I’ve been hiking in kilts for the last 8 to 9 months and do so regularly now. Any time or place where I would or might have worn shorts, I wear a kilt instead. I have two, a Sportkilt original kilt and a Sportkilt hiking kilt.
Pros:
- Fantastic air flow and cooling, avoids build up of moisture and heat – I’ve never had chaffing
- Very comfortable, it never bunches or tightens up like shorts can
- Easy to put on / take off wind pants or leggings or pants or anything else underneath
- It does not have a belt and does not interfere with my pack hip belt (I use an Arc Blast), as worn properly it is up high on your waist, not on your hips
- Easy to both urinate (hands free, guys) and defecate (no pants to remove) with little danger of soiling yourself
- Sportkilt uses velcro to fasten, so it very adjustable to your waist & any number of layers
- In rain (I’m in Oregon), I use a poncho anyway and kilt does not interfere with this or get wet, it fact they work quite well together
Cons:
Almost all the cons of a kilt are similar to those with shorts due to having exposed lower legs: Bugs and cold are issues, just as with shorts. I soak my kilts in permethrin and carry permethrined leggings or wind pants to put on for bugs at rest stops & camp. I don’t hike in the East where ticks are rampant, so I can’t speak to that, but we do have a tick season out here too and so far it has not been a problem for me using that method.
For colder weather, from about 40 F up to the 60s F, I wear a Sportkilt original kilt. It is acrylic and moderately heavy. Now, I admit that I have pretty warm legs, so I had no issue with cooler weather, but below 40F or in wind, I will add wind pants. I have also used merino leggings a couple times. But for long hikes in below freezing weather, I switch to pants.
For warmer weather, I wear the Sportkilt hiking kilt, made of microfiber. It is light (12.3 oz on my scale, with two rather large pockets I had added to it). The only issue I have had is in blustery wind, it is so light that it will blow around a bit and flap in front. A safety pin fixes that.
Hiking through brush is an issue, just like with shorts. I hike almost always on trail, so it is not a major issue for me. If I know i am going into brush a lot, I’d wear long pants instead of a kilt just as I would instead of shorts.
Potential cons:
One thing you have to learn as a man is how to avoid absentmindedly exposing yourself to others. This means learning how to sit with your legs together, and to be aware of who is around and where you’re pointed (if you know what I mean.)
For instance, recently I reached some blow down on the trail and was about to hop over it, when a couple approached from the other side. At the last moment, I realized I should warn the woman on the other side. I said, “Watch out. I’m wearing a kilt, so you might want to turn your back as I hop over.” She did and thanked me.
When sitting down on the ground or a rock or in a (post-hike) chair, you have to learn to sweep your pleats under you as you sit down. If you don’t know how to do that (I didn’t), just ask any woman to teach you.
Another con to a kilt is wearing it inside a sleeping bag or quilt. It is difficult to get the kilt under you and keep it there when getting in and laying down. In a quilt, it gets tangled with any strapping beneath you, too. I find the best solution is just to take it off and use it as part of the bedding system instead. I’ll spread it out over my pad, or roll it up as part of my pillow system.
The final con, and this may just be me, but I find I tend to use my kilt a lot to wipe my hands on, like a chef’s apron in the kitchen. I know it’s bad habit, and I should use my bandana, but hey, there’s all this wonderful microfiber cloth down there just to be used as a towel. (As if Scotsmen didn’t.)
Reactions on the trail:
Most men studiously pretend to ignore it and say nothing. Sometimes, men will say with a bit of envy that it looks really comfortable. I tell them, yes, it is.
Women almost universally smile at the kilt. Bemusement might be the word for it. I am not sure why, but there seems to be something disarming about a man in a kilt that makes women feel comfortable. They tend to strike up conversations much more easily than if I were not in a kilt. Just my own perception of course and I am generalizing, but I had heard this from other kilt wearers before, and it is my experience as well.
A few people have occasionally asked if I am part Scottish or what my clan affiliation is. This usually leads to a nice conversation about our family and clan histories or our visits to Scotland.
Both my kilts have tartans. I have not hiked in generic, solid colors, like the El Kommando grey or Utilikilts sollid colors. so I can’t speak to those. Personally I think a kilt wants a tartan and that’s what I like to wear.
– Randy