There are too many variables, I think, XYZ. I can just make a two week trip at +32F using a Caffin V1 stove and a wind screen/heat shield. Without the windscreen, I can only go about 11-12 days, as a rough guess for the same conditions. So, yes. Without a windscreen, I have to go no cook for one or two days. With a wind screen, I have enough for hot meals every day.
But, there is no measured testing per day. On some days, I am sure that even using a wind screen, my use is higher than without. I don’t log things but basically I figure about 10 minutes to boil 750ml (about 3 cups) of water. I know about where the flame should be after a minute or two of operation. So it is consistent within about a minute. A little less flame when it is 70F ambient, a little more flame when it is 40F ambient. More than ten minutes wastes energy when it is colder. When it is 25F, I have to turn it up even more, to boil in about 7 minutes, for example. Otherwise more heat is lost to the outside air vs heating the water.
In my home, I tested the same set-up at 70F ambient and 2 cups at ~225gm/cup of 40-50F water to between 4-5gm per burn. I have run this test about 20 times at home.
In the field, I get 12 burns at 3 cups out of a 220gm canister, or 36 cups of water at ~225gm/cup boiled. Or about 6gm per cup. Close to 50% more fuel in the field than at home. I have run this test 10-20 times, and usually come home with a little to no fuel in the canister.
Anyway, these are ball park numbers. And, yes, a wind screen/heat shield can make a difference over a week or longer.

