Topic
Esbit burner testing
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Gear (General) › Esbit burner testing
- This topic has 906 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 months, 3 weeks ago by DAN-Y.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nov 19, 2018 at 1:31 am #3564771
Eric is funny
Look at the size difference in the 2 large esbit stoves compared to the original that is sitting inside the one on the right. The large ones could easily be made into nice twig burners. I like dual fuel stoves :-)
Nov 20, 2018 at 12:58 am #3564922“SERIOUSNESSLY”… is there a way to chemically alter ESBIT’s compound to make more heat?
I want MORE HEAT. (And then there’s de-tuned solid rocket fuel….) (Do I smell a dead horse?)
[edited MK]
Nov 20, 2018 at 1:27 am #3564927We have to forget about more heat out of esbit and concentrate on conserving what is already there. I have the ultimate set-up that boils 2 cups of water with 2 four gram esbits under ideal conditions using a Toaks 500 without handles.
IF someone comes up with a more powerful fuel, I’ll be the first to purchase it and switch from wood to the newcomer
Nov 20, 2018 at 1:35 am #3564928Nov 20, 2018 at 1:39 am #3564932It has power
Nov 20, 2018 at 1:54 am #3564936Found this but can’t say for sure if it’s true. California might frown on it.
When carbide comes in contact with moisture, it produces acetylene gas. Acetylene acts like ethylene and accelerates the ripening process, but is inadvisable because calcium carbide has carcinogenic (cancer causing) properties.
Nov 20, 2018 at 1:55 am #3564937Yeah, but please note the very bright yellow flames: there’s a LOT of soot coming off those flames. Totally wasteful of the potential, since acetylene (with enough oxygen) makes a VERY hot flame.
We used to use carbide lamps when caving, with a slow controlled drip-feed of water and a single jet. “”Trog lamps”. They relied on the yellow flame of course.
Cheers
Nov 20, 2018 at 2:09 am #3564938Oh My! look what’s out there Eric…power in a tube:
http://www.historicrail.com/Big-Bang-Gun-Bangsite-Ammunition/productinfo/M902823/
This will put a smile on Eric’s face in the morning:
Nov 20, 2018 at 12:13 pm #3564981As a moderator, I don’t like to get involved in thread drift. When the thread is about Esbit and someone mentions an alcohol stove or makes a pun, I’m not doing anything about it. This thread is getting a bit out of hand. I’d like to redirect the discussion away from women and back to Esbit please.
From the moderation page
“10. Do not deviate from the primary topic of the forum thread.“
Nov 20, 2018 at 12:21 pm #3564989My apologies.
Nov 20, 2018 at 12:46 pm #3564992So I’ve been experimenting with a new cone from TD using a tiny piece of Ti Foil bent into a U around two piece of 4g Esbit stacked on top of each other. This cone relies on a silicone band which allows me to adjust the Esbit to pot bottom distance. I’m wondering if you Esbit gurus can weigh in on any of the following:
- Is there an optimum distance between fuel and pot when using Esbit or does it depend on the size of the pot and the stove?
- Does the quantity/composition of the soot indicate anything about the optimization?
I know I need to just keep experimenting and logging my results but any wisdom that would help me get there would be appreciated.
Nov 20, 2018 at 12:47 pm #3564993Just in case it’s reevant, this is a small, narrow mug (MLD 475).
Nov 20, 2018 at 1:02 pm #3564994I would have to yield to Dan’s expertise on that magical distance.
The only thing I would note is that when I use 2 x 4 g tabs, I place them side-by-side, and normally in an Esbitmiser tray (without the lid). That allows me to warm a precooked stewy meal quite nicely, unless conditions are too windy. But it would depend on your objective. I don’t normally go to a full boil.
If you are getting much soot, that suggests less than optimized combustion, but again Dan has the expertise – I just work here. I usually use a wet wipe to clean the pot base, after cleaning the spoon, pot lid, folding mug, and pot interior (for coffee, not stew); there shouldn’t be much (external) residue, so for coffee, I don’t need to further wash the gear between uses.
Nov 20, 2018 at 3:19 pm #3565010Is there an optimum distance between fuel and pot when using Esbit or does it depend on the size of the pot and the stove?
All dependent on the stove design and pot windscreen configuration
Does the quantity/composition of the soot indicate anything about the optimization?
IMO, if you produce a flat black, dry soot then it is not burning efficiently. If you produce a brown, waxy looking soot that you can wipe a majority off with a paper towel, it’s burning pretty clean. My 2 cents.
Nov 20, 2018 at 3:41 pm #3565013This is an old but interesting video. They demonstrate an ESBIT stove that is virtually soot free. The geometry does not lend itself to backpacking, but interesting never the less. My 2 cents.
Nov 20, 2018 at 6:32 pm #3565039Top of esbit to bottom of pot should be 1-3/4″. More would be better but we have a tendency to want to keep the distance down to facilitate pot supports fitting inside of short/narrow pots.
Jon’s video shows clearly the farther away, the cleaner.
Nov 20, 2018 at 8:46 pm #3565071So we know the height from top of tab to bottom of pot for optimum heat transfer.
This setup seems to totally throw that out just in the name of getting “no soot”. No thanks, I’ll take faster boil/cook times with soot.
Nov 21, 2018 at 4:28 am #3565135Long day at work today. Just reading your comments now. Thank you for sharing them.
“IMO, if you produce a flat black, dry soot then it is not burning efficiently.”
I am getting a very fine, black soot. What does “not burning efficiently” mean? Am I not fully combusting the Esbit fuel? Not enough oxygen?
Robert, I’ll try the tablets side by side. I assumed stacking them made more sense.
My goal is light weight. I want to burn fuel very efficiently. I don’t care about cooking time.
Nov 21, 2018 at 4:56 am #3565139So I’ve been experimenting with a new cone from TD using a tiny piece of Ti Foil bent into a U around two piece of 4g Esbit stacked on top of each other. This cone relies on a silicone band which allows me to adjust the Esbit to pot bottom distance. I’m wondering if you Esbit gurus can weigh in on any of the following:
Adjust the distance to pot with silicone band so the top of cube is 1-3/4″ to the pot bottom. Bend your aluminum foil tray to act the same as a BGET. Start with that. If you still get soot, increase distance to 2-1/4″.
If you continue to have soot, contact Trail Designs and see what they suggest. Air intake has to be sufficient to burn clean also.
We’re into the Winter Solstice which may have an adverse affect on the efficiencyNov 21, 2018 at 5:43 am #3565152Side-by-side for slow cooking (which I regard as preferable); stacked for more rapid and intense burn.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to do the subject fair justice, without devolving into the phenomenological dimensions of the flame, and of fire, witness Bachelard.
As a mathematical aside, the number of side-to-side combinations and permutations of two identical cuboid Esbit tabs is rather (dramatically) higher than I anticipated, though admittedly some configurations are constrained by gravity and practicality.
Nov 21, 2018 at 5:55 am #3565154Say that with an Esbititish accent “It is better to live in a state of impermanence than in one of finality.”
Nov 21, 2018 at 6:03 am #3565156What does “not burning efficiently” mean? Am I not fully combusting the Esbit fuel? Not enough oxygen?
Exactly.
The soot is carbon from the Esbit tablets. By not burning it fully, you are wasting fuel weight and not getting all the energy available in the fuel.Cheers
Nov 21, 2018 at 12:32 pm #3565168Robert, I’m quite surprised to hear that side by side burns slower. I assumed that the greater surface area means they would burn extremely quickly.
Dan, I have a couple of your BGET trays. I’ll switch over to those if the 4g tabs fit side by side (I think they do?). If not, I’m pretty sure I have an Esbitimizer that Robert mentions from you in my box of stove stuff. Or I’ll make a tray. Also, thanks for the distance recommendations.
Roger, thanks for confirming/elaborating. Air intake will be easy to experiment with, I can scratch a couple grooves into the ground and see if that gets rid of the soot.
Nov 21, 2018 at 8:09 pm #3565248I am led to wonder: has anyone ever tried putting a ‘chimney’ around an Esbit tray (air gap at the bottom of course)? I have NO idea whether this would improve the mixing of Esbit fumes and air for better combustion – or just make it worse.
Cheers
Nov 21, 2018 at 8:14 pm #3565249This is close to a chimney
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Garage Grown Gear 2024 Holiday Sale Nov 25 to Dec 2:
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.