Articles (2020)

Campmor (Equinox) Silnylon Tarps

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Configurations Reviewed: 6′ x 8′, 8′ x 10′

Photo Caption: Campmor/Equinox’s Ultralight Backpacking Tarp: In addition to a number of perimeter tie-out grommets, the tarp has three center-tarp tie-out points (white nylon straps). One of these tie-outs is shown in use to decrease side deflection and increase interior room. Campmor’s “Ultralight Backpacking Tarp” and Equinox’s “Tarp Ultra Light” are one in the same. Order a tarp from Campmor and you’ll get an Equinox tarp with a small Campmor barcode stuck to the Equinox label.

Campmor/Equinox tarps offer good performance and an excellent value. They use 1.3 oz/sq yd (36.9 g/sq m) silnylon ripstop fabric [most likely the same 1.4 oz/sq yd (47.5 g/ sq m) that other manufacturers use]. Edge seams are rolled and sewn. Center seams are rolled and sewn with a double top stitch (similar to a flat felled seam). Perimeter tie-out are brass grommets inserted into the reinforced edge seams. Both tarps use 5/8 in (1.6 cm) white webbing for and additional 3 tie-outs in the center of the tarp.

The Campmor/Equinox tarps have a good number of tie-outs – more than enough to make a variety of pitches, including a stable storm pitch. The 6×8 tarp has 15 tie-outs (12 grommets along the perimeter, and 3 webbing tie-outs in the center of the tarp parallel to the short dimension.). The 8×10 tarp has 21 tie-outs (18 grommets along the perimeter, and 3 webbing tie-outs in the center of the tarp parallel to the short dimension.).

Campmor/Equinox tarps offer a great value but to do so they cut a few corners. Their construction/design is not at the same level as higher priced tarps like Oware’s or Integral Design’s. While they may be less expensive, we’re not so keen on grommets for tie-out points. Grosgrain webbing bar tacked to a nylon reinforcement patch is stronger, will last longer, and more evenly distributes stresses in the tarp making for a better pitch than plain grommits. Webbing loops are also easier to use. For instance, webbing tie-outs make it a breeze to pitch a tarp edge to the ground. And yes, you can tie small loops of cord to the grommets and have essentially the same thing.

Also, we’d like to see a few more center tie-outs on the 8×10 tarp. Four center tie-outs, two on each side would add more stability to the larger tarp in strong winds. These tie-outs would also allow for a particularly useful storm pitch. In this pitch, three sides of the tarp are staked to the ground and the two center tie-outs on the rear of the tarp are lifted to raise the foot section. (You end up with the flat-tarp equivalent of something like a GoLite Lair shelter – e.g., see photos in the Oware Flat Tarp Review). Finally, we’re not fans of the two un-looped webbing tie-outs on the tarp. We’d much rather see a single webbing loop sewn to a nylon reinforced patch.

We’ve used the Equinox/Campmor tarps in many types of weather-steady spring rains, strong summer thunderstorms, and dewy meadow campsites. In the hands of a skilled tarper, these light and simple shelters are excellent performers. Their few flaws are minor and they are one of the best ultralight shelter values out there. If you want to see if tarping might be your thing, a Campmor/Equinox tarp is a great and inexpensive way to get started.

Oware Alphamid

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Overview

As the name implies, the Oware Alphamid is based on a pyramid tarp configuration. In fact, it is one-half of a typical four-sided pyramid tarp (which Oware also manufactures). Designed primarily for snow camping, the Alphamid’s steep walls shed snow and provide luxurious space and headroom for one to two people. A zippered front door can be pitched open with the aid of guylines or stakes, or zipped shut for a full-coverage refuge from rain, wind, and snow.

Ease of Setup (4.0)

The Alphamid gets its primary structure from a single pole, pitched at its apex, which rises approximately 63 inches off the ground surface. The apex pole can consist of a pair of trekking or ski poles linked together with a connector sleeve (e.g., aluminum tubing), a ski pole, or the Alphamid’s custom aluminum pole. We tested stability with the option most likely to be used by lightweight backpackers and winter hikers: linked trekking poles.

Alternatively, one can also tie the apex to a high point, such as a tree limb or a chock lodged in a cliff crack; however, some stability is sacrificed using this technique.

The Alphamid is quite simple to pitch:

  1. Stake out its four corners.
  2. Insert the apex pole and stake a guyline from the apex to the front of the tarp.
  3. (Optional) Stake out a perimeter mid-point on the rear edge (stake the tarp directly to the ground) and a point on the back panel (requires a guyline) to increase volume and panel tension.
  4. (Optional) Doors can be staked wide open with the aid of guylines and extra stakes.

In short, the Alphamid requires only one eight-foot guyline and five stakes. For inclement weather pitches (and/or to stake out the doors), one should include two additional stakes and two three-foot guylines for the doors, and two additional stakes and one four-foot guyline for the rear panel. Thus, for maximum flexibility in pitching the Alphamid, nine stakes and about 18 feet of guyline cord are recommended.

Construction Quality (4.5)

The Alphamid is built for serious storm protection in winter conditions. Reinforced corners, a stout metal coil zipper, and a durable apex point add weight, but provide security in high winds.

Our only gripe is that when trekking poles are linked and used for the apex pole, they can slide out of the apex due to the absence of a “cup” like those used on Integral Designs’ Sil Shelters that can be secured around the trekking pole handle to prevent its migration under tension.

A nice touch is a side release buckle at the bottom of the doors, to prevent the zipper from unzipping itself in a sustained wind.

Weight

We weighed the Alphamid on our scales at 19.0 ounces. An aluminum trekking pole connector weighs about 0.4 ounces. With nine titanium stakes and spectra guylines, one can achieve a package weight of less than 23 ounces. For snow camping, even using aluminum deadmen anchors (e.g., T-stakes from SMC, 1 oz ea), a package weight of less than two pounds provides excellent storm protection and headroom.

Stability (4.0)

Pitched with trekking poles, the Alphamid is easily capable of shedding high winds without dramatic flapping, particularly if the shelter is pitched with one of its rear corners into the wind (ideal). Due to its high profile, however, the Alphamid is prone to wind stress, especially if the shelter is pitched with its vertically flat door facing the wind. Fortunately, when using a pole for stability, even this configuration does not pose significant problems at winds less than 25 mph.

Pitched without a pole (with the apex tied to a high point), the Alphamid suffers from excessive flapping and panel deflection in winds greater than 15 mph; thus, this pitch configuration is recommended only for below-the-treeline use when a pole is not available.

Storm Protection (5.0)

The Alphamid pitches with its perimeter to the ground, and offers a full zip door. Consequently, it provides complete protection from rain. Further, it sheds snow exceptionally well due to its steep walls, and there is little risk of snow accumulating on the tarp and causing the walls to sag.

Ventilation / Condensation Resistance (3.5)

When the Alphamid is pitched in its down-to-the-ground-and-fully-zipped mode, one can expect condensation to accumulate on the inside walls. However, the Alphamid offers enough flexibility in pitching to provide airflow: the doors can be pitched partially or completely open, and one or more of the five perimeter guyline points can be pitched off the ground with guylines. When the doors are completely zipped, a two-way zipper that is zipped down from the top of the door can allows a small amount of warm air to escape through the peak.

Flexibility of Pitching (4.0)

The Alphamid offers enough options for the astute tarp camper to control ventilation, storm protection, and wind stability, and thus, is entirely suitable for both dry and damp climates, above or below the treeline.

Insect Protection (3.0)

Since the Alphamid is floorless, it is not an ideal bug shelter, but since it can be pitched to the ground and zipped up, it provides adequate protection from swarms in most conditions, especially when paired with a ground cloth that is large enough to cover the entire floor of the shelter.

Specifications

  • Weight: 19.0 ounces
  • Width: 5.0 feet
  • Length: 10.0 feet
  • Height: 5.0 feet
  • Surface Area: 50.0 feet
  • Square Feet / Ounce: 2.6
  • Price: $160 (price includes tarp, pole, cord, and sealer)

Value (4.0)

At $160, the Alphamid is priced higher than simple tarps. However, considering that (1) it’s the only shelter of its kind on the market, (2) it’s made in the USA, and (3) it offers significant flexibility in a package suitable for a wide range of conditions, and it’s a great value.

 

Lightweight Backpacking for Couples

Introduction

Most of us do not venture into the backcountry alone. Sharing the outdoors with another person heightens our outdoor experience. That person can be a good friend, parent, brother, sister, or our children. Going into the wilderness with a partner (that special and intimate friend) may be the ultimate expression of togetherness. This article will focus on the delights and challenges of going into the backcountry with that special person in your life.

OK, so this is an ultralight backpacking magazine and you’re expecting this article to jump right into the good stuff – gear selection – right?  And yes, there are a lot of cool things you can do with ultralight gear for two but you’ll need to wait a few paragraphs while we cover the true basics of couples backpacking.

First, we’ll cover the most important thing about traveling with two:

“Traveling together is a partnership.”

Nothing can make a trip better or worse than the dynamics between two close people. Nothing is more delightful than when you and your partner are in sync together. When you’re in a groove, even a rainy day’s hike can be a delight. But nothing is less fun than when you and your partner are in a funk. When you are irritated and squabbling with each other, no amount of natural beauty, clement weather or fancy ultralight gear can do much to improve the situation.

To keep the joy in our backcountry travel we have one simple rule, “If either of us is not having fun, we stop and make a new plan.” Each of us has the unilateral right to invoke it; each of us has trust in the other to know that the request will be gracefully honored. This rule has stood the test of time. Nobody is in charge and nobody abdicates responsibility. Backpacking is a joint effort that requires flexible and synchronized input from both of us. If one of us is having a slow day, doesn’t want to do that class 3, 13,000 ft col, or maybe one of us wants to bag an unplanned summit; or possibly we just need a day to swim, fish and relax, we stop what we are doing and come up with a new plan. Without exception, the new plan is much better than what we were doing before. Not every trip is what we expected from the start, but each trip ends up being the best trip we could have.

Jubilation. Alan Dixon and Alison Simon at the top of a 13,000 foot summit: Not much suffering here—just jubilation. Note our light windshirts. Even at noon in full sunlight it was windy and cold enough that we needed them to stay warm while climbing up the mountain.

Other Couples

Herein, we offer only one of many ways to backpack as a couple. We thought readers would like to look at some other approaches, so we’ve invited perspectives from other experienced backpacking couples, Jim and Amy Lauterbach and Ryan and Stephanie Jordan. We’ve received excellent advice from them and much of what we do originated from these sage veterans, who offer a combined 34 years of experience backpacking as couples. You will find a section on each of them at the end of this article.

Overview and Gear Selection

Click here to download Alan and Alison’s Gear List (Adobe PDF Format)

Enough philosophizing on traveling together! On to gear and technique. One of our biggest shared pleasures is doing the gear thing. Both of us enjoy researching, testing and selecting just the right gear for a trip. For example, we spent a whole afternoon setting up different shelters at a local playing field before picking just the right one for our last trip. Our criterion for equipment is that it must be as light as possible, but also keep us happy and comfortable. Neither of is remotely interested in going on a suffer fest.

Our combined base pack weight is usually less than 16 lb. For a 5-day trip in the mountains, loaded with fuel, food, full sized GPS, camera, fishing stuff and miscellany, Alison’s pack weighs less than 15 pounds and Alan’s weighs less than 18. With this gear, we expect to be warm, comfortable, amply equipped to cover difficult cross-country terrain, and capable of camping above the treeline in inclement conditions. We can even catch fish for dinner. We always have a great time and do not lack for much in safety, comfort or enjoyment.

We selected our gear for a typical summer to early fall trip in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. We like to do as much higher elevation cross-country travel as possible – especially through high cols and over peaks – but we stop short of technical climbing that requires ropes! We love to camp above treeline, enjoying the exposure to the winds and cooler temperatures of higher elevations. As such, we do like warm clothing and a lofty sleeping bag. But because it’s the Sierras in the summer, we don’t expect much rain. The most likely precipitation is a strong afternoon thunderstorm and we’re equipped accordingly. We have enough clothing and gear to stay warm overnight and hike out the next day if we get a freak summer snowstorm. Also, since one of us has a very low tolerance for bugs, our shelter has to be a mosquito proof haven for our lower elevation camps.

The benefits of a light pack. Alan on his way to the summit. Since the mountain was on our way to the next drainage, we carried our full packs to the top. No sweat!

Sleeping Bag

On our first backpacking trip together we took two single-person sleeping bags, but eventually migrated to a single narrow mummy bag (a Western Mountaineering Ultralight) used quilt-style, which proved to be an adequate arrangement for a close couple down to about 40 degrees. A single small mummy bag like this might not be the best choice at cooler temperatures due to its inability to control drafts.

After that trip, we considered getting a wider semi-rectangular bag that unzipped all the way around the bottom to make a flat quilt. After some research we got a 45 oz, 600-fill-power semi-rectangular down bag with about 3.5 inches of loft, a North Face Chrysalis (sadly, no longer in production). This arrangement works out to less than 1.5 pounds per person. We purchased the bag on closeout for $150, which kept our wallet shrinkage to a minimum. The Chrysalis keeps us warm in below freezing temperatures, at over 11,000 feet, under a tarp, and in windy conditions. What more can you ask from a couples bag?

Our sleeping system. A semi-rectangular bag spread out as a quilt. A ¾ Thermarest pad and a Mt. Washington foam pad linked by Thermarest Couplers, and a Campmor Emergency blanket as a ground pad. Warm, light and comfortable.

An option that should be considered by any serious backpacking couple is the 26-ounce down-filled Back Country Blanket from Nunatak. It can shave a pound or more – each – off your sleep system and would cost about $315. For a more couples-friendly, semi-custom blanket that is wider (approx. 32 oz), you could expect to pay $400 and wait three months, so plan early! Nunatak also makes a more traditional two person bag, the Dual-Person Alpinist, which weights 50 oz and runs $533. Yet another Nunatak bag is the lighter Dual-Person Arc-Alpinist, which could easily come in at under two pounds.

For those of you looking for a bargain, Campmor’s +20 semi-rectangular bag is only $125. Be warned that it has less loft than the Chrysalis and probably will not meet its +20 F spec unless you and your partner are hardy sleepers. Some couples have used a Western Mountaineering semi-rectangular bag and sewn a simple 1.1 oz nylon sheet on the bottom. There are plenty of other semi-rectangular mummy bags on the market. One of them may work for you. Try to stay clear of zipping two bags together unless they are very light bags. Most zip together bags tend to be heavy and you’ll have the expense of two bags instead of one. Obviously, there are even more options if you want to get creative and are handy sewing baffles or dealing with eiderdown clusters all over your house.

Sleeping Pads and Groundsheets

Pads: Couples immediately notice that ground pads tend to slowly drift apart during the night. One or both of you will end up in the cold, hard rift between pads. Cascade Designs has a simple solution: Thermarest Couplers. A pair of these light and simple straps will keep most 20-inch wide pads closely attached. You can mix and match pads, including Thermarests, Ridgerests, Z-Rests, and most other 20-inch pads on the market. Other people have sewn special pockets and holders onto the bottom of their sleeping bags. Yet a third option is to use two Link Rests. These pads lock together with puzzle piece shaped edges and require no straps. They are, however, a bit heavier than most foam pads.

Pad selection depends primarily on an individual’s tolerance for comfort. Some can sleep fine on a 3/8” thick foamie the size of a jockey’s torso (< 3 oz) while others demand the comfort of a full-length inflatable (20+ ounces). After Alison bruised both hips sleeping on a foam pad, she selected the new ¾-length Thermarest ProLite 3 at 13 oz. An even lighter inflatable solution: Bozeman Mountain Works’ sub-9 ounce torso sized inflatable, which will hit the market in Fall ‘03. Alan still loves his now-discontinued 7-ounce Mt. Washington foam pad. The Thermarest Couplers do a great job of keeping our disparate pads together.

Groundsheet: Since we use a floorless shelter, our groundsheet needs to be wide and reasonably water resistant. We use Campmor’s Emergency Blanket. This huge groundsheet weighs only 5 ounces and has proved over numerous trips to be extremely tough. Another benefit is that it is soft and flexible, and stows to a small size.

Shelter

In addition to their obvious protections, shelters provide privacy and a sense of home in the backcountry. We are keen on simple and light shelters. On our first trip, we used a floorless shelter with a center pole (GoLite Hex 2). Structurally, a center pole is a great idea and provides tremendous wind resistance for the shelter. However, the center pole is a curse for couples who like to sleep close. We ended up angling the bottom of the offending pole towards one side of the tent and sleeping cramped together on the wider side, placing our gear on the narrower side.

A bit wiser now, we use Henry Shires’ Squall TarpTent. This shelter, at 1.5 pounds including stakes and guy lines, is almost as light as some two-person tarps but offers more advantages. The Squall has room for our packs and us, gives us sufficient privacy, provides adequate (as opposed to stellar) protection from a mountain thunderstorm, pitches more easily than a tarp, and offers excellent mosquito protection. The Squall is more stable in the wind than a tarp and does not rely on trekking poles or sticks to pitch. Since the shelter has no floor we use the 5 oz Campmor Emergency Blanket under our pad and bags. Shires’ larger Cloudburst, at 33 oz, with more room and rain protection, would be our choice for trips in climates with more rain than the Sierras.

Our beloved nest. a Henry Shires Squall Tarptent. Only 90 seconds were required to get this catalog photo pitch. As you can see from the tautness of the pitch (in part due to a catenary’s cut ridgeline),  the tarp spills wind well. The mosquito netting preserved our sanity on the previous night when darkness forced us to camp in a lower, wetter, and bug- infested valley.

You can save a lot of weight if you use a tarp. An 8×10 tarp is airy and roomy. If you don’t think you’ll be in driving rain and can handle a few mosquitoes, it may be an ideal choice. GoLite’s Cave 2 is the cult favorite of couples’ tarps, offering plenty of room with great protection from inclement weather for the skilled tarp pitcher. We are excited about some new catenary-cut tarp designs (from Oware and Granite Gear) hitting the market right now. Another intriguing option is to take two poncho tarps and use them together to make one 8×10 tarp. Use your ponchos for both rainwear and shelter, and you can save even more weight. Sleeping under the paired tarps is the Ritz of two-person tarping.

There are many other options for couple’s shelters. Six Moon Designs makes the Europa II, a 33 oz single walled tent (add a bit more weight for stakes and a front pole unless you carry trekking poles) that is getting high marks from reviewers at BackpackingLight.com for its storm resistance and livability. GoLite’s Den 2 and forthcoming Trig 2 are additional options. Double-walled tents for two haven’t reached the sweet spot for light weight yet, but look for emerging offerings from Mont Bell which should weigh less than 3.5 pounds. When we interviewed other couples on this topic, we found that most enjoyed added rain protection, resistance to high winds, and simplicity of a single walled tent over the proposed major benefit of a double-walled tent, breathability and condensation resistance (which is a highly debatable benefit).

New single walled tents made with light breathable fabric, like Black Diamond’s EPIC Firstlight, are closing the weight gap. At a bit over 2 lb (with custom, after market, carbon fiber poles) this tent has nearly the structural integrity of a double walled “dome” tent.

Packs

Since we often travel cross-country above the treeline, there’s a good possibility of a pack ripping in an accidental “butt slide” down scree or talus, or any other manner of mishap with sharp granite. We need packs that can take some abuse and still hold their contents. For instance, the thinner fabrics of a GVP Gear Spinnaker or GoLite Dawn may not survive close encounters with sharp granite. We  are evaluating Granite Gear’s new line of ultralight packs for our more rugged backpacking endeavors.

Pack Features. Alison finishing a class 3 section of a difficult col. A great place for a light pack to help you keep your balance.  Also a good place to concentrate on where you put your hands and feet. And not the place you want to worry about babying your pack.  Her light and rugged pack was a winner on all counts.

Alison, like many women, has tender shoulders and hips. She needs well-padded shoulder straps and a hipbelt in order to comfortably carry the weight of the pack (even ultralighting!). She also needs enough of a frame to her pack so she can distribute most of the load to her hips. Grantite Gear’s Vapor trail pack at 2 lbs works well for her. The pack has a good compression system (which allows the pack to remain stable towards the end of multi-day trips as load volume decreases) and it has tough fabric in most areas prone to encounters with granite. Alison has a short torso (but a tall personality) and the small size Vapor Trail provides a good fit. Another benefit is the external hydration pocket between the pack frame and pack bag. Easy access to plenty of water improves relationship dynamics on hot, dry days!

Alan has tough shoulders and has successfully (not necessarily comfortably) carried close to 30 pounds all day in his hipbeltless GoLite Breeze Pack (yeah, it was a long day in the desert!). The Granite Gear Virga at 21 oz is considerably more durable, has more comfortable shoulder straps, and a simple webbing hipbelt. The pack’s good compression system, when wrapped around his rolled up ground pad inside the pack, provides an excellent structure/”frame” for a frameless rucksack. Alan has to admit that for carrying over 20 pounds, the Virga is more comfortable than his Breeze. Even so, for lighter loads and more moderate terrain, of if he is just plain feeling lucky, Alan may still opt for his Breeze.

Clothing

We both run a bit cold and have colder than normal hands and feet. Since we expect to be at high elevations where it is cold and windy we bring plenty of clothes to stay warm. The warmest pieces of gear we carry are our very light down jackets. The other piece of gear that you’d have a hard time prying from our cold dead fingers, is a very light windshirt. For 90% of cold dry weather above treeline, we’ll hike in our baselayer and a windshirt. If it’s really cold we’ll add our fleece layer. No combination is better for keeping you warm and sweat free!

Since down is useless when wet, we use our wicking top base layer and a fleece layer under a rain jacket in the unlikely case of precipitation. Also, we don’t expect to be in the rain all that long. In foul weather we intend to quit hiking and pitch a shelter at the earliest opportunity. We have softshell pants that shed rain reasonably well and have a napped inner surface for added wicking and warmth. Our pants are warm enough that we don’t bring a bottom base layer or rain pants for summer trips.

For colder and/or wetter climates than the Sierras we might switch to a synthetic parka like GoLite’s Coal and bring a more substantial rain jacket and pants.

Cooking, Food and Water

For us cooking is an integral part of the mutual mountain experience. Sharing a hot cup of tea in the morning or a warm homemade dinner is a crucial part of the esprit de corps. Also since both of us are fond of fish, we bring a fly rod intending to catch some mountain trout for lunch or dinner – so no skimping on cooking equipment or fuel for us! We take a 3 oz canister stove, a pair of titanium mugs, a 1.5L titanium pot and plenty of fuel.

From experience, we know that Alan needs about 1.7 pounds of food a day and Alison about 1.5 pounds. We both aim for around 120 to 125 cal/oz from our food. When we pack this much food we usually have enough breakfast to make it out on the last day by early afternoon – not starving – but with a healthy appetite for a hearty restaurant dinner.

Note: Alan can pretty much eat the same food day in and out. Alison enjoys a much greater variety of foods. We each pack our own breakfasts and lunches but carefully plan our shared dinners to have enough variety to please us both. Tea in the morning and hot chocolate at night is a must for us.

We carefully choose our food to be compact so that we can store our food in a single bear storage device (canister or Ursack depending on land agency regulations). Getting all of our food into one container saves us pounds (2 to 3 of them) and volume when using a bear canister. In areas that do not require a bear canister we use an Ursack TKO food sack that weighs only 5.8 oz. It’s far easier to tie the Ursack to a tree than to fiddle around bearbagging late in the evening when we camp below the treeline.

We sometimes carry up to 7 liters of water between us. We find this amount adequate even for the driest sections of the Sierras. Alison likes to drink a lot of water. For her, a hydration system is an essential piece of gear. Alan is something of a camel and is fine with taking large (sometimes up to 1 liter) swigs from his Platy from time to time. Alison carries a 3 L Zip Platypus with a hydration hose and drinks smaller quantities more frequently.

The Zip Platypus makes for easy collection and treatment of water. Alan carries two 2 L Platypus bags but has been known to take a few hits from time to time from Alison’s hydration hose.  We use the 3 L Zip Platypus or our mugs to fill the narrow opening of the 2 L Platys. We chemically treat with Aqua Mira and gave up on water filters a long time ago. Aqua Mira excels for its light weight, ease of use, good taste, lack of maintenance, and effectiveness.

Navigation

Both of us enjoy route planning (and finding!) on our trips. For us, figuring out just how we’ll make it over some remote 13,000 ft col is one of our favorite parts of the trip. We always do our best navigating when we put our heads together.

We use mapping software, National Geographic’s Topo! 1:2400 state series, to plan many of our trips. This software is a boon to the cross-country traveler. With it we can get reasonably accurate mileages and elevation profiles for our routes. We can print up to a few days of travel on a single side of an 8.5×11 sheet of waterproof map paper. This saves a lot of weight from carrying a complete set of USGS 7.5 minute series maps in a waterproof container. As a backup, and in case our plans change, we usually carry a USGS 15 minute series map of the area we’ll hike in.

An admitted luxury, we carry a GPS receiver, a Garmin eTrex Legend. We started using one in Scotland and found it to be so much fun and so useful (we navigated to two summits in complete whiteout) that we’ve carried it on all of our trips since. Yes, we could save weight and navigate just fine with maps and a compass, and have done so for years, but for now we like the all the benefits of a GPS. With a GPS, we know exactly where we are and just how far it is to the next waypoint or location.  This helps us make better decisions, like how far we’ll comfortably go in a day and where we’ll most likely camp at night. We think we gain more than the weight of the unit back in good decisions and trip logistics.

To be safe, the person not carrying the detailed maps and GPS receiver usually carries a 15 minute USGS map and a small compass. Each of us is capable of independently navigating without the other’s help, maps or navigation equipment.

Note: We are aware of Garmin’s lighter Geko series of GPS units. Limited screen resolution, a reduced feature set, low battery capacity and lack of lithium batteries (the Gekos use 3 AAA’s) keeps us with the slightly heavier but far more useful eTrex series.

Shared Miscellany

We’ve already covered the obvious ways to share equipment and save weight, sleeping bag, shelter, cooking equipment, water storage, and navigation equipment. When there are two, of you it makes sense to share as much equipment as possible and save even more weight.

We love to take pictures on our trips. A recent purchase was a 5 mega-pixel digital camera, an Olympus C-50. It’s compact and weights only 8.1 oz. In our experience, it runs for 4 or more days on a single lithium ion battery. Alison usually carries the camera and extra battery. Alan carries the GPS unit, its extra batteries and the detailed maps. We also share a single 1 oz LED headlamp (each of us also has a button light) and of course, the fishing equipment.

Routines

If you’re like us, you’ll find that each has tasks during the day that they like. These routines make the trip efficient and fun. In setting up camp for the night, we both pitch the tent. Alison finishes putting the pads and bags in the shelter and getting everything arranged inside and outside. At the same time, Alan gets and treats water, cooks dinner and makes our evening hot chocolate. We finish our tasks in time to enjoy our cocoa and meal together. If there’s scouting to be done for the next day’s route Alan usually goes out while Alison cleans up and gets things ready for bed. Both of us find the best spot to view alpenglow before settling in for the night. In rare instances alpenglow and moonrise happen simultaneously!

Perspectives: Jim and Amy Lauterbach

Click here to download Jim and Amy’s gear list (Adobe PDF Format)

Jim and Amy Lauterbach have been backpacking together for 20 years. Most weekends, they take an all-day hike together. As such, they are in great shape to pull long (sometimes +20 mile) days in the High Sierra with some cross-country trekking mixed in. Jim and Amy are self-admitted hardcore back-country travelers – they like to do difficult routes that get them off trail and into remote places. On their Southern Utah canyoneering trips, it’s not uncommon for them to do a bit of class 5 climbing.

Their routes are hard on equipment. You’ll notice sometimes they have to make the difficult decision between lightweight and durablility. For example, in Southern Utah they take heavier packs to withstand the abuse of being dragged across slickrock.  Jim and Amy also take a four-pound double walled tent to withstand the extreme weather of their trips. Finally, they do not sleep happily on foam pads and take Thermarest ¾ Ultralight pads to sleep on. They like comfort and a good nights sleep.

Jim and Amy enjoy longer trips than most couples. A normal trip for Jim and Amy is 8 to 10 days without re-supply. They don’t cook on their trips so they save weight on cooking gear and fuel. At a 2 mph pace they are extremely efficient and don’t need more than 1.5 lb of food a day each, even on 20 mile days.

Of special note, Jim and Amy use a Nunatak semi-custom Back Country Blanket (BCB). Their BCB is 67 inches wide at the shoulder, has 3 inch high baffles (2.5 inches is standard), 5 inch baffle spacing, and 6 extra ounces of down to give it 3+ inches of loft. They ordered the BCB with a custom down draft flap at their shoulders. In addition, Amy sewed a nylon liner/foot box on the bottom half of the BCB. They use Velcro straps to secure the upper half of the bag to their Thermarest pad couplers. These straps keep the bag edges near the ground and control drafts well.

Jim and Amy are avid birders and wouldn’t dream of hiking anywhere without their fancy full-sized German binoculars. We’ve tried to convince them to look at some of the newer compact binoc’s with asymmetrical lenses, but no dice. They want the best optical performance possible for their avian pursuit.

Perspectives: Ryan and Stephanie Jordan

Stephanie and Ryan have been backpacking together since 1989. Their couples’ experience was incubated on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, and their travels took them alpine climbing on the glaciers of Mt. Olympus, beach head scrambling along the wilderness coast of the Pacific Northwest, and trail hiking into the remote alpine beauty of Enchanted Valley. Since migrating to Montana, of course, their backcountry travels have been ocean-starved, but mountain-rich.

Stephanie suffers from lower back anomalies that seriously limit her ability to travel long distances or carry much weight. She has two herniated disks, spondylolesthesis, and osteoarthritis along her spine. For Stephanie, lightweight hiking is not a style of choice, but a style of necessity.

Stephanie and Ryan’s typical backcountry outing is a three-day weekend trip. Unintentionally, nearly 90% of the trips they have taken together, even in summer, have been under the throes of lightning, rain, or snow. “How Ryan manages to go hiking solo and bring back these beautiful photographs of blue sky in the mountains is beyond me,” says Stephanie. “But I’m now pretty much tuned into the fact that he might actually be taking me on these inclement weather trips as a covert means of testing new gear, like rain jackets and waterproof stuff sacks…” In June 2001, Ryan and Stephanie took a weekend backpacking trip to a little known Montana alpine lake. They started the trip in heavy rain and ended it in sub-freezing conditions with snow and a crazy hip-deep ford of a stream that had risen during the storm. “Remarkably, we stayed warm and comfortable. We’ve developed a level of trust between each other that allows us to tackle challenging situations together and come out on top,” Ryan says. Stephanie follows with “that was one of my favorite trips, even though we ignored the winter storm warning on the Weather Channel and tackled the elements anyways.” By the time they reached the trailhead, the storm was in full force with nearly 30 inches of snowfall accumulated.

Ryan and Stephanie are small people – 5’8” and 5’6”, and are lucky enough to get away with a single two pound sleeping bag between them – a Western Mountaineering VersaLite. They complement this with high loft insulating jackets (Stephanie, a GoLite Coal, and Ryan, a Western Mountaineering Flight) and sleep under a tarp, or in winter weather, a Stephenson 2RS tent. In buggy conditions they like the comfort of a tent, but stick to a single wall silnylon shelter such as a Six Moon Designs Europa II.

Stephanie tries to limit her pack weight to 15 pounds, carried in a lightweight internal frame pack that provides uncompromising stability to her load, even on rough terrain, so as not to put undue stress on her spinal musculature. Her choice: a custom-fitted McHale Subpop. Dual frame stays keep the pressure off her spine and the wide hip belt helps distribute weight. A Therma-Rest ProLite Long is her sleeping pad of choice, while Ryan’s is a torso-sized foam pad. On a typical 3-day weekend, Stephanie carries between 10 and 12 pounds, which includes her water, tent, sleeping bags, and clothing.

Ryan carries the balance of the weight for them, which usually totals about 15 pounds, and includes his clothing, cooking equipment, food, and remaining gear.

Ryan and Stephanie share a 1.3-L titanium cookpot, and a set of titanium mugs and sporks for eating. They usually cook over a small canister stove. For water treatment, they are diehard Aqua Mira fans, and simply filter murky waters through a bandana and their own silt filter homemade with open cell foam.

Montana winters can get pretty long, so the Jordans have adapted to snow travel well. In the winter, they use an MSR Simmerlite white gas stove and a 2L titanium pot in conjunction with larger titanium mugs for meals and drinks. A Stephenson 2R is their shelter of choice, which cuts the biting evening winds so common in the mountains of the Northern Rockies and eliminates blowing spindrift from Montana’s cold smoke. They travel on Northern Lites snowshoes, using summer weight footwear (fabric boots give more kick leverage when snowshoeing than trail runners) in conjunction with neoprene overboots for warmth and waterproofing, and RBH Designs Vapr-Thrm fleece socks for warmth and vapor barrier protection. For sleeping bags, they replace their Spartan single WM VersaLite with a pair of mating-zip North Face Cat’s Meows and Patagonia DAS parkas. Ryan adds a long Ridge Rest Deluxe for a pad, with Stephanie putting a torso-sized Ridge Rest under her Therma-Rest UltraLite Long pad for additional insulation. They go totally synthetic for clothing and sleeping bags in the winter because, as Ryan says, “we get wet after a day of snowshoeing,” or, as Stephanie says, “we get wet because of this ‘hike-with-Ryan-means-inclement-weather’ phenomenon.”

When asked what advice they had for new couples learning to backpack together, Ryan and Stephanie gave us a top ten list:

10. Schedule a night at a bed and breakfast after the trip.

9. Turn a memorable photograph from a trip into a postcard and mail it to your spouse the next time you travel and have to be apart.

8. Always give the girl the warmer jacket.

7. If she wants to bring Wet Ones for hygiene, don’t argue.

6. Most satin in women’s lingerie weighs about 1.6 oz/yd2, but real silk can weigh as little as 0.8 oz/yd2

5. Don’t try to split the weight equally or turn weight distribution between the two of you into a formula. Men, carry the heavier pack. It’s been that way for thousands of years, don’t try to fight the system.

4. Be flexible. This is an exercise to allow you to enjoy your relationship, not accomplish mileage records.

3. Clear a sitting area of pine cones and sticks before your wife sits down at a rest break.

2. Pick a bundle of wildflowers and use a rubber band to secure them to a titanium tent stake. An instant dinner bouquet.

1. Have a sense of humor. The weatherman is not always right. And your spouse may never be.

Conclusion

Sharing the outdoors with a loved partner can be a pinnacle experience. Unfortunately, normal heavy packing (carrying 40 to 50 lbs of gear each) sucks the pleasure out of backcountry travel and turns what should be fun into a long and miserable trudge. With ultralight backpacking equipment, the strain and discomfort go away. For us, ultralight backpacking puts a spring in our step and brings the joy back to sharing the outdoors. We hope it will do the same for you. Just remember the most important axiom that we introduced at the beginning of this article: “traveling together is a partnership.”

New Lightweight Backpacking Gear – (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2003) – Public Version

If you are a member and would like to view a version that includes full product specifications and high resolution photos, click here

Gear Availability

Many of these products will be available in Spring ’04. Some are being released in Fall ’03 (as early as September) and a few are available now or in the next few weeks. Please contact the manufacturer directly (let ’em know you heard about their products here!) for more precise product release dates and updated retail pricing.

Packs

Trends

Frameless rucksacks aren’t really getting much lighter this year, and there are few innovations in this area. However, there is a substantial push among several manufacturers to drop weights of internal frame packs, and we are now seeing several new internal frame packs in the 2-3 pound range with enough volume for week-long lightweight backpacking trips (up to 50L).

GoLite

GoLite makes the most substantial contribution in internal frame philosophy and design by introducing a corrugated polystyrene frame sheet with rod-shaped aluminum stays, a combination that works well together to provide surprisingly good support for far less weight than full-blown suspension systems.

GoLite Framesheet (photo in member’s version)

Combined with GoLite’s minimal suspensions (padded foam shoulder straps and mesh/webbing or thinly padded hip belts), we think that GoLite spent its weight in the appropriate places in the suspension – these are very comfortable packs. There are three new packs in their internal frame line – the GoLite Vision (30L), the GoLite Continuum (40L), and the GoLite Infinity (50L). They use a combination of fabrics – a newer, stronger (1.76 oz/sq.yd.) silicone-coated polyester ripstop to save weight and Dimension-Polyant’s lightest X-Pac diamond ripstop for wear areas. This combination provides the right balance of weight and durability and are significant improvements to currently available models that use a combination of lighter silicone-coated nylon and Dyneema ripstop. Another new addition to GoLite’s pack line is the GoLite Jam – a smaller and more feature rich version of the Gust.

GoLite Vision. (photo and specs in member’s version).

GoLite Continuum. (photo and specs in member’s version)

GoLite Infinity. (photo and specs in member’s version)

GoLite Jam. (photo and specs in member’s version)

CamelBak

CamelBak enters the lightweight backpacking market with two sleepers that are not being highly touted but offer good load carrying capacity: the 28L frameless CamelBak Raza and the 40L internal frame CamelBak Kronos. We think these are a couple of packs awaiting discovery.

CamelBak Raza. (photo and specs in member’s version)

CamelBak Kronos. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Vaude

Vaude offers what we think is going to be one of the best small volume packs that can comfortably carry a small, dense load (e.g., a full load of water with ultralight overnight gear) – the 24L Vaude Argon (weight about 24 oz).

Vaude Argon. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Equinox

Equinox released a new version of their evolving frameless Equinox Katahdin pack. At 55L, it offers a fabric-wing and buckle compression system that works well to reduce pack volume for smaller loads.

Equinox Katahdin. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Marmot

Marmot has contributed to the flood of other alpine pack manufacturers with reasonably-light frameless rucksacks that carry heavy loads poorly and are somewhat ill-suited for the backpacker. However, this year they introduce hollow 7075-T6 frame stays to the rucksack design in 40L and 55L versions of the Marmot Alpinist packs. Both packs are well under 3 pounds.

Marmot Alpinist 40. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Marmot Alpinist 55. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Granite Gear

Granite Gear introduces the Granite Gear Wisp and enters the market for hardcore ultralighters needing a solid load-carrying pack in the 30L size range.

Granite Gear Wisp. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Note: Most of our field testing is complete and We’ll be publishing reviews on Granite Gear’s other ultralight packs, Granite Gear Virga, Granite Gear Vapor Trail, and Granite Gear Nimbus Ozone in the near future.

Shelters

Trends

Weight is not being shaved in the area of shelters (with some notable innovations from Black Diamond) but a few solid designs emerged for those that like the security of a floored tent. In addition, Granite Gear offers some unique innovations in tarp design that are sure to improve the storm resistance of tarps in inclement conditions.

Black Diamond

Black Diamond introduces Epic Malibu (1.9 oz/sq.yd.) into a new line of shelters, including the Black Diamond Lighthouse (based on Bibler’s Ahwahnee design), Black Diamond Firstlight (based on Bibler’s I-Tent design), and the Black Diamond Lightsabre Bivy (based on the Bibler Tripod Bivy design). Yes, we said Epic. The same Epic (not waterproof in apparel) used in many popular apparel designs. And yes, these are designed to be standalone storm shelters not requiring a tarp pitched above them for a rain fly. We told Black Diamond that we thought this was a great innovation in cold-weather tent design. They replied with, “Cold weather? No, these are for all weather – rain, sleet, or snow, warm or cold…” The shelters save significant weights over the Bibler Todd-Tex counterparts (add Fibraplex carbon pole sets and you can shave a lot more weight). All have 30d silicone-coated nylon floors.

Black Diamond Lighthouse. (specs in member’s version)

Black Diamond Firstlight. (photo and specs in member’s version)

Black Diamond Lightsabre Bivy. (specs in member’s version)

GoLite introduces the GoLite Trig 2 shelter, a more stormproof, vestibuled, and floored version of the GoLite Lair 2. The shelter pitches taut, offers ventilation, and good vestibule storage. A key innovation with this shelter: you can pitch it with trekking poles inside (for greater stability and ease of setup in stormy weather) or outside (for more free space inside the shelter).

GoLite Trig 2. (photos and specs in member’s version) 

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers one person and two person floored double-walled and single-hoop pole tents that weigh less than 2.4 lbs and 3.1 lbs (stakes included) respectively, remarkably light weights for double-walled tents. The inner tents can be left at home, leaving you with virtually stormproof, floorless, single wall shelters with hooped pole designs that are very light.

Mont Bell Mono Frame Shelter Diamond. (specs in member’s version).

Mont Bell Mono Frame Shelter Hexagon. (specs in member’s version)

Granite Gear

Who would have thought that a major pack maker would be introducing what might be this year’s most innovative advances in design application for ultralight tarps. Granite Gear introduces the Granite Gear White Lightnin’, a series of silicone-coated nylon tarps that offer what is probably the tightest pitch of any tarps available on the market today. Offered in sizes suitable for 1-4 persons. A new type of silicone-coated nylon, a unique cut, load bearing binding tape on tarp edges and ridgline, tension buckles at guy points, and finally, an easy way to integrate trekking poles into the ridgeline pitch.

Granite Gear White Lightnin’. (specs in member’s version)

Sleeping Bags

Top bags! More designs are being introduced and it looks like this is a market segment that will have a strong suite of options by Spring 2004.

Western Mountaineering

The Western Mountaineering Pod 15 and Western Mountaineering Pod 30 – we’ve been waiting a long time for these. The new bags are shipping soon. The Western Mountainaering Pod comes with or without an inflatable sleeping pad (and, coming soon: a custom shaped foam pad to fit the bags) and makes valiant attempts to control drafts at the bag-pad interface down the sides with an innovative pad attachment system and side baffle. Our staff is split on whether this will be the bags’ weak point. We’ll reserve our judgment on performance following at the end of our review period. Statistics, features, and more photos are available at BackcountryGear.com.

(photos in member’s version)

Sierra Designs

Sierra Designs also enters the top bag market with the Sierra Designs Wickedfast line, comprised of two bags (“summer” and “spring” weights). The summer weight bag (size regular) weighs less than a pound and has more loft than the Pod 30, from 7 oz of 800 fill down (15 oz claimed weight, which we could not verify). The spring weight bag (size regular) was even loftier, has 14 oz of 800-fill down (1 lb 9 oz total weight). Both bags have generous girth of 63″ x 59″ x 46″, which may cause problems for thin sleepers needing to warm up the extra space.

(photos in member’s version)

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers a complete line of down bags but one contribution in particular, which is one of the lightest down bags in the world, has one of the longest and weirdest names of any bag on the market: The Mont Bell U.L. Alpine Down Hugger #5 (#5 in the U.L. Alpine Down Hugger series). This is a hoodless summer weight bag with vertical box baffles at 15 ounces (6.4 oz fill weight of 725-fill down).

Equinox

Equinox introduces a beta version of a new synthetic sleeping bag. It is a 3/4-zippered design with 1.1 oz nylon shell and liner and summer-weight synthetic insulation. We couldn’t validate the weight, and Equinox didn’t give one, but they are targeting an $80 price point in a summer-weight bag that might be well-suited for combining with clothing and bivy gear for summertime backpacking especially in the humid Northeast.

Slumberjack

Who would’ve thought that Slumberjack, not well known for their premier ultralight backpacking gear, would introduce a synthetic sleeping bag that weighs less than six ounces.

(photo in member’s version)

Kitchen

Kitchen gear innovations. Don’t expect great things here, either. We thought the coolest new gear was a titanium java press.

Snowpeak

Yep, Snow Peak introduces a titanium java press. And color.

(photos in member’s version)

Trangia

Titanium cookpot and fry pan/lid for the 28-5 cookset.

(photos in member’s version)

Vaude

(Markill) folding stove, titanium, 3 oz with piezo ignition. folding legs (good pot support).

(photo in member’s version)

Brunton

Relatively new and redesigned for this year, Brunton has a nice and very compact canister stove, the Brunton Crux. This has 12,000 BTU output, a wide flame spread, and superb simmer control.

(photo in member’s version)

Rain Shells

Patagonia

Patagonia introduces the new Patagonia Specter shell line that includes an 8 ounce anorak with hood (no pockets) and 10.5 ounce jacket that includes a hood, handwarmer pockets/core vents. The 3 oz waterproof breathable fabric has a nice drape and is very durable.

(photos in member’s version)

Equinox

Equinox introduces an 8-ounce (size Large) silnylon anorak that has a neck zip, hood, mesh pit vents, and elastic drawcord hem. We thought this was an innovative piece that offered good emergency rain protection.

(photo in member’s version)

Ibex

Ibex is upgrading the Ibex Bug Wing for Spring ’04 with an ultralight polyurethane-coated fabric that promises to be more breathable than than the current Tomen fabric used in the jacket. Expect it to remain less than four ounces, but offer significantly better comfort in the rain. Hood storage is also improved.

(photo in member’s version)

Wind Shells

Patagonia

The Patagonia Dragonfly gets a face lift and adds half an ounce with a full length zipper and a more durable fabric.

(photo in member’s version)

Pertex Equilibrium, Marmot, and GoLite

Stretchwoven softshell fabrics get even lighter with Pertex Equilibrium, a 4.5 oz fabric that gives full-zip jackets the ability to tip the scales at 10 oz or less. Equilibrium is a density gradient fabric that offers great breathability balanced with wind and drizzle protection, designed primarily for moisture (sweat vapor and wicking) management in high energy activities. Check out new garments from Marmot and GoLite that use Equilibrium.

(photo in member’s version)

Cloudveil Women’s Cloudveil has two new garments for women. A nice pair of capri pants and the Rodeo pants are available in a women’s style.

Base Layers

Ibex

Ibex continues to innovate in the area of wool fabrics. They offer a loose-fitting aerobic jersey with a neck zipper that has a very subtle wool inner surface (for temperature control) and a tightly knitted polyester outer surface (for wind resistance and durability). This design provides a good balance between the wide temperature range of wool while still providing the benefits of low moisture absorption offered by all-synthetic garments.

(photos in member’s version)

Insulating Layers

Patagonia

The new Patagonia Micro Puff pullover revisits the long-forgotten roots of the original puffball, offering a new Polarguard Delta pullover with a 1 oz fabric shell and lining. The result: quite possibly the warmest 10.5 ounces you’ll find in a synthetic garment.

(photo in member’s version)

Western Mountaineering

Western has a 5 oz down vest – the Western Mountaineering Flight Vest. It’s very nice. And very lofty!

(photo in member’s version)

GoLite

At a higher price, the GoLite Belay Parka is a great upgrade to the GoLite Coal. It uses Epic fabric and ads many nice design improvements. The GoLite Coal continues in GoLite’s product line.

Miscellany

The Black Diamond Zenix is a 4.4-ounce headlamp (weight includes 3xAAA batteries that constitute 1.2 oz of the headlamp weight?? why on earth not just use 2xAA lithiums for less weight, more power, and better cold weather performance?) that still works with a helmet. The lamp uses a “hyper” bright LED that can shoot a 50-meter beam. It’s a nice lamp, but what gives with the battery choice?

(photo in member’s version)

Trekking Poles aren’t making a big splash this year, but they do shave a few ounces. Look for 13 oz Leki Air Ergo Ultralight Ti poles and new 14 oz two-section carbon fiber trekking poles from Life-Link.

(photo in member’s version)

Water Treatment. No one really cares about water filters anymore, but the MSR Miox Purifier pen offers 30-minute water treatment for up to 4L at a time in a 3.5 ounce package. Pour some water into a little reservoir in the end of the pen, push a button, wait 30 seconds, watch the solution bubble up, and pour the magic solution into your water bottle. Originally developed for the U.S. Military, the Miox works by reacting salt with a small volume of untreated water to create a brine solution. Then, after electrical activation of the solution, a chemical reaction produces a powerful cocktail of mixed oxidants that is then poured into the untreated water container. The microbes are typically killed in 30 minutes, and the pen is said to be capable of eliminating viruses, bacteria, Giardia, and Cryptosporidia. The pen includes safety indicator strips that measure oxidant residual, useful for evaluating the effectiveness of the dose in particularly dirty waters. The Miox is about the size of a good cigar, leaves no foul taste, and requires only salt (included in tablet form by MSR, or you can add your own iodized rock salt) and a pair of CR-123 batteries to operate.

(photo in member’s version)

ThermaRest lightens their ultralight inflatable sleeping pads with the ProLite 3 series (13 oz in a 3/4 length, 20 oz in full length, and 2.75 oz in a 12″ x 16″ sit pad). But, stay tuned, Bozeman Mountain Works is whispering that a torso-sized inflatable sleeping pad to be introduced this fall will tip the scales at less than 10 ounces, a product to be found exclusively at BackpackingLight.com.

SealSkinz Inroduces fleece lined gloves and socks using their WP/B technology.

Storage. Granite gear introduced a new line of extremely light stuff and storage sacks at the show. These use the lightest silicone fabric in the industry, 1.1 oz coated weight. A 5×12.5″ stuff sack weights in at 0.56 oz! A 5.5×15″ compression sack weighs 2.5 oz. Also included are the rectangular side zip style Air Space stow bags and the smaller Air Pocket stow bags for items like maps, toiletries, sunscreen, matches and the ilk.

(photos in member’s version)

Product Review Program – Participating Companies

BackpackingLight.com is pleased to announce that nearly every company that has been a previous participant in our product review program will be returning for the 2003-2004 season. In addition, we are excited to announce the inclusion of several new companies. In 2003-2004, we will be reviewing products from.

  • Patagonia
  • Sierra Designs
  • Marmot
  • Arc’Teryx
  • GoLite
  • Integral Designs
  • Cloudveil
  • Brunton
  • Mont Bell
  • CamelBak
  • Merrell
  • Black Diamond
  • Vaude
  • Western Mountaineering
  • Granite Gear
  • Cascade Designs
  • Equinox

This is only a partial list, of course, that doesn’t include our existing cottage industry base and many, many more manufacturers that showcased their ultralight products to us at the show and will be submitting them for review.

New Lightweight Backpacking Gear – (Outdoor Retailer Summer Market 2003) – Member’s Version

Gear Availability

Many of these products will be available in Spring ’04. Some are being released in Fall ’03 (as early as September) and a few are available now or in the next few weeks. Please contact the manufacturer directly (let ’em know you heard about their products here!) for more precise product release dates and updated retail pricing.

Packs

Trends

Frameless rucksacks aren’t really getting much lighter this year, and there are few innovations in this area. However, there is a substantial push among several manufacturers to drop weights of internal frame packs, and we are now seeing several new internal frame packs in the 2-3 pound range with enough volume for week-long lightweight backpacking trips (up to 50L).

GoLite

GoLite makes the most substantial contribution in internal frame philosophy and design by introducing a corrugated polystyrene frame sheet with rod-shaped aluminum stays, a combination that works well together to provide surprisingly good support for far less weight than full-blown suspension systems.

GoLite Framesheet

Combined with GoLite’s minimal suspensions (padded foam shoulder straps and mesh/webbing or thinly padded hip belts), we think that GoLite spent its weight in the appropriate places in the suspension – these are very comfortable packs. There are three new packs in their internal frame line – the Vision (30L), the Continuum (40L), and the Infinity (50L). They use a combination of fabrics – a newer, stronger (1.76 oz/sq.yd.) silicone-coated polyester ripstop to save weight and Dimension-Polyant’s lightest X-Pac diamond ripstop for wear areas. This combination provides the right balance of weight and durability and are significant improvements to currently available models that use a combination of lighter silicone-coated nylon and Dyneema ripstop. Another new addition to GoLite’s pack line is the Jam – a smaller and more feature rich version of the Gust.

Vision. The internal frame 30L Vision comes in at 28 ounces and sports the following features: mesh and webbing belt, rear-loading main compartment with water-resistant zipper closure, stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, two daisy chains, single side compression straps, sternum strap, and haul loop.

GoLite Vision

Continuum. 40L and 35 ounces. Top-loading, mesh and webbing belt, dual bellowed rear pockets with watertight zippers and stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, floating top lid with security pocket, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, daisy chain, dual side compression straps, sternum strap, haul loop.

GoLite Continuum

Infinity. 50L and 37 ounces. Top-loading, padded belt, dual bellowed rear pockets with watertight zippers and stretch expansion panels, dual ice axe loops, floating top lid with security pocket, 3-liter hydration sleeve, two side mesh bottle pockets, three small daisy chains, dual side compression straps, sternum strap, haul loop.

Golite Infinity

Jam. 41L and 22 ounces. Top-loading, short extension collar, foam pad back panel, webbing-fabric hip belt, sternum strap, side mesh pockets, dual side compression straps, top retention strap, daisy chain, haul loop, dual ice tool loops, large rear bellows pocket with zipper closure, 3-liter hydration sleeve.

GoLite Jam

CamelBak

CamelBak enters the lightweight backpacking market with two sleepers that are not being highly touted but offer good load carrying capacity: the 28L frameless Raza and the 40L internal frame Kronos. We think these are a couple of packs awaiting discovery.

Raza. 28L and 27 ounces. 70d Cordura fabric, full-zip back panel for hydration reservoir, webbing-and-fabric belt with zippered pockets, top-loading, top lid with zippered mesh top pocket, hydration reservoir included. This pack has some of the best external storage pockets of any pack we’ve seen. It would work equally well for a day hike or a weekend overnighter.

CamelBak Raza

Kronos. 40L and 42 ounces. 70d Cordura fabric in wear areas with silicone-coated nylon for weight savings. polyethyene internal "Y-frame", full-zip back panel, dual compression straps, dual daisy chains, top lid with zippered pocket, hydration reservoir included. What impressed us with the Kronos was its excellent frame system.

CamelBak Kronos

Vaude

Vaude offers what we think is going to be one of the best small volume packs that can comfortably carry a small, dense load (e.g., a full load of water with ultralight overnight gear) – the 24L Argon (weight about 24 oz).

Argon. Made with a durable silicone-coated nylon ripstop body, the Argon sports a hooped frame in combination with a mesh back panel held in tension panel prevents your back from coming into contact with the pack body – which will significantly enhance ventilation across your back. The pack is top-loading, has a rear bungee compression system, dual side mesh pockets, top lid with zippered pocket, durable bottom, and webbing straps.

Vaude Argon

Equinox

Equinox released a new version of their evolving frameless Katahdin pack. At 55L, it offers a fabric-wing and buckle compression system that works well to reduce pack volume for smaller loads.

Equinox Katahdin

Katahdin. 22 oz. Relocation of cinch straps to better integrate with the suspension (the bottom cinch strap is now in line with the hip belt) and lower lumbar (small of back) padding are the more significant improvements. However, more than anything, we like the fact that Equinox raised the shoulder straps, offering a truer fit more appropriate for load transfer for the intended torso sizes. A 1.4-oz silicone coated nylon body complements more durable fabric in the compression system and harness. Standard features include two mesh side bottle/gear pockets, vertically-adjustable and padded hip belt, sternum strap, mesh belt, three compression straps.

Marmot

Marmot has contributed to the flood of other alpine pack manufacturers with reasonably-light frameless rucksacks that carry heavy loads poorly and are somewhat ill-suited for the backpacker. However, this year they introduce hollow 7075-T6 frame stays to the rucksack design in 40L and 55L versions of the Alpinist packs. Both packs are well under 3 pounds.

Alpinist 40. 40 oz Kevlar-ripstop nylon body with 630d in wear areas, frame sheet, removable lid, haul loop, dual ice axe loops, waist belt pockets, daisy chains, single frame stay.

Alpinist 55. 44 oz Kevlar-ripstop nylon body with 630d in wear areas, frame sheet, removable lid, haul loop, dual ice axe loops, rear pocket, waist belt pockets, daisy chains, rear bungee, bellows front stash flap, dual frame stays.

Granite Gear

Granite Gear introduces the Wisp and enters the market for hardcore ultralighters needing a solid load-carrying pack in the 30L size range.

Wisp. 33L and 24 ounces. Silicone-coated nylon body with heavier nylon for wear areas. Beavertail-style flap with dual side compression straps, dual ice axe loops, and dual daisy chains. Top flap with zippered security pocket, padded hip belt with zippered belt pockets, sternum strap, haul loop.

Note: Most of our field testing is complete and We’ll be publishing reviews on Granite Gear’s other ultralight packs, Virga, Vapor Trail, Nimbus Ozone in the near future.

Shelters

Trends

Weight is not being shaved in the area of shelters (with some notable innovations from Black Diamond) but a few solid designs emerged for those that like the security of a floored tent. In addition, Granite Gear offers some unique innovations in tarp design that are sure to improve the storm resistance of tarps in inclement conditions.

Black Diamond

Black Diamond introduces Epic Malibu (1.9 oz/sq.yd.) into a new line of shelters, including the Lighthouse (based on Bibler’s Ahwahnee design), Firstlight (based on Bibler’s I-Tent design), and the Lightsabre Bivy (based on Bibler’s Tripod Bivy design). Yes, we said Epic. The same Epic (not waterproof in apparel) used in many popular apparel designs. And yes, these are designed to be standalone storm shelters not requiring a tarp pitched above them for a rain fly. We told Black Diamond that we thought this was a great innovation in cold-weather tent design. They replied with, "Cold weather? No, these are for all weather – rain, sleet, or snow, warm or cold…" The shelters save significant weights over the Bibler Todd-Tex counterparts (add Fibraplex carbon pole sets and you can shave a lot more weight). All have 30d silicone-coated nylon floors.

Lighthouse. 2 lb 14 oz (vestibule 1 lb 1 oz). Packed size 6" x 9". Two persons. Dimensions 87" x 51" x 43".

Firstlight. 2 lb 9 oz (vestibule 1 lb 2 oz). Packed size 6" x 9". Two persons. Dimensions 82" x 48" x 42".

Black Diamond Firstlight

Lightsabre Bivy. 1 lb 4 oz with two hooped poles. One person. Dimensions 94" x 35" x 25".

GoLite

GoLite introduces the Trig 2 shelter, a more stormproof, vestibuled, and floored version of the Lair 2. The shelter pitches taut, offers ventilation, and good vestibule storage. A key innovation with this shelter: you can pitch it with trekking poles inside (for greater stability and ease of setup in stormy weather) or outside (for more free space inside the shelter).

Trig 2. 2 lb 9 oz. Two persons. Area 35 sq. ft. + 10 sq. ft. vestibule. Single-wall, pole-less shelter (uses trekking poles inside or outside to pitch), closed rear beak, noseeum mesh door (protected with a solid fabric zippered storm flaps) and lower side windows (protected with zip-down storm flaps), interior mesh hanging pockets. 30D silicone coated nylon body construction, 70d polyurethane-coated nylon floor.

GoLite Trig 2 – Front

GoLite Trig 2 – Rear

GoLite Trig 2 – Side Panels

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers one person and two person floored double-walled and single-hoop pole tents that weigh less than 2.4 lbs and 3.1 lbs (stakes included) respectively, remarkably light weights for double-walled tents. The inner tents can be left at home, leaving you with virtually stormproof, floorless, single wall shelters with hooped pole designs that are very light.

Mono Frame Shelter Diamond. 2.4 lbs with stakes. Single person shelter with 24 sq. ft. floor space (enough for two in emergencies). Peak height 3 ft 8 in, length 9 ft 10 in, width 4 ft 11 in. Packed size 10.2 in x 4.7 in (tent) and 15.7 in x 1.6 in (pole).

Mono Frame Shelter Hexagon. 3.1 lbs with stakes. Two persons, 40 sq. ft. (enough for three in emergencies). Peak height 3 ft 10 in, width 4 ft 11 in, length (sides) 5 ft 9 in, length (center) 8 ft 2 in. Packed size 12.6 in x 5.5 in (tent) and 15.7 in x 2.0 in (pole).

Granite Gear

Who would have thought that a major pack maker would be introducing what might be this year’s most innovative advances in design application for ultralight tarps. Granite Gear introduces the White Lightnin’, a series of silicone-coated nylon tarps that offer what is probably the tightest pitch of any tarps available on the market today. Offered in sizes suitable for 1-4 persons. A new type of silicone-coated nylon, a unique cut, load bearing binding tape on tarp edges and ridgline, tension buckles at guy points, and finally, an easy way to integrate trekking poles into the ridgeline pitch.

White Lightnin’. Sizes: 8×10, 10×10, and 10×12. Weights (estimated) 16 oz, 20 oz, and 24 oz. Tension buckle guy out points, catenary cut ridgelines and side edges, reinforced binding on edges and ridgeline to improve tautness of pitch. The tarp has a center vent for condensation resistance.

Sleeping Bags

Top bags! More designs are being introduced and it looks like this is a market segment that will have a strong suite of options by Spring 2004.

Western Mountaineering

Western Mountaineering’s Pod 15 and Pod 30 – we’ve been waiting a long time for these. The new bags are shipping soon. The Pods come with or without an inflatable sleeping pad (and, coming soon: a custom shaped foam pad to fit the bags) and make valiant attempts to control drafts at the bag-pad interface down the sides with an innovative pad attachment system and side baffle. Our staff is split on whether this will be the bags’ weak point. We’ll reserve our judgment on performance following at the end of our review period. Statistics, features, and more photos are available at BackcountryGear.com.

Western Mountaineering Pod 15 – Pad Attachment

Western Mountaineering Pod 15 – Pad Seal

Sierra Designs

Sierra Designs also enters the top bag market with their Wicked Fast line, comprised of two bags ("summer" and "spring" weights). The summer weight bag (size regular) weighs less than a pound and has more loft than the Pod 30, from 7 oz of 800 fill down (15 oz claimed weight, which we could not verify). The spring weight bag (size regular) was even loftier, has 14 oz of 800-fill down (1 lb 9 oz total weight). Both bags have generous girth of 63" x 59" x 46", which may cause problems for thin sleepers needing to warm up the extra space.

Sierra Designs – Wicked Fast Bag – Summer Weight

Mont Bell

Mont Bell offers a complete line of down bags but one contribution in particular, which is one of the lightest down bags in the world, has one of the longest and weirdest names of any bag on the market: The U.L. Alpine Down Hugger #5 (#5 in the U.L. Alpine Down Hugger series). This is a hoodless summer weight bag with vertical box baffles at 15 ounces (6.4 oz fill weight of 725-fill down).

Equinox

Equinox introduces a beta version of a new synthetic sleeping bag. It is a 3/4-zippered design with 1.1 oz nylon shell and liner and summer-weight synthetic insulation. We couldn’t validate the weight, and Equinox didn’t give one, but they are targeting an $80 price point in a summer-weight bag that might be well-suited for combining with clothing and bivy gear for summertime backpacking especially in the humid Northeast.

Slumberjack

Who would’ve thought that Slumberjack, not well known for their premier ultralight backpacking gear, would introduce a synthetic sleeping bag that weighs less than six ounces.

Slumberjack Ultralight Synthetic Bag

Kitchen

Kitchen gear innovations. Don’t expect great things here, either. We thought the coolest new gear was a titanium java press.

Snowpeak

Yep, Snow Peak introduces a titanium java press. And color.

Snow Peak Titanium Java Press

Snow Peak Titanium Mugs – In Color

Trangia

Titanium cookpot and fry pan/lid for the 28-5 cookset.

Trangia 1L Titanium Cook Pot

Vaude

(Markill) folding stove, titanium, 3 oz with piezo ignition. folding legs (good pot support).

Markill Folding Titanium Stove

Brunton

Relatively new and redesigned for this year, Brunton has a nice and very compact canister stove, the Crux. This has 12,000 BTU output, a wide flame spread, and superb simmer control.

Brunton Crux

Rain Shells

Patagonia

Patagonia introduces the new Specter shell line that includes an 8 ounce anorak with hood (no pockets) and 10.5 ounce jacket that includes a hood, handwarmer pockets/core vents. The 3 oz waterproof breathable fabric has a nice drape and is very durable.

Patagonia Specter Jacket

Patagonia Specter Anorak

Equinox

Equinox introduces an 8-ounce (size Large) silnylon anorak that has a neck zip, hood, mesh pit vents, and elastic drawcord hem. We thought this was an innovative piece that offered good emergency rain protection.

Equinox Squall Silnylon Anorak

Ibex

Ibex is upgrading the Bug Wing for Spring ’04 with an ultralight polyurethane-coated fabric that promises to be more breathable than than the current Tomen fabric used in the jacket. Expect it to remain less than four ounces, but offer significantly better comfort in the rain. Hood storage is also improved.

Ibex Bug Wing – 2004

Wind Shells

Patagonia

The Dragonfly gets a face lift and adds half an ounce with a full length zipper and a more durable fabric.

Patagonia Dragonfly

Pertex Equilibrium, Marmot, and GoLite

Stretchwoven softshell fabrics get even lighter with Pertex Equilibrium, a 4.5 oz fabric that gives full-zip jackets the ability to tip the scales at 10 oz or less. Equilibrium is a density gradient fabric that offers great breathability balanced with wind and drizzle protection, designed primarily for moisture (sweat vapor and wicking) management in high energy activities. Check out new garments from Marmot and GoLite that use Equilibrium.

Marmot Scirocco (Pertex Equilibrium)

Cloudveil Women’s Cloudveil has two new garments for women. A nice pair of capri pants and the Rodeo pants are available in a women’s style.

Base Layers

Ibex

Ibex continues to innovate in the area of wool fabrics. They offer a loose-fitting aerobic jersey with a neck zipper that has a very subtle wool inner surface (for temperature control) and a tightly knitted polyester outer surface (for wind resistance and durability). This design provides a good balance between the wide temperature range of wool while still providing the benefits of low moisture absorption offered by all-synthetic garments.

Ibex Teague Wool/Poly Jersey

Ibex Pacifica Merino Wool Base Layer with Front Zip & Handwarmer Cuffs

Insulating Layers

Patagonia

Patagonia’s new Micro Puff pullover revisits the long-forgotten roots of the original puffball, offering a new Polarguard Delta pullover with a 1 oz fabric shell and lining. The result: quite possibly the warmest 10.5 ounces you’ll find in a synthetic garment.

Patagonia Micro Puff

Western Mountaineering

Western has a 5 oz down vest. It’s very nice. And very lofty!

Western Mountaineering Flight Vest

GoLite

At a higher price, the Belay Parka is a great upgrade to the Coal. It uses Epic fabric and ads many nice design improvements. The Coal continues in GoLite’s product line.

Miscellany

The Black Diamond Zenix is a 4.4-ounce headlamp (weight includes 3xAAA batteries that constitute 1.2 oz of the headlamp weight?? why on earth not just use 2xAA lithiums for less weight, more power, and better cold weather performance?) that still works with a helmet. The lamp uses a "hyper" bright LED that can shoot a 50-meter beam. It’s a nice lamp, but what gives with the battery choice?

Black Diamond Zenix

Trekking Poles aren’t making a big splash this year, but they do shave a few ounces. Look for 13 oz Leki Air Ergo Ultralight Ti poles and new 14 oz two-section carbon fiber trekking poles from Life-Link.

Leki Air Ergo

Water Treatment. No one really cares about water filters anymore, but the MSR Miox Purifier pen offers 30-minute water treatment for up to 4L at a time in a 3.5 ounce package. Pour some water into a little reservoir in the end of the pen, push a button, wait 30 seconds, watch the solution bubble up, and pour the magic solution into your water bottle. Originally developed for the U.S. Military, the Miox works by reacting salt with a small volume of untreated water to create a brine solution. Then, after electrical activation of the solution, a chemical reaction produces a powerful cocktail of mixed oxidants that is then poured into the untreated water container. The microbes are typically killed in 30 minutes, and the pen is said to be capable of eliminating viruses, bacteria, Giardia, and Cryptosporidia. The pen includes safety indicator strips that measure oxidant residual, useful for evaluating the effectiveness of the dose in particularly dirty waters. The Miox is about the size of a good cigar, leaves no foul taste, and requires only salt (included in tablet form by MSR, or you can add your own iodized rock salt) and a pair of CR-123 batteries to operate.

MSR Miox Purifier

ThermaRest lightens their ultralight inflatable sleeping pads with the ProLite 3 series (13 oz in a 3/4 length, 20 oz in full length, and 2.75 oz in a 12" x 16" sit pad). But, stay tuned, Bozeman Mountain Works is whispering that a torso-sized inflatable sleeping pad to be introduced this fall will tip the scales at less than 10 ounces, a product to be found exclusively at BackpackingLight.com.

SealSkinz Inroduces fleece lined gloves and socks using their WP/B technology.

Storage. Granite gear introduced a new line of extremely light stuff and storage sacks at the show. These use the lightest silicone fabric in the industry, 1.1 oz coated weight. A 5×12.5" stuff sack weights in at 0.56 oz! A 5.5×15" compression sack weighs 2.5 oz. Also included are the rectangular side zip style Air Space stow bags and the smaller Air Pocket stow bags for items like maps, toiletries, sunscreen, matches and the ilk.

Granite Gear Compression Sack

Granite Gear Silnylon Stow Bag

Product Review Program – Participating Companies

BackpackingLight.com is pleased to announce that nearly every company that has been a previous participant in our product review program will be returning for the 2003-2004 season. In addition, we are excited to announce the inclusion of several new companies. In 2003-2004, we will be reviewing products from.

  • Patagonia
  • Sierra Designs
  • Marmot
  • Arc’Teryx
  • GoLite
  • Integral Designs
  • Cloudveil
  • Brunton
  • Mont Bell
  • CamelBak
  • Merrell
  • Black Diamond
  • Vaude
  • Western Mountaineering
  • Granite Gear
  • Cascade Designs
  • Equinox

This is only a partial list, of course, that doesn’t include our existing cottage industry base and many, many more manufacturers that showcased their ultralight products to us at the show and will be submitting them for review.

Pertex Shield Raises Ante in DWR Finishes for Soft Shell Garments

Woven soft shell fabrics such as microfiber polyester and ultralight ripstop nylons suffer from poor DWR finishes that make their utility in the rain very limited. Perseverance Mills of the UK addresses this concern with the introduction of Pertex Shield.

Pertex Shield is the culmination of extensive research to develop a new process for applying and bonding durable water repellency to breathable fabrics. The net result is a fabric that has the breathability of a typical microfiber with the water repellency approaching more traditional waterproof-breathable fabrics.

Based on the concept of moisture vapor “venting” (convective, rather than diffusive movement of moisture, a process on which eVent fabrics are based), Pertex Shield is poised to add significant water resistance to Perseverance Mills’ already extensive line of highly breathable performance fabrics.

One of the most remarkable features of Pertex Shield is the contact angle of water droplets in contact with the surface (see photograph). Steep contact angles (and they are 90 degrees or greater in this image) mean that there is less water to come into contact with the fabric; as a result, there is a (2) higher probability that water will roll off the fabric rather than stick to it, and thus, (2) a lower probability that water molecules will diffuse through the fabric via capillary action. Even more important, as can be seen in the photograph, is that this contact angle appears to be consistent across drop sizes, which means that even large water drop aggregates, like those that form on fabrics in heavy rain, are more likely to disperse in response to very low surface adsorption between the water and the fabric.

So what does this really mean for the lightweight backpacker? Fabrics that have a higher water resistance without compromising breathability, and the opportunity to achieve a level of water resistance in ultralight fabrics that was once only attainable in heavier fabrics.

We will be reporting more details about Pertex Shield soon, as it will be formally launched at the Outdoor Retailer show in Salt Lake City on August 15. In addition, we are looking forward to formal testing of Pertex Shield and evaluation of ultralight Shield-treated Pertex fabrics and garments this fall.

Revisiting Wind Shirts

Revisiting Wind Shirts: Breaking the 3 oz Barrier

When we last reviewed wind shirts in “Windshirt Wars”, the lightest fabrics were 1.4 to 1.1 oz/sq.yd. nylons and the lightest hoodless wind shirts weighed between 3.2 and 4.0 oz. Hooded wind shirts weighed around 8 oz. Since then, more manufacturers have entered the game with even lighter fabrics. Most notable of these fabrics is Pertex Quantum at 0.9 oz/sq.yd., launched at the 2002 Outdoor Retailer Summer Market in Salt Lake City. Now, a hoodless wind shirt can weigh as little as 2.5 ounces and the lightest hooded wind shirts are in the range of 3.0 to 4.0 ounces. In addition to Quantum, we are now seeing less breathable, ultralight fabrics in wind shirts designed more for rain protection than aerobic activity, thus expanding the market’s current definition of a “wind shirt.” This review offers information about new wind shirts from Montane, Rab, Marmot, GoLite, and Ibex.

The Classic Breathable Wind Shirt

Many feel that a wind shirt is the most versatile piece of clothing you can carry in your pack. Worn over a base layer, a wind shirt provides protection from wind chill and light precipitation, and serves to retain body heat lost through evaporative cooling in colder conditions. On its own (depending on the next-to-skin comfort of the fabric), it can serve as comfortable warm-weather insect and sun protection.

A classic wind shirt is a single-layer woven (nylon or polyester) torso garment cut to the pattern of a shirt, pullover, or jacket. The key characteristics of a wind shirt are its extremely light weight, high breathability of its fabric, and some water resistance (usually provided by a durable water repellent finish, or DWR). Pertex Microlight, Pertex Quantum, and 1.1 oz/sq.yd. uncoated nylon are good examples of fabrics used in classic breathable wind shirts. Herein we review two Quantum wind shirts from Rab and Montane, and a hooded wind shirt from Marmot.

Mostly Waterproof Wind shirts?

An emerging trend in ultralight wind shirts is towards a “mostly waterproof” design. Rather than a DWR finish applied to an uncoated nylon or polyester fabric, a new breed of wind shirts use a very light waterproof breathable coating (e.g., acrylic-based) on the inner surface of the shell fabric. They are more water resistant (and windproof) but far less breathable than a classic wind shirt. Examples of wind shirts using this approach include the GoLite Wisp/Ether and the Ibex Bug Wing, which use a 15 denier x 40 denier 1.3 oz/sq.yd. Tomen fabric that has 350mm of water resistance (hydrostatic head test), achieved with a light acrylic waterproof-breathable coating on the inner surface. The fabric specifications – validated with our experience – indicate that the fabric is at the lower end of the breathability scale relative to other waterproof-breathable fabrics using PTFE laminates or microporous polyurethane coatings. Although they market the garments as wind shirts, the designers of these garments really intend them to be more applicable to situations requiring temporary rain protection. Because they are less breathable, they are best suited for protection in cold wind and brief rain showers rather than sustained aerobic activity. Their ideal use might be as corner-fillers in your day pack or pants pocket for day hikes and climbs in iffy weather. For the ultralight hardcore, they may even be perceived as the summa cum laude of lightweight raingear.

We’ve been using these shirts during aerobic activity in wet conditions to discover their limitations. The most notable features, as verified in our field tests, are lack of breathability, lack of total waterproofness of the fabric, and lack of ventilation options. Sustained aerobic activity in garments made with the Tomen fabric will result in overheating and buildup of condensation in the garment. Lack of ventilation options such as pit zips, a full front zip, or mesh-backed torso pockets, compounds this problem. While the fabric offers a great deal more water resistance than Quantum or 1.1 oz/sq.yd. nylon, it is not totally waterproof, and will begin to wet out in a hard rain. However, the rain protection afforded by the Tomen fabric is significantly greater than uncoated nylons and polyester microfibers of the same weight. Only serious ultralighters that are very experienced managing their clothing system in wet weather will find these garments suitable as backpacking raingear – lack of sealed seams and not-quite-waterproof fabric require that you pay careful attention to your clothing system in cold rain.

Ibex Bug Wing Pullover & Jacket

Weight, Men’s size M: 3.7 oz (Pullover), 4.8 oz (Jacket)

These garments fall into the “mostly waterproof” category. The pullover has a half length (13 in) zipper and a single non-vented napoleon pocket. The jacket has a full length (25 in) zipper and two zippered (but vented with mesh backing) napoleon pockets. Both garments have a full hood with an elastic drawcord, elastic cuff closures and an elastic hem. The mediums fits about as we expect with enough room to throw on over a reasonable midweight base layer. The hem rises a bit when you raise your arms over your head.

Both garments use the Tomen fabric described earlier. The better vented jacket (with its full zips and mesh-backed torso pockets) offered significantly better climate management than the pullover. In fact, because of its ventilation options, the jacket is a reasonable rainwear choice for more aerobic levels found during light hiking and backpacking.

We hesitate to recommend the Bug Wings for sustained (over several hours) aerobic activities. With a low breathability fabric and no pit zips or large core vents, these shells are a bit on the clammy side. Work hard in these garments for an extended period and you’ll get soaked from the inside. In this case, a classic, fully breathable, wind shirt like the Montane Aero or the Marmot Chinook (reviewed later in this article) would be a better choice. Of the two Bug Wings, we give the nod to the full zip jacket due to its better ventilation. The full length front zipper and two vented napoleon pockets add much-needed ventilation options for aerobic activities. If the weather is not too warm and you aren’t sweating too much you may just get by in this jacket.

In our final analysis, both of these garments provide a low-volume, low-weight insurance policy against cold and windy summits and the occasional summer rain shower. In this case they have an advantage in both wind and water resistance over a classic, fully breathable, wind shell. They weight about 25% of conventional waterproof-breathable rain jackets like the Marmot Precip or Cloudveil Drizzle (see review of the Precip and Drizzle).

Contact: http://www.ibexwear.com/

GoLite Wisp and Ether Wind Shirts

Weight, Men’s size M: 2.53 oz (Wisp), 3.02 oz (Ether)

The Wisp (non-hooded pullover) and Ether (hooded pullover) are manufactured with the same Tomen fabric used in the Ibex Bug Wings. The only difference between the two is the addition of a hood (Ether).

These shells are minimalist, hence their lighter weight than the Ibex garments. No pockets and a 7-inch neck zipper, combined with an elastic hem, elastic cuffs, and elastic drawcord hood (Ether) may result in what is the lightest nylon rain protection available. The fit is suitable for layering over a base layer. Lack of ventilation options (including the shorter neck zip) means that they are less suitable for aerobic activity than the Ibex garments. However, their significantly lower weight means that if you are simply looking for temporary shower or wind protection without a need for ventilation, the GoLite garments offer a weight savings of nearly 20% (hooded pullover style), stuff a little smaller, and don’t suffer from the rising hem during an overhead reach like the Ibex Bug Wings.

Contact: http://www.golite.com/

Marmot Chinook

Weight, Men’s M: 3.4 oz

From John Cooley, Marmot Rep: “The Chinook wind shirt fabric is Marmot’s proprietary Meta P-120R. (Fabric code: P = polyester, 120 = 1.2 ounces per yard, R = ripstop). Meta is a 20×20 denier fabric…with Marmot’s proprietary Enduro DWR finish (80/100 ASTM spray test rating, which indicates that it is 80% effective at up to 100 commercial washings). Windproofness, as measured by a Fraser Air Permeability Test, is approx. 3 to 5 cfm., about the same as our DriClime windshirt.”

Marmot’s Chinook is a classic breathable wind shirt with a lot of features in a 3.4 oz package. With a full front zip and hood it weighs only 3.4 oz in a men’s medium. The full front zipper offers more ventilation options than pullover wind shirts (yes, you even need to vent a highly breathable wind shirt if you are working hard.). An elastic drawcord hood adds a lot of flexibility in working temperature range for less than an ounce. Combined with a fleece balaclava and a base layer, the Chinook may provide the ultimate in a full-featured wind jacket capable of extending your comfort range across a wide variety of inclement wind and light rain conditions.

The Chinook has a single chest pocket, a tab for rolling up and stowing the hood, elastic cuff closures and a straight hem (nice for tucking into pants).

The fabric is reasonably wind proof and quite breathable, although field perceptions indicate that it is not quite as breathable – or water resistant – as Pertex Quantum. The nicest feature of this fabric is that it is made with polyester, instead of nylon fibers. The result: it appears to dry about 25% faster than Quantum, absorbs about 15% less moisture, it feels nicer next to skin, and it has a nice drape, even when wet (where nylons tend to “stick” to your skin more when wet).

The fit is on the trim side but not excessively so, and the jacket layers well over a single base layer. You can raise your arms without the hem lifting too much to expose your midriff.

With its light weight, full front zip, and hood we think that the Chinook is an excellent design and highly recommend it. The only improvement we can think of would be to use an even lighter breathable fabric like Pertex’s Quantum to shave some weight, at the expense of losing a more comfortable next-to-skin feeling inherent with polyester garments.

Note: If you are a fan of the classic breathable wind shirt, you better get this year’s Chinook while you can. Rumor has it that next year, Marmot will replace this fabric with a light waterproof breathable fabric more akin to the Tomen fabric used in the Ibex and GoLite products. That’s too bad. Another great product bites the dust.

Contact: http://www.marmot.com/

Montane Aero Smock

Weight, Men’s L: 2.87 oz (2.48 oz with hem drawcord removed)

Montane gave us the king of wind shirts in our last review with the Pertex Microlight FeatherLite Smock. This year, they bring us the same design in Pertex Quantum and bring the weight down to less than three ounces. Considering that the FeatherLite (in size men’s L) weighed only 3.4 oz, the use of Quantum affords more than half an ounce of weight reduction, considering that Montane added a hook-and-loop-closure mesh chest pocket to the aero (large enough to hold most trail maps), more durable elastic wrist cuffs (which we found to be a weak point on the FeatherLite), and replaced the elastic hem with an elastic drawcord hem. By removing the drawcord (to make the hem more comfortable when tucked into pants), the resulting weight is 2.48 oz, and Montane maintains its status as the king of lightness for highly breathable wind shirts.

Quantum is more breathable and more comfortable next to skin (especially when wet) than Microlight. It also dries faster, is more compressible, and nearly as durable. We found it to be more prone to wear in the shoulders when carrying packs without a hip belt, but for the most part, it serves as a terrific replacement to Microlight in virtually every area of fabric performance. We’ve worn the Aero for more than eight months of winter, spring, and summer hiking, and find it to be one of the best wind shirts on the market. The use of hyper-breathable Quantum nearly negates the need for ventilation options. We recently wore the wind shirt over a thin wool base layer while hiking in 80+ degree temperatures, for added mosquito protection. We certainly sweated a fair bit on the uphills, but our wool-Quantum clothing system took only minutes to “breathe itself dry” when hiking on level or downhill inclines. This was one of the most shocking tests we’ve ever had with a shell garment. We look forward to more great designs using Pertex Quantum, and hope Montane fills the gap being left by the Marmot Chinook by offering the Aero in a full-zip, hooded version.

Montane sizes their garments small – that’s why we are reviewing a size large relative to other manufacturer’s size mediums. So, size up one size from normal.

Contact: http://www.montane.co.uk/

RAB Quantum Wind Top

Weight, Men’s M: 2.65 oz

There are few difference between the Rab Quantum Wind Top and the Montane Aero Smock. However, we feel that the differences are meaningful. The first and most important, is that Rab sizes their garments more true to U.S. standards, so a size medium really is a size medium (while the Montane smocks are sized one-half to three-quarters of a size smaller than U.S. standards). Another key difference is that the mesh pocket on the Rab Wind Top is a small chest pocket that is not large enough to hold a map. Like the Aero, the Quantum Wind Top has elastic cuffs (that have proved to be less durable than those used on the Aero after six months of field testing), an elastic drawcord hem, and a short neck zipper. Considering that the Rab shirt is £10 more expensive than the Montane Aero, we think the Aero is a better value.

Contact: http://www.rab.uk.com/

Marmot Precip vs. Cloudveil Drizzle: Raingear for Lightweight Backpacking

Introduction

It seems like all major manufacturers have an “ultralight” rain jacket in their line. The problem, however, is that all is not what it seems to be…ultralight often results in a compromised feature set, reduced sizing (trim and short!), tiny hoods, no cuffs, etc. So, we surveyed the market for the lightest full-featured rain jackets that had full sized hoods, full zips, two torso pockets, pit zips, adjustable cuffs and hem, and waterproof breathable fabric – and weighed less than 13 ounces. This criteria thinned down the playing field considerably – but two jackets in particular stood out as being particularly functional pieces of rainwear.

Cloudveil Drizzle

Weight: 12.2 oz size M

The Drizzle is made with a 2.5-layer waterproof breathable fabric, has a trim fit but will still layer over a Polarguard parka. The jacket sports waterproof zips on its two hand warmer pockets, pit zips, and full length zipper. The addition of waterproof zips seems like a nice feature but they are not easy to maneuver up and down with a single hand. And, after wearing the jacket for more than six months, the zippers remain stiff. The hand warmer pockets are sized a little on the small side, and they lack mesh backing – which we think is a serious oversight on any piece of waterproof raingear, because the fact is: mesh backed torso pockets are capable of venting a lot of moisture, and the success of any waterproof garment is going to depend on its ability to ventilate more than on the ability of the fabric to breathe. On the other hand if you are in really, really wet climates you can use the pockets in the rain without getting wet. Ditto on storing wet gear in the pockets. We leave it up to the user to decide if they want ventilation or water resistance on their front pockets. (The jacket does have two very long, dual slider pit zips.)

The hem is a good length, but by no means generous, the sleeves are plenty long and feature a yoke that doesn’t cause the jacket to ride up the midriff when reaching up, and the fabric has a supple, durable feel. We abused the Drizzle on rainy rock scrambles and found that the lightweight fabric stood up to more abrasion than we expected. The jacket is stylish and its trim fit does have a key benefit – this is an ideal jacket for those that need mobility in brush or mountains.

Overall Grade: B+

Marmot Precip

Weight: 12.5 oz size M

*** TRAIL’S BEST AWARD: RAINGEAR ***

The Precip uses a 2-layer waterproof breathable fabric that seems only a shade less durable than that used on the Drizzle. However, the fabric has certainly stood the test of time and abuse in our review period, in which we’ve worn the jacket during more than 200 hiker days of rain. In contrast to the Drizzle, Marmot skipped waterproof zippers, choosing to add conventional fabric zipper flaps to protect zippers from leaking. For the most part, we found the zippers to be plenty durable and really appreciated the easy-gliding large-toothed plastic zipper down the front. Zipper flaps didn’t get in the way and they protected all of the zippers from leaking in the hardest downpours. Marmot’s hood, piz zips and torso pockets are more generous than the Drizzle’s, and combined with Marmot’s use of mesh in the torso pocket backing, is one of the most well-ventilated jackets we’ve tested. The cut is roomy enough to layer over synthetic high-loft fill garments or thin down jackets, but it’s not as baggy as the GoLite Newt/Squall (which is sized to layer freely over their puffy Polarguard 3D Coal parka), so it’s suitable enough for the bushwacker or mountaineer. We thought the Precip hit the mark for rain jackets, and are pleased to award it with a BackpackingLight.COM 2003 Trail’s Best Award.

Overall Grade: A

BackpackingLight.com Breaks From Mold as the Anti-Establishment Authority in Lightweight Backcountry Travel

Backpacking Experts Unload the Heavy Gear and Marketing B.S. to Enlighten Outdoor Enthusiasts with Meticulous, Frank, Wilderness-Tested Reviews of Niche Outdoor Gear for Ultralight Hikers

Bozeman, MT – July 17, 2003 – After only two years of publishing, BackpackingLight.com emerges as an industry leader for commentary and advice on lightweight backcountry travel. BackpackingLight.com delivers a unique combination of scientific rationale and highly opinionated expert advice. Founded by renowned fastpacker and biomedical science entrepreneur Dr. Ryan Jordan, the BackpackingLight.com editorial team is not only technical in their approach to the sport, most hold engineering degrees. The online journal is currently a resource for 70 percent of lightweight and ultra light backpackers in the US with international readership spanning the globe to more than 200 major outdoor equipment manufacturers and several hundred thousand consumers. In fact, BackpackingLight.com and Dr. Jordan were recently featured in the New York Times (On the Trail With the Clothes on Your Back and Little More, July 13, 2003).

From the vantage point of advertising-free, anti-establishment editorial content, BackpackingLight.com’s product reviews and technique articles have not only spurred the growth of the lightweight backpacking industry but have influenced equipment design and outdoor journalism since the initial launch in July 2001. “BackpackingLight.com has definitely influenced [our company’s] product design. We are avid readers of the magazine and have benefited from many insightful product suggestions and ideas published there,” says Demetrios Coupounas, Co-Founder and President of GoLite, the worldwide market leader in lightweight backpacking gear. “Jordan and company’s in-depth analysis of GoLite products provides us with key information that definitely influences our design process. BackpackingLight.com’s ability to reach a diverse group of users and solicit their feedback has helped us to better understand our customers’ wants and needs. They are unquestionably one of our most important liaisons of communications between the consumer and manufacturer.”

The new BackpackingLight.com website includes an online store featuring hand-picked, exclusive, top-quality lightweight backpacking gear from the industry’s hottest cottage manufacturers. “Lightweight backpackers are a savvy lot,” says Alan Dixon, BackpackingLight.com’s co-founder and Product Review Editor (another engineer, of course). “Much of our readership demands a level of performance that is not found in the mainstream marketplace, so we try to hook them up with gear made by garage designers and techniques being practiced by the relatively unknown ultralight elite that includes long-distance hikers, ultra-marathoners, fastpackers, adventure racers, and alpinists. Our role is not just to report industry trends, but to drive them, realizing that when those garage designs finally find their home in a product catalog of a major manufacturer, we’ve done our job.”

Editors Jordan and Dixon don’t ignore the bulk of backpackers carrying heavy packs. BackpackingLight.com’s hallmark publication, ‘Lightweight Backpacking 101,’ has earned a cult following as a de facto standard of lightweight evangelism for everybody from the Boy Scouts to the U.S. Military. In addition, BackpackingLight.com has caught the attention of the leading manufacturers in the outdoor industry. In addition to GoLite, Dixon counts Arc’Teryx, Cloudveil, Marmot, Big Agnes, Outdoor Research, Western Mountaineering, Ibex, Feathered Friends, Mountain Safety Research, Integral Designs, Wild Things, Montane, Rab Carrington, and a host of other companies as members of BackpackingLight.com’s rigorous product testing and review program.

In addition to frank and sometimes-too-honest reviews of lightweight backpacking gear, BackpackingLight.com offers insightful and informative editorial commentary, features, and technical articles. Expect to find irreverent diatribes and colorful backpacking philosophies borne from random thoughts incubated by too many nights spent in sub-freezing conditions. In addition to holding manufacturers accountable for marketing hype and performance claims, BackpackingLight.com challenges their readers with openings like, "Never, ever, blame your gear – or the manufacturer’s marketing strategy – for your discomfort." Jordan comments, “We are 100% committed to empowering beginning and advanced backpackers alike with the skills, knowledge, and common sense required not only to make solid purchasing decisions, but also to enjoy the backcountry with less of a burden.”

In response to the editorial board’s refusal to accept advertising of any kind, BackpackingLight.com is a subscription-based magazine, a strategic move designed to further distance the unique, unbiased editorial from marketing hype and advertiser influence and to put readers in the driver’s seat when it comes to making purchasing decisions. It is the only major Internet backpacking site that is free of advertising, affiliate marketing, or sponsored content. Member benefits include coop-style gear buying discounts, insider commentary on the outdoor equipment industry, and exclusive content.

BackpackingLight.com is now booking appointments to meet with outdoor trade media, major retailers, and manufacturers at the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market (Salt Lake City, August 14-17). Interview commentary and trade show news will be released in daily dispatches on its website, with insider commentary available to its paying subscribers.

Other manufacturer opinions about BackpackingLight.com:

“BackpackingLight.com is our best source of impartial news, views and reviews for the worldwide community of enlightened mountain sports enthusiasts. Jordan and Dixon’s mountain hiking experience, engineering backgrounds, and rigorous product testing program has allowed us to gather product information that we have been unable to gain elsewhere, allowing us to refine and improve the designs of our ultra light hiking and mountaineering apparel.” – Jake Doxat, CEO, Montane, Northumberland, UK

“Ryan Jordan and his staff at BackpackingLight have been instrumental in recommending refinements for our specialized cold weather hand and footwear. They have extensive knowledge of the outdoor industry and product engineering, and RBH Designs will continue to consult with them for future product development of our high-performance outdoor apparel. Actually, Ryan Jordan may be the only product tester we know that prays for seventy mile an hour winds, thirty-below-zero temperatures, and white-out conditions.” – Nancy B. Hannigan, RBH Designs

What readers say about BackpackingLight.com

"The feature article, ‘Westerner’s Weekend on the Appalachian Trail’ was one of the funniest stories of AT hiking I’ve ever read. If you liked Bill Bryson’s ‘A Walk in the Woods,’ you’ll love Jordan’s take on the AT. It’s pee-your-pants-funny with a cast of characters well-suited for visual comedy." – TT

"BackpackingLight.com is quirky and unconventional but absolutely brilliant. It’s a refreshing place to visit. The Editors are always responsive to technical questions and fortunately, quite honest about gear recommendations. Frankly, the way they test (abuse?) their gear for review seems to be a recipe for disaster that would send manufacturers scampering. But there is a reason why the likes of Cloudveil, Marmot, Arc’Teryx, and GoLite provide them with gear to test: the reviews are just plain honest. Great job. Your subscription fees are way too cheap." – PE

"Fortunately, and refreshingly, Backpacking Light carefully considers the foundation on which gear is designed, challenges (and often dispels) marketing claims, and invokes a rational basis for equipment testing, analysis, and design critique. Kudos to you guys for creating a forum in which other publishers are too scared to challenge the status quo of their advertising partners." – GT

"Alan Dixon is a gear junkie’s godsend. His technique and review articles are outstanding. They are detailed, but not so much so that he provides a bunch of meaningless information. Alan brings a lot to BackpackingLight as its Product Review Editor and is willing to suffer a little pain and punishment to push gear to its limits." – WO

Biographies of BackpackingLight.com Co-Founders

Bio: Ryan Jordan
Dr. Ryan Jordan holds engineering degrees that have launched him to the forefront of backcountry science, with research and design experience spanning the specialties of backcountry health and hygiene, water treatment technologies, backpack load distribution, and condensation management in shelters and apparel. Most recently, he was a Senior Research Engineer with Montana State University’s renown Center for Biofilm Engineering before launching Cytergy, a scientific e-learning company that delivers advanced training to healthcare professionals and life science organizations.

An Eagle Scout, Jordan was the former director of Scouting USA’s oldest high adventure program at Camp Parsons on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula, where he was well known among Chief Seattle Council parents for turning their 13-17 year old boys into wobbling, arthritic young men after a week of hiking and alpine climbing in the Olympic Mountains. Later, as the Program Director for Camp Parsons in 1992, Jordan was responsible for designing and delivering what was one of the first ultralight backpacking instructional and leadership programs in the country to more than 300 adult Scout leaders during an 8-week training tenure.

Dr. Jordan’s recent ultralight accomplishments focus on multi-day ultra-marathon length hikes in the Yellowstone wilderness while carrying less than five pounds of equipment, and single-push alpine ice climbs. He has crossed the Olympic Mountains in a single push with a three-pound day pack, and has circumnavigated Mount Rainier in three days with a ten pound pack.

Dr. Jordan regularly lectures on the topic of lightweight backpacking and is well-known for his comprehensive training seminars, clinics, and field courses for outdoor leadership program staff and youth instructors. He lives in Bozeman, Montana with his wife Stephanie and their son Chase, and calls every wilderness area within a half-day’s drive “home,” including three National Parks (Yellowstone, Glacier, and Grand Teton) and several major mountain ranges (including the Tetons, Beartooths, Absarokas, Spanish Peaks…)

Bio: Alan Dixon

Mr. Alan Dixon is a former aerospace engineer, professional photographer, and special effects engineer for the movie industry (he actually worked on a Star Wars film). Mr. Dixon resides in Washington D.C. where he is a senior engineer for a government public health agency.

Mr. Dixon grew up on the west coast and carried his first backpack into the Yosemite backcountry at age four. He’s been hiking, backpacking and climbing all over the country ever since. Single push alpine climbing and ultralight fastpacking with a sub-five pound pack are his current raves. In addition to his expertise in the areas of lightweight backpacking for couples, groups and families, he manages to run BackpackingLight.com’s premier product review program. “Products are reviewed in a several-month-long ordeal of laboratory and field testing,” Alan says, “where they are swallowed, chewed, and spit out with a comprehensive analysis of their performance.”

Mr. Dixon’s engineering background allows BackpackingLight.com to perform product testing and analysis to an extent that is not found in other publications. The ability to perform things like textile engineering, seam load testing, backpack frame deflection analysis, and shelter wind load analysis adds authenticity to a rigorous field testing process that can span months. As a result, Mr. Dixon has taken BackpackingLight.com to new heights, and is one reason for its appeal to some of the outdoor industry’s biggest manufacturers – and its consumers.

Media Contact:
Bridget Cavanaugh
406.464.7433 ofc
406.320.5000 mbl
bridgetc@cavanaughpr.com

Gerber Sports Saw

Editor’s Note: This product is described only for your information. It has not been submitted for review and thus, has not undergone our normal testing procedures.

The lightest Sven saws still weight in the neighborhood of a pound or more, and those cheesy ultralight wire saws will keep your campmates freezing in front of a firestarter while they wait for you to saw through one six-inch log.

Backpacker’s who enjoy the comforts of cut-wood fires can now have a little power in a 3.4 oz package: The Gerber Sports Saw has a retractable 6 3/8-inch blade, a comfortable plastic handle, and is very sharp to boot (and, retains its edge well). It packs to a size of about 0.75" x 1.5" x 8.0".

We’ve used the saw for three years on April and May hiking trips in the spring where wet wood is difficult to break with our tennies or knees, and recommend it for its good performance:weight ratio for you me-need-fire hikers.

Feathered Friends EPIC Jackorak

Imagine this. A highly water resistant, hooded wind and shower shell sized large enough for layering and to cover your butt with a full-length zipper, massive mesh-vented torso pockets, and pit zips for a mere 9 oz? Feathered Friends has achieved this reality with their Jackorak in 1.9-oz EPIC by Nextec fabric. We’ve climbed, hiked, snowshoed, and skied with EPIC Jackoraks for more than a year now, and they have earned a regular position on our gear lists.

The EPIC used in the Jackorak is the lightest flavor of this fabric, is soft next to skin, and has a drying time that is probably unmatched by any fabric on the market due to its extremely low water absorption capacity. The Jackorak won’t keep you dry in a deluge, but it is suitable for most of the mist and drizzle you’re likely to encounter in the mountains. It is a terrific winter shell in dry, cold, snowy conditions.

But it’s the full length zipper, vented torso pockets, voluminous hood, and pit zips that sets this jacket apart from the crowd. Zip everything up and cinch down the hood and you can add several degrees of comfort to your layering system during a biting mountain wind. Or, unzip and ventilate to your heart’s content when you hit the up hills and deep snow drifts.

The Jackorak is not without its imperfections, of course. Lycra-hemmed cuffs and hem proved to wear quickly – we would have preferred backstitched EPIC cuffs with elastic. Also, contrary to claims that suggest otherwise, EPIC does lose its water resistance over time.

Our suggestions to preserve water resistance:

  1. Never – ever – use soap to wash the jacket. Just throw it in the washer on gentle cycle and dry on medium heat.
  2. Use a hydrocarbon-based water repellent such as Scotchguard or Rain-X to restore its water repellency. Skip the Nikwax and other water-based repellents. They do little for silicone-encapsulated fabrics and readily wash out (silicone blocks the adsorption of water-based repellents to fiber surfaces).
  3. Keep it clean.

The bottom line is this: The EPIC Jackorak may be the most versatile wind shell on the market. It certainly has a wider comfort range than anything we’ve tested.

Ibex Icefall Jacket and Glacier Vest

Both the Icefall and Glacier use Ibex’ Climawool™ Lite, which is similar to Schoeller Dynamic. It has a woven shell of Nylon and Lycra but has a napped merino wool lining. Climawool™ Lite is an upgrade to Schoeller’s Skifans fabric (Ibex had Schoeller modify Skifans to be more resistant to pilling). We found this fabric to be a good blend of warmth, breathability, and wind and water resistance. The napped merino wool lining increases the warmth, moisture management and comfort range of the fabric over standard Dynamic fabrics.

Icefall Jacket

The Ibex Icefall Jacket is a simple stretchwoven, full zip softshell. It has two mesh lined hand warmer pockets, and a one-hand-operated waist drawcord. The only two “extras” are a nice napoleon pocket and a soft merino wool lining (a side benefit of this is a soft collar). In typical stretchwoven style, the jacket has a fairly trim fit but we found it to be a little roomier than competing all-synthetic garments from Cloudveil and Arc’Teryx. The sleeves are generously long and you have full range of motions without restriction or the waist lifting. The jacket has room for a couple of base layers or even a light insulating layer. We’ve used the Icefall jacket extensively for ice climbing, skiing, snow shoeing, and all other manner of cold weather aerobic pursuits. The jacket weighs about 16.5 ounces.

The Icefall jacket’s wool lining separates it from the rest of the stretchwoven crowd. At only 1.5 ounces lighter than Cloudveil’s Serendipity (the gold standard of softshell jackets), the Icefall is less wind and water resistant, but has a wider comfort range across the temperature spectrum than the Serendipity. It is similar in weight to Cloudveil’s Veiled Peak jacket, but we felt the Icefall offered more performance and comfort with the addition of wool.

One key benefit of the Icefall: after several continuous days of skiing, climbing, and sweating in it and not washing it, it resisted odor very well, when we couldn’t wait to get home to throw our all-synthetic stretchwovens in the wash under similar conditions.

Glacier Vest

The Glacier Vest loses the arms to come in at under 9 ounces. At twice the weight of a thin wind vest and a few ounces heavier than a 100-weight fleece vest, we were eyeing it with scrutiny in order to discover a potential market niche. Its Climawool™ Lite fabric it is warmer, more abrasion resistant, and more water resistant than thin nylon wovens found on other wind vests. The fabric is more wind-resistant than 100-weight fleece but not quite as warm when worn under a shell. The Glacier is more breathable and more suited for aerobic activity than either a thin wind vest or a fleece vest. Its smooth surface allows it to layer under other garments more effectively than fleece. Vest features include two hand warmer pockets, two large internal storage pockets, and a draw cord waist.

During months of testing, we discovered that the Glacier offers a niche that is not quite filled by any other garments on the market. We wore it in windy summer-and-fall alpine hiking conditions, where temperatures were cool enough to require something over our base layers, and windy enough that we wanted some wind protection. The arm freedom of the vest design provided both insulation and wind resistance without sacrificing breathability or freedom of movement. For these conditions, a stretchwoven vest is a winner.

We do wish that the Glacier included a small Napoleon pocket to stash a packet of Gu or two.

Cloudveil Veiled Peak Jacket

Weight: 16.3 oz size M

The Veiled Peak is Cloudveil’s midweight softshell jacket for aerobic activities. Unlike their famed Serendipity Jacket, which uses a heavier Schoeller Dryskin Extreme, the Veiled Peak uses the lighter and more breathable Schoeller Dynamic fabric.

This is a basic no frills softshell. It uses standard Schoeller Dynamic (with its smooth, rather than napped inner surface), has two mesh lined hand warmer pockets, and a one hand operated waist draw cord. The only two “extras” are a zippered wallet/key stash pocket on the inside of one the mesh hand warmer pockets and a soft tricot lining on the collar.

The fit is trim and attractive (the jacket looks great hanging around town) with plenty of mobility and room for a couple of base layers. The Veiled Peak has a nice enough fit that it serves well as a minimalist stretchwoven shell for mild winter hiking, climbing, and backcountry skiing.

We would have liked at least one napoleon pocket on the jacket but it’s a minor gripe. We can probably figure out another place to stash the GPS, cell phone, or kisky flask. More disturbing is the jacket’s weight. At 16.3 oz, the Veiled Peak cannot compete with the lightest soft shell jackets on the market (including other stretchwovens) and it is only about 10% lighter than far more weather resistant jackets like Cloudveil’s own Serendipity.

Update July 2003: Cloudveil has decided to discontinue the Veiled Peak collection to pursue development on the Prospector clothing line.

Arc’Teryx Alpha Comp

Weight: 14.3 oz size M

The Alpha Comp softshell/hardshell hybrid is a solid performing alpine hiking/climbing jacket. If you don’t expect to be inundated with rain, this jacket can handle just about anything else the elements can dish out. It is tough, abrasion resistant, and highly wind resistant. The jacket is cut trim for climbing but great shoulder and arm articulation and fabric stretch give the wearer excellent freedom of movement. The jacket sports waterproof fabric in all the important areas without sacrificing the breathability of a softshell that is so important for aerobic endeavors.

Arc’Teryx’s Alpha Comp uses Schoeller Dynamic for the body of the jacket and a PTFE-laminated waterproof breathable fabric for the neck, shoulders, outside of the arms, and waist. This jacket has the same weight and durability of a stretchwoven shell but provides more overall water resistance with the addition of the hardshell yoke. Unless rain is coming horizontally at you (and we’ve been there!) you could stay quite dry in this jacket for a long time.

We did find the jacket’s limits, however. Whilst peak bagging in Northern Scotland, we experienced nonstop rain, hail, sleet, and snow, often blowing horizontally. The jacket shrugged off most of the drier stuff and light rain but during the periods of intense rain, the jacket (Scottish perception follows) “let in a little more water than we would have liked” (American translation: “we got soaked, dude”) as rain ran down and collected between the pack and our back. We did manage to burn much of this off while pushing hard uphill to bag that Munro.

The Alpha Comp also got its most serious aerobic test while on a 36 hour continuous push mixed rock and ice climb in the Tetons. We wore the jacket the entire time over a Patagonia R1 hoodie base layer. This combo kept us warm enough from an 11pm start on the approach, through a long ice climb in sub-freezing temps, and until 8 pm the following evening when darkness, an incoming storm, dropping temperatures, and high winds forced us to throw a belay parka over it. The jacket held up to abrasion of rock, ice, tool scraping and ice screw kisses. Best of all, it was a superb breather and we never got chilled or damp inside while on the climb (the night time descent we’ll save for another story).

This is a jacket designed for climbers and alpine scramblers. It has a trim cut to stay out of the way and not catch on things but has plenty of articulation for a full range of motion and enough room for a substantial baselayer. The dual napoleon pockets are great for stashing all sorts of gear as you climb (they hold an amazing amount of stuff and we were forever stuffing them with more gear). The hand warmer pockets are cut high enough to access above a hip belt. The waterproof PTFE fabric is in the strategic places likely to brush up against wet snow and ice as well as protecting the climber from precipitation.

One gripe about the jacket that we tested is that it has no hood. In Scotland we wore the jacket with a Seattle Sombrero rain hat to stay dry. We understand that in the near future, Arc’Teryx will have a hooded version of this jacket out. With a hood, the Alpha Comp increases its versatility significantly. We’ll be provide an updated review as the jacket becomes available.

At 14.5 oz, it’s a bit heavier than the lightest softshells on the market. If you expect to be wearing the jacket on most of your trip, and it won’t sit in the bottom of your pack as an “extra layer,” then we think it is well worth it: the additional weight does buy added performance.

It’s biggest disadvantage of course: the cost of owning a garment with the embroidered bird-o-saur. You’re going to have to mortgage the farm (it might be worth it) to afford it: $300. That’s a lot of money to shell out for a single piece of clothing. But it’s competitive with other high-end waterproof-breathable garments and will likely outperform them.

Cloudveil Prospector Jackets

Introduction

We like softshell garments. You know that. They are superbly breathable and offer a wider range of comfort than traditional hardshell clothing. Stretchwoven softshells, in particular, with their trim cut and freedom of movement, are some of the more comfortable pieces of clothing to wear while hiking, climbing, or skiing. Their ability to shed enough moisture to keep you dry in most conditions makes them very appealing for the backcountry traveler.

Our biggest complaint with stretchwovens, however, is the fabric weight. Few fabrics from Schoeller Textiles, the self-proclaimed knight of softshell fabrics, are less than 5 oz/sq. yd. Cloudveil addresses this concern with its new Inertia fabric used in its Prospector line of softshell garments. Herein we review the Prospector Pullover and Hooded Jacket.

Inertia Fabric

Cloudveil has developed some of the lightest and most versatile softshell garments available with their new Inertia fabric. The Prospector Hooded Jacket is a fully featured softshell for less than 15 oz, and the Prospector Pullover is a sub-9-oz wind shirt that earns title as the market’s featherweight stretchwoven. Compare this to other softshells that are typically over a pound and lack a hood and the other niceties of the Prospector and you readily see why these garments are worth a closer look.

Inertia does not depend on stretch fibers such as Lycra for its stretch – but is designed with “mechanical stretch” formed during the weaving process. In doing so Cloudveil reduces fabric weight while retaining much of the wind resistance, water resistance, and durability of a heavier nylon/Lycra stretchwoven fabrics. The thin, lightweight Inertia absorbs less water and dries faster than a nylon/Lycra fabric like Dynamic.

Our favorite feature about Inertia is its textured interior and smooth surface, which provides the necessary structure required to most effectively drive moisture through the garment via capillary action (wicking).

Hooded Jacket

At 14.5 oz, the Prospector offers a high feature-to-weight ratio that competes with any softshell on the market. This jacket is loaded with storage with three external pockets and two internal pockets. The jacket’s hand warmer pockets are generous, cut high enough to access above a hip belt, and are mesh lined for ventilation. The single napoleon pocket is also large and has a mesh backing. The jacket has two internal cargo pockets that are perfect for larger items. The jacket’s hood is cut almost large enough to fit over a climbing helmet and has two hem draw cords to seal out the elements and tailor the fit.

Open all of these mesh lined pockets and you get serious ventilation as we discovered when testing jacket ventilation features in one of our high speed wind testing laboratories (a windy bobsled run for suicidal skiers in Montana’s Bridger Mountains). Between the vented pockets and the breathable Inertia fabric, the Prospector Hooded Jacket does an excellent job venting excess moisture and keeping you dry during hard aerobic activity. The brushed wicking lining of the fabric also helps with moisture management and the comfort range of the jacket.

Pullover

At 8.6 oz, the Prospector Pullover is the king of lightweight stretchwovens. It features the cut of a wind shirt and is suitable for layering over a base layer. A single mesh-backed Napoleon pocket, tricot-lined collar, and hem drawcord round out its simple feature set. Cloudveil recognizes the need for ventilation, even on a superbly breathable garment, by adding a deep neck zipper.

A Little Light for Foul Conditions, No?

We first tested these garments on an October ascent of 14,414-foot Mt. Rainier, the Cascades’ iciest peak and Washington’s highly irritable queen of foul weather. She didn’t disappoint us on our first attempt, where we began the approach to Camp Muir in light rain that eventually degraded into driving sleet and snow in a double temperature inversion that draped trails, rocks, packs, and signs in rime ice as we climbed further up the mountain.

We wore our Prospector shells over 100-weight gridded fleece base layers. Moving rapidly, we generated enough body heat so that the garments handled all of this with aplomb and we never resorted to using a hardshell. Needless to say, the foul nature of Mt. Rainier chewed us up and spit us out, but certainly not as a result of the limitations in these remarkable shell layers.

On the summit day of our second attempt a few days later, we climbed most of the way to the summit, again wearing only the Prospectors over 100-weight gridded fleece. (we added additional layers above 14,000 feet). This combination kept us warm enough in high winds and sub-freezing temperatures with no clamminess or sweat-induced chilling. We added additional insulation layers near the summit when winds reached 60 mph and temperatures had dropped into the teens. We found the two internal cargo pockets of the Hooded Jacket ideal for storing half-liter Platypus bags of water to keep it handy and warm, essential for maintaining hydration on any mountain endeavor.

Warm Weather Use

Since their initiation on Rainer, the Prospectors have been abused in a variety of other conditions in all four seasons, including the Utah desert. In the desert, we found that the lighter Inertia fabric of the Cloudveil garments is great for warm as well as cold conditions. One of our reviewers discovered terrific comfort and utility of using the Pullover as a hiking shirt, finding that the napped inner surface provided great wickability and the shirt’s wind resistance allowed for a very high range of comfort. We think that for mild and warm conditions, most stretchwoven softshells are overkill. The Prospector Pullover, however, due to its minimal weight, makes a great companion for three season backpacking.

Price

It seems that those little Schoeller hang tags and ancient bird logos must cost a lot of money (special thread required to attach them to the clothing, maybe?). At any rate, we’re pleased that Cloudveil is offering high quality stretchwoven fabrics at reasonable prices. The Hoodie comes in at $150 and the Pullover is $115. These aren’t bargain basement prices, by any means, but they are at least within shootin’ range for the rest of us.

Soft Shells: The Real Story

Soft shells like the Cloudveil Rodeo Jacket (shown here) are becoming increasingly popular among backpackers and alpinists alike.

Introduction

Given only 60 seconds to choose our clothing for a hike or climb, we would likely choose a soft shell jacket and pants first, and build the rest of layering system around those core garments.

Combinations of soft shell garments, especially when layered over next-to-skin wicking garments, offer a wide enough comfort range to deal with most inclement environmental conditions we are likely to face, including sun, heat, cold, wind, light rain, sleet, snow, brush, sharp rocks, and mosquitoes. The breathability of soft shell fabrics means that we can remain comfortable under a wider variety of conditions than traditional coated or laminated “hard shell” fabrics.

We still find utility in waterproof-breathable (“hard shell”) garments for cold, heavy precipitation, as we find in the spring and early summer in the Rockies and Sierras (or year round in the Pacific Northwest). But for most conditions, we prefer to wear garments made with soft shell fabrics.

“A soft shell garment is a piece of clothing designed to be worn as an outer shell layer made with a breathable, but weather-resistant fabric, and designed to replace a ‘hard shell’ … for most conditions.”

What is a Soft Shell?

Patagonia and Cloudveil, the outdoor industry’s two most vocal proponents of soft shell technology, disagree on the definition of a soft shell. There is quite a lot of pride at stake in this somewhat ridiculous terminology war, simply because these two companies have advanced soft shell garment design more than anyone. However, to find some common ground, we’d rather not fuel the confusion and simply say this:

A soft shell garment is a piece of clothing designed to be worn as an outer shell layer made with a breathable, but weather-resistant fabric, and designed to replace a “hard shell” (e.g., a garment made with a waterproof-breathable or -nonbreathable fabric) for most conditions.

Based on this definition, one might find that an eight dollar polyester disco shirt from your local Target store suits your needs as well as a $300 stretch woven jacket. Hey, it’s not a pretty picture for the outdoor industry, but welcome to reality. But inherent in that reality is the realization that a disco shirt can only take you so far, and there are scores of other fabrics more suitable for high-performance clothing. We take a closer look at two families of those fabrics herein – silicone-encapsulated wovens, and stretch-wovens.

The breathability of a soft shell fabric will almost always surpass that of the best waterproof breathable garments (although as technology continues to advance, the gap is expected to be narrowed), so soft shells tend to be more comfortable over a broader range of temperature and exertion than hard shells. In addition, they typically compact better (this is not a hard and fast rule, as most stretchwovens are notoriously bulky), are quieter, and dry more rapidly than hard shells.

Staying Warm and Comfortable in a Soft Shell

In heavy rain, there are two keys to staying warm and comfortable in a soft shell. First, soft shell garments shed light precipitation, so even if some of the precipitation eventually does come through the garment, the vast majority of it should bead and run off the fabric (but be sure to keep the DWR finish on the soft shell refreshed in order to take advantage of this feature). Second, in conjunction with a good base layer, moisture that does migrate can often be evaporated if your activity level is high enough. And yes – you guessed it – soft shells (at least in inclement conditions) are targeted towards higher activity levels. If you are just ambling down an easy trail or drinking cowboy coffee around the campfire, you might do better with a hard shell. But for anyone who has drenched themselves with sweat in a hard shell while pushing hard in the backcountry, the breathability and temperature regulation of soft shells are a blessing.

Soft Shell Fabrics

We’ve divided soft shell fabrics into three categories: stretchwovens, silicone-encapsulated, and hybrids.

Stretchwovens. Stretchwoven fabrics include Schoeller Dynamic, Ibex Climawool Lite, and Cloudveil Inertia. Garments made with these fabrics tend to be the most breathable and durable of the soft shell families. Their key feature is the ability to stretch and accommodate the body movements of an airport runway flagger, or, say, a mountain climber. The important result from this is that the garment can be made a little trimmer than a non-stretch garment, which reduces bulk. Thus, the garment is less likely to snag on brush or flap in the wind, and it tends to be more effective at breathing moisture generated by activity (there is a downside to a trim fit – ventilation is compromised).

The stretch can originate from two sources: mechanical stretch or fiber stretch. Mechanical stretch is stretch that is built into the woven fiber structure, much like the stretch you find in fishnet underwear, even though the fibers themselves possess little or no stretch. Fiber stretch results from blending fibers like Lycra or Spandex into the material. Proponents of mechanical stretch fabrics claim that the removal of stretch fibers (1) reduces fabric weight for similar performance, (2) reduces water absorption by the fabric (stretch fibers tend to be more water absorbent due to their more porous fiber structure), and (3) increases durability over fabrics using stretch fibers. We’ve found the increased durability to be true on a 50,000-cycle tension machine in the lab, but even for heavy field use for several years, we’ve yet to see a stretchwoven fabric “sag” from overuse. So, be cautious of more marketing hype than you need.

Manufacturers of stretchwovens are quick to tell you that their fabrics possess a unique type of water resistance that is inherent in the fabric structure and is not dependent on a chemical fiber treatment for water resistance (which, they are quick to point out, can wash or wear out, despite the fact that nearly every stretchwoven fabric on the market in the U.S. has been DWR-treated). They go on to say that the surface of the fabric is woven in such a way that the hydrophobic face structure has a significant topography (peaks and valleys) rather than being completely flat like a typical rain shell. The net effect is that there is less surface area in contact with a water droplet that comes to rest on the fabric, which results in a lower surface tension force on the droplet, making it less likely that the droplet will collapse and wick into (i.e. wet out) the fabric. Then they take the garment to the store bathroom and show you all this neat stuff as they run it under water. Lo and behold, magic happens and not a single drop of water leaks through.

“…all of a sudden, you find yourself soaking wet in a light rain and those beads of water that were terrified of the fabric at the store are now ripping their way through the garment like an anopholene whore through open weave mesh. What the heck?”

What is reality like?

The actual field scenario goes something more like this. You bring your $250 stretchwoven jacket home, take it out on your first summertime weeklong backpacking trip, and exclaim that it’s the best thing since peanut butter. A few months of heavy use go by (a few years perhaps for those of you that are more accustomed to armchair adventure) and all of a sudden, you find yourself soaking wet in a light rain and those beads of water that were terrified of the fabric at the store are now ripping their way through the garment like an anopholene whore through open weave mesh. What the heck?

The DWR finish probably washed out when you did your laundry (the likely scenario). Or got mucked up with dirt, grime, and sweat. What can you do? Grab some Scotchguard, Rain-X, or Revivex and restore it. You’ll be back in the saddle before you know it.

So, remember these key principles: (1) DWR finishes on new products can be really good, (2) manufacturers, designers, marketers, and store employees are pretty suave about highlighting the in-store performance of a new garment, and (3) these fabrics aren’t magic. Spend the cash and time to keep the DWR fresh, and you’ll find the utility of a stretchwoven to be very appealing.

Many stretchwovens also provide some measure of insulation (during the summer, we often leave our long underwear bottoms at home when we take stretch-woven pants). This results from the fact that stretchwovens are thicker, have rougher surfaces and interstices, and are able to trap more insulating air. The downside to this type of construction, however, is that rain-soaked stretchwovens absorb more water than silicone encapsulated soft shells, and will require more time to dry out, whether you are hanging it under your tarp or drying with body heat while wearing it.

The biggest downside of stretchwovens for lightweight backpacking is that they are heavier than a similar garment made with other soft shell fabrics. The very lightest stretchwoven nylon zip-T shirts on the market currently remain over 8 ounces, with the lightest jackets weighing 14 oz or more. Thus, if the stretchwoven shell is going to remain in your pack for most of the trip, you might be better off with a garment made with a lighter, more compact soft shell fabric.

Silicone Encapsulated. Silicone encapsulated microfiber fabrics include Nextex EPIC, Cloudveil Cirrus, and Patagona Encapsil. Garments made with these fabrics tend to be lighter, more wind and water resistant, and less water-absorptive that stretchwovens, at the sacrifice of some breathability (and insulation). They are also more fragile than stretchwovens and may not be as appropriate for bushwacking or rock scrambling. Their biggest advantage is their potential to be very light and stuff to a very small size. For example, one manufacturer makes a full-length jacket using EPIC that includes a generous hood, full zip, mesh-backed torso pockets, and pit zips at a weight of only nine ounces. Silicone-encapsulated shirts can weight as little as four ounces.

The most common silicone encapsulated fabric is Nextec EPIC. EPIC depends on the silicone encapsulation of each fiber to repel water and to close spaces between fibers. Since the encapsulation does not completely close spaces between the fibers, the fabric still breathes. After encapsulation, EPIC is more water resistant but not as breathable as an untreated microfiber fabric or a stretch-woven fabric. According to unverified sources, EPIC is water and wind resistant to 4 lbs/sq. in. Again, manufacturers of silicone encapsulated fabrics like to tout the perception that water resistance is a permanent feature of the fabric and can’t be washed out like a DWR. However, if the fabric becomes soiled (from grease, dirt, and sweat), look out – silicone encapsulated fabrics let plenty of water wick through and it thus loses its water resistance. In addition, although silicone encapsulated fabric garments are good for light rain, sleet, and snow, they still are not going to protect you in sustained rain. Their real strength is the combination of light fabric fiber encapsulation – this means they absorb less water into the fabric structure and dry very quickly. This is a significant benefit in the backcountry when you are finally seeking shelter after a long day of rain. You can literally “shake out” a silicone encapsulated fabric garment, hang it in your tent or under your tarp, and it will probably be dry to the touch in less than a few hours.

Hybrids: Some garments are constructed with soft shell type fabrics (like Schoeller Dynamic) with the addition of hard shell (waterproof-breathable) fabric in key areas like the upper arms and hood – areas most likely to saturate and leak during a hard rain. Apparel falling into this new soft/hard-shell category has the most potential to replace fully waterproof-breathable raingear in your backpack. Could a hybrid provide the construction basis for the ideal soft shell? Consider a jacket that uses a waterproof-breathable yoke and hood with a silicone-encapsulated body, with both fabrics less than 2.0 oz/sq.yd. A full-featured jacket could be manufactured at a weight of less than nine ounces. We’re still waiting.

Summary

Soft shells are not the cure all for backcountry shell comfort. But the addition of a stretchwoven or silicone-encapsulated garment to your clothing ensemble has the ability to significantly increase the comfort range of your clothing system.

MSR, Snow Peak, and Backpacker’s Pantry 1-L + 1.5-L Backpacking Cooksets

Introduction

Most hardcore solo ultralight hikers choose miniscule, titanium “pots” that are more appropriately described as “cups”. However, this style remains on the fringe and the defacto standard for a lightweight hiker’s cook kit is a 1-L pot in either titanium or aluminum.

For hiking partners who share their cooking gear, the “fringe” seems to get by on a single 1.5-L pot, but many duos like the convenience of a two pot system so two courses can be prepared simultaneously (e.g., on two stoves) or in an efficient production line (where one pot is on the stove while the other is serving actively as an eating bowl for the food just cooked).

Herein we focus on two-pot cooksets that include nesting 1.0- and 1.5-liter pots:

  • Backpacker’s Pantry Evolution Soloist Cookset
  • MSR DuraLite Mini Cookset
  • MSR Titan Mini Cookset
  • Snow Peak Trek Combo, Combo Ti, and Combo NS

Review Criteria

Boil Time

We were amazed at how much emphasis people place on boil time and fuel efficiency in their cook systems. Both performance measures can differ significantly depending on fuel type, stove design, wind screen design, wind, air temperature, water temperature, etc. To try to predict the impact of these factors on boil time or fuel efficiency is absolutely futile. Further, we learned in testing boil times using this cookware in a 68*F kitchen that the data had zero impact on actual boil times in the field. Further, after analyzing the sensitivity of boil time and fuel efficiency to these factors, stove design and wind played a far more important role than pot design. Now, we are by no means advocating that you should ignore the pot design, but chances are, it’s really not going to matter in the field. You simply can’t save enough weight in fuel on a week-long hike by selecting one pot design over another to actually make a difference. So, we are going to focus on more practical aspects of cookset performance, including weight, packability, durability, and cost.

Having said that, we did decide to report the results of some kitchen counter boil tests. Just take them with a grain of salt. Here’s a summary:

  • 24 ounces of 50 degree water in a 1-L pot
  • 32 ounces of 50 degree water in a 1.5-L pot
  • 24 ounces of 32 degree water in a 1-L pot
  • 32 ounces of 32 degree water in a 1.5-L pot

We used a Snow Peak GigaPower Ti Auto canister stove with a full 220-g canister for each test with no windscreen and a lid on each pot. The time to boil was determined at when the temperature of the water reached 210*F as measured remotely by an insulated wire temperature sensor.

We did find that, all conditions being equal (e.g., in the kitchen) the MSR Duralite was the fastest cooker. We assigned it a score of 1.0 based on it having the fastest average time required to boil a given amount of water in various tests. Other cookware were compared by dividing their average times with the average time of the Duralite Cookware. The following table summarizes these results.

MSR Duralite Mini 1.00
Backpacker’s Pantry Evolution Soloist 1.04
MSR Titan Mini 1.08
Snow Peak Trek Combo Ti 1.31

Conclusion: There is little practical difference in boil time between the Duralite, Evolution, or Titan cooksets. The Trek Combo was a slow boiler, due primarily in part, we suspect, to its high height-to-diameter ratio, which negatively effects the amount of surface area allowed for heat transfer at the contact surface between pot and water. In general, the Snow Peak Trek Combo boiled slower in the field as well, while no meaningful differences were observed among the other three cooksets in field conditions.

Weight

We measured the weight of each cook set on a NIST-certified scale. The weight included only the cookware – pots, lids, and handles – and no stow bag.

MSR Titan Mini 9.6 oz
Snow Peak Trek Combo Ti 13.1 oz
Backpacker’s Pantry Evolution Soloist 16.2 oz
MSR Duralite Mini 17.1 oz
Snow Peak Trek Combo NS 17.9 oz
Snow Peak Trek Combo 19.9 oz

As expected, the titanium cooksets were the lightest, with the MSR Titan Mini blowing away the rest of the field. The Snow Peak Trek Combo Ti really wasn’t really light enough to justify its price premium over the Evolution, especially considering its slow boil time results described above.

Packability

The big advantage of the Snow Peak cooksets were their ability to pack well. They easily stuffed either vertically or on their side, giving us flexible options for location. The MSR and Backpacker’s Pantry cooksets, with their more traditional dimensions, required more attention in packing. This was most important when packing the cooksets in frameless pack, where a mispacked 1.5-L pot could easily wreak havoc on the ability of the pack to flex to your spine.

Durability

Coatings and Cleanability. The Trek Combo NS, Evolution Soloist, and Duralite Mini cooksets all had nonstick coatings. When new, they all performed similarly but were certainly not miracle workers. None of the coatings were really thick enough to prevent scorching (as per manufacturer claims), but we do think that the presence of these coatings minimized scorching. In comparative scorch-resistance tests, however, we did observe the least amount of scorching in the Evolution Soloist. The bottom line is, when you are cooking, you still need to pay attention to the process or your food will burn.

More important is the ability of the coatings to ease cleanup. We felt that for most meals (in the absence of scorching, of course), the nonstick cookware offered distinct advantages – food simply rinsed out. However, greasy foods could not be cleansed from the cookware in the absence of soap, where plain water rinsed out the uncoated pots just fine. So we ignored manufacturer recommendations and subjected all of our cooksets to continuous washing with sand, dirt, and gravel. Of the three cooksets with coatings, we found that the Evolution Soloist cookset was not only the easiest to clean, but was also the most scratch-resistant, showing little wear of the coating over six months of pretty hard abuse. In comparison, the coating on the Trek Combo NS cookset was nearly worn to the metal after subjecting it to similar abuse. The Duralite Mini showed visible scratching, but still remained reasonably functional for scorch-resistance.

Of the uncoated pots, the MSR Titan Mini was the easiest to clean – it offered a titanium surface texture that was far smoother than the Trek Combo Ti. As expected, the uncoated aluminum cookset, the Trek Combo, was the most difficult pot to clean.

Durability. The Duralite Mini cookset gets the nod for most durable cookset in this review. Because it’s hard anodized, it tends to be stronger than a comparable weight of aluminum. However, if we were to assign a durability:weight ratio for cookware, the Trek Combo Ti would win top honors. It withstood several our “let’s run over it with a snowmobile on concrete and see what happens” better than the others, due in part to the thicker titanium walls that make it heavier than the Titan mini cookset. For most experienced lightweight hikers, durability tends to be a is a less meaningful performance criterion.

Summary

The cheapest cookset in this review – the Evolution Soloist – was by no means the worst performer. In contrast, we thought this cookset defined a new sweet spot for cookware pricing. It was the lightest non-titanium cookset in the review, had the best nonstick coating in terms of both durability and its ability to resist scorching, and was the easiest to clean. And at the high end of the scale, the MSR Titan Mini offers the best overall performance-to-weight ratio, but you pay for it. Thus, we are pleased to award the Trail’s Best Award to these two products.

Trail’s Best Award Backpacker’s Pantry Evolution Soloist $34
  Snow Peak Trek Combo $45
  MSR Duralite Mini $50
  Snow Peak Trek Combo NS $80
Trail’s Best Award MSR Titan Mini $90
  Snow Peak Trek Combo Ti $90

Integral Designs George Tarp

See how this shelter rates with others in our Comparison Review of Tarps and Other Floorless Shelters

Introduction

The Integral Designs George Tarp applies economies of scale to a silnylon shelter for shared camping. The George Tarp is a reincarnation of the Sil Shelter for 2 to 4 persons.

Features

The George Tarp is designed to provide stormworthy protection from the elements for two, three, or four hikers. It is made with 1.4 oz silicone coated nylon and has 11 perimeter tie-out points, with an additional two in the sides of the body for added stability. The tarp uses a pole (purchased separately) or two coupled trekking poles for support, and requires a minimum of six stakes for a reasonably taut pitch. The George reflects Integral Designs usual attention to detail and quality of craftsmanship. A noseeum mesh bugnet panel is available for complete side enclosure while maintaining ventilation.

Specifications

  • Weight: 21.6 oz (as measured by us)
  • Dimensions: Depends on height of support pole, but the shelter is luxuriously roomy for two, adequate for three, and tight for four.
  • Packed Size: 4″ x 14″, silnylon stuff sack provided

Performance Review

In addition to our normal reviewer backpacking field trips, we left the George set up for sixteen weeks straight during Montana’s foul-weather transition season between winter and spring, exposing it to high winds, snow, and rain.

Ease of Setup. The George is a trick to set up properly, and takes some practice. Part of the fault lies in the design. The George could benefit from some CAD work with the addition of catenary curve seamlines and edges to increase the tautness of the pitch. Consequently, we were constantly fiddling with pole height and side guy tensions to tweak the pitch. There does, however, seem to be a magic combination of pole height (somewhere between five and a half and six and a half feet) that seemed to provide and ideal balance between storm resistance, headroom, and interior living space.

Interior Living Space. The important thing to remember with the George tarp, is that the higher you pitch it, the less interior living space it provides, but the better you are able to seal off the door from rain spray. At a five foot pole height, the tarp was tight for four people, and the doors remained wide open. At a seven foot pole height, there was sufficient living space for two and the doors could be sealed. We liked a pole height of six feet, which provided roomy accomodations for three.

Performance with a Five Foot Pole. Again, storm resistance depends on the pole height. At a pole height of five feet, there was so much surface area of fabric that was nearly parallel to the ground that excess rain resulted in a lot of pooling. In addition, condensation was worst in this configuration, due to the limited headroom between the sleepers and the ceiling. In high winds the fabric flapped loudly and during big gusts, flattened all the way to our faces. In snowy conditions, the pitch was miserable. We constantly had to remove snow from the tarp to avoid its collapse.

Performance with a Seven Foot Pole. For seriously wet or snowy conditions, this was our favorite pitch. It allowed us to fully close the door and the walls were steep enough not to touch our sleeping bags when the tarp sagged in cool conditions. In addition, excess rain and snow shed easily with no pooling. However, in windy conditions, it is very important to properly tension the side guylines, due to the large wall surface area exposed to the direction of the wind.

Durability. Most silnylon is strong. The silnylon used by Integral Designs is no exception. We’ve always been impressed with its quality and cosmetic appearance. The fabric pole cup that holds the pole is sewn into the silnylon at a point that receives a lot of stress. Surprisingly, even after months of intensive use, we didn’t rip out the cup when cinching guylines. With a little attention and a firm but not neanderthalic tug on the main guyline, the cup and its stitching should last for a long time.

Summary

For two people, the George tarp provides stormworthy and roomy conditions for hardcare lightweights at a cost of less than 13 ounces per person (including stakes and guylines). For three people, it provides a tighter squeeze but allows each person to bear a burden of less than 9 ounces apiece. There may not be a lighter solution to foul-conditions camping than the George.

Our only improvements? Catenary cuts and a redesign to allow for a perfectly taut pitch at its most versatile height of six feet.

Final Grade: B+

Summer Alpine Ice Climbing in Montana’s Beartooth Mountains

This trip report describes a four day backpacking and alpine climbing trip to Whitetail Peak in Montana’s Beartooth Range, July 9-11, 2002.

See end of document for gear notes & gear lists

Overview

The following describes a three-day trip into the West Fork of Rock Creek, in the Beartooth Mountains near Red Lodge, MT, for an attempt of the longest alpine ice climb in the Beartooth range, “Whitetail Gully.”

Day 1 – Tuesday, July 9, 2002

We drove from Bozeman to Red Lodge, MT in the early afternoon and proceeded immediately to the West Fork Rock Creek trailhead (elev. 7,880 feet). After making a few final adjustments and lacing up our mountaineering boots, we started hiking at 2:30 pm.

The West Fork Rock Creek trail ascends a valley harboring a stream of the same name. It winds up a series of meadow benches and subalpine cascades, including Sentinel and Calamity falls. After about five miles, the trail breaks out into Quinnebaugh Meadows (8,800 feet) with our first views of 12,551-foot Whitetail Peak’s north face and its prominent couloir route, the Whitetail Gully.

Although we’d seen pictures of the peak, they didn’t capture the extent of its dominance along the Castle Peak-to-Silver Run Peak skyline. Whitetail was bigger, the north face was steeper, and the couloir was longer than we’d envisioned. The couloir and the lower snowfields adjoining it ascended more than 2,900 vertical feet up Whitetail’s north face, ending only 150 vertical feet short of the summit. This was a spectacular and elegant route, and we were excited to attempt it. There was not a cloud in the sky and temperatures were unseasonably warm. We only hoped that the weather would hold for a few more days.

Quinnebaugh Meadows, with Whitetail Peak as its backdrop, is a fairy tale backcountry camp with moose, mountain views, trout fishing in the creek, and soft grassy campsites. Unfortunately, we had to pass it up, as we wanted to set up a base camp closer to the peak. After leaving Quinnebaugh Meadows, the trail skirts the edge of Sundance Lake (at about mile 7; elev. 9,443 feet, see map below), which is not visible from the trail without a short side trip. This was intended to be our base camp for the next few days, but the lake was inaccessible from the west (trail) side due to some 100 foot high cliff formations rimrocking the lake’s west shore. So, after a brief stop here for some blood sugar replenishment (we were very hungry and had not taken any breaks on the trail for 3 hours), we trudged another half mile to a bridge crossing the creek above a small grassy island in the middle of Rock Creek. Arrriving in the waning evening, we made camp at 9,530 feet on the island. From here we would enjoy tremendous neck-aching views of Whitetail’s north face for the next few days.

USGS 7.5′ Quad Map (Silver Run Peak) showing the Whitetail Peak area with our approach, climbing, and descent routes. The West Fork Rock Creek trailhead is off the map to the NE. The lake basin to the NW of our basecamp was the location of our acclimatization activities on day 2. Contour interval is 40 feet. To give you an idea of the map scale, the segment between basecamp and the base of the climbing route (the section between the two red dots marked “APPROACH ROUTE”) is about one mile.

After dinner and some futile fishing for (reported) cutthroats in Sundance Lake and the lakelets and pools along the creek, we enjoyed coffee, cocoa, and bourbon while watching the alpenglow descend on the peak. We felt the clear mountain sky suck out the day’s accumulated heat. The temperature dropped more than 20 degrees in two hours to 34 deg F by 10:00 pm. We had a good frost overnight and there was ice in our water bladders the next morning. We were pleased to have pitched our silnyon tarps over our (non-waterproof) bivy sacks to keep the frost off – anything outside the tarps’ protection was covered in white.

Day 2 – Wednesday, July 10, 2002

It seems that we camped on a favorite nocturnal feeding ground of a local mountain goat. He visited us during a night of intermittent sleep. We would get to know this goat more intimately over the next 24 hours.

Today was a day for acclimatization, fishing, and climbing practice. After breakfast we ascended cross country to a 10,400+-foot lake basin west of camp. The basin houses some of Montana’s highest alpine lake fisheries, including Marker Lake (10,868 feet), which has the distinction of being the highest lake in Montana with fishable trout. Marker and other lakes in the area are also managed as trophy Yellowstone cutthroat fisheries (stocked on 8-year cycles). We spent the morning and early afternoon fishing Ship (10,462 feet) and Triangle (10,360+) Lakes without success. Unfortunately, 2002 would not be a good fishing year in this area, since it falls around the end of the 8-year stocking cycle for most of the lakes. At this time fish are either sparse (old and died off) or too small to be caught (i.e., just planted this year).

In the afternoon, we traversed to a 10,600-foot north facing snowfield for some alpine climbing practice. The snow was 35 degrees or so and made an adequate practice ground for crampon and ice axe technique. We belayed two short pitches up the slope, using an ice screw for intermediate protection. We made the first belay from two ice tools and the second belay in rock with a piton and a slung flake. Climbing here made our purpose on this trip much more real, although it seemed somewhat ludicrous that this 200-foot-high snowfield would prepare us adequately for the 2000-foot (and much steeper) couloir visible out of the corner of our left eye as we climbed this snowfield. Alan really appreciated the practice, as he hadn’t played around with crampons or ice tools in over 20 years. He wasn’t relishing the thought of climbing the couloir with his rusty climbing skills. We arrived back at camp in the early evening and enjoyed a wonderful sunset dinner, preparing our climbing gear in nervous apprehension of what the next day would bring, never letting both eyes stray from the Whitetail Couloir for an extended period of time.

Our friend the goat had visited our camp while we were away for the day and enjoyed chewing the rubber-and-cork grips off of Alan’s Leki titanium trekking poles. The goat arrived back on the island shortly after dinner and would remain with us the rest of the night until we left for our climb. In anticipation of a night troubled by goat tramping, we both piled some rocks near our tarps. My pile was gone by midnight. Tired of retrieving a pile of rocks from the creek every hour and having to reset the main tarp line that the goat kept upending with his horns (not to mention the fact that a fastball delivered into his ribs only caused him to scratch a few times), I finally reached an understanding with the goat. I would pee on some prime goat grass about 20 feet away and allow him to eat there during the night, and he would not mess with my guy lines. It worked and I finally managed a few hours of sleep.

The nighttime low temperature was even colder than last night – into the upper 20’s. Camped in a stream bottom with a clear night sky, we were bathed in crisp katabatic air that made for a great night’s sleep as we snuggled into our down bags. The nips of bourbon before bed didn’t hurt either.

Day 3 – Thursday, July 11, 2002

Wakeup

3:00 am. Alarm goes off. Goat grunts from 15 feet away, as if to say, “Hey buddy, can’t you hear your alarm? Get up!”

3:05 am. Lubricate contact lenses. Wriggle out of bivy sack. Pee. Get dressed. Go get bear bag.

3:15 am. Look up at Whitetail Peak. Note the dark, massive outline of the mountain against the dimly starlit and moonless sky. Also note that the couloir is the only apparent, but massive feature on the mountain visible in the middle of the night. I think it was then that I heard the mountain start to laugh.

3:25 am. Begin boiling water for a breakfast of hot cereal. Eagerly eat cereal and chase with a cup of very strong but outstanding coffee.

3:50 am. Make final packing preparations, mentally ticking climbing necessities off an unseen gear list.

4:25 am. Bid adieu to the goat. Warn him that if he messes with our stuff again, the size of the rocks will increase. Goat looks unimpressed and just huffs.

4:30 am. Begin the approach to the peak.

The Approach

The approach included about 200 feet of trail, a little frozen neve, and endless steps over talus that was reported in a climbing guide to be “small by Beartooth standards” (typically, about the size of truck engines). The approach allowed us some time to get focused for the actual climbing. I’ve learned to relish this time for mental preparation, using it to visualize what is going to happen on the climb. We climbed mostly talus (and a little snow) from our camp at to the upper fringes (10,200 feet) of the snowfield leading into the couloir, arriving there at about 5:30 am to begin the actual climbing.

Here, during sunrise (with the morning sun creeping up over the massive Castle Mountain, Montana’s third highest summit at 12,604 feet), we prepared our climbing gear – crampons, one axe and hammer each, one 60m twin rope, a handful of slings, a few pitons, one ice screw, a set of stoppers, and a few hexes. We put on our harnesses and crampons, adjusted helmets and ice tool leashes, compressed our packs, and refueled our bodies with Cytomax and carbo gel. Just before climbing, we stripped down to pants and a thin top layer in anticipation of the aerobic effort to come. We were climbing by 6:00 am.

The Climb

The climbing into and in the lower half of the couloir was spectacular – hard, frozen neve offered perfect purchase for crampon points and the spike of our ice axes. We climbed this 35-40 degree, 1000-foot long section with a single axe, un-roped.

Route Topo of the Whitetail Gully. Grade III, AI2+, Class 3 Rock

We moved quickly and efficiently, taking short breaks long enough only to suck a few ounces of water from our bladders and squeeze-eat a packet of Gu. The temperature was cool during the early part of the climb, but the humidity was low and we drank constantly just to keep our mouths from drying out. We reached 11,400 feet (the halfway point where the couloir begins to steepen) by 7:30 am. The sun had been in the upper couloir for more than two hours by now and we knew that we would have to boogie in order to reach the top before the ice conditions deteriorated into one big slushie. We kept moving, remaining unroped but using our second tools to maintain speed as the couloir steepened to 45 degrees and then to 50 degrees. The exposure was incredible but the climbing was secure. We maintained water and carbohydrate intake at regular intervals, and our climbing rate remained steady and swift. Best of all, we felt great. We noticed little if any impact of the 12,000 foot altitude on our aerobic performance. Months of intense pre-climb training and yesterday’s acclimatization day were paying off.

Alan in the Whitetail Couloir at about 11,700 feet, where slope steepness was about 50 degrees. At this point we are soloing but using two tools and the couloir surface was composed of “white” alpine ice and shallow neve, shaded and in excellent climbing condition.

Whitetail Couloir is huge – 2,000 vertical feet in elevation and nearly 3,000 feet of actual climbing distance covered. It is the longest alpine ice climb in the Beartooth Range. Like many gullies, conditions in Whitetail quickly deteriorate as the sun begins to bake it. Unstable snow, wet snow avalanches, and rockfall are a few of its hazards. All of these can be minimized by climbing the route in the pre-dawn and early morning hours. Even this early in the season, our route had sustained significant afternoon deterioration. A 3-4 foot deep and 4-12 foot wide “junk rut” (caused by early season wet snow avalanches) had formed down the middle of the couloir. These ruts are the garbage chutes of couloirs, and it’s not wise to climb in them. Everything that the melting suns loosens, e.g. wet snow and rocks, funnels down the junk rut. We avoided the rut for the first two thirds of the route, but found that as the sun softened the route, the only alpine ice that was solid enough for crampon and ice tool purchase was on the rut’s east wall, so we climbed in the rut for the remainder of the climb. This will be considered by armchair mountaineers to be an unnecessary gamble. We reasoned like this: the rut offered the fastest climbing to the top. Spend less time in the bowling alley and you reduce the odds of getting hit. Get out of the coulior faster and you climb on colder and more stable snow. Simple axioms and a foundation of fast and light alpinism.

With about 200 vertical feet remaining, the couloir steepened to 55 degrees. Deteriorating snow conditions demanded some interesting climbing technique. Ryan found himself using the adze of his ice axe (left hand) and the front points of his left crampon for good purchase in the rut’s east wall, while his right hand resorted to plunging the shaft of his alpine hammer to its head, with his right foot kicking steps into the slope. Alan’s technical ice hammer had a bit more bite and he sunk its pick deep on the rut’s east wall and made huge plunging swings with the adze of his axe into the softer west wall. Even so, he had to resort to occasionally plunging tool and axe handles into the softest sections.

Top of Couloir – 12,400 feet

Note the contribution of the black helmet and dark glacier glasses to Ryan’s “Beartooth Alpinist – MIB” look. On the final steps to the top we climbed up a slope of nearly 60 degrees. We topped out at exactly 9:00 am – a total of three hours in the couloir. This exceeded our wildest expectations, as we anticipated four to six hours of climbing with several belayed pitches. Such is the benefit of moving quick and solo, of being adequately acclimatized, maintaining hydration and nutrition during the effort, being in uncompromising aerobic condition, and of course, packing light. The weather cooperated as well, although we wished for some cooler temperatures. This was an exhilarating finish to a terrific climb and wonderful validation for the light and fast climbing philosophy we brought into this adventure.

The Summit

The summit block of Whitetail Peak is not a “gimme.” It took us about 10 minutes of climbing Class 3 rock to reach the 12,551-foot summit. The views from the top were amazing – sweeping expanses of glacial ice and Beartooth granite carved by lush valleys, and seemingly more alpine lakes than one can count.

Whitetail Peak Summit – 12,551′

Looking West-ish. Castle Mountain dominates the foreground skyline in the upper left. Ryan is sitting on a small talus block with a 2000-foot near-vertical drop down his backside.

Since Whitetail Peak is Montana’s fourth highest summit, one could see a LOT of the Beartooth Range from the top! In addition to the Beartooth mountainscape that dominates the western skyline, Whitetail’s summit offers views east into the plains of Montana, north to the Yellowstone River basin, and south to Yellowstone National Park. It also affords a very scary view – 2,000 very vertical feet DOWN Whitetail’s imposing North Face. This is no place for a misstep!

The Descent

After returning off the summit block to the top of couloir, we packed up our climbing gear and began the scramble down Whitetail’s East Ridge. The first part of the ridge was dominated by Class 2-3 downclimbing over intact rock and blocky talus, with the remaining 2/3 of the distance to Sundance Pass comprising a spectacular “Sound of Music” walk over alpine grass, wildflower, and scree fields.

The east ridge was longer than we expected. We spent more than four hours above 11,000 feet, most of it unprotected under a baking sun. Needless to say, the ridge proved to be the beginning of our eventual physiological and psychological deterioration! Fortunately, continued views, plenty of wildflowers, and the common sense to move slowly but deliberately kept our spirits up.

After climbing over Mt. Lockhart (11,647 feet), we arrived at Sundance Pass (11,037 feet) – and a trail – shortly after noon. From the pass, we could see our campsite – a mere 1,700 feet and some 40 switchbacks below. We knew now that we were “home free” – back on a trail with continued stable weather and nothing but time. So, we proceeded down the trail slowly, enjoying the descent back to camp as if we were enjoying a stroll down Smalltown, USA’s Main Street in our golden years, chatting here and there about the climb and other subjects, and enjoying a head-on view of our route on every northerly switchback.

We arrived back at camp before 2:00 pm, took inventory of our trekking pole grips (no new damage), soaked our very hot feet in the stream’s 38 deg F water, and began to rehydrate for the hike out.

Back to the Car

After a brief nap (mosquitoes and a baking sun prevented total rest), we packed up camp and were on the trail by 3:30 pm. The 7 1/2 miles back to the car were some of the longest miles I’d ever hiked. To describe them as anticlimatic would be a serious understatement. The fact that the balls of our feet were sore (owing to the pounding of Whitetail’s East Ridge and Sundance Pass descents) and that we were running very low on fuel and water (Alan ran out of food at noon somewhere between the summit and Sundance pass) didn’t help things much. We enjoyed each other’s company in near total silence, partaking in brief conversation only during the two rest breaks we took on the hike out:

“Want a cracker?” “Yeah. ‘Your feet hurt?” “Yeah.” “Mine too.” “We’ll be out soon.” “Yeah. Wanna get a motel?” “Yeah. One with a hot tub, OK?” “OK.”

We arrived back at the car by 7:00 pm. Our first order of business? We changed into sandals. Oh the joy! (Alan says he will never hike 17 miles in climbing boots again.)

We drove back to Red Lodge for dinner (crab cakes, bratwurst, and a glass of excellent porter at the local ale house), and then sought a motel. We bypassed the local “Yodeler’s Inn” in favor of something more recognizable, so we checked into a Super 8 and enjoyed the hot tub, finding that our capacity to converse had returned again. A full night’s sleep, uninterrupted by goats (dreamt or otherwise), was a luxury I had temporarily forgotten about.

I woke up the next morning and it hit me. We just climbed the longest alpine ice climb in the Beartooths to a 12,500 foot summit.

Fast. Light. Solo.

Cool.

What’s for breakfast?

– RJ, Bozeman MT; AD Alrlington VA July 16, 2002

GEAR NOTES

Following are some notes made on climbing-specific gear that we used during the actual climb of Whitetail Peak on the third day of this trip. When the term “approach” is used, it refers to the route between our basecamp and the bottom of the climb; “climb” refers to the actual time spent on snow and ice up to and in the couloir; “descent” refers to the route between the top of the couloir and Sundance Pass, and continuing via trail down to our base camp.

Note: Equipment is important but not the most important element of alpine climbing. Good physical conditioning, your climbing technique, and a good summit strategy are far more important. Alan and I spent months prior to this climbing season getting ourselves into excellent physical condition. We also got up at 3 am and left camp under headlamps at 4:30 am to give ourselves the best chance to summit early on cold, stable ice.

This paid off when we climbed the couloir in just three hours, reaching the top by 9:00 am. Had we started at dawn, been in worse shape and taken the usual four-six hours to climb the coulior, we would still have been on the route well past noon. By that time, the route might have been a horror show of soft, unstable snow and falling rock. The weather for the climb was near perfect which helped a lot. Nobody goes up a mountain if nature decides otherwise. That being said, good ice climbing equipment, and especially light climbing hardware and packs also contributed to the speed and success of our ascent.

Boots. We both used La Sportiva Trango S boots. Ryan’s boots (size 42) weighed 52 oz (3 lb 4 oz) for the pair with aftermarket insoles (Superfeet), making them the lightest boot on the market suitable for alpine ice climbing. They offer the excellent Vibram Dru mountaineering sole, lateral and torsional rigidity with a full-length nylon plate and 1/2-length steel shank, a completely synthetic upper, and a reinforced crampon groove in the heel for using semi-automatic crampons.

For hiking comfort, the boots are heavily rockered. This, combined with only a 1/2-length steel shank, make these some of the more comfortable hikers in the mountaineering boot genre. Other features of particular interest include a roomy toe box that provides great protection for downhill hiking. The only hiking downside is that the boots have little shock absorption through the ball and arch of the foot. This boosts rock and ice climbing performance but certainly reduces hiking comfort. This was noticeable on long mileage days. Ryan was pretty happy to be out of the boots after 17 hours in them on our last day. Alan, although he had no blisters, had very sore large toes and foot bottoms the last day. If he had to do it again, he would pack a pair of trail runners in his summit pack and use them for the decent to base camp and the hike out. He did think the boots had excellent performance climbing and negotiating over talus and that they were comfortable enough for the eight mile hike to base camp.

The Trango S boots accept semi-auto crampons easily. I do not know how they would fare with rigid crampons, but I suspect that between the flexible forefoot and the pronounced rocker, this marriage would not be a particularly good one. The Trango S climbs extremely well on moderate grade ice.

Very flexible uppers offer great latitude in French (flat-footed) climbing technique, while the midsole rigidity was adequate for sustained frontpointing. I would suspect that the rigidity would be inappropriate for sustained, steep ice climbing, and would result in some serious calf burn.

A testament to the boot’s design is the fact that Ryan had spent only 1/2 an hour breaking them in on a flat treadmill (wearing no pack) prior to bringing them on this hike and climb. Out of the box, so to speak, the boots gave him no significant problems in fit. Alan hiked about 24 miles in his pair prior to the trip. Neither of us suffered blisters or much foot pain.

Crampons. Our mutual crampon choice was the Kong Grand Course (semi-auto version with heel level and strap-on toe). These aluminum crampons weigh only 22 oz. Because aluminum doesn’t remain as sharp as steel and sharpening their points may deteriorate the temper, they are best suited for hard snow, neve, and not-too-hard (white or blue) alpine ice. We found that the Grand Course mated well with the Trango S boots and climb alpine ice extremely well, although we did not experience conditions harder than frozen neve or white ice. The crampons’ front points penetrated white ice easily. As we encountered some softening neve due to sun-aging in the couloir, we had no problems with balling snow, which factored significantly in our decision to continue climbing solo.

Having used the Grand Course on both black and water ice, I prefer steel points for the latter.

Ice Tools. We both used a 58 cm Grivel Air Tech Racing ice axe (14 oz) as our primary tool. The Air Tech has a steel head/pick/adze, aluminum shaft, and aluminum “tube” type spike. We found the length to be long enough for comfortable single piolet techniques on snow slopes greater than 35 degrees (I’m 5’7″ and Alan is 5’8″), but short enough to allow for standard use in piolet traction. For self-belay, we employed the axe in all modes: spike-sticking (hard neve) and shaft-plunging (sunaged neve), pick-sticking (steep hard ice), and adze-sticking (steep soft ice). The Air Tech swings effortlessly and in this short length, may be the epitome of a lightweight alpine ice climbing tool. Our only complaint was the shallow curvature of the pick, which made removal from deep placements in ice a little problematic. Quite often we had to slide our hands up the shaft to free the head. The light swing weight posed no problems for our harder ice placements in white ice.

Ryan’s second tool was a 43cm Grivel Compact Black 3 hammer (16 oz). Our hammers were used primarily in the upper, steeper half of the couloir. The Black 3 was used in both pick-sticking and shaft-plunging mode, with the latter mode dominating as the morning sun aged the couloir surface.

As such, the 43 cm length was long enough to provide a secure self-belay while short enough to minimize plunging depth.

Alan’s second tool was a DMM Fly Hammer (22 oz), a technical ice tool with a curved shaft and reverse curve pick. Alan accepted the extra weight and was thrilled at the increased performance of using a technical tool on this route. The head weight provided effortless placements in hard ice and the reverse curve pick made removal from deep placements a simple “flick of the wrist” affair.

Surprisingly, the curved shaft (with the curve near the head of the tool) plunged beautifully while providing hand clearance and bash protection when swinging the tool into the ice. DMM seems to have found a versatile shaft geometry ideally suited for alpine ice climbing. I’m considering a pair of Fly tools for myself if I can part with my Black Diamond carbon fiber Black Prophet tools, but don’t hold your breath. The straight-shaft CFBP’s with Alaska picks are hard to beat for steep alpine ice climbing.

Helmet. Ryan’s helmet is an HB Dyneema / Carbon (12.5 oz). His choice was motivated by one thing and one thing only: superior protection from falling rock. The HB can handle multiple sharp object impacts and thus, is one of the most durable helmets on the market. And, it is also one of the lightest alpine helmets on the market. Ryan won’t consider the new wave of “bike”-style helmets for alpine climbing, where rockfall is the most significant objective hazard (not fall impact, for which the “bike” helmets are adequate).

Alan’s helmet was a Petzl Elios Class (12.0 oz). It is a hard shell helmet with polypropylene foam liner in the top. I may be the lightest hard shell helmet on the market. Although not as durable for multiple rock impacts as the HB, the foam provides better impact (fall) protection (“concussionresistance?!”).

The Elios has Petzl’s excellent harness – comfortable, easily adjustable and with no fabric to saturate and get smelly with sweat. The white shell might keep your head cooler in the intense alpine sun (but Ryan noticed no adverse affects from his black HB). Alan’s daughter thinks her dad looks like a dork in the white Petzl but thinks Ryan looks cool in the black HB Dyneema – the MIB of Beartooth Alpinism). For vanity alone, Alan may buy a HB helmet for the next trip.

Protection. We completed the climb solo. It improved our speed and kept the climbing simple. We did bring a rope and climbing protection since we had never done the climb before and did not know in advance what the ice conditions on the route would be like. Most climbers do at least the upper third of the route belayed, so we decided that (1) we should bring protection, but (2) we should keep it minimal to keep our packs light and maximize our climbing speed. Our rope choice was a single twin rope: a 60m Sterling 7.6mm Ice Thong. We chose the long length to reduce the number of belays (saving time) and we accepted the thin diameter as sufficient protection for falls with expected low fall factors from the 45 to 60 degree angle of the climb. The remainder of our equipment included: Cassin Eolo harnesses, Black Diamond ATC’s (belay devices), Black Diamond Neutrino wiregate carabiners (20), Black Diamond Enduro locking carabiners (2 each), DMM 12mm Dyneema slings (four 48″, eight 24″), five wired nuts, three Dyneema-slung hexes, two pitons (one angle, one knifeblade), one 17 cm Black Diamond steel ice screw, and a single titanium nut tool (Ushba) for the follower. Our shared climbing equipment amounted to less than 11 pounds, a remarkable accomplishment for any technical alpine route. The light climbing gear contributed to the speed of our ascent, especially since we ended up carrying it in our packs the whole time.

Pack. Both of our packs were custom-made by Dan McHale in Seattle. Alan carried a 3500-ci Speed Bump and Ryan carried a 2800-ci Sub Pop. We used the same packs on both the approach and the climb. Both of our approach packs weighed less than 3.4 pounds (our total pack weights sans water were 26-27 pounds at the trailhead), and Ryan chose to “strip” his pack into a 28-oz summit pack for the climb (compressed packbag only with a webbing belt, no pockets, and no frame) to accommodate the 19 pounds of gear on the approach (including 4L of water) and the 5-8 pounds of gear on the climb. Ryan’s appreciation of the pack increases after each use. This is unlike Gregory, Dana, North Face, and other packs he’s owned where with each use they seem more uncomfortable and ill suited to hiking or climbing. It becomes increasingly clear that our McHale packs were borne out of long pack making experience, especially for mountaineers. They are built with an attention to detail, simplicity, and fit that can be found nowhere else.

Clothing. We both wore pants made of Schoeller Dynamic fabric: Alan, a pair of Ibex Alp pants, and Ryan, a pair Arc’Teryx Gamma LT pants. The Schoeller Dynamic fabric is durable enough for alpine ice and works over a broad range of temperatures and conditions. These pants were the only bottoms we brought (no raingear, no long underwear) and they worked well in both 80 degree hiking weather and on sub freezing mornings. We waded though creeks in them, bushwhacked through pine and willows and thrashed them ice and rock climbing. Both pants looked new when we came back. Patagonia R0.5 zip-T’s (and for Alan a Rail Riders Eccomesh shirt as a shell) completed our climbing clothing. Conditions were calm, clear, and warm, with temperatures ranging from 30 to 45 degrees on the approach, 45 to 55 degrees on the climb, and 55 to 75 degrees on the descent. We made no clothing adjustments except to wear a wind shell at the breezy summit. The clothing was perfect for these conditions. Our climbing packs including the following extra clothing: Ryan (12 oz PHD Mimimus down jacket, 9 oz Feathered Friends Jackorack EPIC jacket, 1.6 oz powerstretch balaclava (worn only on the approach)), Alan (14 oz GoLite Chill Polarguard 3D vest, 9 oz Feathered Friends Jackorack EPIC jacket and a 2.7 oz 200 weight fleece balaclava). Ryan’s gloves (we wore gloves on the entire climb of the couloir) were Tempest SL’s from Mountain Hardwear (2.8 oz, waterproof breathable shell with a tricot lining), which proved to be adequate for snow climbing but probably couldn’t withstand repeated use on rock or ice routes and provide very little hand protection from the snow surface while swinging ice tools. Alan’s choice was the Schoeller Extreme gloves from Black Diamond (Dry Tool, 3.6 oz), which provided durability, warmth, and some knuckle protection from the snow surface while swinging tools. Neither one of us brought waterproof raingear (except the ponchos that we left in camp while climbing) or other emergency shelter (except our packs? Ziploc baggies?!). This was a roll of the dice in a volatile mountain range like the Beartooths, but with a very stable system of extreme high pressure sitting over us (as promised by NOAA before we hit the trail), we figured it was worth the gamble. It turned out to be a good bet.

Hydration and Food. While climbing, we like to keep both hydration and food simple. Simple access and fast access time means that you’ll actually eat and drink, which is vital to maintaining good speed on a route. We both used 3L hydration bladders (Platypus Big Zips) as our main hydration source. We started the approach with 1L of Cytomax (in a Powerade bottle) to bring our glycogen levels up before the start of the climb, and maintained those glycogen levels with carbohydrate gel (Clif Shot) during the climb at a rate of about 150-200 calories per hour. Keep in mind that we consumed more than 1000 calories in a morning breakfast at 3:30 am that consisted mostly of fats and complex carbs, and climbed below our anaerobic threshold the entire climb.

Neither of us had water when we returned to camp – we consumed all 4L during the 7 or so hours between the time we left camp and shortly after reaching Sundance Pass on the descent. We both brought a half pound or so of lunch food (gorp, meat sticks, cheese, crackers, and dried fruit) that we consumed after reaching the top of the couloir and along the descent route.

Light. We only used a light for 45 minutes (we started our approach at 4:30 am). Ryan’s choice was a Black Diamond Gemini headlamp (6 oz) in 1-LED mode and Alan’s was a Photon Fusion LED headlamp (5 oz) in its lowest illumination setting. We used them to light our path over large, blocky talus, and the only ambient light was starlight (no moon) and the coming dawn. A light was necessary for this early start but both lamps were overkill for the conditions, and Ryan was yearning for his 1.1- oz Black Diamond Ion headlamp (2-LED’s) back in the car at the trailhead. Alan thought he could have done nearly as well with his ½ oz Pocket Brite.

Hiking & Camping Gear

Hiking and camping gear was essentially the same as for a companion 3-day backpacking and fishing trip that we took following the Whitetail climb, and is described in another trip report.

Bourbon

An essential piece of pre-climb equipment. Alan picked up a bottle of Knob Hill single batch bourbon which he decanted into an 8 oz Platy for the trip. A nip of this stuff in the evening made the mosquitoes more tolerable and helped us get to sleep. Alan was surprised to get 5 hours of decent sleep before awakening at 3 am to prepare for the climb. He contributes much of this to the bourbon and some to Ryan who was busy playing with the goat while Alan slept.

Gear Lists

RYAN’S GEAR LIST

ITEM WT (OZ)

  • down top bag (Nunatak Arc Alpinist) in 1000 ci silnylon stuff sack 22.0
  • 18″ x 36″ closed cell foam sleeping pad (Paramount Outfitters’ Mt. Washington) 4.0
  • bivy sack with EPIC top and silnylon bottom (Oware) 11.0
  • silnylon poncho-tarp (Integral Designs) 9.0
  • titanium stakes (14) and mason twine guylines (50 ft) in small ballistics nylon stuff sack 4.0
  • 210d Spectra ripstop pack 2800 ci (McHale) with top pocket/fanny pack, two side pockets, and frame 52.0
  • clothing worn (Supplex shirt, Schoeller Dynamic pants, merino trail socks, mountain boots, Supplex hat, bandana) n/a
  • EPIC shell jacket (Feathered Friends Jackorak) 9.0
  • down jacket (PhD Minimus) 12.0
  • other clothing (1 pr extra socks, Powerstretch balaclava, climbing gloves) 6.0
  • personal cookware (Snowpeak 21 oz ti mug, lid, ti spork) 4.2
  • 1/2 of group cook kit (Snowpeak GigaPower canister stove, lighter, and empty wt of MSR IsoPro fuel canister) 6.0
  • bear bag (Ursack) 5.0
  • hydration (3L bladder, 1L sports bottle, Aqua Mira Kit) 8.0
  • emergency kit (blister kit, meds, whistle, pocket LED light, cell phone) 7.0
  • toilet kit (toothbrush, Dr. Bronner’s, Dermatone, headnet, DEET, TP, Purell, contact lens solution) 7.0
  • navigation (map, headlamp, climbing notes, Suunto Vector worn) 7.0
  • camera (Contax T3, case, extra battery, 4 rolls film) 16.0
  • fishing (5-piece fly rod, vinyl rod tube, reel, 1 box of flies, tippet, split shot, strike indicator, nippers, floatant, lanyard) 16.0

TOTAL PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 12.8 lbs

  • personal climbing gear (helmet, crampons, ice tools, harness, ATC, two locking carabiners) 78.0
  • group climbing gear (half of the total that included the rope + rack) 72.0

TOTAL PERSONAL + CLIMBING EQUIPMENT 22.2 lbs

  • breakfasts (2 x 6 oz ea) 12.0
  • lunches (2 x 12 oz ea) 24.0
  • dinners (2 x 6 oz ea) 12.0
  • coffees (4 x 1 oz ea) 4.0
  • Cytomax (4 oz) 4.0
  • carbo gel (8 oz) 8.0
  • 1/2 of fuel (net wt) 4.0

TOTAL PACK WEIGHT INCLUDING CONSUMABLE (WATER WEIGHT NOT INCLUDED) 26.5 lbs

ALAN’S GEAR LIST

ITEM WT (OZ)

  • down bag (Rab Top bag – modified) in silnylon stuff sack 20.0
  • 3/4 length closed cell foam sleeping pad (Paramount Outfitters’ Mt. Washington) 7.0
  • bivy sack with EPIC top and silnylon bottom (Oware) 9.5
  • silnylon poncho-tarp (Integral Designs) 8.5
  • titanium stakes (9) and Triptease guylines in ziploc bag 3.0
  • 210d Spectra ripstop pack 3500 ci (McHale) with top pocket/fanny pack, two side pockets, and frame 54.0
  • clothing worn (Supplex shirt, Ibex Schoeller Dynamic pants, merino trail socks, mountain boots, Supplex hat, bandana) n/a
  • EPIC shell jacket (Feathered Friends Jackorak) 9.0
  • Polarguard 3D vest (GoLite Chill) lots of loft! 14.5
  • other clothing (1 pr extra socks, 200 wt balaclava, climbing gloves, light poly gloves) 10.0
  • personal cook kit (Snowpeak 21 oz ti mug, plastic spoon) 3.0
  • 1/2 group cookwear (Snowpeak GigaPower canister stove, 1.3 L ti
  • pot, lighter, empty wt of 8 oz fuel canister) 6.0
  • bear bag (Ursack TKO) and mylar liner 5.0
  • hydration (3L bladder, 1L sports bottle, Aqua Mira Kit) 8.0
  • emergency kit (blister kit, meds, whistle, pocket LED light) 3.0
  • toilet kit (toothbrush & paste, headnet, DEET, TP, Purell) 5.0
  • navigation (map, headlamp, Suunto Vector worn) 6.0
  • camera (Olympus digital w. Li batts & 128 Mb card) 15.0
  • fishing (4-pc fly rod, cloth cover, reel, 2 box of flies, tippet, split shot, strike indicator, nippers, hemostats, floatant, lanyard) 18.0

TOTAL PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 12.8 lbs

  • personal climbing gear (helmet, crampons, ice tools, harness, ATC, two locking carabiners) 84.0
  • group climbing gear (half of the total that included the rope + rack) 72.0

TOTAL PERSONAL + CLIMBING EQUIPMENT 22.5 lbs

  • breakfasts (2 x 6 oz ea) 12.0
  • lunches (2 x 12 oz ea) 24.0
  • dinners (2 x 6 oz ea) 12.0
  • coffees (2 x 1 oz ea) 2.0
  • Cytomax (4 oz) 4.0
  • carbo gel (6 oz) 6.0
  • 1/2 fuel (net wt) 4.0

TOTAL PACK WEIGHT INCLUDING CONSUMABLES (WATER WEIGHT NOT INCLUDED) 26.5 lbs