Mike – I applaud your interest in, and efforts to optimize the UI for different screen sizes and client types. Clearly there is a market for that and any good businessman tries not to shut clients out with a lack of choice.
If I may offer a little hard won advice based on 30 years of software and UI design:
Items displayed in a grid can be very good at optimizing space…more items displayed in a smaller space. However humans generally do not do a good job of converting a grid of items into the concept of a “list”. Â For instance it’s hard to know wether the list is ordered down-then-across, or across-then down, or even what the order criteria are. A grid is also harder to scan for a particular item.
Personally, I use your app on an iPad in portrait mode and never considered the UI to be a problem. Â The only criticism I would offer of the “old” UI would be to attempt to minimize the height of each item in the list. Â By making each item take up less vertical space more items can be displayed per page. Â Using the additional available screen width of a tablet or browser might make this easy to accomplish. Â You might also consider a “minimal” list display option with simply the Item name, weight and quantity, eliminating the manufacturer/picture/etc. Â For me, the most useful display would be the most information dense. Â The pack summary panes at the top of the display could also be moved to a dedicated view.
That said, people have different opinions and like different things. Â Some may perfer “everything on the one page”, while other prefer to zero in on the task at hand and eliminate any “noise”. Â So may I suggest that you offer a choice of display types? Â Many (most?) shopping websites offer to display results in Grid or List format, and some offer a list view that does a very good job of maximizing the number of items displayed per page.
Thanks for your attention. Â DFTS, it is my go-to packing tool.