May 4, 2013 at 12:43 pm #1302529
Was just looking through Backcountry.com and noticed on the New Items section: Montane Minimus Smock.
Its made of Pertex Shield+ and weighs 5oz and packs the size of a tennis ball.
Supposedly its waterproof.May 4, 2013 at 2:17 pm #1983178May 4, 2013 at 8:21 pm #1983275
I got the rab Pulse pull on on sale at camp saver…same weight, same pertex shield…I kind of like it actually. Worked really well walking my dog in a nasty downpour the other day here in Chicago….May 4, 2013 at 8:24 pm #1983276
"Worked really well walking my dog in a nasty downpour the other day here in Chicago…."
Can I assume you bought two so poor CharlieDog was protected from the nasty downpour too?May 4, 2013 at 8:30 pm #1983277
Are you kidding?? He LOVES nasty downpours. And mud puddles. He don't need no stinkin' pertex shell!May 5, 2013 at 9:43 pm #1983623
I haven't been impressed with Pertex Shield. The WP/B coating is way too thin/non-durable. I've got the Montane Minimus pants and after biking to work in them for a couple months the coating had flaked off the entire inner butt area. It's darn thin stuff. It comes off like dandruff. It's worth a couple extra ounces for something that'll hold up.May 5, 2013 at 10:00 pm #1983627
I do a few trips every summer where I am fairly confident that it won't rain, but the consequence if it does rain is pretty bad. These pertex jackets fill this niche. I carried my 12oz event jacket way too many times last summer. Hopefully I will never find out if the pertex is waterproof or not.May 5, 2013 at 10:22 pm #1983630
For those shorter weekend trips where I dont think it will rain I usually just take an extra trash compactor bag…works in a pinch, and super light. Covers my pack too.May 6, 2013 at 6:02 am #1983675
Yeah I can't imagine using that Pulse a ton; the fabric really is quite thin. I love the Demand (10 oz eVent) and that has been my go to for just about everything…but I got the pulse for less than $100, so I figured it might be a good idea to throw in the pack on summer trips where I'm not REALLY expecting too much rain. For 5 oz it fits that niche pretty well…
Anyone have any ideas how this compares to, say, the helium II?
Too bad one cannot get the new Haglofs gram comp for less than $300…that's just ridiculous….May 6, 2013 at 9:08 am #1983716
Pulse and Helium II use pretty much the same fabric. The Helium II uses 20d face nylon while the Pulse use 15d (so on paper Helium should be a bit more durable). Otherwise the only real difference is fit and features. Many hate the Helium hood although it's slightly improved in the II version. Dave Chenault says if the hood was improved (more like a Rab hood) then it would be a serious all weather shell. My mens medium weighs in a 6.03oz/171g.
Haven't had rain to test mine out but should get a thorough workout of it this upcoming week so I'll report back later.May 6, 2013 at 9:37 am #1983725
I picked up a Rab Pulse Pull-on last month and had only wore it around town up until this last weekend. I love the fit and design, and around town, it seemed to meet my expectations. However, I did take it out on a three day trip this last weekend and did experience quite a bit of rain on my last day, it started about a mile in on my 15 mile hike back to the car and lasted the rest of my hike. It was in the mid to high 40s and it didn't seem like it was breathing at all, I hiked very hot at first. But after being rained on for about two hours, it began to wet out. It was just a matter of time before my upper body was completely soaked. I was pretty bummed about it, I really wanted it to work. But it looks like I'll be returning it and trying something else. I may have been a bit naive about how it should have performed, but either way, I'd rather not put myself in that situation again, at least not at that temp. For short summer showers, maybe.May 6, 2013 at 10:19 am #1983735
I picked up the OR Helium II during the last campsaver sale and though I haven't used it on a trip yet, I stood in the shower with it on, and the hood worked great. The part where the water was hitting my neck started to wet out, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised that the pressure from a shower over the course of several minutes would do that- I don't expect that to happen so quickly from normal rain, which wouldn't have nearly as high PSI.May 6, 2013 at 11:07 am #1983754
@danepackerLocale: Mojave Desert
What Dan said, so fragile it won't hold up.
Do these vendors FIELD TEST these UL garments?May 6, 2013 at 11:17 am #1983756
@dafiremedicLocale: Southern California
Even if these these things were more durable, its way overpriced at $199. I believe in buying the best stuff you can afford, but I believe theres better out there for much less.May 6, 2013 at 11:54 am #1983761
meh- I got my OR helium II for $83 and change- it's going in the bottom of my pack on trips where the weather report says 0% chance of rain. for anything else, I'll bring my heavier 3 layer eVent jacket.May 6, 2013 at 12:28 pm #1983772
@dwambaughLocale: Pacific Northwest
"What Dan said, so fragile it won't hold up.
Do these vendors FIELD TEST these UL garments?"
Sure, and it's a betting game.
1. They charge a bunch to offset returns. I believe that is a large part of the price for air mattresses.
2. It won't get heavily used and survive. My guess is that a large proportion of expensive outdoor garments don't get heavy use.
3. It does have a no questions asked lifetime warranty and OR is good on their word from my experience.
I like the CYA for no rain forecasted. I carry a 7oz poncho for the same reason and get an emergency shelter in the bargain for $60 retail. I've carried a DriDucks jacket for the same conditions.
This class of jacket is great for travel, where you can have a clean looking do-it-all shell in your day bag. Breathability is less bothersome wandering city streets than climbing a long string of switchbacks, so usingvit to cover windshirt and rain shell is more practical. I would still choke at a $199 price tag.May 6, 2013 at 2:23 pm #1983824
I've often thought about that too- it's probably cheaper for a manufacturer to just make a product that stands up to how 95% of people use it, which is to say, not very much, and happily replace the items that get destroyed by the 5% who use them a whole lot, than to make it so bombproof (and more expensive to make) that no one ever needs to return an item.
This is probably actually very smart, because you then have geeks like us singing the praises of the customer service of a manufacturer who sends you a new item to replace your damaged one without batting an eye.May 6, 2013 at 3:10 pm #1983841
@bookLocale: Northern California
The North Face makes a 5 oz.ish smock with their Hyvent fabric that isn't too bad. It doesn't breathe much so will wet out from exertion, but it's pretty waterproof. I ended up using it most of last summer, gambling with good weather reports. But I wouldn't use it for an extended hike or if there was rain in the forecast. Good wind/mosquito protection too.May 6, 2013 at 4:24 pm #1983866
@ouzelLocale: Pacific Northwest/Sierra
There are a number of reviews by British fell runners, etc, who sing the praises of the Minimus Smock. I'm wondering if it is a jacket that will be fine for most uses, but not heavy duty bush whacking and, in the case of the pants, also not for activities like cycling that produce a lot of friction on the seat area. The one thing that does give me pause, however, is the wear and tear on the shoulder area that would result from carrying a pack for extended periods. All in all, it sounds like a really good bet for the Sierra, where it could serve as both a wind shirt and a WPB shell. I'll report back at the end of the season.May 6, 2013 at 7:45 pm #1983933
My thoughts exactly…I was pleased to get it as cheaply as I did (that's the only reason I went for it), and if I only use it on those trips where I really don't expect much rain, times when I'd rather not carry my 11 oz Demand but I'd be miserable if I didn't have something a bit more than a windshirt.
If I keep it to such limited use I'm HOPING it will serve me well. If not, well, expensive lesson learned.May 6, 2013 at 7:52 pm #1983934
NMMay 6, 2013 at 8:28 pm #1983944
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!May 6, 2013 at 11:22 pm #1983987
It's easy to make a waterproof jacket that weighs less than 7 oz. However it is very hard to make one that waterproof and breathable and lightweight. The lightest Event rain jackets come in at 9 to 11oz which is about double the weight.
Today most people don't want a just waterproof jacket. Instead they want one that is breathable and waterproof. So when a gear manufactures is selecting a fabric for a new rain jacket They have a choice of a really good fabric like neoshell, Event, and Gortex. But these fabrics are heavy and costly. So if you want to target the light low cost market the good fabrics are out leaving the manufacture with a selection of polyurethane Waterproof breathable fabrics.
Polyurethane is a vapor permeable membrane not air permeable. As consequence of this breathability rating of polyurethane is mainly determined by how thick it is. Thick is more durable but less Breathable. Thinner make it more breathable and less durable. Most polyurethane WPB fabrics are however cheap and lightweight.
But the manufactures don't talk about the limitation of Polyurethane and it wouldn't surprise me if most gear manufactures are also unaware of it. Polyurethane works best when the humidity inside the jacket is high. The amount of moisture that moves through the fabric is very low in dry air and reaches a maximum at about at at least 80% humidity. Most people are comfortable at a humidity of 50% or less where polyurethane doesn't work well At humidity over 50% most people people feel damp and start to open vents in the jacket.
So in the end you have a jacket that does appeal to people because it is light and not that expensive when compared to Gortex, Event, or Neoshell. However the final product is also less durable and less breathable. Now a manufacturer can compensate for this by offering a warranty and raising purchase price to cover the warranty costs.
So when other report it's not durable and doesn't breath well, I am not surprised.May 7, 2013 at 1:24 am #1983996
@messiahkhanLocale: Newcastle, UK
I looked at and tried on the Montane Minimus Smock about a month ago. I ended up getting the Montane Minimus Jacket instead in the end, as I found the smock too hard to get in and out of and it would likely just annoy me. So far I am loving the Minimus Jacket. It has held up well in the rain we have had so far, is comfy, looks good and relatively breathable.
Although I understand some of the concerns about durability of these garments, I also think some of them are somewhat unfair and misplaced. These products have been designed for fell/ultra/mountain running and light weight hiking where they would get minimal abrasion and wear & tear. They weren't necessarily designed for backpacking or biking where they are going to get a lot more abuse. It's like taking Ultra Light Weight Cuben gear and saying it doesn't stand up to heavy weight backpacking.
Montane (or any of the other companies) could have made the product a lot more durable, but then it would be heavier and not suit the niche it is designed for in the first place. There are also a lot of other products that are heavier and more durable out there that may better suit a user that needs it to be durable.
I certainly am a very happy customer;
This is my new UL overnight setup. 10lbs base weight with enough clothes to go below freezing, and a MLD supermid to be a huge home for me and my wife. As you can see I am a Montane fan, with Montane Minimus Jacket, Montane Terra Convert trousers and Montane Ultra Tour 22 Pack!
:)May 7, 2013 at 6:38 pm #1984242
@scfhomeLocale: Chocorua NH, USA
"I haven't been impressed with Pertex Shield. The WP/B coating is way too thin/non-durable."
Yes, and the RAB barely covers the nethers. Another concern was that the DWR seemed barely there, an invitation to wetting out, and that is born out by the posts here.
So back to the Patagonia Specter until an M10 can be afforded. It is frightful how companies produce items that are in no way up to the job. But folks who are determined to save another 2-3 ounces buy up these garments, so they make them.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.