May 27, 2013 at 12:20 am #1303429
I just ordered and received a pair of BD poles from a site near me in Australia. However, despite having a picture on their site of the 2013 model, and indicating on the phone when I called that they definitely were new stock from 2013 they are in fact the 2012 model.
I can and likely will return them, and will source the 2013s from the states (along with a few other items). However, is there anyone who thinks the 2012 model is the better one? I feel I read this somewhere… however for me the 2013 locks look more robust and smaller, which seems good.May 27, 2013 at 4:13 am #1990041
Chris WBPL Member
I haven't seen the new version, but I know Skurka uses and loves the previous model and they're a bit lighter. That's enough endorsement for me.May 27, 2013 at 5:34 am #1990046
The old style locking mechanism is what gave them the solid reputation. In use for quite a few years now. You'll be fine with what you got.May 27, 2013 at 9:10 am #1990085
I've the 2013 and think they are fine. I also have the carbon contour 2012 with the older style flip lock. Both work fine and I can't say I'd care which pole I have with me. The weight is also very close, I recall a 49 gram difference with the newer being lighter.
I was in Utah this past week and the lower carbon section got sand in it and really scratched up when I tried to pack them down for the trip home.May 27, 2013 at 5:08 pm #1990238
Here is a review I found from someone who does *not* like the redesign:
His main complaint is the flick locks more easily get hooks on branches and get pulled open. I don't do a lot of off-trail walking, but I can see his reasoning… Also, he says he got grit in the bottom section (like you Sean), which he reckons wasn't an issue with his other poles.. Does the new lock maybe open up more when released allowing more grit in?May 27, 2013 at 7:29 pm #1990264
The flick lock system rocks. I think that they made a huge mistake changing them out for 2013. Why change something that works so well?
My brother tried mine out this spring and ordered what he thought were the 2012's. He got the new model (with the new locks). He hasn't been out with them yet, but we played with them a bit and I can see where they will potentially snag on brush, release, and collapse.
These are my favorite poles… EVER… Strong, comfortable, relatively light weight. Heck they're my tent poles too and not one complaint here. I wouldn't trade them for any other.May 27, 2013 at 8:25 pm #1990283
Sounds like the change was driven by the fact that the patent lapsed in 2010, which resulted in Leki etc all doing a very similar flick lock… BD felt they had to do something different to stay relevant, and maybe screwed it up by the sounds of things..May 27, 2013 at 8:30 pm #1990284
I purchased the 2013s a month or so ago so not enough miles on them to do a proper review. I took them bushwacking in the Cascades last weekend for a couple miles and I didn't experience any concerns with the flip locks. They've always had a bomber reputation so I'm sure the 2012s are great as well.May 28, 2013 at 6:18 am #1990338
I also experienced no problems over a few days through seriously dense growth perfectly sized to snag the locks, if possible.May 28, 2013 at 6:46 pm #1990589
To the guys who have and are happy with the 2013s – did you mainly just buy them cos they were there? is there anything you see as clearly superior to the older style?May 28, 2013 at 7:07 pm #1990598
I'm not familiar enough with the old style to say. All I know is that I really like mine, I've not encountered any design flaws yet, and have no desire to replace them with any other system.
As I mentioned earlier, their bomber reputation was built on the style you have so I'm sure you'll be good either way.
Edit: so yes, I just bought them because they were what was on the shelf at REI when I was ready to buy them.May 28, 2013 at 9:06 pm #1990655
we have several people now that will be able to get the skinny on them and pass it on. My brother and I are going out for 12 days in the Beartooths this fall. I'll be sure to let everyone know how they perform, as we will be off-trail, more than we will be on it.
I'd appreciate it if you others would also report your experiences. It's quite possible that when I'm ready for another set of poles (hopefully not for a long time), I might have to decide whether or not to buy a set with the new locks. It would be great to know how they perform by that time. Nothing worse than dropping $100 bucks on something and not being sure about what you're buying and nothing better than knowing you'll be happy when you write the check.May 29, 2013 at 12:32 am #1990695
I haven't tried any of them yet, but Leki has adjustable carbon and aluminum flick lock poles with the same long handle padding that weigh the same 15-16 oz. The Leki poles also have a wider range with length adjustable to 135 cm instead of only 130 on the BD, which could help with pole-supported tents and mids.
Why would you want a carbon pole more susceptible to breakage from side impact than aluminum when you could have an aluminum pole for the same weight?May 29, 2013 at 1:36 am #1990698
That's a good question – I just bought BD because they have a sterling reputation and were available… However, as a cyclist I can speak for the vibration absorbing qualities of carbon vs alloy – I've got an alloy road-bike which is plenty stiff and reasonably comfortably riding, but I wouldn't dream of putting alloy forks on it… I imagine the same holds true for trekking poles.May 29, 2013 at 1:36 am #1990699
Edit: double post somehow :s, poor connectionMay 29, 2013 at 2:03 am #1990702
Michael SchwartzBPL Member
@greenwalkLocale: PA & Ireland
Carbon vs. aluminum. Is carbon the better choice for those who use their poles for tent/tarp supports taking into consideration the possibility of electrical storms?? Has this been discussed elsewhere? Sorry, drifting off the OP's question. MikeMay 29, 2013 at 6:36 am #1990744
The knock on carbon poles is that they can break with sufficient shock from the side, rendering them useless for their intended purposes. Where aluminum is more likely to bend, allowing you to bend them back and finish your trip. The line is that carbon fiber is stronger along the grain, but brittle from the side.
Funny thing is though… I don't hear/read many comments about this actually happening and it doesn't seem to be curtailing the use of carbon fiber tent poles. My poles got wedged between rocks several times this spring while I was on the Ozark Trail and barely a scratch, let alone breakage. This was with my full weight on them down-hilling, with a 40 lb. pack. Much heavier than I normally hike with.
I can't speak as the "expert", as these are my first set of carbon fiber trekking poles. However, I'm thrilled so far. I've bent aluminum poles with less pressure/weight many times in the past. So long as I can get these in the $100 range, instead of full price, I think they are a no-brainer. My only worry is that I might eventually have to face a windy night with a duct tape splinted pole steadying my tent. Worst case scenario… there are usually some tree branches available to me, if needed.May 29, 2013 at 7:34 am #1990762
Coming from a cycling/racing background and visiting factories in Asia and seeing the evolution of aluminum and carbon, I think carbon fiber is poorly understood and that includes even what it is and how it's produced to make these fine products we lust over.
It is so much stronger than the same weight aluminum, it's really not even comparable. I've ridden on cracked carbon fiber seatposts and frames for hundreds of miles with no issue. I would never ride an AL frame that had the same.
Once AL is bent or dented too much it's far more likely to catastrophically fail.May 29, 2013 at 7:54 am #1990773
Cayenne RedmonkBPL Member
@redmonkLocale: Greater California Ecosystem
The poles that break are the SUL carbon poles.
The BD poles are stronger than AL.
Bad golfers slam clubs into the ground and the shafts don't shatter. Same thing with quality trekking poles.
–G.B.–May 29, 2013 at 1:04 pm #1990897
I've heard quite a few reports of SUL carbon poles breaking. Perhaps the BD and Leki carbon poles are much stronger given their thickness and weight. Note that carbon tent poles are under much less repetitive stress than trekking poles which you're repeatedly planting your weight on and hitting the ground with.
I've never thought about the lightning issue when using AL poles to support your shelter. Valid concern?
The first two Leki models below have a long wrap section extending down from the handle like the BD Alpine Carbon Cork. Anyone try the Leki flick locks? Main advantage seems to be greater length to 135cm instead of the BD's 130cm.
AERGON Thermo Grip
Matte Varnish Finish
Weight: 15.4 oz
Length: 62-135 cm
AERGON Thermo XL Grip
Ultra Sonic Finish
Weight: 16.4 oz
Length: 62-135 cm
AERGON Cor-Tec Grip
Ultra Sonic Finish
Weight: 16.8 oz
Length: 62-135 cm
BD Alpine Carbon Cork Trekking Pole – 2012
Weight Per Pair :
492 g, 1 lb
Usable Length :
62.5-130cm, 25-51 in
Collapsed Length :
62.5 cm, 25 inMay 29, 2013 at 5:49 pm #1991014
If you extend the BD poles until you have the word stop just exposed you have a usable length of 53 inches. There is still a good amount of pole still inside the next section. I would not hesitate to use them extended this far, or slightly longer even, for pitching a shelter.May 29, 2013 at 9:05 pm #1991129
When extended fully to the stop line, is there enough length of the fully extended pole within the next pole to keep the pole rock steady (not wobbly at all) when walking with it as well as when using to support a shelter?May 29, 2013 at 9:14 pm #1991134
There is only about 2 inches left in the shaft when stop is exposed. Plus the plastic slider/guide thing at the end of the section.
I would not.May 30, 2013 at 7:52 pm #1991583
The Leki's may have the advantage in length (my AL Leki twist lock poles are totally solid at 135cm).
Wish there was some feedback on their new flick lock models.May 30, 2013 at 10:02 pm #1991640
@glacierramblerLocale: NW Montana
The Leki Speedlocks weigh about twice what the BD Flicklocks do (the 2012 versions at least). The Leki locks come in at about an ounce per lock, where as the BD locks are more like half an ounce (15-16 grams on my scale).
I haven't pulled off the new BD Flicklock design to weigh it, but I'll assume that it's marginally lighter. Regardless, I find that it holds very, very well, even when bushwhacking.
I do like my Leki Aergon poles, but they aren't as stiff as the BD poles. To keep the same or similar weight, it comes out of the aluminum section because of how heavy the locks themselves are.
FWIW, I just bought a pair of BD Traverse ski poles, removed everything but the aluminum sections with attached flicklocks, put on Leki baskets and Gossamer Gear grips, and the weight came out very reasonable. 8 oz per pole, and they extend up to 60" for pitching the Duomid under a variety of conditions. Not bad for something that weighs less than the BD Carbon Cork and has a much longer usable length.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.