable chinstrap (0.1 ounces) that I rarely needed, even in blustery conditions, because the elastic headband adjustment is so secure. The headband adjustment is made via a one-hand drawcord on the back; as winds pick up, just reach back and pull on the cord for a super secure fit. The chinstrap is an excellent second defense for use during consistent high winds such as those found above the tree line or during sea kayaking.

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW - 4
Side snaps tuck the hat out of your way during dry conditions.

The Nimbus Sombrero features a brim that is 3 1/2 inches wide in the front and 4 inches wide in the back (a full 1 inch wider than a Seattle Sombrero front to back). This provides complete coverage, keeping my collar dry in all but the worst driving rains and funneling water well away from my face. However, this extra coverage also blocks views somewhat and I had a difficult time keeping the front brim out of my eyesight because the plastic brim material is non-bendable. Side snaps tuck the sides of the hat up during dry conditions. After stuffing and re-stuffing the Nimbus Sombrero hat many times, it still retained its original shape due to the stiffened brim.

Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero REVIEW - 5
A mesh liner is comfortable and a lack of insulation keeps your head cool during warmer conditions.

When comparing the Nimbus Sombrero to the Seattle Sombrero, it’s important to consider the conditions in which you plan to use it. If you’re looking for a cool weather hat to shed rain and snow, the classic Seattle Sombrero is a good choice. However, if you are looking for the ultimate in broad rain coverage for use in warmer conditions, the 3.3-ounce Outdoor Research Nimbus Sombrero is hard to beat.

What’s Unique

The Nimbus Sombrero has an extra wide, stiffened brim and a non-insulated liner making it a good hat for warm weather, heavy rain conditions.

Recommendations for Improvement

An eVENT version of this hat would have greater breathability.

Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst Hat REVIEW

Outdoor Research Women introduces a lightweight, warm weather, sun and rain hat.

Introduction

Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst Hat REVIEW - 2
The Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst hat is a well-designed rain hat that handles moderate precipitation and gives good sun protection.

The Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst hat is a full-brimmed waterproof/breathable rain hat. It offers good sun protection and rain protection that is sufficient for most rain conditions.

What’s Good

  • Moderate brim is a good compromise between coverage and all-weather usage
  • Waterproof and breathable
  • Adjustable chin cord and elastic headband keeps the hat secure
  • Very durable, keeps its shape after being stuffed many times
  • Mesh liner and lack of insulation keeps things cool in moderate temps
  • Lightweight at 2.5 ounces

What’s Not So Good

  • Ventia fabric is not as breathable as Gore-Tex or eVENT
  • Brim isn’t wide enough for driving rain
  • Headband isn’t adjustable – be sure to get the right size

Specifications

  Year/Model

2005 Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst hat

  Weight

2.5 oz (71 g) as measured (size M); manufacturer’s specification 3.0 oz (85 g) size L

  Fabrics

Ventia waterproof/breathable – seam taped, mesh-lined crown, Coolmax mesh headband

  Features

Foam-stiffened brim, elastic headband, removable chin cord, floats

  MSRP

$38.00

Performance

Outdoor Research Women (formerly known as Wild Roses) sells a wide variety of outdoor gear specifically designed for women. The Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst hat is a versatile rain hat that can double as a sun hat. The outer shell is made of Ventia, a proprietary fabric from Outdoor Research that is waterproof and breathable, although less breathable than Gore-Tex or eVENT. It is fully seam taped and doesn’t leak. It has a mesh lining and a Coolmax mesh headband.

Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst Hat REVIEW - 3
An elastic headband and adjustable chinstrap keep the Cloudburst secure in windy conditions.

An elastic headband keeps the hat comfortably secure but the Cloudburst includes a removable chinstrap (0.1 ounces) that is essential during high winds. A sliding plastic keeper keeps the chinstrap secure.

Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst Hat REVIEW - 4
A rear brim that is 1/2 inch wider than the front ensures that rain stays off your neck.

The Cloudburst features a brim that is 2 1/2 inches wide in the front and 3 inches wide in the back (1 inch shorter than the classic Seattle Sombrero front to back). This provides moderate coverage, keeping a collar dry during downpours but not windblown rain. The extended back keeps rain out of a rain jacket neckline if it is snugly secured. However, when using a rain jacket with a hood, it is important to tuck in the hood so that it doesn’t catch water.

What’s Unique

When comparing the Cloudburst to the classic Seattle Sombrero, the Cloudburst is much cooler due to its mesh liner and minimalist design. It offers less rain coverage but enough for moderate conditions. However, it does offer all-day utility that makes it good for both rainy and dry conditions. At 2.5 ounces (0.6 ounces lighter than the Seattle Sombrero), the Outdoor Research Women Cloudburst is a true lightweight.

Recommendations for Improvement

An eVENT version of this hat would have greater breathability and would extend its usable range.

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer

Philmont Guidebook to Adventure: “Remember, the key to successful backpacking is to go lightly.”

Introduction

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer - 1
Rock climbing at Cow Camp, Philmont 2004.
Courtesy of Larry Keil, ASM, Troop 815, Danville, CA

Whenever you walk around base camp at Philmont Scout Ranch during the summer you will see the “cripples”: Boy Scouts, mostly adult leaders, who have broken down on the trail and had to be removed from their crew and evacuated from the backcountry. They are almost always limping but quite often you will find them hobbling around with crutches. For each one you see in the base camp there are many more on the trails that are just barely making it and regretting their decision to come to Philmont. Why is this happening when Philmont is one of the great adventures in Scouting? The two most common errors are insufficient training and carrying too much weight. When these two errors happen simultaneously that person has created a dangerous situation for himself, and his crew.

Philmont publishes a pamphlet, Philmont Guidebook to Adventure, which gives Scouts information on the Philmont experience, the training, and equipment needed to hike its trails. The equipment list is extensive (read “heavy”), with lots of gear and multiple sets of clothing. Most people who read this pamphlet assume that this is the recommended list of equipment to bring to Philmont. It is not! There is one paragraph in this pamphlet that is the key to your success at Philmont that most people miss:

Gathering Your Equipment

Backpacking requires proper equipment just as any outdoor sport. Without suitable equipment you will face unnecessary hardships. Take only what you need. After several overnight camps you should be able to conduct your own shakedown to eliminate items you didn’t need. Remember, the key to successful backpacking is to go lightly. Check your equipment against the recommended lists on page 12 and 13. This is the maximum. All backpackers can reduce this list and still be comfortable, clean, and safe.

Philmont Guidebook to Adventure 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2006

The above paragraph sounds like something Ray Jardine wrote instead of the Boy Scouts of America. Statements like “take only what you need,” “eliminate items you don’t need,” and “the key to successful backpacking is to go lightly” have been heard for years throughout the lightweight backpacking community.

This article will show you a reasonable list of gear and techniques that will allow you to carry a lighter pack and truly enjoy the wonders Philmont has to offer.

When I asked my 18-year-old son (Philmont trek 2002, Rayado 2003) how others or I could lighten our packs, his immediate response was, “Bring your 18-year-old son and give him all your gear.” He was joking, of course, but there’s a lot of wisdom in this statement. At Philmont you function as a “crew” or team. You succeed or fail as this team. If you have immensely strong Scouts they can and should carry more of the group gear than the weaker ones, whether boys or leaders. This allows the whole crew to move the most efficiently around Philmont.

Philmont assigns a Ranger to your crew for the intake process and to hike with you for a few days. The Ranger will get your crew through the intake process, ensure that you bring the appropriate gear, and train the crew on Philmont techniques. Your particular Ranger is the one you need to convince concerning the clothing and equipment you bring. Many people who frequent Backpacking Light will know a bit more about backpacking than your average 18-22 year old Ranger, but please do not harass them. Just take the time to explain yourself and your choices and most of the time they will go along with your choices. I recommend that you not challenge them on anything to do with bear protection. In 2002 we wanted to bring lighter ropes and bags, but our Ranger disagreed. We took the Philmont ropes and bags. In 2005 we had a similar event. I cannot see them approving the Bozeman Mountain Works AirCore Pro URSA Dyneema Bear Bag Hanging Rope even though it may be a better and lighter choice.

Philmont does a really good job of having thousands of Scouts camping in close proximity to lots of bears with very few problems and needs to be congratulated for their efforts to keep everyone safe.

Context

The gear on the list below was selected specifically to meet the requirements of Philmont Scout Ranch while being as light as possible. Although the list was compiled for Boy Scouts and Scout Leaders attending Philmont, it will work equally well for others interested in a lighter pack.

  • Seasons: Summer – lows to the 40s F, high 80s to 90s F, short afternoon showers common
  • Length: Four days between resupply
  • Where: Philmont Scout Ranch, Sangre de Christo mountains, New Mexico

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer - 2
Equipment check on day one, Philmont 2004.
Courtesy of Larry Keil, ASM, Troop 815, Danville, CA

Rationale for Selected Gear

The gear you carry is broken into five sections: Personal Equipment: Clothing; Personal Equipment: Gear; Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems; Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont; and Crew Equipment Provided by Your Crew.

1. Personal Equipment: Clothing

Philmont sets some standards that influence your clothing choices. They require completely separate sleep clothing, full rain suits (no ponchos), and long pants for various activities. These requirements dictate some of your choices, but still allow you to go fairly light.

Philmont requires long pants for some of the activities (spar pole climbing, horseback riding, conservation projects). These activities could conceivably be done in your rain pants. I tried this during my 2002 trek, but now my rain pants have numerous pieces of duct tape covering the holes I put in them at Philmont doing these activities. Since most people prefer to hike in shorts, a better solution would be a long pair of pants with zip-off legs. A good choice is the Ex-Officio Amphi Convertible Pant. In addition to zip-off legs, it has a built-in brief so that you do not need to bring underwear. For a shirt, I recommend one with an SPF-30 rating and sleeves you can roll up or down. RailRiders, Ex-Officio, and REI make nice shirts, among others. Another advantage of these shirts over T-shirts is that the fabric weave is much tighter making it hard for mosquitoes to bite through the shirt. Remember to treat your clothing with Permethrin prior to coming to Philmont. All you need to take is the one pair of zip-off pants and one hiking shirt for the whole trek. When you get a chance to shower at one of the staff camps wash your shirt, pants, and socks; put them back on and they will be dry usually in less than an hour. I take two pairs of hiking socks, one to wear and the other to change into part way though the day or when getting into camp.

Boots are not necessary since almost all hiking is done on well-worn trails, and your pack weight should be below 30 pounds. Running shoes with good tread will do fine, especially if they are trail runners. Make sure they are broken in before going. A wide brim hat finishes off your hiking clothing.

I have used Frogg Toggs at Philmont for rainwear. I combined them with an umbrella to keep the rain off my face. The umbrella also functions to keep my pack fairly dry. The Gossamer Gear Micropore Rain suit costs $25 versus $70 for Frogg Toggs and weighs less (10.3 oz vs. 16.2 oz). Several people in our crew tried the Micropore Rain Suit on my 2005 trek with mixed results. Some of the suits were really trashed after a 10-day trek. The consensus of our group was that the Frogg Toggs were a better choice, but for Scouts it’s hard to overlook the low cost of the Micropore Rain suit.

You will also need to bring a warm sweater and/or jacket/vest. I found that a lightweight fleece or wool sweater works OK but adding a lightweight vest really keeps you toasty socializing with other groups at night. If you find you are getting cold due to wind, just wear your rain suit to act as a wind barrier. Don’t use down exclusively for your insulation, in case it gets wet. Mix some wool, fleece, or high loft synthetics into your clothing line. I use a PossumDown (wool) sweater, Patagonia synthetic vest, and a down sleeping bag.

2. Personal Equipment: Gear

When I was in Philmont in 2002 I used a Gossamer Gear G4 pack with a trash compactor bag inside as waterproofing. The G4 worked well at Philmont but it seemed a bit too big even with the bulky food that you get issued. The Ranger was skeptical, but accepted my setup when I showed him I had everything on his list, and then some. In 2005 I used a Gossamer Gear G5 pack (silnylon version). This pack has a smaller volume than the G4, but my gear has also gotten a bit lighter and smaller. The Ranger never questioned me about the pack. Some members of our trek used a GoLite Gust pack (20 oz), and some the Granite Gear Virga (21 oz). The Virga has compression straps to secure the contents better than the Gust, but all the adults and Scouts were happy with their selections. Some of the others took heavier packs that they have owned for a while but are cutting down on other weighty items. Most lightweight packs will work at Philmont if you get total weights to less than 25 pounds with food and water. You need to keep a big enough area in the pack to carry about four days of food, which is usually the most they issue at any one time. Plan on the space for this food to be approximately the size of a bear canister but made up of numerous smaller packages. When the food is issued, go through the food bags and remove items that you and your food group will not use.

Take your water containers of preference. A bladder system, such as Platypus or CamelBak, helps you easily stay hydrated. Bring enough water containers to hold at least 4 liters so that the nights you are in a dry camp you will have water for the morning. If everyone has an extra 2-3 liters of water you do not need to carry the Philmont extra water containers, thus saving a little bit of weight. One other suggestion when going into a dry camp: eat your dinner for lunch near a water source, since dinners require water, whereas lunches and breakfasts are usually dry.

I carry my small pocketknife, whistle, and a couple of photon lights on a necklace so I know where everything is when I need it. The other personal gear you will need are a plastic bowl, cup for hot liquids and a spoon for eating. Some other items are a small propane lighter, personal first aid kit, medicines, sunglasses, and a “stash” of coffee if you are a big coffee drinker. If you really need your caffeine, chocolate-coated coffee beans were really popular on our 2002 and 2005 treks. Remember to bring two cotton bandanas, one for cooking with and one for personal needs.

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer - 5
Troop 257 group photo after arriving back at base camp at the conclusion of their 2005 trek. Tent City, where everyone spends their first and last night at Philmont, is in the background.
Courtesy of Doug Prosser, ASM, Troop 257, Ventura County Council, CA

3. Personal Equipment: Sleep Systems

Philmont requires separate sleeping clothes from the clothing you wear during the day. This is because your hiking clothes could be contaminated with spilled food, thus leaving odors on your clothing that bears might be attracted to while you sleep. Philmont is very serious about bear avoidance. They spend a lot of time teaching your crew the “Philmont” way to prevent bear attraction. Please do not challenge them on these issues, just go with the flow. They have been very successful in preventing most bear attacks with thousands of Scouts going through the Ranch, always camping in the same fixed locations. Your sleep clothing choices depend on a) whether you sleep warm or cold, and b) the rest of your sleep system. Night temperatures are rarely colder than the low 40s. I sleep cold, so I wear lightweight fleece pants with a long sleeve synthetic shirt and sleep socks that double as shoulder pads on the G5 pack. I add, as needed, a lightweight beanie, wool sweater, and vest.

Philmont requires a tent; no tarps or bivies are allowed. They do not require that a tent have an integrated floor, so many lightweight options are available. The Scouts in 2002 and 2005 used the Mountain Hardwear Kiva, which holds up to four Scouts. Our Scoutmaster and I used the Betamid in 2002, and this year we purchased a Betamid Light to save even more weight. Some people use bathtub-type ground cloths, because the campgrounds are all very hard and flat, thus allowing water to pool around the tents. A flat ground sheet will work fine, however, if you pay attention when setting up your camp, just like you would on any other camping trip.

As I’ve aged I have migrated to thicker and thicker sleeping pads, to increase the quality of my sleep on the hard ground at Philmont. I am currently using the Big Agnes Insulated Air Core Pad at 25 ounces. In 2005, three of our crew slept on the Big Agnes pads.

In 2002, I used a three-quarter length thin Therm-a-Rest combined with my Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest closed cell foam pad and a Western Mountaineering MityLite sleeping bag. In a tent, a 30-40 degree bag will work well when combined with some of your insulation layers and a hat. In 2005, I used a Pertex Quantum Arc X down bag, which is both warmer and lighter than the MityLite. I was much warmer sleeping with the Arc X and I may need to lighten my sleep clothing for the next Philmont trek. One other topic that concerns people at night is bugs. We really had no problems with bugs in 2002 and 2005; I never even had to use any Deet or my head net.

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer - 4
Fish Camp just after Troop 257 has finished setting up camp in the rain. The Scouts under the 8’x10′ silnylon dining fly are breaking out the food packets for dinner and getting the cooking started. Note the Micropore Rainsuits, two Mountain Hardwear Kiva shelters, Black Diamond Betamid (purple/white), and Black Diamond Beta Light (blue/gray silnylon). Philmont, 2005.
Courtesy of Doug Prosser, ASM, Troop 257, Ventura County Council, CA

4. Crew Equipment Issued at Philmont

Philmont will issue gear to your crew if you do not bring your own. The Philmont gear is heavy and designed to take the constant abuse that Scouts can deliver. If you plan well you will not have to take much of Philmont’s heavy gear. Below is a discussion of the gear listed in “Philmont 2005 Guidebook to Adventure.”

The first item is a nylon dining fly (12’x12′) weighing about 4 pounds. Its two collapsible poles weigh about 1 pound. Instead, have your crew take a silnylon tarp at least 8’x10′ along with extra titanium stakes and lightweight line. In place of the dining fly poles, our crew used two hiking poles velcroed together to give them added height, just single poles if we wanted to keep the tarp low. For whatever reason, our Ranger did not want us to tie our dining fly to trees.

Do not use the Philmont tents, since they weigh about 5.5 pounds for two people. There are many current lightweight options under 2 pounds per Scout (see above). The cook kits Philmont provides range from 4-6 pounds per cook group and cutlery kits weigh 0.5 pound. Each cook group needs a 6-8 liter pot (4 liters is a bit small), and a 2-liter pot for some desserts. Another option for desserts is to mix them in plastic bags. We did this in 2005 with good success; only one dessert bag blew up on a Scout who was too rough with it. Leave the fry pan at home. The whole crew will need one other 6-8 liter pot to boil water for sterilizing eating utensils and for washing. Philmont is really big on regularly sterilizing your eating and cooking gear. The only cutlery item you need is a large spoon and a serving cup with a handle. Leave the spatula at home.

Due to the Philmont logistics, we always use two stoves, when in theory we could get by with only one. Many of the memorable activities at Philmont happen in late afternoon and early evening. The Scouts want to get out there for those activities as fast as possible. One stove for cooking and another stove to boil water means our crew can finish their meals and get out to the activities much faster. In my opinion this is worth the added weight of a second stove.

The next item from the Philmont cook kit is hot-pot tongs (two pairs), weighing about 0.5 pounds. I never saw a use for these since we bring a cooking bandana (our only cotton item) that works great for grabbing hot items.

The next item on the list is a camp shovel, weighing about 1 pound. This is a relic of early days when latrines were dug at each camp. Today every campsite has an outhouse, so we leave this behind.

The next items are plastic trash bags, salt, and pepper. The packets in which you carry your food provide sufficient space to stuff your trash, but trash bags may come in handy as emergency rain wear if a Scout’s rain gear gets lost. The salt and pepper are in small individual packets, which generate a lot of small pieces of trash. A better option is to bring a small container of each, along with some additional spices for your trail meals.

Philmont provides scrub pads, toilet paper, and small containers of both dishwashing soap and hand sanitizer. We also bring additional hand sanitizer bottles with us so that we have them readily available when cooking, eating, or returning from the outhouse. We think this is one of the most important aspects of avoiding sickness on the trail.

Philmont also provides Katadyn Micropur water purification tablets, a variety of other cleaning equipment, and bear bags and ropes. Philmont uses a plastic strainer to filter food particles out of wash water and drain it into an underground sump. A spatula is used to scoop the larger food particles from the strainer to be thrown in your trash. I feel a fine mesh screen circle, 6-8 inches in diameter, could accomplish the same function as the plastic strainer, and the spatula could be replaced with a small thin flat piece of plastic like a credit card. I’ll be doing this next trip to Philmont.

5. Equipment Provided by Your Crew

This section addresses those miscellaneous gear items that your crew may bring with them that will not be supplied by Philmont.

Philmont recommends a sewing kit with heavy thread and needle. During our past treks we brought a “hotel” sewing kit but we never used it for anything other than draining blisters.

Bring enough tent stakes to put up all your tents, plus the dining fly (in windy conditions) instead of the recommended 10 per person.

Two to three collapsible water containers, 2.5 gallons each are recommended so that when you go to dry camps your crew can bring extra water. In 2002, a number of us brought extra Platypus 2.5 liter containers and in 2005 a few of the crew brought 2.5 gallon containers that they could inflate and use as pillows at night. Either way works fine but it is convenient having some larger containers. I also recommend that you have the crew fill all their water containers and purify them prior to going to bed so you can hit the trail immediately in the morning. You usually need to remind the Scouts to make sure this happens.

Two or three backpacking stoves are recommended. We brought two MSR Simmerlight stoves. Since we had two stoves, we did not bring a repair kit, but we did bring two, 33-ounce and one, 12-ounce fuel containers. We ended up with way too much fuel. I think that a 33-ounce fuel container per stove will provide adequate fuel in between food/fuel pick-ups.

One crew first aid kit is required but the list of items in the kit Philmont suggests is a bit much. Our first aid kit was not any different than we take on a weekend trek. Every Ranger staffed camp has extensive first aid supplies, trained first-aid providers, and the ability to transport people out of the backcountry, so you will not need to provide care for multiple days.

Our crew brought along duct tape wrapped around each of our hiking poles. The duct tape was used for a number of things during the trek but the most important was to patch holes and tears in Micropore Rain suits.

One waterproof ground cloth (5’6″ x 7’6″) per tent is recommended, but we only brought the ground cloth that came with our tents and did not bring this item. Three 50-foot lengths of 1/8 inch nylon cord are recommended but we only brought two 50-foot lengths that we mainly used for tying up the dining fly. We could have saved some weight here by using the AirCore line to tie up our dining fly.

One adult in 2005 brought along a picture guide to plants which some of the boys found interesting. Our crew brought one 4-ounce bottle of sunscreen, one 2.5-ounce tube of 3M Ultrathon insect repellant, and no shampoo. In three treks to Philmont I have never felt a need to use insect repellant so this may be another area to save a little weight. We do bring a small bar of soap for showers and/or use a little Camp Suds.

Conclusion

Boy Scout Gear List: Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, Summer - 3
Untangling bear bagging ropes, Philmont 2004.
Courtesy of Larry Keil, ASM, Troop 815, Danville, CA

I have shown you a way to solve one of the two reasons for failure at Philmont: carrying too much weight. The other reason for failure is lack of training before going to Philmont. The people who walk regularly had no real problems hiking around Philmont while those who did no real training were hard pressed at times to complete the day’s hike. All adults and any Scouts who are not playing sports in high school need to get out and walk five to seven days per week. Everyone who has not done this has slowed down our crew whether adult or Scout. When walking, carry a daypack or the backpack that you will be taking to Philmont. Each week you are walking, increase the weight in your pack by 3-5 pounds until it is a little above what you will carry at Philmont. In 2002, my training route took me past a supermarket where I would stop every other day and buy a bag of dried beans or peas and throw them in my pack until I had 30 pounds to carry. Each week, increase the distance that you are walking until you are doing 3-5+ miles daily. Try to plan your route such that you include some hills. Have your crew plan weekend treks twice a month for a few months before going to Philmont so that you all can learn to work as a team. Refine your gear list until you have it optimized.

With the steps described above you and your Scouts will enjoy the trip of a lifetime, and just maybe get to come back one day with you children and even possibly your grandchildren.

My gear list for Philmont follows. It includes specific brands and models/styles of gear for reference only. This list neither represents an endorsement of any particular product nor suggests that any product listed is the best choice in the context of any particular situation. The list is easily adaptable for Scouts and Leaders and each person’s specific needs.

Philmont Gear List
CLOTHING WORN WHILE HIKING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
hat with brim wide-brimmed hat Dorfman Pacific 4.3 120
hiking shirt short sleeve wicking shirt Troop Cool-max shirt 5.0 140
hiking pants long zip-off pants with built-in briefs Ex Offficio Amphi Convertible 12.8 364
hiking socks lightweight merino wool or Coolmax trail running socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-crew Socks 2.9 82
hiking shoes breathable, lightweight trail shoes Lowa Vento II, size 13 46.4 1316
Total 71.4 2022
OTHER ITEMS WORN OR CARRIED
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
bandana cotton Survival Bandana x 2 (one for cooking; one for everything else) 3.2 88
watch multifunction: compass, altimeter and time Suunto Vector 1.9 54
neck cord nylon line – holds light, whistle, knife, can-opener Kelty Triptease line – reflects light at night, easier to find 2.5 70
lighter small butane lighter, without child locks cheapest on the market 0.5 14
eye glasses case combination glasses case and retainer Backpacking Light Hides TechnoSkin Sunglass Case/Retainers 0.6 15
eye glasses prescription 0.7 20
sun glasses clip-on sun glasses and case 1.4 38
hiking poles adjustable poles with duct tape wrapped on Komperdell Pro Series AS 21.2 600
Total 32.0 899
OTHER CLOTHING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
insulation layer wool shirt PossumDown Sweater, XL 10.3 390
insulation vest synthetic vest Patagonia Micro Puff 6.0 170
rain/wind suit jacket and pants Gossamer Gear Micropore Rainsuit (pants XL 4.2 oz, jacket XL 5.5 oz) 9.7 460
warm hat wool or fleece beanie/watch cap generic lightweight beanie 1.2 34
sleep pants fleece pants REI Polartec 100 Teton Pants, large 10.3 290
sleep shirt nylon short or long sleeve t-shirt LL Bean synthetic shirt 8.0 226
sleep sock warm socks/used as pads on pack’s shoulder straps unknown brand 3.7 106
extra hiking sock lightweight merino wool or Coolmax trail running socks Thorlo Lite Walking Level 2 Mini-crew Socks 2.9 82
Total 52.1 1758
SLEEP SYSTEMS
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
overhead shelter lightweight tent Black Diamond Beta Light ($140) 22.0 622
overhead shelter lightweight flooring for tent Black Diamond Betamid Floor ($55, 20 oz, partner carries) 0.0 0
tent stakes standard, shaped like shepherd’s crook titanium stakes (6) (2 oz, partner carries) 0.0 0
sleeping bag lightweight down Pertex Quantum Arc X Variable Girth Down Sleeping Bag 16.4 466
sleeping pad thick inflatable pad (my one comfort!) Big Agnes Insulated Air Core Pad Mummy, extra-long 25.0 710
Total 63.4 1798
PACKING
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
backpack lightweight Gossamer Gear G5 Ultralight Backpack, silnylon version, size small 7.7 216
waterproof liner trash bag to protect clothing from water and for emergencies trash compactor bag with two extras 6.9 198
sleeping pad closed cell foam cut down to use as frame for pack Therm-a-Rest Ridge Rest 3/4 length closed cell pad-cut down 7.0 196
Total 17.0 478
COOKING AND WATER
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
utensil spoon Lexan soup spoon 0.3 8
dish plastic margarine container, small any brand 1.8 50
spices personal use hot pepper 0.9 26
cup plastic 8-12 oz cup able to take boiling water free plastic cup from Family Fun Cuts that fits in cook kit 0.8 24
water bottles 3 liter sipper w/ tube CamelBak insulated 100 oz Unbottle 9.5 272
extra water bottle 2.5 liter, empty except for dry camps Platypus 3 liter 1.0 28
Total 14.3 408
OTHER ESSENTIALS
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
maps wax coated Philmont official map and plastic bag 5.3 150
first aid/medications minor wound care assorted wound and blister care items, antimicrobial ointment 2.0 57
hand sanitizer 2 oz bottle for pre-cooking/eating and post-bathroom least expensive available 3.0 85
toilet paper non-scented toilet paper small amount in plastic zip-lock bag 6.0 168
personal hygiene teeth and body cleaning kit small toothbrush, small toothpaste, small soap in zip-lock bags 2.0 57
lip balm SPF 15 or higher 0.3 8
bug barrier head net Campmor Backpacker No-See-Um Head net 0.8 22
umbrella lightweight umbrella folds small MontBell umbrella 5.7 160
money 0.1 4
Total 25.2 711
CONSUMABLES
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
food Philmont provided 3lbs/day/person Average 2 days carried (Best Guess!!!) 96.0 454
water average carried – 2 liters 2 L 64.0 1814
water treatment chlorine dioxide based treatment Katadyn Micropur Purification tablets 0.3 8
Total 160.3 1879
TREK SHARED GEAR (split between 10 people on trek)
FUNCTION STYLE/Rationale EXAMPLE Ounces Grams
stove and windscreen lightweight White Gas MSR SimmerLite stove and windscreen x 2 (13.8 oz each) 27.6 773
fuel bottles and fuel white gas MSR 33 oz bottle x 2 (estimate 2 lbs each) 64.0 1792
cookpot lightweight aluminum or titanium, 4-6 quart 4 liter aluminum pots x 3 (10.8 oz each) 32.4 907
guylines 100 feet nylon rope 1/8 inch or less REI Braided Nylon Cord, 1/8 inch, 100 ft 5.6 160
dining fly 10′ x10′ lightweight tarp silnylon 10′ x 8′ + 4 titanium stakes 16.0 454
first aid kit expedition size kit with common medications Adventure Medical Kit Weekender with some additions 23.0 650
spices salt and pepper 4.0 113
cooking utensils spoon and spatula MSR folding large spoons x 2 and 1 spatula 2.7 76
bear bags and rope Philmont provided 3 bags (0.5 lb each) and 1-150 ft, 1/4 inch rope (2.5 lbs) 64.0 1811
sunscreen SPF 30 or higher 4 oz bottle 5.4 152
insect repellant Deet based 3M UltraThon insect repellant 2.5 72
sewing kit small hotel kit 0.1 2
repair kit minimal nylon ties, pins, clevis pins (if needed), stick of hot glue 2.0 56
plastic strainer Frisbee style provided by Philmont 8.0 224
dish soap biodegradable 3 oz Camp Suds 3.4 96
scrub pads small 2 cut down scrub pads 0.6 12
hand sanitizer alcohol based 4 oz Purell x2 10.0 283
camera digital camera and extra batteries Pentax Optio S 50 9.0 255
Total 280.3 7888

 

WEIGHT SUMMARY
Pounds Kilograms
(1) Total Weight Worn or Carried 6.5 2.9
(2) Total Base Weight in Pack 11.0 5.0
(3) Total Weight of Consumables 10.0 4.5
(4) Total weight of Trek Shared Gear 1.8 0.8
(5) Total Initial Pack Weight (2) + (3) + (4) 22.8 10.4
(6) Full Skin Out Weight (1) + (2) + (3) + (4) 29.3 13.3

New Boy Scouts Gear List for Three-Season Mild Conditions - 3

About the Author

Doug Prosser is an Assistant Scoutmaster for Troop 257 in the Ventura County Council, California with 11 years experience. He lives in Camarillo, which is located on the coast in southern California between Santa Barbara and Los Angeles. He has participated in numerous hikes in the local mountains and has planned many treks into the High Sierras for his Troop. He attended Philmont Scout Ranch as a Scout and as a leader, most recently in 2005. He started out with 50+ pound packs and continues to lighten his load, always looking for a better way of backpacking. His friends have dubbed his garage “Doug’s Camping World.” Doug has a strong interest in teaching both kids and adults how to enjoy backpacking. He continues to train and gear up for an extended trek on the Pacific Crest Trail within the next few years. Doug can be contacted at DougProsser@verizon.net

Patagonia Base Layers SPOTLITE REVIEW

Patagonia revamps its Base Layers for Fall 2006

Overview

For fall 2006 Patagonia will update its line of performance base layers and will offer two approaches to the single goal of keeping dry and comfortable. The Capilene polyester garments have been updated and Patagonia will release a completely new line of merino wool base layers.

Capilene Base Layer Updates

The Capilene line will be offered in four weights, now simply named Capilene 1, 2, 3 and 4. These correspond roughly, but not exactly, to Patagonia’s current and previous four weights; silkweight, lightweight, midweight and expedition weight. The photo at right is Karen Wilson in a women’s Capilene 3 Zip-Neck. Note that she was stung by a bee the first day she wore this Golden Yellow color layer in the field!

The Capilene 1 weight is identical to the current silkweight; 3.7 ounces/yard squared. Capilene 2 will be slightly lighter than the current lightweight (4 ounces/yard squared versus 4.6 ounces/yard squared). Capilene 3 is identical in weight to the current midweight at 4.8 ounces/yard squared. Capilene 4 is similar to the previously offered expedition weight at 5.3 ounces/yard squared.

Patagonia is striving to convert their entire Capilene line to recycled polyester fibers. The Capilene 1 fabric is the first to reach this goal and will be made from 100 percent recycled polyester fibers. The other weights are comprised of roughly 50 percent recycled fibers. All of the fabrics are 100 percent recyclable for future generations of clothing as part of Patagonia’s common threads recycling program.

An infamous property of the current Capilene line is the rapid build-up of odor that will occur if you wear them for any length of time without a thorough washing. All new Capilene products will feature a natural odor control technology which Patagonia calls Gladiodor. Patagonia refers to Gladiodor as a natural odor control which uses environmentally benign amino acid chains to break down bacteria whose waste causes odor. In limited testing to date, our Capilene test products are standing up well and have built up very limited odors.

Merino Wool Base Layers

Patagonia’s new merino wool line is made from 18.5 micron, 100 percent merino wool. The wool line will come in 3 weights; Wool 2, Wool 3 and Wool 4. These are named to correspond to the weights of the Capilene line and facilitate comparison and layering. Fabric weights for the 3 wool fabrics will be 4.3, 6.8 and 7.8 ounces per yard squared, respectively.

Again considering the environmental impacts of manufacturing, all of Patagonia’s wool fabrics are developed using a 100 percent chlorine free process. Most other wool fabrics on the market use chlorine during the manufacturing process.

My test garment is a Wool 2 Zip-Neck. I have used it extensively this winter on long training hikes, trail runs and days climbing at our local crags. The fabric weight and performance is comparable to the lightest wool base layers available from Ibex, Icebreaker and Smartwool. It is comfortable and cool in warm weather and dries very rapidly. The zip neck is a nice feature if you plan to use it during high exertion activities such as trail running or aerobic winter sports. I haven’t washed mine all winter. I just take it off when I get home from a hike or run, then toss it in with the other stinky base layers. Wool lives up to its reputation for natural odor resistance – my Wool 2 Zip-Neck doesn’t stink a bit. All of the updated Patagonia base layers will have a more trim fit with the fall 2006 lines. This is a welcome change in my opinion, easing the layering process and creating garments more efficient for use in high exertion activities.

A fundamental difference between the wool and Capilene base layers is the price. The wool line will set you back quite a bit more than the Capilene line. For example, the men’s Capilene 2 Zip-Neck is $43, while the men’s Wool 2 Zip-Neck is $88. In the heavier weights the difference is substantial, but not quite so drastic. The men’s Capilene 4 Zip-Neck is $85 and the men’s Wool 4 Zip-Neck is $125.



Don in a Patagonia Wool 2 Zip-Neck in Arizona’s Aravaipa Canyon.

Capilene Base Layers Features and Specifications

  • Fabric – Polyester, with varying recycled fiber content
  • Gladiodor odor control technology
  • 4 fabric weights
  • Capilene 1 – 3.7 oz/yd2
  • Capilene 2 – 4.0 oz/yd2
  • Capilene 3 – 4.8 oz/yd2
  • Capilene 4 – 5.3 oz/yd2
  • Styles
  • Capilene 1 – Crew, Graphic Crew, T, Bottoms
  • Capilene 2 – Zip-Neck, Crew, T, Bottoms
  • Capilene 3 – Zip-Neck, Crew, Henley, Bottoms
  • Capilene 4 – Zip-Neck, Crew, Bottoms

Merino Wool Base Layers Features and Specifications

  • Fabric – 100 percent merino wool
  • 18.5 micron wool fibers
  • Chlorine free manufacturing process
  • 3 fabric weights
  • Wool 2 – 4.3 oz/yd2
  • Wool 3 – 6.8 oz/yd2
  • Wool 4 – 7.8 oz/yd2
  • Styles
  • Wool 2 – Zip-Neck, T-Neck, Crew, Bottoms
  • Wool 3 – Zip-Neck, Crew, Bottoms
  • Wool 4 – Zip-Neck, Crew, Bottoms

Photon Freedom LED Micro-Light SPOTLITE REVIEW

This miniscule wonder has most of the functionality of a regular headlamp, at a fraction of the weight.

Introduction

The new Photon Freedom micro-light is a perfect example of the amazing things that are attainable with tiny microprocessors. It essentially has all the functionality of a regular headlamp, and even more utility, especially for ultralight backpackers.

Photon Freedom LED Micro-Light SPOTLITE REVIEW - 1
The Photon Freedom advances beyond its predecessors in both microprocessor technology and utility. It’s claimed to be 100% brighter, easily adjusts to the desired brightness level, and comes with both a neck lanyard and a swiveling bill clip.

To make it even more usable, the Freedom comes with a clip so you can easily attach it to the bill of your hat or to a loop in your tent, and also comes with a thin lanyard to carry it around your neck. The bill clip even has a swivel so you can aim it just right, and little imbedded magnets for attaching it to steel surfaces. No more holding the Photon light with your teeth!

Photon Freedom LED Micro-Light SPOTLITE REVIEW - 2
The Photon Freedom comes with a swiveling bill clip (left), key clip (upper center), and a neck lanyard (right).

The Freedom can be switched on by either of two ways: by pressing and holding the button down starts at the dimmest level and brightens until it reaches maximum, which is indicated by a brief blink. Or, a quick push and release starts the light in brightest mode, then a second continuous press dims it to the desired level. After a pause in either mode, a quick press switches the Freedom off. This simple yet sophisticated control strategy places the Freedom ahead of virtually every flashlight and headlamp we’ve tested in terms of user control and preservation of night vision.

The Freedom sports multiple flash modes as well, making it useful as a location marker or a signal light. Other improvements are the Freedom’s greater water resistance and the addition of a pry-off battery cover, eliminating the four tiny case screws formerly used. Our white LED Freedom is powered by two CR2016 button cells (certain colors use one CR2032).

LED’s keep getting brighter and more efficient, and the Freedom (and the new Photon II) is claimed to be 100% brighter than its predecessors and any other micro-light on the market. To check that claim we measured the Photon Freedom’s output, and found a teensy weensy little problem. Read on.

We measured maximum intensity with new batteries (in lux, at beam center and one foot off-axis from a distance of 2 feet) at 30-minute intervals for 12 hours. The initial brightness measurement confirmed what our dazzled retinas had already told us – the Freedom is very bright. As a point of comparison, initially it’s actually brighter than a Princeton Tech Aurora with fresh batteries.

Unfortunately, the performance went downhill from there. Our measurements revealed that intensity dropped by two-thirds in the first half hour (50% in the first 15 minutes), followed by a long tailing off in brightness. We terminated the test at 5 lux, so we don’t know how long it would hold this glimmer, which was still bright enough light to see inside a pack at night.

Photon Freedom LED Micro-Light SPOTLITE REVIEW - 3
At its brightest setting, the Photon Freedom is remarkably bright at first, but intensity dropped rapidly after the first 30 minutes of use, and tailed out from there.

Based on these results, our main caveat for anybody interested in this light is that you can’t count on the dazzling in-store performance for long. The Freedom rapidly drops to output similar to other single 5mm LED lights. The very lowest setting is so dim is that we couldn’t record it. It’s definitely dimmer than 5 lux. The Freedom could probably run at that level for a week.

Beam color and quality are a huge improvement over the original white Photon Micro-Light, there’s hardly a comparison. There’s still a purple beam center but it’s more even and better controlled, and the surrounding halo is a pleasant warm white.

In the field, we used the Freedom on several winter and early spring outings, and found it very user-friendly. Using the bill clip made it easily to read a magazine in our tent while waiting for bedtime. Will especially liked using it with the neck lanyard, and carried it around his neck most of the time so it was always handy.

Don’t let our test results discourage you from buying the new Photon Freedom; it’s the best Photon yet. We found the Freedom’s utility and light output to be a big step above previous Photon models. It’s very versatile and convenient to use, and the light output is certainly adequate for general camp chores and reading. Just don’t expect endless dazzling light to guide you hour after hour down a long, difficult trail, at least not without pausing to swap batteries.

Specifications and Features

  • Manufacturer: Photon Light (www.photonlight.com)
  • Features: one button operation, electronic on/off, continuously adjustable brightness, signaling modes, water-resistant, 10 different beam colors
  • Included: light, clip/swivel, neck cord and clip, key chain clip
  • Weight: light 0.24 oz, clip/swivel 0.2 oz, cord and clip 0.06 oz
  • MSRP: $20