"You are sort of caught in a cross loop which is typical in trip planning. Plan for the max. Reject the psychological.If you were more decisive you'd get better outcomes. You wanted weight. Ben and I both travel Asia and agree on many things. But you started from a high weight premise."
I kind of see what you're saying, but not completely. My premise is a trip where I lived around society for 30 days. Let me explain that a little better:
My two friends and I, all of us 22-23, got on bikes with panniers and rode 1,500 miles across Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Vermont. We spent 21 days riding and 9 days just hanging out in interesting places. We met tons of people, saw all of our families, and we had one magical evening in Burlington that was probably the most fun I've ever had in my life.
However, I went ultralight. I had 12lbs of stuff. I wore one outfit basically the whole time, and my friends packed a little bit more stuff (not much more). For Jim and I, we had fun wearing bike shorts and windbreakers around town in the beginning but by the end, we really wished we had just one set of everyday clothes. It's not like backpacking when you travel amongst society. You're the only ones that instantly accept technical garments. To everyone else, you stick out like a sore thumb.
From a safety standpoint, I bet riding a bus or walking at night is much safer with streetclothes and a backpack, since it doesn't scream "I don't live here" quite as loud.
I'm ready to be convinced, but I'm not speaking out of ignorance. I know the kind of ignorance you're anticipating and in most cases I'd agree with you, but in this one I feel like my luxuries are worth their weight given exactly what I'm anticipating out of traveling in a place like New Zealand or Australia, or rather, the type of experience I want to foster for myself.
Again, I'd love more insight.

