Topic

‘Normal’ looking bear canister capable pack

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
nunatak BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2022 at 8:17 am

The vast majority of cottage gear makers are in the backpack business. I always felt that market was saturated to capacity and in terms of creativity only experiencing incremental steps forward.

We stayed out until we saw a niche that was completely unfilled: the ability to carry a bear canister securely and balanced on a lightweight pack. This proved to be the perfect compliment to our busy goose down sector: self limiting public interest, and technically challenging to design and make, unlike the shoe-box shaped standard offerings.

As one should never stop tinkering for health of brain and business, the Bears Ears line is now up to half a dozen models.

Here’s the latest: A hybrid that can look and feel like a normal, well designed framed pack when no canister is needed, but when called for can take a canister securely in the best balanced location for rugged travel: in the small of the back. It is also a location that happens to work well for those primarily walking on trail.

The patterning process required to make the bottom area fold in and out while working optimally in both modes was delightfully complicated. The finished design has minimal pieces and very few stitch lines. It is quite possibly more durable and slick than normal box bottoms, however for long life we opted to use the new Ultra Weave TX that is bonded with a 50d polyester liner and fiber x grid.

The volume of the two current prototype versions are 45 and 55 liters internal, plus pockets. The weight is 34 and 36 ounces.

Please see an album here:

View post on imgur.com

Iago Vazquez BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2022 at 9:05 am

Really nice! I love the modularity for those of us that carry bear canisters occasionally.

Dustin V BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2022 at 10:04 am

Can the bottom section also be compressed when there isn’t a bear can, to reduce the volume so that it can be used as a daypack for side-trips?

Murali C BPL Member
PostedDec 30, 2022 at 6:46 pm

Nice. Always thought this pack was innovative. One of my hiking partners got it on the SHR and loved it. The only thing holding me back was the boring black grid stop fabric and the cost – to be brutally honest. It is extremely functional. But the first version with the white mesh and black gridstop was not that attractive to me:-)  Yeah – being superficial here!

Please add some colors for some visual appeal. Cost wise, I feel my MLD Prophet wasabi green gridstop can be had for lesser than 220 bucks (new ones are nowadays 245) and can have the Bear canister inside very comfortably – which I have carried on JMT/SHR etc.

 

Chris K BPL Member
PostedJan 3, 2023 at 7:36 am

This ‘hybrid’ bottom is what I always wanted out of my Bears Ears.

Something not mentioned with these packs is the overall layout. Stepping away from the standard two lower pocket template is an improvement, in my opinion. The water bottle holster is what frees up this direction, I suppose. Love the holster.

Jan – I saw you are listing two Hybrid sizes, a 45 and 55. Is the one pictured the 45? And is that winter set-up the 55 or a new beast entirely (not a ‘Hybrid UL’)?

JCH BPL Member
PostedJan 3, 2023 at 8:44 am

I like that when “packed” the can does not consume its full volume of the pack.  Kinda like only packing a can that is 1/3 to 1/2 the size.

nunatak BPL Member
PostedJan 3, 2023 at 1:49 pm

Chris: thanks! When hip belts fell out of fashion bottles had to go in side pockets. But hip belts are back, yet the bottles remain more or less inaccessible in the side pockets. 🤷‍♀️

The 45 and 55 look similar (the final version going on sale this month will likely have a different main pocket and more colors).

The blue one is also 55 but, as you said a different beast. Only one is made and I have used it since winter like conditions hit.

It has modular side and front pockets, plus aids for carrying skis and snowshoes.

No roll top, but instead an extra tall cinch top, or what I call a scrunch top. This allow it to be loaded a little higher, and together with pockets swings it towards true 70 liter capacity

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
Loading...