“The arch is NOT a weight bearing surface and it should not be.”
Agreed, yet my general understanding has been that the third party insoles “claim” to offer superior “heel stabilization”, which in turn, can contribute to improved ankle support. If the arch support isn’t aligned, then the heel isn’t either-right? I admit this is probably their sales Kool-aid lingo, but is there any data to support any of their claims?
Jennifer, I know you are being rhetorical (and I truly value and respect your opinion on this matter), but don’t you think that there is room for improvement when it comes to “stock insoles” that come with shoes? Is there a chance that those insoles might do more long-term harm than good, in certain situations?
(I know that when I used to fit packs at REI, it was important to let people know that… while the pack might feel “ok” in the store, even with weight, they really weren’t going to know how it felt until they got on the trail. Often, it took a lot of trail miles until someone truly knew if a pack was/or wasn’t going to work for them. But only after that, did they start learning “how” to know what was comfortable for them. I just as well assumed it was the same with footwear – and insoles.)
While my podiatrist did offer a Spenco prescription for my particular situation, I still remember my feet feeling A LOT better years ago when I switched out my stock insoles for SuperFeet. Of course, this was in the days of 50 oz boots and 45lb packs.
In between dirt trails, I assume most of us are typically walking on concrete/tile/wood/gravel/ and asphalt these days, which likely doesn’t resonate with our foot’s natural evolution. Wouldn’t that affect what is best for our feet as well?
:)