Open Letter: Don’t make the Gear Swap for members only

But you do find value and entertainment in the forums do you not?

7 cents a day

Support what you will. But don't expect thing to last for years to come, free.

This subject is being hashed out all over this site. Really don't need yet another thread on it. Ryan will do what he wants…

But you should know this. You have been here for years.

I am so elite :)

It's great isn't it!?!

I agree with the OP.

I'm a naive

But I want to be elite someday.

I also want to be e-lite … that's extra lite.

When my regular subscription runs out soon I will upgrade because it's worth having all the things available as a member.

Hahahahahahahahahaha!

So… you've "bought and sold many items" through the Gear Swap and "love" the forums and "hope to follow (it) for many years in the future" but you don't feel the need to pay for "products (you) don't use". What, exactly, do you consider the BackpackingLight "product" to be? Just the members-only sections?

FWIW, I don't care whether the Gear Swap is open to non-members, nor do I care whether others who participate in the forums are members or not. But I do think that when you enter http://www.backpackinglight.com, even if it's only to read the forums or sell something on Gear Swap, you are *using* the product.

RE: Ken

The BPL forums are offered to users free of charge. No, I will not feel guilty for using them without paying a subscription. I don't think you understand that business models exist for running a website which don't depend on the users' charity.

RE: Sumi

Backpacking Light is an online magazine. I am confused why a paying subscriber wouldn't know this without having to ask.

1. You are gonna get all manner of word-I-can't-say-here for this.

2. Good luck getting any sort of official acknowledgement, much less response.

It's important to note, first of all, that the vast majority of paid members are folks who don't even use the forums – including the gear swap forum. BPL has said this is so. So it seems to me that it's a small minority who might be lost because of the no posting in gear swap for nonmembers rule.

BPL is interested in creating a sustainable model for this site. This does not necessarily mean a huge list of members – but simply enough for a vibrant online community. In short, BPL is more interested in quality than quantity. They have said this as well.

None of us know the true makeup or the financials of BPL. So the many "this is the wrong move financially" statements are certainly opinions, but also may be completely wrong. It may be working out quite well.

Lastly, you write: "I made a policy of not paying for products I don't use, and now that I've graduated, I feel no different. The forums, however, are a knowledgeable and colorful community, which I continued to follow long after letting my subscription expire, and hope to follow for many years in the future."

There's some irony in this statement. On the one hand, you're saying you do use the forums and even get something out of them. On the other hand, even though you do use them, you've decided not to pay for them. So your policy of not paying for products you don't use extends to not paying for products you do use. And that's your choice, of course. I hope you continue to contribute to the forums, paid or not – I've learned a lot from non paying members and hope they stick around.

But I also think that anyone who adopts the attitude, basically, of: "I'm going to take my ball and go home if the rest of you won't play MY way" is certainly welcome to do so.

And, really, the elitism thing is a bit of a canard being bandied about by a few folks upset with this particular change. A few members made some posts that, most certainly, could have been taken as elitism, and suddenly all members have an elitist attitude. In fact, some members disagree with the change to the gear swap forum and said so. Others gave their opinions – in favor of the change – with no elitism at all, they simply disagreed with your view. So all of you folks who continue to try and foster the "members have an elitist attitude" meme, as one of the pre-football game show members say, "c'mon man."

RE: Douglas

Who's being ironic? The forums are free. Do you make a habit of paying for things that cost nothing?

I didn't know that "a few members made some posts that….could have been taken as elitism." I've noticed patterns of posting over the years and decided that I needed to preface my post with a note about elitism or else people would think that they could stop in and say "some member you are," "what a leech," "how ironic that you enjoy something without paying for it," and other such comments, which I don't believe are valid criticisms of the position I'm taking.

"Backpacking Light is an online magazine. I am confused why a paying subscriber wouldn't know this without having to ask."

R C, this is a fair statement, at least the first part. BPL, once a print magazine, has become an online magazine. And that's, for all intents and purposes, what your 'subscription' is for.

But just as you are confused as to why paying subscribers 'wouldn't know this,' what you don't seem to understand is that, for a number of active forum participants, the forums have become one of the primary reasons they come to BPL, not the 'printed' content. And perhaps that's where the true division on this issue is. A number of people simply pay their subscription more for the forums than for the magazine (at least that's my belief from having followed the various threads on this topic). Others, if they don't feel the magazine portion is worth it, won't pay for a subscription.

No, you shouldn't feel guilty in any way for using the forums without a subscription. BPL has made them freely available, which is a great thing. Members and nonmembers alike benefit from this free and open forum and exchange of ideas and information.

But you should at least try to understand the 'other side,' some folks get so much from the forums they can't quite understand why frequent visitors/contributors wouldn't want to support that aspect of the site to ensure its long-term sustainability.

Doesn't make them right. Doesn't make you right. Just means we're looking at it from different viewpoints, both valid.

>> Backpacking Light is an online magazine. I am confused why a paying subscriber wouldn't know this without having to ask. <<

[Sigh…] OK, fine. BPL is an "online magazine" – I never said it was or wasn't, nor did I "ask". I just think that you've conveniently decided that the "community" section, which includes the forums that you apparently frequent, does't fall under the "product" that the membership applies to.

Like I said, I really don't care whether you're a member or not. I happen to like BPL and I like to support the things I like when I can and not assume that someone else will. Maintaining a forum isn't free. If the forums you "love" aren't worth $2 a month to you then, well, so be it.

There's nothing convenient about it. That's how it is. Or is it that you haven't noticed the advertisements?

It costs a lot more money to sell your gear on Ebay rather than pay $25 annually to support this site, of which wouldn't be here without the membership.

Can someone honestly be that daft not to understand the concept?

Let's vote. Only Members may vote.

>> The forums are free. Do you make a habit of paying for things that cost nothing? <<

Yes, as a matter of fact, I do. I support "free" things that I value all the time. I support public TV, public radio, museums, symphony orchestras. I buy a National Parks pass every year regardless of how many parks I'm planning to visit.

Nothing is "free". If something is made available without charge, that just means that something or someone else is paying the cost. My opinion is that there is ALWAYS a cost in that arrangement. This is why the plastic water bottle sale ban in the Grand Canyon NP was revoked; because Coke, a parks "benefactor" didn't want the ban. And why, in the very near future, the candidates from among which we will choose our elected officials will be chosen by corporations and special interest groups who can afford to pay for their campaigns.

RC

Your examples of elitism (i.e.,"some member you are," "what a leech," "how ironic that you enjoy something without paying for it," and other such comments), don't seem like they fit the definition of the word "elitism." Where's the snobbery in those remarks?

I think the issue here is that some members think that the people who don't pay for a membership are taking advantage of the people who do. I don't share their sentiment, but I get it and I definitely don't view it as elitism.

I'd rather Gear Swap not include a user fee, and that includes membership dues and a "percentage based donation."

The fact is that persons who PAY to support this site so that it can be here and operate are basically subsidizing those that do not.

Of course they can feel more deserving for doing this, and non payers SHOULD feel less so, if they have a conscience.

There is nothing "free" about the forums,or the site. Someone pays to set them up, host them, police them, and maintain them. They are only free to YOU because others allow them to be.

The unbelievable thing, is that some have no absolutely no appreciation of this.

I'm subscribing to an online magazine? I thought this was the comic section.

RE: Gabriel

Good question. The elitism comes into play when regular users immediately dismiss what the "outsider/new guy" says and take the chance to expound upon the de facto modus operandi of the website as though they run the joint. Ironically, I've probably been a "member" for longer than most of the people posting here.

>>The fact is that persons who PAY to support this site so that it can be here and operate are basically subsidizing those that do not.

>>Of course they can feel more deserving for doing this, and non payers SHOULD feel less so, if they have a conscience.

>>There is nothing "free" about the forums,or the site. Someone pays to set them up, host them, police them, and maintain them. They are only free to YOU because others allow them to be.

>>The unbelievable thing, is that some have no absolutely no appreciation of this.

RE: Martin

Please tell me you don't seriously believe that you're better than me because you subscribe to the BPL magazine.

Clearly BPL's product is no longer just the online magazine, but now also includes the Gear Swap forum. Personally, I would prefer it open to everybody but it's not my decision to make.
I also have no problem with the forums being free. I visited them for a long time before I became a member, and would probably never have become a member without this free access.
As to elitism, if believing that your viewpoint is the only possible correct one is elitism, then there are elitists on both sides of this argument.
P.S. Though I don't have a problem with non-members having access to the forums (or any other part of the site), in fact I prefer it like this, I do find it a bit ironic that some non-members feel that BPL shouldn't have the right to restrict access if it wants to.

>>Clearly BPL's product is no longer just the online magazine, but now also includes the Gear Swap forum.

I don't disagree. I just think it could be better done, as outlined in my OP post. The people jumping the gun and assuming I would not pay to support this site did not read my OP post.