“In particular, the non-telescoping nature of the lower connection enables thicker 16 mm tubing for the tip section. Other poles with telescoping lower connections have to use narrower tubing for the tip section (typically 12 mm) but this makes those poles weaker right where they are most exposed to potential damage. The 16 mm tubing here substantially reduces the risk of breakage.”
this makes sense to me. I love my Gossamer Gear lightrek poles. But I have broken the a pole between the tip and the first adjustment point, twice. And then I learned to pay attention in rocky, pole busting circumstances. They’ve served me well for another 15 years.
But, not having an adjustment point that requires a more narrow–skinny–pole section at the lower end in order to allow it to collapse inside the larger upper portion, makes sense. To say it another way, having only one adjustable mechanism allows for a stronger bottom pole section. And breakage tends to occur at these bottom pole sections.
And in that regard, having single sized, non adjustable poles designed for your height and weight makes even more sense! But of course I use my poles to support my tent, so they need to be adjustable. Durston’s look pretty good.
e