Xmid or free standing?

[Marcus]

I normally hammock camp when trees are reliable, but recently picked up a pad for mountains or desert areas I want to explore in the next year or 2.

A Xmid in the desert is obviously no problem, but what about the high sierras, Tahoe rim, rockies, or Beartooth pass WY area?

The Xmid has a rather large footprint it seems. Does anyone run into site size issues with it?

Also, is high-mountian ground typically stakeable enough that an Xmid feels secure in a strong wind? Or would I be better served with a semi freestanding or freestanding like the slingfin portal or Nemo hornet elite 2p?

When i got back into hiking a couple years ago and built my kit i went straight to hammocking so I don’t have much to compare to when it comes to UL tents.

 

I guess my dilemma is – i like the features, size, materials, and weight of the Xmid, but there are also some ridge lines and rocky outcroppings i kinda want to stay on, and freestanding would allow that. Or I suppose I could just get the Xmid and Cowboy camp the ridges/rocks and choose a mild weekend too.

Thanks for any advice!

[Brad W]

If you are into off trail, limited area camp sites I would go with a more narrow shelter.

[Christopher R]

I “stake out” my xmid with rocks and it is sturdy…as sturdy as the rocks are.  The bigger the rock, the more sturdy.  I am usually on or near a trail, so I haven’t had problems with my tent being too large.

[dirtbag]

Xmid and ultra light bivy???

[Todd T]

The Xmid does have a large-ish footprint, but you only really need a floor’s worth of flat, smooth ground.  However, to handle truly uneven ground or to get a substantially higher pitch, you need to lengthen the corner tie-outs.  The stock ones allow only modest departure from flat.

[Sam Farrington]

It sounds like you want to camp in more open areas (not hammock worthy) at higher altitudes.  And you also mention rock surfaces.  For the latter, I would consult technical climbers about how they safely anchor their tents.  For backpacking in the high country, a tent with a self-supporting frame will place less stress on your stakes and not depend on them to keep the tent upright; hence provide more safety in storms, which are more wicked at higher altitudes.  Of course you can also carry monster stakes with a trekking pole supported tent; but they will weigh you down considerably.

Just as important is site selection, to insure that the ground is suitable for stakes, even if they are there primarily to anchor the tent, not keep it upright.  I’ve found this easier in high, open areas, because more of the terrain is visible.  Ideally, there are small clusters of trees in high, open areas that while not substantial enough for a hammock, do provide a windbreak if the weather gets nasty.

Noticed that the Slingfin Portal you mention is sold out, and this often seems to be the case these days.  However, this design is very common, and with some hunting you should be able to find something that will not let you down.  Another approach can be to plan the route so camping can occur below timberline, and that is certainly the safest route until you have spent some time with a tent and have found it reliable ‘when things go wrong.’

[Paul S]

My wife and I backpack 26 or so weekends a year. Here is WA state we almost always camp above treeline. We use the Tarptent Stratospire 2 (sil nylon version) and The Slingfin portal 2P, and the Durston X-mid. All work great. Never had any problems with any of them. Wind, rain. Ooops I forgot, we did have one problem with the Portal — we were camped in a semi-desert area. The winds were a measured 25-30mph. When it was time to go to sleep, we looked in the tent and it was filled with dust/dirt. You could not see the tent floor through all the dust. Darn those all mesh inners! It really wasn’t the Portals “fault” per say, just the tradeoffs with an all-mesh inner and could/would happen with any tent that had an all mesh inner.

[SIMULACRA]

Use shepherds hook stakes in high mountain rocky terrain. They work far better snaking around all the hidden rocks. For added security, I’ll always put rocks on top of these, which there’s always a great supply. I use 7″ Ti, never had an issue with holding. I do use a freestanding tent, but this method worked the same with a former semi-freestanding tent as well. If you’re looking for light and modular, I like Dirtbag’s idea of a tent with no inner and a lightweight bivy.

[unnamedpeaks]

You will learn to use the x-mid in those conditions. It takes more skill/practice to set up quickly, but it will be so much more spacious and storm worthy for the weight once you have it set up.

Ill not be going back to a freestanding tent.

[Alex Wallace]

I primarily backpack in the high Sierra using a non-freestanding tent (LG Khufu). Like Christopher R above, if I can’t get a stake in I simply use rocks. The bigger, the better.

 

[lisa r]

I have wrestled with this. I have the xmid and really like it, but I do a lot of my camping in alpine terrain and no matter how many rocks I might pile on top of the stakes it just doesn’t feel that secure, at least  not secure enough to withstand higher winds. It’s also kind of annoying to have to spend a half hour moving heavy rocks when I set up camp, and it leaves an impact on the ground. This is not the fault of the tent, just the nature of non-freestanding. Because tent failure in a nighttime storm is my #1 backpacking anxiety I decided to get the Slingfin Portal for when I’m anticipating (or wanting to) camp in high alpine areas, particularly if the forecast doesn’t look 100% calm. Perhaps that’s unnecessary, but I figure peace of mind is worth the extra weight.

[Dan Durston]

I think you’re looking at the X-Mid 2 (as opposed to the 1P). The footprint is somewhat larger than a freestanding tent but quite typical for a trekking pole tent. It’s a bit larger than the average freestanding tent partly because the average 2P tent is quite tiny whereas the X-Mid 2 is much more spacious as a ‘real’ 2P tent, but also because trekking pole tents can’t steepen the lower walls as much as a freestanding tent to trim the footprint. So it is a big larger but it really isn’t that big (lots of 2P tents are larger yet) and also it is getting about 10% smaller for the second generation launching in a few weeks (while keeping the inner just as spacious). The X-Mid 2 is one of the more popular tents on the AT where smaller campsites are common, so I doubt you’d have an issue. I often hear from people who were worried about the foorprint but later found that to be quite unfounded, as at worst they occasionally spend a few more minutes looking around but in exchange enjoy a more spacious shelter.

With regard to staking it out in various environments – even in alpine areas you can almost always find dirt to camp on. For example, trekking pole tents are super common amongst PCT hikers who all cross the sierra’s. When I hiked the PCT I never had issues in the Sierra’s, although I did upsize my stakes for the sandy soils in SoCal. In recent years, I use mine here in the Rockies as my backyard, and I’ve never had a site where I couldn’t stake it out. Like the footprint, you’d quite likely find this to be a non-issue although you might find that you prefer larger stakes for added security.

[Marcus]

Thank you very much for the comments Dan and everyone.

I think I’ll try for the xmid in a couple weeks. I missed out last time but was just second guessing the xmid choice for no good reason really. No one ever sells them – that’s about the best thing that can be said about a product

[Alex Wallace]

From my experience in the Sierra, in most lake basins and even the surrounding benches of granite, good soil that will hold a stake can be found. Sometimes that soil (decomposed granite/sand type stuff) is shallow with a flake of granite underneath. Again, you’ll surely find good sized rocks nearby to supplement or completely tie off to.

[Dan Durston]

Nice shots. We need an “Alex Wallace High Sierra” calendar :)

[Alex Wallace]

Haha! Thanks, Dan. I may have to spice it up with a few x-mid shots.

 

[Eric Blanche]

Most people gravitate towards a free-standing tent because it seems easier. Yes it is, but the extra work/knowledge to properly use a non free-standing tent is not very much and you can get a better ‘package.’

[Ethan A.]

Alex, nice shots. Which shelters are those top to bottom (I realize some photos feature the same shelter), especially the one with the wider four-pointed apex?

One advantage of trekking pole-supported shelters is that the weight saved from the tent poles in freestanding shelters can go into stronger materials and components in trekking pole-supported shelters.

There are advantages to both. It was really nice to be able to move my freestanding shelters when trying out sites, to lift and shake them out before packing and in the case of my Hilleberg to have a much better nights sleep in snow and strong wind (no flapping and not having to constantly shake snow off).

I’ve used rocks as anchors in rocky areas and sometimes it takes a lot of effort to find and move the rocks you need. But even a freestanding tent will need to be rock anchored in a place like that (though the shelter structure won’t depend on the anchors).

[Alex Wallace]

1. Locus Gear Khufu Sil w/ Locus Gear 2/3 mesh; 2. MLD Duomid, 3. MLD Duomid w/ MLD Solomid XL innernet; 4. Tara Poky/Pre Tents Mega; 5. Tara Poky/Pre Tents Mega; 6. Locus Gear Khufu Sil; 7. GoLite Shangri-La 3; and 8. MLD Duomid.

 

 

[Stumphges]

Alex, what do you think of the Mega?

[Author]

Posts