Topic

Are you “packing” while you are packing?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 104 total)
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 11:47 am

You can be as insulted as you like, but I fail to see my hypocrisy. Never even implied you didn't earn the retirement. Don't see how my work for DoD negates my earlier post. In fact, not that you'd want to understand it, but it was your post to Craig that was a bit insulting.

You see, James, as much as it may like to think so, the military is not some entity all to itself. The military does much of the 'hard lifting' as it were, without a doubt. But it couldn't exist without the industrial/commercial base which supplies its food, fuel, weapons, medical supplies, etc. It couldn't exist very easily without the broad support of the many 'back home.' It couldn't exist without the scientists and researchers who try to ensure it has the best equipment/weapons to reduce battlefield injuries, and the best medical practices available to ensure those who are injured live. It couldn't even exist without the teachers, like Craig, who try to ensure that the population is educated, which is vitally important for it to understand the military's purpose and not misuse it.

Because I understand and appreciate that symbiotic relationship doesn't make me hypocritical, it simply makes me someone who, it seems, thinks a bit differently than you. We all (well, most of us) contribute to the defense of this nation. Some do it in uniform, some don't. It's simply hubris to believe otherwise.

Having served myself, I have great respect for those who have, and those who do (which includes a number of family members, some who lost their lives). I just don't puff up my chest and trot out that old semi-canard about how everyone else should thank me for their 'freedom.'

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 11:52 am

Yes, you are above it all aren't you? I've made my point and I'm not going to argue it with you. You're a hypocrite.

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 11:53 am

This post was childish and unnecessary, and so I've deleted it.

My apologies to James.

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 2:37 pm

This is what happens every time when "gun in the backcountry" is brought up. People get emotional and some start fighting like babies.

My two cents: shame on OP for even bringing up such an idiotic thread, "I am wondering what the consensus is on carrying a firearm while backpacking?…".

What next? Gee, I wonder what's the consensus on making ours a Christian country?

James holden BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 2:43 pm

its a valid question .. for most of history frontiersmen and explorers have carried firearms …

now we "know" better or we think we do …

however someone who has never been in the great outdoors may not know that the crazed rampaging bears you see in hollywood movies may not be reflected in real life … or they may according to predatory bear news flashes

there are also 2 legged predators lurking about … arent national parks grow ups these days anyways???

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 2:47 pm

Seems most of us have learned the futility of arguing which is the the right religion — we just need to take the next step to refrain from pontificating about which is the right approach re. guns. There is no single objective right approach, now, is there? No need to answer.

Can't we just learn to determine the right approach for ourselves — and cultivate just a little respect for others to refrain from telling them their ways are wrong and ours is right? Take your gun with you, by all means, or not.

Bob Gross BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 2:51 pm

I liked the incident that happened many years ago in Yosemite. An armed ranger was several miles out on a trail when he received fire from some unknown sniper, and he was hit, then returned fire. The sniper escaped and the ranger was able to limp back to the road with a gunshot wound in the leg. The National Park Service mobilized dozens of armed rangers to search the area. After days, they came up empty.

Later on, the deeper truth of the incident was revealed. There was no sniper. The ranger's sidearm had discharged in the holster. He was so embarrassed that he cooked up the whole story of the sniper.

Needless to say, he doesn't work for NPS anymore.

–B.G.–

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 3:24 pm

Oh gosh Ben, the OP deserves no shame at all. None. He asked a valid question on a backpacking site. He's only guilty of not searching the site very well first, but there's a lot of folks guilty of that.

It's not his fault we can't act like adults and discuss such topics without sliding into silliness.

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 3:29 pm

Ever met the type of person that shows up to the family BBQ and starts railing against the horrors of the meat industry while everyone is eating?

Or the type of dude that walks into the vegetarian health food store, chest puffed out with his favorite "I fear no deer" buck hunting shirt on?

Or the random guy sitting at your table at the corporate luncheon that immediately tries to steer the conversation into a political diatribe?

Yeah. It's not cool to be that dude.

Where I come from talking about killing people or the training necessary to kill people in a group of strangers is a little distasteful too.

EndoftheTrail BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 3:51 pm

Oh yes, Douglas, OP is clearly at fault. He didn't just ask about carrying guns, he asked for consensus!

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 4:25 pm

"Where I come from talking about killing people or the training necessary to kill people in a group of strangers is a little distasteful too."

+1 Especially when it's so casually done.

For anyone keeping score, BTW, The 1st Amendment is clearly in the lead at this point.

Nick Gatel BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 6:21 pm

"Where I come from talking about killing people or the training necessary to kill people in a group of strangers is a little distasteful too."

Don't know if I was the one that started the theme. But if I did, the next part was… often it is better and safer to talk your way out of a potentially volatile situation. Presenting a firearm when confronting someone you feel is a threat to you can be a point of no return. Thinking you will remain somewhat composed may not happen. Things can turn out much different than you projected in your mind. These are some of the factors one should review before deciding whether or not you want to carry a weapon. I don't carry one, don't encourage anyone to, but recognize the right others have to do so as long as they are within the law. As was mentioned, attitude and aptitude are two different things.

Lets face it, for all intents and purposes larger caliber handguns are designed to do one thing; kill. We can skirt that fact and be polite, but it does not change the fact. And some people cannot pull the trigger… that in a sense is a good thing — deep down they value other lives; but presenting a weapon and freezing may put you in a much more serious situation than not. People who ask me about firearms when hiking always mention to protect yourself against others, which leads to many questions I think should be thought out carefully by those who are contemplating a weapon. If someone here asks the question about weapons and backpacking, it is a legitimate question. And to me, asking the question means they may not have considered all the points I just made. My intention is to layout the ingredients that should be considered before making a final decision. It is not my place to tell others how they should live their lives. Unfortunately, I have seen the view from both ends of a barrel. Neither is pretty, and neither is easy.

As I said earlier, do what you think is best for you.

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 6:33 pm

What's the most ultralight gun model? What about a wrist-rocket with some rocks? Would that work pretty well for most things and still be lightweight?

Bob Bankhead BPL Member
PostedJul 15, 2011 at 7:01 pm

IMO as a former law enforcement officer, unless you are hiking where Grizzly or Polar Bears range, I submit that if you think you really need a firearm to protect yourself from anything or anyone, you are probably hiking in the wrong area. Go somewhere else; leave the stress, the extra weight, and the potential legal liabilities behind.

Incidentally, just displaying a firearm in a manner that can imply a threat to use it, even if you don't draw it, can constitute "brandishing" (or another legal equivalent)in many states.

Drawing and/or pointing a firearm at someone or in their general direction can constitute felony assault (of various types) in many states.

Pulling the trigger opens a whole new can of legal worms, even if you think you're justified in doing so.

Bottom line, be careful; you may have to convince a jury that given the circumstances as you saw them, each one of them would have done exactly what you did. That can be a hard sell, as they are not under the same mental stress that you were.

Best course of action…..try to walk or run away from trouble if you can.

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 7:25 pm

Lol. I just went hiking with a buddy about a month ago into an area where there had been some reports of aggressive bear activity. (Mostly just stealing improperly hung food bags) He asked if I was bringing a gun, and I told him I was. (He's a liberal and doesn't own any guns, but he wanted to make sure I had mine!) He asked which gun I brought, and I told him my little .22 pistol. He looked a little concerned and said "A 22 won't stop a bear!" I laughed and told him it wasn't for the bear, it was for him. I was gonna shoot him in the leg and run.

He didn't think it was funny at first, but laughed later. :)

Az

PostedJul 15, 2011 at 9:57 pm

"He's a liberal and doesn't own any guns"

I'm a liberal and I own side arms, shotguns and rifles. And I know ultra-right conservatives who don't own any type of firearm. Maybe it really isn't a political statement.

PostedJul 16, 2011 at 3:26 am

Sorry, didn't mean it that way, it was meant as a joke. I actually despise labels and have been known to vote both ways based on ideas and integrity rather than party affiliation. And clearly it's not too terribly important if I was willing to spend a week in the backcountry with a stinky liberal! ;)

At least he wasn't a Frenchman!

Az

Rod Lawlor BPL Member
PostedJul 16, 2011 at 4:45 am

I told you this was going to be fun.

I think this might be the best one yet! I can't remember that we've had religion and the army in here before. I want to see if we can get private vehicles versus public transport in as well, but I'm not sure if there's a way to bring it up without making it seem like I'm orchestrating something. Any one care to help out?

PostedJul 16, 2011 at 6:01 am

I've never felt I needed a weapon in the woods while backpacking, but I most always feel like I need one when using the metro in the DC area. Those public-transport-using people scare the bejeezus out of me. It's why I use drive in my own car, by myself, most often. I feel much safer in my own car than in any public transport vehicle.

(That wasn't so hard, now was it…..)

Dean F. BPL Member
PostedJul 16, 2011 at 7:44 am

Allright! Now THIS is more like what I was expecting!

(Now do you understand, Tim?)

Where *I* come from discussing ways to kill people is simple professionalism, whereas making condescendingly smarmy straw-man attacks is considered distasteful. Not pointing fingers- just sayin'. :)

But I don't think that Tim was being That Guy. That would imply that BPL is a nest of groupthinking gun-banning hoplophobes, which it obviously is NOT since we do argue about this subject periodically. Some people just like to believe that all Right Thinking People agree with them. Or at least that they should. That is, after all, the very definition of "right thinking", isn't it?

M B BPL Member
PostedJul 16, 2011 at 6:17 pm

A lowly deer can run 75 yds after having its lungs and heart shot out with a high powered rifle, spraying blood the whole way, and drop dead at the end with its body basically drained of blood.

Wild animals are capable of withstanding bodily damage that you and I really cannot comprehend, and still keep functioning for some time. If you shoot a bear, you better kill him and not just make him angry.

PostedJul 16, 2011 at 7:35 pm

Now I understand now why there were groans all around when I started this. I wish I hadn't. I apologize for not properly searching. If I had, I would never had started this. I guess I assumed that everyone that read this would be an adult and would be able to discuss or offer an opinion in an adult manner. I see I was wrong.

FYI, I just got back from an overnight and I did not take a firearm with me. It had nothing to do with the discussion here, it all boiled down to weight. I didn't want to add the extra weight.

For those of you that answered my initial question, thank you for taking the time to respond. For those of you that completely turned this around, thank you for opening my eyes. I will remember what I have learned the next time I ask a question.

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 104 total)
Loading...