I’d like to hear about some firsthand observations – how is the shutdown impacting the public lands where you recreate? What are your direct observations?
Stephanie and I are down in Rocky Mountain NP this week, hiking. So far, so good, but efforts to mitigate cleanup etc. are being made by the Foundation and local volunteers. Things are in good shape on the Estes Park side of things here.
Important to note:
- Volunteers are taking care of things here.
- The town is being hit hard due to decreased tourism, based on my conversations with local shop employees.
- Most of the park users here have been locals, not tourists. And by locals, I mean Lyons, Loveland, and Estes Park – not even Denver/Boulder.
- The trails are pretty barren. The feeling of remoteness is nice, but based on our past experience, the energy of national-park-enthusiasm doesn’t seem to be worth the tradeoff that the decreased visitation has on people’s livelihoods here.
- I’ve talked to a number of local Interior employees (furloughed and not) and zero (0) of them think this is a good idea.
Back up in Wyo, I’ve run into law enforcement rangers up on the Medicine Bow NF and they are not happy about the shutdown, and believe it’s a huge political issue that is costing fed workers – their friends and families – significant harm. I don’t agree with the ideologies of all these guys (they are pro-motorized, most of them!) but it’s clear to me that they are facing some financial challenges in the future. These guys are admittedly pro-trump and also (seem to be) feeling pretty shafted by him.
Is anyone else experiencing or observing any direct effects of the shutdown on public lands / land management agency employees?
Have you interacted with any pro-trump feds who are low/middle-class who are OK with the shutdown continuing indefinitely?
To me, the takeaway is this: these public servants place a higher priority on providing a positive experience for people on public lands than on political issues. That’s very heartening to me!



