Hi Diane
> It is an area that no one has studied, and you can theorize all you want, but
> without data we are all just blowing smoke.
Believe it or not, I actually agree entirely with you (and Jennifer in many ways).
Except that we do have a lot of data that walkers' feet do grow after (during) a long thru-hike. Even your own and my own.
I have no idea what the mechanism is; I am just pushing for the issue to be examined more closely, starting with the data rather than the textbook.
If it is not bone growth, what is it?
> Abdominal waistlines can stretch far more.
Ahhh – that was meant to be a bit of humour. Sorry if that was not clear. Blame it on cultural differences.
> most of the really world-shattering changes happened before the elaboration of the
> scientific method.
We could have a long and fascinating discussion over this, with me citing many many examples of quite recent changes, but that would be a thread drift to the other side of the planet. Let's just say there is plenty of room for more change.
I am sure this could be the subject of several grant proposals and very useful research projects. It's a pity that the change does not seem reversible: all test subjects are once-only cases. That makes the research more difficult. It would be nice if the research happened though.
Cheers

