My MYOG USB powerbank blew up – maybe it was because I plugged the battery in backwards. I bought a similar product, the powerboost 1000 from adafruit. That seems like a better product than some unknown manufacturer on amazon. There are data sheets for the parts. There are discussion forums where adafruit people actually answer questions and seem to know something.
First, I tested the Anker 13,000 with the USB power meter and load as suggest by Rex. I charged it, then ran it with 1A load until it turned off and I measured 40.8 Wh. I can’t find any specs for this. Anker has no specs. I found someone online that measured it at 42 Wh. So maybe I’m close.
This is good for 4 days, maybe 5 days of my backpacking, so I need something like 8 or 10 Wh per day. I take a gaia track, and listen to podcasts with earbud.
I tested two Nitecore 4000 mAh batteries. I soldered an 18650 battery holder to a usb connector, then plugged in a USB power meter and 1A load, 3A load, and 0.2 A load. The USB power meter works down to about 3 V, which is the lowest I want to run the 18650 battery. This tests the capacity of just the battery without any electronics. Rex suggested the USB power meter and load.
Bat # load avg current Wh
1 1A 0.7A 12.45
1 3A 1.8A 11.6
1 0.2A 0.12A 11.1
2 1A 0.7A 12.2
The first line is battery #1. I have two Nitecores. It uses the 1A load, which is at USB voltage of 5V. I’m using it with the nominal 3.6V battery voltage so the actual current averages at 0.7A – it’s higher when the battery starts at 4.2 V, and gradually drops to 3.0 V. The Wh measured was 12.45 Wh.
You get the most Wh with an intermediate load – ~0.7A. It must be that as you increase the current, there’s some loss, so it has less capacity. At really low currents, the parasitic loads, like the bright LED, are on for a longer time so capacity is less. I didn’t repeat this so I may be off on this, but I try to have the current out of the battery about 0.7A to optimize capacity.
The measurements of the two batteries are about the same – 12.3 Wh average. Nitecore specs it as 14.4 Wh, but maybe they’re just multiplying 3.6 V * 4000 mAh and they don’t actually test it. I found someone that measured it online, but they measured 4032 mAh. If they measured close to 4000 mAh, then it should have about 14.4 Wh. Maybe there’s some error in my measurement, or maybe the batteries are a little below spec.
12.35 Wh average capacity of batteries. The spec is 14.4 Wh. Why do I measure them less than spec? I only went down to 3.0V on the batteries. I could have have gone a little below that and got maybe another 0.5 Wh. I measured a 2.048 reference voltage which is +- 0.1%, and determined the USB power meter measures voltage 1% low. If the current was also measured 1% low, the power would be calculated 2% low. That would be 0.26 Wh. So, maybe the capacity is actually 12.35+0.5+0.26 = 13.1 Wh. Within 9% of spec. For some reason, battery manufacturers mostly just spec the mAh but I never see in verification. I won’t be critical of manufacturers that aren’t meeting spec.
Then, I charged bat #1 and used it to charge my phone with the powerboost 1000. I ran the battery down to 3.0V. You can actually go lower but it might risk the battery. If you go below maybe 2.9 V the nitecores have protection circuitry and they shut down. I repeated for battery #2.
The USB current when I charged the phone was 0.49 A – so the current out of the battery was about 0.7A because of conversion and inefficiency, about where the optimum is for Wh capacity.
Bat #1 – 11.5 Wh, charged the phone 47%
Bat #2 – 11.26 Wh – 46%
The average of just the batteries is 12.3 Wh. The average of charging the phone is 11.4 Wh. So, the efficiency is 93%. The data sheet for the part says something like 95%. 93% of the battery capacity actually goes out the USB port. 7% is consumed by the powerboost 1000.
The guy at adafruit said another device – “ubec” – was more efficient so I tried it. That requires 2 batteries in series to produce about 7 volts, then use a step down converter to lower that to the 5V USB voltage. With 2 bats in series, and a 1A load, it delivered 23.84 Wh. The capacity of the two bats is 12.2 + 12.45 = 24.65 Wh. So, the efficiency is 23.84 / 24.65 = 97%. That’s consistent with what the adafruit guy said, but, it’s such a small improvement compared to the powerboost 1000 that it’s not important. Part of what makes the 1 battery solution good, is the flexibility of taking just as many bats as you need, not being restricted to an even number of batteries, and there are no LEDs or anything on it so you don’t know how discharged it is as you use it.
But, if someone wanted to design a more efficient powerbank they could do something like this, only include LEDs, charging circuitry (the ubec is just a voltage regulator),… Powerbank manufacturers don’t seem to be into high capacity per weight, as BPL people would like, but instead are into fast charging and wireless charging. And influencers.
The powerboost 1000 has a blue LED indicating it’s working, and a red LED comes on when you used up about 60% of the bat. Neither ubec or powerboost have battery protection – they’ll just keep going until the battery goes down to zero (?). At some point the battery can be damaged. The nitecores have protection internally and turn off when the battery gets below something like 2.9V so I don’t have to worry about that.
Weight of Anker 13,000 8.5 ounces. Weight of powerboost 1000 + battery holder 0.6 ounces. Weight of nitecore 4000 battery – 1.8 ounces.
If you wanted to have a 13,000 mAh solution with powerboost, it would require 3.25 batteries, that would weigh 6.5 ounces – so you save 2 ounces compared to Anker with this solution.
If you wanted to have a 40.8 Wh solution with the powerboost, it would require 3.6 batteries (11.4 Wh). That would weigh 7 ounces – so you save 1.5 ounces.
I think most people would not consider that weight savings worth it. If you wanted to have just enough for 1 day, and took 1 nitecore battery, that would weigh 2.4 ounces. That might actually be a useful strategy – saving 6 ounces compared to the Anker.
I measured the bat #2 charging – it took 18.58 Wh. The battery capacity is 12.2 Wh. Efficiency – 12.2 / 18.58 = 66%. Not very efficient. Fortunately, it doesn’t matter, the wall has unlimited power.