Steripen Ultra – Junk?

Many, many people seem to have had great success with their Steripens. Thousands and thousands at least. I have several models which have all worked very well over many years. I have but have not used much an Ultra. I favour the Classic 3 for when we need one, but previous (large) models have also been fine.

I am disappointed with Katadyn’s response. The original Steripen company was far more responsive and helpful.

Cheers

Timing.. i have 2 steripen ultras that i have been using for a few years now. Last week before my trip, I pulled one out to charge it.. the display is dark. Uv bulb works, but no display.  Fortunately I had the other one and used it with no problems. Thankfully it happened at home before i left. I emailed customer service and they told me nothing they can do, it’s out of warranty.  Im sad but what are my options? I have used Sawyer squeeze and been stifled on trail with stupid slow flows and too much squeezing.  I then loved my Be Free.. eventually that slowed down too.. i actually own 3 of them because I just would buy new filter.. but.. got tired of slowimg flow no matter what I did.. i always used a steripen in winter and decided to just use it full time all year. I carry Katadyn aqua tabs  ( whatever they are called ) for backup if needed.  I wish there was a better option,  easier option too.. but I figure I will continue to take my chances with the steripen.

I could not tell you. I bought a Steripen Ultralight packaged new at the REI Garage Sale. Dropped it on the floor from about 2 feet up and the bottom busted off and the circuit board came out. No way to put it back together to function. Never got to use it.

So…to summarize:

Russ = Junk

Dirtbag = Junk

Baja Bob = Junk

Thanks Russ W, that was gold:-)

Junk possibly. I have gotten a few years use out of mine,  purifying many many liters of water.  So honestly I would use the term junk loosely. Like I said, I had PITA problems with Sawyer and Be Free.. So it has become a pick my poison type of situation.  I still think its my best option.. But I am Leary every time I use it.. Even more now that I actually had a problem with one of mine.

I have an Adventurer Opti that I bought used over 11 years ago.  Still working fine (or, at least, as of the last trip I took it on, which was this past January).  It doesn’t get a ton of use, mainly in colder temps when I am worried about a filter freezing.  I have certainly heard stories of Steripen failures, but I have also experienced such failures with filters.  No matter what I’m carrying to treat my water, I always carry chemical tabs as a backup.  They weigh almost nothing, so I guess I don’t see any problem.  If anyone finds a perfect and foolproof water treatment method, I would like to hear about it.

OK, I’ll be serious for a minute. While hiking a long trail this year I got a decent feel for why filters fail. Initially there were people who switched from the ubiquitous Sawyer squeeze to the BeFree because the flow slowed down to what they deemed unacceptable. I brought the blue coupler that lets you back flush from an outdoor spigot and mine lasted the whole trail. Later hikers were buying the “Squeeze” because their BeFree “sucked”. The BeFree works better initially because it filters (to keep it simple) one decimal point less than the “Squeeze”. But in the end it’s reliability that matters to hikers. (thru or otherwise). So the reasoning against electronic devices is a function of reliability. Phones and gps have proven fairly reliable. The steripen models only moderately so. Not good enough for a long hike. Maybe ok for shorter ones. Possibly even moderate ones where you can bail and buy another filter if your filter fails. Hell, most thru hikes you can do that too. But it sucks to have a filter fail. More than a leaky tent or a malfunctioning stove or deflating mat.

You could turn this into a long discussion involving freezing temps, earlier models, silty water, whatever.

Bottom line, can you trust your water filtration system. I stayed healthy using a my choice for 1000’s of miles. You do you.

I still think The OP’s breakdown of responses was awesome though.

Have noted that the Steripens have become popular; but do not use them because there are issues:  1) The don’t clean the water the way a pump does; and 2) They don’t always work.

So long ago decided to: 1) Always carry enough iodine tablets; and 2)
Use the pump, and replace the Sawyer Mini cartridge every trip,  and every couple of weeks on longer trips.  Don’t mind the expense, as it is minor compared to infection if the filter fails, and the pumping is always easy.  The pump is described in more detail at:

https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/99643/

Never had a failure with Chlorine Dioxide. Sure, there is a wait time for cold water that is easily overcome with a little planning.

If I’m filtering water, it’s usually pretty mucky or full of decomposing vegetation. I found the Steripen was too heavy. Then I had to worry about batteries.

I’ve never had an issue with my Steripen. Ever. Sometimes issues have to do with user failure–that is, dropping a steripen that was bought at a garage sale and breaking the bulb–and then calling the device “junk”.

ah, come on!

I’m careful with the unit and, again, it’s never failed. I hiked for many years with early iterations of squeeze style water filters, and liked them, until they clogged. After getting a Steripen, I never looked back. I carry it on a two ounce belly pack along with lunch and a map. Easy access, no waiting. No issues.

And yes, I bring some iodine tablets as back up.

Warning, thread drift ahead.

Anything with a battery will fail, and more often than not it will do so at a most inopportune moment. Yes, things without batteries fail as well, but more often than not that is a result of misuse or inadequate maintenance.

If one knows how to clean, store and test a Sawyer Squeeze, in my experience it is the best water filtration system.

As always, HYOH.

Thanks for all of the responses. It sounds like some folks are happy with the Steripens but there seem to be plenty of problems as well. I treated my devices well and they simply quit working. You can literally say I’m not a happy camper. Steripen – you’re fired!

So here are the choices:

1. Steripen with chlorine dioxide backup. Expensive ($130), requires charging and battery source, and turns into a 5 ounce brick when it dies.
2. Use a Sawyer, Be Free, Platy Quick draw or similar option with chlorine dioxide backup. $20-$40 and only 2 ounces dead weight upon failure. Replace with some level of frequency and it shouldn’t be an issue on the trail.
3. Chlorine dioxide – Inexpensive but longer wait times for purification.

My failures with the Steripen are telling me to choose option 2. Only use case  for a Steripen seems to be winter hiking, but I have zero trust at this point.

When I did my NPT thruhike last September,  143 miles over 7 days I actually packed my Sawyer Micro for backup to my Steripen.  It only weighs what 3 ounces and is pretty small. I was concerned if my Steripen failed me on my first night out there.. i would have been in a predicament.. not really any town crossings or gear stores along the way.. and PLENTY of beaver damn crossings.  It was worth it for me @ 3 ounces. Again. All my years never had a my steripen fail, but I always read about others..  and it finally happened to me last week.  I didn’t drop it or abuse it. Last time a few weeks ago I used it just fine. Cleaned it up and put it on my gear shelf in its case.  Went to charge it last week.. no screen illumination.  For a short weekend or overnight trip,  it wouldn’t be a big deal,  carrying a few tablets would get me thru.. but if that happened on say day 1 or 2 of a 6 + day backpacking trip with no resupply options.. well that would be a problem for me.

Wouldn’t carrying 2 sawyer micros even be lighter then 1 steripen Ultra?

Or a Mico and a mini?  Lighter weight and less space too no?

I mean,  for weekend trip or overnighter its overkill.. a few tabs for backup would be fine.. but  for mutli day trips,  6+ days with no resupply options..  kinda makes sense to me. If Im using two, 1L smartwater bottles ..

The BeFree works better initially because it filters (to keep it simple) one decimal point less than the “Squeeze”.

Did I mess something here?  It looks like the specs are the same: 0.1 micron.  Now, Sawyer says 0.1 micron absolute, I didn’t see anything on Be Free.  Just curious.

Absolute  vs. nominal microns

Sawer advertises that no pore is larger than 1 micron. Others are nominally 1 micron which means the vast majority of pores are not larger than 1 micron, though a small percentage may be larger.

Got that: absolute / nominal.  But the quote inplies an order of magnitude difference between the 2 filters and I wondered where that came from.

Went to charge it last week.. no screen illumination.
My 2c:
Rechargeable battery failure. Happens all the time to all sorts of devices.

This is why I use either an Adventurer or Classic 3: both have replaceable batteries.
I did have rechargables in the Adventurer at the start, and yes, the batteries failed regularly. So now I only use primary (ie non-rechargable) batteries. Never any problems since.

Cheers

Did I mess something here?  It looks like the specs are the same: 0.1 micron.  Now, Sawyer says 0.1 micron absolute, I didn’t see anything on Be Free.  Just curious.

I agree, Jon. The specs say 0.1 µm for both filters.

And as someone who does some research in the area of viral filtration in the context of pharmaceutical processing, I will say that there is no such thing as “absolute” removal of pathogens. Specifying a “pore size” is not meaningful. Removal is typically characterized using log-retention-value (LRV), and an LRV of 5 is good, which means that 99.999% of a given pathogen is removed.

In principle, these companies should be reporting effectiveness of their filters using LRVs for various pathogens, but they don’t. Probably because they want to give the impression that the filters are completely removing all pathogens of a particular type, which is simply not true.

I bought a Steripen Adventurer over ten years ago (just after they fixed the issue with battery discharge) and has been working fine since. I like it a lot better than filters like the BeFree. Pump filters are nicer in certain circumstances but heavier. I think the inherent unreliability of electronics (though true) is over emphasized in water treatment. Electronics break/loose charge. Filters clog/become punctured. Chemicals lose potency/aren’t used properly. They all have issues.

Pick your poison. In my opinion, if you are dealing with relatively clean clear mountain water, the steripen is great. If your dealing with mucky, silty, hard to reach water, use a pump that is easy to clean. If your dealing with something in between BeFree and Sawyers excel. If your dealing with off tastes and forever chemicals (which we probably all are dealing with :( ), use a GAC filter with other treatment techniques.

I wonder if this might possibly work as an alternative?

Rovyvon Aurora A8 Pro UV-C

One would obviously have to take care to avoid self exposure and calculating dose time is beyond my technical expertise, but 15.5 grams is light if already carrying a powerbank.

Dave

You are right, for some pathogens BeFree and Sawyer are roughly the same. For protozoa (cysts)  the Sawyer shows higher filtration rates. I believe 7 log for cysts versus 5 log. I let gear skeptic do the leg work for me rather than chasing it myself when I was choosing filters. He referenced the Sawyer mini but at the end points out the Squeeze filters the same. This was third in the series on microfiltration and showed sources. Around 20 minutes in to the you tube video. He also pointed out the difficulty he had in tracing testing sources. Possibly data is available now in easier to access formats? The whole video is worth watching if you have the time. Worth repeating that Dan is correct about these filters only removing some pathogens. Know your area water when hiking, especially outside of of the U.S.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJOiCztnXfY