Topic

Starlyte or Trail Designs 12-10 stove. Urgent question

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Amy Lauterbach BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:15 pm

Pals,

Jim and I leave on Thursday for our big canoe trip down the Mississippi River.

We don't normally cook when we hike. But this is a 3 or even 4 month trip, and we won't have easy access to restaurants to have occasional hot meals. So, based on many recommendations, especially my trusted advisors Manfred and Alan, we bought a Caldera Cone. In my complete indecision, I ordered it with both the Trail Designs 12-10 burner and the Starlyte burner (the one modified to work well inside the cone).

With all good intentions of playing with both in order to choose, I'm now completely out of time. I like the Starlyte burner for its size and it's spillproof feature and it's cap. And I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that the Starlyte burner in a Caldera Cone means I don't need to use the pegs-through-the-cone holes to elevate the pot, meaning I don't have to find a place to carry and keep track of the pegs. So from the outside view, I'm preferring the Starlyte burner.

So – I ask you stove experts to give me a quick easy answer. Is there any downside of the Starlyte over the 12-10? PLEASE don't tell me about other options or things I should have done instead! We leave in two days, and this is what I've got to work with.

We'll be buying denatured alcohol, 1 litre at a time, from marinas or hardware stores along the way.

Thanks a ton.

Ken Thompson BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:30 pm

I have found no downside to the Starlyte. I prefer it to the 12-10 in all regards. I use no pegs/stakes with mine.

Sean Passanisi BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:39 pm

I think the 12-10 may be a better option for simmering (if you purchase the simmer rings).

Ken Thompson BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:40 pm

You can simmer with the Starlyte with the felt ring.

Can I drop one in the mail to you?

Amy Lauterbach BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:52 pm

Ken = thanks for the offer. We leave on Thursday morning, and we're frantically trying to finalize our gear now. So no time to receive the simmer ring. I don't think we need to simmer anyway as our cooking aspirations are limited in scope :)

Ken Thompson BPL Member
PostedAug 4, 2014 at 7:59 pm

Let me know if you change you mind at any point. Glad to send one your way.

Bob Moulder BPL Member
PostedAug 5, 2014 at 4:29 am

I have tested these two stoves with the identical setup you have.

Based on some thoroughly undocumented testing on my deck, I found that the fuel efficiency (amount of fuel used to boil the same amount of water) is virtually identical, but the time to boil is slightly longer with the Starlyte, say 11 mins vs 9 minutes… in that rough range.

My choice is the Starlyte for the other reasons you mentioned.

PostedAug 5, 2014 at 6:01 am

I'll second and third and fourth the starlyte.

Leave with no regrets, don't worry about your cook set! Enjoy your trip, and the knowledge that the starlyte/CC sidewinder is probably the best cooking combo you could have with you.

I'm envious!!!! Have a great trip!

Amy Lauterbach BPL Member
PostedAug 5, 2014 at 7:36 am

Thanks to all of you for taking time to respond. And thanks especially to Jennifer whose reassuring words seem designed to sooth an anxious mind. I'm guessing you are familiar with the stress that comes in the last few days of pre-trip prep!

PostedAug 5, 2014 at 9:10 am

By the way – in case you were still wondering, the beauty of the starlyte/CC sidewinder combo is that EVERYTHING fits in the pot. And you don't need the stakes to hold it up, it just nestles in the cone like it was meant to be there (which it is).

So the capped stove, the cone, all of it will fit inside your pot all happy as can be. I even roll up my 4 oz fuel bottle inside my cone, wrap a rubber band around it, and it sets in the pot just fine.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Loading...