Topic
Product Ideas and Feedback Wanted
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Commerce › Gear Deals › Product Ideas and Feedback Wanted
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jun 5, 2012 at 11:02 am #1884236
I just found out some more info from the distributor. The 1.20lb foam is crazy expensive and has super high minimums. (5x the price and 100x the minimum) So with that said, I have decided to go with the more standard 2.0lb density weight. The foam I am going to use is an ultra soft, highly resilient closed cell cross linked foam with 18% EVA. Basically its the same as Evazote.. I am still waiting to hear back on the colors but here are some rough figures on were we are with the weight and prices
1/8" Thickness:
20"x48" 2.25oz, $12.95
20"x72" 3.35oz, $15.95
24"x76" 4.00oz, $17.95Please let me know your thoughts..
Thanks,
LawsonJun 5, 2012 at 11:07 am #1884237Any idea on shipping costs?
Jun 5, 2012 at 11:40 am #1884249The prices would include Free Shipping.
Jun 5, 2012 at 12:44 pm #1884266Will it be any more tear resistant than the stuff Suluk use to sell?
Jun 5, 2012 at 12:50 pm #1884269Kind of a bummer that it weighs 2x what the Suluk46 ones weigh… my suluk46 74x24x1/8 pad weighs 1.9 oz…
Jun 5, 2012 at 1:07 pm #1884271The Suluk46 pads are garbage in my opinion. Mine tore just by attaching it to my pack. I'll gladly carry 2 more ounces for a long term solution.
Jun 5, 2012 at 1:32 pm #1884278I think you'll have no problem selling them at those prices, especially with free shipping. It's well worth the extra durability for the tiny bit of extra weight.
Jun 5, 2012 at 2:06 pm #1884293Sounds good. I guess I'd be down for a 72×20. I initially thought I'd prefer the larger size, but 72×20 could easily be folded to fit in the pad pocket of my SMD Swift, and I could leave the pad I'm currently using at home (a 20"x10" section from a zlite) and still ditch my groundsheet. Weight sounds fine to me considering the price, assuming the durability is there.
Too bad the lighter stuff is so much more expensive…
Jun 5, 2012 at 9:23 pm #1884451I think the 24" version would be ideal. Affordable (GG), more durable (Suluk) and if someone wants something smaller find a utility knife.
I am also looking forward to the thicker pad.
Jun 5, 2012 at 11:41 pm #1884483I'm still looking for this cord. At 3mm, it holds 3600lbs!
Kevin
Jun 6, 2012 at 3:37 am #1884498Kevin,
I Googled it and found 1, 200 meter roll left at Amazon for $553.80.
http://www.amazon.com/New-England-Ropes-Tech-Cord/dp/B0081ZLJQA
From the picture in your avatar I think I understand why you are looking for this cord.
Party On,
Newton
Jun 6, 2012 at 7:19 am #1884528Lawson, despite the 1.2lb foam being much more expensive, if the estimated R-Values are factual, then I still think a Ridgerest killer is worth bringing to market, even at a higher cost. The higher cost doesn't make sense for a groundpad (1/8"), since the R-Value is more or less irrelevant and it's comfort doesn't really matter. You're really only saving weight with the 1.2lb foam.
For a thick foam mattress that you'll be sleeping on, the better R-Value, comfort value, and weight savings, the higher priced foam would definitely be worth it.
The 24×76 looks good for 1/8" thickness. You get more versatility this way, as people who want something smaller can easily cut it down to size, and the larger size is very useful to people who have large-sized airmats.
Jun 6, 2012 at 7:35 am #1884534I have never owned a Suluk46 pad but from what I understand they use Plastazote foam. Calculating the sleeping pads width x length x thickness, it would appear as if they were using the Plastazote 15LD or 18LD. This weight Plastazote has 0% EVA, a tear strength of 1.80-2.95lbs, and elongation at break of 95%-125%. This is the reason the foam is lightweight but not very durable or resilient.. The foam I am using has 18% EVA, a tear strength of 10.9lbs, and an elongation of break of 550%. These numbers are actually better then Evazote and Supazote..
Jun 6, 2012 at 10:02 am #1884566Someone mentioned 1/8" pads are available already.
True but NOT in wider widths. 20" is too narrow.
I generally use these 1/8" pads under another pad, typically a 20". I suspect a lot of us do.
A wider 1/8" pad would give some insulation and padding for parts of our bodies that do not fit on the 20" pad, think arms, feet, lower legs, and hands.
1/8" pads are highly versatile as has been mentioned.
I'd buy one in a heartbeat.Jun 6, 2012 at 10:35 am #1884579I'd be in for a 24" width pad.
Would you be able to do any custom width or lengths? Not sure how you are receiving this from the distributor.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.