Topic

McHale "ultralight" packs of the 1980s?

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Doug Coe BPL Member
PostedJun 30, 2018 at 11:49 pm

I found this quote on McHale’s website on the Bumps packs page:

“McHale Packs actually made 1.5 lb twin stay packs as far back as the 80s but they were designed more as ‘Summit Packs’ designed to be carried on climbs after long approaches. In the 90s people started UL backpacking with them.”

Anyone ever heard of or seen one of these? I’m curious what features and materials they had. Sounds like something I might like to have.

Doug Coe BPL Member
PostedJul 1, 2018 at 6:53 am

Thanks for the mention of Nick’s McHale pack(s) and others’. What I was particularly curious about was one that weighs 1.5 lbs. Though I’d like to see that I wouldn’t actually consider buying one—too much money for my taste.

On Nick’s website, popupbackpacker.com, he lists his Bump pack at 1 lb. 9 oz without stays, hipbelt, or pad. So what Dan was referring to must have been somewhat different, with stays included in the weight he mentioned. I wonder if those older ones had a hipbelt.

Doug Coe BPL Member
PostedJul 1, 2018 at 3:57 pm

Brad—Good point! So I think a 1.5 lb pack with stays and a hipbelt by McHale would be interesting to see since he’s so good at hipbelts and a good carry using durable materials.

John K BPL Member
PostedJul 1, 2018 at 5:47 pm

Interesting, sounds similar to some of the early white cloud packs. Would love to get my hands on an UL McHale.

Nick Gatel BPL Member
PostedJul 1, 2018 at 7:37 pm

My Bump with the stays and hip belt and without any other accessories weighs 2.5 lbs.

Keep in mind that the bottom of the pack and most of the shoulder straps are full spectra material. Nearly indestructible. The rest of the pack is made from Dyneema grid, the smaller squares, meaning more Dyneema threads. I usually use the water bottle pockets on most trips at a minimum, which adds another 5 ounces. The hip belt has two buckles and pretty thick foam. Shoulder straps have thick foam too. The pack has a foam pad inserted into a sleeve in the back of the pack, I never take it out, put it can be removed. I could probably get the weight down to closer to 2lbs, while keeping the hip belt and stays, but I can save 8 ounces by reducing other gear.

The stays on my Bump are probably half as wide as those on my LBP, which can carry a lot more weight. The LPP is full Dyneema (not the cuben composite dyneema), which adds a lot of weight and is made to last a very long time. The LBP also has some heavier Spectra on the bottom of the back and the shoulder straps — a bit heavier (robust) than the main pack body.

If one wanted to get one of the old “summit packs” a good place would be to check out some of the forums that are mostly focused on the NW part of the country, or maybe Craig’s List in Seattle. Seems like McHale packs are very popular in the Seattle area where Dan lives.

When Dan built my Bump, it was a new model for him, however what I requested was something he had already been toying with. Apparently he had already built a prototype, which might have been the demo he sent me — or perhaps he built the demo specifically for me, with the intention of adding it to his inventory. I use the Bump on most of my shorter trips.

 

Doug Coe BPL Member
PostedJul 2, 2018 at 1:19 am

Greg—Thanks for the link with the photo of that McHale summit pack. That’s surely what I read about on Dan’s site. It looks like it has an unpadded waste belt and no pockets. Neither of which are what I have in mind.

Nick—Yes, a Bump is pretty darned light…for a McHale pack. I’m gathering ideas for my first myog pack and will be aiming for 24 oz (or less). Much like the Superior Wilderness Designs Long Haul 50L.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Loading...