Apr 25, 2013 at 7:01 am #1302168
What are your favorite synthetic pants for hiking? Preferably something relatively inexpensive.Apr 25, 2013 at 8:27 am #1980387
Kate MagillBPL Member
I'm female, so your mileage may vary, but I really like Patagonia Rock Guides; if you're patient they go on sale eventually every year. A lot of folks around here like really lightweight windpants, mainly to go over shorts when it gets chilly. I usually opt for something a little heavier–more durable and less clingy. And they double better as casual wear.
Ex Officio makes some nice options, very light, the cut tends to be a bit roomier in my experience. I like the "Nomad" model. They tend to have a lot of pockets, though.
Rab makes some really nice lightweight pants–the older model is called the "Traverse" I think; this year's is called the Vertex (men) or Helix (women). They fit great but are a bit pricy and hard to try on locally unless you have a good outdoor retailer nearby.
A lot of people seem to like the Columbia Titanium models, and they can be had for pretty cheap, but personally I've never liked the cut of Columbia's clothes.
That's a start at least. Pant fit varies a lot from person to person so it's really hard to suggest what will work for someone else.Apr 25, 2013 at 8:34 am #1980388
Michael RayBPL Member
REI Sahara's are a popular choice as well.Apr 25, 2013 at 8:39 am #1980390
Check out Sierra Trading Post for good deals. It can be hard to find the right size but if you keep your eyes open I'm sure you'll find something you like. I got a pair of Mountain Khaki Granite Creek pants there that I love. I had a pair of Columbia zip-off pants for a long time that I just replaced with a pair of Mountain Hardware Mesas (new version). They're very light (thin) so durability might not be the best but they should dry quickly. The odd thing about the pants is that they don't have an ankle zipper which seems like an oversight on a pair of convertible pants. I can get the legs off over my trail runners but not my Merrell waterproof hiking shoes.
AdamApr 25, 2013 at 8:40 am #1980391
Art TyszkaBPL Member
Kuhl Renegades, but they're not "relatively inexpensive", but hands down my favorite pair of hiking pants ever.Apr 25, 2013 at 9:17 am #1980399
David PostonBPL Member
@dgpostonLocale: Texas / Colorado
While we're on the topic of pants, can anyone tell me which models / makes tend to have a higher rise? My Mountain Hardwear Convertible Pack Pants are the most comfortable pants I've ever owned. I often wear them for just hanging around town because they are that comfortable. What I like about them is that the rise actually comes up high around my waist. It seems a lot of pants have been taken over by the fashionable, but uncomfortable low-rise craze.
Sadly, MH discontinued these pants around 2009 or so. Once these wear out, I can't replace them.Apr 25, 2013 at 9:25 am #1980400
The Mountain Khaki Original Mountain Pants ride higher on the waist, the button was almost at my belly button. My Granite Creeks aren't as high but I wouldn't call them "low-rise."
AdamApr 25, 2013 at 10:00 am #1980408
It seems the fit varies wildly. Pants that received ravishing reviews from others, I hated. I returned my Kuhls, due to the fit, and am a bit disappointed with the Columbia brand I kept. My favorite pants so far were a cheap Walmart pair, albeit, after a lot of abuse, a few too many holes in the rear. If you have to order them, I suggest making sure there is a good return policy.Apr 25, 2013 at 10:01 am #1980409
Brandon =ÞBPL Member
I've been hunting for new hiking pants for a few months now, because I tend to rip less forgiving fabrics. A month or so ago, on personal recommendation of some on BPL, I've went for Arcteryx Rampart. These are unfortunately pretty expensive, but they have a very nice fit and the fabric has a lot of give. Besides the price, the only downside has been they are a little warmer to hike in… which is a plus when there is some wind or temperatures drop.
As of this moment, those are my favorite pants.Apr 25, 2013 at 10:40 am #1980426
Kate MagillBPL Member
I tried a pair of MK Granite Creek pants (women's version) but had to pass on them; they are comfortable and look really nice but I found the snap closure to be annoying. The rise on the women's is quite low, right at my hips, so whenever I would lean or bend, the snap had this habit of popping open. Hoping they tweak the design in the future, because I love their cotton pants. In general, I find button closures work way better on pants than snap closures.Apr 25, 2013 at 10:51 am #1980434
David W.BPL Member
@davidpcvsamoaLocale: East Bay, CA
The REI Sahara pants I purchased used at REI for $10.00. Check out a used gear sale if there is an REI in your area. The price was right and they can take a beating. Over the years I have brushed up against sharp tree limbs that left scrapes on my legs and surprisingly did't tear the pant material.Apr 25, 2013 at 11:03 am #1980440
I only have 2 pairs of pants. One is a pair of EMS pants I bought years ago. They fit well (I have large thighs from wrestling and lifting, even though I haven't done either in years), but have many useless pockets and I found that because of heavy tick population, and the fact that the heat doesn't bother my legs, that the convertible pant/shorts feature is also useless to me. Because of all this they also take on more of a hiking/tactical look and are not very versatile to other parts of life.
The other I just bought, exofficio bugsaway ziwa pants. REI was having a closeout on these online. I normally wear a 32 in jeans, but all they had available was a 30 online. They have a generous fit (perfect for me)and a 32 inch inseam, and are in fact almost too loose. No convertible feature, just basic low profile pockets, plus an extra on the side of the leg for knife, multi-tool etc, and already coated in permethrin for me!
This long-winded answer is all just to say they make a great pair of pants, light as any full pant (9oz), non-tactical in appearance, and when on sale are worth every penny.Apr 25, 2013 at 11:09 am #1980442
Steven ParisBPL Member
@saparisorLocale: Pacific Northwest
+1 on the Arc'Teryx Ramparts.
These seem to go on sale at REI once a year.Apr 25, 2013 at 11:11 am #1980443
Richard CullipBPL Member
@richardcullipLocale: San Diego County
I hike in Railriders Adventure Khaki pants. I like hiking in long pants for sun protection. These pants are light, dry quickly and have a minimum of pockets. All features I like.Apr 25, 2013 at 12:33 pm #1980469
J RBPL Member
Columbia Silver Ridge. Fit me much better than the REI Sahara. Only complaint is that the leg extensions don't open on the sides, so to switch between long and short means taking your boots off.Apr 25, 2013 at 3:07 pm #1980521
Richard RenoBPL Member
@scubahhhLocale: White Mountains, mostly.Apr 25, 2013 at 3:46 pm #1980536
just Justin WhitsonMember
I recently made a pair of pants using 1.1 oz ripstop nylon 2nds. Unfortunately, they are just a bit too small. Very low weight, like around 3 oz.
My next project, using the same material, is to make convertible pants using velcro instead of a zippers. The nylon legs will go on pre-made shorts, probably one of my 100% Linen shorts. The detachable legs, should weigh no more than 2.5 oz, if that. I suspect that these will become my favorite "pants" ;) for the combo of flexibility and weight. Linen shorts are a bit heavy, but i don't count on skin weight & i would be primarily wearing just these for most of the season, most of the time. The nylon legs will come out for bugs, rain (they will be soaked in a DWR), unusually strong or cold wind, etc
I do like the ExOfficio nylon pants that i bought from Jennifer a little while ago, since they are light and fairly breathable for nylon pants. The fit is not bad (though not ideal) since they are women's pants.Apr 25, 2013 at 5:37 pm #1980564
@hknewmanLocale: Western US
Hiking in varied conditions at moderate temps it needs to be the semi-stretchy Patagonia old Rock Guides, which have legs that roll into shorts and stay there if need be. Think they've been reincarnated as the "Rock Craft". Surprisingly good when the day warms up but …
Add: Not for windy winters as a cold wind in the teens will go right through the fabric.Apr 25, 2013 at 7:39 pm #1980603
Anton SolovyevBPL Member
@antonsolovyevLocale: Colorado, Utah
Here's what I typically have on a trip: long underwear (wool or synthetic), shorts and full zip shell pants (Marmot Precip).
If it's warm, it's just shorts. Colder and I add long jones. If it's windy and cold I may put on shell pants. If it's full on nastiness I add long underwear.
There's been a few times when I would shed shell pants and hike just in long bottoms and a t-shirt (Mt.Rainier, Wind Rivers).
The beauty of of full zip pants is that it's very easy to dump heat when moving fast and overheating. It's also easy to regulate the amount of ventilation. When you stop just zip up and you are warm again. Of course, never have to take off shoes to take off pants — zippers.Apr 25, 2013 at 8:07 pm #1980615
I used to agree that shorts were preferable but anymore I wear pants more for the added tick protection. We've got tons of them here, I picked four off my pants two weeks ago and it had snowed earlier that week, and I know two people in the past year who contracted tick born illnesses. If I'm going to be outside for more than a few hours its not worth the risk to wear shorts.
AdamApr 25, 2013 at 8:25 pm #1980619
Ryan CBPL Member
Favorite pants? Locally, ones that are Permethrin treated, such as RailRiders Eco-Mesh. Other places, I am becoming a fan of Arcteryx pants, even though they have a much trimmer athletic fit than anything else I ever wear.Apr 25, 2013 at 8:32 pm #1980620
Justin BakerBPL Member
@justin_bakerLocale: Santa Rosa, CA
I am a shorts guy as well, but for many situations pants are better. They protect from the sun, they protect your legs from getting cut up if you need to bushwack or hike on an overgrown trail (seriously, you can get lacerations on your legs from "trails" in some places), they protect your legs from poison oak, poison ivy, stinging nettles, thorny plants, ticks, mosquitoes and they are much, much more durable than long underwear. Long underwear tear super easy, running tights are much better for hiking in.
My issue with pants has been finding a pair that fit well. They are all just way too baggy (I'm skinny) on me or too tight around the waist. Maybe I will just save up and buy a pair of outlier pants.Apr 25, 2013 at 9:00 pm #1980624
Nick GatelBPL Member
@ngatelLocale: Southern California
1. Patagonia Baggies (I know they're shorts)
2. Rail Riders Eco-Mesh
3. REI Mistral Schoeller pants (when it's cold)
4. REI Acme Schoeller pants (when it's really, really cold)Apr 25, 2013 at 11:04 pm #1980649
@justinmcLocale: Southern California
Though I believe they are retired but….hunt them down. Stretchy, reinforced, slim (not too slim) fit. Amazing.Apr 26, 2013 at 8:57 am #1980728
Steve KBPL Member
@skomaeLocale: northeastern US
REI Acme Pants. I wear them year round, unless it's really, really hot.
Then I wear Arcteryx Rampart pants or lined running shorts.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.