Well, I went back and read through the above mentioned threads (topics 103910 and 89474) and the same arguments are coming up again here in this thread! It’s cool that Lawson paid 3M to test their adhesive, but I’d like to know a little more about the testing. The drop in peel strength from 90 Oz/in to 11 Oz/in @ 0°F seems like enough that 3M could not claim it would work at 0°F, yet in their spec sheet 9485PC is rated to -40°F (that’s negative 40)!! These are well tested and presumably well understood industrial adhesives, and I would think that if they don’t retain their bond strength over the specified temperature range, industry would have pushed back by this point. Maybe the min and max temperatures listed are extremes where you might expect the product to fail, but that’s not usually how specifications work. Here’s a screen shot of their transfer tape brochure I found poking around their website:


So the tapes with the 350 series adhesive (like 9485PC) have the highest bonding strength with both high and low surface energy plastics. DCF falls in the high surface energy category I believe, because of the Mylar (PET) sheet the the dyneema fibers are laminated to, but not by much. Either way, the 9485PC or 9482PC SHOULD be the state of the art in transfer tape adhesives for DCF according to this spec sheet. The tapes with 300LSE series adhesive should also be just as good. I would definitely be curious to hear 3M’s response to their own test results (as reported by Lawson) and how that relates to their low temperature specification.
For me, I don’t think this will matter much since I will probably never be out in conditions that approach 0°F. Maybe in temps that approach 20F, but my other gear will start to get questionable at that point anyway.



