I’ve used a series of shorty self-inflating foam pads (the newer ones don’t self-inflate fully anymore, but some is better than none for keeping moisture out of the pad) and found them all more comfortable for this side-sleeper than either the closed cell or the foamless inflatables. The selfies all run around 3/4″ thick, so there is no need to prop up the feet for posture reasons. Currently use a Nemo that is very light and with foam that is more comfortable than any of its predecessors, but also requires more care because the fabric cover is so thin. But have repaired one without any problem.
Due to the thinness of the pads, have never felt the need for a longer one EXCEPT in well below freezing weather. On these occasions, any number of fixes, including those earlier mentioned in this thread, have sufficed. There has always been something to stuff under the feet. Wearing light thinsulate booties to bed always keeps the feet warm. When almost every insulating item has been layered on in the sleeping bag against the cold, the rain jacket has been folded under the feet. At the point when every loose item has been used, the tent floor is bare and I’m warm, it marks the use of gear to the max with no extra weight carried. Don’t have to do this often, but one never knows when the temp is going to suddenly plummet overnight.
The above being so, there was never a desire to add weight and volume with a longer pad. Cannot sleep on any of the pump up inflatable pads. They all give me the feeling of being on a water bed or worse. So they don’t enter into the equation. As for the ones that crackle with every slightest move – forget it.
Agree that boot fit and comfort is very subjective, but don’t think pads are to that extent. I think it’s more a matter of the natural human need to acquire more “stuff”, as George Carlin put it. But apologies to those who suffer from arthritis or the like, and who must carry whatever is needed to be comfortable, no matter how heavy or cumbersome.