Articles (2020)

Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Overview

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the floorless shelters for lightweight backpackers. Herein, we review products from GoLite, Integral Designs, TarpTent, Oware, Granite Gear, and Campmor (Equinox).

Included are several tarps, tarp-tents, and hybrid shelters that provide the essence of shelter for the lightweight hiker – overhead protection from the elements. In some cases, shelters provide ample wind protection, snow shedding capabilities, and insect protection. After this extensive review, which has encompassed nearly two years of product testing and design evaluation, we were both surprised and pleased to see remarkable innovation by both cottage and major manufacturers alike. Further, we believe that ultralight floorless shelter design using silicone-treated fabrics will continue to be an area of innovation for some time to come.

Most significant among emerging innovations are “pre-shaped” shelters (as opposed to flat sheets) that are designed to be pitched with their edges directly to the ground. The result is simplicity, speed of pitching, fewer guylines, and better storm resistance. Further, while catenary curvature is beginning to appear on ultralight tarp shelters, we expect this trend to continue, as ultralight hikers communicate to manufacturers their need for ultralight shelters for use in inclement conditions.

Review Summary

The following Adobe PDF file can be downloaded to view a detailed summary of the results of this review:

Floorless Shelter Review Summary

Tarp Technique

Previously, we published other articles related to tarp design and camping technique. You might find both these technique articles as well as the following reviews more valuable as a cohesive unit of information.

Shelters Reviewed

Clicking on a link opens up a new window:

M = Premium Membership (Subscription) Required

Rating Criteria Defined

Stability
Resistance to wind: shelters that can be pitched with a low profile (surface area exposed to the wind) and/or pitches that result in minimum flapping/maximum panel tension get the highest ratings. Shelters get points if they can be pitched to the ground surface. Shelters using poles for structural stability get points. This rating assumes that all available tie-outs are used to best advantage. Therefore, a large tarp that has a proportionally large number of tie-outs may still get a good rating. Best: Hex, Tarptents Worst: Some poncho/tarps

Storm Protection
Resistance to precipitation, including rain and snow: Shelters that can be pitched with full coverage, with the perimeter at the ground surface, and no leakage through vents, doors, windows, etc. will get the highest ratings. Shelters that can be pitched with steep walls for snow shedding will get the high ratings. Best: Alphamid and Hex Intermediate: Tarptent, Silshelter, Lair Worst: Small rectangular tarps and poncho/tarps

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance
Shelters that offer the greatest air circulation get the best ratings. Note: many of the variable pitch shelters have dramatically different ventilation / condensation resistance depending on how they are setup. Either the best value, or sometimes a range of values, is listed. Best: Rectangular tarps Worst: Hex, Alphamid, George Tarp, and Silshelter when pitched low to the ground and closed up for storm protection.

Pitch Flexibility
Points given to shelters that allow for multiple pitch variations to control the above three criteria (not necessarily all at the same time) get the highest ratings. This reflects a shelter’s ability to configure to multiple sets of environmental circumstances and shelter performance criteria. Example 1: to provide protection from gentle overhead rain in a humid environment while keeping condensation low and maximizing the sheltered area. Example 2: to provide a stable pitch for high winds and afford maximum protection from driving rain at the expense of sheltered area and condensation resistance. Best: Rectangular tarps and Silshelter Worst: Hex, Tarptents

Ease of Pitch
Shelters that can be pitched with the fewest number of stakes and guylines for full storm protection (see that criteria above) get the highest ratings. It takes little time to pitch these shelters and usually it’s obvious how to set them up. Best: Tarptents, Lair Worst: Silshelter, rectangular tarps

Insect Protection
Fully enclosed (floored) shelters get the highest ratings; floorless shelters that can be pitched with a completely enclosed perimeter get the next highest ratings Best: Tarptents with netting and floors. Intermediate: Hex, Alphamid, Silshelter Worst: Rectangular tarps

Weight
Weight, unless noted, does not include stakes, guylines, stuff sacks, and any support poles that could be replaced with a trekking pole or stick.

Surface Area
This is the ground area that a shelter covers/protects. For variable pitch shelters or shaped shelters, this is the area covered by the “fully enclosed” pitch. For tarps and poncho/tarps, this is the area covered by a standard A-frame pitch. It is approximated with a 30-degree pitch angle for the “roof.”

Sq ft/oz – Sq m/kg
This is a rough measure of how much sheltered area (as defined above) you get for the weight of the shelter. It does not take into account that shelters with additional weight may have highly desirable features such as support poles and increased stability and/or more ventilation and storm protection options.

Number of tie-outs
This is reported for tarps and poncho/tarps only. It gives some idea of the flexibility and stability of pitches available with the shelter. Look for more tie-outs as the size and/or complexity of the shelter increases.

Value
A highly subjective rating that takes into account all of the above criteria and the shelter’s price. Shelters with low cost, good performance and a high area to weight ratio get the best ratings. Some adjustment is made for the type of shelter. For example, the area to weight ratio of a flat tarp is not directly compared to the area to weight ratio of a structured shelter like a Tarptent. For poncho/tarps this considers their protection as a shelter and not their performance as rainwear. Best: Oware Cat Tarp, Tarptent Squall

GoLite Lair 1 Shelter REVIEW

The GoLite Lair 1 Shelter offers more weather protection than a tarp without a dramatic weight penalty. At less than 12 oz, the Lair 1 is ideally suited for solo travel in areas where ventilation is important but the chance for rain is very real.

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

GoLite Lair Overview

The unique feature of the GoLite Lair is its tapered design that terminates in a rear beak staked to the ground to block wind and rain from coming into the rear of the tarp.

With an open front and seven guyline tie-outs, the GoLite Lair can be pitched with the perimeter to the ground or via guylines as with conventional tarps.

As a result, the GoLite Lair is a flexible-pitching shelter that provides excellent storm protection with the rear end pitched into the wind,

Ease of Setup (4.5)

The GoLite Lair 1 deserves an honorable mention as one of the easiest tarp-shelters we’ve ever pitched when staking the perimeter directly to the ground. Yet it offers the flexibility of more versatile configurations as well. The easiest method of pitching the shelter follows:

  1. Stake the rear edge to the ground (two stakes required).
  2. Stake out the front corners (two stakes required).
  3. Stake out rear and front guylines via trekking poles, sticks, etc. (two stakes required)
  4. (Optional) For additional tension, stake out mid points on sides and rear (three stakes).

In total, the GoLite Lair requires only six stakes, one six-foot guyline, and one three-foot guyline. For additional flexibility, take three additional stakes and a few extra guylines.

Construction Quality (4.0)

The Lair is built to GoLite’s usual standard of quality, and we observed no major issues upon inspection or after field use that would indicate that the Lair is unable to withstand high winds or significant snow loading.

Weight

We weighed the Lair on our scales at 11.0 ounces (no stakes or guylines). Adding about 30 feet of light Spectra guylines and nine titanium stakes, a package weight of less than 14 ounces can easily be achieved.

Stability (3.0)

The GoLite Lair is able to shed wind well; however, it’s large side panels and presence of only one mid-perimeter guyline attachment point, it is difficult to distribute panel tension evenly over the entire panel. Consequently, the Lair 1 is not our first choice for tarp camping in very high winds.

Storm Protection (4.0)

The ability to pitch the Lair 1 with three sides down to the ground (with the rear into the wind) makes for a stormworthy shelter. Unfortunately, it’s short length exposes the front area to rain spray and blowing snow and therefore, for stormy conditions, we recommend using a breathable bivy sack in conjunction with the Lair. We would like to see the next generation of the GoLite Lair include front door(s), with the ability to zip the front shut or stake them out for added ventilation or room. Using some combination of design features from Oware’s Alphamid and Integral Designs’ Sil Shelter, the Lair could grow into a very stormworthy shelter entirely suitable for mountain camping.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance (4.0)

Even when the GoLite Lair is pitched down to the ground, the large open front area provides ample ventilation. Even so, ventilation can be improved by staking the rear corners closer together and staking the mid-point rear guyline attachment, via a guyline, to an additional stake to lift the rear of the shelter and increase airflow. Of course, when pitched more like a flat tarp, the Lair offers excellent ventilation.

Flexibility of Pitching (4.0)

The Lair provides enough simplicity for a successful pitch by novice tarp campers, but the flexibility for pitching off the ground to improve ventilation and living space.

Insect Protection (1.0)

The Lair is an open design and thus inappropriate for buggy climates without additional protection.

GoLite Lair 1 Specifications

  • Weight: 11.0 ounces
  • Width: 8.0 feet (front) tapering to 4.0 feet (rear) while flat
  • Length: 8.0 feet
  • Height: typical, 3.5 feet (adjustable)
  • Surface Area: 50 sq. ft. (manufacturer’s claim)
  • Square Feet / Ounce: 4.5
  • Price: $99 (price includes tarp, cord, nine aluminum Y-stakes, and stow sack)

Value (4.5)

At $99, the Lair is a steal. It is one of the simplest and most effective tarp shelters on the market. It is ideal for the beginning lightweight backpacker wanting to learn how to tarp camp with a minimum of fuss, while providing the flexibility for more advanced configurations as the user’s skill grows.

 

Integral Designs Silshelter

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Overview

At only 12.9 ounces, the Integral Designs Sil Shelter provides the lightest fully-enclosable tarp on the market, making it a cult choice among lightweight backpackers that camp in inclement conditions. And, because of its flat sheet design and multitude of tie-out points, the Sil Shelter gets high marks for flexibility.

Ease of Setup (2.0)

It’s difficult to get a super taut, roomy, and storm resistant pitch on a Sil Shelter.

Setting up the shelter rapidly in a storm is a simple affair – stake out its four corners in a rectangle configuration, pop in a trekking pole to raise the apex, and stake out the doors (six total stakes required). All in all, it takes about a minute for a proficient user to have overhead protection – no guylines needed.

Pitched like this (with these six stakes), the Sil Shelter looks like a prop on the set of Sanford and Son. Its sagging panels and drooping ridgeline make this simple pitch inadequate for bearing high winds, pooling rain, or heavy snow.

The first problem to address is the drooping ridgeline, which severely reduces volume in the shelter and under a snow load, cuts it in half. There are two options for stabilizing the ridgeline. The first is to place a second, shorter pole (e.g., collapsed trekking pole) with its handle into the pole cap on the interior of the shelter near the end of the ridgeline. Unfortunately, this reduces interior living space, and even forces a single person far to one side where there is significant risk of having their sleeping bag contact the interior wall of the shelter. The second solution is to use the three guyline tie-out points present along the ridgeline (one at the front apex, one in the middle, and one near the rear). A guyline to a stake (stake no. 7) at the front of the shelter can be used to tension the front tie-out point. Two additional guylines (attached to the rear pole cup tie-out and the center-rear [elastic] tie-out) can be strung to a trekking pole in the rear, and staked out as a single point (stake no. 8). Adjusting the length of the two cords involves some experimentation (and changes depending on the height at which the shelter is pitched). This provides a solution that results in a tight ridgeline capable of shedding snow and significantly increasing interior volume.

The second problem to address is the sagging of the relatively large side panels. Use two guylines and stake out (stake nos. 9 and 10) the two side panel tie-out points on the Sil Shelter. You’ll need to be creative, since we assume that you’ve run out of trekking poles, to raise these guylines. You’ll have to find some sticks or employ your ice axes, skis, snowshoes, or the like for assistance.

The result of these additional efforts is dramatic. Interior living space improves tremendously – to the point that the fruit of your efforts is a shelter that can now truly – and comfortably – accommodate two people. However, we’re not quite ready to shed high winds, as the shelter is still a bit flappy. To solve this last problem, additional stakes should be added along the ground at the mid-points of each door (stakes no. 11 and 12), the mid-points of the sides (stake nos. 13, 14, 15, and 16), and a final stake along the midpoint of the rear (stake no. 17).

A final note that improves the Sil Shelter pitch is to bring the main apex support outside the shelter, using a guyline tied from the apex (via a clove hitch) to the trekking pole (and then staked out to the front of the shelter). The result is that the doors overlap a little better (despite the pole now sticking up through the “vestibule”). More importantly, it results in a tighter ridgeline and improved interior living space.

Now we’re ready for some serious storm and wind resistance. And it only took 17 stakes, five guylines, two trekking poles, and two sticks or other tools!

Construction Quality (4.0)

The Sil Shelter is built to Integral’s high standard of quality and offers a stormworthy package that should last awhile. We were very pleased with the design of the pole caps (for securing trekking pole handles and prevent them from slipping), but wished that more attention was paid both to the overlapping design of the doors (they do not overlap sufficiently at the apex to provide serious rain protection), and the ridgeline (we yearned for catenary lines to simplify the pitch!).

Weight

We weighed the Sil Shelter on our scales at 12.9 ounces (no stakes or guylines). Adding about 25 feet of light Spectra guylines and seventeen titanium stakes, a package weight of less than 18 ounces can be achieved.

Stability (4.0)

Properly pitched as described above, the Sil Shelter provides excellent wind stability and snow shedding. If you know you are going to be in areas of high wind, pitch the rear of the shelter into the wind. For snowy conditions, pitch the apex high to ensure steep walls and a steep ridgeline.

A lot of experimentation, skill in tarp pitching, and perseverance are required to successfully use the Sil Shelter in windy and snowy conditions, but the efforts may be worth it in the end.

Storm Protection (4.5)

The Sil Shelter can be pitched completely to the ground, offers enough stake out points to minimize spindrift blowing into the shelter, and allows for the doors to provide an almost full enclosure for the front (small gaps in the doors resulting from fabric tension are normal). Thus, the design provides a very storm-resistant refuge from the elements and is a viable option for mountain camping.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance (4.0)

The Sil Shelter offers options for reducing condensation and allowing for cross-through air flow. Instead of staking down the rear mid-point to the ground, a guyline and stake can be used to provide a 3-8″ high triangular opening at the rear. In addition, the front doors can be left open, or the shelter can be pitched lower (causing the doors to be not fully close to create a gap or “open vestibule”). Finally, since the sheet is flat, any or all of the sides can be pitched using additional guylines in the manner of a traditional tarp.

We gave the Sil Shelter high marks for ventilation because of the ease in which a single door can be restaked to open the front of the shelter.

Flexibility of Pitching (5.0)

For those that have mastered the art of the Sil Shelter Pitch, more challenges await! Simply add some extra guylines and enjoy experimenting with various pitches. The multitude of tie-out points and the Sil Shelter’s flat design provides the user with seemingly infinite options for creating unique, if not effective pitches.

Insect Protection (3.0)

Because the Sil Shelter is floorless, it’s going to let a few bugs in. However, the ability to stake the perimeter at the ground surface with a lot of tie-out points, and the ability to (almost) close the doors means that the swarms of mosquitoes you’re likely to face will be kept at bay for a little longer.

Specifications

  • Weight: 12.9 ounces
  • Height: typical, 3.5 feet (adjustable)
  • Surface Area: 40 sq. ft.
  • Square Feet / Ounce: 3.1
  • Price: $150 (price includes tarp, cord, nine aluminum Y-stakes, and stow sack)

Value (3.0)

At $150, the Sil Shelter is not cheap – after all, it’s simply a flat sheet of silicone-impregnated nylon. However, it’s certainly unique – because of its performance to weight ratio (where we define performance as storm resistance) – and thus, occupies an important niche in lightweight backpacking gear.

 

Integral Designs Sil Poncho

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Overview

Are you looking for a truly ultralight, minimalist solution for shelter and raingear? If so, eventually your research will point you in the direction of a poncho-tarp.

The Integral Designs Sil Poncho represents the gold standard for high-quality poncho-tarps and, unlike other brands, offers enough width (five feet) and length (eight feet) to pitch as an A-frame without severely cramping your space.

Ease of Setup (3.5)

The only feature that distinguishes the setup of a poncho-tarp from a standard flat tarp is the extra step required to properly secure the hood and prevent it from becoming a failure point during a hard rain. Thus, one must twist the hood into a twinkie shape (cylindrical tube) and wrap the hood’s drawcord several times around its base, finishing off with a half hitch.

Construction Quality (4.0)

The Sil Poncho is built to Integral Designs’ usual high standard of quality, and we’ve been using them for hundreds of miles with no apparent problems whatsoever, without paying a lot of attention to special care.

Weight

We weighed the Sil Poncho on our scales at 8.95 ounces (no stakes or guylines). Adding about 25 feet of light Spectra guylines and eight titanium stakes, a package weight of less than 11 ounces can easily be achieved.

Stability (3.5)

The Sil Poncho, in the hands of someone who knows how to properly pitch a flat tarp, offers no unusual problems. The hood does tend to flap around in high winds, but it doesn’t make as much noise as a fabric panel that is not properly tensioned.

The small size of the Sil Poncho allows the user to pitch it with a lot of tension, and low to the ground. Because of this, a tarp of this size does a creditable job of shedding wind and snow.

Storm Protection (3.0)

The Sil Poncho requires that it be part of a larger equipment “system” before you can consider it for seriously inclement conditions. Foremost is the use of some type of sleeping bag cover or bivy sack to protect your sleeping bag from rain spray, spindrift, and chilling from high winds.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance (5.0)

As with any small, flat tarp, ventilation is not usually the problem. Your major concern is retaining warmth!

Flexibility of Pitching (3.5)

The small size of the Sil Poncho limits its ability to be pitched in unique configurations. Consequently, you are primarily limited to A-frames, lean-tos, and modified Baker pitches forgoing some of the more photogenic pitches offered by larger tarps.

Insect Protection (1.0)

If you are seriously evaluating a small tarp such as this for providing any protection from biting insects, you need your head examined.

Specifications

  • Weight: 9.0 ounces
  • Width: 5.0 feet
  • Length: 8.0 feet
  • Height: typical, 3.0 feet (adjustable)
  • Surface Area: 35 sq. ft.
  • Square Feet / Ounce: 4.2
  • Price: $70

Value (4.5)

At $70, you’d be hard-pressed to find a cheaper solution to both rain gear and shelter without making it yourself. Considering that a poncho-tarp is essential equipment for the ultralight backpacker wanting to reduce their pack weight to less than five pounds, $70 is a paltry price for minimalist rain protection.

 

Merino Wool Shirts

A review of lightweight long sleeve merino wool shirts from Smartwool, Ibex, Icebreaker, Merino Skins, and WhisperWarm.

Overview

In the past year, merino wool shirts are capturing an increasing market share, primarily in response to customer desires for less stink, less itch, less clamminess, and more utility over a wider temperature range. These latter advantages of merino wool over polyester and polypropylene synthetics add up to merino wool’s greatest advantage: better comfort when worn next to skin.

We’ve addressed the utility, performance, and technical advantages of merino wool in great detail elsewhere (see [page 00069]Clothing and Sleep Systems for Mountain Hiking[/page]). In the original version of that discussion, which appeared here in 2001, we noted that the customer had few options from which to choose when shopping for merino wool base layers. In fact, the U.S. market was limited to only one serious player: a midweight merino wool shirt from Smartwool.

At that time, we made an aggressive call to manufacturers to develop ultra-thin merino wool garments made with superfine fibers (i.e., fibers less than 18 microns in diameter) that dried faster, offered a wider temperature range, and weighed less than their midweight counterparts. This review highlights some of the fruits of this “merino wool diet” over the past few years. Keep in mind, our review doesn’t compile every long sleeve lightweight merino base layer on the market. We’ve tried to give you a cross-market snapshot of a variety of garments with particular strengths that would appeal to a wide audience.

Garments Reviewed

Long Sleeve Zip-T Shirts

  • Smartwool Trad
  • Icebreaker Ryder
  • WhisperWarm Zip-T

Long Sleeve Crew Shirts

  • Smartwool Aero
  • Merino Skins Crew
  • Icebreaker Skin
  • Ibex Outback
  • WhisperWarm Crew

Review Criteria

Weight. Weight of each crew in a size men’s or unisex medium was measured on a NIST-certified and calibrated scale and reported to the nearest 0.1 ounce (3 g).

Price. Price is reported as currently available average market prices from online retailers. Where appropriate, prices were converted from international currencies to USD using the currrency calculator at XE.com.

Fabric Weight. Fabric weights, with the exception of the Smartwool Trad (which we consider to be a “midweight” fabric), are all in the range of 6 oz/sq.yd. (200 g/sq.m.). Fiber diameter was verified to be less than 20 microns for all garments, thus meeting the specification for “Superfine” merino wool. Thus, we classify all of the other garments as “lightweight” using the conventional scale of baselayer fabric weighting of “light-mid-expedition” weight.

Sizing. Sizing is identified as “true” for garments that meet U.S. sizing conventions; sizing is indicated as “1/2 size small” when the specified size is one half size smaller than U.S. sizing conventions, and as “full size small” when the specified size is a full size smaller than U.S. sizing conventions. These sizing grades were based on user perception of fit as well as measurements taken of arm length, neck hole diameter, torso diameter, and hem length.

Fit. Fit grades are assigned on a sliding scale, starting with the tightest fits: tight, snug, trim, loose, or baggy, with “trim” identifying our perceived ideal for base layer garments, providing a good balance of mobility, volume, breathability, and ventilation.

Comfort of Fit. The comfort of fit grade (on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 = worst and 5 = best) is not based on the sizing grade assigned above. Rather, the criteria considers the freedom of mobility, a balance of trim vs. baggy fit, length of hem, and comfort of wrist and neck closures. This is a subjective rating based on user perception.

Warmth. Scale of 1 = coldest and 5 = warmest. This criteria is evaluated on a combination of fabric thickness and construction combined with tightness of fit. Thicker fabrics get “warmer” grades, as do “more trim” fitting garments.

Ventilation. 1 = poor ventilation and 5 = excellent ventilation. Ventilation is based on the availability of a neck zipper, fit (see fit criteria above), and size of neck, hem, and cuff openings.

Breathability. 1 = poor breathability and 5 = excellent breathability. This criteria is based on fabric thickness and knit construction. Fabrics with more porous and thinner structures are assigned higher breathability grades. Typically, but not absolutely, breathability and warmth are inversely related.

Value. 1 = high cost/performance ratio, 5 = low cost/performance ratio. Value is based on cost in combination with features, fit, and versatility of the garment.

Note: Zip-T and crewneck shirts were graded in separate groups, and numerical ratings should not be compared between the two styles.

Review Summary

The following table provides a summary of the review.

Brand Style Model Weight (oz) Weight (g) Price Fabric Weight Fit Sizing Comfort of Fit Warmth Ventilation Breathability Value
Smartwool long sleeve zip-t Trad 9.5 269 $75 Mid loose true 3.5 4.5 5.0 3.0 3.0
Icebreaker long sleeve zip-t Superfine (Ryder) 8.1 230 $95 Light trim 1/2 size small 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
WhisperWarm long sleeve zip-t n/a 5.8 164 $66 Light snug full size small 3.5 2.5 3.5 5.0 4.0
Merino Skins long sleeve crew n/a 5.8 164 $32 Light snug 1/2 size small 3.5 2.5 3.0 5.0 5.0
Smartwool long sleeve crew Aero 7.2 204 $60 Light trim true 5.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.0
Icebreaker long sleeve crew Skin 5.9 167 $51 Light tight 1/2 size small 3.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 3.5
Ibex long sleeve crew Outback 7.2 204 $78 Light trim true 5.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 2.0
WhisperWarm long sleeve crew n/a 4.6 130 $50 Light snug full size small 3.5 2.0 3.0 5.0 3.5

Review Summary

All of the shirts reviewed herein are well-constructed and durable with high quality merino wool fabrics. Differences in shirts are seen primarily in garment fit, fabric thickness, and fabric porosity. These three features in turn affect garment warmth, ventilation, breathability, and comfort.

With this in mind, we did feel that three garments in particular stood out from the rest. The first was the Ibex Outback shirt, which gets style points for its exceptional fit and deserves an honorable mention.

We also found somewhat of a sleeper in the long sleeve crew from Merino Skins. At $32, it provides the best performance-to-value ratio of any shirt in the review, and it used the most porous fabric of the lot. Its only caveat was that sizing ran small and the fit was a little snug (with short arms and a short hem), so be sure to size up one full size from your normal size. Merino Skins products are available from Wool-Underwear.com.

Finally, we felt that the Smartwool Aero crew earned top honors as the best all-around merino wool base layer shirt in terms of fit, weight, and overall performance. An excellent fit that wasn’t too baggy or snug, combined with a lightweight fabric that made the shirt suitable for year-round conditions (this was the most comfortable shirt tested in temperatures exceeding 80 degrees in the dry climate of the Northern Rockies), and a sticker price that was almost $20 less than the Ibex product made it a clear favorite among our reviewers.

What’s Coming?

Merino wool fabrics are continuing to evolve. From here, we encourage manufacturers to pursue the development of merino wool-synthetic blends (the addition of synthetic fibers can increase durability and improve water absorption, as well as maximizing fabric memory, or its resistance to permanent, or “plastic” stretching). In addition, we’d like to see some of the international garment manufacturers (especially those from New Zealand and Australia) recognize sizing conventions that better reflect a need for outdoor performance – including longer sleeves and hems.

Around the Corner: We are currently reviewing a new shirt, the Ibex Pacifica. At the same 7.2 oz (204 g) weight as the Outback, the Pacifica has a deep (10 in, 25 cm) neck zipper, hand warmer cuffs and trim fit. First looks indicate that this full-featured wool top offers a lot of bang for the buck, and initial field reports indicate that it offers excellent fit and comfort.

Campmor (Equinox) Silnylon Poncho-Tarp

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Campmor’s “Ultralite Poncho/Tarps” and Equinox’s “Ultralite Poncho” are one in the same. Order an “Ultralite Poncho/Shelter” from Campmor and you’ll get an Equinox “Regular Ultralite Poncho” with a small Campmor barcode stuck to the Equinox label.

Campmor/Equinox Ultralite Poncho/Tarps make fine ponchos and are a good value in an ultralight rainwear. Unfortunately, their lack of ridgeline tie-outs compromises their shelter performance. Our review reflects this deficiency. (Note: It is not difficult for the purchaser to sew a couple of ridgeline tie-out loops to a Campmor/Equinox Ultralite Poncho/Tarp. This modification solves the problem and significantly increases the performance of the shelter.)

These poncho/tarps use 1.3 oz/sq yd (36.9 g/sq m) silnylon ripstop fabric [most likely the same 1.4 oz/sq yd (47.5 g/ sq m) that other manufacturers use]. Edge seams are rolled and sewn. The center seam is rolled and sewn with a double top stitch (similar to a flat felled seam). Perimeter tie-outs are webbing loops are single bar tacked into the rolled edge seam.

Campmor/Equinox Poncho Tarps have some nice features. The extension version includes an excellent 28 inch (71 cm) rear flap to protect your pack. It neatly snaps and Velcos out of the way if you don’t need the additional length. The extension also gives you additional coverage and precipitation protection when under the shelter. At 8.8 ft (2.7 m), it is the longest of the poncho/tarps reviewed. We also applaud the webbing tie-out loops. They are an improvement over the brass grommets used on their tarps

Campmor and Equinox cut a few corners to reduce cost and their construction/design is not at the same level as the higher priced Integral Design Sil Poncho. The Campmor/Equinox poncho’s hood uses a simple, non-elastic drawcord, and no cord ties. The non-elastic cord makes it harder to close off the hood in “shelter” mode. (The ID poncho has an elastic drawcord with cord ties.) The Campmor/Equinox poncho has only 6 tie-outs and no ridgeline tie-outs. Tie-out are attached with a single bar tack. The limited tie-outs significantly reduce shelter performance and pitching options. (The ID poncho has 10 tie-outs, two of which are critical ridgeline tie-outs. Tie-outs are attached with a double bar tack.)

We are at a bit of a loss as to why Campmor/Equinox poncho/tarps do not have ridgeline tie-outs. Especially, since they already have 6 nice tie-out loops along the perimeter. It would add an insignificant amount of cost to include these critical ridgeline tie-outs without which it’s difficult to get a decent pitch. The shelter bunches up between the downward curved ridgeline cord spilling a lot of tension. This causes a baggy, floppy and unstable pitch.

Photo: Problems with the Campmor/Equinox Poncho/Shelter in “shelter” mode: Without ridgeline tie-outs at each end of the shelter it’s difficult to get a decent pitch. As you can see in the photo, the shelter bunches up between the downward curved ridgeline cord spilling a lot of tension. The end result -a baggy, floppy and unstable pitch.

There is another problem with missing ridgeline tie-outs. When you use free standing supports, trekking poles or sticks (i.e. not using a fixed support like a tree or bush), there is nothing to hold the supports in place horizontally. Therefore, the ridgeline cord, which is in no way anchored to the poncho/tarp, slips sideways against the slick silnylon of the shelter. Eventually, the support poles fall sideways and the whole shelter collapses.

One could put two cords in a Y off of each support pole/stick to keep them from falling sideways. This is a time consuming endeavor and it would still not solve the pitch tension problems. The best solution, if you have the skill, is to sew your own ridgeline tie-outs loops at each end of the shelter. With this modification the Poncho/Tarp becomes a reasonable shelter.

Campmor/Equinox tarps offer a good value for rainwear and their construction and design flaws are minor when used in “poncho” mode. As shipped (without ridgeline tie-outs), we find it difficult to recommend them as a shelter. Fortunately, this is easily correctable by the purchaser sewing in two ridgeline tie-outs. With the ridgeline tie-outs added, they work well in “shelter” mode. We particularly like the additional length and precipitation protection of the extension model. When used with a light bivy it would make an excellent ultralight shelter system. If you want to see if poncho/tarping might be your thing, and you are willing to do a little sewing, a Campmor/Equinox tarp is a great and inexpensive way to get started.

Photo: An example of a poncho pitch with ridgeline tie-outs: In this case Integral Design’s Sil Poncho. The ridgeline tie-outs make all the difference and allow for taut and stable, “hummer” of a pitch.

Oware Tapered Catenary Tarp (6×8)

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Photo: Oware’s 6×8 Cat Tarp: The trim size and catenary cut ridgeline make for a super taut pitch with only 6 tie-outs. Stake out the middle-side tie-outs (not used in the photo), and this is one of the most stable tarps on the market.

Oware is one of a few companies to manufacture tarps with catenary cut ridgelines. In this review we’ll cover their very light one-person tarp (6×8 ft nominal size). It is a superb shelter for stability in high winds and above tree line. With an ultralight bivy and some basic tarping skills, it is enough shelter for 3 seasons (potentially 4 seasons for a hardy camper with experience weathering snow in a tarp). Not bad for only 7 ounces (198 grams)!

The 3-inch (7.6-cm) catenary cut ridgeline on the Oware tarp gives you a tauter pitch with less ridgeline tension (i.e. the tarp is easier to pitch). The reduced ridgeline tension means less guyline tension and therefore, less force on your ridgeline stakes. This leaves more of your ridgeline stake’s holding power available to hold your tarp in place in high winds. Say goodbye to flapping tarps and stakes popping out in big wind gusts. For more information about catenary curvature, read [page 00149]Catenary Curvature as an Element of Ultralight Tarp Design[/page].

The Oware Cat Tarp is a low profile, tapered design-perfect for shedding high altitude winds. It is 7.8 ft long and 5.5 ft wide at the head tapering to 4.5 ft at the foot (2.4 m long, 1.7 m wide tapering to 1.4 m). Pitch it with the low and narrow foot into the wind, and the tarp will shed strong gusts with ease.

The Cat Tarp has high quality construction. It uses 1.4 oz/sq yd (47.5 g/ sq m) silnylon ripstop fabric. Edge seams are rolled and sewn. The center seam is rolled and sewn with a top stitch (similar to a flat felled seam). Since the center seam runs the long direction on the tarp it also forms a very strong ridgeline. Combine this with the catenary cut and you can get some serious tension (super taught pitch) along the ridge of the tarp. All tie-outs are 1 in (2.5 cm) grosgrain webbing loops and tie-out attachment points are reinforced with patches of 200 denier nylon fabric. This allows you to crank down on the tie-outs with little fear of ripping the tarp. There are 6 side tie-outs and two ridgeline tie-outs. These are more than adequate given the small size of the tarp, the strong catenary ridgeline, and its wind shedding profile.

In the field, the Cat Tarp is one of the most stable tarps we’ve used. In tests on a ridge known for its exceptionally high winds it had some of the lowest deflections we’ve ever observed in a tarp. In addition, it is easy to pitch and is one of a few tarps that you can get by with a 6-stake pitch in moderate conditions. An 8-stake pitch is always a great option when you’re high up and exposed and the wind starts gusting.

TarpTent Virga, TarpTent Squall, and TarpTent Cloudburst

Henry Shires’ TarpTents, including the solo Virga, the dual-person Squall, and the dual-person Cloudburst, offer simple setup and excellent stability in a package suitable for those who just aren’t quite ready to migrate to an open tarp yet.

Left to right: Cloudburst, Squall and Virga Tarptents

 

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Introduction

As the Tarptent name implies, these shelters have a blend of some of the best features of a tarp and a tent. Like tarps, they are light, have good ventilation and give you a great view of your surroundings. Like tents, they provide rain protection and a bug free haven.

There are three versions of the Tarptent, the Virga, Squall, and Cloudburst. All are catenary cut silnylon tarps with integrated support poles that shape the shelter. All use a hooped rear pole. The Virga (one-person) and Squall (two-person) are identical except for size. Both use a single pole front support (provided, or you can use a trekking pole). The Cloudburst uses a hooped front pole. On all shelters, noseeum mesh is suspended from the perimeter of the tarp edges for complete bug protection. The front of this mesh has a floor to ridgeline zippered door opening. All Tarptents have front and rear beaks to keep most (but not all) precipitation from getting into the shelter. The Cloudburst has additional flaps that roll down over the side mesh panels and a larger front beak for more rain protection. Tarptents come standard without a floor. For a nominal fee you can order a sewn-in ripstop nylon floor on any of the Tarptents listed.

Features and Specifications

Fabric and Materials. All Tarptents use 1.4-oz silicone coated ripstop nylon. The optional sewn-in floor (untested) also uses 1.4-oz silicone coated ripstop nylon. The rear hoop poles, front poles (Virga and Squall) and front hoop (Cloudburst) are 7075 aluminum sections. All shelters use noseeum mesh for front, rear, and side panels. The Cloudburst’s additional side flaps are also made from 1.4-oz silicone coated ripstop nylon. Guylines are 2-mm reflective cord with a kevlar core, Kelty Triptease Lightline™. Stakes are 7″ long titanium and weigh 0.4 ounces/stake. Henry Shire’s also sells Tyvek groundsheets custom sized for each of the shelters.

Weight. We found all Tarptents weighed within an ounce of the manufacturer’s claims. The weight includes absolutely everything required to pitch the shelter. This includes shock corded rear hoop and front poles, four (titanium!) stakes, pre- tied and attached Triptease guylines and a silnylon stuff sack. These packages easily represent the nicest setups we’ve seen for a shelter.

Virga claimed 20.5 oz – measured 20.4 oz

Squall claimed 24.5 oz – measured 24.0 oz

Cloudburst claimed 32.0 oz – measured 32.9 oz

All Tarptents require a minimum of four stakes. We recommend carrying an additional two stakes to stake out the sides for additional interior space and to increase stability in high winds. Two 6 in, lightweight, titanium stakes and additional guylines only weigh 0.5 oz. If you want to shave a bit of weight you can replace the four 0.4 oz titanium stakes provided with the shelter with 0.25 oz titanium stakes. We found the manufacturer’s included Tyvek floor for the Tarptents to be overkill (heavy). We used a 5.5 oz groundsheet for our testing.

Performance Review

Squall Tarptent at 11,000 feet in the Sierras. The benefits of a catenary cut ridgeline: an almost perfect pitch with minimal fuss. Great for weathering those high altitude winds.

 

Setup and Pitch: Tarptents have some of the fastest and easiest setups of any shelter we’ve tested (Well, maybe not as easy as a bivy sack!). It takes only four stakes and as little as 1½ to 2 minutes to pitch a Tarptent. Put the rear hoop into its sleeve, put a single stake in for the rear of the shelter, put the front pole in its grommet, stake out the ridge line, and finally stake out the two front sides. We recommend using two additional stakes for the center-side tie-outs to increase interior volume, and improve stability in high winds.

Note: Pay special attention and stake out the rear of the shelter per the diagram in Shire’s instructions. Put the rear stake only through the ridgeline (center) of the three rear cords. Also, the bottom of the rear hoop has a tendency to scoot forward and loose a bit of side tension for the shelter. A suggestion for Shires: Attaching the side rear guylines nearer to the hoop bottom or possibly adding an option to stake out the hoop bottoms would improve the pitch of the Tarptent. Also the rear hoop sleeve was a bit tight. Getting the hoop in is a bit of a trick. Getting it out is a bit more difficult. A more generous sleeve would make things easier.

We encountered some difficulty in getting a taut pitch on the Cloudburst. Tensioning the ridgeline was fine but we had problems with the lower edges. The front configuration of three guylines coming straightforward and anchored well above the bottom of the front hoop made it more difficult to get tension along the bottom sides of the shelter. The front hoop of the Cloudburst suffered some of the same hoop bottom creep of the rear hoop on all the Tarptents. Even if bottom edge of the pitch was not quite as taut as the Virga or Squall, the Cloudburst with its front and rear hoops, is defiantly the strongest and most rigid of the Tarptents.

We also had some difficulty securing the side flaps on the Cloudburst. The front shock cord tie-downs were short and hard to secure under the front hoop. Also the knots on the shock cord kept slipping out. Eventually we managed to make the cords as long as possible and tie a secure knot. Even so the front flap took a lot of force to secure. A slightly longer shock cord and a more secure knot would be a great idea.

Due to their fairly defined structure, Tarptents are a little less flexible when pitched on uneven ground than a standard tarp. This is especially true if the front and back is rotated at different angles from each other. We found a little pitching creativity usually fixed most of the problem. The Cloudburst had the most difficulty with this (but so would a conventional tent).

Entry and Exit: The entire front of the Tarptent is noseeum mesh. Entry and exit is easy through the large, floor to ridgeline, zipper. The mesh front rolls up and neatly stows out of the way with attached Velcro straps. A large beak provides rain protection for the front of the shelter and, like the front mesh, rolls up and neatly stows out of the way. With both the mesh and beak rolled up it’s a bit like using a barn door to get in and out of the shelter.

Stability in Wind: In the field the Tarptents proved stable in 40 mph winds-even when the rear of the shelter was not exactly pointed in the prevailing wind direction (many times the case when you try and guess the wind direction or the wind is swirling). The rear hoop and catenary cut ridgeline substantially improve the shelter’s stability over a standard tarp and more than a few light tents. Flapping was at a minimum in high winds. Using the four stakes provided and an additional two stakes for the center side tie-outs, the Tarptents suffered some deflection in 40+ mph wind gusts. Not enough to blow the shelter into your face or cause any problems with sleeping. No, they don’t have the resistance to deflection of a dome tent, but they come close to something like a Clip Flashlight. As you might expect, the Cloudburst with its front and rear hoops has the least deflection of the shelters although it was harder to tension its lower side edges and keep them from flapping. Shire’s claims that the Cloudburst is rigid enough to resist some snow loading. We’ll need to test this out as the weather cools.

Because portions of the Tarptent’s front, rear and sides are mesh, Tarptents are draftier than a conventional tent. (Not necessarily bad-in warm weather and high condensation conditions this is good!). The beaks and the noseeum netting do slow the wind down some. We found that making our best effort to pitch the rear of the shelter into the wind and then putting our packs against the noseeum netting on the windward’ish side of the shelter made for an acceptable nights sleep even in high winds. If you are willing to forgo the ventilation, you can roll down the side flaps on the windward edge of the Cloudburst and significantly reduce drafts. As with a tarp (or even a tent), finding a sheltered area (if possible) is always a good idea for windy weather.

Rain Performance Squall and Virga: Neither the Virga and Squall are 100% rainproof-nor were they intended to be. Like a tarp, for light to moderate rain that isn’t too windblown, you’ll stay dry and comfy. The rear beak of the shelter is fairly rainproof but if you get a torrential downpour the rain will spatter in along the sides and through the front mesh. For windblown rain you’ll get even more precipitation in the shelter. The noseeum netting does slow the rain down some and the Virga and Squall will keep you a lot drier than most tarps. Like tarps, these shelters are good for light rain and occasional/intermittent thunderstorms. In this case the core center of the shelter stays relatively precipitation free. For more substantial and sustained precipitation, less hardy hikers may prefer a full tent or possibly the Cloudburst Tarptent.

Rain Performance Cloudburst: Like its name implies, the Cloudburst is the most rain resistant of the Tarptents. It is still not as waterproof as a well-designed tent but it’s fairly close. The Cloudburst has side panels that roll all the way to the ground to cover the noseeum mesh sides. It also has a more substantial front beak that is similar to the rear beak on all the Tarptents. Both the side panels and larger front beak on the Cloudburst provide more rain and wind protection. The result is a much larger percentage of the shelter’s floor area stays dry in driving rain-i.e. more usable living space in a storm. This is at the expense of decreased ventilation and increased condensation (see more below). The front hoop of the Cloudburst creates more vertical walls, more useable interior space, and less roof deflection and wet walls sagging down. All this makes it a lot easier in wet weather to keep your sleeping bag away from condensing shelter sides. An additional benefit is that when shelter bound there’s a lot more space. Two people can sit upright in the front of the shelter.

Cloudburst Tarptent in storm mode, side view: This shows the substantial front beak and roll-down flaps that cover the noseeum netting.

 

Condensation Resistance: Tarptents have good ventilation since the entire perimeter of the shelter is noseeum mesh. Even so the tarp portion of shelter is non-breathable and Tarptents can suffer from condensation in the right (wrong?) circumstances. The front and rear beaks inhibit airflow. The noseeum mesh also restricts airflow (obviously not as much as a solid wall). To reduce condensation, the setup instructions for the Tarptent suggest leaving the front beak and mosquito netting both rolled up unless you need them. This is good advice. We camped one night in a damp and windless valley with the front beak rolled up but the mosquito netting battened down since the bugs were swarming. We did get significant condensation although it did not drip onto our bag. We also got blessed mosquito free sleep! On another night we were camped on a gravel bed next to a tarn at 11,700 feet. The early night was windy so we kept the noseeum netting down to slow the wind a bit. The wind died down overnight and we woke to condensation on the roof of our Tarp Tent. We were a bit surprised since we were fairly sure we were camped where we expected very low humidity.

In both instances, the condensation did not drip on us. We neatly pulled our bag straight out the front door in the morning and kept it free of contact with the condensation. Shires suggest that to reduce condensation you can use a trekking pole for the front of the shelter set at 47 in (42 is standard) to raise the sides another 5 in. This gives you more ventilation, more headroom, and less chance of wet shelter sides touching your bag.

The Cloudburst’s has narrower side panels (the tarp portion comes closer to the ground, at least on our shelter) and a more substantial front beak. Both reduce airflow. With the front hoop, raising the pitch with a trekking pole for better ventilation is not an option. Because of this the Cloudburst is more prone to condensation than the Virga or Squall. Rolling down the silnylon side flaps increases condensation more. Then again, if you are in a raging storm you probably aren’t too concerned with some condensation in the shelter. As with all the Tarptents, rolling up flaps, beaks, and mesh when not needed will eliminate or substantially reduce condensation.

Living Area

Cross sections of the three Tarptents

Interior Living – Virga (1 person): At 31 sq ft we found the Virga has enough of room for one and some, maybe not all, their gear. It’s not the Ritz but it’s adequate. Even going solo, for another 3.5 oz we’d be sorely tempted to move up to a Squall and get an additional 11 sq ft. This extra living area would be especially desirable in the rain or in high condensation conditions.

Interior of the Squall Tarptent

Interior Living – Squall (2 person): At 42 ft sq the Squall has enough room for two people under a single quilt-style bag and plenty of room for gear. There’s enough room that you can stay away from condensing shelter surfaces. For two single sleeping bags there was less room for gear in the shelter and more potential to bush up against wet surfaces. With its relatively low walls you aren’t going to do a lot of sitting up or moving around in the Squall. We didn’t find this to be much of a problem as we only stayed in the shelter to sleep or weather a short thunderstorm.

Interior Living – Cloudburst (2 person): At 39 ft sq the Squall has enough room for two people and some, possibly not all, of their gear. It’s not luxurious but manageable. The front hoop adds a lot more headroom (see “Cross sections of the three Tarptents”). Two people can sit side-by-side in the front of the Cloudburst. Since our testers mostly slept in the shelter and didn’t do a lot of sitting or hanging out, we didn’t see much benefit from the increased headroom. We could see its plusses if you were stormbound. The more rigid and vertical walls on the Cloudburst did make it easier to keep your sleeping bag away from condensing shelter walls-especially true for two single bags in the shelter. Most importantly, the side flaps keep rain from coming in the sides of the shelter. This does create a lot more dry/livable area when the shelter is bombarded with windblown rain.

Summary

Like tarping, the Tarptenting depends somewhat on your skill at pitching and weathering storm in a shelter that is not 100% waterproof. Unlike straight tarping, pitching a Tarptent and staying dry under it are lot easier for the novice or casual user than a conventional tarp. You pay little in shelter weight or cost for these significant benefits (e.g. a high quality 2-person tarp with 6 titanium stakes and guylines weighs approx 16 to 18 oz and costs around $150. This does not include the weight and price of trekking/tarp support poles and some form of mosquito netting.).

Our first choice for summer weather in the western mountains (Rockies and Sierras) would be either the Virga or the Squall for their simplicity, ventilation and light weight. We give the nudge to the Squall (possibly even for solo use) for its additional living space. In windy and stormy weather, the Cloudburst will certainly keep you the driest of the three Tarptents. It is also the heaviest and most condensation prone for all other climatic conditions. We recommend using it when you’re fairly sure that you’ll get the weather to justify its additional 9 oz.

Oware Flat Tarps (6×8, 8×10, 10×10)

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Photo: An Oware 10×10 ft tarp setup for an incoming mountain thunderstorm: Pitch is low to shed wind and increase stability. Windward edge (left side in photo) is staked to the ground at 5 points and an additional 2 mid-side tieouts are used. Leeward edge (right side in photo) is slightly raised to improve ventilation and increase interior room.

Oware produces some of the best-designed and fully featured flat tarps on the market. Oware tarps also have the highest quality construction of the tarps we reviewed. They use 1.4 oz/sq yd (47.5 g/ sq m) silnylon ripstop fabric. Edge seams are rolled and sewn. Center seams are rolled and sewn with a double top stitch (similar to a flat felled seam). All tieouts are 1 inch (2.5 cm) grosgrain webbing loops and the tieout attachment points are reinforced with patches of 200 denier nylon fabric. This allows you to crank down on the tieouts with little fear of ripping the tarp.

Another feature that sets Oware tarps apart from many other flat tarps is the number of tieout loops. Oware tarps have a lot. Their 8×10 tarp has 16 tieouts, and their 10×10 has a whopping 20 tieouts. Multiple tieouts boost tarp stability, and increase interior room. In the hands of a skilled tarper, multiple tieouts allow for a myriad of pitches from a hunkered down, almost tent-like, storm pitch to a wide-open gazebo-like pitch for fairer weather.

We’ve used Oware tarps in all manner of weather-from gusty summer thunderstorms in the Sierras, to mild (but dewy) evenings in the Northeast, to brutal snow camping in the Rockies. In the hands of a skilled tarper, these light and simple shelters can do it all. Their excellent design and quality construction make for stable pitches that distribute stresses evenly across the tarp.

Photo: Pitch possibilities with multiple tieouts: The Oware 10×10 tarp in a low and flat storm pitch. The center-tarp tieouts are used to increase room on the foot of the tarp. The foot end of the tarp faces into the wind.

The only improvement we could recommend for Oware tarps is to add a catenary-cut ridgeline. Oware has already started to do this and offers catenary cuts on a few of their tarp sizes, one of which is reviewed in this roundup. Please see Catenary Curvature as an Element of Ultralight Tarp Design.

Campmor (Equinox) Silnylon Tarps

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Configurations Reviewed: 6′ x 8′, 8′ x 10′

Photo Caption: Campmor/Equinox’s Ultralight Backpacking Tarp: In addition to a number of perimeter tie-out grommets, the tarp has three center-tarp tie-out points (white nylon straps). One of these tie-outs is shown in use to decrease side deflection and increase interior room. Campmor’s “Ultralight Backpacking Tarp” and Equinox’s “Tarp Ultra Light” are one in the same. Order a tarp from Campmor and you’ll get an Equinox tarp with a small Campmor barcode stuck to the Equinox label.

Campmor/Equinox tarps offer good performance and an excellent value. They use 1.3 oz/sq yd (36.9 g/sq m) silnylon ripstop fabric [most likely the same 1.4 oz/sq yd (47.5 g/ sq m) that other manufacturers use]. Edge seams are rolled and sewn. Center seams are rolled and sewn with a double top stitch (similar to a flat felled seam). Perimeter tie-out are brass grommets inserted into the reinforced edge seams. Both tarps use 5/8 in (1.6 cm) white webbing for and additional 3 tie-outs in the center of the tarp.

The Campmor/Equinox tarps have a good number of tie-outs – more than enough to make a variety of pitches, including a stable storm pitch. The 6×8 tarp has 15 tie-outs (12 grommets along the perimeter, and 3 webbing tie-outs in the center of the tarp parallel to the short dimension.). The 8×10 tarp has 21 tie-outs (18 grommets along the perimeter, and 3 webbing tie-outs in the center of the tarp parallel to the short dimension.).

Campmor/Equinox tarps offer a great value but to do so they cut a few corners. Their construction/design is not at the same level as higher priced tarps like Oware’s or Integral Design’s. While they may be less expensive, we’re not so keen on grommets for tie-out points. Grosgrain webbing bar tacked to a nylon reinforcement patch is stronger, will last longer, and more evenly distributes stresses in the tarp making for a better pitch than plain grommits. Webbing loops are also easier to use. For instance, webbing tie-outs make it a breeze to pitch a tarp edge to the ground. And yes, you can tie small loops of cord to the grommets and have essentially the same thing.

Also, we’d like to see a few more center tie-outs on the 8×10 tarp. Four center tie-outs, two on each side would add more stability to the larger tarp in strong winds. These tie-outs would also allow for a particularly useful storm pitch. In this pitch, three sides of the tarp are staked to the ground and the two center tie-outs on the rear of the tarp are lifted to raise the foot section. (You end up with the flat-tarp equivalent of something like a GoLite Lair shelter – e.g., see photos in the Oware Flat Tarp Review). Finally, we’re not fans of the two un-looped webbing tie-outs on the tarp. We’d much rather see a single webbing loop sewn to a nylon reinforced patch.

We’ve used the Equinox/Campmor tarps in many types of weather-steady spring rains, strong summer thunderstorms, and dewy meadow campsites. In the hands of a skilled tarper, these light and simple shelters are excellent performers. Their few flaws are minor and they are one of the best ultralight shelter values out there. If you want to see if tarping might be your thing, a Campmor/Equinox tarp is a great and inexpensive way to get started.

Oware Alphamid

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Overview

As the name implies, the Oware Alphamid is based on a pyramid tarp configuration. In fact, it is one-half of a typical four-sided pyramid tarp (which Oware also manufactures). Designed primarily for snow camping, the Alphamid’s steep walls shed snow and provide luxurious space and headroom for one to two people. A zippered front door can be pitched open with the aid of guylines or stakes, or zipped shut for a full-coverage refuge from rain, wind, and snow.

Ease of Setup (4.0)

The Alphamid gets its primary structure from a single pole, pitched at its apex, which rises approximately 63 inches off the ground surface. The apex pole can consist of a pair of trekking or ski poles linked together with a connector sleeve (e.g., aluminum tubing), a ski pole, or the Alphamid’s custom aluminum pole. We tested stability with the option most likely to be used by lightweight backpackers and winter hikers: linked trekking poles.

Alternatively, one can also tie the apex to a high point, such as a tree limb or a chock lodged in a cliff crack; however, some stability is sacrificed using this technique.

The Alphamid is quite simple to pitch:

  1. Stake out its four corners.
  2. Insert the apex pole and stake a guyline from the apex to the front of the tarp.
  3. (Optional) Stake out a perimeter mid-point on the rear edge (stake the tarp directly to the ground) and a point on the back panel (requires a guyline) to increase volume and panel tension.
  4. (Optional) Doors can be staked wide open with the aid of guylines and extra stakes.

In short, the Alphamid requires only one eight-foot guyline and five stakes. For inclement weather pitches (and/or to stake out the doors), one should include two additional stakes and two three-foot guylines for the doors, and two additional stakes and one four-foot guyline for the rear panel. Thus, for maximum flexibility in pitching the Alphamid, nine stakes and about 18 feet of guyline cord are recommended.

Construction Quality (4.5)

The Alphamid is built for serious storm protection in winter conditions. Reinforced corners, a stout metal coil zipper, and a durable apex point add weight, but provide security in high winds.

Our only gripe is that when trekking poles are linked and used for the apex pole, they can slide out of the apex due to the absence of a “cup” like those used on Integral Designs’ Sil Shelters that can be secured around the trekking pole handle to prevent its migration under tension.

A nice touch is a side release buckle at the bottom of the doors, to prevent the zipper from unzipping itself in a sustained wind.

Weight

We weighed the Alphamid on our scales at 19.0 ounces. An aluminum trekking pole connector weighs about 0.4 ounces. With nine titanium stakes and spectra guylines, one can achieve a package weight of less than 23 ounces. For snow camping, even using aluminum deadmen anchors (e.g., T-stakes from SMC, 1 oz ea), a package weight of less than two pounds provides excellent storm protection and headroom.

Stability (4.0)

Pitched with trekking poles, the Alphamid is easily capable of shedding high winds without dramatic flapping, particularly if the shelter is pitched with one of its rear corners into the wind (ideal). Due to its high profile, however, the Alphamid is prone to wind stress, especially if the shelter is pitched with its vertically flat door facing the wind. Fortunately, when using a pole for stability, even this configuration does not pose significant problems at winds less than 25 mph.

Pitched without a pole (with the apex tied to a high point), the Alphamid suffers from excessive flapping and panel deflection in winds greater than 15 mph; thus, this pitch configuration is recommended only for below-the-treeline use when a pole is not available.

Storm Protection (5.0)

The Alphamid pitches with its perimeter to the ground, and offers a full zip door. Consequently, it provides complete protection from rain. Further, it sheds snow exceptionally well due to its steep walls, and there is little risk of snow accumulating on the tarp and causing the walls to sag.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance (3.5)

When the Alphamid is pitched in its down-to-the-ground-and-fully-zipped mode, one can expect condensation to accumulate on the inside walls. However, the Alphamid offers enough flexibility in pitching to provide airflow: the doors can be pitched partially or completely open, and one or more of the five perimeter guyline points can be pitched off the ground with guylines. When the doors are completely zipped, a two-way zipper that is zipped down from the top of the door can allows a small amount of warm air to escape through the peak.

Flexibility of Pitching (4.0)

The Alphamid offers enough options for the astute tarp camper to control ventilation, storm protection, and wind stability, and thus, is entirely suitable for both dry and damp climates, above or below the treeline.

Insect Protection (3.0)

Since the Alphamid is floorless, it is not an ideal bug shelter, but since it can be pitched to the ground and zipped up, it provides adequate protection from swarms in most conditions, especially when paired with a ground cloth that is large enough to cover the entire floor of the shelter.

Specifications

  • Weight: 19.0 ounces
  • Width: 5.0 feet
  • Length: 10.0 feet
  • Height: 5.0 feet
  • Surface Area: 50.0 feet
  • Square Feet / Ounce: 2.6
  • Price: $160 (price includes tarp, pole, cord, and sealer)

Value (4.0)

At $160, the Alphamid is priced higher than simple tarps. However, considering that (1) it’s the only shelter of its kind on the market, (2) it’s made in the USA, and (3) it offers significant flexibility in a package suitable for a wide range of conditions, and it’s a great value.

 

Lightweight Backpacking for Couples

Introduction

Most of us do not venture into the backcountry alone. Sharing the outdoors with another person heightens our outdoor experience. That person can be a good friend, parent, brother, sister, or our children. Going into the wilderness with a partner (that special and intimate friend) may be the ultimate expression of togetherness. This article will focus on the delights and challenges of going into the backcountry with that special person in your life.

OK, so this is an ultralight backpacking magazine and you’re expecting this article to jump right into the good stuff – gear selection – right?  And yes, there are a lot of cool things you can do with ultralight gear for two but you’ll need to wait a few paragraphs while we cover the true basics of couples backpacking.

First, we’ll cover the most important thing about traveling with two:

“Traveling together is a partnership.”

Nothing can make a trip better or worse than the dynamics between two close people. Nothing is more delightful than when you and your partner are in sync together. When you’re in a groove, even a rainy day’s hike can be a delight. But nothing is less fun than when you and your partner are in a funk. When you are irritated and squabbling with each other, no amount of natural beauty, clement weather or fancy ultralight gear can do much to improve the situation.

To keep the joy in our backcountry travel we have one simple rule, “If either of us is not having fun, we stop and make a new plan.” Each of us has the unilateral right to invoke it; each of us has trust in the other to know that the request will be gracefully honored. This rule has stood the test of time. Nobody is in charge and nobody abdicates responsibility. Backpacking is a joint effort that requires flexible and synchronized input from both of us. If one of us is having a slow day, doesn’t want to do that class 3, 13,000 ft col, or maybe one of us wants to bag an unplanned summit; or possibly we just need a day to swim, fish and relax, we stop what we are doing and come up with a new plan. Without exception, the new plan is much better than what we were doing before. Not every trip is what we expected from the start, but each trip ends up being the best trip we could have.

Jubilation. Alan Dixon and Alison Simon at the top of a 13,000 foot summit: Not much suffering here—just jubilation. Note our light windshirts. Even at noon in full sunlight it was windy and cold enough that we needed them to stay warm while climbing up the mountain.

Other Couples

Herein, we offer only one of many ways to backpack as a couple. We thought readers would like to look at some other approaches, so we’ve invited perspectives from other experienced backpacking couples, Jim and Amy Lauterbach and Ryan and Stephanie Jordan. We’ve received excellent advice from them and much of what we do originated from these sage veterans, who offer a combined 34 years of experience backpacking as couples. You will find a section on each of them at the end of this article.

Overview and Gear Selection

Click here to download Alan and Alison’s Gear List (Adobe PDF Format)

Enough philosophizing on traveling together! On to gear and technique. One of our biggest shared pleasures is doing the gear thing. Both of us enjoy researching, testing and selecting just the right gear for a trip. For example, we spent a whole afternoon setting up different shelters at a local playing field before picking just the right one for our last trip. Our criterion for equipment is that it must be as light as possible, but also keep us happy and comfortable. Neither of is remotely interested in going on a suffer fest.

Our combined base pack weight is usually less than 16 lb. For a 5-day trip in the mountains, loaded with fuel, food, full sized GPS, camera, fishing stuff and miscellany, Alison’s pack weighs less than 15 pounds and Alan’s weighs less than 18. With this gear, we expect to be warm, comfortable, amply equipped to cover difficult cross-country terrain, and capable of camping above the treeline in inclement conditions. We can even catch fish for dinner. We always have a great time and do not lack for much in safety, comfort or enjoyment.

We selected our gear for a typical summer to early fall trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. We like to do as much higher elevation cross-country travel as possible – especially through high cols and over peaks – but we stop short of technical climbing that requires ropes! We love to camp above treeline, enjoying the exposure to the winds and cooler temperatures of higher elevations. As such, we do like warm clothing and a lofty sleeping bag. But because it’s the Sierras in the summer, we don’t expect much rain. The most likely precipitation is a strong afternoon thunderstorm and we’re equipped accordingly. We have enough clothing and gear to stay warm overnight and hike out the next day if we get a freak summer snowstorm. Also, since one of us has a very low tolerance for bugs, our shelter has to be a mosquito proof haven for our lower elevation camps.

The benefits of a light pack. Alan on his way to the summit. Since the mountain was on our way to the next drainage, we carried our full packs to the top. No sweat!

Sleeping Bag

On our first backpacking trip together we took two single-person sleeping bags, but eventually migrated to a single narrow mummy bag (a Western Mountaineering Ultralight) used quilt-style, which proved to be an adequate arrangement for a close couple down to about 40 degrees. A single small mummy bag like this might not be the best choice at cooler temperatures due to its inability to control drafts.

After that trip, we considered getting a wider semi-rectangular bag that unzipped all the way around the bottom to make a flat quilt. After some research we got a 45 oz, 600-fill-power semi-rectangular down bag with about 3.5 inches of loft, a North Face Chrysalis (sadly, no longer in production). This arrangement works out to less than 1.5 pounds per person. We purchased the bag on closeout for $150, which kept our wallet shrinkage to a minimum. The Chrysalis keeps us warm in below freezing temperatures, at over 11,000 feet, under a tarp, and in windy conditions. What more can you ask from a couples bag?

Our sleeping system. A semi-rectangular bag spread out as a quilt. A ž Thermarest pad and a Mt. Washington foam pad linked by Thermarest Couplers, and a Campmor Emergency blanket as a ground pad. Warm, light and comfortable.

An option that should be considered by any serious backpacking couple is the 26-ounce down-filled Back Country Blanket from Nunatak. It can shave a pound or more – each – off your sleep system and would cost about $315. For a more couples-friendly, semi-custom blanket that is wider (approx. 32 oz), you could expect to pay $400 and wait three months, so plan early! Nunatak also makes a more traditional two person bag, the Dual-Person Alpinist, which weights 50 oz and runs $533. Yet another Nunatak bag is the lighter Dual-Person Arc-Alpinist, which could easily come in at under two pounds.

For those of you looking for a bargain, Campmor’s +20 semi-rectangular bag is only $125. Be warned that it has less loft than the Chrysalis and probably will not meet its +20 F spec unless you and your partner are hardy sleepers. Some couples have used a Western Mountaineering semi-rectangular bag and sewn a simple 1.1 oz nylon sheet on the bottom. There are plenty of other semi-rectangular mummy bags on the market. One of them may work for you. Try to stay clear of zipping two bags together unless they are very light bags. Most zip together bags tend to be heavy and you’ll have the expense of two bags instead of one. Obviously, there are even more options if you want to get creative and are handy sewing baffles or dealing with eiderdown clusters all over your house.

Sleeping Pads and Groundsheets

Pads: Couples immediately notice that ground pads tend to slowly drift apart during the night. One or both of you will end up in the cold, hard rift between pads. Cascade Designs has a simple solution: Thermarest Couplers. A pair of these light and simple straps will keep most 20-inch wide pads closely attached. You can mix and match pads, including Thermarests, Ridgerests, Z-Rests, and most other 20-inch pads on the market. Other people have sewn special pockets and holders onto the bottom of their sleeping bags. Yet a third option is to use two Link Rests. These pads lock together with puzzle piece shaped edges and require no straps. They are, however, a bit heavier than most foam pads.

Pad selection depends primarily on an individual’s tolerance for comfort. Some can sleep fine on a 3/8” thick foamie the size of a jockey’s torso (< 3 oz) while others demand the comfort of a full-length inflatable (20+ ounces). After Alison bruised both hips sleeping on a foam pad, she selected the new ¾-length Thermarest ProLite 3 at 13 oz. An even lighter inflatable solution: Bozeman Mountain Works’ sub-9 ounce torso sized inflatable, which will hit the market in Fall ‘03. Alan still loves his now-discontinued 7-ounce Mt. Washington foam pad. The Thermarest Couplers do a great job of keeping our disparate pads together.

Groundsheet: Since we use a floorless shelter, our groundsheet needs to be wide and reasonably water resistant. We use Campmor’s Emergency Blanket. This huge groundsheet weighs only 5 ounces and has proved over numerous trips to be extremely tough. Another benefit is that it is soft and flexible, and stows to a small size.

Shelter

In addition to their obvious protections, shelters provide privacy and a sense of home in the backcountry. We are keen on simple and light shelters. On our first trip, we used a floorless shelter with a center pole (GoLite Hex 2). Structurally, a center pole is a great idea and provides tremendous wind resistance for the shelter. However, the center pole is a curse for couples who like to sleep close. We ended up angling the bottom of the offending pole towards one side of the tent and sleeping cramped together on the wider side, placing our gear on the narrower side.

A bit wiser now, we use Henry Shires’ Squall TarpTent. This shelter, at 1.5 pounds including stakes and guy lines, is almost as light as some two-person tarps but offers more advantages. The Squall has room for our packs and us, gives us sufficient privacy, provides adequate (as opposed to stellar) protection from a mountain thunderstorm, pitches more easily than a tarp, and offers excellent mosquito protection. The Squall is more stable in the wind than a tarp and does not rely on trekking poles or sticks to pitch. Since the shelter has no floor we use the 5 oz Campmor Emergency Blanket under our pad and bags. Shires’ larger Cloudburst, at 33 oz, with more room and rain protection, would be our choice for trips in climates with more rain than the Sierras.

Our beloved nest. a Henry Shires Squall Tarptent. Only 90 seconds were required to get this catalog photo pitch. As you can see from the tautness of the pitch (in part due to a catenary’s cut ridgeline),  the tarp spills wind well. The mosquito netting preserved our sanity on the previous night when darkness forced us to camp in a lower, wetter, and bug- infested valley.

You can save a lot of weight if you use a tarp. An 8×10 tarp is airy and roomy. If you don’t think you’ll be in driving rain and can handle a few mosquitoes, it may be an ideal choice. GoLite’s Cave 2 is the cult favorite of couples’ tarps, offering plenty of room with great protection from inclement weather for the skilled tarp pitcher. We are excited about some new catenary-cut tarp designs (from Oware and Granite Gear) hitting the market right now. Another intriguing option is to take two poncho tarps and use them together to make one 8×10 tarp. Use your ponchos for both rainwear and shelter, and you can save even more weight. Sleeping under the paired tarps is the Ritz of two-person tarping.

There are many other options for couple’s shelters. Six Moon Designs makes the Europa II, a 33 oz single walled tent (add a bit more weight for stakes and a front pole unless you carry trekking poles) that is getting high marks from reviewers at BackpackingLight.com for its storm resistance and livability. GoLite’s Den 2 and forthcoming Trig 2 are additional options. Double-walled tents for two haven’t reached the sweet spot for light weight yet, but look for emerging offerings from Mont Bell which should weigh less than 3.5 pounds. When we interviewed other couples on this topic, we found that most enjoyed added rain protection, resistance to high winds, and simplicity of a single walled tent over the proposed major benefit of a double-walled tent, breathability and condensation resistance (which is a highly debatable benefit).

New single walled tents made with light breathable fabric, like Black Diamond’s EPIC Firstlight, are closing the weight gap. At a bit over 2 lb (with custom, after market, carbon fiber poles) this tent has nearly the structural integrity of a double walled “dome” tent.

Packs

Since we often travel cross-country above the treeline, there’s a good possibility of a pack ripping in an accidental “butt slide” down scree or talus, or any other manner of mishap with sharp granite. We need packs that can take some abuse and still hold their contents. For instance, the thinner fabrics of a GVP Gear Spinnaker or GoLite Dawn may not survive close encounters with sharp granite. We  are evaluating Granite Gear’s new line of ultralight packs for our more rugged backpacking endeavors.

Pack Features. Alison finishing a class 3 section of a difficult col. A great place for a light pack to help you keep your balance.  Also a good place to concentrate on where you put your hands and feet. And not the place you want to worry about babying your pack.  Her light and rugged pack was a winner on all counts.

Alison, like many women, has tender shoulders and hips. She needs well-padded shoulder straps and a hipbelt in order to comfortably carry the weight of the pack (even ultralighting!). She also needs enough of a frame to her pack so she can distribute most of the load to her hips. Grantite Gear’s Vapor trail pack at 2 lbs works well for her. The pack has a good compression system (which allows the pack to remain stable towards the end of multi-day trips as load volume decreases) and it has tough fabric in most areas prone to encounters with granite. Alison has a short torso (but a tall personality) and the small size Vapor Trail provides a good fit. Another benefit is the external hydration pocket between the pack frame and pack bag. Easy access to plenty of water improves relationship dynamics on hot, dry days!

Alan has tough shoulders and has successfully (not necessarily comfortably) carried close to 30 pounds all day in his hipbeltless GoLite Breeze Pack (yeah, it was a long day in the desert!). The Granite Gear Virga at 21 oz is considerably more durable, has more comfortable shoulder straps, and a simple webbing hipbelt. The pack’s good compression system, when wrapped around his rolled up ground pad inside the pack, provides an excellent structure/”frame” for a frameless rucksack. Alan has to admit that for carrying over 20 pounds, the Virga is more comfortable than his Breeze. Even so, for lighter loads and more moderate terrain, of if he is just plain feeling lucky, Alan may still opt for his Breeze.

Clothing

We both run a bit cold and have colder than normal hands and feet. Since we expect to be at high elevations where it is cold and windy we bring plenty of clothes to stay warm. The warmest pieces of gear we carry are our very light down jackets. The other piece of gear that you’d have a hard time prying from our cold dead fingers, is a very light windshirt. For 90% of cold dry weather above treeline, we’ll hike in our baselayer and a windshirt. If it’s really cold we’ll add our fleece layer. No combination is better for keeping you warm and sweat free!

Since down is useless when wet, we use our wicking top base layer and a fleece layer under a rain jacket in the unlikely case of precipitation. Also, we don’t expect to be in the rain all that long. In foul weather we intend to quit hiking and pitch a shelter at the earliest opportunity. We have softshell pants that shed rain reasonably well and have a napped inner surface for added wicking and warmth. Our pants are warm enough that we don’t bring a bottom base layer or rain pants for summer trips.

For colder and/or wetter climates than the Sierras we might switch to a synthetic parka like GoLite’s Coal and bring a more substantial rain jacket and pants.

Cooking, Food and Water

For us cooking is an integral part of the mutual mountain experience. Sharing a hot cup of tea in the morning or a warm homemade dinner is a crucial part of the esprit de corps. Also since both of us are fond of fish, we bring a fly rod intending to catch some mountain trout for lunch or dinner – so no skimping on cooking equipment or fuel for us! We take a 3 oz canister stove, a pair of titanium mugs, a 1.5L titanium pot and plenty of fuel.

From experience, we know that Alan needs about 1.7 pounds of food a day and Alison about 1.5 pounds. We both aim for around 120 to 125 cal/oz from our food. When we pack this much food we usually have enough breakfast to make it out on the last day by early afternoon – not starving – but with a healthy appetite for a hearty restaurant dinner.

Note: Alan can pretty much eat the same food day in and out. Alison enjoys a much greater variety of foods. We each pack our own breakfasts and lunches but carefully plan our shared dinners to have enough variety to please us both. Tea in the morning and hot chocolate at night is a must for us.

We carefully choose our food to be compact so that we can store our food in a single bear storage device (canister or Ursack depending on land agency regulations). Getting all of our food into one container saves us pounds (2 to 3 of them) and volume when using a bear canister. In areas that do not require a bear canister we use an Ursack TKO food sack that weighs only 5.8 oz. It’s far easier to tie the Ursack to a tree than to fiddle around bearbagging late in the evening when we camp below the treeline.

We sometimes carry up to 7 liters of water between us. We find this amount adequate even for the driest sections of the Sierras. Alison likes to drink a lot of water. For her, a hydration system is an essential piece of gear. Alan is something of a camel and is fine with taking large (sometimes up to 1 liter) swigs from his Platy from time to time. Alison carries a 3 L Zip Platypus with a hydration hose and drinks smaller quantities more frequently.

The Zip Platypus makes for easy collection and treatment of water. Alan carries two 2 L Platypus bags but has been known to take a few hits from time to time from Alison’s hydration hose.  We use the 3 L Zip Platypus or our mugs to fill the narrow opening of the 2 L Platys. We chemically treat with Aqua Mira and gave up on water filters a long time ago. Aqua Mira excels for its light weight, ease of use, good taste, lack of maintenance, and effectiveness.

Navigation

Both of us enjoy route planning (and finding!) on our trips. For us, figuring out just how we’ll make it over some remote 13,000 ft col is one of our favorite parts of the trip. We always do our best navigating when we put our heads together.

We use mapping software, National Geographic’s Topo! 1:2400 state series, to plan many of our trips. This software is a boon to the cross-country traveler. With it we can get reasonably accurate mileages and elevation profiles for our routes. We can print up to a few days of travel on a single side of an 8.5×11 sheet of waterproof map paper. This saves a lot of weight from carrying a complete set of USGS 7.5 minute series maps in a waterproof container. As a backup, and in case our plans change, we usually carry a USGS 15 minute series map of the area we’ll hike in.

An admitted luxury, we carry a GPS receiver, a Garmin eTrex Legend. We started using one in Scotland and found it to be so much fun and so useful (we navigated to two summits in complete whiteout) that we’ve carried it on all of our trips since. Yes, we could save weight and navigate just fine with maps and a compass, and have done so for years, but for now we like the all the benefits of a GPS. With a GPS, we know exactly where we are and just how far it is to the next waypoint or location.  This helps us make better decisions, like how far we’ll comfortably go in a day and where we’ll most likely camp at night. We think we gain more than the weight of the unit back in good decisions and trip logistics.

To be safe, the person not carrying the detailed maps and GPS receiver usually carries a 15 minute USGS map and a small compass. Each of us is capable of independently navigating without the other’s help, maps or navigation equipment.

Note: We are aware of Garmin’s lighter Geko series of GPS units. Limited screen resolution, a reduced feature set, low battery capacity and lack of lithium batteries (the Gekos use 3 AAA’s) keeps us with the slightly heavier but far more useful eTrex series.

Shared Miscellany

We’ve already covered the obvious ways to share equipment and save weight, sleeping bag, shelter, cooking equipment, water storage, and navigation equipment. When there are two, of you it makes sense to share as much equipment as possible and save even more weight.

We love to take pictures on our trips. A recent purchase was a 5 mega-pixel digital camera, an Olympus C-50. It’s compact and weights only 8.1 oz. In our experience, it runs for 4 or more days on a single lithium ion battery. Alison usually carries the camera and extra battery. Alan carries the GPS unit, its extra batteries and the detailed maps. We also share a single 1 oz LED headlamp (each of us also has a button light) and of course, the fishing equipment.

Routines

If you’re like us, you’ll find that each has tasks during the day that they like. These routines make the trip efficient and fun. In setting up camp for the night, we both pitch the tent. Alison finishes putting the pads and bags in the shelter and getting everything arranged inside and outside. At the same time, Alan gets and treats water, cooks dinner and makes our evening hot chocolate. We finish our tasks in time to enjoy our cocoa and meal together. If there’s scouting to be done for the next day’s route Alan usually goes out while Alison cleans up and gets things ready for bed. Both of us find the best spot to view alpenglow before settling in for the night. In rare instances alpenglow and moonrise happen simultaneously!

Perspectives: Jim and Amy Lauterbach

Click here to download Jim and Amy’s gear list (Adobe PDF Format)

Jim and Amy Lauterbach have been backpacking together for 20 years. Most weekends, they take an all-day hike together. As such, they are in great shape to pull long (sometimes +20 mile) days in the High Sierra with some cross-country trekking mixed in. Jim and Amy are self-admitted hardcore back-country travelers – they like to do difficult routes that get them off trail and into remote places. On their Southern Utah canyoneering trips, it’s not uncommon for them to do a bit of class 5 climbing.

Their routes are hard on equipment. You’ll notice sometimes they have to make the difficult decision between lightweight and durablility. For example, in Southern Utah they take heavier packs to withstand the abuse of being dragged across slickrock.  Jim and Amy also take a four-pound double walled tent to withstand the extreme weather of their trips. Finally, they do not sleep happily on foam pads and take Thermarest ¾ Ultralight pads to sleep on. They like comfort and a good nights sleep.

Jim and Amy enjoy longer trips than most couples. A normal trip for Jim and Amy is 8 to 10 days without re-supply. They don’t cook on their trips so they save weight on cooking gear and fuel. At a 2 mph pace they are extremely efficient and don’t need more than 1.5 lb of food a day each, even on 20 mile days.

Of special note, Jim and Amy use a Nunatak semi-custom Back Country Blanket (BCB). Their BCB is 67 inches wide at the shoulder, has 3 inch high baffles (2.5 inches is standard), 5 inch baffle spacing, and 6 extra ounces of down to give it 3+ inches of loft. They ordered the BCB with a custom down draft flap at their shoulders. In addition, Amy sewed a nylon liner/foot box on the bottom half of the BCB. They use Velcro straps to secure the upper half of the bag to their Thermarest pad couplers. These straps keep the bag edges near the ground and control drafts well.

Jim and Amy are avid birders and wouldn’t dream of hiking anywhere without their fancy full-sized German binoculars. We’ve tried to convince them to look at some of the newer compact binoc’s with asymmetrical lenses, but no dice. They want the best optical performance possible for their avian pursuit.

Perspectives: Ryan and Stephanie Jordan

Stephanie and Ryan have been backpacking together since 1989. Their couples’ experience was incubated on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, and their travels took them alpine climbing on the glaciers of Mt. Olympus, beach head scrambling along the wilderness coast of the Pacific Northwest, and trail hiking into the remote alpine beauty of Enchanted Valley. Since migrating to Montana, of course, their backcountry travels have been ocean-starved, but mountain-rich.

Stephanie suffers from lower back anomalies that seriously limit her ability to travel long distances or carry much weight. She has two herniated disks, spondylolesthesis, and osteoarthritis along her spine. For Stephanie, lightweight hiking is not a style of choice, but a style of necessity.

Stephanie and Ryan’s typical backcountry outing is a three-day weekend trip. Unintentionally, nearly 90% of the trips they have taken together, even in summer, have been under the throes of lightning, rain, or snow. “How Ryan manages to go hiking solo and bring back these beautiful photographs of blue sky in the mountains is beyond me,” says Stephanie. “But I’m now pretty much tuned into the fact that he might actually be taking me on these inclement weather trips as a covert means of testing new gear, like rain jackets and waterproof stuff sacks…” In June 2001, Ryan and Stephanie took a weekend backpacking trip to a little known Montana alpine lake. They started the trip in heavy rain and ended it in sub-freezing conditions with snow and a crazy hip-deep ford of a stream that had risen during the storm. “Remarkably, we stayed warm and comfortable. We’ve developed a level of trust between each other that allows us to tackle challenging situations together and come out on top,” Ryan says. Stephanie follows with “that was one of my favorite trips, even though we ignored the winter storm warning on the Weather Channel and tackled the elements anyways.” By the time they reached the trailhead, the storm was in full force with nearly 30 inches of snowfall accumulated.

Ryan and Stephanie are small people – 5’8” and 5’6”, and are lucky enough to get away with a single two pound sleeping bag between them – a Western Mountaineering VersaLite. They complement this with high loft insulating jackets (Stephanie, a GoLite Coal, and Ryan, a Western Mountaineering Flight) and sleep under a tarp, or in winter weather, a Stephenson 2RS tent. In buggy conditions they like the comfort of a tent, but stick to a single wall silnylon shelter such as a Six Moon Designs Europa II.

Stephanie tries to limit her pack weight to 15 pounds, carried in a lightweight internal frame pack that provides uncompromising stability to her load, even on rough terrain, so as not to put undue stress on her spinal musculature. Her choice: a custom-fitted McHale Subpop. Dual frame stays keep the pressure off her spine and the wide hip belt helps distribute weight. A Therma-Rest ProLite Long is her sleeping pad of choice, while Ryan’s is a torso-sized foam pad. On a typical 3-day weekend, Stephanie carries between 10 and 12 pounds, which includes her water, tent, sleeping bags, and clothing.

Ryan carries the balance of the weight for them, which usually totals about 15 pounds, and includes his clothing, cooking equipment, food, and remaining gear.

Ryan and Stephanie share a 1.3-L titanium cookpot, and a set of titanium mugs and sporks for eating. They usually cook over a small canister stove. For water treatment, they are diehard Aqua Mira fans, and simply filter murky waters through a bandana and their own silt filter homemade with open cell foam.

Montana winters can get pretty long, so the Jordans have adapted to snow travel well. In the winter, they use an MSR Simmerlite white gas stove and a 2L titanium pot in conjunction with larger titanium mugs for meals and drinks. A Stephenson 2R is their shelter of choice, which cuts the biting evening winds so common in the mountains of the Northern Rockies and eliminates blowing spindrift from Montana’s cold smoke. They travel on Northern Lites snowshoes, using summer weight footwear (fabric boots give more kick leverage when snowshoeing than trail runners) in conjunction with neoprene overboots for warmth and waterproofing, and RBH Designs Vapr-Thrm fleece socks for warmth and vapor barrier protection. For sleeping bags, they replace their Spartan single WM VersaLite with a pair of mating-zip North Face Cat’s Meows and Patagonia DAS parkas. Ryan adds a long Ridge Rest Deluxe for a pad, with Stephanie putting a torso-sized Ridge Rest under her Therma-Rest UltraLite Long pad for additional insulation. They go totally synthetic for clothing and sleeping bags in the winter because, as Ryan says, “we get wet after a day of snowshoeing,” or, as Stephanie says, “we get wet because of this ‘hike-with-Ryan-means-inclement-weather’ phenomenon.”

When asked what advice they had for new couples learning to backpack together, Ryan and Stephanie gave us a top ten list:

10. Schedule a night at a bed and breakfast after the trip.

9. Turn a memorable photograph from a trip into a postcard and mail it to your spouse the next time you travel and have to be apart.

8. Always give the girl the warmer jacket.

7. If she wants to bring Wet Ones for hygiene, don’t argue.

6. Most satin in women’s lingerie weighs about 1.6 oz/yd2, but real silk can weigh as little as 0.8 oz/yd2…

5. Don’t try to split the weight equally or turn weight distribution between the two of you into a formula. Men, carry the heavier pack. It’s been that way for thousands of years, don’t try to fight the system.

4. Be flexible. This is an exercise to allow you to enjoy your relationship, not accomplish mileage records.

3. Clear a sitting area of pine cones and sticks before your wife sits down at a rest break.

2. Pick a bundle of wildflowers and use a rubber band to secure them to a titanium tent stake. An instant dinner bouquet.

1. Have a sense of humor. The weatherman is not always right. And your spouse may never be.

Conclusion

Sharing the outdoors with a loved partner can be a pinnacle experience. Unfortunately, normal heavy packing (carrying 40 to 50 lbs of gear each) sucks the pleasure out of backcountry travel and turns what should be fun into a long and miserable trudge. With ultralight backpacking equipment, the strain and discomfort go away. For us, ultralight backpacking puts a spring in our step and brings the joy back to sharing the outdoors. We hope it will do the same for you. Just remember the most important axiom that we introduced at the beginning of this article: “traveling together is a partnership.”

New Lightweight Backpacking Gear – (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2003) – Public Version

If you are a member and would like to view a version that includes full product specifications and high resolution photos, click here

Gear Availability

Many of these products will be available in Spring ’04. Some are being released in Fall ’03 (as early as September) and a few are available now or in the next few weeks. Please contact the manufacturer directly (let ’em know you heard about their products here!) for more precise product release dates and updated retail pricing.

Packs

Trends

Frameless rucksacks aren’t really getting much lighter this year, and there are few innovations in this area. However, there is a substantial push among several manufacturers to drop weights of internal frame packs, and we are now seeing several new internal frame packs in the 2-3 pound range with enough volume for week-long lightweight backpacking trips (up to 50L).

GoLite

GoLite makes the most substantial contribution in internal frame philosophy and design by introducing a corrugated polystyrene frame sheet with rod-shaped aluminum stays, a combination that works well together to provide surprisingly good support for far less weight than full-blown suspension systems.

GoLite Framesheet (photo in member’s version)

Combined with GoLite’s minimal suspensions (padded foam shoulder straps and mesh/webbing or thinly padded hip belts), we think that GoLite spent its weight in the appropriate places in the suspension – these are very comfortable packs. There are three new packs in their internal frame line – the GoLite Vision (30L), the GoLite Continuum (40L), and the GoLite Infinity (50L). They use a combination of fabrics – a newer, stronger (1.76 oz/sq.yd.) silicone-coated polyester ripstop to save weight and Dimension-Polyant’s lightest X-Pac diamond ripstop for wear areas. This combination provides the right balance of weight and durability and are significant improvements to currently available models that use a combination of lighter silicone-coated nylon and Dyneema ripstop. Another new addition to GoLite’s pack line is the GoLite Jam – a smaller and more feature rich version of the Gust.

GoLite Vision. (photo and specs in member’s version).

GoLite Continuum. (photo and specs in member’s version)

GoLite Infinity. (photo and specs in member’s version)

GoLite Jam. (photo and specs in member’s version)

CamelBak

CamelBak enters the lightweight backpacking market with two sleepers that are not being highly touted but offer good load carrying capacity: the 28L frameless CamelBak Raza and the 40L internal frame CamelBak Kronos. We think these are a couple of packs awaiting discovery.

CamelBak Raza. (photo and specs in member’s version)

CamelBak Kronos. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Vaude

Vaude offers what we think is going to be one of the best small volume packs that can comfortably carry a small, dense load (e.g., a full load of water with ultralight overnight gear) – the 24L Vaude Argon (weight about 24 oz).

Vaude Argon. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Equinox

Equinox released a new version of their evolving frameless Equinox Katahdin pack. At 55L, it offers a fabric-wing and buckle compression system that works well to reduce pack volume for smaller loads.

Equinox Katahdin. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Marmot

Marmot has contributed to the flood of other alpine pack manufacturers with reasonably-light frameless rucksacks that carry heavy loads poorly and are somewhat ill-suited for the backpacker. However, this year they introduce hollow 7075-T6 frame stays to the rucksack design in 40L and 55L versions of the Marmot Alpinist packs. Both packs are well under 3 pounds.

Marmot Alpinist 40. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Marmot Alpinist 55. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Granite Gear

Granite Gear introduces the Granite Gear Wisp and enters the market for hardcore ultralighters needing a solid load-carrying pack in the 30L size range.

Granite Gear Wisp. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Note: Most of our field testing is complete and We’ll be publishing reviews on Granite Gear’s other ultralight packs, Granite Gear Virga, Granite Gear Vapor Trail, and Granite Gear Nimbus Ozone in the near future.

Shelters

Trends

Weight is not being shaved in the area of shelters (with some notable innovations from Black Diamond) but a few solid designs emerged for those that like the security of a floored tent. In addition, Granite Gear offers some unique innovations in tarp design that are sure to improve the storm resistance of tarps in inclement conditions.

Black Diamond

Black Diamond introduces Epic Malibu (1.9 oz/sq.yd.) into a new line of shelters, including the Black Diamond Lighthouse (based on Bibler’s Ahwahnee design), Black Diamond Firstlight (based on Bibler’s I-Tent design), and the Black Diamond Lightsabre Bivy (based on the Bibler Tripod Bivy design). Yes, we said Epic. The same Epic (not waterproof in apparel) used in many popular apparel designs. And yes, these are designed to be standalone storm shelters not requiring a tarp pitched above them for a rain fly. We told Black Diamond that we thought this was a great innovation in cold-weather tent design. They replied with, “Cold weather? No, these are for all weather – rain, sleet, or snow, warm or cold…” The shelters save significant weights over the Bibler Todd-Tex counterparts (add Fibraplex carbon pole sets and you can shave a lot more weight). All have 30d silicone-coated nylon floors.

Black Diamond Lighthouse. (specs in member’s version)

Black Diamond Firstlight. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Black Diamond Lightsabre Bivy. (specs in member’s version)

GoLite introduces the GoLite Trig 2 shelter, a more stormproof, vestibuled, and floored version of the GoLite Lair 2. The shelter pitches taut, offers ventilation, and good vestibule storage. A key innovation with this shelter: you can pitch it with trekking poles inside (for greater stability and ease of setup in stormy weather) or outside (for more free space inside the shelter).

GoLite Trig 2. (photos and specs in member’s version) 

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers one person and two person floored double-walled and single-hoop pole tents that weigh less than 2.4 lbs and 3.1 lbs (stakes included) respectively, remarkably light weights for double-walled tents. The inner tents can be left at home, leaving you with virtually stormproof, floorless, single wall shelters with hooped pole designs that are very light.

Mont Bell Mono Frame Shelter Diamond. (specs in member’s version).

Mont Bell Mono Frame Shelter Hexagon. (specs in member’s version)

Granite Gear

Who would have thought that a major pack maker would be introducing what might be this year’s most innovative advances in design application for ultralight tarps. Granite Gear introduces the Granite Gear White Lightnin’, a series of silicone-coated nylon tarps that offer what is probably the tightest pitch of any tarps available on the market today. Offered in sizes suitable for 1-4 persons. A new type of silicone-coated nylon, a unique cut, load bearing binding tape on tarp edges and ridgline, tension buckles at guy points, and finally, an easy way to integrate trekking poles into the ridgeline pitch.

Granite Gear White Lightnin’. (specs in member’s version)

Sleeping Bags

Top bags! More designs are being introduced and it looks like this is a market segment that will have a strong suite of options by Spring 2004.

Western Mountaineering

The Western Mountaineering Pod 15 and Western Mountaineering Pod 30 – we’ve been waiting a long time for these. The new bags are shipping soon. The Western Mountainaering Pod comes with or without an inflatable sleeping pad (and, coming soon: a custom shaped foam pad to fit the bags) and makes valiant attempts to control drafts at the bag-pad interface down the sides with an innovative pad attachment system and side baffle. Our staff is split on whether this will be the bags’ weak point. We’ll reserve our judgment on performance following at the end of our review period. Statistics, features, and more photos are available at BackcountryGear.com.

(photos in member’s version)

Sierra Designs

Sierra Designs also enters the top bag market with the Sierra Designs Wickedfast line, comprised of two bags (“summer” and “spring” weights). The summer weight bag (size regular) weighs less than a pound and has more loft than the Pod 30, from 7 oz of 800 fill down (15 oz claimed weight, which we could not verify). The spring weight bag (size regular) was even loftier, has 14 oz of 800-fill down (1 lb 9 oz total weight). Both bags have generous girth of 63″ x 59″ x 46″, which may cause problems for thin sleepers needing to warm up the extra space.

(photos in member’s version)

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers a complete line of down bags but one contribution in particular, which is one of the lightest down bags in the world, has one of the longest and weirdest names of any bag on the market: The Mont Bell U.L. Alpine Down Hugger #5 (#5 in the U.L. Alpine Down Hugger series). This is a hoodless summer weight bag with vertical box baffles at 15 ounces (6.4 oz fill weight of 725-fill down).

Equinox

Equinox introduces a beta version of a new synthetic sleeping bag. It is a 3/4-zippered design with 1.1 oz nylon shell and liner and summer-weight synthetic insulation. We couldn’t validate the weight, and Equinox didn’t give one, but they are targeting an $80 price point in a summer-weight bag that might be well-suited for combining with clothing and bivy gear for summertime backpacking especially in the humid Northeast.

Slumberjack

Who would’ve thought that Slumberjack, not well known for their premier ultralight backpacking gear, would introduce a synthetic sleeping bag that weighs less than six ounces.

(photo in member’s version)

Kitchen

Kitchen gear innovations. Don’t expect great things here, either. We thought the coolest new gear was a titanium java press.

Snowpeak

Yep, Snow Peak introduces a titanium java press. And color.

(photos in member’s version)

Trangia

Titanium cookpot and fry pan/lid for the 28-5 cookset.

(photos in member’s version)

Vaude

(Markill) folding stove, titanium, 3 oz with piezo ignition. folding legs (good pot support).

(photo in member’s version)

Brunton

Relatively new and redesigned for this year, Brunton has a nice and very compact canister stove, the Brunton Crux. This has 12,000 BTU output, a wide flame spread, and superb simmer control.

(photo in member’s version)

Rain Shells

Patagonia

Patagonia introduces the new Patagonia Specter shell line that includes an 8 ounce anorak with hood (no pockets) and 10.5 ounce jacket that includes a hood, handwarmer pockets/core vents. The 3 oz waterproof breathable fabric has a nice drape and is very durable.

(photos in member’s version)

Equinox

Equinox introduces an 8-ounce (size Large) silnylon anorak that has a neck zip, hood, mesh pit vents, and elastic drawcord hem. We thought this was an innovative piece that offered good emergency rain protection.

(photo in member’s version)

Ibex

Ibex is upgrading the Ibex Bug Wing for Spring ’04 with an ultralight polyurethane-coated fabric that promises to be more breathable than than the current Tomen fabric used in the jacket. Expect it to remain less than four ounces, but offer significantly better comfort in the rain. Hood storage is also improved.

(photo in member’s version)

Wind Shells

Patagonia

The Patagonia Dragonfly gets a face lift and adds half an ounce with a full length zipper and a more durable fabric.

(photo in member’s version)

Pertex Equilibrium, Marmot, and GoLite

Stretchwoven softshell fabrics get even lighter with Pertex Equilibrium, a 4.5 oz fabric that gives full-zip jackets the ability to tip the scales at 10 oz or less. Equilibrium is a density gradient fabric that offers great breathability balanced with wind and drizzle protection, designed primarily for moisture (sweat vapor and wicking) management in high energy activities. Check out new garments from Marmot and GoLite that use Equilibrium.

(photo in member’s version)

Cloudveil Women’s Cloudveil has two new garments for women. A nice pair of capri pants and the Rodeo pants are available in a women’s style.

Base Layers

Ibex

Ibex continues to innovate in the area of wool fabrics. They offer a loose-fitting aerobic jersey with a neck zipper that has a very subtle wool inner surface (for temperature control) and a tightly knitted polyester outer surface (for wind resistance and durability). This design provides a good balance between the wide temperature range of wool while still providing the benefits of low moisture absorption offered by all-synthetic garments.

(photos in member’s version)

Insulating Layers

Patagonia

The new Patagonia Micro Puff pullover revisits the long-forgotten roots of the original puffball, offering a new Polarguard Delta pullover with a 1 oz fabric shell and lining. The result: quite possibly the warmest 10.5 ounces you’ll find in a synthetic garment.

(photo in member’s version)

Western Mountaineering

Western has a 5 oz down vest – the Western Mountaineering Flight Vest. It’s very nice. And very lofty!

(photo in member’s version)

GoLite

At a higher price, the GoLite Belay Parka is a great upgrade to the GoLite Coal. It uses Epic fabric and ads many nice design improvements. The GoLite Coal continues in GoLite’s product line.

Miscellany

The Black Diamond Zenix is a 4.4-ounce headlamp (weight includes 3xAAA batteries that constitute 1.2 oz of the headlamp weight?? why on earth not just use 2xAA lithiums for less weight, more power, and better cold weather performance?) that still works with a helmet. The lamp uses a “hyper” bright LED that can shoot a 50-meter beam. It’s a nice lamp, but what gives with the battery choice?

(photo in member’s version)

Trekking Poles aren’t making a big splash this year, but they do shave a few ounces. Look for 13 oz Leki Air Ergo Ultralight Ti poles and new 14 oz two-section carbon fiber trekking poles from Life-Link.

(photo in member’s version)

Water Treatment. No one really cares about water filters anymore, but the MSR Miox Purifier pen offers 30-minute water treatment for up to 4L at a time in a 3.5 ounce package. Pour some water into a little reservoir in the end of the pen, push a button, wait 30 seconds, watch the solution bubble up, and pour the magic solution into your water bottle. Originally developed for the U.S. Military, the Miox works by reacting salt with a small volume of untreated water to create a brine solution. Then, after electrical activation of the solution, a chemical reaction produces a powerful cocktail of mixed oxidants that is then poured into the untreated water container. The microbes are typically killed in 30 minutes, and the pen is said to be capable of eliminating viruses, bacteria, Giardia, and Cryptosporidia. The pen includes safety indicator strips that measure oxidant residual, useful for evaluating the effectiveness of the dose in particularly dirty waters. The Miox is about the size of a good cigar, leaves no foul taste, and requires only salt (included in tablet form by MSR, or you can add your own iodized rock salt) and a pair of CR-123 batteries to operate.

(photo in member’s version)

ThermaRest lightens their ultralight inflatable sleeping pads with the ProLite 3 series (13 oz in a 3/4 length, 20 oz in full length, and 2.75 oz in a 12″ x 16″ sit pad). But, stay tuned, Bozeman Mountain Works is whispering that a torso-sized inflatable sleeping pad to be introduced this fall will tip the scales at less than 10 ounces, a product to be found exclusively at BackpackingLight.com.

SealSkinz Inroduces fleece lined gloves and socks using their WP/B technology.

Storage. Granite gear introduced a new line of extremely light stuff and storage sacks at the show. These use the lightest silicone fabric in the industry, 1.1 oz coated weight. A 5×12.5″ stuff sack weights in at 0.56 oz! A 5.5×15″ compression sack weighs 2.5 oz. Also included are the rectangular side zip style Air Space stow bags and the smaller Air Pocket stow bags for items like maps, toiletries, sunscreen, matches and the ilk.

(photos in member’s version)

Product Review Program – Participating Companies

BackpackingLight.com is pleased to announce that nearly every company that has been a previous participant in our product review program will be returning for the 2003-2004 season. In addition, we are excited to announce the inclusion of several new companies. In 2003-2004, we will be reviewing products from.

  • Patagonia
  • Sierra Designs
  • Marmot
  • Arc’Teryx
  • GoLite
  • Integral Designs
  • Cloudveil
  • Brunton
  • Mont Bell
  • CamelBak
  • Merrell
  • Black Diamond
  • Vaude
  • Western Mountaineering
  • Granite Gear
  • Cascade Designs
  • Equinox

This is only a partial list, of course, that doesn’t include our existing cottage industry base and many, many more manufacturers that showcased their ultralight products to us at the show and will be submitting them for review.

New Lightweight Backpacking Gear – (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2003) – Member’s Version

Gear Availability

Many of these products will be available in Spring ’04. Some are being released in Fall ’03 (as early as September) and a few are available now or in the next few weeks. Please contact the manufacturer directly (let ’em know you heard about their products here!) for more precise product release dates and updated retail pricing.

Packs

Trends

Frameless rucksacks aren’t really getting much lighter this year, and there are few innovations in this area. However, there is a substantial push among several manufacturers to drop weights of internal frame packs, and we are now seeing several new internal frame packs in the 2-3 pound range with enough volume for week-long lightweight backpacking trips (up to 50L).

GoLite

GoLite makes the most substantial contribution in internal frame philosophy and design by introducing a corrugated polystyrene frame sheet with rod-shaped aluminum stays, a combination that works well together to provide surprisingly good support for far less weight than full-blown suspension systems.

GoLite Framesheet

Combined with GoLite’s minimal suspensions (padded foam shoulder straps and mesh/webbing or thinly padded hip belts), we think that GoLite spent its weight in the appropriate places in the suspension – these are very comfortable packs. There are three new packs in their internal frame line – the Vision (30L), the Continuum (40L), and the Infinity (50L). They use a combination of fabrics – a newer, stronger (1.76 oz/sq.yd.) silicone-coated polyester ripstop to save weight and Dimension-Polyant’s lightest X-Pac diamond ripstop for wear areas. This combination provides the right balance of weight and durability and are significant improvements to currently available models that use a combination of lighter silicone-coated nylon and Dyneema ripstop. Another new addition to GoLite’s pack line is the Jam – a smaller and more feature rich version of the Gust.

Vision. The internal frame 30L Vision comes in at 28 ounces and sports the following features: mesh and webbing belt, rear-loading main compartment with water-resistant zipper closure, stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, two daisy chains, single side compression straps, sternum strap, and haul loop.

GoLite Vision

Continuum. 40L and 35 ounces. Top-loading, mesh and webbing belt, dual bellowed rear pockets with watertight zippers and stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, floating top lid with security pocket, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, daisy chain, dual side compression straps, sternum strap, haul loop.

GoLite Continuum

Infinity. 50L and 37 ounces. Top-loading, padded belt, dual bellowed rear pockets with watertight zippers and stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, floating top lid with security pocket, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, three small daisy chains, dual side compression straps, sternum strap, haul loop.

Golite Infinity

Jam. 41L and 22 ounces. Top-loading, short extension collar, foam pad back panel, webbing-fabric hip belt, sternum strap, side mesh pockets, dual side compression straps, top retention strap, daisy chain, haul loop, dual ice tool loops, large rear bellows pocket with zipper closure, 3-liter hydration sleeve.

GoLite Jam

CamelBak

CamelBak enters the lightweight backpacking market with two sleepers that are not being highly touted but offer good load carrying capacity: the 28L frameless Raza and the 40L internal frame Kronos. We think these are a couple of packs awaiting discovery.

Raza. 28L and 27 ounces. 70d Cordura fabric, full-zip back panel for hydration reservoir, webbing-and-fabric belt with zippered pockets, top-loading, top lid with zippered mesh top pocket, hydration reservoir included. This pack has some of the best external storage pockets of any pack we’ve seen. It would work equally well for a day hike or a weekend overnighter.

CamelBak Raza

Kronos. 40L and 42 ounces. 70d Cordura fabric in wear areas with silicone-coated nylon for weight savings. polyethyene internal "Y-frame", full-zip back panel, dual compression straps, dual daisy chains, top lid with zippered pocket, hydration reservoir included. What impressed us with the Kronos was its excellent frame system.

CamelBak Kronos

Vaude

Vaude offers what we think is going to be one of the best small volume packs that can comfortably carry a small, dense load (e.g., a full load of water with ultralight overnight gear) – the 24L Argon (weight about 24 oz).

Argon. Made with a durable silicone-coated nylon ripstop body, the Argon sports a hooped frame in combination with a mesh back panel held in tension panel prevents your back from coming into contact with the pack body – which will significantly enhance ventilation across your back. The pack is top-loading, has a rear bungee compression system, dual side mesh pockets, top lid with zippered pocket, durable bottom, and webbing straps.

Vaude Argon

Equinox

Equinox released a new version of their evolving frameless Katahdin pack. At 55L, it offers a fabric-wing and buckle compression system that works well to reduce pack volume for smaller loads.

Equinox Katahdin

Katahdin. 22 oz. Relocation of cinch straps to better integrate with the suspension (the bottom cinch strap is now in line with the hip belt) and lower lumbar (small of back) padding are the more significant improvements. However, more than anything, we like the fact that Equinox raised the shoulder straps, offering a truer fit more appropriate for load transfer for the intended torso sizes. A 1.4-oz silicone coated nylon body complements more durable fabric in the compression system and harness. Standard features include two mesh side bottle/gear pockets, vertically-adjustable and padded hip belt, sternum strap, mesh belt, three compression straps.

Marmot

Marmot has contributed to the flood of other alpine pack manufacturers with reasonably-light frameless rucksacks that carry heavy loads poorly and are somewhat ill-suited for the backpacker. However, this year they introduce hollow 7075-T6 frame stays to the rucksack design in 40L and 55L versions of the Alpinist packs. Both packs are well under 3 pounds.

Alpinist 40. 40 oz Kevlar-ripstop nylon body with 630d in wear areas, frame sheet, removable lid, haul loop, dual ice axe loops, waist belt pockets, daisy chains, single frame stay.

Alpinist 55. 44 oz Kevlar-ripstop nylon body with 630d in wear areas, frame sheet, removable lid, haul loop, dual ice axe loops, rear pocket, waist belt pockets, daisy chains, rear bungee, bellows front stash flap, dual frame stays.

Granite Gear

Granite Gear introduces the Wisp and enters the market for hardcore ultralighters needing a solid load-carrying pack in the 30L size range.

Wisp. 33L and 24 ounces. Silicone-coated nylon body with heavier nylon for wear areas. Beavertail-style flap with dual side compression straps, dual ice axe loops, and dual daisy chains. Top flap with zippered security pocket, padded hip belt with zippered belt pockets, sternum strap, haul loop.

Note: Most of our field testing is complete and We’ll be publishing reviews on Granite Gear’s other ultralight packs, Virga, Vapor Trail, Nimbus Ozone in the near future.

Shelters

Trends

Weight is not being shaved in the area of shelters (with some notable innovations from Black Diamond) but a few solid designs emerged for those that like the security of a floored tent. In addition, Granite Gear offers some unique innovations in tarp design that are sure to improve the storm resistance of tarps in inclement conditions.

Black Diamond

Black Diamond introduces Epic Malibu (1.9 oz/sq.yd.) into a new line of shelters, including the Lighthouse (based on Bibler’s Ahwahnee design), Firstlight (based on Bibler’s I-Tent design), and the Lightsabre Bivy (based on Bibler’s Tripod Bivy design). Yes, we said Epic. The same Epic (not waterproof in apparel) used in many popular apparel designs. And yes, these are designed to be standalone storm shelters not requiring a tarp pitched above them for a rain fly. We told Black Diamond that we thought this was a great innovation in cold-weather tent design. They replied with, "Cold weather? No, these are for all weather – rain, sleet, or snow, warm or cold…" The shelters save significant weights over the Bibler Todd-Tex counterparts (add Fibraplex carbon pole sets and you can shave a lot more weight). All have 30d silicone-coated nylon floors.

Lighthouse. 2 lb 14 oz (vestibule 1 lb 1 oz). Packed size 6" x 9". Two persons. Dimensions 87" x 51" x 43".

Firstlight. 2 lb 9 oz (vestibule 1 lb 2 oz). Packed size 6" x 9". Two persons. Dimensions 82" x 48" x 42".

Black Diamond Firstlight

Lightsabre Bivy. 1 lb 4 oz with two hooped poles. One person. Dimensions 94" x 35" x 25".

GoLite

GoLite introduces the Trig 2 shelter, a more stormproof, vestibuled, and floored version of the Lair 2. The shelter pitches taut, offers ventilation, and good vestibule storage. A key innovation with this shelter: you can pitch it with trekking poles inside (for greater stability and ease of setup in stormy weather) or outside (for more free space inside the shelter).

Trig 2. 2 lb 9 oz. Two persons. Area 35 sq. ft. + 10 sq. ft. vestibule. Single-wall, pole-less shelter (uses trekking poles inside or outside to pitch), closed rear beak, noseeum mesh door (protected with a solid fabric zippered storm flaps) and lower side windows (protected with zip-down storm flaps), interior mesh hanging pockets. 30D silicone coated nylon body construction, 70d polyurethane-coated nylon floor.

GoLite Trig 2 – Front

GoLite Trig 2 – Rear

GoLite Trig 2 – Side Panels

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers one person and two person floored double-walled and single-hoop pole tents that weigh less than 2.4 lbs and 3.1 lbs (stakes included) respectively, remarkably light weights for double-walled tents. The inner tents can be left at home, leaving you with virtually stormproof, floorless, single wall shelters with hooped pole designs that are very light.

Mono Frame Shelter Diamond. 2.4 lbs with stakes. Single person shelter with 24 sq. ft. floor space (enough for two in emergencies). Peak height 3 ft 8 in, length 9 ft 10 in, width 4 ft 11 in. Packed size 10.2 in x 4.7 in (tent) and 15.7 in x 1.6 in (pole).

Mono Frame Shelter Hexagon. 3.1 lbs with stakes. Two persons, 40 sq. ft. (enough for three in emergencies). Peak height 3 ft 10 in, width 4 ft 11 in, length (sides) 5 ft 9 in, length (center) 8 ft 2 in. Packed size 12.6 in x 5.5 in (tent) and 15.7 in x 2.0 in (pole).

Granite Gear

Who would have thought that a major pack maker would be introducing what might be this year’s most innovative advances in design application for ultralight tarps. Granite Gear introduces the White Lightnin’, a series of silicone-coated nylon tarps that offer what is probably the tightest pitch of any tarps available on the market today. Offered in sizes suitable for 1-4 persons. A new type of silicone-coated nylon, a unique cut, load bearing binding tape on tarp edges and ridgline, tension buckles at guy points, and finally, an easy way to integrate trekking poles into the ridgeline pitch.

White Lightnin’. Sizes: 8×10, 10×10, and 10×12. Weights (estimated) 16 oz, 20 oz, and 24 oz. Tension buckle guy out points, catenary cut ridgelines and side edges, reinforced binding on edges and ridgeline to improve tautness of pitch. The tarp has a center vent for condensation resistance.

Sleeping Bags

Top bags! More designs are being introduced and it looks like this is a market segment that will have a strong suite of options by Spring 2004.

Western Mountaineering

Western Mountaineering’s Pod 15 and Pod 30 – we’ve been waiting a long time for these. The new bags are shipping soon. The Pods come with or without an inflatable sleeping pad (and, coming soon: a custom shaped foam pad to fit the bags) and make valiant attempts to control drafts at the bag-pad interface down the sides with an innovative pad attachment system and side baffle. Our staff is split on whether this will be the bags’ weak point. We’ll reserve our judgment on performance following at the end of our review period. Statistics, features, and more photos are available at BackcountryGear.com.

Western Mountaineering Pod 15 – Pad Attachment

Western Mountaineering Pod 15 – Pad Seal

Sierra Designs

Sierra Designs also enters the top bag market with their Wicked Fast line, comprised of two bags ("summer" and "spring" weights). The summer weight bag (size regular) weighs less than a pound and has more loft than the Pod 30, from 7 oz of 800 fill down (15 oz claimed weight, which we could not verify). The spring weight bag (size regular) was even loftier, has 14 oz of 800-fill down (1 lb 9 oz total weight). Both bags have generous girth of 63" x 59" x 46", which may cause problems for thin sleepers needing to warm up the extra space.

Sierra Designs – Wicked Fast Bag – Summer Weight

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers a complete line of down bags but one contribution in particular, which is one of the lightest down bags in the world, has one of the longest and weirdest names of any bag on the market: The U.L. Alpine Down Hugger #5 (#5 in the U.L. Alpine Down Hugger series). This is a hoodless summer weight bag with vertical box baffles at 15 ounces (6.4 oz fill weight of 725-fill down).

Equinox

Equinox introduces a beta version of a new synthetic sleeping bag. It is a 3/4-zippered design with 1.1 oz nylon shell and liner and summer-weight synthetic insulation. We couldn’t validate the weight, and Equinox didn’t give one, but they are targeting an $80 price point in a summer-weight bag that might be well-suited for combining with clothing and bivy gear for summertime backpacking especially in the humid Northeast.

Slumberjack

Who would’ve thought that Slumberjack, not well known for their premier ultralight backpacking gear, would introduce a synthetic sleeping bag that weighs less than six ounces.

Slumberjack Ultralight Synthetic Bag

Kitchen

Kitchen gear innovations. Don’t expect great things here, either. We thought the coolest new gear was a titanium java press.

Snowpeak

Yep, Snow Peak introduces a titanium java press. And color.

Snow Peak Titanium Java Press

Snow Peak Titanium Mugs – In Color

Trangia

Titanium cookpot and fry pan/lid for the 28-5 cookset.

Trangia 1L Titanium Cook Pot

Vaude

(Markill) folding stove, titanium, 3 oz with piezo ignition. folding legs (good pot support).

Markill Folding Titanium Stove

Brunton

Relatively new and redesigned for this year, Brunton has a nice and very compact canister stove, the Crux. This has 12,000 BTU output, a wide flame spread, and superb simmer control.

Brunton Crux

Rain Shells

Patagonia

Patagonia introduces the new Specter shell line that includes an 8 ounce anorak with hood (no pockets) and 10.5 ounce jacket that includes a hood, handwarmer pockets/core vents. The 3 oz waterproof breathable fabric has a nice drape and is very durable.

Patagonia Specter Jacket

Patagonia Specter Anorak

Equinox

Equinox introduces an 8-ounce (size Large) silnylon anorak that has a neck zip, hood, mesh pit vents, and elastic drawcord hem. We thought this was an innovative piece that offered good emergency rain protection.

Equinox Squall Silnylon Anorak

Ibex

Ibex is upgrading the Bug Wing for Spring ’04 with an ultralight polyurethane-coated fabric that promises to be more breathable than than the current Tomen fabric used in the jacket. Expect it to remain less than four ounces, but offer significantly better comfort in the rain. Hood storage is also improved.

Ibex Bug Wing – 2004

Wind Shells

Patagonia

The Dragonfly gets a face lift and adds half an ounce with a full length zipper and a more durable fabric.

Patagonia Dragonfly

Pertex Equilibrium, Marmot, and GoLite

Stretchwoven softshell fabrics get even lighter with Pertex Equilibrium, a 4.5 oz fabric that gives full-zip jackets the ability to tip the scales at 10 oz or less. Equilibrium is a density gradient fabric that offers great breathability balanced with wind and drizzle protection, designed primarily for moisture (sweat vapor and wicking) management in high energy activities. Check out new garments from Marmot and GoLite that use Equilibrium.

Marmot Scirocco (Pertex Equilibrium)

Cloudveil Women’s Cloudveil has two new garments for women. A nice pair of capri pants and the Rodeo pants are available in a women’s style.

Base Layers

Ibex

Ibex continues to innovate in the area of wool fabrics. They offer a loose-fitting aerobic jersey with a neck zipper that has a very subtle wool inner surface (for temperature control) and a tightly knitted polyester outer surface (for wind resistance and durability). This design provides a good balance between the wide temperature range of wool while still providing the benefits of low moisture absorption offered by all-synthetic garments.

Ibex Teague Wool/Poly Jersey

Ibex Pacifica Merino Wool Base Layer with Front Zip & Handwarmer Cuffs

Insulating Layers

Patagonia

Patagonia’s new Micro Puff pullover revisits the long-forgotten roots of the original puffball, offering a new Polarguard Delta pullover with a 1 oz fabric shell and lining. The result: quite possibly the warmest 10.5 ounces you’ll find in a synthetic garment.

Patagonia Micro Puff

Western Mountaineering

Western has a 5 oz down vest. It’s very nice. And very lofty!

Western Mountaineering Flight Vest

GoLite

At a higher price, the Belay Parka is a great upgrade to the Coal. It uses Epic fabric and ads many nice design improvements. The Coal continues in GoLite’s product line.

Miscellany

The Black Diamond Zenix is a 4.4-ounce headlamp (weight includes 3xAAA batteries that constitute 1.2 oz of the headlamp weight?? why on earth not just use 2xAA lithiums for less weight, more power, and better cold weather performance?) that still works with a helmet. The lamp uses a "hyper" bright LED that can shoot a 50-meter beam. It’s a nice lamp, but what gives with the battery choice?

Black Diamond Zenix

Trekking Poles aren’t making a big splash this year, but they do shave a few ounces. Look for 13 oz Leki Air Ergo Ultralight Ti poles and new 14 oz two-section carbon fiber trekking poles from Life-Link.

Leki Air Ergo

Water Treatment. No one really cares about water filters anymore, but the MSR Miox Purifier pen offers 30-minute water treatment for up to 4L at a time in a 3.5 ounce package. Pour some water into a little reservoir in the end of the pen, push a button, wait 30 seconds, watch the solution bubble up, and pour the magic solution into your water bottle. Originally developed for the U.S. Military, the Miox works by reacting salt with a small volume of untreated water to create a brine solution. Then, after electrical activation of the solution, a chemical reaction produces a powerful cocktail of mixed oxidants that is then poured into the untreated water container. The microbes are typically killed in 30 minutes, and the pen is said to be capable of eliminating viruses, bacteria, Giardia, and Cryptosporidia. The pen includes safety indicator strips that measure oxidant residual, useful for evaluating the effectiveness of the dose in particularly dirty waters. The Miox is about the size of a good cigar, leaves no foul taste, and requires only salt (included in tablet form by MSR, or you can add your own iodized rock salt) and a pair of CR-123 batteries to operate.

MSR Miox Purifier

ThermaRest lightens their ultralight inflatable sleeping pads with the ProLite 3 series (13 oz in a 3/4 length, 20 oz in full length, and 2.75 oz in a 12" x 16" sit pad). But, stay tuned, Bozeman Mountain Works is whispering that a torso-sized inflatable sleeping pad to be introduced this fall will tip the scales at less than 10 ounces, a product to be found exclusively at BackpackingLight.com.

SealSkinz Inroduces fleece lined gloves and socks using their WP/B technology.

Storage. Granite gear introduced a new line of extremely light stuff and storage sacks at the show. These use the lightest silicone fabric in the industry, 1.1 oz coated weight. A 5×12.5" stuff sack weights in at 0.56 oz! A 5.5×15" compression sack weighs 2.5 oz. Also included are the rectangular side zip style Air Space stow bags and the smaller Air Pocket stow bags for items like maps, toiletries, sunscreen, matches and the ilk.

Granite Gear Compression Sack

Granite Gear Silnylon Stow Bag

Product Review Program – Participating Companies

BackpackingLight.com is pleased to announce that nearly every company that has been a previous participant in our product review program will be returning for the 2003-2004 season. In addition, we are excited to announce the inclusion of several new companies. In 2003-2004, we will be reviewing products from.

  • Patagonia
  • Sierra Designs
  • Marmot
  • Arc’Teryx
  • GoLite
  • Integral Designs
  • Cloudveil
  • Brunton
  • Mont Bell
  • CamelBak
  • Merrell
  • Black Diamond
  • Vaude
  • Western Mountaineering
  • Granite Gear
  • Cascade Designs
  • Equinox

This is only a partial list, of course, that doesn’t include our existing cottage industry base and many, many more manufacturers that showcased their ultralight products to us at the show and will be submitting them for review.

Pertex Shield Raises Ante in DWR Finishes for Soft Shell Garments

Woven soft shell fabrics such as microfiber polyester and ultralight ripstop nylons suffer from poor DWR finishes that make their utility in the rain very limited. Perseverance Mills of the UK addresses this concern with the introduction of Pertex Shield.

Pertex Shield is the culmination of extensive research to develop a new process for applying and bonding durable water repellency to breathable fabrics. The net result is a fabric that has the breathability of a typical microfiber with the water repellency approaching more traditional waterproof-breathable fabrics.

Based on the concept of moisture vapor “venting” (convective, rather than diffusive movement of moisture, a process on which eVent fabrics are based), Pertex Shield is poised to add significant water resistance to Perseverance Mills’ already extensive line of highly breathable performance fabrics.

One of the most remarkable features of Pertex Shield is the contact angle of water droplets in contact with the surface (see photograph). Steep contact angles (and they are 90 degrees or greater in this image) mean that there is less water to come into contact with the fabric; as a result, there is a (2) higher probability that water will roll off the fabric rather than stick to it, and thus, (2) a lower probability that water molecules will diffuse through the fabric via capillary action. Even more important, as can be seen in the photograph, is that this contact angle appears to be consistent across drop sizes, which means that even large water drop aggregates, like those that form on fabrics in heavy rain, are more likely to disperse in response to very low surface adsorption between the water and the fabric.

So what does this really mean for the lightweight backpacker? Fabrics that have a higher water resistance without compromising breathability, and the opportunity to achieve a level of water resistance in ultralight fabrics that was once only attainable in heavier fabrics.

We will be reporting more details about Pertex Shield soon, as it will be formally launched at the Outdoor Retailer show in Salt Lake City on August 15. In addition, we are looking forward to formal testing of Pertex Shield and evaluation of ultralight Shield-treated Pertex fabrics and garments this fall.

Revisiting Wind Shirts

Revisiting Wind Shirts: Breaking the 3 oz Barrier

When we last reviewed wind shirts in “Windshirt Wars”, the lightest fabrics were 1.4 to 1.1 oz/sq.yd. nylons and the lightest hoodless wind shirts weighed between 3.2 and 4.0 oz. Hooded wind shirts weighed around 8 oz. Since then, more manufacturers have entered the game with even lighter fabrics. Most notable of these fabrics is Pertex Quantum at 0.9 oz/sq.yd., launched at the 2002 Outdoor Retailer Summer Market in Salt Lake City. Now, a hoodless wind shirt can weigh as little as 2.5 ounces and the lightest hooded wind shirts are in the range of 3.0 to 4.0 ounces. In addition to Quantum, we are now seeing less breathable, ultralight fabrics in wind shirts designed more for rain protection than aerobic activity, thus expanding the market’s current definition of a “wind shirt.” This review offers information about new wind shirts from Montane, Rab, Marmot, GoLite, and Ibex.

The Classic Breathable Wind Shirt

Many feel that a wind shirt is the most versatile piece of clothing you can carry in your pack. Worn over a base layer, a wind shirt provides protection from wind chill and light precipitation, and serves to retain body heat lost through evaporative cooling in colder conditions. On its own (depending on the next-to-skin comfort of the fabric), it can serve as comfortable warm-weather insect and sun protection.

A classic wind shirt is a single-layer woven (nylon or polyester) torso garment cut to the pattern of a shirt, pullover, or jacket. The key characteristics of a wind shirt are its extremely light weight, high breathability of its fabric, and some water resistance (usually provided by a durable water repellent finish, or DWR). Pertex Microlight, Pertex Quantum, and 1.1 oz/sq.yd. uncoated nylon are good examples of fabrics used in classic breathable wind shirts. Herein we review two Quantum wind shirts from Rab and Montane, and a hooded wind shirt from Marmot.

Mostly Waterproof Wind shirts?

An emerging trend in ultralight wind shirts is towards a “mostly waterproof” design. Rather than a DWR finish applied to an uncoated nylon or polyester fabric, a new breed of wind shirts use a very light waterproof breathable coating (e.g., acrylic-based) on the inner surface of the shell fabric. They are more water resistant (and windproof) but far less breathable than a classic wind shirt. Examples of wind shirts using this approach include the GoLite Wisp/Ether and the Ibex Bug Wing, which use a 15 denier x 40 denier 1.3 oz/sq.yd. Tomen fabric that has 350mm of water resistance (hydrostatic head test), achieved with a light acrylic waterproof-breathable coating on the inner surface. The fabric specifications – validated with our experience – indicate that the fabric is at the lower end of the breathability scale relative to other waterproof-breathable fabrics using PTFE laminates or microporous polyurethane coatings. Although they market the garments as wind shirts, the designers of these garments really intend them to be more applicable to situations requiring temporary rain protection. Because they are less breathable, they are best suited for protection in cold wind and brief rain showers rather than sustained aerobic activity. Their ideal use might be as corner-fillers in your day pack or pants pocket for day hikes and climbs in iffy weather. For the ultralight hardcore, they may even be perceived as the summa cum laude of lightweight raingear.

We’ve been using these shirts during aerobic activity in wet conditions to discover their limitations. The most notable features, as verified in our field tests, are lack of breathability, lack of total waterproofness of the fabric, and lack of ventilation options. Sustained aerobic activity in garments made with the Tomen fabric will result in overheating and buildup of condensation in the garment. Lack of ventilation options such as pit zips, a full front zip, or mesh-backed torso pockets, compounds this problem. While the fabric offers a great deal more water resistance than Quantum or 1.1 oz/sq.yd. nylon, it is not totally waterproof, and will begin to wet out in a hard rain. However, the rain protection afforded by the Tomen fabric is significantly greater than uncoated nylons and polyester microfibers of the same weight. Only serious ultralighters that are very experienced managing their clothing system in wet weather will find these garments suitable as backpacking raingear – lack of sealed seams and not-quite-waterproof fabric require that you pay careful attention to your clothing system in cold rain.

Ibex Bug Wing Pullover & Jacket

Weight, Men’s size M: 3.7 oz (Pullover), 4.8 oz (Jacket)

These garments fall into the “mostly waterproof” category. The pullover has a half length (13 in) zipper and a single non-vented napoleon pocket. The jacket has a full length (25 in) zipper and two zippered (but vented with mesh backing) napoleon pockets. Both garments have a full hood with an elastic drawcord, elastic cuff closures and an elastic hem. The mediums fits about as we expect with enough room to throw on over a reasonable midweight base layer. The hem rises a bit when you raise your arms over your head.

Both garments use the Tomen fabric described earlier. The better vented jacket (with its full zips and mesh-backed torso pockets) offered significantly better climate management than the pullover. In fact, because of its ventilation options, the jacket is a reasonable rainwear choice for more aerobic levels found during light hiking and backpacking.

We hesitate to recommend the Bug Wings for sustained (over several hours) aerobic activities. With a low breathability fabric and no pit zips or large core vents, these shells are a bit on the clammy side. Work hard in these garments for an extended period and you’ll get soaked from the inside. In this case, a classic, fully breathable, wind shirt like the Montane Aero or the Marmot Chinook (reviewed later in this article) would be a better choice. Of the two Bug Wings, we give the nod to the full zip jacket due to its better ventilation. The full length front zipper and two vented napoleon pockets add much-needed ventilation options for aerobic activities. If the weather is not too warm and you aren’t sweating too much you may just get by in this jacket.

In our final analysis, both of these garments provide a low-volume, low-weight insurance policy against cold and windy summits and the occasional summer rain shower. In this case they have an advantage in both wind and water resistance over a classic, fully breathable, wind shell. They weight about 25% of conventional waterproof-breathable rain jackets like the Marmot Precip or Cloudveil Drizzle (see review of the Precip and Drizzle).

Contact: http://www.ibexwear.com/

GoLite Wisp and Ether Wind Shirts

Weight, Men’s size M: 2.53 oz (Wisp), 3.02 oz (Ether)

The Wisp (non-hooded pullover) and Ether (hooded pullover) are manufactured with the same Tomen fabric used in the Ibex Bug Wings. The only difference between the two is the addition of a hood (Ether).

These shells are minimalist, hence their lighter weight than the Ibex garments. No pockets and a 7-inch neck zipper, combined with an elastic hem, elastic cuffs, and elastic drawcord hood (Ether) may result in what is the lightest nylon rain protection available. The fit is suitable for layering over a base layer. Lack of ventilation options (including the shorter neck zip) means that they are less suitable for aerobic activity than the Ibex garments. However, their significantly lower weight means that if you are simply looking for temporary shower or wind protection without a need for ventilation, the GoLite garments offer a weight savings of nearly 20% (hooded pullover style), stuff a little smaller, and don’t suffer from the rising hem during an overhead reach like the Ibex Bug Wings.

Contact: http://www.golite.com/

Marmot Chinook

Weight, Men’s M: 3.4 oz

From John Cooley, Marmot Rep: “The Chinook wind shirt fabric is Marmot’s proprietary Meta P-120R. (Fabric code: P = polyester, 120 = 1.2 ounces per yard, R = ripstop). Meta is a 20×20 denier fabric…with Marmot’s proprietary Enduro DWR finish (80/100 ASTM spray test rating, which indicates that it is 80% effective at up to 100 commercial washings). Windproofness, as measured by a Fraser Air Permeability Test, is approx. 3 to 5 cfm., about the same as our DriClime windshirt.”

Marmot’s Chinook is a classic breathable wind shirt with a lot of features in a 3.4 oz package. With a full front zip and hood it weighs only 3.4 oz in a men’s medium. The full front zipper offers more ventilation options than pullover wind shirts (yes, you even need to vent a highly breathable wind shirt if you are working hard.). An elastic drawcord hood adds a lot of flexibility in working temperature range for less than an ounce. Combined with a fleece balaclava and a base layer, the Chinook may provide the ultimate in a full-featured wind jacket capable of extending your comfort range across a wide variety of inclement wind and light rain conditions.

The Chinook has a single chest pocket, a tab for rolling up and stowing the hood, elastic cuff closures and a straight hem (nice for tucking into pants).

The fabric is reasonably wind proof and quite breathable, although field perceptions indicate that it is not quite as breathable – or water resistant – as Pertex Quantum. The nicest feature of this fabric is that it is made with polyester, instead of nylon fibers. The result: it appears to dry about 25% faster than Quantum, absorbs about 15% less moisture, it feels nicer next to skin, and it has a nice drape, even when wet (where nylons tend to “stick” to your skin more when wet).

The fit is on the trim side but not excessively so, and the jacket layers well over a single base layer. You can raise your arms without the hem lifting too much to expose your midriff.

With its light weight, full front zip, and hood we think that the Chinook is an excellent design and highly recommend it. The only improvement we can think of would be to use an even lighter breathable fabric like Pertex’s Quantum to shave some weight, at the expense of losing a more comfortable next-to-skin feeling inherent with polyester garments.

Note: If you are a fan of the classic breathable wind shirt, you better get this year’s Chinook while you can. Rumor has it that next year, Marmot will replace this fabric with a light waterproof breathable fabric more akin to the Tomen fabric used in the Ibex and GoLite products. That’s too bad. Another great product bites the dust.

Contact: http://www.marmot.com/

Montane Aero Smock

Weight, Men’s L: 2.87 oz (2.48 oz with hem drawcord removed)

Montane gave us the king of wind shirts in our last review with the Pertex Microlight FeatherLite Smock. This year, they bring us the same design in Pertex Quantum and bring the weight down to less than three ounces. Considering that the FeatherLite (in size men’s L) weighed only 3.4 oz, the use of Quantum affords more than half an ounce of weight reduction, considering that Montane added a hook-and-loop-closure mesh chest pocket to the aero (large enough to hold most trail maps), more durable elastic wrist cuffs (which we found to be a weak point on the FeatherLite), and replaced the elastic hem with an elastic drawcord hem. By removing the drawcord (to make the hem more comfortable when tucked into pants), the resulting weight is 2.48 oz, and Montane maintains its status as the king of lightness for highly breathable wind shirts.

Quantum is more breathable and more comfortable next to skin (especially when wet) than Microlight. It also dries faster, is more compressible, and nearly as durable. We found it to be more prone to wear in the shoulders when carrying packs without a hip belt, but for the most part, it serves as a terrific replacement to Microlight in virtually every area of fabric performance. We’ve worn the Aero for more than eight months of winter, spring, and summer hiking, and find it to be one of the best wind shirts on the market. The use of hyper-breathable Quantum nearly negates the need for ventilation options. We recently wore the wind shirt over a thin wool base layer while hiking in 80+ degree temperatures, for added mosquito protection. We certainly sweated a fair bit on the uphills, but our wool-Quantum clothing system took only minutes to “breathe itself dry” when hiking on level or downhill inclines. This was one of the most shocking tests we’ve ever had with a shell garment. We look forward to more great designs using Pertex Quantum, and hope Montane fills the gap being left by the Marmot Chinook by offering the Aero in a full-zip, hooded version.

Montane sizes their garments small – that’s why we are reviewing a size large relative to other manufacturer’s size mediums. So, size up one size from normal.

Contact: http://www.montane.co.uk/

RAB Quantum Wind Top

Weight, Men’s M: 2.65 oz

There are few difference between the Rab Quantum Wind Top and the Montane Aero Smock. However, we feel that the differences are meaningful. The first and most important, is that Rab sizes their garments more true to U.S. standards, so a size medium really is a size medium (while the Montane smocks are sized one-half to three-quarters of a size smaller than U.S. standards). Another key difference is that the mesh pocket on the Rab Wind Top is a small chest pocket that is not large enough to hold a map. Like the Aero, the Quantum Wind Top has elastic cuffs (that have proved to be less durable than those used on the Aero after six months of field testing), an elastic drawcord hem, and a short neck zipper. Considering that the Rab shirt is ÂŁ10 more expensive than the Montane Aero, we think the Aero is a better value.

Contact: http://www.rab.uk.com/

Marmot Precip vs. Cloudveil Drizzle: Raingear for Lightweight Backpacking

Introduction

It seems like all major manufacturers have an “ultralight” rain jacket in their line. The problem, however, is that all is not what it seems to be…ultralight often results in a compromised feature set, reduced sizing (trim and short!), tiny hoods, no cuffs, etc. So, we surveyed the market for the lightest full-featured rain jackets that had full sized hoods, full zips, two torso pockets, pit zips, adjustable cuffs and hem, and waterproof breathable fabric – and weighed less than 13 ounces. This criteria thinned down the playing field considerably – but two jackets in particular stood out as being particularly functional pieces of rainwear.

Cloudveil Drizzle

Weight: 12.2 oz size M

The Drizzle is made with a 2.5-layer waterproof breathable fabric, has a trim fit but will still layer over a Polarguard parka. The jacket sports waterproof zips on its two hand warmer pockets, pit zips, and full length zipper. The addition of waterproof zips seems like a nice feature but they are not easy to maneuver up and down with a single hand. And, after wearing the jacket for more than six months, the zippers remain stiff. The hand warmer pockets are sized a little on the small side, and they lack mesh backing – which we think is a serious oversight on any piece of waterproof raingear, because the fact is: mesh backed torso pockets are capable of venting a lot of moisture, and the success of any waterproof garment is going to depend on its ability to ventilate more than on the ability of the fabric to breathe. On the other hand if you are in really, really wet climates you can use the pockets in the rain without getting wet. Ditto on storing wet gear in the pockets. We leave it up to the user to decide if they want ventilation or water resistance on their front pockets. (The jacket does have two very long, dual slider pit zips.)

The hem is a good length, but by no means generous, the sleeves are plenty long and feature a yoke that doesn’t cause the jacket to ride up the midriff when reaching up, and the fabric has a supple, durable feel. We abused the Drizzle on rainy rock scrambles and found that the lightweight fabric stood up to more abrasion than we expected. The jacket is stylish and its trim fit does have a key benefit – this is an ideal jacket for those that need mobility in brush or mountains.

Overall Grade: B+

Marmot Precip

Weight: 12.5 oz size M

*** TRAIL’S BEST AWARD: RAINGEAR ***

The Precip uses a 2-layer waterproof breathable fabric that seems only a shade less durable than that used on the Drizzle. However, the fabric has certainly stood the test of time and abuse in our review period, in which we’ve worn the jacket during more than 200 hiker days of rain. In contrast to the Drizzle, Marmot skipped waterproof zippers, choosing to add conventional fabric zipper flaps to protect zippers from leaking. For the most part, we found the zippers to be plenty durable and really appreciated the easy-gliding large-toothed plastic zipper down the front. Zipper flaps didn’t get in the way and they protected all of the zippers from leaking in the hardest downpours. Marmot’s hood, piz zips and torso pockets are more generous than the Drizzle’s, and combined with Marmot’s use of mesh in the torso pocket backing, is one of the most well-ventilated jackets we’ve tested. The cut is roomy enough to layer over synthetic high-loft fill garments or thin down jackets, but it’s not as baggy as the GoLite Newt/Squall (which is sized to layer freely over their puffy Polarguard 3D Coal parka), so it’s suitable enough for the bushwacker or mountaineer. We thought the Precip hit the mark for rain jackets, and are pleased to award it with a BackpackingLight.COM 2003 Trail’s Best Award.

Overall Grade: A

BackpackingLight.com Breaks From Mold as the Anti-Establishment Authority in Lightweight Backcountry Travel

Backpacking Experts Unload the Heavy Gear and Marketing B.S. to Enlighten Outdoor Enthusiasts with Meticulous, Frank, Wilderness-Tested Reviews of Niche Outdoor Gear for Ultralight Hikers

Bozeman, MT – July 17, 2003 – After only two years of publishing, BackpackingLight.com emerges as an industry leader for commentary and advice on lightweight backcountry travel. BackpackingLight.com delivers a unique combination of scientific rationale and highly opinionated expert advice. Founded by renowned fastpacker and biomedical science entrepreneur Dr. Ryan Jordan, the BackpackingLight.com editorial team is not only technical in their approach to the sport, most hold engineering degrees. The online journal is currently a resource for 70 percent of lightweight and ultra light backpackers in the US with international readership spanning the globe to more than 200 major outdoor equipment manufacturers and several hundred thousand consumers. In fact, BackpackingLight.com and Dr. Jordan were recently featured in the New York Times (On the Trail With the Clothes on Your Back and Little More, July 13, 2003).

From the vantage point of advertising-free, anti-establishment editorial content, BackpackingLight.com’s product reviews and technique articles have not only spurred the growth of the lightweight backpacking industry but have influenced equipment design and outdoor journalism since the initial launch in July 2001. “BackpackingLight.com has definitely influenced [our company’s] product design. We are avid readers of the magazine and have benefited from many insightful product suggestions and ideas published there,” says Demetrios Coupounas, Co-Founder and President of GoLite, the worldwide market leader in lightweight backpacking gear. “Jordan and company’s in-depth analysis of GoLite products provides us with key information that definitely influences our design process. BackpackingLight.com’s ability to reach a diverse group of users and solicit their feedback has helped us to better understand our customers’ wants and needs. They are unquestionably one of our most important liaisons of communications between the consumer and manufacturer.”

The new BackpackingLight.com website includes an online store featuring hand-picked, exclusive, top-quality lightweight backpacking gear from the industry’s hottest cottage manufacturers. “Lightweight backpackers are a savvy lot,” says Alan Dixon, BackpackingLight.com’s co-founder and Product Review Editor (another engineer, of course). “Much of our readership demands a level of performance that is not found in the mainstream marketplace, so we try to hook them up with gear made by garage designers and techniques being practiced by the relatively unknown ultralight elite that includes long-distance hikers, ultra-marathoners, fastpackers, adventure racers, and alpinists. Our role is not just to report industry trends, but to drive them, realizing that when those garage designs finally find their home in a product catalog of a major manufacturer, we’ve done our job.”

Editors Jordan and Dixon don’t ignore the bulk of backpackers carrying heavy packs. BackpackingLight.com’s hallmark publication, ‘Lightweight Backpacking 101,’ has earned a cult following as a de facto standard of lightweight evangelism for everybody from the Boy Scouts to the U.S. Military. In addition, BackpackingLight.com has caught the attention of the leading manufacturers in the outdoor industry. In addition to GoLite, Dixon counts Arc’Teryx, Cloudveil, Marmot, Big Agnes, Outdoor Research, Western Mountaineering, Ibex, Feathered Friends, Mountain Safety Research, Integral Designs, Wild Things, Montane, Rab Carrington, and a host of other companies as members of BackpackingLight.com’s rigorous product testing and review program.

In addition to frank and sometimes-too-honest reviews of lightweight backpacking gear, BackpackingLight.com offers insightful and informative editorial commentary, features, and technical articles. Expect to find irreverent diatribes and colorful backpacking philosophies borne from random thoughts incubated by too many nights spent in sub-freezing conditions. In addition to holding manufacturers accountable for marketing hype and performance claims, BackpackingLight.com challenges their readers with openings like, "Never, ever, blame your gear – or the manufacturer’s marketing strategy – for your discomfort." Jordan comments, “We are 100% committed to empowering beginning and advanced backpackers alike with the skills, knowledge, and common sense required not only to make solid purchasing decisions, but also to enjoy the backcountry with less of a burden.”

In response to the editorial board’s refusal to accept advertising of any kind, BackpackingLight.com is a subscription-based magazine, a strategic move designed to further distance the unique, unbiased editorial from marketing hype and advertiser influence and to put readers in the driver’s seat when it comes to making purchasing decisions. It is the only major Internet backpacking site that is free of advertising, affiliate marketing, or sponsored content. Member benefits include coop-style gear buying discounts, insider commentary on the outdoor equipment industry, and exclusive content.

BackpackingLight.com is now booking appointments to meet with outdoor trade media, major retailers, and manufacturers at the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market (Salt Lake City, August 14-17). Interview commentary and trade show news will be released in daily dispatches on its website, with insider commentary available to its paying subscribers.

Other manufacturer opinions about BackpackingLight.com:

“BackpackingLight.com is our best source of impartial news, views and reviews for the worldwide community of enlightened mountain sports enthusiasts. Jordan and Dixon’s mountain hiking experience, engineering backgrounds, and rigorous product testing program has allowed us to gather product information that we have been unable to gain elsewhere, allowing us to refine and improve the designs of our ultra light hiking and mountaineering apparel.” – Jake Doxat, CEO, Montane, Northumberland, UK

“Ryan Jordan and his staff at BackpackingLight have been instrumental in recommending refinements for our specialized cold weather hand and footwear. They have extensive knowledge of the outdoor industry and product engineering, and RBH Designs will continue to consult with them for future product development of our high-performance outdoor apparel. Actually, Ryan Jordan may be the only product tester we know that prays for seventy mile an hour winds, thirty-below-zero temperatures, and white-out conditions.” – Nancy B. Hannigan, RBH Designs

What readers say about BackpackingLight.com

"The feature article, ‘Westerner’s Weekend on the Appalachian Trail’ was one of the funniest stories of AT hiking I’ve ever read. If you liked Bill Bryson’s ‘A Walk in the Woods,’ you’ll love Jordan’s take on the AT. It’s pee-your-pants-funny with a cast of characters well-suited for visual comedy." – TT

"BackpackingLight.com is quirky and unconventional but absolutely brilliant. It’s a refreshing place to visit. The Editors are always responsive to technical questions and fortunately, quite honest about gear recommendations. Frankly, the way they test (abuse?) their gear for review seems to be a recipe for disaster that would send manufacturers scampering. But there is a reason why the likes of Cloudveil, Marmot, Arc’Teryx, and GoLite provide them with gear to test: the reviews are just plain honest. Great job. Your subscription fees are way too cheap." – PE

"Fortunately, and refreshingly, Backpacking Light carefully considers the foundation on which gear is designed, challenges (and often dispels) marketing claims, and invokes a rational basis for equipment testing, analysis, and design critique. Kudos to you guys for creating a forum in which other publishers are too scared to challenge the status quo of their advertising partners." – GT

"Alan Dixon is a gear junkie’s godsend. His technique and review articles are outstanding. They are detailed, but not so much so that he provides a bunch of meaningless information. Alan brings a lot to BackpackingLight as its Product Review Editor and is willing to suffer a little pain and punishment to push gear to its limits." – WO

Biographies of BackpackingLight.com Co-Founders

Bio: Ryan Jordan
Dr. Ryan Jordan holds engineering degrees that have launched him to the forefront of backcountry science, with research and design experience spanning the specialties of backcountry health and hygiene, water treatment technologies, backpack load distribution, and condensation management in shelters and apparel. Most recently, he was a Senior Research Engineer with Montana State University’s renown Center for Biofilm Engineering before launching Cytergy, a scientific e-learning company that delivers advanced training to healthcare professionals and life science organizations.

An Eagle Scout, Jordan was the former director of Scouting USA’s oldest high adventure program at Camp Parsons on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, where he was well known among Chief Seattle Council parents for turning their 13-17 year old boys into wobbling, arthritic young men after a week of hiking and alpine climbing in the Olympic Mountains. Later, as the Program Director for Camp Parsons in 1992, Jordan was responsible for designing and delivering what was one of the first ultralight backpacking instructional and leadership programs in the country to more than 300 adult Scout leaders during an 8-week training tenure.

Dr. Jordan’s recent ultralight accomplishments focus on multi-day ultra-marathon length hikes in the Yellowstone wilderness while carrying less than five pounds of equipment, and single-push alpine ice climbs. He has crossed the Olympic Mountains in a single push with a three-pound day pack, and has circumnavigated Mount Rainier in three days with a ten pound pack.

Dr. Jordan regularly lectures on the topic of lightweight backpacking and is well-known for his comprehensive training seminars, clinics, and field courses for outdoor leadership program staff and youth instructors. He lives in Bozeman, Montana with his wife Stephanie and their son Chase, and calls every wilderness area within a half-day’s drive “home,” including three National Parks (Yellowstone, Glacier, and Grand Teton) and several major mountain ranges (including the Tetons, Beartooths, Absarokas, Spanish Peaks…)

Bio: Alan Dixon

Mr. Alan Dixon is a former aerospace engineer, professional photographer, and special effects engineer for the movie industry (he actually worked on a Star Wars film). Mr. Dixon resides in Washington D.C. where he is a senior engineer for a government public health agency.

Mr. Dixon grew up on the west coast and carried his first backpack into the Yosemite backcountry at age four. He’s been hiking, backpacking and climbing all over the country ever since. Single push alpine climbing and ultralight fastpacking with a sub-five pound pack are his current raves. In addition to his expertise in the areas of lightweight backpacking for couples, groups and families, he manages to run BackpackingLight.com’s premier product review program. “Products are reviewed in a several-month-long ordeal of laboratory and field testing,” Alan says, “where they are swallowed, chewed, and spit out with a comprehensive analysis of their performance.”

Mr. Dixon’s engineering background allows BackpackingLight.com to perform product testing and analysis to an extent that is not found in other publications. The ability to perform things like textile engineering, seam load testing, backpack frame deflection analysis, and shelter wind load analysis adds authenticity to a rigorous field testing process that can span months. As a result, Mr. Dixon has taken BackpackingLight.com to new heights, and is one reason for its appeal to some of the outdoor industry’s biggest manufacturers – and its consumers.

Media Contact:
Bridget Cavanaugh
406.464.7433 ofc
406.320.5000 mbl
bridgetc@cavanaughpr.com

Gerber Sports Saw

Editor’s Note: This product is described only for your information. It has not been submitted for review and thus, has not undergone our normal testing procedures.

The lightest Sven saws still weight in the neighborhood of a pound or more, and those cheesy ultralight wire saws will keep your campmates freezing in front of a firestarter while they wait for you to saw through one six-inch log.

Backpacker’s who enjoy the comforts of cut-wood fires can now have a little power in a 3.4 oz package: The Gerber Sports Saw has a retractable 6 3/8-inch blade, a comfortable plastic handle, and is very sharp to boot (and, retains its edge well). It packs to a size of about 0.75" x 1.5" x 8.0".

We’ve used the saw for three years on April and May hiking trips in the spring where wet wood is difficult to break with our tennies or knees, and recommend it for its good performance:weight ratio for you me-need-fire hikers.