Apr 8, 2013 at 3:31 pm #1301463
Paul MagnantiBPL Member
@paulmagsLocale: Front Range Zoo
Something I wrote recently that has received some good traction. Thought people here may find it interesting. Basically, a look at the humble fleece jacket that many of us here have eschewed at times in favor of more 'sexy' items like soft shell or puffies.
Thrust of the article is that a simple fleece jacket may be more appropriate in certain conditions.
Anyway, just came out my experiences in the past few years.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:07 pm #1974181
@davecLocale: The West Slope
I'm wrapping up a 16 month comparison of fleece, down and primaloft for an article at the moment, and find it difficult to come to the conclusion that expensive fill coats are worthwhile. The caveat is that this does not hold true for winter coats (iclo of ~2 or more), where down is just about the only reasonable option.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:41 pm #1974201
Good article Paul,
Most folk I know back on other side of the pond keep fleece in their packs for active use.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:42 pm #1974202
I liked this article. I've stayed on board for fleece. This forum actually helped me settle on an Arcteryx fleece earlier this year, although the Patagonia R1 stuff is tempting.
It's probably a useless hang-up, but I prefer synthetic insulation over down in all forms— fleece/puffy/sleeping bag —because I'm in what feels like a particularly wet area of the northeast. There's something about the moisture management that really appeals.
Of course, what I would find interesting is a comparison of heavyweight merino wool from Ibex or the like against fleece. That would be interesting.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:50 pm #1974211
R1 is the bees knees, I have two pullovers a hoodie and a vest, also really like my Montane Jackal Powerstretch pro piece.
Up unti last year I hiked mainly in Ireland and Scotland where it rained an awful lot and never got a down bag wet from rain (sweat yes), I do agree that synthetic clothing ala primaloft and the like make a lot of sense in very wet environment, during winter I carry a light weight synthehic and down combo.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:53 pm #1974214
Dale WambaughBPL Member
@dwambaughLocale: Pacific Northwest
Fleece is relatively cheap, durable (it doesn't leak if you tear it), easy to launder (low heat!!!) and works great in cool soggy environments. If you are in a boat of any kind, it is the only way to fly. You can sleep in it comfortably too.
It doesn't compress well and the weight/loft isn't as good as down, but a down jacket needs a finely woven shell to keep the feathers (and sweat) in, where a fleece will breath and transport moisture out to evaporate. You can stand around in camp with your fleece to cut the chill and cap it with a shell if the wind comes up. Fleece and windshirts or rain shells are the perfect system. I have pull-overs, hoodies, "cardigans", and vests in several weights.
Did I mention that I like fleece? :)
BTW, I tried a couple soft shell jackets this winter and found them useless. Great around town, but just a cold boat anchor on the trail. I finally came to the conclusion that they fit in the same slot as a Levi jacket, but synthetic instead of cotton. A windshirt and a 100w fleece will kick any soft shell in the derriere.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:56 pm #1974216
spelt with a tBPL Member
@speltLocale: SW/C PA
As near as I have been able to tell, softshells are just fleece with special napping and DWR. Not worth the premium price when a regular fleece can be layered under varying shells just as well. Fleece socks are also nice. Don't have to worry about sweating them out and waking up with cold feet like down booties.Apr 8, 2013 at 5:59 pm #1974217
Yep, a fleece and windshirt does the trick.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:01 pm #1974219
Jason ElsworthBPL Member
@jephotoLocale: New Zealand
Sounds like a great article is in the works. I usually carry a 100 WT fleece vest or jumper. For me it is a bit of an insurance policy for the weather we can get in NZ. It's also nice to put on if everything else is wet at the end of a day when it has rained non-stop.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:06 pm #1974221
Nice article Paul. I don't own a softshell as of yet but my hardshell was horrible for snowshoeing this past winter. Like you mentioned in your article, the pit zips help but I'm glad I wasn't forced to figure out a way to dry out my gear afterwards.
After reading your article, I'm now thinking about a fleece / windshirt combo in lieu of a soft shell for snowshoeing. Thoughts?Apr 8, 2013 at 6:08 pm #1974222
Justin BakerBPL Member
@justin_bakerLocale: Santa Rosa, CA
I don't get people who hike in puffies. They get compressed on the back and shoulders, synthetic fill will flatten with time, and down is super sensitive to moisture. I only see them being useful at night around camp.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:11 pm #1974225
Ken T.BPL Member
..and it's so comfortable.
nice Mags.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:33 pm #1974237
Paul MagnantiBPL Member
@paulmagsLocale: Front Range Zoo
I am all about the fleece and windshirt combo for winter. I don't snowshoe, but I am an avid Nordic skier and find this is the combo that works for me.
For an in-depth look at this system, go to this link:
The short version is that (at least in the dry cold of Colorado, not as familiar with winters in the PNW) is that the fluffy snow is shed quite easily. A wind shirt is breathable and lets out moisture.
I actually use an old school anorak. Complete with a kangaroo pouch. :) Think I paid $20 for it. Similar to this:
For fleece I already mentioned the reasons why I use it.
But here are some real world examples:
I remember one very cold and dry day in January. My buddy d-low and I were ski touring. His shell was COATED with frost inside. I had a layer of frost from my sweat that had sublimated on the outside of my fleece but was otherwise warm and dry inside. I noticed my buddy started skiing in a fleece after that day. :)
On a recent winter backpacking trip, the old school wool pants, fleece and anorak was amusing at first. Then everyone saw how well it worked. ;)
In any case, the fleece jacket and wind breaker combo works very well in winter. At least for me.
Now, for three season backpacking, I still prefer a puffy layer for breaks and at night (esp with my quilt). I rarely hike in my core insulation layer so the puffy layer works well. Because I do backpack in the Rockies and desert southwest, where it tends to be cooler and drier, I prefer to carry something more compact and lighter then fleece.
Nice to have choices! :)Apr 8, 2013 at 6:38 pm #1974238
I treated all my fleece clothing with this stuff recently and it works very well.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:41 pm #1974239
Stuart .BPL Member
And we may just get another chance tomorrow, assuming this rain turns to snow. I'm a big fan of my R1 fleece and will check out Melanzana's version too. Maybe it's my fault, but every fleece I've bought over the years except the R1 has fit me like a sack of potatoes. That includes Patagonia and (pre-sellout) TNF. I guess that's why I gave up on fleece before the Y2K bug. Who makes fleece for non-couch potatoes these days?Apr 8, 2013 at 6:43 pm #1974240
The Montane stuff has an athletic fit.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:43 pm #1974241
@cameronLocale: Idaho Falls
Andrew Skurka said he has gone back to fleece for hiking in cold wet conditions. I believe he said he would take one if he went back to Alaska for example. The idea is that if you are out in cold wet weather long enough you will get wet eventually. When this happens a fleece under your raincoat keeps you warmer, absorbs less water and will dry quickly once the rain stops.
I still use my puffy on summer trips. Normally I only need insulation in camp when I'm not moving around. I sort of copied Andrew's idea though by using a long sleave synthetic shirt under my raincoat (it was too warm for a fleece). It seemed to work pretty well. It got somewhat moist but kept me warm and dried quickly.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:48 pm #1974242
I'm probably making a distinction in my mind between windshirts and windbreakers which doesn't need to be there. So far I've been using my hardshell for double duty and haven't purchased a windshirt yet. I was considering a softshell but now I'm more inclined to buy a windshirt. I keep hearing that they breathe much better so it's time for me to find out.
I'm glad you mentioned the liabilities of the fleece with a built in wind shell as that was one option I was considering but for now I've tabled that idea.Apr 8, 2013 at 6:56 pm #1974248
Jerry AdamsBPL Member
@retiredjerryLocale: Oregon and Washington
I wear fleece a lot but not when I'm backpacking. The warmth for the weight isn't good. For the same weight, I can get a much warmer synthetic or down.
But, that assumes that while hiking I can wear just base layer and jacket and stay warm, down to 25 F or so.
Synth or down while hiking is too warm so you'll sweat. Below that temperature, which is about 25 F for me, then fleece is great.Apr 8, 2013 at 7:03 pm #1974251
I also ditched softshells recently.
I liked mine for shedding snow, but I find the fleece + Windshirt combo suits me much nicer.
If I need more insulation I've got an Arcteryx Atom.Apr 8, 2013 at 7:05 pm #1974254
Rick MBPL Member
delApr 8, 2013 at 7:51 pm #1974274
Dale WambaughBPL Member
@dwambaughLocale: Pacific Northwest
Ian said: "I'm probably making a distinction in my mind between windshirts and windbreakers which doesn't need to be there. So far I've been using my hardshell for double duty and haven't purchased a windshirt yet. I was considering a softshell but now I'm more inclined to buy a windshirt. I keep hearing that they breathe much better so it's time for me to find out. "
A windshirt is just a lightweight windbreaker. The concept is the same: prevent heat loss from wind and get some protection from light precip. Breathability is key. Get a Houdini and don't look back :)
Softshell jackets are heavy and cold. A 100w fleece and a windshirt are warmer than the Patagonia Super Guide jacket that I **had**. I tried a Millet too. Like I said, they are like a polyester Levi jacket to me.
What I can't logically reconcile is that I really like soft shell pants. Maybe there are differences in the fabrics, but they work for me on cold rainy days.Apr 8, 2013 at 8:34 pm #1974299
dave eBPL Member
@hipassLocale: Los Angeles
I use my R1 for summer and winter.I use it with a windshirt for snowshoeing and its perfect.I just bought a big puffer for cold weather, when on breaks or cool summer evenings.I get cold pretty easy and my downsweater didnt work for me in the sierra.Just sold my softshell cause i realized it was a lot of bulk but couldnt figure a specific use-sort of a redundant piece.Have to figure out the use of my R2.Apr 8, 2013 at 9:06 pm #1974308
Miles BargerBPL Member
@milesbargerLocale: West Virginia
Spending summers in Denali (think days of 40s-50s, constant rain and wind, and helpin' spoonfuls of soak-you-to-the-bone bushwhacking) and winters in Western Oregon (think the same minus the schwhacking) taught me to love fleece. In those conditions, you're going to be and stay wet. If you generate enough body heat to stay warm when soaked and have the stamina to never stop moving in order to continue generating that heat, more power to you. I found that I didn't. I also found that synthetic insulation worked well when damp but sucked when soaked. So, I started packing ye olde fleece. Low and behold, it actually kept me warm when wet. And wringing it out and throwing it back on removed a significant amount of water, at least for awhile.
So, yeah, if you recreate in conditions that allow you to stay warm and dry enough that you don't need insulation while moving, pack the puffy. But for wet, cool/cold conditions, fleece is awesome. The minor increase in weight and packed volume is so very worth being able to actually enjoy trips in continuously wet weather.Apr 8, 2013 at 9:10 pm #1974309
Ed BiermannBPL Member
If you don't need it in your bag/quilt at night it does make a great pillow. Another positive for the lack of compressibility.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.