Jake! I have a couple of questions for you which, were you to answer, would give me a much better picture of your views regarding the matters at hand. (Anyone else, of course, can also answer..)
I'm makin' lemonade here if it's the last thing I do…
1.) What is "worse" from a sustainability/save-the-resource kinda viewpoint?
A.) A weekend warrior who dedicates a closet full of all-season backpacking gear to 12 weekends and a week during summer, or…
B.) That same person who does the same things, but goes out in their normal woods/work clothes, with a few "bushcraft" tools, and constructs temporary shelters that are not reused.
2.) What is worse…
A.) A weekend warrior who dedicates…
B.) That same person..AND THE SHELTERS ARE REUSED FOR A DECADE.
3.) What is worse…
A.) A weekend warrior who dedicates…TO 36 WEEKENDS AND A MONTH IN SUMMER, or..
B.) That same person who does the same things, but goes out in their normal woods/work clothes, with a few "bushcraft" tools, and constructs temporary shelters that are not reused.
If there is a point to all of this, I suppose it's that it's kinda hard for me to draw a distinct line here; everything falls some where on a spectrum, as I see it.
Now this is all pretty much moot in the eyes of the word-as-written law, but it matters much to an individuals trying to maintain a certain moral and ethical compass, and to society as a whole. We can do nothing if not abide by our own personal set of ethics, which makes it only up to the individual to decide what is a "correct" or "incorrect" decision.
(edited for grammatical reasons only)