I have to say the BB buckle chatter is funny.
Most of these updates are a bit of weight savings (about 2 ounces most packs) and improving fit for some people. If it works great currently by all means keep using it as is. Most are very subtle improvements except the lumbar pad can be a large fit improvement for some people we traditionally didn’t fit that well.
The Dual Buckle Belt does have a larger fit range, so fewer people should be on the cusp of sizes or need to change if they loose weight over a long trip. In regards to hip pain, it is an improvement since you can change up an down tension. True story, last fall, I had hip pain on one side, I don’t think it was pack related but more a bad night sleep rolled off pad on rocky terrain sort of related. I tried several of our belts hoping to minimize it .. and the dual buckle was the best for me (and time). Just and FYI
We did a fair amount of testing on a pretty broad user base. Several people were loaded close to 200 lbs with excellent belt integrity with the combination of dual and lumbar pad.
I would think of the lumbar pad as some people need it, some don’t need it but it is an improvement in belt function, some don’t need it all. For me, it helps me at the upper end a bit, but mostly it helps me wear the load a little higher and the captured belt helps keep the belt cleaner. For me, before, the belt worked really well, but if I tried to wear it higher and tighter, I could loose some contact on heavier loads. Now I maintain excellent contact no matter where I wear it. For me, it’s really more of a belt helper than traditional “lumbar pad” .
I don’t disagree on it seems a little steep price wise, but those were the numbers we were essentially given once they were crunched. We try to keep things as fair as possible to our customers, but we also . do not sacrifice quality, performance or service trying to race to the bottom.
Thanks