Topic
How many BPL’ers wear KILTS?
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › General Forums › General Lightweight Backpacking Discussion › How many BPL’ers wear KILTS?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Mar 18, 2011 at 9:08 am #1710710
"Marshall is making it? Make it out of cuben, it'll definitely come out under 8oz."
We thought about it, but i think i would shred it too quickly. Nuff said :)
Grey Dyneema with three of these paracord tassels:
—M
Mar 18, 2011 at 9:20 am #1710719I like the idea of men in kilts. That said , I have an honest question. I have had female friends that had chafing issues, and to them wearing pants was the answer; how does skin to skin prevent chafing? Would it work better for thighs that don't each other and now don't have to rub on fabric? Would chubby thighs be better of with fabric?
I never wear skirts , and dresses I wear only on rare occasions and not when I have to walk a lot, so I am curious.Mar 18, 2011 at 9:32 am #1710728I honestly don't know why kilts work so well for me. Maybe it's an anatomy issue. Women have different "parts" than men and tend to be curvy where men are basically straight (well,i know i'm straight:).
I do use Band Aid brand anti-friction block and that combined with a kilt works for me. Weight might play a part, also.—M
Mar 18, 2011 at 9:49 am #1710740Here is a bit of advice from a Scot. :)
This only applies if you go commando like a true Scot. ie, no underwear.
If you are wearing one of these modern lightweight kilts, make sure you wear a heavy sporran in front. Otherwise, if a nice looking lady walks by, you may develop a rather obvious 'tilt in yir kilt'. :)
Mar 18, 2011 at 9:49 am #1710741Matt – What color is the finger nail polish you're wearing in that photo?
(Sorry – couldn't resist! ; ))
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:21 am #1710758"Matt – What color is the finger nail polish you're wearing in that photo?
(Sorry – couldn't resist! ; ))"
I like that color…
M* edited by sharalds *
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:26 am #1710760If you are worried about certain 'issues', but still want all the advantages, chop the legs off a pair of pantyhose, and wear that. ;)
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 am #1710765You can also wear a "Zardoz" outfit to prevent "problems".
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:31 am #1710766Damn! How did my photo get online!
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:32 am #1710768The guy in the picture is a famous Scott. Can't recall his name.
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:39 am #1710772I'm posting under an alias.
Shurely that's obvioush Mish Moneypenny. :)Mar 18, 2011 at 10:43 am #1710773I hope i look as good in a diaper as he does. Notice he had to wear suspenders to keep it up:)
Where's his holster?—M
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:51 am #1710776Real men don't have a problem. :)
Mar 18, 2011 at 10:55 am #1710778This should look good in dyneema too.
Disclaimer: Only offered in fun. Not personally opposed to kilts or anything else people may choose to wear.
Mar 18, 2011 at 11:20 am #1710799I like the term "manzierre" better :)
—-M
Mar 18, 2011 at 11:25 am #1710801OK…way off topic again…
How many BPL'er's actually wear a kilt or are considering wearing one?Eagle Creek Trail to Whatum Lake, Columbia Gorge, Oregon:
Mar 18, 2011 at 11:38 am #1710808Scottish 51st Highland Division 1945. Here be warriors.
Mar 18, 2011 at 11:39 am #1710809OK, THIS IS the BPL forum — so let's get back on topic.
Why does anyone need a full-on tartan skirt when this covers everything that needs to be covered??
Mar 18, 2011 at 11:47 am #1710813@Matt
I personally have no intention of ever wearing a kilt. However, I do appreciate your clear passion for the subject. And you might just have the calves to pull it off.Mar 18, 2011 at 12:08 pm #1710822I've worn kilts for various functions but never hiking. Personally I think wearing boxer briefs with light nylon shorts or simply going commando with runners shorts work the same or better than wearing a kilt.
At lest for chafing, sweating, and 'monkey butt'.
If you're not Scottish, shallow, and need the attention then a kilt is the way to go. :P
Mar 18, 2011 at 12:15 pm #1710825Deal there Kevin. I've got the legs to pull it off :)
Mar 18, 2011 at 12:23 pm #1710828A piece of useless info.
One of the main reasons the kilt was Scotlands ancient dress was the terrain. Due to the wet and boggy terrain, with frequent river crossings, it made more sense. Legs clad in fabric would have been a problem.
Also, he leather 'brogues' worn on the feet had plenty drainage holes in them, before fashion took a hold.Mar 18, 2011 at 1:35 pm #1710854"If you're not Scottish, shallow, and need the attention then a kilt is the way to go"
Chad,
I am Scott/Irish, not shallow (just don't care what insecure people like you think), and don't wear a kilt for attention…from males, anyway :) I have to wonder why it is that you keep posting on a kilt thread when you obviously dislike them so much? Try it before you bash it…or don't you have enough confidence?
MMar 18, 2011 at 1:44 pm #1710860It's not for me, but I think kilts are cool….why not?
Mar 18, 2011 at 1:44 pm #1710861He just doesn't want to be a hanging chad.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.