Articles (2020)

OR News – Backcountry Base Camp Dispatch: January 29 (Outdoor Retailer Winter Market 2004)

New products: MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes, Ground Zephur Jacket, and Neos Trekker Overshoes

The Outdoor Retailer 2004 Winter Market starts tomorrow, but we spent today at Backcountry Basecamp, a backcountry ski and snowshoe demo day held at Brighton Ski Resort.

We had the opportunity to try new telemark and randonee gear, avalanche probes, transceivers, shovels, snowshoes, poles, and other snow gear.

Some of the product highlights today include:

  • M MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes. MSR launches a beautiful and lightweight snowshoe design that capitalizes on innovative engineering with a vertical rail design that offers agressive traction well suited to icy traverses while being light enough for powder snowshoeing on rolling terrain.
  • M NEOS Overshoes. Overshoes have historically been a hard sell for lightweight backpackers. NEOS finally breaks through the barrier with a fully waterproof (think: stream crossings and wet slush), lug-soled overshoe that has a full-height gaiter, adds tremendous warmth to a running shoe for cold and snowy conditions, and weighs less than a pound on each foot.
  • M Ground Apparel Powershield Micro Zephur Jacket. With a seemingly saturated technical apparel market, it would seem overwhelming to break into it with anything less than an outrageous design. Ground, a new company offer premium fabric brands in smart and technical apparel designs, adds exceptional styling. A weak branding strategy means they’re not going to become a household name anytime soon, but don’t overlook the quality of their designs – some of them truly set the standard in technical apparel. Case in point: the Ground Zephur Jacket, made with Powershield Micro, is the lightest Powershield soft shell on the market and features remarkable simplicity in a well-fitting design perfectly suited for lightweight backcountry enthusiasts.

NEOS Trekker Overshoes (Outdoor Retailer 2004 Winter Market First Looks Review)

NEOS introduces its Trekker Overshoe, designed to slide over running shoes or lightweight boots to provide completely waterproof protection with a treaded sole in a high-gaiter design.

We’ve been hard pressed to get excited about NEOS Overshoes for winter backpacking, but after wearing the NEOS Trekker in the snow and slush all day, these lightweight overshoes have caught our attention. For ultralight hikers who want running shoe comfort with completely waterproof protection for hiking in mud, muck, and even wading shallow streams, the NEOS Trekker might be their ticket.

For winter hikers and snowshoers, the uninsulated NEOS Trekker adds a surprising amount of warmth to running shoes for snow and slush walking. Weighing only a pound per overshoe, but providing a snow-worthy outer sole and a 20″ high seam-taped 160d pack cloth upper, we think lightweight hikers finally have an overshoe worth pairing with their lightweight footwear for enjoying snow sports.

MSRP $100.

Ground Zephur Jacket (Outdoor Retailer 2004 Winter Market First Looks Review)

Arc’Teryx launched the Powershield craze with the Gamma MX product line, GoLite lightened Powershield with their Kinetic Jacket, and a new company with an ambitious apparel line has finally made Powershield sexy.

Ground (Ground Wear, Ground Gear, Ground Clothing, or is it just Ground? see GroundWear.com) is a young company with TNF expatriates who clearly know what they are doing: Ground’s designs are well-executed blends of materials and function, with a focus on product development with both premium branded fabrics (eVENT, Powershield, Schoeller, Primaloft) and "proprietary textiles" used in their lower price point product lines.

In a crowded apparel market, however, Ground differentiates themselves with a refreshing focus on supreme styling and fit. Just when we thought Patagonia and Arc’Teryx had set the standard of outdoor technical styling, Ground ramps it up with technical clothing that truly looks and fits astonishingly well.

Our favorite piece is the Ground Zephur, made with Powershield Micro. Excellent styling, fit, and design simplicity are married well to Powershield’s lightest fabric, in a hooded jacket design that is very light (14 ounces, perhaps, although we couldn’t verify it) and functional as an outer shell. Stay tuned for a review of this product at Backpacking Light.

Ground has obstacles to overcome, and time will tell whether or not the company achieves success. Working against it, perhaps, is the company’s branding strategy – "Ground" conveys so little identity uniqueness in a market that thrives on branding that it will be difficult to get the brand name rolling off people’s tongues. In addition, a complex product story that is not obvious unless you spend some serious time investment understanding it will turn off customers who are searching for products having a specific function for a specific activity within their line. Because of this, and the fact that Ground has rolled out with a lot of SKU’s means that they will have to spend great efforts educating retailers in a merchandising strategy in order to effectively compete with more well-known brands.

On the surface, the merits of Ground’s products are not obvious. But dive in, try them out, and understand how well designed the pieces are, and you could tap into a refreshingly new concept in technical apparel.

MSRP: $249

MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes

MSR launches a revolutionary new snowshoe design in the high-end MSR Lightning Ascent series. The MSR Lightning Ascent will be available in both men’s and women’s specific shapes (and colors), and two sizes (22" and 25"), with a weight range of 3.1 to 3.6 pounds. A heel elevator and a very agressive traction design for icy conditions positions the MSR Lightning Ascent as a premier option for alpine climbers and those craving technical snowshoes that perform well in a wide variety of conditions.

MSR Lightning Ascent SnowshoesThe snowshoe frame is made with water jet-cut aircraft grade aluminum, formed in a vertical rail design (not unlike some ice climbing crampons), and riveted in the rear. High strength carbon steel cross rails and crampon make the MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoe as practical for steep and ice traverses as well as rolling hills of powder. An upgraded binding now sets the standard in ease of use with mittens, requiring no "threading" or other fine motor skills.

We had the chance to take the MSR Lightning Ascent snowshoes out for a spin in the Brighton backcountry at the Backcountry Basecamp events today. Results were impressive – the snowshoes felt light on the feet, and the narrow deck design was shaped for efficient walking while providing reasonable flotation. Although they did not glide as well as tubular-aluminum-frame Northern Lites in deep powder, their agressively cleated rails and crampon provided outstanding bite on steep and ice slopes.

MSR Lightning Ascent SnowshoesOur favorite feature was the heel elevator. Unike MSR’s Denali Ascent, the heel elevator was very easy to both engage and disengage with mittened hands – or a ski pole – and was the right height to relieve calf strain on steep climbs.

MSR Lightning Ascent SnowshoesWe give the MSR Lightning Ascent Snowshoes a "first looks thumbs up" and think they will hit the market strong as a solid product as a light and comfortable snowshoe capable of both technical climbing while being comfortable enough for touring.

MSRP $249.

OR News Pre-Show Dispatch – First Looks at New Products for Fall 2004 (Outdoor Retailer Winter Market 2004)

Featuring new products from Essential Gear, Princeton Tec, ACR Electronics, Suunto, Smartwool, Marmot, GoLite, and Bemis.

The Outdoor Retailer 2004 Winter Market is only a few days away. With the introduction of hundreds of new products and technologies, we are getting excited to once again report to our readers about what’s coming in Fall 2004. For now, we’ll give you a few sneak peeks that you may find interesting, featuring gear from Marmot, GoLite, Essential Gear, Princeton Tec, Suunto, Smartwool, and Bemis.

Headlamps & Gadgets

Essential Gear Ultralight 1-Watt LED Headlamp. Essential Gear gets into the headlamp game with a 1-watt LED headlamp. Cool feature: the adjustable dimmer switch allows you to tune brightness and battery life to suit. An adjustable head strap and lighting angle keep its function on par with other 1-watt LED headlamps. Powered by two 123 3V lithium batteries, the light weighs in as the lightest 1-watt LED headlamp on the market: 3.5 ounces!

Princeton Tec Corona. The Princeton Tec Corona LED headlamp features eight (white) wide-angle LED’s, switchable between 8, 5, 3, or 1 light. The result: what may possibly be the best area light available, and optimally suitable for task lighting and short-to-mid-range navigation.

ACR Electronics TerraFix 406 Personal Locator Beacon. We’re all aware of the utility of a PLB, right? They are getting lighter and smaller, like everything else, which is a good thing. The ACR TerraFix 406 comes in a smaller, half-pound package that allows users to broadcast critical GPS coordinates to orbiting satellites, providing SAR crews with exact latitude and longitude coordinates in the event of an emergency.

Suunto T6. If you’ve almost collected enough pennies to buy a heart rate monitor, hold off. The T6 records every heartbeat during a workout, enabling further analysis of body functions including EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption), a numerical value of oxygen deficit describing the accumulation of fatigue. Physiology geek, are you? The T6 may be your ticket.

Base Layer Clothing

Lighter Merino. Yet even lighter merino wool is here. The Smartwool Microweight Fitted T provides an ultralight foundation to any layering system. We’ve been testing microweight for a few months and are pleased with its initial performance. Look for this category to mature into more styles suitable for backpacking long johns and long sleeve shirts.

Muscle Compression Base Layers. The new Marmot Symbio collection is upping the ante in the highly competitive base layer market. Capitalizing on the wave of new research validating the enhanced physiological performance and reduced muscle strain as a result of muscle compression, the Marmot Symbio line blends the compressive properties of Lycra with the thermoregulation properties of Merino wool in a series of well-contoured base layer tops and bottoms. The look – think Spiderman (or Catwoman) or a French nordic skier, but with more tempered colors and natural fibers.

More (Ho-Hum) "Antibacterial" Base Layers. The use of elemental silver in synthetic base layer garments is nothing new. Manufacturers are jumping on the silver bandwagon left and right, quoting ancient customs of Romans, Egyptians, Chinese emperors, Druids, and American settlers, as well as new silver technologies used in infection control in the biomedical (as device coatings) and wound care (as topic treatments) fields as evidence that somehow, silver on a base layer garment can prevent it from getting stinky. The claim: antimicrobial agents in clothing can destroy the bacteria that ferment our sweat and cause the stink. The reality: it doesn’t work for very long. Sweat oils foul microniches on the textile surface, providing a happy breeding ground for bacteria, and they eventually do their thing anyways. Our research: elemental silver-treated textiles are only marginally effective at halting odor control during sustained (several day) periods of physical activity. Are silver treated textiles a pipe dream? Maybe. Maybe not. Time will tell. But they aren’t quite there yet. So, for now, "ho-hum" and check out merino wool garments if you really want to avoid the stink.

Raingear

Glow in the Dark Jackets? The Marmot Alpinist collection fuses Gore and Novatech technologies in the $750 Marmot Phenomenon EL Jacket, using Gore-Tex XCR (3-layer) fabric with electroluminescent side panels for safety, identification, and convenience in inclement weather. Outerwear that lights up? "Gee whiz, that’s neat" can only take you so far. You’re still stuck with a heavy, overbuilt jacket for most backcountry endeavors, and the electroluminescent panels still remain heavier than a keychain LED light. Do we really need tail lights on every backcountry visitor? Hopefully, the answer is "no" but the fabric has obvious implications for alpinists, search and rescue personnel, and ski patrollers. Don’t hang up your headlamps just yet, but keep on eye our for this technology to evolve and be incorporated into lighter fabrics.

Gold Standard of Everyman WPB Jackets Increases Performance. The Marmot PreCip collection continues to evolve with new fabric for Fall 2004. Increased breathability (by 50%), stable prices, and a dozen color options keeps the PreCip setting the standard for solid-performing, lightweight rainwear at a great price ($99 for the PreCip Jacket).

Full Featured Rainwear: 12 oz. Lightweight rainwear is a dime a dozen, so it seems. However, to keep the weight down, manufacturers skimp on features. That is why the Marmot PreCip, which was nearly the first to market as a full-featured waterproof-breathable shell for $99, has grabbed such a substantial market share. The new GoLite Revelation Jacket offers a similar feature set but skimps on length and has to break through the new product brand identity wall. At $199.99, it’s not going to break any price records, but it’s a meaningful entry into the waterproof-breathable jacket market.

GoLite Revelation Jacket. 2-layer waterproof-breathable rain jacket. Extended arm length, short torso, semi-fitted. Two-way full front zip with double storm flap, two-way watertight pit zips, 2 chest pockets with watertight welded zippers and mesh pockets for core venting, adjustable hood and stand-up collar, hem draw cords, elasticized Velcro cuffs. 12 oz (size L). $199.99.

Synthetic Insulating Apparel

GoLite jumps on the ultralight synthetic high loft bandwagon with the new GoLite Whisper Jacket and GoLite Rumor Vest. Filled with Primaloft PL1 and weighing 9 oz (vest) and 15 oz (jacket), the new pieces are sure to find their place in the kits of their existing customer base. However, with lighter and similarly warm alternatives from Bergaus, Rab, MEC, and Patagonia, grabbing additional market share will be a challenge.

GoLite Whisper Jacket. 1.8 oz (60 g) Primaloft One (PL1)-insulated half-zip pullover with 30d ripstop nylon shell and 20d polyester lining. Zippered chest pocket, draft flap, stand up collar, elasticized hem draw cords, elasticized cuffs with adjustable Velcro tabs. Semi-fitted. 15 oz (size L). $139.99.

GoLite Rumor Vest. 1.8 oz (60 g) Primaloft One (PL1)-insulated half-zip pullover with 30d ripstop nylon shell and 20d polyester lining. Zippered chest pocket, draft flap, stand up collar, elasticized hem draw cords, elasticized cuffs with adjustable Velcro tabs. Semi-fitted. 9 oz (size L). $99.99.

Down Insulating Apparel

Our lukewarm response to GoLite’s initial down apparel program is now long forgotten: look for the GoLite Cumulus Down Sweater and GoLite Cirrus Down Vest to become more serious players, alongside similar garments from Western Mountaineering and Feathered Friends.

GoLite Cumulus Down Sweater. 800 fill down jacket with 15d polyester shell and 20d polyester lining. Full zip front, down-filled stiffened draft flap, stand up collar, elsatic hem and cuffs. 12 oz (size L). $199.99.

GoLite Cirrus Down Vest. 800 fill down vest with 15d polyester shell and 20d polyester lining. Full zip front, down-filled stiffened draft flap, stand up collar, elsatic hem and cuffs. 7 oz (size L). $129.99.

Soft Shell Apparel

GoLite has successfully managed to bring the Schoeller jacket price tag to less than $200 for a full-featured jacket with the GoLite Karma. A head-to-head competitor with the Cloudveil Serendipity, the GoLite Karma is lighter and appeals to a wider range of, uh, body types than the fitted Serendipity. At $50 cheaper, it’s definitely worth a look.

GoLite Karma Jacket. Schoeller Dryskin Extreme / 3XDRY soft shell jacket. Full zip front, fleece-lined chin guard, two front handwarmer pockets with mesh pocket bags, hem draw cords, and elasticized Velcro cuffs. Relaxed fit. 16 oz (size L). $199.99.

Powershield Lite Gets Lighter. Riding on the coattails of the Apex-award winning GoLite Kinetic Jacket, the GoLite Momentum Jacket ditches the vest-jacket hybrid design of the Kinetic and becomes a far more serious player in the soft shell market. With an exceptional fit and lighter in both weight and price than their hottest competitor, the Arc’Teryx Gamma MX Jacket, the GoLite Momentum Jacket will turn some heads as it brings serious soft shell performance into the realistic weight range to be considered by even hardcore lightweight backpackers.

GoLite Momentum Jacket. Polartec Power Shield Lite full zip jacket. Two large watertight welded chest pockets, full watertight front zip with internal draft flap, elasticized hem drawcords, elasticized Velcro cuffs, stand up collar. Semi-Fitted. 13 oz (Size L), $249.99.

Backpacks

We’ve been trying out the new GoLite ski packs this winter. The GoLite Delirium (photo) has a set of features that will whet the appetite of the gear-laden backcountry winter alpinist, including the ability to organize dual ice tools, crampons, a shovel, and skis. With the same suspension as the GoLite Vision, GoLite Infinity, and GoLite Continuum backpacks, the GoLite Delirium provides a comfortable carry with all of that hardware. Time will tell whether its strategic Hypalon reinforcements will withstand sustained abrasion from ski edges and crampon rails, but our first looks indicates that all is well and yes, a winter backcountry pack can indeed be built for less than three pounds.

GoLite Delirium Backpack. Lightweight backpack for backcountry skiing, mountaineering/alpinism, and other winter/snow sports. SilLite HG main body and hip belt pockets, X-Pac composite fabric in front pockets and bottom, Arrowhead Cordura ripstop front pockets, 420d Cordura side panels. Zippered rear-loading pack, GoLite Unlimited suspension system, thermoformed hip belt with two gusseted hip belt pockets, side-access front pocket, ice axe loops with Velcro retention straps, floating top lid with Hypalon crampon patch, zippered pocket with stretch sealing panel, 3-liter insulated hydration sleeve, Hypalon/webbing ski sleeves/compression straps, shovel sleeve, watertight zippers, daisy chain, sternum strap, haul loop. 2 lb 10 oz (size M). 2450 cu. in. $199.99.

GoLite Powder8. Back- and front-country day skiing and ski touring pack. Arrowhead Cordura ripstop nylon body, X-Pac composite fabric in front pockets, side panels, and bottom. SilLite HG in hip belt pockets and harness. Zippered rear-loading main compartment, contoured air-channel mesh back and padded shoulder straps, webbing hip belt, two gusseted hip belt pockets, dual side-access front pocket with pocket dams, dual ice axe loops with Velcro retention straps, 3-liter insulated hydration sleeve, Hypalon and webbing ski sleeves, zippered shovel/accessory pocket, watertight zippers, daisy chain, sternum strap, security key clip, haul loop. 1 lb 10 oz (size M). 1450 cu. in. $99.99.

Fabrics and Technologies

Bemis Sew-Free. Bemis Sew-Free is an adhesive film that eliminates stitching during the garment manufacturing process. Allowing manufacturers to bond fabrics and components in one step will reduce labor and equipment (but probably not your cost) while producing seams that are stronger and less bulky that conventional sewn seams. Don’t expect to have this product available in the mainstream do-it-yourself community, but start keeping your eye out for more outdoor performance clothing with low-bulk seams in the near future.

GoLite Delirium Backpack First Looks (Outdoor Retailer Winter Market 2004)

The GoLite Delirium is an internal frame backcountry ski and winter mountaineering pack that excels at organizing the tools of the winter traveler: skis, snowshoes, ice tools, crampons, you name it – there’s a place to put ’em.

Overview of the GoLite Delirium

The GoLite Delirium is the company’s first foray into the world of backcountry skiing. Designed primarily as a pack for backcountry ski touring, the GoLite Delirium offers enough options to garner attention from a variety of backcountry enthusiasts, with the ability to organize the multitude of tools required to safely enjoy ski mountaineering.

Specifications of the GoLite Delirium

  • Weight: 2 lb 10 oz (size M)
  • Capacity: 2450 cubic inches (size M)
  • Fabric: 1.76 oz/sq.yd. silicone-impregnated nylon (“SilLite HG”) in the main body; Dimension-Polyant X-Pac 3-Layer Composite in front pockets and bottom; Arrowhead Cordura ripstop front pockets; 420 denier Cordura side panels
  • Suspension: thermomolded Brock foam shoulder straps, lumbar pad, and back panel, Schoeller Dryskin Extreme on harness contact areas, corrugated polystyrene framesheet with integrated aluminum dowel frame stays
  • Features of the GoLite Delirium

  • Zippered, rear-loading packbag
  • Two gusseted pockets on hip belt
  • Side access front pocket
  • Ice axe loops (2) with Velcro retention straps
  • Floating top lid with Hypalon crampon patch and zippered pocket
  • 3-liter insulated hydration sleeve
  • Hypalon/webbing ski sleeves/compression straps
  • Shovel sleeve
  • Watertight zippers
  • Daisy chain
  • Haul loop
  • Intended Use

    Backcountry skiing, mountaineering/alpinism, and other winter activities

    First Looks Performance Review

    We tested the GoLite Delirium in the winter backcountry of Montana’s Madison Range, in the Taylor-Hilgard Wilderness. Our intended use: a backcountry ski approach to and descent from a remote alpine couloir ice climb.

    We packed the GoLite Delirium with the following equipment:

    Inside the Main Packbag:

    • Bivy gear: two-pound synthetic sleeping bag (Arc Delta), water-resistant bivy sack (eVENT Vapr Bivy), torso-sized inflatable pad (TorsoLite) with 1/2-length 3/8-inch foam pad, 2L white gas cook kit (SimmerLite)
    • Extra clothing: Integral Designs Dolomitti Jacket and Integral Designs Denali Pants
    • Food: About 5,000 calories
    • Climbing skins for skis
    • 3L hydration bladder with insulated drinking tube
    • Climbing gear, hard goods: carabiners, rock and ice protection (partner carried rope in other pack)

    Top Pocket:

    • Lunch, Beanie hat, insulated mittens
    • Louis Garneaux Top One Helmet (under pocket)

    Front Pocket:

    • Climbing gear, soft goods: harness, slings

    Strapped to Outside

    • Dynafit D410 Skis (only while climbing) – with ski/compression straps
    • Grivel G14 Crampons (on crampon patch on top pocket)
    • Black Diamond Carbon Fiber Black Prophet Ice Tools(strapped in tool loops)
    • SnowClaw Backcountry Snow Shovel (in shovel sleeve)

    Overall, the Delirium carried this 25-30 pound load very well and with excellent stability. The feature set is well-conceived and the external pockets are easy to access, even when all of your backcountry tools are strapped on. The shovel sleeve was too small for larger backcountry shovels, but for the types of shovels carried most often by weight-and-size-skimping backcountry skiers and climbers, it was sufficient.

    Durability. Hypalon reinforcements on the ski/compression straps are a very nice touch – protecting the main packbag from sharp ski edges. We’re not sure how the X-Pac fabric will hold up to abuse from the slicing picks of ice tools, but our inital observations indicate that it is more durable than we expected. Underloaded with a small volume, the pack doesn’t compress well (there are only two compression straps on either side), and as a result of the silicone nylon body fabric, the body doesn’t have much resilience. As a result, the underloaded pack suffers from more abrasion from tools and skis than should be necessary. Fortunately, the scenario by which this pack is be underloaded should be rare – it is sized right for the light and fast alpinist willing to forgo amenities for a long day of climbing and skiing, or as we found out, even an overnight winter climb with a bivy. The pack’s haul loop is strictly for picking up the pack – don’t expect to actually have the pack survive several pitches of vertial hauling in a world of sharp rock and ice, as the body fabric won’t withstand the abuse.

    In short, the GoLite Delirium is an impressive first project for the ski mountaineer from a company who sowed – and reaped – its first harvest on ultralight hiking gear more suited to snowless environs.

    Pertex Equilibrium: Fabric Technology and Performance Overview

    Technical, construction, and performance information about Pertex Equilibrium.

    Pertex Equilibrium: Fabric Technology and Performance Overview

    Overview

    Pertex Equilibrium is a woven 100% nylon (nylon 6.6) from the UK-based looms at Perseverance Mills. Fabric weight is 90 grams per square meter, which equates to unlined shirt and jacket weights coming in at 8 to 15 ounces, with microfibre pile- or tricot-lined garments weighing 4 to 8 ounces more. Most garments using Pertex Equilibrium are manufactured and distributed in the United Kingdom. U.S. Manufacturers include GoLite and Marmot and are expected to increase in 2004 and 2005.

    Equilibrium’s unique feature is its denier gradient design, with the goal of passively moving moisture from the inner face to the outer face of a fabric with a denier (and thus, capillary diameter) gradient driving capillary action. By no means the only fabric on the market with this goal, it is certainly one of the lightest and most resistant to abrasion.

    The primary application for Pertex Equilibrium is "soft-shell" apparel to be used in situations where water and wind resistance is needed for high exertion activities that require fabric breathability.

    Pertex Equilibrium

    Product Examples

    Rab V-Trail Top

    Rab V-Trail Top
    Pertex Equilibrium Shell
    Microfibre Pile Lining


    GoLite Energy Anorak

    GoLite Energy Anorak
    Pertex Equilibrium Shell
    Unlined


    Buffalo Systems Equimax Jacket

    Buffalo Systems Equimax Jacket
    Pertex Equilibrium Shell
    Coolmax Lining


    Parrot Concure Pull On

    Parrot Concure Pull-On
    Pertex Equilibrium Shell
    Coolmax Lining


    Hilly Technical Running Cap

    Hilly Technical Running Caps
    Pertex Equilibrium Shell
    Fleece Lining or Unlined


    Construction

    The inner face of the fabric is woven with larger filaments (comprising a low fiber surface area and large capillary diameter), while the outside face is constructed with smaller filaments (comprising a high fiber surface area and small capillary diameter). Passive movement of liquid moisture occurs primarily by capillary action from small pores to larger pores. Thus, Pertex Equilibrium is designed to manage both external and internal moisture appropriately for active use in foul conditions.

    Pertex Equilibrium Construction
    Fine microfibre outer filaments (blue) provide weather protection and ‘pull’ moisture, while coarse inner filaments (green) ‘push’ moisture and keep fabric surface from clinging to skin. (Illustration: Perseverance Mills Ltd.)

    Moisture Movement

    Pertex Equilibrium is designed such that external moisture (precipitation) should have a difficult time breaking the capillary forces on the fabric’s outer face. And, the moisture that does break through should have a difficult time migrating inward (against both capillary and vapor pressure gradients). On the other hand, moisture that comes into contact with its inner face (i.e., sweat) should effectively be driven to the outer face, where it is free to evaporate to the atmosphere.

    Insulation and Breathability

    Because the inner face is textured, Pertex Equilibrium provides some insulating ability. However, because Pertex Equilibrium contains no coatings, laminates, calendaring, or membranes, moisture vapor is freer to move through the fabric and breathability is greater, than for waterproof-breathable fabrics, or woven nylon and polyester fabrics that are impregnated with water-resistant chemicals or calendared.

    Another unique feature of Pertex Equilibrium lies in its textured inner surface – resulting in the fabric staying off the skin surface, which facilitates moisture vapor permeability (breathability), sweat evaporation, and wicking into the fabric. In short, this type of inner fabric face construction makes Pertex Equilibrium quite comfortable when worn next to the skin.

    Storm Resistance

    The outer face has a tight enough weave (with a sun protection factor of 30+) to significantly resist wind and moisture. In fact, Pertex Equilibrium offers about 10 cfm of wind resistance – significant for a fabric that is this breathable. We found that Pertex Equilibrium-shelled clothing systems are more than sufficient for sloughing off winter snow in cold temperatures, and we highly recommend Pertex Equilibrium as an outer shell material for winter backcountry activities. In addition, they were breathable enough to be worn close to the skin – we’ve worn the Pertex Equilibrium-shelled and microfibre pile-lined Rab V-Trail Top and Smock under a wide variety of conditions as a next-to-skin base layer and found them to be effective at preserving a relatively dry next-to-skin environment, even during high levels of activity.

    Pertex Equilibrium provides a reasonable degree of rain resistance. We wore Pertex Equilibrium shells in all kinds of weather from fine mist and fog to heavy driving rain. Not surprisingly, we found one combination of conditions where the wetting rate of Equilibrium could not be held back by the evaporation rate from body heat – cold temperatures (approximately 38 to 48 degrees) combined with heavy precipitation as rain or wet snow. In this respect, Pertex Equilibrium does not distinguish itself from other soft shell fabrics, such as Schoeller Dynamic or Cloudveil Inertia. However, Pertex Equilibirum enjoys significant advantages over both of those fabrics – less insulation and better wind resistance while still maintaining excellent breathability. In that respect, most of us found that Pertex Equilibrium struck a more meaningful balance of storm resistance and breathability  for a fringe-conditions soft shell fabric.

    Performance Summary

    We’ve been testing Pertex Equilibrium garments since the fabric’s release. We’ve tried unlined garments (GoLite Vitality Jacket) and lined garments (Rab V-Trail Top and V-Trail Smock). They are among the most comfortable “soft shell” garments we’ve worn, in terms of their ability to regulate your body’s next-to-skin microclimate while active, and provide “good enough” protection from the elements (wind, rain, and snow) for most conditions. Although not as light as a tightly woven nylon or polyester microfibre wind shirt (e.g., Montana Aero, GoLite Wisp, or Marmot Chinook), Pertex Equilibrium garments can be worn in a wider range of conditions, and tend to be more versatile. So, before you discount their use on weight alone, consider how a Pertex Equilibrium garment might fit into your overall clothing system. Lined garments, in particular, including the Rab V-Trail Top and the Parrot Conure Pull On, make for excellent base layer choices in the fringe (spring and fall) and winter seasons.

    What’s Next?

    Pertex Stretch Equilibrium, to be released in 2004, will address many of the issues brought on by Equilibrium’s opponents and stretch woven soft shell advocates – comfort. The introduction of Stretch Equilibrium will result in greater latitude of styling, offering garments that can be cut trimmer – and thus perform more efficiently (lighter weight, better integrated with existing layers, less fabric to catch on bush and rock, etc.) – without restricting mobility. Currently, GoLite is the only U.S. manufacturer with a meaningful Pertex Equilibrium product development initiative targeted specifically at backpackers and other fast-and-light enthusiasts. Marmot will introduce a Pertex Equilibrium clothing line in Spring 2004. Look for other U.S. manufacturers to introduce Pertex Equilibrium garments this fall, with Stretch Equilibrium products coming to the U.S. market in 2005.

    About Backpacking Light’s Fabric Technology and Performance Overviews

    In 2004, Backpacking Light launched an initiative to provide consumer education about high performance textiles and materials used in apparel and other soft goods manufacturing. We are pleased to launch this initiative here with Pertex Equilibrium. Fabric Technology and Performance Overviews are in no way sponsored by fiber, textile, or end use product manufacturers, and the appearance of logos, product examples, or discussion of same in the text does not constitute an endorsement of those products over those that may not appear herein. This is an independent review. We have consulted a variety of sources to compile this information. Those sources include technical data sheets from manufacturers, textile testing laboratories and design consultants, and end users. In addition, we have evaluated fabric performance as detailed herein using commercially available products manufactured with the textile described. Reviews of those products and an analysis of their specific features may be found elsewhere at BackpackingLight.com.

    Stay tuned for other Fabric Technology and Performance Overviews, coming soon:

    • Pertex Quantum
    • Pertex Endurance
    • Nextec EPIC
    • eVENT
    • Schoeller Dynamic
    • Schoeller 3XDRY
    • PrimaLoft Sport, PrimaLoft PL1, and PrimaLoft PL Lite
    • Polarguard 3D and Polarguard Delta
    • Silicone-coated nylons

    Winter 2004 Gear Watch: Backcountry Equipment for Climbers, Skiers, and Snowshoers

    Winter Market ’03 Updates!
    Backpacking Light will be reporting from the 2004 Outdoor Retailer Winter Market, January 29-February 2, 2004, Salt Lake City! If you want to stay informed of OR Winter Market news, updates, and new product info, be sure to sign up for our email newsletter. As always, Premium Members get in-depth information about new products we feature in our dispatches.

    Subscribe now so you can stay informed from this year’s Winter Market!

    Introduction

    This of course, is not a comprehensive review of winter backpacking gear. However, we thought we’d take some time to highlight some categories that have seen important innovations in lightweight design over the past few years, focusing primarily on new products that were introduced in 2003, and that we’ve been reviewing the past two winters.

    Herein, we discuss gear that is most applicable to people who like to play in the mountains in the snow. Thus, backcountry skiers and snowboarders, snow campers, snowshoers, winter ice climbers, and alpine climbers will find some useful information here.

    Enjoy!

    Helmets

    The Petzl Edelrid might be the most recognized helmet among today’s alpinists. That doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s among the climber’s best-loved pieces of gear. The Edelrid typifies the brain buckets of old school mountaineers that are bulky, heavy, and uncomfortable. However, increasing recognition that wearing a helmet can dramatically improve safety in a number of backcountry activities, including backcountry skiing, snowboarding, and climbing, has kickstarted a new wave of helmet design over the past few years. Bike helmet technologies are now available, in addition to slimmer designs, better styling, and lighter weight. Two helmets in particular are worth mentioning here, because they break the 10 ounce barrier. The Kong Scarab offers excellent protection and is an ideal multi-use helmet that serves adequately for adventure racing, mountain biking, backcountry skiing, and climbing. It’s comfortable, easy to adjust, and has great styling. For even less bulk, consider the Every Helmets Sky Helmet. It is the trimmest helmet we’ve seen – it even fits well under parka hoods that aren’t necessarily designed for helmet use. The Sky weighs a scant 9.3 ounces, has the slim styling of a high-end skateboard helmet, but is still CE certified for climbing. We’ve been using the Sky this winter for waterfall climbing, resort skiing, and backcountry skiing, and it’s our choice for those who insist on a helmet that embodies the light-and-fast philosophy to the T.

    Avalanche Probes

    Backcountry ski poles that could be disassembled and reassembled into avalanche probes created quite a stir when they hit the market – they appeared to address the needs of ultralight backcountry winter enthusiasts because they could then not only save weight, but completely eliminate an item from their pack – the dedicated avalanche probe. Unfortunately, probe poles are heavier than the lightest ski and trekking poles, so swing comfort is certainly sacrificed. In addition, removing frozen baskets from the poles while reassembling the poles into a probe remains a technical hurdle that the major manufacturers have not yet addressed. Consequently, probe poles remain somewhat of a gimmick solution and are not carried by those who understand the serious consequences of lost time during avalanche rescue.

    All is not lost – probes are getting lighter, easier to use, and faster to deploy. Among the best are new models from Life-Link, including a 196 cm aluminum model that weighs 6.5 ounces (the Life-Link Light Probe 196), which features one of the fastest deployment cords we’ve used. In spite of a recent wave of research that suggests that probing a depth of greater than six feet does not appreciably increase the chance of live rescue, old schoolers will appreciate the extra length – and no weight penalty – of the Life-Link Carbon Speed Light, a 246 cm probe made with carbon fiber tubing and is long enough to maintain a six foot probe depth without significant bending, reducing fatique and increasing probe speed. Even lighter, but not as slick to deploy, are the Kong Carbon 8.5 (6.0 oz and 8.5 foot deployment length), and the Ortovox 200 Carbon, a 6 ft 7 in probe with a packed size of only 13 inches! If you’re thinking this is the nirvana of lightweight probes, hold your breath – the SOS Mini Probe extends to 7.5 feet, also packs to 13 inches, and weighs only 4.7 oz. For serious backcountry users, the Life-Link Carbon Speed Light 246 is a clear winner in a pack of probes cluttered with lookalikes. For ski touring in moderate terrain where avalanche risk is real, but low, the our top pick is the Ortovox 200 Carbon for the best balance of stiffness, length, easy deployment, and weight, but it’s hard to ignore the featherweight SOS Mini.

    Here is a survey of sub-8 oz avalanche probes suitable for backcountry touring and occasional use (avalanche professionals may want to consider longer, stiffer, and more robust probes more suitable for heavy use), where weight and collapsed size are the most important criteria:

    Avalanche Probes for the Ultralight Winter Traveler

    Model MSRP Weight (oz) Collapsed Length (in) Extended Length (ft, in)
    Life-Link Light Probe 196 $40 6.5 oz 16″ 6′ 5″
    Life-Link Carbon Fiber Speed Light Probe 246 $65 6.5 oz 18″ 8′ 1″
    G3 Professional 200 Probe $50 7.5 oz 16″ 6′ 6″
    Ortovox 200 $40 7.1 oz 13″ 6′ 6″
    Ortovox 200 Carbon $68 5.3 oz 13″ 6′ 6″
    Ortovox 280 Carbon $82 6.7 oz 16″ 9′ 4″
    Black Diamond QuickDraw Tour Probe 190 $39 7.4 oz 15″ 6′ 3″
    Black Diamond QuickDraw Carbon Probe 230 $65 7.6 oz 15″ 7′ 7″
    SOS Mini Probe $67 4.7 oz 13″ 7′ 6″
    Kong Carbon 8.5 Probe $50 6.0 oz 17″ 8′ 6″

    Avalanche Transceivers

    “Avalanche transceivers are mostly all the same”, I recently overheard from a sales employee at Bozeman’s largest backcountry ski retailer, “just pick the one that has the coolest color.” This motivated us to conduct a review of avalanche transceivers that focused on one mission only: speed of locating a victim and ease of use. We put several transceivers into the hands of both novices and pros and came up with some results that definitely suggested that “not all avalanche transceivers are the same”.

    We tested the following transceivers: Pieps DSP, Mammut Barryvox, Ortovox F1, Ortovox X1, Ortovox M2, and the Backcountry Access Tracker DTS. We evaluated them primarily on their ability to dial in the location of a victim quickly with a minimum of rescuer movement and guesswork.

    The lightest and smallest transceiver was the Mammut Barryvox – 6.0 oz including batteries. Its compact size fit was the least noticed while sitting in an inside pocket and wasn’t so cumbersome as to require a special harness. It was also one of the easiest transceivers to use – once you jumped an initial learning curve – and was among the fastest to locate victims.

    The technology crown, however, goes to the Pieps DSP. It dialed in the location of victims faster than any transceiver in our test, and it’s the only trasceiver on the market to utilize digital signal processing to locate multiple burials.

    Snowshoe and Ski Gear

    Lightweight backcountry winter travelers have always had secret weapons in their arsenal for overland travel – Northern Lites snowshoes and Dynafit alpine touring skis. Both brands continue to set both technology and weight standards in their respective markets, and have been enjoying little competition the past few years. One up-and-comer, however, is worth taking a look at: Dion Snowshoes offers full size backcountry models that weight less than four pounds, or racing / short models that weight less than three pounds. The innovation, however, lies in their modular design – a customer can pick their own combination of frame, cleat, and binding to spec a shoe that exactly fits their needs.

    Atlas, a market giant for U.S. snowshoes, tells us they are now making a sub-two-pound snowshoe in the Atlas Dual-Trac SL. So, we picked up a pair to see if could match the performance and weight of the Northern Lites Elite. Weight for both snowshoes was the same – 34 ounces. But the Elites’ longer length (25″ vs. 22″ for the SL) and more decking surface area (the SL is a racing shoe with a tapered tail) clearly outshined the Atlas in softer snow conditions. So for now, stick with Northern Lites and watch out for slick marketing of lightweight shoes from other manufacturers that entice you into a racing style.

    Dynafit has now packaged a new alpine touring (randonee) ski system that will make backcountry AT riders and climbers happy. The Dynafit D410 skis, with a 130 cm “approach” length, are the first skis we’ve seen that have a 100 mm tip but weigh less than four and a half pounds. Combined with the 24-ounce Dynafit Tourlite Tech binding and mated with the climbing-friendly Dynafit MLT4 AT boot (4.5 pounds), this system is probably the lightest high-performance climbing/ski approach system available. We’ve been testing this new setup this winter, courtesy of Life-Link (Dynafit’s distributor), and you can bet they’ll earn a priority corner in our ultralight gear closet. The MLT4 boots are surprisingly good ice climbing boots, with enough stiffness to power the approach skis on moderately steep downhill runs. This isn’t a downhill setup for big mountain powder on the steeps, but for 99% of the ice climbing appraoches and descents we’ve had to make this year, they’ve served the purpose better than anything we’ve tried before.

    Another new development in backcountry snowshoe and ski touring gear: nordic walking poles are being seen in more hands of backcountry winter travelers. Why? Thinner grips that are more comfortable with heavier gloves and mitts, very comfortable wrist straps, and lighter swing weights. Stay tuned, and check them out for yourself. We like the new ones from Leki, such as the Leki Nordic Walking Instructor.

    Climbing Gear

    Alpinists will cheer at the 2003 introduction of a 9.2 mm single rope in the U.S. this year – the Mammut Revelation. Combined with a thin rappel rope, this provides the lightest dual rope setup for alpine climbing. The 55 g/m x 60 m Revelation has the ability to shave a few pounds off your current single rope setup while still maintaining a 5-fall (UIAA #101) rating. Because the Revelation does not pass the sharp edge fall (UIAA #108) test, it is best suited for steep alpine face and couloir climbing with little risk of vertical falls over sharp edges.

    Alpine ice tools are getting lighter, too. The constant battle for developing lightweight tools that appeal to alpinists but provide the technical performance of more demanding climbs continues to rage. Grivel and Petzl-Charlet are leading the way with technical ice tools that break the 22 ounce barrier. Grivel’s Light Wing and Petzl-Charlet’s Aztar tools have bent shafts suitable for plunging as well as hammering pitons, excellent swing balance (always a challenge with lighter tools). We tried both sets of tools at a recent ice festival and were even pleased with their performance on hard, brittle waterfall ice and mixed ground.

    No longer does the alpinist need to lug around technical crampons that weigh 38 ounces or more for remote ice and mixed climbs. Petzl-Charlet has introduced the Petzl-Charlet Sarken, an alpine crampon with a low-balling horizontal rail design and integrated forged vertical front points. We’ve tried them on alpine ice couloirs in the Beartooths, mixed ground at Hyalite, and the bullet hard ice of the Canadian Rockies, and can unequivocally say that we are more excited about this technical development for alpine climbing than any other introduced in 2003. The Sarken’s are an alpinists dream. Oh yeah, we forgot to mention the weight: 29 ounces. Where else can you maintain performance while saving more than half a pound?

    LED Headlamp REVIEW SUMMARY 2003: Petzl, Princeton Tec, Black Diamond, and Photon

    A comprehensive review of sub-6-ounce LED headlamps from Princeton Tec, Black Diamond, Petzl, and Photon.

    Overview

    In terms of volume of units, LED headlamps will be the #1 outdoor specialty consumer item purchased this December (Source: current purchasing trend info supplied by outdoor specialty retailers).

    There are now dozens of LED lights on the market, with about two or three dozen in a headlamp style. The major U.S. market players are Princeton Tec, Black Diamond, and Petzl. Photon, Brinkmann, Lightwave, Streamlite, Tektite, and Pelican are all vying for the remainder of the pie, and overseas manufacturers such as FrontaLED and Speleo Technics offer high end (read: pricey) offerings for alpinists and cavers.

    Gear Guide Index – Product Specifications

    NOTE: For a comprehensive comparison of LED Headlamps (not including hybrid LED-halogen models) from around the world, ranging from the ultralight to the ultra-expensive, check out our new LED Headlamp Gear Guide. The Gear Guide also includes several LED headlamps that are not reviewed herein.

    Review Index

    In this review, we narrow the field down to LED headlamps that weigh less than six ounces (170 grams), and that distribute their lightware in U.S. markets (hey, you have to be able to get it in time for Christmas, right?).

    You can click on “Review” to read a headlamp’s performance review, and “Specifications” to view its Product Card in our LED Headlamp Gear Guide.

    Trail’s Best Award Winners

    We are pleased to announce two headlamps as winners of our Trail’s Best Awards for 2004:

    Honorable Mention – Petzl Tikka Plus. The Tikka Plus competes very well on a performance basis with the Princeton Tec Aurora, but we gave the Aurora the Trail’s Best designation due to slightly better usability in cold conditions.

    Review Methodology

    In this review, we focus primarily on cold weather usability and cold weather performance. Evaluation of headlamps in cold conditions is prudent because they are primarily used in the dark – when temperatures plummet. Thus, herein we test battery life and light output at 38 °F (3 °C). In addition, we evaluate headlamp usability and operation with cold, bare hands, and in cold conditions while wearing thin liner gloves, mid-weight windproof fleece gloves, shelled ski gloves, and shelled 300-weight fleece mitts – in the field – where at the end of the day, one is tired, hungry, and cold. Through this methodology, we are better able to evaluate the anticipated field performance of headlamps, rather than the typical industry standard of reviewing light performance at 70 °F (21 °C) and usability with bare fingers while typing the review at a keyboard in a warm cubicle.

    Usability Assessment. For each headlamp, we evaluate weight (of course), headband design, changing the batteries, tilting the housing, operating the switch, and changing light modes (where applicable). We pay special attention to be able to perform these tasks with bare, cold hands, as well as gloved and mittened hands.

    Cold Weather Performance. For each headlamp, we evaluate its initial performance with fresh batteries at room temperature (at both the beam center and the beam edge). More importantly, we take a look at the degradation of beam intensity over a 24 hour period when the lamp is left on continuously and incubated at 38 °F.

    Performance Comparison Summary

    TABLE 1. Measured Weights

    Model Weight w/o Batteries Weight w/Batteries Weight w/Lithium AA Batteries
    Black Diamond Ion 0.64 oz (18 g) 0.97 oz (27 g) n/a
    Black Diamond Moonlight 2.88 oz (82 g) 4.03 oz (114 g) n/a
    Black Diamond Zenix 3.37 oz (96 g) 4.54 oz (129 g) n/a
    Petzl Zipka 0.92 oz (26 g) 2.07 oz (59 g) n/a
    Petzl Tikka Plus 1.39 oz (39 g) 2.54 oz (72 g) n/a
    Princeton Tec Scout 1.01 oz (29 g) 1.41 oz (40 g) n/a
    Princeton Tec Aurora 1.49 oz (42 g) 2.66 oz (75 g) n/a
    Princeton Tec Matrix 2 3.74 oz (106 g) 5.34 oz (151 g) 4.69 oz (133 g)
    Photon Fusion 3.36 oz (95 g) 5.78 oz (164 g) 4.81 oz (136 g)

    For a detailed assessment of the performance of each individual LED headlamp, the reader is referred to the individual reviews, accessible by clicking the link(s) above in the “Review Index” section.

    TABLE 2. Measurement of beam intensity (Lux) at room temperature with fresh batteries

    BATTERIES USED: Energizer Photo lithium AA’s were used for evaluating the performance of the Photon Fusion and Princeton Tec Matrix 2. Energizer Titanium E2 AAA’s were used for all AAA headlamps. Energizer 2032 coin cell lithium batteries were used for the Princeton Tec Scout. The stock Black Diamond 6V battery was used for the Ion.

    Beam Quality Index is a measure of the ratio of beam intensity at its edge (1-foot off center at a distance of 2 feet) to beam intensity at the beam center. Higher values of the Beam Quality Index indicate a beam pattern that is more like a floodlight, while lower values of the Beam Quality Index indicate a beam pattern that is more like a spotlight. Scale: 0 to 100.

    Model Lux @ Center Lux @ Edge Beam Quality Index
    Black Diamond Ion 118 8 6.8
    Black Diamond Moonlight 113 11 9.7
    Black Diamond Zenix (Hyperbright) 438 7 1.6
    Black Diamond Zenix (Normal) 125 9 7.2
    Petzl Zipka 165 18 10.9
    Petzl Tikka Plus 259 13 5.0
    Princeton Tec Scout 111 2 1.8
    Princeton Tec Aurora 203 13 6.4
    Princeton Tec Matrix 2 792 8 1.0
    Photon Fusion 255 22 8.6

    TABLE 3. Comparison of lux at cold vs. warm temperatures with fresh batteries

    Values for warm temperatures are repeated from table above. Values for cold temperatures were collected by incubating headlamps at 38 °F overnight (turned off) before light intensity measurements were taken.

    Model Lux @ 68 °F Lux @ 38 °F Quality of Cold Light Beam
    Black Diamond Ion 118 42 36%
    Black Diamond Moonlight 113 107 95%
    Black Diamond Zenix (Hyperbright) 438 397 91%
    Black Diamond Zenix (Normal) 125 115 92%
    Petzl Zipka 165 152 92%
    Petzl Tikka Plus 259 252 97%
    Princeton Tec Scout 111 81 73%
    Princeton Tec Aurora 203 172 85%
    Princeton Tec Matrix 2 792 604 76%
    Photon Fusion 255 220 86%

    TABLE 4. Lux decay at 38 °F

    Measurement of headlamp beam intensity decay in response to incubation at 38 °F. Light is turned ‘on’ at time zero. Time zero values are reproduced from table above.

    Model Lux @ 0 hours Lux @ 8 hours Lux at 24 hours
    Black Diamond Ion 42 3 1
    Black Diamond Moonlight 107 41 13
    Black Diamond Zenix (Hyperbright) 397 223 44
    Black Diamond Zenix (Normal) 115 14 6
    Petzl Zipka 152 60 25
    Petzl Tikka Plus (High) 252 75 12
    Petzl Tikka Plus (Medium) 110 57 26
    Princeton Tec Scout (High) 81 14 9
    Princeton Tec Scout (Medium) 51 10 6
    Princeton Tec Aurora (High) 172 64 14
    Princeton Tec Aurora (Medium) 88 38 24
    Princeton Tec Matrix 2 604 552 0
    Photon Fusion (Hyperbright) 220 205 0
    Photon Fusion (Brilliant) 155 143 0

    Comparisons to Consider…

    2-LED Headlamps

    • Black Diamond Ion
    • Princeton Tec Scout

    3-4 LED Headlamps

    • Princeton Tec Scout Aurora
    • Petzl Zipka
    • Petzl Tikka Plus
    • Black Diamond Moonlight

    Hyperbright LED Headlamps

    • Black Diamond Zenix
    • Princeton Tec Matrix 2

    Headlamps that can accept AA Lithium Batteries

    • Princeton Tec Matrix 2
    • Photon Fusion

    Headlamps that are easy to operate and change batteries in cold weather and/or with gloves or mittens

    • Princeton Tec Matrix 2
    • Black Diamond Zenix

    Black Diamond Zenix Headlamp Review

    Summary of Specifications

    The Black Diamond Zenix weights 4.54 oz (129 g) with 3xAAA batteries. It is a 3-LED headlamp with two modes that alternate between a central, “hyperbright” LED and two peripheral standard LED’s. Batteries are located in a rear housing and the headband is a conventional bucket-style with 3/4-inch elastic webbing.

    Usability

    The Zenix has two modes: a “high” mode that uses the central lens-focused hyperbright LED, and a “low” mode using the two convenetional peripheral LEDs. The modes are toggled by the pushbutton switch that is designed to be activated with your thumb while your thumb and index finger pinch the lamp housing. The swith can be operated with bare hands or thin gloves, but not with heavily insulated gloves or mittens one might use in the winter.

    The Zenix has the best battery compartment of the bunch, with access provided by a knurled thumbscrew (that doesn’t fall out after opening the lamp, and thus, cannot be lost in the field) and batteries that sit securely in their sockets. We were able to successfully change batteries in the field while wearing heavily insulated (300-weight fleece) shell mitts with full leather palms, a task we could not perform with any other headlamp in the review.

    The Zenix has a tiltable lamp housing that pivots smoothly and is easily adjustable with one hand.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Black Diamond Zenix has an initial center-of-beam brightness of 438 lux at a distance of 2 ft (0.6 m), falling off to 7 lux at 1 ft (0.3 m) off the beam’s center (high setting). The center-of-beam intensity on the Zenix’ low setting was 125 lux.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness 38 °F), the Zenix’s lighting power at its high setting (hyperbright LED) was 397 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 223 lux at 8 hours, and 44 lux at 24 hours. At its low setting (standard LEDs), corresponding intensity levels were 115 lux (0 hours), 14 lux (8 hours), and 6 lux (24 hours).

    Application

    The Zenix is well suited for navigation lighting, throwing a beam that is both long and bright enough for off-trail nightime navigation or moutaineering use. In its low intensity mode, the lamp provides plenty of illumination for short range task lighting. In short, the Zenix is the first all-LED headlamp we’ve reviewed that can effectively perform both task and navigation lighting exceptionally well.

    Weaknesses

    The Zenix’ 2-side-LED proximity lighting mode suffers from poor power drain and intensity fall-off. Lack of voltage regulation and the inability to use lithium batteries certainly contribute to this performance. It is interesting to note that the Princeton Tec Scout (powered by lithium coin cells) maintains approximately the same intensity levels at cold temperatures for 8-24 hours of operation.

    What is most remarkable, is that the Zenix provides higher intensity light output over longer time when operated in its hyperbright mode in cold conditions! Thus, we’re wondering why the two peripheral LEDs and the low brightness setting are even available, since the latter drains the batteries faster!

    As with other Black Diamond headlamps, the button switch of the Zenix is small, tucked under the angled bottom of the headlamp, and difficult to operate with gloved or mittened hands.

    Strengths

    All is not lost! The Zenix uses a lens-focused hyperbright LED that puts out an intense and narrow beam that has light output that exceeds many halogen bulbs. Surprisingly (given the fact that it uses AAA batteries), the Zenix had excellent cold weather performance, exceeding the performance of headlamps with lower-wattage LEDs powered by Lithium AA cells. The only brighter lamp in our review was one that used a higher-powered 1-watt LED, and the Zenix was the brightest of all of the LED headlamps tested after being continuously operating for 24 hours in cold conditions.

    Changing batteries is a cinch in the Zenix and its battery housing design is mitten-friendly.

    At 4.5 oz with batteries, the Zenix is the lightest “high intensity” headlamp on the market and an oustanding choice for someone looking for a long-lasting navigational light.

    Petzl Tikka Plus Headlamp Review

    Summary of Specifications

    The Petzl Tikka Plus headlamp weighs 2.54 oz (72 g) with 3xAAA batteries. It is a 4-LED headlamp with batteries in the lamp housing (front). The headband is a single wrap-style elastic band. A version with similar features and electronics, but with a retractable cord headband, is also offered (the ‘Zipka Plus’ model).

    Usability

    The Tikka Plus improves on the old model Tikka by offering three brightness modes plus one 60 cycles/min strobe mode. A push-button switch toggles between modes, and is designed to be operated with your index finger (it lies on top of the lamp housing) while you pinch the housing with your thumb and index finger. The switch is easily operable with bare hands and thin glove liners. We were able to access it and use it with ski gloves, but not with winter mittens.

    Changing the battery is performed by depressing a molded male fitting in the lamp housing, no easy chore with cold fingers.

    The Tikka Plus has a pivoting head that is easily operated with one hand but its ratchet makes a racket that excludes this lamp from the kit of anyone who enjoys their peace and quiet in nature.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Petzl Tikka Plus (with electronics similar to the Zipka Plus) has an initial center-of-beam brightness on its high setting of 259 lux at a distance of 2 feet (more than 50% brighter than its 3-LED little sister, the Petzl Tikka), falling off to 13 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center. On its medium setting, the Tikka Plus has a center-of-beam brightness of 133 lux.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Zipka’s lighting power at its highest brightness setting was 252 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 75 lux at 8 hours, and 12 lux at 24 hours. At its medium brightness setting, corresponding brightness levels were 110 lux (0 hours), 57 lux (8 hours), and 26 lux (24 hours).

    Application

    The Tikka Plus is Petzl’s most powerful 3xAAA headlamp. It is a solid performer, even under cold conditions, and thus, is appropriate for short range trail navigation as well as task lighting. With fresh batteries, the Tikka Plus casts a beam with good flood quality that is bright enough for off-trail navigation or moutaineering.

    Weaknesses

    The Tikka Plus’ primary weakness is the difficulty in changing batteries in cold conditions. In addition, Petzl might be wise to address the noisy ratcheting head pivot, which can be reengineered for smoother operation.

    Strengths

    The Petzl Tikka Plus is an excellent performer. Its beam quality, brightness, feature set, and cold weather performance are all impressive considering its small form factor.

    Summary

    We had a difficult time selecting a Trail’s Best Award for a headlamp in this class. Two lamps in particular had great performance with multiple lighting modes: the Princeton Tec Aurora and the Petzl Tikka Plus. The Petzl Tikka Plus, with an additional LED, had an initial light intensity with fresh batteries in cold conditions that was nearly 50% greater than that of the Aurora. However, for cold weather usability, the Aurora earned the edge. The Tikka Plus’ noisy and rough ratchet, battery compartment that was nearly impossible to open with cold fingers, and tiny button were its only (albeit minor) blemishes. However, the performance of the Tikka Plus is excellent, and it deserves an honorable mention as a Trail’s Best Award finalist.

    Photon Fusion Headlamp Review

    Summary of Specifications

    The Photon Fusion weighs 5.78 oz (164 g) with 3xAA alkaline batteries, or 4.81 oz (136 g) with 3xAA lithium batteries. The Fusion has a 7-LED headlamp module (4 narrow beam LEDs, 2 wide angle LEDs, and one red LED) attached to a front-mounted battery housing.

    The Fusion offers 9 operational modes. With a switching power supply, the Fusion has one of the few power-regulated circuits among LED headlamps, thus holding a constant light intensity as battery power diminishes.

    The headlamp module is hinged for angle adjustment and the lamp housing mounts to a 1-inch elastic webbing bucket strap.

    Usability

    The Fusion has the most sophisticated electronics and power management of any headlamp we’ve reviewed. Its 9 operational modes include:

    • 4 steady light modes: “hyperbright”, “brilliant”, “bright”, and “economy” (in order of decreasing intensity)
    • 3 blinking strobe modes: strobe (fast), slow (120 Hz), and SOS (visual morse code)
    • 1 dimmable red LED for night vision
    • 1 auto-off mode that doubles as a battery level check.

    The Fusion offers the opportunity to conserve batteries by toggling between the hyperbright mode for taking a quick look into the distance and switching back to its bright mode for short range trail navigation and task lighting.

    The lamp is turned on and off, and the modes are switched, through various combinations of holding or clicking either the left or right switch buttons. This gives the user great flexibility in selecting the mode without cycling through all nine of them, but requires that the user actually read the instruction manual to understand how the process works! The Fusion will certainly not be found in the Headlamps for Dummies aisle.

    The Fusion is the only headlamp we know that has a built in battery level check and a dimmable red light to preserve night vision. From our recent night vision article, you’ll recall that properly dimming a light is the most important factor for preserving night vision, and the Fusion has this ability.

    Operation of the top mounted dual mode (left side, right side) button is possible while wearing thin gloves or light fleece gloves, and nearly impossible with heavy mittens. The problem in cold weather switch operation is not necessarily inherent in the button design, but in distinguishing the two buttons with poorly dexterous handwear.

    Snapping open the battery compartment requires that a fingertip pry open a latch, and is a neither easy nor pleasant task in cold weather.

    The lamp and battery pack module can be separated from the head band and reassembled for use as a handheld flashlight or table light. The downside of this feature is that the headlamp can pop off the battery pack with a sharp blow, as one might experience when accidentally banging the lamp against rock while climbing. A simple solution is to attach the lamp and battery pack with a thin cord to prevent their separation when this happens (which, granted, is not often).

    Performance

    In its “hyperbright” brightness mode, with fresh batteries at room temperature, the Photon Fusion has an initial center-of-beam brightness of 255 lux at a distance of 2 ft (0.6 m), falling off to 22 lux at 1 ft (0.3 m) off the beam’s center.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness 38 °F), the Photon’s “hyperbright” mode lighting power was 220 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 205 lux at 8 hours, and 0 lux (dead) at 24 hours.

    In its “brilliant” brightness mode, with fresh batteries at room temperature, the Fusion has an initial center-of-beam brightness of 164 lux at a distance of 2 ft (0.6 m), falling off to 19 lux at 1 ft (0.3 m) off the beam’s center.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness 38 °F), the Photon’s “brilliant” mode lighting power was 155 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 143 lux at 8 hours, and 0 lux (dead) at 24 hours.

    Application

    The Fusion offers steady, sustained brightness and performs well at cold temperatures for short and mid-range navigation. While it doesn’t have the center of beam intensity and distance of some of the more focused beams, it did provide the brightest (and widest) flood coverage of any lamp we tested. We found this kind of illumination to be very useful for nightime navigation and mid-range task lighting, such as evaluating the overall pitch of a tarp.

    Weaknesses

    The broad beam of the multiple LED Fusion was not nearly as bright as or as energy efficient as the more tightly focused, higher wattage LED headlamps we tested. When Photon is able to marry their sophisticated electronics with one of the new one- or five-watt LEDs on the market, and create a more focused beam for long range navigation lighting, they will likely set the standard in both headlamp performance and sophistication.

    Cycling through the multiple modes of the Fusion is complicated affair, with the most used modes (steady brightness) no less accessible than the least used (strobe and auto-off) modes.

    At its weight, and considering that the Fusion is capable of using lithium AA batteries, its cold weather performance was disappointing, in spite of its use of power regulation.

    Strengths

    Sophisticated power management for constant level light output and multiple modes make the Fusion a versatile and unique lamp. In its “bright” mode, the Fusion will illuminate at a constant intensity of nearly 40 lux (suitable for short- and mid-range task lighting and trail navigation) for almost 4 days. The Fusion also conserves power by dropping an intensity mode at predetermined battery levels.

    For those that prefer a broader floodlight type of beam, the Fusion provides bright illumination over a wider area than most headlamps. At 22 lux, it was the brightest lamp tested at 1 ft (0.3 m) off the beam’s center – brighter than any LED headlamp we tested. The Fusion also has a nice night vision feature (with its red LED) and a battery level check.

    The opportunity to use lithium AA’s, of course, improves its cold weather performance while lightening up the battery weight.

    Princeton Tec Aurora Headlamp Review

    Princeton Tec Aurora Specifications

    The Princeton Tec Aurora weighs 2.66 oz (75 g) with 3xAAA batteries. It is a 3-LED headlamp with batteries in the lamp housing (front). The band is a 1-inch elastic wrap-style headband.

    Usability

    The Princeton Tec Aurora has three lighting modes (‘high’, ‘medium’, and ‘low’ and two strobe modes (30 cycles/min and 120 cycles/min), toggled by a push-button switch on top of the housing, operated with your index finger while your thumb and index finger ‘pinch’ the lamp housing. The switch is not recessed, so its operable while wearing a wider range of handwear than lights with recessed switches, and we were even able to operate it while wearing shelled winter mittens.

    Changing the battery is performed by pulling on the front of the molded lamp housing with your fingertips, and was difficult, even with cold fingers.

    The Princeton Tec Aurora has a pivoting head that operates smoothly and quietly with one hand.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Princeton Tec Aurora has an initial center-of-beam brightness on its high setting of 203 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 13 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center. On its medium setting, the Aurora’s center-of-beam brightness at room temperature was 108 lux.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Aurora’s lighting power on its high setting was 172 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 64 lux at 8 hours, and 14 lux at 24 hours. On its medium setting, the corresponding brightness values were 88 lux (0 hours), 38 lux (8 hours), and 24 lux (24 hours). In general, the Auora was among the best performing LED headlamps in our review with respect to maintaining enough light for bright task lighting after 24 hours of exposure to cold conditions.

    Applications for the Princeton Tec Aurora

    The Princeton Tec Aurora attempts to bridge the gap between task and short range navigation lighting. At a high brightness with fresh batteries near 200 lux, it is more than adequate for trail illumination and short range flood lighting for mountaineering scenarios. Further, even after 24 hours, the Princeton Tec Aurora maintains enough intensity for excellent short-range task lighting.

    Weaknesses

    The Princeton Tec Aurora’s weaknesses are few. As with other LED headlamps in our review, there is always room to improve in designing a battery housing that can be opened with cold fingers. In addition, the Aurora’s AAA batteries do not sit securely in the battery housing, so some care and attention is needed when closing the housing to ensure that the batteries maintain their contact points.

    Strengths

    Overall, the Princeton Tec Aurora is a very bright and powerful headlamp. It was the only 1-to-3-LED headlamp tested that had a brightness exceeding 200 lux without the aid of hyperbright or 1-watt LED’s. Good brightness over the 24-hour life of the light, combined with a switch that can be used with gloves and a wide, comfortable headband makes the Princeton Tec Aurora a wise choice if you are looking for a excellent all-around trail headlamp that weighs less than 3 ounces.

    Summary

    We had a difficult time selecting a Trail’s Best Award for a headlamp in its class. Two lamps in particular had great performance with multiple lighting modes: the Princeton Tec Aurora and the Petzl Tikka Plus. For cold weather usability, the Aurora earned a slight edge, and we are pleased to honor its design and performance with a 2004 Trail’s Best Award.

    Princeton Tec Matrix 2 One-Watt LED Headlamp

    Summary of Specifications

    The Princeton Tec Matrix 2 weighs 5.34 oz (151 g) with 2xAA alkaline batteries and 4.69 oz with 2xAA lithium batteries. It is a 1-LED headlamp featuring a one-watt LED, with batteries in the lamp housing (front). The band is a 1-inch elastic bucket-style headband.

    Usability

    The Matrix 2 has one, full-power lighting mode, operating by an internal switch activated by rotating the lamp housing, as if you were focusing an SLR camera lens. This type of switch can be easily operated with any winter handwear short of thumbless mitt apparel.

    Changing the battery is performed by pulling a lever on the molded battery housing with your thumb, and can be performed with bare hands, gloves, or thin mittens easily.

    The Matrix 2 has a smoothly pivoting head that can be operated with one hand.

    Performance

    The Matrix 2 is the brightest LED headlamp marketed for specialty outdoors use. The only brighter headlamps are 1- and 5-watt LED lights marketed to the caving community.

    Turning this lamp on initially, we thought we received the wrong model. It was our first experience with 1-Watt LED technology, and we thought we were mistakenly provided a halogen lamp. The Matrix 2 shot a bright, white, focused beam that illuminated objects more than 50 m away.

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Princeton Tec Matrix 2 has an initial center-of-beam brightness of 792 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 8 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center – an incredibly narrow beam uncharacteristic of what we’ve seen from LED lights in the past.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Matrix 2’s lighting power was 604 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 552 lux at 8 hours, and 0 lux (dead) at 24 hours, a result that is consistent with Princeton Tec’s claim of a 15 hour battery life. The Matrix 2 is the brightest single-LED headlamp in this review.

    Application

    The Princeton Tec Matrx 2 is not a task light. It is a high-powered navigation headlamp suitable for off-trail and mountaineering use, with good, sustained brightness over the life of the batteries that is achieved without the sophistication and expense of a voltage regulating circuit.

    Weaknesses

    The Matrix 2’s primary weakness is that it lacks a task lighting mode or short-range flood-type LED. While Princeton Tec makes a headlamp that does perform this functionality (the Yukon HL), that model is heavier (8.0 oz with 3xAA alkaline batteries). Our review team felt that Princeton Tec has the potential to be the best all-around performing headlamp for peak-bagging if it had a short range task lighting mode that conserved battery power when needed.

    Strengths

    The Matrix 2 offers bright, sustained light that exceeds the performance of many halogen lights. With its 1-watt LED offering up to 12 hours of sustained bright light, it was the only LED headlamp reviewed suitable for serious mountaineering or off-trail navigation requiring long range lighting. The Matrix 2 has one of the best performance to weight ratios of any light we’ve tested. It is waterproof, can be turned on and off with heavily mittened hands, offers simple battery changes, allows for the use of AA lithium batteries for cold weather performance and weight savings, and has a rugged design. With lithium batteries’ flatter discharge curve, the Matrix 2 achieves many of the benefits of a lamp with programmed voltage regulation. At 8 hours, the Matrix 2 was still at 91% of its brightness (similar to the voltage-regulated Photon Fusion with lithium batteries). However, at 8 hours, the Matrix 2 was 2.7X brighter than the Fusion and 2.5X brighter than the Zenix, two other lamps in the same weight class (4-5 ounces). The Matrix 2’s extremely bright lighting can easily be extended to 24 hours by adding only 0.95 oz (27 g) of batteries (2 lithium AA’s).

    For having an outstanding performance-to-weight ratio that considers weight, usability, battery life, and light intensity in cold conditions, we are pleased to award the Princeton Tec Matrix 2 with BackpackingLight.com’s 2004 Trail’s Best Award.

    Princeton Tec Scout Headlamp Review

    Princeton Tec Scout Specifications

    The Princeton Tec Scout weighs 1.4 oz (40 g) with its 4×2032 coin cell batteries. It is a 2-LED headlamp with the battery housing in the front (same compartment as the lamp housing). The headband is a single strap, wrap-style with 3/4″ elastic webbing.

    Usability

    The Princeton Tec Scout offers three brightness modes (‘high’, ‘medium’, and ‘low’) plus two blinking strobe modes (30 Hz, 120 Hz). Modes are toggled with a single pushbutton switch, designed to be pushed with your index finger while your thumb and index finger ‘pinch’ the lamp housing. The switch is easily operable with bare hands, but its tiny 1/4″ x 3/8″ size and low depression depth make it difficult to use while wearing even thin gloves and nearly impossible with any kind of mitten.

    Changing the batteries requires removing a single screw from the housing with a Phillips screwdriver. Because the screw is not set in a secured screw housing, the tiny screw require attention so you don’t lose it in the field.

    The pivoting head can be operated with one hand (but the hinge could benefit from smoother operation), and pivots to a position where the switch remains covered during storage, preventing accidental turn-on of the lamp in your pack or pocket.

    One unique feature of the Princeton Tec Scout is the ability to remove it from the headband and clip it to the bill or brim of a cap. In this configuration, the Scout with batteries sans headband weighs only 0.94 oz (26.6 g).

    Performance of the Princeton Tec Scout

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Princeton Tec Scout has an initial center-of-beam brightness on its high setting of 111 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 2 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Scout’s lighting power on its high setting was 81 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 14 lux at 8 hours, and 9 lux at 24 hours (sufficient for close-up task lighting). For the Scout’s medium setting, corresponding brightness levels were 51 lux (0 hours), 10 lux (8 hours), and 6 lux (24 hours), respectively.

    Application

    The Princeton Tec Scout is best suited as a short range task light. With fresh batteries at its highest setting, it is bright enough for short-range navigation on a trail, even in cold conditions.

    Weaknesses

    The Scout’s primary weakness is its battery configuration. While 2032 coin cell batteries are readily available, carrying four spares, plus a Phillips screwdriver to open the housing, and having to keep track of the tiny housing screw in the field will effectively limit the Scout to outings where battery replacement is not a chosen option!

    Strengths

    The Princeton Tec Scout offers a lot of function in such a small package. Three brightness modes, two strobe modes, and the ability to separate the light from the headband and use it on a cap brim make the Scout one of the most feature packed sub-2-oz headlamps on the market.

    Petzl Zipka Headlamp Review

    Petzl Zipka Specifications

    The Petzl Zipka weighs 2.07 oz (59 g) with 3xAAA batteries. It is a 3-LED headlamp with batteries in the lamp housing (front). The headband is a spring-loaded retractable cord.

    Usability

    The Petzl Zipka consists of only one lighting mode, activated by a slider switch on top of the housing, operated with your index finger while your thumb and index finger ‘pinch’ the lamp housing. The switch is easily operable with while wearing even thicker gloves, but it’s top-of-the-housing switch location makes mittened use very difficult.

    Changing the battery is performed by depressing a molded male fitting in the lamp housing, no easy chore with cold fingers.

    The Petzl Zipka does not have a pivoting head but we found the natural angle of the lamp to be correct for most task lighting, and some adjustment is possible by changing the location of the headlamp housing on the forehead.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Petzl Zipka (with electronics equal to the Petzl Tikka, which includes a wrap style elastic webbing headband) has an initial center-of-beam brightness on its high setting of 165 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 18 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center. The Zipka’s flood quality (defined as the fraction of beam intensity at 1 foot off center divided by the intensity in the center of the beam) was the best of the all of the headlamps evaluated in our review.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Petzl Zipka’s lighting power was 152 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 60 lux at 8 hours, and 25 lux at 24 hours. The Zipka was the best performing LED headlamp in our review with respect to maintaining its original beam intensity (15%) over a 24 hour period in cold conditions.

    Applications for the Petzl Zipka

    The Zipka-Tikka headlamp line has always been assumed to be a short range task light. However, the performance of this headlamp, even under cold conditions, indicate that it is appropriate for short range trail navigation as well. With fresh batteries, the Petzl Zipka is bright enough to illuminate a large area over a short distance and would even be appropriate for off-trail navigation or moutaineering.

    Weaknesses

    The Petzl Zipka’s primary weakness is the difficulty in changing batteries in cold conditions. Its single mode of brightness may be perceived by some to be a disadvantge, but Petzl offers the Zipka Plus for those who want the advanced circuitry of a multi-mode headlamp.

    Strengths

    The Petzl Zipka is an outstanding performer. We were impressed with its beam quality, brightness, and compact form factor. Further, we were surprised by its cold-conditions performance, considering that it uses alkaline AAA batteries (which currently have no Lithium option). For its weight, it’s hard to find a headlamp that is as simple to operate, or is a better all-around performer.

    Black Diamond Moonlight Headlamp Review

    Summary of Specifications

    The Black Diamond Moonlight weighs 4.4 oz (125 g) with 3xAAA batteries (e.g., Energizer Titanium E2). It is a 4-LED headlamp with the battery housing in the rear. The headband is a conventional three-strap (bucket-style) elastic webbing (3/4″) style.

    Usability

    The Moonlight is upgraded for 2003, with the addition of two more brightness modes (bringing the total to three: high, medium, and low) and one strobe mode. Modes are toggled with a single pushbutton switch, designed to be pushed with your thumb while your thumb and index finger ‘pinch’ the lamp housing. The switch is easily operable with bare hands or thin gloves, but like its smaller cousing the Ion, the 3/8-inch diameter button is nearly impossible to operate with the thick gloves (e.g., ski gloves) or shelled mitts (e.g., 300 weight fleece) commonly used for winter backcountry travel.

    Changing the battery is a simple affair, involving only removing the rubber backing from the rear battery housing, and can be performed with cold hands, or even while wearing thin gloves.

    The pivoting head is easily operated with one hand.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Black Diamond Moonlight has an initial center-of-beam brightness on its high setting of 113 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 11 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness at 38 °F), the Moonlight’s lighting power on its high setting was 107 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 41 lux at 8 hours, and 13 lux at 24 hours. For the Moonlight’s medium setting, corresponding brightness levels were 75 lux (0 hours), 38 lux (8 hours), and 19 lux (24 hours), respectively.

    Application

    The Moonlight is suitable primarily as a short range headlamp for performing camp chores. With fresh batteries at its highest setting, it is bright enough to illuminate a trail, even in cold conditions. After 24 hours of continuous use in cold conditions, the Moonlight’s ability to be a navigation light is replaced by a fair ability to provide continued task lighting.

    Weaknesses

    The Moonlight’s primary weakness is in its LED bulb configuration. One basis behind a parallel LED configuration is to increase the flood area of the beam. However, our tests with multiple headlamps indicate that flood area is best increased by adjusting lens concavity rather than LED configuration. Since the Moonlight is a lens-less headlamp, the benefit of this configuration to promote a flood is marginal.

    Strengths

    The 2003 Moonlight is significantly improved over previous models because of the addition of medium and low brightness settings, which allow batteries to be conserved for task lighting, extending burn time by more the double over older Moonlights.

    Black Diamond Ion Headlamp Review

    Summary of Specifications

    The Black Diamond Ion weighs 0.97 oz (27 g) with its single 6V battery. It is a 2-LED headlamp in a housing hinged and attached to a single, 0.5-inch wide elastic webbing strap that is adjustable with a band toggle.

    Usability

    The Ion has only one brightness mode, toggled between on and off with a single pushbutton switch, which is designed to be pushed with your thumb while your thumb and index finger ‘pinch’ the lamp. The switch is easily operable with bare hands or thin gloves, but nearly impossible with shelled mitts (with a thickness of 300 weight fleece). Changing the battery requires that the lamp be snapped from its housing, after which the casing can be snapped open to expose the battery compartment. The task requires some fine motor dexterity and finger strength, and is very difficult with cold hands. The pivoting head requires two hands to adjust the headlamp angle because of the instability of the headlamp housing against the head.

    Performance

    With fresh batteries at room temperature, the Black Diamond Ion has an initial center-of-beam brightness of 118 lux at a distance of 2 feet, falling off to 8 lux at 1 foot off the beam’s center.

    In our cold conditions test (center-of-beam brightness 38 °F), the Ion’s lighting power was 42 lux at 0 hours (fresh batteries), 3 lux at 8 hours, and 1 lux at 24 hours.

    Application

    The Ion is suitable as a short range headlamp for performing camp chores, but does not appear to have enough power for directional lighting in cold conditions. Even after 8 hours of continuous use with cold batteries, the Ion is generally unsuitable for short range task lighting.

    Weaknesses

    The Ion’s cold weather performance is its primary weakness. It is a difficult light to use with mittens or cold hands, and cold weather lighting performance is poor, with its light output at 8 hours in our cold weather test inadequate for anything but dimly lit task lighting within 1-2 feet of the lamp. Light output after 24 hours was virtually nonexistent.

    Note: To improve cold weather performance there is a 6v 160 mAh lithium photo cell option for the Ion (not tested in this review). Replace the manufacturer provided battery with a Radio Shack battery part number 23-266. Battery designations for other manufacturers are 2CR-1/3N, L544BP, PX28L, K28L.

    Strengths

    The Ion is one of the lightest LED headlamps available. Its tiny form factor, light weight, and ability to use a lithium battery make it an attractive option for the ultralight backpacker.

    Patagonia Dragonfly Pullover REVIEW (Spring 2004 Style)

    A three ounce wind shirt with an important distinguishing feature: durability.

    Introduction

    Herein we review Patagonia’s newest wind shirt, to be released in Spring 2004, the 3 oz, hoodless, Dragonfly Pullover. Patagonia will also manufacture a 4 oz, hooded, Dragonfly Full Zip Jacket.

    Many feel that a wind shirt is the most versatile piece of clothing you can carry in your pack. Worn over a base layer, a wind shirt provides protection from wind chill and light precipitation, and serves to retain body heat lost through evaporative cooling in colder conditions. On its own (depending on the next-to-skin comfort of the fabric), it can serve as comfortable warm-weather insect and sun protection.

    A classic wind shirt is a single-layer woven (nylon or polyester) cut to the pattern of a shirt, pullover, or jacket. The key characteristics of a wind shirt are extremely light weight, high breathability, and water resistance (usually provided by a durable water repellent finish, or DWR). Pertex Microlight, Pertex Quantum, and other 15-30 denier uncoated nylons are examples of the types of fabrics that provide these characteristics.

    Overview

    Patagonia calls the Dragonfly “The absolute lightest shell we’ve ever made for high-intensity minimalist adventures.” The new Dragonfly offers a new balance point between light weight and durability. Patagonia’s 1.1 oz triple ripstop fabric has a substantial feel and a relaxing, but not clingy, drape. This fabric is softer, more breathable, and less transparent than the Dragonfly fabrics used on 2003 and earlier models.

    Some manufacturers have switched to 0.9 oz fabrics to reduce the weight of their wind shirts. Patagonia has taken a slightly different approach. They retained a tougher 1.1 oz shell fabric and compromised weight in other areas. Although the new Dragonfly offers a deep chest zipper, it uses a very light and thin elastic draw cord and miniature one-handed cord lock at the hem.

    Specifications

  • Garment Style – Hoodless wind shirt
     
  • Fabric Description – 1.1-oz. 15 x 20 denier triple ripstop nylon; Deluge DWR treated.
     
  • Weight – BPL measured 3.2 oz men’s medium (manufacturer claim is 3.0 oz) Note: this is a pre-production sample.
     
  • MSRP – Men’s Dragonfly Pullover: $115.00, Version with full zip and hood: $135.00
     
  • Manufacturer Contact Information

    Patagonia
    8550 White Fir St.
    P.O. Box 32050
    Reno, NV 89523-2050
    PH: 1.800.638.6464

  • Usability

    The Dragonfly Pullover has a half-length (14 in), fully backed #3 chest zipper for good ventilation and temperature regulation. A 3 in high collar provides neck protection. Cuff closures are simple sewn-in elastic, and were neither too light nor too loose for anyone on our testing crew. The pullover has a single handwarmer/storage pocket on the lower right side seam (zippered closure). As mentioned earlier, the Pullover’s hem has an exceptionally light drawcord and miniature cord lock that can be operated with a single hand.

    Sizing

    The Dragonfly Pullover in a Size Men’s Medium had a trim-to-slightly-loose fit on one of our testers (an average build 5’8” 150 lb male). The Pullover fits appropriately over a baselayer and 200 weight fleece garment. The mid-length hem comes down to crotch level providing some butt but not much thigh coverage. The collar easily fits over a 200 wt fleece balaclava on a 16 in neck.

    Fit

    We had no problems with the Dragonfly Pullover restricting any of our movements. Raising our arms did not raise the hem of the pullover and there was no binding in the shoulders when wrapping our arms around our chest (although some restriction might occur in shoulders when layering the garment over some bulkier insulating shirts/jackets). There was enough length in the sleeves that we could withdraw our hands while hanging them down at our sides.

    Wind and Precipitation Resistance

    In the field the pullover was able to shed light precipitation (both rain and snow) when used over a wool baselayer and a mid-weight synthetic fleece vest in temperatures between 25 and 40 degrees. The pullover wetted out over time but did a credible job of keeping seepage to reasonable levels. The Dragonfly/baselayer combo makes a surprisingly effective (and very light) soft shell arrangement.

    Breathability

    The 2004 Dragonfly fabric is more breathable and is an improvement over 2003 and preceding models. Still, the deep chest zipper is a welcome feature for ventilation moisture during periods of high exertion, and lack of a deep zipper on other ultralight wind shirts remains our number one complaint with manufacturers. With the garment zippered up, however, it was apparent from our field tests that the 1.1 oz triple ripstop nylon is still not quite as breathable as some of the newer 0.9 oz fabrics used in other manufacturer’s windshirts (e.g., compared to the Marmot Chinook, Montane Aero, and Rab Quantum Wind Top).

    Recommendations for Improvement

    The best features of the Dragonfly are its overall fit and design, the deep chest zipper, and the durability (especially, abrasion resistance) of the triple ripstop fabric. However, the durability comes at a cost – hindered breathability. While pre-2003 Dragonfly garments offered a fabric has enough water resistance to fit the bill as a shower shell, and other fabrics (e.g., Pertex Quantum) offer exceptional levels of breathability, the 2004 Dragonfly fabric appears to fall in the middle. Some will think that this balance provides the best of both worlds. Others will say that it’s the worst of both worlds because it can perform neither function (breathe or resist showers) optimally. Although we recognize that such distinctions in breathability and water resistance may be akin to hair-splitting, we’d prefer that manufacturers bring two wind shirts into their product lines – one with exceptional breathability in a non-hooded, pullover style for use during high exertion activity, and one with exceptional water resistance in a hooded jacket style for use as a shower shell. This would give consumers a better selection to allow them to use the one they need for a particular situation. We’ve even included both types of wind shirts on many of our own trips, recognizing that six ounces is a small weight penalty for such versatility.

    In addition, the side seam pocket on the Dragonfly, while giving an impression of apparent simplicity, is awkward to use, too small, and obscured by a hip belt or climbing harness. A larger, zippered napoleon-style chest pocket would provide more utility and ease of use.

    In fairness to Patagonia, we could not help but recognize that the new Dragonfly offers excellent durability at this weight, so if your outdoor pursuits involve occasional bushwacking or rock scrambling, the Dragonfly might find a home on your gear list.

    And, if the 3.2 ounce weight bothers you because “there are wind shirts that weigh less than 3 ounces out there,” then get your scissors out and cut out the hem cord and cordlock. The result with be a true “shirt” that is easier to tuck in with its flat hem while still retaining good functionality!

    Wireless in the Wilderness: An Overview of Communications Technologies for Backpackers

    Introduction

    Solo. All by yourself. Middle of nowhere. 30 miles from the nearest road. Sounds great, doesn’t it? But, what if something goes wrong? What if you’re injured? What if a storm destroys your tent, or lightning starts a fire nearby? How will you get help?

    Modern wireless communications might be the answer. But, what kind of coverage and service can you expect? What can you do to maximize your cell phone’s effectiveness in the wilderness? What are the weight/performance trade-offs? This article should give you a better feel for the answers to those questions, and help you decide if a cell phone is worth carrying.

    Wireless Technology Primer

    The cellular system concept is simple. When you make or receive a call, your cellular phone communicates with a cell-site somewhere in the area. That cell-site connects to equipment at a central location that in turn connects to the regular telephone network. As you move around, the cellular system figures out which cell-site is best suited to handle your call. All of this is, or should be, transparent to you and the other party on the call. The system provides a service that works just like a regular telephone — only better.

    Basic Radio Facts

    Mobile phones operate on a specific range of radio frequencies. Why do frequencies matter? The answer requires a quick review of high school physics. First, all radio waves travel at the same speed — the speed of light. Frequency is measured in cycles per second — a measure of the number of complete waves transmitted in one second. Since the speed is constant, increasing frequency decreases the wavelength and decreasing frequency increases the wavelength.

    Antenna length is a direct function of wavelength. Longer wavelengths require longer antennas. Shorter antennas mean shorter and hopefully lighter cell phones. That is not the whole story, however. Unfortunately, higher frequency signals attenuate more rapidly — a fancy way of saying they don’t travel as far. That requires either more cell-sites, or more power from the cell phone transmitter.

    Analog and Digital

    Frequency is also an indicator of the type of service available. The FCC grants licenses to carriers for specific services on specific frequencies. Cellular and PCS services are essentially the same, only in different frequency bands. A national carrier may actually have a cellular license in one area and a PCS license in another area. The older analog technology is only available from one of the two cellular carriers in any given area. Push-to-talk two-way radio service (no dialing required) is only available from an SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) carrier. Digital services are available from all three types of carriers — but not all cellular carriers offer digital service.

    There are four major types of digital service in the United States, and none are compatible. TDMA is the oldest system, used primarily by AT&T Wireless. AT&T Wireless has also created a GSM network. GSM is popular in Europe and used by several PCS carriers here. The SMR carrier Nextel uses iDEN®. Verizon Wireless, Sprint PCS, and other PCS carriers use CDMA. Due to industry consolidation (mergers), some carriers have portions of their digital network that are incompatible with other portions. All digital services require significantly less power than analog services and generally offer better overall voice quality, as well as longer battery life.

    Analog service is the same everywhere. Although there are two frequency bands (“A” and “B”) for the two cellular carriers, the phones are capable of working on both bands. Some phones, sold primarily by carriers with both cellular and PCS licenses, are capable of working at both cellular and PCS frequencies. They will provide digital services in both bands, and may work with analog service. An FCC ruling will allow carriers to discontinue analog service in about four years.

    Wilderness and the Wireless Industry

    If you’re a California resident planning a hike on the Appalachian Trail, you don’t have to call an East Coast company to get wireless service. Several carriers are truly nationwide and may have a license where you’re going. Even if your service provider doesn’t have a license, it may have a roaming agreement with a carrier that does have the license. Check with your service provider to see what’s available.

    If your service provider doesn’t have a roaming agreement where you’re going, you may still be able to make a call. Most carriers offer “credit card roaming” for this situation (Editor’s Note: due to inherent insecurities in wireless cellular networks, there may be some risk in transmitting sensitive information such as credit card numbers). Dial a number, and you’ll be directed to a service that will ask for a credit card number before connecting your call. Check the rates before you decide to continue, or you may be very surprised at the bill. This only works if the technology used by your cell phone and the local service provider are identical. A GSM phone won’t work on a CDMA network.

    Coverage

    A much bigger question is whether you’ll actually have coverage. In other words, are there any cell-sites handling the area where you want to backpack? The answer, of course, is — maybe.

    Wireless carriers are in business to make money. They make more money where there are more people to make calls. Their natural preference is to cover populated areas first, and less populated areas later. Cell-sites are expensive, requiring hundreds of thousands of dollars to build, and still more dollars to operate and maintain.

    A cell-site in a remote area may not generate enough revenue to pay operating costs. Most people making calls with that cell-site are just passing through on a nearby highway. Very few of them will go off the highway to any appreciable degree. The financial incentives for the carrier to build anything beyond decent highway coverage are weak at best.

    Since radio transmission is a line of sight proposition, carriers build rural cell-sites where they can cover a large amount of territory. If you’re in a valley one ridge away from the only nearby cell-site, you may as well not have a phone. Climb the ridge and your service should be great. The more rugged the territory, the more this happens.

    Even if the terrain permits line of sight transmission, nature may not. Trees do a very good job of absorbing radio waves. Heavily forested areas are very difficult to cover well. Reception may improve in the winter when the leaves have dropped. You may have to emulate GPS users and move to a meadow or clearing to get a good signal.

    Combine market realities with geographic limitations, and you can see why the FCC rates rural coverage from both PCS and Cellular as “Poor.” The FCC doesn’t specifically discuss the quality of SMR coverage. However, SMR is primarily aimed at commercial dispatch users who have even less reason to go into the backcountry than most wireless users. The coverage maps for SMR carriers reflect that marketing emphasis.

    The “Maintenance Window”

    As you can probably imagine, most people use their cell phone during the day. Usage starts to ramp-up in the early morning, climbs as the morning progresses, levels off a bit at lunch, and then climbs to a late afternoon peak. It then tapers to a minimum level sometime in the very early morning. Naturally, service providers prefer to do any service-affecting work during the wee hours when few people are using the system. That time is called the “maintenance window.”

    A midnight-to-five maintenance window isn’t likely to affect most backpackers. However, not all service-affecting work can get done during that time. Larger projects are usually completed during the other portion of the maintenance window — the weekend. If you’re an employed backpacker, a large portion of your hiking time is probably during a weekend.

    On any given weekend, chances are good that somewhere in a wireless system, some site is off the air for an extended time. The odds of it being the site you need to use are small, but still present. Carriers don’t like this anymore than you do; they can’t generate revenue if people can’t call. A “planned service outage” is still an outage.

    So, what can you do? Nothing, really. The carrier is unlikely to tell you to expect such an event. The service contract probably explicitly allows it, and the disclaimer on the coverage map will certainly cover the possibility. It will probably never affect you — just don’t count on it not happening.

    Alternatives

    You might consider some alternative technologies. The most likely options are Citizen’s Band (CB) Radio, Amateur (HAM) Radio, General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) and Globalstar.

    CB Radio is a short-range push-to-talk service. The portable handsets are heavy, and not very good without a 9-foot-long external antenna. People do monitor the emergency channel, but barring unusual atmospheric conditions you still need line-of-sight to get to them . It’s nowhere near as popular as it used to be, so there are fewer people listening who might help you. I don’t recommend it for lightweight backpacking. (Editor’s Note: Another push-to-talk technology that is gaining popularity to maintain communications within a two-mile line-of-sight distance among members of a party is FRS (Family Radio Service), made popular by the Motorola TalkAbout series radios. FRS technology is moving rapidly, with some FRS radios approaching the 4-oz per handset range, and coming with an ever-increasing number of features useful to outdoorsmen, including compasses, altimeters, and GPS).

    Amateur Radio is much more interesting. It can reach for miles (in a straight line). A lot of people are very serious about monitoring it. You can get news from all over the world. You can get fairly light ham equipment. Although I’ve seen some portables weighing around six ounces, the more powerful ones weigh in the 8-15 ounce range. The biggest catch is that you need to get an FCC license to operate it. If you’re willing to study for the license, amateur radio may be a good solution for you.

    GMRS is somewhat of a cross between Citizen’s Band and amateur radio. According to the FCC, the normal range for a GMRS mobile is five to twenty-five miles. However, that range is more typical of a fixed base station, not a portable unit. In urban areas, many of the same people that monitor the CB emergency channel also monitor GMRS. You do need to pay a fee to get a license, but you don’t need to take a test. GMRS portables cost several hundred dollars and weigh about the same as ham radio portables.

    Globalstar is a system that uses satellites to provide comprehensive coverage. Globalstar does not cover the North or South Pole. It does cover just about everything else. It really does offer complete coverage in North America. You will pay dearly for that coverage though. Not only is it expensive to use, the handsets are expensive to buy, bulky and heavy (Editor’s Note: the average Globalstar handset still weighs about 12 oz). They resemble the cellular phones of ten years ago, but with a much bigger and fatter antenna. If you absolutely have to be able to call, no matter what, this is for you.

    Editor’s Note: Technology will likely evolve in the direction of hybrid devices that support a variety of wireless communications technologies. Examples of this technology include location-reporting cellular phones, cellular/two-way handsets, and radio/GPS combination radios. SAR volunteers tell us that one ideal combination of wireless communication includes two devices – a five-watt two way radio to maintain communication among the entire party, and a cellular phone for use when the radios don’t work. I suspect that a four ounce device capable of cellular, satellite, and two-way communications, with a functional GPS display, weather station, and personal locator beacon, is not far away.

    Recommendations

    If you’re still interested in carrying a cell phone into the wilderness, you should consider some basic things. You need to choose the service provider and then the specific model of phone. You need to do some preparation before you travel, figure out the right way to pack the phone, and know how to use it in an emergency.

    Before You Go

    The first step in choosing a service provider is determining who has coverage where you’re going. Most service provider websites will have a coverage map that gives the approximate coverage for their system. They will probably also give you the address of the store nearest the area you’re interested in. Employees that live or work close to where you’re going will give you a much more reliable answer than those who live closer to your home. If there are no company stores, try to find an authorized agent. Even better, find several such sources.

    If you’re not sure who has coverage, start with the cellular carriers. They have had more time to build out their networks. You can also check one or more of the comparison services on the Internet. They provide the ability to compare pricing from multiple carriers. Use more than one: I’ve found that any single service may not list all of your options — or even all of the service providers.

    Once you’ve chosen a service provider, choose a phone. Since this is for emergency use, you don’t need fancy features. You do want lightweight. In general, smaller phones are lighter and more expensive. Some tips:

    • Look for a phone that can prevent accidentally powering on the phone while it’s stored in your pack. This can be a mechanical method such as a flip up keypad, or a software lock.
    • Get the lightest battery you can afford, preferably Lithium Ion technology since they weigh less, last longer, and aren’t subject to memory effects. If the phone has an extended-life battery, you can usually save weight by getting a slim battery.
    • Get a Cigarette Lighter Adapter (CLA) for your car. Use the CLA if you need to make a call on the road.
    • Look for an antenna that is somewhat protected when retracted. Some popular flip-up phones are notorious for antenna breakage — I’ve replaced mine three times.

    Before you go anywhere with the phone, learn to use it. If it’s a cellular phone, learn how to switch from the “A” system to the “B” system and back (or vice versa). Learn how to force a call into analog if it has that capability. Experiment with every feature in the manual. Like any other piece of gear, it’s only as good as you know how to make it.

    On the Trail

    When you pack the phone, keep a few things in mind. Water, extreme cold, and extreme shocks are all bad for cell phones. Pack it somewhere that is protected from all of the above. Turn it off before you pack it. Take advantage of any battery saving feature you can think of. Turn off vibrating ringers. Turn off service beeps or flashing lights. Minimize the keypad lighting interval. You’re packing this for emergencies, so you want it to work as long as possible.

    If you do need to use it for an emergency, you’ll hopefully have service. If not, try forcing the call to analog. Still no luck — try to use another carrier’s system. If you still can’t call, start looking for high places. Climb the ridge, climb a tree, move into a meadow. Try all the things you tried initially. Make sure you have fully extended the antenna and try again. If you still can’t get through, self-reliance is the name of the game.

    If you are able to make a call, you may still have a problem. You need to know where you are for people to help you. 911 operators are used to dealing with highway locations, not so used to dealing with clearings in a forest. Sounds obvious, but if your map skills aren’t that great, well… (Editor’s Note: The combination of a GPS unit and a cellular (or satellite) telephone can be a tremendous asset to SAR personnel. However, even without a GPS, your ability to read a map and communicate, for example, a quad name and your approximate UTM or lat/lon coordinates can expedite a rescue.)

    Once you’ve made contact, consider scheduling times for future contacts and shutting the phone off in the meantime. This is especially important if you’re making an analog call on a small battery. In that situation, you only have a few hours of standby time, let alone talk time. The available time will shrink considerably if you’re in a limited coverage area requiring more power even in a standby mode.

    In spite of the limitations, I’ve been able to call in a new forest-fire report with my cell phone faster than the ranger standing next to me could get through with his two-way radio. The system does work; you just have to work within its capabilities.

    Resources

    Compare Services:

    Wireless Service Providers:

    Other Resources:

    About the Author

    Eric Kammerer has been an avid backpacker since 1974. He first used tarps in a 1978 Outward Bound course and started backpacking in tennis shoes somewhere in the early 1980’s. He also remembers carrying an 80+ pound backpack – and won’t do it again. Eric is a Senior Network Engineer for a major wireless carrier, where he is responsible for the design of switching elements and facilities for portions of two western states.