This is a preview of a member exclusive premium article.


A tent is pictured with one door open.
The X-Mid Pro 2 is an ultralight, two-person, dual-door, dual-vestibule, side-entry Dyneema Composite Fabrics shelter supported by two trekking poles and requiring a minimum of four stakes to pitch. Photo: Durston Gear.

The Durston X-Mid Pro 2 tent (20.4 oz / 578 g, MSRP: $639) is an ultralight, single-wall, two-person, double-door, double-vestibule, side-entry, trekking pole-supported shelter made of Dyneema Composite Fabrics (DCF). It requires two trekking poles and a minimum of four stakes to pitch. The design combines the headroom and spaciousness of a classic double-pole single-wall shelter with the stormworthiness and simple set-up of a pyramid-style shelter.

The Durston X-Mid Pro 2 is a compelling product in the somewhat narrow category of ultralight, two-person DCF shelters. The silpoly Durston X-Mid 2 is already a popular tent and is Highly Recommended by Backpacking Light. That makes the lighter, updated DCF version particularly intriguing.

The Durston X-Mid series of tents has become a favorite among ultralight backpackers, and demand for these shelters is very high. A recent sale of the Durston X-Mid 1 sold out in three minutes. Company founder Dan Durston notes there that there will be a better supply of the X-Mid Pro 2, but it seems unlikely that they will remain in stock very long following their initial launch.

This First Looks review is based on our initial hands-on evaluation of a pre-production sample of the Durston X-Mid Pro 2 Tent.

Review Update Log:

  • June 13, 2023: This review was updated with long-term performance results.
  • March 25th, 2022: Backpacking Light founder Ryan Jordan and Backpacking Light canine-in-chief Sierra recently had a chance to spend some time with the Durston X-Mid Pro 2 in the field. The new photos are at the end of the review, in the Photo Essay section. Click to jump straight there.
  • August 22nd, 2022: We shot a video exploring the features of the Durston X-Mid Pro 2. You can find it below.

X-Mid Pro 2 Review Video

YouTube video


  • shelter: 20.4 oz (578 g), plus 4 stakes and two trekking poles
  • height: 46 inches (117 cm)
  • floor width: 48 inches (122 cm)
  • floor length: 90 inches (229 cm)
  • floor area: 30 sq ft (2.78 sq m)
  • vestibule area: 21.5 sq ft (2 sq m)
  • packed size: 12 x 6 inches (30 x 15 cm)
  • rectangular design allows the tent to be pitched with four stakes
  • dual peak vents help manage condensation
  • bonded construction instead of sewn construction
  • offset pole design allows for easier entry and increased interior volume
  • two doors with dual vestibules, waterproof zippers on vestibule doors
  • 15 denier nylon floor doesn’t require a footprint in most conditions
  • floor lays taut when pitched and tensioned properly, instead of simply hanging
  • vestibules provide ample room for storing packs and other items not brought into the shelter
  • door zippers are easy to operate one-handed
  • magnets allow for the vestibule and/or the mesh tent door to be easily rolled up
A tent in a stuff sack is shown next to a one-liter water bottle.
The packed size of the X-Mid Pro 2 in the included stuff sack should allow it to fit in most low-volume (40L or less) packs without issue.

Testing Context

This review was conducted using both pre-production prototypes and production models of the X-Mid Pro 2.

person sitting by a tent in the forest
The Durston X-Mid Pro was tested for 27 cumulative nights in Montana and Idaho – a mix of solo trips, trips with a partner, overnight trips and weeklong trips, fair weather, and rough storms.

I used the Durston X-Mid Pro solely on summer and fall backpacking trips in the Northern Rockies. It was used for 27 nights. For 22 of these nights, I was the only occupant (the remaining nights were shared with a partner). This tent was tested in national forests and designated wilderness areas that did not require camping in designated sites; therefore I was able to choose locations at my discretion. Whenever possible, I chose sites that had ample room for the tent to ensure a proper pitch, soil that was easy to place stakes into, and natural features (boulders, trees, slopes) which provided additional shelter from the elements. I did not use a footprint while testing this tent and instead tried to practice good site selection and remove small rocks, pine cones, sticks, and other debris before pitching the tent.

tent pitched by a mountain lake with packrafts on shore
When bringing packrafts to a mountain lake, I was grateful for the light weight of the X-Mid Pro.

I experienced several mild rain events while using this tent, two consecutive days of near-constant rain or drizzle while at a basecamp, three mild-to-moderate thunderstorms, and one severe thunderstorm with approximately 10-minutes of marble-sized hail and gusty winds of around 15-20 mph. I did not use this tent in snowy conditions or excessively windy conditions. Mosquitoes were present, and often in abundance, on roughly half of the nights while using this tent.

First Impressions

As with the popular X-Mid 1 and X-Mid 2, one of the most impressive attributes of the Durston X-Mid Pro 2 is its unique geometric design that incorporates offset trekking pole placements. (Compare this to most shelters that incorporate two trekking poles, which use a direct-opposite placement of the poles.) In addition, the details that caught my attention include its ease of use, livability, and potential performance in inclement weather.

We recommend you read our Durston X-Mid 2 Review to familiarize yourself with some of the design features of X-Mid tents. That review will aid in your understanding of the X-Mid Pro 2 design.

Shoes, a water bottle, and two small items are shown under a tent vestibule.
The vestibule of the X-Mid Pro 2 provides plenty of room for gear including a backpack.

The most obvious unique design features of the X-Mid Pro 2 include:

  • an intuitive (rectangular) pitch that requires a minimum of only four stakes;
  • a spacious interior (a function of the offset poles and overall geometry);
  • integrated fly that extends further to ostensibly provide better coverage in storms than similar tents. The area covered by the fly of the X-Mid Pro 2 is 55.5 sq ft (5.1 sq m), compared to the Zpacks Duplex whose area covered by the fly is 48.6 sq ft (4.5 sq m).

The Durston X-Mid Pro 2 Tent is designed to be pitched using two trekking poles. For hikers who don’t use trekking poles, or for bikepackers and packrafters, Durston Gear has a lightweight, folding pole kit that is compatible with the X-Mid Pro 2 (and other shelters).

Shoes, a water bottle, and two small items are shown under a tent vestibule.
The vestibule of the X-Mid Pro 2 provides plenty of room for gear including a backpack.

“The X-mid Pro 2 can offer more space and function for the weight because it uses genuinely more efficient geometry (e.g. fewer seams, less fabric for the volume, etc.) so we can put more weight into things that matter,” said Dan Durston.

What’s the difference between the Durston X-Mid 2 and the Durston X-Mid Pro 2?

Compared to the X-Mid 2, the X-Mid Pro 2’s footprint is smaller:

  • X-Mid Pro 2: 80 x 100 inches (203 x 254 cm)
  • X-Mid: 90 x 102 inches (229 x 259 cm)

This allows the X-Mid Pro 2 to more easily fit into tighter campsites. The headroom is almost identical between the two shelters. The floor width of the X-Mid Pro 2 is only 2 inches (5 cm) smaller than in the X-Mid 2. The most obvious difference between the two shelters is that the X-Mid 2 is a double-wall shelter and the X-Mid Pro 2 is a single-wall shelter.

A tent and background are pitched on top of snow with mountains in the background.
The X-Mid Pro 2 sets up quickly, has a small footprint, and doesn’t take up a tremendous amount of room in your pack. I can easily pack it into a low-volume pack like my Pa’lante V2.

Is the Durston X-Mid 2 Pro easy to pitch?

Using only four stakes and two trekking poles, I was able to have this tent pitched in just a few minutes without having to readjust anything. It almost seemed too good to be true. There was no fiddling with pole height, moving stakes around, or tensioning (and re-tensioning) guylines. These iterative steps are often required when pitching trekking pole tents. The zippers – both the waterproof fly zippers and the zippers for the body of the tent – operated smoothly.

A woman reads a map inside a tent.
With ample headroom and a spacious design, there’s plenty of elbow room in the X-Mid Pro 2. The mesh door and the fly door can be rolled up and stored out of the way.

In soils where staking is more difficult than in my yard and in campsites with varying topography, pitching will obviously be a bit more challenging and perhaps require longer guylines or other adjustments to the pitch. However, given how straightforward the mechanics of erecting this tent are, it’s an easier pitch than most trekking pole shelters.

A corner of a tent is shown with the guyline stretched tight.
The design of the guylines stabilizes the height of the bathtub floor. The mesh and fly are designed with downward sloping angles to allow condensation to drain to the bottom of the mesh and not land inside the tent.

The DCF used for the body of the tent has been used extensively in many other tents by other manufacturers and will last a while for users who care for their gear with intention. One of the most common failure points of DCF shelters is sewn seams; the seams on Durston X-mid Pro 2 are entirely bonded with no sewing. (You can learn more about the advantages and disadvantages of bonded vs. sewn seams in the Dyneema Composite Fabrics episode of the Backpacking Light Podcast and the Dyneema Composite Fabrics Webinar.

A tent vent is shown near a zipper.
Dual peak vents allow for condensation management and are designed to function in all but the most horrendous weather, such as sideways-driven rain (where drops could bounce up into the vent) or blowing spindrift (snow). In those cases, they can be closed.

Why does the Durston X-Mid Pro 2 have a nylon floor?

A 15-denier nylon fabric was chosen for the floor with the idea that a footprint wouldn’t be necessary for most situations if reasonable precautions are taken with campsite selection. However, hikers using it in conditions where punctures would be more likely (such as rocky terrain or desert environments, with their plethora of spiky things) might want to bring a ground cloth in those specific conditions. The 15-denier floor is similar to the fabrics used in other lightweight tents, including many of those made by MSR and Big Agnes. Many hikers forego using footprints with those tents without experiencing any issues in normal use cases. When asked why the X-Mid Pro 2 uses a 15-denier floor instead of DCF, Dan cited the advantage in packability as one reason.

“We think a 15 denier woven floor is a better choice because it is a similar weight but far less bulk and debatably more abrasion resistant and waterproof in the long term,” said Dan. Using the 15 denier nylon fabric is also less costly than DCF. “Cost is another advantage, although the cost savings are largely offset by our more expensive hot bonding construction process,” said Dan. “We would have used 1.0 osy DCF if we genuinely thought it was better.” Using 15 denier nylon over 1.0 osy DCF results in a less expensive shelter that packs smaller.

A tent and background are pitched on top of snow with mountains in the background.
When set up for solo use, the X-Mid Pro 2 provides luxurious livability.

Other similar shelters, such as the Tarptent Stratospire Li, use an offset pole design. One of the advantages of the X-Mid Pro 2 is that it has such a simple pitch in addition to the benefits of having an offset pole design.

When asked how this was achieved without resulting in other trade-offs in performance, Dan said The X-Mid uses a rectangular base to simplify the pitch (compared to a hexagonal tent) and combines that with two trekking poles (to improve headroom compared to a single pole pyramid). The classic challenge faced by other tents attempting this is locating the poles. Prior tents have positioned them around the perimeter which results in flat walls that catch the wind and mandatory guylines, or they have positioned them along the centerline where they interfere in the sleeping area and/or doorways. The X-Mid uses a new floorplan, where the poles are placed on a diagonal and then the sleeping area passes between them on the opposite diagonal. From the overhead view, these crossing diagonals form the “X” in the X-Mid name. From a functional perspective, they provide a good [larger] living space while avoiding all the common pitfalls (e.g., poles in the doorways, poles in the living area, mandatory guylines, flat walls).”

A tent and background are pitched on top of snow with mountains in the background.
It’s easy to achieve a tight pitch, even when only using four stakes. In the dozen or so times I set it up, I only ended up having to re-adjust about half those times, and those adjustments were very minor (i.e., tightening up one or two guidelines to the stakes a bit, or adjusting pole height, or both). Photo credit: Mark Wetherington

The Durston X-Mid Pro 2 Compared To…

weightMSRPwall design (single-wall vs. double-wall)floor dimensionsmaximum peak heightfloor materialcanopy material
Durston X-Mid Pro 220.4 ounces / 578 g$639single48 x 90 inches (122 x 229 cm)46 inches (117 cm)15 denier nylon0.5 osy Dyneema Composite Fabric
Zpacks Duplex19.0 ounces / 539 g$699single45 x 90 inches (122 x 229 cm)48 inches (122 cm)1 osy Dyneema Composite Fabric0.55 osy Dyneema Composite Fabric
Tarptent Stratospire Li27.5 ounces / 780 g$699double45 x 86 inches (114 x 218 cm)45 inches (115 cm)1 osy Dyneema Composite Fabric0.51 osy Dyneema Composite Fabric
Gossamer Gear The Two23.5 ounces / 666 g$375single42/48 x 84 inches (107/122 x 213)43 inches (109 cm)10 denier nylon ripstop10 denier nylon ripstop

On paper, the Durston X-Mid Pro 2 bests many tents in its category (two-person, two-door, side-entry, dual-vestibule trekking-pole shelters) on a number of metrics. It is either lighter, roomier, less expensive, and in certain cases, all of those things. But how a shelter looks in a table is only part of the equation – one which we are increasingly less inclined to emphasize as shelter builders shave ounces at the expense of other important factors. Craftsmanship, quality control, user-friendliness (ease of pitching), livability, stormworthiness, and aesthetics all come into play. These are the performance metrics consider in this review.

Two sleeping pads are shown inside a tent.
Two long (78 inches / 198 cm) sleeping pads fit well in the X-Mid Pro 2, although the fit will be tight if both of them are wide (25 inches / 64 cm), rectangular pads. There is plenty of room at the ends of the pads for extra layers, stuff sacks, or other items.

Long-Term Performance

In this section, we evaluate:

  • Pitching
  • Livability
  • Stormworthiness
  • Fabric
  • Durability
  • Weight
  • Finish quality/aesthetics
  • Price

--- End of free preview ---
Member Exclusive

A Premium or Unlimited Membership* is required to view the rest of this article.


* A Basic Membership is required to view Member Q&A events