I used to take a lot of still images on my trips. About 5 years ago I began shooting a little video to augment my slideshows and decided it was a far richer way to convey the trip experience and so I quickly transitioned solely to video. I’m curious as to why more folks don’t make videos of their outings? Granted, it takes longer and is more technical to edit video into a compelling narrative compared to simply uploading a chronology of images, but it’s also a compact, self-contained story that conveys so much more information about what it felt like to be there that the trade-off in effort seems like a no-brainer to me. It does not really take much more effort to shoot video than it does to take stills (most of the clips in my videos are 2 or 3 seconds long, and rarely run over 5 seconds). Heck, most point and shoot cameras now record beautiful video, so you are probably already carrying all the equipment you need with you right now. iMovie or similar video editors can be daunting to navigate at first, but after your first project the workflow is pretty easy to master. And to be honest, I make the videos for myself as much as I do to share with the greater interwebs. Reliving my own trips, even years later, I find much more rewarding through video.
Have you tried video and decided you liked stills better? Are you put off by learning a video editing program or does the technology/terminology in general seem too daunting? Do you think creating a vimeo or youtube account is too much bother? Have you seen too many long and boring videos to think you want to subject your fellow backpackers to another one of those? Is it that the difference between a good and bad series of still images is much smaller than the difference between good and bad video [and I will admit that shooting good video takes practice]?
I’m not knocking blog-style TRs, I’m just wondering why more folks don’t do videos.


