Topic

The “I don’t get it” thread


Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Home Forums General Forums Philosophy & Technique The “I don’t get it” thread

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 21 posts - 201 through 221 (of 221 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1968633
    Nick Gatel
    BPL Member

    @ngatel

    Locale: Southern California

    Remove the cables and quit doing trail maintenance. Get rid of the permit system. Mother nature will cull out the hordes.

    ;)

    #1968752
    steven franchuk
    Member

    @surf

    "My proposed system: Anyone can print out a "permit" from a website. It explains the rules and gives safety guidelines."

    Yosemite rangers have been explaining the rules and guidelines for years. Yet people rutinely ignore them. At Yosemite, Vernal, and nevada falls there are signs warning people to stay away from the water and to not go swimming. There are guard rails and signs saying do not cross. And yet people ignor them and go over the edge every year. Explaining the rules and guidelines doesn't work.

    "There's a time/date-stamp machine at Happy Isles. You must be within the first 200 people if you get your permit time-stamped AFTER 7 am. If you get time-stamped before 7 am, there's no limit."

    What is going to revent 700+ people showing up at 4AM to get there permit stamped? having 700 people hiking in the dark doesn't sound like a good idea.

    People may not like that fact that there are a limited number of permits available and that they will be checked 1 mile before they get to the top, but it works.

    "Why can't they look at the underlying causes of those deaths (people on the cables during late afternoon thunderstorms – not due to lightening,"

    They did and found a significant number of deaths appears to be directly or indirectly related to crowds. In one of my links pointed to a hiker from japan that let go of the hand rail so he could get around slower hikers on the cables. He slipped fell in dry weather and rolled over the edge. In another case bad weather appeared suddenly in the morning and most people decided to get off. Unfortunately a traffic jam of people going down occurred and not everyone could get off before the worst of the weather arrived. (the video on the NPS page http://www.nps.gov/yose/planyourvisit/halfdome.htm#CP_JUMP_365187)

    The current permit limit of 300 per day greatly reduces the possibility of traffic jams on the cables.

    #1968759
    Dirk R
    BPL Member

    @dirk

    I have to agree that the greatest threat of accident seems to be relatd to overcrowding. I went up last summer while hiking the JMT and there were entirely too many people trying to get up and down at pretty much the same time. It honestly felt like an accident waiting to happen.

    In the roughly 15 minutes it took me to get up the cables, I witnessed some pretty questionable actions by people I would venture to characterize as inexperienced hikers. The cavalier attitude and risk taking was enough to make me certain they lacked an appreciation for slick granite and the elixir that is momentum and gravity.

    Fortunately, nobody was hurt but if I am to go up again, I will time the hike to minimize the number of users.

    #1968790
    Bob Gross
    BPL Member

    @b-g-2-2

    Locale: Silicon Valley

    "What is going to revent 700+ people showing up at 4AM to get there permit stamped? having 700 people hiking in the dark doesn't sound like a good idea. "

    You won't get 700+ people to get up and stand in line at 4 a.m. unless it is for tickets to a Bon Jovi concert.

    –B.G.–

    #1968815
    spelt with a t
    BPL Member

    @spelt

    Locale: Rangeley, ME

    I don't get trail names. They don't seem to be a big deal here, but they sure are elsewhere (whitblaze, through-hiker blogs). Maybe it is part of through-hiker culture but it seems a little weird to me.

    #1968828
    Jake D
    BPL Member

    @jakedatc

    Locale: Bristol,RI

    It is a thru-hiker thing. Generally it's a nickname that you've earned somehow either from a single incident or a continuous habit/personality. I am guessing it is more prominent on the AT rather than the PCT/CDT since it seems to be more social but they all have it.

    personally i think you should be given a trailname and not name yourself.

    -Speedy LT'12 :)

    #1969056
    J-L
    BPL Member

    @johnnyh88

    I don't get groundsheets for tents. I am surprised how many people think they are necessary, even here on BPL. Why should I carry a 2nd floor?

    Tarp or bivy users – I can understand a groundsheet.

    #1969061
    Jan S
    Member

    @karl-ton

    They have their uses if you camp on wet muddy ground and don't want to crawl through the mud while getting in or out (maybe that problem is just me) or don't want to store your gear in the mud and keep it dry. They also reduce condensation a lot on certain grounds (wet grass in the summer) Same for abrasion on very rocky ground.

    Basically you get a tent floor that you only take when you need and can easily switch out if broken. Of course their use varies with the amount of tents you own and how long you plan to use a tent and how expensive the tent was (Hillebergs come to mind, I wouldn't want to have a hole in my $ 1.000 tent).

    #1969079
    Linda Alvarez
    BPL Member

    @liniac

    Locale: Southern California

    My threshold is quite a bit lower than $1,000! I'll pay a 2 oz penalty to protect even a $100 tent. My groundsheets often come home with abrasions, and pick up dirt, mud, pine needles etc. I can replace it for a few bucks. My tent floors still look pretty good.

    #1969094
    Jan S
    Member

    @karl-ton

    My threshold too actually. And I use groundsheet for all of my tents (is there such a thing as having too many tents? Or being a tentaholic?). And reading the original comment again: I don't have a $ 1.000 Hilleberg tent and probably wouldn't get one even if I could afford one.

    #1969106
    Justin Baker
    BPL Member

    @justin_baker

    Locale: Santa Rosa, CA

    Because ground sheets are extremely light, cheap and replaceable. A tent is none of those things. For some people, an expensive tent is a huge investment that they want to last for years and years.

    #1969159
    Stephen M
    BPL Member

    @stephen-m

    Locale: Way up North

    I don't get the lack of privacy with US Toilet stalls.

    #1969172
    David Thomas
    BPL Member

    @davidinkenai

    Locale: North Woods. Far North.

    >"lack of privacy with US Toilet stalls."

    Do you refer to the relatively large gaps at the bottom of each panel and the vertical gaps at panel junctions? There is less "coverage" than in other countries. I suspect it is to minimize extracurricular activities in the stall and also to make cleaning easier – you can mop under the door and from one stall to the next.

    #1969180
    Stephen M
    BPL Member

    @stephen-m

    Locale: Way up North

    Yep, its the very large gaps.

    #1969181
    BlackHatGuy
    Spectator

    @sleeping

    Locale: The Cascades

    "Yep, its the very large gaps."

    They're there to make it easier for Larry Craig to find dates….

    #1969188
    Stephen M
    BPL Member

    @stephen-m

    Locale: Way up North

    Had to google that one.

    #1977379
    Joel Benford
    Spectator

    @morte66

    Locale: Surrey flatlands, England

    Miguel Arboleda (butuki) wrote: " I don't get outer shells that are shorter than the shirts you wear underneath them. What is the point? Your shirt sticks out from below the hem and gets wet. Unless you wear your mid layer tucked into your pants, I see no advantage to this. And so many outer shells are designed to be short like this, with hardly any alternatives! Am I the only one who is frustrated by this?"

    It's the damn climbers. Jackets are cut short to fit under climbing harnesses, and hoods are like parachutes to go over climbing helmets. I guess manufacturers think they have to cater to climbers, or to walkers who think they might perhaps climb one day.

    [The Rab Bergen, BTW, is a very nice walking jacket in eVent with a long cut and a small hood, at a reasonable if not brilliant weight. Rab make more W/B jackets than I can remember, and all but that one are designed for climbing rather than walking.]

    #1977389
    Joel Benford
    Spectator

    @morte66

    Locale: Surrey flatlands, England

    I don't camp, I haven't camped for 20 years, and I have no great wish to camp. But it has been made clear to me that I may be camping soon. My strongest memory of camping, on a "standard" foam mat, is putting my arms down by my side… …and snatching them back as the ground tried to turn them to ice. Several times.

    I tried an experiment recently with folded blankets on the bedroom floor, and it seemd pretty much the same. Nasty shock every 30 seconds. I'm about 27 inches across at the shoulders, and 20 inch mats just plain don't work.

    What the heck do you people do?

    Of all the werid and wonderful stuff I read about here, I have no problem with sawnoff toothbrushes. I don't have *much* problem with people selling "waterproof" equipment that isn't water proof (until seam sealed), which I suspect might be illegal in Europe. But I can't for the life of me understand how 20 inches became a standard mat width.

    I'm about ready to pull the trigger on a wide Exped, but I keep holding back because I wonder if there's some trick I'm missing.

    #1977422
    Andrew Zajac
    Member

    @azajac

    Locale: South West

    Just my opinions here, but I have to disagree with the climbers opinion above. The voluminous hoods are definitely for climbers as are longer sleeves and chest pockets. However, I look for longer length jackets to climb in so they stay in my harness and don't expose my midriff as I reach above my head. I think short jackets are a product of competition to have the lightest weight jacket on the market.

    I have read Mike Clelland's book and in his book he recommends putting your shoes under your elbows and to sleep on your back. I have not tried this, but it doesn't sound very comfortable. I personally use a 20" wide ridgerest and measured my shoulders at 24" and haven't had any problems. I sleep on my stomach with my hands kind of tucked under my thighs. My shoulders extend ever the edge of the pad, but just don't hit the ground.

    Edited to include narrow pad opinion

    #1977465
    Jerry Adams
    BPL Member

    @retiredjerry

    Locale: Oregon and Washington

    I'm 20 inches across at shoulders. If I lay on back with arms at sides, they fit on 20 inch pad.

    Measure again, I don't think you're 27 inches : )

    #1977570
    Joel Benford
    Spectator

    @morte66

    Locale: Surrey flatlands, England

    You're right, it's 27 inches at the biceps, bit less at the shoulders.

Viewing 21 posts - 201 through 221 (of 221 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting

A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!

Get the Newsletter

Get our free Handbook and Receive our weekly newsletter to see what's new at Backpacking Light!

Gear Research & Discovery Tools


Loading...