I know that the Ursack has been discussed here before. Seems there are different opinions on it, but consensus seems that if it does work and the bear can’t get your food, your food will likely be crushed and relatively useless.
I know that Ursack has the aluminum liner option. Of course that adds some weight, but it appears that it would help a lot with the issue of your food getting ruined if a bear got a hold of it. I still would have some concerns about the food in the bottom of the bag though, given that the bear could get a hold of the bottom of the bag where it appears to be unprotected by the aluminum liner. What are your thoughts on this?
Has anyone used the aluminum liner and actually had their bag “attacked” by a bear? How did it fare and was your food intact?
I am debating over the Ursack setup or the Bare Boxer for short trips. There is only about a 6 ounce difference between the Ursack with liner vs. the Bare Boxer. Not sure if a 6 ounce savings is worth the possibility of food getting ruined.
FWIW volume is not an issue for me, nor are there laws requiring bear can use where I frequent. Also, most of my trips are to places where there are bears, but they are not super active. And a lot of my trips are in the colder months where bears are likely less active. So I may never have a bear try to get my food, but if I do then I don’t want it to ruin my trip.
Of course hanging food is an option, but this always has been a PIA for me.
Thanks for your help
Matt

