We were all set to bring a 8L aluminum pot and silnylon collapsible sink on our trek next month. Yesterday, however I was at my local council Scout store returning something when I began to chat with the person there who told me that they were on a 2017 PSR trek and they brought two collapsible Sea to Summit 4L X-Pots instead. Their cooking method was to use two stoves (remote isobutane canister), heat water in the two, 4L pots, then rehydrate food in the pouches and then serve from there.
As a side note, we have three people on our trek who, for religious reasons, won’t eat pork and will be having separate meals anyway so not everyone will be eating out of the same large pot.
So long as the 4L pots are deep enough to submerge and sterilize our personal bowls and utensils, wouldn’t that be sufficient?
Having two collapsible pots are significantly more expensive and do not provide any weight savings versus a single 8L aluminum pot. I believe the advantages lie in the area of portability and potentially time savings boiling in two half-sized pots versus one large one.
Will rangers accept the “two pot” and “reconstitute in the bag” method proposed above?
Obviously, we don’t want to buy and bring two collapsible pots only to be told that be must use an 8L pot and follow their method exactly.

