Brett bought his trousers from REI under the old warranty, which was a 100% satisfaction guarantee. That meant if for any reason a customer was unhappy with a product, REI would replace it. Apparently they are not honoring that policy, been though they said they would.
The decision of a customer to return a product that was worn from normal wear and tear was an ethical decision by the customer. REI had to change the policy due to abuse by too many customers.
We don't really know why Brett's trousers failed. But under the original warranty, REI should replace them. It is between Brett and REI.
Why he chose to publicize this on BPL is confusing. When I read the original post, I knew what was going to happen, and reading further it did. Brett should have known what would be the outcome here, he has been on BPL for years.



